Conjugation pathways in liver disease

Dotinurad: a clinical pharmacokinetic study of a novel, selective urate reabsorption inhibitor in subjects with hepatic impairment

BACKGROUND

Dotinurad is a novel, selective urate reabsorption inhibitor, which reduces serum uric acid levels by inhibiting the urate transporter 1 (URAT1). We compared the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of dotinurad in subjects with hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, open-label, single dose study. A total of 24 subjects were divided into four groups: the normal hepatic function group and the mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment groups. The primary endpoints were changes in plasma dotinurad levels and PK parameters.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratio of the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) [two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI)] of dotinurad in in the mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment groups relative to that in the normal hepatic function group was 0.840 (0.674-1.047), 0.798 (0.653-0.976), and 0.747 (0.570-0.979), respectively, showing a lower Cmax in the moderate and severe hepatic impairment groups. Following adjustment for body weight, only the moderate hepatic impairment group had a lower Cmax than the normal hepatic function group. No meaningful differences in other PK parameters were observed between the groups. Regarding the PD of dotinurad, the changes in serum uric acid levels after dosing were similar in all groups. As for safety, no noteworthy concerns were raised in relation to any group.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed no clinically meaningful influence of hepatic impairment on the PK, PD, or safety of dotinurad. These findings indicate possibility that dotinurad can be used without dose adjustment in patients with hepatic impairment.

Interaction of Oatp1b2 expression and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis on pravastatin plasma clearance

The downregulation of hepatic uptake transporters, including those of the OATP family, are a well known consequence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Prior studies have shown that the combination of NASH and Oatp1b2 knockout synergistically reduces the clearance of pravastatin (PRAV) in the methionine and choline deficient (MCD) mouse model of NASH, and the current study therefore aimed to determine the impact of NASH and genetic heterozygosity of Oatp1b2 on PRAV clearance, modeling the overlap between the 24% of the human population who are heterozygous for non-functioning OATP1B1, and the ~15% with NASH, potentially placing these people at higher risk of statin-induced myopathy. Therefore, male C57BL/6 wild-type (WT), Oatp1b2+/- (HET), and Oatp1b2-/- (KO) mice were fed either a control (methionine and choline sufficient) or methionine and choline-deficient (MCD) diet to induce NASH. After six weeks of feeding, pravastatin was administered via the carotid artery. Blood and bile samples were collected throughout 90 min after PRAV administration. The concentration of PRAV in plasma, bile, liver, kidney, and muscle was determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. MCD diet did not alter the plasma AUC values of PRAV in either WT or HET mice. However, the MCD diet increased plasma AUC by 4.4-fold in KO mice. MCD diet and nonfunctional Oatp1b2 synergistically increased not only plasma AUC but also the extrahepatic tissue concentration of pravastatin, whereas the partially decreased function of Oatp1b2 and NASH together were insufficient in significantly altering PRAV pharmacokinetics. These data suggest that a single copy of fully functional OATP1B1 in NASH patients may be sufficient to avoid the increase of pravastatin toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Single Oral Dose of Peficitinib (ASP015K) in Japanese Subjects With Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function

Peficitinib (ASP015K) is a novel Janus kinase inhibitor developed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The impact of hepatic impairment on the peficitinib pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety profile was investigated in non‐RA subjects (n = 24) in an open‐label, parallel‐group, multicenter comparative study in Japan. Subjects received a single, clinically relevant, oral dose of a peficitinib 150 mg tablet under fasting conditions. Plasma PK parameters were measured for peficitinib and its metabolites H1 (sulfate and methylated metabolite), H2 (sulfate metabolite), and H4 (methylated metabolite) in subjects with normal hepatic function, mild hepatic impairment, or moderate hepatic impairment. The peficitinib area under the plasma‐concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_inf) and maximum observed concentration (C_max) were not markedly different in subjects with mild hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function. In subjects with moderate hepatic impairment versus normal hepatic function, the geometric mean ratios for peficitinib AUC_inf and C_max, were 1.92 (90% CI: 1.39, 2.66) and 1.82 (90% CI: 1.24, 2.69), respectively. Five treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were experienced by 3 subjects, 1 in each group. There were no deaths, no serious TEAEs, and no TEAEs leading to withdrawal. In summary, the PK profile was unaltered in subjects with mild hepatic impairment after a single clinically relevant dose of peficitinib, but exposure almost doubled in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Peficitinib dose reduction may be considered in RA patients with moderate hepatic impairment.

Clinical Pharmacology of Delafloxacin in Patients With Hepatic Impairment

Delafloxacin is a novel anionic fluoroquinolone with robust activity against Gram‐positive, Gram‐negative, atypical, and anaerobic bacteria, including methicillin‐resistant S aureus. Delafloxacin is currently being studied for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community‐acquired pneumonia. This was a phase 1, open‐label pharmacokinetic and safety study of a single intravenous dose of 300 mg delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (Child‐Pugh class A, B, and C, respectively) compared with matched healthy controls. The effects of hepatic impairment were assessed by ANOVA of log‐transformed values for AUC_0‐∞, C_max, and systemic clearance, with hepatic group as a fixed effect. Mean AUC_0‐∞ and C_max in each impairment group were not significantly different from those of the pooled healthy subjects (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the percentage ratios of least‐squares means of AUC_0‐∞ did not indicate significant differences between the impairment groups and pooled healthy controls: Child‐Pugh class A (mild) 114.4 (CI: 95.6, 137.0), Child‐Pugh class B (moderate) 114.8 (CI: 95.9, 137.4), and Child‐Pugh class C (severe) 115.1 (CI: 96.1, 137.8). A single IV infusion of delafloxacin was generally well tolerated in all treatment groups. The exposure and clearance of delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment did not significantly differ from those of pooled, matched healthy subjects. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, dose adjustment of delafloxacin in the presence of hepatic impairment is not needed.

Pharmacokinetic of antiepileptic drugs in patients with hepatic or renal impairment

Many factors influence choice of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), including efficacy of the drug for the indication (epilepsy, neuropathic pain, affective disorder, migraine), tolerability, and toxicity. The first-generation AEDs and some newer AEDs are predominately eliminated by hepatic metabolism. Other recent AEDs are eliminated by renal excretion of unchanged drug or a combination of hepatic metabolism and renal excretion. The effect of renal and hepatic disease on the dosing will depend on the fraction of the AED eliminated by hepatic and/or renal excretion, the metabolic isozymes involved, as well as the extent of protein binding, if therapeutic drug monitoring is used. For drugs that are eliminated by renal excretion, methods of estimating creatinine clearance can be used to determine dose adjustments. For drugs eliminated by hepatic metabolism, there are no specific markers of liver function that can be used to provide guidance in dosage adjustments. Based on studies with probe drugs, the hepatic metabolic enzymes are differentially affected depending on the cause and severity of hepatic disease, which can aid in predicting dose adjustment when clinical data are not available. Several AEDs are also associated with laboratory markers of mild hepatic dysfunction and, rarely, more severe hepatic injury. In contrast, the risk of renal injury from AEDs is generally low. In general, co-morbid hepatic or renal diseases influence the decision for the selection of an AED. For some patients dosing changes to their existing AEDs may be appropriate. For others, a change to another AED may be a better option.

Relevance of Liver Failure for Anti-Infective Agents: From Pharmacokinetic Alterations to Dosage Adjustments

The liver is a complex organ with great ability to influence drug pharmacokinetics. Due to its wide array of function, its impairment has the potential to affect bioavailability, enterohepatic circulation, drug distribution, metabolism, clearance, and biliary elimination. These alterations differ widely depending on the cause of the liver failure, if it is acute or chronic in nature, the extent of impairment, and comorbid conditions. In addition, effects on liver functions do not occur in a proportional or predictable manner for escalating degrees of liver impairment. The ability of hepatic alterations to influence PK is also dependent on drug characteristics, such as administration route, chemical properties, protein binding, and extraction ratio, among others. This complexity makes it difficult to predict what these effects have on drugs. Unlike certain classes of agents, efficacy of anti-infectives is most often dependent on fulfilling pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets, such as C_max/MIC, AUC/MIC, T_>MIC, IC₅₀/EC₅₀, or T>EC₉₅. Loss of efficacy, or conversely, increased risk of toxicity may occur in certain circumstances of liver injury. Although important to consider these potential alterations and their effects on specific anti-infectives, many lack data to constitute specific dosing adjustments, making it important to monitor patients for effectiveness and toxicities of therapy.

Hepatobiliary excretion of silibinin in normal and liver cirrhotic rats

Silibinin is the main biologically active flavonolignan extracted from the seeds and fruits of milk thistle and has potential efficacy in the treatment of liver disease. The aim of the present study was to examine the hepatobiliary excretion of silibinin and its effect on dimethylnitrosamine (DMN)-induced liver cirrhosis. The experiments were divided into five groups: 10, 30, and 50 mg/kg silibinin alone, 30 mg/kg silibinin coadministered with cyclosporin A (CsA), and 50 mg/kg silibinin with liver cirrhosis induced by DMN. The data indicated that silibinin had dose-related pharmacokinetics in the dose ranges of 10 to 50 mg/kg. All of the unconjugated or total (unconjugated + conjugated) silibinin concentrations in the bile were significantly higher than those in plasma at the sampling time points at each dose, suggesting active hepatobiliary excretion. When coadministered with CsA, the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) in bile was significantly decreased. This result suggested that the active silibinin efflux might be partially inhibited by P-glycoprotein. In the DMN-induced liver cirrhotic rats, the AUC of plasma unconjugated silibinin was reduced by 53%; however, total silibinin was increased by 182%. These results together suggest that the phase II conjugative reaction of silibinin was blocked by treatment with DNM.

An overview of psychiatric issues in liver disease for the consultation-liaison psychiatrist

Liver disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States and elsewhere. Arising from infectious, hereditary, or toxin-induced sources, the detection of liver disease often requires a high index of suspicion. Clinical presentations are highly variable and are often accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms. This fact, along with an increased incidence of liver disease among patients with primary psychiatric disorders and the presence of varied drug use, complicates the tasks of providing care to patients with liver disease. To assist the consultation-liaison psychiatrist, the authors present the first of a two-part series focused on psychiatric issues in liver disease.

Influence of cirrhosis on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics

AIMS

Lamotrigine, an antiepileptic drug, is cleared from the systemic circulation mainly by glucuronidation. The possibility of changes in the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine in plasma owing to hepatic dysfunction has been evaluated.

METHODS

Thirty-six subjects, including 24 patients with various degrees of liver cirrhosis and 12 healthy volunteers received a single 100 mg dose of lamotrgine. Blood samples were taken for 7 days in all subjects, except nine with severe cirrhosis, who had a 29 day blood sampling period.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine were comparable between the patients with moderate cirrhosis (corresponding to Child-Pugh grade A) and the healthy subjects. Plasma oral clearance mean ratios (90% confidence interval) in patients with severe cirrhosis without or with ascites (corresponding, respectively, to Child-Pugh grade B and C) to healthy subjects were, respectively, 60% (44%, 83%) and 36% (25%, 52%). Plasma half-life mean ratios (90% confidence interval) in these two patient groups to healthy subjects were, respectively, 204% (149%, 278%) and 287% (202%, 408%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lamotrigine administered as a single oral dose of 100 mg was well tolerated in all groups. Initial, escalation and maintenance doses should generally be reduced by approximately 50 or 75% in patients with Child-Pugh Grade B or C cirrhosis. Escalation and maintenance doses should be adjusted according to clinical response.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of repaglinide in subjects with chronic liver disease

Repaglinide is a novel insulin secretagogue developed in response to the need for a fast-acting, oral prandial glucose regulator for the treatment of type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Repaglinide is metabolized mainly in the liver; its pharmacokinetics may therefore be altered by hepatic dysfunction. This open, parallel-group study compared the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a single 4 mg dose of repaglinide in healthy subjects (n = 12) and patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) (n = 12). Values for AUC and Cmax were significantly higher in CLD patients compared with healthy subjects, and the MRT was prolonged in CLD patients. Values for tmax did not differ between the groups, but t1/2 was significantly prolonged in CLD patients compared with previously determined values in healthy subjects. AUC was inversely correlated with caffeine clearance in CLD patients but not in healthy subjects. Blood glucose profiles were similar in both groups. Adverse events (principally hypoglycemia) were similar in the two groups; none was serious. Repaglinide clearance is significantly reduced in patients with hepatic impairment; the agent should be used with caution in this group.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of diacerein

Diacerein is a drug for the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis. This drug is administered orally as 50 mg twice daily. Diacerein is entirely converted into rhein before reaching the systemic circulation. Rhein itself is either eliminated by the renal route (20%) or conjugated in the liver to rhein glucuronide (60%) and rhein sulfate (20%); these metabolites are mainly eliminated by the kidney. The pharmacokinetics characteristics of diacerein are about the same in young healthy volunteers and elderly people with normal renal function, both after a single dose (50 mg) or repeated doses (25 to 75 mg twice daily). Rhein kinetics after single oral doses of diacerein are linear in the range 50 to 200 mg. However, rhein kinetics are time-dependent, since the nonrenal clearance decreases with repeated doses. This results in a moderate increase in maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve and elimination half-life. Nevertheless, the steady-state is reached by the third administration and the mean elimination half-life is then around 7 to 8 hours. Taking diacerein with a standard meal delays systemic absorption, but is associated with a 25% increase in the amount absorbed. Mild-to-severe (Child Pugh's grade B to C) liver cirrhosis does not change the kinetics of diacerein, whereas mild-to-severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance < 2.4 L/h) is followed by accumulation of rhein which justifies a 50% reduction of the standard daily dosage. Rhein is highly bound to plasma proteins (about 99%), but this binding is not saturable so that no drug interactions are likely to occur, in contrast to those widely reported with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Except for moderate and transient digestive disturbances (soft stools, diarrhoea), diacerein is well tolerated and seems neither responsible for gastrointestinal bleeding nor for renal, liver or haematological toxicity.

Drug acetylation in liver disease

N-Acetylation is a phase II conjugation reaction mediated in humans by the polymorphic N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) and N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1). Acetylation of some drugs may be modestly decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, whereas acute liver injury has no effect on drug acetylation. For NAT2 substrates, the impairment in acetylation capacity seems to be phenotype-specific, with a more prominent effect being exerted in rapid than slow acetylators. Thus, in the presence of significant hepatic dysfunction, the activity of NAT2 may not exhibit its usual bimodal distribution, and hence phenotypic assignment may not be reliable. Furthermore, it remains to be evaluated whether the precautions advised for slow acetylators when treated with drugs metabolised by NAT2 apply to all patients (regardless of phenotype) with liver cirrhosis.

Pharmacokinetics of dolasetron after oral and intravenous administration of dolasetron mesylate in healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic dysfunction

In previous studies, dolasetron was shown to have both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of dolasetron and its reduced metabolites. Seventeen adults were studied: six healthy volunteers (group I), seven patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class A; group II), and four patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B or C1; group III). Single 150-mg doses of dolasetron mesylate were administered intravenously and orally, with a 7-day washout period separating treatments. After intravenous administration, no differences were observed between healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), or elimination half-life (t1/2) of intact dolasetron. No significant differences were found in Cmax, AUC, or apparent clearance (C(lapp)) of hydrodolasetron, the primary metabolite of dolasetron. The mean t1/2 increased from 6.87 hours in group I to 11.69 hours in group III. After oral administration, C(lapp) of hydrodolasetron decreased by 42%, and Cmax increased by 18% in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were less changes in patients with mildly hepatic impairment. Total percentage of dose excreted as metabolites was similar for healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment, although urinary metabolite profiles differed slightly. Dolasetron was well tolerated and there were no apparent differences in adverse effects between groups or treatments. Because hepatic impairment did not influence Cl(app) of hydrodolasetron after intravenous administration, and the range of plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron after oral administration was not different from those observed in healthy volunteers, dosage adjustments are not recommended for patients with hepatic disease and normal renal function.

Drug administration in chronic liver disease

Cirrhosis encompasses a range of pathophysiological changes that may alter drug disposition. Drugs that are dependent primarily on the liver for their systemic clearance are more likely to be subject to reduced elimination and subsequent accumulation. Drug accumulation may lead to excessive plasma drug concentrations and adverse effects, if the adverse effects of the drug are concentration-dependent. The effects of hepatic insufficiency on the pharmacokinetics of drugs are not consistent or predictable. Furthermore, the influence of hepatic disease on the disposition of various drugs can vary, even though those drugs may share the same apparent metabolic pathway. Problems in forecasting drug kinetic behaviour are further enhanced by the additional impairment of kidney function (frequently encountered in patients with advanced liver disease) and by the unpredictability of the glomerular filtration rate using customary methods in patients with cirrhosis. Accordingly, dosages are generally adapted empirically, with the help of serum drug concentrations, when applicable. However, drugs eliminated predominantly by hepatic metabolism are not among those most commonly inducing adverse drug reactions or causing severe complications in patients with cirrhosis. Electrolyte disturbances and the hepatorenal syndrome produced by furosemide (frusemide)-the disposition of which is not substantially modified in liver disease-appear to be the most frequent adverse drug reactions in patients with liver disease. Furthermore, clinically significant alterations in the action of medications at concentrations generally considered to be in the normal therapeutic range are not uncommon. Tissue responsiveness to the pharmacological action of some drugs may be modified, as evidenced by the increased susceptibility of the brain in patients with cirrhosis to the action of many psychoactive agents. Another example is the greater susceptibility of such patients to the nephrotoxic potential of aminogly-cosides, which should not be used in this patient group. Drugs may also interfere with adaptive physiological processes induced by liver disease. ACE inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs counteract the enhanced activity of the renin-angiotensin system in advanced liver disease, thereby generating a high risk of excessive hypotension or acute renal failure, respectively. These drugs are best avoided in patients with cirrhosis. Finally, there may be pharmacological effects that overlap with some pathophysiological modifications related to the process of liver disease, such as increased portal pressure produced by some calcium antagonists, or hypoprothrombinaemia related to the inhibition of synthesis of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors by some beta-lactam antibacterials (especially moxalactam and cefamandole). Accordingly, the use of these drugs should be avoided in advanced liver disease. It is noteworthy that reduced drug metabolism in patients with liver disease does not seem to have a significant impact on the frequency of hepatotoxicity. Special caution should be exercised, however, in patients with alcoholic liver disease because excessive alcohol intake may potentiate the hepatotoxic effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen).

Idiosyncratic liver toxicity of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: molecular mechanisms and pathology

This review explores the clinical hepatic pathology associated with the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), possible cellular and molecular mechanisms of injury, and future challenges. NSAIDs comprise a group of widely used compounds that have been associated with rare adverse reactions in the liver, including fulminant hepatitis and cholestasis. These reactions are idiosyncratic, mostly independent of the dose administered, and host-dependent. The mechanisms responsible for the initiation and perpetuation of NSAID-induced hepatotoxicity remain poorly understood and have been largely inferred from clinical manifestation. A mounting body of evidence, however, indicates that many acidic NSAIDs are metabolized to reactive acyl glucuronides that can form covalent adducts with plasma proteins and hepatocellular proteins. In hepatocytes cocultured with lymphocytes, these NSAID-altered proteins can become antigenic. Thus, long-lived, drug-altered proteins may act as immunogens and produce cytotoxic T-cell-mediated or antibody-dependent, cell-mediated toxicity in susceptible patients. Alternatively, individual abnormalities in metabolism or disposition of some NSAIDs may lead to the formation or accumulation of toxic metabolites. Additional work with transgenic animal models is needed to permit better understanding of the general and specific risk factors involved in the pathogenesis of the idiosyncratic liver injuries related to NSAIDs and other drugs.

Pharmacokinetics of diacerein in patients with liver cirrhosis

The pharmacokinetics of diacerein following a single oral dose of 50 mg was studied in 12 healthy volunteers, 10 patients with a mild liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh's grade A), and 6 patients with a more severe liver cirrhosis (Child Pugh's grade B to C). Statistical analysis using a Kruskal-Wallis test showed no significant differences between the three groups for the following parameters: median Cmax was 3.9 mg l-1 for the cirrhotic patients group I (CPI) and 3.2 mg l-1 for the cirrhotic patients group II (CPII) versus 3.2 mg l-1 for the healthy volunteers (HV); median t1/2 was 4.9 h for CPI and 4.3 h for CPII versus 4.3 h for HV; median Cl/F was 2.1 l h-1 for CPI and 2.5 l h-1 for CPII versus 1.6 l h-1 for HV; median Vdss/F was 12.6 l for CPI and 14.0 l for CPII versus 13.21 for HV. The urinary parameters were comparable. It was concluded that, from a pharmacokinetic point of view, no reduction in the initial dosage of diacerein need be proposed in liver cirrhosis.

Psychopharmacologic issues in organ transplantation. Part I: Pharmacokinetics in organ failure and psychiatric aspects of immunosuppressants and anti-infectious agents

This article discusses pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during hepatic, renal, and cardiovascular insufficiencies. Hepatic metabolism of psychotropic drugs and of drugs commonly used in transplant patients that have neuropsychiatric side effects is discussed. Neuropsychiatric effects of immunosuppressant agents, including cyclosporine, corticosteroids, azathioprine, OKT3, and FK 506, are reviewed. Certain infections occur more often in immunosuppressed patients; their treatment with antiviral, antifungal, and antibiotic drugs may have neuropsychiatric consequences. Because of altered drug sensitivities and metabolism, drug interactions, and severe medical illness, most drugs are used in reduced doses.

Antipyrine kinetics in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis

Fourteen antimitochrodrial antibody-positive patients (13 women, 1 man) with biopsy-proven primary biliary cirrhosis, aged 40 to 71 years (mean, 57 years) weighing 43 to 102 kg (mean, 63 kg), along with 14 age- and sex-matched healthy controls, received a single 1.0- to 1.2-g dose of intravenous antipyrine. Plasma antipyrine levels were determined during a 12- to 24-hour period. Patients' mean serum chemistry values were: albumin, 3.9 g/dL (range, 3.1-4.4) and total bilirubin, 1.9 mg/dL (range, 0.3-10.9). Seven of the fourteen patients had cirrhosis. Mean kinetic variables for antipyrine in controls and primary biliary cirrhosis patients were: Vd, .54 versus .49 L/kg; half-life, 12.0 versus 15.1 hours (P < .07); clearance, .55 versus .41 mL/min/kg (P < .04). Within the primary biliary cirrhosis group, there was no correlation between total bilirubin and clearance (r = .09), nor did clearance vary significantly among histologic categories. Clearance of antipyrine in primary biliary cirrhosis patients is reduced by an average of 25%, but the clinical prognosticators of serum bilirubin levels and histologic grade do not correlate with or predict the degree of clearance impairment.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of newer antibacterial agents in liver disease

Liver disease may produce significant, albeit highly variable, effects on the pharmacokinetic behaviour of antibiotics in serum. Drug disposition may be altered through several pathophysiological mechanisms including reduced hepatobiliary clearance, and modifications in the volume of distribution induced by albumin synthesis deficiency or portal hypertension-related ascites. Antibacterial agents are not affected by potential alteration in hepatic first-pass effects. Only liver cirrhosis-induced effects on serum pharmacokinetics of antibiotics have been extensively studied, unlike those possibly produced by other forms of liver disease. In liver cirrhosis, pharmacokinetic alterations of nearly all beta-lactam or quinolone agents appear not to be marked enough to require dosage adjustment, provided that renal function stays normal. Adaptation in therapeutic schedule, however, is warranted for those drugs that are substantially cleared by the hepatobiliary system, namely mezlocillin, clindamycin, erythromycin, pefloxacin, enoxacin, antituberculous agents or nitroimidazole derivatives. Special caution should also be exercised when using aminoglycosides or vancomycin because of the wide interpatient variability of their pharmacokinetic disposition and their toxic potential. When renal function is impaired and there is an increased volume of distribution due to ascites, as frequently observed in severe liver insufficiency, the elimination half-life of most antibiotics is markedly prolonged, resulting in potential side effects due to drug accumulation. Accordingly, dosage adjustment applies to all drugs. In this regard, it should be remembered that delineating the dosage guidelines for a given antibiotic on the basis of reported pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis is awkward and probably of limited value. This pattern is ascribed to large interpatient variability in the active hepatic cell mass, the degree of portal hypertension and the alteration of serum binding capacity. Furthermore, there is no way of predicting accurately the extent of liver insufficiency in an individual patient. Dosage reduction is thus done empirically in most cases. Whenever possible, direct measurements of serum antibiotic concentrations should be the reasonable approach to manage antibiotic therapy in this kind of clinical condition.

Interindividual variability in the N-sulphation of desipramine in human liver and platelets

1. The activity of N-sulphotransferase (N-ST) with desipramine (DMI) as substrate was measured in 118 human liver specimens, in platelets obtained from 105 subjects, in 12 specimens of human ileum and colon mucosa and in five specimens of human kidney and lung. 2. N-ST activity ranged between 5.71 and 157 pmol min-1 mg-1 protein in human liver and between 0.27 and 17.3 pmol min-1 mg-1 protein in human platelets. 3. Probit analysis was compatible with a unimodal distribution of the data from both liver and platelets. 4. The frequency distribution histograms of N-ST were asymmetric, with a positive skew in data from both liver and platelets. The mode, median and mean of N-ST were 16.4, 30.2 and 40.4 pmol min-1 mg-1 protein in liver, and 2.12, 3.61 and 3.82 pmol min-1 mg-1 protein in platelets, respectively. After logarithmic transformation of N-ST activity, the frequency distribution histogram was symmetric for data from both liver and platelets. 5. In extrahepatic tissues, the average (+/- s.d.) N-ST activity (pmol min-1 mg-1 protein) was 22.2 +/- 22.8 (ileum), 20.9 +/- 26.9 (colon), 12.4 +/- 5.5 (renal cortex), 9.3 +/- 2.8 (renal medulla) and 4.2 +/- 1.1 (lung). N-ST is widely distributed in the body and the intestine is the extrahepatic tissue with the highest N-ST activity.

Clinical pharmacokinetics in patients with liver disease

From considerations of hepatic physiology and pathology coupled with pharmacokinetic principles, it appears that altered drug elimination in liver disease may result from the following mechanisms: reduction in absolute cell mass, in cellular enzyme content and/or activity, in portal vein perfusion due to extrahepatic/intrahepatic shunting, or of portal perfusion of hepatocyte mass due to decreased portal flow or sinusoidal perfusion; increase in arterial perfusion relative to portal perfusion; preferential perfusion of the sinusoidal midzone and terminal zones by arterioles; potential for direct mixing of arterial blood within the space of Disse; reduced exchange across the endothelial lining; and impaired diffusion within the space of Disse. In general, oxidative drug metabolism is impaired in liver disease and the degree of impairment of oxidisation differs between drugs but correlates best with the degree of sinusoidal capillarisation, i.e. the degree of access of the drug from the sinusoid to the hepatocyte. Drug conjugation appears to be relatively unaffected by liver disease, whereas elimination by biliary excretion correlates best with the degree of intrahepatic shunting and not with sinusoidal capillarisation. As the latter should impair hepatocyte access of all compounds similarly, a potentially important mechanism could be impaired access of oxygen to hepatocytes as oxidative metabolism is much more sensitive to oxygen supply than are conjugation or biliary excretion. This suggests a potentially important therapeutic role for agents which increase the hepatic oxygen supply. Useful adjunctive strategies may also derive from the oxygen limitation hypothesis. Anaemia should be targeted as a critically important variable, as should oxygen-carrying capacity, i.e. modification of the smoking habit. Additionally, enzyme inducers such as barbiturates may be used if overriding hypoxic constraints are removed by oxygen supplementation. Agents likely to seriously compromise arterial perfusion of the hepatic vascular bed should be avoided, e.g. those causing postural hypotension or vasospasm. Vasodilators can be used to actively promote arterial perfusion. While the effect of liver disease on drug handling is highly variable and difficult to predict, there are well recognised principles for modifying dosage. These include halving the dose of drugs given systemically (or of low clearance drugs given orally) and a 50 to 90% reduction in the dose of drugs with a high hepatic clearance given orally. Changes in the pharmacodynamic effects of drugs (either alone or in addition to pharmacokinetic changes) can also be profound, and awareness of this possibility should be increased.