Effect of Hepatic Impairment on Trilaciclib Pharmacokinetics

Trilaciclib is a first-in-class, intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving a platinum/etoposide-containing or topotecan-containing regimen. No dose adjustment is recommended for participants with mild hepatic impairment (HI) based on previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. This open-label, parallel-group study examined the impact of moderate and severe HI on the PK of trilaciclib. The study employed a reduced study design. Participants with moderate (Child-Pugh B, n = 8) and severe (Child-Pugh C, n = 5) HI and matched healthy controls (n = 11) received a single intravenous dose of trilaciclib 100 mg/m2. The unbound fraction of trilaciclib was comparable between the HI groups and the matched healthy control group. The unbound trilaciclib extent of exposure (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve) in participants with moderate and severe HI was ∼40% and ∼60% higher, respectively, compared with healthy matched controls based on Child-Pugh classification. Ad hoc analysis using National Cancer Institute classification showed similar results. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved trilaciclib dose of 240 mg/m2 should be reduced by ∼30%, to 170 mg/m2, for patients with moderate or severe HI.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Exposure-Response Modeling of Nedosiran in Participants With Severe Chronic Kidney Disease

Nedosiran is an investigational RNA-interference therapeutic in development for primary hyperoxaluria (PH). Because nedosiran undergoes renal clearance, we assessed its pharmacokinetic profile in non-PH participants with normal kidney function and Stages 4/5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), the latter with/without dialysis. Nedosiran exposure-response modeling in patients with PH Subtype 1 (PH1) with different renal function level was performed to recommend a nedosiran dose for this subpatient population. In this open-label, single-dose, Phase 1 study, 24 participants with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (CKD Stages 4/5; on hemodialysis [Groups 1a, 1b] and not on hemodialysis [Group 2]) and 10 participants with normal kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; Group 3) received a single dose of subcutaneous nedosiran sodium 170 mg. Group 1a received nedosiran 8 hours before beginning hemodialysis, Group 1b received nedosiran 2 hours after completing hemodialysis; Group 2 was not on hemodialysis. Nedosiran population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted using pooled data from this study and 4 others. Nedosiran pharmacokinetic exposure in non-PH participants with CKD Stages 4/5 was approximately 2-fold higher versus participants with normal kidney function. Hemodialysis timing relative to nedosiran administration had no clinically significant impact on pharmacokinetics (Group 1a vs 1b). Nedosiran was well tolerated. Modeling indicated that in patients with PH1 with CKD Stages 4/5, lower nedosiran doses provide similar exposure and potential reduction in 24-hour urinary oxalate to standard nedosiran doses in patients with PH1 with normal kidney function or CKD Stages 2/3. Nedosiran dosage reductions are recommended in patients with PH1 with CKD Stages 4/5; further adjustments are unnecessary if dialysis is started.

Brigatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with chronic hepatic impairment

Brigatinib is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. This open-label, parallel-group study investigated the effect of chronic hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of brigatinib to inform dosing recommendations for these patients. Participants with hepatic impairment classified according to Child-Pugh categories of mild (A), moderate (B), or severe (C) and matched-healthy participants with normal hepatic function received a single oral dose of 90-mg brigatinib. Plasma samples were collected for the determination of brigatinib plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma PK parameters. Twenty-seven participants were enrolled (Child-Pugh A-C, n = 6 each; matched-healthy participants, n = 9). The mean fraction of free plasma brigatinib was comparable for the Child-Pugh A (11.1%), Child-Pugh B (10.8%), and healthy participant groups (8.5%); free brigatinib was higher in the Child-Pugh C group (23.1%). There were no clinically meaningful effects of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on unbound systemic exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC]) of brigatinib (geometric least-squares mean ratios [90% CI] of 89.32% [69.79%-114.31%] and 99.55% [77.78%-127.41%], respectively). In the severe hepatic impairment group, brigatinib unbound AUC was approximately 37% higher (geometric least-squares mean ratio [90% CI] of 137.41% [107.37%-175.86%]) compared with healthy participants with normal hepatic function. Brigatinib was well tolerated in healthy participants and in participants with hepatic impairment. No dose adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. The brigatinib dose should be reduced by approximately 40% for patients with severe hepatic impairment.

Effects of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Gefapixant, a P2×3 Receptor Antagonist

Gefapixant, a P2×3 receptor antagonist, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. We investigated the effect of renal impairment (RI) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefapixant 50 mg in an open-label, single-dose study enrolling participants with moderate (n = 6) or severe (n = 6) RI, end stage renal disease (ESRD; n = 6) under hemodialysis (HD) and non-HD conditions, and healthy matched controls (n = 6). Serial plasma and urine samples for gefapixant concentrations were collected at selected time points over 72 hours and 48 hours post dose, respectively. Linear regression analysis predicted a 1.87-, 2.79-, and 3.76-fold higher exposure (AUC) for participants with mild, moderate, and severe RI, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Categorical analysis exhibited a 2.98-, 4.43-, and 4.74-fold higher exposure for participants with moderate RI, severe RI, and ESRD, respectively, than that for healthy matched control participants. Clearance (CL/F and CLr) was lower in participants with various degrees of RI, by 66-90%, compared with healthy matched control participants, explaining the increased gefapixant exposure with increasing degrees of renal impairment. Gefapixant AUC and C_max decreased by ∼25% under HD conditions compared to non-HD conditions. Single dose administration of gefapixant was generally well tolerated in this study. The data from this trial informed the enrollment of Phase 3 clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of gefapixant in over 2,000 participants with refractory or unexplained chronic cough. Those efficacy and safety data, combined with analysis of population pharmacokinetics from across the entire development program, will be used to evaluate the magnitude of the renal impairment effect in the refractory or unexplained chronic cough population and to determine any dose adjustment recommendations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effect of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of risdiplam

AIM

This Phase I, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised, parallel-group, two-part study aimed to evaluate the effect of mild to moderate hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a single oral dose of risdiplam.

METHODS

Adult subjects (aged 18-70 years) with mild (Child-Pugh Class A; Part 1) or moderate (Child-Pugh Class B; Part 2) hepatic impairment were matched with subjects with normal hepatic function on sex, age, body mass index and smoking status. Each subject received a single oral dose of 5 mg risdiplam. Plasma concentrations of risdiplam and its metabolite M1 were measured, and PK parameters were compared. Adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, vital signs and electrocardiogram measurements were assessed.

RESULTS

After a single dose (5 mg) risdiplam, the risdiplam PK parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity and maximum observed plasma concentration were approximately 20% and 5% lower, respectively, in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and approximately 8% and 20% higher, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function. These differences were not statistically significant; all 90% confidence intervals for geometric least squares-means ratios spanned unity. No new risdiplam-related safety findings were observed in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment.

CONCLUSION

Mild or moderate hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on the PK of risdiplam. Therefore, no dose adjustment is required in patients with mild or moderate hepatic impairment when receiving risdiplam.

Effect of Mild and Moderate Hepatic Impairment (defined by Child Pugh classification and National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria) on Pexidartinib Pharmacokinetics

Pexidartinib is a novel oral small‐molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the colony‐stimulating factor 1 receptor. Pexidartinib undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism via multiple cytochrome P450 and uridine 5'‐diphospho‐glucuronosyl transferase enzymes, with ZAAD‐1006a as the only major metabolite in human plasma. As pexidartinib is extensively metabolized, hepatic impairment (HI) could lead to increased exposure to pexidartinib. The objective of the two phase 1, open‐label studies was to determine the pharmacokinetics of pexidartinib after a single 200‐mg dose in subjects with mild and moderate HI, based on Child–Pugh classification (PL3397‐A‐U123: 8 mild HI and 8 moderate HI vs 16 matched healthy controls) and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI‐ODWG) criteria (PL3397‐A‐U129: 8 moderate HI versus 8 matched healthy controls [NCT04223635]). Based on Child–Pugh classification, exposure to pexidartinib (maximum observed concentration [C_max], area under the plasma concentration–time curve up to the last measurable concentration [AUC_last], and extrapolated to infinity [AUC_inf]) was similar in subjects with mild and moderate HI and in respective matched healthy controls, whereas ZAAD‐1006a exposure (AUC) was approximately 27% to 28% and 41% to 48% higher in mild and moderate HI, respectively. According to NCI‐ODWG criteria, total pexidartinib exposure was 42% to 46% higher in subjects with moderate HI, compared with healthy controls, and total ZAAD‐1006a exposure was 70% to 79% higher for subjects with moderate HI, compared with matched healthy controls with normal hepatic function. These findings were used to develop appropriate dose recommendations in patients with hepatic impairment.

982. Effect of Hepatic Impairment on the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Rezafungin

Background

Rezafungin (RZF) is a novel echinocandin antifungal being developed for treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis, and for prevention of invasive fungal diseases among immunosuppressed patients. In the Phase 2 and Phase 3 treatment trials of rezafungin compared with caspofungin (STRIVE [NCT02734862] and ReSTORE [NCT03667690], respectively), patients with severe hepatic impairment (HI) were not included due to lack of caspofungin data in this population. Rezafungin was previously evaluated in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. Here we report an open-label, single-dose study on rezafungin in patients with HI (Child-Pugh class C).

Methods

To investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of RZF in subjects with HI and healthy subjects (HS), 8 subjects with HI and 8 HS matched for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were enrolled and received a single 400-mg intravenous 1-hour infusion of RZF. Plasma PK sampling was performed at various time points through 336 hours postdose. RZF PK parameters were derived using non-compartmental analysis. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

Results

The majority of the HI subjects were White (87.5%) and male (75%) while equal distribution between White and Black or African American was observed among HS (50%) and 75% were male. The mean age of HI subjects was 58 years (range, 41–68 years) and 56.6 years (range, 50–61 years) for the HS. Mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m² (range, 24.5–34.3 kg/m²) for HI subjects and 29.7 kg/m² (range, 25.4–34.2 kg/m²) for the HS. RZF exposure (C_max and AUC) in subjects with HI was ~30% lower than that in HS (Table 1), while half-life was generally similar (HI: 121 h, HS:124 h; Figure 1). Three HI subjects had one adverse event (AE) each (bronchitis, worsening hepatic encephalopathy, hyponatremia), all moderate in severity; one HS had 1 AE of infusion site infiltration mild in severity. No AEs were considered related to RZF, and all were resolved or resolving by the end of the study.

Table 1. Plasma Rezafungin PK Parameter Estimates in Subjects with Severe Hepatic Impairment or Normal Hepatic Function After a Single 400 mg IV Infusion of Rezafungin

Figure 1. Mean (+SD) Plasma Rezafungin Concentration-Time Profiles in Subjects with Severe Hepatic Impairment or Normal Hepatic Function After a Single 400-mg IV Infusion of Rezafungin (Semi-Logarithmic Scale)

Conclusion

RZF was well tolerated in HI subjects and showed modestly reduced exposure that was within the range observed in matched HS. These findings support no RZF dose adjustment in subjects with severe hepatic impairment.

Disclosures

Voon Ong, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Taylor Sandison, MD, MPH, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder) Rebeca M. Melara, M.S., Altasciences (contract research organization) (Employee) Thomas C. Marbury, MD, Orlando Clinical Research Center (Employee, Other Financial or Material Support, Equity owner of Orlando Clinical Research Center) Alena Jandourek, MD, Cidara therapeutics (Consultant) Shawn Flanagan, PhD, Cidara Therapeutics (Employee, Shareholder)

Pharmacokinetics of capmatinib in participants with hepatic impairment: A phase 1, open-label, single-dose, parallel-group study

Aims

Capmatinib, a mesenchymal–epithelial transition factor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and aldehyde oxidase. In individuals with hepatic impairment, alterations in hepatobiliary excretion and metabolism could lead to higher capmatinib exposure. We compared the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of capmatinib 200 mg administered to participants with varying degrees of hepatic impairment vs. matched controls with normal hepatic function.

Methods

This phase 1, multicentre, open‐label, parallel‐group study enrolled adult participants with normal hepatic function and mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairments. Eligible participants received a single oral dose of 200 mg capmatinib. The pharmacokinetic parameters of capmatinib were analysed and compared across participants with impaired and normal hepatic function.

Results

Of 31 enrolled participants, 29 had an evaluable pharmacokinetic profile: normal (n = 9); mild (n = 6); moderate (n = 8); severe (n = 6). Compared with the normal group, geometric mean (GM) maximum (peak) observed plasma drug concentration after single‐dose administration decreased by 27.6% in the mild group (GM ratio [GMR] = 0.724; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.476–1.10), by 17.2% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.828; 90% CI: 0.563–1.22) and remained unchanged in the severe group (GMR = 1.02; 90% CI: 0.669–1.55). Compared with the normal group, GM area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time zero to infinity decreased by 23.3% in the mild group (GMR = 0.767; 90% CI: 0.532–1.11), by 8.6% in the moderate group (GMR = 0.914; 90% CI: 0.652–1.28) and increased by 24% in the severe group (GMR = 1.24; 90% CI: 0.858–1.78).

Conclusion

Mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a clinically relevant impact on capmatinib pharmacokinetics. No new safety findings are reported in this study.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of lefamulin after single intravenous dose administration in subjects with impaired renal function and those requiring hemodialysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lefamulin is a novel IV and oral pleuromutilin recently approved for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Given that renal comorbidities are common in patients admitted for CABP, understanding the pharmacokinetics of lefamulin in the face of severe renal impairment, including those requiring hemodialysis, is needed.

DESIGN

Open-label, Phase-1 pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

Research Study Center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-three matched subjects were included, seven with "Normal" renal function (creatinine clearance >90 ml/min), eight with "Severe" renal impairment (glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m² ), and eight subjects requiring hemodialysis.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Subjects were administered a single dose of lefamulin IV 150 mg as a 1-h infusion. Subjects in the hemodialysis group started hemodialysis within 1 h after lefamulin infusion (On dialysis), as well as, on a non-dialysis day (Off dialysis). Plasma, urine, and dialysate fluid were collected for 36 h and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041. Lefamulin was primarily excreted non-renally across groups. Statistical analyses revealed lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were similar between Normal and Severe groups, except for renal clearance, which decreased in Severe subjects (mean 1.3 L/h Normal vs. 0.4 L/h Severe). Likewise, lefamulin pharmacokinetics during on and off dialysis were unchanged, with lefamulin not measurably filtered in dialysate fluid. Two, three, and three subjects reported drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) in Normal, Severe, and Hemodialysis groups, respectively. All TEAEs were mild, except one (infusion-site reaction) that was classified as moderate.

CONCLUSION

No dosage adjustment is required for patients with renal impairment, and lefamulin can be administered without regard to hemodialysis timing.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of lefamulin after single intravenous dose administration in subjects with impaired-hepatic function

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Given that, lefamulin is primarily metabolized by CYP450 Phase-1 reactions, this study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of IV lefamulin in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment as compared with matched healthy subjects.

DESIGN

Open-label, Phase-1 clinical pharmacokinetic study.

SETTING

Research Study Center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven subjects; comprised of 11 individuals with normal hepatic function and eight each with moderate or severe hepatic impairment were included, as classified by Child-Pugh scores.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Subjects were administered a single dose of IV lefamulin 150 mg over 1 h. Plasma was collected for 48 h and analyzed for lefamulin and its major metabolite, BC-8041, concentrations in addition to assessing lefamulin plasma protein binding. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic parameters were compared using least square geometric mean ratios. Lefamulin was well tolerated in all hepatic function groups. Statistical analyses revealed reductions in C_max and increases in renal clearance for Moderate and Severe groups, as well as, the increased volume of distribution for the Severe group. Lefamulin plasma AUC mean (SD) was similar across groups at 7615 (1554), 8233 (2286), and 8938 (1640) h.ng/mL for Normal, Moderate, and Severe groups, respectively, despite decreased clearance observed primarily during terminal elimination phases. Decreased plasma-protein binding was seen in hepatically-impaired versus normal subjects.

CONCLUSION

Lefamulin was generally well tolerated. Differences in lefamulin and BC-8041 pharmacokinetics were small, relative to the overall variability, and any changes appear to be compensated by increases in renal clearance and decreased protein binding.

Glucosuric, renal and haemodynamic effects of licogliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2, in patients with chronic kidney disease: A randomized trial

AIM

To investigate the glucosuric, renal and haemodynamic effects of licogliflozin, a dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

This multiple-dose, parallel-group, phase II mechanistic study randomized 53 participants (aged 18-78 years, body mass index ≤ 50 kg/m² ) with varying degrees of CKD or normal renal function to treatment with licogliflozin (50 mg once daily) or placebo for 7 days. The effects of licogliflozin on 24-h urinary glucose excretion (UGE₂₄ ), renal function, haemodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Licogliflozin treatment for 7 days significantly (p < .01) increased UGE₂₄ from baseline in participants with normal renal function (adjusted mean change: 41.8 [33.6, 49.9] g) or with mild (32.6 [24.1, 41.0] g), moderate A (35.7 [28.6, 42.9] g) or moderate B (20.3 [13.1, 27.5] g) CKD, but not in severe (6.2 [-0.71, 13.18] g) CKD. Licogliflozin reduced urinary electrolytes (sodium, potassium and chloride), blood pressure and urinary volume to varying extents among different groups. Significant increases in renin (p < .05), angiotensin II (p < .05) and aldosterone (p < .01) levels were observed. Adverse events were generally mild, and most commonly included diarrhoea (94%), flatulence (68%) and abdominal pain (21%).

CONCLUSION

Licogliflozin treatment results in significantly increased UGE and favourable changes in urinary electrolytes and haemodynamics in patients with varying degrees of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m² ).

Effect of severe renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of brigatinib

Background Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, targets activated, mutant forms of ALK and overcomes mechanisms of resistance to the ALK inhibitors crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Brigatinib is approved in multiple countries for treatment of patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer. Based on population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses, no dosage adjustment is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. Methods An open-label, single-dose study was conducted to evaluate the PK of brigatinib (90 mg) in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²; n = 8) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m²; n = 8). Plasma and urine were collected for the determination of plasma protein binding and estimation of plasma and urine PK parameters. Results Plasma protein binding of brigatinib was similar between patients with severe renal impairment (92 % bound) and matched healthy volunteers with normal renal function (91 % bound). Unbound brigatinib exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) was approximately 92 % higher in patients with severe renal impairment compared with healthy volunteers with normal renal function. The renal clearance of brigatinib in patients with severe renal impairment was approximately 20 % of that observed in volunteers with normal renal function. Conclusions These findings support a brigatinib dosage reduction of approximately 50 % in patients with severe renal impairment.

Trial registry: Not applicable.

Pharmacokinetics of Gepotidacin in Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function and Hepatic Impairment

Gepotidacin is a novel triazaacenaphthylene bacterial topoisomerase inhibitor. This phase 1 nonrandomized, open‐label, multicenter, 2‐part study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral gepotidacin 1500 mg in 3 different hepatic settings (normal, moderate impairment, and severe impairment). Gepotidacin was safe and generally tolerated in all subjects. Compared to subjects with normal hepatic function, gepotidacin plasma area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_0–∞) and maximum concentration significantly increased by 1.7‐ and 1.9‐fold, respectively, in severe hepatic impairment; increases in moderate impairment were not statistically significant. No significant effect was observed for gepotidacin plasma elimination half‐life (geometric mean range, 8.2–9.1 hours) across hepatic groups. Renal clearance increased in moderate (16%) and severe (52%) hepatic impairment vs normal. The mean fraction of gepotidacin dose excreted in urine increased with increasing hepatic impairment (normal, 7.5%; moderate, 11.2%; and severe, 19.9%). Urine gepotidacin concentrations remained high for 12 hours in all hepatic groups after dosing. Saliva gepotidacin concentrations displayed a linear relationship with plasma concentrations (R² = 0.76). The ratio of saliva AUC to unbound plasma AUC and elimination half‐life were not affected by hepatic impairment. These data indicate that gepotidacin dose adjustment is not required in mild to moderate hepatic impairment; severe hepatic impairment may require increases in dosing interval or dose reduction.

1318. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Cefepime-Taniborbactam (formerly Cefepime/VNRX-5133) in Subjects with Renal Impairment

Background

Taniborbactam is a novel, non-ß-lactam, ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against serine (Class A, C, D) and metallo (Class B) ß-lactamases including epidemiologically important carbapenemases. Both cefepime and taniborbactam are predominantly renally excreted and are likely to require dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The current study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety in patients with renal impairment and ESRD.

Methods

This was a Phase 1, open-label study in subjects with normal renal function (eCL_CR ≥ 90 mL/min) matched to subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment (eGFR 60-89, 30-59, and < 30 mL/min/1.73m², respectively), and patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Subjects received a single dose of cefepime 2 g and taniborbactam 500 mg; subjects with ESRD received a single dose before HD and after a 9 day washout period, following HD. PK parameters including AUC_0-inf and total body clearance (CL) were evaluated. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory evaluations, electrocardiograms, and physical examinations.

Results

Thirty-three subjects were enrolled; 67% male, 58% white and 39% black/African Americans. Median age and BMI were 55.0 years and 29.5 kg/m², respectively. For both cefepime and taniborbactam, exposures increased, and CL decreased with increasing renal impairment (see Table). The hemodialysis extraction ratio was 49.7% and 47.4% for taniborbactam and cefepime respectively. No safety signals were observed and there were no serious adverse events.

Table

Conclusion

Cefepime and taniborbactam CL is similarly reduced with varying degrees of renal impairment. Dialysis removes a high fraction of both drugs. Dose adjustments recommended for cefepime are appropriate for taniborbactam.

Disclosures

Brooke Geibel, BS, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee, Shareholder) James A. Dowell, PhD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Thomas C. Marbury, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) William Smith, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Paul C. McGovern, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee) Cynthia Richards, MD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Independent Contractor) Tim Henkel, MD, PhD, Venatorx Pharmaceuticals (Employee, Shareholder)

NaPi-IIb Inhibition for Hyperphosphatemia in CKD Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a prevalence of 9.1% globally, and frequently results in elevated serum phosphate, increasing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk in hemodialysis (HD) patients. DS-2330b, an oral NaPi-IIb inhibitor, reduced intestinal phosphate absorption in preclinical studies, but its effect in patients with CKD is unknown. This 2-part, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, single- and repeated-dose, phase 1b study evaluated safety and efficacy of DS-2330b in patients with CKD on HD.

Methods

Part A, a 2-period, 2-way study, evaluated safety and pharmacokinetics of DS-2330b 250 mg in solution and tablet formulations. Part B assessed the safety of DS-2330b in solution (chosen based on results of part A) and its effect on serum phosphate. Patients were randomized to placebo 3 times daily (TID), DS-2330b 400 mg TID, DS-2330b 400 mg with sevelamer 1.6 g TID, and sevelamer 1.6 g with placebo TID for 14 days. Safety endpoints included adverse event (AE) monitoring.

Results

Six patients completed part A. Two patients experienced serious AEs considered unrelated to DS-2330b treatment. Thirty-two patients enrolled and completed part B. Serum phosphate mean change from baseline ± SD was −2.2±1.5 mg/dl versus −1.9 ± 1.1 mg/dl for DS-2330b monotherapy versus placebo. Patients receiving DS-2330b with sevelamer or sevelamer with placebo experienced the greatest serum phosphate decrease from baseline. Nine patients (28.1%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE (TEAE); 7 patients experienced drug-related TEAEs. The TEAE incidence was comparable between DS-2330b and control groups.

Conclusions

DS-2330b, alone or in combination with sevelamer, was safe and well tolerated but did not demonstrate clinically meaningful efficacy in HD patients.

A Microdose Cocktail to Evaluate Drug Interactions in Patients with Renal Impairment

Renal impairment (RI) is known to influence the pharmacokinetics of nonrenally eliminated drugs, although the mechanism and clinical impact is poorly understood. We assessed the impact of RI and single dose oral rifampin (RIF) on the pharmacokinetics of CYP3A, OATP1B, P-gp, and BCRP substrates using a microdose cocktail and OATP1B endogenous biomarkers. RI alone had no impact on midazolam (MDZ), maximum plasma concentration (C_max ), and area under the curve (AUC), but a progressive increase in AUC with RI severity for dabigatran (DABI), and up to ~2-fold higher AUC for pitavastatin (PTV), rosuvastatin (RSV), and atorvastatin (ATV) for all degrees of RI was observed. RIF did not impact MDZ, had a progressively smaller DABI drug-drug interaction (DDI) with increasing RI severity, a similar 3.1-fold to 4.4-fold increase in PTV and RSV AUC in healthy volunteers and patients with RI, and a diminishing DDI with RI severity from 6.1-fold to 4.7-fold for ATV. Endogenous biomarkers of OATP1B (bilirubin, coproporphyrin I/III, and sulfated bile salts) were generally not impacted by RI, and RIF effects on these biomarkers in RI were comparable or larger than those in healthy volunteers. The lack of a trend with RI severity of PTV and several OATP1B biomarkers, suggests that mechanisms beyond RI directly impacting OATP1B activity could also be considered. The DABI, RSV, and ATV data suggest an impact of RI on intestinal P-gp, and potentially BCRP activity. Therefore, DDI data from healthy volunteers may represent a worst-case scenario for clinically derisking P-gp and BCRP substrates in the setting of RI.

Pharmacokinetics and Immunogenicity of ASP0113 in CMV-Seronegative Dialysis Patients and CMV-Seronegative and -Seropositive Healthy Subjects

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised transplant patients. ASP0113, a first-in-class DNA vaccine containing plasmids encoding CMV phosphoprotein 65 and glycoprotein B (gB), was evaluated in a phase 1b, subject-blinded study in CMV-seropositive (n = 13) and CMV-seronegative (n = 12) healthy and CMV-seronegative dialysis subjects (n = 12) randomized to ASP0113 or placebo. End points included pharmacokinetics, anti-gB antibody levels, phosphoprotein 65-specific T-cell responses measured by ex vivo enzyme-linked immune absorbent spot (ELISpot) assay and 10-day cultured ELISpot and Stat T-cell activation assays, and safety. ASP0113 concentrations peaked at 2-10 and 24-48 hours; the pharmacokinetics were similar across groups. No group demonstrated significant anti-gB antibody responses. T-cell responder rates in the cultured ELISpot assay were 8/12 (66.7%, 95%CI 35% to 90%) and 4/12 (33.3%, 95%CI 10% to 65%) in CMV-seronegative healthy subjects and dialysis patients, respectively, whereas ex vivo ELISpot assay response rates were 4/11 (36.4%, 95%CI 11% to 69%) and 0/12, respectively. Responses peaked at week 27, with lower magnitude observed in CMV-seronegative dialysis patients versus CMV-seronegative healthy subjects. No serious adverse events occurred; the most common adverse event in ASP0113-vaccinated patients was injection-site pain (64.9%). Some CMV-seronegative healthy subjects and dialysis patients had T-cell responses; no humoral responses were detected.

722. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Lefamulin (LEF) After Single Intravenous Dose Administration in Subjects With Impaired Hepatic Function

Background

Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) have impaired immune function, are prone to community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), and experience greater morbidity/mortality and healthcare costs than CABP patients without CLD. LEF, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic (IV/oral) with primary liver elimination, was generally well tolerated and noninferior to moxifloxacin in two phase 3 studies of adults with CABP. We investigated the PK and safety of LEF and its main metabolite, BC-8041, in subjects with hepatic impairment.

Methods

In this open-label study, subjects were allocated to 1 of 3 groups based on hepatic function level; Moderate (Child-Pugh score 7–9) or Severe subjects (Child-Pugh score ≥10) were matched (gender, age, and weight) to subjects in the Normal group (normal hepatic function, no liver cirrhosis). Subjects received a single 1-hour 150 mg LEF infusion. Blood and urine samples were collected predose and over a 48-hour period postdose for PK analysis; plasma and urine were assayed for LEF and BC-8041 using validated assays. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), labs, vital signs, and electrocardiograms.

Results

27 subjects enrolled in and completed the study (n = 11, Normal; n = 8, Moderate; n = 8, Severe). Mean LEF and BC-8041 plasma concentration profiles were comparable across all hepatic function groups through the first 12 hours following the start of infusion. Subjects with hepatic impairment had slightly slower rates of elimination in the later elimination phases. LEF and BC-8041 exposures were similar across all hepatic function groups (table), and the majority of LEF and BC-8041 were excreted nonrenally. TEAEs were reported in 2 (18.2%) subjects in the Normal group, 2 (25%) in the Moderate group, and 1 (12.5%) in the Severe group. None of the TEAEs were serious or led to study drug discontinuation. No subject met Hy’s law criteria. Within 4 hours postdose, the maximum mean change from baseline in the QTcF interval was 12.4, 19.2, and 14.1 msec in the Normal, Moderate, and Severe groups, respectively.

Conclusion

No dosage adjustment for LEF appears to be required when treating subjects with hepatic impairment. LEF was generally well tolerated in all subjects regardless of hepatic functional status.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures

705. Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety of Lefamulin (LEF) After Single Intravenous Dose Administration in Subjects With Impaired Renal Function and in Those Requiring Hemodialysis

Background

Renal comorbidities are common in patients hospitalized with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). LEF, a novel pleuromutilin antibiotic (IV/oral), was generally well tolerated and noninferior to moxifloxacin in two phase 3 studies of adults with CABP. We investigated the PK and safety of LEF and its main metabolite, BC-8041, in subjects with severe renal impairment and those requiring hemodialysis (HD).

Methods

In this open-label study, subjects were allocated to 1 of 3 groups based on renal function level. Severe subjects (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/minute/1.73 m², not on HD, Severe) were matched (gender, age, and weight) to subjects with normal renal function (estimated creatinine clearance ≥90 mL/minute, Normal). Subjects in the Normal and Severe groups received a single 1-hour 150 mg LEF infusion. Subjects in the HD group started HD within 1 hour after LEF infusion (“On-dialysis”) and on a nondialysis day (“Off-dialysis”). Blood and urine samples were collected predose and over a 36-hour period postdose for PK analysis; LEF and BC-8041 were assayed in plasma and urine with validated methods. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), labs, vital signs, and electrocardiograms.

Results

23 subjects enrolled in and completed the study (n = 7, Normal; n = 8, Severe; n = 8, HD). LEF and BC-8041 pharmacokinetic parameters (table) were comparable between the Normal and Severe groups and between the On-dialysis and Off-dialysis treatment periods for the HD group. The majority of LEF and BC-8041 were excreted nonrenally in Normal and Severe subjects and were not measurably filtered into dialysate. TEAEs were reported in 2 (28.6%) subjects in the Normal group, 4 (50%) in the Severe group, and 4 (50%) in the HD group. None of the TEAEs were serious or led to study drug discontinuation. Within 4 h post-dose, the maximum mean change from baseline in the QTcF interval was 8.9, 6.6, 15.9, and 17.6 msec in the normal, severe, on-dialysis, and off-dialysis groups, respectively.

Conclusion

No dosage adjustment is required for LEF when treating subjects with severe renal impairment, and LEF can be administered without regard to HD timing. LEF was generally well tolerated in all subjects regardless of renal function status.

Disclosures

All authors: No reported disclosures.

Characterization of the Effect of Renal Impairment on Upadacitinib Pharmacokinetics

Upadacitinib is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor developed for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single upadacitinib dose in subjects with normal renal function and in subjects with renal impairment. A total of 24 subjects between the ages of 18 and 75 years were assigned to 1 of 4 renal function groups based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (normal, mild, moderate, severe; N = 6/group). A single 15-mg dose of upadacitinib extended-release formulation was administered under fasting conditions. Serial plasma and urine samples were assayed to evaluate the effect of renal impairment on upadacitinib exposure through regression analysis and analysis of covariance. The primary analysis was the regression analysis of upadacitinib exposures versus estimated glomerular filtration rate. The point estimates for upadacitinib plasma exposure ratios (90% confidence interval [CI]) in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment were 1.18 (90%CI, 1.06-1.32), 1.33 (90%CI, 1.11-1.59), and 1.44 (90%CI, 1.14-1.82) for area under the plasma concentration-time curve and 1.06 (90%CI, 0.92-1.23), 1.11 (90%CI, 0.88-1.40), and 1.14 (90%CI, 0.84-1.56) for maximum observed plasma concentration, respectively, relative to subjects with normal renal function based on the regression analysis. The analysis of covariance categorical analysis provided consistent results. Upadacitinib was well tolerated by all subjects, and no safety issues were identified in subjects with renal impairment. Renal impairment has a limited effect on upadacitinib pharmacokinetics. This is in agreement with the known limited role of urinary excretion in upadacitinib elimination. Based on the limited impact on exposure, no dose adjustment is necessary for upadacitinib in subjects with impaired renal function.

Effect of Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Verinurad, a Selective Uric Acid Reabsorption Inhibitor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity, selective URAT1 transporter inhibitor in development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricemia. This Phase I, single-dose study investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of verinurad in adults with renal impairment and controls with normal renal function.

METHODS

Males aged 18-85 years were enrolled with serum urate (sUA) 4.5-10 mg/dl and creatinine clearance 60- < 90, 30- < 60, 15- < 30, or ≥ 90 ml/min (mild, moderate, severe renal impairment and controls, respectively; n = 7/8). Verinurad 15 mg was administered orally under fasted conditions. Serial plasma/serum and urine samplings were 30 min pre-dose to 72 h post-dose.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, verinurad maximum observed plasma concentration increased by 53, 73, and 128% and area under the concentration-time curve increased by 24, 148, and 130%, in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively; renal clearance decreased by 5, 42, and 79%. Exposures of major verinurad metabolites also increased with increasing renal impairment. Verinurad decreased sUA in all groups, with greater maximal changes in control and mild renal impairment than moderate and severe impairment groups (- 38.3, - 36.9, - 20.5, - 12.6%, respectively). There were no adverse event-related withdrawals or clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values.

CONCLUSION

Exposures of verinurad and metabolites increased with decreasing renal function. Consistent with the renal-dependent mechanism of action of verinurad, increasing severity of renal impairment was associated with decreased sUA lowering. Verinurad safety assessments were similar regardless of renal impairment. Continued investigation of verinurad is warranted in patients with gout and renal impairment. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02219516.

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of a Single Dose of Semaglutide, a Human Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Analog, in Subjects With and Without Renal Impairment

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide, a once-weekly human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, were investigated in subjects with/without renal impairment (RI).

METHODS

Fifty-six subjects, categorized into renal function groups [normal, mild, moderate, severe, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD)], received a single subcutaneous dose of semaglutide 0.5 mg. Semaglutide plasma concentrations were assessed ≤480 h post-dose; the primary endpoint was the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity.

RESULTS

Semaglutide exposure in subjects with mild/moderate RI and ESRD was similar to that in subjects with normal renal function. In subjects with severe RI, the mean exposure of semaglutide was 22% higher than in subjects with normal renal function, and the 95% confidence interval (1.02-1.47) for the ratio exceeded the pre-specified limits (0.70-1.43). When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight between the groups, all comparisons were within the pre-specified clinically relevant limits. Across RI groups there was no relationship between creatinine clearance (CL_CR) and semaglutide exposure, or between CL_CR and semaglutide maximum plasma drug concentration (C _max). Hemodialysis did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of semaglutide. No appreciable changes in safety parameters or vital signs and no serious adverse events were noted. One subject with severe RI reported two major hypoglycemic events.

CONCLUSION

When adjusted for differences in sex, age, and body weight, semaglutide exposure was similar between subjects with RI and subjects with normal renal function. Semaglutide (0.5 mg) was well-tolerated. Dose adjustment may not be warranted for subjects with RI. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT00833716.

The Influence of Hepatic and Renal Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of a Treatment for Herpes Zoster, Amenamevir (ASP2151): Phase 1, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Parallel-Group Studies

INTRODUCTION

Amenamevir (ASP2151) is a nonnucleoside human herpesvirus helicase-primase inhibitor that was approved in Japan for the treatment of herpes zoster (shingles) in 2017. This article reports the results of two clinical trials that investigated the effects of renal and hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of amenamevir.

METHODS

These studies were phase 1, open-label, single-dose (oral 400 mg), parallel-group studies evaluating the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of amenamevir in healthy participants and participants with moderate hepatic impairment and mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment.

RESULTS

In the hepatic impairment study, the pharmacokinetic profile of amenamevir in participants with moderate hepatic impairment was generally similar to that of participants with normal hepatic function. In the renal impairment study, the area under the amenamevir concentration versus time curve from the time of dosing up to the time of the last sample with extrapolation to infinity of the terminal phase was increased by 78.1% in participants with severe renal impairment. There was a positive relationship between creatinine clearance and oral and renal clearance for amenamevir in the renal impairment study. In both studies, amenamevir was safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the hepatic impairment study indicate that no dosing adjustment is required in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. In the renal impairment study, systemic amenamevir exposure was increased by renal impairment. However, it is unlikely that renal impairment will have a significant effect on the safety of amenamevir given that in previous pharmacokinetic and safety studies in healthy individuals amenamevir was safe and well tolerated after a single dose (5-2400 mg, fasted condition) and repeated doses for 7 days (300 or 600 mg, fed condition), and the amount of amenamevir exposure in the renal impairment study was covered by those studies. These findings suggest that amenamevir does not require dosage reduction in accordance with the creatinine clearance FUNDING: Astellas Pharma.

Impact of siponimod on vaccination response in a randomized, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of siponimod on response to T-cell-dependent (influenza) and T-cell-independent (pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPV-23]) vaccinations in healthy participants.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, each participant underwent a 7-week treatment period and received intramuscular injections of influenza and PPV-23 vaccines (day 21). Participants were randomized to 4 treatment groups (N = 30 each) and received placebo or siponimod 2 mg once daily in concomitant, interrupted, or preceding fashion. Individual response to vaccination was defined by a ≥4-fold (influenza) antibody titer increase and by a ≥2-fold increase in serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) G concentrations (PPV-23) on day 28 vs baseline. Responder rates were compared using noninferiority analysis.

RESULTS

Mean influenza titers were similar to placebo in the preceding and interrupted groups but lower in the concomitant group. The proportion of participants with influenza titers ≥40 four weeks after vaccination (seroprotection) was similar to placebo across all groups and antigens. In each treatment group, response criteria were met for 3 of 4 antigens including H1N1 and H3N2. A noninferior response was determined in the context of preceding treatment but not interrupted or concomitant treatment. Regarding PPV-23, approximately 90%-100% of participants exhibited a ≥2-fold increase in IgG concentrations vs baseline. Noninferior responder rates were determined for each siponimod treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Siponimod treatment had no relevant effect on antibody response to PPV-23. European Medicines Agency response criteria were essentially met for influenza, but titers were lower on concomitant treatment. Overall, these data suggest that siponimod has limited effect on the efficacy of vaccinations with neoantigens.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that in healthy persons, siponimod had limited effect on the immune response following influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.

Clinical safety and performance of VIVIA: a novel home hemodialysis system

Background

The VIVIA Hemodialysis System (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, IL, USA) was designed for patient use at home to reduce the burden of treatment and improve patient safety. It has unique features including extended use of the dialyzer and blood set through in situ hot-water disinfection between treatments; generation of on-line infusible-quality dialysate for automated priming, rinseback and hemodynamic support during hypotension and a fully integrated access disconnect sensor.

Methods

The safety and performance of VIVIA were assessed in two clinical studies. A first-in-man study was a prospective, single-arm study that involved 22 prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients who were treated for ∼4 h, four times a week, for 10 weeks. A second clinical study was a prospective, single-arm study (6-8 h of dialysis treatment at night three times a week) that involved 17 prevalent patients treated for 6 weeks.

Results

There were 1114 treatments from the two studies (first-in-man study, 816; extended duration study, 298). Adverse events (AEs) were similar in the two studies to those expected for prevalent HD patients. No deaths and no device-related serious AEs occurred. Adequacy of dialysis ( Kt / V ) urea in both clinical trials was well above the clinical guidelines. VIVIA performed ultrafiltration accurately as prescribed in the two studies. The majority of patients achieved 10 or more uses of the dialyzer. Endotoxin levels and bacterial dialysate sampling met infusible-quality dialysate standards.

Conclusion

These results confirm the safety and expected performance of VIVIA.

Update and trends on pharmacokinetic studies in patients with impaired renal function: practical insight into application of the FDA and EMA guidelines

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of kidney dysfunction increases with age and is highly prevalent among patients with hypertension. Since many therapeutic compounds are primarily eliminated through the kidneys, impaired renal function can have negative consequences on drug disposition, efficacy and safety. Therefore, regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have issued detailed guidelines for new drug applications to determine posology requirements for patients with renal impairment. Areas covered: The current review highlights and contrasts agency requirements for pharmacokinetic renal impairment clinical studies. While many of the guidelines are similar among the two agencies, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) determination and reporting differ. Design considerations for a reduced, full or dialysis renal impairment study, as well as modifications to the FDA's draft guidance are discussed. Furthermore, scenarios where pharmacokinetic modelling analysis can benefit a drug development program are also reviewed. Moreover, practical solutions for patient recruitment challenges are addressed. Expert commentary: We summarize how 'one size does not fit all' for GFR assessment, and recommend when to use certain modalities. Finally, we highlight the need for the pharmaceutical industry to engage therapeutic experts to assist in protocol development for renal impairment studies, as these experts understand the nuances of this special population and recommended guidelines.

Clinical Pharmacology of Delafloxacin in Patients With Hepatic Impairment

Delafloxacin is a novel anionic fluoroquinolone with robust activity against Gram‐positive, Gram‐negative, atypical, and anaerobic bacteria, including methicillin‐resistant S aureus. Delafloxacin is currently being studied for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community‐acquired pneumonia. This was a phase 1, open‐label pharmacokinetic and safety study of a single intravenous dose of 300 mg delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (Child‐Pugh class A, B, and C, respectively) compared with matched healthy controls. The effects of hepatic impairment were assessed by ANOVA of log‐transformed values for AUC_0‐∞, C_max, and systemic clearance, with hepatic group as a fixed effect. Mean AUC_0‐∞ and C_max in each impairment group were not significantly different from those of the pooled healthy subjects (P > 0.05). The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the percentage ratios of least‐squares means of AUC_0‐∞ did not indicate significant differences between the impairment groups and pooled healthy controls: Child‐Pugh class A (mild) 114.4 (CI: 95.6, 137.0), Child‐Pugh class B (moderate) 114.8 (CI: 95.9, 137.4), and Child‐Pugh class C (severe) 115.1 (CI: 96.1, 137.8). A single IV infusion of delafloxacin was generally well tolerated in all treatment groups. The exposure and clearance of delafloxacin in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment did not significantly differ from those of pooled, matched healthy subjects. Based on these pharmacokinetic data, dose adjustment of delafloxacin in the presence of hepatic impairment is not needed.

Pharmacokinetic profile of defibrotide in patients with renal impairment

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease, also called sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS), is an unpredictable, potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Severe VOD/SOS, generally associated with multiorgan dysfunction (pulmonary or renal dysfunction), may be associated with >80% mortality. Defibrotide, recently approved in the US, has demonstrated efficacy treating hepatic VOD/SOS with multiorgan dysfunction. Because renal impairment is prevalent in patients with VOD/SOS, this Phase I, open-label, two-part study in adults examined the effects of hemodialysis and severe or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on defibrotide pharmacokinetics (PK). Part 1 compared defibrotide PK during single 6.25 mg/kg doses infused with and without dialysis. Part 2 assessed defibrotide plasma PK after multiple 6.25 mg/kg doses in nondialysis-dependent subjects with severe/ESRD versus healthy matching subjects. Among six subjects enrolled in Part 1, percent ratios of least-squares mean and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) on dialysis and nondialysis days were 109.71 (CI: 97.23, 123.78) for maximum observed plasma concentration (C_max); 108.39 (CI: 97.85, 120.07) for area under the concentration–time curve to the time of the last quantifiable plasma concentration (AUC_0–t); and 109.98 (CI: 99.39, 121.70) for AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC_0–∞). These ranges were within 80%–125%, indicating no significant effect of dialysis on defibrotide exposure/clearance. In Part 2, defibrotide exposure parameters in six subjects with severe/ESRD after multiple doses (AUC_0–t, 113 µg·h/mL; AUC over dosing interval, 113 µg·h/mL; C_max, 53.8 µg/mL) were within 5%–8% of parameters after the first dose (AUC_0–t, 117 µg·h/mL; AUC_0–∞, 118 µg·h/mL; C_max, 54.9 µg/mL), indicating no accumulation. Defibrotide peak and extent of exposures in those with severe/ESRD were ~35%–37% and 50%–60% higher, respectively, versus controls, following single and multiple doses. One adverse event (vomiting, possibly drug-related) was reported. These findings support defibrotide prescribing guidance stating no dose adjustment is necessary for hemodialysis or severe/ESRD.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial Investigating the Safety and Immunogenicity of Modified Vaccinia Ankara Smallpox Vaccine (MVA-BN®) in 56-80-Year-Old Subjects

BACKGROUND

Modified Vaccinia Ankara MVA-BN® is a live, highly attenuated, viral vaccine under advanced development as a non-replicating smallpox vaccine. In this Phase II trial, the safety and immunogenicity of Modified Vaccinia Ankara MVA-BN® (MVA) was assessed in a 56-80 years old population.

METHODS

MVA with a virus titer of 1 x 108 TCID50/dose was administered via subcutaneous injection to 56-80 year old vaccinia-experienced subjects (N = 120). Subjects received either two injections of MVA (MM group) or one injection of Placebo and one injection of MVA (PM group) four weeks apart. Safety was evaluated by assessment of adverse events (AE), focused physical exams, electrocardiogram recordings and safety laboratories. Solicited AEs consisted of a set of pre-defined expected local reactions (erythema, swelling, pain, pruritus, and induration) and systemic symptoms (body temperature, headache, myalgia, nausea and fatigue) and were recorded on a memory aid for an 8-day period following each injection. The immunogenicity of the vaccine was evaluated in terms of humoral immune responses measured with a vaccinia-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) before and at different time points after vaccination.

RESULTS

Vaccinations were well tolerated by all subjects. No serious adverse event related to MVA and no case of myopericarditis was reported. The overall incidence of unsolicited AEs was similar in both groups. For both groups immunogenicity responses two weeks after the final vaccination (i.e. Visit 4) were as follows: Seroconversion (SC) rates (doubling of titers from baseline) in vaccine specific antibody titers measured by ELISA were 83.3% in Group MM and 82.8% in Group PM (difference 0.6% with 95% exact CI [-13.8%, 15.0%]), and 90.0% for Group MM and 77.6% for Group PM measured by PRNT (difference 12.4% with 95% CI of [-1.1%, 27.0%]). Geometric mean titers (GMT) measured by ELISA two weeks after the final vaccination for Group MM were 804.1 and 605.8 for Group PM (with ratio of GMTs of 1.33 with 95% CI of [0.96, 1.84]). Similarly, GMTs measured by PRNT were 210.3 for Group MM and 126.7 for Group PM (with ratio 1.66 and 95% CI [0.95, 2.90]).

CONCLUSIONS

One or two doses of MVA were safe and immunogenic in a 56-80 years old vaccinia-experienced population. No cases of myopericarditis were observed following vaccinations with MVA. The safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity were similar to that seen in younger (18-55 year old) healthy populations as investigated in other MVA trials. The results suggest that a single dose of MVA in a 56-80 years old population was well tolerated and sufficient to rapidly boost the long-term B cell memory response induced by a prior vaccination with a traditional smallpox vaccine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00857493.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of co-administered paritaprevir plus ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir in hepatic impairment

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir are direct-acting antivirals for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs.

METHODS

HCV-negative subjects with normal hepatic function (n=7) or mild (Child-Pugh A, n=6), moderate (Child-Pugh B, n=6), or severe (Child-Pugh C, n=5) hepatic impairment received a single-dose of the combination of paritaprevir plus ritonavir (paritaprevir/r, 200/100 mg), ombitasvir (25 mg), and dasabuvir (400 mg). Plasma samples were collected through 144 hours after administration for pharmacokinetic assessments.

RESULTS

Paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, and ritonavir exposures (maximal plasma concentration, C(max), and area under the concentration-time curve, AUC) were minimally affected in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Differences in exposures between healthy controls and subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment were less than 35%, except for 62% higher paritaprevir AUC in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. Paritaprevir and dasabuvir AUC were significantly higher in subjects with severe hepatic impairment (950% and 325%, respectively). However, ombitasvir AUC was 54% lower and ritonavir AUC was comparable. Adverse events included eye stye, insomnia, and pain from an infiltrated intravenous line.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes observed in paritaprevir, ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir exposures in subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment do not necessitate dose adjustment. Subjects with severe hepatic impairment had substantially higher paritaprevir and dasabuvir exposures.

Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor

PURPOSE

Canagliflozin is a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Because T2DM is often associated with renal or hepatic impairment, understanding the effects of these comorbid conditions on the pharmacokinetics of canagliflozin, and further assessing its safety, in these special populations is essential. Two open-label studies evaluated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (renal study only), and safety of canagliflozin in participants with hepatic or renal impairment.

METHODS

Participants in the hepatic study (8 in each group) were categorized based on their Child-Pugh score (normal hepatic function, mild impairment [Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6], and moderate impairment [Child-Pugh score of 7-9]) and received a single oral dose of canagliflozin 300 mg. Participants in the renal study (8 in each group) were categorized based on their creatinine clearance (CLCR) (normal renal function [CLCR ≥80 mL/min]; mild [CLCR 50 to <80 mL/min], moderate [CLCR 30 to <50 mL/min], or severe [CLCR <30 mL/min] renal impairment; and end-stage renal disease [ESRD]) and received a single oral dose of canagliflozin 200 mg; the exception was those with ESRD, who received 1 dose postdialysis and 1 dose predialysis (10 days later). Canagliflozin's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (urinary glucose excretion [UGE] and renal threshold for glucose excretion [RTG]) were assessed at predetermined time points.

FINDINGS

Mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinite (AUC)0-∞ values differed by <11% between the group with normal hepatic function and those with mild and moderate hepatic impairment. In the renal study, the mean Cmax values were 13%, 29%, and 29% higher and the mean AUC0-∞ values were 17%, 63%, and 50% higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, respectively; values were similar in the ESRD group relative to the group with normal function, however. The amount of UGE declined as renal function decreased, whereas RTG was not suppressed to the same extent in the moderate to severe renal impairment groups (mean RTG, 93-97 mg/dL) compared with the mild impairment and normal function groups (mean RTG, 68-77 mg/dL).

IMPLICATIONS

Canagliflozin's pharmacokinetics were not affected by mild or moderate hepatic impairment. Systemic exposure to canagliflozin increased in the renal impairment groups relative to participants with normal renal function. Pharmacodynamic response to canagliflozin, measured by using UGE and RTG, declined with increasing severity of renal impairment. A single oral dose of canagliflozin was well tolerated by participants in both studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01186588 and NCT01759576.

Pharmacokinetics of Micafungin in Healthy Volunteers, Volunteers With Moderate Liver Disease, and Volunteers With Renal Dysfunction

Micafungin is an antifungal agent metabolized by arylsulfatase with secondary metabolism by catechol-O-methyltransferase. The objectives of this study were to estimate the pharmacokinetic parameters and plasma protein binding of micafungin in volunteers with moderate hepatic dysfunction (n = 8), volunteers with creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min (n = 9), and matched controls (n = 8 and n = 9, respectively). Single-dose micafungin pharmacokinetics were estimated using noncompartmental techniques. There was a statistically lower area under the observed micafungin concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity for subjects with moderate hepatic dysfunction as compared to control subjects (97.5 +/- 19 microg.h/mL vs 125.9 +/- 26.4 microg.h/mL, P = .03), although there was no difference in micafungin weight-adjusted clearance (10.9 +/- 1.7 mL/h/kg vs 9.8 +/- 1.8 mL/h/kg, P = .2). The difference in area under the concentration-time curve may be explained by the differences in body weight between subjects and controls. Renal dysfunction did not alter micafungin pharmacokinetics.

Pharmacokinetics of Maribavir, a Novel Oral Anticytomegalovirus Agent, in Subjects With Varying Degrees of Renal Impairment

The effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of maribavir, a novel anticytomegalovirus agent, was evaluated in 12 adults with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CrCl] >80 mL/min) and 19 adults with renal impairment classified as mild (n = 5), moderate (n = 5), or severe (n = 9), as measured by CrCl 50-80, 30-49, and <30 mL/min, respectively. After a single oral dose of maribavir 400 mg, the pharmacokinetics of maribavir, based on total and unbound plasma concentrations, showed no statistically significant difference between subjects with normal renal function and subjects with mild/moderate or severe renal impairment. Renal impairment was associated with an increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values for an inactive metabolite of maribavir, VP 44469. Results were consistent with those of previous studies, which showed that very little maribavir was excreted unchanged in urine, whereas about 22% of an oral dose of maribavir is recovered in urine as VP 44469.

The pharmacokinetics of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in African American, Hispanic and Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Amongst Caucasian, Hispanic and African Americans with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV), there is a wide variation in response to treatment with peginterferon alfa-2a (PEG-IFN alfa-2a) and ribavirin.

AIM

To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of PEG-IFN alfa-2a and ribavirin among these three groups.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with genotype 1 CHC (17 African Americans, 14 Hispanics and 16 Caucasians) received 8 weeks of PEG-IFN alfa-2a (180 μg/week) and ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day). PEG-IFN alfa-2a serum concentrations and ribavirin plasma concentrations were measured following the first dose and at week 8. Pharmacokinetic parameters (C(max), T(max), AUC, CL/F) were estimated using noncompartmental methods.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the pharmacokinetic parameters for PEG-IFN alfa-2a following single-dose or steady-state administration between African American or Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients. Ribavirin pharmacokinetic parameters were similar between Hispanic and Caucasian patients for single-dose and steady-state administration. The single-dose C(max) was 33% lower (P < 0.05) in African American compared with Caucasian patients. Other ribavirin single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters were slightly decreased (approximately 20% lower) in African American patients, but were not considered clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences were observed in PEG-IFN alfa-2a pharmacokinetic parameters between African American or Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients. For ribavirin, no differences were observed in pharmacokinetic parameters between Hispanic and Caucasian patients. While a trend towards increased ribavirin clearance and decreased exposure was observed in African American patients vs. Caucasian patients, the differences were small and not considered clinically meaningful (Clinical Trial Number: NP17354).

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of clevidipine after prolonged continuous infusion in subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension

Purpose

Clevidipine is a rapidly-acting intravenous dihydropyridine antihypertensive acting via calcium channel blockade. This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-design study of a 72-h continuous clevidipine infusion.

Method

Doses of 2, 4, 8, or 16.0 mg/h or placebo were evaluated in 61 subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension. IV clevidipine or placebo was initiated at 2.0 mg/h and force-titrated in doubling increments every 3 min to target dose, then maintained for 72 h. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured during infusion, and for 4, 6 and 8 h after termination of infusion, although oral therapy could be restarted at 4 h. Clevidipine blood levels were obtained during infusion and for 1 hour after termination.

Results

Rapid onset of drug effect occurred at all clevidipine dose levels, with consistent pharmacokinetics and rapid offset after 72-h infusion. No evidence of tolerance to the clevidipine drug effect was observed at any dose level over the 72-h infusion. No evidence of rebound hypertension was found for either 4 or 6 h after termination of the clevidipine infusion. At 8 h following cessation of clevidipine, blood pressure was not significantly higher than at baseline. Placebo-treated subjects had blood pressures lower than baseline at 8 h following infusion termination; hence, placebo-adjusted blood pressures tended to be slightly higher than baseline.

Conclusion

This study supports the use of up to 72 h of IV clevidipine therapy for the management of blood pressure, with consistent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics and context insensitive half-life across the dose ranges evaluated.

Phase I dose finding studies of an adjuvanted Clostridium difficile toxoid vaccine

Fifty healthy adult (18-55 years) and 48 elderly (≥ 65 years) volunteers were randomized to receive a candidate Clostridium difficile toxoid vaccine (2 μg, 10 μg, or 50 μg) or placebo on Days 0, 28, and 56. No volunteer receiving placebo seroconverted. For toxin A, seroconversion by Day 56 (post-dose 2) was observed in 100% of volunteers aged 18-55 years in all dose groups and in 50%, 89%, and 100% of elderly participants in the 2 μg, 10 μg, and 50 μg dose groups, respectively. For both age groups, seroconversion for toxin B was lower than toxin A. There were no safety concerns.

Multiple ascending dose study of BMS-790052, a nonstructural protein 5A replication complex inhibitor, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1

The antiviral activity, resistance profile, pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of BMS-790052, a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) replication complex inhibitor, were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential panel, multiple ascending dose study. Thirty patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection were randomized to receive a 14-day course of BMS-790052 (1, 10, 30, 60, or 100 mg once daily or 30 mg twice daily) or placebo in a ratio of 4:1. The mean maximum decline from baseline in HCV RNA ranged from 2.8 to 4.1 log(10) IU/mL; the placebo group showed no evidence of antiviral activity. Most patients experienced viral rebound on or before day 7 of treatment with BMS-790052 monotherapy; viral rebound was associated with viral variants that had been previously implicated in resistance development in the in vitro replicon system. The PK profile was supportive of once-daily dosing with median peak plasma concentrations at 1-2 hours postdose and mean terminal half-life of 12-15 hours. Steady state was achieved following 3-4 days of daily dosing. BMS-790052 was well tolerated in all dose groups, with adverse events occurring with a similar frequency in BMS-790052- and placebo-treated groups. There were no clinically relevant changes in vital signs, laboratory, or electrocardiogram parameters.

CONCLUSION

BMS-7590052 is the first NS5A replication complex inhibitor with multiple dose proof-of-concept in clinic. At doses of 1-100 mg daily, BMS-790052 was well tolerated, had a PK profile supportive of once-daily dosing, and produced a rapid and substantial decrease in HCV-RNA levels in patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1.

The pharmacokinetics of PF-734200, a DPP-IV inhibitor, in subjects with renal insufficiency

AIMS

PF-734200 is a potent, selective inhibitor of DPP-IV. This two-part study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral 20mg PF-734200 in subjects with varying degrees of renal insufficiency or with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring chronic haemodialysis (HD). The study also assessed the HD clearance of PF-734200 in ESRD.

METHODS

Part 1 included subjects with normal renal function or renal insufficiency but not on HD. Subjects received a single dose of 20mg PF-734200 while fasting and serum and urine samples were collected. In part 2, period 1, 1h after HD, a single 20-mg dose was given to subjects with ESRD and serum samples were collected. After a 7-day washout, subjects received another dose followed by collection of serum samples (period 2), during which HD was initiated 4h after dosing. Dialysate samples were collected to quantify amount of drug removed, from which HD clearance was calculated. The fraction of drug dialysed was calculated using an AUC-based method.

RESULTS

Systemic exposures of PF-734200 increased approximately 1.5-, 2.2-, 2.1- and 2.8-fold in subjects with mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency or ESRD, respectively, compared with subjects with normal renal function. The terminal half-life increased from 16.2h in subjects with normal renal function to 36.6h in subjects with ESRD. Approximately, 29% of PF-734200 in the body after a single-dose administration was dialysed by 4h HD.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic exposure of PF-734200 increases with decreasing renal function. The effect of HD on drug removal is modest.

Abstract C132: Effect of hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of casopitant

Introduction: The pharmacokinetics and safety of casopitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist being developed for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced and post-operative nausea and vomiting, were evaluated in subjects with mild (Child-Pugh score of 5–6) and moderate (Child-Pugh score of 7–9) hepatic impairment; mild (creatinine clearance 50–80 mL/min) and moderate (creatinine clearance 30–49 mL/min) renal impairment; and subjects with normal hepatic and renal function.

Experimental Design: Twenty-six subjects were enrolled in the hepatic impairment study (9 mild, 9 moderate and 8 normal subjects) and 18 subjects in the renal impairment study (6 mild, 6 moderate and 6 normal subjects). Subjects with severe hepatic or renal impairment were excluded. All subjects received a once-daily dose of 100 mg oral casopitant for 5 days. Pharmacokinetics and plasma protein binding of casopitant and its major metabolite, GSK525060, were determined on Days 1 and 5. Safety was continuously assessed.

Results: Subjects with mild or moderate hepatic impairment had an increase in casopitant AUC of 11% and 24%, respectively, on Day 1 compared with normal subjects; a similar increase was observed on Day 5. Casopitant Cmax was variable, but similar across all subjects. GSK525060 AUC was not significantly different between normal subjects and subjects with mild hepatic impairment; however, AUC was reduced 29% and 19% on Days 1 and 5, respectively, in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment. The percent bound of casopitant and GSK525060 was similar in all subjects. Casopitant AUC increased 34% and 22% in subjects with mild or moderate renal impairment on Day 1, respectively, and 28% and 11% on Day 5, respectively, when compared with normal subjects. GSK525060 AUC increased 17% and 24% on Days 1 and 5, respectively, in subjects with mild renal impairment, but did not significantly change in subjects with moderate impairment. Further age-adjusted analysis showed no meaningful effect of renal impairment on casopitant or GSK525060 AUC. Cmax and half-life in renal impaired subjects were similar to normal subjects. The plasma protein-binding of casopitant and GSK525060 was similar in all subjects. Casopitant was well tolerated, with no significant difference in the type or frequency of adverse events (AEs) noted between subjects with mild, moderate or no hepatic or renal impairment. Somnolence, flatulence and nausea were the most frequently reported AEs in the hepatic impairment study; whereas constipation and dyspepsia were the most frequently reported events in the renal impairment study. No AEs were reported in subjects with mild renal impairment.

Conclusion: The pharmacokinetics of casopitant is not altered to a clinically significant extent in subjects with mild or moderate, hepatic or renal impairment. The impact of severe hepatic or renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of casopitant was not evaluated.

Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):C132.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of sunitinib malate in subjects with impaired renal function

This phase I, open-label, single-dose study evaluates the effects of severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of sunitinib and its primary active metabolite, SU12662. Subjects with normal renal function (creatinine clearance > 80 mL/min), severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min), and ESRD requiring hemodialysis receive a single dose of sunitinib 50 mg. Serial blood samples are collected for quantification of plasma concentrations using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry assay. Safety is monitored. Twenty-four subjects complete the study. Pharmacokinetics in subjects with severe renal impairment appear similar to those with normal renal function. Plasma exposure to sunitinib and SU12662 appears lower in subjects with ESRD compared with subjects with normal renal function or severe renal impairment. Single-dose sunitinib 50 mg is well tolerated regardless of renal function. The currently approved starting dose of sunitinib 50 mg on Schedule 4/2 is expected to be appropriate for patients with renal impairment; any subsequent dose modifications should be based on patients' ability to tolerate treatment.

A pilot study to examine the feasibility of insulin glargine in subjects with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance or new-onset type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

People with early type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and/or impaired fasting glucose [IFG]) are at risk of hyperglycaemia-related complications, including cardiovascular disease. Insulin, traditionally reserved as late treatment in type 2 diabetes, may also be a useful therapy in this population. We examined the short-term efficacy and tolerability of insulin glargine (glargine) in individuals with early or pre-type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, 12-day study, subjects with IGT/IFG (n=9), newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n=9) or normal glucose tolerance (n=3) (confined to a clinical research unit taking a prescribed diet) were randomized to once-daily glargine (n=16) or placebo (saline; n=5) at bedtime. Dose was titrated to achieve target fasting blood glucose (FBG) 80-95 mg/dL.

RESULTS

Over the treatment period, mean FBG decreased in glargine-treated subjects (from 100.0+/-18.8 to 85.6+/-18.4 mg/dL), but was unchanged in placebo-treated subjects (from 112.5+/-10.6 to 111.3+/-17.5 mg/dL). Mean eight-point blood glucose value decreased by 9.7 mg/dL in the glargine group, but increased by 8.1 mg/dL in the placebo group. Mean post-exercise blood glucose was similar before and after glargine treatment, but increased after placebo treatment. Five subjects receiving glargine experienced 16 mild symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes; however, no hypoglycaemia occurred during exercise. Mean body weight decreased in both the glargine (-0.44 kg) and placebo (-0.25 kg) groups, in line with dietary restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this pilot study suggest that glargine can be used by people with IFG, IGT or new-onset type 2 diabetes for management of hyperglycaemia with low risk of hypoglycaemia. However titration of insulin in people on dietary restrictions should be more cautious as they may be more prone to hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical benefits of this approach.