The influence of protein containing meals on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in healthy volunteers

Drug administration via feeding tubes-a procedure that carries risks: systematic identification of critical factors based on commonly administered drugs in a cohort of stroke patients

PURPOSE

Drug administration via feeding tubes is considered a process with many uncertainties. This review aimed to give a comprehensive overview of data available on feeding tube application and to carry out risk assessments for drug substances commonly administered to stroke patients.

METHODS

Drugs frequently administered via feeding tubes were identified through a retrospective analysis of discharge letters from a stroke unit. Physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and stability properties of these drugs and data on drug-enteral nutrition interactions were systematically searched for in the European Pharmacopoeia, Hagers Handbook of Pharmaceutical Practice, Birchers clinical-pharmacological data compilation, and the Martindale Complete Drug Reference, as well as from databases including DrugBank, DrugDex, PubChem, Google Scholar, and PubMed.

RESULTS

Of the drugs most commonly administered via feeding tubes in the present stroke patient cohort, bisoprolol, candesartan, and ramipril could be considered the least critical due to their overall favourable properties. Acetylsalicylic acid, amlodipine, hydrochlorothiazide, omeprazole and esomeprazole, simvastatin, and torasemide pose risks based on pH or light-dependent instability or proposed food effects. The most critical drugs to be administered via feeding tubes are considered to be furosemide, levodopa, and levothyroxine as they show relevant instabilities under administration conditions and substantial food effects; the latter two even possess a narrow therapeutic index. However, little information is available on drug-tube and drug-formula interactions.

CONCLUSION

Feeding tube administration of medications turned out to be a highly complex process with several unmet risks. Therefore, investigations that systematically assess these risk factors using clinically relevant model systems are urgently needed.

To restrict or not to restrict? Practical considerations for optimizing dietary protein interactions on levodopa absorption in Parkinson's disease

Administration of levodopa for Parkinson's disease (PD) has remained the most effective therapy for symptom management despite being in use for over 50 years. Advancing disease and age, changing tolerability and gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction may result in change in dietary habits and body weight, as well as unpredictable motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Dietary proteins which convert into amino acids after digestion are implicated as major factors that inhibit levodopa absorption. For people living with PD (PwP) who experience motor fluctuations, low protein diets (LPD) and protein redistribution diets (PRD) may be effective and are often recommended as a non-pharmacologic approach for improving levodopa bioavailability. However, there is a lack of consensus on a standard definition of these diets and appropriate treatment algorithms for usage. This may be due to the paucity of high-level evidence of LPD and PRD in PwP and whether all or specific subgroups of patients would benefit from these strategies. Managing diet and protein intake with proper education and monitoring may reduce complications associated with these diets such as dyskinesias and unintentional weight loss. Additionally, alterations to medications and GI function may alter levodopa pharmacokinetics. In this narrative review we focus on 1) mechanisms of dietary protein and levodopa absorption in the intestine and blood brain barrier, 2) dietetic approaches to manage protein and levodopa interactions and 3) practical issues for treating PwP as well as future directions to be considered.

How to Optimize the Effectiveness and Safety of Parkinson's Disease Therapy? - A Systematic Review of Drugs Interactions with Food and Dietary Supplements

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing worldwide incidence of Parkinson's disease, the therapy is still suboptimal due to the diversified clinical manifestations, lack of sufficient treatment, the poor adherence in advanced patients, and varied response. Proper intake of medications regarding food and managing drug-food interactions may optimize Parkinson's disease treatment.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated potential effects that food, beverages, and dietary supplements may have on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used by parkinsonian patients; identified the most probable interactions; and shaped recommendations for the optimal intake of drugs regarding food.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and included a total of 81 studies in the qualitative synthesis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

We found evidence for levodopa positive interaction with coffee, fiber and vitamin C, as well as for the potential beneficial impact of low-fat and protein redistribution diet. Contrastingly, high-protein diet and ferrous sulfate supplements can negatively affect levodopa pharmacokinetics and effectiveness. For other drugs, the data of food impact are scarce. Based on the available limited evidence, all dopamine agonists (bromocriptine, cabergoline, ropinirole), tolcapone, rasagiline, selegiline in tablets, safinamide, amantadine and pimavanserin can be taken with or without a meal. Opicapone and orally disintegrating selegiline tablets should be administered on an empty stomach. Of monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, safinamide is the least susceptible for interaction with the tyramine-rich food, whereas selegiline and rasagiline may lose selectivity to monoamine oxidase B when administered in supratherapeutic doses. The level of presented evidence is low due to the poor studies design, their insufficient actuality, and missing data.

Practical pearls to improve the efficacy and tolerability of levodopa in Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa is the most effective medication for the treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Several factors may affect the efficacy and tolerability of levodopa. These include the timing, dosage and administration of levodopa, concomitant drugs, food, PD-associated non motor symptoms, and various neurologic and non-neurologic comorbidities. If not appropriately addressed, these issues may limit levodopa efficacy, tolerability, and compliance.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the basics of the metabolism of orally administered levodopa, its side effects, and the factors that may affect its tolerability and efficacy. We provide several practical pearls to improve the tolerability and efficacy of levodopa.

EXPERT OPINION

Protein-rich food delays and reduces levodopa absorption. Hence, levodopa should preferably be administered in a relatively empty stomach. Carbidopa dosing is crucial as it not only enhances the entry of levodopa into the central nervous system, but also reduces levodopa's peripheral adverse effects. Patients experiencing the early side effects such as nausea/vomiting should be prescribed with anti-nausea medications that do not block dopamine receptors. Non-oral routes of administration can be used to obviate persistent gastrointestinal side effects. Implementation of these and other tips may help improve the tolerability and efficacy of levodopa.

The Impact of Diet and Exercise on Drug Responses

It is well known that lifestyle changes can alter several physiological functions in the human body. For exercise and diet, these effects are used sensibly in basic therapies, as in cardiovascular diseases. However, the physiological changes induced by exercise and a modified diet also have the capacity to influence the efficacy and toxicity of several drugs, mainly by affecting different pharmacokinetic mechanisms. This pharmacological plasticity is not clinically relevant in all cases but might play an important role in altering the effects of very common drugs, particularly drugs with a narrow therapeutic window. Therefore, with this review, we provide insights into possible food–drug and exercise–drug interactions to sharpen awareness of the potential occurrence of such effects.

Female, aging, difference formulations of DCI, or lower body weight increases AUC4hr of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

There is considerable intra- and inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics (PK) of levodopa after oral administration. Inter-individual variability in levodopa PK has also been demonstrated in fasting single-dose studies. We examined the factors that affect levodopa PK in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and quantified the intensity of their respective effects.

METHODS

We studied 220 patients who underwent PK assessment after administration of 1 tablet of levodopa/DOPA decarboxylase inhibitor (DCI) combination, which contained 10 mg carbidopa/100 mg levodopa or 25 mg benserazide/100 mg levodopa. PK was evaluated using non-compartmental analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 220 PD patients (including 112 men) were studied. The mean age (±standard deviation) and mean disease duration was 68.1 ± 8.9 and 7.7 ± 5.8 years, respectively. The Cmax of levodopa was 9.0 ± 4.0 ng/mL, Tmax was 41.4 ± 40.2 min, and area under the blood concentration-time curve up to 4 h (AUC_4hr) was 12.3 ± 3.7 ng/mL*4hr. Factors affecting AUC_4hr were analyzed using multiple linear regression models. Age (1.1 ± 0.23 per +10 years, p = 3.1E-8), sex (2.2 ± 0.5 for female, p = 1.9E-5), DCI (1.4 ± 0.4 for benserazide, p = 0.0028), and body weight (-0.77 ± 0.22 per +10 kg, p = 5.4E-4) were significantly related to AUC_4hr, while disease duration, dyskinesia status, and eGFR were not related to AUC_4hr and Cmax.

CONCLUSION

Female, aging, difference formulations of DCI, or lower body weight independently contributes to increased AUC_4hr of levodopa in Japanese patients with PD in this study.

Pharmacokinetics of Rytary®, An Extended-Release Capsule Formulation of Carbidopa-Levodopa

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic progressive neurological disorder characterized by resting tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, gait disturbance, and postural instability. Levodopa, the precursor to dopamine, coadministered with carbidopa or benserazide, aromatic amino acid decarboxylase inhibitors, is the most effective and widely used therapeutic agent in the treatment of PD. With continued levodopa treatment, a majority of patients develop motor complications such as dyskinesia and motor 'on-off' fluctuations, which are, in part, related to the fluctuations in plasma concentrations of levodopa. A new extended-release (ER) carbidopa-levodopa capsule product (also referred to as IPX066) was developed and approved in the US as Rytary^® and in the EU as Numient^®. The capsule formulation is designed to provide an initial rapid absorption of levodopa comparable to immediate-release (IR) carbidopa-levodopa, and to subsequently provide stable levodopa concentrations with reduced peak-to-trough excursions in plasma concentrations in order to reduce motor fluctuations associated with pulsatile stimulation of dopamine receptors and to minimize dyskinesia. Phase III studies of this ER carbidopa-levodopa capsule formulation in patients with PD have shown a significant reduction in 'off' time compared with IR carbidopa-levodopa and carbidopa-levodopa-entacapone. We present a review of the clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of this ER product of carbidopa-levodopa in healthy subjects and in patients with PD.

Protein-Restricted Diets for Ameliorating Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson's Disease

Levodopa is considered to be the most effective symptomatic drug for Parkinson's disease (PD). As the disease progresses, however, the patients are likely to experience a reduced response to levodopa and develop motor fluctuations (i.e., end-of-dose wearing off and unpredictable "on-off"). Protein-rich diets and elevated plasma concentrations of large neutral amino acids have been proved to impair the therapeutic effect of levodopa by reducing its absorption and influx into the brain. On the other hand, the protein-restricted diets including low-protein diet (LPD), protein-redistribution diet (PRD) and PRD with use of low-protein products can all improve the efficacy of levodopa in patients with motor fluctuations. However, it should be noted that protein-restricted diets may also contribute to several side effects, including dyskinesia, weight loss, and malnutrition (e.g., protein and calcium insufficiency). Together, protein-restricted diets are an effective approach to improve motor fluctuations in PD patients, while long-term adherence to these diets requires monitoring for side effects.

Model-based dietary optimization for late-stage, levodopa-treated, Parkinson's disease patients

Levodopa has been the gold standard for Parkinson’s disease treatment for more than 40 years. Its bioavailability is hindered by dietary amino acids, leading to fluctuations in the motor response particularly in late-stage (stage 3 and 4 on Hoehn and Yahr scale) patients. The routine dietary intervention consists of low-protein (<0.8 g/kg) diets or the redistribution of daily protein allowance to the last meal. Computational modeling was used to examine the fluctuation of gastrointestinal levodopa absorption under consideration of the diet by (i) identifying the group of patients that could benefit from dietary interventions, (ii) comparing existing diet recommendations for their impact on levodopa bioavailability, and (iii) suggesting a mechanism-based dietary intervention. We developed a multiscale computational model consisting of an ordinary differential equations-based advanced compartmentalized absorption and transit (ACAT) gut model and metabolic genome-scale small intestine epithelial cell model. We used this model to investigate complex spatiotemporal relationship between dietary amino acids and levodopa absorption. Our model predicted an improvement in bioavailability, as reflected by blood concentrations of levodopa with protein redistribution diet by 34% compared with a low-protein diet and by 11% compared with the ante cibum (a.c.) administration. These results are consistent with the reported better outcome in late-stage patients. A systematic analysis of the effect of different amino acids in the diet suggested that a serine-rich diet could improve the bioavailability by 22% compared with the a.c. administration. In addition, the slower gastric emptying rate in PD patients exacerbates the loss of levodopa due to competition. Optimizing dietary recommendations in quantity, composition, and intake time holds the promise to improve levodopa efficiency and patient’s quality of life based on highly detailed, mechanistic models of gut physiology endowed with improved extrapolative properties, thus paving the way for precision medical treatment.

Preventive effect of rikkunshito on gastric motor function inhibited by L-dopa in rats

We previously reported that ghrelin prevented l-dopa (LD)-induced inhibition of gastric emptying (GE) of a non-nutrient solution in rats. Parkinson's disease treatment involves the combined administration of l-dopa with the enzyme l-amino acid decarboxylase inhibitor, carbidopa (CD) to reduce peripheral formation of dopamine. We investigated the effect LD/CD given orogastrically (og) on GE of a non-nutrient or nutrient meal and whether og pretreatment with rikkunshito, a kampo medicine clinically used to treat gastroparesis, influenced LD/CD effect on GE and postprandial antral and duodenal motility in conscious rats. LD/CD (20/2 mgkg(-1)) decreased significantly GE to 26.3 ± 6.0% compared to 61.2 ± 3.2% in og vehicle monitored 20-min after a non-nutrient meal and to 41.9 ± 5.8% compared to 72.9 ± 5.2% in og vehicle monitored 60 min after a nutrient meal. Rikkunshito (0.5 or 1.0 g kg(-1)) reduced the LD/CD (20/2 mg kg(-1)) inhibition of GE of non-nutrient meal (36.9 ± 7.4% and 46.6 ± 4.8% respectively vs. 12.1 ± 7.4% in og vehicle plus LD/CD) while having no effect alone (56.6 ± 8.5%). The ghrelin antagonist, [d-Lys(3)]-GHRP-6 (1 mg kg(-1)) injected intraperitoneally partially reversed rikkunshito preventive effect on LD/CD-inhibited GE. Rikkunshito (1.0 g kg(-1)) blocked LD/CD (20/2 mg kg(-1))-induced delayed GE of a nutrient meal and the reduction of postprandial antral motility. In 6-hydroxydopamine-induced Parkinson's disease rat model, rikkunshito (1.0 g kg(-1), og) also prevented LD/CD-inhibited gastric emptying of a nutrient meal and enhanced fasting plasma levels of acylated ghrelin. These data indicate that oral rikkunshito alleviates the delayed GE induced by LD/CD in naïve and PD rat model in part through ghrelin-related mechanisms.

Strategies for Parkinson’s disease care: prevention and management of motor fluctuations

SUMMARY Parkinson’s disease (PD) is characterized clinically by the hallmark motor signs of bradykinesia, rest tremor and rigidity. Current pharmacological management goals include control of motor symptoms as well as prevention and management of motor complications including motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. While the use of levodopa revolutionized the pharmacological management of PD, multiple other agents and strategies have emerged with many demonstrable, albeit sometimes controversial, advantages to a ‘levodopa’ only approach. Despite these developments, the progressive nature of PD requires vigilance and creativity from clinicians as both motor and nonmotor complications grow in number and severity over time.

No effects of l-dopa and bromocriptine on psychophysiological parameters of human selective attention

Patients with schizophrenia exhibit diverse cognitive deficits, one of which is a loss of the ability to focus attention. According to the revised dopamine hypothesis of schizophrenia both an increased mesolimbic and a decreased prefrontal dopaminergic activity is suggested to be involved in schizophrenia. The current study was designed to explore the relationship between dopamine and two psychophysiological parameters of selective attention, i.e. P300 amplitude and processing negativity (PN) in healthy volunteers. In two separate experiments, with a double-blind, balanced and placebo-controlled crossover design, 18 healthy male volunteers were orally administered either 300 mg l-dopa (precursor of dopamine) or placebo (experiment I), or 1.25mg bromocriptine (D2 agonist) or placebo (experiment II). Following this treatment they were tested in an auditory, dichotic selective attention paradigm. An increase in P300 amplitude was found following deviant stimuli when compared to standard stimuli and following attended stimuli when compared to unattended stimuli, regardless of treatment. Similarly, PN was found regardless of treatment. Neither l-dopa nor bromocriptine affected task performance or the amplitudes of PN or P300. In the present study neither l-dopa nor bromocriptine affected PN, P300 amplitude or task performance in healthy controls, phenomena which are usually found to be disrupted in schizophrenia. This indicates that P300 amplitude and PN are neither affected by a global (l-dopa) increased dopaminergic activity, nor by a more selectively towards striatal areas targeted (bromocriptine) increase in dopaminergic activity.

Update on Apomorphine for the Rapid Treatment of Hypomobility (“Off”) Episodes in Parkinson's Disease

As Parkinson's disease progresses, fluctuations between akinesia, or hypomobility ("off" times), and mobility ("on" times) increase in frequency despite optimized pharmacotherapy. Motor fluctuations include predictable shortening of therapeutic effects, nocturnal or early morning akinesia, random hypomobility, and delayed mobility (variable responses to individual doses of drugs). Current oral antiparkinson drugs are inadequate for rapid and consistent relief of symptoms during hypomobility. Apomorphine, an injectable dopamine agonist recently introduced in the United States, is indicated for the management of hypomobility associated with advanced Parkinson's disease. Subcutaneous apomorphine is effective for rapid and consistent rescue from hypomobility, with a magnitude of motor improvement similar to that of levodopa. The effect begins within 20 minutes after dosing and lasts approximately 100 minutes. Therapeutic rescue doses are 2-6 mg, and patients typically require approximately three rescue doses/day. Apomorphine is associated with a clinically significant potential to cause nausea and orthostatic hypotension. These potential effects can be managed with antiemetic prophylaxis and appropriate determination of the therapeutic rescue dose.

Levodopa availability improves with progression of Parkinson’s disease

BACKGROUND

Previous pharmacokinetic trials with standard levodopa formulations showed a different behaviour of levodopa degradation in plasma of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) in various stages.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate associations between levodopa plasma levels in relation to the scored intensity of PD.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

We administered water soluble 100 mg levodopa and 25 mg benserazide to 50 PD patients, taken off medication for at least 12 hours, and assessed the levodopa plasma concentrations during an 180 minutes period under standardised conditions.

RESULTS

The computed area under the curve (AUC) values of levodopa plasma levels were significant higher in advanced PD patients. PD rating scores significantly correlated to the AUC outcomes and the maximum levodopa plasma concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Levodopa availability improves with progression of PD. This may result from deteriorated peripheral activity of levodopa metabolising enzymes or an increasing enteric dysfunction with subsequent better duodenal levodopa absorption or both.

An active transport system in the blood–brain barrier may reduce levodopa availability

Levodopa, the primary drug used to treat patients with Parkinson's disease, is transported into the brain by the facilitative amino acid transporter (L1). We present here an unanticipated discovery: levodopa may be pumped out of the brain by a Na(+)-dependent transport system that couples the naturally occurring Na(+) gradient existing between the brain's extracellular fluid and the cytoplasm of capillary endothelial cells. The activity of this system reduces the net availability of levodopa.

Food-drug interactions

Interactions between food and drugs may inadvertently reduce or increase the drug effect. The majority of clinically relevant food-drug interactions are caused by food-induced changes in the bioavailability of the drug. Since the bioavailability and clinical effect of most drugs are correlated, the bioavailability is an important pharmacokinetic effect parameter. However, in order to evaluate the clinical relevance of a food-drug interaction, the impact of food intake on the clinical effect of the drug has to be quantified as well. As a result of quality review in healthcare systems, healthcare providers are increasingly required to develop methods for identifying and preventing adverse food-drug interactions. In this review of original literature, we have tried to provide both pharmacokinetic and clinical effect parameters of clinically relevant food-drug interactions. The most important interactions are those associated with a high risk of treatment failure arising from a significantly reduced bioavailability in the fed state. Such interactions are frequently caused by chelation with components in food (as occurs with alendronic acid, clodronic acid, didanosine, etidronic acid, penicillamine and tetracycline) or dairy products (ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin), or by other direct interactions between the drug and certain food components (avitriptan, indinavir, itraconazole solution, levodopa, melphalan, mercaptopurine and perindopril). In addition, the physiological response to food intake, in particular gastric acid secretion, may reduce the bioavailability of certain drugs (ampicillin, azithromycin capsules, didanosine, erythromycin stearate or enteric coated, and isoniazid). For other drugs, concomitant food intake may result in an increase in drug bioavailability either because of a food-induced increase in drug solubility (albendazole, atovaquone, griseofulvin, isotretinoin, lovastatin, mefloquine, saquinavir and tacrolimus) or because of the secretion of gastric acid (itraconazole capsules) or bile (griseofulvin and halofantrine) in response to food intake. For most drugs, such an increase results in a desired increase in drug effect, but in others it may result in serious toxicity (halofantrine).

Choice reaction time after levodopa challenge in parkinsonian patients

Various types of choice reaction time paradigms demonstrated deficits in the preparation and execution of movements in parkinsonian subjects. These studies showed controversial results, since they included parkinsonian individuals being: (i) previously untreated; (ii) off; or (iii) on anti-parkinsonian medication. Moreover, these trials do not take into consideration the acute effects of levodopa administration. Objective of this study was to determine the effect of long-term dopaminergic substitution therapy within a standardized levodopa challenge test in combination with a repeatedly performed choice reaction time task in parkinsonian individuals. Parkinsonian participants consisted of previously untreated, so-called "de-novo" patients and of individuals, who were chronically substituted with dopaminergic drugs, but were taken off medication for at least 12 h. All participants took 250 mg levodopa/benserazide after assessment of baseline data. Then we repeatedly measured choice reaction- and movement time within the next 90 min. No significant change of the assessed task data appeared in the "de-novo" group, but reaction- and movement time significantly shortened in previously treated subjects. Sedative effects of levodopa and/or dopaminergic overstimulation hypothetically explain the results of the previously untreated patients, whereas long-term dopaminergic substitution therapy hypothetically causes tolerance to these phenomena in treated parkinsonian individuals. Future studies on parkinsonian subjects should discuss their results on the basic pathophysiology or basal ganglia dysfunction in the light of a putative impact of long-term anti-parkinsonian drug therapy.

The influence of net water absorption on the permeability of antipyrine and levodopa in the human jejunum

Food ingestion can influence the absorption of levodopa in the intestine and thereby contribute to fluctuations of motor functions in Parkinson patients. Obstruction of the active transport of levodopa by amino acids can be one factor. Paracellular drug absorption, a route proposed to be influenced by net transport of water across the intestinal epithelium, might occur for a small and hydrophilic drug such as levodopa. In the present study we studied how luminal L-leucine (60 mmol/L), alone or combined with hypotonicity, might stimulate net water absorption, and levodopa uptake in the human small intestine, since this possibly can contribute to the variable intestinal absorption of levodopa. The Loc-I-Gut perfusion technique was used in 10 healthy volunteers to study the effects of induced net fluid absorption on the small intestinal absorption of levodopa (2.5 mmol/L). An induced net fluid absorption was observed only when L-leucine was combined with a hypoosmolar perfusion solution. However, this did not enhance the intestinal permeability of levodopa. In conclusion, we suggest that the variability in the absorption of levodopa in Parkinson's disease cannot be explained by differences in transmucosal water flux in the human small intestine.

The effect of L-leucine on the absorption of levodopa, studied by regional jejunal perfusion in man

1. A new method for perfusing a 10 cm segment of jejunum in humans has been used in seven subjects to study the effect of the amino acid L-leucine (40 mM) on the intestinal absorption of levodopa (2.5 mM). The tube contains six channels and has two inflatable balloons, which enable a perfusion of a closed and defined segment of the proximal small intestine. 2. L-leucine decreased the intestinal absorption of levodopa from 40 +/- 19 to 21 +/- 15% but was without effect on the absorption of antipyrine, benserazide and D-glucose. 3. We confirm that levodopa is absorbed by the active transport system normally responsible for the absorption of large neutral amino acids (LNAA) in humans. Oral absorption by passive diffusion, probably by the paracellular route, might also occur for levodopa in the proximal part of the small intestine.

Gastric emptying in healthy volunteers after multiple doses of levodopa

1. Oral levodopa frequently produces an episodic delay in gastric emptying which leads to multiple peak concentrations of the drug in plasma. We have studied the effects of multiple dosing of levodopa on gastric emptying and levodopa absorption in eight healthy young volunteers in a randomised two-way cross-over study. 2. The plasma concentration-time curves for levodopa were measured after three oral doses of 125 mg given at 2 h intervals and compared with the concentration-time curve for levodopa following administration of two doses of placebo and a single oral dose of 125 mg. 3. A low incidence of multiple peak plasma concentrations of levodopa was detected after all doses of levodopa. The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) for the final dose of levodopa (150.8 +/- 22.0 micrograms ml-1 min) was lower than for the two preceding doses (205.7 +/- 41.8 and 199.5 +/- 51.8 micrograms ml-1 min) but not different from that of the single dose given at the same time of day (141.7 +/- 29.1 micrograms ml-1 min). This indicates that the lower AUC of the final dose of levodopa was related to the time of administration and not a result of the two preceding doses. 4. The absence of any significant effects of preceding doses of levodopa on gastric emptying was confirmed a) by co-administration of soluble paracetamol, as a marker of gastric emptying, with the second dose of levodopa or placebo and b) by co-administration of radiolabelled DTPA and gamma-camera imaging with the final dose of levodopa on the multiple dosing day and the single dose of levodopa on the placebo day.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)