A comparison of the contractile effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine, sumatriptan and MK-462 on human coronary artery in vitro

Chiral aryloxyalkylamines: Selective 5-HT(1B/1D) activation and analgesic activity

A series of chiral 2,3-dichlorophenoxy and 1-naphthyloxy alkylamines were synthesized, and their binding affinities towards 5-HT(1D) and h5-HT(1B) receptors were evaluated. In the naphthyloxy series, the (R)-prolinol derivative was the most selective 5-HT(1D) ligand, while (S)-N-methyl-2-(1-naphthyloxy)propan-1-amine showed the highest selectivity for h5-HT(1B). Both compounds performed as 5-HT(1D) agonists in the isolated guinea pig assay and showed higher analgesic activity than both sumatriptan and the achiral analogue 20 b in the mouse hot-plate test. Neither ligand displayed any affinity for nicotinic ACh receptors present in mouse brain membranes, thus indicating that their analgesic activity does not arise through interaction with these receptors.

5-HT1B receptor subtype and aging in rat resistance vessels

The effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), 5-carboxamidotryptamine, and sumatriptan on rat caudal arteries were examined, with the goal of finding experimental conditions useful in enhancing the 'silent' 5-HT(1B) receptor subtype. It was shown that both reserpine treatment and K(+) depolarization increased the vasoconstriction by 5-HT receptor agonists. The role of the 5-HT(2A) receptor in vasoconstriction was examined using ritanserin (50 nmol/l), a selective 5-HT(2A) antagonist, whereas that of the 'silent' 5-HT(1B) receptor was examined using SB-224289 (0.2 micromol/l), a selective 5-HT(1B) receptor antagonist. The influence of age on the 'silent' 5-HT(1B) receptor subtype was also investigated; for this, the effect of sumatriptan, a selective 5-HT(1B/1D )agonist, was tested on arterial tissues of both young and old rats which had been either K(+) depolarized or reserpine treated or both. It was found that aging strongly shifted the concentration-vasoconstriction curve generated by sumatriptan to the left, also increasing the maximum contractile response, mainly in reserpine-treated tissues. RT-PCR was used to study the expression of 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(2A) receptors in both young and old tissues. The results support the idea that reserpine-treated and K(+)-depolarized caudal arteries from old rats can be a pharmacological model which is useful in highlighting the 'silent' 5-HT(1B) receptor subtype.

Coronary vasoconstrictor potential of triptans: a review of in vitro pharmacologic data

This article reviews the in vitro pharmacology of the triptans in human isolated coronary arteries. As expected, based on their similar pharmacologic profiles, the triptans cannot be easily differentiated with respect to effects at human isolated coronary arteries. Furthermore, the data show that at therapeutically relevant concentrations, triptans have little potential to cause clinically significant constriction of nondiseased coronary arteries. These data, considered in the context of clinical findings reviewed elsewhere in this supplement, support the conclusion that, while all triptans have the potential to produce small contractions of human isolated coronary arteries, their craniovascular selectivity, when used at therapeutic doses, renders them unlikely to cause serious adverse coronary events in patients with healthy coronary arteries.

Rizatriptan: an update of its use in the management of migraine

Rizatriptan is an orally active serotonin 5-HT(1) receptor agonist that potently and selectively binds to 5-HT(1B/1D) subtypes. Earlier clinical trials demonstrated that rizatriptan 5 or 10mg is more effective than placebo at providing pain relief and a pain-free state, relieving associated symptoms of migraine, normalising functional ability and improving patient quality of life, and showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recently, rizatriptan 10mg was shown to be more effective than zolmitriptan 2.5mg or naratriptan 2.5mg at producing a pain-free state 2 hours postdose. Furthermore, compared with naratriptan, significantly more patients who received rizatriptan were pain free or had pain relief from 1 hour onwards. The number of patients with normal functional ability at 2 hours was significantly higher after rizatriptan than after naratriptan or zolmitriptan. Rizatriptan was also generally more effective than zolmitriptan or naratriptan at relieving migraine-associated symptoms. Rizatriptan is generally well tolerated and adverse events are usually mild and transient. The most common adverse events associated with rizatriptan in recent randomised trials were asthenia/fatigue, dizziness, somnolence and nausea. There was a trend towards a lower incidence of adverse events with rizatriptan compared with zolmitriptan (31.2 vs 38.8%). However, rizatriptan was associated with a significantly higher incidence of adverse events than naratriptan (39 vs 29%). The incidence of chest pain was similar after the administration of rizatriptan, zolmitriptan or naratriptan (2 to 4%).

CONCLUSION

Rizatriptan is an effective drug for the acute treatment of moderate or severe migraine. Oral rizatriptan 5 and 10mg have shown greater efficacy than placebo in providing pain relief, an absence of pain, relief from associated symptoms, normal functional ability and an improvement in patient quality of life. Earlier results showed that rizatriptan provides faster freedom from pain and reduces nausea to a greater extent than oral sumatriptan. More recent studies have shown that rizatriptan 10mg provides faster pain relief and a higher percentage of patients with an absence of pain and normal functional ability at 2 hours than naratriptan 2.5mg or zolmitriptan 2.5mg. The efficacy of rizatriptan is retained when used in the long term and the drug is generally well tolerated. Although well designed studies comparing rizatriptan with almotriptan, eletriptan and frovatriptan would further define the position of rizatriptan, current data suggest rizatriptan should be considered as a first-line treatment option in the management of migraine.

5-HT1B-receptors and vascular reactivity in human isolated blood vessels: assessment of the potential craniovascular selectivity of sumatriptan

AIMS

5-HT1B-receptor mediated vasoconstriction of cranial arteries is a potential mechanism by which 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonists such as sumatriptan produce their antimigraine effects. 5-HT1B-receptors exist in other blood vessels which may give rise to unwanted vascular effects. Therefore we examined the distribution of 5-HT1B-receptor immunoreactivity (i.r.) in human blood vessels (including target and nontarget vessels) and confirmed the functionality of this receptor protein, by comparing the vasoconstrictor effects of sumatriptan and 5-HT (the endogenous ligand) in isolated vessels.

METHODS

Blood vessels (middle meningeal, pial, temporal and uterine arteries and saphenous veins) were obtained from surgical patients (with consent). Sections of the vessels were prepared for routine immunohistochemical studies using specific 5-HT1B- and 5-HT1D-receptor antibodies. For functional studies, ring segments of the vessels were mounted in organ baths for isometric tension recording.

RESULTS

5-HT1B-receptor i.r. was detected on the smooth muscle layer in middle meningeal, pial and uterine arteries and in saphenous vein and sumatriptan produced contractions in these vessels with potency values (mean pEC50) of 7.00, 7.08, 6.44 and 6.61, respectively, the magnitude of contraction was greatest in the cranial arteries with Emax values of 100.7, 60.3, 23.0 and 35.9%, respectively (expressed as a percentage of the reference agonist 45 mm KCl). 5-HT1B-receptor i.r. was not detected in temporal artery and sumatriptan had no effect in this artery. 5-HT1D-receptor i.r. was not detected in any of the vessels studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Sumatriptan can evoke vasoconstriction in antimigraine target vessels and also in nontarget vessels through an action at 5-HT1B-rcceptors. Sumatriptan acts preferentially to cause contraction in human cranial arteries compared with the other blood vessels we examined and this effect is likely to be shared by other drugs of this class.

Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of almotriptan in healthy volunteers

We studied the possible cardiovascular effects of single oral doses of 12.5, 25, and 50 mg of almotriptan, a new triptan for treatment of migraine, in a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo-controlled study in 24 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 35 years. Doses were given at 1-week intervals. Cardiovascular effects were assessed by frequent recording of blood pressure and heart rate, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) (recorded at 25 mm/s paper speed and 1 cm/mV and at 50 mm/s and 2 cm/mV), and continuous ECG monitoring for 12 h after each dose. ECG variables, PR, QRS, QT interval, and QT dispersion, were measured. QT intervals were adjusted for heart rate using Bazett's formula. None of the doses of almotriptan differed significantly from placebo with respect to PR, QRS, or QTc intervals, QTc dispersion, heart rate, or continuous ECG monitoring. Almotriptan 12.5 mg did not differ significantly from placebo with respect to systolic or diastolic blood pressure, but almotriptan 25 and 50 mg raised systolic blood pressure by a mean of 2.78 and 4.17 mm Hg, and diastolic blood pressure by 3.77 and 6.11 mm Hg, respectively, during 0 to 4 h after dosing. Thus none of the doses of almotriptan affected the ECG, and the 12.5-mg dose (the expected therapeutic dose) had no hemodynamic effects. Almotriptan in doses of 25 and 50 mg caused a small, dose-related increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as seen with other triptans.

No contractile effect for 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor agonists in human and bovine cerebral arteries: similarity with human coronary artery

1. Using subtype-selective 5-HT1 receptor agonists and/or the 5-HT1 receptor antagonist GR127935, we characterized in vitro the 5-HT receptor that mediates the contraction of human and bovine cerebral arteries. Further, we investigated which sumatriptan-sensitive receptors are present in human coronary artery by reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). 2. Agonists with affinity at the 5-HT1B receptor, such as sumatriptan, alniditan and/or IS-159, elicited dose-dependent contraction in both human and bovine cerebral arteries. They behaved as full agonists at the sumatriptan-sensitive 5-HT1 receptors in both species. In contrast, PNU-109291 and LY344864, selective agonists at 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptors, respectively, were devoid of any significant vasocontractile activity in cerebral arteries, or did not affect the sumatriptan-induced vasocontraction. The rank order of agonist potency was similar in both species and could be summarized as 5-HT = alniditan > sumatriptan = IS-159 >>> PNU-109291 = LY344864. 3. In bovine cerebral arteries, the 5-HT1 receptor antagonist GR127935 dose-dependently inhibited the vasoconstrictions elicited by both 5-HT and sumatriptan, with respective pA2 values of 8.0 and 8.6. 4. RT-PCR studies in human coronary arteries showed a strong signal for the 5-HT1B receptor while message for the 5-HT1F receptor was weak and less frequently detected. Expression of 5-HT1D receptor mRNA was not detected in any sample. 5. The present results demonstrate that the triptan-induced contraction in brain vessels is mediated exclusively by the 5-HT1B receptor, which is also present in a majority of human coronary arteries. These results suggest that selective 5-HT1D and 5-HT1F receptor agonists might represent new antimigraine drugs devoid of cerebro- and cardiovascular effects.

Rizatriptan: a review of its efficacy in the management of migraine

Rizatriptan is an orally active serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist selective for the 5-HT(1B/1D) subtypes. The efficacy of oral rizatriptan (5 or 10 mg) has been demonstrated in large (n = 309 to 1746) well designed comparative trials with placebo and oral sumatriptan. Two hours postdose, rizatriptan 5 or 10 mg was more effective than placebo at producing pain relief or a pain free status, relieving migraine-associated symptoms and normalising functional ability. In general, rizatriptan 10 mg appeared to be more effective than rizatriptan 5 mg. However, recurrence rates with rizatriptan 5 and 10 mg appeared to be similar to those with placebo. Patients were significantly more likely to achieve pain relief within 2 hours after receiving rizatriptan 5 mg than sumatriptan 25 mg and after rizatriptan 10 mg than sumatriptan 50 mg. This was also observed with rizatriptan 10 mg compared with sumatriptan 100 mg according to an age-adjusted and a prespecified per-protocol analysis. In general, rizatriptan was better than sumatriptan at relieving migraine-associated symptoms, particularly nausea, and in normalising functional ability depending on which doses were compared. The incidence of headache recurrence, time to onset of recurrence and the need for escape medication in nonresponders appeared to be similar between rizatriptan and sumatriptan. Over the 24 hours after the dose, rizatriptan 10 mg improved the quality of life of patients with migraine compared with placebo. Rizatriptan 10 mg also significantly improved work function compared with placebo and with sumatriptan 50 mg. Rizatriptan appears to be well tolerated with most adverse events being mild and transient. The most commonly experienced events included general digestive complaints, general neurological complaints, dizziness, somnolence, asthenia/fatigue and pain and pressure sensations. In clinical trials, the overall incidence of adverse events with rizatriptan 5 or 10 mg was similar to that with sumatriptan 25 or 50 mg but lower than that with sumatriptan 100 mg. Chest pain was reported by 1 to 3% of rizatriptan recipients and by 3 to 6% of patients receiving sumatriptan (25, 50 or 100 mg); clinically significant effects on ECG parameters, heart rate or blood pressure were not observed with rizatriptan.

CONCLUSIONS

Rizatriptan produces pain relief and a pain free status, relieves associated symptoms of migraine, normalises functional ability and improves patient quality of life. Rizatriptan 10 mg appears to be more effective than rizatriptan 5 mg. In comparison with oral sumatriptan, rizatriptan may provide better relief from pain and nausea, with some evidence of a faster onset of action. Thus, rizatriptan 5 or 10 mg is likely to establish a place as an effective and well tolerated agent for the management of acute migraine.

Characterisation of 5-HT receptors in human coronary arteries by molecular and pharmacological techniques

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) can produce both vasoconstrictor and vasorelaxant effects in human coronary arteries and the response to 5-HT can be influenced by the presence of disease. The aim of the present study was to elucidate the 5-HT receptor subtypes responsible for mediating 5-HT-evoked contraction of human coronary arteries using pharmacological, molecular and immunocytochemical approaches. Normal human coronary arteries, with intact endothelium, were mounted in tissue baths, and the vascular responses to 5-HT and 5-HT receptor agonists were studied. The effects of 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptor antagonists on these responses were also studied. Expression of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) encoding different 5-HT receptors in human coronary arteries, atrium, ventricle wall and epicardium was determined using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Southern blot analysis. The expression of 5-HT1B or 5-HT1D receptor protein was studied using subtype selective antibodies and standard immunocytochemical techniques. The rank order of 5-HT receptor agonist potency in causing vasoconstriction was 5-carboxamido tryptamine, (5-CT) > zolmitriptan = BW183C91 (N10-desmethyl zolmitriptan) = alpha-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (alpha-CH3-5-HT) = 5-HT = sumatriptan > 2-methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine (2-CH3-5-HT) = 8-hydroxy-DPAT (8-OH-DPAT). Alpha-CH3-5-HT, 5-CT, 5-HT, zolmitriptan and BW 183C91 were significantly more potent (approximately 3-fold) than sumatriptan and 2-CH3-5-HT, which in turn were more potent than 8-OH-DPAT. Ketanserin and methiothepin (5-HT2 and 5-HT1 receptor antagonists, respectively) caused parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-effect curves to alpha-CH3-5-HT or 5-CT, respectively, without changing the maximum contractile response. In human coronary arteries, atrium. ventricle and epicardium. RT-PCR products corresponding to the human 5-HT2A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1F receptors were expressed in high levels, mRNAs coding for 5-HT7, 5-HT1A and 5-HT1D receptors were only weakly expressed. No 5-HT1F receptor mRNA was detected. In coronary arteries there was a differential expression of 5-HT1B versus 5-HT1D receptor mRNAs, with 5-HT1B mRNAs being found in greater abundance. Dense 5-HT1B-immunoreactivity was detected on smooth muscle layer within coronary artery, however, 5-HT1D-immunoreactivity was not detected. It is concluded that 5-HT-evoked contraction of human coronary arteries is most probably mediated via the activation of both 5-HT1B and 5-HT2A receptors.

Characterisation of the 5-HT receptor binding profile of eletriptan and kinetics of [3H]eletriptan binding at human 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors

The affinity of eletriptan ((R)-3-(1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinylmethyl)-5-[2-(phenylsulphonyl )ethyl]-1H-indole) for a range of 5-HT receptors was compared to values obtained for other 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists known to be effective in the treatment of migraine. Eletriptan, like sumatriptan, zolmitriptan, naratriptan and rizatriptan had highest affinity for the human 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D and putative 5-ht1f receptor. Kinetic studies comparing the binding of [3H]eletriptan and [3H]sumatriptan to the human recombinant 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors expressed in HeLa cells revealed that both radioligands bound with high specificity (>90%) and reached equilibrium within 10-15 min. However, [3H]eletriptan had over 6-fold higher affinity than [3H]sumatriptan at the 5-HT1D receptor (K(D)): 0.92 and 6.58 nM, respectively) and over 3-fold higher affinity than [3H]sumatriptan at the 5-HT1B receptor (K(D): 3.14 and 11.07 nM, respectively). Association and dissociation rates for both radioligands could only be accurately determined at the 5-HT1D receptor and then only at 4 degrees C. At this temperature, [3H]eletriptan had a significantly (P<0.05) faster association rate (K(on) 0.249 min(-1) nM(-1)) than [3H]sumatriptan (K(on) 0.024 min(-1) nM(-1)) and a significantly (P<0.05) slower off-rate (K(off) 0.027 min(-1) compared to 0.037 min(-1) for [3H]sumatriptan). These data indicate that eletriptan is a potent ligand at the human 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D, and 5-ht1f receptors and are consistent with its potent vasoconstrictor activity and use as a drug for the acute treatment of migraine headache.

3-(Piperazinylpropyl)indoles: selective, orally bioavailable h5-HT1D receptor agonists as potential antimigraine agents

Clinically effective antimigraine drugs such as Sumatriptan have similar affinity at h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptors. In the search for a h5-HT1D-selective agonist as an antimigraine agent, a novel series of 3-(propylpiperazinyl)indoles have been synthesized and evaluated at h5-HT1D and h5-HT1B receptors. This class of compounds has provided subnanomolar, fully efficacious h5-HT1D agonists with up to 200-fold selectivity for the h5-HT1D receptor over the h5-HT1B receptor. Unlike other h5-HT1D-selective series, several propylpiperazines demonstrate good oral bioavailability. The optimum compound was 1-(3-[5-(1,2, 4-triazol-4-yl)-1H-indol-3-yl]propyl)-4-(2-(3-fluorophenyl)ethyl)p ipe razine (7f) which has excellent selectivity for h5-HT1D receptors over other 5-HT receptor subtypes and good oral bioavailability in three species. Compound 7f has been selected for further investigation as a potential development candidate in the treatment of migraine.

Effects of the novel antimigraine agent, frovatriptan, on coronary and cardiac function in dogs

The effects of frovatriptan (VML 251/SB-209509) on coronary artery function were investigated in isolated coronary arteries from beagle dogs. Low concentrations of frovatriptan produced contraction with -logEC50 7.55 +/- 0.08 (n = 11). The maximal observed contraction attained was 56 +/- 7% of the control 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 10 microM) response. At high concentrations of frovatriptan (>6 microM), reversal of sumatriptan (10 microM)-induced contractions was noted. In arteries precontracted with the thromboxane mimetic, U46619, frovatriptan produced a bell-shaped concentration-response relation with a maximal response at 600 nM. Concentrations of frovatriptan >2 microM produced marked reversal of tone, with full relaxation of precontracted tissues at 200 microM. In anesthetized, open-chest mongrel dogs, intravenous (n = 5) or intracoronary (n = 5) artery administration of frovatriptan (0.0001-1 mg/kg) had no consistent effect on left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left end-systolic pressure, cardiac contractility, aortic blood flow, systemic peripheral resistance, coronary blood flow, coronary vascular resistance, mean arterial blood pressure, or heart rate when compared with vehicle (n = 3). Intravenous sumatriptan produced minor effects on blood pressure and heart rate. Intracoronary artery administration of sumatriptan (0.0003 mg/kg) produced an increase in systemic peripheral resistance to 120.5 +/- 8.2% compared with vehicle (97.8 +/- 5.4%; p < 0.05). This dose of sumatriptan also produced a significant increase in coronary blood flow and decrease in coronary vascular resistance. Intravenous administration of sumatriptan produced a dose-related reduction in left ventricular diastolic pressure with a reduction to 58.3 +/- 8.3% and 41.7 +/- 25% of control values observed at 0.3 and 1 mg/kg, respectively; however, administration of sumatriptan by an intracoronary route had no effect. In a model of myocardial infarction, comparable doses of sumatriptan (1.0 mg/kg) or frovatriptan (0.1 mg/kg), in terms of their effect on carotid vascular resistance, had no significant effect on infarct size. Frovatriptan had no effect on coronary blood flow after reperfusion; however, sumatriptan produced a significant reduction in coronary blood flow for < or =3 h. These studies show that frovatriptan has the capability of relaxing coronary arteries in vitro, has no overall effect on cardiac function at rest with no effect on coronary hemodynamics after myocardial infarction, and has a profile superior to that of sumatriptan.

A practical guide to the management and prevention of migraine

Migraine is a paroxysmal disorder with attacks of headache, nausea, vomiting, photo- and phonophobia and malaise. Mild migraine attacks are treated with antiemetics followed by analgesics such as aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), paracetamol (acetaminophen) or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Moderate to severe attacks are treated by antiemetics combined with ergotamine or dihydroergotamine. Sumatriptan, a specific serotonin 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, is used if attacks do not respond to ergotamine or if intolerable adverse effects occur. The new migraine drugs zolmitriptan, naratriptan, rizatriptan and eletriptan differ in their pharmacological profile from sumatriptan, but this translates into only minor differences in efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse effects. Migraine prophylaxis should be implemented when more than 3 attacks occur per month, if attacks do not respond to acute treatment or if the adverse effects of acute treatment are severe. Substances with proven efficacy include the beta-blockers metoprolol and propranolol and the calcium antagonist flunarizine. Drugs less effective or those with unpleasant adverse effects are the serotonin receptor antagonists (pizotifen, methysergide and lisuride), dihydroergotamine, cyclandelate, NSAIDs, valproic acid (sodium valproate) and amitriptyline. The efficacy of aspirin or magnesium is still under evaluation.

Effects of sumatriptan on coronary flow and left ventricular function in the isolated perfused guinea pig heart

The effects of the 5-HT1B/D receptor agonist, sumatriptan, on coronary flow (CF) and left ventricular function in the isolated perfused guinea pig heart were investigated in the presence and absence of coronary endothelial dysfunction induced by nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibition with Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10 microM). Hearts were perfused under constant pressure (80 cm H2O) with oxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2) Krebs bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.4) and were driven at 4 Hz. In the absence of L-NAME (n=37), sumatriptan (0.1-32 microM) failed statistically significantly to affect left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP; maximal change, -8.1+/-1.8%; NS vs. vehicle), left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP; +10.4+/-9.8%, NS), or CF (-12.2+/-1.4%; NS compared with vehicle). L-NAME per se significantly reduced coronary flow (CF; -26.3+/-2.9%; p < 0.001), thereby increasing coronary vascular tone, and decreased LVDP (-17.1+/-1.8%; p < 0.01). In hearts perfused with L-NAME (10 microM; n=61), sumatriptan (0.1-32 microM) still failed significantly to affect CF (maximal change, 0.2+/-5.7%, NS) but concentration-dependently increased LVEDP [maximal increase, 89.0+/-30.3%; p < 0.05; geometric mean EC50 3.6 (2.9-5.7) microM], which was not prevented by the 5-HT1B/D receptor antagonist, GR 127935 (0.1 microM; maximal increase, 51.8+/-11.1%; n=48, NS compared with sumatriptan alone). In conclusion, sumatriptan failed significantly to affect CF even in the presence of endothelial dysfunction. LV function similarly remained unaffected in normal hearts, but sumatriptan produced diastolic contracture in the presence of coronary endothelial dysfunction by a mechanism apparently not involving 5-HT1B/D receptors. Collectively the data indicate that 5-HT1B/D receptor expression or effector coupling or both are absent or low in the guinea pig heart, because no detectable functional responses were observed.

Effects of the novel high-affinity 5-HT(1B/1D)-receptor ligand frovatriptan in human isolated basilar and coronary arteries

The contractile actions of the novel high-affinity 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT(1B/1D)) ligand, frovatriptan (formerly VML 251/SB-209509) were investigated in human isolated basilar and coronary arteries in which the endothelium had been removed. Basilar arteries were obtained post mortem, and coronary arteries were obtained from patients undergoing heart transplant (recipient) or from donor hearts that were not suitable for transplant. Frovatriptan was a potent contractile agent in isolated basilar artery with a -log mean effective concentration (EC50) value of 7.86 +/- 0.07 and intrinsic activity of 1.25 +/- 0.10 relative to 5-HT (n = 4). Frovatriptan was 8.5-fold more potent than sumatriptan, which produced a -log EC50 value of 6.93 +/- 0.09 and intrinsic activity 11.1 +/- 0.08 relative to 5-HT (n = 4). In coronary arteries, frovatriptan produced contraction with -log EC50 values of 7.38 +/- 0.12 and 7.81 +/- 0.2 in recipient (n = 7) and donor (n = 3) arteries, respectively. The relative degree of contraction of frovatriptan was lower than that of 5-HT, with relative intrinsic activities of 0.42 +/- 0.06 and 0.40 +/- 0.09, respectively. Sumatriptan produced contraction of human recipient and donor arteries with -log EC50 values (intrinsic activity) of 6.57 +/- 0.13 (0.79 +/- 0.27; n = 6) and 7.35 (1.41; n = 2), respectively. Furthermore, marked bell-shaped responses were apparent for frovatriptan in coronary arteries, with relaxation occurring at concentrations >6 microM in some tissues. In contrast, no bell-shaped concentration-response curves were apparent for sumatriptan or 5-HT. Threshold concentrations for frovatriptan-induced contractions were also different between basilar (>2 nM) and coronary arteries (>20 nM). No separation of threshold activity was observed with sumatriptan or 5-HT. These data show that frovatriptan produces constriction of human isolated basilar and coronary arteries. However, frovatriptan produces a complex pharmacologic response in the coronary artery, with threshold contractile activity requiring approximately 10-fold greater concentrations of agonist than in the basilar artery. Frovatriptan also shows a differential pharmacologic profile compared with sumatriptan in coronary arteries, with reversal of tone predominating at high concentration.

Coronary side-effect potential of current and prospective antimigraine drugs

BACKGROUND

The antimigraine drugs ergotamine and sumatriptan may cause angina-like symptoms, possibly resulting from coronary artery constriction. We compared the coronary vasoconstrictor potential of a number of current and prospective antimigraine drugs (ergotamine, dihydroergotamine, methysergide and its metabolite methylergometrine, sumatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan, rizatriptan, avitriptan).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Concentration-response curves to the antimigraine drugs were constructed in human isolated coronary artery segments to obtain the maximum contractile response (Emax) and the concentration eliciting 50% of Emax (EC50). The EC50 values were related to maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) reported in patients, obtaining Cmax/EC50 ratios as an index of coronary vasoconstriction occurring in the clinical setting. Furthermore, we studied the duration of contractile responses after washout of the acutely acting antimigraine drugs to assess their disappearance from the receptor biophase. Compared with sumatriptan, all drugs were more potent (lower EC50 values) in contracting the coronary artery but had similar efficacies (Emax <25% of K+-induced contraction). The Cmax of avitriptan was 7- to 11-fold higher than its EC50 value, whereas those of the other drugs were <40% of their respective EC50 values. The contractile responses to ergotamine and dihydroergotamine persisted even after repeated washings, but those to the other drugs declined rapidly after washing.

CONCLUSIONS

All current and prospective antimigraine drugs contract the human coronary artery in vitro, but in view of low efficacy, these drugs are unlikely to cause myocardial ischemia at therapeutic plasma concentrations in healthy subjects. In patients with coronary artery disease, however, these drugs must remain contraindicated. The sustained contraction by ergotamine and dihydroergotamine seems to be an important disadvantage compared with sumatriptan-like drugs.

Sumatriptan. An updated review of its use in migraine

Sumatriptan is a selective agonist at serotonin 5-HT1-like receptors, including 5-HT1B/1D subtypes. It is an effective treatment for acute migraine attacks and the injectable form has also shown efficacy in the treatment of cluster headaches. In placebo-controlled clinical trials, sumatriptan, administered subcutaneously, orally, intranasally or rectally was significantly more effective than placebo in relieving migraine headache and in producing resolution or reduction of other symptoms associated with migraine, including nausea, photophobia and phonophobia. Improvements in clinical disability were also significantly greater after sumatriptan than after placebo. Headache recurred in 21 to 57% of patients who received oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan, but most patients responded to a second dose of the drug. Results of comparative trials showed that subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg was significantly more effective than either patients' usual antimigraine treatments or intranasal dihydroergotamine mesylate 1 mg in relieving migraine headache. Subcutaneous sumatriptan 6 mg and subcutaneous dihydroergotamine mesylate 1 mg provided similarly effective migraine relief, but the headache recurrence rate was significantly higher after sumatriptan than after this formulation of dihydroergotamine mesylate. Response rates achieved after oral sumatriptan were similar to those reported after treatment with oral naratriptan, rizatriptan or lysine acetylsalicylate plus metoclopramide. Treatment of acute migraine attacks with oral or subcutaneous sumatriptan leads to less loss of workplace productivity than other antimigraine therapies. Several pharmacoeconomic analyses showed that gains in workplace productivity in sumatriptan recipients ranged from 12.1 to 89.8 hours per patient per year. Significant improvements from baseline in overall health-related quality-of-life scores were also experienced by sumatriptan recipients. Sumatriptan is generally well tolerated. Nausea, vomiting, malaise and fatigue are the most common adverse events with oral sumatriptan. Injection site reactions occur in 10 to 40% of patients receiving the drug subcutaneously. A bitter taste at the back of the mouth occurs frequently after intranasal administration. Serious adverse events occur in about 0.14% of patients with migraine treated with sumatriptan. As the drug is associated with the rare development of cardiovascular effects, it is contraindicated in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its relatively high acquisition cost, reductions in lost workplace productivity experienced by patients treated with sumatriptan may result in savings in the overall cost of migraine to society. Thus, sumatriptan is a useful first- or second-line treatment option for patients with moderate or severe migraine.

Contractile responses evoked by dihydroergotamine, naratriptan and sumatriptan in the canine isolated coronary artery

Contractile responses evoked by the 5-HT IB/D receptor agonists, dihydroergotamine, naratriptan and sumatriptan, were compared in canine isolated coronary artery rings before and after endothelial dysfunction as obtained by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with Nw-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10 microM). The three agonists contracted rings in the potency order of dihydroergotamine (geometric mean pD2 value with 95% confidence limits in parentheses: 6.9 [5.3-7.9] and 7.0 [5.4-7.3] in the absence and presence of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition [I], respectively) > or = naratriptan (6.8 [5.7-7.3] and 6.4 [5.7-6.6]) > sumatriptan (4.8 [3.6-5.6] and 5.0 [3.6-5.6]) independently of the presence or absence of L-NAME. In absence of L-NAME, efficacy, as assessed by the mean maximal contractile response (Emax), tended to be greater, although not significantly, for sumatriptan and naratriptan compared to dihydroergotamine. L-NAME per se markedly increased developed tension (43.0 +/- 4.6 mN; n = 50) and potentiated maximal responses (0.6 +/- 0.2 and 10.7 +/- 2.4 mN for dihydroergotamine in the absence and presence of L-NAME respectively; 1.7 +/- 0.6 and 18.7 +/- 3.7 mN for naratriptan; 2.5 +/- 0.6 and 21.3 +/- 3.8 mN for sumatriptan; P < 0.01 in each case). Emax values of sumatriptan and naratriptan were greater than those produced by dihydroergotamine in the presence of L-NAME but remained lower than the sub-maximal contractile responses evoked by the thromboxane A2 analogue, U-46619 (ie, 32.4 +/- 5.2 mN in the absence of L-NAME; n = 50), or L-NAME per se. In conclusion, 5-HT IB/D receptor agonist efficacies in contracting coronary arteries are relatively low under basal conditions and are potentiated in the presence of a dysfunctional endothelium, whereas agonist potencies remain unaffected.

Migraine therapy: relationship between serotonergic contractile receptors in canine and rabbit saphenous veins to human cerebral and coronary arteries

Canine and rabbit vascular contractile responses to serotonergic agonists have been used to predict antimigraine efficacy for several antimigraine agents, including sumatriptan. The purpose of the present study was to establish the assumed predictive value of contractile responses in canine and rabbit saphenous veins to contractile efficacy for a series of agonists in human cerebral and coronary arteries and to understand better the receptors mediating such responses. The canine and rabbit saphenous veins contracted similarly (both qualitatively and quantitatively) to a series of structurally diverse serotonergic agonists, suggesting that the receptors mediating serotonin-induced contractility in these tissues were similar. In addition, the contractile potency (estimated as EC50 values) for these structurally diverse serotonergic agonists in either the rabbit or canine saphenous vein significantly correlated with contractile potency for these agonists in human cerebral arteries. Thus, to the extent that contractile responsiveness of human cerebral arteries may predict antimigraine agents, contractile responses of the rabbit and/or canine saphenous vein may be useful surrogates for antimigraine efficacy. In addition, the contractile potency for this series of serotonergic agonists in the rabbit or canine saphenous vein significantly correlated with contractile potency of these agonists in human coronary arteries. These data suggest that the use of the saphenous vein to identify potent vasoconstrictors will also reveal agents capable of contracting human coronary arteries, a liability for using this approach to evaluate promising antimigraine therapies.