Treatment of nasal polyps with intranasal beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol

Adverse Events Associated with Intranasal Sprays: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Database and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Intranasal sprays (INSs) are commonly used medications for the treatment of many rhinologic conditions. Despite their popularity, an analysis of a nationwide reporting database and comparison to the available literature has never been performed.

METHODS

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was accessed to obtain adverse event (AE) records from 2014 to 2019 for varying INSs, including: 10 corticosteroids, 1 alpha adrenergic, and 3 antihistamines. The Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR) and Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) were calculated for dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache. A PRR ≥ 2 or ROR ≥ 1 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Corticosteroids had 98 864 total reported AEs to the database, followed by antihistamines (7011) and alpha adrenergics (2071). In total, dyspnea was reported 5843 times, followed by headache (4230), epistaxis (1205), ageusia/dysgeusia (920), and anosmia (312). Overall, PRR and ROR values for dyspnea ranged from 0.51 to 4.25 and 0.51 to 4.49; for dysgeusia/ageusia from 0.56 to 6.09 and 0.56 to 6.12; and for epistaxis from 1.03 to 27.24 and 1.03 to 30.76, respectively. All medications which listed anosmia within the top AEs had PRR and ROR values exceeding 2 and 1, respectively. The PRR for headache exceeded 2 for 1 medication and the ROR exceeded 1 in 7 medications.

CONCLUSION

The AEs of dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache are reported within the FAERS database for commonly prescribed INSs. When compared against the existing scientific literature, the clinical significance of this reporting tool from the FDA for these classes of medications remains unvalidated.

International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021

I.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BACKGROUND: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR-RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR-RS-2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence-based findings of the document.

METHODS

ICAR-RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence-based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence-based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary.

RESULTS

ICAR-RS-2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence-based management algorithm is provided.

CONCLUSION

This ICAR-RS-2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence-based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS.

Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

This review is one of six looking at the primary medical management options for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.Chronic rhinosinusitis is common and is characterised by inflammation of the lining of the nose and paranasal sinuses leading to nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea, facial pressure/pain and loss of sense of smell. The condition can occur with or without nasal polyps. The use of topical (intranasal) corticosteroids has been widely advocated for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis given the belief that inflammation is a major component of this condition.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of intranasal corticosteroids in people with chronic rhinosinusitis.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2015, Issue 8); MEDLINE; EMBASE; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 11 August 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up period of at least three months comparing intranasal corticosteroids (e.g. beclomethasone dipropionate, triamcinolone acetonide, flunisolide, budesonide) against placebo or no treatment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcomes were disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL), patient-reported disease severity and the commonest adverse event - epistaxis. Secondary outcomes included general HRQL, endoscopic nasal polyp score, computerised tomography (CT) scan score and the adverse events of local irritation or other systemic adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome; this is indicated in italics.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 18 RCTs with a total of 2738 participants. Fourteen studies had participants with nasal polyps and four studies had participants without nasal polyps. Only one study was conducted in children. Intranasal corticosteroids versus placebo or no intervention Only one study (20 adult participants without polyps) measured our primary outcome disease-specific HRQL using the Rhinosinusitis Outcome Measures-31 (RSOM-31). They reported no significant difference (numerical data not available) (very low quality evidence).Our second primary outcome, disease severity , was measured using the Chronic Sinusitis Survey in a second study (134 participants without polyps), which found no important difference (mean difference (MD) 2.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.02 to 10.70; scale 0 to 100). Another study (chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps) reported an increased chance of improvement in the intranasal corticosteroids group (RR 2.78, 95% CI 1.76 to 4.40; 109 participants). The quality of the evidence was low.Six studies provided data on at least two of the individual symptoms used in the EPOS 2012 criteria to define chronic rhinosinusitis (nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea, loss of sense of smell and facial pain/pressure). When all four symptoms in the EPOS criteria were available on a scale of 0 to 3 (higher = more severe symptoms), the average MD in change from baseline was -0.26 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.15; 243 participants; two studies; low quality evidence). Although there were more studies and participants when only nasal blockage and rhinorrhoea were considered (MD -0.31, 95% CI -0.38 to -0.24; 1702 participants; six studies), the MD was almost identical to when loss of sense of smell was also considered (1345 participants, four studies; moderate quality evidence).When considering the results for the individual symptoms, benefit was shown in the intranasal corticosteroids group. The effect size was larger for nasal blockage (MD -0.40, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.29; 1702 participants; six studies) than for rhinorrhoea (MD -0.25, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.17; 1702 participants; six studies) or loss of sense of smell (MD -0.19, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.11; 1345 participants; four studies). There was heterogeneity in the analysis for facial pain/pressure (MD -0.27, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.02; 243 participants; two studies). The quality of the evidence was moderate for nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea and loss of sense of smell, but low for facial pain/pressure.There was an increased risk of epistaxis with intranasal corticosteroids (risk ratio (RR) 2.74, 95% CI 1.88 to 4.00; 2508 participants; 13 studies; high quality evidence).Considering our secondary outcome, general HRQL, one study (134 participants without polyps) measured this using the SF-36 and reported a statistically significant benefit only on the general health subscale. The quality of the evidence was very low.It is unclear whether there is a difference in the risk of local irritation (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.64; 2124 participants; 11 studies) (low quality evidence).None of the studies treated or followed up patients long enough to provide meaningful data on the risk of osteoporosis or stunted growth (children). Other comparisons We identified no other studies that compared intranasal corticosteroids plus co-intervention A versus placebo plus co-intervention A.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most of the evidence available was from studies in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. There is little information about quality of life (very low quality evidence). For disease severity, there seems to be improvement for all symptoms (low quality evidence), a moderate-sized benefit for nasal blockage and a small benefit for rhinorrhoea (moderate quality evidence). The risk of epistaxis is increased (high quality evidence), but these data included all levels of severity; small streaks of blood may not be a major concern for patients. It is unclear whether there is a difference in the risk of local irritation (low quality evidence).

WITHDRAWN: Topical steroids for nasal polyps

Review withdrawn from Issue 4, 2016. Replaced by new reviews 'Intranasal steroids versus placebo or no intervention for chronic rhinosinusitis' (Chong 2016a) and 'Different types of intranasal steroids for chronic rhinosinusitis' (Chong 2016b).

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Intranasal corticosteroids for nasal polyposis : biological rationale, efficacy, and safety

Nasal polyposis, occurring in about 2% of the general population, is the ultimate form of inflammation of the upper airways. For unknown reasons, polyps develop preferentially in subtypes of inflammatory diseases and are associated with perennial non-allergic rhinitis, asthma, intolerance of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid)/NSAIDs, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, cystic fibrosis, and primary ciliary dyskinesia. In contrast to common beliefs, IgE-mediated allergy does not seem to play an etiological role in nasal polyposis.The polyps originate from the mucosa around the clefts of the lateral nasal wall, especially in the region of the ostiomeatal complex. The factors that determine the localization of the disease to a few square centimeters of the airways are not known.Polyps are edematous bags covered by respiratory epithelium and contain very few nerves, blood vessels, and glands that have undergone cystic degeneration. They contain degranulated mast cells, have a very high concentration of histamine, and are characteristically infiltrated by eosinophils. These cells accumulate due to the release of proinflammatory cytokines (in particular, interleukin-5).Nasal polyposis is preceded by a prolonged history of rhinitis accompanied by severe and persistent nasal blockage; typically, the sense of smell is seriously impaired when polyps develop. The diagnosis is based on anterior rhinoscopy or, preferably, endoscopy.Nasal polyposis is medically treatable. Surgical treatment is carried out when medication fails. Intranasal corticosteroids reduce rhinitis symptoms, improve nasal breathing, reduce the size of polyps, and prevent, in part, their recurrence, but this treatment has little effect on the sense of smell. Intranasal corticosteroids can, as basic long-term therapy, be used alone in mild cases or together with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery in severe cases. Systemic corticosteroids administered for 2-3 weeks have a beneficial effect on all observed symptoms and pathology, including the sense of smell. When nasal blockage is a problem in spite of medical treatment, surgery is recommended. Simple polypectomy can be performed, but endoscopic surgery is recommended in more severe and persistent cases.

Mucin 1 downregulation associates with corticosteroid resistance in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

A number of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) are resistant to oral corticosteroids. Mucin 1 (MUC1) shows anti-inflammatory properties, and its cytoplasmic tail (CT) interacts with transcription factors, facilitating their nuclear translocation. Because glucocorticoid receptor (GR) nuclear translocation is key to the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids, we hypothesized that MUC1 is involved in the effectiveness of corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the role of MUC1 in corticosteroid effectiveness in different cohorts of patients with CRSwNP and elucidate the possible mechanisms involved.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients with CRSwNP took oral corticosteroids for 15 days. Corticosteroid resistance was evaluated by nasal endoscopy. The expression of MUC1 and MUC1 CT was evaluated by real-time PCR, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. Beas-2B knockdown with RNA interference for MUC1 (siRNA-MUC1) was used to analyze the role of MUC1 in the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients had nasal polyps that were resistant to oral corticosteroids (NP-CR). MUC1 expression was downregulated in these patients. Primary epithelial cells from patients with NP-CR were insensitive to the anti-inflammatory effects of dexamethasone. In siRNA-MUC1 Beas-2B, dexamethasone showed weaker anti-inflammatory effects, a reduced inhibition of phospho-extracellular-signal-regulated kinases 1/2, a less severe mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase 1 increase, and a reduced GR nuclear translocation. Immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that MUC1-CT and GRα form protein complexes and translocate to the nucleus in response to dexamethasone. MUC1-CT-GRα complex was downregulated in NP-CR tissue.

CONCLUSION

MUC1-CT participates in the corticosteroid response that mediates GRα nuclear translocation. The low expression of MUC1 in patients with CRSwNP may participate in corticosteroid resistance.

Sinus surgery and delivery method influence the effectiveness of topical corticosteroids for chronic rhinosinusitis: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) use either nasal delivery (nasal drop or nasal spray) or sinus delivery (sinus catheter or sinus irrigation) in patients with or without sinus surgery. This influences topical drug delivery and distribution. The effect of these factors on the published results of RCTs is assessed. This systematic review explores the strength of evidence supporting the influence of sinus surgery and delivery methods on the effectiveness of topical steroids in studies for CRS with meta-analyses.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of RCTs comparing INCS with either placebo or no intervention for treating CRS. Data were extracted for meta-analysis and subgroup analyses by sinus surgery status and topical delivery methods.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies (3961 patients) met the inclusion criteria. INCS improved overall symptoms (standardized mean difference [SMD], -0.49; p < 0.00001) and the proportion of responders (risk ratio [RR], 0.59; p < 0.00001) compared with placebo. It decreased nasal polyp size with a greater proportion of responders (RR, 0.48; p < 0.00001) and prevented polyp recurrence (RR, 0.59; p = 0.0004) compared with placebo. Reduction of polyp size was greater in patients with sinus surgery (RR, 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20, 0.48) than those without (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.46, 0.81; p = 0.009). Greater symptom improvement occurred when sinus delivery methods (SMD, -1.32; 95% CI, -2.26, -0.38) were compared with nasal delivery methods (SMD, -0.38; 95% CI, -0.55, -0.22; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

INCS is effective for CRS. Prior sinus surgery and direct sinus delivery enhance the effectiveness of INCS in CRS.

Chronic rhinosinusitis and emerging treatment options

This review describes the epidemiology and various treatments in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Evidence for short-term use of systemic corticosteroids has been shown to be favorable in CRSwNP, but still limited in CRSsNP. Topical corticosteroids improve symptom scores in both CRS subgroups. The role of microbes in CRS is still controversial. Culture-directed antibiotics are recommended for CRSsNP with exacerbation. Long-term use of low dosage antibiotics is recommended for CRSsNP for their anti-inflammatory effects. Other emerging treatment options are also discussed.

Brazilian Academy of Rhinology position paper on topical intranasal therapy

This documents aims at educating those who treat sinonasal diseases - both general practitioners and specialists - about topical nasal treatments. By means of scientific evidence reviews, the Brazilian Academy of Rhinology provides its practical and updated guidelines on the most utilized topical nasal medication, except for the drugs that have topical antibiotics in their formulas.

Role of medical therapy in the management of nasal polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa that, despite differing hypotheses regarding its cause, remains poorly understood. Major symptoms are nasal congestion or blockage, loss of smell, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, and facial pain or pressure. Among the objectives of CRSwNP management are to eradicate nasal polyps from nasal and sinusal cavities, eliminate symptoms, and prevent recurrences. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment and are the most effective drugs for treating CRSwNP. Other potential treatments are nasal saline irrigation and antihistamines (in allergic conditions). Endoscopic sinus surgery is recommended when medical treatment fails. After surgery, medical treatment, including nasal and oral corticosteroids, is recommended.

Topical steroids for nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) represents inflammatory changes throughout the nose and sinuses from a group of disorders which all lead to swelling and overgrowth of the nasal mucosa. Topical corticosteroids have been the most widely used treatment, with each clinician using different regimes, at different doses, in different settings and with or without sinus surgery. CRSwNP requires ongoing medical management to prevent recurrence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of topical corticosteroids on CRSwNP and to analyse various subgroups, including patients who had sinus surgery immediately prior to the delivery of the corticosteroids, surgery any time prior to the topical corticosteroids or patients who had never had previous surgery. Also to assess the most effective dose and delivery methods for topical corticosteroids.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Group Trials Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); PubMed; EMBASE; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 10 April 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials studying topical corticosteroids for patients with CRSwNP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

At least two authors reviewed the search results and selected trials meeting the eligibility criteria, obtaining full texts and contacting authors. We documented our justification for the exclusion of studies. At least two authors extracted data using a pre-determined, standardised data form.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty studies (3624 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The trials were at low (21 trials), medium (13 trials) and high (six trials) risk of bias. The primary outcomes were sino-nasal symptoms, polyp size and polyp recurrence after surgery. When compared to placebo, topical corticosteroids improved overall symptom scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.46; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.65 to -0.27, P < 0.00001; seven trials, n = 445) and had a higher proportion of patients whose symptoms improved (responders) (risk ratio (RR) 1.71; 95% CI 1.29 to 2.26, P = 0.0002; four trials, n = 234). Topical corticosteroids also decreased the polyp score (SMD -0.73; 95% CI -1.00 to -0.46, P < 0.00001; three trials, n = 237) and had a greater proportion of patients with a reduction in polyp size (responders) (RR 2.09; 95% CI 1.65 to 2.64, P < 0.00001; eight trials, n = 785) when compared to placebo. Topical corticosteroids also prevented polyp recurrence after surgery (RR 0.59; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79, P = 0.0004; six trials, n = 437). Subgroup analyses by sinus surgery status revealed a greater benefit in reduction of polyp score when topical steroid was administered any time after sinus surgery (SMD -1.19; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.83) compared to patients who had never had surgery (SMD -0.13; 95% CI -0.53 to 0.28, P < 0.00001). There was no difference between groups in terms of adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Topical corticosteroids are a beneficial treatment for CRSwNP and the adverse effects are minor, with benefits outweighing the risks. They improve symptoms, reduce polyp size and prevent polyp recurrence after surgery. Patients having sinus surgery may have a greater response to topical corticosteroids but further research is required.

The effects of systemic, topical, and intralesional steroid treatments on apoptosis level of nasal polyps

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the apoptotic responses to systemic, topical, and intrapolyp injection of glucocorticoid with no treatment in nasal polyps.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled study.

SETTING

Tertiary training hospital.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study was performed on 48 patients with nasal polyposis in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology between 2008 and 2009. Patients were assigned to 1 of 4 groups of 12 patients. Group A was treated with oral methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/d, and the dose was tapered gradually. Group B received 0.3 mL triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg/mL), which was injected into polyp tissue. Group C was treated with topical 55 µg triamcinolone acetonide 2 times daily for 1 month. Group D received no medication. Samples were collected endoscopically after the seventh day for groups A and B, the first month for group C, and the first visit for group D. Apoptotic indexes were determined using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling method.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences in apoptotic index were found between each steroid-medicated group and the control group (P (D-A) = .0001; P (D-B) = .003; P (D-C) = .026) and between groups A and C (P (A-C) = .012). Group B did not differ significantly from either group A or C (P (A-B) = .11; P (B-C) = .75).

CONCLUSIONS

The apoptotic index in nasal polyps treated with systemic, topical, and intrapolyp injection forms of glucocorticoids was higher than that in the control group. Systemic steroid treatment induced the most apoptosis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis: therapeutic efficacy of anti-inflammatory and antibiotic approaches

Despite the high prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) worldwide, the exact pathogenesis of the disease remains unknown. Even with therapeutic intervention, treatment response is often only partial and frequently ineffective. The inability to define exact disease phenotypes in relation to specific disease mechanisms has led to a broad based approach with both anti-inflammatory and anti-microbial intervention. The clinical efficacy of such current therapeutic strategies is highlighted and the urgent need for further robust therapeutic intervention studies in CRS is discussed in this article.

Rhinosinusitis diagnosis and management for the clinician: a synopsis of recent consensus guidelines

Rhinosinusitis (RS) affects approximately 1 in 7 adults in the United States, and its effect on quality of life, productivity, and finances is substantial. During the past 10 years, several expert panels from authoritative bodies have published evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of RS and its subtypes, including acute viral RS, acute bacterial RS, chronic RS (CRS) without nasal polyposis, CRS with nasal polyposis, and allergic fungal RS. This review examines and compares the recommendations of the Rhinosinusitis Initiative, the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, the Clinical Practice Guideline: Adult Sinusitis, the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2007, and the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Points of consensus and divergent opinions expressed in these guidelines regarding classification, diagnosis, and management of adults with acute RS (ARS) and CRS and their various subtypes are highlighted for the practicing clinician. Key points of agreement regarding therapy in the guidelines for ARS include the efficacy of symptomatic treatment, such as intranasal corticosteroids, and the importance of reducing the unnecessary use of antibiotics in ARS; however, guidelines do not agree precisely regarding when antibiotics should be considered as a reasonable treatment strategy. Although the guidelines diverge markedly on the management of CRS, the diagnostic utility of nasal airway examination is acknowledged by all. Important and relevant data from MEDLINE-indexed articles published since the most recent guidelines were issued are also considered, and needs for future research are discussed.

Evidence-based management of nasal polyposis by intranasal corticosteroids: from the cause to the clinic

BACKGROUND

Nasal polyposis is an inflammatory disorder involving the mucosa of the nose and paranasal sinuses and affecting approximately 2-4% of the general population.

METHODS

A literature search of Medline and Embase was conducted to obtain an overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and current treatment of nasal polyposis, focusing on evidence-based efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) as primary and postoperative therapy. Recent research on INSs in nasal polyp treatment, along with notable historic findings, was reviewed.

RESULTS

Nasal polyps are mostly characterized by eosinophil infiltration, a complex inflammation of nasal mucosa, and possibly production of polyclonal IgE. Current treatment modalities include INSs, oral corticosteroids, and surgery; surgery is generally limited to those with an insufficient response to medical treatment. Because of their effects on eosinophil-dominated inflammation, INSs and oral corticosteroids are the primary medical treatment strategies. The very low (≤1%) systemic bioavailability of newer INSs minimizes the systemic adverse effects seen with oral corticosteroids.

CONCLUSION

Based on randomized, controlled trials, guidelines recommend INSs as first-line therapy for nasal polyps and for care after polypectomy. Clinical data suggest INSs are effective in reducing polyp size and relieving nasal symptoms. INS treatment has also reduced nasal polyp recurrence in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Treatment with these mainstay options has been found to improve quality of life, which, along with symptom improvement, is a key factor in disease treatment.

Canadian clinical practice guidelines for acute and chronic rhinosinusitis

This document provides healthcare practitioners with information regarding the management of acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) to enable them to better meet the needs of this patient population. These guidelines describe controversies in the management of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) and include recommendations that take into account changes in the bacteriologic landscape. Recent guidelines in ABRS have been released by American and European groups as recently as 2007, but these are either limited in their coverage of the subject of CRS, do not follow an evidence-based strategy, or omit relevant stakeholders in guidelines development, and do not address the particulars of the Canadian healthcare environment.

Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of CRS, along with the development of appropriate therapeutic strategies, have improved outcomes for patients with CRS. CRS now affects large numbers of patients globally and primary care practitioners are confronted by this disease on a daily basis. Although initially considered a chronic bacterial infection, CRS is now recognized as having multiple distinct components (eg, infection, inflammation), which have led to changes in therapeutic approaches (eg, increased use of corticosteroids). The role of bacteria in the persistence of chronic infections, and the roles of surgical and medical management are evolving. Although evidence is limited, guidance for managing patients with CRS would help practitioners less experienced in this area offer rational care. It is no longer reasonable to manage CRS as a prolonged version of ARS, but rather, specific therapeutic strategies adapted to pathogenesis must be developed and diffused.

Guidelines must take into account all available evidence and incorporate these in an unbiased fashion into management recommendations based on the quality of evidence, therapeutic benefit, and risks incurred. This document is focused on readability rather than completeness, yet covers relevant information, offers summaries of areas where considerable evidence exists, and provides recommendations with an assessment of strength of the evidence base and degree of endorsement by the multidisciplinary expert group preparing the document.

These guidelines have been copublished in both Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology and the Journal of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Controversies in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) including nasal polyps is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the mucosa of the nose and one or more paranasal sinuses. Despite differing hypotheses, the cause remains poorly understood. The key issue is the maintaining of ostial patency. CRS with nasal polyps is considered to be a subgroup of CRS. Major symptoms are nasal congestion or blockage, loss of smell, rhinorrhea, post-nasal drip, and facial pain or pressure. CRS is associated with lower airway disease such asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis. In CRS with and without nasal polyps, medical treatment, including nasal and oral corticosteroids, is the first therapeutic option. The treatment of CRS still remains an unmet need. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment and are the most effective drugs for treating airway inflammatory diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis and CRS. Endoscopic sinus surgery is only recommended when medical treatment fails. After surgery, medical treatment, including nasal and oral corticosteroids, is recommended.

Oral steroids and doxycycline: two different approaches to treat nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

There is little scientific evidence to support the current practice of using oral glucocorticosteroids and antibiotics to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the effects of oral glucocorticoids and doxycycline on symptoms and objective clinical and biological parameters in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 47 participants with bilateral nasal polyps to receive either methylprednisolone in decreasing doses (32-8 mg once daily), doxycycline (200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg once daily), or placebo for 20 days. Participants were followed for 12 weeks. Patients were assessed for nasal peak inspiratory flow and symptoms and by nasal endoscopy. Markers of inflammation such as eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), IL-5, myeloperoxidase, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and IgE were measured in nasal secretions. Concentrations of eosinophils, ECP, and soluble IL-5 receptor alpha were measured in peripheral blood samples.

RESULTS

Methylprednisolone and doxycycline each significantly decreased nasal polyp size compared with placebo. The effect of methylprednisolone was maximal at week 3 and lasted until week 8, whereas the effect of doxycycline was moderate but present for 12 weeks. Methylprednisolone significantly reduced levels of ECP, IL-5, and IgE in nasal secretions, whereas doxycycline significantly reduced levels of myeloperoxidase, ECP, and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in nasal secretions.

CONCLUSION

This is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled study to show a significant effect of oral methylprednisolone and doxycycline on size of nasal polyps, nasal symptoms, and mucosal and systemic markers of inflammation.

Corticosteroid treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis: the possibilities and the limits

Chronic rhinosinusitis, including nasal polyps, is an inflammatory disease of the nose and sinuses. The medical treatment, mainly topical intranasal and oral corticosteroids, constitutes its first line of therapy. Long-term treatment with corticosteroid nasal spray reduces inflammation and nasal polyp size, and improves nasal symptoms such as nasal blockage, rhinorrea, and the loss of smell. Corticosteroid intranasal drops may be used when intranasal spray fails to demonstrate efficacy. Short courses of oral steroids are recommended in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps or when a rapid symptomatic improvement is needed. Endoscopic sinus surgery is only recommended when the medical treatment fails. Intranasal corticosteroids should be continued postoperatively. When using intranasal corticosteroids, care should be taken in selected populations such as children, pregnant women, and elderly patients; especially in those patients with comorbid conditions such as asthma, in which the overall steroid intake can be high due to the administration of both intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids.

Anti-inflammatory treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: a shifting paradigm

Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis still represents an unmet medical need. Presently, the US Food and Drug Administration has not approved any drugs for the treatment of this common condition. Various inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Treatment of infection and surgical intervention to correct anatomic abnormalities often are inadequate in management when singly employed. Anti-inflammatory therapy such as topical cortico-steroids and more recently long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy has been integrated into the treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis. Better classification and point-of-care identification of inflammatory features may improve choice of anti-inflammatory therapy and thus outcome.

Onset of symptomatic effect of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) for treatment of nasal polyposis was demonstrated in 2 large clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the onset of MFNS symptomatic effect, data from the 2 trials were pooled and analyzed to determine the first day subjects experienced significant symptom relief.

METHODS

Subjects with nasal polyposis randomized to MFNS 200 microg twice daily or placebo scored symptoms on a 3-point scale (0 = none; 3 = severe) and measured peak nasal inspiratory flow immediately before the morning dose. Onset of symptomatic effect was defined as the first day a statistically significant (P < .05) lasting response was observed for MFNS compared with placebo.

RESULTS

A total of 447 subjects with bilateral nasal polyps and clinically significant nasal congestion/obstruction were analyzed. Compared with placebo, MFNS 200 microg twice daily demonstrated statistically significant (P < .05) relief of anterior rhinorrhea by day 2 (-10.9% vs +5.7%), nasal congestion by day 3 (-15.1% vs -7.6%), postnasal drip by day 5 (+1.1% vs +4.6%), and sense of smell by day 13 (-9.6% vs -5.6%). Significant improvement in peak nasal inspiratory flow was seen by day 2 (increase of 6.22 L/min vs 1.48 L/min for placebo; P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily rapidly improves the symptoms of nasal polyposis, leading to lasting relief of most major symptoms within 2 (24 hours after the first dose) to 5 days of initiating therapy.

BSACI guidelines for the management of rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis

This guidance for the management of patients with rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis has been prepared by the Standards of Care Committee (SOCC) of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology (BSACI). The recommendations are based on evidence and expert opinion and are evidence graded. These guidelines are for the benefit of both adult physicians and paediatricians treating allergic conditions. Rhinosinusitis implies inflammation of the nose and sinuses which may or may not have an infective component and includes nasal polyposis. Acute rhinosinusitis lasts up to 12 weeks and resolves completely. Chronic rhinosinusitis persists over 12 weeks and may involve acute exacerbations. Rhinosinusitis is common, affecting around 15% of the population and causes significant reduction in quality of life. The diagnosis is based largely on symptoms with confirmation by nasendoscopy. Computerized tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging are abnormal in approximately one third of the population so are not recommended for routine diagnosis but should be reserved for those with acute complications, diagnostic uncertainty or failed medical therapy. Underlying conditions such as immune deficiency, Wegener's granulomatosis, Churg-Strauss syndrome, aspirin hypersensitivity and allergic fungal sinusitis may present as rhinosinusitis. There are few good quality trials in this area but the available evidence suggests that treatment is primarily medical, involving douching, corticosteroids, antibiotics, anti-leukotrienes, and anti-histamines. Endoscopic sinus surgery should be considered for complications, anatomical variations causing local obstruction, allergic fungal disease or patients who remain very symptomatic despite medical treatment. Further well conducted trials in clearly defined patient groups are needed to improve management.

Anti-inflammatory treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis: A shifting paradigm

Treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis still represents an unmet medical need. Presently, the US Food and Drug Administration has not approved any drugs for the treatment of this common condition. Various inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Treatment of infection and surgical intervention for correction of anatomical abnormalities often are inadequate in management when singly employed. Anti-inflammatory therapy such as topical cortico-steroids and more recently long-term, low-dose macrolide therapy have been integrated into the treatment algorithm for chronic rhinosinusitis. Better classification and point-of-care identification of inflammatory features may improve choice of anti-inflammatory therapy and thus outcome.

Topical glucocorticosteroids in rhinitis: clinical aspects

The introduction of nasal glucocorticosteroids, 30 years ago, has been the most important therapeutic progress in rhinitis management since the introduction of the first generation of antihistamines. Our knowledge of the mode of action of glucocorticosteroids in the nose has improved as the airway mucous membrane of the nose is easily accessible for investigation. However, the exact mechanism behind the marked clinical effect remains unclear. Topical glucocorticosteroids are highly effective in diseases characterized by eosinophil-dominated inflammation (allergic rhinitis, nasal polyposis), but not in diseases characterized by neutrophil-dominated inflammation (common cold, infectious rhinosinusitis). Experience for 30 years and a long series of controlled studies have shown that the treatment is highly effective and that the side effects are few and benign. Intranasal glucocorticosteroids can therefore be considered as first-line treatment for allergic and non-allergic, non-infectious rhinitis and nasal polyps.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

CONCLUSION

In subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis, treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) 200 microg once daily (QD) significantly decreases nasal congestion, reduces polyp size, and improves quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MFNS, administered QD in the morning, in subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis at 12 centers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Inclusion criteria were: age > or = 18 years, a diagnosis of bilateral nasal polyps, and clinically significant nasal congestion. Following a 2-4-week run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive MFNS 200 microg QD or matching placebo for 16 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 298 subjects were randomized to treatment. Of those subjects included in the intent-to-treat efficacy analysis (n = 291), a statistically greater proportion of the MFNS group than the placebo group had improvements in investigator-assessed nasal congestion score between baseline and end point (the primary outcome) (74.3% vs 46.8%; p < 0.001). Significant benefits of MFNS were also seen for secondary end points, including polyp size, sense of smell, peak nasal inspiratory flow, therapeutic improvement, and quality-of-life measures. MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events.

Current concepts in therapy of chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis

The exact pathophysiological mechanisms leading to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) still to a large extent remain obscure. However, recently there has been some progress in elucidating the etiology of nasal polyposis, especially regarding tissue eosinophilia as well as the role of aspirin intolerance and eicosanoid mediators. Endonasal sinus surgery has evolved to be the treatment of choice in CRS and nasal polyposis in all cases where conservative treatment has failed or resulted in only a partial or temporary relief. Today, state of the art in surgical technique includes the ability to combine microscopic and endoscopic procedures. Regardless of technical advances like powered instrumentation or computer-aided surgery, in a modern protocol, surgical therapy can offer only one option within a complex and individually tailored therapeutical concept. This review discusses current concepts and new developments in the diagnosis and treatment of CRS and nasal polyposis.

Topical corticosteroids in nasal polyposis

Nasal polyps are the common end-point of a number of conditions characterised by inflammation and are rarely 'curable' in its true sense. After consideration of the underlying aetiology and confirmation of the diagnosis, they are normally managed by a combination of medical and surgical interventions. Of these, topical corticosteroids have proved to be the medical treatment of choice. The objectives of the medical management are to eliminate or reduce the size of polyps, re-establish nasal airway and nasal breathing, improve or restore the sense of smell, and prevent recurrence of nasal polyps. The mechanism of action of corticosteroids may be by a multifactorial effect on various aspects of the inflammatory reaction, the effect being initiated by their binding to a specific cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptor. At a cellular level, there is a reduction in the number of antigen-presenting cells, in the number and activation of T cells, in the number of mast cells, and in the number and activation of eosinophils. When polyps are large (grade 3) topical medication is difficult to instil in a very blocked nose and surgery or short term systemic corticosteroids may be required. Topical corticosteroids are of use in the primary treatment of nasal polyps when they are of a small or medium size (grades 1 and 2) and in the maintenance of any therapeutic improvement. The efficacy of topical corticosteroids such as betamethasone sodium phosphate nose drops, beclomethasone dipropionate, fluticasone propionate and budesonide nasal sprays in reducing polyp size and rhinitis symptoms has been demonstrated in several randomised, placebo-controlled trials. Beclomethasone dipropionate, flunisolide and budesonide sprays have also been shown to delay the recurrence of polyps after surgery. Placebo-controlled studies of agents that have shown a significant clinical effect in the management of nasal polyposis are reviewed.

An open audit of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, in nasal polyposis associated with asthma

BACKGROUND

Nasal polyposis occurs frequently in patients with intrinsic asthma, especially in those who are aspirin sensitive. It can be difficult to treat effectively, even with surgery and regular topical intranasal corticosteroids many patients are still symptomatic.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response to montelukast, a leukotriene D4 receptor antagonist, as an add-on therapy to topical and inhaled corticosteroids in patients, both aspirin sensitive (AS) and aspirin tolerant (AT), with nasal polyposis and asthma.

METHODS

Nasal polyposis symptoms were assessed by visual analogue scales; nasal polyps were assessed by nasendoscopy and via the measurement of nasal volumes by acoustic rhinometry. The nasal airway was assessed by nasal inspiratory peakflow (NIPF). Asthma was monitored using symptom scores and peak expiratory flow measurements. Aspirin sensitivity was assessed by history together with intranasal lysine aspirin challenge. Upper and lower airway nitric oxide measurements were made before and during treatment.

RESULTS

Clinical subjective improvement in nasal polyposis occurred in 64% AT (P < 0.01), patients and 50% AS patients (P > 0.05); asthma improvement in 87% AT and 61% AS patients (P < 0.05 for both). Objective changes in peak flow occurred only in AT patients (P < 0.05). Acoustic rhinometry, nasal inspiratory peak flow and nitric oxide levels did not change significantly in any group, however, correlations were seen between nitric oxide levels and polyp scores and between nitric oxide levels and acoustic rhinometry changes. Improvement on montelukast therapy was not associated with any of the following variables: age, sex, skin prick test positivity, disease duration or aspirin sensitivity. (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

The findings are consistent with a subgroup of nasal polyps/asthma patients in whom leukotriene receptor antagonists are effective. This is not related to aspirin sensitivity. Further placebo-controlled studies need to be undertaken.

Advances in the medical treatment of nasal polyps

The objectives of the medical management of nasal polyposis are to eliminate or reduce the size of polyps, re-establish nasal breathing, reduce symptoms of rhinitis, restore the sense of smell and prevent the recurrence of nasal polyps. Corticosteroids have a proven therapeutic effect on the symptoms of nasal polyposis and may reduce one of the underlying causes of polyps, inflammation. The efficacy of topical corticosteroids such as beclomethasone dipropionate nasal spray and betamethasone nasal drops in reducing polyp size and rhinitis symptoms has been demonstrated in several randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Flunisolide and budesonide have also been shown to delay the recurrence of polyps after surgery. Topical corticosteroids can be used as long-term therapy either alone in mild cases, or combined with systemic corticosteroids and/or surgery in severe cases. Most patients will respond well to topical corticosteroid treatment of their nasal polyposis; consequently, the requirement for repetitive nasal surgery will be reduced.

Topical treatment of nasal polyps with a beclomethasone dipropionate powder preparation

The clinical efficacy of a topical preparation consisting of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) powder and a mucous membrane adhesive agent (hydroxypropylcellulose, HPC) for nasal polyps was examined. For 1 week, in 31 patients with bilateral nasal polyposis, the clinical efficacy of the topical BDP-HPC powder treatment was examined. The effect of this treatment on the histology of the nasal polyps was also investigated. The controls were six patients with bilateral nasal polyposis, who underwent identical surgery without prior use of the topical steroid therapy. Polyp shrinkage and improvement of some nasal symptoms (rhinorrhea, ease of noseblowing, and nasal blockage) were observed with the topical treatment. Significant clinical improvement (P < 0.05) was seen in the group treated with topical BDP HPC powder compared with the untreated control group. Histological examination of the excised nasal polyps in both groups demonstrated no clear differences attributable to BDP HPC powder. The topical treatment of nasal polyps with BDP HPC powder is a useful conservative therapy.

Efficacy of an aqueous and a powder formulation of nasal budesonide compared in patients with nasal polyps

Nasal polyps are commonly treated surgically. Intranasal administration of topical corticosteroids has gained increased acceptance as a treatment alternative. The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of treatment of two formulations of budesonide with placebo on nasal polyps. At four Danish clinics 138 patients suffering from moderate or severe nasal polyps were randomized to a twice daily treatment with Rhinocort Aqua 128 micrograms, Rhinocort Turbuhaler 140 micrograms or placebo (Astra Draco, Sweden) for 6 weeks. Polyp size (primary efficacy variable), nasal symptoms, sense of smell, and patients' overall evaluation of treatment of efficacy were assessed by scores. Polyp size was reduced significantly in both budesonide treated groups compared with placebo, but there was no statistical difference between the two actively treated groups. Patients' nasal symptom scores was significantly more reduced in the Aqua compared to the Turbuhaler treated group, and both reduced symptom scores were significantly better compared to placebo. Sense of smell was significantly improved in the actively treated groups compared to placebo. The proportion of patients rating substantial or total control over symptoms after 6 weeks treatment was 60.9% and 48.2% in the Aqua and Turbuhaler-treated groups, respectively, which was significantly better compared with 29.8% in the placebo-treated group. Rhinocort Aqua and Rhinocort Turbuhaler were equally well tolerated.

Cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase metabolite generation in nasal polyps

A role of prostaglandins (PGs) and leukotrienes (LTs) in the pathogenesis of nasal polyps has been recently suggested. Cyclooxygenase (CO) products (thromboxane B2, PGE2 and 6-keto PGF1 alpha) and lipoxygenase (LO) products (LTB4 and LTC4) were investigated by radioimmunoassay in polyps, hypertrophic turbinates and nasal mucosa from 14 patients with non-allergic (n = 6), allergic chronic rhinitis (n = 6) and aspirin-sensitive asthma (ASA) (n = 2), who underwent polypectomy. In all tissues CO metabolite levels were found higher than LO products (P < 0.01). Nasal polyps showed a significantly lower (P < 0.05) arachidonic acid (AA) metabolism in comparison to nasal mucosa. In polyps of allergic patients significantly higher LTB4 levels (P < 0.001) and a tendency to produce higher amounts of CO products in comparison to non-allergic subjects were observed, whereas in turbinates of non-allergic patients LT levels were significantly higher in comparison to those of allergic ones (P < 0.01). In ASA patients a decreased CO/LO ratio was found supporting the hypothesis of an imbalance of AA metabolism in this syndrome. These findings seem to indicate that the occurrence of nasal polyps may represent the result of different chronic inflammatory stimuli, regulated in part by AA metabolites.

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray in the treatment of nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Topical glucocorticoids are the medical treatment of choice in a majority of patients suffering from nasal polyposis. Fluticasone propionate is a fluorinated steroid reported to be highly effective when used topically in the nose for seasonal and perennial allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasal fluticasone propionate in the treatment of long-standing polyposis.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with long-standing nasal polyposis were treated over a 26-week period with fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid, beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid or placebo, administered intranasally in an aqueous spray in a double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group design at a single center. The primary efficacy endpoint was the physicians' assessment of symptoms and polyp score. Peak nasal inspiratory flow was performed twice daily and on every visit to evaluate the effect of the corticosteroids on nasal air flow.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the primary efficacy endpoint between fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray compared with placebo was seen after 14 weeks of treatment. This was further verified by the peak nasal inspiratory flow results. There was some evidence of earlier onset in the fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray group compared with the beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray group after 4 weeks in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint. From the daily record cards patients receiving fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray had a significantly higher percentage of days on which they required no rescue medication (P < .009) and a higher percentage of days with an overall nasal blockage score on waking of < 2 (P < .013) when compared with placebo-treated patients. No other statistically significant results were found between the two active compounds.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid and beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray 200 micrograms bid are effective in treating the symptoms of nasal polyps, with some evidence that fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray has a faster onset of action and is tolerated at least as well as beclomethasone dipropionate aqueous nasal spray at the same dose.

A long-term follow-up study of nasal polyp patients after simple polypectomies

A long-term follow-up study was performed on randomly selected patients after simple snare polypectomies. There were 243 patients, of whom 211 underwent endoscopic examination. There were 154 males and 57 females and median age was 57.7 years. Median period of follow-up was 8 years (range, 38-145 months). The median number of polypectomies was 1.6 (range, 1-15). Polyp eosinophilia was recorded in 97% of the cases. From life-table analysis the 5-year rate for two or less polypectomies was 80% (95% confidence intervals, 75-86%). Symptoms and findings were recorded at a median time of 56 months from the last polypectomy. At this time 70% of the patients denied blocked nose or excessive secretions. Seventeen per cent of the group claimed loss of sense of smell, while 28% stated that it was poor. At follow-up, large polyps were found in 3% of the patients, moderately sized ones in 30% and small in 42%. No polyps were visible in 25%. Patients with asthma (26%) had more polypectomies than those without (median, 2.4 versus 1.4). Patients with a history of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug intolerance (7%) had the highest number of polypectomies. Previous troublesome sinusitis and allergy seemed not to exert major influence on the number of polypectomies needed. In the primary care of nasal polyp patients, the majority only need minor or limited surgery or only medical treatment.

Nasal polyps: medical or surgical management?

Nasal polyposis is considered to be a non-IgE-mediated inflammatory condition of the nose and sinuses, often associated with chronic non-allergic rhinitis, aspirin intolerance and non-allergic asthma. The aetiology of nasal polyposis is unknown. The main symptoms are nasal obstruction and disturbance of the sense of smell. Occlusion of the nasal passage by a few large polyps could be treated by simple polypectomy to help the patient breathe through the nose. Polypectomy per se does not worsen asthma. Other surgical procedures can be performed, depending on the degree of the disease. The aim of surgery is to restore the physiological properties of the nose by making the nose as free from polyps as possible, and to allow drainage of infected sinuses. Complementary medical treatment of polyposis is always necessary, as surgery cannot treat the inflammatory component of the mucosal disease. In this respect, topical corticosteroids have long been the drugs of choice to reduce the size of polyps, to prevent recurrence after surgery, and are often the main treatment for the disease in many patients. Fluticasone propionate has now been shown to be at least as effective as beclomethasone dipropionate as a medical tool in the management of polyposis. Short-term treatment with systemic corticosteroids is an alternative method of inducing remission and controlling nasal polyps. However, in most patients with nasal polyps, treatment consists of both medical and surgical management.

Effects of corticosteroid therapy in non-allergic rhinosinusitis

Corticosteroids have a multifactorial effect initiated by their binding to a specific cytoplasmic glucocorticoid receptor. At the cellular level there is a reduction in the number of antigen-presenting cells, in the number and activation and T cells, in the number of epithelial mast cells, and in the number and activation of eosinophils. Steroids have a proven effect on symptoms and signs in non-allergic rhinosinusitis with eosinophilia and in nasal polyposis. Topically applied drugs, studied in many controlled trials, reduce rhinitis symptoms, improved nasal breathing, reduce the size of polyps and their recurrence, but have a poor effect on the sense of smell and no direct effect on sinus pathology. Systemic steroids, less well studied, appear to have an effect on all types of symptoms and pathology, the sense of smell included. A short course of systemic steroids is as effective as polypectomy with a snare. Individualized management of nasal polyposis and non-allergic rhinosinusitis with eosinophilia may consist of long-term topical steroids, short-term systemic steroids, or surgery, in various combinations.

Intranasal lysine aspirin in recurrent nasal polyposis

Twenty patients with recurrent nasal polyposis but without any history of aspirin sensitivity were given 2000 micrograms of intranasal lysine aspirin to one nostril and saline to the other once a week for periods of up to 15 months. Two patients had increased nasal obstruction following the initial test doses of lysine aspirin and were excluded from the trial proper. In the remainder symptomatic polyp recurrence was delayed compared with the previous experience while on intranasal steroids, with eight patients remaining symptom free at 15 months compared with an expected number of three (P = < 0.05, chi 2 test). Polyp recurrence was bilateral but there was a tendency for the lysine aspirin treated side to have less polyp tissue as assessed by nasendoscopy and by acoustic rhinometry.

Diagnosis and treatment of nasal polyps

Images

Clinical course of patients with primary nasal polyps

A follow-up study on 180 patients treated for the first time for nasal polyps was performed. The follow-up period was from 1 to 8 years with a median of 57 months. The majority of patients had postoperative topical steroid treatment. 65.6% of patients had one polypectomy, 17.8% had two polypectomies, 10% had 3, 2.8% had 4, and 3.9% of patients had 5-10 polypectomies performed during the follow-up period. Patients without asthma, acute recurrent or chronic sinusitis, acetylsalicylic acid intolerance, or allergy had fewer polypectomies and less topical steroid treatment than patients with these characteristics. The recurrence profile between the first and second polypectomy described with the life-table method showed a slow decline in the number of patients with only one polypectomy. The time span needed before significant clinical symptoms occurred after the first polypectomy indicates that not all primary polyp patients are prone to recurrence. Nasal polyps is probably a manifestation of different clinical and aetio-pathogenetic entities. Further identification of such entities is needed to improve treatment strategy.

The effect of budesonide (Rhinocort) in the treatment of small and medium-sized nasal polyps

The objectives of this study were to determine if the size of nasal polyps could be assessed in a reproducible way and to study the effect of budesonide in patients suffering from eosinophilic nasal polyposis with small and medium sized polyps. Ninety-one patients entered the study. Budesonide 200 micrograms b.i.d. (aerosol or aqua) and placebo (aerosol or aqua) were compared in a 3-month double-blind, multi-centre, randomized study. Efficacy was measured by an assessment of polyp size, nasal peak-flow index and the patient's assessment of nasal symptoms. The conclusions were that the size of polyps could be assessed in a reproducible way, and that budesonide delivered either as a water-based suspension or as an aerosol is effective in the treatment of patients with small and medium sized polyps.