Twice or four times daily beclomethasone dipropionate in mild stable asthma?

Managing Chronic Cough Due to Asthma and NAEB in Adults and Adolescents: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

Asthma and non-asthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis (NAEB) are among the commonest causes of chronic cough in adults. We sought to determine the role of non-invasive measurements of airway inflammation, including induced sputum and fractional exhaled nitric oxide, in the evaluation of cough associated with asthma, and what the best treatment is for cough due to asthma or NAEB.

METHODS

We undertook three systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials and observational trials of adults and adolescents > 12 years of age with a chronic cough due to asthma or NAEB. Eligible studies were identified in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and SCOPUS and assessed for relevance and quality. Guidelines were developed and voted upon using CHEST guideline methodology.

RESULTS

Of the citations reviewed, 3/1,175, 53/656, and 6/134 were identified as being eligible for inclusion in the three systematic reviews, respectively. In contrast to established guidelines for asthma therapies in general and the inclusion in some guidelines for a role of biomarkers of airway inflammation to guide treatment in severe disease, the evidence of specific benefit related to the use of non-invasive biomarkers in patients with chronic cough due to asthma was weak. The best therapeutic option for cough in asthma or NAEB is inhaled corticosteroids followed by leukotriene receptor antagonism.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline offers recommendations on the role of non-invasive measurements of airway inflammation and treatment for cough due to asthma or NAEB based on the available literature, and identifies gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Dosing schedules may be one important factor determining whether patients take their prescribed medication. Schedules may influence whether a patient stays on the prescribed therapy and, if so, the degree to which the regimen is followed. Both factors are important determinants of health outcomes and health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes and health care costs.

METHODS

Articles from peer-reviewed journals were identified from the medical literature databases MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and HealthSTAR for the years 1985 through 2002. The search included all references that reported on the impact of a change of dose frequency on chronic disease. Search terms used were combinations of dose frequency, dose schedule, and dosing and efficacy, safety, clinical effectiveness, preferences, adherence, compliance, persistence, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, resource use, and costs.

RESULTS

Reducing the number of daily doses through extended-release formulations or newer drugs has frequently been shown to provide the patient with better symptom control in a number of disease states. Overall improvements were seen in adherence, patient quality of life, patient satisfaction, and costs. However, results of some studies indicate that not all patients, medications, or diseases may be candidates for reduced dosing due to the potential effects on symptom control, incidence of adverse events, and overcompensation for missed doses.

CONCLUSION

Where feasible, reducing dose frequency may offer benefits for the patient in terms of health outcomes and for the health care budget holder in terms of costs.

Once-daily inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma: dry powder inhalers

The cornerstone of pharmacological management of asthma in childhood is inhaled corticosteroids. These drugs are intended for long term treatment and, consequently, compliance is a major issue. Once-daily administration of maintenance medication would simplify treatment and it is likely that it would lead to better compliance. Moreover, the excellent safety profile of inhaled corticosteroid treatment tailored to disease severity may, theoretically, be further improved with once-daily administration. Studies comparing inhaled corticosteroids given once or twice daily to patients with asthma indicate that unstable asthma is best treated with at least 2 daily doses. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that, if the asthma is stabilised, most children can be treated with inhaled corticosteroids once daily without loss of efficacy. Thus, the data suggest that newly diagnosed asthma, or asthma after deterioration, should first be reliably controlled with inhaled corticosteroids divided into at least 2 daily doses. Once-daily maintenance treatment should then be tried with the aim of improving compliance and quality of life. A dry powder inhalation device is probably the best choice for children from the age of 5 years.

Chronotherapy of asthma with inhaled steroids: the effect of dosage timing on drug efficacy

BACKGROUND

Studies in asthma with systemic corticosteroids given at 3:00 PM have shown a superior therapeutic benefit compared with dosing at other time points.

OBJECTIVE

The study was designed to compare beneficial and systemic effects of 800 micrograms of inhaled triamcinolone once daily at 3:00 PM (QD group) versus 200 micrograms conventional four times a day dosing (QID group).

METHODS

Efficacy outcome measures included forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rates, bronchial responsiveness, and use of beta-agonist. Systemic effects were blood eosinophil and cortisol levels, 24-hour urinary cortisol, and evaluation for oral candidiasis and dysphonia.

RESULTS

The baseline FEV1 was comparable in the two groups: QD = 67% +/- 2% and QID = 66% +/- 2% of predicted value. After 4 weeks of treatment, FEV1 increased similarly in the QD group to 77% +/- 4% and in the QID group to 74% +/- 4% of predicted value. Likewise, the improvement in morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates was not significantly different between the groups. Both QD and QID groups experienced comparable daily decrements in beta-agonist use. The systemic responses to the two regimens as assessed by eosinophil count, morning serum cortisol, and 24-hour urinary cortisol were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The single daily administration of inhaled triamcinolone at 3:00 PM has no increased systemic effects and produces similar improvement in efficacy variables. A dosing strategy based on once daily dosing should increase compliance of inhaled steroid use in the clinical setting.

Twice daily beclomethasone dipropionate administered with a concentrated aerosol inhaler: efficacy and patient compliance

The efficacy of twice daily inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate administered by a concentrated aerosol inhaler (one puff twice daily-500 micrograms/day) has been compared with that of treatment four times daily with a standard dose inhaler (two puffs four times daily-400 micrograms/day) in 21 patients with stable asthma. Double placebo inhalers were used in a randomised crossover fashion during two four week treatment periods. Mean peak expiratory flow (PEF), mean symptom scores, and number of extra salbutamol inhalations required were not significantly different between the two treatment periods. Local side effects were more common during treatment with the four times daily active preparation; overt oropharyngeal candidiasis, however, was not found in either group during the study. On completion of the crossover study patients were transferred to the twice daily regimen. At the three month follow up all patients had remained stable and the outpatient PEF was significantly higher (mean 382 (SD 26)l min-1) than at entry into the trial (mean 345 (24)l min-1) (p less than 0.05). Twice daily beclomethasone administered by a concentrated aerosol inhaler appears to be as effective as the standard four times daily regimen in controlling stable asthma.