Induction of regulatory T cells by probiotics: potential for treatment of allergy?

Health effects of probiotics on the skin

Skin is the largest organ of the body and is constantly exposed to physical, chemical, bacterial, and fungal challenges. It is well known that probiotics are helpful for specific disorders and different clinical studies have indicated that probiotics have special effects in cutaneous apparatus directly or indirectly that can be considerable from versatile aspects. Probiotic bacteriotherapy can have great potential in preventing and treating the skin diseases including eczema, atopic dermatitis, acne, and allergic inflammation or in skin hypersensitivity, UV-induced skin damage, wound protection, and as a cosmetic product. The current paper comprehensively reviews the different health effects of probiotics on the skin.

Intragastric and Intranasal Administration of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 Modulates Allergic Airway Inflammation in Mice

Introduction. Preclinical and clinical evidences for a role of oral probiotics in the management of allergic diseases are emerging. Aim. We aimed at testing the immunomodulatory effects of intranasal versus intragastric administration of Lactobacillus paracasei NCC2461 in a mouse model of allergic airway inflammation and the specificity of different probiotics by comparing L. paracasei NCC2461 to Lactobacillus plantarum NCC1107. Methods. L. paracasei NCC2461 or L. plantarum NCC1107 strains were administered either intragastrically (NCC2461) or intranasally (NCC2461 or NCC1107) to OVA-sensitized mice challenged with OVA aerosols. Inflammatory cell recruitment into BALF, eotaxin and IL-5 production in the lungs were measured. Results. Intranasal L. paracasei NCC2461 efficiently protected sensitized mice upon exposure to OVA aerosols in a dose-dependent manner as compared to control mice. Inflammatory cell number, eotaxin and IL-5 were significantly reduced in BALF. Intranasal supplementation of L. paracasei NCC2461 was more potent than intragastric application in limiting the allergic response and possibly linked to an increase in T regulatory cells in the lungs. Finally, intranasal L. plantarum NCC1107 reduced total and eosinophilic lung inflammation, but increased neutrophilia and macrophages infiltration. Conclusion. A concerted selection of intervention schedule, doses, and administration routes (intranasal versus intragastric) may markedly contribute to modulate airway inflammation in a probiotic strain-specific manner.

Dual role of Toll-like receptors in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

During the last decade, significant research has been focused on Toll-like receptors (TLRs) in the pathogenesis of airway diseases. TLRs are pattern recognition receptors that play pivotal roles in the detection of and response to pathogens. Because of the involvement of TLRs in innate and adaptive immunity, these receptors are currently being exploited as possible targets for drug development. Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are chronic inflammatory airway diseases in which innate and adaptive immunity play an important role. To date, asthma is the most common chronic disease in children aged 5 years and older. COPD is prevalent amongst the elderly and is currently the fifth-leading cause of death worldwide with still-growing prevalence. Both of these inflammatory diseases result in shortness of breath, which is treated, often ineffectively, with bronchodilators and glucocorticosteroids. Symptomatic treatment approaches are similar for both diseases; however, the underlying immunological mechanisms differ greatly. There is a clear need for improved treatment specific for asthma and for COPD. This review provides an update on the role of TLRs in asthma and in COPD and discusses the merits and difficulties of targeting these proteins as novel treatment strategies for airway diseases. TLR agonist, TLR adjuvant, and TLR antagonist therapies could all be argued to be effective in airway disease management. Because of a possible dual role of TLRs in airway diseases with shared symptoms and risk factors but different immunological mechanisms, caution should be taken while designing pulmonary TLR-based therapies.

Psychoneuroimmunology meets neuropsychopharmacology: translational implications of the impact of inflammation on behavior

The potential contribution of chronic inflammation to the development of neuropsychiatric disorders such as major depression has received increasing attention. Elevated biomarkers of inflammation, including inflammatory cytokines and acute-phase proteins, have been found in depressed patients, and administration of inflammatory stimuli has been associated with the development of depressive symptoms. Data also have demonstrated that inflammatory cytokines can interact with multiple pathways known to be involved in the development of depression, including monoamine metabolism, neuroendocrine function, synaptic plasticity, and neurocircuits relevant to mood regulation. Further understanding of mechanisms by which cytokines alter behavior have revealed a host of pharmacologic targets that may be unique to the impact of inflammation on behavior and may be especially relevant to the treatment and prevention of depression in patients with evidence of increased inflammation. Such targets include the inflammatory signaling pathways cyclooxygenase, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, and nuclear factor-κB, as well as the metabolic enzyme, indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase, which breaks down tryptophan into kynurenine. Other targets include the cytokines themselves in addition to chemokines, which attract inflammatory cells from the periphery to the brain. Psychosocial stress, diet, obesity, a leaky gut, and an imbalance between regulatory and pro-inflammatory T cells also contribute to inflammation and may serve as a focus for preventative strategies relevant to both the development of depression and its recurrence. Taken together, identification of mechanisms by which cytokines influence behavior may reveal a panoply of personalized treatment options that target the unique contributions of the immune system to depression.

Alteration of CD4CD25Foxp3 T cell level in Kawasaki disease

PURPOSE

Exaggerated pro-inflammatory reactions during the acute phase of Kawasaki disease (KD) suggest the role of immune dysregulation in the pathogenesis of KD. We investigated the profiles of T regulatory cells and their correlation with the clinical course of KD.

METHODS

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from 17 KD patients during acute febrile and subacute afebrile phases. T cells expressing CD4, CD25, and Foxp3 were analyzed using flow cytometry, and the results were correlated with the clinical course of KD.

RESULTS

The percentage of circulating CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) T cells among CD4(+) T cells was significantly higher during the subacute afebrile phase than during the acute febrile phase (1.10%±1.22% vs. 0.55%±0.53%, P=0.049). Although levels of CD4(+)CD25(low)Foxp3(+) T cells and CD4(+)CD25(-)Foxp3(+) T cells were only slightly altered, the percentage of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(-) T cells among CD4(+) T cells was significantly lower during the subacute afebrile phase than during the acute febrile phase (2.96%±1.95% vs. 5.64%±5.69%, P=0.036). Consequently, the ratio of CD25(high)Foxp3(+) T cells to CD25(+)Foxp3(-) T cells was higher during the subacute afebrile phase than during the acute febrile phase (0.45%±0.57% vs. 0.13%±0.13%, P=0.038).

CONCLUSION

Decreased CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) T cells and/or an imbalanced ratio of CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) T cells to CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(-) T cells might play a role in KD development. Considering that all KD patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), recovery of CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) T cells during the subacute afebrile phase could be a mechanism of IVIG.

[New in light of immune modulation by probiotics bacteria and increase IL10 producing regulatory T cells]

Studies on probiotics had found a benefit in their use. That was attributed to a barrier effect at the intestinal mucosa. We tried a new immunephysiological explanation supported by murine works and in humans. Immune modulation by probiotic bacteria and induce IL10 producing regulatory T cells. Receptors DCSIGN and Toll dendrites cells interfere in the copresentation of antigens and generate an immune response modulation by regulatory T cells and their inhibitory cytokines TGFβ, IL10.

Pharma-nutrition interface: the gap is narrowing

The interaction between pharmacology and nutrition science is on the rise. Nutritional status is considered one of the important determinants of health and disease and several diseases of our time have a clear link with lifestyle factors including the diet. There is also increasing realization that a continuum between health and disease often exists without strict boundaries. Understanding the subtle interactions between genes, environment and homeostatic processes is the key in finding effective ways to prevent, treat or manage disease. Both pharmacologists and nutritionists are recognizing that most of the low hanging fruit has been picked, and that the one disease-one target-one drug (or nutrient) concept will provide fewer successes than it did in the past. Instead, complex multi-factorial diseases require multi-pathway understanding and multi-targeting approaches which will often result in compound combinations. Therapeutic synergy between foods and drugs does not necessarily mean that both have the same primary target. There are also examples of nutritional products that effectively contribute to the therapeutic regimen by improving the patients' general condition or by reducing side-effects of drugs. Examples of conditions and diseases that are highlighted in this review include the metabolic syndrome with its co-morbidities, immune-related diseases and HIV. With the aging population there are other fields emerging, including CNS-related diseases and cancer, where we will likely see an increased synergy between the two disciplines that seemed to have lost contact since the times of Hippocrates.