Effects of H1-and H2-antihistamines on platelet-activating factor and bradykinin-induced inflammatory responses in human skin

Rupatadine inhibits inflammatory mediator release from human laboratory of allergic diseases 2 cultured mast cells stimulated by platelet-activating factor

BACKGROUND

Mast cells are involved in allergy and inflammation by the secretion of multiple mediators, including histamine, cytokines, and platelet-activating factor (PAF), in response to different triggers, including emotional stress. PAF has been associated with allergic inflammation, but there are no clinically available PAF inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether PAF could stimulate human mast cell mediator release and whether rupatadine (RUP), a dual histamine-1 and PAF receptor antagonist, could inhibit the effect of PAF on human mast cells.

METHODS

Laboratory of allergic diseases 2 cultured mast cells were stimulated with PAF (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 μmol/L) and substance P (1 μmol/L) with or without pretreatment with RUP (2.5 and 25 μmol/L), which was added 10 minutes before stimulation. Release of β-hexosaminidase was measured in supernatant fluid by spectrophotoscopy, and histamine, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

PAF stimulated a statistically significant release of histamine, interleukin-8, and tumor necrosis factor (0.001-0.1 μmol/L) that was comparable to that stimulated by substance P. Pretreatment with RUP (25 μmol/L) for 10 minutes inhibited this effect. In contrast, pretreatment of laboratory of allergic diseases 2 cells with diphenhydramine (25 μmol/L) did not inhibit mediator release, suggesting that the effect of RUP was not due to its antihistaminic effect.

CONCLUSION

PAF stimulates human mast cell release of proinflammatory mediators that is inhibited by RUP. This action endows RUP with additional properties in treating allergic inflammation.

Urticaria and angioedema

Urticaria and angioedema are common disorders that can severely impair the quality of a patient's life and can be extremely difficult to treat. Symptoms can persist for years to decades. The causes of urticaria and angioedema are varied and may be immunologic, nonimmunologic, or idiopathic. This article reviews the literature and provides primary care physicians with up-to-date information of the epidemiology, basic pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of this common and often debilitating condition. Additionally, clinical manifestations of acute and chronic urticaria, hereditary and acquired angioedema, as well as the physical urticarias will be discussed.

Rupatadine in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria is one of the most common and disturbing cutaneous condition. The treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) is still a challenge. Antihistamines are recommended as first-line treatment. Rupatadine is a new potent nonsedative anti-H1.

OBJECTIVE

To study rupatadine efficacy and safety for moderate to severe CIU treatment.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, study was designed to assess primarily mean pruritus score (MPS) reduction with rupatadine, 10 and 20 mg, administered once daily for 4 weeks. Three hundred and thirty-three patients with active episodes of moderate-to-severe CIU were included.

RESULTS

A 57.5% (P < 0.005) and 63.3% (P = 0.0001) significative MPS reduction from baseline, was observed at week 4 with 10 and 20 mg rupatadine, respectively, compared with placebo (44.9%). Both doses of rupatadine were not significantly different at any time point, with respect to their effects on pruritus severity, number of wheals and total symptoms scores. Rupatadine 10 mg had an overall better adverse event profile.

CONCLUSION

Rupatadine 10 mg is a fast, long-acting, efficacious and safe treatment option for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe CIU.

Cold urticaria and infectious mononucleosis in children

Physical urticaria includes a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by the development of urticarial lesions and/or angioedema after exposure to certain physical stimuli. The authors present the case of a child with severe acquired cold urticaria secondary to infectious mononucleosis. Avoidance of exposure to cold was recommended; prophylactic treatment with ketotifen and cetirizine was begun and a self-administered epinephrine kit was prescribed. The results of ice cube test and symptoms significantly improved. Physical urticaria, which involves complex pathogenesis, clinical course and therapy, may be potentially life threatening. Evaluation and diagnosis are especially important in children. To our knowledge this is the first description of persistent severe cold-induced urticaria associated with infectious mononucleosis in a child.

H1-antihistamines: inverse agonism, anti-inflammatory actions and cardiac effects

This review addresses novel concepts of histamine H1-receptor function and attempts to relate them to the anti-inflammatory effects of H1-antihistamines. Furthermore, the molecular mechanisms underlying the cardiotoxic effects of H1-antihistamines are discussed. H1-receptors are G-protein-coupled-receptors (GPCRs), the inactive and active conformations of which coexist in equilibrium. The degree receptor activation in the absence of histamine is its 'constitutive activity'. In this two-state model, histamine acts as an agonist by combining with and stabilizing the activated conformation of the H1-receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the activated state. Drugs classified previously as antagonists act as either inverse agonists or neutral antagonists. Inverse agonists combine with and stabilize the inactive conformation of the receptor to shift the equilibrium towards the inactive state. Thus, they may down-regulate constitutive receptor activity, even in the absence of histamine. Neutral antagonists combine equally with both conformations of the receptor, do not affect basal receptor activity but do interfere with agonist binding. All H1-antihistamines examined to date are inverse agonists. As the term 'H1-receptor antagonists' is obviously erroneous, we suggest that it be replaced by 'H1-antihistamines'. The observations that H1-receptors modulate NF-kappaB activation and that there are complex interactions between GPCRs, has allowed us to postulate receptor dependent-mechanisms for some anti-inflammatory effects of H1-antihistamines, e.g. inhibition of ICAM-1 expression and the effects of bradykinin. Finally, the finding that blockade of HERG1 K+ channels is the mechanism by which some H1-antihistamines may cause cardiac arrhythmias has allowed the development of preclinical tests to predict such activity.

Presentation of cutaneous mastocytosis in 173 children

This is a retrospective review of the case files and clinical photographs of 173 children diagnosed with cutaneous mastocytosis by a dermatologist in an exclusively paediatric practice. Of the 98 males and 75 females, 51% had mastocytomas, 47% had urticaria pigmentosa and three patients had diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis. Of these cases, 87% first appeared prior to or at 6 months of age. Flushing occurred in 26% of urticaria pigmentosa cases, 29% of mastocytomas and 100% of diffuse cutaneous mastocytosis. Blistering was noted in 23% of urticaria pigmentosa, 31% of mastocytomas and 100% of diffuse cases. Neither symptom was noted in 59% of urticaria pigmentosa and 49% of mastocytomas. There were three cases with a positive family history. The finding of a palmar mastocytoma has only once been previously reported. Illustrated descriptions of our cases are provided.

Cetirizine inhibits bradykinin-induced cutaneous wheal and flare in atopic and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Kinins are vasoactive mediators involved in allergic reactions. When applied on the skin or in the nose, bradykinin (BK) elicits inflammation that is poorly affected by previous H1-blockade. The aim of this study was to compare the possible effect of cetirizine (an H1-antagonist) on wheal and flare responses to BK, histamine, and compound 48/80 in atopic and healthy subjects.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, eight atopic and eight healthy subjects received cetirizine (10 mg/day) or placebo for 3 days before cutaneous tests. Intradermal tests (IDT) and prick tests (PT) were performed with BK (20 nmol/ml for IDT and 20 micromol/ml for PT), histamine (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT), and compound 48/80 (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT) as positive controls and saline as negative control. The skin responses were monitored by measurement of wheal and flare areas.

RESULTS

BK, histamine, and 48/80 induced wheal and flare reactions in all placebo-treated subjects. Histamine elicited larger wheal and flare reactions than BK and 48/80. IDT with BK induced four- to six-fold larger wheal and flare reaction than PT. No differences in BK-induced wheal and flare were observed between atopic and healthy subjects. In atopic subjects, cetirizine induced a significant reduction of flare reactions after the BK test (80% for IDT, and 94% for PT [P<0.01]). Moreover, cetirizine reduced significantly BK-induced wheals by 70% for IDT (P<0.01) and 65% for PT (P<0.01). A similar inhibiting effect of cetirizine was also observed in healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed that the wheal and flare reactions induced by BK challenge were markedly inhibited by previous intake of cetirizine. The mechanism by which this effect is mediated cannot be established at present.

Mast cell mediators other than histamine induce pruritus in atopic dermatitis patients: a dermal microdialysis study

While histamine is the crucial mediator of pruritus in type 1 allergic reactions, its role in atopic dermatitis (AD) is unclear. In this study, the role of mast cell mediators in protein extravasation and pruritus was evaluated using intradermal microdialysis. The microdialysis capillaries were used to apply the mast cell degranulating substance compound 48/80 (C48/80; 0.05%) or histamine (0.01%) and also to deliver H1-blockers (cetirizine, 200 microg mL-1) in nine AD patients and nine controls. Large pore size membranes (3000 kDa) enabled simultaneous analysis of protein extravasation. Itch sensation was measured psychophysically and weal and flare reaction were evaluated planimetrically. Protein extravasation induced by histamine and C48/80 was significantly reduced in AD patients. Blockade of H1-receptors by cetirizine significantly reduced C48/80-induced protein extravasation in AD patients and controls to an identical level. C48/80-induced pruritus was abolished by cetirizine in controls, whereas pruritus in AD patients was unchanged after H1 blockade. We conclude that mast cell mediators others than histamine are involved in C48/80-induced pruritus in AD patients. Whether the reduced capacity of AD patients to induce protein extravasation is of pathophysiological relevance for pruritus remains to be established.

Cetirizine inhibits bradykinin-induced cutaneous wheal and flare in atopic and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Kinins are vasoactive mediators involved in allergic reactions. When applied on the skin or in the nose, bradykinin (BK) elicits inflammation that is poorly affected by previous H1-blockade. The aim of this study was to compare the possible effect of cetirizine (an H1-antagonist) on wheal and flare responses to BK, histamine, and compound 48/80 in atopic and healthy subjects.

METHODS

In a randomized, double-blind, crossover study, eight atopic and eight healthy subjects received cetirizine (10 mg/day) or placebo for 3 days before cutaneous tests. Intradermal tests (IDT) and prick tests (PT) were performed with BK (20 nmol/ml for IDT and 20 micromol/ml for PT), histamine (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT), and compound 48/80 (100 microg/ml IDT and 100 mg/ml PT) as positive controls and saline as negative control. The skin responses were monitored by measurement of wheal and flare areas.

RESULTS

BK, histamine, and 48/80 induced wheal and flare reactions in all placebo-treated subjects. Histamine elicited larger wheal and flare reactions than BK and 48/80. IDT with BK induced four- to sixfold larger wheal and flare reaction than PT. No differences in BK-induced wheal and flare were observed between atopic and healthy subjects. In atopic subjects, cetirizine induced a significant reduction of flare reactions after the BK test (80% for IDT, and 94% for PT [P < 0.01]). Moreover, cetirizine reduced significantly BK-induced wheals by 70% for IDT (P < 0.01) and 65% for PT (P < 0.01). A similar inhibiting effect of cetirizine was also observed in healthy subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings showed that the wheal and flare reactions induced by BK challenge were markedly inhibited by previous intake of cetirizine. The mechanism by which this effect is mediated cannot be established at present.

Human skin mast cells: in vitro and in vivo studies

OBJECTIVE

This short review surveys our current knowledge on the development and heterogeneity of human mast cells, the distribution of mast cells within human skin and the properties of human skin mast cells both in vitro and in vivo. It also examines the effects of antihistamines in the wheal-and-flare response in the skin provoked by bradykinin.

RESULTS

Mast cells derive from mononuclear precursor cells which undergo their final phase of their differentiation in the tissues. In normal skin, mast cells, which are primarily of the MC(TC) subtype, occur in the greatest density in the superficial dermal zone. Like all other mast cells, human skin mast cells bind IgE with high affinity to specific FcepsilonRI receptors, but unlike those from lung, tonsils, adenoids or intestine, they also express the C5a receptor (CD88) and activation sites for substance P, VIP, somatostatin, and compound 48/80. Both IgE-dependent stimulation by activating tyrosine kinases, and non-immunologic stimulation by activating G-proteins induce a characteristic compound exocytosis resulting in the liberation of the preformed mediators. Production of prostaglandin D2 and leukotriene C4, however, occurs only with IgE-dependent stimulation. In vivo, dermal microdialysis and scanning laser Doppler imaging have been used to assess the role of histamine in the wheal-and-flare response. These techniques were also used to show that low concentrations of intradermal bradykinin release negligible quantities of histamine. The results showed that although the resultant flare was inhibitable by antihistamines, low concentrations of bradykinin released negligible quantities of histamine. This suggests a potentially novel mechanism of action of antihistamines that requires further detailed investigation.

Effects of H1 antagonists on the cutaneous vascular response to histamine and bradykinin: a study using scanning laser Doppler imaging

Histamine plays an important part in the cutaneous weal and flare response which underlies many allergic skin conditions. It has a direct effect on the local vasculature to promote vasodilatation and increase microvascular permeability and may also initiate the more widely spread neurogenic flare. Quantification of these responses and studies of the mediator mechanisms underlying them have been limited by the lack of appropriate techniques to investigate them. To address this we have used two relatively new techniques, scanning laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and dermal microdialysis to measure changes in skin blood flow and the release of histamine within the weal and flare, following intradermal injection of histamine or bradykinin. These measurements have been made both in the absence and presence of the H1 receptor blockers cetirizine and loratadine. Scanning LDI of the inflammatory response revealed marked differences in both the development and steady state responses to the intradermal injection of histamine (1-3 mumol/L) and bradykinin (1 mumol/L). The development of the flare and the weal response to both histamine and bradykinin was significantly reduced by cetirizine but not by loratadine. The histamine-induced flare area fell by 57 +/- 4% (mean +/- SEM, n = 10, P < 0.001) after cetirizine and the area of the weal fell by 73 +/- 11% (P < 0.009). Bradykinin-induced inflammatory responses were similarly reduced by cetirizine, the weal by 60 +/- 16% (P < 0.02) and the flare by 61 +/- 4% (P < 0.005). Measurement of histamine concentration in skin using microdialysis, in six subjects, confirmed that histamine levels rose in the dialysate collected from the weal to 310 +/- 16 nmol/L following injection of histamine. Histamine levels also rose following bradykinin injection in some subjects (mean 147 +/- 46 nmol/L, range 18-336). Little increase in histamine concentration was seen in the dialysate from the flare following injection of either histamine or bradykinin. The histamine concentration in dialysate from unprovoked skin was 4.19 +/- 0.75 nmol/L. These data reveal differences in the dermal responses to different mediators when assessed using scanning LDI. They confirm that histamine is released within the weal but not the flare response to the intradermal injection of both histamine and bradykinin and that its effects on the local vasculature to cause the oedematous weal and the axon reflex-mediated flare are significantly attenuated by the H1 antagonist cetirizine and to a lesser extent by the H1 antagonist loratadine.