Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenoma: a clinicopathologic analysis of the Mayo Clinic experience

Pituitary tumours without distinct lineage differentiation express stem cell marker SOX2

CONTEXT

The recent WHO 2022 Classification of pituitary tumours identified a novel group of 'plurihormonal tumours without distinct lineage differentiation (WDLD)'. By definition, these express multiple combinations of lineage commitment transcription factors, in a monomorphous population of cells.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the expression of stem cell markers (SOX2, Nestin, CD133) within tumours WDLD, immature PIT-1 lineage and acidophil stem cell tumours, compared with committed cell lineage tumours.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of surgically resected pituitary tumours from St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney. Patients were selected to cover a range of tumour types, based on transcription factor and hormone immunohistochemistry. Clinical data was collected from patient files. Radiology reports were reviewed for size and invasion. Samples were analysed by immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for SF-1, PIT-1, T-PIT, SOX2, Nestin and CD133. Stem cell markers were compared between tumours WDLD and those with classically "mature" types.

RESULTS

On immunohistochemistry, SOX2 was positive in a higher proportion of tumours WDLD compared with those meeting WHO lineage criteria, 7/10 v 10/42 (70 v 23.4%, p = 0.005). CD133 was positive in 2/10 tumours WDLD but 0/41 meeting lineage criteria, P = 0.003. On RT-qPCR, there was no significant difference in relative expression of stem cell markers (SOX2, CD133, Nestin) between tumours with and WDLD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study is the first to biologically characterise pituitary tumours WDLD. We demonstrate that these tumours exhibit a higher expression of the stem cell marker SOX2 compared with other lineage-differentiated tumours, suggesting possible involvement of stem cells in their development.

Transcription Factor Immunohistochemistry in the Classification of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor/Adenoma: Proposal in a Limited-Resource Setting

CONTEXT.—

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenomas are common intracranial tumors that require accurate subtyping because each tumor differs in its biologic behavior and response to treatment. Pituitary-specific transcription factors allow for improved lineage identification and diagnosis of newly introduced variants.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess the usefulness of transcription factors and design a limited panel of immunostains for classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma.

DESIGN.—

A total of 356 tumors were classified as per expression of pituitary hormones and transcription factors T-box family member TBX19 (TPIT), pituitary-specific POU-class homeodomain (PIT1), and steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1). The resultant classification was correlated with patients' clinical and biochemical features. The performance and relevance of individual immunostains were analyzed.

RESULTS.—

Reclassification of 34.8% (124 of 356) of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors/adenoma was done after application of transcription factors. The highest agreement with final diagnosis was seen using a combination of hormone and transcription factors. SF-1 had higher sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value compared with follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone. On the other hand, TPIT and PIT1 had similar performance and Allred scores compared with their respective hormones.

CONCLUSIONS.—

SF-1 and PIT1 should be included in the routine panel for guiding the classification. PIT1 positivity needs to be followed by hormone immunohistochemistry, especially in nonfunctional cases. TPIT and adrenocorticotropin can be used interchangeably as per availability of the lab.

Pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment of plurihormonal pituitary adenoma

Plurihormonal pituitary adenoma (PPA) is a type of pituitary tumor capable of producing two or more hormones and usually presents as an aggressive, large adenoma. As yet, its pathogenesis remains unclear. This is the first study to systematically summarize the underlying pathogenesis of PPA. The pathogenesis is related to plurihormonal primordial stem cells, co-transcription factors, hormone co-expression, differential gene expression, and cell transdifferentiation. We conducted a literature review of PPA and analyzed its clinical characteristics. We found that the average age of patients with PPA was approximately 40 years, and most showed only one clinical symptom. The most common manifestation was acromegaly. Currently, PPA is treated with surgical resection. However, recent studies suggest that immunotherapy may be a potentially effective treatment.

The clinical presentation of PIT1 positive pituitary neuroendocrine tumor immunonegative for growth hormone, prolactin, and thyroid stimulating hormone with analysis of clinical and immunostaining dissociation

BACKGROUND

PIT1 is a pituitary transcription factor that is associated with either growth hormone (GH), prolactin (PRL), or thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) production. However, PIT1-positive pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are occasionally immunonegative for GH, PRL, and TSH. This paper describes the clinical presentation of PIT1 positive however immunonegative PitNETs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis, identifying 228 PIT1-positive PitNET patients between 2017 and 2022. Out of these, ten (4%) tested negative for GH, PRL, and TSH. Functioning PitNETs were defined as those causing hormonal excess symptoms or hormonal overproduction.

RESULTS

As for 10 patients immunonegative for all three hormones however PIT1-positive, the mean ( ± standard deviation) age was 46 ± 13 years with 70% women. Six patients exhibited signs of excess GH or PRL, and three had visual problems. Additionally, one patient had secondary hypothyroidism and adrenal insufficiency resulting from the mass effect. All tumors were macroadenoma, with a median volume of 2.1 cm3 (range, 0.8-17.5 cm3). Gross total resection was attained in six patients by trans-sphenoidal surgery. Postoperatively, eight patients experienced clinical improvement: three in vision, two in amenorrhea, two in headache, and one in acromegaly symptoms. Biochemical improvement was observed in six patients, with all experiencing remission in hormonal excess and one showing improvement in secondary hypothyroidism. Stereotactic radiosurgery was performed in three patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with functioning PitNETs may exhibit PIT1 staining without GH, PRL, or TSH staining. Hormonally active tumors exist in this patient population; therefore, close endocrine follow-up is necessary despite the lack of staining for GH, PRL, and TSH.

Update on Current Evidence for the Diagnosis and Management of Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the third most frequently diagnosed intracranial tumors, with nonfunctioning PitNETs (nfPitNETs) accounting for 30% of all pituitary tumors and representing the most common type of macroPitNETs. NfPitNETs are usually benign tumors with no evidence of hormone oversecretion except for hyperprolactinemia secondary to pituitary stalk compression. Due to this, they do not typically present with clinical syndromes like acromegaly, Cushing's disease or hyperthyroidism and instead are identified incidentally on imaging or from symptoms of mass effects (headache, vision changes, apoplexy). With the lack of effective medical interventions, first-line treatment is transsphenoidal surgical resection, however, nfPitNETs often have supra- or parasellar extension, and total resection of the tumor is often not possible, resulting in residual tumor regrowth or reoccurrence. While functional PitNETs can be easily followed for recurrence using hormonal biomarkers, there is no similar parameter to predict recurrence in nfPitNETs, hence delaying early recognition and timely management. Therefore, there is a need to identify prognostic biomarkers that can be used for patient surveillance and as therapeutic targets. This review focuses on summarizing the current evidence on nfPitNETs, with a special focus on potential new biomarkers and therapeutics.

Digital image analysis allows objective stratification of patients with silent PIT1-lineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Studies describing the clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with silent PIT1 (pituitary specific transcription factor)-lineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are rare. We identified patients with positive PIT1 tumor staining but without evidence of hormone hypersecretion at a tertiary center. Clusters were obtained according to cell morphology and immunostaining from each patient's digitally segmented whole slide image. We compared the clinical presentations, radiological features, and prognoses of the different clusters. We identified 146 patients (68 male, 42.9 ± 14.1 years old) with silent PIT1-lineage PitNETs. Morphology clustering suggested that tumors with large nuclei and apparent eccentricity were associated with a higher proportion of aggressiveness and a higher hazard of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR): 2.64, (95% CI, 1.06-6.55), p = 0.037]. Immunohistochemical clustering suggested that tumors with thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) staining or all negative PIT1-lineage hormones were associated with a higher proportion of aggressiveness and a higher risk of recurrence [HR: 12.4, (95% CI, 1.60-93.5), p = 0.015]. We obtained three-tier risk profiles by combining morphological and immunohistochemical clustering. Patients with the high-risk profile presented the highest recurrence rate compared with those in the medium-risk and low-risk profiles [HR: 3.54, (95% CI, 1.40-8.93), p = 0.002]. In conclusion, digital image analysis based on cell morphology and immunohistochemical staining allows objective stratification of patients with silent PIT1-lineage tumors. Typical morphological characteristics of high-risk tumors are large tumor nuclei and high eccentricity, and typical immunostaining characteristics are TSH staining or negative staining for all PIT1-lineage hormones.

Refractory Pit1 plurihormonal tumours and thyrotroph adenomas

Pit-1 tumours are derived from neoplastic cells of either somatotroph, lactotroph or thyrotroph cell lineages, but there are also distinct mixed tumours and plurihormonal tumours within this category as described within the 2022 edition of the WHO classification of pituitary tumours. Plurihormonal tumours and thyrotroph adenomas are transcriptionally similar and grouped together to discuss in this review, although it is clear an immature type of plurihormonal tumour exists which are more commonly associated with refractory disease. Management of residual or recurrent disease should follow that of other aggressive pituitary tumours, although a trial of somatostatin analogue therapy is certainly warranted before considering temozolomide therapy.

An Overview of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET) and Algorithmic Approach to Diagnosis

The diagnostic algorithm and nomenclature of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors have evolved over the past decade, beginning with simpler categorical schemes focused on histomorphologic features and moving to a more sophisticated lineage-specific categorization. This contemporary overview highlights a multimodal approach to pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with a focus on changes in nomenclature, classification, and subclassification; including, brief comments on treatment, and new guidelines for genetic screening, particularly for young patients with such neoplasms.

Aggressive nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Nonfunctioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PitNETs) are tumors that are not associated with clinical evidence of hormonal hypersecretion. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), there are some subtypes of PitNETs that exhibit more aggressive behavior than others. Among the types of potentially aggressive PitNETs, three are nonfunctional: silent sparsely granulated somatotropinomas, silent corticotropinomas, and poorly differentiated PIT-1 lineage tumors. Several biological markers have been investigated in NF-PitNETs. However, there is no single biomarker able to independently predict aggressive behavior in NF-PitNETs. Thus, a more complex and multidisciplinary proposal of a comprehensive definition of aggressive NF-PitNETs is necessary. Here, we suggest a combined and more complete criterion for the NF-PitNETs classification. We propose that aggressiveness is due to a multifactorial combination, and we emphasize the need to include new emerging markers that are involved in the aggressiveness of NF-PitNETs and the need to identify.

High-risk pituitary adenomas and strategies for predicting response to treatment

High-risk pituitary adenomas are aggressive. They show clinical and imaging features similar to those of carcinomas, including infiltration of the surrounding brain structures, but lack cerebrospinal or systemic metastases. In addition, they display distinct behavior, including tendency for fast growth and frequent recurrences, which are difficult to control. The term "high-risk" adenoma was first introduced in the 4th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Endocrine Tumors in 2017. Five defined adenoma types belong to this category, including sparsely granulated somatotroph, lactotroph in men, Crooke cell, silent corticotroph, and plurihormonal PIT-1 positive adenomas. The morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of high-risk adenomas are herein described in detail. In addition, the clinical features and the treatment options are presented. This review focuses on predictive markers assessed by immunohistochemistry, which help clinicians to design the appropriate treatment strategies for high-risk adenomas. Somatostatin receptor status predicts effectiveness of postsurgical treatment with somatostatin analogs, and MGMT expression predicts response to treatment with temozolomide. This comprehensive review presents the clinical and pathological features of high-risk pituitary adenomas, underlines the contribution of immunohistochemistry, and emphasizes the leading role of pathology in the design of optimal clinical management.

Current opinion on the diagnosis and management of non-functioning pituitary adenomas

INTRODUCTION

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are clinically silent tumors and the second most common pituitary adenoma. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment as there is, as yet, no effective medical treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We present current knowledge on the clinical diagnosis, histopathological classification, molecular data, and management strategies in NFPA.

EXPERT OPINION

NFPA is a heterogeneous group of tumors, in respect to their origin and clinical course. In recent years, research on pathology and molecular biology have advanced our knowledge of NFPA pathogenesis. NFPA exhibit, in the majority of cases, an indolent behavior, with satisfactory response to treatment. In aggressive cases, multimodal management is needed; however, even this approach may be insufficient, so the development of new treatments is warranted for better management. In this setting, the understanding of the mechanisms involved in the genesis and progression of NFPA is crucial for the identification and development of directed treatments with higher chances of response.

Clinically non-functioning pituitary adenomas

Clinically non functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) include all pituitary adenomas that are not hormonally active. They are not associated with clinical syndromes such as amenorrhea-galactorrhea (prolactinomas), acromegaly, Cushing's disease or hyperthyroidism (TSH-secreting adenomas) and are therefore usually diagnosed by signs and symptoms related to a mass effect (headache, visual impairment, sometimes pituitary apoplexy), but also incidentally. Biochemical work up often documents several pituitary insufficiencies. In histopathology, the majority of NFPAs are gonadotroph. In the absence of an established medical therapy, surgery is the mainstay of treatment, unless contraindicated or in particular situations (e.g. small incidentalomas, distance from optic pathways). Resection, generally via a trans-sphenoidal approach (with the help of an endoscope), should be performed by a neurosurgeon with extensive experience in pituitary surgery, in order to maximize the chances of complete resection and to minimize complications. If a tumor remnant persists, watchful waiting is preferred to routine radiotherapy, as long as the tumor residue does not grow and is distant from the optic pathways. NFPA can sometimes recur even after complete resection, but predicting the individual risk of tumor remnant progression is difficult. Postoperative irradiation is only considered in case of residual tumor growth or relapse, due to its potential side effects.

An aggressive poorly differentiated plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma

SUMMARY

In July 2017, a 35-year-old woman was referred to our care for treatment of a large pituitary mass with an unusually high growth rate. She presented with right-sided ptosis and diplopia (n. III palsy), increasing retrobulbar pain and vertigo. Although laboratory investigations were consistent with acromegaly, she exhibited no clear phenotypic traits. During transsphenoidal surgery aimed at biopsy, typical adenomatous tissue was encountered, upon which it was decided to proceed to debulking. Histopathological analysis demonstrated a poorly differentiated plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma with focal growth hormone (GH) and prolactin positivity, positive SSTR2 staining and a Ki-67 of 20-30%. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination revealed a large tumour remnant within the sella invading the right cavernous sinus with total encasement of the internal carotid artery and displacement of the right temporal lobe. As a consequence, she was treated additionally with radiotherapy, and a long-acting first-generation somatostatin analogue was prescribed. Subsequently, the patient developed secondary hypocortisolism and diabetes mellitus despite adequate suppression of GH levels. In September 2019, her symptoms recurred. Laboratory evaluations indicated a notable loss of biochemical control, and MRI revealed tumour progression. Lanreotide was switched to pasireotide, and successful removal of the tumour remnant and decompression of the right optic nerve was performed. She received adjuvant treatment with temozolomide resulting in excellent biochemical and radiological response after three and six courses. Symptoms of right-sided ptosis and diplopia remained. Evidence for systemic therapy in case of tumour progression after temozolomide is currently limited, although various potential targets can be identified in tumour tissue.

LEARNING POINTS

Poorly differentiated plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma is a potentially aggressive subtype of pituitary tumours. This subtype can express somatostatin receptors, allowing treatment with somatostatin analogues. A multidisciplinary approach involving an endocrinologist, neurosurgeon, pituitary pathologist, neuroradiologist, radiation oncologist and medical oncologist is key for the management of patients with aggressive pituitary tumours, allowing the successful application of multimodality treatment. Temozolomide is first-line chemotherapy for aggressive pituitary tumours and carcinomas. Further development of novel targeted therapies, such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor-targeted therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, is needed.

[Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology]

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

Towards precision medicine for clinically non-functioning pituitary tumours

OBJECTIVE

Clinically non-functioning pituitary tumours (NFPT) are a heterogenous group of neoplasms with diverse outcomes. The purpose of this narrative review was to summarize available data on predictive factors, both in routine practice and research settings.

DESIGN

A literature review was conducted for papers published in peer-reviewed journals, investigating clinical, radiological, pathological and genetic predictive factors in NFPT.

RESULTS

Several clinical and radiological factors have been associated with NFPT recurrence and/or aggressiveness, including larger size and pre-/post-operative growth rates. Application of transcription factor immunohistochemistry has given rise to improved subtype identification, including 'higher-risk' subtypes, in routine clinical practice. Numerous other pathological and genetic biomarkers have demonstrated promise for prognostication in the research setting.

CONCLUSION

NFPT are a heterogenous group of tumours, characterized by diverse presentation, pathogenesis and outcomes. Ongoing refinements in understanding of tumour biology are likely to pave the way to improved integrative prognostication and precision medicine for NFPT.

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification

The classification of adenohypophysial neoplasms as "pituitary neuroendocrine tumors" (PitNETs) was proposed in 2017 to reflect their characteristics as epithelial neuroendocrine neoplasms with a spectrum of clinical behaviors ranging from small indolent lesions to large, locally invasive, unresectable tumors. Tumor growth and hormone hypersecretion cause significant morbidity and mortality in a subset of patients. The proposal was endorsed by a WHO working group that sought to provide a unified approach to neuroendocrine neoplasia in all body sites. We review the features that are characteristic of neuroendocrine cells, the epidemiology and prognosis of these tumors, as well as further refinements in terms used for other pituitary tumors to ensure consistency with the WHO framework. The intense study of PitNETs has provided information about the importance of cellular differentiation in tumor prognosis as a model for neuroendocrine tumors in different locations.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

An Update on Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors Leading to Acromegaly and Gigantism

An excess of growth hormone (GH) results in accelerated growth and in childhood, the clinical manifestation is gigantism. When GH excess has its onset after epiphyseal fusion at puberty, the overgrowth of soft tissue and bone results in acromegaly. Persistent GH excess in gigantism also causes acromegalic features that become evident in the adult years. The causes of GH excess are primarily lesions in the pituitary, which is the main source of GH. In this review, we provide an update on the clinical, radiological and pathologic features of the various types of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) that produce GH. These tumors are all derived from PIT1-lineage cells. Those composed of somatotrophs may be densely granulated, resembling normal somatotrophs, or sparsely granulated with unusual fibrous bodies. Those composed of mammosomatotrophs also produce prolactin; rare plurihormonal tumors composed of cells that resemble mammosomatotrophs also produce TSH. Some PitNETs are composed of immature PIT1-lineage cells that do not resemble differentiated somatotrophs, mammosomatotrophs, lactotroph or thyrotrophs; these tumors may cause GH excess. An unusual oncocytic PIT1-lineage tumor known as the acidophil stem cell tumor is predominantly a lactotroph tumor but may express GH. Immature PIT1-lineage cells that express variable amounts of hormones alone or in combination can sometimes cause GH excess. Unusual tumors that do not follow normal lineage differentiation may also secrete GH. Exceptional examples of acromegaly/gigantism are caused by sellar tumors composed of hypothalamic GHRH-producing neurons, alone or associated with a sparsely granulated somatotroph tumor. Each of these various tumors has distinct clinical, biochemical and radiological features. Data from careful studies based on morphologic subtyping indicate that morphologic classification has both prognostic and predictive value.

Plurihormonal PIT-1-Positive Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review and Single-Center Series

OBJECTIVE

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas identified the plurihormonal PIT-1-positive (PP1) adenoma as a distinct subtype. The reported data suggest that PP1 adenomas encompass the former class of silent subtype 3 (SS3) adenomas and might have an aggressive phenotype. In the present study, we summarized the current clinical data on PP1 and SS3 adenomas and compared the reported data with the data from a single institutional cohort.

METHODS

Medline and Google Scholar were searched from 1990 to 2020 for clinical series of PP1 and SS3 adenomas in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they had reported pituitary pathology as PP1 or SS3 adenomas and had reported the clinical outcomes after surgical intervention. To better define the PP1 phenotype compared with non-PP1 adenomas, we also reviewed the adenomas treated surgically at our institution from 2012 to 2019.

RESULTS

Of all the tumors reported in the studies as PP1 or SS3, 99% were macroadenomas and 18% were giant adenomas (>4 cm). Of the reported patients, 31.8% had received radiotherapy, and 22.9% had undergone multiple surgeries for their pituitary tumor. In our single-center experience, 20 patients had an adenoma that met the criteria for a PP1 adenoma. Compared with the 1146 non-PP1 tumors, the PP1 tumors did not show statistically significant differences in the extent of resection, size, number of previous surgeries, future reoperations, rate of radiotherapy, p53 staining, or MIB-1 labeling index.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from the present large, single-center study comparing PP1 and non-PP1 adenomas do not suggest that PP1 tumors are more aggressive. Further work is warranted to identify the pathologic subtypes of pituitary adenomas that are consistently more clinically aggressive.

Clinical Implications of the New WHO Classification 2017 for Pituitary Tumors

According to the WHO classification 2017 of Pituitary Tumors adenomas are classified not only by structure and immunostaining for pituitary hormones but also by expression of the pituitary transcription factors Pit-1, T-pit and SF-1. By these factors, three cell lineages can be identified: Pit-1 for the GH-, Prolactin- and TSH-cell lineage, T-pit for the ACTH-cell lineage, and SF-1 for the gonadotrophic cell lineage. By this principle, all GH and/or Prolactin producing and all TSH producing adenomas must be positive for Pit-1, all corticotrophic adenomas for T-pit, and all gonadotrophic for SF-1. In adenomas without expression of pituitary hormones immunostainings for the transcription factors have to be examined. If these are also negative the criteria for an endocrine inactive null cell adenoma are fulfilled. If one transcription factor is positive the corresponding cell lineage indicates a potential hormonal activity of the adenoma. So Pit-1 expressing hormone-negative adenomas can account for acromegaly, hyperprolactinemia, or TSH hyperfunction. T-pit positive hormone negative adenomas can induce Cushing's disease, and SF-1 positive hormone negative tumors indicate gonadotrophic adenomas. Instead of the deleted atypical adenoma of the WHO classification of 2004 now (WHO classification 2017) criteria exist for the identification of aggressive adenomas with a conceivably worse prognosis. Some adenoma subtypes are described as aggressive "per se" without necessity of increased morphological signs of proliferation. All other adenoma subtypes must also be designated as aggressive if they show signs of increased proliferation (mitoses, Ki-67 index>3-5%, clinically rapid tumor growth) and invasion. By these criteria about one third of pituitary adenoma belong to the group of aggressive adenomas with potentially worse prognosis. The very rare pituitary carcinoma (0.1 % of pituitary tumors) is defined only by metastases. Many of them develop after several recurrences of Prolactin or ACTH secreting adenomas. The correlation of clinical findings and histological classification of pituitary adenomas is very important since every discrepancy has to be discussed between clinicians and pathologists. Based on data of the German Registry of Pituitary Tumors a table for examinations of correlations is shown in this review.

Expression of additional transcription factors is of prognostic value for aggressive behavior of pituitary adenomas

OBJECTIVE

According to the latest WHO classification of tumors of endocrine organs in 2017, plurihormonal adenomas are subclassified by their transcription factor (TF) expression. In the group of plurihormonal adenomas with unusual immunohistochemical combinations (PAWUC), the authors identified a large fraction of adenomas expressing TFs for gonadotroph adenoma (TFGA) cells in addition to other TFs. The aim of this study was to compare clinicopathological parameters of PAWUC with TFGA expression to gonadotroph adenomas that only express TFGA.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center series comprises 73 patients with TFGA-positive pituitary adenomas (SF1, GATA3, estrogen receptor α): 22 PAWUC with TFGA (TFGA-plus group) and 51 with TFGA expression only (TFGA-only group). Patient characteristics, outcome parameters, rate of invasiveness (assessed by direct endoscopic inspection), and MIB1 and MGMT status were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the TFGA-plus group were significantly younger than patients in the TFGA-only group (age 46 vs 56 years, respectively; p = 0.007). In the TFGA-only group, pituitary adenomas were significantly larger (diameter 25 vs 18.3 mm, p = 0.002). Intraoperatively, signs of invasiveness were significantly more common in the TFGA-plus group than in the TFGA-only group (50% vs 16%, p = 0.002). Gross-total resection was significantly lower in the nonfunctioning TFGA-plus group than in the TFGA-only group (44% vs 86%, p = 0.004). MIB1 and MGMT status showed no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a more aggressive behavior of TFGA-positive adenomas if an additional TF is expressed within the tumor cells. Shorter radiographic surveillance and earlier consideration for retreatment should be recommended in these adenoma types.

The clinical aspects of pituitary tumour genetics

BACKGROUND

Pituitary tumours are usually benign and relatively common intracranial tumours, with under- and overexpression of pituitary hormones and local mass effects causing considerable morbidity and increased mortality. While most pituitary tumours are sporadic, around 5% of the cases arise in a familial setting, either isolated [familial isolated pituitary adenoma, related to AIP or X-linked acrogigantism], or in a syndromic disorder, such as multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or 4, Carney complex, McCune-Albright syndrome, phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma with pituitary adenoma, DICER1 syndrome, Lynch syndrome, and USP8-related syndrome. Genetically determined pituitary tumours usually present at younger age and show aggressive behaviour, and are often resistant to different treatment modalities.

SUBJECT

In this practical summary, we take a practical approach: which genetic syndromes should be considered in case of different presentation, such as tumour type, family history, age of onset and additional clinical features of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The identification of the causative mutation allows genetic and clinical screening of relatives at risk, resulting in earlier diagnosis, a better therapeutic response and ultimately to better long-term outcomes.

Recommendations on the pathological report of pituitary tumors. A consensus of experts of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition and the Spanish Society of Pathology

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) constitute, together with other tumors of the sellar region, 15-25% of intracranial neoplasms. In 2017, the World Health Organization proposed a new classification of PitNETs. The main innovation with respect to the 2004 classification was the recommendation to include in the immunohistochemical evaluation of PitNETs the determination of the transcription factors of the 3 pituitary cell lineages: Pit-1, Tpit and SF-1. Additionally, other clinicopathological classifications with a predictive capacity of tumor behavior during follow-up were proposed. Given these changes, it is appropriate to adapt the knowledge generated during the last 15 years to the daily practice of the treatment and monitoring of PitNETs at the Centers of Excellence in Pituitary Pathology. This document includes the positioning of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) on the classification and denomination of the PitNETs and the information that the pathologist should provide to the clinician to facilitate the treatment and monitoring of these tumors.

World Health Ozganization 2017 Classification of Pituitary Tumors

The 2017 (fourth edition) World Health Organization Classification of Endocrine Tumors has recommended major changes in classification of tumors of the pituitary gland and region. In addition to the accurate tumor subtyping, assessment of the tumor proliferative potential (mitotic and/or Ki-67 index) and other clinical parameters such as tumor invasion is strongly recommended in individual cases for consideration of clinically aggressive adenomas. It is expected that this new WHO classification will establish more uniform biologically and clinically groups of pituitary tumors and contribute to understanding of clinical outcomes for patients harboring pituitary tumors.

Preoperative vascular heterogeneity and aggressiveness assessment of pituitary macroadenoma based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI texture analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the vascular heterogeneity and aggressiveness of pituitary macroadenomas (PM) using texture analysis based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI).

METHOD

Fifty patients with pathologically confirmed PM, including 32 patients with aggressive PM (aggressive group) and 18 patients with non-aggressive PM (non-aggressive group), were included in this study. The preoperative DCE-MRI and clinical data were collected from all patients. The features based on Ktrans, Ve, and Kep were generated using Omni-Kinetics software. Independent-samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparison between two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the optimal model for distinguishing aggressive and non-aggressive PM.

RESULTS

Six features related to tumor morphology, 24 features in Ktrans, 20 features in Ve, and 3 features in Kep were significantly different between the aggressive and non-aggressive groups. Volume count, gray-level non-uniformity in Ktrans, voxel value sum in Ve and run-length non-uniformity in Kep (AUC = 0.816, 0.903, 0.785, 0.813) were considered the best feature for tumor diagnosis. After modeling, the diagnosis efficiency of mean model and total model was desirable (AUC = 0.859 and 0.957), and the diagnostic efficiency of morphological, Ktrans, Ve and Kep features model was improved (AUC = 0.845, 0.951, 0.847, 0.804).

CONCLUSIONS

Texture analysis based on DCE-MRI elucidates the vascular heterogeneity and aggressiveness of pituitary adenoma. The total model could be used as a new noninvasive method for predicting the aggressiveness of pituitary macroadenoma.

How Valuable Is the RT-qPCR of Pituitary-Specific Transcription Factors for Identifying Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor Subtypes According to the New WHO 2017 Criteria?

The classification of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) subtypes continues generating interest. In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed considering the immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of pituitary-specific transcription factors (TF) for their typification. The present study targeted the quantification of pituitary-specific TF (TPIT, PIT-1, SF-1, GATA2, ESR1) gene expression by RT-qPCR to overcome the shortcomings of IHC and to complement it. We analyzed 251 tumors from our collection of PitNETs and performed additional IHC studies in a subset of 56 samples to analyze the concordance between gene and protein expression of the TF. The molecular and IHC studies allowed us to significantly reduce the percentage of null cell tumors in our series, most of which were reclassified as gonadotroph tumors. The concordance between the molecular and the immunohistochemical studies was good for tumors coming from the corticotroph and Pit-1 lineages but worsened for the rest of the tumors. Indeed, the RT-qPCR helped to improve the typification of plurihormonal Pit-1 and unusual tumors. Overall, our results suggest that the RT-qPCR of pituitary-specific TF and hormone genes could help pathologists, endocrinologists, and neurosurgeons to improve the management of patients with pituitary tumors.

Multimodal therapy in aggressive pituitary tumors

The concept of aggressive pituitary tumor (APT) has been precisely defined in recent years. These tumors are characterized by morphological (radiological or histopathological) data of invasion, proliferative activity superior to that of typical adenomas and a clinical behavior characterized by resistance to standard therapies and frequent recurrences. The absence of cerebrospinal or distant metastases differentiates them from the pituitary carcinoma. APTs account for about 10% of all pituitary neoplasm. Proper diagnostic implies participation not only of radiological and hormonal investigation but also a thorough pathological assessment including proliferation markers and immunohistochemistry for hormones and transcription factors. Surgical resection, aiming gross total resection or tumor debulking, is the mainstay initial therapy in most patients. Most patients with APTs need more than one surgical intervention, pituitary radiation, sometimes on more than one occasion, and multiple sequential or combined medical treatments, to finally be doomed to unusual treatments, such as alkylating agents (temozolomide alone or in combination), molecular targeted therapies, or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Multimodal therapy, implemented by experts, preferably in specialized centers with high volume caseload, is the only way to improve the prognosis of patients with these uncommon tumors. The research needs in this area are multiple and include a greater knowledge of the molecular biology of these tumors, establishment of protocols for monitoring and sequencing of treatments, development of multicenter studies and international registries.

Clinical and Pathological Aspects of Silent Pituitary Adenomas

CONTEXT

Silent pituitary adenomas are anterior pituitary tumors with hormone synthesis but without signs or symptoms of hormone hypersecretion. They have been increasingly recognized and represent challenging diagnostic issues.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive literature search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January 2000 to March 2018 with the following key words: (i) pituitary adenoma/tumor and nonfunctioning; or (ii) pituitary adenoma/tumor and silent. All titles and abstracts of the retrieved articles were reviewed, and recent advances in the field of silent pituitary adenomas were summarized.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The clinical and biochemical picture of pituitary adenomas reflects a continuum between functional and silent adenomas. Although some adenomas are truly silent, others will show some evidence of biochemical hypersecretion or could have subtle clinical signs and, therefore, can be referred to as clinically silent or "whispering" adenomas. Silent tumors seem to be more aggressive than their secreting counterparts, with a greater recurrence rate. Transcription factors for pituitary cell lineages have been introduced into the 2017 World Health Organization guidelines: steroidogenic factor 1 staining for gonadotroph lineage; PIT1 (pituitary-specific positive transcription factor 1) for growth hormone, prolactin, and TSH lineage, and TPIT for the corticotroph lineage. Prospective studies applying these criteria will establish the value of the new classification.

CONCLUSIONS

A concise review of the clinical and pathological aspects of silent pituitary adenomas was conducted in view of the new World Health Organization classification of pituitary adenomas. New classifications, novel prognostics markers, and emerging imaging and therapeutic approaches need to be evaluated to better serve this unique group of patients.

Invited Review: Pathology of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours: present status, modern diagnostic approach, controversies and future perspectives from a neuropathological and clinical standpoint

Neuroendocrine tumours of the adenohypophysis have traditionally been designated as pituitary adenomas to underline their usually indolent growth and lack of metastatic potential. However, they may demonstrate a huge spectrum of growth patterns and endocrine disturbances, some of them significantly affecting health and quality of life. To predict tumour growth, risk of postoperative recurrence and response to medical therapy in patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumours is challenging. A thorough histopathological and immunohistochemical diagnostic work-up is an obligatory part of a multidisciplinary effort to precisely define the tumour type and assess prognostic and predictive factors on an individual basis. In this review, we have summarized the current status in the pathology in pituitary neuroendocrine tumours based on the selection of references from the PubMed database. We have presented possible diagnostic approaches according to the current pituitary cell lineage-based classification. The importance of recognizing histological subtypes with potentially aggressive behaviour and identification of prognostic and predictive tissue biomarkers have been highlighted. Controversies related to particular subtypes of pituitary tumours and a still limited prognostic impact of the current classification indicate the need for further refinement. Multidisciplinary approach including clinical, pathological and molecular genetic characterization will be essential for improved personalized therapy and the search for novel therapeutic targets in patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumours.

SUBCLINICAL ACROMEGALY DUE TO A PITUITARY CYSTIC SOMATOTROPH ADENOMA

Objective

Excess growth hormone (GH) secretion from a cystic sellar lesion is rare. Indeed, there have been few cases of hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas with a cystic component.

Methods

We report a rare case of subclinical acromegaly that presented as a cystic sellar lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Results

A 34-year-old Caucasian female presented with arthralgias, diaphoresis, paresthesias, cognitive slowing, headaches, presyncope, anxiety, and depression. She underwent evaluation by multiple providers without a diagnosis. Her physical examination was reportedly normal without evidence to suggest acromegaly. While she was undergoing workup for multiple sclerosis, a brain MRI scan revealed a cystic sellar lesion measuring approximately 1.6 × 0.9 cm approaching the optic chiasm. An insulin-like growth factor 1 level was incidentally screened months later and was elevated at 823 ng/mL (reference range is 69 to 227 ng/mL). A subsequent oral glucose tolerance test reported a growth hormone level of 7.5 ng/mL at its nadir (reference range is <1.0 ng/mL). Additional assessment of the pituitary axis reported normal levels of prolactin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, cosyntropin stimulation test, and a normal 24-hour urinary free cortisol collection. The patient underwent transsphenoidal surgery and her pathology reported a somatroph tumor that stained positive for GH and alpha subunit. No postsurgical complications were noted and postoperative MRIs did not demonstrate evidence of tumor recurrence.

Conclusion

Cystic pituitary adenomas can secret GH and may present with no classic clinical features of acromegaly. This case emphasizes the importance of a thorough hormonal evaluation in patients who present with a cystic pituitary incidentaloma.

[Morphofunctional features of non-functioning pituitary adenomas]

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) account for about 30% of all pituitary tumors. NFPAs are characterized by the lack of secretory potential or its weak expression insufficient for determination of the blood level of adenohypophyseal tropic hormones and for development of a specific clinical picture. Morphologically, NFPAs are a heterogeneous group of tumors, the classification of which was previously based only on immunoreactivity for pituitary tropic hormones. The WHO revised its Classification of Tumors of Endocrine Organs (4th edition) in 2017. The main changes relate to adenohypophysial-cell lineage for the designation of adenomas into subtypes. The introduction of transcription factor antibodies has become a fundamentally new approach to the classification of NFPAs, which is necessary to recognize less differentiated tumor types. This paper provides information on the new histopathological classification of pituitary adenomas, on the theories of silent adenomas, and on the proliferative and prognostic markers of NFPAs.

Updates in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare disease, caused largely by a growth hormone (GH) pituitary adenoma. Incidence is higher than previously thought. Due to increased morbidity and mortality, if not appropriately treated, early diagnosis efforts are essential. Screening is recommended for all patients with clinical features of GH excess. There is increased knowledge that classical diagnostic criteria no longer apply to all, and some patients can have GH excess with normal GH response to glucose. Treatment is multifactorial and personalised therapy is advised.

What's new in pituitary pathology?

The increasing recognition of pituitary disorders and their impact on quality of life and longevity has made understanding of this small gland a subject of paramount importance. Pituitary pathology has seen many significant studies that indicate progress in identification and classification of pituitary lesions, as well as improved management strategies for patients. In this review, we outline six major areas of advances: (i) changes in terminology from 'adenoma' to 'pituitary neuroendocrine tumour'; (ii) reclassification of hormone-negative tumours based on transcription factor expression that defines lineage; (iii) updates in new pathogenetic mechanisms, including those that underlie rare lesions such as X-LAG and pituitary blastoma; (iv) clarification of hypophysitis due to immunotherapy, xanthomatous hypophysitis due to rupture of a Rathke's cleft cyst and IgG4 disease as the cause of inflammatory pseudotumour; (v) the consolidation of pituicytoma variants, including spindle cell oncocytoma and granular cell tumour based on thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) reactivity; and (vi) the pathogenetic mechanisms that distinguish papillary from adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma. The remaining challenge is clarification of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying the development of many of these disorders.

Malignant transformation in non-functioning pituitary adenomas (pituitary carcinoma)

Non-functioning pituitary carcinomas (NFPC) are defined as tumours of adenophyseal origin with craniospinal or systemic dissemination, with the absence of a hormonal hypersecretion syndrome. These are a histologically heterogenous group of tumours, comprising gonadotroph, null cell, "silent" tumours of corticotroph, somatotroph or lactotroph cell lineages as well as plurihormonal Pit-1 tumours. NFPC are exceedingly rare, and hence few cases have been described. This review has identified 38 patients with NFPC reported in the literature. Recurrent invasive non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA) were observed in a majority of patients. Various factors have been identified as markers of the potential for aggressive behaviour, including rapid tumour growth, growth after radiotherapy, gain or shift of hormone secretion and raised proliferative markers. Typically, there is a latency of several years from the original presentation with an NFPA to identification of metastases and only 5 cases reported with rapidly progressive malignant disease within 1 month of presentation. Therapeutic options include debulking surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy with temozolomide recommended as first line systemic treatment. Although long-term survivors are described, prognosis remains generally very poor (median survival 8 months). Improvements in molecular tumour profiling may assist in predicting tumour behaviour, guide therapeutic choices and identify novel therapies.

Silent somatotroph pituitary adenomas: an update

Silent growth hormone adenomas (SGHA) are a rare entity of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnosis is invariably made post-operatively of a tumor immunopositive for GH (and Pit-1 in selected cases) but without clinical acromegaly. Mainly young females are affected, and tumors are often uncovered by investigation for headaches or oligoamenorrhea. Integration of clinical, pathological and biochemical data is required for proper diagnosis. Beside normal IGF-1 levels, a third of SGHAs displays elevated GH levels and some will eventually progress to acromegaly. Almost two-thirds will be mixed GH-prolactin tumors and sparsely-granulated monohormonal GH tumors seems the more aggressive subtype. Recurrence and need for radiation is higher than other non-functioning tumors so close follow-up is warranted.

Histopathological classification of non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors

Non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors do not cause endocrine symptoms related to hypersecretion of adenohypophyseal hormones and are clinically characterized by symptoms due to growing sellar tumor mass. Histopathological classification of this tumor group has always been challenging due to their heterogeneity, limited knowledge on their biology, and diverse methodological problems. We have searched PubMed database for data related to the histopathological classification of non-functioning pituitary tumors and methods for its application. Principles of the classification and grading presented in the recently released 4th edition of the World Health Organization classification of endocrine tumors have been summarized. Based on the expression of anterior pituitary hormones and pituitary specific transcription factors, gonadotroph tumors dominate within the group of clinically non-functioning tumors, followed by corticotroph type; however, other less common types of the non-functioning tumors can be identified. Assessment of tumor cell proliferation is important to identify "high-risk adenomas." A few subtypes of non-functioning tumors belong to the category of potentially aggressive tumors, independent of the cell proliferation rate. Here, we present up to date criteria for the classification of clinically non-functioning pituitary tumors, offer a diagnostic approach for the routine clinical use, and emphasize a need for inclusion of prognostic and predictive markers in the classification.

Growth hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in childhood and young adulthood: clinical features and outcomes

PURPOSE

Growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenomas (PAs) in childhood or young adulthood are rare, and the details surrounding these tumors remain enigmatic. We present the clinical, pathological and genetic features of this disease.

METHODS

We identified 25 patients aged 20 years or younger with GH-producing PAs who underwent surgery between 2003 and 2016 at Toranomon Hospital in Tokyo. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data, treatment outcomes and pathological features of these patients to shed light on childhood acromegaly.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised 14 male and 11 female patients whose average age at the time of surgery was 17.3 years. Germline AIP mutations were present in 5 of 13 patients examined, and Carney complex was identified in 2 of 25 patients. The mean maximum tumor diameter was 26.7 mm, and total resection assessed during surgery was achieved in 17 patients. Based on their respective pathological findings, patients were divided into the following 4 groups: sparsely granulated adenomas (5), densely granulated (DG) adenomas (6), plurihormonal adenomas (9), and silent subtype 3 (SS3) adenomas (5). During the mean follow-up period of 50.3 months, complete endocrinological remission was achieved in 14 of 25 patients (56%) by surgery alone and in 19 patients (76%) after postoperative adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

GH-producing PAs in young patients are intriguing and difficult to treat due to their distinct tumor characteristics, including a lower incidence of the DG subtype and a higher incidence of SS3 adenomas and genetic abnormalities. Therefore, multi-modal therapies are essential to achieve optimal clinical outcomes.

New WHO classification of pituitary adenomas (4th edition): assessment of pituitary transcription factors and the prognostic histological factors

WHO classification of pituitary adenomas was revised in 2017. The two major and significant changes are discussed. (1) The new classification focuses on adenohypophysial-cell lineage for the designation of adenomas, and thus, assessment of pituitary transcription factors is recommended. Its appropriate use has a complementary role in obtaining an accurate diagnosis, particularly in hormone-negative adenomas. Subclassification of nonfunctioning adenomas was revised accordingly and, consequently, null cell adenomas became quite rare. (2) "Atypical adenoma", a previous category, was eliminated due to the poor reproducibility and predictive value. Assessment of tumor proliferation marker and other clinical parameters such as invasion are recommended to predict aggressiveness. "High-risk adenomas" are those with rapid growth, radiological invasion, and a high Ki-67 proliferation index, whereas some special adenoma subtypes commonly show aggressive behavior.

Clinical profile of silent growth hormone pituitary adenomas; higher recurrence rate compared to silent gonadotroph pituitary tumors, a large single center experience

PURPOSE

Study and comparison of characteristics of silent growth hormone adenomas (SGHA), silent corticotroph adenomas (SCA), and silent gonadotroph adenomas (SGA) in a single institution cohort of surgically treated pituitary adenomas.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of SGHA surgically resected over 10 years: SGHA was defined as no clinical or biochemical evidence of acromegaly and positive GH immunostaining.

RESULTS

Of 814 pituitary surgeries; 2.1% (n = 17) were SGHA, 4.5% (n = 37) SCA, and 18.9% (n = 70/371; 2011-2016) SGA. Mean age at SGHA diagnosis was 43 years, with a large female predominance (82%). Mean tumor size and cavernous/sphenoid sinus invasiveness for SGHA, SCA, and SGA were 1.5 ± 1.0 cm and 25%, 2.5 ± 1.2 cm and 43%, 2.9 ± 2.0 cm and 41%, respectively (tumor size p = 0.009, SGHA vs. SGA, and invasion p; not-significant). During mean follow-up of 3.9 years, two patients (11%) developed elevated insulin-like growth factor-1 and five patients (29%) required a second surgery for tumor recurrence. Rate of surgical reintervention was similar to SCA (31%), but higher than SGA (10%) (p = 0.035, SGHA vs. SGA), and 18% underwent radiation therapy, similar to SCA (19%, p; not-significant) but higher than SGA (2.9%, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

This is the largest single center study characterizing SGHA behavior with SGA and SCA control groups in a cohort of surgically resected pituitary adenomas. SGHA present mostly in young females, and should be closely followed due to their higher likelihood of recurrence and potential of progression to clinical acromegaly. We propose that a complete hormonal staining panel be routinely performed for all pituitary adenomas.

O-6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression is associated with pituitary adenoma tumor recurrence: a systematic meta-analysis

O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) reportedly counteracts the cytotoxic effects of the alkylating agent temozolomide. MGMT expression is often low in aggressive pituitary adenomas (PAs) and recurrent PAs. However, because these associations are controversial, we performed this meta-analysis to clarify the involvement of MGMT in the prognosis and clinicopathology of PA. We searched for relevant studies in electronic databases (MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library Database, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBD)) and calculated/pooled the odds ratios (ORs) or standard mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven case-control studies with a total of 454 PA patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that lower expression of MGMT was associated with PA recurrence (OR=2.09, 95% CI=1.09-4.02; p=0.026). On the other hand, MGMT expression was not associated with PA invasiveness (OR=1.112, 95% CI=0.706-1.753; p=0.646), Unexpectedly, MGMT expression could not be used to distinguish functional from non-functional PA patients (OR=1.766, 95% CI=0.938-3.324; p=0.078). The MGMT expression was not found to be related to other clinicopathological indicators of PA including age, gender or tumor size. No publication bias was detected in this meta-analysis (p>0.05). This meta-analysis suggests that MGMT expression may be associated with PA tumor recurrence, but not be related to invasiveness or other clinicopathological indicators. Thus, detection of MGMT expression may facilitate outcome prediction and guide clinical therapy for PA patients.

Aggressive Behavior in Silent Subtype III Pituitary Adenomas May Depend on Suppression of Local Immune Response: A Whole Transcriptome Analysis

Silent subtype III pituitary adenomas (SS-3) are clinically nonfunctional adenomas that are more aggressive in terms of invasion and risk of recurrence than their conventional null cell counterparts. We previously showed that these tumors can be distinguished by immunohistochemistry based on the identification of a markedly enlarged and fragmented Golgi apparatus. To understand the molecular correlates of differential aggressiveness, we performed whole transcriptome sequencing (RNAseq) on 4 SS-3 and 4 conventional null cell adenomas. The genes that were highly upregulated in all the SS-3 adenomas included 2 secreted proteins involved in the suppression of T-lymphocyte activity, i.e., ARG2 (multiple testing adjusted padj = 1.5 × 10-3) and SEMA3A (padj = 3.3 × 10-3). Highly downregulated genes in all the SS-3 adenomas included HLA-B (padj = 3.3 × 10-6), suggesting reduced antigen presentation by the adenoma to cytotoxic T-cells. Quantitative RT-PCR of these genes performed on the adenoma samples supported the RNAseq results. We also found a relative decrease in the overall concentration of T-lymphocytes in the SS-3 tumors. These results suggest that SS-3 adenomas actively suppress the immune system and raise the possibility that they may be treatable with immune checkpoint inhibitors or nonspecific cancer immunotherapies.

The 2017 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the pituitary gland: a summary

The 4th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of endocrine tumors has been recently released. In this new edition, major changes are recommended in several areas of the classification of tumors of the anterior pituitary gland (adenophypophysis). The scope of the present manuscript is to summarize these recommended changes, emphasizing a few significant topics. These changes include the following: (1) a novel approach for classifying pituitary neuroendocrine tumors according to pituitary adenohypophyseal cell lineages; (2) changes to the histological grading of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors with the elimination of the term "atypical adenoma;" and (3) introduction of new entities like the pituitary blastoma and re-definition of old entities like the null-cell adenoma. This new classification is very practical and mostly based on immunohistochemistry for pituitary hormones, pituitary-specific transcription factors, and other immunohistochemical markers commonly used in pathology practice, not requiring routine ultrastructural analysis of the tumors. Evaluation of tumor proliferation potential, by mitotic count and Ki-67 labeling index, and tumor invasion is strongly recommended on individual case basis to identify clinically aggressive adenomas. In addition, the classification offers the treating clinical team information on tumor prognosis by identifying specific variants of adenomas associated with an elevated risk for recurrence. Changes in the classification of non-neuroendocrine tumors are also proposed, in particular those tumors arising in the posterior pituitary including pituicytoma, granular cell tumor of the posterior pituitary, and spindle cell oncocytoma. These changes endorse those previously published in the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors. Other tumors arising in the sellar region are also reviewed in detail including craniopharyngiomas, mesenchymal and stromal tumors, germ cell tumors, and hematopoietic tumors. It is hoped that the 2017 WHO classification of pituitary tumors will establish more biologically and clinically uniform groups of tumors, make it possible for practicing pathologists to better diagnose these tumors, and contribute to our understanding of clinical outcomes for patients harboring pituitary tumors.

Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors

This review focuses on discussing the main changes on the upcoming fourth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Pituitary Gland emphasizing histopathological and molecular genetics aspects of pituitary neuroendocrine (i.e., pituitary adenomas) and some of the non-neuroendocrine tumors involving the pituitary gland. Instead of a formal review, we introduced the highlights of the new WHO classification by answering select questions relevant to practising pathologists. The revised classification of pituitary adenomas, in addition to hormone immunohistochemistry, recognizes the role of other immunohistochemical markers including but not limited to pituitary transcription factors. Recognizing this novel approach, the fourth edition of the WHO classification has abandoned the concept of "a hormone-producing pituitary adenoma" and adopted a pituitary adenohypophyseal cell lineage designation of the adenomas with subsequent categorization of histological variants according to hormone content and specific histological and immunohistochemical features. This new classification does not require a routine ultrastructural examination of these tumors. The new definition of the Null cell adenoma requires the demonstration of immunonegativity for pituitary transcription factors and adenohypophyseal hormones Moreover, the term of atypical pituitary adenoma is no longer recommended. In addition to the accurate tumor subtyping, assessment of the tumor proliferative potential by mitotic count and Ki-67 index, and other clinical parameters such as tumor invasion, is strongly recommended in individual cases for consideration of clinically aggressive adenomas. This classification also recognizes some subtypes of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors as "high-risk pituitary adenomas" due to the clinical aggressive behavior; these include the sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma, the lactotroph adenoma in men, the Crooke's cell adenoma, the silent corticotroph adenoma, and the newly introduced plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma (previously known as silent subtype III pituitary adenoma). An additional novel aspect of the new WHO classification was also the definition of the spectrum of thyroid transcription factor-1 expressing pituitary tumors of the posterior lobe as representing a morphological spectrum of a single nosological entity. These tumors include the pituicytoma, the spindle cell oncocytoma, the granular cell tumor of the neurohypophysis, and the sellar ependymoma.

MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Present and future perspectives for medical therapy of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas

In contrast to the clear indication for surgical treatment in symptomatic patients with clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPA), there are no randomized controlled studies comparing therapeutic strategies such as watchful waiting, irradiation or medical therapy for the management of NFPA after surgery. Further, no medical therapy is currently approved for the treatment of NFPA. In this review, we summarize accumulating data on medications currently approved for secreting pituitary adenomas, used off-label in patients with NFPA. Perspectives on overall treatment optimization and potential future therapies are also detailed.

Silent somatotroph tumour revisited from a study of 80 patients with and without acromegaly and a review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Silent somatotroph tumours are growth hormone (GH) immunoreactive (IR) pituitary tumours without clinical and biological signs of acromegaly. Their better characterisation is required to improve the diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one silent somatotroph tumours were compared to 59 somatotroph tumours with acromegaly. Tumours in each group were classified into GH and plurihormonal (GH/prolactin (PRL)/±thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)) and into densely granulated (DG) and sparsely granulated (SG) types. The two groups were then compared with regards to proliferation (Ki-67, p53 indexes and mitotic count), differentiation (expression of somatostatin receptors SSTR_2A-SSTR₅ and transcription factor Pit-1) and secretory activity (% of GH- and PRL-IR cells).

RESULTS

The silent somatotroph tumours represented 2% of all tested pituitary tumours combined. They were more frequent in women than in men (P = 0.002), more frequently plurihormonal and SG (P < 0.01), with a lower percentage of GH-IR cells (P < 0.0001) compared to those with acromegaly. They all expressed SSTR_2A, SSTR₅ and Pit-1. The plurihormonal (GH/PRL/±TSH) tumours were mostly observed in women (sex ratio: 3/1) and in patients who were generally younger than those with acromegaly (P < 0.001). They were larger (P < 0.001) with a higher Ki-67 index (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

The silent somatotroph tumours are not uncommon. Their pathological diagnosis requires the immunodetection of GH and Pit-1. They are more frequently plurihormonal and more proliferative than those with acromegaly. A low secretory activity of these tumours might explain the normal plasma values for GH and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and the absence of clinical signs of acromegaly.