1
|
Boumis JK, Dean M. The BRCA1/2 Previvor Information Journey: Understanding What Helps or Hinders. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024; 39:1942-1954. [PMID: 37622341 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2248677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1/2 previvors - individuals who have a genetic mutation that increases their lifetime risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer - have unique information needs. Previvors can experience distress and uncertainty when these needs are not met, which can have negative consequences on their physical and psychological health. Previous research suggests meeting previvors' information needs is one way to combat these potential harmful effects. However, limited past research has examined previvors' perceptions of the helpfulness of information. Therefore, through surveying 101 previvors, this study explored previvors' perceptions of the (un)helpfulness of information, what (lack of) barriers previvors face to finding desired information, and the information sources they utilized. A thematic analysis revealed that previvors generally viewed information as helpful (through empowerment, coping, camaraderie, and action) but not always (evident in information overload). Previvors also reported several barriers (such as "the healthcare system in general", exclusivity, and uncertainty), while others reported a lack of resistance to finding desired information. Additionally, frequencies were calculated to find that various healthcare providers, support groups, and friends and family were common information sources. Taken together, these results offer a psychosocial model for understanding the previvor information journey, displaying how the themes are interconnected and unique for each previvor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marleah Dean
- Department of Communication, University of South Florida
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Daly GR, Naidoo S, Alabdulrahman M, McGrath J, Dowling GP, AlRawashdeh MM, Hill ADK, Varešlija D, Young L. Screening and Testing for Homologous Recombination Repair Deficiency (HRD) in Breast Cancer: an Overview of the Current Global Landscape. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:890-903. [PMID: 38822929 PMCID: PMC11300621 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01560-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD) increases breast cancer susceptibility and influences both prophylactic and active management of breast cancer. This review evaluates HRD testing and the therapeutic implications of HRD in a global context. RECENT FINDINGS Ongoing research efforts have highlighted the importance of HRD beyond BRCA1/2 as a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer. However, despite the improved affordability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and the discovery of PARP inhibitors, economic and geographical barriers in access to HRD testing and breast cancer screening do not allow all patients to benefit from the personalized treatment approach they provide. Advancements in HRD testing modalities and targeted therapeutics enable tailored breast cancer management. However, inequalities in access to testing and optimized treatments are contributing to widening health disparities globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon R Daly
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
- The Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Sindhuja Naidoo
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mohammad Alabdulrahman
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jason McGrath
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gavin P Dowling
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- The Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maen M AlRawashdeh
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arnold D K Hill
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- The Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Damir Varešlija
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leonie Young
- The Department of Surgery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
- Beaumont RCSI Cancer Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Apostolova C, Ferroum A, Alhassan B, Prakash I, Basik M, Boileau JF, Martel K, Meterissian S, Villareal Corpuz V, Wong N, Foulkes WD, Wong SM. Timing of genetic testing in BRCA1/2 and PALB2-Associated breast cancer: Preoperative result disclosure increases uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy and reduces unnecessary exposure to radiotherapy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108324. [PMID: 38636249 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The impact of timing of genetic testing on uptake of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) in affected female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers remains an area of evolving interest, particularly with the introduction of mainstream genetic testing initiatives. METHODS Women with stage I-III breast cancer and a confirmed germline pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an institutional genetics database. Uptake of RRM was evaluated according to disclosure of genetic testing results before or after index surgery for a first diagnosis of breast cancer. RESULTS The cohort included 287 female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers with a median age of 44 years (IQR, 36-52). Overall, 155 (54 %) carriers received genetic testing results before and 132 (46 %) after index breast surgery. Receipt of genetic testing results before surgery was associated with a higher rate of index bilateral mastectomy (58.7 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.001) and a commensurate decrease in adjuvant radiation (41.9 % vs. 74.2 %, p < 0.001). At a median follow up of 4.4 years after genetic testing, 219 (76.3 %) affected carriers had undergone bilateral RRM, including 83.9 % with preoperative knowledge and 67.4 % of patients with postoperative knowledge of their germline pathogenic variant (log rank, p < 0.001). On multivariate regression, disclosure of genetic testing results before index breast surgery was independently associated with long-term uptake of bilateral mastectomy (HR 1.69, 95 % CI 1.21-2.38). CONCLUSION Genetic testing results delivered prior to index breast surgery increase uptake of bilateral RRM in affected BRCA1/2 and PALB2 carriers. Efforts to mainstream genetic testing would help optimize surgical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Apostolova
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Amina Ferroum
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Basmah Alhassan
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ipshita Prakash
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Mark Basik
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Karyne Martel
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sarkis Meterissian
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Nora Wong
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - William D Foulkes
- Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Human Genetics, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada; Department of Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Actis S, D'Alonzo M, Pace L, Mucciacito S, Bounous VE, Sgrò LG, Mancarella M, Ferrero A, Biglia N. Factors associated with adherence to BRCA1/2 mutation testing after oncogenetic counseling in long-surviving patients with a previous diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. J Community Genet 2023; 14:649-656. [PMID: 37723374 PMCID: PMC10725406 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-023-00671-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BRCA1/2 mutations account for 5 to 10% of breast and 15% of ovarian cancers. Various guidelines on BRCA1/2 genetic counseling and testing have been issued, and the criteria have evolved over the years. Oncogenetic counseling aims to inform patients about the possibility and implications of undergoing predictive testing and risk management programs. We analyzed a cohort of 50 subjects with a previous personal history of breast or ovarian cancer who had not been tested for BRCA1/2 mutations at the time of diagnosis but were found eligible according to the most recent guidelines. All patients were offered pre-test oncogenetic counseling and BRCA1/2 genetic testing. The mean time from cancer diagnosis to genetic counseling was over 10 years. We analyzed socio-demographic and psychological parameters associated with the decision to undergo BRCA1/2 genetic testing or the reasons behind the withdrawal. Thirty-nine patients underwent BRCA1/2 genetic testing. Patients who accept the genetic test communicate more easily with family members than those who refuse. Factors associated with test refusal are having a long-term partner and having a negative perception of life. There is a trend, although not statistically significant, toward younger age at cancer diagnosis, more likely to participate in cancer screening programs (71.8% vs. 45.5%), and more likely to have daughters (63.3% vs. 37.5%) in the group that accepted the test. The offer of BRCA testing was well accepted by our study population, despite the many years since the cancer diagnosis. With the perspective of further broadening the access criteria to genetic testing, it is important to understand how to best approach pre-test counseling in long-surviving patients with a previous diagnosis of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Actis
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
| | - Marta D'Alonzo
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Pace
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Mucciacito
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentina Elisabetta Bounous
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Giuseppe Sgrò
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Mancarella
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Annamaria Ferrero
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Biglia
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Mauriziano Umberto I Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Filippo Turati, 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Briggs L, Corner J, Blake H. Perceived Value of Holistic Needs Assessment in Supporting the Needs of Women With Breast Cancer. Cancer Nurs 2023:00002820-990000000-00161. [PMID: 37449709 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Holistic needs assessments (HNAs) were designed to identify and support the physical, psychological, and social impacts of cancer, yet delivery methods vary significantly. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to explore views of HNAs from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and women with breast cancer, including how the HNA contributed to providing support. METHODS A qualitative case study approach was adopted, with 4 hospitals in England. Twenty-four women with cancer and 24 staff were recruited. Data from interviews, observations, and HNA-related documentation were compiled into cases around use of the HNA in each organization. Principles of framework analysis and Normalization Process Theory enabled identification of conclusions. RESULTS The contribution of HNA to women's experiences of support was complex and dependent on various influences: (1) how the woman's own views and judgments influenced her perceptions of the assessment, (2) how the views of staff delivering the HNA influenced both their own approach to the assessment and patient views, and (3) the organizational context and culture. CONCLUSION Apparent superficial implementation of HNAs seemed to facilitate organizational cultures of evidencing the actions of staff and achieving management targets. Women's views toward the HNA appeared paradoxical; most women perceived the HNA to be meaningful "in principle" but reported little benefit of the assessment, and some reported negative outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Holistic needs assessment implementation in clinical settings requires a greater focus on quality over targets, and healthcare professional training should be centered around delivering HNAs in a meaningful way that prioritizes individual patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Briggs
- Author Affiliations: School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham (Drs Briggs and Blake); Research England, UK Research and Innovation (Prof Corner); and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham (Dr Blake), England
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bokkers K, Bleiker EMA, Aalfs CM, van Dalen T, Velthuizen ME, Duijveman P, Sijmons RH, Koole W, Schoenmaeckers EJP, Ausems MGEM. Surgical Oncologists and Nurses in Breast Cancer Care are Ready to Provide Pre-Test Genetic Counseling. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3248-3258. [PMID: 36853565 PMCID: PMC10175452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13229-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-test genetic counseling for patients with breast cancer is increasingly being provided by nongenetic healthcare professionals. We evaluated the attitudes, knowledge, and self-efficacy of surgeons, oncologists, and nurses regarding mainstream genetic testing and the feasibility to incorporate pre-test genetic counseling into routine care. METHODS We offered an online training to healthcare professionals from 13 hospitals and implemented a mainstream genetic testing pathway in 11/13 (85%) hospitals. Questionnaires were sent before (T0) and 6 months after (T1) completing the training. Those who did not complete the training received a questionnaire to assess their motivations. RESULTS In 11 hospitals, 80 (65%) healthcare professionals completed the training, of whom 70 (88%) completed both questionnaires. The attitudes, (perceived) knowledge and self-efficacy of healthcare professionals were high both at baseline and 6 months after completing the training. After 6 months, their perceived knowledge about the advantages and disadvantages of a genetic test and implications for family members had significantly improved (p = 0.012 and p = 0.021, respectively). For the majority (89%), the time investment for pre-test genetic counseling was less than 15 min per patient and as expected or better. Healthcare professionals considered the total time investment feasible to incorporate mainstream genetic testing into their daily practice. The main barrier to complete the training was lack of time. The online training was considered useful, with a rating of 8/10. CONCLUSION Surgical oncologists and nurses in breast cancer care feel well-equipped and motivated to provide pre-test genetic counseling after completion of an online training module.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Bokkers
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C M Aalfs
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T van Dalen
- Department of surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M E Velthuizen
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Duijveman
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R H Sijmons
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W Koole
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M G E M Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
“It was an important part of my treatment”: a qualitative study of Norwegian breast Cancer patients’ experiences with mainstreamed genetic testing. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:6. [PMID: 35123550 PMCID: PMC8818154 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00212-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In South-Eastern Norway, genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 is offered to breast cancer patients by their treating surgeon or oncologist. Genetic counselling from a geneticist or a genetic counsellor is offered only to those who test positive for a pathogenic variant or have a family history of cancer. This practice is termed “mainstreamed genetic testing”. The aim of this study was to learn about patients’ experience of this healthcare service.
Methods
Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 22 breast cancer patients who had been diagnosed during the first half of 2016 or 2017 at one regional and one university hospital and who had been offered testing by their treating physician. A six-phase thematic approach was used to analyse the data.
Results
The participants had varied experiences of how and when testing was offered. Three main themes emerged from the analysis: 1. informational and communicational needs and challenges during a chaotic time, 2. the value of genetic testing and 3. the importance of standardised routines for mainstreamed genetic testing.
Conclusions
Despite the shock of their diagnosis and the varying experiences they had in respect of how and when testing was offered, all of the participants emphasised that genetic testing had been an important part of their diagnosis and treatment. Our results indicate that there is a need for continuous collaboration between geneticists, surgeons, oncologists and laboratory specialists in order to establish simple and robust routines so as to ensure that all eligible breast cancer patients are offered testing at a point when the test result can have an impact on treatment.
Collapse
|
8
|
Szymaniak BM, Facchini LA, Kelsten MF, Cheng HH, Morgans AK. Operationalizing Genetic Testing in the Care of Patients with Prostate Cancer. Urol Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89891-5_3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
9
|
Metcalfe KA, Eisen A, Wright F, Poll A, Candib A, McCready D, Cil T, Armel S, Silberman Y, Brennenstuhl S, Narod SA. Impact of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at time of breast cancer diagnosis on psychosocial functioning. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 191:631-641. [PMID: 34846626 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06457-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many women are being offered rapid genetic testing (RGT) for cancer predisposition genes, at the time of breast cancer diagnosis prior to surgery. The goal of this study was to determine if psychosocial functioning was affected in women receiving RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis. METHODS Participants were women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2018, at four centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible women were referred into the study by their surgeon at the time of diagnosis. Participants received pre-test genetic counselling and were offered RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Standardized questionnaires (Impact of Event Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were completed before genetic counselling, and follow-up questionnaires at one-week and one-year post-genetic test result disclosure (higher scores indicate higher symptoms). RESULTS 1007 women had RGT; 60 women (6.0%) were found to have a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, 80 women (7.9%) had a VUS, and 867 (86.1%) had a negative test result. At one-week post-testing, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.32), anxiety (p = 0.14), or depression (p = 0.42) between women with a BRCA1/2 mutation and those with a negative result. At one year, there were no differences in distress (p = 0.75) or anxiety (p = 0.13) between women with a BRCA1 or BRCA/2 mutation and those with a negative result. However, women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation had significantly lower depression scores compared to women with a negative result (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION For women who have RGT for BRCA1 and BRCA2 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis, identifying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation does not impair psychosocial functioning in the short or long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly A Metcalfe
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Aletta Poll
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Tulin Cil
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Armel
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Sarah Brennenstuhl
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Byrjalsen A, Stoltze UK, Castor A, Wahlberg A. Germline whole genome sequencing in pediatric oncology in Denmark-Practitioner perspectives. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2020; 8:e1276. [PMID: 32500610 PMCID: PMC7434747 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the implementation of a research project providing whole genome sequencing (WGS) to all pediatric cancer patients in Denmark (2016-2019), we sought to investigate healthcare professionals' views on WGS as it was actively being implemented in pediatric oncology. METHODS Semistructured interviews were carried out with pediatric oncologists, clinical geneticists, and research coordinating nurses (N = 17), followed by content analysis of transcribed interviews. Interviews were supplemented by ethnographic observations on Danish pediatric oncology wards. Additionally, questionnaires were distributed to healthcare professionals concerning when they found it appropriate to approach families regarding WGS. The response rate was 74%. RESULTS Healthcare professionals see imbalances in doctor-patient relationship, especially the double role doctors have as clinicians and researchers. Some were concerned that it might not be possible to obtain meaningful informed consent from all families following diagnosis. Still, 94% of respondents found it acceptable to approach families during the first 4 weeks from the child's diagnosis. Views on the utility of WGS, treatment adaptation, and surveillance differed among interviewees. CONCLUSION Overall, healthcare professionals see dilemmas arising from WGS in the pediatric oncology clinic, and some advocate for further educational sessions with families and healthcare professionals. Despite concerns, healthcare professionals overwhelmingly supported early approach of families regarding WGS. Interviewees disagree on the benefits of surveillance based on genetic findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Byrjalsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulrik K Stoltze
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Castor
- Department of Paediatrics, Skaane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ayo Wahlberg
- Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scherr CL, Nam K, Augusto B, Kasting ML, Caldwell M, Lee MC, Meade CD, Pal T, Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST. A Framework for Pilot Testing Health Risk Video Narratives. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2020; 35:832-841. [PMID: 30999777 PMCID: PMC6800594 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1598612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Narrative messages may be superior to didactic messages when providing educational information due to their natural format for information sharing, ability to engage audiences, and engender positive thoughts about the message. Although narrative messages are gaining popularity in health promotion, little guidance exists regarding the development phase. Our team created a psychosocial narrative video intervention grounded in the Health Belief Model to increase breast cancer survivors' attendance at genetic counseling after treatment. Here we report the use of Learner Verification (LV) during an iterative video development process. Using LV, we conducted individual semi-structured interviews with patients and providers, after they viewed the video. Demographic information was analyzed using descriptive statistics, and verbatim interview transcripts were used to conduct a two-phase qualitative content analysis. Patient and provider participants (n = 30) believed the video was attractive, relatable, and informative, and they identified areas for improvement including narrative coherence, changes to text and graphical information, and including more specific information. LV framework elicited audience feedback on the video intervention relevant to theoretical principles of narrative interventions, and highlighted audience preferences. In this study, LV interviews tapped into theoretical constructs of narratives and facilitated the iterative intervention design process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kelli Nam
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Marie Catherine Lee
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cathy D. Meade
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, USA
| | - Gwendolyn P. Quinn
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Susan T. Vadaparampil
- Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scott N, O'Sullivan J, Asgeirsson K, Macmillan D, Wilson E. Changing practice: moving to a specialist nurse-led service for BRCA gene testing. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 29:S6-S13. [DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.10.s6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Some 5–10% of all breast cancers are associated with a pathogenic variant in a breast cancer-associated gene (BRCA1/BRCA2). Historically, with referral to the Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust's clinical genetics department for genetic testing, waiting times were on average 12–14 weeks for an initial appointment and 4–6 months to obtain results from the date of testing. A specialist, nurse-led mainstreaming cancer genetics (MCG) service was set up in the trust's Nottingham Breast Institute (NBI) to: reduce waiting times for the initial consultation, counselling, consent and obtaining results for BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing; and to ensure appropriate patients with breast cancer were offered genetic testing. Two breast clinical nurse specialists were trained so they could counsel, consent and give results for the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene testing directly to patients. Average waiting times for results from the time of testing were reduced to 35.8 days under the nurse-led service, which enabled oncologists and patients to consider individual treatment options at an earlier time. The MCG service reduced waiting times, resulting in an improved, more streamlined service for patients undergoing genetic testing. The MCG service extended the scope of practice of the breast nurse clinical specialists, embedded an expert advanced nursing role in the breast multidisciplinary team and developed nurse mentoring opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Scott
- Breast Clinical Nurse Specialist and Specialist in Breast Family History, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Jackie O'Sullivan
- Breast Clinical Nurse Specialist and Specialist in Breast Family History, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Kristjan Asgeirsson
- Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Douglas Macmillan
- Consultant Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon, Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Emma Wilson
- Associate Professor in Public Health, University of Nottingham
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frey MK, Lee SS, Gerber D, Schwartz ZP, Martineau J, Lutz K, Reese E, Dalton E, Olsen A, Girdler J, Pothuri B, Boyd L, Curtin JP, Levine DA, Blank SV. Facilitated referral pathway for genetic testing at the time of ovarian cancer diagnosis: uptake of genetic counseling and testing and impact on patient-reported stress, anxiety and depression. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:280-286. [PMID: 32057464 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2019] [Revised: 12/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely genetic testing at ovarian cancer diagnosis is essential as results impact front line treatment decisions. Our objective was to determine rates of genetic counseling and testing with an expedited genetics referral pathway wherein women with newly-diagnosed ovarian cancer are contacted by a genetics navigator to facilitate genetic counseling. METHODS Patients were referred for genetic counseling by their gynecologic oncologist, contacted by a genetics navigator and offered appointments for genetic counseling. Patients completed quality of life (QoL) surveys immediately pre- and post-genetic assessment and 6 months later. The primary outcome was feasibility of this pathway defined by presentation for genetic counseling. RESULTS From 2015 to 2018, 100 patients were enrolled. Seventy-eight had genetic counseling and 73 testing. Median time from diagnosis to genetic counseling was 34 days (range 10-189). Among patients who underwent testing, 12 (16%) had pathogenic germline mutations (BRCA1-7, BRCA2-4, MSH2-1). Sixty-five patients completed QoL assessments demonstrating stress and anxiety at time of testing, however, scores improved at 6 months. Despite the pathway leveling financial and logistical barriers, patients receiving care at a public hospital were less likely to present for genetic counseling compared to private hospital patients (56% versus 84%, P = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS Facilitated referral to genetic counselors at time of ovarian cancer diagnosis is effective, resulting in high uptake of genetic counseling and testing, and does not demonstrate a long term psychologic toll. Concern about causing additional emotional distress should not deter clinicians from early genetics referral as genetic testing can yield important prognostic and therapeutic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sarah S Lee
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Deanna Gerber
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | | | - Jessica Martineau
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Lutz
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Erin Reese
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | | | - Annie Olsen
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Julia Girdler
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Bhavana Pothuri
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Leslie Boyd
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - John P Curtin
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Douglas A Levine
- New York University Langone Medical Center, United States of America
| | - Stephanie V Blank
- Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bancroft EK, Kohut K, Eeles RA. The New Genomics Era: Integration of genomics into mainstream oncology and implications for psycho-oncological care. Psychooncology 2020; 29:453-460. [PMID: 32017261 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth K Bancroft
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | - Rosalind A Eeles
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Halverson CME, Wessinger BC, Clayton EW, Wiesner GL. Patients' willingness to reconsider cancer genetic testing after initially declining: Mention it again. J Genet Couns 2020; 29:18-24. [PMID: 31553110 PMCID: PMC8607552 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Revised: 09/06/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Patients at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes sometimes decline clinically appropriate genetic testing. The purpose of the current study was to understand what preferences, concerns, and desires informed their refusal as well as their current level of interest in being tested. We interviewed patients who had been seen in a hereditary cancer clinic at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and had declined genetic testing. In all, 21 in-depth, semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted. Although patients provided many reasons for declining testing, they most often cited their psychosocial state at the time of the initial invitation to participate in genetic testing as their reason for refusal. The majority (67%) said that they either would or had changed their mind about testing if/when their clinicians 'mentioned it again'. Patients at risk for hereditary cancer who refuse testing at the time of genetic counseling may later change their mind. In particular, if a patient declines testing around the time of a major medical diagnosis or intervention, clinicians who are providing ongoing care may want to raise the topic afresh after the patient has had time to recover from initial distress related to diagnosis or treatment. Strategies to prompt clinicians to have these conversations are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin M E Halverson
- Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | | | - Ellen W Clayton
- Center for Biomedical Ethics and Society, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- School of Law, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Exploring patient and provider perspectives on the intersection between fertility, genetics, and family building. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:4833-4845. [PMID: 31982959 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05315-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients have distinct medical and psychosocial needs and fertility is a key concern. Early age of onset is a risk factor for hereditary cancer and AYAs are more likely to experience reduced fertility. This has implications for future family building decisions and fertility preservation (FP) and genetic testing/counseling (GT/GC) education. METHODS Patients diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 18 and 39 and health care providers (HCPs) who treat AYA cancer patients were recruited from a single institution. Qualitative interviews explored AYA patients' and HCPs' concerns regarding their experiences discussing genetics and FP. RESULTS The majority of patients (n = 17) were female (59%), and the majority of HCPs (n = 18) were male (67%). Overall, participants had differing perceptions of FP and GT/GC-related information provided during the clinical visit. Patients indicated initiating the conversation about FP and did not recall HCPs discussing GT/GC with them. HCPs indicated patients were often overwhelmed with too much information and comprehension of this discussion is limited. HCPs also felt patients' emotions/beliefs determined their information-seeking behavior specific to FP and GT/GC. Participants felt educational materials should be developed and delivered in a video format depicting a patient-provider interaction or patient testimonial. CONCLUSION AYA patients are often overwhelmed by a cancer diagnosis; the complexity/volume of information regarding FP and GT/GC may hinder understanding and decision-making about family building. Educational materials that help patients understand what questions to ask HCPs about FP and GT/GC should be developed to improve knowledge, psychosocial well-being, and future family building decisions.
Collapse
|
17
|
Høberg-Vetti H, Eide GE, Siglen E, Listøl W, Haavind MT, Hoogerbrugge N, Bjorvatn C. Cancer-related distress in unselected women with newly diagnosed breast or ovarian cancer undergoing BRCA1/2 testing without pretest genetic counseling. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:175-181. [PMID: 30334464 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1502466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic testing is increasing in patients newly diagnosed with cancer. This study investigated the levels, course and predictors of cancer-related distress, defined as intrusion and avoidance, in women undergoing BRCA1/2 testing without pretest genetic counseling shortly after a diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Unselected for family history or age, 259 women with breast cancer and 50 women with ovarian cancer, underwent BRCA1/2 testing shortly after diagnosis. Cancer-related distress was measured with the Impact of Event Scale before and after genetic testing. In order to identify predictors of distress, the subscale scores were regressed on baseline predictor variables including sociodemographic and medical variables, perceived social support, and decisional conflict regarding genetic testing. RESULTS The mean levels of intrusion and avoidance were in the moderate range both before and after genetic testing with a statistically significant decline during follow-up. Younger age, shorter time since diagnosis, lower levels of social support, and a diagnosis of ovarian cancer predicted higher levels of both intrusion and avoidance. In addition, higher levels of decisional conflict and living with a partner predicted higher levels of intrusion. CONCLUSIONS Women having genetic testing shortly after a diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer had a moderate mean level of cancer-related distress, which decreased with time. Health personnel offering genetic testing to newly diagnosed women with breast or ovarian cancer should be aware of the potential predictors for increased cancer-related distress identified in this study: younger age, less perceived social support, higher levels of decisional conflict regarding genetic testing, and living with a partner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hildegunn Høberg-Vetti
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Geir Egil Eide
- Centre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Elen Siglen
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Wenche Listøl
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Marianne Tveit Haavind
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cathrine Bjorvatn
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Department of Medical Genetics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Communication about genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients: a scoping review. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 27:511-524. [PMID: 30573802 PMCID: PMC6460583 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0310-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 11/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic testing of patients with cancer is increasingly offered to guide management, resulting in a growing need for oncology health professionals to communicate genetics information and facilitate informed decision-making in a short time frame. This scoping review aimed to map and synthesise what is known about health professionals’ communication about genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer with cancer patients. Four databases were systematically searched using a recognised scoping review method. Areas and types of research were mapped and a narrative synthesis of the findings was undertaken. Twenty-nine papers from 25 studies were included. Studies were identified about (i) information needs, (ii) process and content of genetic counselling, (iii) cognitive and emotional impact, including risk perception and recall, understanding and interpretation of genetic test results, and anxiety and distress, (iv) patients’ experiences, (v) communication shortly after diagnosis and (vi) alternatives to face-to-face genetic counselling. Patients’ need for cancer-focused, personalised information is not always met by genetic counselling. Genetic counselling tends to focus on biomedical information at the expense of psychological support. For most patients, knowledge is increased and anxiety is not raised by pre-test communication. However, some patients experience anxiety and distress when results are disclosed, particularly those tested shortly after diagnosis who are unprepared or unsupported. For many patients, pre-test communication by methods other than face-to-face genetic counselling is acceptable. Research is needed to identify patients who may benefit from genetic counselling and support and to investigate communication about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer by oncology health professionals.
Collapse
|
19
|
Weymann D, Veenstra DL, Jarvik GP, Regier DA. Patient preferences for massively parallel sequencing genetic testing of colorectal cancer risk: a discrete choice experiment. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:1257-1265. [PMID: 29802320 PMCID: PMC6117311 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0161-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Revised: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This study enumerated patients' preference-based personal utility and willingness-to-pay for massively parallel sequencing (MPS) genetic testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Our setting was the New Exome Technology in (NEXT) Medicine Study, a randomized control trial of usual care genetic testing vs. exome sequencing. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we elicited patient preferences for information on genetic causes of CRC. We estimated personal utility for the following four attributes: proportion of individuals with a genetic cause of CRC who receive a diagnosis, number of tests used, wait time for results, and cost. A total of 122 patients completed our DCE (66% response rate). On average, patients preferred genetic tests identifying more individuals with a diagnosis and involving a shorter wait time. Assuming MPS identifies more individuals with a Mendelian form of CRC risk, involves fewer tests, and results in a shorter wait than traditional diagnostic testing, average willingness-to-pay (WTP) for MPS ranged from US$400 (95% CI: $300, $500) to US$1541 (95% CI: $1224, $1859). These results indicate that patients value information on genetic causes of CRC and replacing traditional diagnostic testing with MPS testing will increase patients' utility. Future research exploring the costs and benefits of MPS for CRC risk is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deirdre Weymann
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David L Veenstra
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gail P Jarvik
- Department of Medicine (Medical Genetics), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dean A Regier
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (ARCC), Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wright S, Porteous M, Stirling D, Lawton J, Young O, Gourley C, Hallowell N. Patients' Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing. J Genet Couns 2018; 27:10.1007/s10897-018-0261-5. [PMID: 29752676 PMCID: PMC6209051 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-018-0261-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
This paper explores patients' views and experiences of undergoing treatment-focused BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing (TFGT), either offered following triaging to clinical genetics (breast cancer) or as part of a mainstreamed care pathway in oncology (ovarian cancer). Drawing on 26 in-depth interviews with patients with breast or ovarian cancer who had undergone TFGT, this retrospective study examines patients' views of genetic testing at this point in their care pathway, focusing on issues, such as initial response to the offer of testing, motivations for undergoing testing, and views on care pathways. Patients were amenable to the incorporation of TFGT at an early stage in their cancer care irrespective of (any) prior anticipation of having a genetic test or family history. While patients were glad to have been offered TFGT as part of their care, some questioned the logic of the test's timing in relation to their cancer treatment. Crucially, patients appeared unable to disentangle the treatment role of TFGT from its preventative function for self and other family members, suggesting that some may undergo TFGT to obtain information for others rather than for self.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Wright
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Rm 3.734, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK.
| | - Mary Porteous
- MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Diane Stirling
- MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julia Lawton
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Rm 3.734, Medical School, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK
| | - Oliver Young
- Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Charlie Gourley
- MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nina Hallowell
- Big Data Institute, Ethox Centre, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grieco D, Lacetera N, Macis M, Di Martino D. Motivating Cord Blood Donation with Information and Behavioral Nudges. Sci Rep 2018; 8:252. [PMID: 29321654 PMCID: PMC5762860 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18679-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2017] [Accepted: 12/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Umbilical cord blood is a source of hematopoietic stem cells essential to treat life-threatening diseases, such as leukemia and lymphoma. However, only a very small percentage of parents donate upon delivery. The decision to donate the cord blood occurs at a very specific time and when parents likely experience emotional, informational, and decisional overloads; these features of cord blood donation make it different from other pro-social activities. In collaboration with an OB-GYN clinic in Milan, Italy, we conducted the first randomized controlled trial that applies tools from behavioral science to foster cord blood donation, and quantified the gains that informational and behavioral "nudges" can achieve. We found that information and "soft" commitments increased donations; approaching expecting parents closer to the delivery date and providing them with multiple reminders, moreover, had the strongest impact. However, a significant portion of women who expressed consent to donate could not do so because of organizational constraints. We conclude that simple, non-invasive behavioral interventions that address information gaps and procrastination, and that increase the salience of the activity can substantially enhance altruistic donations of cord blood, especially when coupled with organizational support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Daniela Di Martino
- Department of Woman, Mother, and Neonate, Buzzi Children's Hospital, Biological and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Harkin LJ, Beaver K, Dey P, Choong K. Navigating cancer using online communities: a grounded theory of survivor and family experiences. J Cancer Surviv 2017; 11:658-669. [PMID: 28470506 PMCID: PMC5671555 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0616-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE People affected by cancer often have unmet emotional and social support needs. Online cancer communities are a convenient channel for connecting cancer survivors, allowing them to support one another. However, it is unclear whether online community use makes a meaningful contribution to cancer survivorship, as little previous research has examined the experience of using contemporary cancer communities. We aimed to explore the experiences of visitors to online cancer communities. METHODS Twenty-three in-depth interviews were conducted with online cancer community visitors, including cancer survivors (n = 18), family members (n = 2), and individuals who were both a survivor and family member (n = 3). Interviews were analysed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS A theory developed explaining how individuals 'navigated' the experience of cancer using online cancer communities. Online advice and information led participants on a 'journey to become informed'. Online friendships normalised survivorship and cast participants on a 'journey to recreate identity'. Participants navigated a 'journey through different worlds' as they discovered relevant and hidden communities. CONCLUSIONS This theory highlights virtual paths people affected by cancer can take to self-manage their experience of the disease. Online community experiences can be improved by promoting online evaluation skills and signposting visitors to bereavement support. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Cancer survivors can benefit through both lurking and posting in online communities. However, individuals risk becoming distressed when they befriend individuals who may soon die. Additionally, people affected by rarer cancers can struggle to find shared experiences online and may need to look elsewhere for support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia Jo Harkin
- Division of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG4 1BU, UK.
| | - Kinta Beaver
- School of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK
| | - Paola Dey
- Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK
| | - Kartina Choong
- Lancashire Law School, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wevers MR, Aaronson NK, Bleiker EMA, Hahn DEE, Brouwer T, van Dalen T, Theunissen EB, van Ooijen B, de Roos MA, Borgstein PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Vriens E, Bouma WH, Rijna H, Vente JP, Kuenen MA, van der Sanden-Melis J, Witkamp AJ, Rutgers EJT, Verhoef S, Ausems MGEM. Rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer: Patients' and health professionals' attitudes, experiences, and evaluation of effects on treatment decision making. J Surg Oncol 2017; 116:1029-1039. [PMID: 28703900 DOI: 10.1002/jso.24763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2017] [Accepted: 06/17/2017] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid genetic counseling and testing (RGCT) in newly diagnosed high-risk breast cancer (BC) patients may influence surgical treatment decisions. To successfully integrate RGCT in practice, knowledge of professionals', and patients' attitudes toward RGCT is essential. METHODS Between 2008 and 2010, we performed a randomized clinical trial evaluating the impact of RGCT. Attitudes toward and experience with RGCT were assessed in 265 patients (at diagnosis, 6- and 12-month follow-up) and 29 medical professionals (before and after the recruitment period). RESULTS At 6-month follow-up, more patients who had been offered RGCT felt they had been actively involved in treatment decision-making than patients who had been offered usual care (67% vs 48%, P = 0.06). Patients who received DNA-test results before primary surgery reported more often that RGCT influenced treatment decisions than those who received results afterwards (P < 0.01). Eighty-seven percent felt that genetic counseling and testing (GCT) should preferably take place between diagnosis and surgery. Most professionals (72%) agreed that RGCT should be routinely offered to eligible patients. Most patients (74%) and professionals (85%) considered surgeons the most appropriate source for referral. CONCLUSIONS RGCT is viewed as helpful for newly diagnosed high-risk BC patients in choosing their primary surgery and should be offered routinely by surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke R Wevers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Department of Psychosocial Counseling, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Titia Brouwer
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Division of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart van Ooijen
- Division of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix A de Roos
- Division of Surgery, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Borgstein
- Division of Surgery, OLVG Location East, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Eline Vriens
- Division of Surgery, Tergooi Hospitals, Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H Bouma
- Division of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Rijna
- Division of Surgery, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes P Vente
- Division of Surgery, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Kuenen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Emiel J Th Rutgers
- Division of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Senno Verhoef
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Universal BRCA1/BRCA2 Testing for Ovarian Cancer Patients is Welcomed, but with Care: How Women and Staff Contextualize Experiences of Expanded Access. J Genet Couns 2017; 26:1280-1291. [PMID: 28540621 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-017-0108-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2016] [Accepted: 05/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Decreasing costs of genetic testing and advances in treatment for women with cancer with germline BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations have heralded more inclusive genetic testing programs. The Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) Study, investigates the feasibility and acceptability of offering genetic testing to all women recently diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer (universal genetic testing or UGT). Study participants and staff were interviewed to: (i) assess the impact of UGT (ii) integrate patients' and staff perspectives in the development of new UGT programs. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve GTEOC Study participants and five members of staff involved in recruiting them. The transcripts were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. There are two super-ordinate themes: motivations and influences around offers of genetic testing and impacts of genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients. A major finding is that genetic testing is contextualized within the broader experiences of the women; the impact of UGT was minimized in comparison with the ovarian cancer diagnosis. Women who consent to UGT are motivated by altruism and by their relatives' influence, whilst those who decline are often considered overwhelmed or fearful. Those without a genetic mutation are usually reassured by this result, whilst those with a genetic mutation must negotiate new uncertainties and responsibilities towards their families. Our findings suggest that UGT in this context is generally acceptable to women. However, the period shortly after diagnosis is a sensitive time and some women are emotionally overburdened. UGT is considered a 'family affair' and staff must acknowledge this.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kaphingst KA, Ivanovich J, Elrick A, Dresser R, Matsen C, Goodman MS. How, who, and when: preferences for delivery of genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2016; 4:684-695. [PMID: 27896289 PMCID: PMC5118211 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2016] [Revised: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/02/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The increasing use of genome sequencing with patients raises a critical communication challenge: return of secondary findings. While the issue of what sequencing results should be returned to patients has been examined, much less attention has been paid to developing strategies to return these results in ways that meet patients' needs and preferences. To address this, we investigated delivery preferences (i.e., who, how, when) for individual genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. Methods We conducted 60 semistructured, in‐person individual interviews to examine preferences for the return of different types of genome sequencing results and the reasons underlying these preferences. Two coders independently coded interview transcripts; analysis was conducted using NVivo 10. Results The major findings from the study were that: (1) many participants wanted sequencing results as soon as possible, even at the time of breast cancer diagnosis; (2) participants wanted an opportunity for an in‐person discussion of results; and (3) they put less emphasis on the type of person delivering results than on the knowledge and communicative skills of that person. Participants also emphasized the importance of a results return process tailored to a patient's individual circumstances and one that she has a voice in determining. Conclusions A critical goal for future transdisciplinary research including clinicians, patients, and communication researchers may be to develop decision‐making processes to help patients make decisions about how they would like various sequencing results returned. While the issue of what genome sequencing results should be returned to patients has been examined, much less attention has been paid to developing strategies to return these results in ways that meet patients' needs and preferences. To address this, we investigated delivery preferences (i.e., who, how, when) for individual genome sequencing results among women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger. The major findings from the study were that: (1) many participants wanted sequencing results as soon as possible, even at the time of breast cancer diagnosis; (2) participants wanted an opportunity for an in‐person discussion of results; and (3) they put less emphasis on the type of person delivering results than on the knowledge and communicative skills of that person.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Department of CommunicationUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah; Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Jennifer Ivanovich
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri
| | - Ashley Elrick
- Department of Communication University of Utah Salt Lake City Utah
| | | | - Cindy Matsen
- Huntsman Cancer InstituteUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah; Department of SurgeryUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtah
| | - Melody S Goodman
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Winchester E, Hodgson SV. Psychosocial and Ethical Issues Relating to Genetic Testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Breast Cancer Susceptibility Genes. WOMENS HEALTH 2016; 2:357-73. [DOI: 10.2217/17455057.2.3.357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Two breast cancer susceptibility genes have been identified, BRCA1 and BRCA2, which when inherited in altered form, confer a substantially increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer. Genetic testing for mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is available to adult men and women at increased risk of carrying such a mutation based on their personal and/or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Testing has profound implications not only for the individual being tested but for their entire family. It is therefore important that the psychosocial and ethical issues are explored through genetic counseling to ensure individuals make informed decisions about testing. Genetic testing may impact on psychological wellbeing, decisions regarding cancer risk management, childbearing and the wider family. Individuals who test positive for a mutation may face ethical dilemmas regarding childbearing and when and how to inform relatives of the genetic information. Female carriers will also face complex and challenging decisions concerning cancer risk management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Winchester
- St. Georges Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK,
| | - Shirley V Hodgson
- St. Georges Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK,
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Augestad MT, Høberg-Vetti H, Bjorvatn C, Sekse RJT. Identifying Needs: a Qualitative Study of women's Experiences Regarding Rapid Genetic Testing for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the DNA BONus Study. J Genet Couns 2016; 26:182-189. [PMID: 27465808 PMCID: PMC5258794 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9996-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is increasingly being offered in newly diagnosed breast and ovarian cancer patients. This genetic information may influence treatment decisions. However, there are some concerns that genetic testing offered in an already vulnerable situation might be an extra burden to these women. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of women who had been offered and accepted genetic testing when newly diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer. Four semi-structured focus-group interviews were conducted with 17 women recruited from a Norwegian multicenter study. The material was condensed, and conventional qualitative analysis was used to identify patterns in the participants’ descriptions. Three core themes were identified: 1) being “beside oneself” 2) altruism and ethical dilemmas 3) the need for support and counselling to assist the decision process. The present study indicates that women who are offered genetic testing when newly diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer want a consultation with a health professional. Personalized support and counselling might empower women to improve their ability to manage and comprehend this overwhelming situation, and find meaning in this experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Tonheim Augestad
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 22, P.O. Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway.
- Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | - Hildegunn Høberg-Vetti
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 22, P.O. Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Cathrine Bjorvatn
- Western Norway Familial Cancer Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Haukelandsveien 22, P.O. Box 1400, N-5021, Bergen, Norway
- Center for Medical Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ragnhild Johanne Tveit Sekse
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sollie A, Helsper CW, Ader RJM, Ausems MGEM, van der Wouden JC, Numans ME. Primary care management of women with breast cancer-related concerns-a dynamic cohort study using a network database. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 25:1005-1014. [PMID: 27302697 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, management and diagnostic outcomes of breast cancer-related concerns presented in primary care. A dynamic cohort study was performed in the anonymised routine electronic medical records (EMRs) extracted from 49 General Practices in the Netherlands (163,471 person-years, women aged 18-75). Main Outcome Measures were: (1) incidence rates for breast cancer-related concerns in Primary Care, (2) proportions of these women with and without symptoms of the breast referred for further investigation, (3) proportions of referrals (not) according to the guideline and (4) proportions of women with breast cancer-related concerns diagnosed with breast cancer during follow-up. Breast cancer-related concerns are presented frequently in Primary Care (incidence rate 25.9 per 1,000 women annually). About half these women are referred for further investigation. There is room to improve General Practitioner management, mainly for women with an increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Information concerning family history of cancer is often missing in the EMR. Since cancer is rarely diagnosed during follow-up, particularly when symptoms are absent, reduction of unnecessary concerns is plausible if identification of those without an increased risk is improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sollie
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - C W Helsper
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R J M Ader
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M G E M Ausems
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J C van der Wouden
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E Numans
- Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, VU University Medical Centre and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ringwald J, Wochnowski C, Bosse K, Giel KE, Schäffeler N, Zipfel S, Teufel M. Psychological Distress, Anxiety, and Depression of Cancer-Affected BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: a Systematic Review. J Genet Couns 2016; 25:880-91. [PMID: 27074860 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-016-9949-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Understanding the intermediate- and long-term psychological consequences of genetic testing for cancer patients has led to encouraging research, but a clear consensus of the psychosocial impact and clinical routine for cancer-affected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is still missing. We performed a systematic review of intermediate- and long-term studies investigating the psychological impact like psychological distress, anxiety, and depression in cancer-affected BRCA mutation carriers compared to unaffected mutation carriers. This review included the screening of 1243 studies. Eight intermediate- and long-term studies focusing on distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms among cancer-affected mutation carriers at least six months after the disclosure of genetic testing results were included. Studies reported a great variety of designs, methods, and patient outcomes. We found evidence indicating that cancer-affected mutation carriers experienced a negative effect in relation to psychological well-being in terms of an increase in symptoms of distress, anxiety, and depression in the first months after test disclosure. In the intermediate- and long-term, no significant clinical relevant symptoms occurred. However, none of the included studies used specific measurements, which can clearly identify psychological burdens of cancer-affected mutation carriers. We concluded that current well-implemented distress screening instruments are not sufficient for precisely identifying the psychological burden of genetic testing. Therefore, future studies should implement coping strategies, specific personality structures, the impact of genetic testing, supportive care needs and disease management behaviour to clearly screen for the possible intermediate- and long-term psychological impact of a positive test disclosure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Ringwald
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Christina Wochnowski
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kristin Bosse
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Elisabeth Giel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Norbert Schäffeler
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Zipfel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martin Teufel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Internal Medicine VI, University Hospital Tuebingen, Osianderstrasse 5, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Douma KFL, Meiser B, Kirk J, Mitchell G, Saunders C, Rahman B, Sousa MS, Barlow-Stewart K, Gleeson M, Tucker K. Health professionals' evaluation of delivering treatment-focused genetic testing to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Fam Cancer 2016; 14:265-72. [PMID: 25391616 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-014-9770-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly, women are offered genetic testing shortly after diagnosis of breast cancer to facilitate decision-making about treatment, often referred to as 'treatment-focused genetic testing' (TFGT). As understanding the attitudes of health professionals is likely to inform its integration into clinical care we surveyed professionals who participated in our TFGT randomized control study. Thirty-six completed surveys were received (response rate 59%), 15 (42%) health professionals classified as genetic and 21 (58%) as non-genetic. Mainly positive experiences with participating in the TFGT trial were reported. The high cost of testing and who could best deliver information about TGFT to the patient were raised as key constraints to implementation of TFGT in usual care. More non-genetic than genetic health professionals (44 vs 8%) preferred that the surgeon provide the information for decision-making about TFGT. While costs of TFGT itself and the time and effort of staff involved were perceived barriers, as testing costs become lower, it is expected that TFGT will become a routine part of standard clinical care for patients at high genetic risk in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsten F L Douma
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eccles BK, Copson E, Maishman T, Abraham JE, Eccles DM. Understanding of BRCA VUS genetic results by breast cancer specialists. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:936. [PMID: 26608569 PMCID: PMC4660681 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1934-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/16/2015] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mainstreaming genetic medicine, increased media coverage and clinical trials for BRCA mutation carriers are leading oncologists into more patient discussions about BRCA genetic testing. BRCA variants of uncertain significance (VUS) occur in 10-20% of tests. VUS detection introduces additional uncertainty for patient and potentially clinician. We aimed to explore the ability of breast cancer specialists (BCS) in the UK to correctly respond to a VUS report. METHODS A survey sent to 800 UK BCS collected demographics data, VUS general knowledge and interpretation and communication based on two genetics reports. A separate survey of UK clinical geneticists collected demographics data, laboratory reporting practice and methods used to clarify VUS pathogenicity including classification systems. RESULTS Of the 155 BCS (22.5%) who completed the survey, 12% reported no genetics training. Ninety five percent referred patients for BRCA genetic tests, 71% felt unsure about the clinical implications of the test reports presented here. A VUS report from a patient with a positive family history was interpreted and theoretically communicated correctly by 94% but when presented with a different VUS report with no management guidance and negative family history, 39% did not know how to communicate this result to the patient. Geneticists reported multiple VUS classification systems; the most commonly used was word-based in 32%. CONCLUSIONS A consistent and standardised format to report particularly VUS results across all diagnostic laboratories plus additional training of UK BCS will be necessary for effective mainstreaming of BRCA testing to the oncology clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B K Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - E Copson
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - T Maishman
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - J E Abraham
- Cambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge NHS Foundation Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK.
| | - D M Eccles
- Cancer Sciences Academic Unit and University of Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Wevers MR, Ausems MGEM, Verhoef S, Bleiker EMA, Hahn DEE, Brouwer T, Hogervorst FBL, van der Luijt RB, van Dalen T, Theunissen EB, van Ooijen B, de Roos MA, Borgstein PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Vriens E, Bouma WH, Rijna H, Vente JP, Kieffer JM, Valdimarsdottir HB, Rutgers EJT, Witkamp AJ, Aaronson NK. Does rapid genetic counseling and testing in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients cause additional psychosocial distress? results from a randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2015; 18:137-44. [PMID: 25905441 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Female breast cancer patients carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation have an increased risk of second primary breast cancer. Rapid genetic counseling and testing (RGCT) before surgery may influence choice of primary surgical treatment. In this article, we report on the psychosocial impact of RGCT. METHODS Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at risk for carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation were randomized to an intervention group (offer of RGCT) or a usual care control group (ratio 2:1). Psychosocial impact and quality of life were assessed with the Impact of Events Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Cancer Worry Scale, and the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23. Assessments took place at study entry and at 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. RESULTS Between 2008 and 2010, 265 patients were recruited into the study. Completeness of follow-up data was more than 90%. Of the 178 women in the intervention group, 177 had genetic counseling, of whom 71 (40%) had rapid DNA testing and 59 (33%) received test results before surgery. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed no statistically significant differences between groups over time in any of the psychosocial outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this study, RGCT in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients did not have any measurable adverse psychosocial effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke R Wevers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet G E M Ausems
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Senno Verhoef
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E E Hahn
- Department of Psychosocial Counseling, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Titia Brouwer
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frans B L Hogervorst
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob B van der Luijt
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs van Dalen
- Division of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Bart van Ooijen
- Division of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix A de Roos
- Division of Surgery, Rivierenland Hospital, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Borgstein
- Division of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bart C Vrouenraets
- Division of Surgery, St. Lucas Andreas Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eline Vriens
- Division of Surgery, Tergooi Hospitals, Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H Bouma
- Division of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Rijna
- Division of Surgery, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes P Vente
- Division of Surgery, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Emiel J Th Rutgers
- Division of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjen J Witkamp
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Fox E, McCuaig J, Demsky R, Shuman C, Chitayat D, Maganti M, Murphy J, Rosen B, Ferguson S, Randall Armel S. The sooner the better: Genetic testing following ovarian cancer diagnosis. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 137:423-9. [PMID: 25868966 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As treatment based genetic testing becomes a reality, it is important to assess the attitudes and preferences of women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding genetic testing. The objective of this study was to determine when women with a diagnosis of high grade serous ovarian cancer would prefer to undergo genetic testing and factors that influence this preference. METHODS Women over 18years of age with a known diagnosis of high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between October 2010-2013 were identified via the Princess Margaret Cancer Center Registry. Participants completed a questionnaire, which obtained preferences and attitudes towards genetic testing, cancer history, and demographic information. RESULTS 120 of the 355 women identified (33.8%) completed the questionnaires. The median age at time of ovarian cancer diagnosis was 57years (range 35-84). The majority of participants in this study were offered (94.6%) and pursued (84.8%) genetic testing. In this cohort, testing was most frequently offered at diagnosis (41.8%) or during treatment (19.1%). In this study, women with high grade serous ovarian cancer felt that genetic testing should be offered before or at the time of diagnosis (67.8%). Having a family history of breast or ovarian cancer was significantly (p=0.012) associated with preferring genetic testing at an earlier time point in the disease course. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that women with high grade serous ovarian cancer acknowledge the personal and clinical utility of genetic testing and support test implementation at the time of cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fox
- The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J McCuaig
- Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - R Demsky
- Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C Shuman
- The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D Chitayat
- The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Maganti
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J Murphy
- Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B Rosen
- Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - S Randall Armel
- Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Kurian AW, Morrow M, Hamilton AS, Graff JJ, Katz SJ, Hawley ST. Concerns about cancer risk and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse population of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:1584-91. [PMID: 25847940 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.5885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate preferences for and experiences with genetic testing in a diverse cohort of patients with breast cancer identified through population-based registries, with attention to differences by race/ethnicity. METHODS We surveyed women diagnosed with nonmetastatic breast cancer from 2005 to 2007, as reported to the SEER registries of metropolitan Los Angeles and Detroit, about experiences with hereditary risk evaluation. Multivariable models evaluated correlates of a strong desire for genetic testing, unmet need for discussion with a health care professional, and receipt of testing. RESULTS Among 1,536 patients who completed the survey, 35% expressed strong desire for genetic testing, 28% reported discussing testing with a health care professional, and 19% reported test receipt. Strong desire for testing was more common in younger women, Latinas, and those with family history. Minority patients were significantly more likely to have unmet need for discussion (failure to discuss genetic testing with a health professional when they had a strong desire for testing): odds ratios of 1.68, 2.44, and 7.39 for blacks, English-speaking Latinas, and Spanish-speaking Latinas compared with whites, respectively. Worry in the long-term survivorship period was higher among those with unmet need for discussion (48.7% v 24.9%; P <.001). Patients who received genetic testing were younger, less likely to be black, and more likely to have a family cancer history. CONCLUSION Many patients, especially minorities, express a strong desire for genetic testing and may benefit from discussion to clarify risks. Clinicians should discuss genetic risk even with patients they perceive to be at low risk, as this may reduce worry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reshma Jagsi
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ.
| | - Kent A Griffith
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Allison W Kurian
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Monica Morrow
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Ann S Hamilton
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - John J Graff
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Steven J Katz
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Sarah T Hawley
- Reshma Jagsi, Center for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine, University of Michigan; Kent A. Griffith, Center for Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan; Steven J. Katz, University of Michigan; Sarah T. Hawley, Ann Arbor VA Health Care System, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Allison W. Kurian, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford; Ann S. Hamilton, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Monica Morrow, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; and John J. Graff, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Improving referral for genetic risk assessment in ovarian cancer using an electronic medical record system. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2015; 24:1003-9. [PMID: 24887442 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate an electronic referral form to increase referral for genetic risk assessment of women with newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS A form summarizing referral for genetic counseling for women with ovarian cancer was introduced into the electronic medical record allowing gynecologic oncologists to electronically submit a request for genetic services. Analysis compared patient and provider characteristics for women newly diagnosed with ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer referred 1 year before and after introducing the form. All patients were seen in a single fee-for-service university-based cancer center clinic. RESULTS There were 86 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients seen before and 83 seen after the introduction of the electronic referral form. Most lived in the metropolitan area and had stage III to IV disease, serous histology, a documented family history, and a treating oncologist who was less than 10 years from completion of fellowship. Postintervention referral rates increased from 17% to 30% (P = 0.053). Factors best predicting referral were whether the patient was seen after the intervention (P = 0.009), resided in the metropolitan area (P = 0.006), and had been identified as at high hereditary risk (P < 0.0001). Sixty percent of the referred patients participated in counseling. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of the referred patients before and after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS Referral rates increased with the introduction of an electronic medical record referral form suggesting that streamlining the physician referral process might be effective at increasing referrals for cancer genetic risk assessment.
Collapse
|
36
|
Birch PH. Interactive e-counselling for genetics pre-test decisions: where are we now? Clin Genet 2014; 87:209-17. [PMID: 24828354 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Revised: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In-person genetic counselling (GC) is the model typically used to provide patients with information regarding their genetic testing options. Current and emerging demand for genetic testing may overburden the health care system and exceed the available numbers of genetic counsellors. Furthermore, GC is not always available at times and places convenient for patients. There is little evidence that the in-person model alone is always optimal and alternatives to in-person GC have been studied in genetics and other areas of health care. This review summarizes the published evidence between 1994 and March 2014 for interactive e-learning and decisional support e-tools that could be used in pre-test GC. A total of 21 papers from 15 heterogeneous studies of interactive e-learning tools, with or without decision aids, were reviewed. Study populations, designs, and outcomes varied widely but most used an e-tool as an adjunct to conventional GC. Knowledge acquisition and decisional comfort were achieved and the e-tools were generally well-accepted by users. In a time when health care budgets are constrained and availability of GC is limited, research is needed to determine the specific circumstances in which e-tools might replace or supplement some of the functions of genetic counsellors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wevers MR, Aaronson NK, Verhoef S, Bleiker EMA, Hahn DEE, Kuenen MA, van der Sanden-Melis J, Brouwer T, Hogervorst FBL, van der Luijt RB, Valdimarsdottir HB, van Dalen T, Theunissen EBM, van Ooijen B, de Roos MA, Borgstein PJ, Vrouenraets BC, Vriens E, Bouma WH, Rijna H, Vente JP, Witkamp AJ, Rutgers EJT, Ausems MGEM. Impact of rapid genetic counselling and testing on the decision to undergo immediate or delayed prophylactic mastectomy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients: findings from a randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1081-7. [PMID: 24423928 PMCID: PMC3929884 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2013] [Revised: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 12/04/2013] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Female breast cancer patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation have an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer. We investigated the effect of rapid genetic counselling and testing (RGCT) on choice of surgery. METHODS Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with at least a 10% risk of a BRCA1/2 mutation were randomised to an intervention group (offer of RGCT) or a control group (usual care; ratio 2 : 1). Primary study outcomes were uptake of direct bilateral mastectomy (BLM) and delayed contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). RESULTS Between 2008 and 2010, we recruited 265 women. On the basis of intention-to-treat analyses, no significant group differences were observed in percentage of patients opting for a direct BLM (14.6% for the RGCT group vs 9.2% for the control group; odds ratio (OR) 2.31; confidence interval (CI) 0.92-5.81; P=0.08) or for a delayed CPM (4.5% for the RGCT group vs 5.7% for the control group; OR 0.89; CI 0.27-2.90; P=0.84). Per-protocol analysis indicated that patients who received DNA test results before surgery (59 out of 178 women in the RGCT group) opted for direct BLM significantly more often than patients who received usual care (22% vs 9.2%; OR 3.09, CI 1.15-8.31, P=0.03). INTERPRETATION Although the large majority of patients in the intervention group underwent rapid genetic counselling, only a minority received DNA test results before surgery. This may explain why offering RGCT yielded only marginally significant differences in uptake of BLM. As patients who received DNA test results before surgery were more likely to undergo BLM, we hypothesise that when DNA test results are made routinely available pre-surgery, they will have a more significant role in surgical treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Wevers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - N K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Verhoef
- Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology & Family Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D E E Hahn
- Department of Psychosocial Counseling, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M A Kuenen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J van der Sanden-Melis
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T Brouwer
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - F B L Hogervorst
- Division of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R B van der Luijt
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - H B Valdimarsdottir
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Icahn Medical Institute, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - T van Dalen
- Division of Surgery, Diakonessen Hospital, PO Box 80250, 3508 TG Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E B M Theunissen
- Division of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, PO Box 2500, 3430EM Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - B van Ooijen
- Division of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, PO Box 1502, 3800 BM Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M A de Roos
- Division of Surgery, Rivierenland Hospital, PO Box 6024, 4000 HA Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - P J Borgstein
- Division of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, PO Box 95500, 1090 HM Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B C Vrouenraets
- Division of Surgery, St Lucas Andreas Hospital, PO Box 9243, 1006 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Vriens
- Division of Surgery, Tergooi Hospitals, PO Box 10016, 1201 DA Blaricum, The Netherlands
| | - W H Bouma
- Division of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Albert Schweitzerlaan 31, 7334 DZ Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - H Rijna
- Division of Surgery, Kennemer Gasthuis, PO Box 417, 2000 AK Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - J P Vente
- Division of Surgery, Zuwe Hofpoort Hospital, PO Box 8000, 3440 JD Woerden, The Netherlands
| | - A J Witkamp
- Division of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, 3508GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - E J T Rutgers
- Division of Surgery, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, PO Box 90203, 1006 BE Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M G E M Ausems
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Baars JE, Bleiker EMA, van Riel E, Rodenhuis CC, Velthuizen ME, Schlich KJ, Ausems MGEM. Active approach for breast cancer genetic counseling during radiotherapy: long-term psychosocial and medical impact. Clin Genet 2014; 85:524-31. [PMID: 24372530 DOI: 10.1111/cge.12335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 12/18/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Genetic counseling and DNA testing (GCT) for breast cancer is increasingly being actively offered to newly diagnosed patients. Little is known about the consequences of such an approach. Therefore, the long-term psychosocial and medical impact of referring breast cancer patients for GCT during an early phase of treatment was studied. A group of 112 breast cancer patients who had been actively offered GCT during adjuvant radiotherapy 7-14 years earlier, returned a self-report questionnaire. We compared their experiences with a group of 127 breast cancer patients who had not met the criteria for GCT. In total, 239 women participated in this long-term follow-up study (72% response rate). Nearly 75% of them had received regular mammography surveillance in the past 3 years. Preventive surgery was reported more often in the counseling group (specifically in the BRCA1/2 mutation carriers). Like the comparative group, only a minority of patients who had received GCT were experiencing high levels of depression (5%) or psychological distress (14%). Breast cancer patients can be actively approached and referred for GCT at the beginning of their radiotherapy without a threat to psychological functioning in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Baars
- Division of Biomedical Genetics, Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Francken AB, Schouten PC, Bleiker EMA, Linn SC, Rutgers EJT. Breast cancer in women at high risk: the role of rapid genetic testing for BRCA1 and -2 mutations and the consequences for treatment strategies. Breast 2013; 22:561-8. [PMID: 23972475 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2013] [Revised: 06/05/2013] [Accepted: 07/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Specific clinical questions rise when patients, who are diagnosed with breast cancer, are at risk of carrying a mutation in BRCA1 and -2 gene due to a strong family history or young age at diagnosis. These questions concern topics such as 1. Timing of genetic counseling and testing, 2. Choices to be made for BRCA1 or -2 mutation carriers in local treatment, contralateral treatment, (neo)adjuvant systemic therapy, and 3. The psychological effects of rapid testing. The knowledge of the genetic status might have several advantages for the patient in treatment planning, such as the choice whether or not to undergo mastectomy and/or prophylactic contralateral mastectomy. The increased risk of developing a second breast cancer in the ipsilateral breast in mutation carriers, is only slightly higher after primary cancer treatment, than in the general population. Prophylactic contralateral mastectomy provides a substantial reduction of contralateral breast cancer, although only a small breast cancer specific survival benefit. Patients should be enrolled in clinical trials to investigate (neo)-adjuvant drug regimens, that based on preclinical and early clinical evidence might be targeting the homologous recombination defect, such as platinum compounds and PARP inhibitors. If rapid testing is performed, the patient can make a well-balanced decision. Although rapid genetic counseling and testing might cause some distress, most women reported this approach to be worthwhile. In this review the literature regarding these topics is evaluated. Answers and suggestions, useful in clinical practice are discussed.
Collapse
|
40
|
Burcher S, Meiser B, Mitchell G, Saunders C, Rahman B, Tucker K, Barlow-Stewart K, Watts K, Gleeson M, Kirk J. Oncology health professionals' attitudes toward treatment-focused genetic testing for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Per Med 2013; 10:431-440. [PMID: 29758836 DOI: 10.2217/pme.13.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study explored the attitudes of oncology health professionals towards treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. MATERIALS & METHODS Members of several relevant medical organizations in Australia and New Zealand were invited via email to participate in an online survey. RESULTS A total of 149 respondents, including 40 surgeons, 46 oncologists and 63 breast care nurses, completed the online questionnaire. The majority of respondents believed that TFGT was useful for patient care (87.3%) and valuable for the treatment and management of breast cancer (90.6%). In multivariable analyses, breast care nurses were significantly more likely to agree that TFGT was useful for patient care and the treatment and management of breast cancer compared with oncologists and surgeons (β = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.01-0.60; p = 0.045). Participants also agreed that TFGT has an impact on treatment decision-making (96.0%), uptake of bilateral mastectomy (98.7%) and uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (98.0%) in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. A slight preference towards surgeons (49.7%) as the best health professional to make the initial offer of TFGT was observed and the majority of respondents suggested the best time to offer TFGT was shortly after diagnosis, when the treatment plan is discussed. CONCLUSION The findings suggest health professionals have positive attitudes towards TFGT. Future training programs focusing on teamwork models and guidelines specifying health professionals' roles in regards to TFGT and follow-up management may be of benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Burcher
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bettina Meiser
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Gillian Mitchell
- Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Christobel Saunders
- School of Surgery & Pathology, University of Western Australia, WA, Australia
| | - Belinda Rahman
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kathy Tucker
- Hereditary Cancer Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia
| | - Kristine Barlow-Stewart
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia and The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kaaren Watts
- Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Judy Kirk
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Institute for Cancer Research, Westmead Millenium Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Issues of concern in risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing of younger breast cancer patients in Japan. Breast Cancer 2013; 21:656-63. [PMID: 23754181 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-013-0477-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2013] [Accepted: 05/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
About 5-10 % of breast cancer cases are considered to be hereditary, and germ line mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes have been proven to contribute to the development of hereditary breast and/or ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Breast cancer diagnosed at a young age is an indication of a higher likelihood of HBOC. Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation testing, especially for younger women with breast cancer, have started to be an integral element of practice due to advances in gene sequencing technologies and accumulating evidence for the clinical implications of BRCA mutation status for not only early breast cancer management, but also for the patient's own and their family's next cancer risk, and proactive steps toward a risk-reducing approach. As yet, the cancer genetic service system is immature in Japan. There are several problems to be solved to improve cancer genetic services in clinical practice for breast cancer.
Collapse
|
42
|
Petzel SV, Vogel RI, Bensend T, Leininger A, Argenta PA, Geller MA. Genetic risk assessment for women with epithelial ovarian cancer: referral patterns and outcomes in a university gynecologic oncology clinic. J Genet Couns 2013; 22:662-73. [PMID: 23677535 DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9598-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2012] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about genetic service utilization and ovarian cancer. We identified the frequency and outcome of genetic counseling referral, predictors of referral, and referral uptake for ovarian cancer patients. Using pathology reports, we identified all epithelial ovarian cancer patients seen in a university gynecologic oncology clinic (1/04-8/06). Electronic medical records (EMR) were used to document genetic service referral, time from diagnosis-to-referral, point-in-treatment at referral, personal/family cancer history, demographics, and genetic test results. Groups were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. The study population consisted of 376 women with ovarian cancer, 72 (19 %) of who were referred for genetic counseling/testing, primarily during surveillance. Of those referred, 42 (58 %) had personal or family genetic counseling and 34 (47 %) were ultimately tested or identified due to known family mutation. Family history and prior cancer were associated with referral. Family history, living in a larger community, higher-stage disease, and serous histology were associated with undergoing genetic counseling. Risk assessment identified 20 BRCA1/2 (5.3 %) and 1 HNPCC (0.3 %) mutation carriers. Based on recent estimates that 11.7-16.6 % of women with ovarian cancer are BRCA carriers and 2 % are HNPCC carriers, results suggest under-identification of carriers and under-utilization of genetic services by providers and patients. Interventions to increase medical providers' referrals, even in a specialized oncology clinic, are necessary and may include innovations in educating these providers using web-based methods. Ease of referral by the introduction of an electronic cancer genetic referral form represents another new direction that may increase genetic risk assessment for high-risk women with ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue V Petzel
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gleeson M, Meiser B, Barlow-Stewart K, Trainer AH, Tucker K, Watts KJ, Friedlander M, Kasparian N. Communication and Information Needs of Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer Regarding Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 2013; 40:275-83. [DOI: 10.1188/13.onf.40-03ap] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
44
|
Hurley K, Rubin LR, Werner-Lin A, Sagi M, Kemel Y, Stern R, Phillips A, Cholst I, Kauff N, Offit K. Incorporating information regarding preimplantation genetic diagnosis into discussions concerning testing and risk management for BRCA1/2 mutations: a qualitative study of patient preferences. Cancer 2012; 118:6270-7. [PMID: 22736296 PMCID: PMC4910088 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.27695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2012] [Revised: 05/11/2012] [Accepted: 05/14/2012] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that BRCA1/2 mutation carriers are interested in learning about reproductive options such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to prevent passing their risk onto their children. However, attitudes vary widely, and the procedure raises complex ethical and psychosocial issues. This complexity, plus the highly technical nature of PGD, makes it difficult to integrate PGD information into genetic counseling sessions that already cover probabilistic, emotionally charged risk information. METHODS A total of 33 carriers of the BRCA1/2 mutation who were of reproductive age and had previously undergone genetic counseling viewed a tutorial regarding PGD and were interviewed concerning their attitudes toward PGD and preferences about how to include PGD information in genetic counseling. RESULTS The majority of participants preferred to be briefly informed of the availability of PGD information, and to receive written materials regarding PGD, but with the option of deferring detailed discussion if they already believed themselves to be overloaded or perceived that PGD was not immediately relevant to their risk management and/or childbearing plans. For some individuals, the stress of testing temporarily interfered with information processing, producing states of cognitive avoidance ("in a fog," or "tuning out"). Some preferred to discuss PGD with a physician with whom they had an ongoing relationship (eg, obstetrician/gynecologist, primary care provider, or oncologist). CONCLUSIONS Providers offering cancer genetic testing may consider indicating the availability of PGD information to their patients, while attending to the patients' level of interest and ability to absorb information. Research is needed to link patient responses to information overload with psychosocial outcomes (eg, distress, and quality of decision-making). Continuing medical education is needed to support providers in facilitating informed decisions regarding PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurley
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wevers MR, Hahn DEE, Verhoef S, Bolhaar MDK, Ausems MGEM, Aaronson NK, Bleiker EMA. Breast cancer genetic counseling after diagnosis but before treatment: a pilot study on treatment consequences and psychological impact. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 89:89-95. [PMID: 22543000 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2011] [Revised: 02/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2012] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Female breast cancer patients carrying a BRCA1/2-mutation have an increased risk of second primary breast and ovarian tumors. Little is known about the psychological impact and treatment consequences of rapid genetic counseling and testing offered between breast cancer diagnosis and surgery. METHODS Female breast cancer patients, who had received rapid genetic counseling (and optional testing) (RGC(T)) at The Netherlands Cancer Institute between 2004 and 2008, received a questionnaire in 2009. RESULTS BRCA-mutations were found in 10 of the 26 participants. Six mutation-carriers (60%) had an immediate bilateral mastectomy, compared with 25% of those without a mutation. Five patients (19%) reported having frequent worries about cancer recurrence; none indicated that such worries impaired daily functioning. Six patients had clinically relevant levels of breast cancer-specific distress at the time of assessment. CONCLUSION These results suggest that RGC(T) in high-risk breast cancer patients may influence surgical treatment, without causing long-term psychosocial distress in the majority. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These results are important, since rapid genetic counseling and testing are expected to be offered to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with increasing frequency in order to inform these women and their surgeons about the possible familial/hereditary nature of their disease before deciding on treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijke R Wevers
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Watts KJ, Meiser B, Mitchell G, Kirk J, Saunders C, Peate M, Duffy J, Kelly PJ, Gleeson M, Barlow-Stewart K, Rahman B, Friedlander M, Tucker K. How should we discuss genetic testing with women newly diagnosed with breast cancer? Design and implementation of a randomized controlled trial of two models of delivering education about treatment-focused genetic testing to younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:320. [PMID: 22838957 PMCID: PMC3472271 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing offered shortly after a breast cancer diagnosis to inform women’s treatment choices - treatment-focused genetic testing ‘TFGT’ - has entered clinical practice in specialist centers and is likely to be soon commonplace in acute breast cancer management, especially for younger women. Yet the optimal way to deliver information about TFGT to younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer is not known, particularly for those who were not suspected of having a hereditary breast cancer syndrome prior to their cancer diagnosis. Also, little is known about the behavioral and psychosocial impact or cost effectiveness of educating patients about TFGT. This trial aims to examine the impact and efficiency of two models of educating younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer about genetic testing in order to provide evidence for a safe and effective future clinical pathway for this service. Design/methods In this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, 140 women newly diagnosed with breast cancer (aged less than 50 years) are being recruited from nine cancer centers in Australia. Eligible women with either a significant family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer or with other high risk features suggestive of a mutation detection rate of > 10% are invited by their surgeon prior to mastectomy or radiotherapy. After completing the first questionnaire, participants are randomized to receive either: (a) an educational pamphlet about genetic testing (intervention) or (b) a genetic counseling appointment at a family cancer center (standard care). Each participant is offered genetic testing for germline BRCA mutations. Decision-related and psychosocial outcomes are assessed over 12 months and include decisional conflict (primary outcome);uptake of bilateral mastectomy and/or risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; cancer-specific- and general distress; family involvement in decision making; and decision regret. A process-oriented retrospective online survey will examine health professionals’ attitudes toward TFGT; a health economic analysis will determine the cost effectiveness of the intervention. Discussion This trial will provide crucial information about the impact, efficiency and cost effectiveness of an educational pamphlet designed to inform younger women newly diagnosed with breast cancer about genetic testing. Issues regarding implementation of the trial are discussed. Trial registration The study is registered with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Group (Registration no: ACTRN12610000502033)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaaren J Watts
- Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, High Street, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Meiser B, Gleeson M, Watts K, Peate M, Zilliacus E, Barlow-Stewart K, Saunders C, Mitchell G, Kirk J. Getting to the point: what women newly diagnosed with breast cancer want to know about treatment-focused genetic testing. Oncol Nurs Forum 2012; 39:E101-11. [PMID: 22374498 DOI: 10.1188/12.onf.e101-e111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES To identify young women's information preferences regarding treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT) and to develop and evaluate a novel educational resource. RESEARCH APPROACH Qualitative interview study and pilot testing of a novel resource. SETTING Two familial cancer services and one outpatient oncology clinic in Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS 26 women with breast cancer aged 50 years and younger who either previously had TFGT (n = 14) or had a diagnosis of breast cancer within the previous 6-12 months. METHODOLOGIC APPROACH Participants were asked about their views of TFGT in semistructured interviews. A brief pamphlet on TFGT then was developed and pilot tested with 17 of the 26 women. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES Women's attitudes and preferences with regard to timing, mode of delivery, and amount and format of information regarding TFGT were explored. FINDINGS Most women wanted to be informed about TFGT at or around the time of their cancer diagnosis via a face-to-face consultation. No clear preference existed for which type of healthcare professional should provide information on TFGT. Brief written information about TFGT was viewed as important supporting material. The educational resource developed was well received. CONCLUSIONS The potential for more widespread TFGT in the future indicates a need for patient educational materials that enable women to make informed choices about TFGT. This pilot study has provided timely initial evidence on the efficacy of a brief written resource in preparing women for decision making about TFGT. INTERPRETATION The resource developed in this study will assist oncology nurses to make important genetic risk information available to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer at a stressful time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Meiser
- Department of Medical Oncology at Prince of Wales Hospital, Prince of Wales Clinical School at University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Zilliacus E, Meiser B, Gleeson M, Watts K, Tucker K, Lobb EA, Mitchell G. Are we being overly cautious? A qualitative inquiry into the experiences and perceptions of treatment-focused germline BRCA genetic testing amongst women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2012; 20:2949-58. [PMID: 22441502 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1427-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/27/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with breast cancer, who are found to be BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, have a high risk of ovarian cancer and metachronous breast cancer. Treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT), offered around the time of diagnosis, allows genetic test results to inform surgical treatment decisions. However, concern has been raised that offering TFGT at this time may overly increase psychological burden. This study aimed to qualitatively explore women's attitudes and experiences of TFGT. METHODS Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer at age 50 years or less undertook a semi-structured telephone interview (n = 26). The sample included women who had been offered TFGT, based on family history and/or other risk criteria (n = 14), and women who had been diagnosed within the past 6-12 months and had not been offered TFGT (n = 12). Interviews explored women's attitudes towards TFGT, perceived benefits and disadvantages, implications of TFGT and impact on surgical decision making. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analysed. RESULTS Women expressed positive attitudes towards TFGT and felt it was highly relevant to their surgical decision making. They did not feel that an offer of TFGT shortly after, or at the time of diagnosis, added undue psychological burden. The majority of women interviewed felt that TFGT should be incorporated into standard clinical care. CONCLUSIONS TFGT is viewed favourably by women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to examine the long-term impact of TFGT. We conclude that an offer of TFGT is not perceived as 'too much, too soon' by relevant patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Zilliacus
- Psychosocial Research Group, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
van Riel E, van Dulmen S, Ausems MGEM. Who is being referred to cancer genetic counseling? Characteristics of counselees and their referral. J Community Genet 2012; 3:265-74. [PMID: 22426886 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-012-0090-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2011] [Accepted: 03/06/2012] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Both physician and patient play a role in the referral process for cancer genetic counseling. Access to such counseling is not optimal because some eligible patients are not being reached by current referral practice. We aimed to identify factors associated with the initiator of referral. During a 7-month period, we recorded demographic characteristics like gender, personal and family history of cancer, ethnicity and eligibility for genetic testing for 406 consecutive counselees using a specially designed questionnaire. Counselees were seen in a university hospital or a community hospital (n = 7) in the Netherlands. We also recorded educational level of each counselee, clinical setting and who initiated referral. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the counselees' general characteristics. We analysed the association between counselee characteristics and the initiator of referral by logistic regression. The majority of counselees seemed to have initiated referral themselves but were indeed eligible for genetic testing. In comparison to the general population in the Netherlands, the counselees had a higher level of education, and there were fewer immigrants, although a higher level of education was not found to be a facilitating factor for referral. The clinical setting where a counselee was seen was associated with initiator of referral, although this relationship was not straightforward. There is a complex interaction between clinical setting and initiator of referral, which warrants further research to elucidate the factors involved in this relationship. Patients seen in cancer genetic counseling do not reflect the general population in terms of educational level or ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E van Riel
- Department of Medical Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB, Utrecht, The Netherlands,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
There is no decision to make: Experiences and attitudes toward treatment-focused genetic testing among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012; 124:153-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2011] [Revised: 09/27/2011] [Accepted: 09/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|