Haemodynamic and metabolic effects of combined adrenergic alpha- and beta-receptor blockade with labetalol in the exercising human forearm

The effects of moderate alterations in adrenergic activity on acute appetite regulation in obese women: A randomised crossover trial

Background:

Previous evidence has demonstrated that serum leptin is correlated with appetite in combination with, but not without, modest exercise.

Aim:

The present experiments investigated the effects of exogenous adrenaline and α/β adrenoceptor blockade in combination with moderate exercise on serum leptin concentrations, appetite/satiety sensations and subsequent food intake in obese women.

Methods:

A total of 10 obese women ((mean ± SEM), age: 50 (1.9) years, body mass index 36 (4.1) kg/m², waist 104.8 (4.1) cm) participated in two separate, double-blind randomised experimental trials. Experiment 1: moderate exercise after α/β adrenergic blocker (labetalol, 100 mg orally) versus moderate exercise plus placebo; experiment 2: adrenaline infusion for 20 minutes versus saline infusion. Appetite/satiety and biochemistry were measured at baseline, pre- and immediately post-intervention, then 1 hour post-intervention (i.e., before dinner). Food intake was assessed via ad libitum buffet-style dinner.

Results:

No differences were found in appetite/satiety, subsequent food intake or serum leptin in any of the studies (experiment 1 or experiment 2). In experiment 1, blood glucose was higher (p < 0.01) and plasma free fatty acids lower (p = 0.04) versus placebo. In experiment 2, plasma free fatty acids (p < 0.05) increased after adrenaline versus saline infusion.

Conclusions:

Neither inhibition of exercise-induced adrenergic activity by combined α/β adrenergic blockade nor moderate increases in adrenergic activity induced by intravenous adrenaline infusion affected acute appetite regulation.

Labetalol. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease

Since labetalol was first reviewed in the Journal (1978), its scope of therapeutic use has expanded and become better defined. Labetalol is an adrenoceptor blocking drug with combined alpha- and beta-blocking properties. These result in a more favourable haemodynamic profile for labetalol compared with 'pure' beta-blockers or pure alpha-blockers, but also contribute to a wider range, but not an overall increased incidence, of adverse effects. The drug is effective and well-tolerated in patients with all grades of hypertension, but is of particular value in special subgroups such as Black patients, the elderly and patients with renal hypertension. While comparative studies are not extensive, available data show that the drug reduces blood pressure to a similar extent, and in a similar proportion of patients, as 'pure' beta-blockers such as propranolol, pure alpha-blockers such as prazosin, calcium antagonists (nifedipine, verapamil), and centrally acting drugs (clonidine and methyldopa). Labetalol is very effective in hypertensive pregnant women and in hypertensive crises, where it provides good control of blood pressure without serious adverse effects, and where few therapeutic options exist. Few controlled studies have investigated the use of labetalol in deliberate induction of hypotension or prevention of hypertension during anaesthesia, and also in patients with ischaemic heart disease. However, available evidence suggests a role for labetalol in these indications and further studies should aid in clarification of its efficacy in these areas. Thus, with its broad scope of therapeutic use in hypertension labetalol remains an important therapeutic option, and the drug may well find an additional place in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia if further evidence confirms encouraging preliminary findings.

Haemodynamic effects of atenolol, labetalol, pindolol and captopril: a comparison in hypertensive patients with special reference to changes in limb blood flow, heart rate and left ventricular function

1 To compare the haemodynamic effects of secondary characteristics of beta-adrenoceptor blockers with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor forty patients with previously untreated mild to moderate hypertension were prescribed either atenolol 50-100 mg day-1, labetalol 200-800 mg day-1, pindolol 10-30 mg day-1 or captopril 25-100 mg day-1 and observed for 6 months. 2 Over this period: (a) All four drugs produced similar reductions in blood pressure at rest (P less than or equal to 0.01) and after exercise (P less than or equal to 0.01). (b) All four drugs significantly decreased resting forearm (P less than or equal to 0.01) and calf blood flow (P less than or equal to 0.01). They all also caused a significant reduction in the increased calf blood flow following exercise (P less than or equal to 0.01). (c) No drug produced a change in resting forearm vascular resistance, while resting calf vascular resistance was decreased by captopril and pindolol, unaltered by labetalol and increased by atenolol. Post-exercise calf vascular resistance was increased by atenolol, labetalol and pindolol but unaltered by captopril. (d) Although all four drugs produced a fall in resting heart rate this was significantly greater for atenolol and labetalol (P less than or equal to 0.01). All four treatments however significantly reduced the increase in heart rate following exercise (P less than or equal to 0.01). (e) No drug produced any significant change in resting and post-exercise stroke volume/ejection fraction. 3 It is concluded that despite differing modes of action all four drugs reduce limb blood flow. This primarily appears to be a consequence of reduced perfusion pressure associated with limited autoregulation of skeletal muscle circulation. The reduction in arterial vascular resistance produced by captopril and pindolol is inconsistent and does not appear of major benefit in preserving limb blood flow. The reduction in perfusion with the agents studied may in part be related to a fall in cardiac output associated with decreased heart rate. This suggests that captopril may exert antisympathetic activity when used as an antihypertensive agent.

Effect of labetalol on limb haemodynamics in patients following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Labetalol is a competitive inhibitor of alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors and has an antihypertensive action. To determine limb haemodynamic effects, we measured calf blood flow and venous capacitance by venous occlusion plethysmography before and after oral labetalol in 10 patients 3-7 days following coronary bypass surgery. Vascular resistance was calculated as the ratio of mean arterial pressure to arterial flow. The peak effect of labetalol was taken as the point of maximum blood pressure decline, and this interval was selected for evaluation of the limb haemodynamic response. Ninety to 120 min after administration of 100-200 mg of labetalol the mean blood pressure fell from 88 +/- 3 to 79 +/- 3 mm Hg; (P less than 0.005). The mean arterial blood flow registered 5.1 +/- 1.0 ml 100 ml-1 limb tissue min-1 which was not significantly different from the control value of 4.4 +/- 0.8 ml 100 ml-1 limb tissue min-1. The calculated index of limb vascular resistance was not affected by labetalol administration, averaging 37 +/- 12 mm Hg 100-1 ml limb tissue min-1 before labetalol and 30 +/- 11 mm Hg ml-1 100 ml limb tissue min-1 at the time of peak hypotensive effect. There was a slight but statistically significant increment in limb venous volume to 1.9 +/- 0.3 from 1.5 +/- 0.3 ml 100 ml-1 limb tissue (P less than 0.025). Placebo administration produced no consistent changes in blood pressure, arterial blood flow, vascular resistance or venous capacitance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Stimulation of beta-adrenoceptors in the exercising human forearm

In order to study the effects of local stimulation of beta-adrenoceptors on limb blood flow during exercise and on muscle metabolism, the non-selective beta-adrenoceptor agonist, isoprenaline, was infused intra-arterially into the forearm of six healthy, young subjects. Isoprenaline caused a marked increase in forearm blood flow not only at rest but also during dynamic forearm exercise. The forearm release of lactate increased considerably during drug infusion whereas glucose uptake decreased. The net uptake of free fatty acids during exercise decreased. There were no systemic effects of isoprenaline. These findings suggest that the resistance vessels are responsive to beta-adrenergic vasodilatation also during muscle exercise. The increase in blood flow through the exercising forearm may be secondary to an increased muscle metabolism. The increased lactate release from the exercising muscles indicates an increased muscle glycogen breakdown during beta-adrenoceptor stimulation.

Haemodynamic and metabolic effects of diazoxide during rest and forearm exercise

The immediate haemodynamic and metabolic effects of acute dose of diazoxide 300 mg i.v. were studied in six healthy subjects at rest and during dynamic forearm exercise. Control periods of rest, exercise and recovery were compared with corresponding periods after drug administration. Resting forearm blood flow was almost doubled after diazoxide, and during forearm exercise it increased by about 24%. Systolic blood pressure did not change significantly, but diastolic blood pressure was moderately decreased (5-10 mm Hg). The mean heart rate increased from 57 to 92 beats/min immediately after diazoxide administration and remained about 20% higher throughout the study. There was a sustained increase in arterial blood glucose of almost 1 mmol/l. The arterial concentration of free fatty acids increased transiently just after diazoxide and then returned to the pre-drug level. The arterial concentration of triglycerides after diazoxide was decreased by about 15% throughout the study. Arterial blood lactate remained unchanged. Forearm uptake of oxygen and glucose tended to increase during the exercise and recovery periods, whereas lactate release remained unchanged.