1
|
Pearce CS, Bukovsky D, Douchant K, Katoch A, Greenlaw J, Gale DJ, Nashed JY, Brien D, Kuhlmeier VA, Sabbagh MA, Blohm G, De Felice FG, Pare M, Cook DJ, Scott SH, Munoz DP, Sjaarda CP, Tusche A, Sheth PM, Winterborn A, Boehnke S, Gallivan JP. Changes in social environment impact primate gut microbiota composition. Anim Microbiome 2024; 6:66. [PMID: 39538341 PMCID: PMC11562706 DOI: 10.1186/s42523-024-00355-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 11/05/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The gut microbiota (GM) has proven to be essential for both physical health and mental wellbeing, yet the forces that ultimately shape its composition remain opaque. One critical force known to affect the GM is the social environment. Prior work in humans and free-ranging non-human primates has shown that cohabitation and frequent social interaction can lead to changes in GM composition. However, it is difficult to assess the direction of causation in these studies, and interpretations are complicated by the influence of uncontrolled but correlated factors, such as shared diet. RESULTS We performed a 15-month longitudinal investigation wherein we disentangled the impacts of diet and social living conditions on GM composition in a captive cohort of 13 male cynomolgus macaques. The animals were in single housing for the first 3 months of the study initially with a variable diet. After baseline data collection they were placed on a controlled diet for the remainder of the study. Following this diet shift the animals were moved to paired housing for 6 months, enabling enhanced social interaction, and then subsequently returned to single housing at the end of our study. This structured sequencing of diet and housing changes allowed us to assess their distinct impacts on GM composition. We found that the early dietary adjustments led to GM changes in both alpha and beta diversity, whereas changes in social living conditions only altered beta diversity. With respect to the latter, we found that two particular bacterial families - Lactobacillaceae and Clostridiaceae - demonstrated significant shifts in abundance during the transition from single housing to paired housing, which was distinct from the shifts we observed based on a change in diet. Conversely, we found that other bacteria previously associated with sociality were not altered based on changes in social living conditions but rather only by changes in diet. CONCLUSIONS Together, these findings decouple the influences that diet and social living have on GM composition and reconcile previous observations in the human and animal literatures. Moreover, the results indicate biological alterations of the gut that may, in part, mediate the relationship between sociality and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen S Pearce
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Katya Douchant
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Abhay Katoch
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jill Greenlaw
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel J Gale
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Joseph Y Nashed
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Don Brien
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Valerie A Kuhlmeier
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Mark A Sabbagh
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Gunnar Blohm
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Fernanda G De Felice
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Martin Pare
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas J Cook
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen H Scott
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Douglas P Munoz
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Calvin P Sjaarda
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Anita Tusche
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Prameet M Sheth
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Winterborn
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Boehnke
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jason P Gallivan
- Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
- Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
- Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baer NR, Zoellick JC, Deutschbein J, Anton V, Bergmann MM, Schenk L. Dietary preferences in the context of intra-couple dynamics: Relationship types within the German NutriAct family cohort. Appetite 2021; 167:105625. [PMID: 34364966 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To promote healthy diets in older age, a comprehensive understanding of factors influencing dietary behaviour and underlying preferences is essential. Romantic relationships are focal socialisation contexts, in which diet-related preferences and practices are dynamically negotiated. Our aim was to reconstruct intra-couple dynamics shaping dietary preferences and comparatively analyse relationship types among older couples. Data basis was the NutriAct Family Study - a German web-based cohort. Analyses were based on three a priori defined relationship types: 1) both partners' mutual adaptation of dietary preferences (symmetrical convergence), 2) unilateral adaptation (asymmetrical convergence) and 3) persistence of individual preferences. Relationship types were, among others, comparatively analysed using ANOVAs. Intra-couple dynamics within the asymmetrical convergence type were measured by multivariate logistic regression. The dyadic sample consisted of 398 couples resp. N = 796 individuals aged 63.99 years (SD = 6.15). All three relationship types were identified (symmetrical convergence: n = 62, 15.6 %; asymmetrical convergence: n = 199, 50.0 %; persistence: n = 137, 34.4 %). Within the asymmetrical convergence type, women were more likely to take a dominant role compared to their male partners (OR: 24.40; 95%CI: 14.37-41.41). This study demonstrates the fundamental influence of intra-couple dynamics on individual dietary preferences, whereby traditional gender roles have shown to play a central moderating role. Our study findings are relevant for the development and implementation of public health (nutrition) strategies, since they highlight the importance of understanding dietary preferences as jointly constructed and shaped in the intra-couple context, rather than as isolated, individually developed ones. In this context, future research directions and practical implications targeting not only individuals but involving couples are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja-Raphaela Baer
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jan C Zoellick
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johannes Deutschbein
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Verena Anton
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuela M Bergmann
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany
| | - Liane Schenk
- Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Research, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hartmann C, Dohle S, Siegrist M. Time for change? Food choices in the transition to cohabitation and parenthood. Public Health Nutr 2014; 17:2730-9. [PMID: 24476951 PMCID: PMC10282335 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980013003297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2013] [Revised: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 11/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We compared the dietary behaviour of three different household types and explored developmental trends in food choices following a life event. DESIGN The study is based on data from three Swiss Food Panel survey periods. A cross-sectional comparison between household types was conducted by using a one-way independent ANOVA. Repeated measures were analysed with a mixed ANCOVA to examine changes in dietary behaviour following a life event. SETTING Participants in the survey filled in a questionnaire in the years 2010, 2011 and 2012. SUBJECTS The final sample consisted of 3559 persons with a mean age of 56 years (range 22-94 years; 46 % men). Seventy-two people moved in with their partner and sixty-five people reported the birth of their first child. RESULTS Cross-sectional evidence confirmed that women living in households with a partner reported higher consumption frequencies for meat and processed meats compared with those living alone. Men living in cohabitation had a higher vegetable intake. The transitional effect of moving in with a partner, however, resulted in a higher intake of processed meats for both genders and a higher intake of pork and savoury items for men. Transition to motherhood was linked to an increase in vegetable consumption, while the transition to fatherhood did not change consumption patterns significantly. CONCLUSIONS Individuals in life-stage transitions are more likely to change their nutritional strategies and life events can be a window of opportunity for changes towards better food choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Hartmann
- Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 22, CHN J75.1, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simone Dohle
- Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 22, CHN J75.1, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Siegrist
- Institute for Environmental Decisions (IED), Consumer Behaviour, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 22, CHN J75.1, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|