Activity of adefovir dipivoxil against all patterns of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B viruses in patients

Establishment of stable cell lines in which the HBV genome replicates episomally for evaluation of antivirals

INTRODUCTION

Due to the increasing resistance to nucleot(s)ide analogs in patients with chronic hepatitis B, development of new antiviral drugs to eradicate hepatitis B virus is still urgently needed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

To date, most studies on evaluating anti-HBV drugs have been performed using cell lines where the HBV genomic DNA is chromosomally integrated, e.g. Hep2.2.15 in HBV-infected livers of the viral episomal genome replicates in the nucleus and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) serves as a transcriptional template. Another option involves the use of HBV-infected cells of HepaRG or NTCP-overexpressing cells. However, the development of the infection system is expensive and laborious, and its HBV expression level remained low.

RESULTS

Compared to HuH7 cells, the established stable cell lines based on episomal-type pEB-Multi vectors can been expressed HBV wild-type by qRT-PCR and immunoblotting (p < 0.05). These two vectors are also sensitive to Entecavir and against nucleoside analog Lamivudine in mutants cellines.

CONCLUSIONS

It is worth demonstrating how useful the established cell system is for evaluating antiviral agents and their mechanisms of action.

Novel fluoronucleoside analog NCC inhibits lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus in a hepatocyte model

Antiviral drug resistance is the most important factor contributing to treatment failure using nucleos(t)ide analogs such as lamivudine for chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Development of a system supporting efficient replication of clinically resistant HBV strains is imperative, and new antiviral drugs are needed urgently to prevent selection of drug-resistant HBV mutants. A novel fluorinated cytidine analog, NCC (N-cyclopropyl-4′-azido-2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-β-d-cytidine), was recently shown to strongly inhibit human HBV in vitro and in vivo. This study was designed to evaluate the antiviral activity of NCC against lamivudine-resistant HBV. We generated a stable cell line encoding the major pattern of lamivudine-resistant mutations rtL180M/M204V and designated it “HepG2.RL1”. Immuno-transmission electron microscopic examination and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to detect secretion of HBV-specific particles and antigens. Quantification of extracellular DNA and intracellular DNA of HepG2.RL1 cells by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction revealed >625-fold and >5556-fold increases in the 50% inhibitory concentration of lamivudine, respectively, compared with that for the wild-type virus. The results showed that NCC inhibited DNA replication and HBeAg production in wild-type or lamivudine-resistant HBV in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, screening for antiviral compounds active against lamivudine-resistant HBV can be carried out with relative ease using hepG2.RL1 cells. NCC is a potential antiviral agent against wild-type HBV and clinical lamivudine-resistant HBV and deserves evaluation for the treatment of HBV infection.

Quasispecies structure, cornerstone of hepatitis B virus infection: Mass sequencing approach

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a DNA virus with complex replication, and high replication and mutation rates, leading to a heterogeneous viral population. The population is comprised of genomes that are closely related, but not identical; hence, HBV is considered a viral quasispecies. Quasispecies variability may be somewhat limited by the high degree of overlapping between the HBV coding regions, which is especially important in the P and S gene overlapping regions, but is less significant in the X and preCore/Core genes. Despite this restriction, several clinically and pathologically relevant variants have been characterized along the viral genome. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches enable high-throughput analysis of thousands of clonally amplified regions and are powerful tools for characterizing genetic diversity in viral strains. In the present review, we update the information regarding HBV variability and present a summary of the various NGS approaches available for research in this virus. In addition, we provide an analysis of the clinical implications of HBV variants and their study by NGS.

Long-term efficacy of entecavir plus adefovir combination therapy versus entecavir monotherapy in adefovir refractory chronic hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the long-term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) + adefovir (ADV) combination therapy versus ETV monotherapy in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who failed to respond to ADV rescue therapy.

METHODS

A total of 91 ADV refractory patients with prior LAM resistance received ETV (1.0 mg/day) + ADV (10 mg/day) combination therapy (group A, n = 45) or ETV (1.0 mg/day) monotherapy (group B, n = 46) for more than 48 weeks.

RESULTS

The rates of undetectable serum hepatitis B virus DNA levels (≤20 IU/ml) at weeks 48 and 96 were not significantly different between group A and group B (31.1 vs. 23.9% at week 48, p = 0.442, and 44.7 vs. 34.5% at week 96, p = 0.457). However, the incidence of virological breakthrough in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (0 vs. 17.4% at week 48, p = 0.006, and 2.6 vs. 44.8% at week 96, p < 0.001). ETV monotherapy was the only independent factor significantly associated with virologic breakthrough (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

ETV + ADV combination therapy is a better therapeutic option than ETV monotherapy for ADV refractory CHB patients with prior LAM resistance.

Molecular virology of chronic hepatitis B and C: parallels, contrasts and impact on drug development and treatment outcome

Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are highly prevalent worldwide, causing significant liver disease and thus representing high unmet medical needs. Accordingly, substantial pharmaceutical and clinical research efforts have been made to develop and improve treatments for these viruses. While HBV and HCV are both hepatotropic viruses that can cause similar disease in chronically infected patients, they belong to different viral families. There are substantial differences in the molecular virology of HBV and HCV that have profound implications for therapeutic strategy. In particular, HBV has a long-lived nuclear form of its genome (covalently closed circular DNA) that is able to persist in the face of potent inhibition of viral replication. In contrast, HCV does not have a long-lived genome form and depends on active replication to maintain infection; HCV is therefore much more susceptible to eradication by potent antiviral agents. Additional differences between HBV and HCV with therapeutic implications include the size, structure and heterogeneity of their respective viral genomes. These factors influence the number of targets available for therapeutic intervention, response to therapy among viral genotypes and the emergence of viral resistance. Substantial progress has been made in treating each infection, but unique challenges remain. In this review, key differences in the molecular virology of hepatitis B and C will be presented, highlighting their impact on antiviral therapy (particularly with respect to direct-acting antivirals) and the challenges they present to the cure of each disease.

Comparison of the Mechanisms of Drug Resistance among HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most prevalent deadly chronic viral diseases. HIV is treated by small molecule inhibitors. HBV is treated by immunomodulation and small molecule inhibitors. HCV is currently treated primarily by immunomodulation but many small molecules are in clinical development. Although HIV is a retrovirus, HBV is a double-stranded DNA virus, and HCV is a single-stranded RNA virus, antiviral drug resistance complicates the development of drugs and the successful treatment of each of these viruses. Although their replication cycles, therapeutic targets, and evolutionary mechanisms are different, the fundamental approaches to identifying and characterizing HIV, HBV, and HCV drug resistance are similar. This review describes the evolution of HIV, HBV, and HCV within individuals and populations and the genetic mechanisms associated with drug resistance to each of the antiviral drug classes used for their treatment.

Prevention and management of drug resistant hepatitis B virus infections

In the past decade, broadened therapeutic options of oral direct antiviral agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection include: Lamivudine, Adefovir Dipivoxil, Telbivudine, Entecavir and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate. These direct oral antiviral agents effectively suppress the replication of the virus and reduce the risk of potential liver-related complications. However, prolonged use of these nucleos(t)ide analogues has been associated with drug resistance that compromises the initial clinical benefits. Moreover, the oncogenic risk of mutations due to prolonged nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy needs to be further investigated by in vitro and in vivo studies. In the current era of potent nucleotide analogues, new data are emerging, we are still facing the pool of patients who have developed resistance to the prior generation of nucleos(t)ide analogues. This paper aims to focus on incidence of antiviral drug resistance and virological breakthrough, prudent selection of initial therapy, on-treatment monitoring for drug resistance and revise treatment strategies for patients with resistant virus.

Lamivudine plus adefovir or telbivudine plus adefovir for chronic hepatitis B patients with suboptimal response to adefovir

BACKGROUND

There is no standard management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with suboptimal response to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs). This study aimed to evaluate two different NA combination therapies in patients with suboptimal response to adefovir (ADV).

METHODS

In this study, 72 CHB patients with suboptimal response to ADV were assessed, with 37 patients receiving lamivudine plus ADV (group A) and 35 patients receiving telbivudine plus ADV (group B).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics between two groups were similar. At month 12, rates of biochemical response (BR) and virological response (VR) were similar between groups A and B (17/19 versus 18/20 for BR, [P=0.269] and 30/37 versus 31/35 for VR [P=0.377]), and cumulative rates of serological response were greater in group B than in group A (10/26 versus 2/28 in hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] loss [P=0.006] and 7/26 versus 1/28 in HBeAg/hepatitis B e antibody seroconversion [P=0.022]). After 12-month treatment, 8.1% (3/37) of patients in group A and 5.7% (2/35) of patients in group B had VR; among patients in group A, two had rtM204V/I and rtL180M and one had rtN236T, whereas the two patients in group B had rtM204I+rtL180M.

CONCLUSIONS

Both combination therapies led to a significant decrease in HBV DNA. HBeAg serological outcomes were higher with telbivudine plus ADV combination therapy.

Antiviral therapies: focus on hepatitis B reverse transcriptase

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the etiologic agent of mankind's most serious liver disease. While the availability of a vaccine has reduced the number of new HBV infections, the vaccine does not benefit the approximately 350 million people already chronically infected by the virus. Most of the drugs approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatitis B target the reverse transcriptase (RT or P gene product) and are nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) that suppress viral replication. However, prolonged monotherapies directed against a single target result in the emergence of viral resistance. HBV genotypic differences affect NRTI resistance, and because the reading frames of the S (surface antigen) and P genes partially overlap, genomic differences that affect the surface of the virus may also alter the viral polymerase sequence, function and drug susceptibility. The scope of this review is to assess the effects of HBV genotypic variation on the development of drug resistance to NRTIs. Some RT residues that vary among different genotypes are in the vicinity of residues that mutate and give rise to NRTI resistance. Interactions between these amino acids can help explain the effect of HBV genotype on the development of NRTI resistance during antiviral therapies, and might help in the design of improved therapeutic strategies.

In vitro activity of cepharanthine hydrochloride against clinical wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus isolates

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection causes major public health problems worldwide. The clinical limitation of current antiviral drugs for HBV, such as lamivudine, is the emergence of drug-resistant viral strains during prolonged antiviral therapy. Cepharanthine hydrochloride (CH), a natural alkaloid-derived compound, has been reported to possess potent activity against various viruses. The present study was performed to evaluate the in vitro activity of CH against clinical wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV isolates in transiently transfected cells. HBV DNA was extracted from serum samples collected both before lamivudine therapy and at the time of viral breakthrough and was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The amplicons were cloned into a novel expression vector, pHY106, which can initiate the intracellular HBV replication cycle after cell transfection. Following transfection of the cloned amplicon into HepG2 cells, a drug susceptibility assay was performed. The level of viral antigen, HBeAg, was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative real-time PCR (Q-PCR) was used for determining the amount of intracellular HBV DNA. Heat stress cognate 70 (Hsc70), a host protein required for HBV replication, was also analyzed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) to explore the possible antiviral mechanism of CH. The results showed that CH inhibited replication and HBeAg production by either wild-type or lamivudine-resistant HBV clinical isolates in a dose-dependent manner. The Hsc70 mRNA was also downregulated significantly. In conclusion, CH is active against both wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV clinical isolates, and its activity may be associated with its inhibition of host Hsc70.

The influence of YMDD mutation patterns on clinical outcomes in patients with adefovir add-on lamivudine combination treatment

BACKGROUND/AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of lamivudine (LAM)-resistant mutations and the influence on biochemical and virological responses to adefovir (ADV) add-on LAM combination therapy in patients with LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

Seventy-eight CHB patients with confirmed genotypic resistance to LAM, who initiated ADV add-on LAM combination treatment, were enrolled at our institution between April 2007 and April 2009.

RESULTS

The baseline tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) mutation patterns were as follows: rtM204I 45 (57.7%); and rtM204V + rtM204I/V 33 (42.3%). The decrease in the mean ± standard deviation (SD) serum log(10) HBV-DNA level did not differ between the patients carrying the rtM204I vs. rtM204IV +rtM204I/V mutations at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of ADV add-on LAM combination treatment. The proportion of patients who achieved ALT normalization (<40 IU/L) 12 months after the initiation of ADV add-on LAM combination treatment were significantly higher in patients with a rtM204I mutation than rtM204V+ rtM204I/V mutations (39 [86.7%] vs. 22 [66.7%], P = 0.05). The proportion of patients in whom the log(10) HBV-DNA decreased <2 log(10) copies/ml, 6 months after the initiation of ADV add-on LAM combination treatment (non-responders), was significantly higher in patients with a rtM204V + rtM204I/V mutations than rtM204I mutation (7 [21.2%] vs. 2 [4.4%], P = 0.032).

CONCLUSION

Biochemical response at 12 months from baseline was better in patients with a rtM204I mutation than rtM204V+ rtM204I/V mutations. In addition, early treatment failure was more common in patients with rtM204V+ rtM204I/V mutations than a rtM204I mutation.

rtL180M mutation of hepatitis B virus is closely associated with frequent virological resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We intended to investigate the effects of pre-existing mutations at reverse transcriptase region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) on the occurrence of virological breakthrough (VB) to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients with lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients with LAM-resistant CHB were treated with ADV at a dose of 10 mg daily, and were followed for a median period of 13 months. Just before the initiation of ADV therapy, the whole length of reverse transcriptase region of serum HBV-DNA was sequenced using direct sequencing.

RESULTS

All patients had genotype C HBV and mutations in the YMDD motif, specifically, YIDD (65%), YVDD (28%), or both (7%). The rtL180M and rtL80V/I mutations were identified in 68% and 69%, respectively. The cumulative probability of VB was 19% and 27% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. There was no difference in the occurrence of VB with regard to types of YMDD mutation or rtL80V/I. However, interestingly, patients carrying rtL180M experienced VB during ADV monotherapy more frequently than those not carrying rtL180M (2-year cumulative probability of VB: 37% vs 3% at 2 years, P < 0.01). On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, rtL180M (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-69.09, P = 0.042) and decrease in HBV-DNA for 1 year of treatment (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.51-0.95, P = 0.024) are independently associated with VB.

CONCLUSIONS

The rtL180M mutation of HBV, as well as a small decrease in HBV-DNA after 1 year of treatment might be closely associated with frequent occurrence of virological resistance to ADV in patients with LAM-resistant CHB.

Emergence of HBV resistance to lamivudine (3TC) in HIV/HBV co-infected patients in The Gambia, West Africa

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine (3TC) is a potent inhibitor of both Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) replication and is part of first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the Gambia. Unfortunately, the effectiveness of 3TC against HBV is limited by the emergence of resistant strains.

AIM

The aim of this retrospective study was to characterise 3TC-resistant mutations in HBV from co-infected patients receiving HAART, by generating HBV polymerase sequence data and viral loads from HBV genotype E infected patients, both at initiation and during a course of 3TC therapy.

METHOD

Samples from 21 HBV chronic carriers co-infected with HIV-1 (n = 18), HIV-2 (n = 2) and HIV-dual (n = 1) receiving HAART for a period of 6-52 months were analysed for the emergence of 3TC-resistance mutations.

FINDINGS

Sixteen out of 21 HBV/HIV co-infected patients responded well to HAART treatment maintaining suppression of HBV viraemia to low (≤ 104 copies/mL) (n = 5) or undetectable levels (< 260 copies/ml) (n = 11). Out of the 5 non-responders, 3 had developed 3TC-resistant HBV strains showing mutations in the YMDD motif at position 204 of the RT domain of the HBV polymerase. One patient showed the M204V+ L180M+ V173L+ triple mutation associated with a vaccine escape phenotype, which could be of public health concern in a country with a national HBV vaccination programme. All except one patient was infected with HBV genotype E.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings confirm the risk of 3TC mutations in HAART patients following monotherapy. This is a novel study on 3TC resistance in HBV genotype E patients and encourage the use of tenofovir (in association with 3TC), which has not shown unequivocally documented HBV resistance to date, as part of first-line therapy in HIV/HBV co-infected patients in West Africa.HBV- hepatitis B infection; HIV- human immunodeficiency virus; HAART- antiretroviral therapy.

Hepatitis B virus drug resistance to current nucleos(t)ide analogs: Mechanisms and mutation sites

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) have become the mainstream drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Drug resistance to NAs, however, has posed a major obstacle in obtaining sustained viral suppression. Standardized definitions of terms and nomenclature in discussing NAs resistance have been proposed. Drug resistance to NAs is produced by a combination of viral, host and antiviral drug factors. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms and effects of mutation sites that cause resistance to NAs is important for the design of rational treatment and management of patients with existing drug resistance.

Long-term efficacy of entecavir in adefovir-refractory chronic hepatitis B patients with prior lamivudine resistance

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) in adefovir (ADV)-refractory chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with prior lamivudine (LMV) resistance. A total of 55 ADV-refractory CHB patients with prior LMV resistance, who received rescue therapy with ETV 1 mg daily for at least 12 months, were consecutively enrolled and analysed. Forty-four patients were men, and their median age was 47 (25-69). Ten patients had liver cirrhosis and 46 patients were positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Median hepatitis B virus DNA levels were 6.6 (4.3-8.0) log(10) copies/mL, and the median duration of ETV therapy was 24 (12-47) months. Cumulative virologic response rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 18%, 29%, 58% and 75%, respectively. HBeAg loss occurred in 10 (21.7%) of 46 HBeAg-positive patients. In multivariate analysis, only initial virologic response at 3 months remained as an independent predictor for virologic response (RR 3.143; 95% CI 1.387-7.120; P = 0.006). The patients with a virological response at 3 months had not only a significantly higher probability of achieving a virologic response (P < 0.001) but also lower probability of experiencing a virologic breakthrough (P = 0.043) than the patients without an early response. Viral breakthrough was observed in 29 patients during the follow-up period. Cumulative breakthrough rates at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months were 0%, 15%, 45% and 73%, respectively. ETV monotherapy may be considerably efficacious in cases with an initial virological response but its efficacy is attenuated by frequent emergence of ETV resistance in ADV-refractory CHB patients with prior LMV resistance.

A randomized, multi-central, controlled study of patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B treated by adefovir dipivoxil or adefovir dipivoxil plus bicyclol

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treated with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) or ADV plus bicyclol, and to optimize the treatment strategy for CHB patients.

Patients and methods

A total of 250 patients with HBeAg-positive CHB were randomized to ADV plus bicyclol combination group and ADV monotherapy group. The patients in the ADV plus bicyclol combination therapy group (n = 125) received ADV 10 mg orally q.d. and bicyclol 25 mg orally t.i.d. for 48 weeks, and those in the ADV monotherapy group (n = 125) were administered ADV 10 mg orally q.d. alone for 48 weeks. The serum aminotransferases (ALT/AST), HBV DNA, HBeAg/HBeAb, and liver biopsy were conducted before and after therapy.

Results

The serum aminotransferase levels were decreased significantly in both groups. The serum aminotransferase level in ADV plus bicyclol combination therapy group decreased greater than that in ADV monotherapy group (P < 0.01). The virological response rate in ADV plus bicyclol combination therapy group was not significantly different from that in ADV monotherapy group (P > 0.05). After treatment for 48 weeks, the Knodell necroinflammatory score of the two groups were all alleviated significantly, and the Knodell score in the combination group was significantly lower than that in the ADV monotherapy group (P < 0.05). There were no remarkable adverse events probably related to the drug in this study.

Conclusion

Adefovir dipivoxil plus bicyclol combination therapy is a safe and superior treatment regimen for patients with HBeAg-positive CHB when compared with ADV monotherapy.

Tenofovir therapy in hepatitis B virus-positive solid-organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir therapy has been found to be efficient in treating hepatitis B virus (HBV) in nontransplant patients. However, in the setting of solid-organ transplantation, the efficacy of tenofovir has not been tested. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the clinical and biologic response and tolerance to tenofovir therapy in HBV-positive organ transplant recipients.

METHODS

Seven patients, three kidney, three liver, and one cardiac transplant recipients, with chronic HBV infection were partial responders to adefovir (n=7), lamivudine (n=7), or entecavir (n=5) therapy. Consequently, they were placed on tenofovir therapy (245 mg daily, which was adapted to renal function) alone (n=4) or in combination with lamivudine (n=3). Tenofovir therapy was assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinitiation or at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

HBV DNA viral load (4.16 [2.03-5.56] log10 copies/mL at baseline) became significantly decreased to 3.15 (1.08-5.17), 2.88 (1.3-4.3), 3.53 (1.3-5.75), 3.33 (1.3-7.57), and 2.31 (1.3-4.81) log copies/mL at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttenofovir initiation and at last follow-up, respectively (P=0.02). Three patients were HBV DNA negative at the last follow-up. Liver enzyme levels did not change significantly throughout the follow-up period. Clinical and biologic tolerance was excellent.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though HBV DNA clearance was not achieved in all patients, the results of this pilot study are encouraging and demonstrate that tenofovir therapy is safe and efficacious in treating HBV-positive organ transplant patients. However, a larger trial is needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Recommendation of lamivudine-to-entecavir switching treatment in chronic hepatitis B responders: Randomized controlled trial

AIM

  In the 2007-2008 guidelines of the study group (Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan), lamivudine (LAM)-continuous treatment was recommended in patients treated with LAM for more than 3 years who maintained hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA less than 2.6 log copies/mL, because in these patients LAM resistance might exist and switching treatment to entecavir (ETV) might cause ETV resistance. However, there was no evidence on whether switching treatment to ETV- or LAM-continuous treatment was better in those patients. In the present study, we performed a randomized controlled trial of LAM-to-ETV switching treatment.

METHODS

  Twenty-seven patients treated with LAM for more than 3 years whose HBV DNA levels were less than 2.6 log copies/mL were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups, LAM-continued group or switching to ETV group. Then, we examined incidence of virological breakthrough (VBT) and breakthrough hepatitis (BTH) in each group.

RESULTS

  There was no BTH in any of the patients. VBT was observed in six patients of the LAM group (6/15, 40%), and no patient of the ETV group (0/11, 0%) (P = 0.02). The differences of the proportion of cumulated VBT using a log-rank test with Kaplan-Meier analysis were significant between the LAM and ETV groups (P = 0.025).

CONCLUSION

  In patients treated with LAM for more than 3 years maintaining HBV DNA less than 2.6 log copies/mL, switching treatment to ETV is recommended at least during the 2 years' follow-up period.

Initial virological response and viral mutation with adefovir dipivoxil added to ongoing Lamivudine therapy in Lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Although adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has been used for antiviral treatment of lamivudine (LAM)-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, the long-term efficacy of this treatment is not well understood. Initial virological response (IVR) has been reported to be an important factor in relation to the development of ADV-resistance.

AIMS

We therefore examined the factors associated with IVR and ADV mutation in these patients.

METHODS

Forty-nine LAM-resistant CHB patients with ADV add-on LAM therapy, 47% of whom were hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive with median treatment duration of 23 months, were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into IVR and non-IVR groups on the basis of viral suppression status. Mutational analysis of the HBV polymerase/reverse transcriptase (rt) domain was performed by PCR-direct sequencing.

RESULTS

Serum HBV DNA was undetectable (<2.6 log10 copies/mL) in 67, 82, and 84% of patients at 24, 48, and 96 weeks, respectively, after ADV add-on LAM therapy. IVR was achieved in 82% of patients, and ALT normalized at week 24 in 90% of IVR and 78% of non-IVR patients. The lower pretreatment HBV DNA level and virus-containing mutations other than double mutation of rtL180M + rtM204V were significantly associated with IVR (P=0.002 and P=0.014, respectively). ADV-resistant mutations in the RT motif, reported previously, were not detected.

CONCLUSION

IVR is useful for predicting the antiviral efficacy of ADV and LAM combination therapy in LAM-resistant CHB.

Posttransplantation hepatitis B prophylaxis with combination oral nucleoside and nucleotide analog therapy

Liver transplant recipients are at risk of developing recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease. We evaluated the efficacy of a new hepatitis B prophylaxis regimen involving conversion from at least 12 months of HBIg with lamivudine to combination therapy with an oral nucleoside and nucleotide analog. Between June 2008 and May 2010, a total of 61 liver transplant recipients were converted to a combination of a nucleoside and nucleotide analog. The mean (±standard deviation) follow-up time after conversion was 15.0 (±6.1) months. Recurrent HBV occurred in two (3.3%) patients at 3.1 and 16.6 months after HBIg cessation. The overall person time incidence rate for HBV recurrence after HBIg cessation was 2.7 cases per 100 person-years. The estimate of HBV recurrence was 1.7% at 1 year after HBIg cessation. HBIg cessation a minimum of 12 months after liver transplantation with subsequent combination therapy with a nucleoside and nucleotide analog provides effective prophylaxis against recurrent HBV infection. The clinical implications of HBsAg detection without clinical, biochemical or molecular manifestations of recurrent hepatitis B require further study.

Four-year study of lamivudine and adefovir combination therapy in lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B patients: influence of hepatitis B virus genotype and resistance mutation pattern

To investigate the efficacy of long-term lamivudine (3TC) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) combination therapy in 3TC-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected patients, we analysed 28 3TC-resistant patients treated with the combination therapy during 47 months (range, 9-75). At 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, the rates of virological response with undetectable HBV DNA (≤ 2.6 log copies/mL) were 56, 80, 86, and 92%, respectively. Among 17 hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients, HBeAg disappeared in 24% at 12 months, 25% at 24 months, 62% at 36 months, and 88% at 48 months. When HBV genotypes were compared, patients with genotype B achieved virological response significantly more rapidly than those with genotype C (P=0.0496). One patient developed virological breakthrough after 54 months, and sequence analysis of HBV obtained from the patient was performed. An rtA200V mutation was present in the majority of HBV clones, in addition to the 3TC-resistant mutations of rtL180M+M204V. The rtN236T ADV-resistant mutation was observed in only 25% clones. In vitro analysis showed that the rtA200V mutation recovered the impaired replication capacity of the clone with the rtL180M+M204V mutations and induced resistance to ADV. Moreover, rtT184S and rtS202C, which are known entecavir-resistant mutations, emerged in some rtL180M+M204V clones without rtA200V or rtN236T. In conclusion, 3TC+ADV combination therapy was effective for most 3TC-resistant patients, especially with genotype B HBV, but the risk of emergence of multiple drug-resistant strains with long-term therapy should be considered. The mutation rtA200V with rtL180M+M204V may be sufficient for failure of 3TC+ADV therapy.

Management and treatment of hepatitis B virus in patients with HIV infection: A practical guide for health care professionals

The management and treatment of HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients present specific challenges for clinicians. The morbidity and mortality related to these concomitant infections are growing concerns, while the use of antiviral drugs effective against both viruses complicates therapeutic decision making. The present document provides guidelines for physicians regarding care and treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and HBV. Primary prevention of HBV in HIV-positive patients is achieved through appropriate vaccination schedules. Follow-up before treatment of HBV may include liver biopsy, screening for hepatocellular carcinoma and testing for esophageal varicies in cases of cirrhosis. In HBV-infected patients requiring treatment, recommendations regarding initiation, duration and choice of first-line drugs are made. Finally, in the case of resistance, appropriate alternative therapies are necessary.

Dynamics of hepatitis B virus resistance to adefovir in lamivudine-resistant patients

AIM: To investigate the dynamic changes of hepatitis B virus (HBV) mutants in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (LAM-R CHB) patients who received sequential monotherapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV).

METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive LAM-R CHB patients with viral breakthrough or inadequate virologic response during ADV monotherapy were studied. The dynamics of HBV mutants were analyzed over time by detecting the quantity of HBV DNA using real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR and by sequencing PCR products. Additionally, PCR-TA cloning was performed to study the dynamics of HBV quasispecies in 2 patients.

RESULTS: HBV DNA load fluctuated with the evolution of HBV mutants. Of all patients, 24 developed LAM resistance-associated substitutions during LAM therapy, and 4 had no resistance-associated mutations; 13 had LAM resistance-associated mutations, 11 had ADV resistance-associated mutations, and 7 had no resistance-associated mutations. Of 11 patients with ADV resistance-associated mutations, 6 had A181V mutation, 3 had A181T mutation, 1 had N236T mutation, and 1 had A181T/V+N236T mutation. PCR-TA cloning analysis showed that LAM-resistant viral population was gradually replaced by ADV-resistant viruses during ADV sequential monotherapy. We also detected rtI233M and rtA194T mutations that are associated with resistance to ADV and tenofovir, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Viral quasispecies dynamics in LAM-R CHB patients during ADV sequential monotherapy may manifest as various forms, such as LAM resistance-associated mutations with/without ADV resistance-associated mutations, or absence of resistance-associated mutations. Potential resistance quasispecies could be detected by PCR-TA cloning.

Hepatitis B-related events in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients

AIM: To investigate the frequency of occult hepatitis B, the clinical course of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation and reverse seroconversion and associated risk factors in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients.

METHODS: This study was conducted in 90 patients undergoing autologous HSCT. Occult HBV infection was investigated by HBV-DNA analysis prior to transplantation, while HBV serology and liver function tests were screened prior to and serially after transplantation. HBV-related events including reverse seroconversion and reactivation were recorded in all patients.

RESULTS: None of the patients had occult HBV prior to transplantation. Six (6.7%) patients were positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) prior to transplantation and received lamivudine prophylaxis; they did not develop HBV reactivation after transplantation. Clinical HBV infection emerged in three patients after transplantation who had negative HBV-DNA prior to HSCT. Two of these three patients had HBV reactivation while one patient developed acute hepatitis B. Three patients had anti-HBc as the sole hepatitis B-related antibody prior to transplantation, two of whom developed hepatitis B reactivation while none of the patients with antibody to HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs) did so. The 14 anti-HBs- and/or anti-HBc-positive patients among the 90 HSCT recipients experienced either persistent (8 patients) or transient (6 patients) disappearance of anti-HBs and/or anti-HBc. HBsAg seroconversion and clinical hepatitis did not develop in these patients. Female gender and multiple myeloma emerged as risk factors for loss of antibody in regression analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: Anti-HBc as the sole HBV marker seems to be a risk factor for reactivation after autologous HSCT. Lamivudine prophylaxis in HbsAg-positive patients continues to be effective.

HBV and HCV therapy

One year of interferon therapy inhibits HBV replication in one third of the patients whereas long-term administration of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues is efficient in most of them, as long as early treatment adaptation in patients with partial virological response and resistance is provided. Following the demonstration of a more potent antiviral effect in terms of sustained virological response (SVR) rates, Pegylated-IFN coupled with Ribavirin has become the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, with nearly 65% of all treated patients achieving a SVR. Long-term suppression of HBV and eradication of HCV would halt the progression of chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver decompensation.

Lamivudine-to-entecavir switching treatment in type B chronic hepatitis patients without evidence of lamivudine resistance

PURPOSE

A considerable number of chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) patients remain under continuous lamivudine treatment, although switching treatment to entecavir could be beneficial. We investigated the antiviral efficacy of switching treatment to entecavir in CH-B patients without apparent evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment.

METHODS

Forty-four CH-B patients, who underwent lamivudine treatment for more than 6 months and showed no evidence of lamivudine resistance, switched to entecavir. Serial changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA were correlated with the patients' baseline HBV DNA at the commencement of entecavir administration. The entecavir-resistant substitution was examined by PCR-direct sequencing. The median follow-up period of entecavir treatment was 20 (10-23) months.

RESULTS

All 31 patients with baseline HBV DNA <2.6 logcopies/ml maintained HBV DNA-negative status during entecavir treatment. Of seven patients having HBV DNA of 2.6-<4.0 logcopies/ml, all achieved undetectable HBV DNA at the end of follow-up. As for six patients having HBV DNA >or=4.0 logcopies/ml, three patients achieved undetectable HBV DNA, whereas virological breakthrough was observed in one patient at month 15. An entecavir-resistant virus having rtM204V, rtL180M and rtS202G substitutions was detected in this patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The lamivudine-to-entecavir switching treatment may be generally recommendable in CH-B patients without evidence of lamivudine resistance during the preceding lamivudine treatment. However, great care should be taken with respect to the emergence of entecavir-resistance, especially in patients who do not respond well to the preceding lamivudine treatment.

Future directions in the treatment of HIV-HBV coinfection

Liver disease is a major cause of mortality in individuals with HIV-HBV coinfection. The pathogenesis of liver disease in this setting is unknown, but is likely to involve drug toxicity, infection of hepatic cells with both HIV and HBV, and an altered immune response to HBV. The availability of therapeutic agents that target both HIV and HBV replication enable dual viral suppression, and assessment of chronic hepatitis B is important prior to commencement of antiretroviral therapy. Greater importance is now placed on HBV DNA levels and staging of liver fibrosis, either by liver biopsy or noninvasive measurement, such as transient elastography, since significant liver fibrosis may exist in the presence of normal liver function tests. Earlier treatment of both HIV and HBV is now generally advocated and treatment is usually lifelong.

Hepatitis B virus with the rtL80V/I mutation is associated with a poor response to adefovir dipivoxil therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Lamivudine (LAM) resistance is frequently associated with various types of genomic changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA including YMDD mutations (rtM204V/I). We intended to examine the effects of these genotypic variants on the antiviral efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) therapy.

METHODS

A total of 97 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with YMDD mutants who had been treated with ADV for >12 months were analysed. Mutations of the entire polymerase domain of HBV were determined by direct sequencing.

RESULTS

All the 97 patients had genotype C HBV associated with rtM204V/I mutations; 63 (65%) rtM204I, 27 (28%) rtM204V and seven (7%) both. The rtL80V/I and rtL180M variants were identified in 66 (68%) and 67 (69%) patients respectively. The rtM204I and rtM204V variants were strongly associated with rtL80V/I and rtL180M respectively (P<0.01). There was no difference in antiviral response at 12 months after ADV therapy between patients in relation to the type of YMDD mutation or the presence of rtL180M. However, interestingly, after ADV therapy for 12 months, patients with rtL80V/I achieved a much smaller reduction in serum HBV-DNA titre than those without it (mean, -3.43 vs. -4.43 log(10) copies/ml; P=0.018). In addition, patients with rtL80V/I had lower rates of undetectable HBV-DNA (20 vs. 26%), alanine aminotransferase normalization (70 vs. 81%) and HBeAg loss (16 vs. 26%) than those without it, although none of these differences was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide evidence that rtL80V/I variants of HBV may be associated with a poor antiviral response to ADV in CHB patients with YMDD mutants.

[The efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy and the incidence of genotypic resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B infection]

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is a nucleotide analogue that inhibits wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) and lamivudine (LMV)-resistant HBV mutants. The aim of this study was to elucidate the efficacy of ADV monotherapy and the incidence of genotypic resistance to ADV in patients with LMV-resistant chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

This study involved 124 patients with chronic HBV infection who had received ADV monotherapy due to the presence of LMV-resistant HBV mutants. The efficacy of ADV was evaluated by the normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and by the reduction of serum HBV DNA level (with cutoff levels of 2x10(4) IU/mL and 2x10(2) IU/mL). The cumulative rate of HBeAg loss or seroconversion was assessed in HBeAg-positive patients. The development of mutations in the reverse trancriptase region of HBV DNA polymerase was evaluated by direct sequencing analysis during ADV monotherapy.

RESULTS

The mean serum HBV DNA level was 5.94 log10IU/mL. At 12 and 24 months after ADV monotherapy, the cumulative rates of serum ALT normalization were 69.4% and 75.5%, respectively, and those of serum HBV DNA reduction were 79.8% and 89.2% for a cutoff level of 2x10(4) IU/mL, and 44.2% and 59.0% for a cutoff of 2x10(2) IU/mL. The mean serum HBV DNA levels at 12 and 24 months were significantly lower than baseline, at 3.24 and 3.04 log10IU/mL, respectively (P<0.001). At 12 months after ADV treatment, the cumulative rates of HBeAg loss and seroconversion were 15.8% and 10.5%, respectively, and the rtN236T and rtA181T/V mutants in HBV DNA polymerase were identified in 25% and 64% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ADV monotherapy is effective, it leads to a high rate of mutations of HBV DNA reverse transcriptase gene in patients with chronic HBV infections who have LMV-resistant HBV mutants.

Intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with entecavir for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B re-infection after liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate BIG on HBV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), and to investigate prevention strategies for liver transplantation with YMDD.

METHODS: One hundred and twenty four cases who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation and fulfilled the enrollment criteria, were retrospectively analyzed. HBV reinfection was analyzed and compared between long-term intramuscular hepatitis B virus immunoglobulin & entecavir group and intramuscular hepatitis B virus & immunoglobulin and Lamivudine group. The effect of the prophylaxis for HBV reinfection in patients with YMDD mutants was investigated. HBV markers in serum, HBV DNA and the ratio of HBV reinfection were analyzed.

RESULTS: Entecavir group with a follow- up period of 19.5 ± 9.4 mo, showed no HBV reinfection. However, 10 patients had been traced for 18.1 ± 6.4 mo in lamivudine group. The rate of HBV reinfection in entecavir group was significantly lower than lamivudine group (0% vs 11.9%, P < 0.05). The patients with YMDD mutants before transplantation in Entecavir group had been traced no postoperative HBV reinfection.

CONCLUSION: Entecavir and intramuscular HBIG as the prophylaxis of HBV reinfection is more effective than the lamivudine and intramuscular HBIG, especially for patients with preoperative YMDD mutants.

Association of lamivudine-resistant mutational patterns with the antiviral effect of adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Adefovir has a potent antiviral activity as a rescue treatment against lamivudine-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of lamivudine-resistant mutations and their influence on the virologic response to adefovir rescue therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Sixty-seven patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B were treated with adefovir monotherapy. Baseline blood samples were analyzed for lamivudine-resistant mutations via restriction fragment mass polymorphism. Virologic responses, ALT normalization and loss of HBeAg were assessed. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured using real-time PCR at baseline and 24 weeks of adefovir therapy. Of the 67 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 65 patients (97%) had lamivudine-resistant mutations in the YMDD motif [27 (41%) rtM204I, 22 (34%) rtM204V, and 16 (25%) rtM204I/V]. In addition to the YMDD mutations, the rtL180M, rtL80I, and rtV173L mutations were also present in 78%, 43%, and 11% of patients, respectively. The rtM204V mutation always accompanied rtL180M, and rtL80I was always observed in conjunction with rtM204I. Decrease in mean serum HBV did not differ between patients carrying the rtM204I versus rtM204V mutant at week 24 (-3.3 vs. -3.3 log(10) copies/ml, respectively; P = 0.303). The presence of the rtL180M, rtL80I, and rtV173L did not significantly affect viral load reduction during adefovir administration. These results demonstrate that the rtL80I mutant is co-selected with rtM204I as a compensatory mutation in the same manner as rtL180M with rtM204V, and that adefovir shows similar antiviral efficacy against all of the evaluated patterns of lamivudine-resistant HBV mutations.

Telbivudine, a nucleoside analog inhibitor of HBV polymerase, has a different in vitro cross-resistance profile than the nucleotide analog inhibitors adefovir and tenofovir

Telbivudine, a nucleoside analog inhibitor of the viral polymerase of hepatitis B virus (HBV), has been approved for the treatment of chronic HBV infection, along with the nucleoside inhibitors lamivudine and entecavir, and the nucleotide inhibitors adefovir and tenofovir. The resistance profiles of these agents were investigated via drug treatment of HepG2 cells stably transfected with wild-type or mutant HBV genomes bearing known resistance mutations. Telbivudine was not active against HBV strains bearing lamivudine mutations L180M/M204V/I but remained active against the M204V single mutant in vitro, potentially explaining the difference in resistance profiles between telbivudine and lamivudine. Against HBV genomes with known telbivudine-resistance mutations, M204I and L80I/M204I, telbivudine, lamivudine and entecavir lost 353- to >1000-fold activity whereas adefovir and tenofovir exhibited no more than 3-5-fold change. Conversely, against HBV cell lines expressing adefovir resistance mutations N236T and A181V, or the A194T mutant associated with resistance to tenofovir, telbivudine remained active as shown by respective fold-changes of 0.5 (N236T) and 1.0 (A181V and A194T). These in vitro results indicate that nucleoside and nucleotide drugs have different cross-resistance profiles. The addition of telbivudine to ongoing adefovir therapy could provide effective antiviral therapy to patients who develop adefovir resistance.

Supportive role played by precore and preS2 genomic changes in the establishment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) establishes lamivudine resistance via the resistance-causative rtM204V/I mutation and the replication-compensatory rtL180M mutation. However, both lamivudine-resistant viruses with and those without rtL180M can exist in clinical settings. To elucidate the differences between viruses with and those without rtL180M, we conducted full-length sequencing analysis of HBV derived from patients with type B chronic hepatitis showing lamivudine resistance.

METHODS

The full-length HBV DNA sequences derived from 44 patients showing lamivudine resistance were determined by polymerase chain reaction direct sequencing. Viral replicative competence was examined by in vitro transfection analysis using various HBV-expressing plasmids.

RESULTS

Throughout the HBV genome, a precore-defective A1896 mutation and a short deletion in the preS2 gene were detected more frequently in viruses without rtL180M than in those with it (64% vs. 17% [P < .005] and 50% vs. 10% [P < .01], respectively). In vitro transfection analysis revealed that the level of reduction in intracellular viral replication caused by the introduction of lamivudine resistance-associated mutations was lower in precore-defective and preS2-deleted viruses than in wild-type virus.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the precore-defective mutation and the preS2 deletion may play a supportive role in the replication of lamivudine-resistant HBV, which may be a reason for there being no need for the compensatory rtL180M mutation in lamivudine-resistant HBV possessing the precore and preS2 genomic changes.

Replication of clinical hepatitis B virus isolate and its application for selecting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM: To establish a cell model harboring replicative clinical hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolates and evaluate its application in individualized selection of anti-HBV agents for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

METHODS: The full-length HBV genomic DNA from 8 CHB patients was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All the patients were treated with lamivudine for at least seven months and finally became resistant to lamivudine. The amplified HBV DNA fragments were inserted into pHY106 vectors by Sap I digestion. The recombinant plasmids containing 1.1 copies of HBV genome were transiently transfected into Huh7 cell line, and the levels of HBsAg, HBeAg and intercellular HBV replicative intermediates were determined by ELISA and Southern blot analysis, respectively, with or without lamivudine and adefovir treatment. The antiviral treatment with adefovir was administered to the patients and analyzed in parallel.

RESULTS: A total of 25 independent HBV isolates were obtained from the sera of 8 patients, each patient had at least two isolates. One isolate from each individual was selected and subcloned into pHY106 vector, including 5 isolates with YVDD mutation and 3 isolates with YIDD mutation. All recombinant plasmids harboring HBV isolates were transfected into Huh7 cells. The results indicated that HBV genome carried in HBV replicons of clinical HBV isolates could effectively replicate and express in Huh7 cells. Adefovir, but not lamivudine, inhibited HBV replication both in vitro and in vivo, and in vitro inhibition was dose-dependent.

CONCLUSION: The novel method described herein enables individualized selection of anti-HBV agents in clinic and is useful in future studies of antiviral therapy for CHB.

Solid lipid nanoparticles loading adefovir dipivoxil for antiviral therapy

Herein, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) were proposed as a new drug delivery system for adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). The octadecylamine-fluorescein isothiocynate (ODA-FITC) was synthesized and used as a fluorescence maker to be incorporated into SLN to investigate the time-dependent cellular uptake of SLN by HepG2.2.15. The SLN of monostearin with ODA-FITC or ADV were prepared by solvent diffusion method in an aqueous system. About 15 wt% drug entrapment efficiency (EE) and 3 wt% drug loading (DL) could be reached in SLN loading ADV. Comparing with free ADV, the inhibitory effects of ADV loaded in SLN on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels in vitro were significantly enhanced.

Quantification of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus mutants by type-specific TaqMan minor groove binder probe assay in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Lamivudine (LAM)-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) with mutations in the polymerase region frequently appears after long-term use of LAM. Several methods allowing detection of mutant strains (YIDD, YVDD) have been reported, but they have no quantitative characteristics. In this study, we explored a unique approach for quantification of each mutant strain.

METHODS

A method for detection and quantification of wild and mutant strains was developed using realtime polymerase chain reaction and type-specific minor groove binder (MGB) probes, and tested in patients with chronic hepatitis B before and after additive treatment with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV).

RESULTS

A good correlation was confirmed in HBV DNA quantity obtained between the YMDD-specific MBG probe assay and Amplicor HBV Monitor assay results (P < 0.001), linear between 3 and 9 log copies/mL serum. Of 109 samples from patients with chronic hepatitis B tested by both these assays and conventional direct sequencing, 90 (88.2%) showed identical results. The assays successfully detected and quantified a single type of mutant in three of four patients with additive ADV treatment, and also two coexisting mutant types (YIDD and YVDD) in the remaining patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our specific and sensitive method for detection and quantification of HBV DNA with the wild-type YMDD motif and its two mutant forms (YIDD and YVDD) appears to be clinically useful, especially in patients with multiple mutant HBV infections.

Pradefovir: a prodrug that targets adefovir to the liver for the treatment of hepatitis B

Adefovir dipivoxil, a marketed drug for the treatment of hepatitis B, is dosed at submaximally efficacious doses because of renal toxicity. In an effort to improve the therapeutic index of adefovir, 1-aryl-1,3-propanyl prodrugs were synthesized with the rationale that this selectively liver-activated prodrug class would enhance liver levels of the active metabolite adefovir diphosphate (ADV-DP) and/or decrease kidney exposure. The lead prodrug (14, MB06866, pradefovir), identified from a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays, exhibited good oral bioavailability (F = 42%, mesylate salt, rat) and rate of prodrug conversion to ADV-DP. Tissue distribution studies in the rat using radiolabeled materials showed that cyclic 1-aryl-1,3-propanyl prodrugs enhance the delivery of adefovir and its metabolites to the liver, with pradefovir exhibiting a 12-fold improvement in the liver/kidney ratio over adefovir dipivoxil.

Combination therapy in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B virus without hepatitis B immune globulin

INTRODUCTION

Conventional therapy to prevent HBV recurrence in liver transplant (LTx) recipients consists of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin (HBIg). The aim of this review is to investigate the safety and efficacy of converting HBIg and LAM therapy to ADV and LAM therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review involving all liver transplant patients with HBV maintained on HBIg and LAM therapy. Results collected included: gender, age, HBV serological and DNA status (COBAS AmpliScreen PCR-based testing). Serologic testing was done every three months. Patients were followed for drug reactions, therapy compliance, and immune suppression compliance. A cost benefit analysis was done for drug comparisons using United States currency values.

RESULTS

Patient demographics included: Male (n=6), Female (n=4), mean age 44 years (range 33 to 65). The mean length of follow up since therapy conversion (from HBIg and LMV to ADV and LMV) was 21 months (range 16 to 25 months). Serological status at time of conversion revealed that DNA status remained negative in all patients, HBsAg negative in 10/10, HB eAg (+) (5/10) and HBeAb (+)(5/10). None of the patients experienced an increase in transaminases while on dual ADV and LAM therapy. All patients were maintained on immune suppression monotherapy (tacrolimus) at 7-9 ng/mL. All patients reported compliance with the dual therapy and that they experienced no drug related side effects. Mean yearly costs for ADV and LAM was 7,235.00 United States dollars (range 6,550.00 to 8,225.00); while mean monthly costs for HBIg and LAM; 9225.00 (range 7205.00 to 12005.00).

CONCLUSION

The above results demonstrate beneficial effects of ADV and LAM in place of the current standard of HBIg and LAM therapy. Safety and short term results show nucleoside therapy is adequate at preventing HBV viral recurrence. Lastly, the economic benefit for ADV and LAM vastly outweighed the HBIg and LAM group.

Adefovir dipivoxil treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV)-resistant mutations have been identified in treating hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This study aimed to analyze the response, the incidence of ADV resistance and the virologic characteristics of ADV therapy. A total of 29 CHB patients with confirmed lamivudine (LAM)-resistant HBV were treated with ADV for more than 52 weeks. Serum HBV DNA, HBV genotypes and sequences of HBV polymerase reverse-transcriptase domain were determined. Rates for the biochemical response, HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion and virologic response (< 200 copies/mL of HBV DNA) were 82.8, 23.5, 11.8, and 48.3%, respectively, at week 52 of treatment. Lower pre-treatment mean HBV DNA level was the only significant factor associated with negative HBV DNA after ADV therapy. Six (20.7%) patients had clearance of LAM-resistant YMDD variants with replacement by the wild type HBV at week 52. The rtN236T, rtA181V/T and rtI233V were not identified before ADV therapy and the genotypic mutation of rtN236T was detected in one (3.4%) patient. In conclusion, the 52-week ADV treatment for patients with LAM-resistant HBV variants significantly achieved normalization of ALT levels, reduced serum HBV DNA levels and induced HBeAg loss and seroconversion. The emergence of ADV-resistant mutations seemed rare at weeks 52.

Progress in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: long-term experience with adefovir dipivoxil

Most chronic hepatitis B patients do not undergo a curative response to interferon-alpha or nucleoside/nucleotide-based regimens and require long-term therapy. Long-term safety, efficacy and resistance profiles of hepatitis B virus (HBV) drugs are therefore crucial issues for patient management. Adefovir dipivoxil is a nucleotide prodrug indicated for the treatment of patients with hepatitis B e antigen positive or hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B, lamivudine-resistant HBV infection, HBV infection pre- or post-liver transplantation, or HlV co-infection. Long-term data from clinical trials of up to 5 years duration of adefovir dipivoxil have recently become available and are reviewed here. These data demonstrate that adefovir dipivoxil therapy results in sustained efficacy and safety in the majority of patients after multiple years of treatment. The efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil in treating lamivudine-resistant HBV and the delayed emergence of adefovir resistance are key factors contributing to the durable response achieved in broad groups of chronic hepatitis B patients.

Why do we not yet have combination chemotherapy for chronic hepatitis B?

Despite the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and previous success with combination therapy for other chronic viral infections, we are still using sequential monotherapy for chronic HBV infection. Antiviral-resistant HBV can result in major life-threatening complications. We now have complementary drugs, such as lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, with fundamentally different structures and associated with different signature resistance mutations, with adefovir dipivoxil showing antiviral activity against most lamivudine-resistant strains. Studies of combination therapy to date have used traditional endpoints--short-term reduction of HBV DNA levels and HBeAg seroconversion--rather than evolution of resistance. There is now an emerging body of data suggesting that combination therapy can decrease antiviral resistance in HBV infection, the endpoint likely to be of greatest long-term importance, and, rather than adding or replacing an antiviral agent after resistance develops, it is likely to be more effective in treatment-naive patients.

Adding-on versus switching-to adefovir therapy in lamivudine-resistant HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B

We studied the long-term efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment in 42 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had developed genotypical lamivudine (LAM) resistance with virological and clinical breakthroughs under long-term LAM treatment. Patients were allocated in 2 treatment groups. In the first (n = 14), LAM was switched to ADV monotherapy whereas in the second (n = 28) ADV was added to LAM. The two groups did not differ in patients' characteristics, all of them having HBV genotype D infection with the precore stop codon mutation. Within 12 months from start of ADV treatment, serum HBV DNA became nondetectable and ALT normalized in 71% and 90% of patients, respectively, with no difference between the 2 arms. Patients with baseline HBV DNA levels less than 10(7) copies/ml experienced a significantly earlier and more frequent decline in serum HBV DNA to nondetectable levels as compared with patients with greater than 10(7) HBV DNA copies/ml at baseline (P = 0.0013) This response has hitherto been maintained (median treatment duration 40 months) in all patients with ADV added to LAM, whereas virological and biochemical breakthroughs due to development of ADV signature resistance mutations occurred in 3 of 14 patients (21%) on ADV monotherapy 15 to 18 months from start of treatment (P = 0.0174).

CONCLUSION

Adding ADV to LAM in HBeAg-negative CHB patients with LAM resistance effectively suppresses HBV replication inmost of them and induces biochemical remission that can be maintained in all of them at least for 3 years without any evidence of development of resistance to ADV.

Adefovir Dipivoxil Monotherapy and Combination Therapy with Lamivudine for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B in an Asian Population

Aim

To determine differences in Chinese patients treated with adefovir (ADV) monotherapy or ADV in combination with lamivudine (3TC) after development of resistance to 3TC, with respect to biochemical improvement, HBV DNA suppression and development of subsequent ADV resistance.

Methods

All hepatitis B patients with 3TC resistance treated with ADV for 3 months or more at our centre were included, and monitored 3–6 monthly for biochemical and virological response, and development of ADV resistance.

Results

A total of 56 patients were included, 50% switched to ADV monotherapy and 50% received combination 3TC/ADV therapy. Median follow-up was 15.5 months. Normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) occurred in 25 (89%) patients in the ADV group compared with 24 (86%) in the 3TC/ADV group (P=0.686). Virological response (VR) was achieved in seven (35%) patients in the ADV group at 12 months compared with five (28%) in the 3TC/ADV group (P=0.637). By 24 months, seven (64%) patients in the ADV group achieved VR compared with two (40%) in the 3TC/ADV group (P=0.377). Cumulative probability of developing genotypic ADV resistance in the ADV group at 24 months was 18% compared with 7% in the 3TC/ADV group (P=0.94).

Conclusions

There was no obvious improvement in ALT normalization and virological suppression or reduction in the development of ADV-resistant mutations with 3TC/ADV therapy compared with ADV monotherapy. Further studies with longer follow-ups are required to determine whether combination 3TC/ADV therapy will reduce the emergence of ADV resistance compared with ADV monotherapy.

Improved outcome of chronic hepatitis B after heart transplantation by long-term antiviral therapy

Chronic hepatitis B progresses to cirrhosis in the majority of immunosuppressed patients. The outcome of long-term antiviral therapy in HBV-infected organ transplant recipients is unknown. In 1996, we included 20 heart transplant (HT) recipients in a pilot trial to treat chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir. At that time, bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was evident in 15 individuals (75%). From 1998 onwards, patients were switched to lamivudine in case of primary or secondary virological nonresponse to famciclovir. Adefovir or tenofovir became available at our centre for HT recipients in 2002. After 103 months, one patient was still on famciclovir showing a complete virological response. Sixteen patients were switched to lamivudine after 0.5-4 years of famciclovir therapy. Six of those showed a long-term response to lamivudine therapy lasting for up to 7 years. Lamivudine resistance developed in the remaining 10 patients (63%), in 4 of them successful rescue therapy (adefovir n = 3, tenofovir n = 1) could be initiated. Only one hepatocellular carcinoma developed, which was successfully treated by locoregional ablative therapy. Nine patients died (45%), with lamivudine-resistance-related liver failure as the cause of death in five cases. Significant improvement of Ishak fibrosis scores could be demonstrated in six of the seven patients with more than two sequential liver biopsies available. Long-term antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B can lead to regression of liver cirrhosis in patients after organ transplantation, unless viral resistance occurs. This study demonstrates the urgent need for further antivirals to overcome antiviral resistance.

Where does adefovir stand amongst newly developed antivirals: from pharmacology to virology

Adefovir, an acyclic nucleotide analog of adenosine monophosphate, has demonstrated potent activities against several viruses in vitro. Since 2002, the diester prodrug of this molecule, adefovir dipivoxil, has been approved as a well-tolerated and efficacious treatment for chronic hepatitis B. It is the first nucleotide analog to be approved for this indication and it is now challenged by several other molecules that also inhibit hepatitis B virus replication. In this article, we analyze the strengths and limitations of adefovir in the context of hepatitis B treatment and consider the other alternatives in the treatment of this difficult-to-treat chronic disease. Adefovir dipivoxil has offered a real opportunity for patients who developed lamivudine resistance and were facing a therapeutic deadlock; the next challenge for clinicians will be to offer the best therapeutic strategy to limit the inexorable selection of resistant strains.

Detection of rtN236T and rtA181V/T mutations associated with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in samples from patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection by the INNO-LiPA HBV DR line probe assay (version 2)

The nucleotide analog adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is an effective antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with resistance to ADV estimated to occur less frequently than resistance to lamivudine treatment. The detection of ADV resistance mutations is necessary during therapy to monitor and anticipate possible treatment failure. The INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 (LiPA; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium) is a DNA hybridization line probe assay for the detection of HBV polymerase mutations associated with resistance to lamivudine and ADV. Evaluation of this assay to detect ADV resistance mutations was performed by analyzing 38 patients treated with ADV. Serial samples taken at 6-month intervals during treatment were available for most patients. A total of 124 samples were analyzed by both LiPA and sequencing. By LiPA analysis, 12 patients (31.5%) were found to have mutations associated with resistance to ADV (rtA181V/T and/or rtN236T). This contrasted with sequence analysis, which found nine patients (24%) with either or both mutations. Twice as many samples were rtN236T positive by LiPA (18 of 124) compared to sequence analysis (9 of 124). LiPA detected the rtN236T mutation at least 6 months earlier than its detection by sequencing in patients for whom consecutive serum samples were available. Although less sensitive, sequencing has the advantage of providing information on other polymerase mutations not represented on LiPA strips. The INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2 assay is a very sensitive and specific assay for the detection of the rtN236T mutation associated with resistance to ADV.

Tenofovir for patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and high HBV DNA level during adefovir therapy

Incomplete virological response to adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has been observed in patients with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and may be associated with developing resistance and disease progression. We therefore investigated whether the efficacy of viral suppression could be improved by replacing ADV with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). Twenty patients with chronic HBV infection (18 HBeAg+), viral breakthrough during lamivudine therapy, and persistent viral replication (>10(4) copies/mL) after 15 months of ADV monotherapy (range 4-28 months) were treated with TDF 300 mg daily and were retrospectively analyzed. A screening for nucleoside/nucleotide analogue resistance mutations within the HBV polymerase gene was performed in all patients by direct sequencing. Within a median of 3.5 months, application of TDF led to undetectable HBV DNA in 19 of 20 patients, as demonstrated by suppression of HBV DNA below the detection limit of 400 copies/mL. Initially elevated ALT levels had normalized in 10 of 14 patients by the end of follow-up (median 12 months, range 3-24 months). Four patients lost HBeAg, after 3, 4, 5, and 16 months, and one patient seroconverted to anti-HBs after 16 months of TDF therapy. Lamivudine-associated mutations (rtV173L, rtL180M, rtM204V/I) could be detected in 6 patients at baseline of TDF, but this obviously did not influence the response. ADV-resistant mutations were not detected. No side effects were reported. In conclusion, these preliminary observations strongly suggest that TDF might be a highly effective rescue drug for HBV-infected patients with altered responsiveness to treatment with lamivudine and ADV.