Combination hepatitis C virus antigen and antibody immunoassay as a new tool for early diagnosis of infection

Alcohol use disorders, self-help groups as a supplement to pharmacological and psychological therapy? A retrospective study in a population with alcohol related liver disease

BACKGROUND

According to the new criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th Edition (DSM-V), the prevalence of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) is 20-30% in men and 10-15% in women worldwide.2,3 The anticraving therapy/psychotherapy combination is currently used routinely in clinical practice. However, the results after one year are unsatisfactory. Meta-analytic studies found failure rates of 57 to 75%. These percentages vary in relation to the intensity and length of the treatment. In addition, the abstinence rates gradually decrease over time. In this study, the clinical outcome of alcohol related liver disease (ALD) patients who spontaneously attended self-help groups (SHGs) (club of alcoholics in treatment - multi-family community/ alcoholics anonymous) regularly versus those who did not want to start the path or did not complete it was evaluated.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2010, 1337 alcohol use disorder patients affected by compensated alcohol related liver disease, were prospectively followed and retrospectively assessed. Two hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled: 74 attended self-help groups assiduously, 27 attended sporadically and 130 refused participation in SHGs.

RESULTS

Constant attendance at SHGs compared to non-attendance allows for a significant increase (<0.0001) in the period of sobriety found in the median of distribution. Frequent attendance at SHGs is effectively "preventive," reducing the fraction of relapses by about 30%. The percentage of cases of cirrhosis is significantly different (P=0.0007) between those who have regularly attended SHG meetings (about 1% of patients) and those who have never attended or only occasionally (various percentages between 21 and 31% of patients); in both groups the incidence of new cases would seem to be 0.014 cases/ year. Similar difference in percentages regarding the onset of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), although with a lower level of significance (P=0.017) among those who attended regularly, 4% of patients with an incidence of 0.006 cases/ year, compared to those who have never attended or only occasionally: over 14% of patients with an incidence of 0.022 cases/year.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests the importance of attending SHGs not only for the long-term achievement of alcoholic abstention, but also in positively influencing the course of alcohol-related diseases.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) diagnosis via microfluidics

Humans are subjected to various diseases; hence, proper diagnosis helps avoid further disease consequences. One such severe issue that could cause significant damage to the human liver is the hepatitis C virus (HCV). Several techniques are available to detect HCV under various categories, such as detection through antibodies, antigens, and RNA. Although immunoassays play a significant role in discovering hepatitis viruses, there is a need for point-of-care tests (POCT). Some developing strategies are required to ensure the appropriate selection of POCT for HCV detection, initiate appropriate antiviral therapy, and define associated risks, which will be critical in achieving optimal outcomes. Though molecular assays are precise, reproducible, sensitive, and specific, alternative strategies are required to enhance HCV diagnosis among the infected population. Herein, we described and assessed the potential of various microfluidic detection techniques and confirmatory approaches used in present communities. In addition, current key market players in HCV chip-based diagnosis and the future perspectives on the basis of which the diagnosis can be made easier are presented in the present review.

Evaluation of an antigen-antibody "combination" enzyme linked immunosorbent assay for diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infections

Background

Development of “combination” assays detecting in parallel, within a single test, Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) antigens and antibodies, not only reduces the window period in HCV-infection but also costs. Reduction of costs is important for developing countries where money and personal resources are limited.

Methods

We compared the Monolisa® HCV Antigen-Antibody Ultra (Bio-Rad Laboratories Limited, Marnes La Coquette, France) with the AXSYM HCV version 3.0 (Abbot Diagnostics, Germany)-the latter assay detecting only antibodies to HCV. Seventy three HCV-PCR positive and negative samples were tested.

Results

Although the two assays showed comparable results, two samples from a bone marrow transplant (BMT) patient of viral loads 7.8 × 10₅ and 8.9 × 10₆ IU/mL could not be detected by the Monolisa® HCV Antigen-Antibody Ultra assay. Failure to detect the two samples with viral loads considered above threshold of detection for antigen proteins suggested a lack of sensitivity by this assay to discover viral capsid protein in patient samples. Genotyping of these samples revealed genotype 1b, a HCV-subtype which is widespread and should thus be easily detected.

Conclusion

We conclude that although this assay depicts high sensitivity and specificity in detecting antibodies to HCV, it seems not to add further benefit in our study population to detect HCV infections by enhanced sensitivity due the potential contingency to trace viral capsid antigens.

Classical and modern approaches used for viral hepatitis diagnosis

CONTEXT

Viral hepatitis diagnosis is an important issue in the treatment procedure of this infection. Late diagnosis and delayed treatment of viral hepatitis infections can lead to irreversible liver damages and occurrence of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. A variety of laboratory methods including old and new technologies are being applied to detect hepatitis viruses. Here we have tried to review, categorize, compare and illustrate the classical and modern approaches used for diagnosis of viral hepatitis.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In order to achieve a comprehensive aspect in viral hepatitis detection methods, an extensive search using related keywords was done in major medical library and data were collected, categorized and summarized in different sections.

RESULTS

Analyzing of collected data resulted in the wrapping up the hepatitis virus detection methods in separate sections including 1) immunological methods such as enzyme immunoassay (EIA), radio-immunoassay (RIA) immuno-chromatographic assay (ICA), and immuno-chemiluminescence 2) molecular approaches including non-amplification and amplification based methods, and finally 3) advanced biosensors such as mass-sensitive, electrical, electrochemical and optical based biosensors and also new generation of detection methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Detection procedures in the clinical laboratories possess a large diversity; each has their individual advantages and facilities' differences.

Screening for hepatitis C virus infection in a high prevalence country by an antigen/antibody combination assay versus a rapid test

In low-income-countries, screening for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is often based on rapid tests (RT). Their lower sensitivity compared to enzyme immunoassay (EIA) suggests that newer HCV Antigen/Antibody (Ag/Ab) combination assays might have a role in such countries. To test this idea, 1998 blood donors were tested at the University Teaching Hospital blood bank in Yaoundé, Cameroon simultaneously with a RT (HCV rapid test, Human Diagnostics, Berlin, Germany) according to standard practice (S1) and with an Ag/Ab assay (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab Ultra, Biorad, France) (S2). All discordant, borderline and reactive samples were submitted to confirmatory testing by immunoblot and/or HCV-RNA. Of the 86 (4.3%) samples positive with one or both strategies, 29 were confirmed negative, 37 positive and 20 were false positive or resolved infection. There was a significant difference in test sensitivity (p=0.01) between S1 (70.3%) and S2 (91.9%) but not in test specificity (99.4% and 98.6%, respectively). The benefit of the Ag/Ab assay in the detection of recent HCV seronegative infections could not be evaluated since no Antigen-only donations were identified. However, better Ag/Ab test sensitivity compared to RT supports the implementation of these newer immunoassays for HCV screening in the African blood bank setting.

Detection limit of architect hepatitis C core antigen assay in correlation with HCV RNA, and renewed confirmation algorithm for reactive anti-HCV samples

BACKGROUND

hepatitis C infections are detected by anti-HCV screening tests. Reactive anti-HCV results give no information about the presence or absence of hepatitis C viruses, or of unspecific reactivity. To obtain information about the viral load, HCV RNA measurements, following a reactive anti-HCV result, are performed in well equipped and specialised laboratories. Anti-HCV immunoblots are the only means to exclude non specific reactivity. The measurement of HCV core antigen (HCV-Ag), as an alternative to HCV RNA, is discussed, as it can be analysed on the same instrument as anti-HCV.

OBJECTIVES

The detection limit of HCV-Ag is crucial to use it in lieu of HCV RNA, in regard of the different genotypes. A renewed algorithm is proposed to exclude unspecific reactivity of anti-HCV.

STUDY DESIGNS

Samples were tested on Architect i2000SR (Abbott) for anti-HCV and HCV-Ag. HCV RNA measurements were obtained by Cobas Ampliprep/Taqman (Roche) or m2000rt(®) (Abbott).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Comparison between HCV-Ag and HCV RNA from 126 samples of 101 patients with chronic hepatitis C gave linear regression R(2) 0.89, slope 0.885 and intercept -2.258, which were independent of the genotypes. The detection limit of HCV-Ag was between 2.4 and 4.5 Log(10)IU/mL. A renewed algorithm for confirmation of reactive anti-HCV results is proposed: active or resolved hepatitis C infections or false reactivity can be differentiated by sequenced reflex testing due to HCV-Ag, anti-HCV immunoblot and HCV RNA.

Characterization and application of monoclonal antibody against hepatitis C virus nonstructual protein three

Developing assays for detecting HCV antigens could be beneficial because viral proteins appear earlier than antibodies and are more stable than RNA in the serum. Monoclonal antibody was prepared by immunization and cell fusion. Subclass, specificity, and efficiency of monoclonal antibodies were determined by ELISA. Epitope specificity of monoclonal antibodies was analyzed by ELISA additivity test. HCV antigen in serum of hepatitis patients was examined by double monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA. Five hybridoma cell lines were screened and named HCV(1), HCV(2), HCV(3), HCV(4), and HCV(5). These five monoclonal antibodies had high specificity and efficiency. The additivity test showed that HCV(2), HCV(4), and HCV(5) recognized different epitopes, which can be matched in ELISA. Of 173 anti-HCV positive patients, 37 (21.4%) were positive for HCV antigen. Of 1498 anti-HCV negative patients, 10 (0.67%) were positive for HCV antigen. Fifty normal controls were negative for HCV antigen. HCV antigen detection had moderate agreement and correlation with HCV RNA detection (kappa=0.577, p<0.01; r=0.59, p<0.01). This result indicates that the monoclonal antibody against HCV NS(3) may be a potential diagnostic reagent, which would provide a foundation for developing a sandwich ELISA of HCV antigen detection.

Comparison of monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA with two anti-HCV assays for the detection of HCV infection in hospital setting

In this study, we compared the performance of three serological assays (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA, Innotest HCV Ab IV enzyme immunoassay--EIA, and Ortho HCV 3.0 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay--ELISA) for the detection of HCV infection. Ninety plasma samples were collected, representing 63 samples from groups at risk for acquiring HCV infection and 27 HCV RNA-positive samples. The results of Ortho HCV 3.0 ELISA, Innotest HCV Ab IV, and Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA were fully concordant for 27 HCV RNA-positive samples. Ortho HCV 3.0 ELISA test and Innotest HCV Ab IV also gave the same results for risk groups, while three samples were found to be reactive by Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA and were consequently found negative for HCV RNA. As two of the solely Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA-positive samples were also hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg)-positive, neutralization of HBsAg was performed but no arguments for the HBsAg interference were observed. In conclusion, the non-specific reactive signal was observed, in three samples using Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA, to be negative by other serological assays, and observed to be negative in an HCV RNA assessment, a result that could not be attributed to the interference with HBsAg. In the context of diagnostic testing, no test for various HCV genotypes was observed to be superior to any other.

Performance characteristics of a combined hepatitis C virus core antigen and anti-hepatitis C virus antibody test in different patient groups

We evaluated the performance of a hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen/antibody combination test [Murex HCV Antigen/Antibody Combination Test (Murex Ag/Ab test)] by comparing it with the current third-generation HCV antibody enzyme immunoassay (anti-HCV). A total of 403 serum samples were consecutively collected from four patient groups: healthy controls (n=100); HCV-infected patients (HCV group, n=102); Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-infected patients (HIV/HCV group, n=100); and patients with uremia (uremia group, n=101). Performances were evaluated for the Murex Ag/Ab, anti-HCV, and HCV RNA in the HIV/HCV and uremia patient groups. In the HCV group, all 102 samples showed concordant positive and negative results for anti-HCV, Murex Ag/Ab, and HCV RNA tests. In the HIV/HCV group, all 100 samples were positive for both anti-HCV and Murex Ag/Ab tests, whereas 88 patients (88%) were HCV RNA positive. In the uremia group, 14 (69.0%) of the 23 anti-HCV-positive patients were HCV RNA positive, whereas 14 (77.8%) of the 18 Murex Ag/Ab-positive patients were HCV RNA positive. None of anti-HCV-negative or Murex Ag/Ab-negative patients were HCV RNA positive. Based on the HCV RNA assay, the sensitivities for both anti-HCV and Murex Ag/Ab assays were 100%, whereas the specificities of these two assays were 89.7% and 95.4%, respectively. With good sensitivity and specificity, the Murex Ag/Ab assay could be a useful alternative diagnostic tool, especially in immunocompromised populations, such as patients with uremia or those infected with HIV.

Evaluation of the use of a combined HCV antigen/antibody assay in routine laboratory practice

BACKGROUND

Combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen/antibody (Ag/Ab) assays offer the advantage of a shorter window phase compared to traditional anti-HCV antibody assays. These assays have been extensively evaluated for the screening of healthy blood donors, but not in routine laboratory practice.

METHODS

We evaluated the performance of the combined HCV Ag/Ab assay Monolisa Ultra and compared it to Monolisa anti-HCV Plus (which only detects anti-HCV antibodies) in 61 HCV RNA-positive patients (genotypes 1 to 5) and in 276 consecutive AxSYM HCV-reactive patients. Discordant sera were tested with immunoblot and PCR.

RESULTS

All 61 PCR-positive sera were positive with AxSYM, Monolisa Ultra, and Monolisa Plus. Of the 276 consecutive AxSYM-reactive patients, 177 were confirmed as HCV-positive, 78 were HCV-negative and 21 were HCV-indeterminate. There were 4 false-positive results with Monolisa Ultra compared to 1 false-positive result with Monolisa PLus. The signal/cut-off ratio in immunoblot-negative sera was significantly higher with HCV Ultra compared to HCV Plus (p < 0.01). Sensitivity and specificity in AxSYM-reactive sera were 99.4% and 94.9% for Monolisa Ultra and 99.4% and 98.7% for Monolisa Plus.

CONCLUSION

When used as a secondary test, the sensitivity of the combined HCV Ag/Ab assay Monolisa Ultra was excellent, but specificity was reduced in AxSYM-reactive sera compared to Monolisa Plus.

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) of organ donors: is the 'best' test the right test? A consensus conference report

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) for HIV, HBV and HCV shortens the time between infection and detection by available testing. A group of experts was selected to develop recommendations for the use of NAT in the HIV/HBV/HCV screening of potential organ donors. The rapid turnaround times needed for donor testing and the risk of death while awaiting transplantation make organ donor screening different from screening blood-or tissue donors. In donors with no identified risk factors, there is insufficient evidence to recommend routine NAT, as the benefits of NAT may not outweigh the disadvantages of NAT especially when false-positive results can lead to loss of donor organs. For donors with identified behavioral risk factors, NAT should be considered to reduce the risk of transmission and increase organ utilization. Informed consent balancing the risks of donor-derived infection against the risk of remaining on the waiting list should be obtained at the time of candidate listing and again at the time of organ offer. In conclusion, there is insufficient evidence to recommend universal prospective screening of organ donors for HIV, HCV and HBV using current NAT platforms. Further study of viral screening modalities may reduce disease transmission risk without excessive donor loss.

Simultaneous detection of anti-HCV antibody and HCV core antigen

HCV infection is usually diagnosed by means of an enzyme immune assay for the detection of antibody against HCV. The window period between infection and seroconversion remains a dramatic problem in the transfusional and diagnostic setting. In this chapter, we report (i) procedures for assays using two different approaches designed to reduce the window period and (ii) performance in terms of specificity and sensitivity in the detection of both antibody and antigen, and we compare their efficacy with that of commercial assays.

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibodies in Saudi drug users using a novel assay

Drug users and particularly, injecting drug users, are at increased risk for infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aims of the study were to simultaneously detect HCV core antigen and specific antibodies in sera from Saudi drug users using the new HCV combination assay and to compare this data with HCV core antigen, anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA data from the same patients. A total of 297 patients who are followed up or admitted to a drug rehabilitation hospital over a period of 3 years were included in this study. Samples were analyzed using the new HCV Ag/Ab combination assay (Meurex), HCV core Ag assay, HCV antibodies and with the HCV RNA assay. Out of the 297 samples from Saudi drug users, 111 samples (37.4%) have detectable HCV core Ag, 112 samples (37.7%) have detectable HCV antibodies, 118 have detectable HCV RNA, and 116 samples were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab combination assay (39.1%). Out of the 116 samples, HCV core Ag was detected in 110 samples (94.8%), HCV antibodies were detected in 111 (95.7%) samples and HCV RNA was detected in 114 samples (98.3%). In the control group (n = 305), only 2 (0.66%) blood donor were positive by HCV antibodies assay, HCV RNA assay as well as HCV Ag/Ab combination assay. The new HCV Ag/Ab combination assay may well improve the overall quality of diagnosis of HCV infection especially in high risk population such as drug users that necessitates rigorous testing.

[Clinical assessment of Monolisa HCV Ag-Ab ULTRA (Bio-Rad) in a general hospital]

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate a new test based on simultaneous detection of HCV antibodies and antigen (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad, Marnes la Coquette, France).

METHODS

We studied samples from two groups of patients and 7 commercial HCV seroconversion panels (75 samples). Group 1: 1360 serum samples from patients referred for routine testing of anti HCV antibodies. Group 2: 333 serum samples from 183 hemodialysis patients. All samples were tested by the Ortho HCV 3.0 technique (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Amersham, UK) and the Monolisa HCV Ag-Ab ULTRA technique.

RESULTS

Group 1: Seventy-four of 1360 serum samples were positive by Ortho HCV and 77 by Monolisa. In 1353 samples, the results with the two tests were concordant: 1281 negative and 72 positive. Five samples were positive only by Monolisa and 2 only by Ortho (overall agreement: 99.5%). Group 2: Results were concordant in 325 samples, 308 negative and 17 positive. Seven samples were positive by Monolisa and negative by Ortho. The sensitivity of the Monolisa test in hemodialysis patients was clearly higher than that of the Ortho test (100% and 70.8%, respectively). Monolisa detected HCV infection in 43 of 75 samples from the seroconversion panels; only 18 positive samples were detected by Ortho HCV. Monolisa reduced the window period by up to 72 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate high agreement between the Monolisa and Ortho tests in samples from the general population. In hemodialysis patients, however, Monolisa was more sensitive. In addition, the Monolisa test significantly reduced the window period of HCV infection.

A simple, rapid, and sensitive integrated protein microarray for simultaneous detection of multiple antigens and antibodies of five human hepatitis viruses (HBV, HCV, HDV, HEV, and HGV)

Protein microarrays for parallel detection of multiple viral antigens and antibodies have not yet been described in the field of human hepatitis virus infections. Here, we describe a simple, rapid and sensitive integrated protein microarray with three different reaction models. The integrated protein microarray could simultaneously determine in human sera two viral antigens (HBsAg, HBeAg) and seven viral antibodies (HBsAb, HBcAb, HBeAb, HCVAb, HDVAb, HEVAb, HGVAb) of human hepatitis viruses within 20 min. The results of the protein microarray were assessed directly by the naked eye but can also be analyzed by a quantitative detector. The detection limit of this protein microarray was 0.1 ng/ml for HBsAg. Overall, >85% concordance was observed between the integrated protein microarrays and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for above hepatitis viral antigen and antibody detections in human sera. This integrated protein microarray can be easily optimized for clinical use and epidemiological screening for multiple hepatitis virus infections.

Intérêt d'un nouveau test combiné antigène–anticorps pour le dépistage de l'infection par le virus de l'hépatite C : réduction de la fenêtre sérologique au cours de l'hépatite C aiguë chez le sujet co-infecté par le VIH

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the clinical benefit of a new combined antigen-antibody immunoenzymatic assay (Monolisa HCV Ag-Ab Ultra, Biorad) in the setting of acute HCV infection in HIV infected patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The performance of this assay was first evaluated in 160 HIV positive samples from uninfected and chronically HCV infected patients. To assess the performance of the Ag-Ab assay in the context of acute hepatitis C, 94 stored frozen serums from 20 recently diagnosed cases were retrospectively tested for HCV-RNA and presence of anti-HCV antibodies, in parallel with the new assay.

RESULTS

In HIV infected patients, the sensitivity and specificity of the Ultra assay was 100% with a strong discrimination between positive and negative samples. In HCV acutely infected patients, the Ag-Ab assay significantly reduced the seronegative period, allowing an earlier diagnosis compared to a 3rd generation ELISA in 65% of the cases. The combined assay became positive on the same bleed as the first HCV-RNA detection for 13 patients out of 20. Nevertheless, in one case, characterized by an absence of seroconversion over one year but a continuous viral replication above 1 million IU/ml, the combined assay did not improve HCV infection diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Use of this new assay as a first line screening would significantly reduce the long seronegative window period seen in HCV infection allowing earlier HCV diagnosis and rapid clinical management. However, in case of clinical acute hepatitis C, sensitive HCV-RNA detection should remain the gold standard.

Early detection of hepatitis C virus infection by use of a new combined antigen-antibody detection assay: potential use for high-risk individuals

The performance of a new combined antigen-antibody assay (Monolisa HCV Ag-Ab Ultra; Bio-Rad Laboratories) was evaluated in the context of acute hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. The combined assay became positive as early as the first PCR and earlier than a third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 65% of the cases. Reduction of the long period of HCV seronegativity should improve the diagnosis of hepatitis C infection, especially in high-risk populations.

Combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen-antibody detection assay does not improve diagnosis for seronegative individuals with occult HCV infection

A combined hepatitis C virus (HCV) antigen-antibody assay was evaluated for 115 seronegative individuals with occult HCV infection. The assay was reactive in one patient and negative to weakly reactive in three others (all four gave indeterminate results by supplemental assay) but failed to detect HCV in the remaining patients. Despite increased sensitivity the combined assay does not improve serodiagnosis of occult HCV infection.