The atopy trait in hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Local and Systemic Production of Pro-Inflammatory Eicosanoids Is Inversely Related to Sensitization to Aeroallergens in Patients with Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is characterized by overproduction of the pro-inflammatory eicosanoids. Although immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitization to aeroallergens is common among AERD patients, it does not belong to the defining disease characteristics. In this study of 133 AERD patients, we sought to find a relationship between sensitization to aeroallergens and local (leukotriene E4, prostaglandin E2 and prostaglandin D2) and/or systemic (leukotriene E4) production of arachidonic acid metabolites. Interestingly, a negative association between pro-inflammatory eicosanoid levels in induced sputum supernatant or urine and sensitization to aeroallergens was observed. This inverse relationship might suggest the presence of a protective effect of atopic sensitization to aeroallergens against stronger local airway inflammation and higher systemic AERD-related inflammatory activity.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for cefaclor-induced immediate hypersensitivity: a retrospective observation at two university hospitals in Korea

Background

Cefaclor, a second-generation oral cephalosporin, is widely prescribed to treat infectious diseases. Immediate hypersensitivity (HS) reactions to cefaclor have continuously been reported and are expected to increase with its greater use. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of immediate HS to cefaclor over the most recent 5 years.

Methods

This retrospective study investigated 521 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to cefaclor at pharmacovigilance centers at two tertiary hospitals from January 2014 to December 2018. In total, 459 patients with immediate HS to cefaclor were reviewed.

Results

A total of 459 cases of cefaclor immediate HS were included among 521 cefaclor ADRs, and anaphylaxis was recorded in 61.2%. Female sex (odds ratio 2.917, 95% confidence interval 2.397–3.550, P < 0.001), age under 65 years (4.225, 3.017–5.916, P < 0.001), hypertension (2.520, 1.875–3.388, P < 0.001), liver diseases (2.189, 1.208–3.967, P = 0.010), asthma (8.075, 5.301–12.302, P < 0.001), and concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (1.888, 1.554–2.294, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with cefaclor immediate HS.

Conclusions

Cefaclor was found to elicit high proportions of immediate HS and anaphylaxis. Physicians ought to be cautious with prescribing cefaclor to females, individuals with hypertension, liver diseases, or asthma, and patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered.

Aspirin sensitivity: Lessons in the regulation (and dysregulation) of mast cell function

The idiosyncratic activation of mast cells (MCs) in response to administration of nonselective COX inhibitors is a cardinal feature of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Older studies using MC-stabilizing drugs support a critical role for MCs and their products in driving the severe eosinophilic inflammation and respiratory dysfunction that is typical of AERD. Because patients with AERD react to all nonselective COX inhibitors regardless of their chemical structure, the mechanism of MC activation is not caused by classical, antigen-induced cross-linking of IgE receptors. Recent studies in both human subjects and animal models have revealed a complex and multifactorial process culminating in dysregulation of MC function and an aberrant dependency on COX-1-derived prostaglandin E₂ to maintain a tenuous homeostasis. This article reviews the factors most likely to contribute to MC dysregulation in patients with AERD and the potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications.

Epidemiology of chronic rhinosinusitis, selected risk factors, comorbidities, and economic burden

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a relevant and prevalent medical condition in Germany, Europe and the world. If analysed in detail, the prevalence of CRS shows regional and temporary variety. In this review, currently available data regarding the prevalence of CRS is therefore sorted by country and/or region, time point of data collection and the CRS-definition employed. Risk factors like smoking and gastroesophageal reflux are discussed regarding their influence on CRS prevalence. Moreover, comorbidities of CRS, like asthma, conditions of the cardiovascular system and depression are listed and their influence on CRS is discussed. Furthermore, data on CRS prevalence in special cohorts, like immunocompromised patients, are presented. To estimate the economic burden of CRS, current data e.g. from Germany and the USA are included in this review.

Hypersensitivity to Aspirin and other NSAIDs: Diagnostic Approach in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and/or asthma comprises a distinct clinical syndrome referred to as NSAIDs exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD). Patients with NERD tend to have more severe course of both upper (CRS and nasal polyps) and lower airway (asthma) diseases and are usually recalcitrant to conventional treatment modalities. Diagnosing and phenotyping of patients with NERD are critical for prevention of drug-induced adverse reactions and open novel options for management of underlying chronic airway inflammatory diseases. Diagnosis of NERD is based on detailed clinical history confirmed by challenge with aspirin, but new diagnostic approaches are currently being developed. This review article focuses on the diagnostic approach to a patient with CRS and hypersensitivity to NSAIDs, emphasizing the importance of diagnosis for proper patient's management.

Aspirin-intolerant asthma in the population: prevalence and important determinants

BACKGROUND

Population-based studies on aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA) are very few, and no previous population study has investigated risk factors for the condition.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of AIA in the general population.

METHODS

A questionnaire on respiratory health was mailed to 30,000 randomly selected subjects aged 16-75 years in West Sweden, 29,218 could be traced and 18,087 (62%) responded. The questionnaire included questions on asthma, respiratory symptoms, aspirin-induced dyspnoea and possible determinants.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AIA was 0.5%, 0.3% in men and 0.6% in women (P = 0.014). Sick leave, emergency visits due to asthma and all investigated lower respiratory symptoms were more common in AIA than in aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA). Obesity was a strong risk factor for AIA (BMI > 35: odds ratio (OR) 12.1; 95% CI 2.49-58.5), and there was a dose-response relationship between increasing body mass index (BMI) and risk of AIA. Obesity, airborne occupational exposure and visible mould at home were considerably stronger risk factors for AIA than for ATA. Current smoking was a risk factor for AIA (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.47-4.42), but not ATA.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin-intolerant asthma identified in the general population was associated with a high burden of symptoms, uncontrolled disease and a high morbidity. Increasing BMI increased the risk of AIA in a dose-response manner. A number of risk factors, including obesity and current smoking, were considerably stronger for AIA than for ATA.

Elevated total serum IgE in nonatopic patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), also known as Samter's triad, is characterized by asthma, recurrent nasal polyps, and by allergic-like reactions to aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, although it is not a true immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergy. Atopy, although common in patients with AERD, is not a characteristic of the disease. Recently, we have observed a subgroup of patients with AERD who have no history of atopy but have abnormally elevated total serum IgE, a phenomenon that has been observed in patients with asthma but has not been further explored. We sought to explore this phenomenon of elevated total serum IgE in the absence of atopy in a subset of patients with AERD.

METHODS

Patients were diagnosed with AERD with an oral aspirin challenge at the Brigham and Women's Hospital Allergy and Clinics. Atopy was defined as a positive test result to at least one of the common aeroallergens. Elevated total serum IgE was defined as IgE of >100 IU/mL.

RESULTS

We present six patients with AERD and elevated total serum IgE in the absence of any clear atopy. Total serum IgE in these patients ranged from 110 to 1760 IU/mL. Mean blood eosinophil levels for these patients were not significantly different from those of the entire cohort of patients with AERD included in the study.

CONCLUSION

In a subset of patients with AERD, we observed elevated total serum IgE even when atopy was not present. To better understand the disease, the cause and clinical relevance of this phenomenon deserves further exploration.

Aspirin hypersensitivity in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis: frequency and contributing factors

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is a syndrome frequently seen in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). However, there are few studies on evaluating the prevalence of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) hypersensitivity in patients with CRSwNP using the oral aspirin challenge (OAC) test. This cross-sectional study was designed to determine the frequency of ASA hypersensitivity and factors associated with it in patients with CRSwNP in Tehran, Iran.

METHODS

Adult patients with CRSwNP who were presented to the asthma and allergy clinic were recruited for the study. After confirming CRS and NP, OAC was performed to evaluate/confirm the diagnosis of ASA hypersensitivity. Atopic evaluation was performed using skin-prick test, nasal smear, blood eosinophil count, and serum total IgE.

RESULTS

Eighty Iranian patients (43 women and 37 men) with CRSwNP were enrolled (mean age, 38.9 ± 10.7 years). OAC was performed in all of the patients and 39 patients (48.8%) had a positive reaction; among them, 14 (35.8%) had a self-reported history of ASA hypersensitivity. Concomitant asthma, previous polyp surgery, high polyp score, and ASA hypersensitivity history were all associated with positive OAC (p < 0.05). Presence of AERD was not associated with age, stage of asthma, blood eosinophilia, nasal smear eosinophilia, and atopy.

CONCLUSION

ASA hypersensitivity is common in patients with CRSwNP in Tehran, Iran. Patients at risk for AERD should be evaluated for the presence of ASA hypersensitivity with ASA provocation challenge test to confirm the diagnosis.

Aspirin-intolerant asthma in the Korean population: prevalence and characteristics based on a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-intolerant asthma is a unique clinical syndrome characterized by acute bronchoconstriction following the administration of aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the prevalence and investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma in Korea.

METHODS

Using an adult asthma cohort (COREA) from 11 university hospitals in Korea, we analyzed the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma, defined as a positive response to the question: "Have you ever experienced dyspnea and cough after taking an aspirin or any NSAID (cold medicine)?" Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma and aspirin-tolerant asthma.

RESULTS

Aspirin-intolerant asthma was reported in 68 (5.8%) of 1173 adult asthmatics (age 15-84). Patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma had a lower mean age (43.9 ± 13.4 vs. 49.0 ± 15.6, P = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis (77.9% vs. 61.7%, P = 0.012) and atopic dermatitis (16.2% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.001) than aspirin-tolerant asthma patients. There were no significant differences in lung function, asthma severity or the use of asthma controllers. However, aspirin-intolerant asthma was associated with greater use of healthcare services over a lifetime and over the past 12 months. Aspirin-intolerant asthma was significantly associated with emergency room visits over the past 12 months (P = 0.029, OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.08-4.42).

CONCLUSION

Based on histories, the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma is 5.8% among adult asthma patients in Korea. Aspirin-intolerant asthma is associated with lower age, higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and atopic dermatitis, and more frequent exacerbations.

Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with asthma in Turkey: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

There are no country-based data focused on aspirin (ASA)-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of AERD in adult patients with asthma.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interview by a specialist in pulmonology/allergy at seven centres across Turkey.

RESULTS

A total of 1344 asthma patients (F/M: 1081/263: 80.5%/19.5%, mean age: 45.7 ± 14.2 years) were enrolled. Atopy rate was 47%. Prevalence of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis, and nasal polyposis (NP) were 49%, 69% and 20%, respectively. Of 270 patients with NP, 171 (63.3%) reported previous nasal polypectomy and 40 (25%) had a history of more than three nasal polypectomies. Aspirin hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 180 (13.6%) asthmatic patients, with a reliable history in 145 (80.5%), and oral ASA provocation test in 35 (19.5%) patients. Clinical presentations of ASA hypersensitivity were respiratory in 76% (n=137), respiratory/cutaneous in 15% (n=27), and systemic in 9% (n=16) of the patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that a family history of ASA hypersensitivity (p: 0.001, OR: 3.746, 95% CI: 1.769-7.929), history of chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis (p: 0.025, OR: 1.713, 95% CI: 1.069-2.746) and presence of NP (p<0.001, OR: 7.036, 95% CI: 4.831-10.247) were independent predictors for AERD.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional survey showed that AERD is highly prevalent among adult asthmatics and its prevalence seems to be affected by family history of ASA hypersensitivity, history of rhinosinusitis and presence of NP.

Reduced expression of the prostaglandin E2 receptor E-prostanoid 2 on bronchial mucosal leukocytes in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) is thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of aspirin-sensitive asthma (ASA).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to extend our previous observations implicating impaired inflammatory cell responsiveness to PGE(2) as a pathogenetic mechanism in patients with aspirin-sensitive rhinosinusitis to the bronchial mucosa in patients with ASA.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was used to enumerate inflammatory cells and their expression of cysteinyl leukotriene receptors 1 and 2 (CysLT(1) and CysLT(2)) and the PGE(2) receptors E-prostanoid 1 to 4 (EP(1)-EP(4)) in bronchial biopsy specimens from patients with ASA, patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma, and control subjects (n= 15 in each group). Concentrations of PGE(2) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were measured by using ELISA. The effects of PGE(2) and EP receptor agonists on CD3/CD28-stimulated cytokine production by PBMCs were measured by using ELISA. Airways responsiveness to LTD(4)in vivo was measured in asthmatic patients by means of bronchial challenge.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma, patients with ASA had increased bronchial mucosal neutrophil and eosinophil numbers but reduced percentages of T cells, macrophages, mast cells, and neutrophils expressing EP(2). Both groups showed increased bronchial sensitivity to inhaled LTD(4), but this did not correlate with mucosal expression of CysLT(1) or CysLT(2). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid PGE(2) concentrations were comparable in all groups. In vitro PGE(2) inhibited cytokine production by PBMCs through EP(2) but not other PGE(2) receptors.

CONCLUSION

Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that impaired inhibition of inflammatory leukocytes by PGE(2) acting through the EP(2) receptor has a role in the pathogenesis of ASA.

Characteristics of subjects experiencing hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: patterns of response

BACKGROUND

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most frequently involved groups of medicines in hypersensitivity drug reactions. Two mechanisms can induce the reaction: immunological (sensitization) due to a specific IgE or T cell response and pharmacological (cyclooxygenase inhibition). The contribution of each of these mechanisms to the reactions is not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse a large group of subjects with confirmed hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs.

METHODS

The drugs involved, the clinical entities induced and the time interval between drug intake and appearance of the reaction were studied. In cases where the diagnosis was not confirmed, a drug provocation test was carried out. Atopy status was also assessed with prick test and total IgE in serum.

RESULTS

A total of 659 patients were finally considered to have had hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs; 76% had cross-intolerance (CI) and 24% were selective responders (SR). The most important drugs involved in CI were propionic acid derivatives, in most cases ibuprofen, and in SR pyrazolones. In CI, the most frequent clinical entity was urticaria and angio-oedema and to a lesser extent airway involvement. The skin and airways were both involved in an important proportion of cases. The most frequent entities in SR were urticaria and/or angio-oedema followed by anaphylaxis. Atopy was significantly associated in the CI group (P<0.005).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions by CI to NSAIDs are the most frequent entities induced by these compounds. In addition to aspirin, other NSAIDs are taking on a predominant role. Atopy can be a predisposing factor in patients with CI.

Clinical characteristics of patients with drug hypersensitivity in Norway: a single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) represent an important public health problem. Knowledge of their clinical characteristics will provide improved diagnostic approaches to this topic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to describe the clinical characteristics of patients with suspected DHRs.

METHODS

The medical records of 206 outpatients with suspected DHRs, who consulted a Norwegian allergy centre from January 2005 to December 2009, were investigated in a retrospective study.

RESULTS

Mean age (range) was 44.3 (11-84) years, and 72% of the patients were women. The most common underlying diseases justifying the use of drugs were infections (49%) and pain-related diseases (23%). Antibiotics (53%), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (32%), paracetamol (15%) and other drugs (46%), used as monotherapy or combinations, were the most often suspected drugs. Cutaneous symptoms were the most frequently reported symptoms (83%). Hospitalisation or prolonged hospitalisation was needed in 38% of the cases, and anaphylaxis was reported in 28% of all the patients. Skin prick tests were performed in 185 patients, of which 14 patients had positive test results. Drug provocation tests (DPTs) were performed in only 86 patients, six of which had positive reactions. DHRs were confirmed in 24 and rejected in 81 patients. Unsettled cases (39%) were mainly due to not performing DPTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Suspected DHRs occur predominantly in women. The most common manifestations are cutaneous symptoms, but life-threatening reactions justifying hospitalisation may occur. Antibiotics and NSAIDs are the two drug families most frequently suspected. DPTs need to be included in diagnostic protocols in order to evaluate suspected DHRs.

Safety of Selective COX‐2 Inhibitors in Aspirin/Nonsteroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drug‐Intolerant Patients: Comparison of Nimesulide, Meloxicam, and Rofecoxib

BACKGROUND

Intolerance to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a crucial problem in clinical practice. There is, therefore, a need for safer NSAIDs in patients with analgesic intolerance.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of nimesulide, meloxicam, and rofecoxib, selective COX-2 inhibitors, in a group of ASA/NSAIDs-intolerant patients.

METHOD

Tolerances to nimesulide, meloxicam, and rofecoxib were assessed by single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges. One hundred twenty-seven subjects with history of adverse reaction to ASA/NSAIDs received oral challenges with nimesulide, 61 subjects were challenged with meloxicam, 51 subjects were challenged with rofecoxib, and 37 subjects were challenged with all three drugs. Placebos were given to all patients on the first day of the study. On the second day, one-fourth and three-fourths of the therapeutic doses of the active drugs (nimesulide 100 mg, meloxicam 7.5 mg, or rofecoxib 25 mg) were given at 60-minute intervals. There was at least a 3-day interval between challenge tests. Erythema, pruritus accompanied by erythema, urticaria/angioedema, rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, sneezing, dyspnea, or cough associated with a decrease of at least 20% in the forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and hypotension were considered as positive reactions.

RESULTS

Positive reactions to the nimesulide, meloxicam, and rofecoxib challenges were observed in 18/127 (14.3%), 5/61 (8.1%), and 1/51 (2.0%) patients, respectively. In each group of nine patients, there were two patients with asthma and four who developed skin type reactions and asthmatic reactions, respectively, to the nimesulide challenge. Among five patients who reacted to the meloxicam challenge, asthmatic type reactions were detected in two asthmatics. Only one urticarial type reaction was observed with rofecoxib challenge in one patient who presented with anaphylaxis to ASA/NSAIDs. All patients with asthma tolerated rofecoxib without any adverse effects. None of the patients reacted to the placebo. Among 37 patients challenged with all three drugs, 11 reacted to nimesulide, and one patient reacted only to meloxicam. Three patients reacted to more than one of the drugs tested, and one of them reacted to all drugs.

CONCLUSION

This is the first placebo-controlled report comparing these three drugs. The results indicate that among these alternative drugs for ASA/NSAIDs-intolerant patients, rofecoxib seems to have the most favorable tolerability.

The prevalence of intolerance for low-dose acetylsalicylacid in the secondary prevention of atherothrombosis

Daily low-dose acetylsalicylacid (ASA) is prescribed to patients with atherothrombosis frequently to prevent vascular complications. In reports on complications and side effects of low-dose ASA use in the literature there is a range of definitions. We explored the incidence, characteristics and consequences of symptoms suggestive of ASA intolerance in patients on low-dose ASA. General practitioners and specialists in 105 centres were asked to review their patient files for the last 10 consecutive patients who were prescribed ASA. Participating patients completed a questionnaire about their current ASA use (doctors completed the questionnaire together with the patients), use of co-medication and symptoms suggestive of ASA intolerance. A total of 947 patients were included in this study. Sixty patients (6.6%) had ceased ASA treatment, predominantly because of the occurrence of side effects suspected to be caused by ASA use. A quarter of the patients concomitantly used an anti-acid agent. Of the 947 patients, 271 (30.6%) indicated symptoms during ASA intake. The most common symptoms were related to the gastrointestinal tract (25.1%). In patients prescribed a low-dose of ASA monotherapy, side effects suggestive of intolerance are common. More awareness should be created to detect and treat these symptoms, because the occurrence of side effects is the most important reason for patients to discontinue ASA treatment.

Safety of parecoxib in patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced urticaria or angioedema

BACKGROUND

Parecoxib is the first injectable cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitor indicated for the treatment of acute postoperative pain.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the results of a challenge with parecoxib in patients with a history of urticaria or angioedema to 1 or more nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

The study was performed from October 1, 2006, through March 31, 2007, with 79 patients who historically had experienced urticaria or angioedema after use of NSAIDs. The patients underwent a single-blind challenge with parecoxib, 40 mg.

RESULTS

No reaction to placebo was observed in any patient. Similarly, no reaction to parecoxib was observed in any patients in the single-class or multiple-class intolerance group.

CONCLUSION

Our report demonstrates that parecoxib does not induce cross-reactivity in patients with a history of urticaria or angioedema. Hence, this finding suggests that this drug could be safely proposed as an alternative (but only after a prior challenge) in patients with previous hypersensitive reactions to NSAIDs, even if there are added risk factors such as atopy and antimicrobial allergy, who require an analgesic drug perioperatively.

Safety of meloxicam in aspirin-hypersensitive patients with asthma and/or nasal polyps. A challenge-proven study

BACKGROUND

The anti-inflammatory actions of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)/non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are thought to be due to inhibition of COX-2, whereas the side effects such as gastric damage and aspirin-induced asthma are mediated through inhibition of COX-1. Therefore, a new class of drugs with COX-2 selectivity may be well tolerated by patients with ASA/NSAIDs hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether subjects with asthma and/or nasal polyps (NP) and analgesic intolerance proven by oral ASA provocation test tolerated the selective COX-2 inhibitor, meloxicam.

METHODS

All subjects were first challenged with ASA using a 2-day, single-blind, placebo-controlled oral provocation test. Thereafter, the subjects showing positive response to ASA provocation underwent a single-blind, placebo-controlled challenge with a cumulative dose of 7.5 mg of meloxicam on 2 separate days. One and three fourths of the divided doses of placebo and the active drug were given at 1-hour intervals. Clinical symptoms, lung function, and blood pressure were monitored during these challenge protocols.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with asthma and/or NP (10 males and 11 females; mean age: 38.4 +/- 2.9 years) who reacted to ASA challenges were enrolled in the study. Response to ASA provocation was rhinitis + bronchospasm in 13, and extrabronchial reactions in 8 (isolated rhinitis in 3) patients. Mean PD(20) was 163.4 +/- 39.9 mg ASA among patients who reacted with bronchospasm to ASA. Only 1 patient reacted to meloxicam challenge at a cumulative dose of 7.5 mg.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that 7.5 mg of meloxicam is a safe alternative treatment for ASA-hypersensitive asthma and/or NP patients with proven hypersensitivity via oral ASA challenges.

Pathogenesis and management of aspirin-intolerant asthma

In 2-23% of adults with asthma, and rarely in children with asthma, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause asthma exacerbations. Within 3 hours of ingestion of aspirin/NSAIDs, individuals with aspirin-intolerant asthma (AIA) develop bronchoconstriction, often accompanied by rhinorrhea, conjunctival irritation, and scarlet flush. In severe cases, a single therapeutic dose of aspirin/NSAIDs can provoke violent bronchospasm, loss of consciousness, and respiratory arrest. In order to diagnose AIA, oral, inhaled, nasal or intravenous aspirin challenge tests are performed in facilities where experienced physicians are present and emergency treatment is available. The exact differences in the pathogenesis of AIA and other types of asthma are not fully understood. The interference of aspirin/NSAIDs with arachidonic acid metabolism in the lungs plays an important role in the mechanism of AIA; inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase is accompanied by overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs). It has been proposed that overproduction of cys-LTs, together with removal by aspirin/NSAIDs of the 'brake' imposed by the bronchodilator prostaglandin E2, may cause an asthma attack in patients with AIA. Development of a suitable animal model to investigate the pathogenesis of AIA would help to clarify this question. Although it is still controversial whether leukotriene modifiers are more effective in patients with AIA compared with other types of asthma, because LT plays an important role in the pathogenesis of AIA, leukotriene modifiers are the preferred medication for the long-term control of AIA. Add-on efficacy of leukotriene modifiers has been confirmed in patients with AIA already treated with inhaled corticosteroids. However, this does not mean that aspirin/NSAIDs can be safely taken by aspirin-sensitive patients treated with leukotriene modifiers. To prevent attacks of AIA, sensitive patients should avoid the use of aspirin/NSAIDs or use selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors when required. When patients with AIA need aspirin for specific situations they should receive aspirin desensitization therapy or treatment with selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors.

Tolerability of selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor, celecoxib, in patients with analgesic intolerance

Intolerance reactions to acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are common and caused by inhibition of COX-1 enzyme. Therefore, drugs that selectively inhibit COX-2 enzyme may be safe in these subjects. In this study, we evaluated the tolerability of celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, in patients with analgesic intolerance. The eligible study population consisted of patients with a history of urticaria/angioedema, naso-ocular symptoms, bronchospasm, and/or anaphylactoid reaction induced by ASA and/or NSAIDs. A single-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenge test was performed in the hospital setting. On 2 separate days, 1/4 and 3/4 divided doses of placebo and celecoxib (Celebrex 200 mg, Pfizer, Turkey) were given with 2-hour intervals. Seventy-five subjects (mean age: 38.2 +/- 1.4 years; F:M: 55:20) were included in the study. Twenty-one subjects had asthma. No reaction was observed with placebo or celecoxib provocation. Although celecoxib seems to be a safe alternative drug in our study group, considering its serious adverse events reported in the literature, the drug should be recommended for patients with analgesic intolerance only after being tested by an experienced allergist.

Immune Tolerance to Drugs. (II).: Long–Term Tolerability of Nimesulide in Patients with NSAID Hypersensitivity

Nimesulide is well-tolerated as an alternative to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients with a previous adverse reaction to other classes of NSAIDs. However, there is little information in the literature about its long-term tolerability. The study was carried out on 625 patients who had experienced adverse reactions to one or more NSAIDs. All patients received and tolerated peroral challenges with nimesulide. On the first day, patients were given an equivalent number of placebo doses to the planned number of nimesulide doses. In a successive session, the test was administered by means of increasing doses of nimesulide at 30 min intervals until the common daily therapeutic dose of 100 mg was reached (10 mg-20 mg-30 mg-40 mg). A questionnaire was distributed to all subjects. In particular, they were asked to clarify any reactive symptoms they had developed after ingestion of the drug. It was found that only 2.1% (4/192) of subjects who were given this drug experienced urticaria during treatment. We have identified three significant risk factors: a history of chronic urticaria, a history of antibiotic hypersensitivity and a history of hypersensitivity to more than one class of NSAIDs. In patients with the above risk factors, a prior tolerance test with a selective COX2 antagonist should be administered.

Severe rhinosinusitis

Rhinosinusitis is diagnosed frequently in clinical practice, but the term may in fact encompass a wide spectrum of diseases. Inflammation of the nasal and sinus mucosa can arise from various causes and lead to different sequelae. Moreover, the term rhinosinusitis is more accurate than sinusitis. Causes range from a viral infection leading to the common cold to an invasive, fungal infection. An accurate diagnosis is important because effective therapy is available if recognized early and if specific therapy is used. Importantly, there is a close relationship between upper and lower airway disease and each have unique structural and functional differences that make an understanding of rhinosinusitis important not only for upper airway disease, but also for the management of asthma. All too often, rhinosinusitis becomes chronic and this becomes a challenge because medical therapy may not be sufficient to control disease. Finally, we should note that the differential diagnosis of rhinosinusitis is extensive and physicians should place heavy emphasis not only on the history, but also on appropriate imaging studies. A normal exam does not rule out the possibility of rhinosinusitis. Finally, we should emphasize that effective treatment is dependent on the etiology of the symptoms but also dependent on whether it is acute or chronic.

Aspirin intolerance and the cyclooxygenase-leukotriene pathways

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In up to 10% of patients with bronchial asthma, aspirin and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs precipitate asthmatic attacks. This is a hallmark of a distinct clinical syndrome that develops according to a characteristic sequence of symptoms. Here we discuss its clinical picture and management as related to the abnormalities in arachidonic acid transformations.

RECENT FINDINGS

At the biochemical level, the characteristic feature is profound alteration in eicosanoid biosynthesis and metabolism. Major advances in the molecular biology of eicosanoids, exemplified by the cloning of cysteinyl-leukotriene receptors and discovery of a whole family of cyclooxygenase enzymes, offer new insights into mechanisms operating in aspirin-induced asthma. Clinical interest has been enhanced by the introduction into therapy of highly specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors and antileukotriene drugs.

SUMMARY

Recent studies have improved our understanding of mechanisms operating in asthma and unvieled the role of eicosanoid mediators in pulmonary disease.

Aspirin-induced asthma: advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

In some asthmatic individuals, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that inhibit cyclooxygen-ase 1 (COX-1) exacerbate the condition. This distinct clinical syndrome, called aspirin-induced asthma (AIA), is characterized by an eosinophilic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, aspirin sensitivity, and asthma. There is no in vitro test for the disorder, and diagnosis can be established only by provocation challenges with aspirin or NSAIDs. Recent major advances in the molecular biology of eicosanoids, exemplified by the cloning of 2 cysteinyl leukotriene receptors and the discovery of a whole family of cyclooxygenase enzymes, offer new insights into mechanisms operating in AIA. The disease runs a protracted course even if COX-1 inhibitors are avoided, and the course is often severe, many patients requiring systemic corticosteroids to control their sinusitis and asthma. Aspirin and NSAIDs should be avoided, but highly specific COX-2 inhibitors, known as coxibs, are well tolerated and can be safely used. Aspirin desensitization, followed by daily aspirin treatment, is a valuable therapeutic option in most patients with AIA, particularly those with recurrent nasal polyposis or overdependence on systemic corticosteroids.

Paracetamol and asthma

Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is one of the over-the-counter analgesics that is used frequently for the self-management of some of the common disorders. There seems to be two types of relations between paracetamol and asthma - paracetamol intolerance leading to bronchospasm in analgesic-induced asthmatics; and the relation between asthma and the amount and frequency of consumption of paracetamol. Paracetamol is generally recommended as one of the safer analgesics in both analgesic tolerant and intolerant asthmatics, without the fear of severe bronchospasm that aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can induce in these patients. However, Paracetamol is reported to cross-react with aspirin at a rate of approximately 20-30% in a dose-dependent way. Therefore, it should not be recommended to analgesic intolerant asthmatics, without performing oral provocation tests to prove its safety. The possible association between the amount and frequency of paracetamol consumption and the prevalence and degree of asthma as suggested by some of the recent surveys, needs to be investigated further.

Increased exhaled cysteinyl-leukotrienes and 8-isoprostane in aspirin-induced asthma

The pathogenesis of aspirin-induced asthma (AIA) has not yet been clearly elucidated, although eicosanoid metabolites appear to play an important role. We hypothesized that levels of eicosanoids in exhaled air condensate are abnormal in patients with AIA and that they change in patients receiving steroid therapy. We measured cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cys-LTs), prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)), and leukotriene B(4) (LTB(4)), and also 8-isoprostane as a marker of oxidative stress, by enzyme immunoassay in exhaled breath condensate from patients with AIA (17 steroid naive; mean age, 41 +/- 23 years; FEV(1), 63%pred), 26 patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma (ATA) (11 steroid naive; mean age, 47 +/- 18 years; FEV(1), 69%pred), and 16 healthy subjects (mean age, 45 +/- 17 years; FEV(1), 93%pred). Cys-LTs were significantly higher in steroid-naive patients with AIA compared with steroid-naive patients with ATA and healthy subjects (152.3 +/- 30.4 and 36.6 +/- 7.1 versus 19.4 +/- 2.8 pg/ml; p < 0.05 and p < 0.05, respectively). Steroid-naive patients with AIA also had higher levels of 8-isoprostane than normal subjects (131.8 +/- 31.0 versus 21.9 +/- 4.5 pg/ml; p < 0.05). There were significantly lower levels of both cys-LTs and 8-isoprostanes in steroid-treated patients with AIA. There was no difference in either the PGE(2) or LTB(4) level between the patient groups. This is the first study to show that cys-LTs and 8-isoprostanes are elevated in expired breath condensate of steroid-naive patients with AIA, and that cys-LTs are decreased in steroid-treated patients. Exhaled PGE(2) levels are not reduced, so that it is unlikely that a deficiency of PGE(2) is an important mechanism, whereas exhaled LTB(4) levels are unchanged, indicating an abnormality beyond 5-lipoxygenase.

The prevalence of aspirin intolerant asthma (AIA) in Australian asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Aspirin intolerant asthma (AIA) is a clinically distinct syndrome characterised by the precipitation of asthma attacks following the ingestion of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The prevalence of AIA among Australian asthmatic patients has not previously been reported.

METHODS

Three populations were surveyed to establish the prevalence of AIA among Australian asthmatics. Two surveys were completed in patients recruited from the metropolitan area in Perth, Western Australia, one comprising 150 recruited from hospital based sources (hospital cohort) and the second comprising 366 from the membership of the Asthma Foundation of Western Australia (Asthma Foundation cohort). In a third study 1298 individuals were randomly selected from the rural community of Busselton in Western Australia.

RESULTS

The prevalence of AIA in the hospital and Asthma Foundation cohorts was found to be 10.7% and 10.4%, respectively. Univariate analyses in the Asthma Foundation cohort indicated that AIA was associated with more severe asthma (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.18 to 4.86), nasal polyposis (OR=3.19, 95% CI 1.52 to 6.68), atopy (OR=2.96, 95% CI 1.48 to 5.89), sulfite sensitivity (OR=3.97, 95% CI 1.87 to 8.41), and sensitivity to wine (OR=3.27, 95% CI 1.65 to 6.47). Multivariate analyses indicated that atopy (OR=2.80, 95% CI 1.38 to 5.70), nasal polyposis (OR=3.39, 95% CI 1.57 to 7.29), and the number of asthma attacks in the previous 12 months (OR=1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42) were independent predictors for AIA, as was wine sensitivity (OR=2.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.72). The prevalence of AIA among asthmatic patients in the Busselton cohort was 10.9%. In addition, 2.5% of non-diagnosed asthmatics in this cohort reported asthma symptoms following aspirin ingestion.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of respiratory symptoms triggered by aspirin/NSAID use was found to be 10-11% in patients with asthma and 2.5% in non-asthmatics. Aspirin sensitivity appears to be a significant problem in the community and further investigations of the mechanisms of these responses and the possible link between this syndrome and other food and chemical sensitivities are required.

Analgesics and asthma

The incidence of asthma is increasing throughout the world, which presents both public health and economic concerns. It is widely recognized that in some adult patients with asthma, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) that inhibit cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 exacerbate the condition. This is a distinct clinical syndrome called aspirin-induced asthma (AIA). The disease develops according to a characteristic pattern of symptoms. Persistent eosinophilic rhinosinusitis precedes development of nasal polyposis, aspirin hypersensitivity, and asthma. There is no in vitro test, and diagnosis can only be established by provocation tests with aspirin. At the biochemical level, AIA is characterized by a chronic overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes. The key enzyme, leukotriene C4 synthase, is overexpressed in bronchi, and its messenger RNA is upregulated in peripheral blood eosinophils. This can be partly related to the genetic polymorphism of the enzyme. The disease runs a protracted course, even if COX-1 inhibitors are avoided. The course of AIA is often severe, and at least half of the patients need systemic corticosteroids to control their asthma. To prevent life-threatening reactions, patients with AIA should avoid aspirin and other analgesics that inhibit COX-1. The incidence of cross-sensitivity to paracetamol in AIA patients is low and, when a reaction does occur, the symptoms experienced are shorter and milder than if the reactions were evoked by an NSAID. Rapidly growing evidence indicates that highly specific COX-2 inhibitors, known as coxibs, are well tolerated and can be safely used by AIA patients.

Clinical features and atopy profile in Turkish subjects with analgesic intolerance

The factors underlying analgesic intolerance (AI), particularly the role of ethnic characteristics, are readily not clear. In this trial, we aimed to assess the predictive features of AI in Turkish subjects. One hundred and ninety patients with AI were enrolled into the study conducted in our tertiary care clinic. The types of drug causing adverse reaction(s) and types of reaction(s) were recorded. The presence of atopy was assessed by skin prick tests. According to the results, the most frequently intolerated analgesic was acetyl salicylic acid (72.1%), followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (68.4%) and paracetamol (15.8%). Urticaria/angioedema (52.6%) and asthmatic response (40.5%) were the most common reactions to analgesics. Compared with the general adult population of Turkey, the rate of atopy was found be higher in patients with AI and asthma (25% vs. 45%, p = 0.004) but comparable in patients with AI but no atopic disorder (25% vs. 29.2%, p> 0.05). In conclusion, subjects exhibiting intolerance to analgesics have particular features in our population; the presence of atopy in these subjects seems to be associated with the coexistent asthma rather than the drug allergy itself.

A new insight into aspirin-induced asthma

In about 10% of adult patients with asthma, aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs precipitate attacks of dyspnoea. Accumulated evidence shows that these reactions are due to the interference of aspirin-like drugs with arachidonic acid metabolism in the lungs of the sensitive patients: inhibition of cyclooxygenase is accompanied by overproduction of cysteinyl leukotrienes. The mechanisms of these reactions and the characteristic course of aspirin-induced asthma and its management are discussed.

Atopy is a risk factor for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug sensitivity

BACKGROUND

There is scarce information in the literature about a possible association between atopy and certain clinical manifestations of NSAID sensitivity.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To evaluate the prevalence of atopy in patients proved to be sensitive to cyclooxygenase inhibitors. (2) To assess cross-reactivity to two alternative NSAIDs, paracetamol (acetaminophen) and nimesulide.

METHODS

NSAID-sensitive patients attending an allergy clinic and unselected controls were prick tested with inhalant allergens. Oral challenges with NSAIDs were carried out by the single-blinded (SBOC) method. Clinical data about personal and family history of allergic and atopic diseases were obtained by a careful review of the medical records and by direct questioning by experienced allergists.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had positive SBOCs to the suspected NSAID and only these were studied. A personal history of atopic diseases was present in 41 patients (82%) and 7 controls (14.5%), and a family history in 24 patients (48%) and 6 controls (12.5%). Prick skin tests with aeroallergens were positive in 39 of 45 patients tested (86.6%) and in 14 of 48 controls (29.1%), (P = .0001). Skin test positivity rates were higher in patients with cutaneous challenge reactions who responded to only one NSAID (single reactors) in comparison to cross-reactors (P = .04). The most frequent clinical manifestations of NSAID sensitivity were (1) cutaneous (angioedema, urticaria) in 34 patients, (2) blended (cutaneous plus respiratory) in 12, (3) respiratory in 3, and (4) anaphylactoid in 1. Aspirin, pyrazolone, paracetamol, and ibuprofen were the drugs more frequently implicated in these reactions. Cross-sensitivity with paracetamol and nimesulide were 32% and 25%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of atopy is increased in challenge-proven NSAID-intolerant patients. The atopic condition may represent an important risk factor for developing reactions to these drugs. Paracetamol and nimesulide are relatively safe alternative choices in those patients, although their use still carries some risk of unwanted reactions.

The use of nimesulide in patients with acetylsalicylic acid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug intolerance

Intolerance or idiosyncrasy to acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a crucial problem because these drugs are frequently used in medical treatment. In this study, we tested whether nimesulide, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, might be a valid alternative for patients with histories of adverse reaction to ASA or NSAIDs. A single-blind, placebo-controlled oral challenge procedure was applied to 60 adult patients (19 male, 41 female; with a mean age of 40.31 +/- 10.44 years, range 20-68 years) with a reliable history of ASA/NSAIDs-intolerance. According to history, the clinical presentations of intolerance were urticaria/angioedema in 32 patients, anaphylactoid reaction in 2 patients, respiratory reaction in 19 patients, and respiratory and cutaneous reaction in 7 patients. Atopy was confirmed by means of skin prick test with inhalant allergens. Oral challenge protocol was started with 25 mg of nimesulide and the remaining 75 mg was given 1 hr later. During the challenge procedure, blood pressure, pulse, nasoocular, pulmonary, and cutaneous symptoms were monitored. Of the 60 patients tested, 55 (91.7%) tolerated the drug with no adverse reaction. Only five (8.3%) patients demonstrated a positive response to oral challenge. The clinical presentations of intolerance to nimesulide were urticaria/angioedema in three patients, mild rhinitis in one patient, and mild dyspnea in one patient. The atopy prevalence was higher, with a ratio of 41.7%, in patients with ASA/NSAIDs intolerance than that of the healthy adult population in Turkey (p < 0.05). We believe that nimesulide can be used as an alternative drug for patients with ASA/NSAIDs intolerance.

Association of pyrazolone drug hypersensitivity with HLA-DQ and DR antigens

BACKGROUND

In sensitive patients pyrazolone drugs can precipitate adverse reactions ranging from urticaria and angioedema to anaphylactic shock, presumably by immunological, IgE-mediated mechanism. However, up to now no genetic factors influencing the development of allergic reaction have been reported in this type of hypersensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was the investigation whether the susceptibility to development of pyrazolone drugs hypersensitivity (PDH) reactions was associated with HLA class II antigens.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis we studied the distribution of HLA-DR and DQ antigens in 26 pyrazolone sensitive patients and control groups including unselected general population and clearly defined atopic and non-atopic groups.

RESULTS

Significantly higher frequencies of DQ 7 and DR11 antigens were found in PDH group as compared with control unselected population (RR= 16.48, P < 0.0001; P(cor)< 0.002 and RR = 4.57, P = 0.0002; Pcor = 0.003 for DQ and DR antigen respectively). Similarly, statistically significant increased frequencies of DQ 7 and DR11 in patients with PDH were observed compared with atopic control group (RR= 18.43, P < 0.0001; Pcor <0.002 and RR= 6.33, P= 0.0007; Pcor =0.01, for DQ and DR antigen respectively). However, in comparison to non-atopic control group only the frequency of DQ 7 antigen was significantly increased (RR = 15.42, P = 0.0001; Pcor = 0.0015). DQ 7 antigen was present in 46.1% of PDH patients compared with 4.9%, 4.4% and 5.3% in the general population, atopic and non-atopic groups respectively, suggesting pyrazolone hypersensitivity as a trait positively correlated with this HLA antigen.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest a genetic predisposition to pyrazolone hypersensitivity reactions, linked to HLA-DQ locus.

Anaphylactoid reactions due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: clinical and cross-reactivity studies

BACKGROUND

Anaphylactoid reactions due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have been described.

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical characteristics of 21 patients with anaphylactoid reactions due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and to determine the cross-reactivity to non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs not involved in the previous reactions nor structurally related by means of single-blind, placebo-controlled drug challenges.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who exhibited clinical evidence of anaphylactoid reactions after nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were recruited for the study at the time of admission in Emergency Unit of our Hospital, Single-blind, placebo controlled oral challenges with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (except those reported by the patient as being responsible for the previous reaction), were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were woman and six man, with a mean age of 35.7 years (range 18 to 62 years). Thirteen patients (60%) were normal subjects without concomitant diseases. No increase in frequency of atopy in comparison to the general population was observed. Pyrazole derivatives were the most common nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs involved (71.3%). A tolerance to drugs included in drug challenge protocol was noted in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In our population, pyrazole derivatives were the most common nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs involved in anaphylactoid reactions. Most patients appeared to be otherwise normal subjects without concomitant disease and no cross-reactivity with other non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs not involved in the anaphylactoid reaction nor structurally related was found.