Isolated heart and liver transplant recipients are at low risk for polyomavirus BKV nephropathy

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Infection, Rejection, and the Connection

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for people with end-stage organ disease. Immune-mediated transplant rejection is a common complication that decreases allograft survival. Although immunosuppression is required to prevent rejection, it also increases the risk of infection. Some infections, such as cytomegalovirus and BK virus, can promote inflammatory gene expression that can further tip the balance toward rejection. BK virus and other infections can induce damage that resembles the clinical pathology of rejection, and this complicates accurate diagnosis. Moreover, T cells specific for viral infection can lead to rejection through heterologous immunity to donor antigen directly mediated by antiviral cells. Thus, viral infections and allograft rejection interact in multiple ways that are important to maintain immunologic homeostasis in solid organ transplant recipients. Better insight into this dynamic interplay will help promote long-term transplant survival.

Kidney disease in children with heart or liver transplant

Over the past few decades, there has been increasing recognition of kidney disease in children with non-kidney solid organ transplantation. The risk of kidney disease in children undergoing heart or liver transplantation is higher than the general population as the underlying disease and its associated management may directly impair kidney function. Both heart and liver failures contribute to hypoperfusion and kidney ischemia before patients reach the point of transplant. The transplant surgery itself can often be complicated by acute kidney injury (AKI), which may be further exacerbated by a complicated postoperative course. In the short- and long-term post-transplant period, these children are at risk of acute illness, exposed to nephrotoxic medications, and susceptible to rare but severe infections and immunologic insults that may contribute to AKI and chronic kidney disease (CKD). In some, CKD can progress to kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT). CKD and KFRT are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Therefore, it is critical to monitor for and recognize the risk factors for kidney injury in this population and mitigate these risks. In this paper, the authors provide an overview of kidney disease pertaining to heart and liver transplantation in children with guidance on monitoring, diagnosis, prevention, and management.

BK polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

The present AST-IDCOP guidelines update information on BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection, replication, and disease, which impact kidney transplantation (KT), but rarely non-kidney solid organ transplantation (SOT). As pretransplant risk factors in KT donors and recipients presently do not translate into clinically validated measures regarding organ allocation, antiviral prophylaxis, or screening, all KT recipients should be screened for BKPyV-DNAemia monthly until month 9, and then every 3 months until 2 years posttransplant. Extended screening after 2 years may be considered in pediatric KT. Stepwise immunosuppression reduction is recommended for KT patients with plasma BKPyV-DNAemia of >1000 copies/mL sustained for 3 weeks or increasing to >10 000 copies/mL reflecting probable and presumptive BKPyV-associated nephropathy, respectively. Reducing immunosuppression is also the primary intervention for biopsy-proven BKPyV-associated nephropathy. Hence, allograft biopsy is not required for treating BKPyV-DNAemic patients with baseline renal function. Despite virological rationales, proper randomized clinical trials are lacking to generally recommend treatment by switching from tacrolimus to cyclosporine-A, from mycophenolate to mTOR inhibitors or leflunomide or by the adjunct use of intravenous immunoglobulins, leflunomide, or cidofovir. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended for prophylaxis or therapy. Retransplantation after allograft loss due to BKPyV nephropathy can be successful if BKPyV-DNAemia is definitively cleared, independent of failed allograft nephrectomy.

BK Virus: A Cause for Concern in Thoracic Transplantation?

Human BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is poorly documented in heart and lung transplant patients. BK viruria and viremia have been estimated to affect 19% and 5% of heart transplant recipients, respectively. Data are limited, especially for lung transplantation, but the proportion of patients progressing from BK viruria to viremia or BKV-related nephropathy (BKVN) appears lower than in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, a number of cases of BKVN have been reported in heart and lung transplant patients, typically with late diagnosis and generally poor outcomes. Risk factors for BKV infection or BKVN in this setting are unclear but may include cytomegalovirus infection and anti-rejection treatment. The relative infrequency of BKVN or other BK-related complications means that routine BKV surveillance in thoracic transplantation is not warranted, but a diagnostic workup for BKV infection may be justified for progressive renal dysfunction with no readily-identifiable cause; after anti-rejection therapy; and for renal dysfunction in patients with cytomegalovirus infection or hypogammaglobulinemia. Treatment strategies in heart or lung transplant recipients rely on protocols developed in kidney transplantation, with reductions in immunosuppression tailored to match the higher risk status of thoracic transplant patients.

BK virus: microbiology, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and treatment

Background: BK virus infection is common but is usually asymptomatic. However, it can become life threatening as severe hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) or the polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) particularly in immune compromised and transplant recipients. Some investigators have studied the pathophysiology and there are anecdotal and uncontrolled studies of therapy with few conclusions allowing treatment guidelines. Objectives: Summarize literature review of current knowledge concerning the nature, epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of this common virus infection. Results: HC is a not uncommon and often misdiagnosed infection from BK virus. It is usually self limited but can become life threatening in immune compromised patients. PVAN threatens survival of transplanted kidneys and is difficult to differentiate from rejection without sophisticated molecular diagnostic technology. We have sufficient information for making a diagnosis of BK virus disease by using clinical, serological and molecular technology. Studies using manipulation of immunosuppression and a variety of antiviral agents, including cidofovir, leflunomide, intravenous immunoglobulin, vidarabine, fluroquinolones, have been published but most were uncontrolled reports of few cases. Cidofovir offers some promise but more must be learned before there is hope for evidence-based treatment guidelines.

BK nephropathy in the native kidneys of patients with organ transplants: Clinical spectrum of BK infection

Nephropathy secondary to BK virus, a member of the Papoviridae family of viruses, has been recognized for some time as an important cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. In recent times, BK nephropathy (BKN) of the native kidneys has being increasingly recognized as a cause of chronic kidney disease in patients with solid organ transplants, bone marrow transplants and in patients with other clinical entities associated with immunosuppression. In such patients renal dysfunction is often attributed to other factors including nephrotoxicity of medications used to prevent rejection of the transplanted organs. Renal biopsy is required for the diagnosis of BKN. Quantitation of the BK viral load in blood and urine are surrogate diagnostic methods. The treatment of BKN is based on reduction of the immunosuppressive medications. Several compounds have shown antiviral activity, but have not consistently shown to have beneficial effects in BKN. In addition to BKN, BK viral infection can cause severe urinary bladder cystitis, ureteritis and urinary tract obstruction as well as manifestations in other organ systems including the central nervous system, the respiratory system, the gastrointestinal system and the hematopoietic system. BK viral infection has also been implicated in tumorigenesis. The spectrum of clinical manifestations from BK infection and infection from other members of the Papoviridae family is widening. Prevention and treatment of BK infection and infections from other Papovaviruses are subjects of intense research.

The association between polyomavirus BK strains and BKV viruria in liver transplant recipients

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus that cause of allograft dysfunction among kidney transplant recipients. The role of BKV infection in non-renal solid organ transplant recipients is not well understood neither for the relationship between various BKV strains with occurrence of BKV viral viruria. This study aimed to understand the prevalence of BKV infection and identified of BKV various strains in the urine of liver transplant recipients. There was not significant difference of renal outcome between high BKV viruria and low BKV viruria in the liver transplant recipients. The WW-non-coding control region (NCCR) BKV detected in urine was associated with higher urinary BKV load, whereas the Dunlop-NCCR BKV was detected in the urine of low urinary BKV load. An in vitro cultivation system demonstrated that WW-BKV strain exhibiting the higher viral DNA replication efficiency and higher BKV load. Altogether, this is the first study to demonstrate the impact of BKV strains on the occurrence of BK viruria in the liver transplant recipients.

Different behaviour of BK-virus infection in liver transplant recipients

Polyomavirus BK (BKV) infects up to 90% of the general population. After primary infection, occurring early during childhood, a state of non-replicative infection is established in the reno-urinary tract, without complications for immunocompetent hosts. In immunocompromised individuals, particularly transplanted patients, asymptomatic BKV viremia and/or viruria can be observed. Renal grafts may also be sources of infection as BKV prefers kidneys rather than other solid organs for transplantation such as the liver. The mechanism behind the higher incidence of BKV infection in kidney transplant patients, compared to liver or heart transplantation, is unclear and the prevalence of BKV infection in non-renal solid organ transplants has not been yet thoroughly investigated. We evaluated the prevalence of Polyomavirus BK infection among liver transplant recipients. A PubMed search was conducted using the terms BKV infection AND liver transplant recipients; BKV AND non-renal solid organ transplant*; BKV infection AND immunosuppression; the search was limited to title/abstract and English-language articles published from 2000, to March 2015. Eleven relevant studies suggest that the prevalence of BKV viruria and/or viremia among liver transplant recipients is less than that reported in kidney or heart transplant recipients, except when chronic kidney disease (CKD) is present at the same time. Data also suggest that viruric and viremic patients have higher levels of serum creatinine than BKV negative patients. Moreover, no specific immunosuppressive drugs are associated with the onset of BKV nephropathy. The comorbidity of transplantation and CKD could play a major role in promoting BKV replication.

European perspective on human polyomavirus infection, replication and disease in solid organ transplantation

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) are a growing challenge in immunocompromised patients in view of the increasing number of now 12 HPyV species and their diverse disease potential. Currently, histological evidence of disease is available for BKPyV causing nephropathy and haemorrhagic cystitis, JCPyV causing progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and occasionally nephropathy, MCPyV causing Merkel cell carcinoma and TSPyV causing trichodysplasia spinulosa, the last two being proliferative skin diseases. Here, the current role of HPyV in solid organ transplantation (SOT) was reviewed and recommendations regarding screening, monitoring and intervention were made. Pre-transplant screening of SOT donor or recipient for serostatus or active replication is currently not recommended for any HPyV. Post-transplant, however, regular clinical search for skin lesions, including those associated with MCPyV or TSPyV, is recommended in all SOT recipients. Also, regular screening for BKPyV replication (e.g. by plasma viral load) is recommended in kidney transplant recipients. For SOT patients with probable or proven HPyV disease, reducing immunosuppression should be considered to permit regaining of immune control. Antivirals would be desirable for treating proven HPyV disease, but are solely considered as adjunct local treatment of trichodysplasia spinulosa, whereas surgical resection and chemotherapy are key in Merkel cell carcinoma. Overall, the quality of the clinical evidence and the strength of most recommendations are presently limited, but are expected to improve in the coming years.

BK virus nephropathy in a pediatric heart transplant recipient with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a case report and review of literature

BKV is known to cause allograft failure in kidney transplant recipients. It has been recently recognized to cause native kidney nephropathy in non-kidney transplant recipients. This is a case report BKVN in a 15-yr-old HTx recipient who had PTLD and a review of pediatric cases in the literature. The patient was diagnosed with BKVN +189 months after transplantation and died thirty days after diagnosis of BKVN. We identified five other cases of BKVN in pediatric non-kidney solid organ transplantation, of which all were HTx recipients. Overall, outcome was poor and BKV clearance was not achieved with reduction of immunosuppression and with current therapies. We strongly recommend that pediatric HTx recipients be tested for BKV infection if there is evidence of kidney dysfunction. We also recommend that they have an annual screening for BKV viruria and viremia with the assessment of kidney function.

BK viremia in critically ill surgical patients with hemorrhagic or septic shock

Background

Infections with polyomavirus BK virus (BKV) are a common cause of renal dysfunction after renal transplantation and may also be harmful in surgical patients with shock. The aim of the present study was to determine the frequency of BKV viremia in critically ill surgical patients with septic or hemorrhagic shock, and, if viremia is detectable, whether viremia may be associated with renal dysfunction.

Findings

A total of 125 plasma samples from 44 critically ill surgical patients with septic or hemorrhagic shock were tested by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BKV DNA during their stay on the intensive care unit (ICU). BKV viremia occurred in four patients, i.e. in three of the septic and in one of the hemorrhagic shock group. There was no association between viremia and renal dysfunction. All positive samples contained a low viral load (< 500 copies/ml).

Conclusions

Since BK viremia was rarely found and with low viral load only in critically ill surgical patients with shock, it is very unlikely that BK viremia results in BK nephropathy later on.

Polyomavirus BK replication in liver transplant candidates with normal renal function

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has a predilection for kidney rather than for other solid organ transplants such as the liver. Immunosuppression is widely recognized to be a major risk factor for PVAN development. Since end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients are immunocompromised and immunosuppression is a major cause of BK virus reactivation, we sought to evaluate BK virus replication in patients listed for liver transplantation. From April to October 2010, we enrolled 20 patients listed for liver transplantation. BK virus load was measured by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction on plasma and urine samples. Viremia occurred in only 1 among 20 patients. We hypothesized that in ESLD patients, the low prevalence of BK virus infection may be related to the prevalent impairment of antibacterial immunity rather than to the viral-specific one. In BK virus reactivation, not only the immunodepressive state itself, but also the specific immunologic mechanisms involved may have a role.

Antigen-specific T cell responses to BK polyomavirus antigens identify functional anti-viral immunity and may help to guide immunosuppression following renal transplantation

Infection with the polyoma virus BK (BKV) is a major cause of morbidity following renal transplantation. Limited understanding of the anti-viral immune response has prevented the design of a strategy that balances treatment with the preservation of graft function. The proven utility of interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays to measure T cell responses in immunocompetent hosts was the basis for trying to develop a rational approach to the management of BKV following renal transplantation. In a sample of transplant recipients and healthy controls, comparisons were made between T cell responses to the complete panel of BKV antigens, the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens, BZLF1 and EBNA1, and the mitogen phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). Correlations between responses to individual antigens and immunosuppressive regimens were also analysed. Antigen-specific T cell responses were a specific indicator of recent or ongoing recovery from BKV infection (P < 0·05), with responses to different BKV antigens being highly heterogeneous. Significant BKV immunity was undetectable in transplant patients with persistent viral replication or no history of BKV reactivation. Responses to EBV antigens and mitogen were reduced in patients with BKV reactivation, but these differences were not statistically significant. The T cell response to BKV antigens is a useful and specific guide to recovery from BKV reactivation in renal transplant recipients, provided that the full range of antigenic responses is measured.

Renal failure five years after lung transplantation due to polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN) is rare in nonrenal solid organ transplantation and only limited information is available from single cases. We describe a 67-year-old female presenting with hypertension and progressive kidney failure due to PyVAN 60 months after lung transplantation. Plasma BK virus (BKV) loads were 4.85 log¹⁰ copies/mL at diagnosis and cleared slowly over 14 months after switching from tacrolimus, mycophenolate and prednisone to low-dose tacrolimus, sirolimus and leflunomide, the latter being discontinued for anemia and diarrhea. BKV- and JC virus-specific immunoglobulins were detectable prior to transplantation. Only BKV-specific IgG and IgM increased during follow-up. BKV-specific T cells were detectable in blood following in vitro expansion, but cleared with reincreased sirolimus, yet BKV viremia remained undetectable. We identified eight other cases of PyVAN in nonrenal solid organ transplantation including lung (n = 1), heart (n = 6) and pancreas (n = 1). Overall, diagnosis was later than commonly seen in kidney transplants (median 18 months, interquartile range 10-29). Seven patients were male, five received triple immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, prednisone. Immunosuppression was reduced in four cases and cidofovir and/or leflunomide administered in five and two cases, respectively. Renal function deteriorated in five requiring hemodialysis in four. We discuss mTOR inhibitors versus cidofovir and leflunomide as potential PyVAN rescue therapy.

Native BK viral nephropathy in a pediatric heart transplant recipient

BK viral nephropathy is a well-documented clinical entity in kidney transplant recipients and a significant cause of morbidity and allograft loss in affected patients. BK viral nephropathy in native kidneys of non-kidney transplant recipients is relatively uncommon, but has been reported in adult patients. We report the occurrence of BK viral nephropathy in a pediatric heart transplant recipient. A 10-yr-old boy with past history of Ewing's sarcoma underwent heart transplantation for dilated cardiomyopathy induced by previous chemotherapy with doxorubicin. Post-transplant course was complicated by grade 3A rejection and CMV colitis. He was diagnosed with native BK viral nephropathy approximately 18 months post-transplant due to mild, but persistent, elevation in serum creatinine associated with proteinuria. BK viral nephropathy affects non-kidney transplant recipients, and a high index of suspicion is necessary for early diagnosis and management of this condition.

BK virus nephropathy in the native kidneys of a pediatric heart transplant recipient

BK virus is a human polyoma virus that may cause nephropathy in immunosuppressed patients. It is a well-recognized cause of renal allograft dysfunction and allograft loss in renal transplant recipients, but it is an infrequent cause of nephropathy outside this setting. There are a few case reports of BK virus nephropathy in the native kidneys of immunosuppressed adult patients with non-renal transplants, but so far it has not been reported in pediatric non-renal solid organ transplant recipients. We report a case of a seven-yr-old heart transplant patient who was diagnosed with BK virus nephropathy, eight months after his second heart transplant. Despite intervention, his renal dysfunction progressed to renal failure. He is currently receiving maintenance hemodialysis and awaiting renal transplantation. It is important to recognize BK virus infection as a possible cause of renal dysfunction in immunosuppressed children who are non-renal transplant recipients.

Prevalence of polyomavirus viruria (JC virus/BK virus) in children following liver transplantation

BKV infection is a potential cause of renal dysfunction in non-renal organ transplant recipients. JCV is the causative agent of PML. Furthermore, polyomaviruses are tumor inducing viruses and molecular data suggest an association with malignancies among solid organ transplant patients. So far, there are no studies analyzing polyomavirus viruria following Ltx in children. We performed a prospective prevalence study at a mean of 2187 (range 20-5671) days after transplantation in 100 consecutive children admitted for the routine follow-up examination post-Ltx. The urine was screened for BKV and JCV DNA by using PCR in each case. A plasma analysis by PCR was also done if more than 100,000 DNA copies/mL urine were detected. BKV or JCV viruria was found in 19% (n = 19) of our patients. All patients were free of clinical signs of viral infection, PML, or nephropathy. GFR was normal in 97% of patients and we found no statistical difference of kidney function between patients with and without BKV/JCV viruria. The extent of immunosuppressive therapy had no influence on the polyomavirus viruria. Overall, we found a higher prevalence of polyomavirus viruria in our pediatric liver transplant recipients than reported in adult patients.

BK virus in liver transplant recipients: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

BK virus (BKV) is a polyomavirus that is associated with nephropathy and graft loss among kidney transplant recipients. The role of BK virus in nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients has not been clearly established; only anecdotal case reports have been published.

METHODS

From August 2005 to September 2007, all liver transplant (OLT) recipients who gave their consent were enrolled in this prospective longitudinal study. BK viral load was measured using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays of urine and plasma, using samples collected at week 1 and months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 posttransplantation. We also collected demographic and clinical data, including serum creatinine and immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 62 patients was 51.4 years including 14 (22.5%) women. Hepatitis C infection was present in 24 patients (38.7%). BK viruria was detected in 14.5% of 290 samples, corresponding to 13 patients (21%). BK viremia was detected in 5.1% of 317 samples, corresponding to 11 patients (18%). Almost all cases of BK viremia (91%) occurred in the first 3 months after OLT. BKV viremia was more common among patients experiencing a rejection episode (10.6 vs 40%, P = .01). We did not observe a relationship between single episodes of BKV replication and renal function: median plasma creatinine 1.1 mg/dL in patients without versus 1.2 mg/dL with BKV viremia. The three patients with persistent viremia displayed renal insufficiency; one of them died due to multiorgan failure of unknown origin.

CONCLUSIONS

BKV is frequently detected in OLT recipients (viruria 21% and viremia 18%) early after transplantation. It is more common among patients with rejection episodes. Persistent BKV viremia may be related to renal dysfunction in OLT patients.

Decline in native kidney function in liver transplant recipients is not associated with BK virus infection

BK virus (BKV) infection is an established cause of allograft dysfunction in renal transplant recipients. The relationship between BKV infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD) post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is not well understood. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of BKV infection, its relationship to CKD and renal function loss over time in patients receiving OLT. Prevalence of BK viruria and viremia were studied in 41 post-OLT patients after a mean 6.5 +/- 4.7 years posttransplantation. Renal function was assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated from the yearly serum creatinine levels using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for detection of BKV DNA in urine and plasma. BK viruria was present in 24.2% of patients, but none of these OLT recipients had detectable BK viremia. Decoy cells in the urine were found in 9.7% patients, although none of these patients had BK viruria. CKD, defined as eGFR <60 mL/minute/1.73 m(2), was found in 83% of OLT recipients. The yearly decline in eGFR was -6.9 +/- 17 and -9.2 +/- 18 mL/minute/year in BK viruria-positive and BK viruria-negative patients, respectively (P = 0.39). There was no relationship between the presence or absence of BK viruria and either current eGFR, yearly decline in eGFR, number and type of immunosuppressive agents, or etiology of liver failure. In OLT recipients, BK viruria is not associated with BK viremia or native kidney dysfunction. It appears that the most probable pathway for the development of BKV nephropathy requires a second hit, such as kidney inflammation, kidney ischemia, or donor-recipient human leukocyte antigen mismatch.