Usefulness of a program of neoplasia surveillance in liver transplantation. A preliminary report

Relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus vs mycophenolate after solid organ transplantation and its implications for liver transplant care

BACKGROUND

De novo malignancy is a leading cause of late morbidity and mortality in liver transplant recipients. Cumulative immunosuppression has been shown to contribute to post-transplant malignancy (PTM) risk. There is emerging evidence on the differential carcinogenic risk profile of individual immunosuppressive drugs, independent of the net effect of immunosuppression. Calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus may promote tumourigenesis, whereas mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite of mycophenolate mofetil, may limit tumour progression. Liver transplantation (LT) is relatively unique among solid organ transplantation in that immunosuppression monotherapy with either tacrolimus or MPA is often achievable, which makes careful consideration of the risk-benefit profile of these immunosuppression agents particularly relevant for this cohort. However, there is limited clinical data on this subject in both LT and other solid organ transplant recipients.

AIM

To investigate the relative carcinogenicity of tacrolimus and MPA in solid organ transplantation.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and Embase databases using the key terms "solid organ transplantation", "tacrolimus", "mycophenolic acid", and "carcinogenicity", in order to identify relevant articles published in English between 1st January 2002 to 11th August 2022. Related terms, synonyms and explosion of MeSH terms, Boolean operators and truncations were also utilised in the search. Reference lists of retrieved articles were also reviewed to identify any additional articles. Excluding duplicates, abstracts from 1230 records were screened by a single reviewer, whereby 31 records were reviewed in detail. Full-text articles were assessed for eligibility based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies were included in this review. All studies were large population registries or cohort studies, which varied in transplant era, type of organ transplanted and immunosuppression protocol used. Overall, there was no clear difference demonstrated between tacrolimus and MPA in de novo PTM risk following solid organ transplantation. Furthermore, no study provided a direct comparison of carcinogenic risk between tacrolimus and MPA monotherapy in solid organ transplantation recipients.

CONCLUSION

The contrasting carcinogenic risk profiles of tacrolimus and MPA demonstrated in previous experimental studies, and its application in solid organ transplantation, is yet to be confirmed in clinical studies. Thus, the optimal choice of immunosuppression drug to use as maintenance monotherapy in LT recipients is not supported by a strong evidence base and remains unclear.

Tacrolimus Drug Exposure Level and Smoking Are Modifiable Risk Factors for Early De Novo Malignancy After Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease

De novo malignancy (DNM) is the primary cause of mortality after liver transplantation (LT) for alcohol-related liver disease (ALD). However, data on risk factors for DNM development after LT are limited, specifically in patients with ALD. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed all patients transplanted for ALD at our center before October 2016. Patients with a post-LT follow-up of <12 months, DNM within 12 months after LT, patients not on tacrolimus in the 1st year post-LT, and unknown smoking habits were excluded. Tacrolimus drug exposure level (TDEL) was calculated by area under the curve of trough levels in the 1st year post-LT. 174 patients received tacrolimus of which 19 (10.9%) patients developed a DNM between 12 and 60 months post-LT. Multivariate cox regression analysis identified TDEL [HR: 1.710 (1.211-2.414); p = 0.002], age [1.158 (1.076-1.246); p < 0.001], number of pack years pre-LT [HR: 1.021 (1.004-1.038); p = 0.014] and active smoking at LT [HR: 3.056 (1.072-8.715); p = 0.037] as independent risk factors for DNM. Tacrolimus dose minimization in the 1st year after LT and smoking cessation before LT might lower DNM risk in patients transplanted for ALD.

Clinical outcomes of gastric cancer surgery after liver transplantation

Purpose

De novo malignancy is common after liver transplantation (LT); however, there are limited reports on the clinical outcomes of gastric cancer surgery after LT. Our study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of gastric cancer surgery after LT.

Methods

Seventeen patients underwent gastric cancer surgery after LT at a single institution between January 2013 and June 2021. We retrospectively collected data on surgical complications, survival, and recurrence status of these cases.

Results

Fifteen patients (88.2%) underwent curative gastrectomy, with 10 open distal (66.7%) and 5 laparoscopic distal (33.3%) gastrectomies. Surgical and severe complication rates were 3 of 15 (20.0%) and 1 of 15 (6.7%), respectively. There were no significant differences between laparoscopic (33.3%) and open surgery (66.7%) in terms of operation time and complication rate. No surgery-related mortalities occurred. Immunosuppressants could be maintained without difficulty, and no suspicious acute rejection was identified during the perioperative period. There was 1 recurrence after curative surgery (recurrence rate, 6.7%), and the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate after curative surgery was 93.3%.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic gastrectomy can be safely done even after LT in terms of postoperative complications and graft safety.

Mortality and Causes of Death After Liver Transplantation: Analysis of Sex Differences in a Large Nationwide Cohort

In the last few years, several studies have analyzed sex and gender differences in liver transplantation (LT), but none have performed a disaggregated analysis of both mortality and causes of death. Data from 15,998 patients, 11,914 (74.5%) males and 4,069 (25.5%) females, transplanted between 2000 and 2016 were obtained from the Liver Transplantation Spanish Registry. Survival analysis was applied to explore recipient sex as a risk factor for death. The causes of death at different follow-up duration were disaggregated by recipient sex for analysis. Short-term survival was higher in males, whereas long-term survival was higher in females. Survival at 1, 5 and 10 years post-transplant was 87.43%, 73.83%, and 61.23%, respectively, in males and 86.28%, 74.19%, and 65.10%, respectively, in females (p = 0.05). Post-LT mortality related to previous liver disease also presented sex differences. Males had 37% increased overall mortality from acute liver failure (p = 0.035) and 37% from HCV-negative cirrhosis (p < 0.001). Females had approximately 16% increased mortality when the liver disease was HCV-positive cirrhosis (p = 0.003). Regarding causes of death, non-malignancy HCV+ recurrence (6.3% vs. 3.9% of patients; p < 0.001), was more frequently reported in females. By contrast, death because of malignancy recurrence (3.9% vs. 2.2% of patients; p = 0.003) and de novo malignancy (4.8% vs. 2.5% of patients; p < 0.001) were significantly more frequent in male recipients. Cardiovascular disease, renal failure, and surgical complications were similar in both. In summary, male patients have lower short-term mortality than females but higher long-term and overall mortality. In addition, the post-LT mortality risk related to previous liver disease and the causes of mortality differ between males and females.

Evaluation and Management of Liver Transplant Candidates With Prior Nonhepatic Cancer: Guidelines From the ILTS/SETH Consensus Conference

Liver transplant in patients with prior nonhepatic cancer is a matter of concern, needing further research, development, and consensus guidelines. This International Liver Transplantation Society/Sociedad Española De Trasplante Hepático consensus conference document focuses on the role of liver transplantation in patients with a prior history of nonhepatic cancer. This document addresses (1) the evaluation of transplant candidates with prior cancers based on the assessment of prognosis, the natural history of individual cancers, and the emerging role for circulating DNA and minimal residual disease in these patients; (2) the impact of prior treatments, including immunotherapy for prior malignancies; and (3) the surveillance of posttransplant cancer recurrence. The consensus statement is based on previously published guidelines, as well as a review of the current, relevant, published literature.

De Novo Malignancy After Liver Transplantation: Risk Assessment, Prevention, and Management-Guidelines From the ILTS-SETH Consensus Conference

De novo malignancies (DNMs) following liver transplantation (LT) have been reported as 1 of the major causes of late mortality, being the most common cause of death in the second decade after LT. The overall incidence of DNMs is reported to be in the range of 3.1% to 14.4%, and the incidence is 2- to 3-fold higher in transplant recipients than in age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy, which is the key in maintaining host tolerance and achieving good long-term outcomes, is known to contribute to a higher risk of DNMs. However, the incidence and type of DNM also depends on different risk factors, including patient demographics, cause of the underlying chronic liver disease, behavior (smoking and alcohol abuse), and pre-existing premalignant conditions. The estimated standardized incidence ratio for different DNMs is also variable. The International Liver Transplantation Society-Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation Consensus Conference working group on DNM has summarized and discussed the current available literature on epidemiology, risk factors, management, and survival after DNMs. Recommendations for screening and surveillance for specific tumors, as well as immunosuppression and cancer-specific management in patients with DNM, are summarized.

Long-term Management of the Adult Liver Transplantation Recipients

The survival of liver transplantation (LT) recipients has been improved remarkably in short-term. The major causes of mortality in long-term include nonimmunological causes such as cardiovascular, de novo malignancy, chronic kidney disease, and recurrence of primary disease. Rejection-related mortality is rare in the long-term after LT. We discuss nonrejection causes of long-term morbidity/mortality, risk factors, and management strategies in LT recipients. In addition, we discuss osteoporosis, contraception, and pregnancy in LT recipients.

Extrahepatic Malignancies and Liver Transplantation: Current Status

Recipients of liver transplantation (LT) remain at higher risk (adjusted for other risk factors) of de novo malignancies (DNMs). The higher risk can be attributed to the effect of immunosuppression and patient-related risk factors (age, tobacco, alcohol, etiology of liver disease). DNMs are an important cause of late mortality in liver transplant recipients. The pattern (type) of posttransplant malignancies reflects pattern in local population. The common types include skin cancers, solid organ malignancies, and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Counseling of patients about risk factors and surveillance protocols may help in the prevention and diagnosis at early stage. We also discuss the results of LT in patients with a history of extrahepatic malignancy in the pretransplant period.

Liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing colorectal adenomas: Results from a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Liver transplant recipients have an increased incidence of malignancies, but it is unclear whether they have a higher risk of colorectal cancer.

AIM

To investigate whether liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing colorectal adenomas (a surrogate marker of colorectal cancer risk).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine liver transplant recipients (excluding primary sclerosing cholangitis) who underwent a colonoscopy and polypectomy before and after transplantation, and 367 nontransplanted patients who underwent a colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and a second colonoscopy later were retrospectively studied. The risks of incident colorectal adenomas and high-risk adenomas (advanced or multiple adenomas or carcinomas) were compared between both cohorts.

RESULTS

Incident colorectal adenomas were found in 40.3% of the transplanted patients and 30.0% of the nontransplanted patients (15.1% and 5.5%, respectively, had high-risk adenomas). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of adenomas in the baseline endoscopy, and interval between colonoscopies, transplant recipients showed a higher risk of developing colorectal adenomas (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.05-2.47; p = .03) and high-risk adenomas (OR: 2.87; 95% CI: 1.46-5.65; p = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing colorectal adenomas and lesions with high risk of colorectal cancer.

Post-transplant malignancies in alcoholic liver disease

Post-transplant malignancy is emerging as an important cause of mortality in patients with cirrhosis undergoing liver transplant (LT). However, establishing the exact relationship between the two needs further evaluation. It has been observed that approximately 30% deaths after 10 years of hepatic transplantation occur due to de novo malignancies. Various known risk factors include immunosuppression, age of patient, alcoholic liver disease (ALD) or primary sclerosing cholangitis, smoking, and oncogenic viral infections. There is scanty literature on the post-transplant malignancy risk in patients with alcoholic cirrhosis. The current evidence suggests a particularly increased risk of oropharyngeal and lung cancers in patients transplanted for ALD. Abstinence from alcohol, smoking and other tobacco-containing products along with optimization of immunosuppression are paramount for decreasing the risk of post-transplant malignancies.

Incidence and outcome of colorectal cancer in liver transplant recipients: A national, multicentre analysis on 8115 patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

De novo malignancies after liver transplantation represent one of the leading causes of death in the long-term. It remains unclear whether liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of colorectal cancer and whether this negatively impacts on survival, particularly in those patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

In this national multicentre cohort retrospective study, the incidence of colorectal cancer in 8115 evaluable adult patients undergoing a liver transplantation between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2010 was compared to the incidence in the general population through standardised incidence ratios.

RESULTS

Fifty-two (0.6%) cases of colorectal cancer were identified at a median of 5.6 years postliver transplantation, predominantly grade 2 (76.9%) and stage T3 (50%) at diagnosis. The incidence rate of colorectal cancer in the whole liver transplant population was similar to the general UK population (SIR: 0.92), but significantly higher (SIR: 7.0) in the group of patients affected by primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis. One-, five- and ten-year survival rates from colorectal cancer diagnosis were 71%, 48% and 31%, respectively, and the majority of colorectal cancer patients died of cancer-specific causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation alone is not associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer development. The primary sclerosing cholangitis/ulcerative colitis liver transplant population showed a significantly higher risk of colorectal cancer development than the general population, with a high proportion of advanced stage at diagnosis and a reduced patient survival.

De Novo Malignancies Screening After Liver Transplantation for Alcoholic Liver Disease: A Comparative Opportunistic Study

Patients having received a liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) have a high risk of de novo malignancies, especially in the upper aerodigestive tract and lungs due to their smoking and alcohol history. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare a group of patients transplanted for ALD who continue to smoke and who were included in an intensive screening program for tobacco-related cancers implemented at the Grenoble University Hospital and a group of similar patients followed according to usual practice (chest computed tomography [CT] scan every 5 years) at the Edouard Herriot Hospital in Lyon. The intensive screening program consisted of an annual checkup, including a clinical examination by an otorhinolaryngologist, a chest CT scan, and an upper digestive endoscopy. A total of 147 patients were included: 71 patients in Grenoble and 76 patients in Lyon. The cumulative incidence of a first tobacco-related cancer was 12.3% at 3 years, 20.6% at 5 years, 42.6% at 10 years, and 64.0% at 15 years. A curative treatment was possible in 80.0% of the patients in Grenoble versus 57.9% in Lyon (P = 0.068). The rates of curative treatment were 63.6% versus 26.3% (P = 0.062) for lung cancers, 100.0% versus 87.5% (P = 0.498) for lip-mouth-pharynx and larynx cancers, and 66.7% versus 100.0% (P = 1) for esophageal cancers, respectively. In addition, for lung cancers, regardless of study group, 68.7% received a curative treatment when the diagnosis was made by CT scan screening versus 14.3% when it was made because of symptoms (P = 0.008). In conclusion, our study strongly confirms the high rate of tobacco-related de novo malignancies in LT patients for ALD and suggests that the screening of lung cancer by annual chest CT scan could significantly increase the rate of curative treatment.

Longterm Risk of Solid Organ De Novo Malignancies After Liver Transplantation: A French National Study on 11,226 Patients

De novo malignancies are one of the major late complications and causes of death after liver transplantation (LT). Using extensive data from the French national Agence de la Biomédecine database, the present study aimed to quantify the risk of solid organ de novo malignancies (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) after LT. The incidence of de novo malignancies among all LT patients between 1993 and 2012 was compared with that of the French population, standardized on age, sex, and calendar period (standardized incidence ratio; SIR). Among the 11,226 LT patients included in the study, 1200 de novo malignancies were diagnosed (10.7%). The risk of death was approximately 2 times higher in patients with de novo malignancy (48.8% versus 24.3%). The SIR for all de novo solid organ malignancies was 2.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.08-2.33). The risk was higher in men (SIR = 2.23; 95% CI, 2.09-2.38) and in patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (ALD; SIR = 2.89; 95% CI, 2.68-3.11). The cancers with the highest excess risk were laryngeal (SIR = 7.57; 95% CI, 5.97-9.48), esophageal (SIR = 4.76; 95% CI, 3.56-6.24), lung (SIR = 2.56; 95% CI, 2.21-2.95), and lip-mouth-pharynx (SIR = 2.20; 95% CI, 1.72-2.77). In conclusion, LT recipients have an increased risk of de novo solid organ malignancies, and this is strongly related to ALD as a primary indication for LT.

Risk of virus and non-virus related malignancies following immunosuppression in a cohort of liver transplant recipients. Italy, 1985-2014

This cohort study assessed, in Italy, the overall pattern of risk of de novo malignancies following liver transplantation (LT). The study group included 2,832 individuals who underwent LT between 1985 and 2014 in nine centers all over Italy. Person-years (PYs) at cancer risk were computed from 30 days after LT to the date of cancer diagnosis, to the date of death or to the end of follow-up. Excess cancer risk, as compared to the general population, was estimated using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During 18,642 PYs, 246 LT recipients developed 266 de novo malignancies, corresponding to a 1.8-fold higher cancer risk (95% CI: 1.6-2.0). SIRs were particularly elevated for virus-related malignancies, including Kaposi's sarcoma (SIR = 53.6, 95% CI: 30.0-88.5), non-Hodgkin lymphomas (SIR = 7.1, 95% CI: 4.8-10.1) and cervix uteri (SIR = 5.4, 95% CI: 1.1-15.8). Among virus-unrelated malignancies, elevated risks emerged for head and neck (SIR = 4.4, 95% CI: 3.1-6.2), esophagus (SIR = 6.7, 95% CI: 2.9-13.3) and adrenal gland (SIR = 22.9, 95% CI: 2.8-82.7). Borderline statistically significant elevated risks were found for lung cancer (SIR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0-2.1) and skin melanoma (SIR = 2.6, 95% CI: 1.0-5.3). A reduced risk emerged for prostate cancer (SIR = 0.1, 95% CI: 0.0-0.5). These findings underline the need of preventive interventions and early detection of malignancies, specifically tailored to LT recipients.

Immunosuppressive regimen and risk for de novo malignancies after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Long-term prognosis after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease is impaired because of the occurrence of de novo malignancies and recurrent disease on liver graft. The aim of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the risk of de novo malignancy and to identify the predictive factors in a large cohort of liver-transplanted patients with a long follow-up in the setting of alcoholic liver disease.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a first liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease in our centre, from December 1985 to October 2010, and who survived more than 6 months were included. Survival, incidence of de novo malignancies and several clinical and biological parameters were studied.

RESULTS

The study population consisted in 368 patients (284 males, median age 52.6 years). The cumulative incidence of a first solid organ de novo malignancy after LT was 8.7% at 5 years, 22.3% at 10 years, 31.5% at 15 years, and 33.1% at 20 years. Tobacco use (both past and current) was associated with a significant increased risk of de novo solid organ malignancy (HR 3.35 and 4.62, respectively), whereas immunosuppressive regimen including mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) was associated with a decreased risk (post-transplant time under mTORi-including immunosuppressive regimen was significantly longer in patients who did not present de novo malignancy (10.6% vs. 2.3%, P=1.4×10^-5)).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study provides additional evidence that de novo malignancies in alcoholic liver disease liver transplant patients is a major long-term complication, and that conversion from to an mTORi-including immunosuppressive regimen could reduce this risk.

Alcoholic liver disease is a strong predictor of colorectal polyps in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

 Colorectal cancer (CRC) is associated with a significantly reduced survival rate in transplant recipients. The prevalence and risk factors of CRC and of colorectal polyps after orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) remain unclear. The study aim was to determine the prevalence of colorectal polyps in OLT recipients. A secondary objective was to explore possible risk factors of polyps.

PATIENTS AND MATERIALS

 This was a retrospective single center study of all OLT recipients transplanted between 2007 and 2009. All patients who underwent a colonoscopy 5 ± 5 years after OLT were included. The outcome was colorectal polyps, as identified on colonoscopy. A logistic regression model was performed to identify potential predictors of polyps.

RESULTS

 Of 164 OLT recipients, 80 were included in this study. Polyps were diagnosed in 37 % of patients before transplant and in 33 % afterwards. With regard to post-transplant lesions, 22 % were advanced adenomas or cancerous. In the regression analysis, the odds of post-transplant polyps were 11 times higher in patients with alcoholic liver disease (OR 11.3, 95 %CI 3.2 - 39.4; P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

 Patients with end-stage liver disease may be at high risk of colorectal polyps before and after liver transplant, and screening should be continued in both contexts. Those with alcoholic liver disease are particularly at risk for post-OLT polyps and may benefit from more intensive screening.

Risk of colorectal cancer in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in various chronic liver diseases compared with the general population remains unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases before and after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for studies assessing the risk of CRC in patients with chronic liver diseases. The primary outcome was the pooled risk of CRC among studies that reported the risk as standardized incidence rate (SIR).

RESULTS

Fifty studies that included 55,991 patients were identified. Among studies that included hepatitis and cirrhotic patients, the pooled SIR was 2.06 (P < .0001; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.46-2.90) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 49.2%), which appeared to be because of the difference between subgroup of diseases and the power of studies. Three studies reported an increased risk of CRC in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients (pooled SIR 6.70; P < .0001; 95% CI, 3.48-12.91) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 36.3%), which appeared to be because of the difference between the power of studies. Among studies that included post-transplant patients, the pooled SIR was 2.16 (P < .0001; 95% CI, 1.59-2.94) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 56.4%). Meta-regression showed a correlation between the proportion of autoimmune-related liver diseases and the risk of CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with chronic liver diseases had an increased risk of CRC compared with the general population, which persisted after liver transplantation. A more intensive surveillance for CRC is warranted in this population.

Rapid Disease Progression of Liver Metastases following Resection in a Liver-Transplanted Patient with Probable Lynch Syndrome – A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Solid organ transplantation provides life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage organ disease, and its outcomes have been improving dramatically over the past few decades. However, substantial morbidity results from chronic immunosuppressive therapy administered to prevent graft rejection. It predisposes patients to several life-threatening complications, such as opportunistic microbial infections and the development of different types of cancers. Here, we presented the case of a young man with probable Lynch syndrome, who developed an aggressive colon carcinoma after long-term immunosuppressive therapy due to a prior liver transplantation. Based on this case report, we attempt to find an answer to the question about the risk of cancer development or recurrence in patients with familial syndromes receiving long-term immunosuppressive therapy and to find out how it can be minimized. Answering these questions is particularly important, given the facts that disease course is substantially more aggressive among transplanted patients and that prognosis is poor due to lack of immunocompetence, especially in the setting of Lynch syndrome.

Asymptomatic De Novo Inflammatory Bowel Disease Late After Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Case Report

Guidelines recommend colonoscopy screening for possible asymptomatic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in all patients diagnosed with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). PSC-IBD warrants regular dysplasia-surveillance colonoscopy. However, no consensus exists regarding follow-up colonoscopy in PSC patients without IBD who remain asymptomatic. We describe a 43-year-old female who had undergone liver transplantation (LT) due to advanced PSC. Previous colonoscopies had been normal. The post-transplantation course was uneventful, with no rejections and signs of PSC recurrence. Immunosuppression was by tacrolimus monotherapy. She was asymptomatic with normal inflammation markers. A protocol colonoscopy, performed as general dysplasia surveillance 8 years post-transplantation, revealed mucopurulent-covered small superficial ulcerations and erythema diffusely distributed from the cecal to sigmoid colon with intervening normal mucosa and rectal sparing. Histologic examination showed patchy chronic colitis with crypt architectural distortion and mild-moderate inflammation activity. Infection samples were negative. Findings complied with de novo IBD, type unclassified. In conclusion, the link between PSC and clinically silent IBD may manifest after the PSC diagnosis and even several years after LT. Given the increased colorectal cancer risk associated with PSC, IBD, and LT, repeat colonoscopy might be warranted in PSC patients without IBD at initial assessment, and also after LT.

De Novo Malignancies After Transplantation: Risk and Surveillance Strategies

De novo malignancies are one of the leading causes of late mortality after liver and kidney transplantation. Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common malignancy, followed by posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and solid organ tumors. Immunosuppression is a key factor for cancer development, although many other transplant-related and traditional risk factors also play a role. In this review, the authors summarize risk factors and outcomes of frequently encountered de novo malignancies after liver and kidney transplantation to stratify recipients at highest risk. Future efforts in prospectively validated, cost-effective surveillance strategies that improve survival of these complex patients are greatly needed.

Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of de novo malignancies post liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is associated with a 2 to 7 fold higher, age and gender adjusted, risk of de novo malignancy. The overall incidence of de novo malignancy post LT ranges from 2.2% to 26%, and 5 and 10 years incidence rates are estimated at 10% to 14.6% and 20% to 32%, respectively. The main risk factors for de novo malignancy include immunosuppression with impaired immunosurveillance, and a number of patient factors which include; age, latent oncogenic viral infections, tobacco and alcohol use history, and underlying liver disease. The most common cancers after LT are non-melanoma skin cancers, accounting for approximately 37% of de novo malignancies, with a noted increase in the ratio of squamous to basal cell cancers. While these types of skin cancer do not impact patient survival, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders and solid organ cancer, accounting for 25% and 48% of malignancies, are associated with increased mortality. Patients developing these types of cancer are diagnosed at more advanced stages, and their cancers behave more aggressively compared with the general population. Patients undergoing LT for primary sclerosing cholangitis (particularly with inflammatory bowel disease) and alcoholic liver disease have high rates of malignancies compared with patients undergoing LT for other indications. These populations are at particular risk for gastrointestinal and aerodigestive cancers respectively. Counseling smoking cessation, skin protection from sun exposure and routine clinical follow-up are the current approach in practice. There are no standardized surveillance protocol, but available data suggests that regimented surveillance strategies are needed and capable of yielding cancer diagnosis at earlier stages with better resulting survival. Evidence-based strategies are needed to guide optimal surveillance and safe minimization of immunosuppression.

Solid, non-skin, post-liver transplant tumors: Key role of lifestyle and immunosuppression management

Liver transplantation has been the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease since 1983. Cancer has emerged as a major long-term cause of death for liver transplant recipients. Many retrospective studies that have explored standardized incidence ratio have reported increased rates of solid organ cancers post-liver transplantation; some have also studied risk factors. Liver transplantation results in a two to five-fold mean increase in the rate of solid organ cancers. Risk of head and neck, lung, esophageal, cervical cancers and Kaposi’s sarcoma is high, but risk of colorectal cancer is not clearly demonstrated. There appears to be no excess risk of developing breast or prostate cancer. Environmental risk factors such as viral infection and tobacco consumption, and personal risk factors such as obesity play a key role, but recent data also implicate the role of calcineurin inhibitors, whose cumulative and dose-dependent effects on cell metabolism might play a direct role in oncogenesis. In this paper, we review the results of studies assessing the incidence of non-skin solid tumors in order to understand the mechanisms underlying solid cancers in post-liver transplant patients and, ultimately, discuss how to prevent these cancers. Immunosuppressive protocol changes, including a calcineurin inhibitor-free regimen, combined with dietary guidelines and smoking cessation, are theoretically the best preventive measures.

Neoplastic disease after liver transplantation: Focus on de novo neoplasms

De novo neoplasms account for almost 30% of deaths 10 years after liver transplantation and are the most common cause of mortality in patients surviving at least 1 year after transplant. The risk of malignancy is two to four times higher in transplant recipients than in an age- and sex-matched population, and cancer is expected to surpass cardiovascular complications as the primary cause of death in transplanted patients within the next 2 decades. Since exposure to immunosuppression is associated with an increased frequency of developing neoplasm, long-term immunosuppression should be therefore minimized. Promising results in the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence have been reported with the use of mTOR inhibitors including everolimus and sirolimus and the ongoing open-label prospective randomized controlled SILVER. Study will provide more information on whether sirolimus-containing vs mTOR-inhibitor-free immunosuppression is more efficacious in reducing HCC recurrence.

Incidence, risk factors and outcome of de novo tumors in liver transplant recipients focusing on alcoholic cirrhosis

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is an established life-saving procedure for alcoholic cirrhotic (AC) patients, but the incidence of de novo tumors ranges between 2.6% and 15.7% and is significantly increased in comparison with patients who undergo OLT for other etiologies. Tobacco, a known carcinogen, has been reported to be between 52% and 83.3% in AC patients before OLT. Other risk factors that contribute to the development of malignancies are dose-dependent immunosuppression, advanced age, viral infections, sun exposure, and premalignant lesions (inflammatory bowel disease, Barrett’s esophagus). A significantly more frequent incidence of upper aerodigestive (UAD) tract, lung, skin, and kidney-bladder tumors has been found in OLT recipients for AC in comparison with other etiologies. Liver transplant recipients who develop de novo non-skin tumors have a decreased long-term survival rate compared with controls. This significantly lower survival rate is more evident in AC recipients who develop UAD tract or lung tumors after OLT mainly because the diagnosis is usually performed at an advanced stage. All transplant candidates, especially AC patients, should be encouraged to cease smoking and alcohol consumption in the pre- and post-OLT periods, use skin protection, avoid sun exposure and over-immunosuppression, and have a yearly otopharyngolaryngeal exploration and chest computed tomography scan in order to prevent or reduce the incidence of de novo malignancies. Although still under investigation, substitution of calcineurin inhibitors for sirolimus or everolimus may reduce the incidence of de novo tumors after OLT.

Increased incidence of head and neck cancer in liver transplant recipients: a meta-analysis

Background

It is unclear whether liver transplantation is associated with an increased incidence of post-transplant head and neck cancer. This comprehensive meta-analysis evaluated the association between liver transplantation and the risk of head and neck cancer using data from all available studies.

Methods

PubMed and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify all relevant publications up to March 2014. Standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of head and neck cancer in liver transplant recipients were calculated. Tests for heterogeneity, sensitivity, and publishing bias were also performed.

Result

Of the 964 identified articles, 10 were deemed eligible. These studies included data on 56,507 patients with a total follow-up of 129,448.9 patient-years. SIR for head and neck cancer was 3.836-fold higher (95% CI 2.754–4.918, P = 0.000) in liver transplant recipients than in the general population. No heterogeneity or publication bias was observed. Sensitivity analysis indicated that omission of any of the studies resulted in an SIR for head and neck cancer between 3.488 (95% CI: 2.379–4.598) and 4.306 (95% CI: 3.020–5.592).

Conclusions

Liver transplant recipients are at higher risk of developing head and neck cancer than the general population.

Challenges in transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Transplantation for the treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis is more controversially discussed than it is for any other indication. The crucial aspect in this setting is abstinence before and after liver transplantation. We established pre-transplant selection criteria for potential transplant candidates. Provided that the underlying disease can be treated, there is no reason to withhold liver transplantation in a patient suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis. Evaluation of the patient by a multidisciplinary team, including an addiction specialist, is considered to be the gold standard. However, several centers demand a specified period of abstinence - usually 6 mo- irrespective of the specialist’s assessment. The 6-mo rule is viewed critically because liver transplantation was found to clearly benefit selected patients with acute alcoholic hepatitis; the benefit was similar to that achieved for other acute indications. However, the discussion may well be an academic one because the waiting time for liver transplantation exceeds six months at the majority of centers. The actual challenge in liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis may well be the need for lifelong post-transplant follow-up rather than the patient’s pre-transplant evaluation. A small number of recipients experience a relapse of alcoholism; these patients are at risk for organ damage and graft-related death. Post-transplant surveillance protocols should demonstrate alcohol relapse at an early stage, thus permitting the initiation of adequate treatment. Patients with alcoholic cirrhosis are at high risk of developing head and neck, esophageal, or lung cancer. The higher risk of malignancies should be considered in the routine assessment of patients suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis. Tumor surveillance protocols for liver transplant recipients, currently being developed, should become a part of standard care; these will improve survival by permitting diagnosis at an early stage. In conclusion, the key factor determining the outcome of transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis is intensive lifelong medical and psychological care. Post-transplant surveillance might be much more important than pre-transplant selection.

Long-term survival after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease

Currently, alcoholic cirrhosis is the second leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe. The quality of life and survival after a liver transplantation (LT) in patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) are similar to those in patients with other cirrhosis etiologies. The alcoholic relapse rate after a LT varies from 10%-50%, and these relapse patients are the ones who present a reduced long-term survival, mainly due to cardiovascular diseases and the onset of de novo neoplasms, including lung and upper aerodigestive tract. Nearly 40% of ALD recipients resume smoking and resume it early post-LT. Therefore, our pre-and post-LT follow-up efforts regarding ALD should be focused not only on alcoholic relapse but also on treating and avoiding other modifiable risk factors such as tobacco. The psychiatric and psychosocial pre-LT evaluation and the post-LT follow-up with physicians, psychiatrists and addiction specialists are important for reversing these problems because these professionals help to identify patients at risk for relapse as well as those patients who have relapsed, thus enabling responsive actions.

Antitumor efficacy of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor therapy in liver transplant recipients with oncological disease: a case-control study

INTRODUCTION

The reported incidences of de novo malignancy following orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are significantly greater than those in the general population. We have analyzed the efficacy of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) as immunosuppressant therapy in patients with de novo malignancies or those engrafted because of a primary liver cancer.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; n = 119), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 1) or de novo malignancies (n = 73). Thirty-seven patients with these tumors were treated with mTORi, and 167, with calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). Switching to mTORi was performed progressively, withdrawing the CNI over 15 days, until obtaining levels of 5-10 ng/dL.

RESULTS

No incidence of rejection, serious adverse events, or death was observed with an overall actuarial survival of 68.5% in the mTORi group versus 45.7% among the CNI group. Overall rates of tumor recurrence were 15.2% and 36.8%, respectively (P < .05). Among patients with HCC, survival was 100% of mTORi with and 61.5% among CNI patients, with tumor recurrence rates of 6.2% and 19.1%, respectively (P < .05).

DISCUSSION

Surprising differences in survival and tumor recurrence rates were observed among the mTORi-treated group compared with controls. Switching from CNI to mTORi immunosuppressant therapy appeared to be safe. It seems to be reasonable to employ this strategy in liver transplant patients with primary hepatic or "de novo" neoplasms.

New concepts and best practices for management of pre- and post-transplantation cancer

Solid-organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of developing cancer compared with the general population. Tumours can arise de novo, as a recurrence of a preexisting malignancy, or from the donated organ. The ATOS (Aula sobre Trasplantes de Órganos Sólidos; the Solid-Organ Transplantation Working Group) group, integrated by Spanish transplant experts, meets annually to discuss current advances in the field. In 2011, the 11th edition covered a range of new topics on cancer and transplantation. In this review we have highlighted the new concepts and best practices for managing cancer in the pre-transplant and post-transplant settings that were presented at the ATOS meeting. Immunosuppression plays a major role in oncogenesis in the transplant recipient, both through impaired immunosurveillance and through direct oncogenic activity. It is possible to transplant organs obtained from donors with a history of cancer as long as an effective minimization of malignancy transmission strategy is followed. Tumour-specific wait-periods have been proposed for the increased number of transplantation candidates with a history of malignancy; however, the patient's individual risk of death from organ failure must be taken into consideration. It is important to actively prevent tumour recurrence, especially the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant recipients. To effectively manage post-transplant malignancies, it is essential to proactively monitor patients, with long-term intensive screening programs showing a reduced incidence of cancer post-transplantation. Proposed management strategies for post-transplantation malignancies include viral monitoring and prophylaxis to decrease infection-related cancer, immunosuppression modulation with lower doses of calcineurin inhibitors, and addition of or conversion to inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin.

Long-term outcome after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, acute liver failure, and liver tumors. Over the past 4 decades, improvements in surgical techniques, peritransplant intensive care, and immunosuppressive regimens have resulted in significant improvements in short-term survival. Focus has now shifted to addressing long-term complications and improving quality of life in liver recipients. These include adverse effects of immunosuppression; recurrence of the primary liver disease; and management of diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular disease, renal dysfunction, osteoporosis, and de novo malignancy. Issues such as posttransplant depression, employment, sexual function, fertility, and pregnancy must not be overlooked, as they have a direct impact on the liver recipient's quality of life. This review summarizes the latest data in long-term outcome after liver transplantation.

Screening of de novo tumors after liver transplantation

De novo malignancies are frequent complications after liver transplantation. They are one of the leading causes of late death. Some authors have reported promising results following implementation of extensive cancer surveillance programs. Screening protocols might benefit patients by providing a diagnosis at an earlier stage when tumors may be cured. These protocols should be based on the specific risk factors of every patient. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence supporting screening protocols is still very weak both in the general population and in the transplant patients. On this basis, there is not enough evidence to recommend routine screening for all liver transplant recipients, apart from the recommendations accepted for the general population. Multicenter studies in selected groups of patients at high risk for malignancy may be the only way of defining the potential benefit of screening programs post-transplantation.

Everolimus in clinical practice in long-term liver transplantation: an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Everolimus, a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, has been used in acute and chronic treatment of kidney and heart transplants. There is scarce information regarding its use in liver transplant recipients, although everolimus may be a useful alternative for selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to study the clinical, biochemical, and pathological features of patients to whom everolimus was added based upon defined clinical profiles.

STUDY DESIGN

This study was prospective observational ongoing study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of everolimus alone or in combination with low doses of a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Chronic liver transplant recipients without contraindications to everolimus were defined based upon 7 profiles of complications. The initial everolimus dose (0.25 mg every 12 hours) was overlapped during conversion, measuring blood levels and evaluating clinical tolerance. Routine monitoring was performed to obtain immunosuppressant blood levels near the lower limit of the therapeutic range.

RESULTS

The 35 patients' including 17 men and 18 women, had an overall mean age of 61 ± 10 years with a mean follow-up of 34 months. The everolimus treatment lasted 20 months (range, 6-60). The indication for everolimus conversion were as follows: renal insufficiency (45.7%), no response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment (42.9%), autoimmune hepatitis associated with interferon (8.5%), de novo autoimmune hepatitis (25.5%), de novo tumor (37.1%), neurotoxicity (14.3%), or side effects to rapamycin treatment (5.7%). Patients may have presented more than one indication. Effectiveness was assessed based upon improved liver (48.6%) or renal function (31.25% with renal insufficiency) or withdrawal of prednisone (100% of 10 patients receiving prednisone). CNI was withdrawn from 48.6% of patients due to de novo tumors or neurotoxicity. The side effect were as follows: anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia (11.4%) or dyslipidemia (27.3%). The survival rate was 94.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of everolimus to chronic liver transplants enhanced therapeutic options in the long term recipients when applied for predefined clinical indications and administrated with dose adjustments based on serial monitoring of exposure.

Medical management of the liver transplant recipient

Long-term survival of liver transplant recipients has become the rule rather than the exception. As a result, the medical complications of long-term survival, including atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, metabolic bone disease, and de novo malignancy, have accounted for an increasing proportion of late morbidity and mortality. Risk factors for these complications begin before transplant and are potentially modifiable but are exacerbated by the requirement for immunosuppressive medications after transplantation. Surveillance and early intervention programs administered by transplant hepatologists and other medical subspecialists may improve long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients by ameliorating risk factors for atherosclerosis, bone fractures, and cancer.

Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer after liver transplantation

A case report described a 72-year-old man with a history of a deceased-donor liver transplantation (due to hepatitis B-associated end-stage liver cirrhosis) performed in 1994. The patient was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma and pulmonary metastasis in 1997 and was successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation and thoracoscopic superior segmentectomy. There was no evidence of newly diagnosed metastatic lesions or recurrence until the 19th post-operative month. Gastric cancer was identified by endoscopy during a routine follow-up examination; the pre-pyloric antral lesion measured 1.5 cm in size and was histologically well-differentiated and confined to the submucosal layers on endoscopic ultrasound. Laparoscopic gastrectomy and lymph node dissection (D1 + β) was successfully performed in March 2009, and the patient was discharged on the 5th post-operative day without complications. This suggests that laparoscopic surgery is one of the feasible methods for resection of gastric cancer in liver transplant patients.

Long-term results of liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established therapy associated with a dramatic improvement in patients life expectancy. With improved early-term management, current 10-year patient survival rates in many indications exceed 70%. Life-long immunosuppressive therapy may, however, be accompanied by considerable longterm toxicity: most importantly, renal dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, and cancer, which, in addition to recurrence of the primary liver disease, emerge as key contributors to late mortality. Chronic kidney disease cumulatively affects up to 28% of patients by ten years after LT. Various factors can contribute to renal impairment, but perioperative acute kidney injury, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, hypertension, and diabetes are considered most important. LT patients demonstrate 3-fold risk for cardiovascular events, which seems to result mostly from an excess of traditional risk factors, mainly hypertension and diabetes. The cumulative cancer incidence reaches 16-42% by 20 years after LT, and cancer rates are 2- to 4-fold higher among LT patients than among matched controls. Highest rates are for nonmelanoma skin cancer (3- to 70-fold) and lymphoma (8- to 29-fold). The liver graft usually displays uncomplicated function in the long term. Most common causes for chronic graft dysfunction include disease recurrence and biliary problems. LT generally restores patients quality of life to a level comparable with that of the general population, with only minor deficits in some areas. Thus, long-term survival after LT is impressive, and despite these long-term complications, patients quality of life remains comparable with that of the general population.

Risk factors of lung, head and neck, esophageal, and kidney and urinary tract carcinomas after liver transplantation: the effect of smoking withdrawal

Liver transplant recipients have an increased risk of malignancy. Smoking is related to some of the most frequent causes of posttransplant malignancy. The incidence and risk factors for the development of neoplasia related to smoking (head and neck, lung, esophageal, and kidney and urinary tract carcinomas) were studied in 339 liver transplant recipients. Risk factors for the development of smoking-related neoplasia were also studied in 135 patients who had a history of smoking so that it could be determined whether smoking withdrawal was associated with a lower risk of malignancy. After a mean follow-up of 7.5 years, 26 patients were diagnosed with 29 smoking-related malignancies. The 5- and 10-year actuarial rates were 5% and 13%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, smoking and older age were independently associated with a higher risk of malignancy. In the smoker subgroup, the variables related to a higher risk of malignancy were active smoking and older age. In conclusion, smoking withdrawal after liver transplantation may have a protective effect against the development of neoplasia.

CD28 expression by peripheral blood lymphocytes as a potential predictor of the development of de novo malignancies in long-term survivors after liver transplantation

At present, no method is available for accurately monitoring the degree of immunosuppression induced by antirejection therapies. The aim of this study was to determine whether CD28 and CD38 expression by peripheral blood mononuclear cells could be useful in predicting the development of de novo malignancies after liver transplantation. Flow cytometry analysis was used to measure the expression of CD28 and CD38 by peripheral blood lymphocytes in 134 stable, long-term survivors of liver transplantation. Patients who developed a de novo malignancy after undergoing a medical checkup were entered into a cancer group. Twenty-two patients (16.4%) developed at least 1 de novo malignancy over a mean interval of 22 ± 14 months (1.2-49.4 months) after the checkup. The mean frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells was significantly lower in the cancer group versus the noncancer group (39% ± 22 versus 51% ± 21, P = 0.008), but CD38 expression was similar in the 2 groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that an age greater than 50 years (odds ratio = 5.81) and a low frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells at the time of the checkup (odds ratio =3.16) were the only significant predictors of the development of de novo malignancies (P = 0.027). The actuarial proportion of patients with de novo malignancies was significantly lower when the frequency of CD28(+)CD8(+) cells was greater than or equal to 40% instead of less than 40% (P = 0.01). Flow cytometry measurements of CD28 expression by peripheral blood lymphocytes may facilitate the identification of patients at a high risk of developing de novo malignancies. Further prospective studies are necessary to determine whether such measurements could have a place in routine clinical practice to enable the intensity of immunosuppression to be minimized in patients who have an increased risk of developing cancer.

Risk factors and incidence of de novo malignancy in liver transplant recipients: a systematic review

Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) is an established life saving procedure for both acute and chronic liver failure, but incidences and risk factors for development of these malignancies are yet to be established. To determine the incidences and risk factors associated with de novo malignancy after OLT. We performed a systematic review of relevant epidemiological studies available on MEDLINE, which provided information on the incidences and risk factors for the development malignancies in adult OLT recipients published from 1983 to 2009. All data was compiled from retrospective studies. Independent risk factors for the development of de novo malignancy in adult OLT recipients were identified to be statistically significant including immunosuppression, hepatitis C virus infection, smoking, alcoholic cirrhosis and sun exposure. OLT recipients with smoking and alcohol history are of particular risk for head and neck and lung cancers. Primary sclerosing cholangitis and inflammatory bowel disease were found to be independent risk factors for colon cancer. Adult OLT recipients are at increased risk for the development of post-transplant malignancies and obviates the need for surveillance protocols that are safe and cost-effective. OLT recipients should be advised on taking proper precautions in the sun, smoking cessation, and eliminating alcohol consumption. Given the emergence of alcoholic cirrhosis as a leading indication for liver transplantation, the early detection of lung and head and neck cancers is of particular importance.

Risk of colorectal carcinoma in post-liver transplant patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liver transplant patients (LTx) have an increased risk for developing de novo malignancies, but for colorectal cancer (CRC) this risk is less clear. We aimed to determine whether the CRC risk post-LTx was increased. A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE and Cochrane databases to identify studies published between 1986 and 2008 reporting on the risk of CRC post-LTx. The outcomes were (1) CRC incidence rate (IR per 100,000 person-years (PY)) compared to a weighted age-matched control population using SEER and (2) relative risk (RR) for CRC compared to the general population. If no RR data were available, the RR was estimated using SEER. Twenty-nine studies were included. The overall post-LTx IR was 119 (95% CI 88-161) per 100,000 PY. The overall RR was 2.6 (95% CI 1.7-4.1). The non-primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) IR was 129 per 100,000 PY (95% CI 81-207). Compared to SEER (71 per 100,000 PY), the non-PSC RR was 1.8 (95% CI 1.1-2.9). In conclusion, the overall transplants and the subgroup non-PSC transplants have an increased CRC risk compared to the general population. However, in contrast to PSC, non-PSC transplants do not need an intensified screening strategy compared to the general population until a prospective study further defines recommendations.

De novo malignancies following liver transplantation: impact and recommendations

1. De novo malignancy is one of the leading causes of late mortality after liver transplantation. 2. The risks of skin cancers and lymphoma are more than 10-fold greater than the risks in an age-matched and sex-matched general population. 3. Some types of neoplasia, such as lung, head and neck, and colorectal cancer, are more frequent in liver transplant recipients than in an age-matched and sex-matched population. The risks of other frequent malignancies, such as prostate and breast cancer, do not seem to be increased. 4. The most important risks for posttransplant malignancy are Epstein-Barr virus seronegativity (for lymphoma), sun exposure (for skin cancer), smoking, and increasing age. 5. Despite the absence of evidence, general recommendations (such as avoidance of overimmunosuppression, sunlight protection, and cessation of smoking) should be given. Screening protocols may help to detect neoplasia at an early stage of disease.