Donor-transmitted adenovirus infection causing kidney allograft nephritis and graft loss

The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.

Clinical approach to donor-derived infection in solid organ transplant recipients

Donor-derived infection is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication of solid organ transplantation (SOT). Accurate and timely identification of unexpected infectious disease transmission events has implications not only for the recipient(s) experiencing infection, but also other recipients of organs or tissues from the same donor who may require additional testing or risk mitigation, as well as the broader organ transplant regulatory framework. This narrative review synthesizes data from published reports of symptomatic unexpected donor-derived infections in SOT recipients to provide clinicians with a systematic approach to the evaluation of undifferentiated illnesses that may be of donor origin. Key reasons to consider donor-derived infection include certain microbiologically proven infections in the recipient, especially early after transplant, characteristics of the donor or their management that suggest potential exposure to or infection with specific pathogens prior to organ procurement, and select clinical syndromes that occur in the post-transplant period. Syndromes for which expedited consideration and evaluation of donor-derived infection may be warranted include central nervous system infection, graft or perigraft complications developing in the absence of typical risk factors, and unexplained critical illness/sepsis syndrome in the early post-transplant period. When embarking on an investigation of a suspected donor-derived infection, clinicians should apply knowledge of the entire continuum of the organ procurement and transplant process to ensure unbiased and comprehensive data collection that will facilitate appropriate adjudication of these uncommon but high-consequence events.

Case Report: Early-Onset Adenovirus Nephritis Without Hemorrhagic Cystitis Following Kidney Transplantation

We report a case of adenovirus nephritis (ADVN) in a kidney transplant recipient (KTR) occurring within 8 days post-transplantation. The patient, a 35-year-old male, displayed systemic symptoms, high-grade fever, and acute kidney injury (AKI) without signs of hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Extensive diagnostic workup revealed widespread necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in the allograft, leading to the identification of adenovirus (ADV) via histopathology and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing. The source of ADV transmission remained uncertain, raising questions about the potential donor-derived infection. Unlike typical ADVN cases, the patient exhibited no hematuria or urinary symptoms. The case underscores the atypical presentation of ADVN in KTRs, challenging the conventional understanding of its timeline, transmission routes, and associated clinical features. We discuss the diagnostic challenges, histological findings, and management strategies for ADVN, emphasizing the importance of considering this entity in KTRs with unexplained fever and AKI, even in the absence of classical urinary symptoms or hematuria.

The Role of Allograft Nephrectomy in the Failing Kidney Transplant

Patients with failed renal allografts have associated increased morbidity and mortality. The individualization of immunosuppression taper is the key element in managing these patients to avoid graft intolerance and sensitization while balancing the risk of continued immunosuppression. Most patients with uncomplicated chronic allograft failure do not require allograft nephrectomy (AN), and there is no clear evidence that it improves outcomes. The AN procedure is associated with variable morbidity and mortality. It is reserved mainly for early technical graft failure or in symptomatic cases associated with allograft infection, malignancy, or graft intolerance syndrome. It may also be considered in those who cannot tolerate immunosuppression and are at high risk for graft intolerance. AN has been associated with an increased risk of sensitization due to inflammatory response from surgery, immunosuppression withdrawal with allograft failure, and retained endovascular tissue. Although it is presumed that for-cause AN after transplant failure is associated with sensitization, it remains unclear whether elective AN in patients who remain on immunotherapy may prevent sensitization. The current practice of immunosuppression taper has not been shown to prevent sensitization or increase infection risk, but current literature is limited by selection bias and the absence of medication adherence data. We discuss the management of failed allografts based on retransplant candidacy, wait times, risk of graft intolerance syndrome, and immunosuppression side effects. Many unanswered questions remain, and future prospective randomized trials are needed to help guide evidence-based management.

Possible Donor-Derived Infection in a Pediatric Liver Transplant Patient With Granulomatous Hepatitis

Pediatric liver transplant recipients are a high-risk group for the development of adenovirus hepatitis and other manifestations of disseminated adenoviral disease. The risk is greatest during periods of increased immunosuppression, including immediately post-transplantation and following treatment for rejection. Manifestations of adenovirus hepatitis are heterogeneous with a wide spectrum of clinical severity, ranging from mild, focal disease to fulminant liver failure. Here we report a case of liver transplantation-associated adenovirus hepatitis presenting with fever and multifocal liver lesions. The diagnosis was not clinically suspected due to atypical imaging findings and pathology. Non-targeted metagenomic sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA facilitated and expedited the diagnosis. Confirmatory conventional testing was obtained, allowing for appropriate initiation of targeted treatment in this patient.

Adenovirus Infection in a Kidney-Pancreatic Transplant Recipient: Case Report

Adenovirus infection in transplant recipients may present from asymptomatic viremia to multisystemic involvement. Most frequently, it occurs in the first year after a kidney transplant, and it is secondary to the reactivation of latent disease. However, primary infection may occur, and disseminated disease is more common when related to primary infection. Kidney involvement may be confirmed by biopsy, although diagnosis may be presumptive. Reduction of immunosuppression and supportive care are important components of therapy. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 41-year-old female renal-pancreatic recipient 12 years before with chronic renal graft dysfunction and a functional pancreatic graft had a history of cytomegalovirus and polyoma virus infection 2 years after transplantation. She was taking tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone. The patient was admitted after persistent uncharacteristic diarrhea 3 weeks before hospitalization without any relevant epidemiologic context. She was dehydrated, and the lab results showed worsened kidney function and leucocytosis. The viral culture revealed adenovirus. Vigorous hydration was implemented, and the mycophenolate mofetil dose was reduced. The patient was discharged, and renal function returned to previous values. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Adenovirus infection has a wide clinical presentation, and multisystemic involvement may occur in transplant recipients. Supportive care is paramount. The clinical features and viral culture confirm the diagnosis, although tissue samples and quantitative polymerase chain reaction may be required in more severe cases.

The pathologic spectrum of adenovirus nephritis in the kidney allograft

Adenovirus nephritis (ADVN) is a rare and understudied complication of kidney transplantation. Unlike BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), our knowledge of clinicopathologic manifestations of ADVN remains rudimentary and essentially limited to case reports. To expand on this, we retrospectively studied 11 kidney transplant recipients with ADVN and compared their allograft biopsies to 33 kidney transplant recipients with BKVN using conventional microscopy and the 770 gene Nanostring Banff Human Organ Transplant Profiling Panel. Patients with ADVN had a median age of 44 years, were predominantly male, and developed ADVN at a median of 31 months post-transplantation. Eight patients presented with fever and ten had hematuria. The most common histologic manifestations included granulomas (82%), tubulocentric inflammation (73%), and tubular degenerative changes consistent with acute tubular necrosis (73%). During a median follow-up of 55 months after biopsy, three patients developed allograft failure from subsequent acute rejection. All seven patients with available follow-up PCR showed resolution of viremia at a median of 30 days after diagnosis. Compared to BKVN, ADVN demonstrated more granulomas and less tubulointerstitial scarring. On follow-up, patients with ADVN had more rapid clearance of viral DNA from plasma. Transcriptomic analyses showed that ADVN had increased expression of several pro-inflammatory transcriptomes, mainly related to innate immunity, was associated with increased expression of transcripts with inhibitory effects on inflammatory response and showed higher enrichment with neutrophils, which can cause aggressive but short-lasting damage. Thus, we demonstrate that, despite its association with aggressive neutrophil-rich inflammation, ADVN does not often lead to allograft failure. Hence, preventing subsequent acute rejection following resolution of ADVN may improve allograft survival.

Adenovirus-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy and Necrotizing Interstitial Nephritis in a Renal Transplant Recipient: A Case Report and Review

Adenoviral infections, though rare, may be a source of significant morbidity and mortality in the early post renal transplant period. We present a case of fever and graft dysfunction in a deceased donor renal transplant recipient whose initial post-operative period was complicated by vascular thrombosis and ureteric necrosis. He had received induction immunosuppression with Rabbit-Anti Thymocyte Globulin. Graft biopsy was suggestive of Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TMA) accompanied by intense interstitial inflammation, hemorrhage, necrosis, WBC casts and tubular injury. Viral cytopathic changes were discernible on light microscopy, leading to suspicion of adenoviral infection. This was confirmed with immunohistochemical demonstration of adenoviral antigens in the graft biopsy. He was treated with a step down of immunosuppression and intravenous Immunoglobulin. However, the patient's general condition deteriorated rapidly, and he succumbed to his illness. We highlight this association of TMA and necrotizing tubulo-interstitial nephritis with adenoviral infection of the renal allograft.

Literature review of allograft adenovirus nephritis and a case presenting as mass lesions in a transplanted kidney without symptoms of urinary tract infection or acute kidney injury

Adenovirus (AdV) infection is a common complication in bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplant and solid organ transplant recipients. AdV infection usually presents as hemorrhagic cystitis, but sometimes it can progress to acute kidney injury showing AdV nephritis (AdVN). We present the case of a 52-year-old Japanese female who had received a living kidney transplantation (KT) from her husband. At 21 months post-KT, the patient presented with a fever, but no renal dysfunction and no abnormal urine findings. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a few mass lesions with hypoperfusion in the transplanted kidney. An enhanced CT-guided biopsy targeting one of these lesions revealed a necrotizing tubulointerstitial nephritis suggesting AdVN. The polymerase chain reaction tests for ADV were negative in a urine sample but positive in the sera and the frozen kidney biopsy samples. AdVN can manifest as an unusual pattern of acute lobar nephritis/acute focal bacterial nephritis-like localization without symptoms of acute kidney injury or urinary tract infection. Enhanced CT can provide clues for clinical diagnosis.

Adenovirus diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 228 case reports

OBJECTIVE

The clinical characteristics of various adenovirus (ADV) infection are underexplored up till now. To investigate the risk factors, manifestation, current status of ADV species, treatment and prognosis of this disease.

METHODS

We performed a Pubmed and Embase systematic review for case report reporting the ADV infection to analyze the clinical characteristics of disease.

RESULTS

Initial database searched identified articles of which 168 (228 cases) were included in the final analysis. Previous solid organ transplantation [odds ratio (OR) = 3.45, 95% CI 1.31-9.08, P = 0.01], hematopoietic stem cell transplant (OR = 4.24, 95% CI 1.33-13.51, P = 0.01) and hematological malignancy (OR = 4.78, 95% CI 1.70-13.46, P = 0.01) were associated with increased risk of disseminated ADV infection. Use of corticosteroids (OR = 3.86, 95% CI 1.21-12.24, P = 0.02) was a significant risk factor for acquiring urinary tract infections. A total of six species (21 types) of ADV infection have been identified in 100/228 (43.9%) cases. ADV B was the most common species. ADV B species (26/60, 52.0% or 5/41, 12.2% P = 0.001) were more isolated in patients with ADV pneumonia. ADV C (13/15, 86.7% versus 35/86, 40.7% P = 0.001) species were more identified in patients with disseminated disease. The species associated with keratoconjunctivitis is only ADV D in our analysis. Urinary tract ADV infections were observed in ADV A/B/D species. Cidofovir (CDV) (82/228, 36.0%) remained the most commonly antiviral therapy in our cases, followed by ribavirin (15/228, 6.6%), ganciclovir (18/228, 7.9%), and brincidofovir (12/228, 5.3%). Brincidofovir was administered as salvage therapy in 10 cases. Death was reported in 81/228 (35.5%) patients. Mortality rate was higher among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) ADV infection (5/10, 50.0%), ADV pneumonia (20/45, 44.4%) and disseminated ADV infection (53/122, 43.4%).

CONCLUSION

Previous solid organ transplantation, hematopoietic stem cell transplant and hematological malignancy were risk factors for disseminated ADV infection. Use of corticosteroids was significant for urinary tract ADV infection. Different species correlated with different clinical manifestations of infection. Mortality rate was higher among patients with GI disease, pneumonia and disseminated disease. Our review clarified the current treatment of ADV infections, and more treatment required further investigation.

Disseminated Adenovirus Infection After Combined Liver-Kidney Transplantation

Human adenovirus (HAdV) infections are well-described after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation but less well understood in solid organ transplantation (SOT). We describe a case of disseminated HAdV type 21 infection 5 months after combined liver-kidney transplantation, expanding the limited literature describing this infection in the SOT population.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adenovirus infection of the urinary tract after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection caused by human adenovirus (HAdV) after renal transplantation (RT) results in graft loss because of concomitant nephropathy and acute rejection and may result in death because of systemic dissemination.

METHODS

We assessed the time period between RT and disease onset, symptoms, treatment details, disease duration, renal graft function, outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

HAdV infection of the urinary tract occurred in 8 of 170 renal transplant recipients. Symptoms were macrohematuria in all 8 patients, dysuria in 7, and fever in 5. The median period from RT to disease onset was 367 (range, 7-1763) days, and the median disease duration was 15 (range, 8-42) days. The mean serum creatinine (sCr) level prior to onset was 1.35 ± 0.48 mg/dL and the mean maximum sCr level during disease was 2.34 ± 1.95 mg/dL. These values were increased by ≥25% in 5 patients. The mean sCr levels when symptoms resolved was 1.54 ± 0.67 mg/dL, and no significant difference was seen before, during, or after disease onset (P = 0.069). Two patients were diagnosed with HAdV viremia and 1 with acute tubulointerstitial nephritis revealed on biopsy. In addition to a reduction in immunosuppressant dosage, 2 patients received gammaglobulins and 5 received ganciclovir.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms of all patients were alleviated, although some patients developed nephritis or viremia. Hence, the possibility of exacerbation should always be considered. Adequate follow-up observation should be conducted, and diligent and aggressive therapeutic intervention is required to prevent the condition from worsening.

Successful treatment of disseminated adenovirus infection with ribavirin and intravenous immunoglobulin in an adult renal transplant recipient: a case report

Disseminated adenovirus infection in recipients of renal transplants is a rare but often fatal complication. We present a case of a 32-year-old woman who underwent renal transplantation from a deceased donor. Ten months after transplantation, she presented with dysuria, hematuria, and febrile illness. Despite the use of antibiotics, the patient's symptoms continued and worsened and the serum creatinine level was increased. The results of urine and serum polymerase chain reaction were positive for adenovirus. Renal biopsy revealed viral interstitial nephritis. The patient was treated with ribavirin, intravenous immunoglobulin, and reduction in immunosuppression. Her symptoms progressively improved from 7 days after the treatment. Serum and urine polymerase chain reaction for adenovirus became negative 10 and 21 days after the treatment, respectively. She remained in good health with excellent allograft function 6 months later.

[Hemorrhagic cystitis due to adenovirus in a renal transplant recipient: the first reported case in black Africa in a setting of a very beginning of a kidney transplantation program and review of the literature]

Viral infections are an important complication of transplantation. Polyomavirus are the commonest viruses that infect the renal allograft. Herpes virus nephropathy has also been described. In the past 15 years, adenovirus nephritis has emerged as a potentially life-threatening disease in renal transplant patients in developed countries. Most of the papers devoted to adenovirus nephritis are reported cases. The fate of such patients in resources-limited countries is not known. Herein, we describe the clinical, biological and prognostic findings of a black African transplanted patient with adenoviral hemorrhagic cystitis. This case is the very first of its kind reported in black Africa in a setting of a start of a renal transplantation pilot project. The patient is a 54-year-old man admitted at the nephrology service for gross haematuria and fever occurred 1 month after kidney transplantation. The diagnosis of adenoviral hemorrhagic cystitis has been suspected because the patient has displayed recurrent conjunctivitis and gastroenteritis well before transplantation, which was then confirmed by the real-time polymerase chain reaction performed on the blood. Conservatory measures associated with immunosuppression reduction have permitted the discontinuation of haematuria. This case has been discussed in regard of the epidemiology, the diagnosis, the treatment, the evolution and the prognosis of the adenoviral infection in the renal transplant patient. A review of the literature has been performed subsequently.

Selecting suitable solid organ transplant donors: Reducing the risk of donor-transmitted infections

Selection of the appropriate donor is essential to a successful allograft recipient outcome for solid organ transplantation. Multiple infectious diseases have been transmitted from the donor to the recipient via transplantation. Donor-transmitted infections cause increased morbidity and mortality to the recipient. In recent years, a series of high-profile transmissions of infections have occurred in organ recipients prompting increased attention on the process of improving the selection of an appropriate donor that balances the shortage of needed allografts with an approach that mitigates the risk of donor-transmitted infection to the recipient. Important advances focused on improving donor screening diagnostics, using previously excluded high-risk donors, and individualizing the selection of allografts to recipients based on their prior infection history are serving to increase the donor pool and improve outcomes after transplant. This article serves to review the relevant literature surrounding this topic and to provide a suggested approach to the selection of an appropriate solid organ transplant donor.