|
1
|
Tetaj N, Garotto G, Albarello F, Mastrobattista A, Maritti M, Stazi GV, Marini MC, Caravella I, Macchione M, De Angelis G, Busso D, Di Lorenzo R, Scarcia S, Farina A, Centanni D, Vargas J, Savino M, Carucci A, Antinori A, Palmieri F, D’Offizi G, Ianniello S, Taglietti F, Campioni P, Vaia F, Nicastri E, Girardi E, Marchioni L. Incidence of Pneumothorax and Pneumomediastinum in 497 COVID-19 Patients with Moderate-Severe ARDS over a Year of the Pandemic: An Observational Study in an Italian Third Level COVID-19 Hospital. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5608. [PMID: 34884310 PMCID: PMC8658701 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: COVID-19 is a novel cause of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Indeed, with the increase of ARDS cases due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has also been an increase in the incidence of cases with pneumothorax (PNX) and pneumomediastinum (PNM). However, the incidence and the predictors of PNX/PMN in these patients are currently unclear and even conflicting. (2) Methods: The present observational study analyzed the incidence of barotrauma (PNX/PNM) in COVID-19 patients with moderate-severe ARDS hospitalized in a year of the pandemic, also focusing on the three waves occurring during the year, and treated with positive-pressure ventilation (PPV). We collected demographic and clinical data. (3) Results: During this period, 40 patients developed PNX/PNM. The overall incidence of barotrauma in all COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a year was 1.6%, and in those with moderate-severe ARDS in PPV was 7.2% and 3.8 events per 1000 positive-pressure ventilator days. The incidence of barotrauma in moderate-severe ARDS COVID-19 patients during the three waves was 7.8%, 7.4%, and 8.7%, respectively. Treatment with noninvasive respiratory support alone was associated with an incidence of barotrauma of 9.1% and 2.6 events per 1000 noninvasive ventilator days, of which 95% were admitted to the ICU after the event, due to a worsening of respiratory parameters. The incidence of barotrauma of ICU COVID-19 patients in invasive ventilation over a year was 5.8% and 2.7 events per 1000 invasive ventilator days. There was no significant difference in demographics and clinical features between the barotrauma and non-barotrauma group. The mortality was higher in the barotrauma group (17 patients died, 47.2%) than in the non-barotrauma group (170 patients died, 37%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.429). (4) Conclusions: The incidence of PNX/PNM in moderate-severe ARDS COVID-19 patients did not differ significantly between the three waves over a year, and does not appear to be very different from that in ARDS patients in the pre-COVID era. The barotrauma does not appear to significantly increase mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate-severe ARDS if protective ventilation strategies are applied. Attention should be paid to the risk of barotrauma in COVID-19 patients in noninvasive ventilation because the event increases the probability of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nardi Tetaj
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Gabriele Garotto
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Fabrizio Albarello
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (S.I.); (P.C.)
| | - Annelisa Mastrobattista
- Respiratory Infectious Diseases Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (F.P.)
| | - Micaela Maritti
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Giulia Valeria Stazi
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Maria Cristina Marini
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Ilaria Caravella
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Manuela Macchione
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Giada De Angelis
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Donatella Busso
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Rachele Di Lorenzo
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Silvana Scarcia
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Anna Farina
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Daniele Centanni
- Clinical and Research Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (A.A.); (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Joel Vargas
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (J.V.); (M.S.)
| | - Martina Savino
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (J.V.); (M.S.)
| | - Alessandro Carucci
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | - Andrea Antinori
- Clinical and Research Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (A.A.); (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Fabrizio Palmieri
- Respiratory Infectious Diseases Unit, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (A.M.); (F.P.)
| | - Gianpiero D’Offizi
- Clinical and Research Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (A.A.); (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Stefania Ianniello
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (S.I.); (P.C.)
| | - Fabrizio Taglietti
- Clinical and Research Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (A.A.); (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Paolo Campioni
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (F.A.); (S.I.); (P.C.)
| | - Francesco Vaia
- Health Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy;
| | - Emanuele Nicastri
- Clinical and Research Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (D.C.); (A.A.); (G.D.); (F.T.); (E.N.)
| | - Enrico Girardi
- Scientific Direction, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy;
| | - Luisa Marchioni
- UOC Resuscitation, Intensive and Sub-Intensive Care, National Institute for Infectious Diseases IRCCS, Lazzaro Spallanzani, 00149 Rome, Italy; (G.G.); (M.M.); (G.V.S.); (M.C.M.); (I.C.); (M.M.); (G.D.A.); (D.B.); (R.D.L.); (S.S.); (A.F.); (A.C.); (L.M.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Matus I, Mertens A, Wilton S, Raja H, Roedder T. Safety and Efficacy of Manual Aspiration Via Small Bore Chest Tube in Facilitating the Outpatient Management of Transbronchial Biopsy-related Iatrogenic Pneumothorax. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol 2021; 28:272-280. [PMID: 33758149 DOI: 10.1097/lbr.0000000000000754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Iatrogenic pneumothorax complicates transbronchial biopsies with a prevalence of 1% to 6%. Conventional treatment consists of inpatient management with chest tube drainage. While aspiration techniques have been investigated in the management of both primary spontaneous and transthoracic lung biopsy-induced pneumothorax, its role in the management of transbronchial biopsy-iatrogenic pneumothorax (TBBX-IP) is undefined. An appealing treatment alternative for TBBX-IP may exist in the placement of a small bore chest tube (SBCT) followed by a manual aspiration (MA) technique promoting earlier SBCT removal to facilitate outpatient management. To our knowledge, no study exists evaluating the efficacy of MA via a SBCT performed specifically for TBBX-IP. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospective evaluation of the efficacy of a protocolized pathway incorporating MA through a SBCT for the outpatient management of TBBX-IP. Primary outcome was the clinicoradiographic resolution of TBBX-IP avoiding hospitalizations. RESULTS A total of 763 biopsies performed; 31 complicated by TBBX-IP, 18 qualified for intervention. Sixteen were outpatients, 2 inpatients. Thirteen (81.25%) of the 16 outpatients were successfully treated with MA via SBCT and did not require admission. Twelve (75%) of these 13 had SBCT removed, 1 patient was discharged with SBCT and removed in 24 hours. Of the 18 patients requiring intervention, 13 (72.2%) were successfully treated with MA via SBCT enabling removal of SBCT. No patient required reintervention. CONCLUSION MA via SBCT represents a safe and viable management approach of TBBX-IP promoting earlier SBCT removal and decreased hospitalizations. Our results challenge conventional management of TBBX-IP warranting further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismael Matus
- Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology Service, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System
| | - Avalon Mertens
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ
| | - Shannon Wilton
- Department of Medicine, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE
| | - Haroon Raja
- Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology Service, Helen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System
| | - Timothy Roedder
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Chang SH, Kang YN, Chiu HY, Chiu YH. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Pigtail Catheter and Chest Tube as the Initial Treatment for Pneumothorax. Chest 2018; 153:1201-1212. [PMID: 29452099 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.01.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal initial treatment approach for pneumothorax remains controversial. This systemic review and meta-analysis investigated the effectiveness of small-bore pigtail catheter (PC) drainage compared with that of large-bore chest tube (LBCT) drainage as the initial treatment approach for all subtypes of pneumothorax. METHODS PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials published up to October 9, 2017, that compared PC and LBCT as the initial treatment for pneumothorax. The investigative outcomes included success rates, recurrence rates, complication rates, drainage duration, and hospital stay. RESULTS Of the 11 included studies (875 patients), the success rate was similar in the PC (79.84%) and LBCT (82.87%) groups, with a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.05; I2 = 0%). Specifically, PC drainage was associated with a significantly lower complication rate following spontaneous pneumothorax than LBCT drainage (Peto odds ratio: 0.49 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.85]; I2 = 29%). In the spontaneous subgroup, PC drainage was associated with a significantly shorter drainage duration (mean difference, -1.51 [95% CI, -2.93 to -0.09]) and hospital stay (mean difference: -2.54 [95% CI, -3.16 to -1.92]; P < .001) than the LBCT group. CONCLUSIONS Collectively, results of the meta-analysis suggest PC drainage may be considered as the initial treatment option for patients with primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ideally, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare PC vs LBCT among different subgroups of patients with pneumothorax, which may ultimately improve clinical care and management for these patients. TRIAL REGISTRY PROSPERO; No.: CRD42017078481; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su-Huan Chang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-No Kang
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yi Chiu
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Medical Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Education and Humanities in Medicine, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Animal Science and Technology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Yu-Han Chiu
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Tsuchiya T, Sano A. Outpatient Treatment of Pneumothorax with a Thoracic Vent: Economic Benefit. Respiration 2015; 90:33-9. [PMID: 25997413 DOI: 10.1159/000381958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2014] [Accepted: 03/27/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since rising medical costs currently represent a growing problem worldwide, finding cost-effective treatment options is important. In our hospital, outpatient treatment of pneumothorax using a thoracic vent began in December 2012. OBJECTIVES We aimed to test our hypothesis that outpatient treatment of pneumothorax with a thoracic vent can reduce medical expenses. METHODS Patients were classified into four groups based on treatment: thoracic vent with or without surgery or conventional intercostal chest tube drainage with or without surgery. We compared mean medical expenses, duration of hospitalization and number of physician visits among these four groups. RESULTS During a 2-year period, 65 patients were treated with a thoracic vent (36 patients) or conventional intercostal chest tube drainage (29 patients). Patients treated with a thoracic vent who underwent surgery had a shorter mean duration of hospitalization (5.0 ± 1.3 vs. 10.3 ± 3.4 days; p < 0.0001) and lower overall cost, at JPY 971,830.00 ± 81,291.80 (USD 10,400.40 ± 1,464.90) versus JPY 1,179,791.10 ± 198,383.10 (USD 13,888.90 ± 1,965.30; p < 0.0001) compared with conventional intercostal chest tube drainage. Nonsurgical patients treated with a thoracic vent had lower overall costs, at JPY 79,960.00 ± 25,643.60 (USD 890.10 ± 352.30) versus JPY 268,588.80 ± 94,636.50 (USD 2,932.80 ± 903.50; p < 0.0001) compared with conventional intercostal chest tube drainage. No serious complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS Outpatient thoracic vent treatment can significantly reduce medical expenses and thereby have a major economic impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takehiro Tsuchiya
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Chigasaki Municipal Hospital, Chigasaki, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|