Transfusion reactions: state-of-the-art 1994

An association of soluble CD40 ligand (CD154) with adverse reactions to platelet transfusions

BACKGROUND

Removal of stored supernatant abrogates most transfusion reactions to leukoreduced platelets (PLTs), suggesting that PLT-derived soluble mediators are involved. PLTs are the primary source of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L). Engagement of the receptor for CD40L induces synthesis of proinflammatory mediators including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1).

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Supernatants from poststorage leukoreduced PLT concentrates were assayed for white cell- (IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1) and PLT-derived (sCD40L, RANTES) inflammatory mediators. These levels were correlated with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 534 transfusions, there were 12 reported (2.2%) and 2 unreported reactions (0.4%)--10 febrile and 4 allergic. Transfusions with reactions had significantly higher levels of IL-6 (2.3-fold higher; p = 0.005), IL-8 (2.2-fold higher; p = 0.001), MCP-1 (2.6-fold higher; p = 0.002), and sCD40L (1.24-fold higher; p = 0.015), but not RANTES. (1.14-fold higher; p = 0.22). The vast majority (>93%) of patients transfused with mediator levels in the highest quintile had no reactions. When levels of all five mediators were summed, the reaction rates in the first through fifth quintiles increased from 1 to 7 percent (p = 0.027). All but one reaction occurred in patients with hematologic malignancies (13 reactions/380 transfusions; 3.4%; p = 0.04 vs. other diagnoses).

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first data demonstrating that a PLT-derived mediator, sCD40L, is associated with adverse transfusion events. Existing clinical factors, for example, inflammation or leukopenia, may influence whether infused mediators cause reactions.

A multistate cluster of red blood cell transfusion reactions associated with use of a leucocyte reduction filter

In 2000, the American Red Cross (ARC) received reports of unusual transfusion reactions of unknown aetiology among patients receiving leucocyte-reduced (LR) red blood cell (RBC) units in multiple distribution regions. We evaluated potential risk factors of reactions among patients who received LR-RBC transfusions. A case-patient was defined as any patient with onset of back pain while receiving an LR-RBC transfusion from 1 January to 25 May 2000. Controls were chosen randomly and selected in a 1:3 case : control ratio from healthcare facilities in which case-patients were transfused. Product-specific risk factors of reactions were further determined through nested case-control study, procedural review of blood collection facility and quality-control-testing record review of product processing. Reaction incidence rates were determined through ARC blood product distribution data by region of blood collection and processing. There were 29 reactions detected in patients who received transfusions in 13 healthcare facilities in five states. Eighteen case-patients and 78 controls were included in the case-control study. In univariate analysis, case-patients were more likely than controls to have a haematologic malignancy, to have received the transfusion as an outpatient, to have received an RBC transfusion within the previous 3 months, to have received medication used to prevent reactions or to diminish their intensity upon transfusion (i.e. premedication) or to have received LR-RBC units prepared with the HemaSure r\LS System(HS) rather than two other filters used. In multivariate analysis limited to recipients of HS-filtered RBC units, transfusion premedication [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-37; P = 0.02] and transfusion as an outpatient (AOR = 5; 95% CI 1.1-20; P = 0.03) were independently associated with reactions. The rate of reported transfusion reactions was 2.0 reactions per 10 000 RBC units distributed. A multistate cluster of transfusion reactions was significantly associated with leucocyte filtration of RBC units prepared with a specific product, the HS filter. The reactions also were independently associated with premedication and transfusion as an outpatient; these may be surrogates for an increased risk of reaction or for greater likelihood of detection. The mechanism for these reactions has not been elucidated. This cluster of reactions underscores the importance of surveillance efforts to detect adverse events after transfusion, particularly when new methods to modify blood products are introduced.

Removal of T and B lymphocytes by in-line filtration: evaluation of the efficiency of a polyester filter type (Pall WBF-2) by flow cytometric counting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate whether in-line filtration, using a polyester filter for the preparation of red cell concentrates (RCC) and plasma (PL), leads to an altered proportion of T and B lymphocytes in the fraction of residual white blood cells (WBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The capacity of Pall WBF-2 in-line filters to reduce the numbers of T and B lymphocytes from red blood cell concentrates (RCC) and plasma (PL) of 22 donations was investigated by three-colour flow cytometry (FC) using the Tritest-Trucount kit. T and B lymphocytes were identified using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against CD3, CD19 and CD45, conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate, phycoerythrin or peridinin chlorophyll protein-A, respectively. As the number of B cells was below the detection limit of the FC method, WBC of the respective blood components of healthy donors were concentrated 25-fold by Percoll density-gradient centrifugation. In this fraction the absolute numbers of T and B cells, as well as their ratio, were determined using the Attractor software, which provides a discrimination of rare cell counts from FC in relation to debris.

RESULTS

The mean numbers, as well as minima and maxima of T and B lymphocytes per unit, were as follows. T cells in RCC: 4.51 x 10(3) (1.68 x 10(2)-4.09 x 10(4)) and in PL: 1.35 x 10(3) (2.21-1.78 x 10(4)); B cells in RCC: 2.33 x 10(3) (7.10 x 10(1)-9.15 x 10(3)) and in PL: 2.33 x 102 (7.5 x 10(2)-2.8 x 10(3)). T cells were retained, on average, at a higher level than B cells: 3.01 times higher in RCC and 1.01 times higher in PL.

CONCLUSION

After filtration, the ratio of T and B lymphocytes changed in RCC (1.95 : 1) compared with unfiltered blood, where it was 5.83 : 1. In PL the ratio did not change notably compared to unfiltered blood. The results of this research show that cell concentration (using gradient centrifugation) in combination with an appropriate FC acquisition and analysis procedure, allows both residual T and B lymphocytes (being under the detection limit without cell concentration) to be determined.

Improved flow cytometric method to enumerate residual cells: minimal linear detection limits for platelets, erythrocytes, and leukocytes

Increasing demand for quality control of blood products requires more sensitive methods to enumerate residual cells. Presently, the reported threshold (in cells per microliter) is 400 for red blood cells, 30-500 for platelets, and 1 for leukocytes. To examine precision and linearity in enumerating residual platelets and red blood cells, EDTA-anticoagulated blood from healthy donors was serially diluted with serum, stained in TruCount tubes using a no-lyse/no-wash procedure and a monoclonal antibody cocktail against the CD42a (FL1) and glycophorin-A (FL2) epitopes, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Leukocyte counts were determined in separate tubes. Cell preparation and analysis were performed once for 20 blood samples each and 20 times using the same specimen. Acquisition from the same tube was performed separately for platelets (threshold on FL1) and red blood cells (threshold on FL2). Multiparameter analysis was used for data evaluation. Linear results were obtained for platelets per microliter between 3,410 and 5 and for red blood cells per microliter between 54,000 and 3. For the lower cell concentrations, the coefficient of variation was 16.7% for platelets and 10.9% for red blood cells. The presented method allows the distinction between physiologically intact and ghost red blood cells. The method represents a reliable, sensitive, and accurate approach to quantify platelets and red blood cells in diluted blood. It can be applied to enumerate residual cells in plasma products and meets the increasing demand for quality control in blood components.

White cell reduction during plateletpheresis: a comparison of three blood cell separators

BACKGROUND

White cell (WBC)-reduced single-donor platelet concentrates (SDPs) can be collected by the newest generation of blood cell separators. Three WBC-reduction techniques during plateletpheresis were investigated in the present study with respect to WBC content and platelet yield.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The Amicus device used the elutriation principle for WBC reduction, and separations with periodically alternating interface position (PAIP) were employed in the AS.TEC 204. WBC reduction by in-line filtration was performed in the MCS+. Platelets were measured electronically and WBCs were determined manually (Nageotte chamber).

RESULTS

In-line filtered SDPs showed significantly lower WBC content (0.088+/-0.178 x 10(6)) than SDPs that were WBC reduced by elutriation (0.31+/-0.48 x 106) or PAIP technique (0.89+/-1.57 x 10(6), p = 0.0001). Platelet yield (5.0+/-0.46 x 10(11)) was significantly higher in components obtained with the Amicus device (p = 0.0001). The AS.TEC 204 and MCS+ gave similar results for platelet yields: 3.15+/-0.63 and 3.28+/-0.71 x 10(11), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The plateletpheresis systems studied allow the collection of WBC-reduced SDPs. In-line filtration resulted in the best WBC reduction. Some SDPs collected with the devices studied had a WBC content >1 x 10(6) per unit. Platelet yield was significantly higher in SDPs from the Amicus device.