Factors associated with fainting: before, during and after whole blood donation

Development and validation of a scoring system to predict vasovagal reaction upon whole-blood donation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Risk factors for vasovagal reaction (VVR) have been extensively studied. With knowledge of the relative importance of these risk factors for VVR, collection staff could take care of blood donors from the same standpoint, leading to improved donor safety. We therefore developed a scoring system to predict VVR, which incorporates registration information.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pre-syncopal and syncopal symptoms, as well as on- and off-site reactions, are included in this analysis as VVR. We defined the donor status as follows: first-time donors, repeat donors with no history of reaction and repeat donors with a history of reaction. We prepared two datasets: whole-blood donations at a blood donation site in Tokyo between January 2019 and December 2019 were included in training data (n = 361,114), and whole-blood donations between January 2020 and August 2020 were included in testing data (n = 216,211).

RESULTS

The most important variable was the donor status, followed by age, estimated blood volume and height. We integrated them into a scoring system. Training and testing datasets were combined (n = 577,325), and VVR rates in groups with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 or more were 0.09% (95% CI: 0.081%-0.10%), 0.33% (95% CI: 0.31%-0.36%), 0.87% (95% CI: 0.78%-0.96%), 1.17% (95% CI: 1.05%-1.30%), 2.15% (95% CI: 1.98%-2.32%) and 3.11% (95% CI: 2.90%-3.34%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system enables staff to significantly predict VVR and may help them to identify donors at increased risk of experiencing syncope, thereby mitigating the negative impact of VVR on donor safety and return by paying close attention to high-risk donors.

Identifying new safety risk of human serum albumin: a retrospective study of real-world data

Objective: To mine and analyze the adverse reaction signals of human serum albumin (HSA) using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database for the safe clinical use of this drug. Methods: Data cleaning and analysis of adverse event reports in the FAERS database for a total of 76 quarters from Q1 2004 to Q4 2022 were performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). Gender-differentiated signal detection was used to investigate the gender differences in the occurrence of HSA adverse events. Results: Through a combination of three methods, a total of 535 adverse event reports were identified. These reports involved 1,885 cases of adverse reactions, with respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders, as well as general disorders and administration site conditions, as the most common. One noteworthy new signal was the occurrence of transfusion-related acute lung injury. Additionally, gender-differentiated signals were present, with females experiencing paraesthesia, hypertension, pulmonary oedema, loss of consciousness, and vomiting. Conclusion: This study has revealed that HSA poses a risk of causing transfusion-related acute lung injury. It has also been observed that adverse reactions, including paraesthesia, hypertension, pulmonary oedema, loss of consciousness, and vomiting, are more prevalent in females. These findings should be taken into account when using HSA in a clinical setting.

Severe donor reaction as a hazard of replacement blood donation

Blood donation is generally considered to be a safe procedure, but occasionally adverse reactions of varying severity may occur predonation, donation, or postdonation phases. Various studies have reported the incidence of adverse donor reaction as 0.6%-5.6%. Donor reactions are classified into mild, moderate, and severe types or immediate and delayed. Although delayed reactions account for <2% of total adverse donor reactions, 27.6% are severe with or without injury. Herein, we report a case of potentially preventable delayed Grade 2 vasovagal reaction in a 56-year-old replacement blood donor.

A new risk predictive scoring system of vasovagal reactions in patients with preoperative autologous blood donation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vasovagal response (VVR) is the most common adverse reaction during blood donation and it is the main element for the safety of the patients with preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD). Accurate identification high-risk group is of great significance for PABD. Our study aimed to establish a scoring system based on the nomogram to screen the high-risk population and provide evidence for preventing the occurrence of VVRs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A number of 4829 patients underwent PABD between July 2017 and June 2020 in the first medical center of Chinese PLA Hospital were recruited, 3387 of whom were included in the training group (70 %; 108 VVRs patients vs 3279 Non-VVRs patients), 1442 were included in the validation group (30 %; 46 VVRs patients vs 1396 Non-VVRs patients). The data were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram of the scoring system was created by using the RMS tool in R software.

RESULTS

Seven variables including BMI, hematocrit, pre-phlebotomy heart rate and systolic blood pressure, history of blood donation, age group and primary disease were selected to build the nomogram, which was shown as prediction model. And the score was 0-1 for BMI, 0-2 for hematocrit, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and no blood donation history, 0-10 for age, 0-3 for primary disease. When the total cutoff score was 11, the predictive system for identifying VVRs displayed higher diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of the training group were 0.942, 82.41 % and 97.17 %, respectively, whereas those of the validation group were 0.836, 78.26 % and 78.15 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

A risk predictive scoring system was successfully developed to identify high-risk VVRs group form PABD patients that performed well.

Novel risk patterns of vasovagal reactions in NZ blood donations complicated by COVID-19 restrictions

Introduction

Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) are common but complex donor adverse reactions (DAEs) in blood donations. VVRs have been extensively studied with a multitude of risk factors identified including young age, female gender and first-time donor status. How they may interplay remains obscure.

Methods

A total of 1,984,116 blood donations and 27,952 immediate VVRs (iVVRs) and 1,365 delayed VVRs (dVVRs) reported between 2011 and 2021 in NZ were used in multivariate logistic regression analyses each concerning donations with iVVRs as cases and those free of DAEs as controls. For each analysis stepwise selection was used to identify the best model and risk factors carrying significant main effects and/or interactions. Identified interactions informed further in-depth regression analyses to dissect iVVR risk patterns.

Results

Over 95% of VVRs were iVVRs that had lower female preponderance and deferrals than dVVRs. iVVRs had a school seasonal pattern in whole blood donations driven by first-time donors from schools/colleges, and interactions between gender and age group differentiating the first-time from repeat donations. Subsequent regression analyses identified the known and novel risk factors of year and mobile collection sites and their interactions. iVVR rates were roundly elevated in 2020 and 2021 probably because of COVID-19 restrictions like facemask wearing. Exclusion of the 2020 and 2021 data removed the interactions with year, but confirmed interactions of gender with mobile collection sites (p = 6.2e-07) in first-time donations only and with age group in repeat donations only (p < 2.2e-16), together indicating young female donors at the highest risk of iVVRs. Our results also revealed that donation policy changes contributed to the year effects; donors had a lower iVVR risk at mobile sites than well-medicalized donation centers probably because of under-reporting.

Conclusion

Modeling statistical interactions is valuable in identifying odds and revealing novel iVVR risk patterns and insights into blood donations.

Genetic variants associated with syncope implicate neural and autonomic processes

AIMS

Syncope is a common and clinically challenging condition. In this study, the genetics of syncope were investigated to seek knowledge about its pathophysiology and prognostic implications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This genome-wide association meta-analysis included 56 071 syncope cases and 890 790 controls from deCODE genetics (Iceland), UK Biobank (United Kingdom), and Copenhagen Hospital Biobank Cardiovascular Study/Danish Blood Donor Study (Denmark), with a follow-up assessment of variants in 22 412 cases and 286 003 controls from Intermountain (Utah, USA) and FinnGen (Finland). The study yielded 18 independent syncope variants, 17 of which were novel. One of the variants, p.Ser140Thr in PTPRN2, affected syncope only when maternally inherited. Another variant associated with a vasovagal reaction during blood donation and five others with heart rate and/or blood pressure regulation, with variable directions of effects. None of the 18 associations could be attributed to cardiovascular or other disorders. Annotation with regard to regulatory elements indicated that the syncope variants were preferentially located in neural-specific regulatory regions. Mendelian randomization analysis supported a causal effect of coronary artery disease on syncope. A polygenic score (PGS) for syncope captured genetic correlation with cardiovascular disorders, diabetes, depression, and shortened lifespan. However, a score based solely on the 18 syncope variants performed similarly to the PGS in detecting syncope risk but did not associate with other disorders.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that syncope has a distinct genetic architecture that implicates neural regulatory processes and a complex relationship with heart rate and blood pressure regulation. A shared genetic background with poor cardiovascular health was observed, supporting the importance of a thorough assessment of individuals presenting with syncope.

Machine learning-based prediction of fainting during blood donations using donor properties and weather data as features

Background and objectives

Fainting is a well-known side effect of blood donation. Such adverse experiences can diminish the return rate for further blood donations. Identifying factors associated with fainting could help prevent adverse incidents during blood donation.

Materials and methods

Data of 85,040 blood donations from whole blood and apheresis donors within four consecutive years were included in this retrospective study. Seven different machine learning models (random forests, artificial neural networks, XGradient Boosting, AdaBoost, logistic regression, K nearest neighbors, and support vector machines) for predicting fainting during blood donation were established. The used features derived from the data obtained from the questionnaire every donor has to fill in before the donation and weather data of the day of the donation.

Results

One thousand seven hundred fifteen fainting reactions were observed in 228 846 blood donations from 88,003 donors over a study period of 48 months. Similar values for all machine learning algorithms investigated for NPV, PPV, AUC, and F1-score were obtained. In general, NPV was above 0.996, whereas PPV was below 0.03. AUC and F1-score were close to 0.9 for all models. Essential features predicting fainting during blood donation were systolic and diastolic blood pressure and ambient temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure.

Conclusion

Machine-learning algorithms can establish prediction models of fainting in blood donors. These new tools can reduce adverse reactions during blood donation and improve donor safety and minimize negative associations relating to blood donation.

Factors associated with first-time and repeat blood donation: Adverse reactions and effects on donor behavior

BACKGROUND

Blood centers have a dual mission to protect donors and patients; donor safety is paramount to maintaining an adequate blood supply. Elucidating donor factors associated with adverse reactions (AR) is critical to this mission.

STUDY DESIGN/METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of whole blood donors from 2003 to 2020 was conducted at a single blood center in northern California. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs for ARs were estimated via multivariable logistic regression on demographics, donation history, and physical examination data. Where appropriate, Wilcoxon-Rank Sum and chi-squared tests were used to determine significance.

RESULTS

First-time blood donors (FTD) exhibited a higher AR rate than repeat donors (4.4% vs. 1.9% p < .0001). When compared with FTDs without AR, FTDs with ARs (FT-AR) were less likely to return (30.0% vs. 47.3%, p < .0001), and, of those who returned, had a higher rate of reaction 20.2% versus 2.8% (p < .001). Factors found to be associated with FT-AR (younger age, increased heart rate, and higher diastolic blood pressure) still correlated positively with AR on return donation, but to a lower degree. FTD who potentially witnessed an AR had a lower return rate (44.6% vs. 47.3%, p = <.001) and donated fewer units (2.38 vs. 3.37, p < .001) when compared to FTD who did not witness an AR.

CONCLUSION

The AR on FTD increases the AR likelihood of return donation. Longitudinal analysis shows that a time-based deferral policy targeted at FT-AR young donors can reduce the number of ARs while not dramatically impacting the blood supply.

Vasovagal syncope after blood donation in active duty military personnel of the Spanish Army

BACKGROUND

All studies of vasovagal syncope (VVS) after blood donation have been performed with civilian donors. We hypothesized that military donors have a lower incidence of VVS and a particular set of predisposing factors.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective case-control study matching every case of VVS seen from 2011 to 2019 with two controls without VVS from the same blood drive. We used the odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), estimated by multivariate logistic regression, to identify independent predictors of VVS.

RESULTS

There were 105 episodes of VVS among 65.481 whole blood donations (0.15%). VVS was more frequent among donors from military academies than from other military units (0.37% vs. 0.10%, p < .001) and in collections conducted in mobile inside setups than in mobile buses (0.23% vs. 0.06%, p < .001). In the multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of VVS were the status of first-time donor (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.5-4.4; p < .001) and pre-donation systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 120 mm Hg (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3; p = .01). Donors with both risk factors had a 5.5-fold increased risk of VVS than donors without any risk factor. Age and female sex were not predictive of VVS.

DISCUSSION

Active duty military blood donors have a lower incidence of VVS than that reported in civilian donors. First-time donors and donors with SBP < 120 mm Hg should be temporarily deferred when immediate reincorporation to hazardous or strenuous duty tasks after donation is inescapable.

Evaluation of efficacy of Valsalva for attenuating needle puncture pain in first time nonremunerated voluntary plateletpheresis donors: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND:

Plateletpheresis is generally safe but may have adverse reactions. Adverse reactions can negatively influence donor recruitment and retention. Valsalva is a proven method of attenuating pain caused by venipuncture.

AIMS:

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the Valsalva maneuver on the attenuation of needle pain and donor anxiety.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN:

This prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted between November 2015 and April 2016 at the Department of Transfusion Medicine.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS:

One-hundred and sixty consecutive donors were grouped into control group (C) and Valsalva group (V) each of sample size 80. The Valsalva group performed a Valsalva maneuver and control did nothing before the venipuncture. Anxiety and pain were scored using a 10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). Severity was graded as VAS = 0 defines no pain and anxiety, VAS = 1–3 as mild pain and anxiety, VAS = 4–6 as moderate pain and anxiety, VAS = 7–9 as severe pain and anxiety, whereas VAS = 10 denotes extreme pain and anxiety.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 23 was used for analysis. Independent samples t-test/Mann–Whitney U-test was used to compare between treatment and control group, whereas the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the difference between pre- and postobservations.

RESULTS:

In the Valsalva group, post-Valsalva anxiety levels were significantly reduced to (1 [0–2]) from their pre-Valsalva values of (2 [0–3]); (P < 0.001). Pain was significantly lower (2[1-2]) in Valsalva group compared to control (4[2–5]); (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Valsalva reduced both severity of venipuncture pain and anxiety. Valsalva can be performed by donors as it is an easy, painless, and nonpharmacological method of pain and anxiety attenuation.

Vasovagal syncope related to pain procedures in a pain clinic at a tertiary Lebanese hospital between 2016 and 2019

Objectives

Our study focuses on evaluating the factors associated with vasovagal syncope (VVS) when having a pain procedure at the pain clinic as well as showing variation in vital signs associated with fainting across different periods of the procedure (before, during and after).A retrospective case control study was conducted in a university hospital in Lebanon (CHU-NDS) on adult Lebanese patients with data taken from the archives covering a 4 year period (2016–2019).

Results

The multivariable analysis showed that a higher systolic blood pressure per-procedure was significantly associated with lower odds of having vasovagal syncope. An adequate dose of a vasopressor like ephedrine can be used to prevent a vasovagal event from happening. In our study the blood pressure component was more significant than the heart rate component which stayed in the normal range limit in the three different periods of procedure. Cases having a pain procedure for the first time represent 59.6% of the occurrence of VVS. Vasovagal syncope is a complication that can be prevented in high risk patients. Our study suggests taking preventive measures for VVS for patients with first time infiltration status especially if appearing in an anxious state.

Prospective analysis of syncope/pre-syncope in a tertiary paediatric orthopaedic fracture outpatient clinic

BACKGROUND

The incidence of vasovagal syncope (VVS) precipitated by medical procedures such as blood donation is quoted as between 0.13% and 4.17%. Vasovagal events have been observed to occur following cast removal at our paediatric orthopaedic clinic; however, there is no available information in the existing literature regarding incidence or risk factors. This study aims to identify the incidence and demographic traits of patients experiencing syncopal events following cast removal.

METHODS

Over a 12-month period, paediatric patients experiencing a syncopal or pre-syncopal event during an outpatient appointment for cast removal were prospectively enrolled into the study. Basic demographic data were recorded, as well as injury and procedure details and a description of the event. Statistical analysis as well as calculation of incidence of vasovagal events were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 6078 patients presented for cast removal in the 12-month period. Twenty syncopal or pre-syncopal events were recorded. Incidence was calculated as 0.32%. Mean patient age was 10.8 years. Male : female ratio was 2.3:1. Mean body mass index (BMI) was 20.08, with a trend for higher prevalence of males under the 50th BMI percentile-for-age. The mean time post-injury was 31.4 days. Ninety-five percent of patients were being treated for an upper limb injury and 30% had injuries that had been treated surgically. There were no associated secondary complications or injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidence of VVS following cast removal is comparable to the values quoted in literature for other medical procedures. Demographic data of our cohort suggested that those who experienced VVS were predominantly young males of lower-than-average BMI.

Blood collection failures from a blood establishment perspective

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to show experience of the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine in monitoring and analysing collection failures caused by the venepuncture technique or occurred as a result of adverse reactions and complications experienced by donors during donation.

BACKGROUND

Collection failures represent one of the leading nonconformities in blood establishments. Apart from being a negative motivating factor for blood donors, they also affect the blood components supply and have a negative financial impact.

METHODS

Nonconformity records referring to collection failures were analysed retrospectively over a 6-year period (2013-2018) with regard to their frequency, causes, donor characteristics (age, gender, number of donations), place of occurrence (blood establishment, mobile sessions) and trends during the analysed period.

RESULTS

A total of 5166 collection failures out of 618 251 donations (0.84%) were recorded during the analysed period. The leading cause was haematoma at puncture site (1676, i.e., 32.4%). Collection failures which are primarily attributed to the venepuncture technique or vein selection accounted for 91% of all cases, whereas collection failures which occurred as a result of discontinued punctures due to adverse reactions in donors accounted for 9% of all cases. A much higher frequency of all collection failure types was recorded in female donors, whereas younger donors experienced adverse reactions more frequently (median age of 24).

CONCLUSION

The analysis and monitoring frequency of collection failures play an important role in planning of staff training activities, work organisation and timely implementation of corrective actions.

Syncopal-type reactions tend to be delayed and result in falls among elderly blood donors

BACKGROUND

Delayed syncopal-type complications are infrequent among blood donors, but sometimes have critical consequences, such as severe injury. We retrospectively investigated the characteristics of donors with delayed syncopal-type complications or falls.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We defined a delayed reaction (DR) as syncopal-type complications occurring >20 min after needle removal. Subjects were stratified by sex, age, estimated blood volume (EBV), body mass index (BMI) and frequency of donation. Multiple logistic regression analysis and propensity score weighted M estimation were performed to evaluate the covariate-adjusted risk of syncopal DRs among donors giving 400 ml of whole blood (WB). The DR rate was calculated as the number of DRs divided by the number of all syncopal-type reactions after needle removal. The risk of falls was assessed similarly. Donors who discontinued before completing phlebotomy (donation of 400 ml) were excluded.

RESULTS

Among 3818 syncopal-type reactions after needle removal, there were 359 DRs and 93 falls. Elderly donors and female donors with syncopal-type reactions had a significantly higher risk of DRs (P for trend < 0·001). Elderly donors with syncopal-type reactions also had a higher risk of falls (P for trend < 0·001). Among all donors with syncopal-type reactions, the risk of DRs or falls was not correlated with EBV, BMI or donation frequency.

CONCLUSION

In female donors and elderly donors (donating 400 ml of WB), syncopal-type reactions tended to be delayed. Elderly donors with syncopal-type reactions had a significantly higher risk of falls.

Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations

The process for blood donation is considered safe, but some adverse events have been reported. Risk factors for adverse events were assessed in this study.A retrospective case-control study was conducted to investigate the risk factors for adverse events after blood donation between 2010 and 2013. Variables such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), donation status, donation volume, donation site, pre-donation systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pre-donation diastolic blood pressure were compared between donors with and without adverse events. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the joint effects of age, gender, and donation status on adverse events.The incidence of adverse events among adult blood donations was 1287/1,253,678 (0.1%). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, blood donors aged <35 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.99, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.57-3.48), of female gender (OR, 3.30, 95% CI, 2.62-4.15), and with first-time donor status (OR, 6.40, 95% CI, 5.17-7.93), donation of 500 mL (OR, 2.22, 95% CI, 1.83-2.69), predonation SBP <124 mm Hg (OR, 1.25, 95% CI,1.05-1.48) and BMI <24 kg/m (OR, 1.67, 95% CI, 1.42-1.96) were associated with increased likelihood of adverse event. Further analysis with joint effects method revealed that first-time female donors aged <35 years are associated with the highest odds of adverse events when compared with repeat male donors aged ≧35 years (OR, 100.57, 95% CI, 48.45-208.75).The findings of our study should prove useful in identifying donors at risk and planning appropriate strategies for the prevention of adverse effects.

Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood

Background

Research on the recruitment and retention of blood donors has typically drawn on a homogeneous set of descriptive theories, viewing the decision to become and remain a donor as the outcome of affectively cold, planned, and rational decision-making by the individual. While this approach provides insight into how our donors think about blood donation, it is limited and has not translated into a suite of effective interventions. In this review, we set out to explore how a broader consideration of the influences on donor decision-making, in terms of affect, memory, and the context in which donation takes place, may yield benefit in the way we approach donor recruitment and retention.

Summary

Drawing on emerging research, we argue for the importance of considering the implications of both the positive and the negative emotions that donors experience and we argue for the importance of directly targeting affect in interventions to recruit nondonors. Next, we focus on the reconstructed nature of memory and the factors that influence what we remember about an event. We discuss how these processes may impact the retention of donors and the potential to intervene to enhance donors' recollections of their experiences. Finally, we discuss how our focus on the individual has led us to neglect the influence of the context in which donation takes place on donor behavior. We argue that the amassing of comprehensive large data sets detailing both the characteristics of the individuals and the context of their giving will ultimately allow for the more effective deployment of resources to improve recruitment and retention.

Key Messages

In suggesting these directions for future research, our want is to move beyond the ways in which we have traditionally described blood donation behavior with the aim of improving our theorizing about donors while improving the translational value of our research.

Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012-2016: Results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics

Objective:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can cause seizures in healthy individuals and patients. However, the rate at which this occurs is unknown. We estimated the risk of seizure and other adverse events with TMS.

Methods:

We surveyed laboratories and clinics about seizures and other events observed between 2012 and 2016 (inclusive). Respondents (N = 174) reported an estimated 318,560 TMS sessions.

Results:

Twenty-four seizures were reported (.08/1000 sessions). TMS delivered within published guidelines to subjects without recognized risk factors caused 4 seizures (<.02/1000 sessions). High-frequency (>1 Hz) rTMS delivered within published guidelines to individuals without known risk factors was no more likely to cause seizures than low-frequency and single/paired-pulse TMS. Subject risk factors (e.g., brain lesions and epilepsy) increased seizure risk substantially. Seizures appeared more common when safety guidelines were exceeded. Seizures were most likely to occur within the first few exposures to TMS.

Conclusions:

TMS delivered within published guidelines to individuals without risk factors appears to cause fewer than 1 seizure per 60,000 sessions. The assumption that repetitive TMS is riskier than single and paired pulses under these conditions should be reevaluated.

Significance:

This information should help laboratories, clinics, and regulatory authorities form updated safety policies for TMS.

International haemovigilance: what have we learned and what do we need to do next?

The International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) defines haemovigilance as 'a set of surveillance procedures covering the whole transfusion chain (from the collection of blood and its components to the follow-up of recipients), intended to collect and assess information on unexpected or undesirable effects resulting from the therapeutic use of labile blood products, and to prevent their occurrence or recurrence'. IHN, the International Society of Blood Transfusion and World Health Organization work together to support both developing and established haemovigilance systems. Haemovigilance systems provide valuable data on a range of adverse events related to blood donation and clinical transfusion, from donor syncopal events to transfusion-transmitted infections, immunological complications and the impact of human errors. Harmonised definitions for most adverse reactions have been developed and validated internationally. Definitions of pulmonary complications are again under review. Haemovigilance data have resulted in changes in policy, products and practice, and can complement and inform clinical audit and research, leading to improved blood donor safety, optimised product use and better clinical outcomes after transfusion. However, more work is needed. Not all countries have haemovigilance systems in place. More robust data and careful analysis are required to improve the understanding of the causes, occurrence and clinical outcomes of these events. Wider dissemination of results will facilitate health policy development internationally, and implementation of haemovigilance recommendations will support further important progress in blood safety.

Adverse reactions to whole blood donation, basic human needs and nursing diagnoses: a reflection

ABSTRACT A theoretical-Reflective study with the objective to reflect on human needs regarding the imbalance of whole blood donors considering adverse reactions to the donation, and the existing nursing diagnoses that best meet the imbalance needs. The following needs were pointed out according to the signs and symptoms of adverse reactions and based on the Theory of Basic Human Needs: skin and tissue integrity, emotional security, pain perception, body mechanics, oxygenation, physical integrity, physical comfort, elimination, neurological, electrolytic and vascular regulation. By observing NANDA International’s Definitions and Classifications, adaptations to the existing nursing diagnoses and suggestions for new headings have been proposed. We conclude that some of the needs are interrelated, such as vascular regulation, oxygenation and physical integrity. Thus, more contextualized nursing diagnoses related to the needs of whole blood donors are needed, given the specific nature of the situation generating imbalances such as: ineffective systemic vascular regulation characterized by self-reported dizziness, cutaneous pallor and arterial hypotension related to vasovagal reaction.

Drinking Water to Prevent Postvaccination Presyncope in Adolescents: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postvaccination syncope can cause injury. Drinking water prephlebotomy increases peripheral vascular tone, decreasing risk of blood-donation presyncope and syncope. This study evaluated whether drinking water prevaccination reduces postvaccination presyncope, a potential syncope precursor.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial of subjects aged 11 to 21 years receiving ≥1 intramuscular vaccine in primary care clinics. Intervention subjects were encouraged to drink 500 mL of water, with vaccination recommended 10 to 60 minutes later. Control subjects received usual care. Presyncope symptoms were assessed with a 12-item survey during the 20-minutes postvaccination. Symptoms were classified with a primary cutoff sensitive for presyncope, and a secondary, more restrictive cutoff requiring greater symptoms. Results were adjusted for clustering by recruitment center.

RESULTS

There were 906 subjects randomly assigned to the control group and 901 subjects randomly assigned to the intervention group. None had syncope. Presyncope occurred in 36.2% of subjects by using the primary definition, and in 8.0% of subjects by using the restrictive definition. There were no significant differences in presyncope by intervention group for the primary (1-sided test, P = .24) or restrictive outcome (1-sided test, P = .17). Among intervention subjects vaccinated within 10 to 60 minutes after drinking all 500 mL of water (n = 519), no reduction in presyncope was observed for the primary or restrictive outcome (1-sided tests, P = .13, P = .17). In multivariable regression analysis, presyncope was associated with younger age, history of passing out or nearly passing out after a shot or blood draw, prevaccination anxiety, receiving >1 injected vaccine, and greater postvaccination pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Drinking water before vaccination did not prevent postvaccination presyncope. Predictors of postvaccination presyncope suggest opportunities for presyncope and syncope prevention interventions.

Impact of Elevated Hemoglobin and Serum Protein on Vasovagal Reaction from Blood Donation

We conducted a cross-sectional study to elucidate factors contributing to vasovagal reaction (VVR), the most frequent side effect following whole blood and apheresis donations. Complications recorded at the collection sites after voluntary donations by the Japanese Red Cross Tokyo Blood Center (JRC), in the 2006 and 2007 fiscal years, were analyzed by both univariate analysis and the multivariate conditional logistic regression model. Of 1,119,716 blood donations over the full two years, complications were recorded for 13,320 donations (1.18%), among which 67% were VVR. There were 4,303 VVR cases which had sufficient information and could be used for this study. For each VVR case, two sex- and age-matched controls (n = 8,606) were randomly selected from the donors without complications. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), predonation blood pressure, pulse and blood test results, including total protein, albumin, and hemoglobin, were compared between the VVR group and the control group. In univariate analysis, the VVR group was significantly younger, with a lower BMI, higher blood pressure and higher blood protein and hemoglobin levels than the control group (p<0.001). Furthermore, blood protein and hemoglobin levels showed dose-dependent relationships with VVR incidences by the Cochran-Armitage trend test (p<0.01). For both sexes, after adjusting for confounders with the multivariate conditional logistic regression model, the higher than median groups for total protein (male: OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.76,-2.21; female: OR 2.29; 95%CI 2.05–2.56), albumin (male: 1.75; 1.55–1.96; female: 1.76; 1.57–1.97) and hemoglobin (male: 1.98; 1.76–2.22; female: 1.62; 1.45–1.81) had statistically significant higher risk of VVR compared to the lower than median groups. These elevated serum protein and hemoglobin levels might offer new indicators to help understand VVR occurrence.

Development of standard definitions for surveillance of complications related to blood donation

Standard definitions of donor reactions allow each blood establishment to monitor donor adverse events and compare with other organizations to develop best practices. The ISBT Haemovigilance Working Party leads a multi-organizational effort to update the 2008 ISBT standard for surveillance of complications related to blood donation. Revised definitions have been developed and endorsed by the ISBT, AABB, International Haemovigilance Network (IHN) and other international organizations.

2015 proceedings of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's State of the Science in Transfusion Medicine symposium

On March 25 and 26, 2015, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute sponsored a meeting on the State of the Science in Transfusion Medicine on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) campus in Bethesda, Maryland, which was attended by a diverse group of 330 registrants. The meeting's goal was to identify important research questions that could be answered in the next 5 to 10 years and which would have the potential to transform the clinical practice of transfusion medicine. These questions could be addressed by basic, translational, and/or clinical research studies and were focused on four areas: the three "classical" transfusion products (i.e., red blood cells, platelets, and plasma) and blood donor issues. Before the meeting, four working groups, one for each area, prepared five major questions for discussion along with a list of five to 10 additional questions for consideration. At the meeting itself, all of these questions, and others, were discussed in keynote lectures, small-group breakout sessions, and large-group sessions with open discourse involving all meeting attendees. In addition to the final lists of questions, provided herein, the meeting attendees identified multiple overarching, cross-cutting themes that addressed issues common to all four areas; the latter are also provided. It is anticipated that addressing these scientific priorities, with careful attention to the overarching themes, will inform funding priorities developed by the NIH and provide a solid research platform for transforming the future practice of transfusion medicine.

Donor Hemovigilance with Blood Donation

BACKGROUND

Reports on unexpected events (UEs) during blood donation (BD) inadequately consider the role of technical UEs.

METHODS

Defined local and systemic UEs were graded by severity; technical UEs were not graded. On January 1, 2008, E.B.P.S.-Logistics (EBPS) installed the UE module for plasma management software (PMS). Donor room physicians entered UEs daily into PMS. Medical directors reviewed entries quarterly. EBPS compiled data on donors, donations, and UEs from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2011.

RESULTS

6,605 UEs were observed during 166,650 BDs from 57,622 donors for a corrected incidence of 4.30% (0.66% local, 1.59% systemic, 2.04% technical UEs). 2.96% of BDs were accompanied by one UE and 0.45% by >1 UE (2-4). 6.3% of donors donating blood for their first time, 3.5% of those giving blood for their second time, and 1.9% of donors giving their third or more BD experienced UEs. Most common UEs were: discontinued collections due to venous access problems, repeated venipuncture, and small hematomas. Severe circulatory UEs occurred at a rate of 16 per 100,000 BDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical UEs were common during BD. UEs accompanied first and second donations significantly more often than subsequent donations.

Donor vigilance data of a blood transfusion service: A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Donor vigilance is an important part of the quality management system of blood transfusion services. The evaluation of donor side effects helps to improve the donation process and donor compliance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate donor vigilance data in whole blood and plasmapheresis donors of a blood donor service.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Donors fulfilling current national and European eligibility criteria underwent whole blood and plasmapheresis donation (PCS and MCS+ (Haemonetics, Braintree, USA), A 200 (Fenwal, Round Lake, USA). Whole blood was collected at fixed and mobile sites while plasmaphereses were performed at 8 plasma centers. From 2011 to 2013 donor information was provided for gender, age, body weight, height, first and repeat donation. Donors were monitored for venipuncture and circulatory associated side effects.

RESULTS

The total incidences of adverse events were 5004 (0.56%) in repeat donors and 2111 (2.78%) in first time donors for whole blood donation and 3323 (1.01%) and 514 (7.96%) for plasmaphereses, respectively. Circulatory associated events were 2679 (0.30%) for whole blood donation and 1624 (0.49%) for plasmaphereses.

CONCLUSION

Our donor vigilance data of a blood transfusion service show that whole blood and plasmapheresis are safe with low incidences of adverse events. Repeat donation and age are predictors for low rates of adverse events. On the other hand, first time donation and female gender were associated with higher incidences of adverse events.

Management of young blood donors

The emphasis on high-school blood drives and acceptance of 16-year-old blood donors led to more research on physiologic and psychological ways to decrease vasovagal reaction rates in young blood donors and to increase donor retention. Research on how to accomplish this has been advantageous for the blood collection industry and blood donors. This review discussed the current situation and what can be done psychologically, physiologically, and via process improvements to decrease vasovagal reaction rates and increase donor retention. The donation process can be significantly improved. Future interventions may include more dietary salt, a shorter muscle tension program to make it more feasible, recommendations for post-donation muscle tension / squatting / laying down for lightheadedness, more donor education by the staff at the collection site, more staff attention to donors with fear or higher risk for a vasovagal reaction (e.g. estimated blood volume near 3.5 l, first-time donor), and a more focused donation process to ensure a pleasant and safer procedure.

Donor Hemovigilance during Preparatory Plasmapheresis

BACKGROUND

Reports on unexpected donor events (UEs) during preparatory plasmapheresis (PPP) are scarce, and rarely consider technical UEs.

METHODS

Defined local and systemic UEs were graded by severity; technical UEs were not graded. On January 1, 2008, E.B.P.S.-Logistics (EBPS) installed the UE module for plasma management software (PMS). Donor room physicians entered UEs daily into the PMS. Medical directors reviewed entries quarterly. EBPS compiled data on donors, donations and UEs from January 1, 2008 to June 30, 2011.

RESULTS

66,822 UEs were observed during 1,107,846 PPPs for a corrected incidence of 6.55% (1.4% local, 0.55% systemic, 4.6% technical UEs). 3.36% of PPPs were accompanied by 1 UE and 1.18% by >1 UE (2-5). 13.7% of donors undergoing PPP for the first time, 9.7% of those having a second PPP and 4.0% of those having a third or more PPPs were associated with UEs. Most common UEs were repeated venipuncture, and broken-off collection due to venous access problems and small hematomas. Severe systemic UEs occurred at a rate of 36 per 100,000 PPPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical UEs were common with PPP. UEs accompanied first and second donations significantly more frequently than for subsequent donations.

Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return

BACKGROUND

First-time donation is among recognised risk factors for vasovagal reactions to blood donation and reactions are known to reduce donor return. We assessed associations between potential risk factors and vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in first-time whole blood donation in comparison to repeat donation and analysed the impact of complications on donor return.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a cohort study on whole blood donations in The Netherlands from 1/1/2010 to 31/12/2010 using data extracted from the blood service information system. Donation data up to 31/12/2011 were used to ascertain donor return.

RESULTS

In 2010 28,786 donors made first whole blood donations and there were 522,958 repeat donations. Vasovagal reactions occurred in 3.9% of first donations by males and 3.5% of first donations by females compared to in 0.2% and 0.6%, respectively, of repeat donations. Associations of vasovagal reactions with other factors including age, body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in first-time and repeat donors. Needle-related complications occurred in 0.2% of male and 0.5% of female first-time donations and in 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively, of repeat donations. Among first-time donors, the return rate within 1 year was 82% following an uncomplicated first donation, but 55% and 61% following vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications, respectively; the corresponding percentages among repeat donors were 86%, 58% and 82%.

DISCUSSION

Among first-time donors, females suffered less than males from vasovagal reactions. Other risk factors had similar associations among first-time and repeat donors. Vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in both first-time and repeat donors are followed by reduced donor return.