Improving results in solitary pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage, thymoglobin induction, and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression

Epidemiology and Risk Factors for Invasive Fungal Infections in Pancreas Transplant in the Absence of Postoperative Antifungal Prophylaxis

Background

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) remain a rare yet dreaded complication following pancreas transplantation. Current guidelines recommend antifungal prophylaxis in patients with 1 or more risk factors. At our center, single-dose antifungal prophylaxis is administered in the operating room but none subsequently, regardless of risk factors. Here we evaluate the 1-year incidence, outcome, and risk factors associated with IFI following pancreas transplantation.

Methods

A retrospective, single-center cohort study was conducted in patients who underwent pancreas transplantation between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2019. Records were manually reviewed, and cases were adjudicated using consensus definitions. The 1-year cumulative incidence, mortality, and risk factors were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and differences between populations were assessed with Fisher test and Mann-Whitney U test.

Results

Three hundred sixty-nine recipients were included. Twelve IFIs were identified: candidiasis (8), aspergillosis (2), histoplasmosis (1), and cryptococcosis (1). Intra-abdominal infections were the most common presentation (5), followed by bloodstream infections (3), disseminated disease (2), pulmonary disease (1), and invasive fungal sinusitis (1). Median time to IFI was 64 days (interquartile range, 30-234 days). One-year cumulative incidence was 3.25% (95% confidence interval, 1.86%-5.65%). There were no significant differences between patients with or without IFI regarding type of transplant (P = .17), posttransplant dialysis (P = .3), rejection (P = .5), cytomegalovirus serostatus (P = .45), or reoperation (P = .19). For patients with IFI, the 1-year graft and patient survival rates were 58% versus 95% (P < .0001) and 75% versus 98.6% (P < .001), respectively.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the use of a single-dose antifungal prophylaxis administered in the operating room but none subsequently does not result in an increased incidence of IFI following pancreas transplantation.

Early technical pancreas failure in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Recipients does not impact renal allograft outcomes

Early pancreas loss in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants has been associated with longer perioperative recovery and reduced kidney allograft function. We assessed the impact of early pancreas allograft failure on transplant outcomes in a contemporary cohort of SPK patients (n = 218). Early pancreas allograft loss occurred in 12.8% (n = 28) of recipients. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common (21.4% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.03) in the early pancreas loss group, but there were no differences in hospital length of stay (median 6.5 vs. 7.0, p = 0.22), surgical wound complications (p = 0.12), or rejection episodes occurring in the first year (p = 0.87). Despite differences in DGF, both groups had excellent renal function at 1 year post-transplant (eGFR 64.1 ± 20.8 vs. 65.8 ± 22.9, p = 0.75). There were no differences in patient (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.18-1.87, p = 0.26) or kidney allograft survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.23-3.06, p = 0.77). One- and 2-year protocol kidney biopsies were comparable between the groups and showed minimal chronic changes; the early pancreas loss group showed more cv changes at 2 years (p = 0.04). Current data demonstrate good outcomes and excellent kidney allograft function following early pancreas loss.

Immunosuppression for pancreas transplantation with an emphasis on antibody induction strategies: review and perspective

A review of recent literature was performed to identify trends and evaluate outcomes with respect to immunosuppression in pancreas transplantation (PTX). In the past decade, the majority of PTXs were performed with depleting antibody induction, particularly in the setting of either calcineurin inhibitor minimization, corticosteroid withdrawal or both. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of predominantly tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolatemofetil, TAC/mycophenolic acid or TAC/sirolimus with or without corticosteroids. Depending on PTX category, donor and recipient risk factors, case mix and immunosuppressive regimen, the 1-year incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 5-20%. Current 1-year rates of immunological pancreas graft loss range between 1.8 and 6%. Depleting antibody induction and either TAC/mycophenolatemofetil or TAC/sirolimus maintenance therapy with early steroid withdrawal have become the mainstay of immunosuppression in PTX. However, the development of non-nephrotoxic, nondiabetogenic, and nongastrointestinal toxic regimens is highly desirable to improve quality of life in all solid organ transplant recipients.

Vascular catastrophes following pancreas transplantation: an evolution in strategy at a single center

INTRODUCTION

Complications of pancreas transplantation involving the arterial anastomosis are potentially life threatening. In this report, we review our experience with such vascular catastrophes.

METHODS

Pancreas transplants performed between January 2003 and December 2009 were reviewed. All cases of pseudoaneurysm (PA) or arterioenteric fistula (AEF) were included.

RESULTS

Of 346 pancreas transplants, 10 vascular catastrophes in nine recipients were identified. There were five PAs, one involving the pancreas allograft, one involving the donor iliac artery Y-graft stump following allograft pancreatectomy, two involving the kidney allograft, and one involving the bifurcation of the Y-graft. The latter was treated with coil embolization, but subsequently developed into an AEF. There were five AEFs including the recipient mentioned above. Four had a failed allograft and three had discontinued immunosuppression. The final case had a clamp injury to the proximal common iliac artery that fistulized to the donor duodenum. The management, course and outcome of all nine recipients are described in detail.

CONCLUSION

Vascular catastrophes such as PA and AEF are potentially life-threatening complications of pancreas transplantation. Immediate treatment at the time of bleeding is essential and covered stenting of the involved artery may provide immediate vascular control in these situations.

Improvement in Short-Term Pancreas Transplant Outcome by Targeted Antimicrobial Therapy and Refined Donor Selection

Graft thrombosis and infectious complications are the main early causes of pancreatic allograft loss in recipients of whole vascularized pancreas transplants, resulting in loss rates up to 10 per cent in the first post transplant week. In this study we sought to determine if initiation of a standardized selection criteria and posttransplant chemoprophylaxis regimen could reduce the rate of early allograft loss; we compared the rate of early allograft loss after introduction of these changes. Of the 61 diabetic recipients who underwent these protocols, 50.8 per cent were female. Average age was 42.9 ± 7.4 years of age, average length of stay was 12.7 ± 8.7 days, with all transplants performed heterotopic to the right lower quadrant with venous drainage to the proximal external or common iliac vein. Organ donors were 21.4 ± 4.8 years of age, body mass index was 23.9 ± 2.8 kg/m2, with a length of stay of 3.7 ± 1.6 days. One-week pancreatic allograft survival for the protocolized versus nonprotocolized patients was 100 per cent versus 96.7 per cent, 1 month was 98.4 per cent versus 93.4 per cent, and 1 year was 96.7 per cent versus 88.5 per cent, respectively. In the protocolized group there were two graft losses due to infectious complications and none due to thrombosis. Before initiation of the protocols patient survival at 1 year was 91.8 per cent and after was 100 per cent. Pancreas transplantation is arguably the most technically demanding organ transplant from a complication and loss standpoint. However, highly successful outcomes can be obtained with standardized protocols beginning pretransplant to reduce the incidence of posttransplant complications.

A mathematical model for shortening waiting time in pancreas-kidney transplantation

AIM: To simulate a hypothetical increase of 50% in the number of pancreas-kidney (PK) transplantations using less-than-ideal donors by a mathematical model.

METHODS: We projected the size of the waiting list by taking into account the incidence of new patients per year, the number of PK transplantations carried out in the year and the number of patients who died on the waiting list or were removed from the list for other reasons. These variables were treated using a model developed elsewhere.

RESULTS: We found that the waiting list demand will meet the number of PK transplantation by the year 2022.

CONCLUSION: In future years, it is perfectly possible to minimize the waiting list time for pancreas transplantation through expansion of the donor pool using less-than-ideal donors.

Early reexploration for suspected thrombosis after pancreas transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft thrombosis is the most common cause of early graft loss after pancreas transplantation. Early reexploration may permit salvage or timely removal of the thrombosed graft.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 345 pancreas transplants performed at a single center between January 2003 and December 2009. Early reexploration was defined as within 1 week of pancreas transplantation.

RESULTS

Of the 345 transplants, there were 35 early reexplorations. The graft was compromised in 20 cases (57%): 10 venous thromboses, 3 arterial thromboses, 2 combined arterial and venous thrombosis, 2 thromboses secondary to allograft pancreatitis, and 3 cases of positional ischemia without thrombosis. Of these allografts, three reperfused once repositioned and six were successfully thrombectomized for a graft salvage rate of 45%. One of the thrombectomized grafts remained perfused but never functioned and was removed at retransplantation. The 10 remaining compromised grafts that were deemed unsalvageable and required allograft pancreatectomy. Nine of these recipients were retransplanted (eight within 2 weeks) and one was not a retransplantation candidate.

CONCLUSIONS

Reexploration for suspected graft thrombosis after pancreas transplantation resulted in a negative laparotomy rate of 43%, but permitted graft salvage in 45% of compromised grafts.

Evolution of β-Cell Replacement Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus: Pancreas Transplantation

Diabetes mellitus remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, approximately 23.6 million people in the United States are affected. Of these individuals, 5-10% have been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes mellitus (TIDM), an autoimmune disease. Although it often appears in childhood, T1DM may manifest at any age. The effects of T1DM can be devastating, as the disease often leads to significant secondary complications, morbidity, and decreased quality of life. Since the late 1960s, surgical treatment for diabetes mellitus has continued to evolve and has become a viable alternative to chronic insulin administration. In this review, the historical evolution, current status, graft efficacy, benefits, and complications of pancreas transplantation are explored.

Immediate retransplantation for pancreas allograft thrombosis

Early pancreas allograft failure most commonly results from thrombosis and requires immediate allograft pancreatectomy. Optimal timing for retransplantation remains undefined. Immediate retransplantation facilitates reuse of the same anatomic site before extensive adhesions have formed. Some studies suggest that early retransplantation is associated with a higher incidence of graft loss. This study is a retrospective review of immediate pancreas retransplants performed at a single center. All cases of pancreas allograft loss within 2 weeks were examined. Of 228 pancreas transplants, 12 grafts were lost within 2 weeks of surgery. Eleven of these underwent allograft pancreatectomy for thrombosis. One suffered anoxic brain injury and was not a retransplantation candidate, one was retransplanted at 3.5 months and nine patients underwent retransplantation 1-16 days following the original transplant. Of the nine early retransplants, one pancreas was lost to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, one recipient died with function at 2.9 years and the other grafts continue to function at 76-1137 days (mean 572 days). One-year graft survival for early retransplantation was 89% compared to 91% for all pancreas transplants at our center. Immediate retransplantation following pancreatic graft thrombosis restores durable allograft function with outcomes comparable to first-time pancreas transplantation.

Minimization protocols in pancreas transplantation

Diagnosis of immunologic injury (acute and chronic) is much more difficult in pancreas transplants when compared with transplants of other organs. Currently, the immunosuppressive regimen for induction involves calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), antimetabolites and corticosteroids (Cs). This strong and nonspecific regimen does not take into consideration pancreas specificities (i.e. the need to avoid diabetogenic compounds). For obvious reasons, CNI might be calling for review, if permanently indicated in recipients of solitary pancreas with mild renal dysfunction. CNI as well as corticosteroids may induce hyperglycemia and contribute to differential diagnosis of a rejection process. However, in spite of the benefits accruing from withdrawal of above immunosuppressive agents, minimization or avoidance of these drugs could be dangerous and may end up with graft loss (i.e. antibody-mediated process). Long-term results of pancreas transplantation are now achieving comparable survival rates similar to the transplant of traditional organs such as kidney and liver. As a consequence, the physicians' objectives are to prolong the patient's quality of life and organ function as long as possible. Weaning strategies in regard to CNI and steroids are tested. Sirolimus, everolimus, CTLA-4 Ig, etc, are agents known to be either both nonnephrotoxic and nondiabetogenic or less so when compared with CNI. Their impact on pancreas transplantation is beginning to be evaluated. Large randomized trials in all pancreas categories, with long-term clinical and histologic results, are mandatory to establish new guidelines for immunosuppressive regimens for pancreas transplantation.

What happens to the kidney in an SPK transplant when the pancreas fails due to a technical complication?

We examined a group of SPK recipients that had early (<90 d post-transplant) pancreas graft failure caused by a technical complication, and looked at outcomes of the kidney graft in these recipients. Of 289 SPK transplants, 36 (12.5%) had early pancreas graft failure because of a technical complication: thrombosis (n = 16), leak (n = 5), infection (n = 14), and pancreatitis (n = 1). Once the pancreas was lost, there was a high incidence of subsequent kidney graft failure. Kidney graft survival in these 36 recipients was 71.4% at one yr and 59.5% at three yr, significantly inferior compared to recipients that did not have early failure of the pancreas (86% at one yr and 82% at three yr, p < 0.001). Of the 36 recipients with early pancreas loss, 18 have gone on to failure of the kidney graft. Causes included thrombosis (n = 3), infection (n = 1), death with function (n = 6), chronic rejection (n = 4), ischemia (n = 1), and other (n = 3). Of the 18 kidney graft failures, nine occurred within three months after loss of the pancreas graft, usually either because of graft thrombosis, or patient death (usually from systemic sepsis). Multivariate analysis showed technical failure of the pancreas to be the most significant risk factor for kidney graft loss (HR = 2.08, p = 0.006).

Pancreas-kidney and pancreas transplantation for the treatment of diabetes mellitus

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage diabetic nephropathy, but the ultimate treatment today for type 1 diabetes mellitus is the whole vascularized pancreas transplant. Although its use is increasing, pancreas transplantation remains an uncommonly used therapeutic option that normalizes glucose levels and results in stabilization or improvement in secondary complications far better than any other strategy available for treatment of type 1 diabetes. These documented benefits of a simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant are the basis for its acceptance as an appropriate therapy for patients who have type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease.

Infectious complications following 72 consecutive enteric-drained pancreas transplants

New immunosuppressive protocols and advanced surgical technique resulted in an improved outcome of pancreatic transplantation (PTx) with infection remaining the most common complication. Seventy-two enteric-drained whole PTxs performed at the Innsbruck University Hospital between September 2002 and October 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Prophylactic immunosuppression consisted of either the standard protocol consisting of single bolus antithymocyteglobulin (ATG) (Thymoglobulin, Sangstat or ATG Fresenius) induction (9 mg/kg), tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenylate mofetil (MMF) and steroids (38 patients) or a 4-day course of ATG (4 mg/kg) tacrolimus and steroids with MMF (n = 19), or Sirolimus (n = 15). Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis consisted of Piperacillin/Tazobactam (4.5 g q 8 h) in combination with ciprofloxacin (200 mg q 12 h) and fluconazole (400 mg daily). Ganciclovir was used for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis if donor was positive and recipient-negative. Patient, pancreas, and kidney graft survival at 1 year were 97.2%, 88.8%, and 93%, respectively, with no difference between the groups. All retransplants (n = 8) and single transplants (n = 8) as well as all type II diabetics and nine of 11 patients older 55 years received standard immunosuppression (IS). The rejection rate was 14% and infection rate 46% with no difference in terms of incidence or type according to the three groups. Severe infectious complications included intra-abdominal infection (n = 12), wound infection (n = 7), sepsis (n = 13), respiratory tract infection (n = 4), urinary tract infection (n = 12), herpes simplex/human herpes virus 6 infection (n = 5), CMV infection/disease (n = 7), post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD, n = 3), invasive filamentous fungal infection (n = 4), Clostridial/Rotavirus colitis (n = 1), and endocarditis (n = 1). All four patients in this series died of infectious complications (invasive aspergillosis n = 2) (one with Candida glabrata superinfection), invasive zygomycosis (n = 1), PTLD (n = 1). Five grafts were lost (vascular thrombosis n = 3, pancreatitis n = 1, noncompliance n = 1). Infection represented the most frequent complication in this series and all four deaths were of infectious origin. Better prophylaxis and management of infections now should be the primary target to be addressed in the field of pancreas transplantation.

Experience with alternate-day thymoglobulin induction in pancreas transplantation with portal-enteric drainage

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes in patients undergoing pancreas transplantation (PTX) with a novel induction protocol of alternate-day thymoglobulin (rATG) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroids. From January 2002 through January 2005, we performed 55 PTXs in 53 patients. The first dose of rATG (1.5 mg/kg) was given intraoperatively, and subsequent doses were given on alternate days until therapeutic TAC levels (>8 ng/mL) were achieved. All patients underwent PTX with enteric drainage, including 51 with portal and 4 with systemic venous drainage. Patients received a minimum of 2 and maximum of 6 doses of rATG induction (median 3 doses). The patient group had a mean age of 42.8 years and included 40 simultaneous kidney-PTX, 11 sequential PTX after kidney, and 4 PTX-alone transplant recipients. Patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates are 96%, 96%, and 84%, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 21 months. The incidence of acute rejection was 18%; there were no graft losses due to isolated acute rejection. The incidence of infection was 60%, but there were no cases of polyomavirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection and only 6 cases (11%) of cytomegalovirus infection. The composite endpoint of no rejection, graft loss, or mortality was attained by 71% of patients. At present, 94% of surviving patients are both dialysis and insulin-free, including 5 successful PTX retransplants. These findings suggest that PTX with portal-enteric drainage and alternate day rATG induction may result in excellent intermediate-term outcomes.

Early morbidity after pancreas transplantation

This study aims to evaluate and compare the early outcome of both pancreas-alone transplantation (PTA) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKT) focusing on the complications affecting the first month after the procedures. The records of all patients who underwent PTA or SPKT were reviewed. We considered the length of ICU stay, the need for postoperative ventilatory support, hemodynamic and metabolic data (arterial pH, serum glucose, need for exogenous insulin), infectious diseases incidence, microbiological colonization rate and any kind of postoperative complication arising during the first month after the transplantation. PTA recipients underwent a quicker surgery (P < 0.01) with shorter ICU stay (P < 0.05) and a lower need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (P < 0.05). They also had a higher hemodynamic stability (P < 0.05) with less cardiological complications (P < 0.05) in the intra- and postoperative phases; bacterial colonisation was also less frequent in PTA recipients (P < 0.05). On the contrary, no significant difference was noted with regard to postoperative nausea/vomiting, sudden myocardial death, ICU re-admissions, graft function, rate of rejection, grafts explantation and re-transplantation. PTA could be considered as preemptive for severe diabetic complications in patients with long-lasting severe type I diabetes. However, establishing the correct timing of PTA is of paramount importance in order not to expose the patients early to risks arising from a major surgery and heavy immunosuppressive treatments.

Thymoglobulin induction protects liver allografts from ischemia/reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

Interventions that minimize hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) can expand the donor organ pool. Thymoglobulin (TG) induction therapy has been shown to ameliorate delayed graft function and possibly decrease IRI in cadaver renal transplants recipients. This controlled randomized trial was designated to assess the ability of TG to protect against IRI in liver transplant recipients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two cadaveric liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either TG (1.5 mg/kg/dose) during the anhepatic period and QOD x2 doses or no TG. No differences in recipients' demographics were present and donor characteristics were similar in terms of age, cause of death, and cold ischemia time. Maintenance immunosupression consisted of Tacrolimus (or Cyclosporine) and steroids for both groups. Donor biopsies were obtained during organ procurement, cold storage and 1 h after re-vascularization. Post-operative liver function tests were monitored. Early graft function, length of stay, patient and graft survival rates, incidence of primary non-function and rate of rejection were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival at 3 months was 100%. There was no incidence of primary graft non-function and no need for re-transplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups. Patients in the TG group had significant decreases in alanine aminotransferase test at day 1 compared to the control group (p = 0.02). There were also near significant decreases of total bilirubin at day 5 and shorter length of hospitalization. Liver biopsy (at procurement, when cold, and post-reperfusion) of TG group demonstrated a trend for increased central ballooning.

CONCLUSION

The TG allowed for more compromised liver grafts to be transplanted with less clinical evidence of IRI and improved function. Further studies on the degree of apoptosis in the liver biopsy post-reperfusion are underway.

Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury can be modulated with thymoglobulin induction therapy

BACKGROUND

Thymoglobulin induction therapy has been shown to ameliorate delayed graft function and possibly decrease ischemia reperfusion injury in cadaver renal transplant recipients. This controlled randomized trial was designed to assess whether thymoglobulin also protects liver transplant recipients from ischemia reperfusion injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two cadaver liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg per dose) during the anhepatic period and two doses every other day or no thymoglobulin. No differences in recipient or donor demographics were present. Maintenance immunosupression consisted of tacrolimus (or cyclosporine) and steroids for both groups. Donor biopsies were obtained during organ procurement, cold storage, and 1 hour after revascularization. Postoperative liver function tests were monitored. Early graft function, length of stay, patient and graft survival rates, incidence of primary nonfunction, and rate of rejection were assessed.

RESULTS

Patient and graft survival at 3 months was 100%. There was no incidence of primary graft nonfunction and no need for retransplantation. The incidence of acute rejection was similar between the two groups. Although donor livers randomized to thymoglobulin had less optimal preimplantation biopsies, these recipients had significant decreases in ALT at day 1 compared to the control group (P = .02), near significant decreases of total bilirubin at day 5, and shorter length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Thymoglobulin allowed for more compromised liver grafts to be transplanted with less clinical evidence of ischemia reperfusion injury and improved function.

Technical failures after pancreas transplants: why grafts fail and the risk factors--a multivariate analysis

BACKGROUND

Technical failure (TF) rates remain high after pancreas transplants; while rates have decreased over the last decade, more than 10% of all pancreas grafts continue to be lost due to technical reasons. We performed a multivariate analysis to determine causes and risk factors for TF of pancreas grafts.

RESULTS

Between 1994 and 2003, 937 pancreas transplants were performed at our center in the following transplant categories: simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) (n=327), pancreas after kidney (PAK) (n=399), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA) (n=211). Of these, 123 (13.1%) grafts were lost due to technical reasons (thrombosis, leaks, infections). TF rates were higher for SPK (15.3%) versus PAK (12.2%) or PTA (11.4%), though this was not statistically significant. Thrombosis accounted for 52.0% of all TFs. Other causes were infections (18.7%), pancreatitis (20.3%), leaks (6.5%), and bleeding (2.4%). Thrombosis was the most common cause for TF in all three transplant categories. By multivariate analysis, the following were significant risk factors for TF of the graft: recipient body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m (relative risk [RR]=2.42, P=0.0003), preservation time >24 hr (1.87, P=0.04), cause of donor death other than trauma (RR=1.58, P=0.04), enteric versus bladder drainage (1.68, P=0.06), and donor BMI >30 kg/m (1.66, P=0.06). Not significant were donor or recipient age, a retransplant, and the category of transplant.

CONCLUSIONS

TFs remain significant after pancreas transplants. In SPK recipients, TF represents the most common cause of pancreas graft loss. For isolated pancreas transplants, TF is second only to rejection as a cause of graft loss. Increased preservation times and donor or recipient obesity seem to be risk factors. Minimizing these risks factors would be important to try to decrease TF.

Pancreatic transplantation: Beta cell replacement

Diabetes is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Complications of diabetes including renal failure, retinopathy, neuropathy, and cardiovascular disease limit both survival and quality of life. Pancreatic transplantation can restore euglycemia thereby stabilizing or even reversing secondary complications of diabetes as well as improving quality of life particularly in patients with labile diabetes. Recent evidence also shows an improved survival in diabetic patients that undergo pancreatic transplantation when combined with a kidney transplant. Pancreatic transplantation should more properly be referred to as beta cell replacement as the field today encompasses both whole organ and islet cell transplantation. We have outlined herein the indications and contraindications to islet or whole organ pancreas transplantation and we have described periprocedure care and short- and long-term prognosis.

Advances in pancreas transplantation

Despite early obstacles impacting the success of pancreatic transplantation, the introduction of new procedures and new immunosuppressive therapies during the past 2 decades has improved outcomes for pancreatic transplant recipients. For example, the use of bladder drainage and better human leukocyte antigen matching has helped overcome some of the early obstacles of pancreatic transplantation. In addition, the introduction of tacrolimus in 1994 and mycophenolate mofetil in 1996 has helped lower rates of acute rejection and increase graft survival, with less nephrotoxicity than treatment with cyclosporine. Regimens allowing the tapering of corticosteroids have also helped reduce the rates of acute pancreas rejection. To further improve therapeutic options for patients with type 1 diabetes or end-stage renal disease, pancreatic islet transplantation and organ and islet xenotransplantation should be further explored.