Blood pressure, antihypertensive treatment, and graft survival in kidney transplant patients

Telemedicine for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Current State, Advantages, and Barriers

Telemedicine is defined as the use of electronic information and communication technologies to provide and support healthcare at a distance. In kidney transplantation, telemedicine is limited but is expected to grow markedly in the coming y. Current experience shows that it is possible to provide transplant care at a distance, with benefits for patients like reduced travel time and costs, better adherence to medication and appointment visits, more self-sufficiency, and more reliable blood pressure values. However, multiple barriers in different areas need to be overcome for successful implementation, such as recipients' preferences, willingness, skills, and digital literacy. Moreover, in many countries, limited digital infrastructure, legislation, local policy, costs, and reimbursement issues could be barriers to the implementation of telemedicine. Finally, telemedicine changes the way transplant professionals provide care, and this transition needs time, training, willingness, and acceptance. This review discusses the current state and benefits of telemedicine in kidney transplantation, with the aforementioned barriers, and provides an overview of future directions on telemedicine in kidney transplantation.

Overview of Renal Transplantation for Primary Care Physicians: Workup, Complications, and Management

Kidney transplantation remains the treatment of choice for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease. The last few decades have seen an expansion in the transplant recipient pool with over 250,000 patients living with a kidney transplant today. Because of limited bandwidth for ongoing follow-up and management of chronic medical conditions, transplant centers are directing more and more patients back to their general nephrologists and primary care doctors for longitudinal care. As a result, it is becoming increasingly important for primary care physicians to have a nuanced understanding of medications, complications, and chronic medical problems unique to transplant recipients. This article reviews the role of the primary care office in helping streamline the pretransplant evaluation process and long-term posttransplant care.

Headache changes after kidney transplant

Headache is considered as a possible complication of dialytic treatment in chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study was to evaluate possible change in headache characteristics after kidney transplantation in patients with CKD. During a 1-year period, we enrolled 110 subjects submitted to a kidney transplant in the previous 5 years. Headache characteristics before and after the transplant were investigated by a specific questionnaire. Possible effects of pharmacological therapies were also evaluated. 65.5% of patients complained of headache before the transplant (38.2% migraine and 14.5% dialysis headache). After transplant, 53.6% of patients reported changes in headache characteristics. In particular, 27.3% of the patients had a complete resolution, 19.1% presented a headache improvement and 7.2% showed a worsening. In both migraine and dialysis headache subgroups, steroids, beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers were associated with a significant improvement of headache. Kidney transplantation seems to impact significantly headache frequency and severity in patients with CKD. A careful evaluation and use of targeted treatments could improve both patients' compliance to therapies and quality of life.

Assessment of hypertension in kidney transplantation by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hypertension (HTN) is common following renal transplantation and it is associated with adverse effects on cardiovascular (CV) and graft health. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is the preferred method to characterize blood pressure (BP) status, since HTN misclassification by office BP (OBP) is quite common in this population. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at determining the clinical utility of 24-h ABPM and its potential implications for the management of HTN in this population.

Methods

Ovid-MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched for interventional or observational studies enrolling adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) undergoing 24-h ABP readings compared with OBP or home BP. The main outcome was the proportion of KTRs diagnosed with HTN by ABPM, home or OBP recordings. Additionally, day-night BP variability and dipper/non-dipper status were assessed.

Results

Forty-two eligible studies (4115 participants) were reviewed. A cumulative analysis including 27 studies (3481 participants) revealed a prevalence of uncontrolled HTN detected by ABPM of 56% [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-65%]. The pooled prevalence of uncontrolled HTN according to OBP was 47% (95% CI 36-58%) in 25 studies (3261 participants). Very few studies reported on home BP recordings. The average concordance rate between OBP and ABPM measurements in classifying patients as controlled or uncontrolled hypertensive was 66% (95% CI 59-73%). ABPM revealed HTN phenotypes among KTRs. Two pooled analyses of 11 and 10 studies, respectively, revealed an average prevalence of 26% (95% CI 19-33%) for masked HTN (MHT) and 10% (95% CI 6-17%) for white-coat HTN (WCH). The proportion of non-dippers was variable across the 28 studies that analysed dipping status, with an average prevalence of 54% (95% CI 45-63%).

Conclusions

In our systematic review, comparison of OBP versus ABP measurements disclosed a high proportion of MHT, uncontrolled HTN and, to a lesser extent, WCH in KTRs. These results suggest that HTN is not adequately diagnosed and controlled by OBP recordings in this population. Furthermore, the high prevalence of non-dippers confirmed that circadian rhythm is commonly disturbed in KTRs.

Chronic Kidney Allograft Disease: New Concepts and Opportunities

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in most countries and kidney transplantation is the best option for those patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Therefore, there is a significant number of patients living with a functioning kidney allograft. However, progressive kidney allograft functional deterioration remains unchanged despite of major advances in the field. After the first post-transplant year, it has been estimated that this chronic allograft damage may cause a 5% graft loss per year. Most studies focused on mechanisms of kidney graft damage, especially on ischemia-reperfusion injury, alloimmunity, nephrotoxicity, infection and disease recurrence. Thus, therapeutic interventions focus on those modifiable factors associated with chronic kidney allograft disease (CKaD). There are strategies to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury, to improve the immunologic risk stratification and monitoring, to reduce calcineurin-inhibitor exposure and to identify recurrence of primary renal disease early. On the other hand, control of risk factors for chronic disease progression are particularly relevant as kidney transplantation is inherently associated with renal mass reduction. However, despite progress in pathophysiology and interventions, clinical advances in terms of long-term kidney allograft survival have been subtle. New approaches are needed and probably a holistic view can help. Chronic kidney allograft deterioration is probably the consequence of damage from various etiologies but can be attenuated by kidney repair mechanisms. Thus, besides immunological and other mechanisms of damage, the intrinsic repair kidney graft capacity should be considered to generate new hypothesis and potential therapeutic targets. In this review, the critical risk factors that define CKaD will be discussed but also how the renal mechanisms of regeneration could contribute to a change chronic kidney allograft disease paradigm.

Antihypertensive Treatment in Kidney Transplant Recipients-A Current Single Center Experience

Arterial hypertension affects the survival of the kidney graft and the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the recipient after kidney transplantation (KTx). Thus, antihypertensive treatment is necessary for a vast majority of these patients. Long-term data on antihypertensive drugs and their effects on allograft function after KTx is still limited, and further investigation is required. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 854 recipients who received a kidney transplant at our transplant center between 2007 and 2015 with regard to antihypertensive treatment and its influence on graft function and survival. 1-y after KTx, 95.3% patients were treated with antihypertensive therapy. Of these, 38.6% received mono- or dual-drug therapy, 38.0% received three to four drugs and 8.1% were on a regimen of ≥5 drugs. Beta-blockers were the most frequently used antihypertensive agents (68.1%). Neither the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers (51.9%) and calcium channel blockers (51.5%), nor the use the use of loop diuretics (38.7%) affected allograft survival. Arterial hypertension and the number of antihypertensive agents were associated with unfavorable allograft outcomes (each p < 0.001). In addition to the well-known risk factors of cold ischemic time and acute rejection episodes, the number of antihypertensive drugs after one year, which reflects the severity of hypertension, is a strong predictor of unfavorable allograft survival.

What solid organ transplant healthcare providers should know about renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and COVID-19

The data on the outcomes of solid organ transplant recipients who have contracted coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) are still emerging. Kidney transplant recipients are commonly prescribed renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (AAS) inhibitors given the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. As the angiotensin‐converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) facilitates the entry of coronaviruses into target cells, there have been hypotheses that preexisting use of renin‐angiotensin‐aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may increase the risk of developing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) infection. Given the common use of RAAS inhibitors among solid organ transplant recipients, we sought to review the RAAS cascade, the mechanism of SARS‐CoV‐2 entry, and pertinent data related to the effect of RAAS inhibitors on ACE2 to guide management of solid organ transplant recipients during the COVID‐19 pandemic. At present, there is no clear evidence to support the discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors in solid organ transplant recipients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Self-Monitoring Kidney Function Post Transplantation: Reliability of Patient-Reported Data

Background

The high frequency of outpatient visits after kidney transplantation is burdensome to both the recovering patient and health care capacity. Self-monitoring kidney function offers a promising strategy to reduce the number of these outpatient visits.

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate whether it is safe to rely on patients’ self-measurements of creatinine and blood pressure, using data from a self-management randomized controlled trial.

Methods

For self-monitoring creatinine, each participant received a StatSensor Xpress-i Creatinine Meter and related test material. For self-monitoring blood pressure, each participant received a Microlife WatchBP Home, an oscillometric device for blood pressure self-measurement on the upper arm. Both devices had a memory function and the option to download stored values to a computer. During the first year post transplantation, 54 patients registered their self-measured creatinine values in a Web-based Self-Management Support System (SMSS) which provided automatic feedback on the registered values (eg, seek contact with hospital). Values registered in the SMSS were compared with those logged automatically in the creatinine device to study reliability of registered data. Adherence to measurement frequency was determined by comparing the number of requested with the number of performed measurements. To study adherence to provided feedback, SMSS-logged feedback and information from the electronic hospital files were analyzed.

Results

Level of adherence was highest during months 2-4 post transplantation with over 90% (42/47) of patients performing at least 75% of the requested measurements. Overall, 87.00% (3448/3963) of all registered creatinine values were entered correctly, although values were often registered several days later. If (the number of) measured and registered values deviated, the mean of registered creatinine values was significantly lower than what was measured, suggesting active selection of lower creatinine values. Adherence to SMSS feedback ranged from 53% (14/24) to 85% (33/39), depending on the specific feedback.

Conclusions

Patients’ tendency to postpone registration and to select lower creatinine values for registration and the suboptimal adherence to the feedback provided by the SMSS might challenge safety. This should be well considered when designing self-monitoring care systems, for example by ensuring that self-measured data are transferred automatically to an SMSS.

Managing Cardiovascular Risk in the Post Solid Organ Transplant Recipient

Solid organ transplantation is an effective treatment for patients with end-stage organ disease. The prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has increased in recipients. CVD remains a leading cause of mortality among recipients with functioning grafts. The pathophysiology of CVD recipients is a complex interplay between preexisting risk factors, metabolic sequelae of immunosuppressive agents, infection, and rejection. Risk modification must be weighed against the risk of mortality owing to rejection or infection. Aggressive risk stratification and modification before and after transplantation and tailoring immunosuppressive regimens are essential to prevent complications and improve short-term and long-term mortality and graft survival.

Effect of calcium channels blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system on renal outcomes and mortality in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The renoprotective effect of inhibitors of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been identified through placebo-controlled trials. However, the effect of calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) on renal system is still controversial. Our current meta-analysis includes available evidences to compare the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs and ACEIs or ARBs on renal outcomes and mortality. We also further investigate whether CCBs can be used in combination with inhibitors of RAS to improve the prognosis of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were searched up to July 2012, for clinical randomized controlled trials, assessing the effect of dihydropyridine CCBs on the incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and all-cause mortality in contrast to ACEIs or ARBs. Eight clinical trials were included containing 25,647 participants. ESRD showed significantly higher frequency with CCBs therapy compared with ACEIs or ARBs therapy, though blood pressure was decreased similarly in both groups in every trial (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.05-1.48; p = 0.01). In contrast, there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause mortality between these two groups, though ACEIs or ARBs exhibited better renoprotective effect compared to CCBs (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.03; p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

CCBs did not increase all-cause mortality incidence in patients with CKD though they displayed weaker renoprotective, compared to ACEIs or ARBs therapy. Our results suggest the combination of a CCB and an ACEI or ARB should be a preferable antihypertensive therapy in patients with CKD, considering their higher effect in decreasing blood pressure and fewer adverse metabolic problems caused.

Pathophysiologic and treatment strategies for cardiovascular disease in end-stage renal disease and kidney transplantations

The inextricable link between the heart and the kidneys predestines that significant cardiovascular disease ensues in the face of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). As a point of fact, the leading cause of mortality of patients on dialysis is still from cardiovascular etiologies, albeit differing in particular types of disease from the general population. For example, sudden cardiac death outnumbers coronary artery disease in patients with ESRD, which is the reverse for the general population. In this review, we will focus on the pathophysiology and treatment options of important traditional and nontraditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease in ESRD patients such as hypertension, anemia, vascular calcification, hyperparathyroidism, uremia, and oxidative stress. The evidence of erythropoietin-stimulating agents, phosphate binders, calcimimetics, and dialysis modalities will be presented. We will then discuss how these risk factors may be changed and perhaps exacerbated after renal transplantation. This is largely due to the immunosuppressive agents that are both crucial yet potentially detrimental in the posttransplant state. Calcineurin inhibitors, corticosteroids, and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, the mainstay of transplant immunosuppression, are all known to increase the risks of developing new onset diabetes as well as the metabolic syndrome. Thus, we need to carefully negotiate between patients' cardiovascular profile and their risks of rejection. Finally, we end by considering strategies by which we may minimize cardiovascular disease in the transplant population, as this modality still confers the highest chance of survival in patients with ESRD.

Patient experiences with self-monitoring renal function after renal transplantation: results from a single-center prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

After a kidney transplantation, patients have to visit the hospital often to monitor for early signs of graft rejection. Self-monitoring of creatinine in addition to blood pressure at home could alleviate the burden of frequent outpatient visits, but only if patients are willing to self-monitor and if they adhere to the self-monitoring measurement regimen. A prospective pilot study was conducted to assess patients' experiences and satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 3 months after transplantation, 30 patients registered self-measured creatinine and blood pressure values in an online record to which their physician had access to. Patients completed a questionnaire at baseline and follow-up to assess satisfaction, attitude, self-efficacy regarding self-monitoring, worries, and physician support. Adherence was studied by comparing the number of registered with the number of requested measurements.

RESULTS

Patients were highly motivated to self-monitor kidney function, and reported high levels of general satisfaction. Level of satisfaction was positively related to perceived support from physicians (P<0.01), level of self-efficacy (P<0.01), and amount of trust in the accuracy of the creatinine meter (P<0.01). The use of both the creatinine and blood pressure meter was considered pleasant and useful, despite the level of trust in the accuracy of the creatinine device being relatively low. Trust in the accuracy of the creatinine device appeared to be related to level of variation in subsequent measurement results, with more variation being related to lower levels of trust. Protocol adherence was generally very high, although the range of adherence levels was large and increased over time.

CONCLUSION

Patients' high levels of satisfaction suggest that at-home monitoring of creatinine and blood pressure after transplantation offers a promising strategy. Important prerequisites for safe implementation in transplant care seem to be support from physicians and patients' confidence in both their own self-monitoring skills and the accuracy of the devices used.

Association of pre-transplant blood pressure with post-transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have indicated U-shaped associations between blood pressure (BP) and mortality in dialysis patients. We hypothesized that a similar association exists between pre-transplant BP and post-transplant outcomes in dialysis patients who undergo successful kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients were linked to the five-yr cohort of a large dialysis organization in the United States. We identified all dialysis patients who received a kidney transplant during this period. Unadjusted and multivariate adjusted predictors of transplant outcomes were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 13 881 patients included in our study were 47 ± 14 yr old and included 42% women. There was no association between pre-transplant systolic BP and post-transplant mortality, although a decreased risk trend was observed in those with low post-dialysis systolic BP. Compared to patients with pre-dialysis diastolic BP 70 to <80 mmHg, patients with pre-dialysis diastolic BP <50 mmHg experienced lower risk of post-transplant death (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99). However, compared to patients with post-dialysis diastolic BP 70 to <80 mmHg, patients with post-dialysis diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg experienced higher risk of death (HR: 3.50, 95% CI: 1.57-7.84). In addition, very low (<50 mmHg for diastolic BP and <110 mmHg for systolic BP) pre-transplant BP was associated with lower risk of graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Low post-dialysis systolic BP and low pre-dialysis diastolic BP are associated with lower post-transplant risk of death, whereas very high post-dialysis diastolic BP is associated with higher mortality in kidney transplant recipients. BP variations in dialysis patients prior to kidney transplantation may have a bearing on post-transplant outcome, which warrants additional studies.

Acidosis and hyperkalemia caused by losartan and enalapril in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of losartan and enalapril in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed in 31 pediatric kidney transplant recipients who were treated with losartan (50 mg/d, oral) for 1 to 6 months because of mild hypertension and persistent proteinuria. All patients were treated concurrently with enalapril (5 or 10 mg daily, oral), and 12 patients (39%) also were treated with amlodipine (5 or 10 mg daily, oral). Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Losartan use was associated with a significant decrease in mean systolic (before losartan was started, 123 ± 14 mm Hg; before losartan was stopped, 111 ± 10 mm Hg; P ≤ .001) and diastolic blood pressure (before losartan was started, 78 ± 11 mm Hg; before losartan was stopped, 69 ± 10 mm Hg; P ≤ .001) and urinary protein excretion (before losartan was started, 51 ± 45 mg/m2/h; before losartan was stopped, 28 ± 34 mg/m2/h; P ≤ .001). However, losartan therapy was associated with a significant mean increase in serum potassium level (before losartan was started, 4.0 ± 0.4 mmol/L; before losartan was stopped, 5.7 ± 0.5 mmol/L; P ≤ .001) and decrease in pH (before losartan was started, 7.35 ± 0.0; before losartan was stopped, 7.23 ± 0.0; P ≤ .001). Losartan was stopped because of hyperkalemia and acidosis earlier in patients who were on tacrolimus than cyclosporine immunosuppression (tacrolimus, 3 ± 1 mo; cyclosporine, 4.7 ± 0.8 mo; P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan and enalapril may be beneficial in pediatric kidney transplant recipients by decreasing blood pressure and proteinuria, with maintenance of stable graft function, but may be associated with serious adverse events including hyperkalemia and life-threatening acidosis.

Cardiovascular complications after transplantation: treatment options in solid organ recipients

Premature cardiovascular disease is the commonest cause of death in solid organ transplant recipients, with coronary artery disease, sudden cardiac death and heart failure being highly prevalent. There are unique factors leading to CV disease in organ transplant recipients that include underlying comorbidities, and metabolic effects of immunosuppression. As a consequence management strategies developed in the general population may have limited benefit. In this review, we will focus on renal transplantation, where most research has been carried out and, despite incomplete understanding of the disease process, the incidence of cardiovascular disease appears to be falling.

Blood pressure control according to the prevalence of diabetes in renal transplant recipients

Hypertension is one of the most frequent complications of renal transplantation. About 70% to 90% of this population display either high blood pressure (BP) or require antihypertensive therapy. Diabetes mellitus is also a common finding among kidney transplant recipients. The aim of the study was to assess the BP control among kidney transplant recipients according to the prevalence of diabetes. This retrospective analysis included 172 renal transplant recipients of overall mean age 50 years and 51% males. Hypertension was present in 79% of patients. About one-third of the studied population showed abnormal blood pressures based on office measurements. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the presence of diabetes: group 1, diabetic patients (n = 14) versus group 2, nondiabetics (n = 158). Nondiabetic patients were significantly older than diabetic ones (61.5 versus 49 years; P < .05) and their time after renal transplantation was longer (98.83 versus 67.33 months, P < .05). There was no difference in regard to hypertension prevalence, mean BP value, percentage of abnormal (≥ 140/90 mm Hg) BP values or glomerular filtration rate. Diabetic patients were prescribed less steroid. The main hypotensive drug used in whole cohort and in no-diabetic patients was a beta-blocker (n = 64, 37%; n = 4, 28%), patients with diabetes used beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at the same frequency (n = 60, 37%). The main causative factor for hypertension appeared to be the calcineurin inhibitor. More aggressive antihypertensive treatment using combined drugs, including RAS blockers, might provide adequate BP control among renal transplant subjects with high cardiovascular risk.

Assessment of nonimmunologic factors in kidney transplant recipients according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), whereas chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is the main reason leading to end-stage chronic kidney disease. The etiologies of both entities include immunologic and nonimmunologic factors. The management of modifiable nonimmunologic parameters has recently been identified by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. The aim of our study was to assess the implementation of these guidelines in the outpatient kidney transplantation clinic of our hospital.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We retrospectively monitored the records of 48 transplanted KTRs including 32 males of overall mean age 45.1 ± 10.7 years regarding control of anemia, dyslipidemia, mineral bone disorder (MBD), and blood pressure (BP) levels. Data were recorded every 6 months for 2 years, starting 1 year after renal transplantation.

RESULTS

The estimated glomerular filtration rate of patients at baseline was 60.3 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m(2) with no significant change during 2 years of follow-up. The control of anemia was satisfactory in 42 patients (88%) with hemoglobin values ≥ 11 g/dL during the follow-up. Regarding dyslipidemia management, the aggregate of patients showed fasting triglycerides ≤500 mg/dL in all measurements. The percentage of KTRs with LDL ≤100 mg/dL tended to improve from baseline versus the end of the study period (20.8% vs 41.7%). Serum calcium was satisfactorily controlled in 77% of patients, serum phosphorus in all patients, whereas parathyroid hormone (PTH) was abnormal in 60% of KTRs with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5. Finally, the BP goal of <130/80 mm Hg was achieved in approximately half of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Control of nonimmunologic factors was satisfactory in terms of renal anemia and MBD, whereas dyslipidemia and BP levels were inadequately controlled. There is a clear need for better integration into clinical practice of KDIGO guidelines with regard to modifiable nonimmunologic factors.

Prevention of cardiovascular disease in adult recipients of kidney transplants

Although advances in immunosuppression, tissue typing, surgery, and medical management have made transplantation a routine and preferred treatment for patients with irreversible renal failure, successful transplant recipients have a greatly increased risk of premature mortality because of cardiovascular disease and malignancy compared with the general population. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, and diabetes are common in transplant recipients, partly because of the effects of immunosuppressive drugs, and are associated with adverse outcomes. However, the natural history of cardiovascular disease in such recipients differs from that in the general population, and only statin therapy has been studied in a large-scale interventional trial. Thus, the management of this disease and the balance between management of conventional risk factors and modification of immunosuppression is complex.

Hypertension in kidney transplant recipients

Arterial hypertension is frequently observed in renal transplant recipients. Its pathogenesis is multifactorial in most cases. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) can increase peripheral vascular resistance by inducing arteriolar vasoconstriction and can cause extracellular fluid expansion by reducing the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), activating the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and by inactivating the atrial natriuretic peptide. Glucocorticoids can impair urinary water and salt excretion. Poor graft function can lead to increased extracellular volume and inappropriate production of renin. Native kidneys, older age of the donor and transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) may also contribute to the development of hypertension. Arterial hypertension not only can increases the risk for cardiovascular events but can also deteriorate renal allograft function. A number of studies have shown that the higher the levels of blood pressure are, the higher is the risk of graft failure. On the other hand, a good control of blood pressure may prevent many cardiovascular and renal complications. Appropriate lifestyle modification is the first step for treating hypertension. Calcium channel blockers (CCB) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors are the most frequently used antihypertensive agents, but in many cases, a combination of these and other drugs is required to obtain good control of hypertension.