Contribution of aspirin-intolerant asthma to near fatal asthma based on a questionnaire survey in Niigata Prefecture, Japan

Aspirin desensitization in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and its outcomes in the clinical course of asthma: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

Background

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (NERD) might benefit from aspirin desensitization (AD) as an alternative treatment to standard care. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding its role in bronchial symptoms and asthma exacerbations.

Objective

To analyze the clinical effects of AD in terms of lung function, systemic and inhaled steroid use, the frequency of acute asthma exacerbations, and adverse effects in patients with NERD and asthma.

Methodology

We identified randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and EBSCO. We also searched the RCT references for additional studies. Studies comparing AD to placebo in patients with a previous history of pulmonary symptoms triggered by ASA or other NSAIDs or with a positive provocation test to ASA were included.

Primary results

Five studies with 210 participants with NERD were included in this review. The study duration ranged from 3 to 6 months. Overall, the risk of bias across the included RCTs was low. We identified 3 studies evaluating lung function, 2 of which reported a significant improvement in FEV1 in the AD group after 6 months, while the other reported no difference among the treatments. Due to high heterogeneity, we did not pool the results. The remaining primary outcomes were reported only in a single study each, hindering their interpretation. Secondary outcomes revealed reduced symptom and medication scores in patients with AD.

Conclusions

Due to the small number of studies included in this systematic review, conclusions should be made with caution. AD shows a trend towards improving lung function (FEV1) following 6 months of treatment, although no conclusions can be made regarding the use of corticosteroids or the frequency of acute exacerbations. AD appears to reduce both symptom and medication scores. Additional RCTs are needed to fully assess the efficacy of AD in reducing bronchial symptoms in patients with NERD.

Evaluation and management of the critically ill adult asthmatic in the emergency department setting

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common reason for presentation to the Emergency Department and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. While patients may have a relatively benign course, there is a subset of patients who present in a critical state and require emergent management.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with severe asthma.

DISCUSSION

It is important to consider a broad differential diagnosis for the cause and potential mimics of asthma exacerbation. Once the diagnosis is determined, the majority of the assessment is based upon the clinical examination. First line therapies for severe exacerbations include inhaled short-acting beta agonists, inhaled anticholinergics, intravenous steroids, and magnesium. Additional therapies for refractory cases include parenteral epinephrine or terbutaline, helium‑oxygen mixture, and consideration of ketamine. Intravenous fluids should be administered, as many of these patients are dehydrated and at risk for hypotension if they receive positive pressure ventilatory support. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation may prevent the need for endotracheal intubation. If mechanical ventilation is required, it is important to avoid breath stacking by setting a low respiratory rate and allowing permissive hypercapnia. Patients with severe asthma exacerbations will require intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of severe asthma with a focus on the emergency clinician.

Diagnosis and management of NSAID-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD)-a EAACI position paper

NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is a chronic eosinophilic, inflammatory disorder of the respiratory tract occurring in patients with asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), symptoms of which are exacerbated by NSAIDs, including aspirin. Despite some progress in understanding of the pathophysiology of the syndrome, which affects 1/10 of patients with asthma and rhinosinusitis, it remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In order to provide evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of N-ERD, a panel of international experts was called by the EAACI Asthma Section. The document summarizes current knowledge on the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of N-ERD pointing at significant heterogeneity of this syndrome. Critically evaluating the usefulness of diagnostic tools available, the paper offers practical algorithm for the diagnosis of N-ERD. Recommendations for the most effective management of a patient with N-ERD stressing the potential high morbidity and severity of the underlying asthma and rhinosinusitis are discussed and proposed. Newly described sub-phenotypes and emerging sub-endotypes of N-ERD are potentially relevant for new and more specific (eg, biological) treatment modalities. Finally, the document defines major gaps in our knowledge on N-ERD and unmet needs, which should be addressed in the future.

Aspirin Intolerance: Experimental Models for Bed-to-Bench

Aspirin is the oldest non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), and it sometimes causes asthma-like symptoms known as aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), which can be serious. Unwanted effects of aspirin (aspirin intolerance) are also observed in patients with food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis, a type I allergy disease, and aspirin-induced urticaria (AIU). However the target and the mechanism of the aspirin intolerance are still unknown. There is no animal or cellular model of AERD, because its pathophysiological mechanism is still unknown, but it is thought that inhibition of cyclooxygenase by causative agents leads to an increase of free arachidonic acid, which is metabolized into cysteinyl leukotrienes (cysLTs) that provoke airway smooth muscle constriction and asthma symptoms. As the bed-to-bench approach, to confirm the clinical discussion in experimental cellular models, we have tried to develop a cellular model of AERD using activated RBL-2H3 cells, a rat mast cell like cell line. Indomethacin (another NSAID and also causes AERD), enhances in vitro cysLTs production by RBL-2H3 cells, while there is no induction of cysLTs production in the absence of inflammatory activation. Since this suggests that all inflammatory cells with activation of prostaglandin and cysLT metabolism should respond to NSAIDs, and then I have concluded that aspirin intolerance should be separated from subsequent bronchoconstriction. Evidence about the cellular mechanisms of NSAIDs may be employed for development of in vitro AERD models as the approach from bench-to-bed.

Respiratory hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs in Europe: the global allergy and asthma network (GA2 LEN) survey

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most prevalent drugs inducing hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this analysis was to estimate the prevalence of NSAID-induced respiratory symptoms in population across Europe and to assess its association with upper and lower respiratory tract disorders.

METHODS

The GA² LEN survey was conducted in 22 centers in 15 European countries. Each of 19 centers selected random samples of 5000 adults aged 15-74 from their general population, and in three centers (Athens, Munich, Oslo), a younger population was sampled. Questionnaires including questions about age, gender, presence of symptoms of asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, smoking status, and history of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions were sent to participants by mail. Totally, 62 737 participants completed the questionnaires.

RESULTS

The mean prevalence of NSAID-induced dyspnea was 1.9% and was highest in the three Polish centers [Katowice (4.9%), Krakow (4.8%), and Lodz (4.4%)] and lowest in Skopje, (0.9%), Amsterdam (1.1%), and Umea (1.2%). In multivariate analysis, the prevalence of respiratory reactions to NSAIDs was higher in participants with chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms (Odds Ratio 2.12; 95%CI 1.78-2.74), asthma symptoms in last 12 months (2.7; 2.18-3.35), hospitalization due to asthma (1.53; 1.22-1.99), and adults vs children (1.53; 1.24-1.89), but was not associated with allergic rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

Our study documented significant variation between European countries in the prevalence of NSAID-induced respiratory hypersensitivity reactions, and association with chronic airway diseases, but also with environmental factors.

Seven steps to the diagnosis of NSAIDs hypersensitivity: how to apply a new classification in real practice?

Frequent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been paralleled by increasing occurrence of adverse reactions, which vary from mild local skin rashes or gastric irritation to severe, generalized symptoms and even life-threatening anaphylaxis. NSAID-induced hypersensitivity reactions may involve both immunological and non-immunological mechanisms and should be differentiated from type A adverse reactions. Clinical diagnosis and effective management of a hypersensitive patient cannot be achieved without identifying the underlying mechanism. In this review, we discuss the current classification of NSAID-induced adverse reactions and propose a practical diagnostic algorithm that involves 7 steps leading to the determination of the type of NSAID-induced hypersensitivity and allows for proper patient management.

Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease among asthmatic patients: A meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) is manifested by adult-onset asthma, nasal polyposis, chronic rhinosinusitis, and aspirin sensitivity. Previously reported prevalence rates have been widely variable based on the population studied, method of diagnosis, and definition of aspirin sensitivity.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the prevalence of AERD among asthmatic adults.

METHODS

A systematic review of databases was performed to identify all clinical trials published on or before June 16, 2013, that evaluated the prevalence of AERD. The studies were clustered into 7 different groups based on underlying disease (asthma, nasal polyps or chronic rhinosinusitis, or both), as well as on the methodology of prevalence determination.

RESULTS

A total of 1770 articles were identified, with 27 considered appropriate for inclusion. Prevalence rates of AERD ranged from 5.5% to 12.4% based on study type. Among all studies in asthmatic patients, regardless of method, the prevalence of AERD was 7.15% (95% CI, 5.26% to 9.03%). The prevalence of AERD was highest among patients with severe asthma (14.89% [95% CI, 6.48% to 23.29%]). Among patients with nasal polyps and chronic rhinosinusitis, the prevalence was 9.69% (95% CI, 2.16% to 17.22%) and 8.7% (95% CI, -1.02% to 18.34%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

AERD is a distinct and important subtype of asthma and polypoid sinus disease. The prevalence of AERD is 7% in typical adult asthmatic patients and twice that number in patients with severe asthma, which underscores the importance of recognizing this disorder. Early identification of this syndrome is critical in view of the increased morbidity and costs associated with asthma exacerbations and the option to treat patients with AERD with long-term aspirin treatment after desensitization.

Analysis of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic infection in Japanese asthmatic patients: using a questionnaire-based survey

BACKGROUND

Influenza infection is known to be an exacerbating factor in the control of asthma, therfore its prevention is critical in managing asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the influenza A H1N1 2009 pandemic virus (H1N1 pdm09) infection in adult asthmatic patients.

METHODS

Data were obtained from a questionnaire-based survey of asthmatic patients conducted from September to October 2010 in Niigata Prefecture. Patient background, H1N1 pdm09 infection, vaccination status, and asthma exacerbation due to influenza infection were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 2,555 cases were analyzed. The incidence of the infection was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-7.6), and the rate of vaccination was 63.9% (95% CI: 62.1-65.8). The odds ratio (OR) for vaccination against the infection among adult patients and younger patients (≤ the median age) were 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.84) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.42-0.90), respectively. However, OR among the older patient (> median age) were 1.38 (95%CI: 0.66-2.89). The rate of infection-induced asthma exacerbation was 23.2% (95% CI: 18.6-29.6), and the OR for vaccination against the infection-induced asthma exacerbation was 1.42 (95% CI: 0.69-2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of the vaccination against the H1N1 pdm09 virus was confirmed during the first pandemic season, but it was limited. Further investigation on H1N1 pdm09 virus infection in asthmatics will be required.

Classification and practical approach to the diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Hypersensitivity reactions to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) constitute only a subset of all adverse reactions to these drugs, but due to their severity pose a significant burden to patients and are a challenge to the allergist. In susceptible individuals, NSAIDs induce a wide spectrum of hypersensitivity reactions with various timing, organ manifestations, and severity, involving either immunological (allergic) or nonimmunological mechanisms. Proper classification of reactions based on clinical manifestations and suspected mechanism is a prerequisite for the implementation of rational diagnostic procedures and adequate patient management. This document, prepared by a panel of experts from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force on NSAIDs Hypersensitivity, aims at reviewing the current knowledge in the field and proposes uniform definitions and clinically useful classification of hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. The document proposes also practical algorithms for the diagnosis of specific types of NSAIDs hypersensitivity (which include drug provocations, skin testing and in vitro testing) and provides, when data are available, evidence-based recommendations for the management of hypersensitive patients, including drug avoidance and drug desensitization.

The Asthma Control Test, Japanese version (ACT-J) as a predictor of Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guideline-defined asthma control: analysis of a questionnaire-based survey

BACKGROUND

The 2006 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2006) guidelines emphasize the importance of evaluating the control rather than the severity of asthma. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is well known to be an excellent tool for evaluating asthma control in the clinical setting. This study aimed to evaluate the ACT, Japanese version (ACT-J) as a predictor of asthma control as defined by the GINA 2006 guidelines in actual clinical practice.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis comparing the ACT-J score and GINA classification of asthma control among 419 patients of primary care physicians and specialists was performed using the data from a 2010 questionnaire-based survey conducted by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group.

RESULTS

The optimal cut-off point of the ACT-J score for predicting GINA-defined asthma control was 23, with ACT-J scores of ≥23 and ≤22 predicting controlled and uncontrolled asthma with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve values of 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72-0.81] and 0.93 [95% CI: 0.90-0.97], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ACT scores of ≥23 and ≤22 are useful for identifying patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma, respectively, as defined by GINA 2006, and the latter is more strongly predictive than the former. The reason for the higher cut-off point of the ACT-J relative to other versions of the ACT is unclear and warrants further investigation.

Efficacy of using the Japanese version of the asthma control test for determing the level of asthma control in clinical settings

BACKGROUND

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is frequently used for the evaluation of asthma control in clinical care setting because it does not require the use of pulmonary function tests, which can be difficult for general practitioners to use. However, few large-scale studies have investigated the efficacy of the Japanese version ACT (J-ACT) in actual use during clinical care.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of the J-ACT in a clinical care setting. Using data from a 2008 questionnaire survey including the J-ACT by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we compared the ACT scores of 2233 patients with respect to multiple parameters, including the severity by Japanese Society of Allergology and the attack frequency. Using the definition of asthma control partially referred to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines from the survey data, the accuracy screening and determination of optimal ACT cutpoints were performed by retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

Cronbach's α for the J-ACT was 0.785. Patients with more severe asthma and more frequent asthma attacks had lower ACT scores than did patients with less severe, less frequent attacks. The optimal ACT cutpoints were 24 for the controlled asthma and 20 for the uncontrolled asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study, the first large-scale investigation of the efficacy of the J-ACT, determined that this evaluation tool is highly efficacious in establishing the level of asthma control. However, the determination of accurate cutpoints for the J-ACT will require more clear definitions of asthma control in future prospective studies.

Aspirin-intolerant asthma in the Korean population: prevalence and characteristics based on a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Aspirin-intolerant asthma is a unique clinical syndrome characterized by acute bronchoconstriction following the administration of aspirin and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the prevalence and investigated the demographic and clinical characteristics of adult patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma in Korea.

METHODS

Using an adult asthma cohort (COREA) from 11 university hospitals in Korea, we analyzed the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma, defined as a positive response to the question: "Have you ever experienced dyspnea and cough after taking an aspirin or any NSAID (cold medicine)?" Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma and aspirin-tolerant asthma.

RESULTS

Aspirin-intolerant asthma was reported in 68 (5.8%) of 1173 adult asthmatics (age 15-84). Patients with aspirin-intolerant asthma had a lower mean age (43.9 ± 13.4 vs. 49.0 ± 15.6, P = 0.003) and a higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis (77.9% vs. 61.7%, P = 0.012) and atopic dermatitis (16.2% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.001) than aspirin-tolerant asthma patients. There were no significant differences in lung function, asthma severity or the use of asthma controllers. However, aspirin-intolerant asthma was associated with greater use of healthcare services over a lifetime and over the past 12 months. Aspirin-intolerant asthma was significantly associated with emergency room visits over the past 12 months (P = 0.029, OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.08-4.42).

CONCLUSION

Based on histories, the prevalence of aspirin-intolerant asthma is 5.8% among adult asthma patients in Korea. Aspirin-intolerant asthma is associated with lower age, higher prevalence of rhinosinusitis and atopic dermatitis, and more frequent exacerbations.

Influence of underweight on asthma control

BACKGROUND

Although the association between asthma control and body mass index (BMI) has been thoroughly investigated, most of this work has focused on the influence on asthma incidence or the effect of obesity on asthma control. To date, there have been no published studies on the influence of underweight on asthma control.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of underweight, as defined by the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity (JASSO), on asthma control in Japanese asthmatic patients. Using data from questionnaire surveys administered by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we compared asthma control, as measured by the Asthma Control Test (ACT), between a normal weight group (18.5kg/m2 =< BMI < 25kg/m2) and an underweight group (BMI < 18.5kg/m2).

RESULTS

Of the asthmatic patients who completed the 2008 and 2010 surveys, 1464 and 1260 cases were classified as being in the normal weight group, and 174 and 155 cases were classified as being in the underweight group. The ACT score (median, [interquartile range]) in the underweight group in 2008 (22, [19-24]) and 2010 (23, [19-25]) was significantly lower than that in the normal group in 2008 (23, [20-25]) and in 2010 (24, [21-25]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first, large-scale investigation of the influence of underweight on asthma control, and we have confirmed an adverse influence in a clinical setting. A potential mechanism for this interaction was unknown. Further investigation will be required.

Analysis of depression in asthmatic patients using the Japanese version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9

BACKGROUND

Previous studies show that depression plays an important role in asthma. However, the association between asthma control and severity, and depression is inconclusive.

METHODS

To investigate the association between asthma control and severity, and depression, we assessed differences in asthma control and asthma severity between groups with various grades of depressive state as defined by the PHQ-9 score using data from the Japanese version of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (J-PHQ-9) and a questionnaire survey including the Asthma Control Test (ACT).

RESULTS

The ACT scores in the symptom-screen positive (SP) and major/other depressive disorder (MDD/ODD) group were significantly lower than those in the symptom-screen negative (SN) and non-MDD/ODD groups, respectively. The rate of step1 and of step 3 and 4 in the SP group were significantly lower and higher than those in the SN group, respectively. When the SP group was divided into three, that is minimal, mild, and more than mild (MTM) depressive state subgroups, the ACT scores in the mild and MTM depressive state subgroups were significantly lower than those in the minimal depressive state subgroup. When the MTM subgroup was divided into moderate, moderate-severe and severe depressive state groups, however, there was no significant variation in ACT score and asthma severity among these three depressive state groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first, large-scale investigation of the use of the J-PHQ-9 in asthma patients. Using the J-PHQ-9 and the questionnaire, there was a clear association between asthma control and severity, and depression. As the depression became more severe, the existence of other depression-associated factors unrelated to asthma control and severity might be assumed, although further investigation will be required.

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions

BACKGROUND

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivities, also referred to as pseudoallergic or anaphylactoid reactions, have clinical manifestations that are often indistinguishable from allergic reactions.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search using the terms 'drug allergy, drug hypersensitivity, pseudoallergies, anaphylaxis and nonallergic drug reactions' and reviewed 511 publications dated between 1970 and 2012. A total of 160 papers that were relevant to the most common nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions were selected for discussion.

RESULTS

Nonallergic drug hypersensitivities do not involve either IgE-mediated (type 1) or delayed (type 4) hypersensitivity. Nonallergic hypersensitivities are commonly referred to as pseudoallergic or idiosyncratic reactions. The common nonallergic drug hypersensitivities are secondary to chemotherapeutic drugs, radiocontrast agents, vancomycin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, local anesthetic reactions and opiates. Protocols for skin testing of radiocontrast, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, local anesthetics and chemotherapeutic agents have been developed, though most have not been validated or standardized. Other diagnostic tests include in vitro-specific IgE tests, and the current 'gold' standard is usually an oral challenge or bronchoprovocation test. In the case of aspirin, even though it is not believed to be IgE-mediated, a 'desensitization' protocol has been developed and utilized successfully, although the mechanism of this desensitization is unclear.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic methods exist to distinguish allergic from nonallergic drug hypersensitivity reactions. The best option in nonallergic drug hypersensitivity is avoidance. If that is not possible, premedication protocols have been developed, although the success of premedication varies amongst drugs and patients.

Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease in patients with asthma in Turkey: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

There are no country-based data focused on aspirin (ASA)-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD) in Turkey.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prevalence of AERD in adult patients with asthma.

METHODS

A structured questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interview by a specialist in pulmonology/allergy at seven centres across Turkey.

RESULTS

A total of 1344 asthma patients (F/M: 1081/263: 80.5%/19.5%, mean age: 45.7 ± 14.2 years) were enrolled. Atopy rate was 47%. Prevalence of allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis, and nasal polyposis (NP) were 49%, 69% and 20%, respectively. Of 270 patients with NP, 171 (63.3%) reported previous nasal polypectomy and 40 (25%) had a history of more than three nasal polypectomies. Aspirin hypersensitivity was diagnosed in 180 (13.6%) asthmatic patients, with a reliable history in 145 (80.5%), and oral ASA provocation test in 35 (19.5%) patients. Clinical presentations of ASA hypersensitivity were respiratory in 76% (n=137), respiratory/cutaneous in 15% (n=27), and systemic in 9% (n=16) of the patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that a family history of ASA hypersensitivity (p: 0.001, OR: 3.746, 95% CI: 1.769-7.929), history of chronic rhinosinusitis/rhinitis (p: 0.025, OR: 1.713, 95% CI: 1.069-2.746) and presence of NP (p<0.001, OR: 7.036, 95% CI: 4.831-10.247) were independent predictors for AERD.

CONCLUSION

This cross-sectional survey showed that AERD is highly prevalent among adult asthmatics and its prevalence seems to be affected by family history of ASA hypersensitivity, history of rhinosinusitis and presence of NP.

Reduced expression of the prostaglandin E2 receptor E-prostanoid 2 on bronchial mucosal leukocytes in patients with aspirin-sensitive asthma

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) is thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of aspirin-sensitive asthma (ASA).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to extend our previous observations implicating impaired inflammatory cell responsiveness to PGE(2) as a pathogenetic mechanism in patients with aspirin-sensitive rhinosinusitis to the bronchial mucosa in patients with ASA.

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry was used to enumerate inflammatory cells and their expression of cysteinyl leukotriene receptors 1 and 2 (CysLT(1) and CysLT(2)) and the PGE(2) receptors E-prostanoid 1 to 4 (EP(1)-EP(4)) in bronchial biopsy specimens from patients with ASA, patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma, and control subjects (n= 15 in each group). Concentrations of PGE(2) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were measured by using ELISA. The effects of PGE(2) and EP receptor agonists on CD3/CD28-stimulated cytokine production by PBMCs were measured by using ELISA. Airways responsiveness to LTD(4)in vivo was measured in asthmatic patients by means of bronchial challenge.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with aspirin-tolerant asthma, patients with ASA had increased bronchial mucosal neutrophil and eosinophil numbers but reduced percentages of T cells, macrophages, mast cells, and neutrophils expressing EP(2). Both groups showed increased bronchial sensitivity to inhaled LTD(4), but this did not correlate with mucosal expression of CysLT(1) or CysLT(2). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid PGE(2) concentrations were comparable in all groups. In vitro PGE(2) inhibited cytokine production by PBMCs through EP(2) but not other PGE(2) receptors.

CONCLUSION

Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that impaired inhibition of inflammatory leukocytes by PGE(2) acting through the EP(2) receptor has a role in the pathogenesis of ASA.

Asthma control and management changes in Japan: questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances of asthma management and the accompanying improved asthma control, many problems related to asthma management still remain. The Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group has been regularly collecting information via surveys since 1998 using a questionnaire, on problems related to asthma management; various studies on asthma management have been reported using data from the questionnaire.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in asthma control and management for every two-year period using the data from 1998 to 2008; future problems requiring resolution were extracted and discussed.

RESULTS

The number of cases surveyed each year was about 3,000 (2,593-3,347 cases). The changes in the data from 1998 to 2008, including asthma attacks and symptoms rate, indicated the improvement of asthma control with the spread of medication according to the guidelines; of particular note, there was a 24.1% increase in the usage rate of inhaled corticosteroids during the study period. From 2002 to 2008, however, some asthmatic conditions seemed to show no improvement with regards to asthma control related to the rates of changes in peak flow meter use, leukotriene receptor antagonist use and oral sustained-released theophylline use. Moreover, there was no decrease in the occurrence of emergency episodes related to asthma deaths.

CONCLUSION

In the actual clinical setting, asthma control seems to be progressing well with the appropriate changes of medication according to the guidelines, and in part due to inhaled corticosteroid use. However, there were two problems which need to be addressed: 1) no improvement in some asthmatic conditions and 2) the occurrence of emergency episodes related to asthma deaths. In the future, it will be necessary to manage asthma in view of these points.

Hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) - classification, diagnosis and management: review of the EAACI/ENDA(#) and GA2LEN/HANNA*

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are responsible for 21-25% of reported adverse drug events which include immunological and nonimmunological hypersensitivity reactions. This study presents up-to-date information on pathomechanisms, clinical spectrum, diagnostic tools and management of hypersensitivity reactions to NSAIDs. Clinically, NSAID hypersensitivity is particularly manifested by bronchial asthma, rhinosinusitis, anaphylaxis or urticaria and variety of late cutaneous and organ-specific reactions. Diagnosis of hypersensitivity to a NSAID includes understanding of the underlying mechanism and is necessary for prevention and management. A stepwise approach to the diagnosis of hypersensitivity to NSAIDs is proposed, including clinical history, in vitro testing and/or provocation test with a culprit or alternative drug depending on the type of the reaction. The diagnostic process should result in providing the patient with written information both on forbidden and on alternative drugs.

Pharmacologic approaches to life-threatening asthma

Following a peak in asthma mortality in the late 1980s and early 1990s, we have been fortunate to see a substantial decrease in asthma deaths in recent years. Although most asthma deaths occur outside the hospital, near-fatal events are commonplace, with anywhere from 2-20% of patients with acute asthma admitted to intensive care, and 2-4% intubated for respiratory failure. Standard therapies for acute severe and near-fatal asthma include administration of systemic corticosteroids, and frequent or continuous inhaled beta agonists. Controversy remains regarding the optimal therapy of those who fail to respond to these initial treatments, those who remain at risk of acute respiratory failure, and patients requiring mechanical ventilation. There remain significant gaps in our knowledge regarding relative benefits of intravenous versus oral corticosteroids, intermittent versus continuous beta agonists, and the role of various adjunctive treatments including intravenous magnesium, systemic beta agonists, aminophylline, and helium-oxygen mixtures. Using models and radiolabeled aerosols, there is a greater understanding regarding effective administration of inhaled beta-agonists in ventilated patients. There is limited available evidence for treatment of near-fatal asthma, a fact reflected by the significant variability in asthma critical care practice. Much of the data guiding treatment in this setting has been generalized from studies of acute asthma in the ED and from general populations of hospitalized patients with acute asthma. This review will focus on pharmacologic approaches to life-threatening asthma by reviewing current guideline recommendations, reviewing the scientific basis of the guidelines, and highlighting gaps in our knowledge in treatment of refractory acute or near-fatal asthma.

Influence of obesity on control in asthmatic Japanese patients defined by the Japanese definition of obesity

BACKGROUND Despite the use of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) becoming increasingly widespread, many problems related to asthma management still need to be addressed. One of them, obesity, has been reported to exert a harmful influence on asthma control. However, there have been few reports focusing not only on both obesity and its influence on Japanese asthma patients but also on the Japanese definition of obesity, as defined by the Japan Society for the Study of Obesity (JASSO). AIMS & METHODS The aim of this study was to confirm the influence of obesity, as defined by the JASSO, on asthma management in Japanese asthmatic patients. Using data from the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group 2008 questionnaire survey, differences between the "normal" group (18.5 kg/m(2) ≤ BMI <25 kg/m(2)) and the "obese" group (25 kg/m(2) ≤ BMI) were analyzed. RESULTS There was a significantly lower step 1 rate (19.4% v.s. 26.8%) and a higher proportion of patients using inhaled salmeterol (43.6% v.s. 35.8%) and leukotriene receptor antagonist (49.8% v.s. 40.8%) in the obese group relative to the normal group, although there were no significant differences in indicators of asthma control, including asthma control test scores. CONCLUSION This study investigated influences of JASSO-defined obesity on asthma severity and management in a clinical setting in Japan. It is possible that there are strong interactions between asthma and obesity, such as obesity causing decreased ICS therapy efficacy and leukotriene (LT)-related inflammation, although further investigation is necessary.

An analysis of factors that exacerbate asthma, based on a Japanese questionnaire

BACKGROUND

It is known that a wide variety of factors exacerbate asthma; however, few studies have investigated the factors that exacerbate asthma from a patient's perspective. The aim of this study was to analyze the factors that exacerbate asthma, based on a questionnaire completed by asthma patients in Niigata Prefecture.

METHODS

Based on questionnaires given to 3085 patients who visited the medical institutes in the Niigata Prefecture monthly from September through October 2006, groups stratified by sex, age, disease type and disease severity, were analyzed for factors contributing to asthma exacerbation, as described in the guideline of the Japanese Society of Allergology.

RESULTS

The leading exacerbating factor chosen by patients was a change in the weather, followed by smoking, allergen exposure, fatigue, stimulants, and air pollutants. Respiratory infection, widely recognized as a critical factor of severe exacerbation, was ranked seventh. Allergen exposure and air pollutants were prominent in younger individuals, whereas respiratory infection tended to be more common in elderly subjects. Allergen exposure, air pollutants, and exercise were significantly more common in atopic-type patients, in contrast with respiratory infection in non-atopic-type patients. According to multiple regression analysis, poor asthma control during the last one year was associated with changes in the weather, whereas the non-atopic disease type was related to exacerbation by respiratory infection. Current smoking was associated with both factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Many factors exacerbate asthma, depending on the individual case and his/her background. These data suggest that changes in the weather may be more important factor for patients in asthma exacerbation.

Aspirin-sensitive respiratory disease

Aspirin-sensitive respiratory disease (ASRD) is a condition characterized by persistent and often severe inflammation of the upper and lower respiratory tracts. Patients develop chronic eosinophilic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyposis, and asthma. The ingestion of aspirin and other cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibitors induces exacerbations of airway disease that may be life-threatening. Thus, aspirin sensitivity is a phenotypic marker for the syndrome, yet nearly all affected individuals can be desensitized by the administration of graded doses of aspirin, leading to long-term clinical benefits. Patients with aspirin sensitivity are often able to tolerate selective COX-2 inhibitors. The pathogenesis of ASRD is underpinned by abnormalities in eicosanoid biosynthesis and eicosanoid receptor expression coupled with intense mast cell and eosinophilic infiltration of the entire respiratory tract. This review focuses on the molecular, cellular, and biochemical abnormalities characterizing ASRD and highlights unanswered questions in the literature and potential future areas of investigation.

Analysis of inhaled corticosteroid selection in patients with bronchial asthma using a questionnaire survey--effects of age, gender, and disease severity

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) has played an important role in the management of asthma. Although several kinds of ICSs are currently available, there is no established strategy for ICS selection.

METHODS

Using the data from the 2004 questionnaire surveys by the Niigata Asthma Treatment Study Group, we analyzed relationships between each patient and the ICS employed on the basis of patient background, asthma control and treatment, and indicated characteristics of ICS selection by the physician.

RESULTS

Of 2852 cases, 2279 (79.9%) were ICS users, and 1513 (66.4% of ICS users) were classified as being in the fluticasone propionate (FP) group, 438 (19.2%) in the budesonide (BUD) group, and 240 (10.5%) in the hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone (HFA-BDP) group, indicating that FP was a standard ICS in this study. The mean age was significantly lower in the BUD group (52.3+/-18.2 years) and was significantly higher in the HFA-BDP group (59.9+/-17.0 years) than that in the FP group (55.8+/-16.6 years). The proportion of female patients was significantly higher not in the HFA-BDP (46.5%) but in the BUD group (59.0%) than in the FP group (51.1%). These results indicated that BUD was frequently prescribed to young female and HFA-BDP was employed in the elderly patients irrespective of gender compared with FP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that ICS selection is reasonably adapted to each patient's background at least in the surveyed area. We need to elucidate the characteristics of ICS selection further in the future as new ICS and devices are developed.

Factors for poor prognosis of near-fatal asthma after recovery from a life-threatening asthma attack

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The aim of this study was to investigate poor prognostic factors associated with a near-fatal asthma attack following patient recovery.

METHODS

We enrolled 68 patients who suffered near-fatal asthma attacks and were admitted to the intensive care units of five university hospitals. The patients were divided into two groups. The first group was comprised of patients who discontinued oral corticosteroids within 6 months after being discharged from the hospital and who maintained a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) >/=60% of the maximum or estimated values of the corresponding patients. The second group included patients who continued on oral corticosteroids for >/=6 months or who maintained a FEV(1) <60%.

RESULTS

In patients with near-fatal asthma, factors for a poor prognosis included older age [48.47+/-3.53 vs. 64.69+/-2.59 years, p<0.05], chronic severe asthma, high values for inflammation-related laboratory markers (ESR, 8.75+/-2.05 vs. 23.88+/-4.40 mm/h, p=0.004; CRP, 1.72+/-0.46 vs. 6.68+/-9.36 mg/dL, p<0.05), asthma exacerbated by pneumonia (28.1 vs. 52.8%, p<0.05), and relatively low nutritional status (albumin, 4.00+/-0.14 vs. 3.51+/-0.10 g/dL, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These prognostic factors may induce irreversible obstruction of the airways with subsequent acute exacerbation of asthma or the need for continual oral corticosteroids after being discharged from the hospital. Patients with these factors should be treated appropriately, under close surveillance.

Near-fatal asthma: recognition and management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Near-fatal asthma continues to be a significant problem despite the decline in overall asthma mortality. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment of near-fatal asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two distinctive phenotypes of near-fatal asthma have been identified: one with eosinophilic inflammation associated with a gradual onset and a slow response to therapy and a second phenotype with neutrophilic inflammation that has a rapid onset and rapid response to therapy. Patients who develop sudden-onset near-fatal asthma seem to have massive allergen exposure and emotional distress. In stable condition, near-fatal asthma frequently cannot be distinguished from mild asthma. Diminished perception of dyspnea plays a relevant role in treatment delay, near-fatal events, and death in patients with severe asthma. Reduced compliance with anti-inflammatory therapy and ingestion of medications or drugs (heroin, cocaine) have been associated with fatal or near-fatal asthma.

SUMMARY

Near-fatal asthma is a subtype of asthma with unique risk factors and variable presentation that requires early recognition and aggressive intervention.

Analysis of perimenstrual asthma based on questionnaire surveys in Japan

BACKGROUND

Perimenstrual asthma (PMA) has been documented in 30% to 40% of asthmatic women; the characteristics of PMA have also been well described. However, there have been few epidemiological investigations of PMA in practice. In this study, we analyzed PMA based on a questionnaire survey carried out in Japan and compared the results with those of studies reported previously.

METHODS

For 8 weeks from September through October 2004, a questionnaire survey was administered to patients with bronchial asthma and their attending physicians. The questionnaire surveyed asthma control, asthma-related emergencies and satisfaction in daily life. The attending physicians were questioned about patient profiles and medications. All female patients who were menstruating during the survey period and who were known to have asthma exacerbation related to menstruation were allocated to the PMA group; those who were not were allocated to the non-PMA group.

RESULTS

The rate of PMA in female patients who were menstruating during the survey period was 11.3% in this study. Characteristic features of the PMA group (n = 54) included more severe disease, worsened disease control and more aggressive patient management, including increased oral corticosteroid use compared with the non-PMA group. The rates of emergency episodes in the PMA group were higher than in the non-PMA group. There was a significant increase in aspirin intolerant asthma (AIA, 25.5%) in the PMA group compared with the non-PMA group (8.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Attention should be paid to the lack of knowledge regarding PMA in patients with asthma in actual clinical settings. The low rate of PMA reported in this study may be due to the study method using self-reports of PMA by patients without sufficient knowledge, and may not be an accurate representation of the actual incidence of the disease. The clinical similarity of PMA to AIA in this study may also provide a new insight into the mechanism of PMA.

Management options for patients with aspirin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and provide management strategies for patients with aspirin or nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) sensitivity.

DATA SOURCES

Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-March 2007) using the terms acetaminophen, aspirin, antiinflammatory agents nonsteroidal, urticaria, angioedema, asthma, leukotriene antagonists, desensitization, and tacrolimus. Article references retrieved were hand-searched for other relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All studies published in English were evaluated. Studies, review articles, and commentaries on aspirin-induced asthma and aspirin- or NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema were included in the review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Aspirin sensitivity is most often manifested as respiratory reactions (eg, bronchospasm, profuse rhinorrhea, conjunctival injection) or urticaria/angioedema. The primary mechanism is believed to be inhibition of the cyclooxygenase 1 (COX-1) enzyme; as such, patients with aspirin sensitivity often display cross-reactions to nonselective NSAIDs that inhibit the COX-1 enzyme. Management strategies include avoidance of aspirin and cross-reacting nonselective NSAIDs. However, desensitization to aspirin is a viable option for patients with aspirin-induced respiratory reactions, especially for those who require aspirin for thromboembolic prophylaxis. Aspirin desensitization is maintained indefinitely with a daily aspirin dose. There is limited evidence of the use of leukotriene modifiers in preventing aspirin-induced asthma. COX-2 selective NSAIDs, especially in patients with aspirin-induced asthma, have not been found to cross-react. However, approximately 4% of patients with a history of aspirin-induced skin reactions may experience a cutaneous reaction following a challenge to a COX-2 selective NSAID. Since acetaminophen is a weak inhibitor of the COX-1 enzyme, patients with aspirin-induced asthma should not take more than 1000 mg of acetaminophen in a single dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Management of patients with aspirin/NSAID sensitivity includes avoidance of aspirin/nonselective NSAIDs, use of COX-2 selective NSAIDs, acetaminophen in doses less than 1000 mg, and desensitization. The role of leukotriene modifiers requires further study before they can be recommended for patients.

Near-fatal asthma phenotype in the ENFUMOSA Cohort

BACKGROUND

Near-fatal asthma (NFA) is characterized by severe asthma attacks usually requiring intensive care unit admission. This phenotype of asthma has been studied mainly in acute conditions.

METHODS

The aim of our study was to compare the clinical, functional and inflammatory characteristics of NFA patients with mild to severe asthmatics in stable conditions. We recruited 155 asthmatic patients from five centres of the European Network for Understanding Mechanisms of Severe Asthma: 67 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma controlled by low/medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids; 64 with severe asthma that, despite treatment with high doses of inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-agonists and for 1/3 also with regular oral corticosteroids, had at least one asthma exacerbation in the previous year; 24 with an NFA episode in the previous 5 years in the absence of inclusion criteria for the previous groups. All the patients were examined in stable conditions.

RESULTS

NFA patients were taking less corticosteroids and were less compliant to prescribed asthma medications than the other two groups of patients. Lung function, blood gases, atopic status, sputum and blood inflammatory cell count of NFA patients were similar to mild-to-moderate, but not severe, asthmatic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable conditions patients with an NFA attack in the previous 5 years cannot be distinguished from patients with mild-to-moderate asthma, while they are different from severe asthmatics both in terms of lung function and of airway inflammation. The risk factor that characterizes this group of patients is reduced usage of prophylactic corticosteroids.