Current Controversies in Melanoma Treatment

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After reading this article and viewing the videos, the participant should be able to: 1. Discuss margins for in situ and invasive disease and describe reconstructive options for wide excision defects, including the keystone flap. 2. Describe a digit-sparing alternative for subungual melanoma. 3. Calculate personalized risk estimates for sentinel node biopsy using predictive nomograms. 4. Describe the indications for lymphadenectomy and describe a technique intended to reduce the risk of lymphedema following lymphadenectomy. 5. Offer options for in-transit melanoma management.

SUMMARY

Melanoma management continues to evolve, and plastic surgeons need to stay at the forefront of advances and controversies. Appropriate margins for in situ and invasive disease require consideration of the trials on which they are based. A workhorse reconstruction option for wide excision defects, particularly in extremities, is the keystone flap. There are alternative surgical approaches to subungual tumors besides amputation. It is now possible to personalize a risk estimate for sentinel node positivity beyond what is available for groups of patients with a given stage of disease. Sentinel node biopsy can be made more accurate and less morbid with novel adjuncts. Positive sentinel node biopsies are now rarely managed with completion lymphadenectomy. Should a patient require lymphadenectomy, immediate lymphatic reconstruction may mitigate the lymphedema risk. Finally, there are minimally invasive modalities for effective control of in-transit recurrences.

Extent of Groin Dissection in Melanoma: A Mixed-Methods, Population-Based Study of Practice Patterns and Outcomes

Melanoma metastases to the groin are frequently managed by therapeutic lymph node dissection. Evidence is lacking regarding the extent of dissection required. Thus, we sought to describe practice patterns for the use of inguinal vs. ilioinguinal dissection, as well as the perioperative/oncologic outcomes of each procedure. A mixed-methods approach was employed to evaluate surgical practice patterns. A retrospective review of three multi-site databases was carried out, together with semi-structured interviews of melanoma surgeons. A total of 347 patients who underwent dissection were reviewed. The main indications stated for adding a “deep” ilioinguinal dissection were palpable or radiologically positive disease. There was no significant difference in complications, length of stay or lymphedema between patients having inguinal vs. ilioinguinal dissection, irrespective of method of diagnosis. There was also no significant difference in recurrence, cancer-specific survival or overall survival between groups. In conclusion, ilioinguinal dissection is a safe and well-tolerated procedure, with no significant added morbidity relative to an inguinal dissection. The indications for ilioinguinal dissection currently in use produce an appropriate deep node positivity rate and ilioinguinal dissection should continue to be used selectively. Randomized data are needed to clarify the impact of ilioinguinal dissection on regional control and survival.

Contemporary management of locoregionally advanced melanoma in Australia and New Zealand and the role of adjuvant systemic therapy

Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence and mortality rates for melanoma in the world. Local surgery is still the standard treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma, and it is therefore important that surgeons understand the optimal care pathways for patients with melanoma. Accurate staging is critical to ensure a reliable assessment of prognosis and to guide treatment selection. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) plays an important role in staging and the provision of reliable prognostic estimates for patients with cutaneous melanoma. Patients with stage III melanoma have a substantial risk of disease recurrence following surgery, leading to poor long-term outcomes. Systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies, known to be effective for stage IV melanoma, have now also been shown to be effective as adjuvant post-surgical treatments for resected stage III melanoma. These patients should be made aware of this and preferably managed in an integrated multidisciplinary model of care, involving the surgeon, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists. This review considers the impact of a recent update to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, the role of SNB for patients with high-risk primary melanoma and recent advances in adjuvant systemic therapies for high-risk patients.

Complications following completion lymphadenectomy versus therapeutic lymphadenectomy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been reported to be less morbid than lymphadenectomy for palpable disease (therapeutic lymph node dissection; TLND). The reporting of morbidity data can be heterogeneous, and hence no 'average' surgical complication rates of these procedures has been reported. This review aims to determine complications rates to inform patients undergoing surgery for metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of English-language literature from 2000 to 2017, reporting morbidity information about CLND and TLND for melanoma, was performed. The methodological quality of the included studies was performed using the methodological index for non-randomised studies (MINORS) instrument and Detsky score. Pooled proportions of post-operative complications were constructed using a random effects statistical model.

RESULTS

After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 articles progressed to the final analysis. In relation to TLND (1627 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 39.3% (95% CI 32.6-46.2); including wound infection/breakdown 25.4% (95% CI: 20.9-30.3); lymphoedema 20.9% (95% CI: 13.8-29.1); and seroma 20.4% (95% CI: 15.9-25.2). For CLND (1929 patients), the overall incidence of surgical complications was 37.2% (95% CI 27.6-47.4); including wound infection/breakdown 21.6% (95% CI: 13.8-30.6); lymphoedema 18% (95% CI: 12.5-24.2); and seroma 17.9% (95% CI: 10.3-27). The complication rate was marginally lower for CLND but not to statistical significance.

DISCUSSION

This study provides information about the incidence of complications after CLND and TLND. It can be used to counsel patients about the procedures and it sets a benchmark against which surgeons can audit their practice.

Is pelvic sentinel node biopsy necessary for lower extremity and trunk melanomas?

OBJECTIVE

There is currently no consensus regarding how to address pelvic sentinel lymph nodes (PSLNs) in melanoma. Thus, our objectives were to identify the incidence and clinical impact of PSLNs.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multi-institutional melanoma database.

RESULTS

Of 2476 cases of lower extremity and trunk melanomas, 227 (9%) drained to PSLNs (181 to both PSLNs and superficial (inguinal or femoral) sentinel lymph nodes (SSLN) and 46 to PSLNs alone). Seventeen (7.5%) of 227 PSLN cases were positive for nodal metastasis, 8 of which drained to PSLNs only while 9 drained to both PSLNs and SSLNs. Complication rates between PSLN and SSLN biopsy were similar (15% vs. 14% respectively). In 181 cases with drainage to both SSLNs and PSLNs, PSLN biopsy upstaged one patient (0.6%), and completion dissection based on a positive PSLN did not upstage any.

CONCLUSIONS

PSLN biopsy is safe, however in the setting of negative SSLNs there is minimal clinical impact. We therefore recommend PSLN biopsy when the SSLNs are positive or when the tumor drains to PSLNs alone.

Low Probability of Lymphatic Drainage to Cloquet's Node Is of Limited Value as Indicator for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Lower Limb Melanoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

For patients with melanoma, the choice between an inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) alone and both an ILND and a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is controversial. Although Cloquet's node (CN) is considered the sentinel pelvic node, evaluation of this factor to predict pelvic node status has produced varied results. We investigated inguinal and pelvic lymphatic drainage patterns and focused on CN to clarify whether CN status could be an indicator of PLND.

METHODS

Patients with primary cutaneous lower limb melanoma who underwent lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and SPECT/CT were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent lymphatic mapping and SLNB. Each patient's CN was identified by SPECT/CT. A radioactive CN was detected in only 37.5% (12/32) of patients, and no lymphatic drainage to CN occurred in 62.5% (20/32). In 37.5% (12/32) of patients, the lymph drained directly from the inguinal to the pelvic nodes bypassing CN.

CONCLUSION

In melanoma patients, lymphatic drainage from the lower extremity does not always pass from the inguinal node to the pelvic nodes via CN. Tumor-negative status of CN alone is of limited value as an indicator for avoiding PLND.

Risk Factors for Positive Deep Pelvic Nodal Involvement in Patients with Palpable Groin Melanoma Metastases: Can the Extent of Surgery be Safely Minimized? : A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

Patients with palpable melanoma groin metastases have a poor prognosis. There is debate whether a combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) is necessary or if superficial groin dissection (SGD) alone is sufficient.

Aim

The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors for deep pelvic nodal involvement in a retrospective, multicenter cohort of palpable groin melanoma metastases. This could aid in the development of an algorithm for selective surgery in the future.

Methods

This study related to 209 therapeutic CGDs from four tertiary centers in The Netherlands (1992–2013), selected based on complete preoperative imaging and pathology reports. Analyzed risk factors included baseline and primary tumor characteristics, total and positive number of inguinal nodes, inguinal lymph node ratio (LNR) and positive deep pelvic nodes on imaging (computed tomography [CT] ± positron emission tomography [PET], or PET − low-dose CT).

Results

Median age was 57 years, 54 % of patients were female, and median follow-up was 21 months (interquartile range [IQR] 11–46 months). Median Breslow thickness was 2.10 mm (IQR 1.40–3.40 mm), and 26 % of all primary melanomas were ulcerated. Positive deep pelvic nodes occurred in 35 % of CGDs. Significantly fewer inguinal nodes were positive in case of negative deep pelvic nodes (median 1 [IQR 1–2] vs. 3 [IQR 1–4] for positive deep pelvic nodes; p < 0.001), and LNR was significantly lower for negative versus positive deep pelvic nodes [median 0.15 (IQR 0.10–0.25) vs. 0.33 (IQR 0.14–0.54); p < 0.001]. A combination of negative imaging, low LNR, low number of positive inguinal nodes, and no extracapsular extension (ECE) could accurately predict the absence of pelvic nodal involvement in 84 % of patients.

Conclusions

Patients with negative imaging, few positive inguinal nodes, no ECE, and low LNR have a low risk of positive deep pelvic nodes and may safely undergo SGD alone.

Evaluation of inter-rater reliability of subjective and objective criteria for diagnosis of lymphedema in upper and lower limbs

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of lymphedema can be obtained objectively by measurement methods, and also by subjective methods, based on the patient's complaint. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inter-rater reliability of objective and subjective criteria used for diagnosis of lymphedema and to propose a lymphedema cut-off for differences in volume between affected and control limbs. METHODS: We studied 84 patients who had undergone lymphadenectomy for treatment of cutaneous melanoma. Physical measures were obtained by manual perimetry (MP). The subjective criteria analyzed were clinical diagnosis of lymphedema in patients' medical records and self-report of feelings of heaviness and/or increase in volume in the affected limb. RESULTS: For upper limbs, the subjective criteria clinical observation (k 0.754, P<0.001) and heaviness and swelling (k 0.689, P<0.001) both exhibited strong agreement with MP results and there was moderate agreement between MP results and swelling (k 0.483 P<0.001), heaviness (k 0.576, P<0.001) and heaviness or swelling (k 0.412, P=0.001). For lower limbs there was moderate agreement between MP results and clinical observation (k 0.423, P=0.003) and regular agreement between MP and self-report of swelling (k 0.383, P=0.003). Cut-off values for diagnosing lymphedema were defined as a 9.7% difference between an affected upper limb and control upper limb and a 5.7% difference between lower limbs. CONCLUSION: Manual perimetry, medical criteria, and self-report of heaviness and/or swelling exhibited better agreement for upper limbs than for lower limbs for diagnosis of lymphedema.

Deep lymph node metastases in the groin significantly affects prognosis, particularly in sentinel node-positive melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

In order to define patients eligible for only a superficial groin dissection or a combined superficial and deep groin dissection, this study aimed to determine the incidence of deep lymph node metastases (LNM) in patients with melanoma metastasized to the groin, to identify patient and melanoma factors that predict deep nodal involvement, and to analyze the impact of deep nodal involvement on survival and recurrence.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a combined superficial (inguinal) and deep (iliac and obturator) complete (CLND) or therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) of the groin between 1994 and 2012 were analyzed.

RESULTS

QueryDeep LNM were found in 8 of 62 CLND patients (13 %) and in 21 of 67 TLND patients (31 %). More than three superficial LNM was the only independent predictor for deep LNM in both CLND and TLND patients. The 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) for CLND and TLND patients with deep LNM was 14.3 and 16.6 %, respectively, and was significantly worse (hazard ratio [HR] 3.39, 95 % CI 1.34-8.58, p = 0.010; and HR 2.01, 95 % CI 1.04-3.88, p = 0.039) compared with CLND and TLND patients without deep LNM (5-year MSS: 54.1 and 37.2 %, respectively). Distant recurrence was significantly associated with deep LNM in CLND patients (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that LNM in the deep area of the groin are fairly common in both CLND and TLND patients and significantly affect prognosis, especially in CLND patients. The number of superficial LNM is the only factor that was found to predict a finding of deep nodal metastases.

Outcomes of routine ilioinguinal lymph node dissection for palpable inguinal melanoma nodal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Patients who present with palpable inguinal melanoma nodal metastasis have two surgical options: inguinal or ilioinguinal lymph node dissection. Indications for either operation remain controversial. This study examined survival and recurrence outcomes following ilioinguinal dissection for patients with palpable inguinal nodal metastasis, and assessed the incidence and preoperative predictors of pelvic nodal metastasis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective clinicopathological analysis of consecutive surgical patients with stage III malignant melanoma. All patients underwent a standardized ilioinguinal dissection at a specialist tertiary oncology hospital over a 12-year period (1998-2010).

RESULTS

Some 38.9 per cent of 113 patients had metastatic pelvic nodes. Over a median follow-up of 31 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 28 per cent for patients with metastatic inguinal and pelvic nodes, and 51 per cent for those with inguinal nodal metastasis only (P = 0.002). The nodal basin control rate was 88.5 per cent. Despite no evidence of pelvic node involvement on preoperative computed tomography (CT), six patients (5.3 per cent) with a single metastatic inguinal lymph node had metastatic pelvic lymph nodes. Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of metastatic inguinal nodes (odds ratio 1.56; P = 0.021) and suspicious CT findings (odds ratio 9.89; P = 0.001) were both significantly associated with metastatic pelvic nodes. The specificity of CT was good (89.2 per cent) in detecting metastatic pelvic nodes, but the sensitivity was limited (57.9 per cent).

CONCLUSION

Metastatic pelvic nodes are common when palpable metastatic inguinal nodes are present. Long-term survival can be achieved following their resection by ilioinguinal dissection. As metastatic pelvic nodes cannot be diagnosed reliably by preoperative CT, patients presenting with palpable inguinal nodal metastasis should be considered for ilioinguinal dissection.

Prognostic significance of drainage to pelvic nodes at sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with extremity melanoma

Patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for lower extremity melanoma may have drainage to pelvic nodes (DPN) in addition to superficial inguinal nodes. These nodes are not sampled routinely at SLN biopsy. Factors predicting DPN and its prognostic significance were assessed in a large cohort of patients undergoing an SLN biopsy. Three hundred and twenty five patients with single primary melanomas of the lower extremity or buttocks who underwent SLN mapping were identified from our prospective melanoma database (December 1995-October 2008). Associations of clinical and pathologic factors with DPN and time to melanoma recurrence (TTR) were analyzed by logistic and Cox regression, respectively. DPN was common, occurring in 23% of cases. Increased Breslow's thickness (P=0.007) and age (P=0.01) were associated with DPN by multivariate analysis. Patients with DPN were not more likely to have a positive SLN; however, SLN- patients with DPN showed a shorter TTR (P=0.02) in a multivariable model including thickness and ulceration. With age included in the model, DPN remained marginally associated with TTR in this group (P=0.08). The pelvic recurrence rates observed were similar in recurrent patients with DPN compared with those without DPN (39% in both groups). In conclusion, DPN occurs in almost one-quarter of patients with lower extremity melanoma and is marginally associated with a shorter TTR in SLN- patients.

Lymphatic abnormalities in the normal contralateral arms of subjects with breast cancer-related lymphedema as assessed by near-infrared fluorescent imaging

Current treatment of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is only directed to the afflicted arm. Near-infrared fluorescent imaging (NIRF) of arm lymphatic vessel architecture and function in BCRL and control subjects revealed a trend of increased lymphatic abnormalities in both the afflicted and unafflicted arms with increasing time after lymphedema onset. These pilot results show that BCRL may progress to affect the clinically "normal" arm, and suggest that cancer-related lymphedema may become a systemic, rather than local, malady. These findings support further study to understand the etiology of cancer-related lymphedema and lead to better diagnostics and therapeutics directed to the systemic lymphatic system.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for palpable melanoma metastases to the groin: when to irradiate?

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of and criteria for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with palpable melanoma metastases to the groin.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with palpable metastases to the groin who were treated with therapeutic nodal dissection during 2000 to 2006 were identified in a prospective institutional database.

RESULTS

In 101 patients, 103 therapeutic nodal dissections were performed; 37 of these were treated with PORT to a median equivalent dose (eqTD(2)) of 50.6 Gy (range, 50-72 Gy). In the surgery-only and PORT groups, 2-year regional control rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-95%) and 91% (95% CI, 81-100%), respectively (p = 0.395). Of five recurrences in radiation-treated patients, four were of dermal type, and in three of these cases, no bolus over the operative scar was used. PORT improved 2-year regional control (46% [95% CI, 11-82%] vs. 82% [95% CI, 63-100%], p = 0.022) among patients in which the sum of risk factors present (i.e., risk factor score) was ≥2. In multivariate analysis, risk-factor score (<2 vs. ≥2: HR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.00-8.56; p < 0.0001) and PORT (yes vs. no: HR, 7.81; 95% CI, 2.83-21.74; p = 0.050) was predictive for regional control and on logistic-regression testing, number of involved lymph nodes was predictive for systemic dissemination (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

PORT should follow therapeutic nodal dissection in cases with two or more adverse factors. More conventional fractionation (≤2.5 Gy), cumulative eqTD(2) <60 Gy and use of bolus over the operative scar are recommended.

Therapeutic surgical management of palpable melanoma groin metastases: superficial or combined superficial and deep groin lymph node dissection

Background

Management of patients with clinically detectable lymph node metastasis to the groin is by ilioinguinal or combined superficial and deep groin dissection (CGD) according to most literature, but in practice superficial groin dissection (SGD) only is still performed in some centers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the experience in CGD versus SGD patients in our center.

Methods

Between 1991 and 2009, 121 therapeutic CGD and 48 SGD were performed in 169 melanoma patients with palpable groin metastases at our institute. Median follow-up was 20 and, for survivors, 45 months.

Results

In this heterogeneous group of patients, overall (OS) and disease-free survival, local control rates, and morbidity rates were not significantly different between CGD and SGD patients. However, CGD patients had a trend towards more chronic lymphedema. Superficial lymph node ratio, the number of positive superficial lymph nodes, and the presence of deep nodes were prognostic factors for survival. CGD patients with involved deep lymph nodes (24.8%) had estimated 5-year OS of 12% compared with 40% with no involved deep lymph nodes (p = 0.001). Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan had high negative predictive value of 91% for detection of pelvic nodal involvement.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that survival and local control do not differ for patients with palpable groin metastases treated by CGD or SGD. Patients without pathological iliac nodes on CT might safely undergo SGD, while CGD might be reserved for patients with multiple positive nodes on SGD and/or positive deep nodes on CT scan.

Adjuvant radiation therapy in metastatic lymph nodes from melanoma

Purpose

To analyze the outcome after adjuvant radiation therapy with standard fractionation regimen in metastatic lymph nodes (LN) from cutaneous melanoma.

Patients and methods

86 successive patients (57 men) were treated for locally advanced melanoma in our institution. 60 patients (69%) underwent LN dissection followed by radiation therapy (RT), while 26 patients (31%) had no radiotherapy.

Results

The median number of resected LN was 12 (1 to 36) with 2 metastases (1 to 28). Median survival after the first relapse was 31.8 months. Extracapsular extension was a significant prognostic factor for regional control (p = 0.019). Median total dose was 50 Gy (30 to 70 Gy). A standard fractionation regimen was used (2 Gy/fraction). Median number of fractions was 25 (10 to 44 fractions). Patients were treated with five fractions/week. Patients with extracapsular extension treated with surgery followed by RT (total dose ≥50 Gy) had a better regional control than patients treated by surgery followed by RT with a total dose <50 Gy (80% vs. 35% at 5-year follow-up; p = 0.004).

Conclusion

Adjuvant radiotherapy was able to increase regional control in targeted sub-population (LN with extracapsular extension).

Regional control and morbidity after superficial groin dissection in melanoma

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus about the optimal extent of surgery for patients with melanoma metastases to inguinal nodes, and this is further complicated by variations in terminology for these dissections. In patients without clinical evidence of iliac metastases, we routinely perform a superficial groin dissection (SGD), which clears node-bearing tissue superficial to the fascia lata. We hypothesized that SGD provides regional tumor control comparable to published experience with deep groin dissection (DGD) and iliac and obturator dissection (IOD), but with less morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database evaluated patients undergoing SGD April 1994 through May 2008. Patients with clinical evidence of iliac metastases were excluded. Clinical and pathologic data regarding recurrence and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 53 primary SGD: 27 for clinically palpable disease, and 25 for microscopic disease. Number and percentage of positive nodes were similar between groups. Median follow-up was 39 months, and 2 patients had primary recurrence in the groin (1 in each group). Two additional patients had concurrent groin and systemic recurrence. Ipsilateral groin recurrence rate prior to systemic disease was similar at 4% and 3.7% for microscopic and palpable disease, respectively. Similarly, survival was comparable between groups (82% and 73%). Toxicities were comparable to previously published data.

CONCLUSION

SGD provides regional control rates similar to DGD and IOD, for lymph node metastases clinically limited to the groin, whether occult or clinically evident.

Lymphedema following cancer therapy in Slovenia: a frequently overlooked condition?

Introduction

Secondary lymphedema following cancer therapy is a frequent, often painful, quality of life disturbing condition, reducing the patients’ mobility and predisposing them to complications, e.g. infections and malignancies. The critical aspect of lymphedema therapy is to start as soon as possible to prevent the irreversible tissue damage.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective study of patients with lymphedema, treated at the Department of Dermatovenereology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, from January 2002 to June 2010. The patients’ demographic and medical data were collected, including type of cancer, type and stage of lymphedema, and time to first therapy of lymphedema. The number of referred patients with lymphedema following the therapy of melanoma, breast cancer, and uterine/cervical cancer, was compared to the number of patients expected to experience lymphedema following cancer therapy, calculated from the incidence reported in the literature.

Results

In the period of 8.5 years, 543 patients (432 females, 112 males) with lymphedema were treated. The results show that probably many Slovenian patients with secondary lymphedema following cancer therapy remain unrecognized and untreated or undertreated. In the majority of our patients, the management of lymphedema was delayed; on average, the patients first received therapy for lymphedema 3.6 years after the first signs of lymphedema.

Conclusions

To avoid a delay in diagnosis and therapy, and the complications of lymphedema following cancer therapy, the physician should actively look for signs or symptoms of lymphedema during the follow-up period, and promptly manage or refer the patients developing problems.

The popliteal fossa - a problem zone for sentinel lymphonodectomy

BACKGROUND

The impact of lymphatic drainage to popliteal sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has yet to be explored in detail.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed lymphoscintigraphy on 663 patients with cutaneous melanomas. The following day sentinel lymphonodectomy was performed. SLNs were studied on serial sections with both histology and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

166 patients had a melanoma located on the foot, the lower leg or the knee, i. e., the potential of lymphatic drainage to the popliteal lymph nodes. On lymphoscintigraphy, only 16 patients (9.6 %) showed popliteal SLNs. A popliteal SLN was surgically identified in only 6 of the 16 patients. The reason for the poor identification rate was exhausted radioactivity in the small popliteal nodes the day after lymphoscintigraphy. In 3 cases, popliteal SLN metastasis was diagnosed. All but one patient had an additional drainage to the inguinal lymph nodes; inguinal SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 7 patients. Even all 16 patients showed lymphatic drainage to iliac lymph nodes, metastasis in the pelvis was diagnosed in 4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Popliteal SLNs are observed in less than 10 % of the patients with melanomas of the distal leg. In the case of suspected popliteal drainage, lymphoscintigraphy should be performed on the day of sentinel lymphonodectomy because the radioactivity of the small and deeply situated popliteal nodes diminishes rapidly. With respect to complete lymphadenectomy, decision-making is difficult since three nodal basins (popliteal, inguinal and iliac) may harbor metastases.

Role of radiotherapy in melanoma management

BACKGROUND

In melanoma, radiotherapy has generally been considered as a palliative treatment option indicated only for advanced cases or disseminated disease. In the 70s of the previous century, the technological advances in radiotherapy, linked to rapid development of computer sciences, resulted in restored interest for radiotherapy in melanoma management. Although a fundamental lack of well designed prospective and/or randomized clinical trials critically influenced the integration of radiotherapy into treatment strategies in melanoma, radiotherapy was recently recognized as an indispensable part in the multidisciplinary management of patients with melanoma. Altogether, approximately 23% of melanoma patients should receive at least one course of radiotherapy during the course of the disease. In this review, radiobiological properties of melanoma that govern the decisions for the fractionation patterns used in the treatment of this disease are described. Moreover, the indications for irradiation and the results of pertinent clinical studies from the literature, creating a rationale for the use of radiotherapy in the management of this disease, are reviewed and a brief description of radiotherapy techniques is given.

CONCLUSIONS

Basic treatment modality in melanoma is surgery. However, whenever surgery is not radical or there are adverse prognostic factors identified on histopathological examination of resected tissue specimen, it needs to be supplemented. Also, in patients with unresectable disease or in those not being suitable for major surgery or who refuse proposed surgical intervention, other effective mode(s) of therapy need to be implemented. From this perspective, supported by clinical experiences and literature results, radiotherapy is a valuable option: it is effective and safe, in curative and palliative setting.