The effects of dexfenfluramine on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent that has been shown to reduce total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic agents, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and has been considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis, and to evaluate blood lactate levels, for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search was performed of electronic databases to identify studies of metformin treatment. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective trials and observational cohort studies in patients with type 2 diabetes of least one month duration were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for non-metformin treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases was calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed-effect model for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 347 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 70,490 patient-years of metformin use or in 55,451 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis per 100,000 patient-years was 4.3 cases in the metformin group and 5.4 cases in the non-metformin group. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to non-metformin therapies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments.

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent that has been shown to reduce total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic agents, in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and has been considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis, and to evaluate blood lactate levels, for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search was performed of electronic databases to identify studies of metformin treatment. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective trials and observational cohort studies in patients with type 2 diabetes of least one month duration were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for non-metformin treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases was calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed-effect model for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 347 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 70,490 patient-years of metformin use or in 55,451 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis per 100,000 patient-years was 4.3 cases in the metformin group and 5.4 cases in the non-metformin group. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to non-metformin therapies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments.

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study indicate that metformin treatment is associated with a reduction in total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and is considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use compared to placebo and other glucose-lowering treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A secondary objective was to evaluate the blood lactate levels for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was performed of The Cochrane Library (up to 8/2005), MEDLINE (up to 8/2005), EMBASE (up to 11/2000), OLD MEDLINE, and REACTIONS (up to 8/2005), in order to identify all studies of metformin treatment from 1966 to August 2005. The Cumulated Index Medicus was used to search relevant articles from 1959 to 1965. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators. Date of latest search: August 2005.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective trials in patients with type 2 diabetes that lasted longer than one month were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy. Observational cohort studies of metformin treatment lasting greater than one month were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials to be included, assessed study quality and extracted data. The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for placebo or other treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases in the metformin and non-metformin groups were calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed effect model for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 206 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 47,846 patient-years of metformin use or in 38,221 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics with 95% confidence intervals the upper limit for the true incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis was 6.3 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis in the non-metformin group was 7.8 cases per 100,000 patient-years. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to placebo or other non-biguanide therapies. The mean lactate levels were slightly lower for metformin treatment compared to phenformin (WMD -0.75 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.15).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments if prescribed under the study conditions.

Diabesity

Weight reduction has been shown to improve glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors associated with insulin resistance in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therapeutic options for these patients include promoting weight loss (non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatment) and improving glycemic control, as well as treating common associated risk factors such as arterial hypertension and dyslipidemias. This article provides an overview of anti-obesity drugs used in the treatment of obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. The most widely investigated drugs, sibutramine and orlistat, result in modest, clinically worthwhile weight loss, with demonstrable improvements in many co-morbidities, among them, type 2 diabetes. Clinical trials with these anti-obesity medications in cohorts of obese diabetic patients have been reviewed as well as cathecolaminergic agents (diethylpropion [amfepramone], fenproporex, mazindol, ephedrine-caffeine combination), serotoninergic drugs (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, fluoxetine), and other drugs that have some action on weight loss (the antidiabetic agent metformin, anti-epileptic agents topiramate and zonisamide, and the antidepressive bupropion [amfebutamone]). These trials show variable benefits in terms of effects on glucose profiles.

Treatment of obesity: an update on anti-obesity medications

The information presented in this article provides an overview of physiological agents, therapeutics in current use, and medications that have been extensively used in the past but are no longer available, or are not classically considered as anti-obesity drugs. The authors present an extensive review on the criteria for anti-obesity management efficacy, on physiological mechanisms that regulate central and/or peripheral action energetic homeostasis (nutrients, monoamines and peptides), and on beta-phenethylamine pharmacological-derivative agents (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, phentermine, diethylpropion, fenproporex and sibutramine), tricyclic derivatives (mazindol), phenylpropanolamine derivatives (ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine), a phenylpropanolamine oxy-tri-fluor-phenyl derivative (fluoxetine), a naftilamine derivative (sertraline) and a lipstatine derivative (orlistat). An analysis of all clinical trials longer than 10 weeks in duration is also presented for medications used in the management of obesity.

Risk of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study indicate that metformin treatment is associated with a reduction in total mortality compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments. Metformin, however, is thought to increase the risk of lactic acidosis, and is considered to be contraindicated in many chronic hypoxemic conditions that may be associated with lactic acidosis, such as cardiovascular, renal, hepatic and pulmonary disease, and advancing age.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis with metformin use compared to placebo and other glucose-lowering treatments in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A secondary objective was to evaluate the blood lactate levels for those on metformin treatment compared to placebo or non-metformin therapies.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search was performed of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (up to 4/2000), Medline (up to 11/2000), Embase (up to 11/2000), Oldmedline, and Reactions (up to 5/2000), in order to identify all studies of metformin treatment from 1966 to November 2000. The Cumulated Index Medicus was used to search relevant articles from 1959 to 1965. The search was augmented by scanning references of identified articles, and by contacting principal investigators. Date of latest search: November 2000.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective trials in patients with type 2 diabetes that lasted longer than one month were included if they evaluated metformin, alone or in combination with other treatments, compared to placebo or any other glucose-lowering therapy. Observational cohort studies of metformin treatment lasting greater than one month were also included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently selected trials to be included, assessed study quality and extracted data. The incidence of fatal and nonfatal lactic acidosis was recorded as cases per patient-years, for metformin treatment and for placebo or other treatments. The upper limit for the true incidence of cases in the metformin and non-metformin groups were calculated using Poisson statistics. In a second analysis lactate levels were measured as a net change from baseline or as mean treatment values (basal and stimulated by food or exercise) for treatment and comparison groups. The pooled results were recorded as a weighted mean difference (WMD) in mmol/L, using the fixed effects model for continuous data.

MAIN RESULTS

Pooled data from 176 comparative trials and cohort studies revealed no cases of fatal or nonfatal lactic acidosis in 35,619 patient-years of metformin use or in 30,002 patients-years in the non-metformin group. Using Poisson statistics with 95% confidence intervals the upper limit for the true incidence of metformin-associated lactic acidosis was 8.4 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and the upper limit for the true incidence of lactic acidosis in the non-metformin group was 9 cases per 100,000 patient-years. There was no difference in lactate levels, either as mean treatment levels or as a net change from baseline, for metformin compared to placebo or other non-biguanide therapies. The mean lactate levels were slightly lower for metformin treatment compared to phenformin (WMD -0.75 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.86 to -0.15).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments if prescribed under the study conditions, taking into account contra-indications.

Therapeutic and adverse actions of serotonin transporter substrates

A variety of drugs release serotonin (5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine) from neurons by acting as substrates for 5-HT transporter (SERT) proteins. This review summarizes the neurochemical, therapeutic, and adverse actions of substrate-type 5-HT-releasing agents. The appetite suppressant (+/-)-fenfluramine is composed of (+) and (-) isomers, which are N-de-ethylated in the liver to yield the metabolites (+)- and (-)-norfenfluramine. Fenfluramines and norfenfluramines are potent 5-HT releasers. (+/-)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine ((+/-)-MDMA, "ecstasy") and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) are substrate-type 5-HT releasers. Fenfluramines, (+/-)-MDMA, and mCPP release neuronal 5-HT by a common non-exocytotic diffusion-exchange mechanism involving SERTs. (+)-Norfenfluramine is a potent 5-HT(2B) and 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist. The former activity may increase the risk of valvular heart disease, whereas the latter activity is implicated in the anorexic effect of systemic fenfluramine. Appetite suppressants that increase the risk for developing primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) are all SERT substrates, but these drugs vary considerably in their propensity to increase this risk. For example, fenfluramine and aminorex are clearly linked to the occurrence of PPH, whereas other anorectics are not. Similarly, some SERT substrates deplete brain tissue 5-HT in animals (e.g., fenfluramine), while others do not (e.g., mCPP). In addition to the established indication of obesity, 5-HT releasers may help treat psychiatric disorders, such as drug and alcohol dependence, depression, and premenstrual syndrome. Viewed collectively, we believe new medications can be developed that selectively release 5-HT without increasing the risk for adverse effects of valvular heart disease, PPH, and neurotoxicity. Such agents may be useful for treating a variety of psychiatric disorders.

Serotonin releasing agents. Neurochemical, therapeutic and adverse effects

This review summarizes the neurochemical, therapeutic and adverse effects of serotonin (5-HT) releasing agents. The 5-HT releaser (plus minus)-fenfluramine is composed of two stereoisomers, (+)-fenfluramine and (minus sign)-fenfluramine, which are N-de-ethylated to yield the metabolites, (+)-norfenfluramine and (minus sign)-norfenfluramine. Fenfluramines and norfenfluramines are 5-HT transporter substrates and potent 5-HT releasers. Other 5-HT releasing agents include m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), a major metabolite of the antidepressant drug trazodone. Findings from in vitro and in vivo studies support the hypothesis that fenfluramines and mCPP release neuronal 5-HT via a non-exocytotic carrier-mediated exchange mechanism involving 5-HT transporters. (+)-Norfenfluramine is a potent 5-HT(2B) and 5-HT(2C) receptor agonist. The former activity may increase the risk of developing valvular heart disease (VHD), whereas the latter activity is implicated in the anorectic effect of systemic fenfluramine. Anorectic agents that increase the risk of developing primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) share the common property of being 5-HT transporter substrates. However, these drugs vary considerably in their propensity to increase the risk of PPH. In this regard, neither trazodone nor mCPP is associated with PPH. Similarly, although some 5-HT substrates can deplete brain 5-HT (fenfluramine), others do not (mCPP). In addition to the established indication of obesity, 5-HT releasers may be helpful in treating psychiatric problems such as drug and alcohol dependence, depression and premenstrual syndrome. Viewed collectively, it seems possible to develop new medications that selectively release 5-HT without the adverse effects of PPH, VHD or neurotoxicity. Such agents may have utility in treating a variety of psychiatric disorders.

Antiobesity pharmacotherapy in the management of type 2 diabetes

Obesity is a well-known risk factor for the development of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The management of the obese diabetic patient remains a challenge for the clinician but, in any case, weight reduction should be considered as a key objective. In this respect, several antiobesity drugs have demonstrated potential. However, while fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine have been shown to promote weight loss and to directly improve insulin sensitivity, being two mechanisms contributing to better blood glucose control in obese Type 2 diabetic patients, they were recently withdrawn due to safety problems. Sibutramine, a new selective norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitor, promotes weight loss by decreasing food intake, an effect which leads to a mild improvement (significant in patients losing > or =5% of initial body weight) of blood glucose control in obese diabetic patients. Similarly, orlistat, a selective gastrointestinal lipase inhibitor which increases faecal fat losses, enhances diet-induced weight reduction and improves both blood glucose control and vascular risk profile, especially dyslipidaemia, in obese Type 2 diabetic patients. Further studies are required to better identify good responders to pharmacotherapy and specify the role of antiobesity agents in the overall long-term management of obese subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Other novel pharmacological approaches deserve further consideration, for instance beta-3 agonists aiming to increase energy expenditure, drugs interfering with tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) or free fatty acid release by the adipose tissue or agents that slow gastric emptying. However, until now, results regarding efficacy and/or safety have been disappointing or preliminary in humans.

Current concepts in the pharmacological management of obesity

The pharmacological management of obesity has gained increasing attention as new weight loss treatments are approved and a significant proportion of the public strives to lose weight. Obesity is associated with a high mortality rate, multiple chronic medical conditions, and carries an enormous financial burden. Obesity is a multifactorial condition, most often due to an imbalance in energy intake and expenditure. Despite the greater focus on management of obesity, weight loss remains a difficult goal to achieve. Obesity is a chronic medical condition that may require long term treatment, therefore the risks and benefits of all pharmacological agents must be carefully considered. Noradrenergic appetite suppressants (ie. phenyl-propanolamine, phentermine) result in weight loss but stimulatory effects limit their use. The serotonergic agents (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine) were effective weight loss drugs, but were voluntarily withdrawn from the US market last year because of cardiovascular and pulmonary complications. The combination noradrenergic/serotonergic agent sibutramine is indicated for the management of obesity, particularly in the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors. Modest weight loss is achieved with sibutramine, although weight gain is significant after discontinuation. In addition, long term safety data are not yet available. The thermogenic combination of ephedrine plus caffeine is minimally effective, and adverse effects are usually transient. Other thermogenic agents, such as beta3-agonists, are still under investigation. Agents may alter digestion through lipase inhibition (orlistat) or fat substitution (olestra). Orlistat decreases systemic absorption of dietary fat, decreasing body weight and cholesterol. Olestra is a fat substitute that has been incorporated into snack foods. Olestra substitution for dietary fat has not been studied as a weight loss strategy, although olestra has no caloric value and may be beneficial. The use of orlistat and olestra may be limited by gastrointestinal adverse effects. Finally, the manipulation of leptin and neuropeptide Y are under investigation for the treatment of obesity. Pharmacological agents should be used as an aid to a structured diet and exercise regimen in the treatment of obesity. Weight loss agents may result in initial weight loss, but sustained weight loss is not always achieved even with continuation of treatment. The effect of weight loss obtained while using pharmacotherapeutic agents on morbidity and mortality has not been established. Therefore, diet and exercise should be the focus of any weight loss programme. There is a continued need for safe and effective pharmacotherapeutic agents for the treatment of obesity.

Insulin resistance: site of the primary defect or how the current and the emerging therapies work

Insulin resistance is one of the cardinal pathophysiological components of the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and frequently co-exists with essential hypertension. Although insulin resistance is defined as inadequate target organ (muscle, liver and fat) responsiveness and/or sensitivity to insulin, the primary defect may be located in the target organs themselves or at their remote controller--the central nervous system. One of the ways of resolving this dilemma is studying the mechanisms of action of drugs that have insulin-sensitizing properties. In this brief review we discuss how the known and potential insulin sensitizers: metformin, appetite suppressants, thiazolidinediones, and the new class of centrally acting antihypertensive drugs, I1-receptor agonists, may work.

Obesity medications and the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Obesity is a chronic disease and requires ongoing treatment. Type 2 diabetes is associated with obesity and improves with weight loss. Diets of 800 kcal/d induce twice the weight loss induced by weight loss medications. The strength of weight loss medication, which should be used with diet and a lifestyle change program, is the maintenance of weight loss. Sibutramine and orlistat are the only two medications approved for the long-term treatment of obesity. Orlistat gives a reduction of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol in excess of that expected with weight loss, and the drop in blood pressure expected with weight loss is not seen with sibutramine. Except in newly diagnosed patients with diabetes subjects, patients with diabetes lose half the weight of subjects who do not have diabetes when treated with weight loss medications. Metformin and, to a lesser extent, acarbose cause weight loss, making them attractive choices for the treatment of obese type 2 diabetic subjects. Repaglinide appears to be weight-neutral, but other medications for patients with diabetes can be associated with weight gain. Many new medications are in development for the treatment of obesity. These new medications act through a variety of mechanisms and will surely play an increasingly important role in the treatment of obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pharmacological intervention: the antiobesity approach

Reduction in overweight and obesity management have been shown to be important in the treatment of diabetes. Even modest weight loss produces important metabolic benefits if maintained over the long term. Thus a pharmacotherapeutic agent that could produce a maintained weight loss, and had a good safety profile, would revolutionize the treatment of type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Two obesity management agents, orlistat and sibutramine, are expected shortly for the long-term treatment of obesity. These agents have been shown to be effective in 1-2-year-long studies in obese, non-diabetic patients. They produced significant improvements in weight loss compared with placebos. The efficacy of these obesity management agents has also been demonstrated in short-term studies in patients with type II diabetes. As yet, however, few studies have investigated the long-term effects of these treatments in diabetic patients. Obese patients with type II diabetes receiving 12 months of dexfenfluramine therapy showed greater reductions in weight, fasting blood glucose and HbA1c levels than the controls. A 1-year study of orlistat treatment for patients with type II diabetes revealed substantial benefits in glycaemic control, even though weight loss was only moderate. A 1-year treatment with orlistat also substantially prevented the conversion of impaired glucose tolerance into type II diabetes (conversion rate 2.6% in the orlistat group versus 10.4% in the placebo group). Encouraging results have also been reported from studies on orlistat and sibutramine in non-diabetics, with beneficial effects seen for weight loss and other diabetes risk factors. Antiobesity pharmacotherapy therefore appears to offer a realistic option for the prevention of diabetes, although further studies are required to determine its efficacy.

Update on the pharmacotherapy of obesity

OBJECTIVE

To review recent developments in the pharmacotherapy of obesity, including the agents currently approved for use in the management of obesity and those under development.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search from January 1990 to July 1997 was conducted to identify English literature available on the pharmacotherapy of obesity. The search was supplemented by a review of the bibliographies of identified literature.

STUDY SELECTION

All controlled and uncontrolled trials were reviewed. When available, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were used preferentially.

DATA EXTRACTION

Agents were reviewed with regard to mechanism of action, clinical trial data regarding efficacy, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, and contraindications where information was available. Study design, selected population, results, and adverse effect information were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The anorexiants currently available or under development for the management of obesity regulate food intake and satiety via the adrenergic and/or serotonergic pathways. Clinical trials have shown a 10-15% weight loss can typically be anticipated; however, little long-term safety and efficacy data are available. Adverse events tend to be mild and self-limiting, but serious adverse events can occur. Treatment options under development include thermogenic agents, digestive inhibitors, and analogs and antagonists of hormones that regulate food intake and satiety.

CONCLUSIONS

Several mechanisms to control weight are currently under investigation for the management of obesity. Since obesity is a chronic condition, further studies should be conducted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these agents and the role of combination therapy using different modalities.

Dexfenfluramine. An updated review of its therapeutic use in the management of obesity

Dexfenfluramine increases serotonergic activity by stimulating serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) release into brain synapses, inhibiting its reuptake into presynaptic neurons and by directly stimulating postsynaptic serotonin receptors. On the basis of the serotonin hypothesis of appetite control, these actions would be expected to reduce appetite and, consequently, bodyweight. Studies conducted in animals and in overweight patients with and without associated disorders have confirmed the weight-reducing efficacy and good tolerability of dexfenfluramine. In 3-month clinical studies in obese patients, weight reductions with dexfenfluramine 15mg twice daily combined with dietary support were significantly higher than those achieved with placebo and similar to those with ephedrine/caffeine 20/20mg 3 times daily, sibutramine 10mg once daily and fluoxetine 60 mg/day. Furthermore, dexfenfluramine recipients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia or hypertension consistently show improvements in glycaemic control, blood lipid profiles and blood pressure. 12-month trial results indicate that most weight loss occurs in the initial 6 months and appears to be maintained for a further 6 months. Weight regain after withdrawal of treatment in 12-month studies demonstrates that dexfenfluramine is effective in maintaining a stable bodyweight at a lower level than placebo and in limiting food intake over this time period. Commonly reported adverse events with dexfenfluramine include diarrhoea, tiredness, dry mouth and somnolence; these symptoms are generally mild and transient. Approximately 7 and 10% of dexfenfluramine recipients in short and long term studies withdrew because of adverse events. Dexfenfluramine was better tolerated than ephedrine/caffeine and fluoxetine in short term studies. Obesity is a chronic condition that is accompanied by a number of metabolic complications. It is a significant health problem in developed countries, and as a major risk factor for many chronic diseases, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease, the economic burden of this condition is considerable. As with other chronic conditions, there is a role for pharmacological intervention in patients with severe obesity. However, drugs should be considered as only one component of a weight-control programme, since additional lifestyle modification is required to maintain weight loss. The promising data on the long term efficacy and tolerability of dexfenfluramine as well as its favourable effects on risk factors associated with obesity requires confirmation in long term studies. In the meantime, dexfenfluramine should be considered a valuable adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet in the management of severe obesity, particularly in patients with associated disorders and those unsuccessful with conventional weight loss measures. Available data support the use of the drug for up to 1 year to maintain weight loss and thus dexfenfluramine should be considered for long term administration.

The addition of dexfenfluramine to fluoxetine in the treatment of obesity: a randomized clinical trial

Current evidence demonstrates that pharmacologic agents, alone or in combination produce short-term weight-loss and may remain effective for extended periods of time in obese patients. We have evaluated the weight loss of a selective inhibitor of serotonin uptake, fluoxetine, alone as compared with combined therapeutic trial with another serotoninergic drug, dexfenfluramine. Thirty-three patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind randomized clinical trial divided to two groups: Group I [Fluoxetine 40 mg and placebo (n = 13)] and Group II [Fluoxetine 40 mg plus dexfenfluramine 15 mg at night (n = 20)]. Both groups had a significant weight loss at the end of 8 months (Group I, mean +/- SEM 6.2 +/- 2.8 kg and Group II 13.4 +/- 6.3 kg, p < 0.05). Group II patients had a significantly greater weight loss as compared with Group I both in terms of mean weight loss in kg and BMI in kg/m2. However significance between Group I and II related to BMI mean values and weight mean values were only achieved after, respectively, 4 and 6 months of treatment. At laboratory level there was an elevation of HDL-cholesterol and lowering of serum lipids values (cholesterol and triglycerides) in both groups. Side effects were relatively minor and no altered clinical vital signs or abnormal laboratory values were observed. We concluded that the combination of fluoxetine (daytime) and dexfenfluramine (at night) may be more effective than fluoxetine alone in weight reduction although the small size of this study does not permit broad generalization.

Reduction of visceral adipose tissue and improvement of metabolic indices: effect of dexfenfluramine in NIDDM

Increased visceral adipose tissue is thought to contribute to impaired glucose tolerance. We studied 10 men with non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM) before and after a 12-week intervention study using dexfenfluramine. Subjects had a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 +/- 1.7 kg/m2 and had an abdominal distribution of body fatness (waist-to hip ratio > 0.9). Anthropometric indices, biochemistry, macronutrient intake from 7-day food records as well as a euglycaemic glucose clamp and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were performed at week 0 and week 12. Abdominal adipose tissue area measured by MRI was reduced from 854 +/- 270 cm2 to 666 +/- 231 cm2 (p = 0.003) due mainly to a selective 32% reduction in visceral fat area from 484 +/- 230 cm2 to 333 +/- 72 cm2 (p = 0.002). Insulin sensitivity improved from 0.29 +/- 0.13 [min-1 (mU/L)] to 0.54 +/- 0.21 [min-1 (mU/L)] (p = 0.01) and C-peptide levels reduced from 0.77 +/- 0.24 mumol/L to 0.58 +/- 0.15 mumol/L (p = 0.002). The reductions in fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin failed to achieve significance. Fasting total cholesterol and triglyceride levels significantly reduced (p = < 0.001 and p = 0.021 respectively). There was a reduction in total energy intake (p = 0.005) due to a significant reduction in calories obtained from fat (p < 0.001). Thus dexfenfluramine was shown to be a useful adjunct therapy for the reduction of visceral fat in abdominally-obese men with NIDDM with an associated improvement in insulin sensitivity.

Clinical studies with dexfenfluramine: from past to future

d Fenfluramine (dF) (15 mg twice daily) has been studied in controlled trials in human obesity. It has been shown to increase adherence to weight lowering programs, to double the number of patients losing 10 kg or more when compared with a fairly efficient placebo plus dietary counselling, and to prevent weight regain when continued over a 1 year period. Weight loss after 1 month and 4 months is likely to predict subsequent outcome. Also, significant improvement in metabolic risk factors and blood pressure were clearly demonstrated, even more markedly in some obesity-associated diseases, when body weight is maintained at a lower level. Even moderate but sustained weight loss of some 10% of starting weight or less has been confirmed to be of medical value. Tolerance and safety of dF can be considered acceptable, even if longer term follow-up is clearly needed. These studies support the concept that long-term pharmacotherapy with this serotoninergic drug might help achieve better outcome in the management of many obese patients, particularly in preventing relapse. The long-term managerial strategies to be developed for each patient might thus include dF together with dietary advice, behavioral modification and physical exercise, either simultaneously or sequentially.

Drugs on the horizon for treatment of type 2 diabetes

The only new pharmaceutical therapy for Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes that has become available for clinical use in the last 40 years is the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose, which reduces postprandial glucose levels by retarding digestion of complex carbohydrates in the gut. It has proved difficult to find other new metabolically active drugs that lack toxicity. Agents that reduce insulin resistance include the thiazolidinediones, which are very effective in animals. Of these, the only one that has been maintained in clinical evaluation appears from preliminary data to have an effect that although still useful, is not greater than that reported for current oral agents. Agents that reduce non-esterified fatty acid levels by inhibiting lipolysis, thereby allowing increased peripheral uptake of glucose, have so far given minimal reduction in glycaemia. The development of fatty acid oxidation inhibitors to reduce gluconeogenesis in the liver has been hampered by toxicity, but additional new agents are being studied. The most promising new approach for enhancing insulin secretion has been suggested by the demonstration that pharmacological doses of GLP-1 (7-36 amide), a natural enteric incretin hormone, improves pancreatic beta-cell and alpha-cell sensitivity to glucose and can induce normal basal glucose levels in diabetic man. The future development of GLP-1 agonists will be of great interest. This is timely as other insulin secretogogues, such as alpha 2 adrenergic blockers have proved relatively ineffective. Anti-obesity agents would in theory be beneficial, but have either had limited efficacy or have been avoided because of concern about long-term safety. Until new pharmaceutical agents become available, if near-normal glycaemia is to be achieved, many more Type 2 diabetic patients will need insulin therapy. When full insulin replacement therapy is not feasible, reducing the fasting blood glucose level towards normal with a single daily basal insulin supplement, either alone or in combination with oral agents, could become a more widely used therapy.

The comparison of four weight reduction strategies aimed at overweight diabetic patients

Four weight reduction strategies were investigated in a diabetic population who previously had shown little motivation to lose weight. Some 409 patients, body mass index 28-45 were invited to participate. Only 51% replied, although 22 patients (5.4%) lost > 3 kg by invitation alone. The study comprised 159 patients, randomly allotted to either regular clinic visits, behavioural group therapy, dexfenfluramine (30 mg d-1 for initial 3 months) or combined home and clinic visits. A further 58 patients were monitored as controls. At 3 months the best weight loss (intention to treat) was achieved using dexfenfluramine with mean weight losses of 1.6, 1.2, 3.4, and 1.7 kg, respectively, in each group. At 1 year weight losses were similar (1.2, 1.8, 2.8, 1.2 kg, respectively) but contrasted with a mean 1.2 kg weight gain in the controls. Some 38% lost > 3 kg on dexfenfluramine compared to 19-23% for the others. In those who completed the study, weight loss was similar with behavioural therapy (3 kg) or dexfenfluramine (3.2 kg). We conclude that intensive dietetic efforts can reverse the weight increase in the diabetic population although weight loss is minimal. Dexfenfluramine was most effective in the short term, behavioural therapy useful long term but only in those who remained within the group; home visits offered no advantage.

Effects of dexfenfluramine on free fatty acid turnover and oxidation in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

To test the potential effects of dexfenfluramine (dF) on enhancing free fatty acid (FFA) turnover and oxidation rates, 11 obese female non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) outpatients (age, 52.5 +/- 1.5 years; weight, 81.3 +/- 3.2 kg; height, 158 +/- 3.04 cm; body mass index, 32.4 +/- 0.7 kg/m2) received a primed-constant infusion of 1-14C-palmitate. The waist to hip ratio (WHR) was 0.91 +/- 0.04. Fat body mass and lean body mass, assessed by dual-energy x-ray densitometry, were 32.0 +/- 1.5 and 49.30 +/- 2.67 kg, respectively. All patients had an average hemoglobin A1 of 6.3% +/- 0.3% in the month preceding the study and had not received oral hypoglycemic agents. Gas exchange was measured both basally and during a ventilated-hood system, indirect-calorimetry session. The protocol was a randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind design. Subjects received dF 30 mg acutely (n = 6) or a placebo (n = 5). A dose of dF 15 mg twice daily or placebo was then administered over 15 days (chronic). To obtain serum peak level of the drug, dF was administered 2 hours before starting palmitate infusion. A free diet was allowed throughout the study, and the group treated with dF lost approximately 0.5 kg body weight. Acute and chronic dF administration resulted in a significant increase in FFA oxidation, expressed as a percentage of the dose of radiocarbon (respectively, 11.47% +/- 0.46% v 9.50% +/- 0.46% [P < .01] and 12.06% +/- 0.71% v 9.88% +/- 0.62% [P < .01]). FFA turnover rate was higher after both acute and chronic dF administration (respectively, 10.71 +/- 2.18 v 7.79 +/- 1.48 mumol/kg/min [P < .05] and 11.92 +/- 2.74 v 8.43 +/- 1.86 mumol/kg/min [P < .05]). Serum FFA concentration during both acute and chronic dF administration increased, but not significantly. Mean serum glucose level decreased after acute dF from 114.3 +/- 8.6 to 86.5 +/- 5.1 mg/dL (P < .001) and after chronic dF from 120.3 +/- 7.3 to 89.8 +/- 5.8 mg/dL (P < .001). Serum insulin was not affected by dF administration. In conclusion, oral acute and chronic dF administration increase FFA turnover and oxidation rates in NIDDM obese patients. This may play an important role in weight reduction. In addition, dF shows a weight-independent effect on glucose metabolism, reducing serum glucose levels without acting on insulin secretion.

Obese patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by insulin and metformin: effects of adjunctive dexfenfluramine therapy on glycaemic control

Dexfenfluramine is well known for its weight reducing action and has been reported to improve glycaemic control in obese Type 2 diabetic patients not adequately controlled on conventional oral hypoglycaemic therapy. In this double-blind placebo-controlled study, 20 obese Type 2 diabetic patients with mean HbA1c of 8.8 +/- 0.5% (normal range 3.5-6.0%), and mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.4 +/- 1.0 kg m-2, who were poorly controlled on insulin (mean dosage 58.0 +/- 6.1 units day-1) were randomized to receive either additional dexfenfluramine or placebo for 12 weeks. Seventeen of these patients were already taking maximum tolerated metformin therapy (mean dosage 1.6 +/- 0.2 g day-1) and the other three were unable to tolerate any at all. At baseline, the dexfenfluramine and placebo groups were similar in all parameters studied. After the 12-week treatment period, median HbA1c had fallen in dexfenfluramine treated patients from 8.5 (interquartile range (IR): 7.5-10.3) to 7.1% (IR: 6.7-7.5; p < 0.02). The fall in HbA1c in individual patients after treatment with dexfenfluramine was strongly associated with weight loss (r = 0.69; p < 0.04), although as a group the changes in weight and BMI were not statistically significant. Placebo was without effect. These results show that in the obese patient with Type 2 diabetes who is poorly controlled despite large daily doses of insulin and metformin, adjunctive dexfenfluramine can improve glycaemic control without exacerbating weight gain.

Traditional treatment of obesity: does it work?

Obesity is the most important nutritional disorder in the developed world, since up to 10% of the population are obese. The place of physical activity and diet in the aetiology of obesity is discussed. The traditional treatment of obesity includes change in lifestyle, nutritional education and modification and increase in exercise. These changes are important for long-term success. There are a number of other treatment options including anorectic drugs, the use of very low calorie diets and surgical techniques which may have some clinical role. For the extremely obese patient with established complications surgery may be the most appropriate intervention and may be life-saving. Most studies of traditional treatment have demonstrated limited success. The prevention of obesity is therefore of great importance. Large-scale studies have shown that it is possible to modify behaviour and cardiovascular risk factors. The prevention of obesity requires a coordinated approach with targeting of children and their carers. Governmental involvement and legislation is essential. The future holds the promise of more imaginative and coordinated therapies for obesity using the skills of physicians, nutritionists, exercise physiologists and psychologists. Different forms of treatment may be appropriate for different groups of obese patients.

Therapy for obesity--today and tomorrow

Obesity poses a serious health hazard and its treatment is often disappointing. Besides conservative methods, the place of pharmacotherapy, very-low-calorie diets, and even, in selected cases, mechanical means or surgery can be considered. Effective drug treatment for obesity must reduce energy intake, or increase energy expenditure, or increase energy losses in faeces. All these possibilities have potential activities but also serious limitations. Current pharmacotherapy essentially uses anorectic drugs and the other approaches, although promising, are still under investigation. Of the anorectic compounds currently available, serotoninergic agents, like dexfenfluramine and fluoxetine, appear to have the most suitable pharmacological profile. Very-low-calorie diets could help in the short-term but should be associated with other approaches to increase the rate of long-term success. They must be well-balanced as macronutrients and micronutrients are concerned, be prescribed in well-selected patients under careful medical supervision, and not be followed longer than a few weeks. Surgery can provide palliation for severe obesity when all medical approaches have failed. It may consist in decreasing food intake (gastric procedures), affecting calorie absorption (intestinal shunting, biliopancreatic bypass), or removing localized excess fat (lipectomy, liposuction). Gastric reduction operations are safe and effective provided they are performed by experienced surgeons in well-selected patients. They can be considered now as the best option for a minority of patients with morbid and refractory obesity. Finally, in very selected patients, mechanical means (such as the waist cord) may also help losing weight and/or avoiding weight regain. Even if all these therapeutic approaches can be helpful, at least in some obese individuals, they also have important limitations so that prevention remains up to now the 'treatment' of choice for obesity.