Influence of blood pressure and cardiac output on cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in acute stroke measured by TCD

Cardiac Output and Cerebral Blood Flow: A Systematic Review of Cardio-Cerebral Coupling

Control of cerebral blood flow (CBF) is crucial to the management of neurocritically ill patients. Small studies which have examined the role of cardiac output (CO) as a determinant of CBF have inconsistently demonstrated evidence of cardio-cerebral coupling. Putative physiological mechanisms underpinning such coupling include changes in arterial blood pressure pulsatility, which would produce vasodilation through increased oscillatory wall-shear-stress and baroreceptor mediated reflex sympatholysis, and changes in venous backpressure which may improve cerebral perfusion pressure. We sought to summarize and contextualize the literature on the relationship between CO and CBF and discuss the implications of cardio-cerebral coupling for neurocritical care. A systematic review of the literature yielded 41 studies; all were of low-quality and at high-risk of bias. Results were heterogenous, with evidence for both corroboration and confutation of a relationship between CO and CBF in both normal and abnormal cerebrovascular states. Common limitations of studies were lack of instantaneous CBF measures with reliance on transcranial Doppler-derived blood flow velocity as a surrogate, inability to control for fluctuations in established determinants of CBF (eg, PaCO2), and direct effects on CBF by the interventions used to alter CO. Currently, the literature is insufficiently robust to confirm an independent relationship between CO and CBF. Hypothetically, the presence of cardio-cerebral coupling would have important implications for clinical practice. Manipulation of CBF could occur without the risks associated with extremes of arterial pressure, potentially improving therapy for those with cerebral ischemia of various etiologies. However, current literature is insufficiently robust to confirm an independent relationship between CO and CBF, and further studies with improved methodology are required before therapeutic interventions can be based on cardio-cerebral coupling.

Cardiac Output and Cerebral Blood Flow

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is rigorously regulated by various powerful mechanisms to safeguard the match between cerebral metabolic demand and supply. The question of how a change in cardiac output (CO) affects CBF is fundamental, because CBF is dependent on constantly receiving a significant proportion of CO. The authors reviewed the studies that investigated the association between CO and CBF in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic heart failure. The overall evidence shows that an alteration in CO, either acutely or chronically, leads to a change in CBF that is independent of other CBF-regulating parameters including blood pressure and carbon dioxide. However, studies on the association between CO and CBF in patients with varying neurologic, medical, and surgical conditions were confounded by methodologic limitations. Given that CBF regulation is multifactorial but the various processes must exert their effects on the cerebral circulation simultaneously, the authors propose a conceptual framework that integrates the various CBF-regulating processes at the level of cerebral arteries/arterioles while still maintaining autoregulation. The clinical implications pertinent to the effect of CO on CBF are discussed. Outcome research relating to the management of CO and CBF in high-risk patients or during high-risk surgeries is needed.

Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and its distribution are highly sensitive to changes in the partial pressure of arterial CO(2) (Pa(CO(2))). This physiological response, termed cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity, is a vital homeostatic function that helps regulate and maintain central pH and, therefore, affects the respiratory central chemoreceptor stimulus. CBF increases with hypercapnia to wash out CO(2) from brain tissue, thereby attenuating the rise in central Pco(2), whereas hypocapnia causes cerebral vasoconstriction, which reduces CBF and attenuates the fall of brain tissue Pco(2). Cerebrovascular reactivity and ventilatory response to Pa(CO(2)) are therefore tightly linked, so that the regulation of CBF has an important role in stabilizing breathing during fluctuating levels of chemical stimuli. Indeed, recent reports indicate that cerebrovascular responsiveness to CO(2), primarily via its effects at the level of the central chemoreceptors, is an important determinant of eupneic and hypercapnic ventilatory responsiveness in otherwise healthy humans during wakefulness, sleep, and exercise and at high altitude. In particular, reductions in cerebrovascular responsiveness to CO(2) that provoke an increase in the gain of the chemoreflex control of breathing may underpin breathing instability during central sleep apnea in patients with congestive heart failure and on ascent to high altitude. In this review, we summarize the major factors that regulate CBF to emphasize the integrated mechanisms, in addition to Pa(CO(2)), that control CBF. We discuss in detail the assessment and interpretation of cerebrovascular reactivity to CO(2). Next, we provide a detailed update on the integration of the role of cerebrovascular CO(2) reactivity and CBF in regulation of chemoreflex control of breathing in health and disease. Finally, we describe the use of a newly developed steady-state modeling approach to examine the effects of changes in CBF on the chemoreflex control of breathing and suggest avenues for future research.

Autonomic ganglionic blockade does not prevent reduction in cerebral blood flow velocity during orthostasis in humans

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The underlying mechanisms for reductions in cerebral blood flow (CBF) during orthostasis are not completely understood. This study tested the hypothesis that sympathetic activation causes cerebral vasoconstriction leading to reductions in CBF during lower body negative pressure (LBNP).

METHODS

CBF velocity, arterial pressure, and end-tidal CO(2) were measured during LBNP (-30 to -50 mm Hg) in 11 healthy subjects before and after autonomic ganglionic blockade with trimethaphan. Arterial partial pressure of CO(2) also was measured in a subgroup of 5 subjects. Mean arterial pressure during LBNP after blockade was maintained by infusion of phenylephrine.

RESULTS

Before blockade, mean arterial pressure did not change during LBNP. However, CBF velocity was reduced in all subjects by 14% (P<0.05). Systolic and pulsatile (systolic-diastolic) CBF velocity were reduced by 18% and 28%, respectively, associated with significant reductions in pulse arterial pressure and end-tidal CO(2) (all P<0.05). After blockade, mean arterial pressure during LBNP was well-maintained and even increased slightly with infusion of phenylephrine. However, reductions in mean, systolic, and pulsatile CBF velocity, pulse arterial pressure, and ETCO(2) were similar to those before blockade. In contrast to reductions in end-tidal CO(2), arterial partial pressure of CO(2) did not change during LBNP.

CONCLUSIONS

These data, contrary to our hypothesis, demonstrate that sympathetic vasoconstriction is not the primary mechanism underlying reductions in CBF during moderate LBNP. We speculate that diminished pulse arterial pressure or pulsatile blood flow may reduce cerebral vessel wall shear stress and contribute to reductions in CBF during orthostasis through flow mediated regulatory mechanisms.

Impaired cerebral autoregulation 24 h after induction of transient unilateral focal ischaemia in the rat

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral autoregulation have been investigated 24 h after transient focal ischaemia in the rat. Cerebral blood flow was measured autoradiographically before and during a moderate hypotensive challenge, to test autoregulatory responses, using two CBF tracers, (99m)Tc-d,l-hexamethylproyleneamine oxide and 14C-iodoantipyrine. Prior to induced hypotension, CBF was significantly reduced within areas of infarction; cortex (28 +/- 20 compared with 109 +/- 23 mL/100 g/min contralateral to ischaemic focus, P = 0.001) and caudate (57 +/- 31 compared with 141 +/- 32 mL/100 g/min contralaterally, P = 0.005). The hypotensive challenge (mean arterial pressure reduced to 60 mmHg by increasing halothane concentration) did not compromise grey matter autoregulation in the contralateral hemisphere; CBF data were not significantly different at normotension and during hypotension. However, in the ipsilateral hemisphere, a significant volume of cortex adjacent to the infarct, which exhibited normal flow at normotension, became oligaemic during the hypotensive challenge (e.g. frontal parietal cortex 109 +/- 15% to 65 +/- 15% of cerebellar flow, P < 0.01). This resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in the volume of cortex which fell below 50% cerebellar flow (39 +/- 34 to 97 +/- 46 mm3, P = 0.003). Moderate hypotension induced a significant reduction in CBF in both ipsilateral and contralateral subcortical white matter (P < 0.01). In peri-infarct caudate tissue, CBF was not significantly affected by hypotension. In conclusion, a significant volume of histologically normal cortex within the middle cerebral artery territory was found to have essentially normal levels of CBF but impaired autoregulatory function at 24 h post-ischaemia.

Assessment of cerebral pressure autoregulation in humans--a review of measurement methods

Assessment of cerebral autoregulation is an important adjunct to measurement of cerebral blood flow for diagnosis, monitoring or prognosis of cerebrovascular disease. The most common approach tests the effects of changes in mean arterial blood pressure on cerebral blood flow, known as pressure autoregulation. A 'gold standard' for this purpose is not available and the literature shows considerable disparity of methods and criteria. This is understandable because cerebral autoregulation is more a concept rather than a physically measurable entity. Static methods utilize steady-state values to test for changes in cerebral blood flow (or velocity) when mean arterial pressure is changed significantly. This is usually achieved with the use of drugs, shifts in blood volume or by observing spontaneous changes. The long time interval between measurements is a particular concern in many of the studies reviewed. Parallel changes in other critical variables, such as pCO2, haematocrit, brain activation and sympathetic tone, are rarely controlled for. Proposed indices of static autoregulation are based on changes in cerebrovascular resistance, on parameters of the linear regression of flow/velocity versus pressure changes, or only on the absolute changes in flow. The limitations of studies which assess patient groups rather than individual cases are highlighted. Newer methods of dynamic assessment are based on transient changes in cerebral blood flow (or velocity) induced by the deflation of thigh cuffs, Valsalva manoeuvres, tilting and induced or spontaneous oscillations in mean arterial blood pressure. Dynamic testing overcomes several limitations of static methods but it is not clear whether the two approaches are interchangeable. Classification of autoregulation performance using dynamic methods has been based on mathematical modelling, coherent averaging, transfer function analysis, crosscorrelation function or impulse response analysis. More research on reproducibility and inter-method comparisons is urgently needed, particularly involving the assessment of pressure autoregulation in individuals rather than patient groups.