Patient-reported convenience of once-daily versus three-times-daily dosing during long-term studies of pramipexole in early and advanced Parkinson’s disease

Comparative Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence Evaluation of Two Formulations of Pramipexole Dihydrochloride Extended-Release Tablets in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fasted and Fed States: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Clinical Trial

Background

Pramipexole dihydrochloride extended-release tablet is a novel long-acting form of non-ergot dopamine agonist indicated as one of main therapeutic approaches for Parkinson's disease. However, pharmacokinetic properties of extended-release pramipexole in healthy Chinese subjects remain unclear.

Methods

A single-center, randomized, open-label, two-period crossover, single-dose study was performed to investigate comparative pharmacokinetics and evaluate bioequivalence of 0.375 mg test (Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.) and reference (Trade name: Sifrol®, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG) formulations of pramipexole dihydrochloride extended-release tablets in healthy Chinese subjects under fasted and fed states.

Results

A total of 56 subjects (28 in each dietary trial) were enrolled and randomized. After single dose of 0.375 mg test and reference formulations under fasted condition, main pharmacokinetics of pramipexole were as follows: peak concentration (Cmax) were 409.33±95.93 and 413.77±132.03 pg/mL; plasma area under concentration-time curve from time 0 to last measurable concentration (AUC0-t) were 8801.95±1966.83 and 8646.37±2600.49 h*pg/mL; AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞) were 9469.03±1991.61 and 9082.95±2666.26 h*pg/mL; elimination half-life (t1/2) were 11.98±3.91 and 9.85±2.63 h; both time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were about 4.50 h, respectively, for test and reference formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios (test/reference) of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ under fasted and fed conditions were all within 80-125%. Following administration under fed condition, Cmax and Tmax for both test and reference formulations slightly increased and prolonged to 5.0 h, respectively, but AUC approximately remained unchanged compared with dosing under fasted condition. Test and reference formulations showed similar bioequivalence and favorable safety under fasted and fed states.

Conclusion

Test and reference formulations of pramipexole dihydrochloride extended-release tablets (0.375 mg) showed similar bioequivalence and well safety and tolerability in healthy Chinese subjects under fasted and fed states, which supports further investigations of test formulation in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Factors to Consider in the Selection of Dopamine Agonists for Older Persons with Parkinson's Disease

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are frequently used in the management of Parkinson's disease (PD), a complex multisystem disorder influenced substantially by age-related factors. Over 80% of PD patients present after age 60 years and may have clinical features exacerbated by age-related comorbidities or decline in physiological compensatory mechanisms. Pharmacotherapy for motor symptoms in older persons is more likely to involve exclusive use of levodopa combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor throughout the course of the illness. Non-ergot DAs, such as pramipexole, rotigotine and ropinirole, may be used as de novo monotherapy for the control of motor symptoms in older persons, although they are less efficacious than levodopa therapy. DAs may also be considered as adjunct therapy in older persons when motor symptoms are no longer adequately controlled by levodopa or when motor fluctuations and dyskinesia appear. DAs may be used cautiously in older persons with cognitive impairment and orthostatic hypotension but should be avoided when there is a history or risk of psychosis or impulse control disorders.

Efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended-release in Parkinson's disease: a review based on meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended-release (pramipexole ER) versus pramipexole immediate-release (pramipexole IR) or placebo in Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic online search for clinical trials for pramipexole ER treatment up to 1 August 2016. We assessed differences in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores, percentage of 'on' time or 'off' time, withdrawals, adverse events (AEs) and life quality between pramipexole ER and pramipexole IR or placebo. Data analyses were performed by the Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials were included. Compared with placebo, pramipexole ER achieved a significant improvement in the UPDRS Part II + III score [weighted mean difference, -4.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), -6.40 to -3.23], whereas no significant difference was found in the UPDRS Part III + III score between pramipexole ER and pramipexole IR groups (weighted mean difference, -0.26; 95% CI, -1.15 to 0.64). No differences were found in total AEs (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.03), drug-related AEs (relative risk, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.03) or the commonly reported AEs between pramipexole ER and pramipexole IR.

CONCLUSIONS

Pramipexole ER is as safe and effective as pramipexole IR in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Twice-Daily versus Once-Daily Pramipexole Extended Release Dosage Regimens in Parkinson's Disease

This open-label study aimed to compare once-daily and twice-daily pramipexole extended release (PER) treatment in Parkinson's disease (PD). PD patients on dopamine agonist therapy, but with unsatisfactory control, were enrolled. Existing agonist doses were switched into equivalent PER doses. Subjects were consecutively enrolled into either once-daily-first or twice-daily-first groups and received the prescribed amount in one or two, respectively, daily doses for 8 weeks. For the second period, subjects switched regimens in a crossover manner. The forty-four patients completed a questionnaire requesting preference during their last visit. We measured the UPDRS-III, Hoehn and Yahr stages (H&Y) in medication-on state, Parkinson's disease sleep scale (PDSS), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Eighteen patients preferred a twice-daily regimen, 12 preferred a once-daily regimen, and 14 had no preference. After the trial, 14 subjects wanted to be on a once-daily regimen, 25 chose a twice-daily regimen, and 5 wanted to maintain the prestudy regimen. Main reasons for choosing the twice-daily regimen were decreased off-duration, more tolerable off-symptoms, and psychological stability. The mean UPDRS-III, H&Y, and PDSS were not different. Daytime sleepiness was significantly high in the once-daily regimen, whereas nocturnal hallucinations were more common in the twice-daily. Multiple dosing should be considered if once-daily dosing is unsatisfactory. This study is registered as NCT01515774 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

Cost of Living with Parkinson's Disease over 12 Months in Australia: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background. Parkinson disease (PD) is a costly chronic condition in terms of managing both motor and nonmotor symptoms. The burden of disease is high for individuals, caregivers, and the health system. The aim of this study is to estimate the annual cost of PD from the household, health system, and societal perspectives. Methods. A prospective cohort study of newly referred people with PD to a specialist PD clinic in Melbourne, Australia. Participants completed baseline and monthly health resource use questionnaires and Medicare data were collected over 12 months. Results. 87 patients completed the 12-month follow-up assessments. The mean annual cost per person to the health care system was $32,556 AUD. The burden to society was an additional $45,000 per annum per person with PD. The largest component of health system costs were for hospitalisation (69% of total costs). The costs for people with moderate to severe disease were almost 4 times those with mild PD ($63,569 versus $17,537 p < 0.001). Conclusion. PD is associated with significant costs to individuals and to society. Costs escalated with disease severity suggesting that the burden to society is likely to grow with the increasing disease prevalence that is associated with population ageing.

Optimizing extended-release carbidopa/levodopa in Parkinson disease: Consensus on conversion from standard therapy

Purpose of review:

To help clinicians optimize the conversion of a patient's Parkinson disease pharmacotherapy from immediate-release carbidopa/levodopa (IR CD/LD) to an extended-release formulation (ER CD/LD).

Recent findings:

Eleven movement disorders specialists achieved consensus positions on the modification of trial-based conversion guidelines to suit individual patients in clinical practice.

Summary:

Because the pharmacokinetics of ER CD/LD differ from those of IR CD/LD, modification of dosage and dosing frequency are to be expected. Initial regimens may be based on doubling the patient's preconversion levodopa daily dosage and choosing a division of doses to address the patient's motor complications, e.g., wearing-off (warranting a relatively high ER CD/LD dose, possibly at a lower frequency than for IR CD/LD) or dyskinesia (warranting a relatively low dose, perhaps at an unchanged frequency). Patients should know that the main goal of conversion is a steadier levodopa clinical response, even if dosing frequency is unchanged.

No Difference on Adherence Between Immediate-Release Versus Extended-Release Dopamine Agonists in Uninsured Subjects with Parkinson's Disease

Background

Pharmacological management of subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) is complex. Regardless of drug selection, adherence is one of the main concerns. Nonadherence is associated with poor symptomatic control and low quality of life. In general, adherence to once-a-day formulations is thought to be better in comparison to 3-times-daily dosing.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out. Consecutive uninsured subjects diagnosed with PD were treated either with an immediate- or extended-release dopamine agonist formulation. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Subjects were assessed using the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society UPDRS. Adherence was evaluated using the Morisky-Green test (MGT).

Results

A total of 314 (175 males and 139 females) subjects with PD were included. In regard to treatment, 188 (59.9%) were on an immediate-release dopamine agonist and 126 (40.1%) on an extended-release dopamine agonist. According to the MGT, 21 (6.7%) subjects were classified as nonadherent, 273 (86.9%) with a low adherence, and only 20 (6.4%) were considered with high adherence. Dopamine agonist levodopa equivalent daily dose was higher in the extended-release group (296.6 ± 112.4 vs. 231.3 ± 133.4; P = 0.011); also, these subjects had more years of formal education (12.3 ± 5.2 vs. 9.5 ± 5.2; P = 0.630). No difference in adherence levels was found (P = 0.802) between subjects treated with an immediate-release dopamine agonist and those receiving an extended-release formulation.

Conclusions

Overall adherence in subjects with PD is low. Use of an extended-release over an immediate-release dopamine agonist formulation in this study population is not associated with a better adherence.

Early versus delayed initiation of pharmacotherapy in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder after Alzheimer's disease and pathologically is characterised by a progressive loss of dopaminergic cells of the nigrostriatal pathway. Clinically, PD is mainly defined by the presence of the motor symptoms of bradykinesia, rigidity, rest tremor and postural instability, but non-motor symptoms such as depression, dementia and autonomic disturbances are recognised as integral parts of the disease. Although pharmacotherapy for PD was introduced almost 50 years ago, and has improved significantly over the intervening period, the timing of initiation of treatment in newly diagnosed PD remains controversial. While some physicians favour an early start of pharmacotherapy at or soon after diagnosis, others prefer to delay pharmacological treatment until a certain degree of disability has developed. This article aims to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both strategies by exploring their effects on symptoms, disease progression and quality of life. Although the data on putative disease-modifying effects of early pharmacological intervention in PD are still inconclusive, we believe that the most important indication for an early initiation of anti-parkinsonian treatment should be to maintain the quality of life of PD patients and to secure their socioeconomic status as long as possible.

Treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Later stage Parkinson's disease, sometimes referred to as advanced disease, has been characterized by motor complication, as well as by the potential emergence of nonlevodopa responsive motor and nonmotor symptoms. The management of advanced stage Parkinson's disease can be complex. This review summarizes the currently available treatment strategies for addressing advanced Parkinson's disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

We will discuss the latest pharmacological strategies (e.g., inhibitors of dopamine-metabolizing enzymes, dopamine agonists, and extended release dopamine formulations) for addressing motor dysfunction. We will summarize the risks and benefits of current invasive treatments. Finally, we will address the current evidence supporting the treatment of nonmotor symptoms in the advanced Parkinson's disease patient. We will conclude by detailing the potential nonpharmacological and multidisciplinary approaches for advanced stage Parkinson's disease.

SUMMARY

The optimization of levodopa is, in most cases, the most powerful therapeutic option available; however, medication optimization requires an advanced understanding of Parkinson's disease. Failure of conventional pharmacotherapy should precipitate a discussion of the potential risks and benefits of more invasive treatments. Currently, there are no comparative studies of invasive treatment. Among the invasive treatments, deep brain stimulation has the largest amount of existing evidence, but also has the highest individual per patient risk. Nonmotor symptoms will affect quality of life more than the motor Parkinson's disease symptoms, and these nonmotor symptoms should be aggressively treated. Many advanced Parkinson's disease patients will likely benefit from multi and interdisciplinary Parkinson's disease teams with multiple professionals collaborating to develop a collective and tailored strategy for an individual patient.

Long-term safety and sustained efficacy of extended-release pramipexole in early and advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole as a once-daily (q.d.) extended-release oral formulation in early or advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

In two double-blind (DB) studies of early PD and one of advanced PD,active-treatment arms received pramipexole immediate release (IR) or extended release (ER), with exposure lasting up to 33 weeks. In open-label (OL) extensions that followed immediately, subjects took ER q.d. for up to 80 weeks, with dosage adjustment permitted (range 0.375-4.5 mg q.d.).

RESULTS

Of 590 subjects completing an early-PD DB study, 511 entered the early-PD OL extension; 408 completed it. Reported adverse events (AEs) with incidence ≥10.0% were somnolence (15.1%), peripheral edema (11.7%) and back pain (10.6%). Of 465 subjects completing the advanced-PD DB study, 391 entered the advanced-PD OL extension; 329 completed it. Reported AEs with incidence ≥10.0%were dyskinesia (27.4%) and somnolence (13.6%). Impulse control disorders were identified by semi-structured interview in 13 subjects (1.4% of 902). In exploratory analyses, adjusted mean Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) PartsII + III scores (excluding ex-placebo recipients) remained substantially improved from DB baseline scores prior to pramipexole introduction, at -6.6 and -6.3 points amongst ex-DB-ER and ex-DB-IR recipients after 113 weeks of pramipexole (33 DB plus 80 OL) in early PD, and -11.5 and -9.1 after up to 113 weeks (up to 33 DB plus 80 OL) in advanced PD.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support the long-term safety and efficacy of pramipexole ER in early and advanced PD. AEs were typical for dopaminergic medications, and UPDRS scores suggested sustained symptomatic benefit.

Dopamine receptor agonists for Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

Prolonged administration of l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is hampered by motor complications related to the progressive incapacity of residual nigrostriatal neurons to properly utilize the drug. Direct stimulation of dopaminergic (DAergic) receptors with specific compounds (DA agonists) has, therefore, become an additional therapeutic tool for PD.

AREAS COVERED

DA agonists have considerable anti-parkinsonian symptomatic efficacy, although they are less potent than l-DOPA. This review summarizes pre-clinical and clinical data on DA agonists and their role in treating PD. Specific focus was put on second-generation, first-line non-ergolinic DA agonists and their motor, non-motor and putative neuroprotective effects. The anti-parkinsonian potential of recently developed DA agonists that reached Phase II and III clinical trials was also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

DA agonists can be useful along the whole natural course of PD, as monotherapy in the initial phase or combined with l-DOPA in advanced PD. Extended-release formulations have been developed for second-generation DA agonists, which are better appreciated by patients. Neuroprotective properties have been proposed for DA agonists, based on pre-clinical studies, but never convincingly demonstrated in patients. New DA agonists, with better symptomatic efficacy and devoid of the side effects that characterize current compounds, are needed.

Initial treatment of Parkinson's disease: an update

OPINION STATEMENT

This is an update to an article published in this journal in 2006, which covered the initial treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). In this update, we review new research into symptomatic treatments, potential disease modifying ("neuroprotective") agents, and evidence-based reviews of current treatment. We discuss the usage of the MAO-B inhibitors, including the controversy surrounding the possible neuroprotective effects of rasagiline. Usage of extended release formulations of pramipexole and ropinirole, as well as the transdermal dopamine agonist rotigotine, are reviewed. Side effects of the dopamine agonists are discussed, including the cardiac side effects of ergot-derived dopamine agonists, and the impulse control disorders associated with the dopamine agonists. The use of zonisamide as an agent for PD tremor is reviewed. We touch on the clinical research into the benefits of exercise in PD, and briefly review some of the current studies for new formulations of levodopa and other medications and treatments with novel mechanisms of action.