Naratriptan Has a Selective Inhibitory Effect on Trigeminovascular Neurones at Central 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/1D Receptors in the Cat: Implications for Migraine Therapy

Effects of somatostatin, a somatostatin agonist, and an antagonist, on a putative migraine trigger pathway

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether somatostatin (SST) could be a cortico-brainstem neurotransmitter involved in producing the headache of migraine.

BACKGROUND

There is evidence to support the idea that a cortico-brainstem-trigeminal nucleus neuraxis might be responsible for producing migraine headache; we have suggested that SST may be one of the neurotransmitters involved.

METHODS

Rats were anesthetised and prepared for recording neurons in either the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) or nucleus raphe magnus (NRM), as well as the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC). The dura mater and facial skin were stimulated electrically or mechanically. SST, the SST agonist L054264 and the SST antagonist CYN54806 were injected intravenously, by microinjection, or by iontophoresis into the PAG or NRM. Cortical neuronal activity was provoked by cortical spreading depression (CSD) or light flash (LF) and was monitored by recording cortical blood flow (CBF).

RESULTS

Intravenous injection of SST: (a) selectively decreased the responses of TNC neurons to stimulation of the dura, but not skin, for up to 5 h; (b) decreased the ongoing discharge rate of TNC neurons while simultaneously increasing the discharge rate of neurons in either brainstem nucleus and; (c) prevented, or reversed, the effect of CSD and LF on brainstem and trigeminal neuron discharge rates. CSD and LF decreased the discharge rate of neurons in both brainstem nuclei and increased the discharge rate of TNC neurons. These effects were reversed by L054264 and mimicked by CYN54806. Injections of L054264 into the PAG or NRM reduced the response of TNC neurons to dural stimulation and skin stimulation differentially, depending on the nucleus injected. Injections of CYN54806 into either brainstem nucleus potentiated the responses of TNC neurons to dural and skin stimulation, but without a marked differential effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These results imply that SST could be a neurotransmitter in a pathway responsible for migraine pain.

Stimulation of dural vessels excites the SI somatosensory cortex of the cat via a relay in the thalamus

Aim

We carried out experiments in cats to determine the thalamo-cortical projection sites of trigeminovascular sensory neurons.

Methods

1) We stimulated the middle meningeal artery (MMA) with C-fibre intensity electrical shocks and made field potential recordings over the somatosensory cortical surface. 2) We then recorded neurons in the ventroposteromedial (VPM) nucleus of the thalamus in search of neurons which could be activated from the skin, MMA and superior sagittal sinus. 3) Finally, we attempted to antidromically activate the neurons found in stage 2 by stimulating the responsive cortical areas revealed in stage 1.

Results

VPM neurons received trigeminovascular input, input from the V1 facial skin and could also be activated by electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex. VPM neurons activated from the cortex responded with short and invariant latencies (6.7 ± 7.7 msec mean and SD). They could follow high rates of stimulation and sometimes showed collision with orthodromic action potentials.

Conclusions

We conclude that somatosensory (SI) cortical stimulation excites trigeminovascular VPM neurons antidromically. In consequence, these VPM neurons project to the somatosensory cortex. These findings may help to explain the ability of migraineurs with headache in the trigeminal distribution to localise their pain to a particular region in this distribution.

The neurobiology of migraine

The understanding of migraine has moved well beyond its traditional characterization as a "vascular headache." In considering the basic neurobiology of migraine, it is important to begin with the concept of migraine as not merely a headache, but rather a heterogeneous array of episodic symptoms. Among the array of phenomena experienced by migraine patients are visual disturbances, nausea, cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, and sensitivity to light, sound, smell, and touch. These symptoms may occur independently or in any combination, and in some patients occur even in the absence of headache. The diversity and variability of symptoms experienced by migraine patients belies a complex neurobiology, involving multiple cellular, neurochemical, and neurophysiological processes occurring at multiple neuroanatomical sites. Migraine is a multifaceted neurobiological phenomenon that involves activation of diverse neurochemical and cellular signaling pathways in multiple regions of the brain. Propagated waves of cellular activity in the cortex, possibly involving distinct glial and vascular signaling mechanisms, can occur along with activation of brainstem centers and nociceptive pathways. Whether different brain regions become involved in a linear sequence, or as parallel processes, is uncertain. The modulation of brain signaling by genetic factors, and by sex and sex hormones, provides important clues regarding the fundamental mechanisms by which migraine is initiated and sustained. Each of these mechanisms may represent distinct therapeutic targets for this complex and commonly disabling disorder.

The blood-brain barrier in migraine treatment

Salient aspects of the anatomy and function of the blood-barrier barrier (BBB) are reviewed in relation to migraine pathophysiology and treatment. The main function of the BBB is to limit the access of circulating substances to the neuropile. Smaller lipophilic substances have some access to the central nervous system by diffusion, whereas other substances can cross the BBB by carrier-mediated influx transport, receptor-mediated transcytosis and absorptive-mediated transcytosis. Studies of drugs relevant to migraine pathophysiology and treatment have been examined with the pressurized arteriography method. The drugs, given both luminally and abluminally, provide important notions regarding antimigraine site of action, probably abluminal to the BBB. The problems with the BBB in animal models designed to study the pathophysiology, acute treatment models and preventive treatments are discussed with special emphasize on the triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The human experimental headache model, especially the use of glycerol trinitrate (the nitric oxide model), and experiences with CGRP administrations utilize the systemic administration of the agonists with effects on other vascular beds also. We discuss how this can be related to genuine migraine attacks. Our view is that there exists no clear proof of breakdown or leakage of the BBB during migraine attacks, and that antimigraine drugs need to pass the BBB for efficacy.

Functional polymorphisms of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptor are associated with clinical symptoms in migraineurs

Migraine is regarded as a polygenic disease and serotonergic pathways appear to play a major role in its pathogenesis. In the present study, the role of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors in migraine was evaluated. The human 5-HT1A receptor gene transcription is modulated by a functional C-1019G promoter polymorphism. The 5-HT1B receptor is the main effector of vasoconstriction in meningeal and cerebral arteries and its functional G861C promoter polymorphism was investigated. We report a positive association of the GG genotype of the 5-HT1A promoter polymorphism with avoidance of physical activity during a migraine attack in comparison to the CC genotype (p = 0.008). Moreover, a positive association of the CC genotype of the G861C polymorphism of the 5-HT1B receptor with the reported intensity of the headache attack on the visual analogue scale was observed (CC 8.3 +/- 1.5 vs. GG 6.9 +/- 1.8; p < 0.05). An association of either polymorphism with migraine with or without aura could not be found. For the first time, our results indicate a role of allelic variation of the 5-HT1A receptor in motion related discomfort in migraineurs and a role of the 5-HT1B receptor polymorphism in headache intensity.

A model-based approach to treatment comparison in acute migraine

AIMS

Currently, direct comparisons between 5-HT(1B/d) receptor agonists are used to assess differences and similarities in antimigraine response. Such comparisons depend on the selected sampling time and do not allow evaluation of entire response profiles. A thorough evaluation of drug properties requires that the time course of the response be taken into account. In this investigation we show the advantages of a model-based approach to compare the efficacy of two triptans (sumatriptan vs. naratriptan).

METHODS

A Markov model was used to describe the course of a migraine attack over three clinically identified stages. Drug effects were modelled as concentration-dependent increases in transition rates and were parameterised as potency (EC(50)) and maximum effect (E(max)). Parameters were estimated using headache measurements from efficacy studies. Model estimates were then used to compare the pharmacodynamics of the two drugs in a time-independent manner.

RESULTS

Efficacy parameters could be derived, allowing for comparison between compounds. The potency ratio (EC50(suma)/EC50(nara)) for headache relief was 3.3 (0.9, 12). The ratio of maximum effects (Emax(suma)/Emax(nara)) for this endpoint was 0.74 (0.55, 0.97). To interpret these efficacy measures and explore their value for the development of antimigraine drugs, results were evaluated against the reported in vitro potency at 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the effects of two or more drugs based on preset sampling times does not allow proper assessment of the antimigraine properties in vivo. Disease dynamics must be considered to evaluate treatment response adequately and optimise the dosing regimen in migraine.

Motion sickness in migraine sufferers

Motion sickness commonly occurs after exposure to actual motion, such as car or amusement park rides, or virtual motion, such as panoramic movies. Motion sickness symptoms may be disabling, significantly limiting business, travel and leisure activities. Motion sickness occurs in approximately 50% of migraine sufferers. Understanding motion sickness in migraine patients may improve understanding of the physiology of both conditions. Recent literature suggests important relationships between the trigeminal system and vestibular nuclei that may have implications for both motion sickness and migraine. Studies demonstrating an important relationship between serotonin receptors and motion sickness susceptibility in both rodents and humans suggest possible new motion sickness prevention therapies.

Orexin 1 Receptor Activation Attenuates Neurogenic Dural Vasodilation in an Animal Model of Trigeminovascular Nociception

The pathophysiology underlying the pulsating quality of the pain of a migraine attack is not fully understood, although trigeminal vascular afferents containing the sensory neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) must have a role. Antimigraine drugs, such as triptans, serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine(1B/1D) receptor agonists, reproducibly block neurogenic vasodilation associated with CGRP release. We examined the effects of the hypothalamic neuropeptides orexin A and orexin B on neurogenic dural vasodilation, dissecting out the receptor pharmacology with the novel orexin 1 (OX1) receptor antagonist N-(2-methyl-6-benzoxazolyl)-N''-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl urea (SB-334867). Electrical stimulation of dural afferents (50-300 microA) resulted in reproducible dural vasodilation of 136 +/- 9%. Orexin A 30 microg kg(-1), but not 3 and 10 microg kg(-1), inhibited the dilation brought about by electrical stimulation over 60 min and maximally after 15 min by 60% (t7= 7.138; P < 0.001; n = 8). This response was reversed by pretreatment with the OX1 receptor antagonist SB-334867. Addition of CGRP(8-37) at the point of maximal effect of orexin A produced a further significant decrease in neurogenic dural vasodilation compared with orexin A only. CGRP administration (1 microg kg(-1)) produced a reproducible dural blood vessel dilation of 145 +/- 7% that was not inhibited by intravenous administration of orexin A (30 microg kg(-1)). Orexin B had no significant effect even at the highest dose. The current study demonstrates that orexin A is able to inhibit neurogenic dural vasodilation via activation of the OX1 receptor, resulting in inhibition of prejunctional release of CGRP from trigeminal neurons.

Sumatriptan (5-HT1B/1D-agonist) causes a transient allodynia

Unpleasant sensory symptoms are commonly reported in association with the use of 5-HT1B/1D-agonists, i.e. triptans. In particular, pain/pressure symptoms from the chest and neck have restricted the use of triptans in the acute treatment of migraine. The cause of these triptan induced side-effects is still unidentified. We have now tested the hypothesis that sumatriptan influences the perception of tactile and thermal stimuli in humans in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. Two groups were tested; one consisted of 12 (mean age 41.2 years, 10 women) subjects with migraine and a history of cutaneous allodynia in association with sumatriptan treatment. Twelve healthy subjects (mean age 38.7 years, 10 women) without migraine served as control group. During pain- and medication-free intervals tactile directional sensibility, perception of dynamic touch (brush) and thermal sensory and pain thresholds were studied on the dorsal side of the left hand. Measurements were performed before, 20, and 40 min after injection of 6 mg sumatriptan or saline. Twenty minutes after injection, sumatriptan caused a significant placebo-subtracted increase in brush-evoked feeling of unpleasantness in both groups (P < 0.01), an increase in brush-evoked pain in migraineurs only (P = 0.021), a reduction of heat pain threshold in all participants pooled (P = 0.031), and a reduction of cold pain threshold in controls only (P = 0.013). At 40 min after injection, no differences remained significant. There were no changes in ratings of brush intensity, tactile directional sensibility or cold or warm sensation thresholds. Thus, sumatriptan may cause a short-lasting allodynia in response to light dynamic touch and a reduction of heat and cold pain thresholds. This could explain at least some of the temporary sensory side-effects of triptans and warrants consideration in the interpretation of studies on migraine-induced allodynia.

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Antagonists as Treatments of Migraine and Other Primary Headaches

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a potent neuromodulator that is expressed in the trigeminovascular system and is released into the cranial circulation in various primary headaches. CGRP is released in migraine, cluster headache and paroxysmal hemicrania. The blockade of its release is associated with the successful treatment of acute migraine and cluster headache. CGRP receptor blockade has recently been shown to be an effective acute anti-migraine strategy and is non-vasoconstricting in terms of the mechanism of action. The prospect of a non-vasoconstricting therapy for acute migraine offers a real opportunity to patients, and perhaps more importantly, provides a therapeutic rationale to reinforce migraine as a neurological disorder.

Preclinical neuropharmacology of naratriptan

The basic CNS neuropharmacology of naratriptan is reviewed here. Naratriptan is a second-generation triptan antimigraine drug, developed at a time when CNS activity was thought not to be relevant to its therapeutic effect in migraine. It was, however, developed to be a more lipid-soluble, more readily absorbed and less readily metabolized variant on preexisting triptans and these variations conferred on it a higher CNS profile. Naratriptan is a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a highly selective action on migraine pain and nausea, without significant effect on other pain or even other trigeminal pain. Probable sites of therapeutic action of naratriptan include any or all of: the cranial vasculature; the peripheral terminations of trigeminovascular sensory nerves; the first-order synapses of the trigeminovascular sensory system; the descending pain control system; and the nuclei of the thalamus. Naratriptan may prevent painful dilatation of intracranial vessels or reverse such painful dilatation. Naratriptan can prevent the release of sensory peptides and inhibit painful neurogenic vasodilatation of intracranial blood vessels. At the first order synapse of the trigeminal sensory system, naratriptan can selectively suppress neurotransmission from sensory fibers from dural and vascular tissue, while sparing transmission from other trigeminal fibers, probably through inhibition of neuropeptide transmitter release. In the periaqueductal gray matter and in the nucleus raphe magnus, naratriptan selectively activates inhibitory neurons which project to the trigeminal nucleus and spinal cord and which exert inhibitory influences on trigeminovascular sensory input. Naratriptan has also a therapeutic effect on the nausea of migraine, possibly exerting its action at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarius via the same mechanisms by which it inhibits trigeminovascular nociceptive input. The incidence of naratriptan-induced adverse effects in the CNS is low and it is not an analgesic for pain other than that of vascular headache. In patients receiving selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) naratriptan may cause serotonin syndrome-like behavioral side effects. The mechanism of action involved in the production of behavioral and other CNS side effects of naratriptan is unknown.

Nitrergic and glutamatergic neuronal mechanisms at the trigeminovascular first-order synapse

Nitric oxide (NO) donors such as glyceryl trinitrate cause headache, which suggests involvement of NO in trigeminovascular sensory processing. Sensory transmission at first-order synapses is believed to involve glutamate and the question arises as to whether it is also involved in trigeminovascular sensation and whether it might interact with nitrergic mechanisms. We investigated these questions at the first central synapse in the trigeminovascular sensory system of the cat. Neuronal action potentials in the trigeminal nucleus were recorded while the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) or facial receptive field (RF) were stimulated electrically. Drugs, including the neuronal excitant glutamate, were applied to neurons via microiontophoresis. Results were obtained from 152 neurons activated with A-delta latencies by SSS stimulation and by glutamate. The NO donor S-nitrosoglutathione (SNOG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 41 neurons during SSS stimulation and 13 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both modes of stimulation were enhanced by SNOG; the proportion of neurons enhanced was 56% to SSS stimulation and 59% to glutamate. The inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase (NOS), N(omega)-propyl-L-arginine (p-ARG, 50 nA) was applied iontophoretically to 17 neurons during stimulation of SSS and to 10 neurons during pulsatile glutamate ejection. Responses to both stimuli were suppressed by p-ARG: The proportion of neurons suppressed were: to SSS stimulation 59% and to glutamate 80%. Microiontophoretic ejection of eletriptan (50 nA) reversibly suppressed responses of neurons to SSS stimulation, to RF electrical stimulation and to pulsatile iontophoretic application of glutamate. This suppression of responses was antagonised by the concurrent local iontophoretic application of the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR127935 or by concurrent iontophoretic application of the selective 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL155732. These results suggest that glutamatergic mechanisms are important in sensory transmission in the trigeminovascular system and that they can be modulated by nitrergic and serotonergic mechanisms.