The impact of early cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplant recipients

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Valganciclovir for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic administration of valganciclovir (VG) is an accepted method for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after kidney transplantation (KTx). The standard dosage of oral VG is 900 mg/day, adjusted to renal function. There is growing evidence that low-dose 450 mg/day VG might be safe and effective. We compared low-dose vs standard-dose prophylaxis after KTx in a single-center follow-up study.

METHODS

Data from 603 renal transplantations at a single center were retrospectively analyzed (2011-2014, 12-month follow-up). Recipients with donor IgG positive-recipient IgG positive (D+/R+), (D+/R-), and (D-/R+) CMV serostatus were routinely treated with 450 mg/day VG for 3 months. Based on the same prophylactic dose, patients could be categorized into two groups according to their postoperative renal function: those receiving standard-dose VG due to a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (average eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and those receiving low-dose VG due to higher eGFR (average eGFR>60 mL/min/1.73 m2).

RESULTS

Estimated glomerular filtration rate-based VG serum alterations significantly affected the risk of CMV infection with a higher incidence in higher VG levels (standard-dose: 357 patients, CMV: 33 cases (9.2 %); low-dose: 246 patients, CMV: 10 cases (4.1%). The occurrence of known risk factors: serologic risk distribution and rate of induction therapy were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Treatment of an acute rejection episode influenced the infection rate significantly in the standard-dose group. As a side effect of prophylaxis, leucopenia (<3G/L) was 2.46 times higher in standard-dose vs low-dose group.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose VG administration is safe and non-inferior to the standard dose in the prophylaxis of CMV infection after KTx.

Acute rejection in pediatric renal transplantation: Retrospective study of epidemiology, risk factors, and impact on renal function

AR is a major relevant and challenging topic in pediatric kidney transplantation. Our objective was to evaluate cumulative incidence of AR in pediatric kidney transplant patient, risk factors for this outcome, and impact on allograft function and survival. A retrospective cohort including pediatric patients that underwent kidney transplantation between 2011 and 2015 was designed. Risk factors for AR were tested by competing risk analysis. To estimate its impact, graft survival and difference in GFR were evaluated. Two hundred thirty patients were included. As a whole, the incidence of AR episodes was 0.16 (95% CI = 0.12-0.20) per person-year of follow-up. And cumulative incidence of AR was 23% in 1 year and 39% in 5 years. Risk factors for AR were number of MM (SHR 1.36 CI 1.14-1.63 P = .001); ISS with CSA, PRED, and AZA (SHR 2.22 CI 1.14-4.33 P = .018); DGF (SHR 2.49 CI 1.57-3.93 P < .001); CMV infection (SHR 5.52 CI 2.27-11.0 P < .001); and poor adherence (SHR 2.28 CI 1.70-4.66 P < .001). Death-censored graft survival in 1 and 5 years was 92.5% and 72.1%. Risk factors for graft loss were number of MM (HR 1.51 CI 1.07-2.13 P = .01), >12 years (HR 2.66 CI 1.07-6.59 P = .03), and PRA 1%-50% (HR 2.67 CI 1.24-5.73 P = .01). Although occurrence of AR did not influence 5-year graft survival, it negatively impacted GFR. AR was frequent in patients assessed and associated with number of MM, ISS regimen, DGF, CMV infection, and poor adherence, and had deleterious effect on GFR.

The impact of cytomegalovirus infection on new-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: a review on current findings

CONTEXT

New onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, rate of infections, graft rejection and graft loss as well as decreases patient and graft survival rates. There is a controversy surrounding the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the development of NODAT. This meta-analysis aims to identify the role of CMV infection leading to the development of NODAT in kidney recipient patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITIONS

We searched several electronic databases, including PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, Trip Database and Google Scholar for studies that completely fulfill our criteria between January 1990 and January 2014 RESULTS: Seven studies with 1389 kidney transplant patients were included in this metaanalysis.The mean age of patients ranged from 42.8 to 48.8 years and males made up 53% to 75% of patients in the cohort studies. The incidence of NODAT varies from 14.3% to 27.1% in these studies. Overall adj OR was 1.94 [exp (0.66)] with a 95% CI of 1.26-2.98 [exp (0.23) and (1.09)]. There was no significant publication bias based on the Begg's and Egger's test (p value = 0.17 and 0.54, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that CMV infection is a risk factor for increasing incidence of NODAT. Thus, prophylaxis against CMV infection after kidney transplantation is strongly suggested. However, further clinical trials and cohorts are needed to confirm this association.

Impact of antiviral preventive strategies on the incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

We assessed the impact of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy on the incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in a nationwide prospective cohort of solid organ transplant recipients. Risk factors associated with CMV disease and graft failure-free survival were analyzed using Cox regression models. One thousand two hundred thirty-nine patients transplanted from May 2008 until March 2011 were included; 466 (38%) patients received CMV prophylaxis and 522 (42%) patients were managed preemptively. Overall incidence of CMV disease was 6.05% and was linked to CMV serostatus (D+/R- vs. R+, hazard ratio [HR] 5.36 [95% CI 3.14-9.14], p < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of CMV disease was observed in patients receiving antiviral prophylaxis as compared to the preemptive approach (HR 1.16 [95% CI 0.63-2.17], p = 0.63). CMV disease was not associated with a lower graft failure-free survival (HR 1.27 [95% CI 0.64-2.53], p = 0.50). Nevertheless, patients followed by the preemptive approach had an inferior graft failure-free survival after a median of 1.05 years of follow-up (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.01-2.64], p = 0.044). The incidence of CMV disease in this cohort was low and not influenced by the preventive strategy used. However, patients on CMV prophylaxis were more likely to be free from graft failure.

CMV driven CD8(+) T-cell activation is associated with acute rejection in lung transplantation

Lung transplantation is the definitive treatment for terminal respiratory disease, but the associated mortality rate is high. Acute rejection of the transplanted lung is a key determinant of adverse prognosis. Furthermore, an epidemiological relationship has been established between the occurrence of acute lung rejection and cytomegalovirus infection. However, the reasons for this association remain unclear. Here, we performed a longitudinal characterization of CMV-specific T-cell responses and immune activation status in the peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of forty-four lung transplant patients. Acute rejection was associated with high levels of cellular activation in the periphery, reflecting strong CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell activity post-transplant. Peripheral and lung CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cell responses were very similar, and related to the presence of CMV in the transplanted organ. These findings support that activated CMV-specific CD8(+) T-cells in the lung may play a role in promoting acute rejection.

Review of cytomegalovirus infection findings with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy in de novo renal transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are major complications in the renal transplant recipient. The occurrence of CMV is associated with acute rejection, allograft dysfunction, significant end-organ disease, and mortality. Several clinical studies have indicated that the use of certain immunosuppressive drugs can delay the reconstitution of CMV-specific cell-mediated immune responses, thereby leading to uncontrolled CMV replication. Accumulating evidence indicates, however, that the use of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, sirolimus, and everolimus, may decrease the incidence and severity of CMV infection in renal transplant recipients. The purpose of this article is to review CMV infection data from randomized clinical trials that investigated the use of sirolimus- and everolimus-based treatment regimens in de novo renal transplantation. The mTOR inhibitor clinical trials included were primarily identified using biomedical literature database searches, with additional studies added at the authors' discretion. This review will summarize these studies to discuss whether mTOR inhibitor-based immunosuppressive therapy can reduce the magnitude of CMV-related complications in the de novo renal transplantation setting.

Overview of the diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is recognized as the most common congenital viral infection in humans and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts. This recognition of the clinical importance of invasive CMV disease in the setting of immunodeficiency and in children with congenital CMV infection has led to the development of new diagnostic procedures for the rapid identification of CMV. Diagnosis of acute maternal CMV infection by the presence of immunoglobulin (Ig)M and low-avidity IgG requires confirmation of fetal infection, which is typically performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for CMV on amniotic fluid. Viral culture of the urine and saliva obtained within the first two weeks of life continues to be the gold standard for diagnosis of congenitally-infected infants. PCR assays of dried blood spots from newborns have been shown to lack sufficient sensitivity for the identification of most neonates with congenital CMV infection for universal screening purposes. However, saliva PCR assays are currently being assessed as a useful screening method for congenital CMV infection. In the immunocompromised host, newer rapid diagnostic assays, such as phosphoprotein 65 antigenemia and CMV real-time PCR of blood or plasma have allowed for preemptive treatment, reducing morbidity and mortality. However, lack of standardized real-time PCR protocols hinders the comparison of data from different centers and the development of uniform guidelines for the management of invasive CMV infections in immunocompromised individuals.

The effect of cytomegalovirus antigenemia titer on the efficacy of preemptive therapy for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after kidney transplantation

There is some controversy regarding the exact cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia titer that should be used as a guideline for preemptive anti-CMV therapy. We performed 634 consecutive kidney transplantations between January 2000 and June 2007. Preemptive therapy employed intravenous gancyclovir treatment when the CMV antigenemia titer was >or=50/4x10(5) leukocytes after kidney transplantation. The 634 recipients were allocated into 2 groups according to the peak CMV antegenemia: group A, CMV antigenemia titer<50/4x10(5) (n=550); and group B, >or=50/40x10(5) (n=84). Among the 634 recipients, 264 were positive for CMV antigenemia, and 61 developed symptomatic CMV infections. The incidence of symptomatic CMV infections in group B was significantly higher than in group A. Two cases in both groups developed tissue-proven CMV disease: group A CMV colitis and CMV nephritis, and group B, 2 cases of CMV colitis. Graft and patient survival rates in groups A and B at 5 years posttransplantation were not different. The authors concluded that a CMV antigenemia titer of >or=50/4x10(5) leukocytes can be considered an appropriate guideline for preemptive anti-CMV therapy.

Avoiding pitfalls: what an endoscopist should know in liver transplantation--part II

Over the last decade the number of patients undergoing transplantation has increased. At the same time, effective peri- and postoperative care and better surgical techniques have resulted in greater numbers of recipients achieving long-term survival. Identification and effective management in the form of adequate treatment is essential, since any delay in diagnosis or treatment may result in graft loss or serious threat to patient's life. Various aspects of endoscopic findings that can be commonly encountered among liver transplant recipients are discussed herein. Topics include: persistent and/or recurrent esophageal varices, reflux, Candida or cytomegalovirus (CMV) esophagitis, esophageal neoplasms, posttransplant peptic ulcer, biliary complications, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), Kaposi's sarcoma, CMV colitis and inflammatory bowel disease, colonic neoplasms, Clostridium difficile infection, and graft versus host disease (GVHD).

Probabilistic modeling of cytomegalovirus infection under consensus clinical management guidelines

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral pathogen after renal transplantation and remains a major therapeutic challenge with important clinical and economic implications from both direct and indirect consequences of infection.

METHODS

This 5-year study modeled the relationship between CMV infection and biopsy-proven graft rejection, graft loss, or death after renal transplantation in an inception cohort using Canadian consensus guidelines for CMV management as a component of a detailed cost-analysis of viral infection.

RESULTS

Probabilities of CMV viremia and syndrome/disease among 270 sequential graft recipients were 0.27 and 0.09, respectively; 91% of cases occurred in the first 6 months. Probability of CMV infection as the first event was 0.29, with a probability of subsequent biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) of 0.05 (mean: 62+/-26 days, range: 32-85 days), whereas the probability of BPAR as the first event was 0.18, with a probability of subsequent CMV infection of 0.38 (mean: 63+/-31, range: 27-119 days). Probability of freedom from both CMV infection and BPAR throughout the period of observation was 0.53. Time-dependent Cox analysis showed that neither donor/recipient CMV risk stratum nor CMV infection influenced the risks of BPAR (P=0.24; P=0.74) or of graft loss or death (P=0.26; P=0.34). In contrast, BPAR significantly increased the risk of both subsequent CMV infection (hazard ratio=1.77, P=0.03) and of graft loss or death (hazard ratio=8.31, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although current antiviral therapy seems to mitigate the reported deleterious effects of CMV infection on BPAR or graft survival, BPAR remains a significantly risk factor for both CMV infection and functional graft survival.

Acute rejection episodes in pediatric renal transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection

CMV infection is the most important opportunistic virus infection after renal transplantation leading to increased patient mortality, graft loss, risk for acute rejection episodes and impaired renal function. The potential impact of prophylactic anti-viral therapy on long-term graft outcome is relevant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of CMV infection, its risk factors and long-term outcome in children after renal transplantation. 103 children (mean age 10.6 +/- 5.3, range 1.6-22.0 yr) were monitored weekly for pp65 for the first 6-8 wk after renal transplantation, followed by a monthly monitoring for the first year. CMV infection occurred in 23/103 children (21.1%) with 10 patients (9.7%) developing CMV disease characterized by positive pp65 in the presence of organ involvement. The CMV R-/D+ and R+/D+ serostatus was significantly associated with an increased risk of CMV infection (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.009). 14/28 R-/D+ patients developed CMV infection despite prophylactic treatment with CMV hyperimmune globulin. The incidence of acute rejection episodes after or during CMV infection was significantly increased (p = 0.003) and the D+ serostatus was significantly associated with acute rejection episodes within the first year after transplantation (p = 0.006). In summary the overall incidence of CMV infection in this single center experience is 21.1%. The D+ serostatus represents a serious risk factor for both CMV infection and acute rejection episodes. In future the potential impact of different modalities of prophylactic anti-viral therapy on the prevention of acute rejection should be considered.

Why hasn't eliminating acute rejection improved graft survival?

Although patients with end-stage renal disease can be maintained with dialysis therapy, the superiority of patient survival with renal transplantation makes transplantation the preferred method of renal replacement. Potent immunosuppressive therapies, particularly calcineurin inhibitors, have greatly reduced the incidence of acute rejection. However, long-term allograft survival remains limited. We discuss the impact of acute rejection on long-term allograft survival and discuss other factors leading to late allograft loss, including calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, chronic allograft nephropathy, and BK virus nephropathy, as well as donor and recipient factors associated with long-term allograft loss.

Cytomegalovirus in transplantation ? challenging the status quo

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients causes both ''direct'' and ''indirect'' effects including allograft rejection, decreased graft and patient survival, and predisposition to opportunistic infections and malignancies. Options for CMV prevention include pre-emptive therapy, whereby anti-CMV agents are administered based on sensitive viral assays, or universal prophylaxis of all at-risk patients. Each approach has advantages and disadvantages in terms of efficacy, costs, and side effects. Standards of care for prophylaxis have not been established.

METHODS

A committee of international experts was convened to review the available data regarding CMV prophylaxis and to compare preventative strategies for CMV after transplantation from seropositive donors or in seropositive recipients.

RESULTS

Pre-emptive therapy requires frequent monitoring with subsequent treatment of disease and associated costs, while universal prophylaxis results in greater exposure to potential toxicities and costs of drugs. The advantages of prophylaxis include suppressing asymptomatic viremia and prevention of both direct and indirect effects of CMV infection. Meta analyses reveal decreased in mortality for patients receiving CMV prophylaxis. Costs associated with prophylaxis are less than for routine monitoring and pre-emptive therapy. The optimal duration of antiviral prophylaxis remains undefined. Extended prophylaxis may improve clinical outcomes in the highest-risk patient populations including donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative renal transplants and in CMV-infected lung and heart transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing direct and indirect effects of CMV infection in transplant recipients, affecting both allograft and patient survival. More studies are necessary to define optimal prophylaxis regimens.

Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients

We have retrospectively analyzed the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 250 consecutive renal allograft transplants performed in 244 recipients. The mean follow-up was 35.1+/-25.4 months. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine- or tacrolimus-based triple therapy. CMV infection prophylaxis with ganciclovir for 3 months post transplant was prescribed in CMV-seronegative recipients of allografts from seropositive donors (D+R-) and in all recipients treated with OKT3. CMV antigenemia was monitored by the pp65-antigen assay. Thirteen of 57 D+R- recipients (22.8%) developed CMV antigenemia. One recipient had a breakthrough of CMV antigenemia during ganciclovir prophylaxis; 12 D+R- recipients developed CMV antigenemia 147.5+/-173.8 days after transplantation. Four of 13 (30.7%) D+R- recipients had asymptomatic CMV infection, 8 (61.6%) had CMV infection with non-specific symptoms including fever, and 1 (7.7%) developed CMV pneumonia. Six of 13 (46.1%) D+R- patients had been treated with intensified immunosuppressive therapy before CMV infection. In the low-risk CMV groups (D+R+; D-R+; D-R-), 28 recipients (14.5%) developed CMV antigenemia 42.5+/-15.2 days post transplantation. Ten of the 28 (35.7%) recipients had asymptomatic CMV infection, 17 (60.7%) developed CMV infection with non-specific symptoms, and 1 (3.6%) developed CMV pneumonia. Twenty-one of 28 (75.0%) had intensified immunosuppressive therapy before CMV infection. In conclusion, ganciclovir prophylaxis diminished and delayed the onset of CMV infection but did not totally prevent it from occurring in D+R- renal transplant recipients. Clinicians should be vigilant to the possibility of CMV infection in both seronegative and seropositive recipients, especially after anti-rejection therapy.