A clinical trial using danazol for the treatment of premenstrual tension

Gene expression profiling reveals a role of immune system and inflammation in innate and stress-induced anxiety-like behavior

Anxiety is an evolutionarily conserved response that is essential for survival. Pathological anxiety, however, is a maladaptive response to nonthreatening situations and greatly affects quality of life. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has increased the prevalence of anxiety symptoms and highlighted the urge to identify the molecular events that initiate pathological anxiety. To this aim, we investigated the extent of similarity of brain region-specific gene expression patterns associated with innate and stress-induced anxiety-like behavior. We compared the cortico-frontal (FCx) and hippocampal (Hpc) gene expression patterns of five inbred mouse strains with high or low levels of innate anxiety-like behavior with gene expression patterns of mice subjected to chronic social defeat stress. We found significantly large overlap of the Hpc but small overlap of the FCx gene expression patterns in innate and stress-induced anxiety, that however, converged onto common inflammation and immune system canonical pathways. Comparing the gene expression data with drug-gene interaction datasets revealed drug candidates, including medrysone, simvastatin, captopril, and sulpiride, that produced gene expression changes opposite to those observed in innate or stress-induced anxiety-like behavior. Together, our data provide a comprehensive overview of FCx and Hpc gene expression differences between innate and stress-induced anxiety and support the role of inflammation and immune system in anxiety-like behavior.

Treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is comprised of a cluster of affective, behavioral and somatic symptoms recurring monthly during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. The disorder affects 3-8% of menstruating women and represents the more severe and disabling end of the spectrum of premenstrual disorders, which includes premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual aggravation of underlying affective disorder. Rigorous and specific diagnostic criteria for PMDD were specified in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (1994) and reaffirmed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders V (2013) and, consequently, there has been a marked increase in well-designed, placebo-controlled studies evaluating treatment modalities. Although the exact pathogenesis of PMDD is still elusive, treatment of PMDD and severe premenstrual syndrome has centered on neuromodulation via serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants, and ovulation suppression utilizing various contraceptive and hormonal preparations. Unlike the approach to the treatment of depression, serotonergic antidepressants need not be given daily, but can be effective when used cyclically, only in the luteal phase or even limited to the duration of the monthly symptoms. Less, well-substantiated alternative treatments, such as calcium supplementation, agnus castus (chasteberry), Hypericum perforatum (St John's wort) and cognitive/behavioral/relaxation therapies, may be useful adjuncts in the treatment of PMDD. This review provides an overview of current information on the treatment of PMDD.

Update on research and treatment of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Many women in their reproductive years experience some mood, behavioral. or physical symptoms in the week prior to menses. Variability exists in the level of symptom burden in that some women experience mild symptoms, whereas a small minority experience severe and debilitating symptoms. For an estimated 5%-8% of premenopausal women, work or social functioning are affected by severe premenstrual syndrome. Many women in this group meet diagnostic criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Among women who suffer from PMDD, mood and behavioral symptoms such as irritability, depressed mood, tension, and labile mood dominate. Somatic complaints, including breast tenderness and bloating, also can prove disruptive to women's overall functioning and quality of life. Recent evidence suggests that individual sensitivity to cyclical variations in levels of gonadal hormones may predispose certain women to experience these mood, behavioral, and somatic symptoms. Treatments include: antidepressants of the serotonin reuptake inhibitor class, taken intermittently or throughout the menstrual cycle; medications that suppress ovarian cyclicity; and newer oral contraceptives with novel progestins.

Premenstrual syndrome

Most women of reproductive age have some physical discomfort or dysphoria in the weeks before menstruation. Symptoms are often mild, but can be severe enough to substantially affect daily activities. About 5-8% of women thus suffer from severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS); most of these women also meet criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Mood and behavioural symptoms, including irritability, tension, depressed mood, tearfulness, and mood swings, are the most distressing, but somatic complaints, such as breast tenderness and bloating, can also be problematic. We outline theories for the underlying causes of severe PMS, and describe two main methods of treating it: one targeting the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis, and the other targeting brain serotonergic synapses. Fluctuations in gonadal hormone levels trigger the symptoms, and thus interventions that abolish ovarian cyclicity, including long-acting analogues of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or oestradiol (administered as patches or implants), effectively reduce the symptoms, as can some oral contraceptives. The effectiveness of serotonin reuptake inhibitors, taken throughout the cycle or during luteal phases only, is also well established.

The pharmacologic management of premenstrual dysphoric disorder

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is characterized by physical, affective and behavioral symptoms that are linked to the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle and relieved soon after the onset of menses. The disorder is chronic and exerts a major impact on personal relationships and occupational productivity for the estimated 6% of reproductive-aged women who fulfill strict PMDD criteria and the almost 20% of women who nearly meet these criteria. There are now various pharmacologic options that have demonstrated efficacy for PMDD and two of these approaches have an approved indication for treatment from the US FDA: three selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors; and for women who also desire hormonal contraception, a low dose oral contraceptive pill containing the progestin drospirenone, in a new dosing regimen. Due to the unique pathophysiology of the disorder, the selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors can be effectively administered intermittently, with dosing limited to the luteal phase of the cycle (2 weeks prior to menses). In the future, new pharmacotherapy will likely evolve from research evaluating other hormonal formulations that inhibit ovulation, without simulating PMDD-like symptoms, or novel pharmacologic agents that modulate the central neurotransmission.

Are there differential symptom profiles that improve in response to different pharmacological treatments of premenstrual syndrome/premenstrual dysphoric disorder?

Current evidence suggests that the accepted treatments for premenstrual syndrome (PMS)/premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) have similar overall efficacy. While these treatments are more effective than placebo, response rates associated with them are far from satisfactory (<60%), such that, irrespective of treatment modality, there remain a significant number of women who are unresponsive to current conventional pharmacological therapy. The available data on response rates of specific types of premenstrual symptoms to, or symptom profiles that are most amenable to, each treatment modality are limited and not well defined because most studies were not designed to assess specific symptom profiles. Those studies that have attempted to evaluate which symptom profiles respond to specific therapies have revealed variations within the individual modalities, as well as between the different modalities. It appears that suppression of ovulation ameliorates a broad range of behavioural as well as physical premenstrual symptoms. SSRIs are most effective for irritability and anxiety symptoms, with lesser efficacy for 'atypical' premenstrual symptoms. GABAergic compounds are most efficacious for anxiety and anxious/depressive symptoms, while dopamine agonists, particularly bromocriptine, are perhaps most efficacious for mastalgia. Overall treatment response rates may improve if treatments are targeted at well-defined subgroups of patients. Re-analysis of available datasets from randomised clinical trials may shed more light on the notion that targeting women with specific premenstrual symptom profiles for specific treatment modalities would improve response rates beyond the current ceiling of approximately 60%. Such information would also improve understanding of the putative pathophysiological mechanisms underlying PMS and PMDD, and may point to a more specific diagnosis of these conditions.

Ovariotomy for menstrual madness and premenstrual syndrome--19th century history and lessons for current practice

Ovariotomy--the removal of normal ovaries, known as Battey's Operation--began in 1872 and became the fashionable treatment of menstrual madness, neurasthenia, nymphomania, masturbation and "all cases of insanity". This practice was supported by distinguished gynecologists and psychiatrists, becoming one of the great medical scandals of the 19th century. In modern times, if menstrual madness is considered to be premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), and ovariotomy, the surgical equivalent of ovulation suppression of GnRH analogues, it can be argued that the surgery would have been effective for this limited indication, although the side effects of long-term estrogen deficiency would have made the treatment unacceptable. Currently, the successful hormonal treatment of PMDD is one of suppression of ovulation and removal of the cyclical hormonal changes in the luteal phase, probably progesterone, which is the essential cause of PMDD. Such therapy would be by GnRH analogues, transdermal estradiol and, in a few cases, the surgical option of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with adequate hormone replacement. A study of medical history can help us prevent the mistakes of over-enthusiasm but positive lessons can be learned.

Evaluation and management of breast pain

Pain is one of the most common breast symptoms experienced by women. It can be severe enough to interfere with usual daily activities, but the etiology and optimal treatment remain undefined. Breast pain is typically approached according to its classification as cyclic mastalgia, noncyclic mastalgia, and extramammary (nonbreast) pain. Cyclic mastalgia is breast pain that has a clear relationship to the menstrual cycle. Noncyclic mastalgia may be constant or intermittent but is not associated with the menstrual cycle and often occurs after menopause. Extramammary pain arises from the chest wall or other sources and is interpreted as having a cause within the breast. The risk of cancer in a woman presenting with breast pain as her only symptom is extremely low. After appropriate clinical evaluation, most patients with breast pain respond favorably to a combination of reassurance and nonpharmacological measures. The medications danazol, tamoxifen, and bromocriptine are effective; however, the potentially serious adverse effects of these medications limit their use to selected patients with severe, sustained breast pain. The status of other therapeutic strategies and directions for future research are discussed.

[Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: approach and treatment]

The premenstrual dysphoric disorder corresponds to a severe form of the premenstrual syndrome that mainly shows psychiatric symptoms. The incidence is about 3 to 8% of women in the reproductive age. The essential characteristics are depressive mood, a marked anxiety, emotional instability, and decrease of activity, appearing during the luteal phase and ceasing in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Several factors are implied in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Neurobiological and psychobiologic effects concerning the metabolism of serotonin and the melatonin play a role. Several therapies were proposed. The most effective treatment seem to be the selective inhibitors of the of serotonin reuptake.

The treatment of severe premenstrual syndrome with goserelin with and without 'add-back' estrogen therapy: a placebo-controlled study

The study aimed to determine if the addition of daily low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen given to young women using a depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog implant for the treatment of their premenstrual syndrome (PMS) would affect the clinical outcome. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study in a specialist premenstrual syndrome clinic setting, 60 women aged between 20 and 45 years were randomized to one of three treatment groups: Group A (placebo implant four weekly + placebo tablets daily), Group B (goserelin 3.6 mg implant four weekly + estradiol valerate 2 mg daily with norethisterone 5 mg from days 21-28 of a 28-day cycle) or Group C (goserelin 3.6 mg implant four weekly + placebo tablets daily). Differences between PMS scores at 2, 4 and 6 months were compared with pretreatment values. There was a significant improvement in PMS scores in Group C (Zoladex + placebo) after 2, 4 and 6 months of treatment when compared to pretreatment values and Group A (placebo + placebo). The addition of a low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen to GnRH analog treatment (Group B) resulted in a less dramatic response when compared to pretreatment values and no significant improvement when compared to Group A (placebo + placebo) at 2, 4 and 6 months of treatment. The addition of a low-dose oral estrogen with a cyclical progestogen to depot GnRH analog therapy in the treatment of PMS reduces the clinical response.

The psychotherapeutic effects of estrogens

The effect of estrogens on the central nervous system, particularly mood and behavior, remains a controversial area which needs clarification, not just for understanding of depression in women but to ensure that such commonplace problems in women have efficient and appropriate therapy. There is now good evidence that estrogens are rapidly effective in the treatment of depression in many women but this information has not found its way through to those health care personnel, psychiatrists and psychologists who are principally involved in the treatment of depression. There is also strong evidence for the benefits of estrogens on cognitive functioning, not only in preventing the onset of dementia but also in improving the symptoms in the established condition. Recent work has also suggested a benefit for estrogens on mood in women diagnosed as suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome. This article reviews the effect of endogenous estrogen on the female central nervous system and the ever increasing evidence for the diverse psychotherapeutic effects of exogenous estrogens.

Premenstrual syndrome: systematic diagnosis and individualized therapy

Premenstrual syndrome, or PMS, typically involves physical symptoms like bloating, headache, and breast tenderness, along with psychological and behavioral changes like irritability, depression, and fatigue. Other conditions can mimic PMS, so it's important to rule out look-alikes such as contraceptive side effects, dysmenorrhea, and substance abuse. Moderate exercise and a healthy diet may alleviate symptoms for some patients. Others may require symptom-specific measures, hormonal therapy, psychotropic drugs, or, for recalcitrant cases, ovulation suppression.

Breast disease

This article reviews the presentation and management of common breast disorders. It focuses on the diagnosis of treatment and management of patients with breast cancer in a multidisciplinary approach.

Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample

OBJECTIVES

A descriptive study was conducted to examine the prevalence of premenstrual breast symptoms, the impact of cyclic mastalgia on various activities, and associated patterns of health care utilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients at an obstetrics and gynecology clinic (n = 1171) completed a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine percent of women reported regular premenstrual discomfort; 36% had consulted a health care provider about the symptoms. Current moderate-to-severe cyclic mastalgia was found in 11%. Women <36 years old with cyclic mastalgia were 4.7 times as likely as asymptomatic young women to have had a mammogram. Mastalgia interferes with usual sexual activity in 48% of women and with physical (37%), social (12%), and work or school (8%) activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cyclic mastalgia is a common problem, sometimes severe enough to interfere with usual activities, and it is associated with high use of mammography among young women. Largely ignored both scientifically and clinically in the United States, this disorder merits further biopsychosocial investigation.

Breast health and associated premenstrual symptoms in women with severe cyclic mastopathy

OBJECTIVES

A case-control study was undertaken to examine the association of cyclic mastopathy with premenstrual syndrome and prior breast health.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 34 women with severe cyclic mastopathy (cases) and 29 women with no significant breast symptoms (controls) prospectively recorded breast pain and swelling and symptoms of premenstrual syndrome during one menstrual cycle. They also provided information on past breast health. The two study groups were compared by use of standard statistical methods.

RESULTS

Women with cyclic mastopathy reported more frequent consultations with physicians for specific breast lumpiness (p = 0.02) or generalized lumpiness (p = 0.004) and for all breast problems (p = 0.0001) and more frequent mammograms (p = 0.04), surgical breast biopsies (p = 0.06), and breast needle aspirations (p = 0.05). Premenstrual symptoms were more severe in women with cyclic mastopathy; this was most pronounced for physical symptoms (water retention and breast symptoms, p < 0.001) but also present for negative affect, behavior change, and impaired concentration (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with cyclic mastopathy have a spectrum of breast concerns and they undergo more frequent breast investigations than do women without the disorder. Most symptoms of premenstrual syndrome are also more severe in women with cyclic mastopathy.

A randomised comparison over 8 months of 100 micrograms and 200 micrograms twice weekly doses of transdermal oestradiol in the treatment of severe premenstrual syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of a 100 micrograms twice weekly dose of Estraderm TTS compared with a 200 micrograms dose in the treatment of severe PMS, and to determine the overall acceptability of the treatment. To determine the serum oestradiol levels produced by the two doses of Estraderm and to discover whether the lower dose suppresses ovulation.

DESIGN

Main: randomised, prospective, comparative study. Subsidiary: cross-sectional and prospective.

SETTING

Premenstrual syndrome clinic in teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

Women with severe PMS confirmed by prospective daily symptom recording.

INTERVENTIONS

Estraderm TTS at a dose of either 100 or 200 micrograms twice weekly continuously with either dydrogesterone 10 mg or medroxyprogesterone acetate 5 mg, from day 17 to day 26 of each cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main: change in total, exponentially smoothed, average maximum score (total-ESAmax) of 10 common premenstrual syndrome symptoms derived from Trigg's trend analysis and patient satisfaction. Subsidiary: plasma oestradiol and day 21 progesterone levels.

RESULTS

Main: no difference in change in total-ESAmax between Estraderm 100 micrograms and 200 micrograms groups. Greater drop-out rate and greater incidence of side effects attributed to oestrogen in higher dosage group. Satisfaction rate of 45% to 57% at eight months. Subsidiary: 1. Mean (95% CI) oestradiol level of 300 pmol/l (255 to 345) with Estraderm 100 micrograms and 573 (494 to 693) with Estraderm 200 micrograms; 2. Estraderm 100 micrograms suppresses mid-luteal progesterone from a mean (95% CI) of 35.5 (28.4 to 42.7) to 3.4 (2.4 to 4.5).

CONCLUSIONS

Estraderm TTS 100 micrograms twice weekly is as effective as 200 micrograms twice weekly in reducing symptom levels in severe premenstrual syndrome but is better tolerated. Estraderm 100 micrograms suppresses ovulation and results in a mean plasma oestradiol level similar to that observed in a spontaneous cycle.

A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of danazol for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome

To investigate whether danazol is more effective than placebo for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS), we conducted a randomized, double-blind, crossover study comparing three successive cycles of danazol (200 mg bid) to three cycles of placebo. Thirty-one women meeting rigorous criteria for a diagnosis of severe PMS over two pretreatment cycles were enrolled; 28 of these subjects completed at least one cycle of treatment with symptom recordings, which were entered into the analysis. A significant period effect confounded the planned within-subject analysis and therefore, the main treatment comparisons were confined to the first period only. Symptom scores on the Premenstrual Tension Self-Rating Scale (PMTS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were compared for the premenstrual week in the last cycle of treatment. For the 16 patients on danazol, scores on the PMTS decreased by an average of 14.0 (10.7) (standard deviation) points from a baseline of 25.4 (5.6) points. For the 12 patients on placebo, PMTS scores decreased by an average of 3.6 (9.5) points from a baseline of 23.5 (5.8) points (14.0 vs. 3.6; p = .0133, unpaired t-test). Seven (43.8%) of the subjects on danazol achieved a clinically relevant reduction of symptoms into the asymptomatic range (PMTS scores < or = 5) as compared to one (8.3%) of the subjects on placebo. Thus, danazol (200 mg bid) provided greater relief from severe PMS during the premenstrual week than did placebo.

The premenstrual syndrome--a reappraisal of the concept and the evidence

The Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) remains a controversial issue. As a clinical concept it is surrounded by confusion. Attempts to establish a consensus definition have resulted in the majority of women seeking help for such problems excluded from the diagnosis. Furthermore, there is no consensus about how such problems should be treated, with a variety of methods being advocated usually on very uncertain scientific grounds. The issue also has its political implications; there are those who see PMS as a way of reducing the status of women, by linking the normal ovarian cycle to a phenomenon which, on the face of it, impairs women's ability to cope. Yet there are a substantial number of women who experience significant negative changes which vary with the menstrual cycle, and produce long-term effects on their well being and family relationship which can be serious. There is also a real possibility that recurrent perimenstrual mood changes of this kind may increase the likelihood of chronic depressive illness in susceptible individuals. In most respects the features of depression which occurs perimenstrually are essentially similar to those of major depressive disorder, except for the short duration and recurrent pattern. PMS, therefore, remains an issue not only of clinical importance, but of considerable potential relevance to our understanding of major depressive disorder, which is substantially more common in women of reproductive age than in their male counterparts. In this review the concept of PMS, and some prominent operational definitions of it, are critically evaluated; it is now questionable whether the concept, as currently applied, still carries any heuristic or clinical value. Some current theoretical and aetiological issues are considered: e.g. the role of the corpus luteum, the effects of hormonal regimes which block ovulation, such as oral contraceptives, and the possibility that cyclical mood change represents an entrained rhythm in the brain. The conclusions reached at this stage in the review lead to a 'paradigm shift' with the proposal of a three-factor model to account for the complexities of menstrual cycle-related problems.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Low dose danazol in the treatment of the premenstrual syndrome

This double-blind, randomized, crossover study compared the efficacy and safety of danazol (100 mg twice daily) with matching placebo in the treatment of severe premenstrual syndrome. Nineteen patients were randomly allocated to receive danazol for 3 months followed by placebo, and 18 to receive treatment in the reverse order. Assessments of overall condition showed improvement to be statistically significantly more likely with danazol than with placebo (P less than 0.001) after 3 months' treatment. Furthermore, daily visual analogue scale assessments demonstrated statistically significantly better premenstrual scores with danazol in comparison to placebo for breast discomfort, irritability, depression, anxiety, mood swings, crying, depressed libido and abdominal swelling. It is concluded that danazol provides effective and generally well tolerated treatment for severe premenstrual syndrome.

The treatment of late luteal phase dysphoric disorder

This mini-review provides a comprehensive discussion of the management of the late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD). The various treatments will be described with particular attention to their efficacy and the nature of side effects. These include: psychoactive drugs (lithium, anxiolytics, antidepressants), nutritional agents (L-tryptophan, Vitamin B6, prostaglandins precursors and inhibitors), dopamine agonists, diuretics, antihypertensives, hormonal interventions (gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues, oestradiol, tamoxifen, progesterone, danazol, and oral contraceptives). Less attention has been given to non-pharmacologic approaches such as diet, exercise and psychotherapy. The availability of an operational definition of LLPDD in the DSM-III-R and the improvement in research methodology has provided a clearer direction for clinical management and for future investigations.

Treatment of premenstrual syndromes with progesterone antagonists (e.g., RU-486): political and methodological issues

The effect of political and social considerations on development and availability of medication is exemplified by the debate of the progesterone antagonist RU-486 and its indications. Premenstrual syndromes (PMS) are quite prevalent. In some women they are severe enough to warrant treatment, but at present there is no single treatment modality that has been shown to be effective with most women with PMS. Increased levels of progesterone and/or its fluctuations during the luteal phase have been suggested as possible factors in the pathophysiology of PMS. Therefore, progesterone antagonists represent a very promising avenue for treatment of a subgroup of PMS, and some other hormonally-related dysphoric disorders as well. Regretfully, because of the abortant properties of these compounds, they are the subject of a fierce debate and political considerations in the United States, and their availability for treatment trials of other indications in women is limited. It is hoped that progesterone antagonists will eventually be introduced for studies of their treatment and efficacy when indicated.

The long-term effects of estradiol implant therapy for the treatment of premenstrual syndrome

Fifty patients receiving estradiol implants for long-term treatment of premenstrual syndrome were studied over 5.6 years (range 2-8 years). There was a continued beneficial response to treatment in all symptoms, varying between 74% for bloating and 96% for depression. Menstrual cycle control improved in 31 patients and periods were less painful in 30 patients. Cyclical progestogenic symptoms occurred in 58% of patients. These were partially relieved by alterations in dose, type and duration of progestogen treatment but in 7 patients the symptoms remained severe. Eight patients had a hysterectomy during treatment; 5 for continuing progestogenic symptoms, 1 for prolapse and 2 for prolonged menstrual bleeding despite adequate progestogen therapy. Attempts to reduce the dose of progestogen led to cystic hyperplasia in 4 patients. This was treated by hysterectomy in 2 patients and corrected with two 21-day courses of progestogen in the other 2. Uterine enlargement with a mean weight of 133 g (125-145 g) associated with myometrial hypertrophy occurred in all 8 hysterectomy patients. There were no complications form venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolus, breast disease or atypical endometrial hyperplasia.

The effect of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in women with severe premenstrual syndrome

The etiology of premenstrual syndrome is unknown, although this syndrome is linked to the menstrual cycle. Fourteen women with severe, debilitating premenstrual syndrome volunteered for a study of therapy by hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and continuous estrogen replacement. All had completed their families and had failed to benefit from previous medical treatment. The diagnosis and severity of premenstrual syndrome were assessed by means of prospective charting and psychological evaluation. All patients had clearly cyclic symptoms and psychological scores consistent with a major disruption of their lives before surgery. Six months after surgery, premenstrual syndrome symptom charting revealed complete disappearance of a cyclic pattern with scores equivalent to those of a normal population. Psychological measures 6 months after operation showed dramatic improvement in mood, general affect, well-being, life satisfaction, and overall quality of life. Surgical therapy, involving oophorectomy, hysterectomy, and continuous estrogen replacement, is effective in relieving the symptoms of premenstrual syndrome and is indicated for a small, selected group of women.

Inhibition of ovulation with oral progestins--effectiveness in premenstrual syndrome

Forty-eight women with premenstrual problems were recruited for therapy with either medroxyprogesterone (MPA) or norethisterone (NET), both compared with placebo, in a double-blind cross-over study. Thirty-five (73%) completed the study. At an oral dose of 15 mg daily for 21 days each cycle, both MPA and NET suppressed ovulation, although reduction of urinary total oestrogen excretion was significantly greater with NET. Breakthrough bleeding occurred in 74% of the cycles treated with MPA but only in 22% of those with NET. Symptoms were monitored daily by visual analogue scales. Both progestins significantly reduced breast discomfort, compared with placebo. While MPA significantly improved individual psychological symptom scores by the second active treatment cycle and pooled psychological symptom scores in both active cycles, NET was no more effective than the placebo. Similar numbers from both groups withdrew because of adverse effects. Among the women treated with MPA, the response to active and placebo therapy was related to the pretreatment psychological symptom profile. The results suggest that the beneficial effect of therapy with MPA in women with premenstrual problems was a consequence of disruption of menstrual cyclicity rather than a result of ovulation suppression.

Lasting response to ovariectomy in severe intractable premenstrual syndrome

A total of 14 women with severe premenstrual syndrome unresponsive to conservative medical therapy were treated with danazol in doses sufficient to suppress cyclic ovarian steroidogenesis. In each case medical ovarian suppression resulted in complete relief from symptoms. For ongoing symptom relief, each woman elected to undergo bilateral ovariectomy and concomitant hysterectomy. Both medical ovarian suppression and ovariectomy with low-dose conjugated estrogen therapy afforded lasting relief from cyclic symptoms of premenstrual syndrome and a corresponding improvement in overall quality of life. We conclude that cyclic ovarian steroidogenesis is a powerful determinant for the expression of premenstrual symptomatology. Ovariectomy with low-dose estrogen replacement is an effective alternative for the woman with debilitating premenstrual syndrome who does not respond to conventional interventions.

Premenstrual syndrome

The term premenstrual syndrome is often used to describe several clinical conditions. Only a full history covering not only reproductive but also psychological and social factors, combined with daily diaries which are kept prospectively for at least two months, can help clarify the problems the patient experiences. As it is the timing rather than the type of symptoms which is essential to a diagnosis, diaries are used to assess symptoms, make a diagnosis and monitor the effectiveness of therapy. Patients with premenstrual syndrome should therefore always keep a diary and bring it to every consultation. We do not know if patients complaining of premenstrual syndrome are at one extreme of a spectrum disorder or if they are a 'specific group'. Such patients may have classical premenstrual syndrome, perimenstrual distress, benign idiopathic oedema, dysmenorrhoea, cyclical benign breast disease or mood symptoms which are not significantly related to the menstrual cycle. There are many aetiological theories--biological, psychological, environmental and social, the syndrome being a complex psychosomatic disorder. For appropriate management an accurate diagnostic formation is required. Reassurance, stress management techniques, an improvement in general mental and physical well-being, information and education are the mainstays of therapy. Symptomatic relief of symptoms is often helpful. Many other managements have been tried with the aim of correcting the underlying aetiological case. These include vitamins, prostaglandin inhibitors and endocrine therapies. As the disorder is long-term, the safety of treatments should be carefully considered.

The premenstrual syndrome--diagnosis and management

Premenstrual syndrome is an extremely common disorder. Prospective documentation of symptoms and their temporal relationship to menstruation establishes the diagnosis of PMS. Because the pathophysiologic mechanisms causing PMS are still undetermined, therapy for PMS is largely empiric. A number of pharmacologic agents may be used to reduce PMS symptomatology, and therapeutic decisions should be tailored to the individual's symptom complex. Many women will be able to lead more productive lives if PMS is properly diagnosed and intelligently treated.

Multi-component behavioral treatment of premenstrual syndrome: a case report

A 36-year-old female was treated for severe Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS) utilizing a multi-component behavioral approach which included relaxation training, stress inoculation, assertiveness training, marital therapy, and prescribed exercise. Following nine weeks of therapy the patient reported significantly less premenstrual distress and a decrease in sick leave each month. Treatment gains were maintained at both three and nine month follow-up.