Antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnancy: prevalence and clinical associations

Thrombotic Markers in Pregnant Patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND

 Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with coagulation abnormalities and increased risk for venous and arterial thrombi. This study aimed to evaluate D-dimer levels and lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positivity in pregnant individuals with and without Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a prospective cohort study of pregnant individuals delivering at a single academic institution from April 2020 to March 2022. Individuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 result during pregnancy were compared with a convenience sample of those without a positive SARS-CoV-2 result. For individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, severity was assessed based on the National Institutes of Health classification system. The primary outcome was D-dimer level measured during delivery admission. The secondary outcomes were LAC positivity and thromboembolic events. Outcomes were compared between individuals with and without a positive SARS-CoV-2 result, and further by disease severity.

RESULTS

 Of 98 participants, 77 (78.6%) were SARS-CoV-2 positive during pregnancy. Among individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection, severity was asymptomatic in 20 (26.0%), mild in 13 (16.9%), moderate in 4 (5.2%), severe in 38 (49.4%), and critical in 2 (2.6%). The D-dimer concentration at delivery did not significantly differ between those with a SARS-CoV-2 positive result compared with those without (mean 2.03 µg/mL [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.72-2.40] vs. 2.37 µg/mL [95% CI 1.65-3.40]; p = 0.43). Three individuals (4%) with SARS-CoV-2 infection and none (0%) without infection were LAC positive (p = 0.59). There were no clinically apparent thromboses in either group. D-dimer concentrations and LAC positive results did not differ by COVID-19 severity.

CONCLUSION

 Thrombotic markers did not differ in pregnant individuals by SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, high rates of LAC positivity were detected.

KEY POINTS

· Thrombotic markers did not differ in pregnant individuals by SARS-CoV-2 infection.. · Higher than expected rates of LAC positivity were detected.. · There were no clinically apparent thromboses..

Pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia is a life-threatening disease of pregnancy unique to humans and a leading cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women who survive pre-eclampsia have reduced life expectancy, with increased risks of stroke, cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while babies from a pre-eclamptic pregnancy have increased risks of preterm birth, perinatal death and neurodevelopmental disability and cardiovascular and metabolic disease later in life. Pre-eclampsia is a complex multisystem disease, diagnosed by sudden-onset hypertension (>20 weeks of gestation) and at least one other associated complication, including proteinuria, maternal organ dysfunction or uteroplacental dysfunction. Pre-eclampsia is found only when a placenta is or was recently present and is classified as preterm (delivery <37 weeks of gestation), term (delivery ≥37 weeks of gestation) and postpartum pre-eclampsia. The maternal syndrome of pre-eclampsia is driven by a dysfunctional placenta, which releases factors into maternal blood causing systemic inflammation and widespread maternal endothelial dysfunction. Available treatments target maternal hypertension and seizures, but the only 'cure' for pre-eclampsia is delivery of the dysfunctional placenta and baby, often prematurely. Despite decades of research, the aetiology of pre-eclampsia, particularly of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia, remains poorly defined. Significant advances have been made in the prediction and prevention of preterm pre-eclampsia, which is predicted in early pregnancy through combined screening and is prevented with daily low-dose aspirin, starting before 16 weeks of gestation. By contrast, the prediction of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia is limited and there are no preventive treatments. Future research must investigate the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia, in particular of term and postpartum pre-eclampsia, and evaluate new prognostic tests and treatments in adequately powered clinical trials.

Frequency of positive antiphospholipid antibodies in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection and impact on pregnancy outcome: A single-center prospective study on 151 pregnancies

Background

At the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, there was a lack of information about the infection’s impact on pregnancy and capability to induce de novo autoantibodies. It soon became clear that thrombosis was a manifestation of COVID-19, therefore the possible contribution of de novo antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) raised research interest. We aimed at screening SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnant patients for aPL.

Methods

The study included consecutive pregnant women who were hospitalized in our Obstetric Department between March 2020 and July 2021 for either a symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection or for other reasons (obstetric complications, labour, delivery) and found positive at the admission nasopharyngeal swab. All these women underwent the search for aPL by means of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA), IgG/IgM anti-cardiolipin (aCL), IgG/IgM anti-beta2glycoprotein I (aB2GPI). Data about comorbidities, obstetric and neonatal complications were collected.

Results

151 women were included. Sixteen (11%) were positive for aPL, mostly at low titre. Pneumonia was diagnosed in 20 women (5 with positive aPL) and 5 required ICU admission (2 with positive aPL). Obstetric complications occurred in 10/16 (63%) aPL positive and in 36/135 (27%) negative patients. The occurrence of HELLP syndrome and preeclampsia was significantly associated with positive aPL (p=0,004). One case of maternal thrombosis occurred in an aPL negative woman. aPL positivity was checked after at least 12 weeks in 7/16 women (44%): 3 had become negative; 2 were still positive (1 IgG aB2GPI + IgG aCL; 1 IgM aB2GPI); 1 remained positive for IgG aCL but became negative for aB2GPI; 1 became negative for LA but displayed a new positivity for IgG aCL at high titre.

Conclusions

The frequency of positive aPL in pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection was low in our cohort and similar to the one described in the general obstetric population. aPL mostly presented as single positive, low titre, transient antibodies. The rate of obstetric complications was higher in aPL positive women as compared to negative ones, particularly hypertensive disorders. Causality cannot be excluded; however, other risk factors, including a full-blown picture of COVID-19, may have elicited the pathogenic potential of aPL and contributed themselves to the development of complications.

Antiphospholipid antibodies do not cause retargeting of placental extracellular vesicles in the maternal body

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoantibodies that cause pregnancy disorders by a poorly defined mechanism that involves the placenta. The human placenta is covered by a single multinucleated cell, the syncytiotrophoblast, which extrudes vast numbers of extracellular vesicles (EVs) into the maternal blood. Extracellular vesicles are tiny packages of cellular material used by cells for remote signalling. In normal pregnancy, placental EVs assist maternal adaptations to pregnancy. We have previously shown that aPL alter the cargo of placental EVs, increasing the load of danger signals. These changes in EV cargo may explain how aPL contribute to the increased risk of recurrent miscarriage, preeclampsia and stillbirths observed in aPL-affected pregnancies. An additional possibility, that aPL alters the targeting of placental EVs to maternal organs to cause maternal maladaptation to pregnancy was investigated in this study.

FIGO (international Federation of Gynecology and obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined as the failure of the fetus to meet its growth potential due to a pathological factor, most commonly placental dysfunction. Worldwide, FGR is a leading cause of stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and short- and long-term morbidity. Ongoing advances in clinical care, especially in definitions, diagnosis, and management of FGR, require efforts to effectively translate these changes to the wide range of obstetric care providers. This article highlights agreements based on current research in the diagnosis and management of FGR, and the areas that need more research to provide further clarification of recommendations. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive summary of available evidence along with practical recommendations concerning the care of pregnancies at risk of or complicated by FGR, with the overall goal to decrease the risk of stillbirth and neonatal mortality and morbidity associated with this condition. To achieve these goals, FIGO (the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) brought together international experts to review and summarize current knowledge of FGR. This summary is directed at multiple stakeholders, including healthcare providers, healthcare delivery organizations and providers, FIGO member societies, and professional organizations. Recognizing the variation in the resources and expertise available for the management of FGR in different countries or regions, this article attempts to take into consideration the unique aspects of antenatal care in low-resource settings (labelled “LRS” in the recommendations). This was achieved by collaboration with authors and FIGO member societies from low-resource settings such as India, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and extracellular vesicles in pregnancy

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are autoantibodies that target phospholipid-binding proteins, such as β2 glycoprotein I (β2GPI), and can induce thrombosis systemically, as well as increase the risk of obstetric complications such as recurrent miscarriage and preeclampsia. Due to the expression of β2GPI by placental trophoblasts, aPL readily target the maternal-fetal interface during pregnancy and many studies have investigated the deleterious effects of aPL on placental trophoblast function. This review will focus on studies that have examined the effects of aPL on the production and modification of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from trophoblasts, as EVs are a key mode of feto-maternal communication in both normal and pathological pregnancy. A more comprehensive understanding of the effects of aPL on the quantity and cargo of EVs extruded by the human placenta may contribute to our current knowledge of how aPL induce both systemic and obstetric disease.

Changes of platelet count throughout pregnancy in women with antiphospholipid syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) activate several cell types, such as endothelial cells, monocytes, neutrophils, fibroblasts, trophoblasts and platelets, thus leading to thrombosis and obstetric complications in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The aim of the present study was the longitudinal investigation of platelet count in women with APS. Additionally, platelet count in women with APS who developed preeclampsia during pregnancy were compared to women with APS and uncomplicated pregnancy for potential early detection of preeclampsia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This longitudinal study included 65 women with APS, 38 women with preeclampsia and 84 women with normal pregnancies, where platelet count was determined every four weeks, starting in early pregnancy.

RESULTS

Platelet count was significantly lower in women with APS compared to women who developed preeclampsia and normal pregnancies starting at 12 weeks of gestation. The areas under the curve (AUC) for platelet count were 0.765 at 12 weeks of gestation (95% of CI of 0.634-0.896), 0.747 at 20 weeks (95% of CI of 0.600-0.894), 0.719 at 24 weeks (95% of CI of 0.555-0.882), respectively. The cut off points for platelets were 216 at 12-14 weeks of gestation, 226.5 at 20 weeks of gestation, and 163.5 at 24 weeks of gestation, respectively.

DISCUSSION

We demonstrated a significant lower platelet count in women with APS throughout gestation. Additionally, platelet count is significantly decreased in women with APS who developed preeclampsia. According to our results, platelet count seems to have a predictive value for the development of preeclampsia in these women.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in women with severe preeclampsia and placental insufficiency: a case-control study

Objective Preterm delivery for preeclampsia or placental insufficiency (PREPI) is a clinical criterion for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but no prior prospective studies have used the international classification criteria for APS. Our objective is to determine the proportion of women with PREPI who test positive for aPL using international criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) assays. Methods We conducted a prospective, case-control study of 148 women delivered < 36 weeks because of PREPI compared to 148 controls. PREPI cases delivered < 36 weeks were compared to matched controls. Cases and controls were tested for aPL. Demographic variables were compared with chi-squared and Wilcoxon-rank-sum statistics. Rates of + aPL were compared using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for maternal body mass index (BMI) and Caucasian race. Positive aPL (+aPL) was defined as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin G (IgG) (GPL) or immunoglobulin M (IgM) (MPL) ≥ 40, or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG (SGU) or IgM (SMU) ≥ 40. Results Controls were more likely to be Caucasian (87% vs 70%, p = 0.006) and had lower BMIs (BMI 26 vs 33, p < 0.001). Positive aPL were found more commonly in cases than controls (11.5% vs 1.4%, aOR 8.9 (95% CI 1.9-41.4)). In + aPL cases, 76% had + LA, 41% had + aCL, and 24% had + aβ2GPI. Conclusion Women requiring early delivery for PREPI are more likely to have aPL (and thus APS) than controls. This is the first prospective study using both obstetric definitions and laboratory criteria in accordance with APS international criteria.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

The present clinical and laboratory classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were established in Sydney, Australia, in 2006. In this review, we focus on the obstetric subset of APS (OAPS), defined by persistent positivity for antiphospholipid antibodies together with either early recurrent pregnancy loss, early fetal death, stillbirth or premature birth <34 gestational weeks due to pre-eclampsia, eclampsia and placental insufficiency. It is important to diagnose these cases since most women suffering from OAPS can, when given appropriate treatment, have successful pregnancies. Furthermore, patients with OAPS may, depending on the antibody profile, be at enhanced risk of thrombotic events later in life. We present an update on the present knowledge of possible underlying pathogenesis, risk factors and risk estimations for adverse pregnancy outcomes before and during pregnancy, current treatment concepts, and long-term outcomes for women with OAPS and their children.

Angiogenic factors in pregnancies of women with antiphospholipid syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES

An imbalance of angiogenic placental factors such as endoglin, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1(sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. This study aimed to evaluate serum levels of sFlt-1, PlGF and endoglin in women with primary and secondary antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) longitudinally through pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Serum levels of sFlt-1, PlGF and endoglin were measured prospectively at 4-week intervals (from gestational weeks 12-36) in 17 women with primary APS (PAPS), 18 women with secondary APS (SAPS), and 23 women with SLE.

RESULTS

6/17 (35%) of women with PAPS, 3/18 (17%) of women with SAPS, and 2/23 (9%) of women with SLE developed early-onset preeclampsia. Women who developed preeclampsia had significantly higher mean sFlt-1 and endoglin levels, higher sFlt-1/PlGF ratios, and lower mean PlGF-levels than women who did not. These changes became statistically significant at 12 weeks for sFlt-1, PlGF and endoglin.

DISCUSSION

Endoglin, sFlt-1 and PlGF are potential early screening parameters for the development of preeclampsia in pregnant women with autoimmune diseases like APS and SLE.

Utility of metabolic profiling of serum in the diagnosis of pregnancy complications

INTRODUCTION

Currently there are no clinical screening tests available to identify pregnancies at risk of developing preeclampsia (PET) and/or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), both of which are associated with abnormal placentation. Metabolic profiling is now a stable analytical platform used in many laboratories and has successfully been used to identify biomarkers associated with various pathological states.

METHODS

We used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) to metabolically profile serum samples collected from 143 pregnant women at 26-41 weeks gestation with pregnancy outcomes of PET, IUGR, PET IUGR or small for gestational age (SGA) that were age-matched to normal pre/term pregnancies.

RESULTS

Spectral analysis found no difference in the measured metabolites from normal term, pre-term and SGA samples, and of 25 identified metabolites, only glutamate was marginally different between groups. Of the identified metabolites, 3-methylhistidine, creatinine, acetyl groups and acetate, were determined to be independent predictors of PET and produced area under the curves (AUC) = 0.938 and 0.936 for the discovery and validation sets. Only 3-hydroxybutyrate was determined to be an independent predictor of IUGR, however the model had low predictive power (AUC = 0.623 and 0.581 for the discovery and validation sets).

CONCLUSIONS

A sub-panel of metabolites had strong predictive power for identifying PET samples in a validation dataset, however prediction of IUGR was more difficult using the identified metabolites. NMR based metabolomics can identify metabolites strongly associated with disease and has the potential to be useful in developing early clinical screening tests for at risk pregnancies.

Antiphospholipid antibodies increase the levels of mitochondrial DNA in placental extracellular vesicles: Alarmin-g for preeclampsia

The pathogenesis of preeclampsia remains unclear but placental factors are known to play a crucial role causing maternal endothelial cell dysfunction. One potential factor is placental micro- and nano- vesicles. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) increase the risk of preeclampsia ten-fold, in part by damaging the mitochondria in the syncytiotrophoblast. Since mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a danger- associated molecular pattern (DAMP/alarmin) that may activate endothelial cells, the aims of the current study were to investigate whether aPL affect the number of placental vesicles extruded, their mtDNA content and their ability to activate endothelial cells. Exposure of first trimester human placental explants to aPL affected neither the number nor size of extruded micro- and nano- vesicles (n = 5), however their levels of mtDNA were increased (n = 6). These vesicles significantly activated endothelial cells (n = 5), which was prevented by blocking toll-like receptor 9 (TLR-9), a receptor for extracellular DNA. Thus, aPL may increase the risk of preeclampsia in part by increasing the amount of mtDNA associated with placental vesicles. That mitochondrial DNA is recognised as a DAMP by TLR-9 to cause endothelial cell activation, raises the possibility that placental vesicles or TLR-9 might be a target for pharmaceutical intervention to reduce the consequences of aPL in pregnancy.

Histopathology in the placentae of women with antiphospholipid antibodies: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are a heterogenous group of autoantibodies associated with recurrent miscarriage, stillbirth, foetal growth restriction and premature birth. The cause of obstetric morbidity in women with aPLs is not completely understood. Workers have attempted to understand the role of aPLs in obstetric morbidity by investigating the histopathology of placentae from aPL-positive women. However, it is unclear from these diverse, and at times contradictory reports what histopathological lesions are common in the placentae of women with aPLs. This systematic review was undertaken to generate a complete picture of the placental features associated with aPLs in an attempt to understand the pathological processes that occur in pregnancies affected by aPLs.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase were searched on the 27th November 2014 using the keywords "placenta" OR "trophoblast" AND "antiphospholipid antibody" OR "antiphospholipid antibody syndrome". Records that were relevant and eligible were qualitatively assessed and given a score out of 24.

RESULTS

Of the 1112 records that were retrieved from the systematic search, 34 records were eligible for review, and were qualitatively scored. Of the 44 histopathological features that were reported in 580 placentae from aPL-positive women, six features appeared to be more common in the placentae of aPL-positive women compared to control women, including: placental infarction, impaired spiral artery remodelling, decidual inflammation, increased syncytial knots, decreased vasculosyncytial membranes and the deposition of complement split product C4d.

CONCLUSION

Based on the evidence in this systematic review, a human placental aPL fingerprint has been proposed. The diversity of the human placental aPL fingerprint suggests that multiple pathological processes may occur in pregnancies affected by aPL.

Prevalence and significance of persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies in women with preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and their association with obstetric outcomes in women with preeclampsia.

METHODS

The study included 150 patients. Clinical variables, risk factors, and severity criteria for preeclampsia and aPL were analyzed.

RESULTS

We found aPL in 4% of patients without risk factors for preeclampsia and in no women with risk factors (p = 0.03). Fifty percent of aPL-positive patients had a fetus with intrauterine growth restriction versus 13.9% (p = 0.04). No relation between aPL and severe preeclampsia was found.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of aPL among women with preeclampsia is low. aPL can predispose women without risk factors to preeclampsia.

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage is still a challenging diagnostic and therapeutic quagmire

Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage (RSM), affecting 1-2% of women of reproductive age seeking pregnancy, has been a clinical quagmire and a formidable challenge for the treating physician. There are many areas of controversy in the definition, aetiology, investigations and treatment of RSM. This review will address the many factors involved in the aetiology of RSM which is multifactorial in many patients, with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) being the most recognized aetiological factor. There is no identifiable cause in about 40-60% of these patients, in which case the condition is classified as idiopathic or unexplained RSM. The RSM investigations are extensive and should be undertaken in dedicated, specialized, well-equipped clinics/centres where services are provided by trained specialists. The challenges faced by the treating physician are even more overwhelming regarding the decision of what should be the most appropriate therapy offered to patients with RSM. Our review will cover the diverse modalities of therapy available including the role of preimplantation genetic testing using recent microarray technology, such as single nucleotide polymorphism and comparative genomic hybridization, as well as preimplantation genetic diagnosis; the greatest emphasis will be on the treatment of APS, and there will be important comments on the management of patients presenting with idiopathic RSM. The controversial areas of the role of natural killer cells in RSM, the varied modalities in the management of idiopathic RSM and the need for better-planned studies will be covered as well.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the placenta: a systematic review of their in vitro effects and modulation by treatment

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are a family of auto-antibodies that are associated with an increased risk of recurrent miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth. The placenta is a major target of aPL and it is likely that these antibodies promote pregnancy morbidity by affecting trophoblast function. Numerous studies have investigated the effect of aPL on trophoblast function in vitro. However, different trophoblast models and a variety of culture conditions have been employed, resulting in a myriad of different reported findings. This review systematically summarized those published studies that have investigated the effect of aPL on trophoblast function in vitro. In addition, the reported effects of pharmacological treatment on trophoblast function in the presence of aPL were also systematically reviewed.

METHODS

PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched using the keywords 'placenta OR trophoblast' AND 'antiphospholipid antibody OR antiphospholipid syndrome' up to 25 April 2014. Studies were excluded based on the absence of appropriate controls. The effects of aPL on trophoblast proliferation, death, syncytialization, invasion, hormone production, cytokine production, coagulation and complement activation were recorded. The effects of different treatments on the function of trophoblasts in the presence of aPL were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1071 records were retrieved from the four databases. After removing duplicates, the titles and abstracts of 529 articles were reviewed. Of those, 48 articles were read and relevant experimental results were extracted from 47 articles.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an overview of all the studies performed to date on the effects of aPL on trophoblast function in vitro. There is considerable support for aPL decreasing trophoblast viability, syncytialization and invasion in vitro. Some work has also suggested that aPL may affect the production of hormones and signalling molecules by trophoblasts, and may stimulate coagulation and complement activation in vitro. Current reports of the in vitro effects of therapeutic treatments on trophoblast function in the presence of aPL are inconclusive. This systematic review has highlighted many gaps in our knowledge of how aPL work and may direct future research in this area.

The challenge of pregnancy for patients with SLE

Pregnancy poses an important challenge for doctors looking after women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Knowledge about safety of medications, the effect of pregnancy on such disease, and vice versa, together with multidisciplinary team care, are basic cornerstones needed to provide the best obstetric and medical care to these women. Pre-conceptional counselling constitutes the ideal scenario where a patient's previous obstetric history, organ damage, disease activity, serological profile and additional medical history can be summarized. Important issues regarding medication adjustment, planned scans and visits, and main risks discussion should also be raised at this stage. Planned pregnancies lead to better outcomes for both mothers and babies. Close surveillance throughout pregnancy and the puerperium, and tailored management approach guarantee the highest rates of successful pregnancies in these women.

14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies Task Force report on obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

Pregnancy morbidity is one of the clinical manifestations used for classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). During the 14th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies (aPL), a Task Force with internationally-known experts was created to carry out a critical appraisal of the literature available regarding the association of aPL with obstetric manifestations present in actual classification criteria (recurrent early miscarriage, fetal death, preeclampsia and placental insufficiency) and the quality of the evidence that treatment(s) provide benefit in terms of avoiding recurrent adverse obstetric outcomes. The association of infertility with aPL and the effectiveness of the treatment of patients with infertility and positive aPL was also investigated. This report presents current knowledge and limitations of published studies regarding pregnancy morbidity, infertility and aPL, identifying areas that need better investigative efforts and proposing how critical flaws could be avoided in future studies, as suggested by participants of the Task Force. Except for fetal death, there are limitations in the quality of the data supporting the association of aPL with obstetric complications included in the current APS classification criteria. Recommended treatments for all pregnancy morbidity associated to APS also lack well-designed studies to confirm its efficacy. APL does not seem to be associated with infertility and treatment does not improve the outcomes in infertile patients with aPL. In another section of the Task Force, Dr. Jane Salmon reviewed complement-mediated inflammation in reproductive failure in APS, considering new therapeutic targets to obstetric APS (Ob APS).

Pregnancy and thrombophilia

The physiological changes that occur during pregnancy create a hypercoagulable milieu. This hypercoagulable state is thought to be protective, especially at the time of labor, preventing excessive hemorrhage. The presence of hereditary or acquired causes of thrombophilia during pregnancy tilts the balance in favor of unwanted venous thromboembolism and adverse pregnancy outcomes due to vascular uteroplacental insufficiency. These adverse pregnancy outcomes include recurrent pregnancy losses, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth retardation, preeclampsia and placental abruption. Much of the current data with regards to the association of the different thrombophilias and pregnancy-related complications are based on retrospectively designed studies. This lack of randomization, in-homogeneity of patient populations, varying case definitions, selection biases and inadequately matched control populations, have given rise to conflicting data with regard to screening for, and treatment of, pregnant women with suspected thrombophilias. The limited data that we have support the use of anticoagulant drugs for the prevention of pregnancy-related complications in the setting of thrombophilia. Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins are the anticoagulant drugs of choice as they do not cross the placental barrier and, hence, do not cause fetal anticoagulation or teratogenicity. Warfarin can be used from the 12th week of gestation onwards but is preferably reserved for the postpartum period.

Duration of anticoagulation treatment for thrombosis in APS: is it ever safe to stop?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an auto-immune thrombophilia for which anti-thrombotic medication is necessary for long-term management to reduce thrombotic risk or pregnancy morbidity. Choosing the type of pharmacological treatment, i.e. the intensity and duration of anticoagulation, depends on the severity of an individual's APS and the risk of bleeding. This article reviews the current literature on anticoagulation therapy, provides recommendations on when to initiate therapy, and suggests possible alternatives for optimisation of management.

Persistent antiphospholipid antibodies do not contribute to adverse pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether women with persistent aPL (>12 weeks apart on at least two separate occasions) without a history of thrombosis or adverse pregnancy outcome had the same adverse pregnancy outcomes as those with obstetric APS or unmatched controls.

METHODS

This was a case-control study between 2005 and 2011 where we identified 73 women with persistent aPL and coincidentally the same number with obstetric APS. Unmatched controls were identified from low-risk clinics (ratio 1:4). Women with multiple pregnancies, fetal anomalies, SLE, thrombotic APS and other thrombophilias were excluded.

RESULTS

Cases and controls were demographically similar, with the exception of younger controls with fewer medical comorbidities. aPL profiles were similar between aPL and APS. In women with aPL, risk of APS-type complications (odds ratio 1.3; 95% CI 0.6, 2.9) and birthweight distribution (median birthweight on a customized centile was 50.8, interquartile range 26.4-68.9; P < 0.05) were similar to controls. These findings persisted even after adjustment for maternal age and medical comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

Women with persistent aPL on aspirin had pregnancy outcomes that were similar to controls. These data suggest that in the absence of other risk factors, women with aPL do not need intense antenatal surveillance or modified management in pregnancy.

The correlation of autoantibodies and uNK cells in women with reproductive failure

There is conflicting evidence on the role of autoimmune disorders in reproductive failure, including recurrent miscarriage (RM) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF), after in vitro fertilisation (IVF). Several commonly studied autoimmune markers in women with reproductive failure include antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs), thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPA) and uterine natural killer (uNK) cells. However, there have not been any studies that have examined the correlation of these markers in women with reproductive failure. To determine if women who tested positive for autoantibodies (APA and thyroid peroxidase antibodies) have significantly higher uNK cell numbers than women who tested negative for these antibodies, the percentage of stromal cells that stained positive for CD56 was identified by immunocytochemistry in endometrial biopsies from 42 women with unexplained RM (29 women tested negative for autoantibodies and 13 women tested positive for autoantibodies) and 40 women with unexplained RIF (30 women tested negative for autoantibodies and 10 women tested positive for autoantibodies). Biopsies were obtained on days LH+7 to LH+9. There was no significant difference in uNK cell numbers between women with unexplained RM who tested negative and those who tested positive for autoantibodies. Similarly, there was no significant difference in uNK cell numbers between women with unexplained RIF who tested negative and those who tested positive for autoantibodies. In women with reproductive failure the presence of autoantibodies does not appear to affect the numbers of uNK cells in the endometrium around the time of implantation.

Prevalence and clinical usefulness of antiphospholipid and anticofactor antibodies in different Spanish preeclampsia subsets

Objective: To study the prevalence and clinical usefulness of antiphospholipid antibodies in different preeclampsia subsets. Design: Observational cross-sectional study. Setting: Tertiary teaching hospital. Patients: Ninety-nine women with preeclampsia versus 83 healthy pregnant women as controls. Interventions: We analysed anticardiolipin IgG/IgM, anti-ß2glycoprotein IgG/IgM, antiphosphatidylserine IgG/IgM, antiAnnexin-A5 IgG/IgM, and lupus anticoagulant. Main outcome measure: Comparison of antiphospholipid antibody positivity between groups. Results: Antiphospholipid antibody prevalence was 14.14% in the study group vs. 7.23% in controls. Excluding antiAnnexin-A5-positive women, overall antiphospholipid prevalence was 13.19% vs. 3.61% ( p = 0.034). Only IgM-anticardiolipin positivity showed significant differences between preeclampsia group and controls (8.1% vs. 1.20%, p = 0.041). Comparing a severe preeclampsia subset vs. controls, we obtained these significant results: for two or more positive antiphospholipid tests: 9.09% vs. 1.20 ( p = 0.037); IgM-anticardiolipin 10.91% vs. 1.20% ( p = 0.016); IgG/IgM-anti-ß2glycoprotein-I 10.91% vs. 1.90% ( p = 0.016), IgM-anti-ß2glycoprotein-I 9.09% vs.1.20 ( p = 0.037). When comparing early-onset preeclampsia vs. controls we found IgM-anticardiolipin 11.11% vs. 1.20% ( p = 0.029). Conclusions: Prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies in preeclampsia patients is twice that in healthy pregnant women. Multipositive aPL test, IgM-anticardiolipin and IgM-anti-ß2glycoprotein-I isotypes showed an association with severe and early-onset preeclampsia. Larger studies are needed to establish the usefulness of antiphospholipid tests as risk markers for severe and early onset preeclampsia.

Report of the Obstetric APS Task Force: 13th International Congress on Antiphospholipid Antibodies, 13th April 2010

The Obstetric APS Task Force of the 13th International Congress identified and discussed five general topics within 'Obstetric' Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) that contained areas of controversy or uncertainty: recurrent early miscarriage (REM), fetal death, delivery <34 weeks for severe preeclampsia or placental insufficiency, postpartum care, and long-term implications and care. The Task Force concluded that the frequency with which women with REM have a high titer of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) or lupus anticoagulant (LA) is somewhat controversial, especially with regard to the diagnostic titers required by the current international criteria for APS. Also, treatment trials involving heparin differ from one another with regard to the patients included and the outcomes achieved. Similarly, the frequency with which women with fetal death or delivery <34 weeks for severe preeclampsia or placental insufficiency have a high titer of aPL or LA is poorly defined, and there is no level I evidence to guide treatment in either group. Suggestions for future studies with regard to both REM and fetal death or delivery <34 weeks for severe preeclampsia or placental insufficiency were discussed and are outlined below. Postpartum and long-term care in women with APS diagnosed solely for obstetric criteria has been largely guided by expert opinion, and systematic evaluations of these populations would be welcome.

Association of anticardiolipin antibodies with preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence of the association of anticardiolipin antibodies with preeclampsia.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and LILACS were perused up to June 2009, citations were searched using the ISI Web of Knowledge database, textbooks and reference lists were reviewed, and experts were contacted. Search terms included "antiphospholipid syndrome," "Hughes' syndrome," "anticardiolipin antibodies," "antiphospholipid antibodies," "anti-cardiolipin," "preeclampsia," and "pre-eclampsia."

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Inclusion criteria were: cohorts, case-control, or controlled cross-sectional studies; healthy pregnancy as controls; no autoimmune diseases; immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgM anticardiolipin antibody of at least 20 units by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, or both; and end-point preeclampsia.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Our search generated 68,528 entries and 64 full-text articles were reviewed. Twelve studies were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratio (OR) for association of anticardiolipin antibodies with preeclampsia was 2.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-5.98). Pooled OR for anticardiolipin antibodies and severe preeclampsia was 11.15 (95% CI 2.66-46.75). Funnel plot showed minor asymmetry, and the Egger test was not significant (P=.359). Meta-regression identified study design and size as related to heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Moderate-to-high levels of anticardiolipin antibodies are associated with preeclampsia, but there is insufficient evidence to use anticardiolipin antibodies as predictors of preeclampsia in clinical practice.

Obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome: current uncertainties should guide our way

The subject of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been reviewed dozens of times, and there is little doubt that the international APS community has done well in bringing APS to the attention of clinicians around the world. However, the evolution of clinical practice, at least in the US, also has convinced us that our field would benefit from further clinical study. For example, the number of women diagnosed with 'APS', but who do not meet the revised Sapporo criteria, seems to have increased. It is now common practice for women with recurrent miscarriage or prior fetal death to be treated with heparin, even in the presence of indeterminate or low titer antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) levels and even after only one positive test. In part, this common practice derives from confusion on the part of many clinicians and patients regarding the diagnosis of APS as well as the clinical and laboratory criteria for the syndrome. In part, this derives from the common practice of so-called 'empiric treatment' in US reproductive medicine, often driven as much by patients as by clinicians. This brief commentary focuses on areas of uncertainty that we see as deserving of new or renewed study for the sake of improving our understanding of APS and best patient care.

Maternal anti-protein Z antibodies in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia, SGA and fetal death

OBJECTIVE

Low maternal plasma protein Z (PZ) concentrations were reported in patients with pre-eclampsia (PE), a small for gestational age (SGA) neonate, and a fetal demise (FD). Anti-protein Z antibodies (APZ-AB) have been proposed as a possible underlying mechanism leading to low plasma PZ concentrations. The objective of this study was to determine the maternal plasma concentration of APZ-AB in women with a normal pregnancy, and patients with PE, an SGA neonate or a FD.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study included women in the following groups: (1) non-pregnant women (n = 45); and pregnant women with: (2) normal pregnancies (n = 70); (3) PE (n = 123); (4) SGA neonates (n = 51); and (5) a FD (n = 51). Plasma concentrations of anti-protein Z IgM and IgG antibodies were measured by ELISA. Elevated APZ-AB was defined as >75th, 90th and 95th percentile of the normal pregnancy group. Non-parametric statistics were used for analyses.

RESULTS

(1) Patients with an SGA neonate had a higher median maternal plasma IgG APZ-AB concentration than women with normal pregnancies (p < 0.001), and patients with PE (p < 0.001) or with a FD (p = 0.001). (2) The proportion of patients with a maternal plasma IgM APZ-AB concentration >90th percentile was higher in the SGA group than in the PE group (p = 0.01). (3) Patients with PE maternal plasma IgM APZ-AB concentration >90th percentile had a higher rate of villous thrombosis (p = 0.03) and persistent muscularization of basal plate arteries (p = 0.01) than those with IgM APZ-AB concentration <90th percentile; and (5) Patients with FD and maternal plasma IgM APZ-AB concentration >90th percentile had a higher rate of umbilical phlebitis and arteritis than those with IgM APZ-AB concentration <90th percentile (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Patients with SGA neonates have a higher median plasma concentration of IgG APZ-AB than normal pregnant women, or patients with PE or FD; and (2) maternal plasma IgM APZ-AB concentration >90th percentile was associated with vascular placental lesions in patients with PE, but not in those with an SGA neonate, suggesting that in a subset of patients, these antibodies can be associated with abnormal placentation and pregnancy complications.

Pregnancy outcome in different clinical phenotypes of antiphospholipid syndrome

Women with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) may have diverse pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate pregnancy outcome in women with APS according to their clinical phenotype, i.e. thrombotic and obstetric APS. Eighty-three pregnancies in 67 women with APS were included in the study, including 21 with recurrent miscarriage (Group 1), 21 with late fetal loss or early delivery due to placental dysfunction (Group 2) and 41 with thrombotic APS (Group 3). Group 3 had higher rates of preterm delivery (26.8% versus 4.7%, p = 0.05) than Group 1 and more small for gestational age (SGA) babies than Group 2 (39.5% versus 4.8%, p = 0.003). Group 2 had significantly longer gestations compared with their pretreatment pregnancies (38.4 [28.4—41.4] versus 24.0 [18—35] weeks, p < 0.0001) and 100% live birth rate after treatment with aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). In conclusion, women with thrombotic APS (Group 3) have higher rates of pregnancy complications than those with obstetric APS (Groups 1 and 2). Treatment with aspirin and LMWH is associated with improved outcomes for women with previous late fetal loss or early delivery due to placental dysfunction (Group 2). Lupus (2010) 19, 58—64.

Antiphospholipid antibodies increase the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) is associated with thromboembolism. There is scant evidence of a relationship between the aPL profile and serious adverse pregnancy outcome. The aim of this study was to assess whether aPL measurements during early pregnancy were useful in predicting a serious adverse pregnancy outcome. In this prospective study, we measured aPLs, including lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG, IgM, IgA anticardiolipin antibody (aCL), IgG, IgM phosphatidylserine-dependent antiprothrombin antibody, and IgG kininogen-dependent antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibody (aPE) during the first trimester in a consecutive series of 1155 women. The 99 th percentile cut-off values in each aPL were determined using samples from 105 women who did not exhibit any pregnancy morbidity. We assessed the predictive risk of a serious adverse pregnancy outcome adjusted for confounding factors. We found that IgG aCL was associated with developing pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) (odds ratio 11.4, 95% CI 2.7-48); IgG aPE with PIH (8.3, 2.4-29), severe PIH (20.4, 4.5-91), and premature delivery (PD) (12.7, 3.1-50); and LA with PD (11.0, 2.8-44) and low birth weight (8.0, 2.1-31). The combinations of IgG aPE plus IgG aCL (17.5, 4.7-66.7) or IgG aPE plus LA (22.2, 5.4-909) measurements predicted severe PIH with 30.8% sensitivity and 99.2% specificity. We conclude that aPL measurements during early pregnancy may be useful in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome.

The obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome

The association of persistent presence of circulating antiphospholipid antibodies and thromboembolic events, (recurrent) pregnancy loss or both is termed antiphospholipid syndrome. Pregnancies in women with the syndrome should be regarded as at high-risk for complications. Optimal management consisting of close follow-up and pharmacological treatment can result in about 70-80% live births. Apart from the laboratory diagnosis of the syndrome and pathophysiology, this review will focus on treatment during pregnancy.

Do antiphospholipid antibodies cause preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes including preeclampsia, recurrent early pregnancy loss, fetal death, and intrauterine growth restriction. Approximately one third of women with APS will develop preeclampsia during pregnancy. The association between antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in the absence of the clinical syndrome and preeclampsia is less clear, and a causal relationship has not yet been proven. Testing for aPL should be considered in women with early-onset (< 34 weeks) severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, or HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome, especially when additional clinical features of APS are present. Prospective testing for aPL in women at risk for preeclampsia is not recommended. Current evidence does not justify inclusion of preeclampsia as a major criterion for APS, but preeclampsia could reasonably be included as a secondary or minor criterion in diagnosis when a patient has other clinical features of APS.

Pregnancies Complicated with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: The Pathogenic Mechanism of Antiphospholipid Antibodies: A Review of the Literature

There are several possible mechanisms by which antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) may have adverse effects on placental functions. Examination of placentas and first-trimester decidua from antiphospholipid syndrome-complicated pregnancies has found little evidence of specific thrombotic placental pathology. It is now generally accepted that the clinically relevant aPL bind to proteins with affinity for phospholipids. The most important epitope for antiphospholipid syndrome-related aPL resides on beta2-glycoprotein-I (beta2GPI). aPL detected by anti-beta2GPI assays are associated with fetal loss. During differentiation to syncytium, trophoblasts express cell membrane anionic phospholipids that can bind beta2GPI. Adhered beta2GPI can be recognized by the antibodies that, once bound, interfere with trophoblast cell maturation, resulting in defective placentation. The improved outcome of pregnancies treated with heparin stimulated interest on the drug's mechanism of action. Several mechanisms could explain its beneficial effects in addition to a direct effect of heparin on the coagulation cascade. It might reduce the binding of aPL, inflammation by inhibiting complement activation, and might facilitate implantation. Further investigations are needed to better understand how aPL induce obstetric complications and to better clarify the functional role of heparin in the human placenta, leading to more successful therapeutic options.

Work-up of stillbirth: a review of the evidence

Despite improvements in antenatal and intrapartum care, stillbirth, defined as in utero fetal death at 20 weeks of gestation or greater, remains an important, largely unstudied, and poignant problem in obstetrics. More than 26,000 stillbirths were reported in the United States in 2001. Although several conditions have been linked to stillbirth, it is difficult to define the precise etiology in many cases. This paper reviews known and suspected causes of stillbirth including genetic abnormalities, infection, fetal-maternal hemorrhage, and a variety of medical conditions in the mother. The proportion of stillbirths that have a diagnostic explanation is higher in centers that conduct a defined and systematic evaluation. The evidence for recommended diagnostic tests for stillbirth are discussed. The ongoing work of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network, a consortium of 5 academic centers in the United States that are studying the scope and causes of stillbirth, is presented.

Influence of antiphospholipid antibodies on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

PROBLEM

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) are thought to be involved in recurrent pregnancy loss. Therefore, we investigated the impact of APA on pregnancy outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET).

METHOD OF STUDY

Blood samples taken from 54 Korean women referred for IVF were tested for the presence of APA, anticardiolipin antibody IgG and IgM and lupus anticoagulant. The standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol was used for ovarian stimulation.

RESULTS

Nine patients (16.7%) were positive and 45 (83.3%) were negative for APA. There were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical characteristics such as age, infertility duration, and response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. However, pregnancy outcome significantly differed between the two groups (p < 0.05). The APA positive group and APA negative group had abortion rates of 62.5% and 20.0%, respectively and delivery rates of 37.5% and 80.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of APA in women undergoing IVF-ET was associated with a poor pregnancy outcome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and pregnancy

Since the 1960s, antiphospholipid antibodies have been known to be associated with repeated miscarriages and fetal losses. Other complications of pregnancy, such as preterm birth, with pre-eclampsia or severe placental insufficiency were also frequently reported and are included in the current classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome. The titer, isotype or antigen specificity of the antibodies may be important in risk determination. The pathogenesis of pregnancy failures is not only linked to the thrombophilic effect of antiphospholipid antibodies but also to a direct effect of antibodies on trophoblast differentiation and invasion. The study of experimental animal models provided sound evidence of the pathogenic role of antiphospholipid antibodies both in lupus-prone and -naive mice. The classification of pregnant antiphospholipid syndrome patients as being at a 'high risk' has completely changed their prognosis due to obstetric monitoring and the application of effective therapy. In fact, despite the high rates of complications and preterm delivery, a successful outcome can now be achieved in a large majority of cases.

Antiphospholipid syndrome: An evolving story

Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) is a form of immune mediated thrombophilia, presenting as recurrent thrombotic events and pregnancy morbidity, in association with positive laboratory tests for antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) in the form of Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) or anticardiolipin antibodies(ACA). Insights into the pathophysiology of the condition suggest that some antibodies are prothrombotic in vivo, and that the mechanism of thrombosis is likely to be multifactorial. APS has a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, and the laboratory diagnosis can be difficult due to heterogeneity of APAs and poor standardisation of laboratory tests. Anticoagulation is the mainstay of the management of the thrombotic and obstetric complications of APS. The risk of recurrent thrombosis appears to be high, and the duration and intensity of therapy remains controversial. Randomised controlled trials have shown that standard intensity anticoagulation is adequate in most cases of venous thrombosis. Further trials are required to establish whether high intensity coagulation is of benefit in recurrent or arterial thrombosis. The optimal management of recurrent fetal loss is debated and large studies are required to establish a clear benefit of heparin and aspirin over aspirin alone or supportive care.

[Hormone therapy, fertility and pregnancy in antiphospholipid syndrome]

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) carries a risk of thrombosis and infertility. Consequently the use of any type of hormone therapy and pregnancy in APS requires special considerations. The present article provides a broad review of all these issues. The use of contraception, hormone replacement therapy and selective estrogen receptor modulators in APS are described. In vitro fertilization/embryo transfer and ovarian induction in these patients are reviewed. Lastly, the possible fetal and maternal complications that can occur during pregnancy are described and, based on the literature, recommendations for the management of pregnancy in women with APS are provided.

Antiphospholipid antibodies in serum and follicular fluid--is there a correlation with IVF implantation failure?

BACKGROUND

Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are associated with infertility, but the mechanism underlying this statistical association is currently obscure. We aimed to investigate the finding that aPLs are concentrated in follicular fluid and to establish if this is associated with a poorer outcome from IVF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 19.2% of 99 women undergoing IVF, at least one aPL was detected in their serum and/or follicular fluids, but the antibody levels in follicular fluid were not higher than in serum. Women with aPLs had a lower implantation rate (14%) than women without these antibodies (24.1%), but this difference was not significant (P=0.127). There was also a non-significant reduction in the live birth rate for women with aPLs. In a parallel investigation, 10 sheep immunized with beta2 glycoprotein I (beta2GPI) or irrelevant control antigens showed strong immune responses, but there were no significant differences between the levels of antibodies in the follicular fluid or serum from beta2GPI or control immunized sheep.

CONCLUSION

aPLs do not appear to be selectively concentrated in follicular fluids and, when present, do not adversely affect the reproductive outcome of women undergoing IVF.

Anti-Phospholipid Antibodies against Phosphatidylinositol, and Phosphatidylserine are More Significant in Reproductive Failure than Antibodies against Cardiolipin only

PROBLEM

The humoral immune response to phospholipids was investigated in women with reproductive failure [1073 women after one in vitro fertilization (IVF), 853 women after two and more IVF, 627 women after three and more repeated spontaneous miscarriages or missed abortions, 412 women after diagnostic laparoscopy] and compared with that of 391 healthy fertile women.

METHOD OF STUDY

Sera from all women in the study were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the detection of IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes of antibodies against seven phospholipids (aPLs), i.e. cardiolipin, L-phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylacid as well as against beta2-glycoprotein I.

RESULTS

Patients after two and more IVF (48 and 50%, respectively), patients with three and more repeated spontaneous miscarriages (50 and 46.5%, respectively) are associated with significantly higher serum levels of aPLs against inositol, and L-serine (P < 0.01). A quarter of them were positive for three and more aPLs.

CONCLUSION

It seems that determination of aPLs only against cardiolipin in reproductive failure is not sufficient for obstetric-gynecology diagnosis as the primary anti-phospholipid syndrome. Our long-ranging study (from 1998 to 2003) shows the necessity to test for a complete aPLs profile. Sera from patients after two and more IVF procedures, and sera from women after three and more repeated abortions are immunologically more active than sera from women after one unsuccessful IVF and sera from women after diagnostic laparoscopy. This important result is very significant for future treatment.