Oestrogenic and antioestrogenic actions in a series of triphenylbut-1-enes: modulation of prolactin synthesis in vitro

Estrogen for the Treatment and Prevention of Breast Cancer: A Tale of 2 Karnofsky Lectures

ABSTRACT

In 1971, Sir Alexander Haddow et al. delivered the inaugural David A. Karnofsky lecture at the American Society for Clinical Oncology. This award was designated American Society for Clinical Oncology's highest, as he had used translational research to identify the first clinical therapy, that is, synthetic estrogens to treat breast cancer. His lecture was entitled "Thoughts on Chemical Therapy." For 40 years, high-dose synthetic estrogens were used as palliative therapy, for some advanced breast cancer patients 5 years following menopause. Mechanisms were unknown. Tamoxifen, a failed "morning-after pill," is an antiestrogen in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, which was subsequently used to treat all stages of breast cancer and to prevent breast cancer. In 2008, Jordan was selected to present the 38th Karnofsky lecture entitled: "The Paradoxical Action of Estrogen in Breast Cancer-Survival or Death?" Unexpectedly, through a study of acquired resistance to long-term tamoxifen therapy, estrogen-induced apoptosis in long-term estrogen-deprived breast cancer was deciphered in Jordan's laboratory. These data and the biological rules established under laboratory conditions provided molecular mechanisms to aid in the interpretation of the Women's Health initiative in the United States and the Million Women Study in the United Kingdom. In addition, by establishing laboratory models to understand mechanisms of estrogen-induced apoptosis, new estrogen derivatives were successfully evaluated in the laboratory and tested as candidates for women after the therapeutic failure of antiestrogenic strategies to treat breast cancer. For the future, the knowledge obtained about estrogen-induced apoptosis in cancer holds the promise of discovering new therapies to control or cure cancer in general.

Estrogen Receptor Complex to Trigger or Delay Estrogen-Induced Apoptosis in Long-Term Estrogen Deprived Breast Cancer

Antiestrogen therapy of breast cancer has been a "gold standard" of treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer for decades. Resistance to antiestrogen therapy may develop, however, a vulnerability in long-term estrogen deprived (LTED) breast cancer cells was discovered. LTED breast cancer cells may undergo estrogen-induced apoptosis within a week of treatment with estrogen in vitro. This phenomenon has been also validated in vivo and in the clinic. The molecular ER-mediated mechanism of action of estrogen-induced apoptosis was deciphered, however, the relationship between the structure of estrogenic ligands and the activity of the ER in LTED breast cancer cells remained a mystery until recently. In this review we provide an overview of the structure-activity relationship of various estrogens with different chemical structures and the modulation of estrogen-induced apoptosis in LTED breast cancer cells resistant to antihormone therapy. We provide analysis of evidence gathered over more than a decade of structure-activity relationship studies by our group on the role of the change in the conformation of the estrogen receptor and the biological activities of different classes of estrogens and the receptor as well in LTED breast cancer.

Turning scientific serendipity into discoveries in breast cancer research and treatment: a tale of PhD students and a 50-year roaming tamoxifen team

PURPOSE

This retrospective, about a single "mobile" laboratory in six locations on two continents, is intended as a case study in discovery for trainees and junior faculty in the medical sciences. Your knowledge of your topic is necessary to expect the unexpected.

HISTORICAL METHOD

In 1972, there was no tamoxifen, only ICI 46, 474, a non-steroidal anti-estrogen with little chance of clinical development. No one would ever be foolish enough to predict that the medicine, 20 years later, would achieve legendary status as the first targeted treatment for breast cancer, and millions of women would benefit from long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. The secret of tamoxifen's success was a translational research strategy proposed in the mid 1970's. This strategy was to treat only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer and deploy 5 or more years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy to prevent recurrence. Additionally, tamoxifen prevented mammary cancer in animals. Could the medicine prevent breast cancer in women?

RESULTS

Tamoxifen and the failed breast cancer drug raloxifene became the first selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): a new drug group, discovered at the University of Wisconsin, Comprehensive Cancer Center. Serendipity can play a fundamental role in discovery, but there must be a rigorous preparation for the investigator to appreciate the possibility of a pending discovery. This article follows the unanticipated discoveries when PhD students "get the wrong answer." The secret of success of my six Tamoxifen Teams was their technical excellence to create models, to decipher mechanisms, that drove the development of new medicines. Discoveries are listed that either changed women's health or allowed an understanding of originally opaque mechanisms of action of potential therapies. These advances in women's health were supported entirely by government-sponsored peer-reviewed funding and major philanthropy from the Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation, the Avon Foundation, and the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. The resulting lives saved or extended, families aided in a time of crisis and the injection of billions of dollars into national economies by drug development, is proof of the value of Federal or philanthropic investment into unencumbered research aimed at saving millions of lives.

Pharmacology and Molecular Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Estrogen Estetrol and Estrogen Mimic BMI-135 for the Treatment of Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer

Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) with tamoxifen (TAM) or aromatase inhibitors leads to endocrine-resistance, whereby physiologic levels of estrogen kill breast cancer (BC). Estrogen therapy is effective in treating patients with advanced BC after resistance to TAM and aromatase inhibitors develops. This therapeutic effect is attributed to estrogen-induced apoptosis via the estrogen receptor (ER). Estrogen therapy can have unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse events. Here, we study estetrol (E4) and a model Selective Human ER Partial Agonist (ShERPA) BMI-135. Estetrol and ShERPA TTC-352 are being evaluated in clinical trials. These agents are proposed as safer estrogenic candidates compared with 17β-estradiol (E2) for the treatment of endocrine-resistant BC. Cell viability assays, real-time polymerase chain reaction, luciferase reporter assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation, docking and molecular dynamics simulations, human unfolded protein response (UPR) RT2 PCR profiler arrays, live cell microscopic imaging and analysis, and annexin V staining assays were conducted. Our work was done in eight biologically different human BC cell lines and one human endometrial cancer cell line, and results were compared with full agonists estrone, E2, and estriol, a benchmark partial agonist triphenylethylene bisphenol (BPTPE), and antagonists 4-hydroxytamoxifen and endoxifen. Our study shows the pharmacology of E4 and BMI-135 as less-potent full-estrogen agonists as well as their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression in LTED BC through triggering a rapid UPR and apoptosis. Our work concludes that the use of a full agonist to treat BC is potentially superior to a partial agonist given BPTPE's delayed induction of UPR and apoptosis, with a higher probability of tumor clonal evolution and resistance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Given the unpleasant gynecologic and nongynecologic adverse effects of estrogen treatment, the development of safer estrogens for endocrine-resistant breast cancer (BC) treatment and hormone replacement therapy remains a priority. The naturally occurring estrogen estetrol and Selective Human Estrogen-Receptor Partial Agonists are being evaluated in endocrine-resistant BC clinical trials. This work provides a comprehensive evaluation of their pharmacology in numerous endocrine-resistant BC models and an endometrial cancer model and their molecular mechanisms of tumor regression through the unfolded protein response and apoptosis.

The SERM Saga, Something from Nothing: American Cancer Society/SSO Basic Science Lecture

BACKGROUND

The discovery of nonsteroidal antiestrogens created a new group of medicines looking for an application; however, at the time, cytotoxic chemotherapy was the modality of choice to treat all cancers. Antiestrogens were orphan drugs until 1971, with the passing of the National Cancer Act. This enabled laboratory innovations to aid patient care.

METHODS

This article traces the strategic application of tamoxifen to treat breast cancer by targeting the estrogen receptor (ER), deploying long-term adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, and becoming the first chemopreventive for any cancer. Laboratory discoveries from the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center (UWCCC) are described that address a broad range of biological issues with tamoxifen. These translated to improvements in clinical care.

RESULTS

Tamoxifen was studied extensively at UWCCC in the 1980s for the development of acquired resistance to long-term therapy. Additionally, the long-term metabolism of tamoxifen and regulation of growth factors were also studied. A concern with tamoxifen use for chemoprevention was that an antiestrogen would increase bone loss and atherosclerosis. Laboratory studies with tamoxifen and keoxifene (subsequently named raloxifene) demonstrated that 'nonsteroidal antiestrogens' maintained bone density, and this translated into successful clinical trials with tamoxifen at UWCCC. However, tamoxifen also increased endometrial cancer growth; this discovery in the laboratory translated into changes in clinical care. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were born at UWCCC.

CONCLUSIONS

There are now five US FDA-approved SERMs, all with discovery origins at UWCCC. Women's health was revolutionized as SERMs have the ability to treat multiple diseases by switching target sites around a woman's body on or off.

The molecular, cellular and clinical consequences of targeting the estrogen receptor following estrogen deprivation therapy

During the past 20 years our understanding of the control of breast tumor development, growth and survival has changed dramatically. The once long forgotten application of high dose synthetic estrogen therapy as the first chemical therapy to treat any cancer has been resurrected, refined and reinvented as the new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis. High dose estrogen therapy was cast aside once tamoxifen, from its origins as a failed "morning after pill", was reinvented as the first targeted therapy to treat any cancer. The current understanding of the mechanism of estrogen-induced apoptosis is described as a consequence of acquired resistance to long term antihormone therapy in estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer. The ER signal transduction pathway remains a target for therapy in breast cancer despite "antiestrogen" resistance, but becomes a regulator of resistance. Multiple mechanisms of resistance come into play: Selective ER modulator (SERM) stimulated growth, growth factor/ER crosstalk, estrogen-induced apoptosis and mutations of ER. But it is with the science of estrogen-induced apoptosis that the next innovation in women's health will be developed. Recent evidence suggests that the glucocorticoid properties of medroxyprogesterone acetate blunt estrogen-induced apoptosis in estrogen deprived breast cancer cell populations. As a result breast cancer develops during long-term hormone replacement therapy (HRT). A new synthetic progestin with estrogen-like properties, such as the 19 nortestosterone derivatives used in oral contraceptives, will continue to protect the uterus from unopposed estrogen stimulation but at the same time, reinforce apoptosis in vulnerable populations of nascent breast cancer cells.

Differences in the rate of oestrogen-induced apoptosis in breast cancer by oestradiol and the triphenylethylene bisphenol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Triphenylethylene (TPE)-like compounds were the first agents to be used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Although structurally related to the anti-oestrogen, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, TPEs possess oestrogenic properties in fully oestrogenized breast cancer cells but do not induce apoptosis with short-term treatment in long-term oestrogen-deprived breast cancer cells. This study determined the differential effects of bisphenol, a TPE, on growth and apoptosis based on the modulation of the shape of the ligand-oestrogen receptor complex.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Apoptotic flow cytometric studies were used to evaluate apoptosis over time. Proliferation of the breast cancer cells was assessed using DNA quantification and cell cycle analysis. Real-time PCR was performed to quantify mRNA levels of apoptotic genes. Regulation of cell cycle and apoptotic genes was determined using PCR-based arrays.

KEY RESULTS

Bisphenol induced an up-regulation of cell cycle genes similar to those induced by 17β oestradiol (E2 ). Unlike the changes induced by E2 that occur after 24 h, the apoptosis evoked by bisphenol occurred after 4 days, with quantifiable apoptotic changes noted at 6 days. A prolonged up-regulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory stress response genes was observed with subsequent activation of apoptosis-related genes in the second week of treatment with bisphenol.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The bisphenol: ERα complex induces delayed biological effects on the growth and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. Both the shape of the complex and the duration of treatment control the initiation of apoptosis.

Estrogen receptor mutations found in breast cancer metastases integrated with the molecular pharmacology of selective ER modulators

The consistent reports of mutations at Asp538 and Tyr537 in helix 12 of the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of estrogen receptors (ERs) from antihormone-resistant breast cancer metastases constitute an important advance. The mutant amino acids interact with an anchor amino acid, Asp351, to close the LBD, thereby creating a ligand-free constitutively activated ER. Amino acids Asp 538, Tyr 537, and Asp 351 are known to play a role in either the turnover of ER, the antiestrogenic activity of the ER complex, or the estrogen-like actions of selective ER modulators. A unifying mechanism of action for these amino acids to enhance ER gene activation and growth response is presented. There is a range of mutations described in metastases vs low to zero in primary disease, so the new knowledge is of clinical relevance, thereby confirming an additional mechanism of acquired resistance to antihormone therapy through cell population selection pressure and enrichment during treatment. Circulating tumor cells containing ER mutations can be cultured ex vivo, and tumor tissues can be grown as patient-derived xenografts to add a new dimension for testing drug susceptibility for future drug discovery.

The new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis applied to treat and prevent breast cancer

The successful use of high-dose synthetic estrogens to treat postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer is the first effective 'chemical therapy' proven in clinical trial to treat any cancer. This review documents the clinical use of estrogen for breast cancer treatment or estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in postmenopausal hysterectomized women, which can either result in breast cancer cell growth or breast cancer regression. This has remained a paradox since the 1950s until the discovery of the new biology of estrogen-induced apoptosis at the end of the 20th century. The key to triggering apoptosis with estrogen is the selection of breast cancer cell populations that are resistant to long-term estrogen deprivation. However, estrogen-independent growth occurs through trial and error. At the cellular level, estrogen-induced apoptosis is dependent upon the presence of the estrogen receptor (ER), which can be blocked by nonsteroidal or steroidal antiestrogens. The shape of an estrogenic ligand programs the conformation of the ER complex, which, in turn, can modulate estrogen-induced apoptosis: class I planar estrogens (e.g., estradiol) trigger apoptosis after 24 h, whereas class II angular estrogens (e.g., bisphenol triphenylethylene) delay the process until after 72 h. This contrasts with paclitaxel, which causes G2 blockade with immediate apoptosis. The process is complete within 24 h. Estrogen-induced apoptosis is modulated by glucocorticoids and cSrc inhibitors, but the target mechanism for estrogen action is genomic and not through a nongenomic pathway. The process is stepwise through the creation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammatory responses, which then initiate an unfolded protein response. This, in turn, initiates apoptosis through the intrinsic pathway (mitochondrial) with the subsequent recruitment of the extrinsic pathway (death receptor) to complete the process. The symmetry of the clinical and laboratory studies now permits the creation of rules for the future clinical application of ERT or phytoestrogen supplements: a 5-year gap is necessary after menopause to permit the selection of estrogen-deprived breast cancer cell populations to cause them to become vulnerable to apoptotic cell death. Earlier treatment with estrogen around menopause encourages growth of ER-positive tumor cells, as the cells are still dependent on estrogen to maintain replication within the expanding population. An awareness of the evidence that the molecular events associated with estrogen-induced apoptosis can be orchestrated in the laboratory in estrogen-deprived breast cancers now supports the clinical findings regarding the treatment of metastatic breast cancer following estrogen deprivation, decreases in mortality following long-term antihormonal adjuvant therapy, and the results of treatment with ERT and ERT plus progestin in the Women's Health Initiative for women over the age of 60. Principles have emerged for understanding and applying physiological estrogen therapy appropriately by targeting the correct patient populations.

Molecular mechanism of action of bisphenol and bisphenol A mediated by oestrogen receptor alpha in growth and apoptosis of breast cancer cells

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oestrogen receptor alpha (ERα) binds to different ligand which can function as complete/partial oestrogen-agonist or antagonist. This depends on the chemical structure of the ligands which modulates the transcriptional activity of the oestrogen-responsive genes by altering the conformation of the liganded-ERα complex. This study determined the molecular mechanism of oestrogen-agonistic/antagonistic action of structurally similar ligands, bisphenol (BP) and bisphenol A (BPA) on cell proliferation and apoptosis of ERα + ve breast cancer cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

DNA was measured to assess the proliferation and apoptosis of breast cancer cells. RT-PCR and ChIP assays were performed to quantify the transcripts of TFF1 gene and recruitment of ERα and SRC3 at the promoter of TFF1 gene respectively. Molecular docking was used to delineate the binding modes of BP and BPA with the ERα. PCR-based arrays were used to study the regulation of the apoptotic genes.

KEY RESULTS

BP and BPA induced the proliferation of breast cancer cells; however, unlike BPA, BP failed to induce apoptosis. BPA consistently acted as an agonist in our studies but BP exhibited mixed agonistic/antagonistic properties. Molecular docking revealed agonistic and antagonistic mode of binding for BPA and BP respectively. BPA treatment resembled E2 treatment in terms of PCR-based regulation of apoptotic genes whereas BP was similar to 4OHT treatment.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The chemical structure of ERα ligand determines the agonistic or antagonistic biological responses by the virtue of their binding mode, conformation of the liganded-ERα complex and the context of the cellular function.

An overview of current and emerging SERMs

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are compounds that exhibit tissue-specific estrogen receptor (ER) agonist or antagonist activity, and are used for various indications, including treatment of breast cancer, osteoporosis, and menopausal symptoms. Endometrial safety has been a key differentiator between SERMs in clinical practice. For example, tamoxifen exhibits ER agonist activity in the uterus, resulting in an increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia and malignancy, whereas raloxifene and bazedoxifene have neutral effects on the uterus. Based on their efficacy and long-term safety, SERMs are increasingly being prescribed for women who cannot tolerate other treatment options and for younger women at an increased risk of fracture who may remain on therapy for long periods of time. Continuing advances in the understanding of SERM mechanisms of action and structural interactions with the ER may lead to the development of new agents and combinations of agents to provide optimal treatments to meet the varying needs of postmenopausal women. One such example is the tissue selective estrogen complex, which partners a SERM with 1 or more estrogens, with the aim of blending the desired estrogen-receptor agonist activities of estrogens on vasomotor symptoms, vulvar-vaginal atrophy, and loss of bone mass with the tissue selectivity of a SERM.

Influence of the length and positioning of the antiestrogenic side chain of endoxifen and 4-hydroxytamoxifen on gene activation and growth of estrogen receptor positive cancer cells

Tamoxifen has biologically active metabolites: 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT) and endoxifen. The E-isomers are not stable in solution as Z-isomerization occurs. We have synthesized fixed ring (FR) analogues of 4OHT and endoxifen as well as FR E and Z isomers with methoxy and ethoxy side chains. Pharmacologic properties were documented in the MCF-7 cell line, and prolactin synthesis was assessed in GH3 rat pituitary tumor cells. The FR Z-isomers of 4OHT and endoxifen were equivalent to 4OHT and endoxifen. Other test compounds used possessed partial estrogenic activity. The E-isomers of FR 4OHT and endoxifen had no estrogenic activity at therapeutic serum concentrations. None of the newly synthesized compounds were able to down-regulate ER levels. Molecular modeling demonstrated that some compounds would each create a best fit with a novel agonist conformation of the ER. The results demonstrate modulation by the ER complex of cell replication or gene transcription in cancer.

The discovery and development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for clinical practice

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally different compounds that interact with intracellular estrogen receptors in target organs as estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists. These drugs have been intensively studied over the past decade and have proven to be a highly versatile group for the treatment of different conditions associated with postmenopausal women's health, including hormone responsive cancer and osteoporosis. Tamoxifen, a failed contraceptive is currently used to treat all stages of breast cancer, chemoprevention in women at high risk for breast cancer and also has beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene, a failed breast cancer drug, is the only SERM approved internationally for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. However, although these SERMs have many benefits, they also have some potentially serious adverse effects, such as thromboembolic disorders and, in the case of tamoxifen, uterine cancer. These adverse effects represent a major concern given that long-term therapy is required to prevent osteoporosis or prevent and treat breast cancer. The search for the 'ideal' SERM, which would have estrogenic effects on bone and serum lipids, neutral effects on the uterus, and antiestrogenic effects on breast tissue, but none of the adverse effects associated with current therapies, is currently under way. Ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene and arzoxifene, which are new SERM molecules with potentially greater efficacy and potency than previous SERMs, have been investigated for use in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. These drugs have been shown to be comparably effective to conventional hormone replacement therapy in animal models, with potential indications for an improved safety profile. Clinical efficacy data from ongoing phase III trials are available or are awaited for each SERM so that a true understanding of the therapeutic potential of these compounds can be obtained. In this article, we describe the discovery and development of the group of medicines called SERMs. The newer SERMs in late development: ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene, are arzoxifene are described in detail.

Progress in endocrine approaches to the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

Tamoxifen had been the only available hormonal option for the systemic treatment for breast cancer from 1973 to 2000. Enormous efforts have led to the development of potent and selective third generation aromatase inhibitors including anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane. Due to their superior efficacy to tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors are presently approved as first line agents for the treatment of advanced estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer and adjuvant therapy in early ER positive early breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Selective ER Modulators (SERMS), tamoxifen and raloxifene are the only agents presently used in breast cancer prevention in high risk women and their use has increased substantially over the last decade. Third generations SERMS, lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene have shown significant reduction in bone loss compared to placebo in postmenopausal women and are currently approved in the European Union for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This review outlines the current strategies employed in the use of endocrine therapy in the management and prevention of breast cancer.

The Paradox of Oestradiol-Induced Breast Cancer Cell Growth and Apoptosis

High dose oestrogen therapy was used as a treatment for postmenopausal patients with breast cancer from the 1950s until the introduction of the safer antioestrogen, tamoxifen in the 1970s. The anti-tumour mechanism of high dose oestrogen therapy remained unknown. There was no enthusiasm to study these signal transduction pathways as oestrogen therapy has almost completely been eliminated from the treatment paradigm. Current use of tamoxifen and the aromatase inhibitors seek to create oestrogen deprivation that prevents the growth of oestrogen stimulated oestrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer cells. However, acquired resistance to antihormonal therapy does occur, but it is through investigation of laboratory models that a vulnerability of the cancer cell has been discovered and is being investigated to provide new opportunities in therapy with the potential for discovering new cancer-specific apoptotic drugs. Laboratory models of resistance to raloxifene and tamoxifen, the selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors demonstrate an evolution of drug resistance so that after many years of oestrogen deprivation, the ER positive cancer cell reconfigures the survival signal transduction pathways so oestrogen now becomes an apoptotic trigger rather than a survival signal. Current efforts are evaluating the mechanisms of oestrogen-induced apoptosis and how this new biology of oestrogen action can be amplified and enhanced, thereby increasing the value of this therapeutic opportunity for the treatment of breast cancer. Several synergistic approaches to therapeutic enhancement are being advanced which involve drug combinations to impair survival signaling with the use of specific agents and to impair bcl-2 that protects the cancer cell from apoptosis. We highlight the historical understanding of oestrogen's role in cell survival and death and specifically illustrate the progress that has been made in the last five years to understand the mechanisms of oestrogen-induced apoptosis. There are opportunities to harness knowledge from this new signal transduction pathway to discover the precise mechanism of this oestrogen-induced apoptotic trigger. Indeed, the new biology of oestrogen action also has significance for understanding the physiology of bone remodeling. Thus, the pathway has a broad appeal in both physiology and cancer research.

Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators and Antihormonal Resistance in Breast Cancer

Selective estrogen-receptor (ER) modulators (SERMs) are synthetic nonsteroidal compounds that switch on and switch off target sites throughout the body. Tamoxifen, the pioneering SERM, blocks estrogen action by binding to the ER in breast cancers. Tamoxifen has been used ubiquitously in clinical practice during the last 30 years for the treatment of breast cancer and is currently available to reduce the risk of breast cancer in high-risk women. Raloxifene maintains bone density (estrogen-like effect) in postmenopausal osteoporotic women, but at the same time reduces the incidence of breast cancer in both high- and low-risk (osteoporotic) postmenopausal women. Unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene does not increase the incidence of endometrial cancer. Clearly, the simple ER model of estrogen action can no longer be used to explain SERM action at different sites around the body. Instead, a new model has evolved on the basis of the discovery of protein partners that modulate estrogen action at distinct target sites. Coactivators are the principal players that assemble a complex of functional proteins around the ligand ER complex to initiate transcription of a target gene at its promoter site. A promiscuous SERM ER complex creates a stimulatory signal in growth factor receptor–rich breast or endometrial cancer cells. These events cause drug-resistant, SERM-stimulated growth. The sometimes surprising pharmacology of SERMs has resulted in a growing interest in the development of new selective medicines for other members of the nuclear receptor superfamily. This will allow the precise treatment of diseases that was previously considered impossible.

New insights into the metabolism of tamoxifen and its role in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

The metabolism of tamoxifen is being redefined in the light of several important pharmacological observations. Recent studies have identified 4-hydroxy N-desmethyltamoxifen (endoxifen) as an important metabolite of tamoxifen necessary for antitumor actions. The metabolite is formed through the enzymatic product of CYP2D6 which also interacts with specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to prevent the hot flashes observed in up to 45% of patients taking tamoxifen. Additionally, the finding that enzyme variants of CYP2D6 do not promote the metabolism of tamoxifen to endoxifen means that significant numbers of women might not receive optimal benefit from tamoxifen treatment. Clearly these are particularly important issues not only for breast cancer treatment but also for selecting premenopausal women, at high risk for breast cancer, as candidates for chemoprevention using tamoxifen.

Investigations on estrogen receptor binding. The estrogenic, antiestrogenic, and cytotoxic properties of C2-alkyl-substituted 1,1-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylethenes

C2-Alkyl-substituted 1,1-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylethenes were synthesized and assayed for estrogen receptor binding in a competition experiment with radiolabeled estradiol ([3H]-E2) using calf uterine cytosol. The relative binding affinity decreased with the length of the side chain R = H (3a: 35.2%) > Me (3b: 32.1%) > Et (3c: 6.20%) approximately CH2CF3 (3d: 5.95%) > n-Pr (3e: 2.09%) > Bu (3f: 0.62%). Agonistic and antagonistic effects were evaluated in the luciferase assay with MCF-7-2a cells stably transfected with the plasmid ERE(wtc)luc. All compounds showed high antiestrogenic activity without significant agonistic potency. The comparison of the IC(50) values for the inhibition of E2 (1 nM) documented the dependence of the antagonistic effects on the kind of the side chain: 3a (IC50 = 150 nM), 3b (IC50 = 30 nM), and 3f (IC50 = 500 nM) were weak antagonists, while 3c (IC50 = 15 nM), 3d (IC50 = 9 nM), and 3e (IC50 = 50 nM) were full antiestrogens and antagonized the effect of E2 completely. The most active compound 3d possessed the same antagonistic potency as 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT: IC50= 7 nM) without bearing a basic side chain. 3d as well as all other 1,1-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenylalkenes were not able to influence the proliferation of hormone dependent MCF-7 cells despite the antagonistic mode of action. In this assay tamoxifen (TAM) and 4OHT reduced the cell growth concentration dependent up to T/C(corr) = 15% and 25%, respectively.

Chlorocarbamate-mustard-linked 1,1,2-triphenylbut-1-enes with a selective antitumor activity on mammary tumors containing estrogen receptors

A 1,1,2-triphenylbut-1-ene with a 4-OH group at one C-1 phenyl ring and a chlorocarbamate mustard moiety at the second C-1 ring (compound 3) was synthesized in order to obtain a "cytotoxic estrogen" with a specific antitumor effect on estrogen-receptor-containing tumors. This compound was tested in comparison to the carrier (compound 1) and a compound (2) having a carbamate mustard group on both C-1 phenyl rings. The estrogen receptor affinity of compound 3 was only about one-quarter lower than that of compound 1, but much higher than that of compound 2. Compounds 2 and 3 showed only partially irreversible binding to the receptor owing to their relatively low alkylating properties. The growth inhibition of the receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cell line by compound 3, but not by compound 1 or 2, was more pronounced than the inhibition of the receptor-negative line MDA. In vivo the hormone-dependent, transplantable mammary tumor MXT M3.2 of the mouse was much better inhibited by compound 3 than its hormone-resistent line MXT OVEX. Compounds 1-3 had no antiestrogenic properties in the mouse, but estrogenic activity was in the order 1 greater than 3 greater than 2. From these results and because the antitumor activity of compound 3 was superior to that of compounds 1 and 2 in the hormone-dependent tumor models, a selective, receptor-mediated cytotoxic effect of compound 3 on estrogen-receptor-positive tumors in obvious.

Cytotoxic esters of 1,1-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-but-1-ene with selective antitumor activity against estrogen receptor-containing mammary tumors

Both hydroxy groups of 1,1-bis-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-phenyl-but-1-ene (1) were esterified with the beta-chloropropionate (2), beta-bromopropionate (3) and acrylate functions (4). Linkage of these cytotoxic moieties reduced the estrogen receptor affinities of these compounds, especially in the case of the beta-haloesters only slightly compared with the affinity of the unsubstituted carrier molecule 1. The estrogenic potencies of the derivatives 2-4 and of 1 were nearly identical. The alkylating activities increased in the order 2, 3, and 4. Because of their alkylating activities, all cytotoxic esters showed an irreversible mode of binding to the estrogen receptor. In vitro, 3 in particular, exerted better growth inhibition of the hormone-dependent MCF-7 cell line than of the hormone-independent MDA cell line. In vivo, all cytotoxic derivatives caused almost complete inhibition of the growth of the hormone-dependent MXT M3.2 mouse mammary tumor, whereas growth of the hormone-independent MXT-Ovex tumor was much less inhibited. In all tumor models, the antitumor effect of the cytotoxic esters was better than that of the unsubstituted carrier. Therefore, the antitumor activity of these esters could be due not only to their improved pharmacokinetic properties compared to 1, but also to a selective estrogen receptor-mediated cytotoxic action.

Acetoxy substituted 1,1,2-triphenylbut-1-enes: estrogenic, antiestrogenic and mammary tumor inhibiting activity

1,1,2-Triphenylbut-1-enes substituted with 3- or 4-acetoxy (OAc) groups on one, two, or three phenyl rings were tested for their estrogen receptor affinities, their estrogenic and antiestrogenic properties in the immature mouse, and their effect on the growth of the hormone-dependent MXT mammary tumor of the mouse. The 4-OAc-substituted compounds had a stronger uterotrophic potency than their 3-OAc-substituted analogs. A certain correlation between estrogenic properties and receptor affinities was demonstrable. Compounds with 3-OAc groups generally had antiestrogenic properties. By varying the aromatic substitution it was possible to obtain compounds ranging from strong estrogens to potent antiestrogens with almost no agonistic activity. The 4-OAc-substituted triphenylbut-1-enes had a better antitumor effect than the compounds with 3-OAc moieties. Thus, the tumor inhibiting activity correlates more with the estrogenic than with the antiestrogenic properties. The strong antiestrogens among these compounds did not show any significant antitumor effect. Further studies are necessary to solve the problem why strong antiestrogens do not, in contrast to ovariectomy, inhibit tumor growth.