Vulvovaginal atrophy in the CRETA study: the healthcare professionals' perception

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to assess the perception of gynecologists regarding patients' adherence to vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) treatments, to evaluate the gynecologists' opinions on what their patients think about treatment adherence, and to compare the gynecologists' opinions with the patients' own perceptions within the CRETA study.

METHODS

Spanish gynecologists who participated in the CRETA study were asked to fill out an online 41-item questionnaire to evaluate their views on VVA management.

RESULTS

From 29 centers across Spain, 44 gynecologists completed the survey. Their mean age was 47.2 years old, two-thirds of them were women, and the average professional experience was over 20 years. According to the gynecologists, the therapy most frequently used by VVA-diagnosed women was vaginal moisturizers (45.5%), followed by local estrogen therapy (36.4%) and ospemifene (18.2%). Nevertheless, ospemifene was viewed as the therapeutic option with the most efficacy, easiest route of administration, shorter time to symptom improvement, lower percentage of dropouts, and higher treatment adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Spanish gynecologists are in general agreement with their patients regarding VVA treatment preferences and the main issues for adherence and effectiveness. However, there is an opportunity for doctor-patient communication improvement. Among the three therapeutic options evaluated, ospemifene is regarded as offering some competitive advantages.

A real-world disproportionality analysis of ospemifene: data mining of the public version of FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Ospemifene has been authorized for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). This study wasto evaluate adverse events (AEs) associated with ospemifene by data mining the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

The signals of AEs linked to ospemifene were measured using disproportionality analyses, such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms.

RESULTS

There were 2283 events of ospemifene being the 'primary suspected (PS)' AE out of the 12,692,824 reports from the FAERS database. Ospemifene-induced AEs hit 25 organ systems. There were 726 severely disproportional preferred terms (PTs) that complied with the four algorithms. The investigation turned up a number of anticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and significant unanticipated ADRs linked to eye and renal problems were found, indicating potential side effects not yet included in the prescription instructions.

CONCLUSION

We detected novel AEs signals for ospemifene, and the results of our investigation were compatible with clinical observations. This suggests that further prospective clinical trials are required to confirm these findings and demonstrate their link. Our findings might be useful supporting data for ospemifene safety research in the future.

Non-hormonal treatments for managing vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause

The demand for non-hormonal therapies for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is increasing due to an increasing number of patients surviving long term post cancer diagnosis, as well as increased public knowledge of the symptoms of menopause and availability of non-hormonal therapies. Treatment options are wide-ranging and encompass different formulations and methods of application. This review summarizes the key characteristics of the main forms of these therapies, as well as considering the current evidence for each of them and where future clinical studies should be directed. Care for VVA may be in primary care, or under gynecology or oncology. Further research requirements include the need for long-term data as well larger randomized controlled trials into alternatives where vaginal estrogen cannot be used as first-line treatment. Widespread education of health-care providers and patients on VVA and the impact on quality of life is urgently needed, as well as increased use of non-hormonal methods in routine clinical practice.

Sequential treatment in vulvovaginal atrophy

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic and progressive disease that affects sexuality and quality of life. VVA is preventable and treatable, but requires long-term and often sequential treatment. Sequential treatment consists of designing a strategy that uses one or more medications for a long enough time to achieve the desired benefits with minimal risk and maximum adherence. Currently available therapeutic options consist of topical over-the-counter products (including non-hormonal lubricants and moisturizers applied to the vagina), systemic hormone therapy and estrogens, and prescribed vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). In addition, we have a selective estrogen receptor modulator, ospemifene, and new energy-based treatments (laser and radiofrequency). There are clear differences between the treatments both in the mechanism of action and in the efficacy. Compliance is very low, and patients complain about the use of the vaginal route, often due to its low efficacy, or express fear of the long-term use of estrogens or the price of the treatments. We believe that, as a first option, and for physiological, preventive and efficacy reasons, we should consider the prescription of treatments that work on estrogen receptors. As a second option, there are vaginal moisturizers, which are effective on symptoms but do not prevent or improve conditions. Finally, techniques using heat, which although each time represent a clearer alternative, but on the other hand are the cost and the long-term safety data, give us a third option. Of course, we consider that vulvar moisturizers and lubricants can be used at any time.

Expert opinion on the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy with ospemifene based on new evidence

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is an underdiagnosed and undertreated chronic condition resulting in physiological and histological changes in the genitourinary tract of postmenopausal women. Treatment of moderate to severe VVA includes local estrogens, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and oral ospemifene, a third-generation selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM). Due to venous thromboembolism (VTE) safety concerns classically associated with the SERM class, and as part of its original marketing authorization approval (MAA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA) requested the performance of a 5-year post-authorization safety study (PASS) to study the incidence rate of VTE among women receiving ospemifene. The results have led to important regulatory changes to ospemifene's labeling, extending its indication and eliminating concerted risk management measures. A panel of experts discussed and reached consensus on the impact of these regulatory changes on clinical practice, reflecting on the reassurance of ospemifene's benefit-risk balance and recommending its positioning as a first-line pharmacological treatment option for moderate to severe VVA together with local therapies. In a scenario where different treatments present similar efficacy and safety profiles, a shared decision between clinician and patient, according to her needs and preferences over time, is fundamental to improve adherence and persistence with sequential treatment, contributing to the achievement of health outcomes.

New developments in the management of vulvovaginal atrophy: a comprehensive overview

INTRODUCTION

Proper recognition and individualized therapy of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is paramount.

AREAS COVERED

Assessment of VVA should be done using several questionnaires in combination with wet mount microscopy to determine Vaginal Cell Maturation Index (VCMI) and infections. PubMed searches were done between 1march 2022 and 15 Oct 2022.Low dose vaginal estriol seems safe, efficient, and could be used in patients with contraindications for steroid hormones such as women with a history of breast cancer, and should therefore be considered as first choice hormonal treatment, when non-hormonal treatments fail. New estrogens, androgens and several Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) are being developed and tested. Intravaginal Hyaluronic Acid (HA) or Vit D can help women who can't or don't want to use hormones.

EXPERT OPINION

Proper treatment is not possible without a correct and full diagnosis, including microscopy of the vaginal fluid. Low dose vaginal estrogen treatment, especially with estriol, is very efficient and is preferred in most women with VVA. Oral ospemifene and vaginal dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) are now considered efficient and safe alternative therapies for VVA. More safety data are waited for several SERMs and for a newly introduced estrogen: estretol (E4), although so far no major side effects were seen from these drugs. Indications for laser treatments are questionable.

Effects of ospemifene on overactive bladder in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy

OBJECTIVE

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a complex and multifactorial syndrome associated with urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence. The menopause-associated hormonal changes play a role in the development of this condition. Vaginal estrogens are effective in improving OAB in postmenopausal women (PMW) with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator licensed for the treatment of VVA. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of ospemifene on OAB symptoms in PMW with VVA.

METHODS

Forty PMW suffering from OAB and VVA received oral ospemifene (60 mg/day) for 12 weeks. All patients were assessed with a urodynamic study, a 3-day bladder diary and validated questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form [ICIQ-UI SF] and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Overactive Bladder [ICIQ-OAB]) at enrollment and at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Cytometric capacity, bladder compliance and verbal sensory threshold responses during bladder filling were improved after treatment. The voiding diary showed a significant reduction of daily voids, urge urinary incontinence episodes and nocturnal events. The median overall scores of the ICIQ-UI and ICIQ-OAB were also significantly improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggest that treatment with ospemifene in PMW suffering from OAB is associated with a reduction of OAB symptoms due to a decreased bladder sensitivity and with an improvement in quality of life.

Pharmacotherapy for female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs): what is on the market and where is this field heading?

INTRODUCTION

Female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs) are common in women of any age and have a huge impact on quality of life and relationships. They have a multifaceted etiology limiting the development of pharmacotherapies with a high rate of effectiveness. Safety issues are also a concern.

AREAS COVERED

The authors report the most recent advances in pharmacotherapy for premenopausal and postmenopausal women with a main focus on hypoactive sexual desire disorders (HSDD) and associated sexual symptoms. Good levels of evidence have emerged for psychoactive agents, such as flibanserin and bremelanotide, as well as hormonal compounds (transdermal testosterone). The authors also report briefly on intravaginal DHEA (prasterone), local estrogen therapy (LET), and ospemifene to manage effectively vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause (VVA/GSM). In addition, they discuss promising therapeutic options highlighting the main reasons that hamper the availability of new labeled products. Finally, they include the importance of the multimodal approach to address FSDs.

EXPERT OPINION

Approved pharmacotherapies for FSD are limited. Validated multidimensional instruments and adequate objective measures of physical and mental responses to sexual external and internal incentives are mandatory to identify women suitable to chronic or on-demand treatments and to assess their pattern of response in research and practice.

Current challenges in the pharmacological management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause

INTRODUCTION

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is caused by climacteric estrogens drop and leads to bothersome and progressive genital and urinary symptoms. Considering the high frequency in the population and the impact on quality of life, it is crucial to find a safe and effective treatment. Pharmacological therapies aim to modulate the hormonal system and reverse tissue changes due to hypoestrogenism and consequently the symptoms.

AREAS COVERED

We analyzed the scientific evidence concerning the main pharmacological treatments, which include systemic and topical estrogens, prasterone and ospemifene. This literature review focused on recent safety and efficacy findings in an attempt to identify the best treatment choice for each individual patient.

EXPERT OPINION

There are encouraging data regarding the efficacy of all currently available pharmacological options and concerning their short and long-term safety. There are still doubts regarding best treatment choice for oncological high-risk population, in particular for breast cancer survivors, and some issues relative to patients' poor compliance and treatment adherence. For these reasons further studies need to be conducted with a patient-tailored focus.

The role of hormone therapy in urogenital health after menopause

Menopause represents an endocrine challenge to urogenital health, as oestrogens deprivation and androgens decline significantly contributes to age-related involution of vulvovaginal tissues and lower urinary tract. Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a clinical entity including the chronic and progressive condition of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) and encompassing both anatomical and functional consequences of menopause. The term GSM describes genital, sexual and urinary symptoms with a detrimental impact on quality of life (QOL). Several treatment options are available, but many barriers are still present to adequately diagnose and treat GSM. This review aims to present current evidences about epidemiology, aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of GSM, with a focus on prescription medications [low-dose local oestrogen therapy (LET), prasterone (DHEA) and the SERM ospemifene] for urogenital symptoms in healthy postmenopausal women and in special populations, including women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) and breast cancer survivors (BCS).

Guideline No. 422b: Menopause and Genitourinary Health

OBJECTIVE

Provide strategies for improving the care of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women based on the most recent published evidence.

TARGET POPULATION

Perimenopausal and postmenopausal women.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Target population will benefit from the most recent published scientific evidence provided via the information from their health care provider. No harms or costs are involved with this information since women will have the opportunity to choose among the different therapeutic options for the management of the symptoms and morbidities associated with menopause, including the option to choose no treatment.

EVIDENCE

Databases consulted were PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library for the years 2002-2020, and MeSH search terms were specific for each topic developed through the 7 chapters.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations). INTENDED AUDIENCE: physicians, including gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, internists, emergency medicine specialists; nurses, including registered nurses and nurse practitioners; pharmacists; medical trainees, including medical students, residents, fellows; and other providers of health care for the target population.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Management of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: recommendations of the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease

OBJECTIVE

To develop a best practice document for the management of postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA).

METHOD

Literature review carried out using clinical terms, treatments or interventions and comorbidity related to VVA.

RESULTS

There is a wide variety of interventions that may produce temporal benefits for VVA. However, there are significant limitations in scientific publications concerning VVA and related issues, including variable outcome evaluations, variability in population age range, and small, often underpowered sample sizes. Therapeutic management of VVA should follow a sequential order, considering women's age, symptoms, general health as well as treatment preference. Beneficial options include lubricants, moisturizers, vaginal estrogens (estradiol, estriol, promestriene, conjugated estrogens), androgens, prasterone, and laser application. In women with general menopausal symptoms who are candidates for systemic hormone therapy, the lowest effective dose should be used. Oral ospemifene is an effective selective estrogen receptor modulator to treat VVA. Systemic androgens have a limited role. Although laser procedures are commonly used, at this moment the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease does not endorse its use out of the setting of clinical trials. Pelvic floor muscle training improves blood flow and elasticity of the vulvovaginal tissue. In breast cancer survivors, moisturizers and lubricants are first line therapy. However, limited absorption of low/ultra-low doses of estrogens suggests safety, especially in women under treatment with aromatase inhibitors. As clinical practice and available preparations vary between countries this text should be adapted to local circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide range of therapeutic options to individualize VVA treatments.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of vaginal carbon dioxide laser therapy compared with standard medical therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia

BACKGROUND

Topical vaginal estrogen therapy is considered the gold standard treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause-associated dyspareunia, but early investigations of energy-based devices show promise for patients with contraindications or those who are refractory to vaginal estrogen cream therapy. Although evaluating safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes for novel technologies is critically important when new technologies become available to treat unmet healthcare needs, evaluation of the costs of these new technologies compared with existing therapies is also critically important but often understudied.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of 3 therapies for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, including vaginal estrogen therapy, oral ospemifene therapy, and vaginal CO₂ laser therapy and determine if vaginal laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

STUDY DESIGN

An institutional review board-exempt cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by constructing a decision tree using decision analysis software (TreeAge Pro; TreeAge Software, Inc, Williamstown, MA) using integrated empirical data from the published literature. Tornado plots and 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to assess how changes in the model's input parameters altered the overall outcome of the cost-effectiveness analysis model.

RESULTS

All 3 treatment methods were found to be cost-effective below the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000.00 per quality-adjusted life year for moderate dyspareunia. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for vaginal CO2 laser therapy was $16,372.01 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for ospemifene therapy was $5711.14. Although all 3 treatment strategies were on the efficient frontier, vaginal CO₂ laser therapy was the optimal treatment strategy with the highest effectiveness. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis of treatment adherence, vaginal CO₂ laser therapy was no longer cost-effective when the adherence fell below 38.8%. Vaginal estrogen cream and ospemifene therapies remained cost-effective treatment strategies at all ranges of adherence. When varying the adherence to 100% for all strategies, oral ospemifene therapy was "dominated" by both vaginal CO₂ laser therapy and vaginal estrogen cream therapy. In a 2-way sensitivity analysis of vaginal CO₂ laser therapy adherence and vaginal CO₂ laser therapy cost, vaginal CO₂ laser therapy still remained the optimal treatment strategy at 200% of its current cost ($5554.00) when the adherence was >55%. When the cost fell to 20% of its current cost ($555.40), it was the optimal treatment strategy at all adherence values above 29%.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that vaginal fractional CO₂ laser therapy is a cost-effective treatment strategy for dyspareunia associated with GSM, as are both vaginal estrogen and oral ospemifene therapies. In our model, vaginal CO₂ laser therapy is the optimal cost-effective treatment strategy, and insurance coverage should be considered for this treatment option if it is proven to be safe and effective in FDA trials.

Experience with ospemifene in patients with vulvovaginal atrophy treated with laser therapy: case studies

Vaginal laser therapy is a non-hormonal treatment option for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), a component of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Through a microablative and/or thermal effect on atrophic vaginal epithelium, laser therapy activates growth factors that increase vascularity and collagen production. Laser and ospemifene are complementary treatments: the laser’s effects on intra- and extracellular water are supported by the activity of ospemifene at estrogen receptors to restore vaginal epithelium and natural lubrication. This article reports the clinical course of two women with dyspareunia preventing sexual intercourse who were treated with ospemifene and laser therapy. The woman in case 1 had extreme vaginal stenosis and severe VVA symptoms. CO₂ laser therapy accompanied by estriol vaginal gel and vaginal moisturizer was unsuccessful. After ospemifene and three sessions of laser therapy, followed by vaginal ring resection and continued physiotherapy-directed mechanical dilation of the vagina, she was asymptomatic within 6 months. The woman in case 2 had severe VVA, which had prevented penetration for 2 years. Ospemifene was administered for 1 month to prepare the vaginal epithelium for photothermal therapy. A single erbium:YAG laser session and continued ospemifene treatment improved her symptoms sufficiently to allow her to resume sexual relations within 2 months.

Experience with ospemifene in patients with vulvar and vaginal atrophy and associated sexual dysfunction: case studies

The pathophysiological changes associated with hypoestrogenism of menopause, a condition known as genitourinary syndrome of menopause, are responsible for the hallmark symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), namely dyspareunia secondary to vaginal dryness. Many postmenopausal women with VVA find sexual relations to be challenging or impossible. Ospemifene has estrogen-like effects on the vaginal epithelium, and is indicated to treat moderate-to-severe symptomatic VVA (Europe) or moderate-to-severe symptomatic dyspareunia and vaginal dryness (United States) in postmenopausal women. The case studies presented in this article follow the progress of two women who began treatment with ospemifene for the main presenting symptom of dyspareunia. Both women had concerns about the impact of their symptomatology on new relationships. The patient in case 1 experienced relevant improvement within 3 months of treatment start and, by 1 year, dyspareunia was absent. Vaginal lubricants were no longer required. The patient in case 2 experienced relevant improvement within 4 weeks of starting ospemifene. At 15 months, with the use of a lubricant for vaginal penetration, she could enjoy sexual intercourse without pain. At the time of writing, she had been receiving ospemifene continuously for more than 2 years with effective symptom relief and good tolerability.

Ospemifene for vulvar and vaginal atrophy: an overview

The menopause-related decline in estrogen levels leads to an array of genital, sexual, and urinary symptoms collectively known as genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The constellation of symptoms associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) can have a profoundly detrimental effect on a woman's sexual function, relationships, and quality of life. Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated for treatment of moderate-to-severe symptomatic VVA in postmenopausal women who are not candidates for local vaginal estrogen therapy or have contraindications for estrogen products. Ospemifene is administered orally, thus avoiding the inconveniences of local therapy, and can be used in women with VVA and a history of breast cancer after completing all (including adjuvant) breast cancer treatment. As well as restoring vaginal health in symptomatic VVA, ospemifene may have collateral benefits of importance to postmenopausal women. In this Special Issue entitled "Treatment of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy: Clinical Experience with Ospemifene," illustrative case studies examine the experiences of women with VVA during treatment with ospemifene. Specific topics include the effects of ospemifene on bone markers; its use in breast cancer survivors and in women with dyslipidemia, urinary incontinence, or VVA-related sexual dysfunction; and its concomitant use with laser therapy.

Experience with ospemifene in patients with vulvar and vaginal atrophy and urinary incontinence: case studies

Pelvic floor muscle atrophy and collagen loss in connective tissue due to declining estrogen production in women as they age may underlie the increasing prevalence of urge and stress incontinence. Estrogen therapy can correct the deficiency of estrogen receptors in genitourinary structures after menopause, but estrogen is not suitable for all women. A series of retrospective studies showed that urinary symptoms improved in women with overactive bladder syndrome who were receiving ospemifene for vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), a component of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. Two case studies presented in this article support the findings. The woman in case 1 was 76 years old, had a 4-year history of urinary incontinence (UI), and several risk factors for urinary symptoms. During 15 months' treatment with ospemifene for VVA, her urinary symptoms also improved as evidenced by a reduction (from four/day to one/day) in sanitary pad requirements to manage leakage. The patient in case 2 had predominantly moderate-to-severe VVA and mild mixed UI. During 6 months' treatment with ospemifene, she experienced marked improvement in VVA symptoms, including normalization of vaginal pH and disappearance of dyspareunia, accompanied by a decrease in urinary symptoms, which allowed her to resume a normal exercise program.

Ospemifene plus fractional CO2 laser: a powerful strategy to treat postmenopausal vulvar pain

This study is a single-center, retrospective analysis of postmenopausal women presenting with dyspareunia and vulvar pain, aiming to evaluate relative effectiveness of vestibular CO₂ laser therapy as a treatment. Three monthly sessions of laser were performed to each patient and thereafter a three-months follow-up was stablished. A total number of 72 patients undergoing vestibular laser treatment were recruited from patient files in the period between 2016 and 2018. Among these, 39 women also received a concomitant treatment with ospemifene (60 mg/day) during the study period. There was a statistically significant reduction of all the symptoms in both groups up to the three month follow-up. Regarding dryness and dyspareunia, the relief tent to be more prominent in the ospemifene + laser group at all follow-ups and remained statistically significant at three-month follow-up. Specifically, vestibular dryness was significantly lower in the ospemifene + laser group compared with the laser treatment group (-87% vs - 34%, respectively), and the vestibular health score started declining faster in the ospemifene + laser group. Although, additional research is needed to understand the mechanism of action, our data shows that a combination regimen of laser and ospemifene may improve clinical effectiveness for long-term treatment of symptoms associated with the under-recognized genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Ospemifene in the Management of Vulvar and Vaginal Atrophy: Focus on the Assessment of Patient Acceptability and Ease of Use

Endocrinological changes that occur with menopause lead to a chronic and progressive condition named vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). This disease is characterized by symptoms such as dryness, dyspareunia, itching, burning, and dysuria. According to recent epidemiological studies, VVA has a high prevalence and can also occur in younger women prior to the menopause, negatively affecting quality of life, sexual function, intimacy and relationship with the partner. Accordingly, therapy should be effective, initiated early and continued for as long as possible. Up to recent years, available therapeutic options have included over-the-counter lubricants and moisturizers, vaginal oestrogens and systemic hormones. These products are not indicated for all women. Hormones are mostly contraindicated in women with a history of hormone-sensitive cancer and are frequently not accepted even by women without contraindications. Local therapies are frequently considered uncomfortable, difficult to apply, and messy. Indeed, these treatments have a high spontaneous discontinuation rate, mostly due to dissatisfaction, safety concern, side effects and difficulty in vaginal placement. Recently, ospemifene, a new non-hormonal systemic remedy, was approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) and EMA (European Medicines Agency) for the treatment of the two most bothersome symptoms of VVA: dryness and dyspareunia. Because ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), it can be administered also in women with a history of breast cancer, and this makes it more acceptable by any woman. In addition, its route of administration minimizes those bothersome side effects intrinsic to the vaginal route of administration. Available data indicate that women using ospemifene have higher adherence to treatment, higher persistence and lower discontinuation rate. Satisfaction is higher than with other local therapies and overall health care cost is lower.

Effects of ospemifene on genitourinary health assessed by prospective vulvar-vestibular photography and vaginal/vulvar health indices

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively evaluate the effects of ospemifene on the vulva and vagina in postmenopausal women using vulvar-vestibular photography and direct visual assessments.

METHODS

Postmenopausal women (aged 40-80 years) with moderate to severe vaginal dryness as their most bothersome symptom (MBS) were randomized to daily ospemifene 60 mg or placebo in this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 study. Vulvar-vestibular photographic images were captured at baseline and week 12 and were independently assessed with the Vulvar Imaging Assessment Scale (VIAS). Changes from baseline in Vaginal and Vulvar Health Indices (VHI and VuHI) with ospemifene versus placebo were analyzed at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Correlations between VIAS, VHI, and VuHI, with vaginal dryness severity and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores were also assessed.

RESULTS

In all, 631 eligible participants were randomized (ospemifene 316, placebo 315) and included in the intention-to-treat population. Compared with placebo, ospemifene significantly improved total scores for VIAS (P = 0.0154), VHI (P < 0.0001), and VuHI (P < 0.0001) from baseline to week 12; significant VHI (P < 0.0001) and VuHI (P = 0.002) improvements were observed at week 4. Most VHI and VuHI individual items were significantly better with ospemifene versus placebo at week 12 (P < 0.05). Most correlations between the vulvovaginal assessment total scores versus vaginal dryness severity and FSFI scores were significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Improvements observed in vulvovaginal health with ospemifene assessed by prospective vulvar-vestibular photography and other direct visual assessments support its efficacy in addition to the treatment of moderate to severe vaginal dryness due to menopause and the use of photographic and direct visual evaluations in future clinical trials.

VIDEO SUMMARY

Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/MENO/A415.

Ospemifene for the treatment of menopausal vaginal dryness, a symptom of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause

Introduction: Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), a component of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, is a progressive condition due to decline in estrogen leading to vaginal and vulvar epithelial changes. Accompanying symptoms of dryness, irritation, burning, dysuria, and/or dyspareunia have a negative impact on quality of life. Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) approved by the FDA for moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness due to postmenopausal VVA. Areas covered: PubMed was searched from inception to March 2019 with keywords ospemifene and vulvar vaginal atrophy to review preclinical and clinical data describing the safety and efficacy of ospemifene for vaginal dryness and dyspareunia due to VVA. Covered topics include efficacy of ospemifene on vaginal cell populations, vaginal pH, and most bothersome VVA symptoms; imaging studies of vulvar and vaginal tissues; effects on sexual function; and safety of ospemifene on endometrium, cardiovascular system, and breast. Expert opinion: Ospemifene is significantly more effective than placebo in all efficacy analyses studied, working through estrogen receptors and possibly androgen receptors. Safety as assessed by adverse events was generally comparable to that with placebo and to other SERMs, and/or adverse events were not clinically meaningful. No cases of endometrial or breast cancer were reported.

Ospemifene versus local estrogen: adherence and costs in postmenopausal dyspareunia

Aim: Objective was to compare adherence and persistence, as well as direct healthcare costs and utilization, of ospemifene to available local estrogen therapies (LETs). Patients & methods: This retrospective database study used integrated medical and pharmacy claims data from the IQVIA Real-World Data Adjudicated Claims - US Database. Results: Ospemifene patients had significantly greater adherence and persistence compared with the other nonring LETs. Ospemifene had the lowest mean outpatient costs of any of the LET cohorts, including the estradiol vaginal ring. Total all-cause healthcare costs were also significantly less for ospemifene patients compared with all other LETs.

Therapies for the management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause

Introduction

The genitourinary syndrome of menopause is a new term that describes various menopausal symptoms and signs including not only genital symptoms (dryness, burning, and irritation) and sexual symptoms (lack of lubrication, discomfort or pain, and impaired function), but also urinary symptoms (urgency, dysuria, and recurrent urinary tract infections).

Methods

We conducted a systematic scoping review of data in women therapies with genitourinary syndrome of menopause or vulvovaginal atrophy in peer-reviewed, English-language publications in the last 20 years.

Results

The terms vulvovaginal atrophy and atrophic vaginitis, which were generally used up until recently, had a limitation because they did not cover the full spectrum of symptoms and did not imply that the symptoms are related to a decreased sex steroid level in menopause. The concept of genitourinary syndrome of menopause was recently introduced and has been gaining widespread use. Since genitourinary syndrome of menopause may have a profound negative impact on the quality of life of postmenopausal women, patients should be made aware of these problems and treated with an appropriate effective therapy. Therefore, in this review we introduce therapies for this syndrome, both local and systemic, and discuss the importance of genitourinary syndrome of menopause comprehension and the need to have an active treatment of this syndrome in postmenopausal women.

Conclusion

The increasing number of therapies for menopausal symptoms opens up new options. In addition, new products have been designed and developed by pharmaceutical companies as new possibilities for patients who did not have any treatment available and also to improve compliance.

Effects of ospemifene on bone in postmenopausal women

Ospemifene is a selective estrogen-receptor modulator approved for treating menopause-related moderate to severe dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA), in the United States, and for treating menopause-related, symptomatic VVA in women not appropriate for local estrogen therapy in Europe. This review summarizes the effects of ospemifene on bone, including bone biomarker data from a phase 3 vaginal dryness study. Early-phase studies of postmenopausal women showed that ospemifene dose-dependently decreased bone turnover markers versus placebo, similar to raloxifene. A 12-week, phase 3 study of ospemifene 60 mg/day in postmenopausal women showed improvements in all VVA parameters and significantly greater decreases in seven of nine bone biomarkers versus placebo. Lower bone resorption markers with ospemifene were observed regardless of time since menopause (≤5 years or >5 years) or baseline bone mineral density (BMD) (normal [n = 18], osteopenia [n = 164], or osteoporosis [n = 21]). Biomarker studies (n = 565 who took ospemifene) therefore support a potential role for ospemifene in maintaining bone health (and possibly reducing fracture risk) in postmenopausal women taking it for VVA; however, caution is warranted because data are limited to biochemical markers, rather than fracture and BMD. Although studies show that bone turnover predicts BMD and fractures, any hypothesis about a bone-sparing effect of ospemifene needs testing in rigorous, long-term, phase 3 studies monitoring fractures and BMD.

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: hard to communicate, easy to treat

About 40 % of woman suffer from vulvovaginal atrophy after menopausal transition. It is very important to put question on this problem, because about 70 % of them are not able to start discussion on it. Regarding treatment, vaginal low doses estriol and estradiol are drugs of first choice with high efficacy and safety.

Expert opinion on existing and developing drugs to treat female sexual dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) is a highly prevalent, yet commonly underdiagnosed and undertreated condition. This paper reviews the diagnostic terminology for FSD, and basic sexual physiology in women. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs for FSD are discussed, followed by investigational drugs for FSD currently in phase 2 or 3 clinical trials, reasons for failure of drug development, and potential future drug targets. Areas covered: A literature review was conducted for available treatments for FSD: flibanserin, estrogen, ospemifene and prasterone. Potential treatments are assessed, as was the Pharmaprojects database which includes clinical trial information. Testosterone, bremelanotide, bupropion-trazodone, PDE-5 inhibitors, prostaglandins, tibolone and combination therapies, and the theoretical basis of potential drug targets are discussed. Expert opinion: The lack of established endpoints for phase 3 studies of FSD has impeded approval of new treatments, and required additional studies for validation, resulting in proposed changes to the FDA draft guidance for FSD clinical trials in October 2016. Current DSM-5 diagnostic nosology also fails to capture the full range of symptomology. Several promising compounds have shown no movement for several years limiting women's options. Overcoming socio-cultural bias against women's sexual and reproductive health will be critical in the approval of new treatments for FSD.

Overactive bladder syndrome treatment with ospemifene in menopausal patients with vulvovaginal atrophy: improvement of sexuality?

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of ospemifene in the improvement of sexual function in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) affected by overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) or urge urinary incontinence (UUI). One hundred five postmenopausal patients with VVA affected by OAB and/or UUI were enrolled for the study. All patients received ospemifene 60 mg for 12 weeks. Clinical examination, 3-d voiding diary and the vaginal health index (VHI) were performed at baseline and at 12 weeks. Patients completed the OAB-Q SF, FSFI, FSDS, and SF-36 questionnaires. The patient's satisfaction was also calculated. After 12 weeks, the reduction of urinary symptoms was observed. The OAB-Q symptoms, OAB-Q (HRQL) score were (55.34 ± 13.54 vs. 23.22 ± 9.76; p < .0001) and (22.45 ± 9.78 vs. 70.56 ± 15.49; p < .0001), before and after treatment. SF-36 questionnaire showed a significant improvement (p < .0001). VHI score increased and the women who regularly practice sexual activity increased after treatment. The total FSFI score increased significantly and the FSDS score changed after 12 weeks (p < .0001). The PGI-I after 12 weeks showed a total success rate of 90.5%. Ospemifene is an effective potential therapy for postmenopausal women with VVA affected by OAB or UUI improving sexual function and quality of life.

Vulvar vestibular effects of ospemifene: a pilot study

The study aimed to assess the effects of ospemifene on vulvar vestibule in postmenopausal women with vulvar pain and dyspareunia. Fifty-five postmenopausal women used oral ospemifene 60 mg/d for 60 d. Symptoms of dryness, burning, and dyspareunia were evaluated on a 10 cm visual analog scale. Visual examination of the vulvar vestibule was also conducted. Patients also underwent current perception threshold (CPT) testing obtained from the vulvar vestibule. Fifty-five patients (94.6%) completed the treatment. Hot flashes were the most frequent adverse effects, but this led to a discontinuation of therapy in three patients (5.4%). After therapy, there was a statistically significant decrease from the baseline in the mean scores for dryness, burning, and dyspareunia and reduction of vestibular trophic score (baseline value of 11.2-4.2 after the therapy, p ≤ 002) and cotton swab test scores (2.81 compared with 1.25, p = .001). There was a difference in CPT values for all nerve fibers and more consistent for C fibers (-38% of sensitivity). These results confirm the efficacy of ospemifene on postmenopausal vestibular symptoms and signs; moreover, the drug was effective in normalizing vestibular innervation sensitivity.

Prevention of recurrent lower urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women with genitourinary syndrome: outcome after 6 months of treatment with ospemifene

Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ospemifene in the prevention of recurrent lower urinary tract infections in postmenopausal women with vulvovaginal atrophy. The study have a retrospective design. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled. Patients underwent clinical examination and urine culture. The urinary symptoms and the quality of life were evaluated with UTISA score, PUF and SF-36 questionnaires before and after treatment. All 39 patients received ospemifene 60 mg one tablet/daily for 6 months. Adverse effects and complications were assessed. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Two patients experienced one new UTI episode and the mean number of positive urine culture decreased significantly after 6 months (3.65 ± 2.12 vs 0.25 ± 0.17, p < .0001). The mean number of urinary infection symptoms decreased significantly after treatment; dysuria reduced (4.76 ± 2.45 vs 0.89 ± 1.12). PUF score and SF-36 showed a statistically significant change (22.43 ± 5.89 vs 12.14 ± 3.21) and (52.86 ± 9.21 vs 83.43 ± 10.76). No adverse effects were reported and the total success rate was the 92.3% after 6 months at PGI-I. Ospemifene is a valid alternative with excellent tolerability for the UTI_S prevention in postmenopausal patients.

Retrospective analysis in 46 women with vulvovaginal atrophy treated with ospemifene for 12 weeks: improvement in overactive bladder symptoms

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of ospemifene in the improvement of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in postmenopausal women affected by vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA).

METHODS

Forty-six postmenopausal patients affected by VVA with OAB syndrome were enrolled for the study. All patients received Ospemifene 60 mg for 12 weeks. Clinical examination, 3-day voiding diary, urodynamic testing, ultrasound measurement of endometrial and bladder wall thickness (BWT) and the Vaginal Health Index (VHI) were performed at baseline and 12 weeks. Patients completed the OAB-Q SF and UDI-6.

RESULTS

After 12-weeks, the number of patients with detrusor overactivity decreased from 39% to 13% (p = 0.04). The reduction in the mean number in 24 h of voids (9.57 ± 2.12 vs. 6.63 ± 1.22, p < 0.0001), urgent micturition episodes/24 h (5.63 ± 1.46 vs. 1.44 ± 1.31, p < 0.0001), nocturia episodes (3.17 ± 0.85 vs. 1.11 ± 1.18, p < 0.0001), urinary incontinence episodes/24 h (0.85 ± 0.96 vs. 0.33 ± 0.64, p = 0.003) was observed. The UDI-6, OAB-Q symptoms, OAB-Q (HRQL) scores were 8.95 ± 0.91 vs. 5.56 ± 1.40, 62.60 ± 14.70 vs. 20.08 ± 10.83 and 18.71 ± 7.41 vs. 79.45 ± 14.47 (p < 0.001) before and after 12 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Ospemifene is an effective potential therapy for postmenopausal women with VVA improving OAB symptoms and quality of life.

Overall Safety of Ospemifene in Postmenopausal Women from Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 and 3 Trials

Objective: To evaluate the safety of daily oral ospemifene 60 mg, estrogen agonist/antagonist, used to treat moderate-to-severe dyspareunia due to postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy, which is part of genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Methods:Post hoc analysis of safety data (treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) pooled from six phase 2 and 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter placebo-controlled studies, evaluating the effects of ospemifene 60 mg on the breast, cardiovascular system, and bone in postmenopausal women.

Results: At least one TEAE was reported by 67.6% (840/1242) and 54.1% (518/958) of women taking ospemifene 60 mg and placebo, respectively. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate and occurred within 4 to 12 weeks. The most commonly reported TEAEs with ospemifene were hot flush (8.5% vs. 3.3% for placebo) and urinary tract infection (6.5% vs. 4.8%). Discontinuation due to TEAEs was 7.6% with ospemifene and 3.8% with placebo. Most women discontinued treatment due to adverse events (AEs): hot flushes, muscle spasms, headache, and vaginal discharge. Serious AEs occurred infrequently (ospemifene, 2.6%; placebo, 1.8%); most were not considered related to treatment. Breast cancer and other breast-related TEAE incidences were comparable between ospemifene (2.5%) and placebo (2.2%), and cardiovascular TEAE incidence, including deep vein thrombosis, was low with ospemifene (0.3%) and placebo (0.1%).

Conclusion: No unexpected safety signals were reported, and discontinuation due to TEAEs was low, with use of ospemifene 60 mg versus placebo in six phase 2 and 3 trials, suggesting a lack of detrimental effects on the breast, bone, and cardiovascular health of postmenopausal women when ospemifene is used to effectively treat moderate-to-severe postmenopausal dyspareunia.

Local hormone therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer patients: is it safe?

The genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a frequent complaint among breast cancer (BC) survivors that lead to an important affection of their quality of life (QoL). Lifestyle measures such as smoking cessation or regular sexual activity are usually insufficient to significantly improve GMS and although therapies such as lubricants and polycarbophil moisturized gels are considered first-line therapies to alleviate symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy, these non-hormonal options are not able to reverse atrophy once it occurs. Instead, this complaint is corrected by local estrogens. The estrogen vaginal treatment usually used to treat GSM, is an issue of concern in this group due to the possible negative effect over the BC outcomes. On the other hand, the worsening of QoL in these patients due to symptoms related to GSM can lead to discontinuation of hormone adjuvant therapies and therefore must be addressed properly. The goal of this review is to contribute to health care professionals to make an informed decision to care for their BC patients.

Clinical update on the use of ospemifene in the treatment of severe symptomatic vulvar and vaginal atrophy

The physiological decrease in vaginal estrogens is accountable for the emergence of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) and its related symptoms such as vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, vaginal and/or vulvar irritation or itching, and dysuria. The repercussion of these symptoms on quality of life often makes it necessary to initiate treatment. Up until now, the treatments available included vaginal moisturizers and lubricants, local estrogens, and hormonal therapy. However, therapeutic options have now been increased with the approval of 60 mg ospemifene, the first nonhormonal oral treatment with an agonist effect on the vaginal epithelium and an endometrial and breast safety profile which makes it unique. This is the first selective estrogen receptor modulator indicated in women with moderate-to-severe vaginal atrophy not eligible for local estrogen treatment. Considering that "local estrogen noneligible women" are those in whom such treatment cannot be administered either because it is contraindicated or due to skill issues, who are averse to the mode and convenience of vaginal products' administration or to their use on account of potential systemic absorption, or those who demonstrate dissatisfaction in terms of efficacy and safety, it is clear that there is a significant unmet medical need in VVA management. In fact, a great number of women show lack of adherence, dropping out of at least one VVA treatment, including nonhormonal moisturizers and lubricants, which they consider to be ineffective and uncomfortable. If they could choose, many of them may opt for oral treatment. In Phase III studies, ospemifene demonstrated efficacy in vaginal dryness and dyspareunia, regenerating vaginal cells, improving lubrication, and reducing pain during sexual intercourse. Symptoms improved in the first 4 weeks and endured for up to 1 year. Additionally, it demonstrated a good endometrial, cardiovascular system, and breast safety profile.

Effect of ospemifene on moderate or severe symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy

Objectives To determine whether assessment of all moderate-to-severe symptoms at baseline gives a more accurate evaluation of the treatment effect of ospemifene in vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) than the most bothersome symptom (MBS) approach.

Methods Data were pooled from two pivotal phase-III clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral ospemifene 60 mg/day for the treatment of symptoms of VVA (n = 1463 subjects). Symptoms of vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, and vaginal and/or vulvar irritation/itching reported as moderate or severe at baseline were evaluated. Clinically relevant differences between ospemifene and placebo were analyzed using a four-point severity scoring system and presented as improvement, substantial improvement, or relief.

Results Subjects in these studies reported statistically significant improvement, substantial improvement, and relief for vaginal dryness (p < 0.00001), dyspareunia (p < 0.001) and statistically significant improvement and relief for vaginal and/or vulvar irritation/itching (p < 0.01) from baseline to week 12 with ospemifene compared with placebo. A similar trend was observed for women who reported substantial improvement of vaginal and/or vulvar irritation/itching.

Conclusions For drug registration purposes, the use of the MBS model is appealing because of its simplicity and ease of scientific validation. However, the MBS model may underestimate the total magnitude of the clinical benefit of ospemifene treatment for symptomatic women suffering from VVA.

Perceptions of dyspareunia in postmenopausal women with vulvar and vaginal atrophy: findings from the REVIVE survey

Symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA), including dyspareunia and vaginal dryness, have a distinct negative impact on a woman's quality of life. The REVIVE survey highlighted the lack of awareness of VVA symptoms among postmenopausal women with vaginal symptoms, with many women reluctant to initiate discussions with their healthcare professionals despite the presence of vaginal symptoms. The REVIVE survey also provided insights into women's views of VVA treatments. Women reported displeasure with the vaginal administration route, lack of symptom relief with over-the-counter products, and concerns about the safety of estrogen therapies. With the high prevalence of VVA, obstetricians/gynecologists should become vigilant in identifying women with VVA by implementing screening and discussion of symptoms during routine office visits - providing patients with information about appropriate therapies based on the severity and impact of symptoms, keeping in mind individual preferences and perceptions.

Ospemifene: a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator for treatment of dyspareunia

Ospemifene is a novel, oral selective estrogen receptor modulator that has been approved in the USA for treatment of dyspareunia. The decline in estrogen during menopause creates vulvovaginal changes that can cause symptoms that adversely impact women psychosexually. Many women are reluctant to discuss painful sex and providers must proactively inquire about sexuality issues. Ospemifene has been shown to reverse changes associated with vulvovaginal atrophy and relieve symptoms of dyspareunia. Safety studies of treatment up to 52 weeks have shown ospemifene to be safe with no impact on endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma, venous thrombotic events or pelvic organ prolapse. Further studies are needed to evaluate its role in bone and breast health.

Ospemifene for the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy and dyspareunia in postmenopausal women

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) and dyspareunia are common problems experienced by postmenopausal women, although few seek treatment. Symptom-based therapies include nonhormonal vaginal lubricants, vaginal moisturizers, low-dose vaginal estrogen, and systemic estrogen. The 2013 United States Food and Drug Administration approval of ospemifene, an estrogen agonist/antagonist for the treatment of moderate-to-severe dyspareunia associated with VVA, increased options available to women. Several studies have evaluated the effects of ospemifene on VVA and dyspareunia and indicate an improvement in subjective findings. Objective findings such as a decrease in pH and recovery of a premenopausal vaginal maturation index have been reported. Beneficial effects have also been demonstrated in bone. Evaluations of breast health support the safety of ospemifene, although data are limited to 1 year. Short-term risks appear to be limited and include the development of hot flushes. Until additional comparative studies of ospemifene and estrogens have been performed, ospemifene should be recommended for women with symptoms of VVA and dyspareunia who are unable to tolerate or unwilling to take local or systemic estrogens. In this review, current evidence for the safety and efficacy of ospemifene in the treatment of moderate-to-severe VVA and dyspareunia are evaluated.

Treatment of dyspareunia secondary to vulvovaginal atrophy

Declining estrogen levels associated with menopause can result in vulvovaginal atrophy and some degree of dyspareunia for more than half of all women in menopause. In 2013, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved ospemifene, a nonhormonal oral medication for the treatment of dyspareunia in menopause. This article will provide an overview of ospemifene and its indications, side effects and implications for nurses.

Ospemifene in the treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of ospemifene in the management of dyspareunia.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was sought using PubMed (1966-January 2014) and EMBASE (1973-January 2014). Search terms included ospemifene, FC-1271a, dyspareunia, vulvovaginal atrophy, and vaginal atrophy.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All studies, including studies on humans, published in English with data assessing the efficacy and safety of ospemifene in the management of dyspareunia were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ospemifene is a new oral estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist indicated for moderate to severe dyspareunia. Clinical trials evaluating efficacy have shown a significant improvement in superficial cells, parabasal cells, vaginal pH, vaginal dryness, and dyspareunia. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions in the clinical trials included hot flashes, vaginal discharge, muscle spasms, and hyperhidrosis. Similar to systemic estrogen, boxed warnings with ospemifene include risk for thromboembolism and cerebrovascular disease. Additionally, patients with a uterus still need to use a progestogen with ospemifene to reduce the risk of hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Ospemifene has been effective in improving symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy when compared with placebo; however, no studies comparing ospemifene with estrogen products exist. Additional clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety in specialty populations, and long-term safety data are needed to assess the potential for serious adverse events. With the risks being similar to that for systemic estrogen therapy, ospemifene appears to be an alternative agent to estrogen therapy but does not have any advantages over estrogen.

Ospemifene for the treatment of dyspareunia associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy: potential benefits in bone and breast

Ospemifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), or estrogen receptor agonist/antagonist, that was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of dyspareunia associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy, a chronic condition that affects up to 60% of postmenopausal women. Ospemifene is the first and only nonestrogen compound approved for this indication. Compared with other approved SERMs, such as tamoxifen, toremifene, bazedoxifene, and raloxifene, the estrogen-like effects of ospemifene in the vaginal epithelium are unique. This review first discusses the rationale for developing ospemifene, including its mechanism of action, and then focuses on the clinical development of ospemifene for the treatment of dyspareunia associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy. Included are discussions of the effects of ospemifene on the endometrium, serum lipids, coagulation markers, bone, and breast cancer. In conclusion, ospemifene is a SERM with a unique estrogen agonist/antagonist tissue profile that was recently approved in the US for the treatment of dyspareunia associated with vulvar and vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women. Ospemifene warrants further clinical investigation for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis and breast cancer.

Profile of ospemifene in the breast

Vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic, progressive medical condition prevalent among postmenopausal women, which produces symptoms such as dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and vaginal irritation. Currently, the only prescription options are systemic and vaginal estrogen therapies that may be limited by concerns about long-term safety and breast cancer risk. Ospemifene is a tissue-selective estrogen agonist/antagonist (a selective estrogen receptor modulator) recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of dyspareunia, a symptom of VVA, due to menopause. Ospemifene, the first nonestrogen oral treatment for this indication, may provide an alternative to treatment with estrogen. Animal models with ospemifene suggest an inhibitory effect on growth of malignant breast tissue, but animal data cannot necessarily be extrapolated to humans. Clinical trials, including 3 long-term studies assessing the overall safety of ospemifene, support that ospemifene is generally well tolerated, with beneficial effects on the vagina, neutral effects on the breast, and minimal effects on the endometrium.

The discovery and development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for clinical practice

Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are structurally different compounds that interact with intracellular estrogen receptors in target organs as estrogen receptor agonists or antagonists. These drugs have been intensively studied over the past decade and have proven to be a highly versatile group for the treatment of different conditions associated with postmenopausal women's health, including hormone responsive cancer and osteoporosis. Tamoxifen, a failed contraceptive is currently used to treat all stages of breast cancer, chemoprevention in women at high risk for breast cancer and also has beneficial effects on bone mineral density and serum lipids in postmenopausal women. Raloxifene, a failed breast cancer drug, is the only SERM approved internationally for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and vertebral fractures. However, although these SERMs have many benefits, they also have some potentially serious adverse effects, such as thromboembolic disorders and, in the case of tamoxifen, uterine cancer. These adverse effects represent a major concern given that long-term therapy is required to prevent osteoporosis or prevent and treat breast cancer. The search for the 'ideal' SERM, which would have estrogenic effects on bone and serum lipids, neutral effects on the uterus, and antiestrogenic effects on breast tissue, but none of the adverse effects associated with current therapies, is currently under way. Ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene and arzoxifene, which are new SERM molecules with potentially greater efficacy and potency than previous SERMs, have been investigated for use in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. These drugs have been shown to be comparably effective to conventional hormone replacement therapy in animal models, with potential indications for an improved safety profile. Clinical efficacy data from ongoing phase III trials are available or are awaited for each SERM so that a true understanding of the therapeutic potential of these compounds can be obtained. In this article, we describe the discovery and development of the group of medicines called SERMs. The newer SERMs in late development: ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene, are arzoxifene are described in detail.

New insights into the metabolism of tamoxifen and its role in the treatment and prevention of breast cancer

The metabolism of tamoxifen is being redefined in the light of several important pharmacological observations. Recent studies have identified 4-hydroxy N-desmethyltamoxifen (endoxifen) as an important metabolite of tamoxifen necessary for antitumor actions. The metabolite is formed through the enzymatic product of CYP2D6 which also interacts with specific selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) used to prevent the hot flashes observed in up to 45% of patients taking tamoxifen. Additionally, the finding that enzyme variants of CYP2D6 do not promote the metabolism of tamoxifen to endoxifen means that significant numbers of women might not receive optimal benefit from tamoxifen treatment. Clearly these are particularly important issues not only for breast cancer treatment but also for selecting premenopausal women, at high risk for breast cancer, as candidates for chemoprevention using tamoxifen.