Angiotensin converting enzyme binding sites in human heart and lung: comparison with rat tissues

ACE phenotyping in human heart

Aims

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), which metabolizes many peptides and plays a key role in blood pressure regulation and vascular remodeling, is expressed as a type-1 membrane glycoprotein on the surface of different cells, including endothelial cells of the heart. We hypothesized that the local conformation and, therefore, the properties of heart ACE could differ from lung ACE due to different microenvironment in these organs.

Methods and results

We performed ACE phenotyping (ACE levels, conformation and kinetic characteristics) in the human heart and compared it with that in the lung. ACE activity in heart tissues was 10–15 lower than that in lung. Various ACE effectors, LMW endogenous ACE inhibitors and HMW ACE-binding partners, were shown to be present in both heart and lung tissues. “Conformational fingerprint” of heart ACE (i.e., the pattern of 17 mAbs binding to different epitopes on the ACE surface) significantly differed from that of lung ACE, which reflects differences in the local conformations of these ACEs, likely controlled by different ACE glycosylation in these organs. Substrate specificity and pH-optima of the heart and lung ACEs also differed. Moreover, even within heart the apparent ACE activities, the local ACE conformations, and the content of ACE inhibitors differ in atria and ventricles.

Conclusions

Significant differences in the local conformations and kinetic properties of heart and lung ACEs demonstrate tissue specificity of ACE and provide a structural base for the development of mAbs able to distinguish heart and lung ACEs as a potential blood test for predicting atrial fibrillation risk.

Species differences in expression of angiotensin II receptors and angiotensin-converting enzyme in human, canine and rat mitral valve leaflets

In normal valvular collagen turnover in the rat, angiotensin (Ang) II and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) seem to be involved. In common human and canine valvular diseases, changes in valvular collagen play a pathogenetic role and the valvular renin-angiotensin system is therefore of particular interest in these species. Healthy mitral valve leaflets and adjacent left ventricular myocardium were taken from five rats and five dogs immediately after euthanasia, and from five humans at autopsy. The valvular and myocardial Ang II receptors and ACE were detected and measured by quantitative autoradiography. In rat valves, high levels of Ang II receptors and ACE were found. In human and canine valves, insignificant levels were found. Significant myocardial levels of Ang II receptors and ACE were found only in the rat. The study demonstrated major species differences regarding the level of valvular and myocardial Ang II receptors and ACE in man, dog and rat. The lack of valvular Ang II receptors and ACE in man and dog, suggest that the renin-angiotensin system plays a minor, if any, role in the physiological valvular collagen formation in these two species. The findings in humans, however, need to be confirmed using fresh material.

Differential regulation of cardiac angiotensin converting enzyme binding sites and AT1 receptor density in the failing human heart

BACKGROUND

The regulation and interaction of ACE and the angiotensin II (Ang II) type I (AT1) receptor in the failing human heart are not understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Radioligand binding with 3H-ramiprilat was used to measure ACE protein in membrane preparations of hearts obtained from 36 subjects with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC), 8 subjects with primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH), and 32 organ donors with normal cardiac function (NF hearts). 125I-Ang II formation was measured in a subset of hearts. Saralasin (125I-(Sar1,Ile8)-Ang II) was used to measure total Ang II receptor density. AT1 and AT2 receptor binding were determined with the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan. Maximal ACE binding (Bmax) was 578+/-47 fmol/mg in IDC left ventricle (LV), 713+/-97 fmol/mg in PPH LV, and 325+/-27 fmol/mg in NF LV (P<0.001, IDC or PPH versus NF). In IDC, PPH, and NF right ventricles (RV), ACE Bmax was 737+/-78, 638+/-137, and 422+/-49 fmol/mg, respectively (P=0.02, IDC versus NF; P=0.08, PPH versus NF). 125I-Ang II formation correlated with ACE binding sites (r=0.60, P=0.00005). There was selective downregulation of the AT1 receptor subtype in failing PPH ventricles: 6.41+/-1.23 fmol/mg in PPH LV, 2.37+/-0.50 fmol/mg in PPH RV, 5.38+/-0.53 fmol/mg in NF LV, and 7.30+/-1.10 fmol/mg in NF RV (P=0.01, PPH RV versus PPH LV; P=0.0006, PPH RV versus NF RV).

CONCLUSIONS

ACE binding sites are increased in both failing IDC and nonfailing PPH ventricles. In PPH hearts, the AT1 receptor is downregulated only in the failing RV.

Bradykinin-mediated cardiovascular protective actions of ACE inhibitors. A new dimension in anti-ischaemic therapy?

In addition to being accepted therapy in hypertension and heart failure, ACE inhibitors may well offer a new dimension in anti-ischaemic therapy. Currently, anti-ischaemic properties have been demonstrated by ACE inhibitors in selected patient groups, including patients with left ventricular dysfunction with or without a direct temporal relationship with myocardial infarction. Anti-ischaemic effects of ACE inhibitors become apparent late after initiation of treatment and suggest a structural rather than a functional effect. Underlying mechanisms may include a reduction in ventricular dilatation and (abnormal) cardiac hypertrophy, leading to less myocardial oxygen demand and, possibly, improved subendocardial blood supply, and vasculoprotective effects, i.e. anti-atherosclerotic and antiremodelling properties, a beneficial effect on the fibrinolytic system and an improvement in abnormal endothelial vasodilator function. The latter aspect is most probably the pivotal mode of action where the anti-ischaemic profile of ACE inhibition is concerned. An improvement in endothelial dysfunction has been shown in patients with mild to moderate coronary artery disease [Trial on Reversing ENdothelial Dysfunction (TREND)]. It is of importance that, in both clinical experiments and human studies, the role of bradykinin appears central in the structural and functional cardiovascular effects of ACE inhibition. This is particularly true for the improvement of impaired endothelial function. Myocardial ischaemia evokes vasoconstrictor neurohormonal activation, which may lead to coronary vasoconstriction in diseased coronary segments. The subsequent abnormal endothelial function leads to diminished coronary flow and also increases systemic vasotone and afterload, thus unfavourably altering the myocardial oxygen supply/demand ratio. Under laboratory conditions, acute ACE inhibition counteracts this activation in humans. However, it is speculated that this anti-ischaemic mechanism may become operative and clinically important during long term oral ACE inhibitor therapy when endothelial function improves, and may subsequently protect against the vasoconstrictor effect of neurohormonal activation. As it is unlikely that the mechanisms mentioned above are only relevant in patients with ventricular dysfunction or heart failure, several large controlled trials are currently examining the long term anti-ischaemic and cardiovascular protective effects of ACE inhibition in patients at risk of a cardiovascular event [Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study (HOPE)], with a normal cardiac function [Prevention of Events with ACE inhibition study (PEACE)] or in all patients with coronary artery disease irrespective of cardiac function [EUropean trial of Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA)].

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition unmasks the sympathofacilitatory effect of bradykinin in human right atrium

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in bradykinin-mediated modulation of noradrenaline release in human and rat atrium.

METHODS

Human and rat atrial slices were incubated with [3H]-noradrenaline, superfused with Krebs-Henseleit solution and stimulated electrically at 5 Hz. The stimulation-induced outflow of radioactivity was taken as an index of endogenous noradrenaline release.

RESULTS

In the absence of ACE inhibition 0.01-1 micromol/l bradykinin failed to alter the release of noradrenaline in human atrium. In contrast, 0.001-0.1 micromol/l bradykinin enhanced the release of noradrenaline in rat atrium. In the presence of 3 micromol/l of the ACE inhibitor captopril, however, bradykinin significantly enhanced the release of noradrenaline in human atrium. The bradykinin B1-receptor agonist (Des-Arg9)-bradykinin (0.01-1 micromol/l) had no effect on the release of noradrenaline in human atrium both in the absence and in the presence of 3 micromol/l captopril. Captopril (3 micromol/l) potentiated the facilitatory effect of bradykinin in rat atrium. The selective bradykinin B2-receptor antagonist D-Arg[Hyp3,Thi5, D-Tic7,Oic8]-bradykinin (Hoe 140, 0.3 micromol/l) and the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (10 micromol/l) reduced the facilitatory effect of bradykinin significantly in the presence of captopril in rat and human atrium. Prostaglandin F2alpha (0.1 micromol/l), prostaglandin E2 (0.3 micromol/l) and the thromboxane A2 receptor agonist U-46 619 (0.1 micromol/l) enhanced the release of noradrenaline in human atria, whereas 0.1 micromol/l prostaglandin I2 had no effect.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that bradykinin facilitates the release of noradrenaline in human and rat atrium by activation of bradykinin receptors of the B2-subtype and subsequent release of facilitatory prostaglandins. The facilitatory effect of bradykinin in human atrium can only be demonstrated when its enzymatic degradation is prevented by ACE inhibition.

Affinity of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for N- and C-binding sites of human ACE is different in heart, lung, arteries, and veins

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has two enzymatically active domains: a C-domain in the carboxy terminal region and an N-domain in the amino terminal region. We based the pharmacologic characterization of these sites on the rat testis-lung model. In testis, only a truncate form of ACE is present (C-site), whereas both N- and C-sites are present in lung. In this model, captopril was shown to be N-selective and delaprilat to be C-selective. Ro 31-8472, a cilazapril derivative, and enalaprilat proved to be not site selective. We used these drugs to evaluate the affinity of C and N sites in various human tissues involved in the cardiovascular actions of ACE and used [125I]Ro31-8472 as ligand. The number and affinity of ACE binding sites were 17,680 +/- 2,345 fmol/mg protein (Kd = 0.32 +/- 0.04 nM) in lung, 560 +/- 65 (Kd = 0.36 +/- 0.05 nM) in heart, 237 +/- 51 (Kd = 0.37 +/- 0.06 nM) in coronary artery, 236 +/- 63 (Kd = 0.14 +/- 0.05 nM) in saphenous vein, and 603 +/- 121 (Kd = 0.50 +/- 0.06 nM) in mammary artery. The affinity (pKi) of captopril for the N sites ranged from 9.40 +/- 0.14 (lung) to 8.41 +/- 0.10 (coronary artery). The affinity for the C-site by delaprilat ranged from 9.97 +/- 0.15 (coronary artery) to 9.10 +/- 0.14 (mammary artery). Therefore, the affinity of C- and N-sites of ACE for ACE inhibitor (ACEI) drugs is different according to the organ involved. Because ACE is a glycosylated enzyme and glycosylation is organ dependent, we suggest that organ-specific glycosylation affects the binding characteristics of ACE inhibitors to N- or C-site of human tissular ACE.

Pharmacologic data reveal the heterogeneity of angiotensin-converting enzyme according to its source (lung versus heart)

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) has 2 different active sites: a C-site (in the carboxy terminal region) and an N-site (in the amino terminal part). Some ACE inhibitors have a relatively greater affinity for the C-sites, whereas others bind to the 2 sites with equal affinity. The different ontogenesis of lung and heart endothelial cells can be related to binding differences to the C- and N-sites. We labeled Ro31-8472, a clizapril derivative, which has the same affinity for the 2 ACE sites. Binding of 125I-Ro31-8472 to human left ventricle and lung plasma membranes was saturable, inhibited by ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid and displayed affinities of 360 +/- 41 pM in heart and 320 +/- 51 pM in lung. For captopril the Hill slope was 0.57 +/- 0.03 for heart and 0.48 +/- 0.05 for lung; for delaprilat, a nonsulfhydryl analogue of captopril, the slope was 0.43 +/- 0.05 for heart and 0.55 +/- 0.05 for lung. These drugs were characterized by biphasic competition isotherms. The Hill slope of enalaprilat was 1.01 +/- 0.06 for heart and 0.93 +/- 0.06 for lung, and Ro31-8472 had a slope of 0.97 +/- 0.04 for heart and 0.93 +/- 0.03 for lung. The affinity of ACE inhibitors with Hill slope different from unity varied according to the source of ACE; in fact, delaprilat had greater affinity for the high-affinity sites of heart than lung (pKi, 9.89 and 9.47, respectively), whereas captopril had greater affinity for the high-affinity sites of lung than heart (9.40 and 8.85, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ramipril. An updated review of its therapeutic use in essential hypertension and heart failure

Ramipril is a second generation angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Like enalapril, it is a prodrug and is hydrolysed in vivo to release the active metabolite, ramiprilat, which has a long elimination half-life, permitting once-daily administration. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril has been confirmed in large-scale noncomparative studies conducted in general practice as well as in more rigorously controlled clinical trials. In the former, approximately 85% of patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension have responded successfully to treatment with ramipril 2.5 or 5 mg/day, while comparative trials indicate that the antihypertensive efficacy of the drug is equivalent to that of other established ACE inhibitors and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist atenolol. As expected, the response rate to ramipril monotherapy is lower in patients with severe hypertension (around 40%), although the blood pressure lowering effect can be enhanced with the addition of a diuretic such as hydrochlorothiazide or piretanide. The antihypertensive efficacy of ramipril is maintained in patients with diabetes mellitus and preliminary data indicate that the drug has the beneficial effect of decreasing urinary albumin excretion in diabetic patients with nephropathy. Ramipril is superior to atenolol in causing regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, although the clinical significance of this effect per se remains to be established. The large-scale Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study demonstrated that ramipril 5 or 10 mg/day significantly decreased the risk of all-cause mortality by 27% in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction, even if transient. The beneficial effect of ramipril was apparent by 30 days of treatment and appeared to be greatest in patients with more severe ventricular damage after infarction. Ramipril is well tolerated in general practice, with 5% or fewer patients discontinuing therapy because of drug intolerance. The data available suggest that ramipril shares a similar tolerability profile to that of other established ACE inhibitors. Thus, clinical data confirm ramipril as a useful alternative ACE inhibitor for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension, and indicate a beneficial effect of the drug in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. It is also reasonable to assume that ramipril will be of value in the treatment of patients with more established heart failure or asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction.