Evidence for the involvement of different receptor subtypes in the pre- and postjunctional actions of angiotensin II at rat sympathetic neuroeffector sites

[Angiotensin II Regulates Excitability and Contractile Functions of Myocardium and Smooth Muscles through Autonomic Nervous Transmission]

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is an intrinsic peptide having strong vasopressor effects, and thus, it plays an important role in the physiological regulation of blood pressure. The vasopressor effects of Ang II include direct contraction of myocardium and vascular smooth muscles (SMs) along with aldosterone-mediated sodium retention. In addition, indirect vascular contractions induced by noradrenaline (NA), the release of which is mediated through Ang II receptor type 1 (AT₁) existing at the sympathetic nerve terminals (SNTs), also contribute to the vasopressor effects of Ang II. Stimulation of NA release from SNTs by Ang II also occurs in the myocardium leading to an increase in heart rate and cardiac contraction. Furthermore, Ang II enhances the contractions of non-vascular SMs, such as vas deferens, through induction of NA release from the SNTs. We have found that Ang II attenuated vagus nerve stimulation-induced bradycardia in a losartan-sensitive manner. This suggests that Ang II attenuates vagus nerve stimulation-induced bradycardia by inhibiting acetylcholine (ACh) release from the parasympathetic nerve terminals (PNTs) through activation of the AT₁ receptor. Ang II was also reported to attenuate the release of ACh from the PNTs in SMs, such as stomach and airway, thus suppressing their contractile functions. There are, however, conflicting reports of the effects of Ang II on parasympathetic nerve-mediated contractile regulation of SMs. In this review, we have highlighted the relevant research articles including our experimental reports on the regulation of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve-mediated excitation and contraction by Ang II along with the future prospects.

Physical training promotes similar effects to the blockade of angiotensin-converting enzyme on the cardiac morphology and function in old female rats subjected to premature ovarian failure

We investigated the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition and aerobic physical training on the heart of old female rats (82-wk-old) submitted to premature ovarian failure (10-wk.-old). We used different approaches: morphology and function by echocardiography, reactivity of the coronary bed and left ventricular contractibility (Langendorff Technique). Female Wistar ovariectomized (OVX) rats (n=42) were assigned to one of four groups: OVX, vehicle treated only; OVX-EM, Enalapril Maleate only (EM, 10mg·kg^-1·d^-1); OVX-T, aerobic trained only; and OVX-EMT, treated with Enalapril Maleate and aerobic trained. Both Enalapril Maleate treatment and aerobic training were done in the last 20weeks of the experimental protocol. When compared to the OVX group, the OVX-EM group showed lower values of wall thickness and left ventricular (LV) mass, lower values of coronary bed reactivity and reduced maximum response of LV contractility to dobutamine, while the OVX-T group showed lower values of LV wall thickness, increase in end-systolic volume, reduced maximum response of LV contractility to dobutamine, and left intraventricular pressure due to increased flow. The combination of treatments (EM and aerobic physical training) did not promote additional important effects on the parameters evaluated. Our results suggest similar beneficial effects of physical training and EM treatment on the morphology and cardiac function in old female rats submitted to premature ovarian failure. Although the causes of these benefits are still unknown, both treatments have promoted a decrease in cardiac contractility, and the reduced β1-adrenergic sensitivity suggests that both treatments may attenuate the sympathetic effect on the heart.

Impaired neuronal and vascular responses to angiotensin II in a rabbit congestive heart failure model

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is characterised by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). Both systems are known to interact and to potentiate each other's activities. We recently demonstrated that angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances sympathetic nerve traffic via prejunctionally-located AT1-receptors. At present, little is known about the effects of Ang II at the level of the sympathetic neurones in CHF.

Accordingly, we investigated the effect of Ang II in the presence and absence of the AT1-receptor antagonist, eprosartan, on stimulation-induced nerve traffic in isolated thoracic aorta preparations obtained from rabbits suffering from experimentally-induced CHF. Control-preparations were obtained from age-matched animals. Sympathetic activity was assessed by a [3H]noradrenaline spill-over model. Additionally, Ang II constrictor responses were compared between CHF and control vessels in the presence and absence of eprosartan. Additionally, to study postjunctional facilitation, the effects of Ang II on postsynaptic α-adrenoceptor-mediated responses were studied using noradrenaline.

Stimulation-evoked SNS-neurotransmission was similar in both groups (CHF versus control). Ang II (0.1 nM—0.1 µM) caused a concentration-dependent increase of the stimulation-evoked sympathetic outflow in both groups, with a maximum at 10 nM (control [n=7], FR2/FR12.03±0.11 and CHF-preparations [n=7], FR2/FR11.71±0.07). The enhancement by Ang II was decreased in CHF-preparations compared with controls (p<0.05). Eprosartan concentration-dependently attenuated the Ang II-enhanced (10 nM) sympathetic outflow in both CHF- and control preparations. The sympathoinhibitory potency of eprosartan was similar in both groups (control pIC508.81±0.31; CHF 8.65±0.42).

Ang II (1 nM—0.3 µM) concentration-dependently increased the contractile force in control preparations (Emax21.64±3.86 mN, pD27.63±0.02, n=7). Eprosartan (1 nM—0.1 µM) influenced the Ang IIcontractions via a mixed form of antagonism. In CHF-preparations, Ang II caused impaired vascular contraction. The KCl-induced contraction was decreased in the CHF- compared with control preparations (13.02±0.64 mN versus 30.40±0.89 mN). The relative Ang II contraction (% of KCl) was also decreased (2.3% vs. 58.0%). Concentration-response curves to noradrenaline (%KCl) were similar (control pD26.93±0.05, Emax131.0±2.7; CHF pD27.00±0.05, Emax136.7±2.6) (p>0.05) and were not affected by Ang II.

We conclude that Ang II-enhanced sympathetic neurotransmission is mediated by the prejunctional AT1-receptor in both control and CHF-preparations. The decreased facilitation of SNS effects by Ang II may be explained by down-regulation or desensitisation of the neuronal AT1-receptor. Additionally, the aortic contractile capacity in heart failure rabbits appears to be decreased, probably as a result of heart failure-associated neuroendocrine and functional changes.

The role of the kidney and the sympathetic nervous system in hypertension

Nearly one-third of the world's population has hypertension. The human and societal impact of hypertension is enormous. Primary hypertension accounts for 95 % of cases of hypertension in adults. The pathogenesis of primary hypertension is complex. The kidney and the sympathetic nervous system play important roles in the development and maintenance of hypertension. This review discusses their respective roles, the interaction between the two, implications of sympathetic overactivity in kidney disease and therapeutic interventions that have been developed on the basis of this knowledge, especially modulation of the sympathetic nervous system.

Spinal cord injury increases the reactivity of rat tail artery to angiotensin II

Studies in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) suggest the vasculature is hyperreactive to angiotensin II (Ang II). In the present study, the effects of SCI on the reactivity of the rat tail and mesenteric arteries to Ang II have been investigated. In addition, the effects of SCI on the facilitatory action of Ang II on nerve-evoked contractions of these vessels were determined. Isometric contractions of artery segments from T11 (tail artery) or T4 (mesenteric arteries) spinal cord-transected rats and sham-operated rats were compared 6–7 weeks postoperatively. In both tail and mesenteric arteries, SCI increased nerve-evoked contractions. In tail arteries, SCI also greatly increased Ang II-evoked contractions and the facilitatory effect of Ang II on nerve-evoked contractions. By contrast, SCI did not detectably change the responses of mesenteric arteries to Ang II. These findings provide the first direct evidence that SCI increases the reactivity of arterial vessels to Ang II. In addition, in tail artery, the findings indicate that Ang II may contribute to modifying their responses following SCI.

Regulation of aortic extracellular matrix synthesis via noradrenergic system and angiotensin II in juvenile rats

CONTEXT

Extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis regulation by sympathetic nervous system (SNS) or angiotensin II (ANG II) was widely reported, but interaction between the two systems on ECM synthesis needs further investigation.

OBJECTIVE

We tested implication of SNS and ANG II on ECM synthesis in juvenile rat aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sympathectomy with guanethidine (50 mg/kg, subcutaneous) and blockade of the ANG II AT1 receptors (AT1R) blocker with losartan (20 mg/kg/day in drinking water) were performed alone or in combination in rats. mRNA and protein synthesis of collagen and elastin were examined by Q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting.

RESULTS

Collagen type I and III mRNA were increased respectively by 62 and 43% after sympathectomy and decreased respectively by 31 and 60% after AT1R blockade. Combined treatment increased collagen type III by 36% but not collagen type I. The same tendency of collagen expression was observed at mRNA and protein levels after the three treatments. mRNA and protein level of elastin was decreased respectively by 63 and 39% and increased by 158 and 15% after losartan treatment. Combined treatment abrogates changes induced by single treatments.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The two systems act as antagonists on ECM expression in the aorta and combined inhibition of the two systems prevents imbalance of mRNA and protein level of collagen I and elastin induced by single treatment. Combined inhibition of the two systems prevents deposit or excessive reduction of ECM and can more prevent cardiovascular disorders.

Physiological regulation of MMPs and tPA/PAI in the arterial wall of rats by noradrenergic tone and angiotensin II

The interactions between the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and angiotensin II (ANG II), and their direct effects in vitro on the enzymes involved in vascular extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, were examined.

Rats were treated with guanethidine, losartan or the combined treatments. mRNA, protein and activity of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 and mRNA of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) were quantified in abdominal aorta (AA) and femoral artery (FA). Norepinephrine (NE) or ANG II with adrenergic (β, α1 and α2) or losartan antagonists was tested for MMP mRNA response in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs).

Combined treatment enhances the inhibition of MMP-2 mRNA and protein level induced by simple treatment in AA. However MMP-9 in AA and MMP mRNA in FA were reduced in the same order by treatments. MMP activities were not affected by treatments. The t-PA/PAI-1 ratio, which reflects the fibrinolytic balance, remained higher after treatments. In cultured VSMCs, NE induced stimulation of MMP mRNA via α2 and β adrenergic receptors and MMP-2 activity via β adrenergic receptors, while ANG II-induced stimulation was abrogated by losartan.

Overall, there is a synergic inhibition of both systems on the level of MMP-2 in AA.

Physiological regulation of extracellular matrix collagen and elastin in the arterial wall of rats by noradrenergic tone and angiotensin II

The interactions between the effects of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and angiotensin II (ANG II) on vascular extracellular matrix (ECM) synthesis were determined in rats.

The mRNA and protein content of collagen I, collagen III and elastin in the abdominal aorta (AA) and femoral artery (FA) was investigated in Wistar–Kyoto rats treated for 5 weeks with guanethidine, a sympathoplegic, losartan, an ANG II AT1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, or both. The effects of noradrenaline (NE) and ANG II on collagen III and elastin mRNA, and the receptor involved, were tested in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in vitro.

Guanethidine increased collagen types I and III and decreased elastin, while losartan had an opposite effect, although without effect on collagen III. The combination of treatments abrogated changes induced by simple treatment with collagen I and elastin, but increased collagen III mRNA in AA and not in FA. NE stimulated collagen III mRNA via β receptors and elastin via α1 and α2 receptors. ANG II stimulated collagen III but inhibited elastin mRNA via AT1R.

Overall, SNS and ANG II exert opposite and antagonistic effects on major components of ECM in the vascular wall. This may be of relevance for the choice of a therapeutic strategy in vascular diseases.

Differential control of collagen synthesis by the sympathetic and renin-angiotensin systems in the rat left ventricle

In the present study, we tested the hypothesis of the indirect (via the sympathetic nervous system (SNS)) and direct (via AT1 receptors) contributions of Angiotensin II (Ang II) on the synthesis of collagen types I and III in the left ventricle (LV) in vivo. Sympathectomy and blockade of the Ang II receptor AT1 were performed alone or in combination in normotensive rats. The mRNA and protein synthesis of collagen types I and III were examined by Q-RT-PCR and immunoblotting in the LV. Collagen types I and III mRNA were decreased respectively by 53% and 22% after sympathectomy and only collagen type I mRNA was increased by 52% after AT1 receptor blockade. mRNA was not changed for collagen type I but was decreased by 25% for collagen type III after double treatment. Only collagen protein type III was decreased after sympathectomy by 12%, but collagen proteins were increased respectively for types I and III by 145% and 52% after AT1 receptor blockade and by 45% and 60% after double treatment. Deducted interpretations from our experimental approach suggest that Ang II stimulates indirectly (via SNS) and inhibits directly (via AT1 receptors) the collagen type I at transcriptional and protein levels. For collagen type III, it stimulates indirectly the transcription and inhibited directly the protein level. Therefore, the Ang II regulates collagen synthesis differently through indirect and direct pathways.

Nerve stimulation induced overflow of neuropeptide Y and modulation by angiotensin II in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The sympathetic nervous system and renin-angiotensin system are both thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of hypertension in experimental models such as the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR). We demonstrated that periarterial nerve stimulation (NS) increased the perfusion pressure (PP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) overflow from perfused mesenteric arterial beds of SHRs at 4-6, 10-12, and 18-20 wk of age, which correspond to prehypertensive, developing hypertensive, and maintained hypertensive stages, respectively, in the SHR. NS also increased PP and NPY overflow from mesenteric beds of Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) normotensive rats. NS-induced increases in PP and NPY were greater in vessels obtained from SHRs of all three ages compared with WKY rats. ANG II produced a greater increase in PP in preparations taken from SHRs than WKY rats. ANG II also resulted in a greater increase in basal NPY overflow from 10- to 12-wk-old and 18- to 20-wk-old SHRs than age-matched WKY rats. ANG II enhanced the NS-induced overflow of NPY from SHR preparations more than WKY controls at all ages studied. The enhancement of NS-induced NPY overflow by ANG II was blocked by the AT1 receptor antagonist EMD-66684 and the angiotensin type 2 receptor antagonist PD-123319. In contrast, ANG II greatly enhanced norepinephrine overflow in the presence of PD-123319. Both captopril and EMD-66684 decreased neurotransmitter overflow from SHR mesenteric beds; therefore, we conclude that an endogenous renin-angiotensin system is active in this preparation. It is concluded that the ANG II-induced enhancement of sympathetic nerve stimulation may contribute to the development and maintenance of hypertension in the SHR.

Involvement of G-protein βγ subunits on the influence of inhibitory α2-autoreceptors on the angiotensin AT1-receptor modulation of noradrenaline release in the rat vas deferens

The influence of alpha2-autoreceptors on the facilitation of [3H]-noradrenaline release mediated by angiotensin II was studied in prostatic portions of rat vas deferens preincubated with [3H]-noradrenaline. Angiotensin II enhanced tritium overflow evoked by trains of 100 pulses at 8 Hz, an effect that was attenuated by the AT1-receptor antagonist losartan (0.3-1 microM), at concentrations suggesting the involvement of the AT1B subtype. The effect of angiotensin II was also attenuated by inhibition of phospholipase C (PLC) and protein kinase C (PKC) indicating that prejunctional AT1-receptors are coupled to the PLC-PKC pathway. Angiotensin II (0.3-100 nM) enhanced tritium overflow more markedly, up to 64%, under conditions that favor alpha2-autoinhibition, observed when stimulation consisted of 100 pulses at 8 Hz, than under poor alpha2-autoinhibition conditions, only up to 14%, observed when alpha2-adrenoceptors were blocked with yohimbine (1 microM) or when stimulation consisted of 20 pulses at 50 Hz. Activation of PKC with 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 0.1-3 microM) also enhanced tritium overflow more markedly under strong alpha2-autoinhibition conditions. Inhibition of Gi/o-proteins with pertussis toxin (8 microg/ml) or blockade of Gbetagamma subunits with the anti-betagamma peptide MPS-Phos (30 microM) attenuated the effects of angiotensin II and PMA. The results indicate that activation of AT1-receptors coupled to the PLC-PKC pathway enhances noradrenaline release, an effect that is markedly favoured by an ongoing activation of alpha2-autoreceptors. Interaction between alpha2-adrenoceptors and AT1-receptors seems to involve the betagamma subunits released from the Gi/o-proteins coupled to alpha2-adrenoceptors and protein kinase C activated by AT1-receptors.

Pre- and postjunctional effects of angiotensin II in hypertension due to adenosine receptor blockade

Prejunctional facilitation of [3H]noradrenaline release induced by sympathetic nerve stimulation and postjunctional contractile effects of angiotensin II were studied in the mesenteric artery and vein of 1,3-dipropyl-8-sulfophenylxanthine (DPSPX)-hypertensive rats. Male Wistar rats received infusions of saline or DPSPX (90 microg/kg/h) i.p.. Blood pressure was determined by tail-cuff. The prejunctional effect of angiotensin II was similar in artery and vein preparations of control rats and was increased in DPSPX-hypertensive rats. In contrast, the contractile effect of angiotensin II was much more pronounced in the mesenteric vein than in the mesenteric artery of control rats and was markedly reduced in DPSPX-hypertensive rats. We conclude that (1) the increased prejunctional effect of angiotensin II may contribute to, while (2) the decreased contractile effect of angiotensin II may attenuate DPSPX-induced hypertension. This study also supports the hypothesis that pre- and postjunctional angiotensin II receptors are different.

Effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on autonomic nervous system function in patients with essential hypertension

It has long been proposed that the renin-angiotensin system exerts a stimulatory influence on the sympathetic nervous system, including augmentation of central sympathetic outflow and presynaptic facilitation of norepinephrine release from sympathetic nerves. We tested this proposition in 19 patients with essential hypertension, evaluating whether the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) eprosartan and losartan had identifiable antiadrenergic properties. This was done in a prospective, randomized, three-way placebo-controlled study of crossover design. Patients were randomized to 600 mg of eprosartan daily, 50 mg of losartan daily, or placebo. The treatment period was 4 wk, with 2-wk washout periods. Multiunit firing rates in efferent sympathetic nerves distributed to skeletal muscle vasculature (muscle sympathetic nerve activity, MSNA) were measured with microneurography, testing whether ARBs inhibit central sympathetic outflow. In parallel, isotope dilution methodology was used to measure whole body norepinephrine spillover to plasma. Mean blood pressure on placebo was 151/98 mmHg, with both ARBs causing reductions of approximately 11 mmHg systolic and 6 mmHg diastolic pressure, placebo corrected. Both MSNA [35 +/- 12 bursts/min (mean +/- SD) on placebo] and whole body norepinephrine spillover [366 +/- 247 ng/min] were unchanged by ARB administration, indicating that the ARBs did not materially inhibit central sympathetic outflow or act presynaptically to reduce norepinephrine release at existing rates of nerve firing. These findings contrast with the easily demonstrable reduction in sympathetic nervous activity produced by antihypertensive drugs of the imidazoline-binding class, which are known to act within the brain to inhibit sympathetic nervous outflow. We conclude that sympathetic nervous inhibition is not a major component of the blood pressure-lowering action of ARBs in essential hypertension.

Angiotensin II Receptor Modulation of Renal Vascular Resistance and Neurotransmission in Young and Adult Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Angiotensin (Ang) II modulates vascular resistance and sympathetic neurotransmission through Ang II type 1 (AT1) receptors. Recent studies reported an involvement of AT2 receptors. We investigated whether AT2 receptors participate in modulation of vascular resistance and sympathetic neurotransmission in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

METHODS

Kidneys of 6- and 16-week-old normotensive (WKY) and SHR were isolated and perfused.

RESULTS

Noradrenaline release induced by renal nerve stimulation (RNS) was increased in SHR (WKY: 1,837 +/- 128, SHR: 2,310 +/- 192 pg/g). Ang I- and II-induced pressor responses and enhancement of noradrenaline release were greater in SHR than in WKY. Pressor responses to Ang I and II were greater in adult compared with young SHR. The AT1 receptor antagonist EXP3174 (0.1 microM) blocked Ang I- and II-induced renal vasoconstriction and noradrenaline release to RNS in both strains. In contrast, the selective AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (1 microM) had no influence in young and adult WKY and SHR.

CONCLUSION

Ang I and II had a greater impact on renal vascular resistance and neurotransmission in SHR, which was more pronounced in adult SHR. All effects are mediated by the AT1 receptor and no modulatory influence of the AT2 receptor could be found.

Prejunctional AT(1) receptor subtype-dependent modification of neurotransmitter releases in canine isolated splenic arteries

1. The regulation by angiotensin II (Ang II) formed locally on nerve-stimulated purinergic and adrenergic components of double-peaked vasoconstrictions in the canine splenic artery and Ang II receptor subtypes involved were investigated. 2. The perfusion of the precursor angiotensin I (Ang I, 0.1-1 nm) did not affect the vasoconstrictor responses to noradrenaline (NA, 0.03-1 nmol) and adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP, 0.03-1 micromol). The second component vasoconstrictor response to nerve stimulation was dose dependently potentiated by Ang I (0.1-1 nm). The first peaked constriction was slightly, but insignificantly increased. The potentiating effects of Ang I were abolished by KRH-594 (10 nm), a selective AT(1) receptor antagonist, but not by PD 123319 (1-10 nm), an AT(2) receptor antagonist. KRH-594 (10 nm) or PD 123319 (10 nm) never affected the vasoconstrictions to either NA or ATP. 3. The treatment with KRH-594 (1-10 nm) produced a greater inhibition on the second peaked response than the first one, although both of them were dose dependently inhibited. PD 123319 (1-10 nm) did not affect the vasoconstrictor responses induced by nerve stimulation. 4. Inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme with 10 nm enalaprilat reduced the second peaked response, having no significant inhibition on the first peaked response. A higher dose of enalaprilat (100 nm) produced a greater inhibition of the second peak than the first one. It reduced the second peak by approximately 65%, while the first peak was decreased approximately 35%. After treatment with enalaprilat, Ang I (1 nm) failed to enhance the neuronal vascular response. Enalaprilat at doses used did not affect the vasoconstrictions to either NA or ATP. 5. The present results indicate that endogenously generated Ang II may produce a more marked potentiation of adrenergic transmission than purinergic transmission via activation of prejunctional AT(1) receptors.

A pharmacological differentiation between postjunctional (AT1A) and prejunctional (AT1B) angiotensin II receptors in the rabbit aorta

The effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin III were compared at prejunctional and postjunctional AT(1) receptors of the rabbit thoracic aorta. Furthermore, the influence of PD123319, losartan and eprosartan on these effects was also compared. To study prejunctional effects, the tissues were preincubated with ((3)H)-noradrenaline, superfused and electrically stimulated (1 Hz, 2 ms, 50 mA, 5 min). To study postjunctional effects, non-cumulative concentration-response curves were determined. Both angiotensin II and angiotensin III were more potent prejunctionally than postjunctionally. In the case of angiotensin II, the EC(50) was 12 times lower at the prejunctional than at the postjunctional level, while that of angiotensin III was 30 times lower prejunctionally. Furthermore, whereas angiotensin II was about 33 times more potent than angiotensin III postjunctionally, it was only 12 times more potent than angiotensin III prejunctionally. Eprosartan did not differentiate between prejunctional and postjunctional effects of both angiotensins. In contrast, PD123319 and losartan did differentiate; however, whereas PD123319 concentration-dependently antagonised the facilitation of tritium release caused by angiotensin II and angiotensin III and had no influence on the contraction of the aortic rings elicited by the peptides, losartan did the opposite: it concentration-dependently antagonised the contractions caused by the peptides on the aortic rings and exerted no influence on the facilitatory effect of angiotensin II and angiotensin III. These results show that prejunctional and postjunctional receptors for angiotensin II and angiotensin III are different and underline the hypothesis that postjunctional AT(1) receptors belong to the AT(1A) subtype, while prejunctional AT(1) receptors belong to the AT(1B) subtype.

AT1 and AT2-receptor antagonists inhibit Ang II-mediated facilitation of noradrenaline release in human atria

It is generally accepted that regulation of blood pressure and sympathetic neurotransmission by angiotensin (Ang) II is brought about through activation of AT1-receptors. Since recent studies demonstrated a high proportion of AT2-receptors in the human heart, the aim of our study was to investigate whether Ang II modulates noradrenaline release also through activation of AT2-receptors in this tissue. Human atrial appendages were prelabeled with [3H]-noradrenaline and electrically field-stimulated. Stimulation-induced outflow of radioactivity was taken as an index of endogenous noradrenaline release. Ang I and II enhanced noradrenaline release in a dose-dependent manner up to 55 and 72%, respectively. These effects were blocked by the selective AT1-receptor antagonists EXP3174 and irbesartan (10 nmol/L). Moreover, the selective AT2-receptor antagonists PD123319 and CGP42112A (0.1 and 1 micromol/L) also inhibited Ang II-induced facilitation of noradrenaline release. Captopril (5 micromol/L) shifted the dose response curve for Ang I less potent to the right than EXP3174 (10 nmol/L). Ang I and II enhanced the stimulation-induced noradrenaline release significantly more potent in tissues of patients pretreated with ACE inhibitors than without. In conclusion, both AT1- and AT2-receptors seem to play a role in Ang II-mediated facilitation of noradrenaline release in the human heart. Chronic treatment with ACE inhibitors appears to affect cardiac sympathetic neurotransmission possibly by upregulation of presynaptic Ang II receptors.

Mechanisms of release of ATP from vascular purinergic nerves

1. The vasoconstrictor response to periarterial nerve electrical stimulation (PNS) and neurotransmission by ATP are discussed and illustrated, using canine isolated and perfused splenic arterial preparations. 2. The conditions for appearance of dominant purinergic constrictor response to PNS are discussed. 3. Modulation of the purinergic vasoconstrictor responses to PNS by several kinds of presynaptic receptor agonists and antagonists is reviewed. 4. Influences of purinergic responses to PNS by guanethidine, reserpine, tetrodotoxin (TTX) or omega-conotoxin GVIA (omegaCTX) are also reviewed. 5. Effects of imipramine and removal of the endothelium are discussed. 6. Evidence is presented for selective inhibition of purinergic responses to PNS by an adequate cold storage of the vessel. 7. The roles of ATP released by PNS in isolated canine splenic arteries are proposed.

AT1-receptor blockade and sympathetic neurotransmission in cardiovascular disease

1. The present survey is dealing with the interactions between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in various organs and tissues, with an emphasis on the angiotensin AT-receptors located at the sympathetic nerve endings. 2. Angiotensin II, the main effector of the RAAS is known to stimulate sympathetic nerve traffic and its sequelae in numerous organs and tissues, such as the central nervous system, the adrenal medulla, the sympathetic ganglia and the sympathetic nerve endings. These stimulatory effects are mediated by AT(1)-receptors and counteracted by AT(1)-receptor antagonists. 3. Sympatho-inhibition at the level of the sympathetic nerve ending appears to be a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor blockers, mediated by presynaptic AT(1)-receptors. With respect to the ratio pre-/postsynaptic AT(1)-receptor antagonism important quantitative differences between the various compounds were found. 4. Both the pre- and postjunctional receptors at the sympathetic nerve endings belong to the AT(1)-receptor population. However, the presynaptic receptors belong to the AT(1B)-subtype, whereas the postjunctional receptors probably belong to a different AT(1)-receptor subpopulation. 5. Sympatho-inhibition is a class effect of the AT(1)-receptor antagonists. In conditions in which the SNS plays a pathophysiological role, such as hypertension and congestive heart failure, this property may well be of therapeutic relevance.

No involvement of the AT2-receptor in angiotensin II-enhanced sympathetic transmission in vitro

Angiotensin II (Ang II) enhances sympathetic neurotransmission via AT(1)-receptors located on sympathetic nerve terminals. We recently demonstrated that inhibition of Ang II-mediated facilitation in the pithed rat by irbesartan resulted in a U-shaped dose response curve, which was not observed when PD 123319, at a concentration that selectively blocks the AT(2)-receptor, was co-administered. Hence, the irbesartan-mediated upstroke might be explained by the involvement of the AT(2)-receptor after AT(1) blockade with high-dose irbesartan. In the present study, we further investigated the possible role of the AT(2)-receptor in Ang II-mediated facilitation in vitro. We studied the effect of the AT(2)-receptor antagonist PD 123319 (10 nM) on Ang II-enhanced sympathetic outflow evoked by electrical field stimulation (EFS) in the rat isolated inferior vena cava. Additionally, we investigated the effect of the AT(1)-receptor blocker irbesartan (0.1 nM 1 M) on the sequelae of Ang II-enhanced, EFS-evoked sympathetic nerve traffic in the presence or absence of PD 123319 (10 nM). PD 123319 did not influence Ang II-enhanced sympathetic outflow. Irbesartan dose-dependently attenuate Ang II-augmented transmitter release (pIC50 7.99+0.03), whereas no U-shaped concentration-response relationship for irbesartan was observed. Co-administration of PD 123319 with irbesartan proved unable to influence Ang II-mediated facilitation differently compared with irbesartan alone. The experimental observations indicate that the AT(2)-receptor is not involved in Ang II-mediated enhancement of sympathetic nerve traffic in the present in vitro study.

Sympatholytic properties of several AT1-receptor antagonists in the isolated rabbit thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the facilitating effect of angiotensin II on sympathetic neurotransmission to quantitatively compare the sympatho-inhibitory potencies of the selective AT1 -receptor antagonists losartan, irbesartan and telmisartan in the isolated rabbit thoracic aorta.

DESIGN

To investigate the influence of pharmacological compounds on pre-junctional sympathetic transmission, the quantification of sympathetic transmitter release is the most straightforward approach.

METHODS

To investigate the sympatholytic properties of AT1 -blockers, we studied their effects on the enhancement by angiotensin II of electrical field stimulation (EFS)-evoked (2 Hz) sympathetic transmission in a modified spillover model.

RESULTS

Angiotensin II (0.01 nmol/l-0.1 micromol/l) caused a concentration-dependent enhancement of EFS-evoked noradrenaline release (control versus concentrations 0.1 nmol/l-0.1 micromol/l, P<0.05). The maximal augmentation, by almost 100%, was observed at a concentration of 1 nmol/l (FR2/FR1, 2.03 +/- 0.11 versus control, 0.99 +/- 0.03). Higher concentrations (up to 0.1 micromol/l) produced less than maximal facilitation. The AT1 -receptor antagonists losartan (0.1 nmol/l-0.1 micromol/l), telmisartan (0.01-10 nmol/l) and irbesartan (0.1 nmol/l-0.1 micromol/l) concentration dependently attenuated the angiotensin II-mediated (1 nmol/l) enhancement of EFS-evoked sympathetic outflow. The concentrations that reduced the enhancement by 50% (IC50 values, expressed as -log mol/l +/- SEM) were 9.05 +/- 0.16 losartan, 10.28 +/- 0.20 telmisartan and 9.20 +/- 0.23 irbesartan. Accordingly, the order of potency with respect to sympatho-inhibition proved telmisartan> irbesartan = losartan (where > signifies P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The facilitating effect of angiotensin II on the sequelae of neuronal stimulation appears to be mediated by pre-synaptically located AT1 -receptors. Facilitation can be concentration dependently attenuated by AT1 -blockade. The order of potency with respect to sympatho-inhibition is telmisartan irbesartan = losartan. These differences may be explained by differences in affinity for the pre-synaptic AT1 -receptor.

Physiological and pathophysiological functions of the AT(2) subtype receptor of angiotensin II: from large arteries to the microcirculation

Angiotensin II exerts a potent role in the control of hemodynamic and renal homeostasis. Angiotensin II is also a local and biologically active mediator involved in both endothelial and smooth muscle cell function acting on 2 receptor subtypes: type 1 (AT(1)R) and type 2 (AT(2)R). Whereas the key role of AT(2)R in the development of the embryo has been extensively studied, the role of AT(2)R in the adult remains more questionable, especially in humans. In vitro studies in cultured cells and in isolated segments of aorta have shown that AT(2)R stimulation could lead to the production of vasoactive substances, among which NO is certainly the most cited, suggesting that acute AT(2)R stimulation will produce vasodilation. However, in different organs or in small arteries isolated from different type of tissues, other vasoactive substances may also mediate AT(2)R-dependent dilation. Sometimes, such as in large renal arteries, AT(2)R stimulation may lead to vasoconstriction, although it is not always seen. In isolated arteries submitted to physiological conditions of pressure and flow, AT(2)R stimulation may also have a role in shear stress-induced dilation through a endothelial production of NO. Thus, when acutely stimulated, the most probable response expected from AT(2)R stimulation will be a vasodilation. Therefore, in the perspective of a chronic AT(1)R blockade in patients, overstimulation of AT(2)R might be beneficial, given their potential vasodilator effect. Concerning the possible role of AT(2)R in cardiovascular remodeling, the situation is more controversial. In vitro AT(2)R stimulation clearly inhibits cardiac and vascular smooth muscle growth and proliferation, stimulates apoptosis, and promotes extra cellular matrix synthesis. In vivo, the situation might be less beneficial if not deleterious; indeed, if chronic AT(2)R overstimulation would lead to cardiovascular hypertrophy and fibrosis, then the long-term consequences of chronic AT(1)R blockade, and thus AT(2)R overstimulation, require more in-depth analysis.

Characterisation of a modified approach to the study of sympathetic neurotransmission and its presynaptic modulation in the isolated rabbit thoracic aorta

INTRODUCTION

The quantification of [(3)H]noradrenaline spillover from electrically stimulated, sympathetic nerves is a widely used method to study presynaptic effects of hormones, transmitters and drugs. Although a straightforward approach, the execution of the experiments is not trivial. This holds true mainly for a reliable control of the experimental conditions, a major pitfall of the commonly used superfusion setup, and problems concerning the sampling of the tritium containing probes.

METHODS

These difficulties prompted us to develop a variant of this method, which is based on a classical organ bath setup. Rabbit thoracic aortic rings were incubated with [(3)H]-labeled noradrenaline. Instead of being constantly washed away by superfusion, the [(3)H]noradrenaline is allowed to accumulate in the medium.

RESULTS

Electrical field stimulation (EFS) (2 Hz, 3 ms, 150 mA) caused a significant increase of [(3)H]noradrenaline outflow by approximately a factor 4.2 (P<.05). The fractional release of noradrenaline during consecutive periods of stimulation remained unaltered (FR(2)/FR(1) 0.99+/-0.03). The EFS-evoked release could be nearly abolished by the selective sodium channel blocker tetrodotoxin (1 microM) (FR(2)/FR(1) 0.06+/-0.03, P<.05). The N-type calcium antagonist omega-conotoxin GVIA (0.3 microM) abolished the stimulation-evoked outflow (FR(2)/FR(1) 0.01+/-0.06, P<.05), whereas the antisympathotonic agent guanethidine (10 microM) attenuated the EFS-evoked noradrenaline outflow by approximately a factor 2 (FR(2)/FR(1) 0.46+/-0.07, P<.05). Angiotensin II (0.1 and 1 nM) enhanced the EFS-evoked [(3)H]noradrenaline outflow by nearly a factor 1.5 and 2, respectively (FR(2)/FR(1) of 1.43+/-0.11 (0.1 nM) and 2.03+/-0.11 (1 nM); n=6-8, P<.05). All agents failed to influence basal outflow.

DISCUSSION

Our modified experimental approach appears to be suitable to study presynaptic influences on sympathetic transmission in the rabbit thoracic aorta. In addition to optimal control of the experimental conditions, the method offers the advantage of a safe and reliable sampling.

Differentiation in the angiotensin II receptor 1 blocker class on autonomic function

Autonomic function is disordered in cardiovascular disease states such as chronic heart failure (CHF) and hypertension. Interactions between the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) may potentially occur at a number of sites. These include central sites (eg, rostral ventrolateral medulla), at the level of baroreflex control, and at the sympathetic prejunctional angiotensin II receptor 1 (AT(1)) receptor, which is facilitatory for norepinephrine release from the sympathetic nerve terminal. Therefore, drugs that block the RAAS may be expected to improve autonomic dysfunction in cardiovascular disease states. In order to test the hypothesis that RAAS inhibition directly reduces SNS activity, a pithed rat model of sympathetic stimulation has been established. In this model, an increase in frequency of stimulation results in a pressor response that is sympathetically mediated and highly reproducible. This pressor response is enhanced in the presence of angiotensin II and is reduced in the presence of nonselective AIIRAs that block both AT(1) and AT(2) receptor subtypes (eg, saralasin). AT(1)-selective antagonists have also been studied in this model, at pharmacologically relevant doses. In one such study, only the AT(1) blocker eprosartan reduced sympathetically stimulated increases in blood pressure, whereas comparable doses of losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan did not. The reason(s) for the differences between eprosartan and other agents of this class on sympathetic modulation are not clear, but may relate to the chemical structure of the drug (a non- biphenyl tetrazole structure that is chemically distinct from the structure of other AIIRAs), receptor binding characteristics (competitive), or unique effects on presynaptic AT(1) receptors.

Effect of the AT1-receptor antagonists losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan on angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat mesenteric artery

SUMMARY

The effect of the AT1-receptor antagonists losartan, irbesartan, and telmisartan on angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced facilitation of noradrenergic neurotransmission was investigated in the isolated rat mesenteric artery under isometric conditions. Electrical field stimulation (2, 4, and 8 Hz) caused a frequency-dependent increase of contractile force. At stimulation frequencies of 2, 4, and 8 Hz, Ang 11 (10 nM) increased the stimulation-induced vasoconstrictor responses by a factor 4.8 +/- 0.9, 2.9 +/- 0.7, and 1.3 +/- 0.1, respectively (p < 0.05 compared with control for all frequencies). The enhancement could be concentration-dependently antagonized by losartan (1 nM-1 microM), irbesartan (0.1 nM-0.1 microM), and telmisartan (0.01 nM-0.01 microM). At a stimulation frequency of 2 Hz, the relation between stimulation-induced vasoconstrictor responses (in presence of Ang II 10 nM) and the concentration of the AT1-antagonists used could be described by linear regression. The order of potency concerning sympathoinhibition was telmisartan > irbesartan > losartan (p < 0.05 between linear regression lines). Contractile responses to exogenous noradrenaline were unaltered in the presence of Ang II 10 nM. We conclude that the facilitating effect of Ang II on noradrenergic neurotransmission is mediated by presynaptically located AT1-receptors. Conversely, this facilitating effect can be dose-dependently counteracted by blockade of these receptors. Sympathoinhibitory properties are likely to contribute to the therapeutic effect of AT1-blockers, in particular in conditions in which the sympathetic nervous system is activated, such as congestive heart failure and hypertension.

Inhibition of angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission in the pithed rat: a comparison between losartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, and captopril

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have shown that angiotensin II enhances sympathetic nervous transmission. The objective of the present study was to quantify the inhibitory effect of the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers losartan, irbesartan and telmisartan and the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril on sympathetic neurotransmission and to compare the potency of these agents both at the presynaptic and the postsynaptic levels.

DESIGN

In the male, normotensive pithed rat model, we studied the effect of losartan (1, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg), irbesartan (3, 10, 30 and 60 mg/kg), telmisartan (0.3, 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) and captopril (1.5, 5, 15 and 45 mg/kg) on electrical stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord. To investigate the interaction between postsynaptic AT1-receptors and alpha-adrenoceptors, the effects of these compounds on pressor responses to exogenous noradrenaline were studied.

RESULTS

Stimulation of the thoracolumbar spinal cord caused a stimulation-frequency dependent rise in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) that could be dose-dependently reduced by both AT1 receptor blockade and ACE inhibition. Interestingly, the highest doses of the AT1 antagonists caused less than maximal reduction in the rise in DBP. This phenomenon was not observed after ACE inhibition by captopril. In experiments with exogenous noradrenaline, no effect of AT1 blockade or ACE inhibition on alpha-adrenoceptor-mediated blood pressure responses was seen.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that, in the pithed rat model, the effects of stimulation of the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord on DBP are counteracted by blockade of presynaptically located AT1 receptors. The order of potency concerning sympatico-inhibition is telmisartan > losartan > irbesartan. Regarding the inhibition of angiotensin II-induced facilitation of sympathetic neurotransmission, marked differences were observed between selective AT1 blockade and ACE inhibition. The finding that all three AT1 blockers cause less than maximal inhibition in their highest doses, as opposed to captopril, suggests that this is a class effect of the AT1 antagonists.

Angiotensin II receptor subtype gene expression and cellular localization in the retina and non-neuronal ocular tissues of the rat

In addition to its function as a peripheral hormone, angiotensin II (AngII) has been shown to act as a neuromodulator in various brain regions. AngII effects are mediated by two major AngII receptor subtypes, AT1 and AT2, and different AT1 receptor isoforms AT1A and AT1B are described in rat brains. The purpose of the present study was to analyse the expression pattern of AT receptors in different parts of the rat eye with special emphasis on the retina. Specific primers were constructed and the gene expression of AngII receptor subtypes was investigated by means of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). An antibody was used for cellular localization of AT1 receptor in the retina. AT2 receptor mRNA was localized by in situ hybridization (ISH). We examined the retinas of different developmental stages as well as non-neuronal ocular tissues, e.g. choroid and anterior uveal tract of rats (Brown Norway and Wistar strain), for the gene expression of AT receptors. Our results show that AT1A and AT2 mRNAs are expressed in rat choroid, iris/ciliary body and retinas, whereas AT1B mRNA is not expressed in the retina but in all other ocular tissues under investigation. AT1 receptor immunohistochemistry of the retina showed strong labelling in the ganglion cell layer (GCL), and some cells in the inner nuclear layer (INL), suggesting putative ganglion cell but also amacrine cell labelling. In the retina, ISH for AT2 mRNA revealed labelling in the GCL and a faint labelling in the inner nuclear layer. No AT2 ISH-signal was found in the other ocular tissues. These data suggest that there is a specific distribution pattern of AT receptors in rat ocular tissues, especially in the retina. The expression of AT receptors on retinal ganglion cells confirms the AngII action on these cell types and supports the role of AngII as a retinal neurotransmitter or neuromodulator.

Prejunctional angiotensin receptors involved in the facilitation of noradrenaline release in mouse tissues

The effect of angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) on the electrically induced release of noradrenaline was studied in preparations of mouse atria, spleen, hippocampus, occipito-parietal cortex and hypothalamus preincubated with [3H]-noradrenaline. The prejunctional angiotensin receptor type was investigated using the non-selective receptor antagonist saralasin (AT1/AT2) and the AT1 and AT2 selective receptor antagonists losartan and PD 123319, respectively. In atrial and splenic preparations, angiotensin II (0.01 nM-0.1 microM) and angiotensin III (0.01 and 0.1 nM-1 microM) increased the stimulation-induced overflow of tritium in a concentration-dependent manner. Angiotensin IV, only at high concentrations (1 and 10 pM), enhanced tritium overflow in the atria, while angiotensin-(1-7) (0.1 nM-10 microM) was without effect in both preparations. In preparations of hippocampus, occipito-parietal cortex and hypothalamus, none of the angiotensin peptides altered the evoked overflow of tritium. In atrial and splenic preparations, saralasin (0.1 microM) and losartan (0.1 and 1 microM), but not PD 123319 (0.1 microM), shifted the concentration-response curves of angiotensin II and angiotensin III to the right. In conclusion, in mouse atria and spleen, angiotensin II and angiotensin III facilitate the action potential induced release of noradrenaline via a prejunctional AT1 receptor. Only high concentrations of angiotensin IV are effective in the atria and angiotensin-(1-7) is without effect in both preparations. In mouse brain areas, angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) do not modulate the release of noradrenaline.

Regulation of jejunal sodium and water absorption by angiotensin subtype receptors

The purpose of this study was to determine the precise role of angiotensin subtype-1 (AT1) and -2 (AT2) receptors and the mechanisms by which they act to alter fluid transport in the rat jejunum. In rats on normal sodium intake, ANG II at low dose stimulated net jejunal fluid absorption, whereas at a high dose the peptide inhibited absorption. Low-dose ANG II-stimulated fluid absorption was blocked completely by the specific AT2 receptor antagonist PD-123319 (PD) but was unchanged by the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan (Los). The AT2 receptor agonist CGP-42112A, caused an inversely dose-dependent increase in fluid absorption, which also was totally prevented by PD but was unaltered by Los. Conversely, high-dose ANG II inhibition of absorption was blocked by Los but not by PD. In animals receiving normal sodium intake, neither Los nor PD alone altered fluid absorption. In sodium-restricted animals, however, Los alone increased absorption and PD alone inhibited absorption. In rats on normal sodium intake, low-dose ANG II increased jejunal interstitial and luminal (loop) fluid concentrations of cGMP. These increases in cGMP were blocked with PD but not with Los. 8-Bromoguanosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphate administered via the mesenteric artery or the submucosal interstitial space markedly increased absorption, but it inhibited absorption when administered into the loop. High-dose ANG II decreased jejunal interstitial and loop fluid cAMP and increased PGE2. The increase in PGE2 was blocked by Los but not by PD. The data demonstrate that ANG II mediates jejunal sodium and water absorption by an action at the AT2 receptor involving cGMP formation. The data also show that ANG II inhibits absorption via the AT1 receptor by a mechanism that is both negatively coupled to cAMP and increases jejunal PGE2 production.

Different receptors for angiotensin II at pre- and postjunctional level of the canine mesenteric and pulmonary arteries

1. This investigation was undertaken to compare pre- and postjunctional receptors involved in the responses of the canine mesenteric and pulmonary arteries to angiotensin II. 2. In the mesenteric artery, angiotensin II caused an enhancement of tritium overflow evoked by electrical stimulation (EC30% = 5 nM), the maximal effect representing an increase by about 45%. Postjunctionally, angiotensin II caused concentration-dependent contractions (pD2 = 8.57). Saralasin antagonized both pre- and postjunctional effects of angiotensin II, but it was more potent at post- than at prejunctional level (pA2 of 9.51 and 8.15, respectively), while losartan antagonized exclusively the postjunctional effects of angiotensin II (pA = 8.15). PD123319 had no antagonist effect either pre- or postjunctionally. 3. In the pulmonary artery, angiotensin II also caused an enhancement of the electrically-evoked tritium overflow (EC30% = 1.54 nM), its maximal effect increasing tritium overflow by about 80%. Postjunctionally, angiotensin II caused contractile responses (pD2 = 8.52). As in the mesenteric artery, saralasin antagonized angiotensin II effects at both pre- and postjunctional level and it was more potent postjunctionally (pA2 of 9.58 and 8.10, respectively). Losartan antagonized only the postjunctional effects of angiotensin II (pA2 = 7.96) and PD123319 was ineffective. 4. It is concluded that in both vessels: (1) pre- and postjunctional receptors belong to a different subtype, since they are differently antagonized by the same antagonists; (2) postjunctional receptors belong to AT1 subtype, since they are blocked by losartan but not by AT2 antagonists; (3) prejunctional receptors apparently belong to neither AT1 or AT2 subtype since they are blocked by neither AT1 nor AT2 antagonists.

Effect of angiotensin II receptor blockade on the interaction between enalaprilat and doxazosin in rat tail arteries

1. Previous work has shown that enalaprilat, an inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), potentiated the actions of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists; it was hypothesized that angiotensin II (AngII) modulated the activity of alpha 1-adrenoceptors. This hypothesis was tested in Sprague-Dawley rat isolated perfused tail arteries using the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319. 2. Losartan had no alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist effects at concentrations below 1 mumol/L. Similarly, losartan (0.1 mumol/L) had no effect on the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist action of doxazosin (1, 10 nmol/L) nor on the potentiation of doxazosin by enalaprilat (1 mumol/L). 3. PD123319 (0.1 mumol/L) had no alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist effect but altered the mode of action of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist doxazosin: PD123319 changed doxazosin from a competitive to a non-competitive antagonist, as evidenced by the reduced slope of the dose-response curve for the alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. 4. These results suggest that AngII can modulate alpha 1-adrenoceptor function in rat tail arteries via an indirect action at AT2 receptors. However, the present results do not rule out the involvement of bradykinin, endothelin or prostaglandin in the modulation of alpha 1-adrenoceptor function by angiotensin II.

Direct evidence for an angiotensin AT1 receptor type in rat vas deferens

Physiological experiments suggest that the angiotensin AT1 receptor type predominates in rat vas deferens. Membrane binding experiments, using 125I-[Sarl,Ile8]angiotensin II, confirm the presence of angiotensin AT1 receptors and the absence of angiotensin AT2 receptors in this tissue. Angiotensin II and the angiotensin AT1 receptor-specific antagonist, losartan, bind to rat vas deferens membranes with comparable affinity, with KD equal to 22.7 and 34.1 nM, respectively. The affinities of angiotensin AT2 receptor-specific ligands are 3 orders of magnitude lower. According to the numbers of binding sites and Western blotting of membrane proteins, the concentration of angiotensin AT1 receptors in the rat vas deferens is rather low. The fact that similar numbers of binding sites were obtained from binding data for angiotensin II and losartan further supports the hypothesis of exclusive existence of angiotensin AT1 receptor type in rat vas deferens.

Enhancement by exogenous and locally generated angiotensin II of purinergic neurotransmission via angiotensin type 1 receptor in the guinea-pig isolated mesenteric artery

1. Angiotensin II is known to enhance sympathetic neurotransmission in the vasculature by increasing the release of noradrenaline, but little is known about the effect on the co-released transmitter, adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP). In the present study we have examined the effect of angiotensin II on the excitatory junction potential (e.j.p.) elicited by repetitive field stimulation in the guinea-pig isolated mesenteric artery, to establish the angiotensin II receptor subtype involved in modulating the release of ATP and the role of the endothelium in converting angiotensin I to angiotensin II. 2. Suramin (300 microM), a P2 purinoceptor antagonist, abolished both the e.j.p.s and depolarizing response to alpha,beta-methylene-ATP, a stable analogue of ATP, without affecting the resting membrane potential and noradrenaline-induced depolarization. 3. Angiotensin II (0.1 microM) affected neither the resting membrane potential nor the amplitude of the first e.j.p., but increased the amplitudes of the subsequent e.j.p.s. This enhancing effect of angiotensin II was abolished by CV-11974 (0.1 microM), an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, but unaffected by PD 123319 (1 microM), an angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor antagonist, or CGP 42112A (1 microM), AT2 receptor ligand. 4. Angiotensin I (0.1 microM) exerted a similar effect on e.j.p.s to that of angiotensin II. CV-11974 (0.1 microM) or temocaprilat (10 microM), an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, abolished the effect of angiotensin I. Removal of the endothelium did not alter the action of angiotensin I. 5. The results of the present study indicate that the release of ATP from sympathetic nerves innervating the guinea-pig isolated mesenteric artery, as determined from the magnitude of the e.j.p., can be enhanced by angiotensin II via activation of prejunctional AT1 receptors. Qualitatively similar effects were observed with angiotensin I, which appears to be converted into angiotensin II by a subendothelial process.

Multiple prejunctional actions of angiotensin II on noradrenergic transmission in the caudal artery of the rat

1. Angiotensin II produced concentration-dependent enhancement of both stimulation-induced (S-I) efflux of [3H]-noradrenaline and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses in isolated preparations of rat caudal artery in which the noradrenergic transmitter stores had been labelled with [3H]-noradrenaline. The threshold concentrations of angiotensin II for enhancement of S-I efflux (between 0.03 and 0.1 microM) and of the stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses (about 0.3 microM) were 10-1000 times higher than those that have been found for several other vascular preparations. 2. The AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (0.01 and 0.1 microM), reduced or abolished the enhancement of S-I efflux by 1 and 3 microM angiotensin II and the enhancement of vasoconstrictor responses by 1 microM angiotensin II. Surprisingly, the combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced S-I efflux to a much greater extent than did 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone. Moreover, the combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses, in contrast to the lack of effect of 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone. 3. In a concentration of 0.01 microM, the angiotensin II AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 did not affect the enhancement of either S-I efflux or vasoconstrictor responses by angiotensin II. However, in a higher concentration (0.1 microM), PD 123319 antagonized the enhancement of both the S-I efflux and vasoconstrictor responses by angiotensin II. 4. In concentrations of 0.01 and 0.1 microM, PD 123319 prevented the marked enhancement of both S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses produced by the combination of 0.1 microM angiotensin II and 0.01 microM losartan. 5. The potentiation by losartan (0.01 microM) of the facilitatory effect of 0.1 microM angiotensin II on S-I efflux and on stimulation-evoked vasoconstriction was still observed in the presence of either the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin (3 microM), or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 100 microM). 6. The findings confirm our previous suggestion that, in the rat caudal artery, angiotensin II receptors similar to the AT1B subtype subserve enhancement of transmitter noradrenaline release. 7. The synergistic prejunctional interaction of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II may be due to either the unmasking by losartan of a latent population of angiotensin II receptors also subserving facilitation of transmitter noradrenaline release, or alternatively, losartan may block an inhibitory action of angiotensin II on transmitter noradrenaline release which normally opposes its facilitatory effect.

Angiotensin II receptors involved in the enhancement of noradrenergic transmission in the caudal artery of the spontaneously hypertensive rat

1. The effects of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan and the AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319, on actions of angiotensin II in isolated caudal arteries of spontaneously hypertensive (SH) and age-matched normotensive (Wistar-Kyoto) rats were compared. 2. Angiotensin II (0.1-3 microM) produced concentration-dependent increases in perfusion pressure in artery preparations from both SH and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats, the maximal increase in the SH rat being significantly greater than the increase in WKY rats. The increase in perfusion pressure in preparations from both strains of rats was prevented by losartan (0.1 microM) and unaffected by PD 123319 (0.1 microM), indicating that the vasoconstrictor action of angiotensin II is subserved by AT1 receptors. 3. Angiotensin II (0.1-3 microM) produced concentration-dependent enhancement of both stimulation-induced (S-I) efflux of [3H]-noradrenaline and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses in isolated preparations of caudal artery from both SH and WKY rats, in which the noradrenergic transmitter stores had been labelled with [3H]-noradrenaline. The maximum enhancement of S-I efflux produced by angiotensin II (1 microM) was significantly greater in artery preparations from WKY rats than in preparations from SH rats, whereas the maximum enhancement of stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses was greater in preparations from SH rats than in those from WKY rats. 4. In artery preparations from both WKY and SH rats, the AT1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist, losartan (0.01 and 0.1 microM), reduced or abolished the enhancement of both S-I efflux and vasoconstrictor responses by 1 microM angiotensin II. 5. The combination of 0.01 microM losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II enhanced both the S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor response in caudal artery preparations from WKY rats, whereas 0.1 microM angiotensin alone was ineffective. The AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123319 (0.01 and 0.1 microM) prevented the enhancement of both S-I efflux and stimulation-evoked vasoconstrictor responses by the combination of angiotensin II and losartan. 6. In contrast to findings in WKY preparations and those previously obtained for arteries from another normotensive strain (Sprague-Dawley), in artery preparations from SH rats there was no synergistic interaction between losartan and angiotensin II. Rather, combinations of 0.1 microM angiotensin II and PD 123319 (both 0.01 and 0.1 microM) enhanced S-I [3H]-noradrenaline efflux, whereas 0.1 microM angiotensin II alone was without effect. Moreover, losartan (0.1 microM) prevented the enhancement of S-I efflux by the combination of angiotensin II and PD 123319. 7. The present findings indicate that in the caudal artery of WKY and SH rats, and as previously found in Sprague-Dawley preparations, angiotensin II receptors similar to the AT1B subtype subserve enhancement of transmitter noradrenaline release. 8. As previously suggested for Sprague-Dawley caudal artery preparations, the synergistic prejunctional interaction of losartan and 0.1 microM angiotensin II in caudal artery preparations from WKY rats may be due to either the unmasking by losartan of a latent population of angiotensin II receptors subserving facilitation of transmitter noradrenaline release, or blockade by losartan of an inhibitory action of angiotensin II on transmitter release. 9. The synergistic interaction of PD 123319 and 0.1 microM angiotensin II in caudal arteries of SH rats may also be explained by either of the mechanisms proposed for the normotensive strains, but the involvement of different receptor subtypes would need to be postulated for each of the proposed mechanisms.