Comparative effects of angiotensin II and its degradation products angiotensin III and angiotensin IV in rat aorta

The Fate of Angiotensin II in Placental Tissue and Blood

The existence of a non-canonical pathway of renin-angiotensin system in the blood pressure control system has been highlighted over the past three decades. The enzymes involved in this pathway include a series of angiotensinases such as neprilysin (NEP), aminopeptidase A (APA), carboxypeptidase, and angiotensin converting enzyme 2. The physiological roles of these peptidases have been reconsidered in this study, based on the publications of other research groups and the results from our previous study, regarding the liberation of constituent amino acids from angiotensin II by placenta tissue and blood serum, respectively.

Label-free cell signaling pathway deconvolution of angiotensin type 1 receptor reveals time-resolved G-protein activity and distinct AngII and AngIIIIV responses

Angiotensin II (AngII) type 1 receptor (AT₁R) is a G protein-coupled receptor known for its role in numerous physiological processes and its implication in many vascular diseases. Its functions are mediated through G protein dependent and independent signaling pathways. AT₁R has several endogenous peptidic agonists, all derived from angiotensinogen, as well as several synthetic ligands known to elicit biased signaling responses. Here, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used as a cell-based and label-free technique to quantify, in real time, the response of HEK293 cells stably expressing the human AT₁R. The goal was to take advantage of the integrative nature of this assay to identify specific signaling pathways in the features of the response profiles generated by numerous endogenous and synthetic ligands of AT₁R. First, we assessed the contributions of Gq, G12/13, Gi, Gβγ, ERK1/2 and β-arrestins pathways in the cellular responses measured by SPR where Gq, G12/Rho/ROCK together with β-arrestins and ERK1/2 were found to play significant roles. More specifically, we established a major role for G12 in the early events of the AT₁R-dependent response, which was followed by a robust ERK1/2 component associated to the later phase of the signal. Interestingly, endogenous AT₁R ligands (AngII, AngIII and AngIV) exhibited distinct responses signatures with a significant increase of the ERK1/2-like components for both AngIII and AngIV, which points toward possibly distinct physiological roles for the later. We also tested AT₁R biased ligands, all of which affected both the early and later events. Our results support SPR-based integrative cellular assays as a powerful approach to delineate the contribution of specific signaling pathways for a given cell response and reveal response differences associated with ligands with distinct pharmacological properties.

Accurate quantification of impurities in pure peptide material - angiotensin I: Comparison of calibration requirements and method performance characteristics of liquid chromatography coupled to hybrid tandem mass spectrometry and linear ion trap high-resolution mass spectrometry

RATIONALE

The prohormone angiotensin I (ANG I) [amino acid sequence: DRVYIHPFHL] and other structurally related peptide hormones play an essential role in the regulation of the water and electrolyte balance in the human body as well as blood pressure. ANG I is a biomarker for hypertension and diabetes. Therefore, well-characterized pure reference materials and comparable and SI-traceable analytical characterization methods are required to establish reference measurement systems (RMS) for laboratory medicine.

METHODS

Two analytical characterization methods based on liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) systems with electrospray ionization have been developed and validated in-house. Both high-resolution MS (hrMS) and hybrid-tandem MS/MS were used for the identification and quantification of the major structurally related peptide impurities of ANG I. The impurities were quantified by use of external calibrations with original impurity standards. Mass fraction impurity values and corresponding expanded measurement uncertainties were calculated.

RESULTS

Five structurally related degradation products were detected as major impurities in a 'pure' ANG I material. The peptides ANG (2-10) [RVYIHPFHL], ANG II [DRVYIHPF] and three ANG I isomers [DRVYLHPFHL, DRVYIHPFHI and DRVYLHPFHI] were identified and corresponding mass fraction values calculated that range from 0.66 to 4.86 mg/g.

CONCLUSIONS

The mass fraction values for the major related peptide impurities in the ANG I material obtained with both LC/hrMS and LC/MS/MS systems are in excellent agreement. This study emphasizes the importance of mass spectrometric techniques for application to mass balance approaches for mass fraction value and uncertainty assignment of impurities in 'pure' substance reference materials for peptides.

Croton schiedeanus Schltd prevents experimental hypertension in rats induced by nitric oxide deficit

Croton schiedeanus Schltd (N.V.: "almizclillo") is a plant used in traditional medicine as an antihypertensive in Colombia. It contains flavonoid, diterpenoid and fenilbutanoid metabolites that have vasodilatation effects linked to the NO/cGMP pathway. This work aimed to assess the capacity of a 96% EtOH extract to prevent the hypertension induced by nitric oxide (NO) deficiency in rats. The NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME (10 mg/kg/d, i.p) was administered during five weeks to three groups of rats (6-7 animals): C. Schiedeanus (200 mg/kg/d, p.o), enalapril (reference, 10 mg/kg/d, p.o) and vehicle (control: olive oil 1 ml/kg/d, p.o). In addition, the blank group received only vehicle. The arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were measured daily for six weeks. After sacrificing the animals, the aortic rings were isolated, contraction was triggered with phenylephrine (PE 10-6 M) and relaxant responses were achieved with cumulative concentrations of acetylcholine (ACh, 10-10 - 10-4 M). L-NAME increased the systolic arterial pressure in the control group, attaining mean values of 131 mm Hg at week 5, whereas the C. schiedeanus, enalapril and blank groups maintained blood pressure under 100 mm Hg. The capacity of PE to contract aortic rings was greater in the C. schiedeanus, enalapril and blank groups than in the control group (2157, 2005, 1910 and 1646 mg, respectively). The pEC50 values for ACh were as follows: C. Schiedeanus (6.89) >enalapril (6.39) > blank (5.68) > control (5.09). These results give support to C. Schiedeanus as a natural antihypertensive source.

Angiotensin II and III metabolism and effects on steroid production in the HAC15 human adrenocortical cell line

Aldosterone is synthesized in the zona glomerulosa of the adrenal cortex under primary regulation by the renin-angiotensin system. Angiotensin II (A-II) acts through the angiotensin types 1 and 2 receptors (AT1R and AT2R). A-II is metabolized in different tissues by various enzymes to generate two heptapeptides A-III and angiotensin 1-7, which can then be catabolized into smaller peptides. A-II was more potent than A-III in stimulating aldosterone secretion in the adrenocortical cell line HAC15, and A-II, but not A-III, stimulated cortisol secretion. A-II stimulated mRNA expression of steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, CYP11B1, and CYP11B2, whereas A-III stimulated 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, CYP11B1, and CYP11B2 but decreased the expression of CYP17A1 required for cortisol synthesis. The stimulation of aldosterone secretion by A-II and A-III was blocked by the AT1R receptor blocker, losartan, but not by an AT2R blocker. A-II was rapidly metabolized by the HAC15 cells to mainly to angiotensin 1-7, but not to A-III, and disappeared from the supernatant within 6 h. A-III was metabolized rapidly and disappeared within 1 h. In conclusion, A-II was not converted to A-III in the HAC15 cell and is the more potent stimulator of aldosterone secretion and cortisol of the two. A-III stimulated aldosterone secretion but not cortisol secretion.

Angiotensin IV protects against angiotensin II-induced cardiac injury via AT4 receptor

Angiotensin II (Ang II) is an important regulator of cardiac function and injury in hypertension. The novel Ang IV peptide/AT4 receptor system has been implicated in several physiological functions and has some effects opposite to those of Ang II. However, little is known about the role of this system in Ang II-induced cardiac injury. Here we studied the effect of Ang IV on Ang II-induced cardiac dysfunction and injury using isolated rat hearts, neonatal cardiomyocytes and cardiac fibroblasts. We found that Ang IV significantly improved Ang II-induced cardiac dysfunction and injury in the isolated heart in response to ischemia/reperfusion (I/R). Moreover, Ang IV inhibited Ang II-induced cardiac cell apoptosis, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and proliferation and collagen synthesis of cardiac fibroblasts; these effects were mediated through the AT4 receptor as confirmed by siRNA knockdown. These findings suggest that Ang IV may have a protective effect on Ang II-induced cardiac injury and dysfunction and may be a novel therapeutic target for hypertensive heart disease.

Lack of heterologous receptor desensitization induced by angiotensin II type 1 receptor activation in isolated normal rat thoracic aorta

We tested whether heterologous receptor desensitization induced by activation of AT1 receptors may explain the purported relaxation produced by angiotensin II in normal rat aorta. Also, the role for AT2 receptors in the promotion of vasodilation was studied. In endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded aortic rings, angiotensin II elicited biphasic contractions, which were significantly depressed when repeated in each tissue. Angiotensin II produced biphasic responses on phenylephrine preconstricted endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded tissues, without reducing precontractile tone. These responses were abolished in the presence of the AT1 receptor antagonist losartan, but no relaxing responses to angiotensin II were uncovered. PD123319 did not influence angiotensin II responses in endothelium-intact tissues precontracted with phenylephrine; thus, under AT2 receptors blockade the contractile effects of angiotensin II were not overexposed. In conclusion, angiotensin II-induced biphasic responses can be attributed to AT1 receptors activation and rapid desensitization with time. Desensitization proved to be homologous in nature, since precontractile tone induced by phenylephrine was not depressed by angiotensin II (i.e., angiotensin II did not induce heterologous α1-adrenergic receptors desensitization). We found no functional evidence of the participation of AT2 receptors in angiotensin II elicited biphasic contractions. Angiotensin II does not exert relaxant effects in normal rat aorta.

Effects of angiotensin II and its metabolites in the rat coronary vascular bed: is angiotensin III the preferred ligand of the angiotensin AT2 receptor?

Aminopeptidases metabolize angiotensin II to angiotensin-(2-8) (=angiotensin III) and angiotensin-(3-8) (=angiotensin IV), and carboxypeptidases generate angiotensin-(1-7) from angiotensin I and II. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers affect the concentrations of these metabolites, and they may thus contribute to the beneficial effects of these drugs, possibly through stimulation of non-classical angiotensin AT receptors. Here, we investigated the effects of angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) in the rat coronary vascular bed, with or without angiotensin AT1 - or angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor blockade. Results were compared to those in rat iliac arteries and abdominal aortas. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV constricted coronary arteries via angiotensin AT1 receptor stimulation, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV being approximately 20- and approximately 8000-fold less potent than angiotensin II. The angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 greatly enhanced the constrictor effects of angiotensin III, starting at angiotensin III concentrations in the low nanomolar range. PD123319 enhanced the angiotensin II-induced constriction at submicromolar angiotensin II concentrations only. Angiotensin-(1-7) exerted no effects in the coronary circulation, although, at micromolar concentrations, it blocked angiotensin AT1 receptor-induced constriction. Angiotensin AT2 receptor-mediated relaxation did not occur in iliac arteries and abdominal aortas, and the constrictor effects of the angiotensin metabolites in these vessels were identical to those in the coronary vascular bed. In conclusion, angiotensin AT2 receptor activation in the rat coronary vascular bed results in vasodilation, and angiotensin III rather than angiotensin II is the preferred endogenous agonist of these receptors. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) do not exert effects through non-classical angiotensin AT receptors in the rat coronary vascular bed, iliac artery or aorta.

Angiotensin II activates plasminogen activator inhibitor-I promoter in renal tubular epithelial cells via the AT1receptor

BACKGROUND

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) regulates normal extracellular matrix (ECM) metabolism and it is a key regulator of the fibrotic process. Both angiotensin II (Ang II) and angiotensin IV (Ang IV) have been reported to stimulate PAI-1 expression. It is not known how PAI-1 expression is regulated by the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in renal tubular cells.

METHODS

To dissect signaling mechanisms contributing to the up-regulation of the PAI-1 promoter, porcine proximal tubular cells stably expressing the rabbit AT1 receptor (LLC-PK/AT1) were transiently transfected with a luciferase reporter construct containing the PAI-1 promoter. Promoter activation was assessed by measuring luciferase activity from cell lysates.

RESULTS

Ang II dose-dependently stimulated the transcriptional activity of the PAI-1 promoter in renal proximal tubular cells whereas Ang IV had no consistent effect on the promoter activity. Neither inhibition of the Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase (ERK) cascade nor inhibition of the c-Jun-N-terminal Kinase (JNK) pathway did reduce the stimulation of the PAI-1 promoter by Ang II. However, genistein, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocked the effect of Ang II.

CONCLUSION

Ang II but not Ang IV activates the PAI-1 promoter in renal proximal tubular cells and this effect is mediated by tyrosine kinases.

Interaction of Endothelial Nitric Oxide and Angiotensin in the Circulation

Discovery of the unexpected intercellular messenger and transmitter nitric oxide (NO) was the highlight of highly competitive investigations to identify the nature of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. This labile, gaseous molecule plays obligatory roles as one of the most promising physiological regulators in cardiovascular function. Its biological effects include vasodilatation, increased regional blood perfusion, lowering of systemic blood pressure, and antithrombosis and anti-atherosclerosis effects, which counteract the vascular actions of endogenous angiotensin (ANG) II. Interactions of these vasodilator and vasoconstrictor substances in the circulation have been a topic that has drawn the special interest of both cardiovascular researchers and clinicians. Therapeutic agents that inhibit the synthesis and action of ANG II are widely accepted to be essential in treating circulatory and metabolic dysfunctions, including hypertension and diabetes mellitus, and increased availability of NO is one of the most important pharmacological mechanisms underlying their beneficial actions. ANG II provokes vascular actions through various receptor subtypes (AT1, AT2, and AT4), which are differently involved in NO synthesis and actions. ANG II and its derivatives, ANG III, ANG IV, and ANG-(1-7), alter vascular contractility with different mechanisms of action in relation to NO. This review article summarizes information concerning advances in research on interactions between NO and ANG in reference to ANG receptor subtypes, radical oxygen species, particularly superoxide anions, ANG-converting enzyme inhibitors, and ANG receptor blockers in patients with cardiovascular disease, healthy individuals, and experimental animals. Interactions of ANG and endothelium-derived relaxing factor other than NO, such as prostaglandin I2 and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, are also described.

Discovery of a Dual-Function Peptide That Combines Aminopeptidase N Inhibition and Kinin B1Receptor Antagonism

Previous analyses support that aminopeptidase N is a major inactivation pathway for high-affinity peptide ligands of the human and rabbit forms of the kinin B(1) receptor (agonists or antagonists). In this study, we found that the high-affinity antagonist B-9958 (Lys-Lys-[Hyp(3), CpG(5), D-Tic(7), CpG(8)]des-Arg(9)-BK; des-Arg(9)-BK, des-arginine(9)-bradykinin) is an aminopeptidase N substrate based on its capacity to compete for the hydrolysis of the chromogenic substrate L-Ala-p-nitroanilide by membranes isolated from human or rabbit arterial smooth muscle cells, its inactivation in the presence of these membranes (radioreceptor assay) and on its intense potentiation by the aminopeptidase N inhibitor amastatin in the rabbit aorta contractility assay (gain of 0.84 units in the pA(2) scale). Analogs of B-9958 in which the N-terminal Lys residue was substituted by D-Lys or D-Arg (B-10352 and B-10356, respectively) showed reduced affinity at the human or rabbit B(1) receptors (1.2-2.8-fold), as estimated by the displacement of [(3)H]Lys-des-Arg(9)-BK binding, but were more potent antagonists of des-Arg(9)-BK-induced contraction of the rabbit aorta than B-9958 in the absence of amastatin; they were not potentiated by the latter inhibitor. Unexpectedly, B-10356 inhibited L-Ala- p-nitroanilide hydrolysis without being inactivated, suggesting that it is an aminopeptidase N inhibitor. This was verified because B-10356 (but not B-10352) potentiated peptides unrelated to kinins but susceptible to aminopeptidase N inactivation (angiotensin III, thrombin receptor hexapeptide agonist). B-10356 inhibits dual molecular targets (aminopeptidase N enzyme K(i), 0.9-2.2 microM; kinin B(1) receptor binding K(i), 0.5-1.5 nM), and this may be an advantage for specific therapeutic applications (e.g., inhibition of angiogenesis).

Comparison of effects of angiotensin peptides in the regulation of clitoral cavernosum smooth muscle tone

The isometric tension measurement and in vitro autoradiography were used in clitoral cavernosum smooth muscle (CSM). Angiotensin ANG III, ANG IV, ANG II and ANG I induced contractions in clitoral CSM strips. ANG III and ANG I- induced contraction was five times less active than ANG II, whereas ANG IV-induced contraction was 1181-fold less potent than ANG II. Contractile responses to ANG III, ANG IV, ANG II and ANG I were significantly inhibited by type 1 ANG II (AT 1) receptor antagonist Dup 753 but not by type 2 ANG II (AT2) receptor antagonist PD 123,319. Pre-treatment with Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor accentuated force of contraction induced by ANG III, ANG IV and ANG II. Amastatin, an aminopeptidase inhibitor enhanced ANG III- and ANG IV-induced contractions. Specific binding sites for 125I-ANG II were found in the clitoral CSM. Specific binding of 125I-ANG II was displaced by unlabeled ANG peptides. This study suggests that the contractile responses to all four peptides of the ANG family are mediated via AT1 receptors but not AT2 receptors. Further, the rank order of potency of contraction was as follows, ANG II> ANG I>ANG III>ANG IV. It is also suggested that peptides of the ANG family have a cross-talk with the NO system and aminopeptidase is involved in the modulation of the tone of clitoral CSM by ANG III and ANG IV.

Vasoconstriction is determined by interstitial rather than circulating angiotensin II

1. We investigated why angiotensin (Ang) I and II induce vasoconstriction with similar potencies, although Ang I-II conversion is limited. 2. Construction of concentration-response curves to Ang I and II in porcine femoral arteries, in the absence or presence of the AT(1) or AT(2) receptor antagonists irbesartan and PD123319, revealed that the approximately 2 fold difference in potency between Ang I and II was not due to stimulation of different AT receptor populations by exogenous and locally generated Ang II. 3. Measurement of Ang I and II and their metabolites at the time of vasoconstriction confirmed that, at equimolar application of Ang I and II, bath fluid Ang II during Ang I was approximately 18 times lower than during Ang II and that Ang II was by far the most important metabolite of Ang I. Tissue Ang II was 2.9+/-1.5% and 12.2+/-2.4% of the corresponding Ang I and II bath fluid levels, and was not affected by irbesartan or PD123319, suggesting that it was located extracellularly. 4. Since approximately 15% of tissue weight consists of interstitial fluid, it can be calculated that interstitial Ang II levels during Ang II resemble bath fluid Ang II levels, whereas during Ang I they are 8.8 - 27 fold higher. Consequently at equimolar application of Ang I and II, the interstitial Ang II levels differ only 2 - 4 fold. 5. Interstitial, rather than circulating Ang II determines vasoconstriction. Arterial Ang I, resulting in high interstitial Ang II levels via its local conversion by ACE, may be of greater physiological importance than arterial Ang II.

Contractile effects of angiotensin peptides in rat aorta are differentially dependent on tyrosine kinase activity

It has been suggested that tyrosine kinase activity participates in the regulation of signal transduction associated with angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced pharmaco-mechanical coupling in rat aortic smooth muscle. We further tested the effects of genistein, a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, and its inactive analogue, daidzein, on angiotensin I (Ang I), angiotensin III (Ang III) and angiotensin IV (Ang IV) contractions, as compared with those on Ang II. Genistein partially inhibited Ang II- and Ang I-induced contractions. The genistein-induced inhibition was more evident on Ang III and especially important on Ang IV contractile effects. Thus, Ang IV- and Ang III-induced contractions seem to be more dependent on tyrosine kinase activity than those evoked by Ang II or Ang I. Daidzein did not significantly affect the contractile effects of any of angiotensin peptides tested. These results clearly suggest that the inhibition of the action of angiotensin peptides actions by genistein is mediated by inhibition of endogenous tyrosine kinase activity. Furthermore, our data show that the type and/or intensity of tyrosine kinase activity is differentially associated with the contractile effects of different angiotensin peptides in rat aorta. Nifedipine, a blocker of membrane L-type Ca2+ channels, strongly inhibited Ang IV-induced contractions. At the same time, it significantly inhibited Ang III contractile effects as compared with Ang II and Ang I contractions. Meanwhile, we observed a close relationship between calcium influx and tyrosine kinase phosphorylation activity under the stimulatory effects of angiotensin peptides. Furthermore, genistein did not significantly influence the phasic contractions induced by angiotensin peptides in Ca2+-free Krebs-Henseleit solution. Thus, it appears that Ca2+ influx, rather than the release of Ca2+ from IP3-sensitive stores, may play a major role in the contractile effects of angiotensin peptides in rat aorta via tyrosine kinase activation. One argument against a direct action of genistein on the Ca2+ channel itself is that it did not markedly affect the K+-induced contraction (depolarisation) in rat aorta. At the same time, a potential role for tyrosine kinase activity in the process of calcium entry is suggested. An elevation of intracellular calcium via tyrosine kinase-mediated processes may mediate the actions of G-protein coupled receptor agonists in smooth muscle, including angiotensin peptides.

Endothelium-dependent desensitization to angiotensin II in rabbit aorta: the mechanisms involved

The aim of this study was to characterize the role of the endothelium in angiotensin II-desensitization and its mechanisms of action. Rabbit aortic rings were exposed to increasing doses of angiotensin II (Ang II, 10–9 to 2.5 × 10–6) to generate two cumulative dose-response curves (CDRC I and II). A 50-min interval separated CDRC I and II. Desensitization was observed at all doses in unrubbed aortic tissue and at lower doses in rubbed aortic tissue. Tachyphylaxis was greater in arteries with endothelium. Treatment of intact rings with L-NG-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME, 10–4 M) did not prevent this phenomenon. However, indomethacin (10–5 M) and miconazol (10–6 M) attenuated Ang II-desensitization. Treatment of unrubbed rings with nifedipine (10–6 M) and cromakalim (10–6 M) inhibited the effect of indomethacin. To confirm the involvement of K+ channels, unrubbed and rubbed aortic rings were treated with the KCa2+ blockers apamin (10–7 M), tetraethylammonium (TEA, 10–3 M), and iberiotoxin (10–8 M), and the KATP blocker glibenclamide (10–5 M). In both arteries apamin, TEA, and glibenclamide abolished the tachyphylaxis without changes in the maximal response. Iberiotoxin diminished Ang II-desensitization in rubbed but not unrubbed arteries. Results from this study suggest that Ang II-desensitization involves endothelium-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Endothelium-dependent desensitization could be mediated by a cyclooxygenase-cytochrome P450 product, which could act by increasing KCa2+ channel activity.Key words: angiotensin II, rabbit aorta, desensitization, endothelium, cyclooxygenase products.

Aspects of gene polymorphisms in cardiovascular disease: the renin-angiotensin system

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a central role in cardiovascular homeostasis. Angiotensin is the key peptide of the RAS, and exerts its influence on the heart and blood vessels both through its haemodynamic effects (via its influence on after-load and pre-load and determining coronary vasoconstriction) and through its direct cellular effects (via its actions on cell proliferation). Numerous studies in the past 10 years have demonstrated that the pharmacological inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE), one of the two critical enzymes of the RAS, improves the outcome in patients with several cardiovascular disorders (hypertension, heart failure, ischaemic heart disease). These studies suggest a role of the RAS as a major determinant of cardiovascular risk. Recent data suggest that genetics may in turn contribute to modulating the effects of angiotensin on coronary vascular biology and ischaemia. This paper reviews the physiologic characteristics of the RAS and recent research developments related to angiotensin cell biology and pathobiology in heart disease. In particular, this review will cover the genetic aspects of RAS and their implications in cardiovascular disease.

Different types of antagonism by losartan and irbesartan on the effects of angiotensin II and its degradation products in rabbit arteries

A previous study by our group has demonstrated that the selective AT1-receptor antagonist losartan behaves as a noncompetitive antagonist in rabbit isolated renal artery (RA). In the present investigation, the influence of losartan and irbesartan on the contractile effects of angiotensin II (AII) and its degradation products angiotensin III (AIII) and angiotensin IV (AIV) was determined in the rabbit isolated RA and femoral artery (FA). The arteries were set up in organ chambers and changes in isometric force were recorded. In both rabbit isolated RA and FA preparations, AII, AIII and AIV elicited significant contractile responses with a similar efficacy. These effects were impaired by the presence of functional endothelium in RA preparations but not in FA preparations. In both preparations studied, the effects of AII, AIII and AIV were influenced neither by the aminopeptidase-A and -M inhibitor amastatin (10 microM), nor by the aminopeptidase-B and -M inhibitor bestatin (10 microM). In endothelium-denuded FA preparations, preincubation with losartan (3-300 nM) antagonized AII-, AIII- and AIV-induced contractions in a competitive manner. However, in endothelium-denuded RA preparations, losartan depressed the maximal contractile responses induced by AII but not those induced by AIII and AIV. In the same preparations, preincubation of another selective AT1-receptor antagonist irbesartan (3-30 nM) concentration-dependently shifted AII and AIII curves to the right in an insurmountable manner. The reduction of the maximal response of AII is more potent when compared to that of AIII (47.7 +/- 1.51% vs. 66.7 +/- 1.88%, percentage of the initial maximal response; P < 0.05; n=5). The selective AT2-receptor antagonist PD123177 (1 microM) did not influence the responses to all three peptides in both RA and FA preparations. These heterogeneous antagonistic effects of the two AT1-receptor antagonists studied with respect to the contractile actions of AII, AIII and AIV suggest the possible existence of multiple, functionally relevant AT1-receptor subtypes in rabbit RA preparations.

Influence of losartan and nicardipine on the contractile responses of human subcutaneous arteries and veins to angiotensin II

In the human forearm vascular bed, the arterial constrictor effects of angiotensin II were found to be caused by an AT1-receptor mediated calcium influx, while the venous constrictor effects appeared to be independent of L-type calcium channels. In this study, we investigated the influences of the AT1-receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker nicardipine on the angiotensin II-induced constriction of small isolated subcutaneous arteries and veins obtained from human mammary tissue. Subcutaneous arteries and veins were isolated from mammary tissue from 9 healthy women who underwent breast reduction surgery. Effects of angiotensin II (0.3 nM to 1 mM), losartan (0.1 mM) and nicardipine (0.1 mM) were investigated in a myograph set up. Identification of arteries and veins was confirmed histologically after the experiments. Drug effects were expressed relatively to the potassium-induced contraction. Angiotensin II concentration-dependently contracted arteries and veins by maximally 1.66 +/- 0.31 N/m and 0.43 +/- 0.08 N/m, respectively (P < 0.05). In arteries the angiotensin II were subject to a mild degree of tachyphylaxis: the Emax of the repetitive concentration-response curve (CRC) was reduced from 105 +/- 4% of the potassium-induced contraction to 84 +/- 6% (P < 0.05); the EC50 value was unchanged (P > 0.05). In veins no tachyphylaxis was observed. Losartan caused a rightward shift of the CRC of angiotensin II in arteries and veins (P < 0.05), and reduced the Emax in arteries from 105 +/- 4 to 85 +/- 9% (P < 0.05), but did not change the Emax in veins. Nicardipine significantly decreased the Emax in arteries and veins (to residual values of 10 +/- 2 and 20 +/- 4%, respectively, of the control values). In conclusion, the angiotensin II-induced constriction of human arteries and veins isolated from mammary tissue are AT1-receptor mediated and inhibited by losartan. The nearly complete inhibition by nicardipine indicates that the constrictor effects in both types of vessels are dependent on L-type calcium channels.

Characterization and signaling of the AT(4) receptor in human proximal tubule epithelial (HK-2) cells

(125)I-divalinal-angiotensin IV (metabolically resistant analog of angiotensin IV) was used as a receptor ligand to identify the expression and properties of the angiotensin AT(4) receptor in epithelial HK-2 cells (an immortalized cell line derived from adult human proximal tubules). Saturation binding isotherms revealed that HK-2 cells contain a saturable (125)I-divalinal-angiotensin IV binding site with an affinity of 3 nmol/L and a density of 508 fmol/mg protein. An analysis of ligand specificity showed that only angiotensin AT(4) receptor ligands (angiotensin IV and divalinal-angiotensin IV) competed with both a high- and low-affinity binding site. GTPgammaS and dithiothreitol did not affect (125)I-Ang IV or (125)I-divalinal-Ang IV binding, suggesting that the AT(4) receptor was not G-protein coupled and did not require sulfhydryl bonds for receptor affinity. Activation of the AT(4) receptor caused a complex concentration-dependent rise in [Ca(2+)](i), an elevation in [Na(+)](i), and increased mitogen-activated protein kinase activity. These results suggest that human proximal tubule epithelial cells contain functional AT(4) receptors that are pharmacologically similar to the AT(4) receptor described in more distal segments of the nephron. Furthermore, the AT(4) receptor uses several intracellular signaling pathways to convey information.

Potentiation of cholinergic transmission in the rat hippocampus by angiotensin IV and LVV-hemorphin-7

Recent evidence demonstrates that the fragment of angiotensin II, angiotensin II (3-8) termed angiotensin IV, binds with high affinity to a specific binding site, the AT(4) receptor. Intracerebroventricular injection of AT(4) receptor agonists improves the performance of rats in passive avoidance and spatial learning paradigms. AT(4) receptors and cholinergic neurons are closely associated in regions involved in cognitive processing, such as the hippocampus and neocortex. We therefore postulated that AT(4) receptors affect cognitive processing by modulating cholinergic neurotransmission. To test this, we examined the effect of AT(4) receptor ligands, angiotensin IV and LVV-hemorphin-7, on potassium-evoked [(3)H]acetylcholine ([(3)H]ACh) release from rat hippocampal slices. Hippocampal slices from male Sprague--Dawley rats were incubated with [(3)H]choline chloride, perfused with Krebs--Henseleit solution and [(3)H]ACh release was determined. Angiotensin IV and LVV-hemorphin-7 both potentiated depolarisation-induced [(3)H]ACh release from the rat hippocampus in a concentration-dependent manner with the maximal dose (10(-7)M) of each inducing an increase of 45+/-7.5% (P<0.01) and 95.8+/-19% (P<0.01) above control, respectively. Potentiation of release by both agonists was attenuated by the AT(4) receptor antagonist, divalinal-Ang IV. Angiotensin IV-induced potentiation was not affected by AT(1) and AT(2) receptor antagonists. These results indicate that stimulation of AT(4) receptors can potentiate depolarisation-induced release of ACh from hippocampal slices and suggest that potentiation of cholinergic transmission may be a mechanism by which AT(4) receptor ligands enhance cognition.

Binding and signaling of angiotensin-(1-7) in bovine kidney epithelial cells involves the AT(4) receptor

Angiotensin-(1-7) decreased mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase (Erks) activation in cultured Mardin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) epithelial cells. Also, saturable, high-affinity (125)I-angiotensin-(1-7) binding was detected in MDBK cell membranes. Together, the data suggested the possible presence of an angiotensin-(1-7) receptor. However, ligand structure-binding studies revealed that angiotensin-(3-7) and AT(4) receptor ligands competed with high-affinity for (125)I-angiotensin-(1-7) binding. Furthermore, angiotensin-(3-7) and AT(4) receptor ligands decreased MAP kinase activation in MDBK cells. These results demonstrate that NH(2)-terminal-deleted metabolites of angiotensin-(1-7) can bind with high affinity to the AT(4) receptor and regulate the MAP kinase/Erk signaling pathway in renal epithelial cells.

Angiotensin III depressor action in the conscious rabbit is blocked by losartan but not PD 123319

Vasodilator and vasodepressor properties of angiotensins have been reported, and mediation by prostaglandins or nitric oxide has been proposed. Other studies indicate that angiotensin AT(2) receptors might mediate a depressor action, and the present study was designed to delineate and explore this possibility in a conscious rabbit model. Large intravenous boluses of angiotensin III (15 nmol/kg) produced a predictable pressor peak (82+/-4 mm Hg) followed by a depressor phase (20+/-3 mm Hg), whereas equipressor doses of angiotensin II were less effective at producing depressor responses. Angiotensin-(1-7) did not exert a depressor action, and the reduced potency of angiotensin IV (relative to angiotensin III) was similar for both the pressor and depressor phases ( approximately 100-fold). It is clear that specific angiotensin IV or angiotensin-(1-7) receptors do not mediate depressor effects in this model. The AT(1) antagonist losartan (1 mg/kg) blocked both the pressor and depressor components of the angiotensin III response, whereas the AT(2) antagonist PD 123319 (35 mg/kg) had no effect on either element of the response. The data obtained with the angiotensin receptor subtype-selective compounds, losartan and PD 123319, suggest that the depressor action is an AT(1)-mediated effect and give no indication that AT(2) receptors could be involved. Paradoxically, the greater potency of angiotensin III as a vasodepressor belies the conclusion that the response is AT(1)-mediated, because AT(1) receptors have a greater affinity for angiotensin II versus angiotensin III.

Aminopeptidase A activity and angiotensin III effects on [Ca2+]i along the rat nephron

BACKGROUND

This study examined the specific effects of angiotensin III (Ang III) along the nephron.

METHODS

We examined the distribution of aminopeptidase A (APA) activity by using a specific APA inhibitor and by immunostaining with an antirat kidney APA antibody, the Ang III-induced variations of [Ca2+]i by using fura-2 and the characterization of the receptor subtype involved in the response to Ang III in cortical thick ascending limb (CTAL).

RESULTS

APA activity was found all along the nephron but was higher in the cortex than in the medulla. This was confirmed by immunostaining. Increases in [Ca2+]i elicited by 10(-7) mol/liter Ang III were observed all along the nephron. The characterization of the receptor subtype involved in the [Ca2+]i response to Ang III in CTAL indicated that EC50 values for Ang III and Ang II were similar (13.5 and 10.3 nmol/liter, respectively), and Ang III-induced responses were totally abolished by AT1 receptor but not by AT2 receptor antagonists. There was a cross-desensitization of [Ca2+]i responses to 10(-7) mol/liter Ang III and Ang II, and the [Ca2+]i responses to 10(-7) mol/liter Ang II and Ang III were not additive.

CONCLUSION

These results show that in CTAL, the [Ca2+]i responses to Ang II and Ang III occur through the same AT1a receptor because this subtype is predominant in this segment. Taken together, these data suggest that APA could be a key enzyme to generate Ang III from Ang II in the kidney.

Up regulation of AT4 receptor levels in carotid arteries following balloon injury

Angiotensin IV, (V-Y-I-H-P-F), binds to AT4 receptors in blood vessels to induce vasodilatation and proliferation of cultured bovine endothelial cells. This latter effect may be important not only in developing tissues but also in injured vessels undergoing remodelling. In the present study, using normal rabbit carotid arteries, we detected AT4 receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells and in the vasa vasorum of the adventitia. Very low receptor levels were observed in the endothelial cells. In keeping with the described binding specificity of AT4 receptors, unlabelled angiotensin IV competed for [125I]angiotensin IV binding in the arteries, with an IC50 of 1.4 nM, whereas angiotensin II and angiotensin III were weaker competitors. Within the first week following endothelial denudation of the carotid artery by balloon catheter, AT4 receptor binding in the media increased to approximately 150% of control tissue. AT4 receptor binding further increased in the media, large neointima and re-endothelialized cell layer to 223% at 20 weeks after injury. In view of the known trophic effects of angiotensin IV, the elevated expression of AT4 receptors, in both the neointima and media of arteries, following balloon injury to the endothelium, suggests a role for the peptide in the adaptive response and remodelling of the vascular wall following damage.

Interactions between AT1 and AT2 receptors in uterine arteries from pregnant ewes

This study was performed to investigate the roles of angiotensin receptors (AT1 and AT2) in the contractility of uterine arteries during normal pregnancy and after angiotensin II levels have been elevated. Pregnant ewes were given intravenous infusions of saline for 24 h (control) or angiotensin II (30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) for 2 or 24 h. The contractile responses of uterine arterial rings to angiotensin II (4 microM) and antagonists were then examined in vitro. Most uterine arteries were relatively insensitive to the vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II. In rings from control ewes an angiotensin AT2 antagonist enhanced (P < 0.05) the contractile responses to angiotensin II, suggesting that angiotensin AT2 receptors inhibited the angiotensin AT1 receptor mediated contractions. Uterine arterial rings from ewes given intravenous infusions of angiotensin II displayed greater (P < 0.05) contractile responses to angiotensin II in vitro compared to rings from control ewes. This was in part due to down regulation of angiotensin AT2 receptors. Surprisingly, while performing these experiments a small number of ewes had uterine arteries which were "hyperreactive" to angiotensin II (contractile responses 6-fold greater). These ewes also had abnormal renin angiotensin systems and had some features which are characteristic of those seen in preeclampsia. The "hyperreactivity" of these arteries could only in part be explained by down regulation of angiotensin AT2 receptors. It is concluded that in normal pregnancy angiotensin AT2 receptors play a role in maintaining an adequate uterine blood flow for the fetus. When angiotensin II levels are elevated for a prolonged period this protective effect is lost partly because angiotensin AT1 receptors are down regulated.

Prejunctional angiotensin receptors involved in the facilitation of noradrenaline release in mouse tissues

The effect of angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) on the electrically induced release of noradrenaline was studied in preparations of mouse atria, spleen, hippocampus, occipito-parietal cortex and hypothalamus preincubated with [3H]-noradrenaline. The prejunctional angiotensin receptor type was investigated using the non-selective receptor antagonist saralasin (AT1/AT2) and the AT1 and AT2 selective receptor antagonists losartan and PD 123319, respectively. In atrial and splenic preparations, angiotensin II (0.01 nM-0.1 microM) and angiotensin III (0.01 and 0.1 nM-1 microM) increased the stimulation-induced overflow of tritium in a concentration-dependent manner. Angiotensin IV, only at high concentrations (1 and 10 pM), enhanced tritium overflow in the atria, while angiotensin-(1-7) (0.1 nM-10 microM) was without effect in both preparations. In preparations of hippocampus, occipito-parietal cortex and hypothalamus, none of the angiotensin peptides altered the evoked overflow of tritium. In atrial and splenic preparations, saralasin (0.1 microM) and losartan (0.1 and 1 microM), but not PD 123319 (0.1 microM), shifted the concentration-response curves of angiotensin II and angiotensin III to the right. In conclusion, in mouse atria and spleen, angiotensin II and angiotensin III facilitate the action potential induced release of noradrenaline via a prejunctional AT1 receptor. Only high concentrations of angiotensin IV are effective in the atria and angiotensin-(1-7) is without effect in both preparations. In mouse brain areas, angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) do not modulate the release of noradrenaline.

Haemorphin peptides may be endogenous ligands for brain angiotensin AT4 receptors

1. Angiotensin IV (AngIV), the (3-8) fragment of AngII, was previously believed to be an inactive metabolite. However, specific binding sites, termed AT4 receptors, have been identified in the brain and peripheral organs and the peptide has been reported to enhance memory recall in passive avoidance studies and to dilate pial and renal cortical vessels. 2. AT4 receptors are distinct from AngII AT1 and AT2 receptors with respect to function, ligand specificity and distribution. 3. In the brain, AT4 receptors are abundant in cerebral and cerebellar cortex, hippocampal formation and cholinergic systems, as well as sensory and motor systems. However, the peptide AngIV is low or undetectable in the central nervous system. This led us to search for an alternative peptide ligand of the AT4 receptor. 4. The decapeptide LVVYPWTQRF was isolated from cerebral cortex and binds with high affinity to brain AT4 receptors. This peptide sequence corresponds to an internal sequence of beta-globin and has previously been named LVV-haemorphin 7. 5. Haemorphin may represent a new class of endogenous neuropeptides, some of which interact potently with the brain AT4 receptor to elicit a range of actions.

Effects of angiotensin II and losartan in the forearm of patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor-mediated constrictor effects may be modulated by hypertension-related vascular changes, changes in receptor function and in neurohumoral activity.

DESIGN

The forearm blood flow (FBF) effects of angiotensin II, methoxamine, and losartan were investigated in essential hypertensive patients. Minimal forearm vascular resistance was measured to determine structural vascular changes.

METHODS

Seven hypertensive patients were selected, and seven matched normotensives. Angiotensin II (0.01-10 ng/kg per min) was infused during predilatation by sodium nitroprusside (6.1 +/- 0.6 ng/kg per min) before and during losartan infusion (0.3-3 microg/kg per min). Methoxamine (0.2-2 microg/kg per min) was co-infused with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine. FBF, measured by venous occlusion plethysmography, was expressed as the change in FBF ratio (FBFinfused arm/FBFnon-infused arm).

RESULTS

Baseline FBF (infused arm) was increased by sodium nitroprusside from 2.56 +/- 0.80 to 5.46 +/- 0.92 (P<0.05) and from 2.66 +/- 0.25 to 5.42 +/- 0.40 ml/100 ml per min (P<0.05) in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively. Baseline forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was higher in the hypertensive than in the normotensive group [51 +/- 8 versus 33 +/- 3 mmHg/ (ml/100 ml per min); P<0.05]. Angiotensin II caused a maximal change in FBF ratio (Emax) by -70 +/- 3 and -72 +/- 6% in the hypertensive and normotensive group, respectively (NS). Tachyphylaxis did not occur. Infusions of losartan at 0.3, 1 and 3 microg/kg per min reduced the Emax values from -70 +/- 3 to -50 +/- 5, -45 +/- 5 and -15 +/- 2%, respectively, in the hypertensive group, and from -72 +/- 6 to -62 +/- 4, -45 +/- 2 and -32 +/- 2%, respectively, in the normotensive group (NS). Infusion of methoxamine significantly reduced the FBF ratio by -58 +/- 6 and -69 +/- 5% in the hypertensive and normotensive groups, respectively (NS). Minimal FVR, after forearm ischemia, was the same in hypertensives and normotensives, namely 3.2 +/- 0.7 and 3.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg/(ml per 100 ml per min), respectively (NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Angiotensin II type 1- and alpha1-mediated vascular effects were unchanged by essential hypertension. Baseline FVR was greater in the hypertensives than in the normotensives, while minimal FVR was the same. These results indicate that the forearm vascular bed of the patient group studied does not show important structural and renin-angiotensin system-related functional changes as a result of hypertension.

The biochemical and physiological characteristics of receptors

Cell surface receptors play a central role in the regulation of both cellular and systemic physiology by mediating intercellular communication, facilitating protein trafficking, and regulating virtually all intracellular processes. Receptor expression is often cell specific and is determined by cellular lineage, genetics, and a variety of factors in the extracellular milieu. As receptors are generally localized on the plasma membrane and differentially expressed in certain cell types and tissues, they provide a potential target for drug delivery. However, since most receptors are integrally connected with intracellular signal transduction networks, targeting via these receptors may elicit a biological response. This review describes some established and emerging concepts regarding the structure and functions of receptors. In addition, some aspects related to the regulation and crosstalk between receptors are discussed.

Angiotensin IV AT4-receptor system in the rat kidney

Angiotensin IV, [[des-Asp1,Arg2]ANG II or ANG-(3-8)], has been shown to preferentially bind to a novel angiotensin binding site (AT4 receptor). The cellular location and function of this receptor in the rat kidney is unknown. Autoradiography localized AT4 receptors to the cell body and apical membrane of convoluted and straight proximal tubules in the cortex and outer stripe of the outer medulla. ANG IV (0.1 pM-1 microM) elicited a concentration-dependent decrease in transcellular Na+ transport (as measured by proximal tubule O2 consumption rates) in fresh suspensions of control or nystatin-stimulated (bypasses rate-limiting step of apical Na+ entry) rat proximal tubules. The inhibitory effect of 1 pM ANG IV was unaltered by either 1 microM losartan (AT1-receptor antagonist) or 1 microM PD-123319 (AT2-receptor antagonist) and yet was abolished by 1 microM divalinal-ANG IV (AT4-receptor antagonist) or ouabain pretreatment. These results demonstrate that the kidney AT4-receptor system is localized to the proximal tubule and suggests that one potential biological role of this system is in the regulation of Na+ transport by inhibiting a ouabain-sensitive component of Na(+)-K(+)-adenosinetriphosphatase activity in the rat.

Angiotensinases restrict locally generated angiotensin II to the blood vessel wall

We tested the hypothesis that angiotensinases limit the spillover of locally formed angiotensin II into the circulation. The release of angiotensin peptides from isolated rat hindquarters perfused with an artificial medium was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and radioimmunoassay. The spontaneous release of angiotensins was increased by the angiotensinase inhibitors phenanthroline (850+/-195 versus 95+/-33 fmol of angiotensin I per 30 minutes in controls, P<.05, n=5 each) and amastatin (P<.05, n=5 each). Infusion of renin induced sustained local angiotensin I formation, which was also increased by phenanthroline. Stimulation of local angiotensin formation by renin infusion was compared with infusion of exogenous angiotensin II. Renin caused similar increases of perfusion pressure (11.1+/-2.2 versus 7.6+/-1.9 mm Hg after angiotensin II, P>.05) despite lower angiotensin II levels in the venous effluent than during infusion of exogenous angiotensin II (65+/-2 versus 482+/-33 fmol/mL, P<.05, n=7 each). Thus, renin must have caused higher angiotensin II tissue levels than indicated by the measurements in the venous effluent. The pressor response to renin was abolished by the type 1 angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan. We conclude that the major part of locally generated angiotensins is not released into the circulation but degraded by angiotensinases within the tissue compartment.

Angiotensin II stimulates the production of NO and peroxynitrite in endothelial cells

Angiotensin II (ANG II) produces vasoconstriction by a direct action on smooth muscle cells via AT1 receptors. These receptors are also present in the endothelium, but their function is poorly understood. This study was therefore undertaken to determine whether ANG II elicits the release of nitric oxide (NO) from cultured rat aortic endothelial cells. NO production, measured by the accumulation of nitrite and nitrate, was enhanced by 10(-7) M ANG II. The biological activity of the NO released by ANG II action was evaluated by measuring its guanylate cyclase-stimulating activity in smooth muscle cells. The guanosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cGMP) content of smooth muscle cells was significantly increased by exposure of supernatant from ANG II-stimulated endothelial cells. These effects resulted from the activation of NO synthase, as they were inhibited by the L-arginine analogs. These ANG II actions were mediated by the AT1 receptor, as shown by their inhibition by the AT1 antagonist losartan. The cGMP production by reporter cells was inhibited by the calmodulin antagonist W-7, suggesting that ANG II activates endothelial calmodulin-dependent NO synthase. This hypothesis is also supported by the increase of intracellular free calcium induced by ANG II in endothelial cells. ANG II also stimulated luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence in endothelial cells. This effect was inhibited by N omega-monomethyl-L-arginine and superoxide dismutase, suggesting that this luminol-enhanced chemiluminescence reflected an increase in peroxynitrite production. Thus ANG II stimulates NO release from macrovascular endothelium, which may modulate the direct vasoconstrictor effect of ANG II on smooth muscle cells. However, this beneficial effect may be counteracted by the simultaneous production of peroxynitrite, which could contribute to several pathological processes in the vascular wall.

Comparative vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II, III, and IV in human isolated saphenous vein

Elevated levels of angiotensin (Ang II) and its degradation products angiotensin III (Ang III) and angiotensin IV (Ang IV) may contribute to the regulation of vascular tone under various clinical circumstances. We investigated the contractile effects of Ang III and Ang IV in endothelium-denuded human saphenous vein (SV) preparations and compared them with those of Ang II. The veins were suspended in organ chambers, and changes in isometric force were recorded. Ang II (0.1-100 nM), Ang III (1 nM-3 microM), and Ang IV (0.3 microM-0.1 mM) caused concentration-dependent contractions with comparable maximal responses (Emax). Ang III was 16 times less active than Ang II, whereas Ang IV was approximately 2,700-fold less potent than Ang II. In the presence of the aminopeptidase-A and -M inhibitor amastatin (10 microM), the potencies of Ang III and Ang IV were increased by approximately 16 and 12 times, respectively, although no changes of Ang II potency were observed. The AT1-selective Ang II receptor antagonist losartan (10 and 100 nM) but not the AT2-selective antagonist PD123177 (1 microM), shifted the concentration-response curves (CRC) for the angiotensin peptides to the right in a parallel manner. Preincubation with indomethacin (10 microM), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, did not influence the CRCs for any of the angiotensin peptides studied. Tachyphylaxis was investigated by constructing a second series of CRCs for the angiotensin peptides after an interval of 60 min. Ang II showed strong tachyphylaxis (the Emax value of the second Ang II CRC was approximately 50% of the first), whereas Ang III and Ang IV did not. Our results indicate that in endothelium-denuded human SV, both Ang III and Ang IV are less potent but similarly efficacious vasoconstrictor agents compared with Ang II. Endogenous aminopeptidase activity may counteract the effects of the angiotensin peptides. The contractile responses to all three peptides are mediated via AT1-receptors but not AT2-receptors.

Direct positive chronotropic effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin III in pithed rats and in rat isolated atria

1. The direct positive chronotropic effects of angiotensin II (AII) and its degradation products angiotensin III (AIII) and angiotensin IV (AIV) were established in pithed rats and in rat spontaneously beating right atria. 2. In pithed rats, AII, AIII and AIV caused dose-dependent tachycardia with similar maximal responses (110 beats min-1). The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (3.37 x 10(-6) mol kg-1) but not the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin (2.38 x 10(-7) mol kg-1) significantly reduced these effects (P < 0.05; n = 7-8), but 20-25% of the responses could not be blocked by propranolol. 3. In isolated atria, AII, AIII and AIV caused concentration-dependent increases in beating rate with similar maximal responses to AII and AIII (34.3 +/- 0.4 and 34.7 +/- 0.4 beats min-1; n = 9-10), and a lower maximal response to AIV (26.8 +/- 0.6 beats min-1; P < 0.05; n = 8). AIII was about 9 times less potent than AII, whereas AIV proved approximately 3800 times less potent than AII. Neither propranolol (1 microM) nor prazosin (1 microM) could influence the effects of the angiotensin peptides. 4. In isolated atria, the selective AT1-receptor antagonist, losartan (10, 100 and 300 nM) caused parallel rightward shifts of the concentration-response curves for AII and AIII, whereas the selective AT2- receptor antagonist PD123177 (1 microM) did not influence the effects of AII and AIII. The aminopeptidase-A and -M inhibitor amastatin (10 microM), significantly steepened the slope of the AIII curves and increased the potency of AIII about 6 fold. Amastatin did not influence the responses to AII. 5. Our results indicate that both in vivo and in vitro, exogenous AII and AIII induced a direct dose-dependent chronotropic effect, which is independent of the adrenergic system. This chronotropic effect is mediated by AT1-subtype receptors.