Necessity of dual blockade of endothelin ETA and ETB receptor subtypes for antagonism of endothelin-1-induced contraction in human bronchi

Endothelin-1-Rho kinase interactions impair lung structure and cause pulmonary hypertension after bleomycin exposure in neonatal rat pups

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is the chronic lung disease associated with premature birth, characterized by impaired vascular and alveolar growth. In neonatal rats bleomycin decreases lung growth and causes pulmonary hypertension (PH), which is poorly responsive to nitric oxide. In the developing lung, through Rho kinase (ROCK) activation, ET-1 impairs endothelial cell function; however, whether ET-1-ROCK interactions contribute to impaired vascular and alveolar growth in experimental BPD is unknown. Neonatal rats were treated daily with intraperitoneal bleomycin with and without selective ETA (BQ123/BQ610) and ETB (BQ788) receptor blockers, nonselective ET receptor blocker (ETRB) (bosentan), or fasudil (ROCK inhibitor). At day 14, lungs were harvested for morphometrics, and measurements of Fulton's index (RV/LV+S), medial wall thickness (MWT), and vessel density. Lung ET-1 protein and ROCK activity (phospho-MYPT-1:total MYPT-1 ratio) were also measured by Western blot analysis. Bleomycin increased lung ET-1 protein expression by 65%, RV/LV+S by 60%, mean linear intercept (MLI) by 212%, and MWT by 140% and decreased radial alveolar count (RAC) and vessel density by 40 and 44%, respectively (P < 0.01 for each comparison). After bleomycin treatment, fasudil and bosentan partially restored RAC and vessel density and decreased MLI, RV/LV+S, and MWT to normal values. Bleomycin increased ROCK activity by 120%, which was restored to normal values by bosentan but not selective ETRB. We conclude that ET-1-ROCK interactions contribute to decreased alveolar and vascular growth and PH in experimental BPD. We speculate that nonselective ETRB and ROCK inhibitors may be effective in the treatment of infants with BPD and PH.

The emerging role of endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is the most frequently encountered medical complication during pregnancy. It is characterized by a rise in systemic vascular resistance with a relatively low cardiac output and hypovolemia, combined with severe proteinuria. Despite the hypovolemia, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activity is suppressed and aldosterone levels are decreased to the same degree as renin. This suggests that the RAS is not the cause of the hypertension in PE, but rather that its suppression is the consequence of the rise in blood pressure. Abnormal placentation early in pregnancy is widely assumed to be an important initial event in the onset of PE. Eventually, this results in the release of anti-angiogenic factors [in particular, soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1)] and cytokines, leading to generalized vascular dysfunction. Elevated sFlt-1 levels bind and inactivate vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Of interest, VEGF inhibition with drugs like sunitinib, applied in cancer patients, results in a PE-like syndrome, characterized by hypertension, proteinuria and renal toxicity. Both in cancer patients treated with sunitinib and in pregnant women with PE, significant rises in endothelin-1 occur. Multiple regression analysis revealed that endothelin-1 is an independent determinant of the hypertension and proteinuria in PE, and additionally a renin suppressor. Moreover, studies in animal models representative of PE, have shown that endothelin receptor blockers prevent the development of this disease. Similarly, endothelin receptor blockers are protective during sunitinib treatment. Taken together, activation of the endothelin system emerges as an important pathway causing the clinical manifestations of PE. This paper critically addresses this concept, taking into consideration both clinical and preclinical data, and simultaneously discusses the therapeutic consequences of this observation.

Functional characteristics of alpha adrenergic and endothelinergic receptors in pressurized rat mesenteric veins

Increasing transmural pressure can alter the functional role of post-junctional receptor subtypes. Under conditions of changing transmural pressure, we investigated the relative contributions of alpha adrenergic (α-ARs) and endothelinergic receptors to norepinephrine (NE) and endothelin (ET-1) contractile responses, respectively, in third-order rat mesenteric small veins (MSV) and arteries (MSA). NE, phenylephrine (PE), clonidine, and ET-1 concentration–response curves were constructed in the absence and presence of α-adrenergic and ET-1 receptor antagonists, respectively. MSV were more sensitive to NE, PE, and ET-1 compared with MSA. The sensitivity of MSV to NE was higher than that to PE. Phentolamine (α1-AR/α2-AR antagonist) and prazosin (α1-AR antagonist) completely abolished NE responses. Yohimbine (α2-AR antagonist) reduced NE and clonidine contractile responses in MSV. Clonidine contractile responses were reduced by prazosin in MSA. In MSA and MSV, BQ-610 (ETA receptor antagonist) but not BQ-788 (ETB receptor antagonist) reduced ET-1 contractile responses. Combined application of BQ-610 and BQ-788 caused further reduction in ET-1 concentration–response curves obtained in MSV. These results suggest that in addition to α1-ARs and ETA receptors, α2-ARs and ETB receptors also mediate NE and ET-1 contractile responses in MSV, respectively, with no change in the participation of these receptors as transmural pressure is increased.

Vascular endothelial cells mediate mechanical stimulation-induced enhancement of endothelin hyperalgesia via activation of P2X2/3 receptors on nociceptors

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is unique among a broad range of hyperalgesic agents in that it induces hyperalgesia in rats that is markedly enhanced by repeated mechanical stimulation at the site of administration. Antagonists to the ET-1 receptors, ET(A) and ET(B), attenuated both initial as well as stimulation-induced enhancement of hyperalgesia (SIEH) by endothelin. However, administering antisense oligodeoxynucleotide to attenuate ET(A) receptor expression on nociceptors attenuated ET-1 hyperalgesia but had no effect on SIEH, suggesting that this is mediated via a non-neuronal cell. Because vascular endothelial cells are both stretch sensitive and express ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, we tested the hypothesis that SIEH is dependent on endothelial cells by impairing vascular endothelial function with octoxynol-9 administration; this procedure eliminated SIEH without attenuating ET-1 hyperalgesia. A role for protein kinase Cε (PKCε), a second messenger implicated in the induction and maintenance of chronic pain, was explored. Intrathecal antisense for PKCε did not inhibit either ET-1 hyperalgesia or SIEH, suggesting no role for neuronal PKCε; however, administration of a PKCε inhibitor at the site of testing selectively attenuated SIEH. Compatible with endothelial cells releasing ATP in response to mechanical stimulation, P2X(2/3) receptor antagonists eliminated SIEH. The endothelium also appears to contribute to hyperalgesia in two ergonomic pain models (eccentric exercise and hindlimb vibration) and in a model of endometriosis. We propose that SIEH is produced by an effect of ET-1 on vascular endothelial cells, sensitizing its release of ATP in response to mechanical stimulation; ATP in turn acts at the nociceptor P2X(2/3) receptor.

Endothelin(A)-endothelin(B) receptor cross talk in endothelin-1-induced contraction of smooth muscle

The efficacy of selective endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists may be limited by a functional interaction between the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. This interaction, also termed "cross talk", is characterized by the dependency of the inhibition of an ET-1 response due to antagonism of one ET receptor subtype upon concomitant antagonism of the other ET receptor subtype. Although a reduction in ET(A)-ET(B) receptor cross talk would presumably increase the efficacy of selective ET receptor antagonists, an approach that accomplishes this aim is largely absent due to a lack of mechanistic understanding. Toward this goal, we evaluated the characteristics and potential dependencies of cross talk in smooth muscle. Smooth muscle was adopted as an exemplar not only because cross talk is widely reported in this tissue type, thereby allowing numerous comparisons, but also significant controversy surrounds the use of selective versus nonselective ET receptor antagonists in ET-1-related pathophysiologies involving smooth muscle. Based on this evaluation, we suggest that ET(A)-ET(B) receptor cross talk is a dynamic process directed by either or both ET receptor subtypes and expressed to varying magnitudes depending on the ET-1 and selective ET receptor antagonist concentrations, tone due to intraluminal pressure/stretch, agonists acting at receptors other than the ET(A)/ET(B) receptors, and endothelial/epithelial function. It is speculated that ET(A)-ET(B) receptor cross talk occurs through signal transduction pathways along with changes at the receptor level. Pharmacologic intervention of the signaling pathways could increase the therapeutic efficacy of ET receptor antagonists.

Maturation of the GABAergic transmission in normal and pathologic motoneurons

γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) acting on Cl⁻-permeable ionotropic type A (GABA_A) receptors (GABA_AR) is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the adult central nervous system of vertebrates. In immature brain structures, GABA exerts depolarizing effects mostly contributing to the expression of spontaneous activities that are instructive for the construction of neural networks but GABA also acts as a potent trophic factor. In the present paper, we concentrate on brainstem and spinal motoneurons that are largely targeted by GABAergic interneurons, and we bring together data on the switch from excitatory to inhibitory effects of GABA, on the maturation of the GABAergic system and GABA_AR subunits. We finally discuss the role of GABA and its GABA_AR in immature hypoglossal motoneurons of the spastic (SPA) mouse, a model of human hyperekplexic syndrome.

Endothelin(A)-endothelin(B) receptor cross-talk and endothelin receptor binding

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The magnitude of inhibition of an endothelin (ET)-1 response by selective blockade of the ET(A) or ET(B) receptors can be limited by apparent compensation mediated by the unblocked receptor. While the mechanism underlying this functionally defined interaction, or 'cross-talk', is not clear, binding studies suggest an interaction between the ET receptor subtypes.

KEY FINDINGS

These binding studies are reviewed and suggest that, in general, they support the hypothesis that ET(A) and ET(B) receptor activation of intracellular signalling pathways influence ET-1 binding to these receptor subtypes.

SUMMARY

However, the relationship of these binding studies to functional effects and, thus, functional ET(A)-ET(B) receptor cross-talk, remains largely untested.

The interdependence of endothelin-1 and calcium: a review

The 21-amino-acid peptide ET-1 (endothelin-1) regulates a diverse array of physiological processes, including vasoconstriction, angiogenesis, nociception and cell proliferation. Most of the effects of ET-1 are associated with an increase in intracellular calcium concentration. The calcium influx and mobilization pathways activated by ET-1, however, vary immensely. The present review begins with the basics of calcium signalling and investigates the different ways intracellular calcium concentration can increase in response to a stimulus. The focus then shifts to ET-1, and discusses how ET receptors mobilize calcium. We also examine how disease alters calcium-dependent responses to ET-1 by discussing changes to ET-1-mediated calcium signalling in hypertension, as there is significant interest in the role of ET-1 in this important disease. A list of unanswered questions regarding ET-mediated calcium signals are also presented, as well as perspectives for future research of calcium mobilization by ET-1.

Endothelin receptors: what's new and what do we need to know?

Receptors are at the heart of how a molecule transmits a signal to a cell. Two receptor classes for endothelin (ET) are recognized, the ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Intriguing questions have arisen in the field of ET receptor pharmacology, physiology, and function. For example, a host of pharmacological studies support the interaction of the ET(A) and ET(B) receptor in tissues (veins, arteries, bronchus, arterioles, esophagus), but yet few have been able to demonstrate direct ET(A)/ET(B) receptor interaction. Have we modeled this interaction wrong? Do we have a truly selective ET(A) receptor agonist such that we could selectively stimulate this important receptor? What can we learn from the recent phylogenic studies of the ET receptor family? Have we adequately addressed the number of biological molecules with which ET can interact to exert a biological effect? Recent mass spectrometry studies in our laboratory suggest that ET-1 interacts with other hereto unrecognized proteins. Biased ligands (ligands at the same receptor that elicit distinct signaling responses) have been discovered for other receptors. Do these exist for ET receptors and can we take advantage of this possibility in drug design? These and other questions will be posed in this minireview on topics on ET receptors.

Transcriptional regulation of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 release by endothelin-1 in human airway smooth muscle cells involves NF-kappaB and AP-1

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is implicated in airway inflammation in asthma, but the mechanisms of its effects are poorly understood. We studied the effect of ET-1 on expression of the chemokine, monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), in primary cultures of human airway smooth muscle cells.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

MCP-1 release was measured by elisa. Pharmacological antagonists/inhibitors, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Western blotting were used to study ET receptors and kinase cascades. Transcriptional regulation was studied by real-time RT-PCR, transient transfection studies and chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Major findings were confirmed in cells from three donors and mechanistic studies in cells from one donor.

KEY RESULTS

ET-1 increased MCP-1 release through an ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-dependent mechanism. ET-1 increased MCP-1 mRNA levels but not mRNA stability suggesting it was acting transcriptionally. ET-1 increased the activity of an MCP-1 promoter-reporter construct. Serial deletions of the MCP-1 promoter mapped ET-1 effects to a region between -213 and -128 base pairs upstream of the translation start codon, containing consensus sequences for activator protein-1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB). ET-1 promoted binding of AP-1 c-Jun subunit and NF-kappaB p65 subunit to the MCP-1 promoter. Blocking the inhibitor of kappaB kinase-2 with 2-[(aminocarbonyl)amino]-5-[4-fluorophenyl]-3-thiophenecarboxamide (TPCA-1) decreased ET-1-stimulated MCP-1 production. p38 and p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinases were involved in upstream signalling.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

ET-1 regulated MCP-1 transcriptionally, via NF-kappaB and AP-1. The upstream signalling involved ET(A), ET(B) receptors, p38 and p44/p42 mitogen-activated protein kinases. These may be targets for novel asthma therapies.

Differential roles of endothelin-1 ETA and ETB receptors and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in regulation of the airways and the pulmonary vasculature in isolated rat lung

The available treatment strategies against pulmonary hypertension include the administration of endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor subtype blockers (ET(A) and ET(B) antagonists); vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) has recently been suggested as a potential new therapeutic agent. We set out to investigate the ability of these agents to protect against the vasoconstriction and impairment of lung function commonly observed in patients with pulmonary hypertension. An ET(A) blocker (BQ123), ET(B) blocker (BQ788), a combination of these selective blockers (ET(A) + ET(B) blockers) or VIP (V6130) was administered into the pulmonary circulation in four groups of perfused normal rat lungs. Pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and forced oscillatory lung input impedance (Z(L)) were measured in all groups under baseline conditions and at 1 min intervals following ET-1 administrations. The airway resistance, inertance, tissue damping and elastance were extracted from the Z(L) spectra. While VIP, ET(A) blocker and combined ET(A) and ET(B) blockers significantly prevented the pulmonary vasoconstriction induced by ET-1, ET(B) blockade enhanced the ET-1-induced increases in PVR. In contrast, the ET(A) and ET(B) blockers markedly elevated the ET-1-induced increases in airway resistance, while VIP blunted this constrictor response. Our results suggest that VIP potently acts against the airway and pulmonary vascular constriction mediated by endothelin-1, while the ET(A) and ET(B) blockers exert a differential effect between airway resistance and PVR.

An endothelin A receptor antagonist induces dilatation of sinusoidal endothelial fenestrae: implications for endothelin-1 in hepatic microcirculation

BACKGROUND

Sinusoidal endothelial fenestrae (SEF) regulate the sinusoidal circulation by altering their diameter and number. This study documented the effects of endothelin (ET) receptor antagonists on SEF and hepatic microcirculation.

METHODS

The portal pressure and hepatic tissue blood flow were measured with a hydromanometer and a laser Doppler blood flow meter, respectively. BQ-123 (ET(A) receptor antagonist) or BQ-788 (ET(B) receptor antagonist) was continuously infused into normal rats at the rate of 10 nmol/min for 10 min. The sinusoids were observed at 60 min after the infusion by scanning electron microscopy. The localization of ET-1 and ET(A) and ET(B) receptors was examined by the indirect immunoperoxidase method.

RESULTS

When BQ-123 was infused, the portal pressure gradually decreased with time, and it showed a significant reduction compared with the control groups. On the other hand, a decrease in portal pressure was not evident in the BQ-788-infused groups. Hepatic tissue blood flow was maintained at the value prior to the infusion in both groups. BQ-123 also caused a marked dilatation of the SEF. The diameters of the SEF after BQ-123 infusion were almost three times those of normal SEF. ET-1 was evenly present along the sinusoidal walls, and the reaction products of the ET(A) receptors were recognized along the portal vein and in the sinusoidal cells, that is, the hepatic stellate cells and endothelial cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Action of ET-1 via the ET(A) receptors may regulate the size of SEF in addition to hepatic microcirculation.

Dual ET(A)/ET(B) vs. selective ET(A) endothelin receptor antagonism in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Since the identification of endothelin as a key mediator in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the pharmacologic control of the activated endothelin system with endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) has been a major therapeutic achievement for the treatment of patients with PAH. To date, dual ET(A)/ET(B) and selective ET(A) receptor antagonists have clinically been evaluated. To answer the question of whether selective or dual ETRA is preferable in patients with PAH, experimental and clinical data with relevance to the pulmonary circulation are reviewed in this article. Whereas experimental and clinical data provide unambiguous evidence that ET(A) receptors mediate the detrimental effects of ET-1, such as vasoconstriction and cell proliferation, the elucidation of the role of ET(B) receptors has been more complex. It has been shown that there is a subpopulation of ET(B) receptors on smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts mediating vasoconstriction and proliferation. On the contrary, there is clear evidence that endothelial ET(B) receptors continue to mediate vasodilation, vasoprotection and ET-1 clearance despite the pathology associated with pulmonary hypertension. More difficult to assess is the net effect of these mechanisms in patients to be treated with ETRA. When considering the available data from controlled clinical trials, nonselectivity does not appear to carry a relevant clinical benefit for the treatment of patients with PAH when compared with selective ET(A) receptor antagonism.

beta2-Adrenoceptor agonist modulates endothelin-1 receptors in human isolated bronchi

Chronic exposure of human isolated bronchi to beta(2)-adrenergic agonists, especially fenoterol, potentiates smooth muscle contraction in response to endothelin-1 (ET-1), a peptide implicated in chronic inflammatory airway diseases. Our objective was to determine whether ET-1 receptors ETA and ETB are involved in fenoterol enhancement. Twenty-two human bronchi were sensitized to ET-1 by prolonged incubation with 0.1 microM fenoterol (15 h, 21 degrees C). Removing the epithelium after fenoterol incubation limited the maximal contraction (0.10+/-0.36 g without epithelium versus 1.18+/-0.22 with, n=8, P=0.04). After 15 h incubation, 14 and 8 paired rings were fixed, respectively, for immunolabeling of bronchial ETA and ETB receptors, and to determine the mRNA expression levels using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. ETA and ETB receptor mRNA expressions were 1.27- +/- 0.14-fold (not significant) and 2.24- +/- 0.28-fold (P<0.01) higher, respectively, in fenoterol-treated bronchi than in paired controls. Fenoterol incubation significantly increased epithelial ETA and ETB receptor labeling intensity scores (P=0.001 and P=0.002, respectively, versus controls), and enhanced the diffuse localization of ETA receptors on the epithelial cells (P=0.002 versus controls), but did not change the ETB-receptor immunolabeling intensity on airway smooth muscle. We conclude that fenoterol-induced sensitization of human isolated bronchi involves epithelial ETA and ETB receptors, which suggests perturbation of the epithelial regulation of airway smooth muscle contraction in response to ET-1.

Endothelin-1-induced translocation of RhoA is mediated by endothelin ET(A) receptors in rat bronchial smooth muscle

To clarify the receptor subtype(s) contributing to the RhoA activation by endothelin-1 in bronchial smooth muscle, the effects of BQ-123 [cycro(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp)], an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist, and/or BQ-788 [2,6-dimethylpiperidinecarbonyl-g-methyl-Leu-Nin-(Methoxycarbonyl)-D-Trp-D-Nle], an endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist, on the endothelin-1-induced translocation of RhoA to plasma membrane were examined. Incubation of rat bronchial smooth muscle with endothelin-1 induced a distinct translocation of RhoA to plasma membrane, indicating an activation of RhoA by endothelin-1. The endothelin-1-induced translocation of RhoA was completely blocked by treatment with BQ-123, whereas BQ-788 had no effect. Thus, endothelin ET(A) but not ET(B) receptors might be involved in the endothelin-1-induced translocation of RhoA in rat bronchial smooth muscle.

Vascular reactivity of mesenteric arteries and veins to endothelin-1 in a murine model of high blood pressure

We characterized vascular reactivity to endothelin-1 (ET-1) in mesenteric vessels from DOCA-salt hypertensive and SHAM control mice and assessed the effect that endothelial-derived vasodilators have on ET-1-induced vasoconstriction. Changes in the diameter of unpressurized small mesenteric arteries and veins (100- to 300-microm outside diameter) were measured in vitro using computer-assisted video microscopy. Veins were more sensitive than arteries to the contractile effects of ET-1. There was a decrease in arterial maximal responses (E(max)) compared to veins, this effect was larger in DOCA-salt arteries. The selective ET(B) receptor agonist, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c), contracted DOCA-salt and SHAM veins but did not contract arteries. The ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ-788 (100 nM), but not the ET(A) receptor antagonist, BQ-610 (100 nM), blocked S6c responses. BQ-610 partially inhibited responses to ET-1 in mesenteric veins from DOCA-salt and SHAM mice while BQ-788 did not affect responses to ET-1. Co-administration of both antagonists inhibited responses to ET-1 to a greater extent than BQ-610 alone suggesting a possible functional interaction between ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Responses to ET-1 in mesenteric arteries were completely inhibited by BQ-610 while BQ-788 did not affect arterial responses. Nitric oxide synthase inhibition potentiated ET-1 responses in veins from SHAM but not DOCA-salt mice. There was a prominent role for ET-mediated nitric oxide release in DOCA-salt but not SHAM arteries. In summary, these studies showed a differential regulation of ET-1 contractile mechanisms between murine mesenteric arteries and veins.

Prostanoid receptor expression by human airway smooth muscle cells and regulation of the secretion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor

The prostanoid receptors on human airway smooth muscle cells (HASMC) that augment the release by IL-1β of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) have been characterized and the signaling pathway elucidated. PCR of HASM cDNA identified products corresponding to EP2, EP3, and EP4receptor subtypes. These findings were corroborated at the protein level by immunocytochemistry. IL-1β promoted the elaboration of G-CSF, which was augmented by PGE2. Cicaprost (IP receptor agonist) was approximately equiactive with PGE2, whereas PGD2, PGF2α, and U-46619 (TP receptor agonist) were over 10-fold less potent. Neither SQ 29,548 nor BW A868C (TP and DP1receptor antagonists, respectively) attenuated the enhancement of G-CSF release evoking any of the prostanoids studied. With respect to PGE2, the EP receptor agonists 16,16-dimethyl PGE2(nonselective), misoprostol (EP2/EP3selective), 17-phenyl-ω-trinor PGE2(EP1selective), ONO-AE1-259, and butaprost (both EP2selective) were full agonists at enhancing G-CSF release. AH 6809 (10 μM) and L-161,982 (2 μM), which can be used in HASMC as selective EP2and EP4receptor antagonists, respectively, failed to displace to the right the PGE2concentration-response curve that described the augmented G-CSF release. In contrast, AH 6809 and L-161,982 in combination competitively antagonized PGE2-induced G-CSF release. Augmentation of G-CSF release by PGE2was mimicked by 8-BrcAMP and abolished in cells infected with an adenovirus vector encoding an inhibitor protein of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). These data demonstrate that PGE2facilitates G-CSF secretion from HASMC through a PKA-dependent mechanism by acting through EP2and EP4prostanoid receptors and that effective antagonism is realized only when both subtypes are blocked concurrently.

Endothelin-3 induced mesenteric vasoconstriction and PMN infiltration in the rat small intestine: role of endothelin receptors

The objectives of this study were to characterize endothelin (ET)-3-induced alterations in intestinal hemodynamics and to evaluate whether ET-3 administration alters the tissue levels of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and modulates the epithelial barrier function of the small intestine. ET-3 (100 pmol/kg/min) was infused into the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) for 10 min, and tissue samples were obtained 30 min after terminating the infusion. SMA blood flow was significantly decreased throughout the experiment following ET-3 infusion. Pretreatment with bosentan (ET-A and ET-B receptor antagonist), ET-B receptor antagonist BQ-788 or ET-A receptor antagonist BQ-485 completely inhibited the ET-3-induced decrease in the SMA blood flow. Similar results were obtained from the resistance data, in which ET-3-induced increases in SMA resistance were significantly reduced by all ET receptor antagonists. ET-3 administration significantly elevated tissue MPO activity, blood-to-lumen clearance of (51)Cr-EDTA and caused a marked microscopic damage in the intestinal mucosa. ET-3-induced elevations in tissue PMN infiltration and mucosal damage were significantly inhibited by pretreatments with ET-A or ET-B receptor antagonists. Overall, our data indicate that ET-3 causes microscopic damage, PMN infiltration and mucosal dysfunction in the rat small intestine. In addition, ET-3-induced hemodynamic alterations as well as tissue PMN infiltration and mucosal damage are mediated by both ET-A and ET-B receptors.

E-ring 8-isoprostanes are agonists at EP2- and EP4-prostanoid receptors on human airway smooth muscle cells and regulate the release of colony-stimulating factors by activating cAMP-dependent protein kinase

8-Isoprostanes are bioactive lipid mediators formed via the nonenzymatic peroxidation of arachidonic acid by free radicals and reactive oxygen species. However, their cognate receptors, biological actions, and signaling pathways are poorly studied. Here, we report the effect of a variety of E- and Falpha-ring 8-isoprostanes on the release of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) from human airway smooth muscle (HASM) cells stimulated with interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta). The elaboration of GM-CSF and G-CSF by IL-1beta was inhibited and augmented, respectively, in a concentration-dependent manner by 8-iso-prostaglandin (PG) E(1) and 8-iso-PGE(2), but not by 8-iso-PGF(1alpha), 8-iso-PGF(2alpha), and 8-iso-PGF(3)alpha. AH 6809 (6-isopropoxy-9-oxoxanthine-2-carboxylic acid), an EP(1)-/EP(2)-/DP-receptor blocking drug, antagonized the inhibitory effect of 8-iso-PGE(1) and 8-iso-PGE(2) on GM-CSF output with an affinity consistent with an interaction at prostanoid receptors of the EP(2)-subtype. In contrast, the facilitation by 8-iso-PGE(1) and 8-iso-PGE(2) of G-CSF release was unaffected by AH 6809 and the selective EP(4)-receptor antagonist L-161,982 [4'-[3-butyl-5-oxo-1-(2-trifluoromethyl-phenyl)-1,5-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazol-4-ylmethyl]-biphenyl-2-sulfonic acid (3-methyl-thiophene-2-carbonyl)-amide]. However, when used in combination, AH 6809 and L-161,982 displaced 5-fold to the right the 8-iso-PGE and 8-iso-PGE concentration-response curves. The opposing (1)effect of E-ring (2)8-isoprostanes on GM-CSF and G-CSF release was mimicked by 8-bromo-cAMP and abolished in cells infected with an adenovirus vector encoding an inhibitor protein of cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Together, these data demonstrate that E-ring 8-isoprostanes regulate the secretion of GM-CSF and G-CSF from HASM cells by a cAMP- and PKA-dependent mechanism. Moreover, antagonist studies revealed that 8-iso-PGE(1) and 8-iso-PGE(2) act solely via EP(2) -receptors to inhibit GM-CSF release, whereas both EP(2)- and EP(4)-receptor subtypes positively regulate G-CSF output.

Role of endothelin ETA and ETB receptors in the guinea-pig urinary bladder contraction

The distribution and function of endothelin receptors in the guinea-pig urinary bladder were examined. Specific [125I]endothelin-1 binding sites with both the endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptor subtypes were distributed in the muscle layer. Endothelin-1 elicited a tonic contraction which was inhibited by cyclo(D-Asp-Pro-D-Val-Leu-D-Trp) (BQ123) but not by N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine (BQ788) and which was inhibited more strongly by a combination of BQ123 and BQ788. Sarafotoxin S6c elicited a contraction which was abolished by BQ788. The concentration of endothelin-1 in the muscle layer was 707.0+/-67.5 pg/g wet weight. Thus, endothelin-1 may regulate muscle tone via both subtypes of endothelin receptors in an autocrine manner in the guinea-pig urinary bladder.

Endothelin-1-induced venous contraction is maintained in DOCA-salt hypertension; studies with receptor agonists

1. Deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA) salt hypertension is associated with an endothelin-1 (ET-1)-dependent increase in arterial resistance and mean circulatory filling pressure. Contraction of endothelium-intact arteries and veins from sham and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats to agonists of the ET(A) (ET-1((1-31))) and ET(B) receptor (sarafotoxin 6c; S6c) was investigated in tissue baths as was expression of mRNA for ET-1 and mRNA and protein for the ET(A) and ET(B) receptor. 2. ET-1((1-31)) contracted aorta and vena cava from sham rats with a 30 fold lower potency than ET-1. Contraction was not altered by the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ788 (100 nM) but was abolished by the ET(A) receptor antagonist ABT-627 (30 nM). 3. In DOCA-salt thoracic aorta, maximum contraction to ET-1 and ET-1((1-31)) was reduced (36.6 +/- 6.3 and 13.3 +/- 4.4% of sham response, respectively); aorta did not contract to S6c. 4. In vena cava from DOCA-salt rats, contraction to ET-1 and ET-1((1-31)) was not reduced compared to sham contraction; vena cava from sham and DOCA-salt rats contracted to S6c with a similar potency. 5. Real time RT-PCR revealed that prepro ET-1 mRNA was increased 6.6 +/- 3.3 fold and 8.7 +/- 3.9 fold greater in DOCA-salt aorta and vena cava, respectively, compared to sham. Vena cava expressed a higher content of ET(A) and ET(B) receptor mRNA than aorta (P < 0.05), but no differences were observed between sham and DOCA-salt tissues. ET(A) and ET(B) receptor protein was identified in all tissues. Immunoreactive ET(A) receptor, observed as a 65, 30 and 28 kDa bands, was expressed 400% greater in DOCA-salt aorta compared to sham, but was not altered in vena cava. Immunoreactive ET(B) receptor, observed as 120, 45 and 30 kDa bands, tended to be higher in vena cava compared to aorta, but was not different in sham and DOCA-salt vena cava. 6. These results suggest that ET(A) receptor function is impaired in aorta but not vena cava of DOCA-salt rats. The ET(B) receptor was present in the aorta but, unlike in veins, does not mediate contraction directly. A sustained response to ET-1 in the venous circulation may contribute to the elevated blood pressure in the DOCA-salt model.

BQ-788, a selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist

We describe characteristics of a selective endothelin (ET) ET(B) receptor antagonist, BQ-788 [N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D-1-methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine], which is widely used to demonstrate the role of endogenous or exogenous ETs in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, BQ-788 potently and competitively inhibited (125)I-labeled ET-1 binding to ET(B) receptors in human Girrardi heart cells (hGH) with an IC(50) of 1.2 nM, but only poorly inhibited the binding to ET A receptors in human neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-MC cells (IC(50), 1300 nM). In isolated rabbit pulmonary arteries, BQ-788 showed no agonistic activity up to 10 microM and competitively inhibited the vasoconstriction induced by an ET(B)-selective agonist (pA(2), 8.4). BQ-788 also inhibited several bioactivities of ET-1, such as bronchoconstriction, cell proliferation, and clearance of perfused ET-1. Thus, it is confirmed that BQ-788 is a potent, selective ET(B) receptor antagonist. In vivo, in conscious rats, BQ-788, 3 mg/kg/h, i.v., completely inhibited a pharmacological dose of ET-1- or sarafotoxin6c (S6c) (0.5 nmol/kg, i.v.)-induced ET(B) receptor-mediated depressor, but not pressor responses. Furthermore, BQ-788 markedly increased the plasma concentration of ET-1, which is considered an index of potential ET(B) receptor blockade in vivo. In Dahl salt-sensitive hypertensive (DS) rats, BQ-788, 3 mg/kg/h, i.v., increased blood pressure by about 20 mm Hg. It is reported that BQ-788 also inhibited ET-1-induced bronchoconstriction, tumor growth and lipopolysaccharide-induced organ failure. These data suggest that BQ-788 is a good tool for demonstrating the role of ET-1 and ET(B) receptor subtypes in physiological and/or pathophysiological conditions.

Endothelin receptor function in mesenteric veins from deoxycorticosterone acetate salt-hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVES

To identify the receptors by which endothelin-1 (ET-1) increases venomotor tone in hypertension.

METHODS

Vascular reactivity to ET-1 and the selective endothelin receptor subtype B (ET(B)) agonist, sarafotoxin 6c (S6c), was studied in mesenteric blood vessels from deoxycorticosterone acetate (DOCA-salt) hypertensive and normotensive control rats. The diameter of small (< or = 280 microm) mesenteric arteries and veins was monitored in vitro using computer-assisted video microscopy. Contractions of mesenteric arteries (< or= 250 microm diameter) were also studied, using a myograph. ET-1 mRNA levels were measured in mesenteric arteries and veins using real-time RT-PCR techniques.

RESULTS

ET-1-induced contractions were reduced in arteries of DOCA-salt hypertensive rats compared with those of normotensive control rats; S6c produced negligible contractions in arteries from both groups. ET-1 concentration-responses curves in arteries measured using video microscopy or a myograph were similar. ET-1 and S6c caused veins to contract, and there were no differences between responses to these agonists in tissues from DOCA-salt hypertensive rats or normotensive control rats. Studies using ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonists indicated that ET-1-induced venoconstriction was mediated by ET(A) receptors. Potassium chloride concentration-response curves were similar in arteries and veins from normotensive control rats and DOCA-salt hypertensive rats. ET-1 mRNA levels in DOCA-salt hypertensive rat arteries or veins were not different from those in normotensive control rat arteries and veins.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that ET-1 reactivity is maintained in mesenteric veins, but not arteries, in DOCA-salt hypertension. Therefore, the sustained increase in venomotor tone mediated by ET(A) receptors that is known to occur in vivo in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats is not caused by direct venoconstriction.

Endothelin-1 binding to endothelin receptors in the rat anterior pituitary gland: possible formation of an ETA-ETB receptor heterodimer

1. Interaction in the recognition of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a typical bivalent ET receptor-ligand, between ETA and ETB receptors was investigated in the rat anterior pituitary gland, using our quantitative receptor autoradiographic method with tissue sections preserving the cell-membrane structure and ET receptor-related compounds. 2. In saturation binding studies with increasing concentrations (0.77-200 pM) of 125I-ET-1 (nonselective bivalent radioligand), 125I-ET-1 binding to the rat anterior pituitary gland was saturable and single with a KD of 71 pM and a Bmax of 120 fmol mg(-1). When 1.0 microM BQ-123 (ETA antagonist) was added to the incubation buffer, binding parameters were 8.3 pM of KD and 8.0 fmol mg(-1) of Bmax, whereas 10 nM sarafotoxin S6c (ETB agonist) exerted little change in these binding parameters (KD, 72 pM; Bmax, 110 fmol mg(-1)). 3. Competition binding studies with a fixed amount (3.8 pM) of 125 I-ET-1 revealed that when 1.0 microM BQ-123 was present in the incubation buffer, ETB receptor-related compounds such as sarafotoxin S6c, ET-3, IRL1620 (ETB agonist), and BQ-788 (ETB antagonist) competitively inhibited 125I-ET-1 binding with K(i)s of 140,18,350 pM, and 14 nM, respectively, however, these compounds were not significant competitors for 125I-ET-1 binding in the case of absence of BQ-123. 4. In cold-ligand saturation studies with a fixed amount (390 pM) of 125I-IRL 1620 (ETB radioligand), IRL1620 bound to a single population of the ETB receptor, and no change was observed in binding characteristics in the presence of 1.0 microM BQ-123. 125I-IRL1620 binding was competitively inhibited by ET-1 and ET-3 in the absence of BQ-123, with K(i)s of 20 and 29 pM, respectively, the affinities being much the same as those of 29 nM, in the presence of 1.0 microM BQ-123. 5. Two nonbivalent ETA antagonists, BQ-123 and PD151242, were highly sensitive and full competitors for 125I-ET-1 binding (5.0 pM), in the presence of 10 nM sarafotoxin S6c. 6. Taken together with the present finding that mRNAs encoding the rat ETA and the ETB receptors are expressed in the anterior pituitary gland, we tentatively conclude that although there are ETA and ETB receptors with a functional binding capability for ET receptor-ligands, the ETB receptor does not independently recognize ET-1 without the aid of the ETA receptor. If this thesis is tenable, then ET-1 can bridge between the two receptors to form an ETA-ETB receptor heterodimer.

Combined endothelin receptor blockade evokes enhanced vasodilatation in patients with atherosclerosis

Endothelin (ET)-1 causes vasoconstriction via ET(A) and ET(B) receptors located on vascular smooth muscle cells and vasodilatation via ET(B) receptors on endothelial cells. Studies in vitro indicate an upregulation of ET(B) receptors in atherosclerosis. The present study investigated the vascular effects evoked by endogenous ET-1 in atherosclerotic patients. Forearm blood flow (FBF) was measured with venous occlusion plethysmography in 10 patients with atherosclerosis and in 10 healthy control subjects during intra-arterial infusion of selective ET receptor antagonists. The ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ788 evoked a significant increase in FBF (31+/-13%) in the patients, whereas a 20+/-9% reduction was observed in the control subjects. The ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ123 combined with BQ788 evoked a marked increase in FBF (102+/-25%) in the patients compared with no effect in the control subjects (-3+/-9%, P<0.001 versus patients). The ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ123 increased FBF to a similar degree in patients (39+/-11%) as in control subjects (41+/-11%). The increase in FBF evoked by selective ET(A) receptor blockade was significantly (P<0.05) less than that evoked by combined ET(A)/ET(B) receptor blockade in the atherosclerotic patients. These observations suggest an enhanced ET-1-mediated vascular tone in atherosclerotic patients, which is at least partly due to increased ET(B)-mediated vasoconstriction.

Modulation of noradrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in isolated perfused mesenteric arterial beds from obese Zucker rats in the presence and absence of insulin

The genetically obese Zucker rat (fa/fa) is an insulin-resistant animal model with early-onset severe hyperinsulinemia that eventually develops mild hypertension. Thus, it represents a model in which the effect of hyperinsulinemia - insulin resistance associated with hypertension on vascular reactivity can be examined. The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins to reactivity to noradrenaline (NA) in the presence and absence of insulin in mesenteric arterial beds (MAB) from 25-week-old obese Zucker rats and their lean, gender-matched littermates. In the absence of insulin, bolus injection of NA (0.9-90 nmol) produced a dose-dependent increase in perfusion pressure in MAB from both lean and obese rats. Although there was no significant difference in NA pD2 (-log ED50) values, the maximum response of MAB from obese rats to NA was slightly but significantly reduced compared with that of MAB from lean rats. The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 300 microM) enhanced and indomethacin (20 microM) inhibited pressor responses to NA in MAB from both obese and lean rats. Perfusion with insulin (200 mU/L, a level similar to that in obese rats in vivo) potentiated only the responses of the obese MAB to the two lowest doses of NA tested (0.9 and 3 nmol). In the presence of L-NMMA, insulin further potentiated the NA response in MAB from obese rats. Indomethacin, the prostaglandin H2/thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist SQ 29548 (0.3 microM), and the nonselective endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptor antagonist bosentan (3 microM) all abolished insulin potentiation of the NA response in obese MAB. These data suggest that concurrent release of NO and vasoconstrictor cyclooxygenase product(s) in MAB from both obese and lean Zucker rats normally regulates NA-induced vasoconstrictor responses. Furthermore, insulin increases the release of contracting cyclooxygenase product(s) and enhances reactivity to low doses of NA in MAB from obese rats. The effects of insulin may be partially mediated by ET-1 via ET receptors and are buffered to some extent by concomitant NO release. This altered action of insulin may play a role in hypertension in this hyperinsulinemic - insulin-resistant model.

Basic and therapeutic relevance of endothelin-mediated regulation

Three endothelin family peptides (endothelin-1, -2 and -3) exert an extremely potent and long-lasting vasoconstrictor action as well as other various actions through stimulating two subtypes of receptor (ETA and ETB). Vascular endothelial cells produce only endothelin-1. Although the pharmacological actions of exogenous endothelin-1 have been extensively analyzed, the physiological roles of endogenous endothelin-1 have long been obscure. Using potent and selective receptor antagonists, endothelin-1 has been demonstrated to contribute slightly to the maintenance of regional vascular tone. In gene-targeted mice, endothelin family peptides and their receptors have been shown to play an important role in the embryonic development of neural crest-derived tissues. In addition to its potent vasoconstrictor action, endothelin-1 has direct mitogenic actions on cardiovascular tissues, as well as co-mitogenic actions with a wide variety of growth factors and vasoactive substances. Endothelin-1 also promotes the synthesis and secretion of various substances including extracellular constituents. These effects of endogenous endothelin-1 would appear to be naturally concerned with the development and/or aggravation of chronic cardiovascular diseases, e.g. hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, vascular remodeling (restenosis, atherosclerosis), renal failure, and heart failure. A great many non-peptide and orally active endothelin receptor antagonists have been developed, and shown to exert excellent therapeutic effects in animal models as well as human patients with these diseases.

Differential adrenomedullin release and endothelin receptor expression in distinct subpopulations of human airway smooth-muscle cells

Although adrenomedullin (ADM) is implicated in the control of airway tone, regulation of ADM release from airway smooth-muscle cells (ASMCs) has not been explored. Preliminary experiments have indicated that human ASMC populations were heterogeneous in their rate of ADM release and expression of endothelin (ET)(A) and ET(B) receptors. We isolated these phenotypically distinct ASMCs from explants derived from the same airway segment. ASMCs possessing exclusively ET(A) receptors appeared smaller and proliferated faster than ET(A)/ET(B) isolates. Macroautoradiographic analysis confirmed the presence of both receptors in human bronchi. ADM release and messenger RNA expression was greater in ET(A)/ET(B) isolates compared with ET(A) isolates. No measurable ET release was detected from ASMCs. Exogenous ET-1 (1 to 100 nM) more potently stimulated the release of ADM from ET(A)/ET(B) compared with ET(A) isolates. In addition, ET-3 (1 to 100 nM) stimulated ADM release only from ET(A)/ET(B) isolates, implicating the ET(B) receptor in this response. Exogenous ET-1 potentiated platelet- derived growth factor-stimulated [3H]thymidine uptake in ET(A)/ ET(B) but not ET(A) isolates. ET-3 did not affect [3H]thymidine uptake in either cell type. Possession of ET(A)/ET(B) receptors is associated with higher rates of ADM release and slower proliferation, but a capacity for ET-1 stimulated DNA synthesis via ET(A) receptors. These results support a paracrine role for the regulation of ADM release predominantly via the ET(B) receptor in human ASMCs.

Evidence that ET-1, but not ET-3 and S6b, ET(A)-receptor mediated contractions in isolated rat mesenteric arteries are modulated by co-activation of ET(B) receptors

The effects of agonists with endothelin (ET) ET(A)-receptor activity have been analysed in relation to their interaction with ET(B) receptors in rat mesenteric arteries. ET-1, sarafotoxin 6b (S6b) and ET-3 induced large, slow-onset and sustained contractions whereas S6c induced weak transient contractions. However, following pre-contraction with U46619 and subsequent relaxation with forskolin, the effect of S6c was amplified, indicating a potential for powerful ET(B)-receptor mediated contraction. The selective ET(A)-receptor antagonist, FR139317, produced parallel rightward shifts of ET-1, S6b and ET-3 concentration-effect curves indicating that the contractions were mediated by ET(A) receptors. However, the corresponding FR139317 pK(B) values were significantly different between the agonists. As expected FR139317 had no effect on S6c responses. Pre-treatment with S6c to desensitize ET(B) receptors, increased ET-1 potency and the pK(B) value for FR139317. In contrast, neither the potency of S6b and ET-3 nor the pK(B) values for FR139317 estimated using these agonists were affected by ET(B)-receptor desensitization. Segments pre-contracted with submaximal concentrations of S6b and ET-3, but not ET-1, rapidly relaxed following wash-out or FR139317 administration. The results indicate that the small contractile response to selective ET(B) receptor activation, barely detectable under standard bioassay conditions, is greatly amplified when adenylate cyclase activity is elevated. Moreover, the response to ET(A) receptor activation by ET-1, but not ET-3 and S6b, is significantly modified by co-activation of ET(B) receptors. This interaction has a significant effect on the apparent affinity of ET(A)-receptor selective antagonists when ET-1 is used as agonist and decreases the potency of ET-1.

Differential modulation of endothelin ligand-induced contraction in isolated tracheae from endothelin B (ET(B)) receptor knockout mice

The role of endothelin B (ET(B)) receptors in mediating ET ligand-induced contractions in mouse trachea was examined in ET(B) receptor knockout animals. Autoradiographic binding studies, using [(125)I]-ET-1, confirmed the presence of ET(A) receptors in tracheal and bronchial airway smooth muscle from wild-type (+/+) and homozygous recessive (-/-) ET(B) receptor knockout mice. In contrast, ET(B) receptors were not detected in airway tissues from (-/-) mice. In tracheae from (+/+) mice, the rank order of potencies of the ET ligands was sarafotoxin (Stx) S6c>ET-1>ET-3; Stx S6c had a lower efficacy than ET-1 or ET-3. In tissues from (-/-) mice there was no response to Stx S6c (up to 0.1 microM), whereas the maximum responses and potencies of ET-1 and ET-3 were similar to those in (+/+) tracheae. ET-3 concentration-response curve was biphasic in (+/+) tissues (via ET(A) and ET(B) receptor activation), and monophasic in (-/-) preparations (via stimulation of only ET(A) receptors). In (+/+) preparations SB 234551 (1 nM), an ET(A) receptor-selective antagonist, inhibited the secondary phase, but not the first phase, of the ET-3 concentration-response curve, whereas A192621 (100 nM), an ET(B) receptor-selective antagonist, had the opposite effect. In (-/-) tissues SB 234551 (1 nM), but not A192621 (100 nM), produced a rightward shift in ET-3 concentration-response curves. The results confirm the significant influence of both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in mediating ET-1-induced contractions in mouse trachea. Furthermore, the data do not support the hypothesis of atypical ET(B) receptors. In this preparation ET-3 is not an ET(B) receptor-selective ligand, producing contractions via activation of both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors.

Effect of a novel bifunctional endothelin receptor antagonist, IRL 3630A, on guinea pig respiratory mechanics

This study characterized the in vitro pharmacological properties of a newly developed endothelin receptor antagonist, N-butanesulfonyl-[N-(3, 5-dimethylbenzoyl)-N-methyl-3-[4-(5-isoxazolyl)-phenyl]-(D)- alanyl]-( L)-valineamide sodium salt (IRL 3630A), and its in vivo effects on respiratory mechanics were determined. IRL 3630A showed highly balanced affinities to human endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, giving apparent K(i) values of 1.5 and 1.2 nM, respectively. This compound also potently antagonized the endothelin-1-induced intracellular Ca(2+) increases in both embryonic bovine tracheal (EBTr) cells expressing endothelin ET(A) receptors and human Girardi heart (hGH) cells expressing endothelin ET(B) receptors. In guinea pig isolated tracheas having both endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, IRL 3630A greatly inhibited endothelin-1-induced contraction (pA(2)=7.1), which was partially or scarcely suppressed by the endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist cyclo[-(D)-Trp-(D)-Asp-(L)-Pro-(D)-Val-(L)-Leu-] (BQ-123) or the endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist N-(3, 5-dimethylbenzoyl)-N-methyl-3-(4-phenyl)-(D)-phenylalanyl-(L)-t ryptop han (IRL 2500), respectively. Bolus i.v. injections of IRL 3630A administered into anaesthetized guinea pigs at 10 and 30 microg/kg inhibited endothelin-1 (1.3 microg/kg)-induced changes in respiratory resistance and compliance in a dose dependent manner, whereas both sodium 2-benzo[1, 3]dioxol-5-yl-4-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-4-oxo-3-(3,4, 5-trimethoxy-benzyl)-but-2-enoate (an endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist: PD 156707) and IRL 2500 at doses of up to 30 microg/kg did not affect endothelin-1-induced changes in respiratory mechanics, reflecting the in vitro results. IRL 3630A is thus an effective bifunctional endothelin receptor antagonist, and will be useful in clarifying the role of endothelin in pulmonary diseases such as bronchial asthma.

Antiadrenergic effects of endothelin-1 on the L-type Ca2+ current in dog ventricular myocytes

The effect of endothelin-1 (ET-1) on L-type Ca2+ current (I(Ca)) and the interaction of ET-1 with beta-adrenergic stimulation were studied in dog ventricular myocytes by means of a whole-cell patch-clamp technique. ET-1 (10(-8) M) had no effect on the baseline I(Ca), but at 10(-9)-10(-7) M, it inhibited the isoproterenol (ISO)-induced increase in I(Ca). The maximal inhibition induced by ET-1 at 3 x 10(-8) M was approximately 30%, and the median inhibitory (IC50) value of ET-1 was 1.1 x 10(-9) M. The inhibitory action of ET-1 (10(-8) M) on the ISO-induced increase in I(Ca) was markedly attenuated by the ET(A) antagonist FR139317 (10(-6) M) and was partially inhibited by the ET(B) antagonist BQ-788 (10(-6) M). The inhibitory action of ET-1 was totally inhibited by the nonselective ET-receptor antagonist, TAK-044 (10(-6) M). These results indicate that ET-1 exerts an antiadrenergic effect on the ISO-induced increase in I(Ca), which is mediated mainly by ET(A), but activation of ET(B) receptors might contribute to the effect of ET-1 to a lesser extent.

Endothelin-1 is a potent activator of nonselective cation currents in human bronchial smooth muscle cells

The effects of endothelin (ET)-1 on cultured human bronchial smooth muscle cells (HBSMC) were investigated and compared with those of histamine, using the patch clamp techniques and measurements of intracellular Ca(2+) ([Ca(2+)](i)). Both ET-1 and histamine caused an initial transient elevation of [Ca(2+)](i) by Ca(2+) mobilization, followed by a sustained rise due to Ca(2+) entry. Nicardipine inhibited the sustained phase, but La(3+) abolished it. With low ethyleneglycol-bis-(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and K(+) internal solutions, both ET-1 and histamine induced a sustained depolarization from approximately -40 to -20 mV. Under voltage clamp conditions, both drugs transiently activated an outward K(+) current at a holding potential of 0 mV. Additionally, with a Cs(+) internal solution, they elicited another transient inward current, frequently followed by current oscillations. These transient currents were blocked by high EGTA or heparin. With high EGTA and Cs(+) internal solutions, both drugs activated a long-lasting inward current. The reversal potential of these agonist-induced currents was approximately 0 mV and was not altered by the replacement of internal or external concentration of Cl(-), suggesting that the inward current was a nonselective cation current (I(cat)). The half-maximal effective concentration to activate I(cat) was 12 nM for ET-1 and 11 microM for histamine. La(3+) and Cd(2+) abolished these agonist-induced I(cat). The effects of ET-1 on [Ca(2+)](i) and I(cat) could be blocked by combined pretreatment with BQ-123 and BQ-788. Sarafotoxin S6c also increased [Ca(2+)](i) and activated I(cat). By polymerase chain reaction of reverse transcribed RNA, we detected both ET-A and ET-B receptor messenger RNA. These results provide the first evidence that ET-1 is a potent activator of I(cat) in HBSMC via ET-A and ET-B receptors, and the activation of I(cat) plays an important role in ET-1-induced Ca(2+) entry in human airways.

Endothelium and aortic contraction to endothelin-1 in the pregnant rat

Endothelium-derived factors modulate tone and may be involved in hyporeactivity to vasoconstrictors, such as norepinephrine or angiotensin II, as has been previously described during gestation. The endothelium produces endothelin-1, a major vasoconstrictor peptide, therefore aortic contractions to endothelin-1 (10-10 to 3 ×10-7 M) were used to assess the role of the endothelium in pregnant Wistar rats (at 20 days of gestation). Late pregnancy is characterized by a significantly diminished systolic blood pressure in conscious rats (-17 mmHg, P < 0.001, n = 14). In pregnant and in age-matched nonpregnant female rats, endothelin-1 induced aortic contraction was greater when endothelium was present (at least P < 0.01). Indomethacin significantly reduced this contraction in aortic rings with intact endothelium in all groups. In aortic rings that had endothelium physically removed, contraction to endothelin-1 was greater in pregnant rats than in nonpregnant ones. Indomethacin decreased contraction of aortic rings in pregnant rats only. These results suggest an enhanced synthesis of vasoconstrictors by cyclooxygenases in vascular smooth muscle during pregnancy. In vessels with intact endothelium, we did not find hyporeactivity to endothelin-1 during late pregnancy. Contraction to endothelin-1 involved ETA receptors because it was decreased by BQ-123, an ETA receptor antagonist, whereas there was no significant change when using BQ-788, an ETB receptor antagonist.

Key words: endothelin-1, endothelium, contraction, aorta, gestation.

Effects on haemodynamics by selective endothelin ET(B) receptor and combined endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonism during endotoxin shock

The endothelin system is highly activated during endotoxin and septic shock. To investigate this matter the selective non-peptide endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonist A-192621 ([2R-(2alpha,3beta, 4alpha)]-4-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-yl)-1-[2-[2, 6-diethylphenyl)amino]-2-oxoethyl]-2-(4-propoxy-phenyl)-3-py rrolidine carboxylic acid) was administered alone and in combination with the selective non-peptide endothelin ET(A) receptor antagonist PD 155080 (sodium 2-benzo[1, 3]dioxol-5-yl-3-benzyl-4-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-4-oxobut-2-enoat e) during established porcine endotoxin shock. Cardiopulmonary vascular function, metabolic parameters and plasma endothelin-1-like immunoreactivity levels were compared to a control group only receiving endotoxin. Administration of A-192621 alone resulted in cardiovascular collapse and death whereas combining A-192621 with PD 155080 abolished endotoxin induced pulmonary hypertension, enhanced cardiac performance and improved systemic oxygen delivery and acid-base balance. The beneficial effects of mixed endothelin ET(A)/ET(B) receptor antagonisms on the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems may result from blockage of constrictive endothelin receptors in and pulmonary circulation, reduced afterload and a direct inotropic effect. Possible mechanisms for the devastating effects by selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism include increased endothelin ET(A) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction due to lack of endothelin ET(B) receptormediated vasodilation and decreased endothelin clearance from endothelin ET(B) receptor blockade. In conclusion, selective endothelin ET(B) receptor antagonism is deleterious whereas combined endothelin ET(A) and ET(B) receptor antagonism has favourable effects on haemodynamics, suggesting participation of the endothelin system in cardiopulmonary dysfunction during endotoxin shock.

Endothelins and asthma

In the decade since endothelin-1 (ET-1) and related endogenous peptides were first identified as vascular endothelium-derived spasmogens, with potential pathophysiological roles in vascular diseases, there has been a significant accumulation of evidence pointing to mediator roles in obstructive respiratory diseases such as asthma. Critical pieces of evidence for this concept include the fact that ET-1 is an extremely potent spasmogen in human and animal airway smooth muscle and that it is synthesised in and released from the bronchial epithelium. Importantly, symptomatic asthma involves a marked enhancement of these processes, whereas asthmatics treated with anti-inflammatory glucocorticoids exhibit reductions in these previously elevated indices. Despite this profile, a causal link between ET-1 and asthma has not been definitively established. This review attempts to bring together some of the evidence suggesting the potential mediator roles for ET-1 in this disease.

Suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]-endothelin-1 (8-21), IRL 1620, identifies two populations of ET(B) receptors in guinea-pig bronchus

The pharmacological properties of endothelin receptors (ETR) were investigated in guinea-pig bronchus by comparing binding and functional results. In binding assays, both the ET(B) agonists, endothelin-3 (ET-3) and N-suc-[Glu9,Ala11,15]ET-1(8-21) (IRL 1620), and the antagonist, N-cis-2,6-dimethylpiperidinocarbonyl-L-gamma-methylleucyl-D- 1-methoxycarbonyltryptophanyl-D-norleucine (BQ 788), showed biphasic inhibition curves of [125I]-endothelin-1 (ET-1) binding to bronchus membranes prepared from intact or epithelium-deprived tissue. IRL 1620 did not completely displace specifically [125I]-ET-1 bound to these tissue preparations. In the presence of the ET(A)-selective antagonist, cyclo(-D-Trp-D-Asp-L-Pro-D-Val-L-Leu) (BQ 123, 1 microM), IRL 1620 displacement curves were shallow but a complete inhibition was reached at a concentration of 1 microM. Both curves were better represented by two-site models. In addition, BQ 788 competition curves became monophasic when binding experiments were performed in the presence of 1 microM BQ 123. The non-selective agonist, ET-1, and BQ 123 inhibited [125I]-ET binding to bronchus membranes in dose-dependent fashions with monophasic curves. The contracting activity of IRL 1620 (0.55 nM- 1.6 microM) was tested on multiple-ring bronchial preparations pretreated with peptidase and cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors. BQ 788 shifted IRL1620 concentration-response curves to the right while BQ 123 did not influence bronchial responsiveness. In addition, a potentiation of the maximal response to the agonist was observed in BQ 788 treated bronchial rings. This effect was abolished by tissue pretreatment with Nomega-nitro-L-argininemethylester (L-NAME) or epithelium removal but not by pretreatment with atropine or iberiotoxin. Our results demonstrate that guinea-pig bronchus contains two populations of ET(B) receptors with different affinities for the ET(B)-selective agonist, IRL 1620. One ET(B) receptor population appears to activate bronchial muscle contraction while another on epithelial cells causes muscle relaxation through the release of nitric oxide (NO).

Does blockade of endothelinB1-receptor activation increase endothelinB2/endothelinA receptor-mediated constriction in the rabbit basilar artery?

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether endothelin (ET)-1 activation of ETB1 receptors influences the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated ET-1 constriction in the rabbit basilar artery. Initial challenge of ET-1-constricted vessels with BQ610, an ETA-receptor antagonist, resulted in approximately 60% relaxation, and subsequent addition of BQ788, an ETB1/2-receptor antagonist, relaxed the remaining constriction. To test whether blockade of ETB1 receptors influenced the relative magnitude of ETA/ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, ET-1-constricted vessels were exposed to RES-701-1, an ETB1-receptor antagonist, before challenge with BQ610 or BQ788. RES-701-1 enhanced the ET-1 constriction by approximately 60%, consistent with blockade of ETB1 receptor-mediated endothelium-dependent relaxation. In ET-1-constricted vessels treated with RES-701-1, BQ610 challenge resulted in complete relaxation, whereas BQ788 was without effect. However, when 10 nM acetylcholine was added to RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels, (a) BQ610 challenge resulted in only approximately 30% relaxation, and subsequent BQ788 addition relaxed the remaining constriction; and (b) BQ788 challenge resulted in approximately 35% relaxation, and subsequent BQ610 addition relaxed the remaining constriction. Acetylcholine induced approximately 10% relaxation of RES-701-1-treated ET-1-constricted vessels. It is speculated that a dynamic relation exists between ETA and ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction, such that ET-1-induced ETB2 receptor-mediated constriction of the basilar artery is dependent on ETB1 receptor activation and, in the absence of this activation, the constriction reverts to completely ETA receptor mediated.

Endothelin receptor distribution and function in the airways

1. Within the lung, endothelin (ET)-1 is synthesized and released by airway epithelial and vascular endothelial cells, as well as by inflammatory cells, such as macrophages. Following release, ET-1 can modulate the activities of a wide range of different cell types within the lung through the stimulation of specific endothelin ETA and ETB receptors. The present review focuses on recent advances in our understanding of the distribution and function of endothelin receptors within the airway wall and peripheral lung and, where possible, particular attention is given to studies using human cells, tissues and subjects. 2. The highest densities of endothelin receptors within the lung appear to be associated with airway smooth muscle and the alveolar septae. The relative proportions of ETA and ETB receptors present within these tissues display marked interspecies differences, although ETB receptors predominate at both sites in human lung. 3. The effects induced by ET-1 within the lung include contraction and proliferation of airway smooth muscle, facilitation of cholinergic neurotransmission, mucous gland hypersecretion, microvascular leakage and inflammatory cell influx and activation. There is also evidence that a proportion of ETB receptors in the pulmonary microvasculature act as clearance receptors for endothelin-1. 4. Evidence to date suggests that changes in the endothelin content within the airway wall, conceivably associated with lung pathology, are likely to have profound effects on the function of many cells within the lung.

Selective activation of excitation-contraction coupling pathways by ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle

1. Signalling events responsible for endothelin(A) (ET(A)) and ET(B) receptor-induced contraction were examined in epithelium-denuded guinea-pig tracheal smooth muscle strips. Selective stimulation of each subtype was achieved by a combination of ET-1 (100 nM) and ET(A) and ET(B) receptor-selective antagonists, BQ-123 (10 microM) and BQ-788 (3 microM), respectively. 2. Both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors induced long-lasting contraction that was totally dependent on Ca2+ influx. Stimulation of ET(A) receptor induced both transient and sustained (Ca2+)i increases whereas that of ET(B) receptor induced only a sustained increase. Suppression of the transient (Ca2+)i increase by U73122 (3 microM) did not affect the ET(A)-induced sustained (Ca2+)i increase and tension development. Stimulation of ET(A) receptor, but not ET(B), induced phosphoinositide breakdown and protein kinase C (PKC). The activated PKC contributed to the contraction by increasing the Ca2+ sensitivity of the contractile apparatus. 3. Thus, ET(A) receptor is coupled both with phospholipase C/Ca2+/PKC signalling and Ca2+ influx pathways whereas ET(B) receptor was coupled only with the latter. 4. Stimulation of ET(B) receptor, but not ET(A), caused membrane depolarization measured with a fluorescent indicator, bis-(1,3 dibutylbarbituric acid)-trimethine oxonol. Both nifedipine (1 microM) and verapamil (10 microM) abolished ET(B)-induced Ca2+ influx and contraction, while they barely affected ET(A)-induced responses. 5. Therefore, the Ca2+ influx pathways activated by each subtype appeared to be completely different; ET(A) and ET(B) receptors opens voltage-independent Ca2+ channels and L-type voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels, respectively.

Radioiodinated endothelin-1: a radiotracer for imaging endothelin receptor distribution and occupancy

Endothelin (ET) is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors known. Recently, ET has been implicated in various diseases, e.g., acute renal failure and congestive heart failure, which present the possibility of treating such diseases with endothelin receptor antagonists. However, establishing the dosages for these antagonists may be difficult because no convenient physiologic indicator of action exists, and because of complexities in receptor function. Two receptor subtypes have been identified for which selective antagonists have been reported (e.g., BQ-123 for the ETA receptor and BQ-788 for the ETB receptor). Of the three natural peptide hormones (ET-1, ET-2, and ET-3), ET-1 exhibits high affinity for both subtypes of receptor. Using the selective peptide antagonists, and a nonpeptide antagonist with relatively balanced affinity for the two subtypes (L-749,329), we have characterized the interactions of [125I]ET-1 with its receptors in vivo (in rat). BQ-123, BQ-788, and L-749,329 inhibited binding consistent with binding to a single receptor site. However, the sum of inhibition by the selective antagonist was greater than 100% (as defined by inhibition with L-749,329), which suggests (a) lower in vivo selectivity than determined in vitro and/or (b) receptor subtype interactions. The latter explanation is supported, in part, by in vitro autoradiographic studies as well as studies in isolated tissues and cells. We synthesized ET-1 labeled with I-123 and obtained images of receptor distribution in both rat and rhesus monkey and have demonstrated our ability to visualize, via planar, noninvasive imaging, the occupancy of endothelin receptor by antagonists in both kidney and lung. [123I]ET-1 can therefore be used to determine clinical dosages of antagonist needed for receptor saturation.

Putative mediator role of endothelin-1 in asthma and other lung diseases

1. There is an increasing amount of research to implicate endothelin (ET)-1, a member of a family of 21 amino acid peptides, as a potentially important mediator in pulmonary diseases, in particular asthma and pulmonary hypertension. Thus, ET-1 fits several of the standard criteria that need to be fulfilled for a pathophysiologically relevant substance. 2. Endothelin-1 is present in abundance in human lung: the major loci for ET-1 are the epithelium, endothelium, endocrine cells and inflammatory cells. Furthermore, the receptors that mediate the biological effects of ET-1, the ETA and ETB receptor subtypes, are found in human lung, predominantly in airway smooth muscle, and vascular smooth muscle and, to a lesser extent, nerves. There is no change in the relative proportions of ETA and ETB receptors in asthmatic versus non-asthmatic bronchial smooth muscle and peripheral lung. 3. Several studies have shown that ET-1 mimics several of the features of asthma (including bronchospasm, airway remodelling, inflammatory cell recruitment and activation, oedema, mucus secretion, airway hyperreactivity and dysfunction in neuronal inputs); however, some other reports are at odds with these findings. 4. Endothelin-1 mimics the two classical features of pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary vascular constriction and remodelling), which is often a serious complication of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 5. Intranasal ET-1 produces several of the symptoms of allergic rhinitis. 6. There are several reports of increased levels and/or expression of ET in patients with many pulmonary disorders, in particular asthma or pulmonary hypertension, with some evidence of a correlation between ET amounts and disease severity; however, other studies do not confirm these observations. 7. Despite these intriguing data in support of a pathophysiological role of ET-1 in lung disease, the definitive test and most difficult criteria to fulfil, the clinical evaluation of ET receptor antagonists or ET synthesis inhibitors, has still to be conducted. Only after these pivotal data are available will we be able to determine definitively whether ET-1 is a pathophysiologically important mediator in lung diseases or merely an interesting peptide with several effects in the pulmonary system.

Modulation of ET-1-induced contraction of human bronchi by airway epithelium-dependent nitric oxide release via ET(A) receptor activation

1. The purpose of this work was to investigate whether endothelin-1 (ET-1) was able to induce the release of an inhibitory factor from the airway epithelium in isolated human bronchi and to identify this mediator as well as the endothelin receptor involved in this phenomenon. 2. In intact bronchi, ET-1 induced a concentration-dependent contraction (-logEC50 = 7.92+/-0.09, n = 18) which was potentiated by epithelium removal (-logEC50 = 8.65+/-0.11, n = 17). BQ-123 , an ET(A) receptor antagonist, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 concentration-response curve (CRC). This leftward shift was abolished after epithelium removal. 3. L-NAME (3 x 10(-3) M), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthase, induced a significant leftward shift of the ET-1 CRC, and abolished the potentiation by BQ-123 (10(-8) M) of ET-1-induced contraction. 4. In intact preparations, the ET(B) receptor antagonist BQ-788 induced only at 10(-5) M a slight rightward shift of the ET-1 CRC. In contrast, in epithelium-denuded bronchi or in intact preparations in the presence of L-NAME, BQ-788 displayed a non-competitive antagonism toward ET-1-induced contraction. 5. IRL 1620, a selective ET(B) receptor agonist, induced a contraction of the isolated bronchus (-logEC50=7.94+/-0.11, n= 19). This effect was not modified by epithelium removal or by BQ-123. BQ-788 exerted a competitive antagonism against IRL 1620 which was similar in the presence or absence of epithelium. 6. These results show that ET-1 exerts two opposite effects on the human airway smooth muscle. One is contractile via ETB-receptor activation, the other is inhibitory and responsible of NO release which counteracts via ETA-receptor activation the contraction.

Ca2+ signalling by endothelin receptors in rat and human cultured airway smooth muscle cells

1. The aim of the current study was to characterize the ET receptor subtypes in cultured airway smooth muscle cells derived from rat trachea and human bronchus using radioligand binding techniques and to investigate the coupling of ET receptors to intracellular calcium signalling mechanisms using endothelin receptor-selective agonists (sarafotoxin S6c) and antagonists (BQ-123, BQ-788) and digital image fluorescence microscopy. 2. Confluent rat airway smooth muscle cells in culture possessed a mixed ET receptor population (30% ETA : 70% ETB), with a density of approximately 3400+/-280 ETA and 8000+/-610 ETB receptors/cell (n = 3 experiments). The density of ETB, but not ETA receptors increased substantially in serum-containing medium. However, a 2-day period of serum deprivation, which inhibited cellular growth, substantially reduced ETB receptor density such that the ET receptor subtype proportions were approximately equal (55% ETA; 45% ETB) and similar to those previously observed in intact rat tracheal smooth muscle. 3. Challenge of rat airway smooth muscle cells in culture with endothelin- 1 elicited a concentration-dependent biphasic increase in [Ca2+]i (EC50: 16 nM), that comprised an initial transient peak [Ca2+]i increase (typically 350 nM) followed by a modest sustained component. The endothelin-1-induced biphasic [Ca2+]i increase was primarily due to ETA receptor activation, although a modest and inconsistent ETB response was observed. The ETA-mediated [Ca2+]i increase was due primarily to the mobilization of IP3-sensitive and to a lesser extent ryanodine-sensitive intracellular calcium stores. In contrast, ETB receptor activation was exclusively coupled to extracellular calcium influx. 4. Somewhat surprisingly, human airway smooth muscle cells in culture contained a homogeneous population of ETA receptors at a density of 6100+/-800 receptors cell(-1) (n = 3 experiments). Serum deprivation was without effect on either ET receptor subtype proportion or ETA receptor density. Challenge of human airway smooth muscle cells with endothelin-1 provoked a concentration-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i (EC50: 15 nM), with a peak [Ca2+]i increase to greater than 700 nM. Furthermore, the ETA-mediated calcium response in these human airway smooth muscle cells in culture was entirely dependent upon the mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores. 5. In summary, rat cultured tracheal airway smooth muscle cells contained both ETA and ETB receptors. ETA receptors, the numbers of which remained constant during cell growth, were linked to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and a strong rise in [Ca2+]i in the majority of airway smooth muscle cells. In stark contrast, the numbers of ETB receptors increased significantly during cell growth, an effect that was diminished substantially by incubation in serum-free medium. Moreover, despite the greater number of ETB receptors, their activation in a small number of airway smooth muscle cells produced only a weak rise in [Ca2+]i, which appeared to be attributable to the influx of extracellular Ca2+. In contrast, the populations of ET receptors and their linkage to [Ca2+]i were markedly different in the human cultured airway smooth muscle cells used in the current study compared to that previously observed in intact human isolated bronchial smooth muscle.

Regional variations in endothelin-1 and its receptor subtypes in human coronary vasculature: pathophysiological implications in coronary disease

Endothelin-1 is a potent vasoconstrictor peptide and mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells. Increased plasma or tissue levels of endothelin-1 have been described after myocardial infarction and in atherosclerosis, suggesting that this peptide may play a pathophysiological role in various coronary syndromes. Here, we have studied regional variations in ET-1 and its receptors in control and atherosclerotic human coronary vasculature using standard immunohistochemistry and in vitro autoradiography. ET-1 immunoreactivity was associated with luminal endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells at regions of atherosclerosis. ET(A) receptors were present on smooth muscle cells of coronary arteries and on cardiac myocytes. Medial ET(B) receptor binding at the proximal region of coronary arteries was weak, but increased significantly towards distal regions of this vessel (p<0.005 in control and p<0.0005 in ischaemic heart disease). Microvascular endothelial cells in the adventitia of coronary arteries, myocardial microvessels and the endocardial endothelium expressed the ET(B) receptor exclusively. The receptor variations revealed in this study provide supporting evidence that ET-1 is associated with (1) vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cell proliferation, including areas of intimal hyperplasia and regions of neovascularization (2) increased ET-1-induced reactivity of distal portions of the human coronary artery, (3) ET-1-mediated constriction of myocardial microvessels. These results provide new insights into different potential roles for this peptide in healthy and diseased human coronary vasculature.

Involvement of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors in the activation of phospholipase D by endothelins in cultured rat cortical astrocytes

This study was performed to characterize the receptor subtypes involved in the endothelin stimulation of phospholipase D (PLD) in rat cortical astrocytes in primary culture. PLD activity was determined by measuring the formation of [32P]phosphatidylbutanol in [32P]orthophosphate prelabelled cells stimulated in the presence of 25 mM butanol. The agonists endothelin-1 (ET-1), endothelin-3 (ET-3), sarafotoxin 6c (S6c) and IRL 1620 elicited PLD activation in a concentration-dependent manner. The potencies of ET-1, ET-3 and S6c were similar. The maximal effects evoked by the ET(B)-preferring agonists, ET-3, S6c and IRL 1620, were significantly lower than the maximal response to the non-selective agonist ET-1. The response to 1 nM ET-1 was inhibited by increasing concentrations of the ET(A) receptor antagonist BQ-123 in a biphasic manner. A high potency component of the inhibition curve (24.2+/-3.5% of the ET-1 response) was defined at low (up to 1 microM) concentrations of BQ-123, yielding an estimated Ki value for BQ-123 of 21.3+/-2.5 nM. In addition, the presence of 1 microM BQ-123 significantly reduced the maximal response to ET-1 but did not change the pD2 value. Increasing concentrations of the ET(B) selective antagonist BQ-788 inhibited the S6c response with a Ki of 17.8+/-0.8 nM. BQ-788 also inhibited the effect of ET-1, although, in this case, two components were defined, accounting for approximately 50% of the response, and showing Ki values of 20.9+/-5.1 nM and 439+/-110 nM, respectively. The ET-1 concentration-response curve was shifted to the right by 1 microM BQ-788, also revealing two components. Only one of them, corresponding to 69.8+/-4.4% of the response, was sensitive to BQ-788 which showed a Ki value of 28.8+/-8.9 nM. Rapid desensitization was achieved by preincubation with ET-1 or S6c. In cells pretreated with S6c neither ET-3 nor S6c activated PLD, but ET-1 still induced approximately 40% of the response shown by non-desensitised cells. This remaining response was insensitive to BQ-788, but fully inhibited by BQ-123. In conclusion, endothelins activate PLD in rat cortical astrocytes acting through both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors, and this response desensitizes rapidly in an apparently homologous fashion. The percentage contribution of ET(A) and ET(B) receptors to the ET-1 response was found to be approximately 20% and 80%, respectively, when ET(B) receptors were not blocked, and 30-50% and 50-70%, respectively, when ET(B) receptors were inhibited or desensitized. These results may be relevant to the study of a possible role of PLD in the proliferative effects shown by endothelins on cultured and reactive astrocytes.