Arrestins differentially regulate histamine- and oxytocin-evoked phospholipase C and mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling in myometrial cells

Robust GRK2/3/6-dependent desensitization of oxytocin receptor in neurons

Oxytocin plays critical roles in the brain as a neuromodulator, regulating social and other affective behavior. However, the regulatory mechanisms controlling oxytocin receptor (OXTR) signaling in neurons remain unexplored. In this study, we have identified robust and rapid-onset desensitization of OXTR response in multiple regions of the mouse brain. Both cell autonomous spiking response and presynaptic activation undergo similar agonist-induced desensitization. G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) GRK2, GRK3, and GRK6 are recruited to the activated OXTR in neurons, followed by recruitment of β-arrestin-1 and -2. Neuronal OXTR desensitization was impaired by suppression of GRK2/3/6 kinase activity but remained unaltered with double knockout of β-arrestin-1 and -2. Additionally, we observed robust agonist-induced internalization of neuronal OXTR and its Rab5-dependent recruitment to early endosomes, which was impaired by GRK2/3/6 inhibition. This work defines distinctive aspects of the mechanisms governing OXTR desensitization and internalization in neurons compared to prior studies in heterologous cells.

Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated JNK Phosphorylation Is Regulated by Gq Protein-Dependent but Arrestin-Independent Pathways

Arrestins are known to be involved not only in the desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors but also in the G protein-independent activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), to regulate cell proliferation and inflammation. Our previous study revealed that the histamine H1 receptor-mediated activation of ERK is dually regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. In this study, we investigated the roles of Gq proteins and arrestins in the H1 receptor-mediated activation of JNK in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type (WT) human H1 receptors, the Gq protein-biased mutant S487TR, and the arrestin-biased mutant S487A. In these mutants, the Ser487 residue in the C-terminus region of the WT was truncated (S487TR) or mutated to alanine (S487A). Histamine significantly stimulated JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR but not S487A. Histamine-induced JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR was suppressed by inhibitors against H1 receptors (ketotifen and diphenhydramine), Gq proteins (YM-254890), and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X) as well as an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) but not by inhibitors against G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), β-arrestin2 (β-arrestin2 siRNA), and clathrin (hypertonic sucrose). These results suggest that the H1 receptor-mediated phosphorylation of JNK is regulated by Gq-protein/Ca2+/PKC-dependent but GRK/arrestin/clathrin-independent pathways.

Differential regulation of histamine H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation by Gq proteins and arrestins

Gq protein-coupled histamine H1 receptors play crucial roles in allergic and inflammatory reactions, in which the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) appears to mediate the production of inflammatory cytokines. ERK phosphorylation is regulated by G protein- and arrestin-mediated signal transduction pathways. Here, we aimed to explore how H1 receptor-mediated processes of ERK phosphorylation might be differentially regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. For this purpose, we evaluated the regulatory mechanism(s) of H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing Gq protein- and arrestin-biased mutants of human H1 receptors, S487TR and S487A, in which the Ser487 residue in the C-terminal was truncated and mutated to alanine, respectively. Immunoblotting analysis indicated that histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation was prompt and transient in cells expressing Gq protein-biased S487TR, whereas it was slow and sustained in cells expressing arrestin-biased S487A. Inhibitors of Gq proteins (YM-254890) and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X), and an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) suppressed histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation in cells expressing S487TR, but not those expressing S487A. Conversely, inhibitors of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), β-arrestin2 (β-arrestin2 siRNA), clathrin (hypertonic sucrose), Raf (LY3009120), and MEK (U0126) suppressed histamine-induced ERK phosphorylation in cells expressing S487A, but not those expressing S487TR. These results suggest that H1 receptor-mediated ERK phosphorylation might be differentially regulated by the Gq protein/Ca2+/PKC and GRK/arrestin/clathrin/Raf/MEK pathways to potentially determine the early and late phases of histamine-induced allergic and inflammatory responses, respectively.

Function and Role of Histamine H1 Receptor in the Mammalian Heart

Histamine can change the force of cardiac contraction and alter the beating rate in mammals, including humans. However, striking species and regional differences have been observed. Depending on the species and the cardiac region (atrium versus ventricle) studied, the contractile, chronotropic, dromotropic, and bathmotropic effects of histamine vary. Histamine is present and is produced in the mammalian heart. Thus, histamine may exert autocrine or paracrine effects in the mammalian heart. Histamine uses at least four heptahelical receptors: H1, H2, H3 and H4. Depending on the species and region studied, cardiomyocytes express only histamine H1 or only histamine H2 receptors or both. These receptors are not necessarily functional concerning contractility. We have considerable knowledge of the cardiac expression and function of histamine H2 receptors. In contrast, we have a poor understanding of the cardiac role of the histamine H1 receptor. Therefore, we address the structure, signal transduction, and expressional regulation of the histamine H1 receptor with an eye on its cardiac role. We point out signal transduction and the role of the histamine H1 receptor in various animal species. This review aims to identify gaps in our knowledge of cardiac histamine H1 receptors. We highlight where the published research shows disagreements and requires a new approach. Moreover, we show that diseases alter the expression and functional effects of histamine H1 receptors in the heart. We found that antidepressive drugs and neuroleptic drugs might act as antagonists of cardiac histamine H1 receptors, and believe that histamine H1 receptors in the heart might be attractive targets for drug therapy. The authors believe that a better understanding of the role of histamine H1 receptors in the human heart might be clinically relevant for improving drug therapy.

BRET-Based Biosensors to Measure Agonist Efficacies in Histamine H1 Receptor-Mediated G Protein Activation, Signaling and Interactions with GRKs and β-Arrestins

The histamine H₁ receptor (H₁R) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and plays a key role in allergic reactions upon activation by histamine which is locally released from mast cells and basophils. Consequently, H₁R is a well-established therapeutic target for antihistamines that relieve allergy symptoms. H₁R signals via heterotrimeric G_q proteins and is phosphorylated by GPCR kinase (GRK) subtypes 2, 5, and 6, consequently facilitating the subsequent recruitment of β-arrestin1 and/or 2. Stimulation of a GPCR with structurally different agonists can result in preferential engagement of one or more of these intracellular signaling molecules. To evaluate this so-called biased agonism for H₁R, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET)-based biosensors were applied to measure H₁R signaling through heterotrimeric G_q proteins, second messengers (inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and Ca²⁺), and receptor-protein interactions (GRKs and β-arrestins) in response to histamine, 2-phenylhistamines, and histaprodifens in a similar cellular background. Although differences in efficacy were observed for these agonists between some functional readouts as compared to reference agonist histamine, subsequent data analysis using an operational model of agonism revealed only signaling bias of the agonist Br-phHA-HA in recruiting β-arrestin2 to H₁R over G_q biosensor activation.

Histamine receptors rapidly desensitize without altering nerve-evoked contractions in murine urinary bladder smooth muscle

Histamine has been implicated in urinary bladder dysfunction as an inflammatory mediator driving sensory nerve hypersensitivity. However, the direct influence of histamine on smooth muscle has not been thoroughly investigated. We hypothesized that histamine directly contracts urinary bladder smooth muscle (UBSM) independent of effects on nerves. Single cell quantitative RT-PCR determined that only histamine H1 and H2 receptors were expressed on UBSM cells. In isolated tissue bath experiments, histamine (200 µM) caused a highly variable and rapidly desensitizing contraction that was completely abolished by the H1 receptor antagonist fexofenadine (5 µM) and the Gq/11 inhibitor YM254890 (1 µM). Neither the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (1 µM), the Na+ channel blocker tetrodotoxin (1 µM), nor the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 antagonist capsazepine (10 µM) altered responses to histamine, suggesting that nerve activation was not involved. UBSM desensitization to histamine was not due to receptor internalization, as neither the cholesterol-depleting agent methyl-β-cyclodextrin (10 mM), the dynamin-mediated endocytosis inhibitor dynasore (100 µM), nor the clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibitor pitstop2 (15 µM) augmented or prolonged histamine contractions. Buffer from desensitized tissues still contracted histamine-naïve tissues, revealing that histamine was not metabolized. Prolonged exposure to histamine also had no effect on contractions due to electrical field stimulation, suggesting that both efferent nerve and UBSM excitability were unchanged. Together, these data suggest that histamine, although able to transiently contract UBSM, does not have a lasting effect on UBSM excitability or responses to efferent nerve input. Thus, any acute effects of histamine directly on UBSM contractility are unlikely to alter urinary bladder function.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Histamine is commonly associated with inflammatory bladder pathologies. We sought to investigate the role of histamine on urinary bladder contractility. Histamine contracts the bladder, but this response is highly variable and desensitizes completely in minutes. This desensitization is not due to internalization of the receptor or metabolism of histamine. Because nerve-evoked contractions are also not increased in the presence of histamine, our findings suggest that histamine is not directly acting to change contractility.

β 2-Adrenoceptor Agonists Promote Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Dephosphorylation in Human Airway Epithelial Cells by Canonical, cAMP-Driven Signaling Independently of β-Arrestin 2

Chronic use of β 2-adrenoceptor agonists as a monotherapy in asthma is associated with a loss of disease control and an increased risk of mortality. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that β 2-adrenoceptor agonists, including formoterol, promote biased, β-arrestin (Arr) 2-dependent activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinases, ERK1/2, in human airway epithelial cells and, thereby, effect changes in gene expression that could contribute to their adverse clinical outcomes. Three airway epithelial cell models were used: the BEAS-2B cell line, human primary bronchial epithelial cells (HBEC) grown in submersion culture, and HBEC that were highly differentiated at an air-liquid interface. Unexpectedly, treatment of all epithelial cell models with formoterol decreased basal ERK1/2 phosphorylation. This was mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase and involved the inactivation of C-rapidly-activated fibrosarcoma, which attenuated downstream ERK1/2 activity, and the induction of dual-specificity phosphatase 1. Formoterol also inhibited the basal expression of early growth response-1, an ERK1/2-regulated gene that controls cell growth and repair in the airways. Neither carvedilol, a β 2-adrenoceptor agonist biased toward βArr2, nor formoterol promoted ERK1/2 phosphorylation in BEAS-2B cells, although β 2-adrenoceptor desensitization was compromised in ARRB2-deficient cells. Collectively, these results contest the hypothesis that formoterol activates ERK1/2 in airway epithelia by nucleating a βArr2 signaling complex; instead, they indicate that β 2-adrenoceptor agonists inhibit constitutive ERK1/2 activity in a cAMP-dependent manner. These findings are the antithesis of results obtained using acutely challenged native and engineered HEK293 cells, which have been used extensively to study mechanisms of ERK1/2 activation, and highlight the cell type dependence of β 2-adrenoceptor-mediated signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: It has been proposed that the adverse effects of β 2-adrenoceptor agonist monotherapy in asthma are mediated by genomic mechanisms that occur principally in airway epithelial cells and are the result of β-arrestin 2-dependent activation of ERK1/2. This study shows that β 2-adrenoceptor agonists, paradoxically, reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in airway epithelia by disrupting upstream rat sarcoma-C-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma complex formation and inducing dual-specificity phosphatase 1. Moreover, these effects were cAMP-dependent protein kinase-dependent, suggesting that β 2-adrenoceptor agonists were not biased toward β-arrestin 2 and acted via canonical, cAMP-dependent signaling.

Biased agonism at histamine H1 receptor: Desensitization, internalization and MAPK activation triggered by antihistamines

Histamine H₁ receptor ligands used clinically as antiallergics rank among the most widely prescribed and over-the-counter drugs in the world. They exert the therapeutic actions by blocking the effects of histamine, due to null or negative efficacy towards Gα_q-phospholipase C (PLC)-inositol triphosphates (IP₃)-Ca²⁺ and nuclear factor-kappa B cascades. However, there is no information regarding their ability to modulate other receptor responses. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether histamine H₁ receptor ligands could display positive efficacy concerning receptor desensitization, internalization, signaling through Gα_q independent pathways or even transcriptional regulation of proinflammatory genes. While diphenhydramine, triprolidine and chlorpheniramine activate ERK1/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2) pathway in A549 cells, pre-treatment with chlorpheniramine or triprolidine completely desensitize histamine H₁ receptor mediated Ca²⁺ response, and both diphenhydramine and triprolidine lead to receptor internalization. Unlike histamine, histamine H₁ receptor desensitization and internalization induced by antihistamines prove to be independent of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylation. Also, unlike the reference agonist, the recovery of the number of cell-surface histamine H₁ receptors is a consequence of de novo synthesis. On the other hand, all of the ligands lack efficacy regarding cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) mRNA regulation. However, a prolonged exposure with each of the antihistamines impaires the increase in COX-2 and IL-8 mRNA levels induced by histamine, even after ligand removal. Altogether, these findings demonstrate the biased nature of histamine H₁ receptor ligands contributing to a more accurate classification, and providing evidence for a more rational and safe use of them.

Protein/ Hormone Based Nanoparticles as Carriers for Drugs Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions

BACKGROUND

In this review, protein-protein interactions (PPIs) were defined, and their behaviors in normal in disease conditions are discussed. Their status at nuclear, molecular and cellular level was underscored, as for their interference in many diseases. Finally, the use of protein nanoscale structures as possible carriers for drugs targeting PPIs was highlighted.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to suggest a novel approach for targeting PPIs. By using protein nanospheres and nanocapsules, a promising field of study can be emerged.

METHODS

To solidify this argument, PPIs and their biological significance was discussed, same as their role in hormone signaling.

RESULTS

We shed the light on the drugs that targets PPI and we suggested the use of nanovectors to encapsulate these drugs to possibly achieve better results.

CONCLUSION

Protein based nanoparticles, due to their advantages, can be suitable carriers for drugs targeting PPIs. This can open a new opportunity in the emerging field of multifunctional therapeutics.

Systematic review of p38 mitogen-activated kinase and its functional role in reproductive tissues

Oxidative stress (OS) plays a role in uterine tissue remodeling during pregnancy and parturition. While p38 MAPK is an OS-response kinase, a precise functional role is unknown. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review of literature on p38 MAPK expression, activation, and function in reproductive tissues throughout pregnancy and parturition, published between January 1980 and August 2017, using four electronic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, and CoCHRANE). We identified 418 reports; 108 were selected for full-text evaluation and 74 were included in final review. p38 MAPK was investigated using feto-maternal primary or immortalized cells, tissue explants, and animal models. Western blot was most commonly used to report phosphorylated (active) p38 MAPK. Human placenta (27), chorioamniotic membranes (14), myometrium (13), decidua (8), and cervix (1) were the studied tissues. p38 MAPK's functions were tissue and gestational age dependent. Isoform specificity was hardly reported. p38 MAPK activity was induced by ROS or proinflammatory cytokines to promote cell signaling linked to cell fate, primed uterus, ripened cervix, and proinflammatory cytokine/chemokine production. In 35 years, reports on p38 MAPK's role during pregnancy and parturition are scarce and current literature is insufficient to provide a comprehensive description of p38 MAPK's mechanistic role during pregnancy and parturition.

The Oxytocin Receptor: From Intracellular Signaling to Behavior

The many facets of the oxytocin (OXT) system of the brain and periphery elicited nearly 25,000 publications since 1930 (see FIGURE 1 , as listed in PubMed), which revealed central roles for OXT and its receptor (OXTR) in reproduction, and social and emotional behaviors in animal and human studies focusing on mental and physical health and disease. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of OXT expression and release, expression and binding of the OXTR in brain and periphery, OXTR-coupled signaling cascades, and their involvement in behavioral outcomes to assemble a comprehensive picture of the central and peripheral OXT system. Traditionally known for its role in milk let-down and uterine contraction during labor, OXT also has implications in physiological, and also behavioral, aspects of reproduction, such as sexual and maternal behaviors and pair bonding, but also anxiety, trust, sociability, food intake, or even drug abuse. The many facets of OXT are, on a molecular basis, brought about by a single receptor. The OXTR, a 7-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor capable of binding to either Gαior Gαqproteins, activates a set of signaling cascades, such as the MAPK, PKC, PLC, or CaMK pathways, which converge on transcription factors like CREB or MEF-2. The cellular response to OXT includes regulation of neurite outgrowth, cellular viability, and increased survival. OXTergic projections in the brain represent anxiety and stress-regulating circuits connecting the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, amygdala, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, or the medial prefrontal cortex. Which OXT-induced patterns finally alter the behavior of an animal or a human being is still poorly understood, and studying those OXTR-coupled signaling cascades is one initial step toward a better understanding of the molecular background of those behavioral effects.

Reciprocal regulation of β2-adrenoceptor-activated cAMP response-element binding protein signalling by arrestin2 and arrestin3

Activation of Gs coupled receptors (e.g. β₂-adrenoreceptor (β₂AR)) expressed within the uterine muscle layer (myometrium), promotes intracellular cAMP generation, inducing muscle relaxation through short-term inhibition of contractile proteins, and longer-term modulation of cellular phenotype to promote quiescence. In the myometrium cAMP-driven modulation of cell phenotype is facilitated by CREB activity, however despite the importance of CREB signalling in the promotion of myometrial quiescence during pregnancy, little is currently known regarding the molecular mechanisms involved. Thus, we have characterised β-adrenoceptor-stimulated CREB signalling in the immortalised ULTR human myometrial cell line. The non-selective β-adrenoceptor agonist isoprenaline induced time- and concentration-dependent CREB phosphorylation, which was abolished by the β₂AR selective antagonist ICI118,551. β₂AR-stimulated CREB phosphorylation was mediated through a short-term PKA-dependent phase, and longer-term Src/p38 MAPK-dependent/PKA-independent phase. Since in model cells, arrestin2 can facilitate β₂AR-mediated Src/p38 recruitment, we examined whether CREB signalling was activated through a similar process in myometrial cells. Depletion of arrestin2 attenuated p38 phosphorylation, whilst arrestin3 depletion enhanced and prolonged isoprenaline-stimulated p38 signals, which was reversed following inhibition of Src. Knockdown of arrestin2 led to enhanced short-term (up to 10min), and attenuated longer-term (>10min) isoprenaline-stimulated CREB phosphorylation. Contrastingly, removal of arrestin3 enhanced and prolonged isoprenaline-stimulated CREB phosphorylation, whilst depletion of both arrestins abolished CREB signals at time points >5min. In summary, we have delineated the molecular mechanisms coupling β₂AR activity to CREB signalling in ULTR myometrial cells, revealing a biphasic activation process encompassing short-term PKA-dependent, and prolonged Src/arrestin2/p38-dependent components. Indeed, our data highlight a novel arrestin-mediated modulation of CREB signalling, suggesting a reciprocal relationship between arrestin2 and arrestin3, wherein recruitment of arrestin3 restricts the ability of β₂AR to activate prolonged CREB phosphorylation by precluding recruitment of an arrestin2/Src/p38 complex.

Molecular Basis of Oxytocin Receptor Signalling in the Brain: What We Know and What We Need to Know

Oxytocin (OT), a hypothalamic neuropeptide involved in regulating the social behaviour of all vertebrates, has been proposed as a treatment for a number of neuropsychiatric disorders characterised by deficits in the social domain. Over the last few decades, advances focused on understanding the social effects of OT and its role in physiological conditions and brain diseases, but much less has been done to clarify the molecular cascade of events involved in mediating such effects and in particular the cellular and molecular pharmacology of OT and its target receptor (OTR) in neuronal and glial cells.The entity and persistence of OT activity in the brain is closely related to the expression and regulation of the OTR expressed on the cell surface, which transmits the signal intracellularly and permits OT to affect cell function. Understanding the various signalling mechanisms mediating OTR-induced cell responses is crucial to determine the different responses in different cells and brain regions, and the success of OT and OT-derived analogues in the treatment of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric diseases depends on how well we can control such responses. In this review, we will consider the most important aspects of OT/OTR signalling by focusing on the molecular events involved in OT binding and coupling, on the main signalling pathways activated by the OTR in neuronal cells and on intracellular and plasma membrane OTR trafficking, all of which contribute to the quantitative and qualitative features of OT responses in the brain.

Label-free versus conventional cellular assays: Functional investigations on the human histamine H1 receptor

A set of histamine H₁ receptor (H₁R) agonists and antagonists was characterized in functional assays, using dynamic mass redistribution (DMR), electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) and various signaling pathway specific readouts (Fura-2 and aequorin calcium assays, arrestin recruitment (luciferase fragment complementation) assay, luciferase gene reporter assay). Data were gained from genetically engineered HEK293T cells and compared with reference data from GTPase assays and radioligand binding. Histamine and the other H₁R agonists gave different assay-related pEC₅₀ values, however, the order of potency was maintained. In the luciferase fragment complementation assay, the H₁R preferred β-arrestin2 over β-arrestin1. The calcium and the impedimetric assay depended on G_q coupling of the H₁R, as demonstrated by complete inhibition of the histamine-induced signals in the presence of the G_q inhibitor FR900359 (UBO-QIC). Whereas partial inhibition by FR900359 was observed in DMR and the gene reporter assay, pertussis toxin substantially decreased the response in DMR, but increased the luciferase signal, reflecting the contribution of both, G_q and G_i, to signaling in these assays. For antagonists, the results from DMR were essentially compatible with those from conventional readouts, whereas the impedance-based data revealed a trend towards higher pK_b values. ECIS and calcium assays apparently only reflect G_q signaling, whereas DMR and gene reporter assays appear to integrate both, G_q and G_i mediated signaling. The results confirm the value of the label-free methods, DMR and ECIS, for the characterization of H₁R ligands. Both noninvasive techniques are complementary to each other, but cannot fully replace reductionist signaling pathway focused assays.

BRET-based β-arrestin2 recruitment to the histamine H1 receptor for investigating antihistamine binding kinetics

Ligand residence time is thought to be a critical parameter for optimizing the in vivo efficacy of drug candidates. For the histamine H1 receptor (H1R) and other G protein-coupled receptors, the kinetics of ligand binding are typically measured by low throughput radioligand binding experiments using homogenized cell membranes expressing the target receptor. In this study, a real-time proximity assay between H1R and β-arrestin2 in living cells was established to investigate the dynamics of antihistamine binding to the H1R. No receptor reserve was found for the histamine-induced recruitment of β-arrestin2 to the H1R and the transiently recruited β-arrestin2 therefore reflected occupancy of the receptor by histamine. Antihistamines displayed similar kinetic signatures on antagonizing histamine-induced β-arrestin2 recruitment as compared to displacing radioligand binding from the H1R. This homogeneous functional method unambiguously determined the fifty-fold difference in the dissociation rate constant between mepyramine and the long residence time antihistamines levocetirizine and desloratadine.

Characterisation of the Novel Mixed Mu-NOP Peptide Ligand Dermorphin-N/OFQ (DeNo)

INTRODUCTION

Opioid receptors are currently classified as Mu (μ), Delta (δ), Kappa (κ) plus the opioid related nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide receptor (NOP). Despite compelling evidence for interactions and benefits of targeting more than one receptor type in producing analgesia, clinical ligands are Mu agonists. In this study we have designed a Mu-NOP agonist named DeNo. The Mu agonist component is provided by dermorphin, a peptide isolated from the skin of Phyllomedusa frogs and the NOP component by the endogenous agonist N/OFQ.

METHODS

We have assessed receptor binding profile of DeNo and compared with dermorphin and N/OFQ. In a series of functional screens we have assessed the ability to (i) increase Ca2+ in cells coexpressing recombinant receptors and a the chimeric protein Gαqi5, (ii) stimulate the binding of GTPγ[35S], (iii) inhibit cAMP formation, (iv) activate MAPKinase, (v) stimulate receptor-G protein and arrestin interaction using BRET, (vi) electrically stimulated guinea pig ileum (gpI) assay and (vii) ability to produce analgesia via the intrathecal route in rats.

RESULTS

DeNo bound to Mu (pKi; 9.55) and NOP (pKi; 10.22) and with reasonable selectivity. This translated to increased Ca2+ in Gαqi5 expressing cells (pEC50 Mu 7.17; NOP 9.69), increased binding of GTPγ[35S] (pEC50 Mu 7.70; NOP 9.50) and receptor-G protein interaction in BRET (pEC50 Mu 8.01; NOP 9.02). cAMP formation was inhibited and arrestin was activated (pEC50 Mu 6.36; NOP 8.19). For MAPK DeNo activated p38 and ERK1/2 at Mu but only ERK1/2 at NOP. In the gpI DeNO inhibited electrically-evoked contractions (pEC50 8.63) that was sensitive to both Mu and NOP antagonists. DeNo was antinociceptive in rats.

CONCLUSION

Collectively these data validate the strategy used to create a novel bivalent Mu-NOP peptide agonist by combining dermorphin (Mu) and N/OFQ (NOP). This molecule behaves essentially as the parent compounds in vitro. In the antonocicoeptive assays employed in this study DeNo displays only weak antinociceptive properties.

Histamine H(1)- and H(4)-receptor signaling cooperatively regulate MAPK activation

The histamine (HA) receptor subtype 1 (H1R) and H4R are expressed on immune cells and contribute to an inflammatory reaction. Both receptor subtypes individually enhance the intracellular concentrations of calcium and regulate the accumulation of cAMP, increase MAPK activity, and regulate expression of e.g., inflammatory genes. In a previous study we characterized and compared signaling pathways of the murine orthologs of the H1R and the H4R recombinantly expressed at comparable levels in HEK 293 cells. In the present study, we aimed at analyzing possible interactions of the signaling pathways emerging at the mH1R and the mH4R. Therefore, we co-expressed both receptor subtypes at comparable levels in HEK 293 cells and investigated HA-induced signaling parameters such as the concentrations of intracellular calcium and cAMP, phosphorylation of the MAPKs p38, ERK 1, and ERK 2, and of the transcription factor CREB, and expression of the immediate early gene EGR-1. We demonstrate that the intracellular concentrations of calcium and cAMP as well as the EGR-1 expression are regulated exclusively via the mH1R. In contrast, both receptor subtypes H1R and H4R synergize in HA-induced MAPK activation. This synergism most probably relies on signaling pathways independent of the second messenger calcium and cAMP. In summary, we provide evidence that the mH1R inhibits or dampens the function of the co-expressed mH4R regarding specific parameters, while other signaling events are regulated cooperatively by the mH1R and the mH4R.

Minireview: Spatial Programming of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Activity: Decoding Signaling in Health and Disease

Probing the multiplicity of hormone signaling via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has demonstrated the complex signal pathways that underlie the multiple functions these receptors play in vivo. This is highly pertinent for the GPCRs key in reproduction and pregnancy that are exposed to cyclical and dynamic changes in their extracellular milieu. How such functional pleiotropy in GPCR signaling is translated to specific downstream cellular responses, however, is largely unknown. Emerging data strongly support mechanisms for a central role of receptor location in signal regulation via membrane trafficking. In this review, we discuss current progress in our understanding of the role membrane trafficking plays in location control of GPCR signaling, from organized plasma membrane signaling microdomains, potentially provided by both distinct endocytic and exocytic pathways, to more recent evidence for spatial control within the endomembrane system. Application of these emerging mechanisms in their relevance to GPCR activity in physiological and pathophysiological conditions will also be discussed, and in improving therapeutic strategies that exploits these mechanisms in order to program highly regulated and distinct signaling profiles.

Bradykinin-activated contractile signalling pathways in human myometrial cells are differentially regulated by arrestin proteins

Bradykinin is associated with infections and inflammation, which given the strong correlation between uterine infection and preterm labour may imply that it could play a role in this process. Therefore, we investigated bradykinin signalling, and the roles that arrestin proteins play in their regulation in human myometrial cells. Bradykinin induced rapid, transient intracellular Ca(2+) increases that were inhibited following B2 receptor (B2R) antagonism. Arrestin2 or arrestin3 depletion enhanced and prolonged bradykinin-stimulated Ca(2+) responses, and attenuated B2R desensitisation. Knockdown of either arrestin enhanced B2R-stimulated ERK1/2 signals. Moreover, depletion of either arrestin elevated peak-phase p38-MAPK signalling, yet only arrestin3 depletion prolonged B2R-induced p38-MAPK signals. Arrestin2-knockdown augmented bradykinin-induced cell movement. Bradykinin stimulates pro-contractile signalling mechanisms in human myometrial cells and arrestin proteins play key roles in their regulation. Our data suggest bradykinin not only acts as an utertonin, but may also have the potential to enhance the contractile environment of the uterus.

Distinct signalling pathways of murine histamine H1- and H4-receptors expressed at comparable levels in HEK293 cells

Histamine (HA) is recognized by its target cells via four G-protein-coupled receptors, referred to as histamine H₁-receptor (H₁R), H₂R, H₃R, and H₄R. Both H₁R and H₄R exert pro-inflammatory functions. However, their signal transduction pathways have never been analyzed in a directly comparable manner side by side. Moreover, the analysis of pharmacological properties of the murine orthologs, representing the main targets of pre-clinical research, is very important. Therefore, we engineered recombinant HEK293 cells expressing either mouse (m)H₁R or mH₄R at similar levels and analyzed HA-induced signalling in these cells. HA induced intracellular calcium mobilization via both mH₁R and mH₄R, with the mH₁R being much more effective. Whereas cAMP accumulation was potentiated via the mH₁R, it was reduced via the mH₄R. The regulation of both second messengers via the H₄R, but not the H₁R, was sensitive to pertussis toxin (PTX). The mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) ERK 1/2 were massively activated downstream of both receptors and demonstrated a functional involvement in HA-induced EGR-1 gene expression. The p38 MAPK was moderately activated via both receptors as well, but was functionally involved in HA-induced EGR-1 gene expression only in H₄R-expressing cells. Surprisingly, in this system p38 MAPK activity reduced the HA-induced gene expression. In summary, using this system which allows a direct comparison of mH₁R- and mH₄R-induced signalling, qualitative and quantitative differences on the levels of second messenger generation and also in terms of p38 MAPK function became evident.

Arrestins 2 and 3 differentially regulate ETA and P2Y2 receptor-mediated cell signaling and migration in arterial smooth muscle

Overstimulation of endothelin type A (ET(A)) and nucleotide (P2Y) Gα(q)-coupled receptors in vascular smooth muscle causes vasoconstriction, hypertension, and, eventually, hypertrophy and vascular occlusion. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and arrestin proteins are sequentially recruited by agonist-occupied Gα(q)-coupled receptors to terminate phospholipase C signaling, preventing prolonged/inappropriate contractile signaling. However, these proteins also play roles in the regulation of several mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascades known to be essential for vascular remodeling. Here we investigated whether different arrestin isoforms regulate endothelin and nucleotide receptor MAPK signaling in rat aortic smooth muscle cells (ASMCs). When intracellular Ca(2+) levels were assessed in isolated ASMCs loaded with Ca(2+)-sensitive dyes, P2Y(2) and ET(A) receptor desensitization was attenuated by selective small-interfering (si)RNA-mediated depletion of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2). Using similar siRNA techniques, knockdown of arrestin2 prevented P2Y(2) receptor desensitization and enhanced and prolonged p38 and ERK MAPK signals, while arrestin3 depletion was ineffective. Conversely, arrestin3 knockdown prevented ET(A) receptor desensitization and attenuated ET1-stimulated p38 and ERK signals, while arrestin2 depletion had no effect. Using Transwell assays to assess agonist-stimulated ASMC migration, we found that UTP-stimulated migration was markedly attenuated following arrestin2 depletion, while ET1-stimulated migration was attenuated following knockdown of either arrestin. These data highlight a differential arrestin-dependent regulation of ET(A) and P2Y(2) receptor-stimulated MAPK signaling. GRK2 and arrestin expression are essential for agonist-stimulated ASMC migration, which, as a key process in vascular remodeling, highlights the potential roles of GRK2 and arrestin proteins in the progression of vascular disease.

Functional interactions between the oxytocin receptor and the β2-adrenergic receptor: implications for ERK1/2 activation in human myometrial cells

The Gq-coupled oxytocin receptor (OTR) and the Gs-coupled β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)AR) are both expressed in myometrial cells and mediate uterine contraction and relaxation, respectively. The two receptors represent important pharmacological targets as OTR antagonists and β(2)AR agonists are used to control pre-term uterine contractions. Despite their physiologically antagonistic effects, both receptors activate the MAP kinases ERK1/2, which has been implicated in uterine contraction and the onset of labor. To determine the signalling pathways involved in mediating the ERK1/2 response, we assessed the effect of blockers of specific G protein-associated pathways. In human myometrial hTERT-C3 cells, inhibition of Gαi as well as inhibition of the Gαq/PKC pathway led to a reduction of both OTR- and β(2)AR-mediated ERK1/2 activation. The involvement of Gαq/PKC in β(2)AR-mediated ERK1/2 induction was unexpected. To test whether the emergence of this novel signalling mechanism was dependent on OTR expression in the same cell, we conducted experiments in HEK 293 cells that were transfected with the β(2)AR alone or co-transfected with the OTR. Using this approach, we found that β(2)AR-mediated ERK1/2 responses became sensitive to PKC inhibition only in cells co-transfected with the OTR. Inhibitor studies indicated the involvement of an atypical PKC isoform in this process. We confirmed the specific involvement of PKCζ in this pathway by assessing PKCζ translocation to the cell membrane. Consistent with our inhibitor studies, we found that β(2)AR-mediated PKCζ translocation was dependent on co-expression of OTR. The present demonstration of a novel β(2)AR-coupled signalling pathway that is dependent on OTR co-expression is suggestive of a molecular interaction between the two receptors.