Efficacy of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications for prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Effectiveness of Anti-Inflammatory Agents to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background

Preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) as one of the most significant complications of cardiovascular surgeries remains a major clinical challenge. We conducted a systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, to identify the most effective and safe anti-inflammatory drugs to prevent new-onset POAF.

Methods

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched without language or publication-date restriction on August 8, 2022 (updated on August 8, 2023). We assessed the risk of bias of included trials using the Cochrane risk-of-bias 2.0 tool. We conducted a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis in R, and we assessed the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Results

A total of 85 trials reported the incidence of new-onset POAF, including 18,981 patients. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (relative risk [RR] 0.37 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.59]) and statins (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.45-0.7]) potentially reduced the risk of POAF compared with placebo (both with a moderate certainty level). Use of fish oil in combination with vitamins C and E (RR 0.30 [95% CI 0.13-0.68]) may reduce the risk of POAF, compared with placebo (low level of certainty). Use of colchicine (RR 0.62 [95% CI 0.45- 0.85]), corticosteroids (RR 0.70 [95% CI 0.59-0.82]), and N-acetylcysteine (RR 0.69 [95% CI 0.49- 0.98]) may reduce the risk of POAF (all with a low level of certainty). None of the interventions had a significant effect on mortality rate or risk of serious adverse effects.

Conclusions

Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and statins probably are effective in preventing new-onset POAF, with a moderate level of certainty, compared to placebo.

Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery: The Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypothesis that implementation of a cytochrome P-450 2D6 (CYP2D6) genotype-guided perioperative metoprolol administration will reduce the risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF), the authors conducted the Preemptive Pharmacogenetic-Guided Metoprolol Management for Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery pilot study.

DESIGN

Clinical pilot trial.

SETTING

Single academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-three cardiac surgery patients.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were classified as normal, intermediate, poor, or ultrarapid metabolizers after testing for their CYP2D6 genotype. A clinical decision support tool in the electronic health record advised providers on CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol dosing. Using historical data, the Bayesian method was used to compare the incidence of postoperative AF in patients with altered metabolizer status to the reference incidence. A logistic regression analysis was performed to study the association between the metabolizer status and postoperative AF while controlling for the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia AF Risk Index. Of the 73 patients, 30% (n = 22) developed postoperative AF; 89% (n = 65) were normal metabolizers; 11% (n = 8) were poor/intermediate metabolizers; and there were no ultrarapid metabolizer patients identified. The estimated rate of postoperative AF in patients with altered metabolizer status was 30% (95% CI 8%-60%), compared with the historical reference incidence (27%). In the risk-adjusted analysis, there was insufficient evidence to conclude that modifying metoprolol dosing based on poor/intermediate metabolizer status was associated significantly with the odds of postoperative AF (odds ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.15-4.55, p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

A CYP2D6 genotype-guided metoprolol management was not associated with a reduction of postoperative AF after cardiac surgery.

Perioperative Statin Use May Reduce Postoperative Arrhythmia Rates After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative arrhythmias are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. HMG-CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) decrease atrial fibrillation rates after cardiac surgery, but it is unknown if this cardioprotective effect is maintained after joint reconstruction surgery. We aim to determine if perioperative statin use decreases the incidence of 90-day postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing primary TJA.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in which 231 primary TJA patients (109 hips, 122 knees) received simvastatin 80 mg daily during their hospitalization as part of a single surgeon's standard postoperative protocol. This cohort was matched to 966 primary TJA patients (387 hips and 579 knees) that did not receive simvastatin. New-onset arrhythmias (bradycardia, atrial fibrillation/tachycardia/flutter, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, and ventricular tachycardia) and complications (readmissions, thromboembolism, infection, and dislocation) within 90 days of the procedure were documented. Categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests. Our study was powered to detect a 3% difference in arrhythmia rates.

RESULTS

Within 90 days postoperatively, arrhythmias occurred in 1 patient (0.4%) who received a perioperative statin, 39 patients (4.0%) who did not receive statins (P = .003), and 24 patients (4.2%) who were on outpatient statins (P = .005). This is 10-fold reduction in the relative risk of developing a postoperative arrhythmia within 90 days of arthroplasty and an absolute risk reduction of 3.6%.

CONCLUSION

Treating as few as 28 patients with perioperative simvastatin prevents one new cardiac arrhythmia within 90 days in statin-naïve patients undergoing TJA.

Atrial fibrillation post cardiac bypass surgery

Atrial fibrillation occurs in 5-40% patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Atrial fibrillation increases mortality and morbidity in the post-operative period. We sought to conduct a comprehensive review of literature focusing on pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention and treatment of post coronary artery bypass graft atrial fibrillation.

Reducing Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery - Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Critical Care Strategies

Patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery are exposed to opioids in the operating room and intensive care unit and after hospital discharge. Opportunities exist to reduce perioperative opioid use at all stages of care and include alternative oral and intravenous medications, novel intraoperative regional anesthetic techniques, and postoperative opioid-sparing sedative and analgesic strategies. In this review, currently used and investigational strategies to reduce the opioid burden for cardiothoracic surgical patients are explored.

The Effect of Diclofenac on Bleeding, Platelet Function, and Consumption of Opioids Following Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To establish whether the use of diclofenac reduces the administration of opioids and how it affects bleeding and platelet function after the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery with use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

METHODS

A total of 72 patients undergoing CABG surgery were included in this retrospective randomized study and divided into two groups (34 patients received diclofenac and the control group of 38 patients did not). For postoperative analgesia, both groups were prescribed opioids (piritramide). The primary endpoint was to establish the consumption of opioids. The secondary endpoint was to determine bleeding and the function of platelets 20 hours after the surgery.

RESULTS

The consumption of piritramide (diclofenac group 26±8 mg vs. control group 28±8 mg), the blood loss, and the function of platelets did not significantly differ between the groups within 20 hours after surgery. C-reactive protein (CRP) was statistically significantly lower in the diclofenac group than in the control group (33±15 mg/L vs. 46±22 mg/L, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that patients administered with diclofenac after the heart surgery did not consume less opioid analgesics and did not exhibit less symptoms linked to the consumption of opioids. Diclofenac in clinically administered doses does not interfere with the function of platelets and does not cause increased bleeding. Lower CRP in the diclofenac group may indicate a reduced inflammatory response after CPB. Therefore, diclofenac could be safe for use in patients undergoing CABG surgery but its value in reducing opioid consumption should be questioned.

Anti-inflammatory drugs in the prevention of post-operative atrial fibrillation: a literature review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a serious and common complication following heart surgery. Cardiac surgery triggers inflammation in the heart and makes it susceptible to the incidence of AF. Therefore, anti-inflammatory drugs may reduce the rate of AF incidence in the post-surgery conditions. Immunosuppressant agents, steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (corticosteroids), non-aspirin non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), colchicine and omega-3 unsaturated fatty acids (n-3 UFA) are drugs with well-known anti-inflammatory properties. The efficacy, safety and other aspects of using these drugs in the prevention of post-operative AF (POAF) have been reviewed here. Studies evaluating the efficacy of colchicine have shown that it could be effective in the prevention of POAF. However, there is a need for additional studies to find a colchicine regimen with optimal efficacy and higher tolerability. The use of corticosteroids may also be of value based on the most of meta-analyses. In the case of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and NSAIDs, current data fail to support their efficacy in POAF prevention. Moreover, perioperative administration of NSAIDs may be associated with some severe safety considerations. Immunosuppressant agents have not been used for the prevention of POAF. Further studies are needed to find the most effective strategy for POAF prevention with the least safety considerations and the highest health benefits.

New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Adult Patients After Cardiac Surgery

Purpose of Review

An overview of recent literature regarding pathophysiology, risk factors, prophylaxis, and treatment of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in post-cardiac surgical patients.

Recent Findings

AF is the most frequent adverse event after cardiac surgery with significant associated morbidity, mortality, and financial cost. Its causes are multifactorial, and models to stratify patients into risk categories are progressing but a consistent, evidence-based system has not yet been developed. Pharmacologic and surgical interventions to prevent and treat this complication have been an area of ongoing research and recent societal guidelines reflect this.

Summary

Inconsistencies remain surrounding how to best identify higher-risk AF patients, which interventions should be used to prevent and treat AF, and which patient groups should receive these interventions. The evidence for these available strategies and their place in contemporary guidelines are summarized.

Effects of peri-operative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on post-operative kidney function for adults with normal kidney function

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide effective analgesia during the post-operative period but can cause acute kidney injury (AKI) when used peri-operatively (at or around the time of surgery). This is an update of a Cochrane review published in 2007.

OBJECTIVES

This review looked at the effect of NSAIDs used in the peri-operative period on post-operative kidney function in patients with normal kidney function.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register to 4 January 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs (RCTs in which allocation to treatment was obtained by alternation, use of alternate medical records, date of birth or other predictable methods) looking at the use of NSAIDs versus placebo for the treatment of post-operative pain in patients with normal kidney function were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction was carried out independently by two authors as was assessment of risk of bias. Disagreements were resolved by a third author. Dichotomous outcomes are reported as relative risk (RR) and continuous outcomes as mean difference (MD) together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Meta-analyses were used to assess the outcomes of AKI, change in serum creatinine (SCr), urine output, renal replacement therapy (RRT), death (all causes) and length of hospital stay.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 26 studies (8835 participants). Risk of bias was high in 17, unclear in 6and low in three studies. There was high risk of attrition bias in six studies.Only two studies measured AKI. The use of NSAIDs had uncertain effects on the incidence of AKI compared to placebo (7066 participants: RR 1.79, 95% CI 0.40 to 7.96; I2 = 59%; very low certainty evidence). One study was stopped early by the data monitoring committee due to increased rates of AKI in the NSAID group. Moreover, both of these studies were examining NSAIDs for indications other than analgesia and therefore utilised relatively low doses.Compared to placebo, NSAIDs may slightly increase serum SCr (15 studies, 794 participants: MD 3.23 μmol/L, 95% CI -0.80 to 7.26; I2 = 63%; low certainty evidence). Studies displayed moderate to high heterogeneity and had multiple exclusion criteria including age and so were not representative of patients undergoing surgery. Three of these studies excluded patients if their creatinine rose post-operatively.NSAIDs may make little or no difference to post-operative urine output compared to placebo (6 studies, 149 participants: SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.31 to 0.27). No reliable conclusions could be drawn from these studies due to the differing units of measurements and measurement time points.It is uncertain whether NSAIDs leads to the need for RRT because the certainty of this evidence is very low (2 studies, 7056 participants: RR 1.57, 95% CI 0.49 to 5.07; I2 = 26%); there were few events and the results were inconsistent.It is uncertain whether NSAIDs lead to more deaths (2 studies, 312 participants: RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.19 to 11.12; I2 = 38%) or increased the length of hospital stay (3 studies, 410 participants: MD 0.12 days, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.72; I2 = 24%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Overall NSAIDs had uncertain effects on the risk of post-operative AKI, may slightly increase post-operative SCr, and it is uncertain whether NSAIDs lead to the need for RRT, death or increases the length of hospital stay. The available data therefore does not confirm the safety of NSAIDs in patients undergoing surgery. Further larger studies using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definition for AKI including patients with co-morbidities are required to confirm these findings. .

New-onset atrial fibrillation: an update

New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is the most common perioperative complication of heart surgery, typically occurring in the perioperative period. NOAF commonly occurs in patients who are elderly, or have left atrial enlargement, or left ventricular hypertrophy. Various factors have been identified as being involved in the development of NOAF, and numerous approaches have been proposed for its prevention and treatment. Risk factors include diabetes, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. For prevention of NOAF, β-blockers and amiodarone are particularly effective and are recommended by guidelines. NOAF can be treated by rhythm/rate control, and antithrombotic therapy. Treatment is required in patients with decreased cardiac function, a heart rate exceeding 130 beats/min, or persistent NOAF lasting for ≥ 48 h. It is anticipated that anticoagulant therapies, as well as hemodynamic management, will also play a major role in the management of NOAF. When using warfarin as an anticoagulant, its dose should be adjusted based on PT-INR. PT-INR should be controlled between 2.0 and 3.0 in patients aged < 70 years and between 1.6 and 2.6 in those aged ≥ 70 years. Rate control combined with antithrombotic therapies for NOAF is expected to contribute to further advances in treatment and improvement of survival.

Systemic Inflammation and Arrhythmogenesis: A Review of Mechanistic and Clinical Perspectives

In the recent decades, systemic inflammation, as a clinical phenomenon, has been the focus of extensive research particularly with regard to its potential association with a variety of cardiovascular diseases including atherogenesis and acute coronary syndromes. Within this context, there also exists a potential link between systemic inflammation and cardiac arrhythmogenesis in various aspects. Accordingly, systemic inflammation response as measured with inflammation markers (cytokines, etc) has been investigated in the setting of well-known cardiac arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. Based on current literature, clinical utility of these markers might potentially yield important prognostic implications in the setting of certain arrhythmogenic conditions. On the other hand, there exists limited data regarding therapeutic implications including clinical benefit of primary anti-inflammatory agents (corticosteroids, colchicine, etc) in the setting of arrhythmia management. The present review primarily aims to discuss potential triggers and fundamental mechanisms of inflammation-related arrhythmias along with a particular emphasis on clinical implications of systemic inflammation in the setting of cardiac arrhythmogenesis.

Cardiology: Post-Cardiothoracic Surgery Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Preventive Strategies

Objective:

To review the available literature addressing preventive strategies of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation (post-CTS atrial fibrillation).

Data Sources:

Pertinent articles related to the etiology, risk factors, and preventive strategies were identified through a MEDLINE search (1966–March 2007) using the MeSH terms atrial fibrillation, cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac surgery, etiology, neurohormonal, sympathetic, volume, fluid, inflammation, risk factors, operative, pacing, β-adrenergic blockers, amiodarone, sotalol, calcium-channel blockers, magnesium, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, statins, fatty acids, PUFA, steroids, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs.

Study Selection and Data Extraction:

Articles evaluated were limited to human studies, published in the English language, with a Jadad score greater than 3. References of identified articles were reviewed for additional pertinent articles.

Data Synthesis:

Post-CTS atrial fibrillation most commonly occurs on the second or third postoperative day, with an incidence of 20–50%. Etiology theories include neurohormonal activation, volume overload, and inflammation. Studies examining nonpharmacologic therapies have shown that maintenance of the anterior epicardial fat pad is not a viable prophylactic strategy. Biatrial cardiac pacing, especially in combination with amiodarone, is a viable preventive option. Withdrawal of preoperative β-blockers places patients at higher risk for atrial fibrillation; these drugs should be continued postoperatively. Evidence exists supporting the use of amiodarone, sotalol, and magnesium in addition to β-blockers. Since most of these strategies work by attenuating neurohormonal activation, adverse events, including hypotension and bradycardia, are of concern. Adding agents with antiinflammatory properties, including hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors or corticosteroids, may prove to be of benefit. Additional studies using novel therapies are needed in addition to established preventive strategies.

Conclusions:

Available evidence supports the continuation of preoperative β-blockers, as well as prophylactic amiodarone, sotalol, and magnesium. Other novel therapies, mostly targeting inflammation, are under investigation and may provide additional strategies.

Predicting New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Cardiac Surgery Patients

OBJECTIVE

To derive a simple clinical prediction rule identifying patients at high risk of developing new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected observational data.

SETTING

A university-affiliated cardiac hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Observation for the occurrence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Details on 28 preoperative variables from 999 patients were collected and significant predictors (p<0.2) were inserted into multivariable logistic regression and reconfirmed with recursive partitioning. A total of 305 (30.5%) patients developed new-onset POAF. Eleven variables were associated significantly with atrial fibrillation. A multivariable logistic regression model included left atrial dilatation, mitral valve disease, and age. Coefficients from the model were converted into a simple 7-point predictive score. The risk of POAF per score is: 15.0%, if 0; 20%, if 1; 27%, if 2; 35%, if 3; 44%, if 4; 53%, if 5; 62%, if 6; and 70%, if 7. A score of 4 has a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 82% for POAF. A score of 6 has a sensitivity of 11% and a specificity of 97%. Bootstrapping with 5,000 samples confirmed the final model provided consistent predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proposed a simple predictive score incorporating three risk variables to identify cardiac surgical patients at high risk of developing new-onset POAF. Preventive treatment should target patients ≥ 65 years with left atrial dilatation and mitral valve disease.

Inflammation in new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (PNAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery. The pathogenesis of PNAF is multifactorial. The concept of the postoperative inflammatory response, as a potential underlying mechanism has been extensively studied. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of literature relevant to the association between the inflammatory response following cardiac surgery and PNAF.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register were systematically reviewed by two independent investigators for studies published between January 1980 and May 2012, in which an association between serum markers of inflammation and PNAF was evaluated, or the effect of drugs with anti-inflammatory properties on the risk of PNAF.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies met selection criteria (39 observational and 24 randomized studies) including 27,363 patients. The mean incidence of PNAF after cardiac surgery was 25·5%. Elevated levels of various inflammatory mediators were associated with PNAF, and the most consistent association was found between white blood cell count and PNAF. Of the drugs with anti-inflammatory properties, statins gave the best protective effect against PNAF, followed by anti-oxidants, steroids and colchicine. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not prevent PNAF significantly.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative inflammation response may play a role in the pathogenesis of PNAF. However, of the inflammation biomarkers, only elevated white blood cell count reliably predicts PNAF. Pre- and perioperative use of statins and several other drugs with anti-inflammatory properties reduce the incidence of PNAF.

The role of inflammatory markers in atrial fibrillation: a review

This review is focused on the role of latent inflammation in atrial fibrillation (AF) pathogenesis. The modern views and available evidence on the association between the levels of inflammatory markers and AF development and recurrence are presented. The justification for the use of pleiotropic effects of pharmacological therapy in AF prevention and treatment is discussed.

Intravenous magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 7 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials

Background

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is the most common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The preventive effect of magnesium on POAF is not well known. This meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the efficacy of intravenous magnesium on the prevention of POAF after CABG.

Methods

Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of POAF. The meta-analysis was performed with the fixed-effect model or random-effect model according to heterogeneity.

Results

Seven double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials met the inclusion criteria including 1,028 participants. The pooled results showed that intravenous magnesium reduced the incidence of POAF by 36% (RR 0.64; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.83; P = 0.001; with no heterogeneity between trials (heterogeneity P = 0.8, I² = 0%)).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis indicates that intravenous magnesium significantly reduces the incidence of POAF after CABG. This finding encourages the use of intravenous magnesium as an alternative to prevent POAF after CABG. But more high quality randomized clinical trials are still need to confirm the safety.

Management of postoperative atrial fibrillation

The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation (PAF) on patient outcomes has prompted intense investigation into the optimal methods for prevention and treatment of this complication. In the prevention of PAF, β-blockers and amiodarone are particularly effective and are recommended by guidelines. However, their use requires caution due to the possibility of drug-related adverse effects. Aside from these risks, perioperative prophylactic treatment with statins seems to be effective for preventing PAF and is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects. PAF can be treated by rhythm control, heart-rate control, and antithrombotic therapy. For the purpose of heart rate control, β-blockers, calcium-channel antagonists, and amiodarone are used. In patients with unstable hemodynamics, cardioversion may be performed for rhythm control. Antithrombotic therapy is used in addition to heart-rate maintenance therapy in cases of PAF >48-h duration or in cases with a history of cerebrovascular thromboembolism. Anticoagulation is the first choice for antithrombotic therapy, and anticoagulation management should focus on maintaining international normalized ratio (INRs) in the 2.0–3.0 range in patients <75 years of age, whereas prothrombin-time INR should be controlled to the 1.6–2.6 range in patients ≥75 years of age. In the future, dabigatran could be used for perioperative management of PAF, because it does not require regular monitoring and has a quick onset of action with short serum half-life. Preventing PAF is an important goal and requires specific perioperative management as well as other approaches. PAF is also associated with lifestyle-related diseases, which emphasizes the ongoing need for appropriate lifestyle management in individual patients.

Naproxen as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the NAFARM randomized trial

PURPOSE

We sought to assess the effect of naproxen versus placebo on prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center trial of 161 consecutive patients undergoing CABG surgery, patients received naproxen 275 mg every 12 hours or placebo at the same dosage and interval over 120 hours immediately after CABG surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the first 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation was 15.2% (12/79) in the placebo versus 7.3% (6/82) in the naproxen group (P=.11). The duration of atrial fibrillation episodes was significantly lower in the naproxen (0.35 hours) versus placebo group (3.74 hours; P=.04). There was no difference in the overall days of hospitalization between placebo (17.23±7.39) and naproxen (18.33±9.59) groups (P=.44). Intensive care unit length of stay was 4.0±4.57 days in the placebo and 3.23±1.25 days in the naproxen group (P=.16). The trial was stopped by the data monitoring committee before reaching the initial target number of 200 patients because of an increase in renal failure in the naproxen group (7.3% vs 1.3%; P=.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative use of naproxen did not reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation but decreased its duration, in a limited sample of patients after CABG surgery. There was a significant increase in acute renal failure in patients receiving naproxen 275 mg twice daily. Our study does not support the routine use of naproxen after CABG surgery for the prevention of atrial fibrillation.

Statin use and postoperative atrial fibrillation after major noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Although statin lipid-lowering medications likely reduce perioperative ischemic complications, few data exist to describe statins' effects on risk for and outcomes of atrial fibrillation following noncardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between treatment with statin medications and clinically significant postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) following major noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent major noncardiac surgery between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2008. Cases of clinically significant POAF were selected by using a combination of International Classification of Diseases-9 codes and clinical variables. We defined statin users as those whose pharmacy data included a charge for a statin drug on the day of surgery, the day after surgery, or both.

RESULTS

Of 370,447 patients, 10,957 (3.0%) developed clinically significant POAF; overall, 79,871 (21.6%) received a perioperative statin. Patients receiving statins were generally older (68.8 vs 61.1 years; P <.001) and more likely to be receiving a beta-blocker (50.3% vs 21.6%; P < .001). Statin use was associated with a lower unadjusted rate of POAF (2.6% vs 3.0%; P < .001). After adjustment for patient risk factors and surgery type, odds for POAF remained significantly lower among statin-treated patients (adjusted odds ratio = 0.79; 95% confidence interval = 0.71-0.87; P < .001). Statin use was not associated with differences in cost, length of stay, or mortality among patients who developed POAF.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with statin agents appears to be associated with a lower risk for clinically significant POAF following major noncardiac surgery.

Review: Beyond the Guidelines: New and Novel Agents for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiothoracic Surgery

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF), a common complication of cardiac surgery, can increase the morbidity and mortality, as well as the costs of the surgery being preformed. Guidelines recommend the use of β-blockers, amiodarone, or sotalol to decrease the risk of experiencing POAF. However, none of these agents fully protect the patient from POAF, thus newer agents are needed to be used in combination with them. Many different agents have been studied to fit this role and may be grouped into 2 categories: agents with antiarrhythmic activity such as magnesium and polyunsaturated fatty acids and agents with anti-inflammatory activity such as statins and free radical scavengers. Most of these novel agents have been studied in a wide variety of trials; however, some clearly have more effect than others. Although none of these newer agents have the data required to make blanket recommendations for use at this point, given the safety profile and low costs of some, many continue to be evaluated in randomized-controlled trials.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and risk of incident myocardial infarction and heart failure, and all-cause mortality in the Australian veteran community

AIMS

We studied the association between either non-selective NSAIDs (ns-NSAIDs), selective COX-2 inhibitors, or any NSAID and risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure (HF), and all-cause mortality in elderly subjects.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective nested case-control study on Australian veterans using nationwide hospital admission and pharmacy dispensing data. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the risk of events for three different measures of prescription supply exposure over the last 2 years: (i) supplied at least once, (ii) supply frequency: supplied more than twice within the last 30 days, once or twice within the last 30 days, and once or more 30 days to 2 years and (iii) total supplies.

RESULTS

We identified 83 623 cases and 1 662 099 matched controls (1:20) contributing 3 862 931 persons-years of observation. NSAID use at least once within the last 2 years did not significantly affect the risk of MI (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96, 1.04) but was associated with a mildly reduced risk of HF (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92, 0.98). There was a reduced all-cause mortality with at least one supply of either ns-NSAIDs (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90, 0.97), selective COX-2 inhibitors (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.88, 0.93), or any NSAID (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.85, 0.90). Risk of death was also inversely associated with the number of prescription supplies.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAID use is not associated with an increased risk of incident MI and HF but is associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in Australian veterans.

Pharmacologic prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a systematic review

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring after cardiac surgery. Its incidence varies depending on type of surgery. Postoperative AF may cause hemodynamic deterioration, predispose to stroke and increase mortality. Effective treatment for prophylaxis of postoperative AF is vital as reduces hospitalization and overall morbidity. Beta-blockers, have been proved to prevent effectively atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery and should be routinely used if there are no contraindications. Sotalol may be more effective than standard b-blockers for the prevention of AF without causing an excess of side effects. Amiodarone is useful when beta-blocker therapy is not possible or as additional prophylaxis in high risk patients. Other agents such as magnesium, calcium channels blocker or non-antiarrhythmic drugs as glycose-insulin--potassium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, N-acetylcysteine and statins have been studied as alternative treatment for postoperative AF prophylaxis.

Systemic vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 predicts the occurrence of post-operative atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Post-operative atrial fibrillation occurs in 30% of patients after on-pump heart surgery and is associated to elevated inflammatory markers. We have evaluated if the systemic biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial damage, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and soluble thrombomodulin may help in identifying patients prone to development of post-operative atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-four patients in sinus rhythm submitted to elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Systemic inflammatory, oxidative stress and endothelial damage markers were measured at baseline and 72 h after surgery. During the procedure, a sample of the right atrial appendage was obtained for histochemistry. Electrocardiogram was monitored for 72 h after surgery for event adjudication.

RESULTS

22% of the patients developed post-operative atrial fibrillation. Baseline systemic inflammatory markers did not differ between patients with or without post-operative atrial fibrillation. However, baseline plasma VCAM-1 and thrombomodulin levels were significantly higher in patients who developed post-operative atrial fibrillation. After adjustment for age, gender, comorbidities and concurrent medication, circulating VCAM-1 remained as an independent predictor for post-operative atrial fibrillation development. No association was observed between systemic plasma VCAM-1 and VCAM-1 tissue expression in the right atrial appendage.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery, elevated VCAM-1 levels predict a higher risk for post-operative atrial fibrillation. Plasma VCAM-1 elevation is not related to its expression in the right atria, suggesting that systemic endothelial damage rather than local changes pre-exist in patients who develop the arrhythmia.

The impact of statin use on atrial fibrillation

The aim of the present systematic review is to present an overview of the evidence linking atrial fibrillation (AF), inflammation and oxidative stress, with emphasis on the potential of statins to decrease the incidence of different types of AF, including new-onset AF, after electrical cardioversion (EC) and after cardiac surgery. Observational and clinical trials have studied the impact of statin therapy on new-onset, post-EC or postoperative AF. Data from different observational trials have shown that treatment with statins significantly reduces the incidence of new-onset AF in the primary and secondary prevention. The data are insufficient to recommend the use of statins before EC. Finally, perioperative statin therapy may represent an important non-antiarrhythmic adjunctive therapeutic strategy for the prevention of postoperative AF.

Association between perioperative NSAID use and post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation, blood transfusions, and cardiovascular outcomes: a nested cohort study from the AF Suppression Trials (AFIST) I, II and III

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use may reduce the incidence of post-cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) atrial fibrillation (AF). The cerebrovascular and cardiovascular safety of using NSAIDs for post-CTS AF has not been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether NSAIDs could reduce the incidence of post-CTS atrial fibrillation without increasing patients' risk of stroke or myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

Patients (n = 555) undergoing CTS from the Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trials I, II and III were evaluated in this nested cohort study. Demographic, surgical and medication use characteristics were prospectively collected as part of the AFIST trials. Endpoints included post-CTS atrial fibrillation, stroke, MI and the need for red blood cell transfusion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders and calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The population was 67.8 +/- 8.6 years old and 77.1% male with 127 (22.9%) patients receiving an NSAID postoperatively. Overall, 14.6% underwent valve surgery, 6.1% had prior AF, 12.6% had heart failure and 84.0% and 44.1% received postoperative beta-blockade and prophylactic amiodarone. NSAID use was associated with reductions in the adjusted odds of post-CTS atrial fibrillation (0.54 (0.32-0.90)) and the need for RBC transfusions (0.63 (0.41-0.97)). No elevation in the odds of developing stroke (1.10 (0.21-5.66)) or MI (1.70 (0.40-7.10)) was observed.

LIMITATIONS

Patients were not randomized to receive NSAIDs versus a control. We may not have had adequate power to evaluate stoke or MI in this analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs decreased the odds of developing post-CTS atrial fibrillation, further supporting the hypothesis of inflammation as a trigger for post-CTS atrial fibrillation. The need for RBC transfusions was also reduced with NSAID use. We may have been underpowered to evaluate stroke or MI incidence, but the qualitative elevations in these variables suggest more safety data is needed before NSAIDs can be routinely recommended.

Possible arrhythmiogenic mechanism produced by ibuprofen

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate the electrophysiological effect of ibuprofen on the cardiac action potentials (AP) and electrocardiograms (ECG), and to identify its arrhythmiogenic mechanism.

METHODS

The intracellular microelectrode recording technique was employed to record the fast- and slowresponse AP in guinea pig papillary muscles. The cardiac responses of ibuprofen were monitored by ECG, both in in vivo and in vitro studies.

RESULTS

The ECG recording revealed that ibuprofen could induce arrhythmias, both in vitro and in vivo. Fatal ventricular fibrillations are readily produced in in vitro experiments by ibuprofen. Our results show that ibuprofen could dose dependently shorten the duration of AP and the effective refractory period (ERP), and it could also decrease the maximum depolarization velocity of phase 0 (V(max)) in both the fast- and slow-response AP. The duration of the QRS complex wave (QRS duration) in ECG was prolonged. Although the heart rate was depressed by ibuprofen, the corrected QT interval duration (QTc) decreased.

CONCLUSION

Ibuprofen could inhibit cardiac Na+ and Ca2+ channels as it slows V(max) in both fast- and slowresponse AP. Furthermore, ibuprofen shortens the ERP and decreases the excitation propagation within the heart, which might provide a substrate for an arrhythmiogenic re-entry circuit. Taken together, we conclude that ibuprofen, when used improperly, may impose a potential hazard in inducing cardiac arrhythmias in patients with existing heart diseases.

Relation of C-reactive protein to long-term risk of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

The aim of this study is to assess the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting long-term risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after electrical cardioversion. CRP levels are associated with the presence of AF and failure of electrical or pharmacologic cardioversion, but no previous study has assessed their predictive role in long-term follow-up after successful electrical cardioversion. One hundred two consecutive patients (age 67 +/- 11 years; 58 men) with nonvalvular persistent AF who underwent successful biphasic electrical cardioversion were studied. High-sensitivity CRP was measured immediately before cardioversion. Follow-up was performed up to 1 year in all cases. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to CRP quartiles. Patients in the lowest CRP quartile (<1.9 mg/L) had significantly lower rates of AF recurrence (4% vs 33% at 3 months in the other 3 groups combined, p = 0.007, and 28% vs 60% at 1 year, p = 0.01). The 4 groups were similar in age, gender, ejection fraction, and left atrial size. Survival analysis confirmed that patients in the lowest CRP quartile had a lower recurrence rate (p = 0.02). Cox regression analyses using age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, ejection fraction, left atrial diameter, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II antagonists, and statins, and CRP quartiles as covariates showed that only CRP was independently associated with AF recurrence during follow-up (hazard ratio 4.98, 95% confidence interval 1.75 to 14.26, p = 0.003). In conclusion, low CRP is associated with long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion for nonvalvular AF.

Lipid-lowering therapy with statins, a new approach to antiarrhythmic therapy

Inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (statins) are the most effective and best-tolerated drugs to treat elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In addition, they exhibit other effects unrelated to their lipid lowering effects (pleiotropic actions). In recent years, experimental and clinical evidence demonstrates that statins exert antiarrhythmic properties, reducing the recurrences of supraventricular and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias both in patients with and without coronary artery disease (CAD). Thus, statins may constitute a novel therapeutic approach to cardiac arrhythmias. This article reviews the antiarrhythmic properties of statins as well as the possible mechanisms involved, including the lowering of LDL-C levels, the improvement of endothelial dysfunction and autonomic function, the stabilization of the atherosclerotic plaques, the antioxidant, antiinflammatory, antithrombotic and cardioprotective properties and the modulation of transmembrane ion fluxes.

Effect of perioperative corticosteroid use on the incidence of postcardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation and length of stay

BACKGROUND

While the mechanism underlying the development of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation has not been fully elucidated, it has been suggested that inflammation may play a causative role. Corticosteroids have been traditionally used to reduce inflammation, and when administered perioperatively, they may decrease the incidence of atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of corticosteroid administration on the incidence of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation and resultant hospital length of stay.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews through July 2006 was conducted using specific search terms. A review of cardiology abstracts and a manual review of references were also performed. Studies that met the following criteria were included: randomized, controlled trials comparing patients receiving perioperative corticosteroids or placebo and reporting data on post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation. A random-effects model was used.

RESULTS

Nine of the 1396 citations initially identified, representing 990 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Upon meta-analysis, corticosteroids significantly lowered patients' odds of developing post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation by 45% (odds ratio [OR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.78) and reduced hospital length of stay by approximately 1.6 days (weighted mean difference -1.59; 95% CI -2.96 to -0.21). Reductions in the incidence of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation appeared greatest in patients receiving intermediate doses of corticosteroid (50-210 mg dexamethasone equivalent), while both lower (up to 8 mg) and higher (236-2850 mg) dosing resulted in blunted effects.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroids appear to reduce the incidence of post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation and shorten hospital length of stay in randomized controlled trials.

Inflammatory markers are not associated with outcomes following elective external cardioversion

BACKGROUND

Electrical cardioversion is a common modality of therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation. Unfortunately even if the cardioversion is initially successful many patients revert to atrial fibrillation. It has been proposed that there may be an inflammatory component to this arrhythmia. It is interesting to speculate that this may have a role in determining the outcome following elective cardioversion.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 81 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing elective external cardioversion. Blood samples were taken immediately prior to the procedure. Soluble E-Selectin, P-Selectin, intra-cellular adhesion molecule and vascular cell adhesion molecule were assayed using a commercially available enzyme linked immunosorbent assay technique (R&D systems) and high sensitivity C reactive protein was measured by rate nephelometry. Patients were reviewed at 8 weeks and bloods were taken at this time.

RESULTS

At baseline patients who had an unsuccessful cardioversion (n=15) were compared to those who had a successful cardioversion (n=66). Thirty-two patients of the 66 initially successful patients reverted to atrial fibrillation during the follow-up period. There was no difference in the levels of baseline serum inflammatory markers measured between those with an unsuccessful cardioversion and those who were successful. When the group who reverted to atrial fibrillation were compared to those who remained in sinus rhythm again there was no difference in the levels of serum markers measured at baseline.

CONCLUSION

There was no association between maintenance of sinus rhythm following cardioversion and serum inflammatory markers.

Atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort series

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common postoperative complication of cardiac surgery, yet the prevention and treatment of postoperative AF remains controversial and varies among practitioners. The purpose of this study was to document the incidence and time of onset of postoperative AF in a cardiac surgical cohort, examine risk factors implicated in the occurrence of postoperative AF, and assess effectiveness of current treatment strategies implemented for postoperative AF. A retrospective health record review was conducted on 1078 adults following cardiac surgery. Data on demographic, preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative risk factors for postoperative AF, documented episodes of AF, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Overall incidence of postoperative AF was 39.6%: 57.6% after cardiac valve surgery, 69.3% after combined coronary artery bypass graft and valve surgery, and 33% after bypass graft surgery alone. The peak onset of postoperative AF occurred on the second postoperative day. Advancing age, history of AF, combined cardiac valve and coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and high Mg+2 levels on the third postoperative day were significant predictors of postoperative AF in this cohort. Length of hospitalization increased with the presence of postoperative AF. Findings corroborate that multiple factors play a role in the development of AF following cardiac surgery.

Prophylaxis and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia seen after cardiac surgery. It is associated with prolongation of hospital stay, postoperative complications, stroke, mortality, and increased hospital cost. Several prevention strategies have been proven effective in reducing postoperative AF; in addition, active prevention of postoperative AF is associated with a decrease in the length of hospital stay and a reduction trend in hospital costs. In patients with postoperative AF, restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm and rate control are adequate treatment alternatives in the majority of cases. In severely symptomatic or hemodynamically compromised patients urgent cardioversion is needed. Adequate oral anticoagulation may be indicated for a limited period of time.

C reactive protein concentration and recurrence of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion

BACKGROUND

To test the hypothesis that a high C reactive protein (CRP) concentration would predict recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardioversion in patients taking antiarrhythmic drugs.

METHODS

111 patients who underwent direct current cardioversion for symptomatic AF were enrolled. Blood was drawn for CRP determination before cardioversion on the same day. All patients were taking antiarrhythmic drugs before and after electrical cardioversion.

RESULTS

After a mean follow up of 76 days, 75 patients had recurrence of AF. In univariate analysis, the median CRP concentration was significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence (3.95 mg/l v 1.81 mg/l, p = 0.002). Among the 55 patients with CRP in the upper 50th centile, 44 (80%) experienced recurrence of AF over a total follow up of 8.98 patient years, whereas among the 56 patients with CRP in the lower 50th centile, 31 (55%) experienced recurrence of AF over a total follow up of 14.3 patient years (p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio comparing the upper 50th centile of CRP with the lower 50th centile of CRP was 2.0 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.2, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP is independently associated with recurrence of AF after electrical cardioversion among patients taking antiarrhythmic drugs. These results suggest that inflammation may have a role in the pathogenesis of AF resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs.