1
|
Hurt CN, Kaiser K, Shaunfield S, Webster KA, Keating K, Boyken L, Duffey S, Garcia J, Cella D. Content validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lymphoma Symptom Index-18 (NFLymSI-18) in indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:68. [PMID: 38980533 PMCID: PMC11233475 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00752-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The NFLymSI-18 is a patient-reported outcome measure comprised of the highest priority symptoms, emotional concerns, treatment side effects, and other concerns identified by lymphoma patients and oncologists. This study assessed the content validity of the NFLymSI-18 for patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL), with a focus on the Disease-Related Symptoms Physical (DRS-P) subscale. METHODS Patients with a confirmed iNHL diagnosis who had received one or more lines of treatment were recruited during clinic visits. Patients described their symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional concerns related to iNHL in a semi-structured interview. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVivo10. RESULTS Data saturation was obtained by the 18th interview. Most participants (67%) had follicular lymphoma. 28% of participants had marginal zone lymphoma, and one participant had lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia. Mean age of the 18 participants was 67 years. 56% of the sample was male. Most participants (67%) had a college or advanced degree. When asked to describe their iNHL symptoms, patients most often discussed swelling (n = 14), fatigue (n = 11), and pain (n = 8). The following symptoms were mentioned by three patients each: anxiety, appetite loss, rash, sleep disruption, trouble breathing, and malaise. Mapping of NFLymSI-18 content to these concerns showed the instrument includes all those most frequently mentioned symptoms. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the content validity of the NFLymSI-18, including its DRS-P Subscale, for patients with iNHL. The instrument shows strong validity for the most referenced symptoms of swelling, fatigue, and pain. The diversity of additional symptoms reported by patients is consistent with the heterogeneous symptomology of iNHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney N Hurt
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Karen Kaiser
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sara Shaunfield
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kimberly A Webster
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Lara Boyken
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sara Duffey
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jessica Garcia
- Lurie Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Almeida D, Umuhire D, Gonzalez-Quevedo R, António A, Burgos JG, Verpillat P, Bere N, Sepodes B, Torre C. Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1408636. [PMID: 38846141 PMCID: PMC11153762 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient experience data (PED), provided by patients/their carers without interpretation by clinicians, directly capture what matters more to patients on their medical condition, treatment and impact of healthcare. PED can be collected through different methodologies and these need to be robust and validated for its intended use. Medicine regulators are increasingly encouraging stakeholders to generate, collect and submit PED to support both scientific advice in development programs and regulatory decisions on the approval and use of these medicines. This article reviews the existing definitions and types of PED and demonstrate the potential for use in different settings of medicines' life cycle, focusing on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Patient Preferences (PP). Furthermore, it addresses some challenges and opportunities, alluding to important regulatory guidance that has been published, methodological aspects and digitalization, highlighting the lack of guidance as a key hurdle to achieve more systematic inclusion of PED in regulatory submissions. In addition, the article discusses opportunities at European and global level that could be implemented to leverage PED use. New digital tools that allow patients to collect PED in real time could also contribute to these advances, but it is equally important not to overlook the challenges they entail. The numerous and relevant initiatives being developed by various stakeholders in this field, including regulators, show their confidence in PED's value and create an ideal moment to address challenges and consolidate PED use across medicines' life cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Almeida
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Denise Umuhire
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rosa Gonzalez-Quevedo
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ana António
- Referrals Office, Quality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Juan Garcia Burgos
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrice Verpillat
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Bere
- Regulatory Practice and Analysis, Medsafe—New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Bruno Sepodes
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Torre
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Judson MA. Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis. Clin Chest Med 2024; 45:159-173. [PMID: 38245364 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of major concern to patients with sarcoidosis. HRQoL impairment is the most common reason to treat the disease. Advances in patient-reported outcome (PRO) methodology offer the promise to use these instruments to follow quality of life in individual patients with sarcoidosis over time. Several HRQoL issues will be highlighted including their clinical importance, common causes in patients with sarcoidosis, the construction and use of PROs in clinical sarcoidosis trials, methods to adapt PROs to monitor HRQoL in individual patients with sarcoidosis, and the approach to improving HRQoL in this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc A Judson
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Albany Medical Center, 16 New Scotland Avenue, MC-91 Division Pulm-CCM, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oyenuga M, Halabi S, Oyenuga A, McSweeney S, Morgans AK, Ryan CJ, Prizment A. Quality of life outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and pretreatment prognostic score. Prostate 2023; 83:688-694. [PMID: 36842158 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A prognostic risk score (Halabi score) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) accurately predicts overall survival, but its association with quality of life (QOL) has not been defined. We hypothesize that a higher pretreatment Halabi score is associated with worse QOL outcomes over time in mCRPC patients. METHODS Patient-level data from the docetaxel plus prednisone control arm of Mainsail, a Phase 3 clinical trial in mCRPC were accessed via ProjectDataSphere. Pretreatment Halabi score included disease-related factors: metastatic site, opioid use, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), alkaline phosphatase, albumin, hemoglobin, lactic acid dehydrogenase, and PSA, with higher score indicating worse survival. Three QOL scales were created: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P, higher score = better QOL), Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Severity score (BPI-SFSS, higher score = higher pain severity), and BPI-SF Interference score (BPI-SFIS, higher score = greater pain interference). Mixed linear model was used to estimate the associations between Halabi score and QOL scores assessed at different time points (baseline, 2 months, and 6 months). RESULTS This analysis included 412 mCRPC patients (median age = 68 years, 82% white, 5% Black, median log PSA = 4.4 ng/mL). After multivariable adjustment, Halabi score was significantly associated with QOL scores at all time points. At 6 months, multivariable adjusted FACT-P decreased by 10.0 points (worsening), BPI-SFSS increased by 0.8 points (worsening), and BPI-SFIS increased by 0.9 points (worsening) for each unit increase in Halabi risk score. In multivariable analysis of individual components, ECOG-PS, site of metastasis, and opioid use were significantly associated with worse QOL scores at baseline. CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients with poorer Halabi prognostic risk scores have poorer QOL and greater pain intensity and interference at baseline and during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mosunmoluwa Oyenuga
- Department of Internal Medicine, SSM St Mary's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Susan Halabi
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Abayomi Oyenuga
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sean McSweeney
- Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Alicia K Morgans
- Department of Medicine, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charles J Ryan
- Prostate Cancer Foundation, Santa Monica, California, USA
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anna Prizment
- Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
- University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Postoperative outcomes that matter to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: A qualitative study. Surg Open Sci 2022; 10:76-82. [PMID: 36039074 PMCID: PMC9418602 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose was to explore which postoperative outcomes are important to patients operated for inguinal hernia to gain a better insight into the patient experience going through surgery. Methods A qualitative study was performed using semistructured individual interviews. Participants were all male and had undergone inguinal hernia repair. Data were analyzed with directed content analysis. Results Ten patients were interviewed. Identified domains were function, sensation, expectations, appearance, social aspects, and satisfaction with surgeon/staff. Preoperative functional limitations were the main motivation for seeking surgery, and postoperative functional improvement seemed to be the most important factor determining overall patient satisfaction. Conclusion Patients consider a wide range of factors when assessing the outcome of their inguinal hernia repair. Our results suggest that the current practice of outcome assessment of inguinal hernia repair with focus on recurrence may be too narrow and may not adequately reflect the patients' experience. Summary This qualitative study explored patients' perspectives on postoperative outcome after inguinal hernia repair, and the identified domains of importance were function, sensation, expectations, appearance, social aspects, and satisfaction with surgeon/staff. These results highlight that patients emphasize a wide range of elements when assessing the outcome of their inguinal hernia repair that are important to acknowledge, as current practice of outcome assessment of inguinal hernia repair may be too narrow.
Collapse
|
6
|
Nishimura K, Shiota M, Eto M, Satoh T, Stroupe A, Seo C, Uzumcu A, Ledesma DA. Conceptual assessment of HRQOL among Japanese non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. Cancer Med 2022; 12:1762-1778. [PMID: 35770744 PMCID: PMC9883429 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study objectives were to understand how patients view the quality of life in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), including unmet needs and what patients consider most important in treatment outcomes. A gap analysis was conducted on existing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) measures versus what is missing from the patient perspective, to guide future development of PRO-based real-world evidence for nmCRPC in Japan. A conceptual model for nmCRPC Japanese patients' HRQOL was also created. METHODS This non-interventional, qualitative study consisted of a targeted literature review, PRO instrument review, and interviews with 20 nmCRPC patients and five treating physicians. Triangulation of the gap analysis, evidence from the targeted review of the literature, and qualitative interview findings were employed to assess the comprehensiveness of current nmCRPC and HRQOL measures. RESULTS Symptoms most reported by patients were frequent urination (70%), nocturia (65%), and general pain (65%). Others reported included lack of strength (30%). HRQOL impacts most reported were anxiety (45%) and worry (50%) about their diagnosis. Additional impacts mentioned were weight changes, loss of sleep, difficulty walking, loss of appetite, and difficulty traveling and seeking toilets in public. The gap analysis revealed 31 symptoms and 33 impacts not covered in existing prostate cancer-specific PRO instruments. Patients mentioned musculoskeletal symptoms such as fractures, leg pain, cramps, numbness, and loss of leg bone strength. Impacts not previously discussed in the literature or in outcome measures were feelings of self-consciousness around diagnosis, stigma around illness, and the impact on mobility including traveling. CONCLUSION Key results reveal pain and urinary symptoms are the most experienced by Japanese nmCRPC patients. The diagnosis and treatment of disease leads to significant impacts in patient lives. Analysis revealed that symptoms and life impacts are missing in the current literature and outcome measures. Testing and debriefing of specific items could further substantiate these dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of UrologyOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityKyushuJapan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKyushu UniversityKyushuJapan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sultan P, Jensen SE, Taylor J, El-Sayed Y, Carmichael S, Cella D, Angst MS, Gaudilliere B, Lyell DJ, Carvalho B. Proposed domains for assessing postpartum recovery: a concept elicitation study. BJOG 2021; 129:9-20. [PMID: 34536324 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose postpartum recovery domains. DESIGN Concept elicitation study. SETTING Semi-structured interviews. POPULATION Ten writing committee members and 50 stakeholder interviews (23 postpartum women, nine general obstetricians, five maternal and fetal medicine specialists, eight nurses and five obstetric anaesthetists). METHODS Alternating interviews and focus group meetings until concept saturation was achieved (no new themes discussed in three consecutive interviews). Interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed, and an iterative coding process was used to identify domains. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was to identify recovery domains. We also report key symptoms and concerns. Discussion frequency and importance scores (0-100; 0 = not important; 100 = vitally important to recovery) were used to rank domains. Discussion frequency was used to rank factors helping and hindering recovery, and to determine the greatest challenges experienced postpartum. RESULTS Thirty-four interviews and two focus group meetings were performed. The 13 postpartum recovery domains identified, (ranked highest to lowest) were: psychosocial distress, surgical/medical factors, infant feeding and breast health, psychosocial support, pain, physical function, sleep, motherhood experience, infant health, fatigue, appearance, sexual function and cognition. The most frequently discussed factors facilitating postpartum recovery were: family support, lactation/breastfeeding support and partner support. The most frequently discussed factor hindering recovery was inadequate social support. The most frequent challenges reported were: breastfeeding (week 1), breastfeeding (week 3) and sleep (week 6). CONCLUSIONS We propose 13 domains that comprehensively describe recovery in women delivering in a single centre within the USA. This provides a novel framework to study the postpartum recovery process. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT We propose 13 postpartum recovery domains that provide a framework to study the recovery process following childbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sultan
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - S E Jensen
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J Taylor
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Y El-Sayed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - S Carmichael
- Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - D Cella
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - M S Angst
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Gaudilliere
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - D J Lyell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - B Carvalho
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Pain, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stover AM, Kurtzman R, Walker Bissram J, Jansen J, Carr P, Atkinson T, Ellis CT, Freeman AT, Turner K, Basch EM. Stakeholder Perceptions of Key Aspects of High-Quality Cancer Care to Assess with Patient Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143628. [PMID: 34298841 PMCID: PMC8306432 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We conducted a review to identify important symptoms reported by patients on questionnaires (e.g., pain) that can be used to compare cancer centers on how well they provide care. For example, cancer centers could be compared on the percentage of patients with controlled pain after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics. Standard review methods were used to identify studies through August 2020. Searches generated 1813 articles and 1779 were coded as not relevant. The remaining 34 studies showed that patients, caregivers, clinicians, and healthcare administrators identify psychosocial care (e.g., distress) and symptom management as critical parts of high-quality care. Patients and caregivers also perceive that maintaining physical function and daily activities are important. Clinicians and healthcare administrators perceive control of specific symptoms to be important (e.g., pain, poor sleep, diarrhea). Results were used to inform testing of symptom questionnaires to compare the quality of care provided by six cancer centers. Abstract Performance measurement is the process of collecting, analyzing, and reporting standardized measures of clinical performance that can be compared across practices to evaluate how well care was provided. We conducted a systematic review to identify stakeholder perceptions of key symptoms and health domains to test as patient-reported performance measures in oncology. Stakeholders included cancer patients, caregivers, clinicians, and healthcare administrators. Standard review methodology was used, consistent with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies through August 2020. Four coders independently reviewed entries and conflicts were resolved by a fifth coder. Efficacy and effectiveness studies, and studies focused exclusively on patient experiences of care (e.g., communication skills of providers) were excluded. Searches generated 1813 articles and 1779 were coded as not relevant, leaving 34 international articles for extraction. Patients, caregivers, clinicians, and healthcare administrators prioritize psychosocial care (e.g., distress) and symptom management for patient-reported performance measures. Patients and caregivers also perceive that maintaining physical function and daily activities are critical. Clinicians and administrators perceive control of specific symptoms to be critical (gastrointestinal symptoms, pain, poor sleep). Results were used to inform testing at six US cancer centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela M. Stover
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (J.J.); (P.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Rachel Kurtzman
- Department of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| | | | - Jennifer Jansen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (J.J.); (P.C.)
| | - Philip Carr
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (J.J.); (P.C.)
| | - Thomas Atkinson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - C. Tyler Ellis
- Department of Surgery, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, KY 40202, USA;
| | | | - Kea Turner
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
| | - Ethan M. Basch
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA; (J.J.); (P.C.)
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Downie S, Stillie A, Moran M, Sudlow C, Simpson H. Patient-reported assessment of outcome after surgery for bone metastases. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2021; 13:9062. [PMID: 33953891 PMCID: PMC8077288 DOI: 10.4081/or.2021.9062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Regardless of prognosis, surgery is often considered in metastatic bone disease (MBD) as a palliative procedure to improve function and quality of life. Traditional focus on objective outcomes such as mortality is inappropriate in this group, and there is a drive to assess outcomes via patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). This is an overview of current understanding of MBD outcomes and how this should influence future decision-making and research. The objectives of this review were to identify difficulties in measuring PROMs in the MBD patient population and explore alternatives to patientreported outcomes. We also provide an overview of current understanding of outcomes in MBD and how this should influence decision-making and direct research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Downie
- Orthopaedics and Trauma Department, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| | | | | | - Cathie Sudlow
- Division of Clinical Neurosciences, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Hamish Simpson
- Orthopaedics and Trauma Department, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaunfield S, Webster KA, Kaiser K, Greene GJ, Yount SE, Lacson L, Benson AB, Halperin DM, Yao JC, Singh S, Feuilly M, Marteau F, Cella D. Development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Carcinoid Syndrome Symptom Index. Neuroendocrinology 2021; 111:850-862. [PMID: 32911478 DOI: 10.1159/000511482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a symptom-focused index to evaluate representative symptoms, treatment side effects, and emotional and functional well-being of patients with carcinoid syndrome (CS). METHODS The development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Carcinoid Syndrome Symptom Index (FACT-CSI) followed US Food and Drug Administration guidelines for the development of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and involved the following: (a) literature review; (b) interviews with 14 CS patients; (c) interviews with 9 clinicians; and (d) instrument development involving input from a range of PRO measure development and CS experts. The resulting draft instrument underwent cognitive interviews with 7 CS patients. RESULTS Forty-six CS sources were reviewed. Analysis of patient interviews produced 23 patient-reported symptoms. The most frequently endorsed physical symptoms were flushing, diarrhea, abdominal pain, fatigue, and food sensitivity/triggers. Seven priority CS emotional and functional themes were also identified by patients. Expert interviews revealed 12 unique priority symptoms - the most common being diarrhea, flushing, wheezing, edema, abdominal pain/cramping, fatigue, and 8 emotional and functional concerns. Through an iterative process of team and clinical collaborator meetings, data review, item reduction and measure revision, 24 items were selected for the draft symptom index representing symptoms, emotional concerns, global assessment of treatment side effects, and functional well-being. Cognitive interview results demonstrated strong content validity, including positive endorsement of item clarity (>86% across items), symptom relevance (>70% for most items), and overall measure content (86%). CONCLUSIONS The FACT-CSI is a content-relevant, symptom-focused index reflecting the highest priority and clinically relevant symptoms and concerns of people with CS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Shaunfield
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA,
| | - Kimberly A Webster
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karen Kaiser
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - George J Greene
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Susan E Yount
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Leilani Lacson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Al B Benson
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - James C Yao
- Department Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Simron Singh
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marion Feuilly
- Ipsen Pharma, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Florence Marteau
- Ipsen Pharma, Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Facing life-prolonging treatment: The perspectives of men with advanced metastatic prostate cancer - An interview study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2020; 49:101859. [PMID: 33126157 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Several life-prolonging treatment options have recently become available for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, research regarding patient experiences while undergoing these treatments is scarce. The aim was to explore the perspectives of men when facing life-prolonging treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. METHOD Qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 men as they were starting, undergoing or had completed their first life-prolonging treatment. Interpretive description was used for analysis. RESULTS The results illuminate the complexity of facing life-prolonging treatment, with interlaced dimensions beyond just the outcome, and where the men described other dimensions of their lives in relation to the treatment. The results are presented as 4 themes; Considering treatment when the remainder of life is at stake, Preparing for the life-prolonging treatment after deciding to go through with it, Considering the prospect of the life-prolonging treatment not being successful and Reflecting on death and dying in the light of a life-limiting illness. CONCLUSIONS The quality and content of the remainder of life are central for men when facing life-prolonging treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This is important when weighing desired treatment outcomes against side effects, and when reflecting upon whether going through with treatment would be worth it or not. The results illuminate the importance of encouraging men at this stage to express expectations, hopes and fears regarding the treatment and the future when considering life-prolonging treatments. Nurses working with these patients are important in the decision-making process and in evaluating treatments, to detect needs for interventions.
Collapse
|
12
|
Fang MM, Nowinski CJ, Lai J, Shaunfield S, Silverberg JI, Rangel SM, Cella D, Paller AS. Characteristics and impacts of itch in children with inflammatory skin disorders. Br J Dermatol 2020; 184:896-904. [PMID: 32893339 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.19541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Itch is a cardinal feature of paediatric disorders and can impair quality of life. However, few studies have addressed symptoms and impacts of itch in paediatric patients. OBJECTIVES We focused on understanding the child's experience of itch and the impact of itch specifically on affected children, including comparison with the adult experience. METHODS Semistructured interviews (nine parents, 15 children with itch) explored concerns related to paediatric itch experiences and effects. Themes were compared with those of previous adult interviews. Literature was reviewed to identify the need for a more comprehensive measure of paediatric itch. RESULTS Itch quality, intensity, duration and environmental triggers (sweating, climate change, stress and certain fabrics) are important aspects of the child's itch experience. Skin disruption, physical function, concentration, emotional reactions, stigma and relationships/social effects are itch impact themes that emerged. No paediatric-specific scale comprehensively captures the paediatric patient itch experience. However, differences between child and adult reports of itch-related pain, functional limitations, fatigue and restlessness, emotional reactions to itch, and treatment effects emphasize the need for a paediatric-specific measurement tool. CONCLUSIONS Children and parents endorse the importance of capturing the paediatric-focused characteristics and impacts of itch in measuring disease severity and response to intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M M Fang
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - C J Nowinski
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J Lai
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S Shaunfield
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - J I Silverberg
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S M Rangel
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - D Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A S Paller
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaiser K, Lyleroehr M, Shaunfield S, Lacson L, Corona M, Kircher S, Nittve M, Cella D. Neuropathy experienced by colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin: A qualitative study to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity scale. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:205-218. [PMID: 32104551 PMCID: PMC7031152 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i2.205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although oxaliplatin is widely established as a standard treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC), oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy has emerged as a prominent dose-limiting side effect associated with quality of life decrements. Ongoing monitoring and management of neuropathy is important for CRC patient quality of life and adherence to treatment. Therefore, a validated self-reported measure of neuropathy would aid in the management and assessment of oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy in clinical practice and research. We sought to evaluate the content validity of the 13-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group- Neurotoxicity subscale (FACT/GOG-Ntx) for CRC patients receiving oxaliplatin.
AIM To understand the neuropathy experiences of CRC patients and assess content validity of the FACT/GOG-Ntx.
METHODS Semi-structured concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews were conducted with 31 CRC patients experiencing peripheral neuropathy from current or previous oxaliplatin treatment. Interview data were analyzed using a constant comparative approach, and data were mapped to the FACT/GOG-Ntx to assess content validity.
RESULTS Mean age of the sample was 54 (range 34-82). The sample was primarily Caucasian (84%) and consisted of nearly equal numbers of men and women. Participants described 28 unique neuropathy symptoms; hand tingling (experienced by 87% of respondents); feet tingling (81%); hand numbness (68%); and feet numbness (84%) were most frequently mentioned. Neuropathy symptoms occurring on the feet were most often identified as most bothersome by participants. Eleven of the 13 FACT/GOG-Ntx items exhibited moderate to strong evidence of content validity. Two items related to trouble hearing and ringing in the ears had weak support; however, these items represent severe neuropathy and could be useful for a patient reported outcome measure.
CONCLUSION The FACT/GOG-Ntx represents the key neuropathy experiences of CRC patients treated with oxaliplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Kaiser
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Madison Lyleroehr
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Sara Shaunfield
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Leilani Lacson
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Maria Corona
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Sheetal Kircher
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| | - Malin Nittve
- Project and Regulatory Affairs, PledPharma AB, Stockholm 114 46, Sweden
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shaunfield S, Jensen S, Fisher AP, Webster K, Shahabi S, Ganguli A, Cella D. Further content validation of the 18-item NCCN/FACT Ovarian Symptom Index and its Disease Related Symptom-Physical (DRS-P) subscale for use in advanced ovarian cancer clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019; 17:185. [PMID: 31856850 PMCID: PMC6921394 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1253-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated pre-defined aspects of content validity of the 18-item NCCN FACT-Ovarian Symptom Index (NFOSI-18) and its Disease-Related Symptoms-Physical (DRS-P) subscale, as clinical trial outcome tools for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS Twenty-one women (mean age 59.5 years) diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer completed the NFOSI-18 and participated in a cognitive interview to explore: (1) whether 'pain' and 'cramps' are considered redundant; (2) whether 'fatigue' and 'lack of energy' are overlapping concepts; (3) whether patients consider severity when responding to the item "I am bothered by constipation;" and (4) factors considered when responding to the item "I am sleeping well." Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS Pain was associated with discomfort, hurt, and life interference; 'cramps' was associated with pain, muscle tightening, and menstrual or digestive issues. Most (81%) considered the items "I have pain" and "I have cramps in my stomach area" to be more different than similar. Participants associated 'fatigue' with intense tiredness and 'lack of energy' with motivation and capability to complete daily activities. Item comparisons revealed a majority (65%) considered the items to be more different than similar. When responding to "I am bothered by constipation," patients indicated constipation severity was related to bother. Finally, patients considered disease, treatment, and other factors when responding to "I am sleeping well." CONCLUSIONS Findings support content validity of the NFOSI-18 and its DRS-P as originally constructed. We propose an alternative scoring option that excludes the item "I am sleeping well" from the DRS-P when used as a symptom-focused index for clinical research in a regulatory context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Shaunfield
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Sally Jensen
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Allison P Fisher
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Kimberly Webster
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Shohreh Shahabi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 N. Michigan Ave. Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ruseckaite R, Maharaj AD, Krysinska K, Dean J, Ahern S. Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries. PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES 2019; 10:355-372. [PMID: 31849553 PMCID: PMC6911317 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s229569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Patient-centred and value-based health-care organisations are increasingly recognising the importance of the patient perspective in the measurement and evaluation of health outcomes. This has been primarily implemented using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are specifically designed to improve direct clinical care, benchmark health-care provision and inform health service planning and policy. Despite CQRs having incorporated the patient perspective to support the evaluation of health-care provision, no evidence-based guidelines for inclusion of PROMs in CQRs exist. This has led to substantial heterogeneity in capturing and reporting PROMs within this setting. This publication is the first in a series describing the development of evidence-informed guidelines for PROMs inclusion within CQRs in Australia. Methods This study consisted of three components: 1) a literature review of existing evidence of guidelines, enablers, barriers, and lessons learnt of PROMs use within the CQRs setting; 2) a survey of Australian CQRs to determine current practices for PROMs use and reporting; and 3) development of a preliminary conceptual framework for PROMs inclusion in CQRs. Results Content analysis of the literature review and survey of 66 Australian registries elicited eight categories for the conceptual framework. The framework covers eight components: rationale, setting, ethics, selection of PROMs, administration, data management, statistical methods, feedback, and reporting. Conclusion We developed a preliminary conceptual framework, which classified findings, from both the literature and the survey, into broad categories ranging from initial development to outcome dissemination providing the structure for development of guidelines in the next phase of this project, engaging national and international leaders in health-related quality of life research, clinicians, researchers, patient advocates and consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasa Ruseckaite
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ashika D Maharaj
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karolina Krysinska
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Joanne Dean
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susannah Ahern
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rönningås U, Fransson P, Holm M, Wennman-Larsen A. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and distress: - a cross-sectional nationwide survey in men with prostate cancer in Sweden. BMC Urol 2019; 19:66. [PMID: 31299962 PMCID: PMC6626380 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0493-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) -value is often used during the prostate cancer trajectory as a marker of progression or response to treatment. Concerns about PSA-values are often expressed by patients in clinical situations. Today there is a lack of larger studies that have investigated the association between PSA-value and distress. The aim was to investigate the association between PSA-values and distress adjusted for sociodemographic factors, hormonal therapy and quality of life (QoL), among men with prostate cancer. Methods In this cross-sectional survey of 3165 men with prostate cancer, members of the Swedish Prostate Cancer Federation, answered questions about sociodemographic factors, PSA, distress, QoL and treatments. Descriptive statistics, and bivariate and multivariable analyses were performed. The result was presented based on four PSA-value groups: 0–19, 20–99, 100–999, and ≥ 1000 ng/ml. Results Of the men, 53% experienced distress. An association between distress and PSA-values was found where higher PSA-values were associated with higher OR:s for experiencing distress in the different PSA-groups: 0–19 ng/ml (ref 1), 20–99 ng/ml (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.01–1.55), 100–999 ng/ml (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12–1.94), ≥1000 ng/ml (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.11–2.85). These associations were adjusted for sociodemographic factors and hormonal therapy. In the multivariable analyses, beside PSA-values, higher levels of distress were associated with being without partner or hormonal therapy. When adding QoL in the multivariable analysis, the association between PSA and distress did not remain significant. Conclusion These results indicate that the PSA-values are associated with distress, especially for those with higher values. However, to be able to support these men, continued research is needed to gain more knowledge about the mechanisms behind the association between emotional distress and PSA-values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Rönningås
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. .,Department of Oncology, Sundsvall County Hospital, 851 86, Sundsvall, Sweden. .,Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Per Fransson
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.,Cancercentrum, Norrlands University Hospital, 901 85, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Maja Holm
- Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Agneta Wennman-Larsen
- Division of Insurance Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Holmstrom S, Naidoo S, Turnbull J, Hawryluk E, Paty J, Morlock R. Symptoms and Impacts in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Findings from Patient and Physician Interviews. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 12:57-67. [PMID: 30519830 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0349-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information available on health-related quality of life in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a conceptual model that describes patients' experiences of living with this condition. METHODS This was a cross-sectional, non-interventional qualitative research study. Sixty-minute semi-structured interviews were conducted with physicians experienced in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and with chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcripts were analysed to identify the key symptoms and impacts on quality of life. Results were used to expand a previously published conceptual model for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. RESULTS Three physicians and 19 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were interviewed. Physicians identified several symptoms frequently mentioned by their patients: fatigue, bone pain, anxiety, stress, depression and interference with daily activities. The most salient symptoms emerging from the patient interviews were urinary frequency and urgency, fatigue, pain/stiffness and sexual dysfunction. The most salient impacts were interference with daily activities, frustration, anxiety and sleep problems. Compared with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, some symptoms and impacts in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were more common and rated as more disturbing (e.g. fatigue, pain, urinary frequency, interference with daily activities and frustration). New concepts that were added to the non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer model, to more accurately reflect the experiences of patients with metastatic disease, were enlarged breasts, muscle loss/deconditioning, inability to focus/mental slowing, body image perception, interference with work and lack of ambition/motivation. CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer experience a substantial burden from their condition. Furthermore, as castration-resistant prostate cancer progresses from the non-metastatic stage to the early metastatic (pre-chemotherapy) stage, certain symptoms become more common and disturb patients' lives to a greater extent. The resulting conceptual model for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer highlights areas that are not adequately assessed with current patient-reported outcome instruments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - James Turnbull
- IQVIA, 26th Floor, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Emily Hawryluk
- IQVIA, 26th Floor, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
| | - Jean Paty
- IQVIA, 26th Floor, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Unger JM, Griffin K, Donaldson GW, Baranowski KM, Good MJ, Reburiano E, Hussain M, Monk PJ, Van Veldhuizen PJ, Carducci MA, Higano CS, Lara PN, Tangen CM, Quinn DI, Wade JL, Vogelzang NJ, Thompson IM, Moinpour CM. Patient-reported outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving docetaxel and Atrasentan versus docetaxel and placebo in a randomized phase III clinical trial (SWOG S0421). J Patient Rep Outcomes 2018; 2:27. [PMID: 29951640 PMCID: PMC5997724 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0054-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background SWOG S0421 was a large randomized trial comparing docetaxel/prednisone plus placebo (DPP) to docetaxel/prednisone plus atrasentan over 12 cycles for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The current report presents the PRO results for this trial, an important secondary endpoint. Methods The trial specified two primary PRO endpoints. Palliation of worst pain was based on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), where a 2 point difference is defined as clinically meaningful. Improvement of functional status was based on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Prostate Cancer Trial Outcome Index (FACT-P TOI); a 5-point difference has been defined as clinically meaningful. We compared rates by arm using chi-square tests. Longitudinal analyses using linear mixed models addressed changes by arm over time. Results Four-hundred eighty-nine patients on each arm were evaluable for PRO endpoint data. There were no differences by arm in clinically meaningful pain palliation (41.7% for DPP vs. 44.0% for DPA, p = .70) or functional status (24.2% for DPP vs. 28.7% for DPA, p = .13). Longitudinal comparisons indicated no differences over time by arm for BPI Worst Pain scores (0.13 points, p = .23). Patients on the DPA arm had improved functional status of 1.78 points on average, a statistically significant (p = .02) but not clinically meaningful difference. Conclusions The SWOG S0421 PRO data showed little evidence of clinically meaningful differences by arm in either pain palliation or functional status. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41687-018-0054-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Unger
- 1SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA.,17Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, M3-C102/P.O. Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA
| | - Katherine Griffin
- 1SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Maha Hussain
- 6Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Paul J Monk
- 7The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH USA
| | | | | | - Celestia S Higano
- 10Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA
| | - Primo N Lara
- 11University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA USA
| | - Catherine M Tangen
- 1SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA
| | - David I Quinn
- 12University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - James L Wade
- 1SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA.,2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.,3Karmanos Cancer Center, Farmington Hills, MI USA.,4National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC USA.,ICON PLCC, Philadelphia, PA USA.,6Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA.,7The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH USA.,Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS USA.,9Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.,10Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.,11University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA USA.,12University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA USA.,Heartland NCORP, Decatur, IL USA.,US Oncology Research Comprehensive Cancer Centers, Las Vegas, NV USA.,15CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital Medical Center, San Antonio, TX USA.,16Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA.,17Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, M3-C102/P.O. Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA
| | | | - Ian M Thompson
- 1SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA.,2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA.,3Karmanos Cancer Center, Farmington Hills, MI USA.,4National Cancer Institute, Washington, DC USA.,ICON PLCC, Philadelphia, PA USA.,6Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA.,7The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH USA.,Sarah Cannon Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS USA.,9Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.,10Pacific Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, University of Washington, Seattle, WA USA.,11University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA USA.,12University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA USA.,Heartland NCORP, Decatur, IL USA.,US Oncology Research Comprehensive Cancer Centers, Las Vegas, NV USA.,15CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital Medical Center, San Antonio, TX USA.,16Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA USA.,17Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, M3-C102/P.O. Box 19024, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109-1024 USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tomaszewski EL, Moise P, Krupnick RN, Downing J, Meyer M, Naidoo S, Holmstrom S. Symptoms and Impacts in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Qualitative Study Findings. THE PATIENT 2017; 10:567-578. [PMID: 28285412 PMCID: PMC5605614 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0227-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We developed a conceptual model to define key concepts associated with patients' experiences with the signs, symptoms, and impacts of non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (M0-CRPC). METHODS A targeted review of peer-reviewed literature, and other publicly available information, identified and categorized symptoms and impacts related to early-stage prostate cancer. Semi-structured interviews with five clinical experts helped determine the most relevant and important concepts for patients with M0-CRPC. Qualitative interviews with 17 patients with M0-CRPC identified the most frequently experienced symptoms and impacts, and their degree of interference with patients' lives. The findings from these three lines of evidence were summarized in a conceptual model. RESULTS Literature searches identified mainly urinary, intestinal, and sexual symptoms. Experts noted the symptoms most frequently mentioned by patients include erectile dysfunction, loss of sexual desire or interest, incontinence/leaking, urgency, and hot flashes. Patient interviews confirmed the high frequency of erectile dysfunction, loss of libido, urinary urgency, and incontinence. The most frequently mentioned impacts expressed by patients were the need to monitor/plan for urinary frequency, interference with/restriction of daily activities, and frustration or anxiety over diagnosis, symptoms, or treatment. Symptoms and impacts most frequently experienced by patients were typically not those with the greatest effects on their lives; rather, those with the greatest consequences were related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS The leading concerns associated with M0-CRPC were related to voiding and sexual dysfunction. The most relevant symptoms and impacts expressed by patients may be a consequence of therapy rather than of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pierre Moise
- QuintilesIMS Inc., 3-5 rue Maurice Ravel, Levallois-Perret, 92594, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Colloca G, Colloca P. The Effects of Social Support on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2016; 31:244-252. [PMID: 26174117 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-015-0884-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC) live longer than patients with metastatic tumours of other sites. Consequently, their social network can influence their quality of life (QoL) during a remarkable life span. The aim of this article is to present the findings of a systematic review of the studies that focused on social network supporting the quality of life of these patients. A systematic review for studies meeting specific criteria was undertaken on three databases. Some level of unmet psychological needs was present in 54 % of the patients. Depression and fatigue are highly prevalent, and the dyads, patient and partner, are at higher risk for distress symptoms. The efforts of individuals to cope with metastatic PC appear influenced by adaptative skills and specific types of family support. Psychological and relational problems predominate in the hormone-sensitive stage and are increasingly replaced by physical symptoms, social and spiritual needs in the later stages. In the early castration-resistant stage, patients will discuss with their doctors information about drugs, control of side effects and treatment strategies. In metastatic PC patients, needs change during the course of the disease. Social support plays a major role in maintaining or disrupting QoL and in the efficacy of psychosocial treatments. The trajectory of disease and its effect on the reduced QoL over the entire life expectancy should be kept in mind by health system providers and social workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Colloca
- Department of Oncology, G. Borea Hospital, Via G. Borea, 56, 18038, Sanremo, Imperia, Italy.
| | - Pasquale Colloca
- Department of Educational Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Nussbaum N, George DJ, Abernethy AP, Dolan CM, Oestreicher N, Flanders S, Dorff TB. Patient experience in the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: state of the science. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2016; 19:111-21. [PMID: 26832363 PMCID: PMC4868871 DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2015.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background: Contemporary therapies for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have shown survival improvements, which do not account for patient experience and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This literature review included a search of MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials enrolling ⩾50 patients with mCRPC and reporting on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) since 2010. Results: Nineteen of 25 publications describing seven treatment regimens (10 clinical trials and nine associated secondary analyses) met the inclusion criteria and were critically appraised. The most commonly used measures were the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (n=5 trials) and Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (n=4 trials) questionnaires. The published data indicated that HRQoL and pain status augmented the clinical efficacy data by providing a better understanding of treatment impact in mCRPC. Abiraterone acetate and prednisone, enzalutamide, radium-223 dichloride and sipuleucel-T offered varying levels of HRQoL benefit and/or pain mitigation versus their respective comparators, whereas three treatments (mitoxantrone, estramustine phosphate and docetaxel, and cabazitaxel) had no meaningful impact on HRQoL or pain. The main limitation of the data were that the PROs utilized were not developed for use in mCRPC patients and hence may not have comprehensively captured symptoms important to this population. Conclusions: Recently published randomized clinical trials of new agents for mCRPC have captured elements of the patient experience while on treatment. Further research is required to standardize methods for measuring, quantifying and reporting on HRQoL and pain in patients with mCRPC in the clinical practice setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Nussbaum
- Department of Genitourinary Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.,Flatiron Health, Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | - D J George
- Department of Genitourinary Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - C M Dolan
- CMD Consulting, Inc., Sandy, UT, USA
| | - N Oestreicher
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S Flanders
- Health Economics and Clinical Outcomes Research, Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
| | - T B Dorff
- USC Norris Cancer Hospital, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sartor O, Flood E, Beusterien K, Park J, Webb I, MacLean D, Wong BJO, Mark Lin H. Health-related quality of life in advanced prostate cancer and its treatments: biochemical failure and metastatic disease populations. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2014; 13:101-12. [PMID: 25262852 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2014.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Revised: 07/30/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to examine the impact of advanced prostate cancer and its treatments on patients' perceptions of their health and to better understand concerns not captured by currently available health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments. PATIENTS AND METHODS Open ended one-on-one interviews were conducted with patients with prostate cancer who had biochemical failure or metastatic cancer to understand the impacts of disease and treatments on patients' perceptions of their lives. Interviews with 25 patients (7 biochemical failure and 18 metastatic) and 6 clinicians were conducted. Patient responses were analyzed to assess whether information saturation (ie, the point at which no new information is collected) was attained and compared with currently available HRQL instruments. The data informed the development of a comprehensive conceptual model illustrating the impacts of advanced disease and treatments. Clinical expert interviews also informed the conceptual model. RESULTS Patients with prostate cancer reported many of the key symptoms already captured by current measures, such as bone pain, urinary functioning, bowel functioning, and fatigue. However, a number of impacts reported as bothersome by patients were identified that are not fully captured by existing HRQL measures. Specific examples include genital atrophy, muscle atrophy, stamina, body image, and emotional well-being. CONCLUSION The conceptual model identified herein describes the impacts of prostate cancer and its treatments from the patient's perspective. The model can be useful in identifying key concepts important to patients that should be measured in trials to capture treatment benefits. The model also can help inform the selection of patient-reported outcomes to assess these benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Sartor
- Departments of Medicine and Urology, Tulane Medical School, New Orleans, LA
| | - Emuella Flood
- Oxford Outcomes Inc, an ICON plc company, Bethesda, MD.
| | | | - Josephine Park
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Takeda Oncology Company, Cambridge, MA
| | - Iain Webb
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Takeda Oncology Company, Cambridge, MA
| | - David MacLean
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Takeda Oncology Company, Cambridge, MA
| | | | - H Mark Lin
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc, The Takeda Oncology Company, Cambridge, MA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Eton DT, Beebe TJ, Hagen PT, Halyard MY, Montori VM, Naessens JM, Sloan JA, Thompson CA, Wood DL. Harmonizing and consolidating the measurement of patient-reported information at health care institutions: a position statement of the Mayo Clinic. PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES 2014; 5:7-15. [PMID: 24550683 PMCID: PMC3926456 DOI: 10.2147/prom.s55069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) capture how patients perceive their health and their health care; their use in clinical research is longstanding. Today, however, PROs increasingly are being used to inform the care of individual patients, and document the performance of health care entities. We recently wrote and internally distributed an institutional position statement titled “Harmonizing and Consolidating the Measurement of Patient-Reported Outcomes at Mayo Clinic: A Position Statement for the Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery”. The statement is meant to educate clinicians, clinical teams, and institutional administrators about the merits of using PROs in a systematic manner for clinical care and quality measurement throughout the institution. The present article summarizes the most important messages from the statement, describing PROs and their use, identifying practical considerations for implementing them in routine practice, elucidating potential barriers to their use, and formulating strategies to overcome these barriers. The lessons learned from our experience – including pitfalls, challenges, and successes – may inform other health care institutions that are interested in systematically using PROs in health care delivery science and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Eton
- Division of Heath Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA ; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Timothy J Beebe
- Division of Heath Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA ; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Philip T Hagen
- Department of Preventive, Occupational, and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Victor M Montori
- Division of Heath Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA ; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James M Naessens
- Division of Heath Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA ; Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jeff A Sloan
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Douglas L Wood
- Division of Heath Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Rochester, MN, USA ; Center for Innovation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Graham JD. End of Life Care in Prostate Cancer. Prostate Cancer 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118347379.ch15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
25
|
Hatoum HT, Crawford ED, Nielsen SK, Lin SJ, Marshall DC. Review of the economic evaluations of hormonal therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2014; 13:251-9. [DOI: 10.1586/erp.13.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
26
|
Flynn K. Metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a discussion of the physical and psychosocial effects. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING 2013. [DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
27
|
Szeinbach SL, Seoane-Vazquez E, Summers KH. Development of a men's Preference for Testosterone Replacement Therapy (P-TRT) instrument. Patient Prefer Adherence 2012; 6:631-41. [PMID: 22969294 PMCID: PMC3437909 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s35840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study used a standard research approach to create a final conceptual model and the Preference for the Testosterone Replacement Therapy (P-TRT) instrument. METHODS A discussion guide was developed from a literature review and expert opinion to direct one-on-one interviews with participants who used testosterone replacement therapy and consented to participate in the study. Data from telephone interviews were transcribed for theme analysis using NVivo 9 qualitative analysis software, analyzed descriptively from a saturation grid, and used to evaluate men's P-TRT. Data from cognitive debriefing for five participants were used to evaluate the final conceptual model and validate the initial P-TRT instrument. RESULTS Item saturation and theme exhaustion was achieved by 58 male participants of mean age 55.0 ± 10.0 (22-69) years who had used testosterone replacement therapy for a mean of 175.0 ± 299.2 days. The conceptual model was developed from items and themes obtained from the participant interviews and saturation grid. Items comprising eight dimensions were used for instrument development, ie, ease of use, effect on libido, product characteristics, physiological impact, psychological impact, side effects, treatment experience, and preference. Results from the testosterone replacement therapy preference evaluation provide a detailed insight into why most men preferred a topical gel product over an injection or patch. CONCLUSION Items and themes relating to use of testosterone replacement therapy were in concordance with the final conceptual model and 29-item P-TRT instrument. The standard research approach used in this study produced the P-TRT instrument, which is suitable for further psychometric development and use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Enrique Seoane-Vazquez
- International Center for Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
|
29
|
Gater A, Abetz-Webb L, Battersby C, Parasuraman B, McIntosh S, Nathan F, Piault EC. Pain in castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases: a qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011; 9:88. [PMID: 21992720 PMCID: PMC3222603 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2011] [Accepted: 10/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone metastases are a common painful and debilitating consequence of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CPRC). Bone pain may predict patients' prognosis and there is a need to further explore CRPC patients' experiences of bone pain in the overall context of disease pathology. Due to the subjective nature of pain, assessments of pain severity, onset and progression are reliant on patient assessment. Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures, therefore, are commonly used as key endpoints for evaluating the efficacy of CRPC treatments. Evidence of the content validity of leading PRO measures of pain severity used in CRPC clinical trials is, however, limited. METHODS To document patients' experience of CRPC symptoms including pain, and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQL), semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 patients with CRPC and bone metastases. The content validity of the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) scale from the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), and the 'Average Pain' and 'Worst Pain' items of the Brief Pain Inventory Short-Form (BPI-SF) was also assessed. RESULTS Patients with CRPC and bone metastases present with a constellation of symptoms that can have a profound effect on HRQL. For patients in this study, bone pain was the most prominent and debilitating symptom associated with their condition. Bone pain was chronic and, despite being generally well-managed by analgesic medication, instances of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) were common. Cognitive debriefing of the selected PRO measures of pain severity highlighted difficulties among patients in understanding the verbal response scale (VRS) of the MPQ PPI scale. There were also some inconsistencies in the way in which the BPI-SF 'Average Pain' item was interpreted by patients. In contrast, the BPI-SF 'Worst Pain' item was well understood and interpreted consistently among patients. CONCLUSIONS Study findings support the importance of PRO measures of pain severity as key endpoints for evaluating the efficacy of treatments for CRPC, particularly for patients with bone metastases where episodes of BTcP are common. Qualitative evidence from CRPC patients supports the content validity of the BPI-SF ''Worst Pain' item and promotes use of this item for measuring pain severity in this population.
Collapse
|