1
|
Ozair A, Wilding H, Bhanja D, Mikolajewicz N, Glantz M, Grossman SA, Sahgal A, Le Rhun E, Weller M, Weiss T, Batchelor TT, Wen PY, Haas-Kogan DA, Khasraw M, Rudà R, Soffietti R, Vollmuth P, Subbiah V, Bettegowda C, Pham LC, Woodworth GF, Ahluwalia MS, Mansouri A. Leptomeningeal metastatic disease: new frontiers and future directions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024:10.1038/s41571-024-00970-3. [PMID: 39653782 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-024-00970-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastatic disease (LMD), encompassing entities of 'meningeal carcinomatosis', neoplastic meningitis' and 'leukaemic/lymphomatous meningitis', arises secondary to the metastatic dissemination of cancer cells from extracranial and certain intracranial malignancies into the leptomeninges and cerebrospinal fluid. The clinical burden of LMD has been increasing secondary to more sensitive diagnostics, aggressive local therapies for discrete brain metastases, and improved management of extracranial disease with targeted and immunotherapeutic agents, resulting in improved survival. However, owing to drug delivery challenges and the unique microenvironment of LMD, novel therapies against systemic disease have not yet translated into improved outcomes for these patients. Underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis are common, response assessment remains challenging, and the prognosis associated with this disease of whole neuroaxis remains extremely poor. The dearth of effective therapies is further challenged by the difficulties in studying this dynamic disease state. In this Review, a multidisciplinary group of experts describe the emerging evidence and areas of active investigation in LMD and provide directed recommendations for future research. Drawing upon paradigm-changing advances in mechanistic science, computational approaches, and trial design, the authors discuss domain-specific and cross-disciplinary strategies for optimizing the clinical and translational research landscape for LMD. Advances in diagnostics, multi-agent intrathecal therapies, cell-based therapies, immunotherapies, proton craniospinal irradiation and ongoing clinical trials offer hope for improving outcomes for patients with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hannah Wilding
- Penn State College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Debarati Bhanja
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Mikolajewicz
- Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Glantz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Stuart A Grossman
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Weiss
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tracy T Batchelor
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daphne A Haas-Kogan
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mustafa Khasraw
- Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumour Center at Duke, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
- Department of Oncology, Candiolo Institute for Cancer Research, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Philipp Vollmuth
- Division for Computational Radiology and Clinical AI, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Division for Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Early Phase Drug Development Program, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lily C Pham
- Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Brain Tumor Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Graeme F Woodworth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Brain Tumor Program, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA.
- Department of Translational Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Alireza Mansouri
- Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
- Penn State Cancer Institute, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jirattikanwong N, Charoentum C, Phenphinan N, Pooriwarangkakul P, Ruttanaphol D, Phinyo P. Individual survival prediction model for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024:hyae162. [PMID: 39563491 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survival prediction for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is crucial for making proper management plans and counseling patients. Prognostic models in this patient domain have been limited, and existing models often include predictors that are not available in resource-limited settings. Our aim was to develop a practical, individualized survival prediction model for patients diagnosed with LM. METHODS We collected a retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with LM from cerebrospinal fluid at Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2015 to July 2021. Nine candidate predictors included male gender, age > 60 years, presence of extracranial involvement, types of primary cancer, the time between primary cancer and LM diagnosis, presence of cerebral symptoms, cranial symptoms, spinal symptoms, and abnormal CSF profiles. Flexible parametric survival analysis was used to develop the survival prognostic model for predicting survival at 3, 6, and 12 months after diagnosis. The model was evaluated for discrimination and calibration. RESULTS 161 patients with 133 events were included. The derived individual survival prediction model for patients with LM, or the LMsurv model, consists of three final predictors: types of primary cancer, presence of cerebral symptoms, and presence of spinal symptoms. The model showed acceptable discrimination (Harrell's C-statistics: 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.76) and was well calibrated at 3, 6, and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS The LMsurv model, incorporating three practical predictors, demonstrated acceptable discrimination and calibration for predicting survival in LM patients. This model could serve as an assisting tool during clinical decision-making. External validation is suggested to confirm the generalizability of the model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noraworn Jirattikanwong
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (BioCE), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Chaiyut Charoentum
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Niphitphon Phenphinan
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Phurich Pooriwarangkakul
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Danusorn Ruttanaphol
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| | - Phichayut Phinyo
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Clinical Statistics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Department of Biomedical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology (BioCE), Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
- Center of Multidisciplinary Technology for Advanced Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intawaroros, Si Phum, Muang, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellomo J, Zeitlberger AM, Padevit L, Stumpo V, Gönel M, Fierstra J, Nierobisch N, Reimann R, Witzel I, Weller M, Le Rhun E, Bozinov O, Regli L, Neidert MC, Serra C, Voglis S. Role of microsurgical tumor burden reduction in patients with breast cancer brain metastases considering molecular subtypes: a two-center volumetric survival analysis. J Neurooncol 2024; 169:379-390. [PMID: 38829577 PMCID: PMC11341656 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04728-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in metastatic breast cancer (BC) treatment have enhanced overall survival (OS), leading to increased rates of brain metastases (BM). This study analyzes the association between microsurgical tumor reduction and OS in patients with BCBM, considering tumor molecular subtypes and perioperative treatment approaches. METHODS Retrospective analysis of surgically treated patients with BCBM from two tertiary brain tumor Swiss centers. The association of extent of resection (EOR), gross-total resection (GTR) achievement, and postoperative residual tumor volume (RV) with OS and intracranial progression-free survival (IC-PFS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS 101 patients were included in the final analysis, most patients (38%) exhibited HER2-/HR + BC molecular subtype, followed by HER2 + /HR + (25%), HER2-/HR- (21%), and HER2 + /HR- subtypes (13%). The majority received postoperative systemic treatment (75%) and radiotherapy (84%). Median OS and intracranial PFS were 22 and 8 months, respectively. The mean pre-surgery intracranial tumor volume was 26 cm3, reduced to 3 cm3 post-surgery. EOR, GTR achievement and RV were not significantly associated with OS or IC-PFS, but higher EOR and lower RV correlated with extended OS in patients without extracranial metastases. HER2-positive tumor status was associated with longer OS, extracranial metastases at BM diagnosis and symptomatic lesions with shorter OS and IC-PFS. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that BC molecular subtypes, extracranial disease status, and BM-related symptoms were associated with OS in surgically treated patients with BCBM. Additionally, while extensive resection to minimize residual tumor volume did not significantly affect OS across the entire cohort, it appeared beneficial for patients without extracranial metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Bellomo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Luis Padevit
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vittorio Stumpo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Meltem Gönel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jorn Fierstra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nathalie Nierobisch
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Regina Reimann
- Institute of Neuropathology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Bozinov
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St, Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Luca Regli
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Carlo Serra
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stefanos Voglis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Frauenklinikstrasse 10, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Huppert LA, Fisch S, Tsopurashvili E, Somepalle SS, Salans M, Vasudevan HN, Jo Chien A, Majure M, Rugo HS, Balassanian R, Boreta L, Melisko ME. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with metastatic breast cancer and leptomeningeal disease: a single center retrospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2024; 206:625-636. [PMID: 38888796 PMCID: PMC11208257 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-024-07339-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). It is critical to better understand the risk factors, natural history, and treatment outcomes, including patients in a modern cohort. METHODS In this single center retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with MBC and LMD who received care from 2000 to 2024 and abstracted key clinical, treatment, and survival data. RESULTS We identified 111 patients with MBC and LMD, including patients with the following subtypes: HR+/HER2- (n = 53, 47.7%), HER2+ (n = 30, 27.0%), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC; n = 28, 25.2%). Median time from the diagnosis of MBC to LMD was 16.4 months (range 0-101.3 months). After the diagnosis of LMD, most patients received systemic therapy (n = 66, 59.5%) and/or central nervous system (CNS)-directed therapy (n = 94, 84.7%) including intrathecal therapy (n = 42, 37.8%) and/or CNS-directed radiation therapy (n = 70, 63.1%). In all patients, median overall survival (OS) from the diagnosis of LMD to death was 4.1 months (range 0.1-78.1 months) and varied by subtype, with HR+/HER2- or HER2+ MBC patients living longer than those with TNBC (4.2 and 6.8 months respectively vs. 2.0 months, p < 0.01, HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36-3.39). Patients who received CNS-directed therapy lived longer than those who did not (4.2 vs. 1.3, p = 0.02 HR 0.54, 0.32-0.91). Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014 (6.4 vs. 2.9 months, p = 0.04, HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99). On multivariable analysis, having TNBC was associated with shorter OS from time of LMD to death (p = 0.004, HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.25-3.30). CONCLUSION This is one of the largest case series of patients with MBC and LMD. Patients diagnosed with LMD from 2015 to 2024 lived longer than those diagnosed from 2000 to 2014, although median OS was short overall. Patients with TNBC and LMD had particularly short OS. Novel therapeutic strategies for LMD remain an area of unmet clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A Huppert
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Samantha Fisch
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elene Tsopurashvili
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sai Sahitha Somepalle
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mia Salans
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Harish N Vasudevan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - A Jo Chien
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Melanie Majure
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hope S Rugo
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ronald Balassanian
- Division of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michelle E Melisko
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freret ME, Boire A. The anatomic basis of leptomeningeal metastasis. J Exp Med 2024; 221:e20212121. [PMID: 38451255 PMCID: PMC10919154 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20212121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), or spread of cancer to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled space surrounding the central nervous system, is a fatal complication of cancer. Entry into this space poses an anatomical challenge for cancer cells; movement of cells between the blood and CSF is tightly regulated by the blood-CSF barriers. Anatomical understanding of the leptomeninges provides a roadmap of corridors for cancer entry. This Review describes the anatomy of the leptomeninges and routes of cancer spread to the CSF. Granular understanding of LM by route of entry may inform strategies for novel diagnostic and preventive strategies as well as therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bardhan M, Dey D, Suresh V, Javed B, Venur VA, Joe N, Kalidindi R, Ozair A, Khan M, Mahtani R, Lo S, Odia Y, Ahluwalia MS. An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why? Expert Rev Neurother 2024; 24:77-103. [PMID: 38145503 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2293223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options. AREAS COVERED This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer. EXPERT OPINION Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainak Bardhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Vinay Suresh
- King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Binish Javed
- Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vyshak Alva Venur
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Neha Joe
- St John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India
| | | | - Ahmad Ozair
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Reshma Mahtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Simon Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Yazmin Odia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Manmeet S Ahluwalia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, van den Bent M, Brandsma D, Furtner J, Rudà R, Schadendorf D, Seoane J, Tonn JC, Wesseling P, Wick W, Minniti G, Peters S, Curigliano G, Preusser M. Leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours: EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2023; 8:101624. [PMID: 37863528 PMCID: PMC10619142 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.101624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023] Open
Abstract
•This Clinical Practice Guideline provides recommendations for managing leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumours. •The guideline covers clinical, imaging and cytological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •A treatment and management algorithm is provided. •The author panel encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M van den Bent
- Department of The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria
| | - R Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - D Schadendorf
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Essen; University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Seoane
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J-C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University School of Medicine, Munich; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers/VUmc and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam; Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - G Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome; IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli IS, Italy
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - G Curigliano
- European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steininger J, Gellrich FF, Engellandt K, Meinhardt M, Westphal D, Beissert S, Meier F, Glitza Oliva IC. Leptomeningeal Metastases in Melanoma Patients: An Update on and Future Perspectives for Diagnosis and Treatment. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:11443. [PMID: 37511202 PMCID: PMC10380419 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241411443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with a particularly poor prognosis. Among solid tumours, malignant melanoma (MM) has one of the highest rates of metastasis to the leptomeninges, with approximately 10-15% of patients with advanced disease developing LMD. Tumour cells that metastasise to the brain have unique properties that allow them to cross the blood-brain barrier, evade the immune system, and survive in the brain microenvironment. Metastatic colonisation is achieved through dynamic communication between metastatic cells and the tumour microenvironment, resulting in a tumour-permissive milieu. Despite advances in treatment options, the incidence of LMD appears to be increasing and current treatment modalities have a limited impact on survival. This review provides an overview of the biology of LMD, diagnosis and current treatment approaches for MM patients with LMD, and an overview of ongoing clinical trials. Despite the still limited efficacy of current therapies, there is hope that emerging treatments will improve the outcomes for patients with LMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Steininger
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Frank Friedrich Gellrich
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kay Engellandt
- Department of Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Dana Westphal
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Stefan Beissert
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Friedegund Meier
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- Skin Cancer Center at the University Cancer Center, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT/UCC), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Warrior S, Cohen-Nowak A, Kumthekar P. Modern Management and Diagnostics in HER2+ Breast Cancer with CNS Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112908. [PMID: 37296873 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer have seen improved survival and outcomes over the past two decades. As patients live longer, the incidence of CNS metastases has increased in this population. The authors' review outlines the most current data in HER2-positive brain and leptomeningeal metastases and discuss the current treatment paradigm in this disease. Up to 55% of HER2-positive breast cancer patients go on to experience CNS metastases. They may present with a variety of focal neurologic symptoms, such as speech changes or weakness, and may also have more diffuse symptoms related to high intracranial pressure, such as headaches, nausea, or vomiting. Treatment can include focal treatments, such as surgical resection or radiation (focal or whole-brain radiation), as well as systemic therapy options or even intrathecal therapy in the case of leptomeningeal disease. There have been multiple advancements in systemic therapy for these patients over the past few years, including the availability of tucatinib and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. Hope remains high as clinical trials for CNS metastases receive greater attention and as other HER2-directed methods are being studied in clinical trials with the goal of better outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surbhi Warrior
- Department of Hematology, Oncology Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Adam Cohen-Nowak
- Department of Internal Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Priya Kumthekar
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Freret ME, Wijetunga NA, Shamseddine AA, Higginson DS, Schmitt AM, Yamada Y, Lis E, Boire A, Yang JT, Xu AJ. Early Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases Among Patients Undergoing Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101154. [PMID: 36845624 PMCID: PMC9943781 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The management of patients with advanced solid malignancies increasingly uses stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Advanced cancer patients are at risk for developing leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is routinely collected during computed tomography (CT) myelography for spinal SBRT planning, offering an opportunity for early LM detection by CSF cytology in the absence of radiographic LM or LM symptoms (subclinical LM). This study tested the hypothesis that early detection of tumor cells in CSF in patients undergoing spine SBRT portends a similarly poor prognosis compared with clinically overt LM. Methods and Materials We retrospectively analyzed clinical records for 495 patients with metastatic solid tumors who underwent CT myelography for spinal SBRT planning at a single institution from 2014 to 2019. Results Among patients planned for SBRT, 51 (10.3%) developed LM. Eight patients (1.6%) had subclinical LM. Median survival with LM was similar between patients with subclinical versus clinically evident LM (3.6 vs 3.0 months, P = .30). Patients harboring both parenchymal brain metastases and LM (29/51) demonstrated shorter survival than those with LM alone (2.4 vs 7.1 months, P = .02). Conclusions LM remains a fatal complication of metastatic cancer. Subclinical LM detected by CSF cytology in spine SBRT patients has a similarly poor prognosis compared with standardly detected LM and warrants consideration of central nervous system-directed therapies. As aggressive local therapies are increasingly used for metastatic patients, more sensitive CSF evaluation may further identify patients with subclinical LM and should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan E. Freret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - N. Ari Wijetunga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Achraf A. Shamseddine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel S. Higginson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adam M. Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Adrienne Boire
- Department of Neurology, Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan T. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Novel Therapeutic Approaches in Neoplastic Meningitis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010119. [PMID: 36612116 PMCID: PMC9817816 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis from systemic cancers can involve the brain parenchyma, leptomeninges, or the dura. Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known by different terms, including leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and carcinomatous meningitis, occurs due to solid tumors and hematologic malignancies and is associated with a poor prognosis. The current management paradigm entails a multimodal approach focused on palliation with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, which may be administered systemically or directly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). This review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches, including targeted and immunotherapeutic agents under investigation, that have shown promise in NM arising from solid tumors.
Collapse
|
12
|
Alhubayshi M, Alasmari D, Almahdi B, Khojah O, Allaf F, AlMaghrabi HQ. Neurology Case Report: Rapidly Progressive Dementia and Extrapyramidal Symptoms as the First Presentation of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis. Cureus 2022; 14:e22923. [PMID: 35281578 PMCID: PMC8906505 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
13
|
Chi Y, Shang M, Xu L, Gong H, Tao R, Song L, Zhang B, Yin S, Cong B, Li H. Durable Effect of Pyrotinib and Metronomic Vinorelbine in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front Oncol 2022; 12:811919. [PMID: 35251981 PMCID: PMC8888838 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.811919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are rare and catastrophic for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) with LM is extremely poor. There is no high-quality evidence of treatment regimens in HER2-positive BC with LM yet. Here, we present a case of LM in a 50-year-old woman with HER2-positive BC. Immunohistochemistry revealed invasive ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, HER2 3+, P53 positive 80%, and Ki-67 positive 35%. Reported for the first time, the patient was given pyrotinib-targeted therapy (400 mg, oral, every day), metronomic vinorelbine (40 mg, oral, three times a week), and intrathecal methotrexate (10 mg, infrequent and irregular use due to poor compliance) synchronously. The patient received and benefited from the treatment regimen for 16 months. And the quality of life, as self-reported, improved significantly. We also comprehensively summarized all the case reports, observational studies, and clinical trials related to HER2-positive BC with LM in the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Intrathecal chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa), intrathecal trastuzumab, whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapy are commonly used treatment options according to a review of the literature and research. Pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) as novel drugs are promising in LM. Furthermore, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as tucatinib and neratinib have exhibited good efficacy in HER2-positive BC with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and deserve further exploration. In our report, combining pyrotinib-targeted therapy with metronomic chemotherapy is a potential regimen, which has presented satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and also warrants additional investigation in HER2-positive BC with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Chi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Mao Shang
- Department of Oncology, Jinan Central Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Liang Xu
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Heyi Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Rongjie Tao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Lihua Song
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Baoxuan Zhang
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Sha Yin
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Binbin Cong
- Department of Breast Surgery, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Huihui Li
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gasparri ML, Di Micco R, Siconolfi A, Farooqi AA, Di Bartolomeo G, Zuber V, Caserta D, Bellati F, Ruscito I, Papadia A, Gentilini OD. Brain metastases in breast cancer. UNRAVELING THE COMPLEXITIES OF METASTASIS 2022:63-85. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-821789-4.24001-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
15
|
Mollica L, Leli C, Puglisi S, Sardi S, Sottotetti F. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and breast cancer: a systematic review of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Drugs Context 2021; 10:dic-2021-6-6. [PMID: 34745272 PMCID: PMC8552906 DOI: 10.7573/dic.2021-6-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare but challenging manifestation of advanced breast cancer with a severe impact on morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last two decades, focusing on recent advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic options of LC. Lobular histology and a triple-negative intrinsic subtype are well-known risk factors for LC. Clinical manifestations are diverse and often aspecific. There is no gold standard for LC diagnosis: MRI and cerebrospinal fluid cytology are the most frequently used modalities despite the low accuracy. Current standard of care involves a multimodal strategy including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in combination with brain radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy has been widely used through the years despite the lack of data from randomized controlled trials and conflicting evidence on patient outcomes. No specific chemotherapeutic agent has shown superiority over others for both intrathecal and systemic treatment. Although endocrine therapy was heuristically considered unable to exert significant control on central nervous system metastatic disease, retrospective data suggest a favourable toxicity profile and even a possible positive impact on survival. In recent years, encouraging data on the use of targeted agents has emerged but further research in this field is required. Palliative treatment in the form of whole brain or stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with improvement in clinical manifestations and quality of life, with no proven impact on survival. The most investigated prognostic factors include performance status, non-triple-negative disease and multimodal treatment. Validation of prognostic scores is necessary to aid clinicians in the identification of patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit from an intensive therapeutic approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claudia Leli
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Sardi
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | - Federico Sottotetti
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS-ICS Maugeri, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Comlek S, Saglam S. A new approach for leptomeningeal metastases: chemotherapy administered through lumbar intrathecal port. ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA 2021; 79:816-823. [PMID: 34669821 DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrathecal chemotherapy is a local therapeutic modality used for treatment of leptomeningeal metastases. However, the techniques currently used, i.e. repeated lumbar puncture and Ommaya reservoir, have certain disadvantages. Lumbar intrathecal port (LIP) placement is a relatively novel technique, which has been used for pain management in cancer patients. OBJECTIVE To investigate the use of LIP for intrathecal administration of chemotherapeutic agents in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. METHODS Retrospective study of 13 patients treated with intrathecal chemotherapy for secondary leptomeningeal involvement of a primary solid tumor were included in this retrospective study. The patients received intrathecal chemotherapy through a LIP. RESULTS The patients received a total of 123 intrathecal chemotherapy doses. No grade 3-4 toxicity, technical problem or severe complication developed. During a median of 136 days of follow-up (range, 67-376 days), 12 patients died (92.3%). The treatment resulted in symptom improvement in all patients and self-rated overall health and quality of life improved, compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS The LIP system, which has been used for intrathecal pain management for decades, appears to offer a safe alternative for intrathecal chemotherapy in patients with leptomeningeal metastases. Further studies are warranted to clarify its potential use in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savas Comlek
- Gayrettepe Florence Nightingale Hastanesi, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sezer Saglam
- Demiroglu Bilim Üniversitesi, Department of Medical Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brastianos PK, Strickland MR, Lee EQ, Wang N, Cohen JV, Chukwueke U, Forst DA, Eichler A, Overmoyer B, Lin NU, Chen WY, Bardia A, Juric D, Dagogo-Jack I, White MD, Dietrich J, Nayyar N, Kim AE, Alvarez-Breckenridge C, Mahar M, Mora JL, Nahed BV, Jones PS, Shih HA, Gerstner ER, Giobbie-Hurder A, Carter SL, Oh K, Cahill DP, Sullivan RJ. Phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab in leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Nat Commun 2021; 12:5954. [PMID: 34642329 PMCID: PMC8511104 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25859-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a common complication from solid tumor malignancies with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. We present a single arm Phase II study of 18 patients with LMD receiving combined ipilimumab and nivolumab until progression or unacceptable toxicity (NCT02939300). The primary end point is overall survival at 3 months (OS3). Secondary end points include toxicity, cumulative time-to-progression at 3 months, and progression-free survival. A Simon two-stage design is used to compare a null hypothesis OS3 of 18% against an alternative of 44%. Median follow up based on patients still alive is 8.0 months (range: 0.5 to 15.9 months). The study has met its primary endpoint as 8 of 18 (OS3 0.44; 90% CI: 0.24 to 0.66) patients are alive at three months. One third of patients have experienced one (or more) grade-3 or higher adverse events. Two patients have discontinued protocol treatment due to unacceptable toxicity (hepatitis and colitis, respectively). The most frequent adverse events include fatigue (N = 7), nausea (N = 6), fever (N = 6), anorexia (N = 6) and rash (N = 6). Combined ipilimumab and nivolumab has an acceptable safety profile and demonstrates promising activity in LMD patients. Larger, multicenter clinical trials are needed to validate these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matthew R Strickland
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Eudocia Quant Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy Wang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Justine V Cohen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ugonma Chukwueke
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - April Eichler
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Beth Overmoyer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Wendy Y Chen
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Dejan Juric
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | | | - Michael D White
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Naema Nayyar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Albert E Kim
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | | | - Maura Mahar
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Joana L Mora
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Brian V Nahed
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Pamela S Jones
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Helen A Shih
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | | | | | - Scott L Carter
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Kevin Oh
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Daniel P Cahill
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Metastases are the most common intracranial tumors in adults. Lung cancer, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer are the most common primary tumors that metastasize to the brain. Improved detection of small metastases by MRI, and improved systemic therapy for primary tumors, resulted in increased incidence of brain metastasis. Advances in neuroanesthesia and neurosurgery have significantly improved the safety of surgical resection of brain metastases. Surgical approach and active management have become applicable for many patients. Subsequently, brain metastases diagnosis no longer equals palliative treatment. Moreover, the demand for diagnosing brain masses has increased with its associated challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saber Tadros
- Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 3N248, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
| | - Abhik Ray-Chaudhury
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 10 Center Drive, Building 10, Room 3D-03, MSC1414, Bethesda, MD 20892-3704, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Breast cancer patients treated with intrathecal therapy for leptomeningeal metastases in a large real-life database. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100150. [PMID: 33984675 PMCID: PMC8134714 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a rare complication of metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with high morbidity/mortality rates. Our study aimed to describe the largest-to-date real-life population of MBC patients treated with intrathecal (IT) therapy and to evaluate prognostic models. Methods The Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) MBC database (NCT03275311) includes all consecutive patients who have initiated treatment for MBC since 2008. Overall survival (OS) of patients treated with IT therapy was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Prognostic models were constructed using Cox proportional hazards models. Performance was evaluated using C-index and calibration plots. Results Of the 22 266 patients included in the database between 2008 and 2016, 312 received IT therapy and were selected for our analysis. Compared with non-IT-treated patients, IT-treated patients were younger at MBC relapse (median age: 52 years versus 61 years) and more often had lobular histology (23.4% versus 12.7%) or triple-negative subtype (24.7% versus 13.3%) (all P < 0.001). Median OS was 4.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8-5.6] and 1-year survival rate was 25.6%. Significant prognostic factors associated with poorer outcome on multivariable analysis were triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.47), treatment line ≥3 (hazard ratio 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.73), ≥3 other metastatic sites (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.74) and IT cytarabine or thiotepa versus methotrexate (hazard ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.28-2.22), while concomitant systemic therapy was associated with better OS (hazard ratio 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.62) (all P < 0.001). We validated two previously published prognostic scores, the Curie score and the Breast-graded prognostic assessment, both with C-index of 0.57. Conclusions MBC patients with LM treated with IT therapy have a poor prognosis. We could identify a subgroup of patients with better prognosis, when concomitant systemic therapy and IT methotrexate were used. The outcome of BC patients with IT-treated LM is poor, with a median OS of 4.5 months. Concomitant systemic therapy may improve the outcome in IT-treated patients. Patients treated with IT methotrexate had better outcome than those treated with IT cytarabine/thiotepa. The Curie and Breast-graded prognostic assessment scores were prognostic for IT-treated patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Ogawa Y, Saraya T, Noda A, Kurokawa N, Sakuma S, Aso K, Mikura S, Oda M, Ishida M, Honda K, Nakamoto K, Tamura M, Takata S, Ishii H, Takizawa H. A simple method for discrimination of carcinomatous meningitis using CEA, total protein, and total cell count in the cerebrospinal fluid of primary lung cancer patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25367. [PMID: 33832119 PMCID: PMC8036056 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Carcinomatous meningitis (CM) is a critical issue for physicians. However, no study has reported a simple and useful diagnostic or predictive marker for CM.This study aimed to elucidate the potential markers for diagnosing CM derived from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).We retrospectively enrolled 78 lung cancer patients with suspected CM during the clinical course, including 42 CM and 36 non-CM patients. We compared the clinical and CSF findings, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), between CM and non-CM patients, and explored the diagnostic markers for early identification of CM as well as the contributing factors for mortality.On CSF analysis, with cutoff values of CEA ≥5 ng/ml, total protein (TP) in CSF ≥45 g/dl, and total cell count (TCC) ≥7 cells/μL, the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for CM were 85.7%, 84.6%, and 0.887 (95% CI: 0.758-1.0, P < .001); 80.5%, 69.4%, and 0.755 (95% CI: 0.646-0.865, P < .001); and 56.1%, 100%, and 0.817 (95% CI: 0.722-0.912, P < .001), respectively. TP levels in CSF ≥the patients' age had a sensitivity, specificity, and an AUC of 48.8%, 77.8%, and 0.633 (95% CI: 0.722-0.912, P = .045) for CM, respectively. Among CM patients, patients with 'TP in CSF (>patients' age)" (n = 19, P = .008) showed significantly shorter 90-day survival probability than the residual patients (n = 20). None of the CSF parameters could predict the risk of mortality on Cox regression analysis.The cutoff value of CEA ≥5 ng/ml in CSF is a simple and useful method with a high diagnostic value for CM diagnosis, but not a suitable predicting factor for mortality. 'TP in CSF >patients' age" might be a novel factor for assessing short-term mortality.
Collapse
|
21
|
Single-arm, open-label phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Nat Med 2020; 26:1280-1284. [PMID: 32483359 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0918-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
An increasing fraction of patients with metastatic cancer develop leptomeningeal dissemination of disease (LMD), and survival is dismal1-3. We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumor malignancies and LMD (NCT02886585). Patients received 200 mg of pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks until definitive progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was rate of overall survival at 3 months (OS3). Secondary objectives included toxicity, response rate and time to intracranial or extracranial disease progression. A Simon two-stage design was used to compare a null hypothesis OS3 of 18% against an alternative of 43%. Twenty patients-17 with breast cancer, two with lung cancer and one with ovarian cancer-were enrolled into the pre-specified evaluation group having received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. The median follow-up of surviving patients was 6.3 months (range, 2.2-12.5 months). The percentage of patients who experienced one (or more) grade 3 or higher adverse events at least possibly related to treatment was 40%, the most frequent being hyperglycemia (n = 6), nausea (n = 7) and vomiting (n = 7). The study met the primary endpoint, as 12 of 20 (OS3, 0.60; 90% confidence interval, 0.39-0.78) patients were alive at 3 months after enrollment. Pembrolizumab is safe and feasible and displays promising activity in patients with LMD. Further investigations are needed to identify which patients with LMD can benefit from pembrolizumab.
Collapse
|
22
|
Cacho-Díaz B, Salmerón-Moreno K, Alvarez-Alvarez A, Mendoza-Olivas LG, Alvarado-Miranda A, Villarreal-Garza C, Reynoso-Noverón N, Chávez-MacGregor M, Meneses-García AA. Identification of risk factors for central nervous system metastasis in patients with breast cancer with neurologic symptoms. Cancer 2020; 126:3456-3463. [PMID: 32453447 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was performed to identify factors that are present at the time of breast cancer (BC) diagnosis that are associated with a higher rate of central nervous system metastasis (CNSm). METHODS The authors analyzed a database of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BC who were referred for a neuro-oncology consultation at the National Cancer Institute in Mexico City, Mexico, from June 2009 to June 2017. Information was collected prospectively and included demographic, pathologic, and clinical data at the time of diagnosis of BC. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were built to estimate the associations between the development of CNSm and the time after BC diagnosis. RESULTS Among 970 patients with BC, 263 (27%) were diagnosed with CNSm. The median time from BC diagnosis to the development of CNSm was 33 months (interquartile range, 15-76 months). After multivariate analysis, age <50 years at the time of BC diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8-3.5 [P < .0001]), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive status (HER2+) (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.1-6.1 [P < .0001]), luminal B/HER2+ subtype (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.9-5.3 [P < .001]), triple-negative subtype(OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.5-4 [P = .001]), and Karnofsky performance status ≤70 (OR, 6.6; 95% CI, 4.5-9.6 [P < .0001]) were associated with a higher frequency of CNSm. Brain parenchyma was the most common site of CNSm. The median overall survival after a diagnosis of CNSm was 12.2 months (95% CI, 9.3-15.1 months). CONCLUSIONS CNSm is not uncommon among patients with BC, particularly in those with neurologic symptoms who require neuro-oncology evaluation and are aged <50 years at the time of diagnosis, have HER2+ or triple-negative subtypes, have a poor Karnofsky performance status, and/or have ≥2 non-CNS metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mariana Chávez-MacGregor
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Darlix A, Louvel G, Fraisse J, Jacot W, Brain E, Debled M, Mouret-Reynier MA, Goncalves A, Dalenc F, Delaloge S, Campone M, Augereau P, Ferrero JM, Levy C, Fumet JD, Lecouillard I, Cottu P, Petit T, Uwer L, Jouannaud C, Leheurteur M, Dieras V, Robain M, Chevrot M, Pasquier D, Bachelot T. Impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohort. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:991-1000. [PMID: 31719684 PMCID: PMC6964671 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0619-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) behaviour differs depending on hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) statuses. METHODS The kinetics of central nervous system (CNS) metastases (CNS metastasis-free survival, CNSM-FS) and subsequent patient's prognosis (overall survival, OS) according to the molecular subtype were retrospectively assessed in 16703 MBC patients of the ESME nationwide multicentre MBC database (Kaplan-Meier method). RESULTS CNS metastases occurred in 4118 patients (24.6%) (7.2% at MBC diagnosis and 17.5% later during follow-up). Tumours were HER2-/HR+ (45.3%), HER2+/HR+ (14.5%), HER2+/HR- (14.9%) and triple negative (25.4%). Median age at CNS metastasis diagnosis was 58.1 years (range: 22.8-92.0). The median CNSM-FS was 10.8 months (95% CI: 16.5-17.9) among patients who developed CNS metastases. Molecular subtype was independently associated with CNSM-FS (HR = 3.45, 95% CI: 3.18-3.75, triple-negative and HER2-/HR+ tumours). After a 30-month follow-up, median OS after CNS metastasis diagnosis was 7.9 months (95% CI: 7.2-8.4). OS was independently associated with subtypes: median OS was 18.9 months (HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50-0.64) for HER2+/HR+ , 13.1 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.65-0.81) for HER2+/HR-, 4.4 months (HR = 1.55, 95% CI: 1.42-1.69) for triple-negative and 7.1 months for HER2-/HR+ patients (p <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Tumour molecular subtypes strongly impact incidence, kinetics and prognosis of CNS metastases in MBC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03275311.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Darlix
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.
| | - Guillaume Louvel
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Julien Fraisse
- Biometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - William Jacot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France.,Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier 208 Rue des Apothicaires, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - Etienne Brain
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Marc Debled
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 229 Cours de l'Argonne, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marie Ange Mouret-Reynier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, 58 Rue Montalembert, 63011, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - Florence Dalenc
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud - IUCT Oncopole, 1 Avenue Irène-Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 Rue Edouard-Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Mario Campone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805, Saint Herblain, France
| | - Paule Augereau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, 15 rue André Boquel, 49055, Angers, France
| | - Jean Marc Ferrero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 Avenue de valambrose, 06189, Nice, France
| | - Christelle Levy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 3 Avenue du Général Harris, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-David Fumet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, 1 rue Professeur Marion, 21079, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Lecouillard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, 26 Rue d'Ulm, 75005, Paris & Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Thierry Petit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, 3 Rue de la Porte de l'Hôpital, 67000, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lionel Uwer
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 Avenue de Bourgogne, 54519, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Christelle Jouannaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie Jean-Godinot, 1 Rue du Général Koenig, 51100, Reims, France
| | - Marianne Leheurteur
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rue d'Amiens, 76000, Rouen, France
| | - Véronique Dieras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Avenue de la Bataille Flandres-Dunkerque, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Mathieu Robain
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - Michaël Chevrot
- Department of Research and Development, Unicancer, 101 Rue de Tolbiac, 75654, Paris, France
| | - David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Thomas Bachelot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, 28 Promenade Léa et Napoléon Bullukian, 69008, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mayinger M, Reibelt A, Borm KJ, Ettl J, Wilkens JJ, Combs SE, Oechsner M, Duma MN. MRI based neuroanatomical segmentation in breast cancer patients: leptomeningeal carcinomatosis vs. oligometastatic brain disease vs. multimetastastic brain disease. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:170. [PMID: 31533742 PMCID: PMC6749713 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1380-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Pathogenesis of brain metastases/meningeal cancer and the emotional and neurological outcomes are not yet well understood. The hypothesis of our study is that patients with leptomeningeal cancer show volumetric differences in brain substructures compared to patients with cerebral metastases. Methods Three groups consisting of female breast cancer patients prior to brain radiotherapy were compared. Leptomeningeal cancer patients (LMC Group), oligometastatic patients (1–3 brain metastases) prior to radiosurgery (OMRS Group) and patients prior to whole brain radiation (WB Group) were included. All patients had MRI imaging before treatment. T1 MRI sequences were segmented using automatic segmentation. For each patient, 14 bilateral and 11 central/median subcortical structures were tested. Overall 1127 structures were analyzed and compared between groups using age matched two-sided t-tests. Results The average age of patients in the OMRS group was 60.8 years (± 14.7), 65.3 (± 10.3) in the LMC group and 62.6 (± 10.2) in the WB group. LMC patients showed a significantly larger fourth ventricle compared to OMRS (p = 0.001) and WB (p = 0.003). The central corpus callosum appeared smaller in the LMC group (LMC vs OMRS p = 0.01; LMC vs WB p = 0.026). The right amygdala in the WB group appeared larger compared with the OMRS (p = 0.035). Conclusions Differences in the size of brain substructures of the three groups were found. The results appear promising and should be taken into account for further prospective studies also involving healthy controls. The volumetrically determined size of the fourth ventricle might be a helpful diagnostic marker in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mayinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antonia Reibelt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kai Joachim Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie Elisabeth Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical School, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of the Friedrich-Schiller-University, Bachstr. 18, 07745, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Figura NB, Rizk VT, Armaghani AJ, Arrington JA, Etame AB, Han HS, Czerniecki BJ, Forsyth PA, Ahmed KA. Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2019; 177:277-294. [PMID: 31209686 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05317-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing. METHODS In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD. RESULTS We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD. CONCLUSIONS We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas B Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Victoria T Rizk
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Avan J Armaghani
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - John A Arrington
- Department of Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Arnold B Etame
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Hyo S Han
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Brian J Czerniecki
- Department of Breast Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Peter A Forsyth
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr., Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Franzoi MA, Hortobagyi GN. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in patients with breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 135:85-94. [PMID: 30819451 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is defined as infiltration of the leptomeninges by metastatic carcinoma, a relatively uncommon but devastating complication of many malignancies. Although only 5% of patients with breast cancer develop leptomeningeal involvement, it remains the most common etiology of LC. It can occur as a late-stage complication of systemic progression or present as the first sign of metastatic disease, with or without parenchymal brain metastases. Lobular carcinomas have a higher propensity to metastasize into the meninges when compared to ductal carcinoma, especially the triple-negative subtype, which usually is associated with a shorter interval between metastatic breast cancer diagnosis and the development of LC. Prognosis remains poor, with median survival of 4 months for patients receiving state-of-the-art treatment. The main factors associated with survival are performance status at diagnosis, CSF protein level and triple-negative subtype. Headache is commonly the first clinical presentation of LC, and the diagnostic workup usually requires CSF-cytological analysis and or/MRI. The current management of LC consists of a combination of intra-CSF chemotherapy, systemic therapy, radiotherapy and/or best-supportive care. The standard intra-CSF chemotherapy regimen is methotrexate. Radiotherapy is used for relieving obstruction points on CSF-outflow channels due to ependymal nodules, tumor deposits or bulky disease. Objective responses have been reported with intrathecal administration of trastuzumab for HER2-positive disease, yet this strategy is still under investigation. Further prospective trials are needed to better address the impact of these treatment modalities on overall survival and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel N Hortobagyi
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Sterzing F, Hörner-Rieber J, Löw S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Outcome and prognostic factors following palliative craniospinal irradiation for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Cancer Manag Res 2019; 11:789-801. [PMID: 30697071 PMCID: PMC6340499 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s182154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a severe complication of metastatic tumor spread to the central nervous system. Prognosis is dismal with a median overall survival (OS) of ~10–15 weeks. Treatment options include radiotherapy (RT) to involved sites, systemic chemo- or targeted therapy, intrathecal chemotherapy and best supportive care with dexamethasone. Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a more aggressive radiotherapeutic approach, for which very limited data exists. Here, we report on our 10-year experience with palliative CSI of selected patients with LC. Patients and methods Twenty-five patients received CSI for the treatment of LC at our institution between 2008 and 2018. Patients were selected individually for CSI based on clinical performance, presenting symptoms and estimated benefit. Median patient age was 53 years (IQR: 45–59), and breast cancer was the most common primary. Additional brain metastases were found in 18 patients (72.0%). RT was delivered at a TomoTherapy machine, using helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The most commonly prescribed dose was 36 Gy in 20 fractions, corresponding to a median biologically equivalent dose of 40.8 Gy (IQR: 39.0–2.5). Clinical performance and neurologic function were assessed before and in response to therapy, and deficits were retrospectively quantified on the 5-point neurologic function scale (NFS). A Cox proportional hazards model with univariate and multivariate analyses was fitted for survival. Results Twenty-one patients died and four were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis was 19.3 weeks (IQR: 9.3–34.0, 95% CI: 11.0–32.0). In univariate analysis, a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) ≥70% (P=0.001), age ≤55 years at LC diagnosis (P=0.022), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein <100 mg/dL (P=0.018) and no more than mild or moderate neurologic deficits (NFS ≤2; P=0.007) were predictive of longer OS. So were the neurologic response to treatment (P=0.018) and the application of systemic therapy after RT completion (P=0.029). The presence of CSF flow obstruction was predictive of shorter OS (P=0.026). In multivariate analysis, age at LC diagnosis (P=0.018), KPI (P<0.001) and neurologic response (P=0.037) remained as independent prognostic factors for longer OS. Treatment-associated toxicity was manageable and mostly grades I and II according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. Eight patients (32%) developed grade III myelosuppression. Neurologic symptom stabilization could be achieved in 40.0% and a sizeable improvement in 28.0% of all patients. Conclusion CSI for the treatment of LC is feasible and may have therapeutic value in carefully selected patients, alleviating symptoms or delaying neurologic deterioration. OS after CSI was comparable to the rates described in current literature for patients with LC. The use of modern irradiation techniques such as helical IMRT is warranted to limit toxicity. Patient selection should take into account prognostic factors such as age, clinical performance, neurologic function and the availability of systemic treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Matthias F Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Florian Sterzing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Kempten, Kempten 87439, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg 69120, Germany, .,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg 69120, Germany,
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
El Shafie RA, Böhm K, Weber D, Lang K, Schlaich F, Adeberg S, Paul A, Haefner MF, Katayama S, Hörner-Rieber J, Hoegen P, Löw S, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Palliative Radiotherapy for Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis-Analysis of Outcome, Prognostic Factors, and Symptom Response. Front Oncol 2019; 8:641. [PMID: 30671384 PMCID: PMC6331444 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this article is to report our institution's 10-year experience on palliative radiotherapy for the treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC), assessing survival, neurologic outcome, and prognostic factors. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 110 patients who received palliative radiotherapy for LC between 2008 and 2018. The most common histologies were breast cancer (n = 43, 39.1%) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (n = 31, 28.2%). Radiotherapy was administered as whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) (n = 51, 46.4%), focal spinal RT (n = 11, 10.0%) or both (n = 47, 42.7%). Twenty-five patients (22.7%) were selected for craniospinal irradiation. Clinical performance and neurologic function were quantified on the neurologic function scale (NFS) before and in response to therapy. A Cox Proportional Hazards model with univariate and multivariate analysis was fitted for survival. Results: Ninety-eight patients (89.1%) died and 12 (10.9%) were alive at the time of analysis. Median OS from LC diagnosis and from the beginning of RT was 13.9 weeks (IQR: 7.1-34.0) and 9.9 weeks (IQR: 5.3-26.3), respectively. In univariate analysis, prognostic of longer OS were a Karnofsky performance scale index (KPI) of ≥70% (HR 0.20, 95%-CI: [0.13; 0.32], p < 0.001), initially moderate neurological deficits (NFS ≤2) (HR 0.32, 95% CI: [0.19; 0.52], p < 0.001), symptom response to RT (HR 0.41, 95%-CI: [0.26; 0.67], p < 0.001) and the administration of systemic therapy (HR 0.51, 95%-CI: [0.33; 0.78], p = 0.002). Prognostic of inferior OS were high-grade myelosuppression (HR 1.78, 95% CI: [1.06; 3.00], p = 0.03) and serum LDH levels >500 U/l (HR 3.62, 95% CI: [1.76; 7.44], p < 0.001). Clinical performance, symptom response and serum LDH stayed independently prognostic for survival in multivariate analysis. RT was well-tolerated and except for grade III myelosuppression in 19 cases (17.3%), no high-grade acute toxicities were observed. Neurologic symptom stabilization was achieved in 83 cases (75.5%) and a sizeable improvement in 39 cases (35.5%). Conclusion: Radiotherapy is a well-tolerated and efficacious means of providing symptom palliation for patients with LC, delaying neurologic deterioration while probably not directly influencing survival. Prognostic factors such as clinical performance, neurologic response and serum LDH can be used for patient stratification to facilitate treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A. El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karina Böhm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Schlaich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Angela Paul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias F. Haefner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sonja Katayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Löw
- Department of Neurology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Montes de Oca Delgado M, Cacho Díaz B, Santos Zambrano J, Guerrero Juárez V, López Martínez MS, Castro Martínez E, Avendaño Méndez-Padilla J, Mejía Pérez S, Reyes Moreno I, Gutiérrez Aceves A, González Aguilar A. The Comparative Treatment of Intraventricular Chemotherapy by Ommaya Reservoir vs. Lumbar Puncture in Patients With Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis. Front Oncol 2018; 8:509. [PMID: 30524956 PMCID: PMC6256195 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Object: Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis (LCM) represents a state of systemic malignant disease with poor prognosis. The purpose of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) between intraventricular chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir (OR) and chemotherapy through lumbar puncture (LP) in LCM. Patients and Methods: Forty adult patients with LCM were included. All patients underwent lumbar puncture and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty patients received chemotherapy through LP and 10 undergone colocation of Ommaya reservoir for intraventricular chemotherapy. Results: The most common symptom was headache (Present in 50%). The cranial nerves most affected were VI and VII. Leptomeningeal enhancement was the most frequent finding in MRI. The OS in the LP group was 4 months and Ommaya group was 9.2 months (p = 0.0006; CI:1.8-3), with statistical differences in favor to Intraventricular treatment. Proportional hazard regression showed that receiving chemotherapy through Ommaya reservoir was a protective factor (Hazard ratio = 0.258, Standard Error = 0.112, p = 0.002 and 95% CI 0.110-0.606). Using KPS as a factor did not affect the hazard ratio of Ommaya reservoir itself. Conclusions: OS was significantly higher in patients with Ommaya reservoir in spite of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) previous to chemotherapy. Therefore, intraventricular chemotherapy should be preferred over lumbar puncture chemotherapy administration if there are resources available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariano Montes de Oca Delgado
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - José Santos Zambrano
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Vicente Guerrero Juárez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Manuel Salvador López Martínez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Elvira Castro Martínez
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Javier Avendaño Méndez-Padilla
- Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Sonia Mejía Pérez
- Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Ignacio Reyes Moreno
- Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Axayacatl Gutiérrez Aceves
- Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico.,Radioneurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Alberto González Aguilar
- Emergency Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurosurgery Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurooncology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery "Manuel Velasco Suárez" (INNN), Mexico City, Mexico.,Neurological Service, The American British Cowdray Medical Center, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Burger MC, Wagner M, Franz K, Harter PN, Bähr O, Steinbach JP, Senft C. Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Equipped with On-Off Valves for Intraventricular Therapies in Patients with Communicating Hydrocephalus due to Leptomeningeal Metastases. J Clin Med 2018; 7:jcm7080216. [PMID: 30110924 PMCID: PMC6111529 DOI: 10.3390/jcm7080216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2018] [Revised: 07/28/2018] [Accepted: 08/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with a reservoir and a valve to manually switch off the shunt function can be used for intraventricular injections of therapeutics in patients suffering from a communicating hydrocephalus caused by leptomeningeal metastases. These shunt devices avoid the risk of injecting therapeutics through the distal leg of the shunt system into the intraperitoneal space, which may cause toxicity. Furthermore, regular intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics help to maintain sufficient concentrations in the ventricular space. Therefore, ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with an on-off valve are a useful tool to reliably inject chemotherapeutics into the ventricles. In order to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this procedure, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with leptomeningeal metastases who had received a shunt system at our institution. In total, six adult patients had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt equipped with an on-off valve implanted. Out of these six patients, two patients subsequently received intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics. The configuration of the valve setting and the intraventricular injections were easily feasible in the setting of a neuro-oncology department. The complication of a shunt leakage occurred in one patient following the first intraventricular injection. No extra-central nervous system (CNS) toxicities were observed. In summary, ventriculoperitoneal shunts with on-off valves are useful tools for reliable intraventricular administration of therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Burger
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Marlies Wagner
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Kea Franz
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Patrick N Harter
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Oliver Bähr
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Joachim P Steinbach
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Christian Senft
- University Cancer Center Frankfurt (UCT), 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe University Hospital, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.
Collapse
|
32
|
Le Rhun E, Taillibert S, Chamberlain MC. Neoplastic Meningitis Due to Lung, Breast, and Melanoma Metastases. Cancer Control 2018; 24:22-32. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and
Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, the Breast
Unit, Departments of Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of
Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sophie Taillibert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
Cedex, France, the Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of Neurology and Neurological
Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marc C. Chamberlain
- Departments of Neurology, and Radiation Oncology,
Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et
Marie Curie, Paris, France, and the Department of Neurology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research
Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Departments of
Neurology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle,
Washington
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pellerino A, Bertero L, Rudà R, Soffietti R. Neoplastic meningitis in solid tumors: from diagnosis to personalized treatments. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 2018. [PMID: 29535794 PMCID: PMC5844521 DOI: 10.1177/1756286418759618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a devastating complication of solid tumors with poor outcome. Some randomized clinical trials have been conducted with heterogeneous inclusion criteria, diagnostic parameters, response evaluation and primary endpoints. Recently, the Leptomeningeal Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (LANO) Group and the European Society for Medical Oncology/European Association for Neuro-Oncology have proposed some recommendations in order to provide diagnostic criteria and response evaluation scores for NM. The aim of these guidelines is to integrate the neurological examination with magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid findings as well as to provide a framework for use in clinical trials. However, this composite assessment needs further validation. Since intrathecal therapy represents a treatment with limited efficacy in NM, many studies have been conducted on systemic therapies, including target therapies, with some encouraging results in terms of disease control. In this review, we have analyzed the clinical aspects and the most recent diagnostic tools and therapeutic options in NM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Pellerino
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Via Cherasco 15, Turin, 10126 Italy
| | - Luca Bertero
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Determinants of prolonged survival for breast cancer patient groups with leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). J Neurooncol 2018; 138:191-198. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2790-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
35
|
Le Rhun E, Weller M, Brandsma D, Van den Bent M, de Azambuja E, Henriksson R, Boulanger T, Peters S, Watts C, Wick W, Wesseling P, Rudà R, Preusser M. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumours. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:iv84-iv99. [PMID: 28881917 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 254] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- E Le Rhun
- Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille
- Neurology, Medical Oncology Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille
- Lille University, Inserm U-1192, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
| | - M Weller
- Department of Neurology and Brain Tumour Center, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - D Brandsma
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam
| | - M Van den Bent
- The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E de Azambuja
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Jules Bordet and L'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Henriksson
- Regional Cancer Center, Stockholm
- Department of Radiation Sciences and Oncology, University, Umea, Sweden
| | - T Boulanger
- Neuroradiology, Imaging Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France
| | - S Peters
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Watts
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - W Wick
- Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuro-Oncology, German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, VU University Medical Centre and Brain Tumour Center, Amsterdam
- Department of Pathology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, City of Health and Science Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - M Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, CNS Unit Comprehensive Cancer Centre (CCC-CNS), Medical University, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Diagnosis and treatment patterns for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors across Europe. J Neurooncol 2017; 133:419-427. [PMID: 28455788 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2452-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/24/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastases are a late manifestation of systemic cancer which affects up to 10% of patients with solid tumors. Prognosis is poor, and overall survival at 1 year is only approximately 10%. Management depends mainly on general and neurological condition, primary tumor, and patterns of metastasis, notably absence or presence of concurrent systemic or solid brain metastases. Here we set out to characterize current practice patterns of diagnosis and treatment of patients with leptomeningeal metastasis in Europe. We prepared a web-based survey including 25 simple or multiple choices questions on best practice supplemented by eight case vignettes with various diagnosis and management options. The survey was sent to the membership of the European Association of Neuro-Oncology and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumor Group. Between April 7, 2016 and August 8, 2016, 224 colleagues from 26 countries initiated the survey, 115 colleagues completed the whole survey. There were major differences both in the general diagnostic and therapeutic approach, e.g., regarding the use of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow studies, intra-CSF chemotherapy, various types of radiotherapy, and even more so when selecting decisions on diagnostic and therapeutic measures for single case vignettes. Diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with leptomeningeal metastasis from solid tumors vary widely across Europe. Standardization of diagnosis and evaluation tools as well as controlled studies to improve the level of evidence for all therapeutic approaches to LM are required.
Collapse
|
37
|
Rigakos G, Liakou CI, Felipe N, Orkoulas-Razis D, Razis E. Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Radiological Findings of Neoplastic Meningitis. Cancer Control 2017; 24:9-21. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481702400103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Naillid Felipe
- Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece, Boston University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Dennis Orkoulas-Razis
- Boston, Massachusetts, and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sacco K, Muhammad A, Saleem W, Alshaker H, Monzon L, Islam MR, Pchejetski D. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis as the primary presentation of relapse in breast cancer. Oncol Lett 2016; 12:779-782. [PMID: 27446350 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an uncommon presentation of relapse in breast cancer, which is associated with poor clinical outcomes and poor prognosis. Notably, LM most commonly occurs in breast cancer. The aim of the present review was to investigate the occurrence of LM as the primary presentation of relapse following remission in breast cancer patients and to determine whether specific histological subtypes are predisposed to meningeal metastases. In addition, the present review evaluated whether patients presenting with LM as the primary site of relapse exhibit differences in survival when compared with patients exhibiting metastasis to other sites. Cross-sectional studies have demonstrated that LM is commonly associated with other sites of distant metastasis including lung, liver and bone metastases. The histological breast cancer subtype most commonly associated with LM was invasive lobular carcinoma, while triple-negative breast cancer patients appear to be predisposed to the development of LM when considering the overall prevalence of histological breast cancer subtypes. At present, data regarding LM as the primary site of relapse are limited due to its rarity as the first site of metastasis in breast cancer. Case-controlled studies are required to investigate the incidence of LM as the primary site of recurrence in breast cancer patients as this would enable treatment standardization and identification of prognostic factors for improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Sacco
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Aun Muhammad
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, UK
| | | | - Heba Alshaker
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Petra University, Amman 00962, Jordan
| | - Leonardo Monzon
- Department of Imaging, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mittica G, Senetta R, Richiardi L, Rudà R, Coda R, Castellano I, Sapino A, Cassoni P. Meningeal carcinomatosis underdiagnosis and overestimation: incidence in a large consecutive and unselected population of breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2015; 15:1021. [PMID: 26715407 PMCID: PMC4696095 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-2042-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of meningeal carcinomatosis appears to be higher than in the past due to advances in neuro-imaging diagnostic techniques and improvements in cancer survival. Among solid tumors, breast cancer is the cancer most commonly associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, with an incidence rate of between 0.8 and 16%. Aim of this study has been i) to evaluate the incidence of meningeal carcinomatosis in a continuous breast cancer unselected series treated in a dedicated Breast Unit and ii) to define the clinico-pathological and molecular parameters associated with meningeal carcinomatosis development. METHODS A retrospective series of 1915 consecutive patients surgically treated for breast cancer between 1998 and 2010 was collected. Clinico-pathological data were recorded from medical charts and pathological reports, including the date of development of symptomatic meningeal carcinomatosis. Meningeal carcinomatosis incidence was determined at both 5- and 10-year follow-ups. RESULTS Three patients in the first 5 years of follow-up and six patients in 10 years of follow-up developed meningeal carcinomatosis. An incidence rate of 5.44 per 10,000 patients (95% CI: 1.75-16.9) was observed, with a 5-year risk of 0.3%. At 10-year follow up, the rate increased to 7.55 per 10,000 patients (95% CI: 3.39-16.8). In a univariate analysis, young age, tumor size larger than 15 mm, histological grade 3, more than three metastatic lymph nodes, negative estrogen receptor, positive HER2 and high proliferative index were significantly associated with meningeal carcinomatosis development. CONCLUSIONS In an unselected breast cancer population, meningeal carcinomatosis is a rare event that is associated with adverse prognostic factors. Meningeal carcinomatosis incidence is overestimated when recorded in biased/high-risk selected breast cancer patients and should not be considered to accurately reflect the overall breast cancer population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gloria Mittica
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Turin Medical School, Fondazione del Piemonte per l'Oncologia-Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment of Candiolo, Strada Provinciale 142 km 3,95, 10060, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
| | - Rebecca Senetta
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Richiardi
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Via Cherasco 15, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Renato Coda
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Isabella Castellano
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Anna Sapino
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Paola Cassoni
- Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Santena 7, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kak M, Nanda R, Ramsdale EE, Lukas RV. Treatment of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis: current challenges and future opportunities. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22:632-7. [PMID: 25677875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/17/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) in breast cancer patients confers a uniformly poor prognosis and decreased quality of life. Treatment options are limited and often ineffective, due in large part to limitations imposed by the blood-brain barrier and the very aggressive nature of this disease. The majority of studies investigating the treatment of LM are not specific to site of origin. Conducting randomized, disease-specific clinical trials in LM is challenging, and much clinical outcomes data are based on case reports or retrospective case series. Multiple studies have suggested that chemo-radiotherapy is superior to either chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone. Attempts to overcome current obstacles in the treatment of breast cancer LM hold promise for the future. We review the epidemiology, diagnosis, and prognosis of LM in breast cancer, and discuss the treatment options currently available as well as those under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Kak
- University of Chicago, Department of Neurology, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2030, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Rita Nanda
- University of Chicago, Section of Hematology and Oncology, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Erika E Ramsdale
- University of Virginia, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Rimas V Lukas
- University of Chicago, Department of Neurology, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 2030, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Madgula IM, Hemmerdinger CM, Clark P. Metastatic breast cancer presenting as sequential cranial nerve palsy: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2014; 8:430. [PMID: 25511612 PMCID: PMC4301651 DOI: 10.1186/1752-1947-8-430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2014] [Accepted: 10/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cranial nerve palsy is a common presentation in the neuro-ophthalmology clinic and investigations are directed towards the cause. Metastatic breast cancer presenting as carcinomatous meningitis leading to sequential fourth, third and sixth nerve palsy is very rare. This is the first case to be reported to the best of our knowledge. Case presentation A 66-year-old Caucasian woman presented with vertical double vision for the previous 3 weeks. At 6-weeks follow up this had resolved. However, she presented with a new third and sixth cranial nerve palsy. Neuroimaging with contrast revealed carcinomatous meningitis. Conclusions Metastatic cancer may manifest as cerebral metastases or carcinomatous meningitis. This is evident on neuroimaging with contrast and may be missed on unenhanced scans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Indira M Madgula
- Ophthalmology Department, Warrington Hospital, Lovely Lane, Warrington WA5 1QG, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Le Rhun E, Kramar A, Salingue S, Girot M, Rodrigues I, Mailliez A, Zairi F, Bakhache E, Robin YM, Taillibert S, Dubois F, Bonneterre J, Chamberlain MC. CSF CA 15-3 in breast cancer-related leptomeningeal metastases. J Neurooncol 2014; 117:117-24. [PMID: 24469852 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1361-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The sensitivity of CSF cytology, the standard method for diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases (LM), is low. Serum cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) is frequently used for the monitoring of patients with breast cancer (BC) and is a laboratory test available in most centers. The aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of measuring CSF CA 15-3 and CA 15-3 CSF/serum ratio in patients with BC-related LM. Serum and CSF CA 15-3 values were evaluated in 20 BC patients with LM (Group 1), 20 patients with LM from other primary cancers (Group 2), 20 BC patients with parenchymal brain metastases only (Group 3) and 20 controls (Group 4). CSF and serum were collected on the same day. Serum and CSF CA 15-3 were assessed by an automatized immuno-enzymatic technology (TRACE(®) technology, KRYPTOR Automate, Brahms Society, France). In univariate analysis, BC patients with LM (Group 1) compared to other groups, a significantly elevated serum CA 15-3 (median 51 U/ml, range 12-2819) and CSF CA 15-3 (median 8.7 U/ml, range 0.1-251) was observed. Additionally, the CSF/serum ratio of CA 15-3 was significantly higher in this group of patients (median 0.18, range 0.002-4.40). Multivariate analysis identified a cut-off for CSF CA15-3 with 80 % sensitivity and 70 % specificity. CONCLUSIONS The current study confirms the feasibility of determining CSF CA 15-3 using a widely available technology. Evaluation of the CSF CA 15-3 may be useful in the diagnosis and management of BC-related LM but further studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilie Le Rhun
- Breast Unit, Department of Medical Oncology, Oscar Lambret Center, 59 020, Lille Cedex, France,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|