Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs older women: is age an independent prognostic factor? The Hellenic Oncology Cooperative Group experience

Non-surgical management of advanced ovarian cancer with maintenance PARP inhibitors

The standard of care for advanced ovarian cancer is cytoreductive surgery followed by a platinum-taxane combination with PARP inhibition as a maintenance strategy. In practice, many advanced ovarian cancer patients are older and are either not candidates for surgery or decline surgical intervention. There are limited data for using PARP inhibitor maintenance in the non-surgical patient population. We describe two cases of patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received platinum-taxane chemotherapy and declined surgical debulking. They were continued on maintenance PARP inhibitors and have no evidence of disease for over four years.

Effectiveness and safety of standard chemotherapy in older patients with ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis by age group and treatment regimen

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of standard chemotherapy administered to patients >70 years with advanced ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods

Medical records of 956 advanced-stage patients with OC treated between 2002-2020 with standard surgery and paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy in a three-weekly (PC-3W) or weekly (PC-1W) regimen were reviewed. Treatment response and tolerability were compared between patients ≤70 years (N=723) and >70 years (N=233) with stratification to septuagenarians (>70-80 years) and octogenarians (>80 years).

Results

Median overall survival (mOS) in patients >70 was 41.26 months (95% confidence interval [Cl], 37.22-45.14) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 11.04 months (95% Cl, 8.97-15.74). No statistically significant differences in mPFS and mOS were observed between septuagenarians and octogenarians. Patients >70 treated with PC-1W versus PC-3W had significantly longer mOS (57.17 versus 30.00 months) and mPFS (19.09 versus 8.15 months). Toxicity rates were mostly similar between younger and older patients. Among patients >70 treated with PC-1W, the rate of neutropenia (75.7% versus 51.8%, p=0.0005), thrombocytopenia (41.0% versus 22.2%, p=0.0042) and anemia (78.1% versus 51.9%, p<0.0001) were significantly higher and the rate of grade 2 alopecia was statistically significantly lower compared with those >70 treated with PC-3W. Significantly more patients treated with PC-1W completed ≥6 chemotherapy cycles, suggesting better tolerability of this regimen.

Conclusions

Older patients with OC may benefit from improved OS with reasonable toxicity if treated with standard chemotherapy. Older patients treated with PC-1W are more likely to complete the full chemotherapy course and survive longer compared with those treated with conventional PC-3W.

Ovarian cancer in the older patient: where are we now? What to do next?

In recent years, major advances have been made toward the individualization of epithelial ovarian cancer care, leading to an overall improvement of patient outcomes. However, real-life data indicate that the oldest populations do not benefit from this, due to aspects related to cancer (more aggressive histopathological features), treatment (i.e. frequently suboptimal), and the host (increased toxicities in patients with lower physiological reserve). A specific risk-benefit perspective should therefore be taken when considering surgery, chemotherapy, and maintenance treatments: the decision for cytoreductive surgery should include geriatric vulnerability and surgical complexity, neo-adjuvant chemotherapy being an option when primary surgery appears at high risk; carboplatin paclitaxel association remains the standard even in vulnerable older patients; and bevacizumab and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors maintenance are interesting options provided they are prescribed according to their indications with a close monitoring of their toxicities. Future studies should aim to individualize care without limiting access of older patients to innovation. A specific focus is needed on age-specific translational analyses (focusing on tumor mutational burden and impaired biological pathways), a better patient stratification according to geriatric parameters, an adaptation of both oncological treatment and geriatric interventions, and treatment adaptations not a priori but according to formal pharmacokinetic data.

Serology-Based Model for Personalized Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Risk Evaluation

This study aimed to establish a prognosis-prediction model based on serological indicators in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Patients initially diagnosed as ovarian cancer and surgically treated in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center from 2014 to 2018 were consecutively enrolled. Serological indicators preoperatively were collected. A risk model score (RMS) was constructed based on the levels of serological indicators determined by receiver operating characteristic curves. We correlated this RMS with EOC patients’ overall survival (OS). Finally, 635 patients were identified. Pearson’s χ2 results showed that RMS was significantly related to clinical parameters. Kaplan−Meier analysis demonstrated that an RMS less than 3 correlated with a longer OS (p < 0.0001). Specifically, significant differences were perceived in the survival curves of different subgroups. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that age (p = 0.015), FIGO stage (p = 0.006), ascites (p = 0.015) and RMS (p = 0.005) were independent risk factors for OS. Moreover, RMS combined with age, FIGO and ascites could better evaluate for patients’ prognosis in DCA analyses. Our novel RMS-guided classification preoperatively identified the prognostic subgroups of patients with EOC and showed higher accuracy than the conventional method, meaning that it could be a useful and economical tool for tailored monitoring and/or therapy.

Pretreatment maximum standardized uptake value in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a prognostic factor for ovarian clear cell carcinoma and low-grade serous carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) derived by positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) can be an index of biological tumor aggressiveness, which is assessed using noninvasive tools before the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the pretreatment SUVmax in patients with EOC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the data of patients with EOC who underwent pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT between June 2006 and September 2016. The relationships between pretreatment SUVmax and histological subtypes of EOC were determined. Moreover, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to the pretreatment SUVmax. Risk factors associated with progression or death were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 148 patients, 66 (44.6%), 11 (7.4%), 34 (23.0%), 19 (12.8%), 15 (10.1%), and three (2.0%) were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC), clear cell carcinoma (CCC), endometrioid carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and others, respectively. The median SUVmax was marginally lower in LGSC (6.80 vs. 10.5; P = 0.059) and significantly lower in CCC (5.92 vs. 10.5; P = 0.001) than in HGSC. A high pretreatment SUVmax (≥9.30) was a prognostic factor for OS in patients with LGSC (P = 0.046). Furthermore, multivariate analysis revealed that a high SUVmax (≥5.85) was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.046) in patients with CCC. However, a high SUVmax (≥7.77) was a poor predictor of PFS and OS in patients with EOC (P = 0.156 and P = 0.158, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the pretreatment SUVmax is not only an independent predictor of survival in patients with CCC but also a significant predictor of survival in patients with LGSC.

Histological Characteristics and Early-Stage Diagnosis Are Associated With Better Survival in Young Patients With Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Database

PURPOSE

To analyze the potential prognostic factors of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in women aged under 35 compared to those aged 60-79.

METHODS

Cases were retrospectively obtained from SEER database. Clinical characteristics, such as race, histological type, AJCC stage, laterality of tumors, CA125 results, and surgical strategies, were analyzed in < 35 years group and 60-79 years group. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify the predictors for CSS.

RESULTS

Sixteen thousand eight hundred forty-seven EOC patients diagnosed in 2004-2015 were identified from SEER database, with 1,015 aged under 35 and 15,833 aged 60-79. In < 35 years group, mucinous (32.2%) was the most common histological type, followed by high-grade serous (26.6%) and endometrioid (18.3%), while in 60-79 years group, high-grade serous (68.3%) represented the leading histological type. Most young women were diagnosed at stage I (57.7%), while most old women were diagnosed at stage (48.1%). Both 5-year OS and 5-year CSS were higher in < 35 years group (5-year OS: 76.00% vs 40.18%, p < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 83.56% vs 55.18%, p < 0.001). The multivariate analysis identified histological type and stage as prognostic factors for CSS in both groups. Endometrioid represented a positive predictor for CSS, while carcinosarcoma and malignant Brenner were related to a worse CSS. (< 35 years group: carcinosarcoma vs endometrioid: HR 5.630, p=0.024; malignant Brenner vs endometrioid: HR 4.005, p < 0.001; 60-79 years group: carcinosarcoma vs endometrioid: HR 3.606, p < 0.001; malignant Brenner vs endometrioid: HR 2.291, p < 0.001). Tumors laterality, CA125 levels, surgery and lymphadenectomy failed to be associated with the CSS in < 35 years group, while found to be independent risk factors in 60-79 years group.

CONCLUSION

EOC women aged under 35 had a better survival outcome over EOC women aged 60-79, owing to high proportion of endometrioid and mucinous types in histology, as well as early-stage diagnosis. Identification of histological types and gene profiles should be underscored in young EOC patients.

Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives

AIM

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients.

METHODS

This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%.

CONCLUSION

In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.

Further insights into the role of tumour characteristics in survival of young women with epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing the counselling of women ≤40years with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) by investigating the role of young age and tumour characteristics on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A retrospective population-based study was done using data of EOC patients diagnosed between 1990 and 2014 registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyse clinical and tumour characteristics. Five- and 10-year OS rates were calculated using Kaplan Meier curves. To determine prognostic factors, univariable and multivariable survival analyses were performed.

RESULTS

1407 women ≤40years and 29,022 women >40years old were included. OS was higher for the younger women compared to older group (5-year survival of 65.6% vs. 32.7%, 10-year survival of 57.5% vs. 22.5%, respectively). The younger women had more often a mucinous (36.4%), well-differentiated (31.8%) tumour in early stage of disease (49.9%). Serous tumours (43.0%), high-grade (36.0%) and stage III (47.1%) were most frequently found in the older women. Histology, grade, stage, incidence year, and age group are independent prognostic factors for survival. OS of the young women for several combinations of tumour characteristics were calculated.

CONCLUSIONS

Age is an independent prognostic factor for OS in EOC patients. Counselling on prognosis could be more individualised in young EOC patients using the tumour characteristics histology, stage and grade.

[Epithelial ovarian cancer and elderly patients. Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

In ovarian, tubal and primary peritoneal cancers, older adults have an over-mortality due to more aggressive disease (NP4), surgical and chemotherapy under treatment (NP4) and co-morbidities (NP4). Older age is at higher risk for postoperative morbidity and mortality (NP4). Surgery is more often incomplete in this elderly population (NP4). Older age is a risk factor for lower dose intensity in adjuvant chemotherapy (NP4) and incomplete chemotherapy (NP4). Nevertheless, the benefit of a complete surgery remains identical to that of the younger population (NP2). Preoperative functional assessment identifies patients at risk for postoperative complications (NP4). The perioperative risk depends on three variables, the ASA score, the age and the complexity score of the surgery (NP4). It is recommended to perform cytoreduction surgery in an expert centre (grade C) and on the basis of geriatric expertise analysing functional and physical performance (grade C). The benefit/risk balance of surgery should be assessed on a case-by-case basis for the most at-risk (NP4) populations defined by: (i) age≥80 years, especially if albuminemia≤37g/L; (ii) age≥75 years and FIGO stage IV; (iii) age≥75 years, stage FIGO III and≥1 comorbidity. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is recommended prior to the management of an elderly person with primary ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer (grade C). The GVS (Geriatric Vulnerability Score) is used to identify vulnerable elderly patients (NP2). In fit elderly patients, it is recommended to perform intravenous chemotherapy identical to that of younger patients (ie platinum-based dual therapy) (grade B). In vulnerable elderly patients, various adapted chemotherapy regimens have been prospectively evaluated in non-comparative trials, and seem feasible considering specific and nonspecific toxicities: carboplatin monotherapy (NP2), carboplatin AUC2+paclitaxel 60mg/m² 3 weeks/4 (NP2), carboplatin AUC 4-5+paclitaxel 135mg/m²/3 weeks (NP2), carboplatin AUC5/3 weeks+paclitaxel 60mg/m²/week (NP3). In the absence of comparative data, no recommendation can be made in this population. Primary chemotherapy decreases the complexity of the surgical procedure and perioperative morbidity and mortality during interval surgery (NP1). It should be considered after 70 years in cases of comorbidities and/or peritoneal carcinomatosis sufficient for complex initial surgery (NP4).

Optimal cutoff age for predicting prognosis associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer: what is the best age cutoff?

Objective

Elderly age is one of the poor prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but the optimal age cut-off is not known. The present study sought to identify the ideal age cutoff that represents a negative prognostic factor in EOC, considering the geriatric assessment.

Methods

Hazard ratios (HRs) with p-values were calculated using all possible age cutoffs with stage, histology, grade, optimality and comorbidities as covariates in multivariate Cox regression model. The trends of p-value and HR by age cutoff were further evaluated in a subgroup of histology and in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. In addition, propensity score-matching analysis using the identified age cutoff was performed.

Results

An age of 66 years was shown to be the most significant cutoff for defining old age with independent prognostic power (HR=1.45; 95% confidence interval=1.04–2.03; p=0.027). This result was also observed with the analyses of serous histology subgroup and with the analysis of a TCGA dataset with serous EOC. In survival analysis, patients aged ≥66 years had significantly worse overall survival compared with younger individuals (56 months vs. 87 months; p=0.006), even following propensity score matching (57 vs. 78 months; p=0.038).

Conclusion

An age of 66 years is the best cutoff to define elderly age in serous EOC patients considering the geriatric assessment, and this information can be used in the administration of individualized therapies in elderly EOC patients.

Disparities of age-based cancer-specific survival improvement with various clinicopathologic characteristics for kidney cancer

Introduction

Whether or not age is a predictor of kidney cancer survival is currently unknown but debated. It is also unknown whether improved kidney cancer survival is associated with age with particular clinicopathologic characteristics. The aim of this study was to evaluate kidney cancer survival in four age-based subgroups of patients by analyzing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-registered database.

Methods

Age-based survival disparity by sex, race, marital status, year of diagnosis, pathological grade, histological type, and stage was measured. The impact of age and further parameters on disease specific mortality was evaluated by multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.

Results

Results showed that 8-year cancer-specific survival was 79.6% in those aged ≤49 years, 70.6% in those aged 50-64 years, 65.3% in those aged 65-74 years, and 56.0% in those aged 75-84 years. These differences were significant as judged by a univariate log-rank test (P<0.001) and multivariate Cox regression (P<0.001). Age-based survival improvement was most obvious in patients diagnosed from 2005 to 2009 and with the following clinicopathologic characteristics: female, white race, low pathological grade, and localized stage. There was no obvious disparity of age-based survival improvement with regard to marital status or histologic type. No age-based survival improvement was observed in patients of the black race, pathological grade IV, or distant stage (P=0.05, P=0.07, and P=0.07, respectively).

Conclusion

These data suggest that age is an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with kidney cancer and that age-based survival improvement is associated with particular clinicopathologic characteristics.

Old age at diagnosis increases risk of tumor progression in nasopharyngeal cancer

Age at diagnosis has been found to be a prognostic factor of outcomes in various cancers. However, the effect of age at diagnosis on nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) progression has not been explored. We retrospectively evaluated the relationship between age and disease progression in 3,153 NPC patients who underwent radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy between 2007 and 2009. Patients were randomly assigned to either a testing cohort or a validation cohort by computer-generated random assignment. X-tile plots determined the optimal cut-point of age based on survival status to be ≤61 vs. >61 years. Further correlation analysis showed that age >61 years was significantly correlated with the tumor progression and therapeutic regimen in both testing and validation cohorts (P <0.05). In the present study, we observed that older age (>61 years) was a strong and independent predictor of poor disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age was also found to be a significant prognostic predictor as well (P <0.05) when evaluating patients with the same disease stage. ROC analysis confirmed the predictive value of age on NPC-specific survival in both cohorts (P <0.001) and suggested that age may improve the ability to discriminate outcomes in NPCs, especially regarding tumor progression. In conclusion, our study suggests that older age at NPC diagnosis is associated with a higher incidence of tumor progression and cancer-specific mortality. Age is a strong and independent predictor of poor outcomes and may allow for more tailored therapeutic decision-making and individualized patient counseling.

Big data and computational biology strategy for personalized prognosis

The era of big data and precision medicine has led to accumulation of massive datasets of gene expression data and clinical information of patients. For a new patient, we propose that identification of a highly similar reference patient from an existing patient database via similarity matching of both clinical and expression data could be useful for predicting the prognostic risk or therapeutic efficacy.

Here, we propose a novel methodology to predict disease/treatment outcome via analysis of the similarity between any pair of patients who are each characterized by a certain set of pre-defined biological variables (biomarkers or clinical features) represented initially as a prognostic binary variable vector (PBVV) and subsequently transformed to a prognostic signature vector (PSV). Our analyses revealed that Euclidean distance rather correlation distance measure was effective in defining an unbiased similarity measure calculated between two PSVs.

We implemented our methods to high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) based on a 36-mRNA predictor that was previously shown to stratify patients into 3 distinct prognostic subgroups. We studied and revealed that patient's age, when converted into binary variable, was positively correlated with the overall risk of succumbing to the disease. When applied to an independent testing dataset, the inclusion of age into the molecular predictor provided more robust personalized prognosis of overall survival correlated with the therapeutic response of HGSC and provided benefit for treatment targeting of the tumors in HGSC patients.

Finally, our method can be generalized and implemented in many other diseases to accurately predict personalized patients’ outcomes.

Prognostic value of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in elderly patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Objective

To investigate the prognostic significance of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) in elderly patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) receiving primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 42 elderly patients (≥65 years) diagnosed with EOC who are receiving primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy from 2009 to 2012 was included. LMR was calculated from complete blood cell count sampled before operation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to calculate optimal cut-off values for LMR. Prognostic significance with respect to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were determined using log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

Results

The optimized LMR cut-off value determined by ROC curve analysis was 3.63 for PFS and OS. The high LMR group (LMR ≥3.63) was found to be significantly more associated with optimal debulking (P=0.045) and platinum response (P=0.018) than the low LMR group. In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed the LMR-high group was significantly more associated with high PFS and OS rates (P=0.023 and P=0.033, respectively), and univariate analysis revealed that a high LMR, histology type, and optimal debulking and platinum responses were significantly associated with prolonged PFS and OS. However, subsequent Cox multivariate analysis showed only optimal debulking and platinum response were independent prognostic factors of PFS or OS.

Conclusion

This study suggests that LMR might be associated with treatment and survival outcomes in elderly patients with EOC receiving standard oncology treatment.

Impact of Young Age at Diagnosis on Survival in Patients with Surgically Treated Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Multicenter Study

The prognostic significance of age in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a subject of debate. The aim of the present multi-institutional study was to evaluate the impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival in a large cohort of patients with RCC. A total of 5,178 patients who underwent surgery for RCC at eight institutions in Korea between 1999 and 2011 were categorized into three groups according to age at diagnosis as follows: young age (< 40 years, n = 541), middle-age (≥ 40 and < 60 years, n = 2,551), and old age (≥ 60 years, n = 2,096) groups. Clinicopathological variables and survival rates were compared between the three groups. Young patients had lower stage tumors with a low Fuhrman grade, a lower rate of lymphovascular invasion than patients in the other age groups. Regarding histologic type, the young age group had a lower percentage of clear cell histology and a greater incidence of Xp11.2 translocation RCC. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that cancer-specific survival was significantly better in the young age group than in the other groups (log rank test, P = 0.008). However, age at diagnosis was not an independent predictor of survival in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, young age at diagnosis was associated with favorable pathologic features, although it was not an independent prognostic factor for survival in patients with surgically-treated RCC. Age itself should not be regarded as a crucial determinant for the treatment of RCC.

Is there a difference in clinicopathological outcomes of renal tumor between young and old patients? A multicenter matched-pair analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of age at diagnosis on tumor characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of patients who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy for renal tumor between 2003 and 2011 at multiple institutions were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to age at diagnosis: 20-39 years and 40-79 years. To adjust for potential baseline confounders, propensity score matching was performed.

RESULTS

All included data showed that young RCC patients presented with renal tumors that had a more favorable histological subtype, were localized, smaller in size, and had a lower Fuhrman nuclear grade. The 5 year CSS rates were 95.5% and 90.5% in the young and old patient groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.019). After matching on the propensity score, the two groups with RCC had 302 patients each. Because the groups were matched on covariates, there were no significant differences in the pathological proportion, tumor size, Fuhrman nuclear grade and clinical T stage. The 5 year CSS rates were 95.5% and 94.7% in the young and old patient groups, respectively (log rank p = 0.184).

CONCLUSION

After adjusting for potential biases, there was no significant difference in prognosis between young and old patients with RCC.

Can CA-125 predict lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancers in Turkish population?

Objective. The role of single preoperative serum CA-125 levels in predicting pelvic or paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients operated for epithelial ovarian cancer has been investigated. Methods. 176 patients diagnosed with epithelial ovarian carcinoma after staging laparotomy between January 2002 and May 2010 were evaluated retrospectively. Results. The mean, geometric mean, and median of preoperative serum CA-125 levels were 632,6, 200,29, and 191,5 U/mL, respectively. The cut-off value predicting lymph node metastases in the ROC curve was 71,92 U/mL, which is significant in logistic regression analysis (P = 0.005). The preoperative log CA-125 levels were also statistically significant in predicting lymph node metastasis in logistic regression analysis (P = 0.008). Conclusions. The tumor marker CA-125, which increases with grade independent of the effect of stage in EOC, is predictive of lymph node metastasis with a high rate of false positivity in Turkish population. The high false positive rate may obscure the predictive value of CA-125.

Age--an independent prognostic factor of clinical outcome in renal malignancies: results of a large study over two decades

PURPOSE

Age has been linked to outcome in renal cancer patients, but mainly in North American cohorts. In this study, we hypothesized that age is correlated with metastasis and cancer-specific survival in a German cohort regardless of types of treatments.

METHODS

A total of 1,538 patients treated for renal malignancies between 1991 and 2010 were evaluated. Mean age and median age are 61.9 ± 11.6 and 62.6 years. Clinicopathologic [tumor type, size, grade, stage and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, immunotherapy)] and outcome parameters (metastasis and survival) were examined for an association with age using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model, and Kaplan-Meier plots.

RESULTS

Age was associated with stage, metastasis, treatment, cancer-specific and overall mortality (p < 0.01). The metastasis-free and cancer-free survival rates for patients >63 years were lower than those for patients ≤63 years (p < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, age was an independent prognostic factor of metastasis, cancer-specific and overall mortality (p < 0.0001) even when data were stratified in different decades and treatment was included as one of the parameters. Patients >63 years of age had 29-35% higher risk of metastasis and cancer-specific mortality than younger patients. Median metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival for patients >63 years of age (months: 84.4; 70.3) was ~50% shorter than in patients ≤63 years (months: 151; 144.6).

CONCLUSIONS

This large study shows that, despite advances in surgical and non-surgical treatment modalities over the two decades, age is an independent prognostic indicator of metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in renal cancer patients. Patients >63 years have ~30% increased risk for metastasis and ~50% shorter cancer-specific survival.

Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor for the survival of ovarian cancer: a Danish register-based cohort study from a clinical database

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine whether comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor for 3129 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer from 2005 to 2011. As Performance status (PS) might capture the impact of comorbidity we addressed whether comorbidity can be explained by PS or whether comorbidity has an independent impact on survival.

METHODS

The Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) is a national clinical database including information on comorbidity and a large number of tumor-related and patient-related factors. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to measure the patients' comorbidity based on the registration in DGCD. The overall mortality (OS) from the date of surgery to death or censoring was the outcome measure.

RESULTS

The hazard ratio (HR) for patients with comorbidity was 3.31 (1.14-1.50) compared to patients without comorbidity after adjustment for age, stage, residual tumor, histology and grade. After including PS in the model, comorbidity remained significant for OS. Age, stage, residual tumor, histology and PS prove to be independent prognostic factors as well. No association is found between comorbidity and receiving surgery or not.

CONCLUSION

Comorbidity is an independent prognostic factor, and has a negative impact on the survival of ovarian cancer patients. However, comorbidity has a smaller impact on survival compared with the other prognostic factors considered.

Impact of age on the cancer-specific survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: martingale residual and competing risks analysis

Background

Age at diagnosis has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in several studies. We used contemporary statistical methods to reevaluate the effect of age on the cancer-specific survival (CSS) of localized RCC.

Methods and Findings

1,147 patients with localized RCC who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1993 and 2009 were identified in our four institutions. The association between age and CSS was estimated, and the potential threshold was identified by a univariate Cox model and by martingale residual analysis. Competing risks regression was used to identify the independent impact of age on CSS. The median age was 52 years (range, 19–84 years). The median follow-up was 61 months (range, 6–144 months) for survivors. A steep increasing smoothed martingale residual plot indicated an adverse prognostic effect of age on CSS. The age cut-off of 45 years was most predictive of CSS on univariate Cox analysis and martingale residual analysis (p = 0.005). Age ≤45 years was independently associated with a higher CSS rate in the multivariate Cox regression model (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.05–2.40, p = 0.027) as well as in competing risks regression (HR = 3.60, 95% CI = 1.93–6.71, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Increasing age was associated with a higher incidence of cancer-specific mortality of localized RCC. Age dichotomized at 45 years would maximize the predictive value of age on CSS, and independently predict the CSS of patients with localized RCC.

Doublet chemotherapy in the elderly patient with ovarian cancer

The aging of the population has focused on the need to evaluate older patients with cancer. Approximately 50% of patients with ovarian cancer will be older than age 65 years. Increasing age has been associated with decreased survival. It is uncertain whether this relates to biologic factors, treatment factors, or both. There is concern that undertreatment may be associated with decreased survival. Older patients with ovarian cancer have been underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, the evidence base on which make decisions is lacking. Clinicians need to be aware of the currently available data to aid in treatment decisions. Doublet therapy is the most common standard treatment in epithelial ovarian cancer. It usually consists of a taxane and a platinum compound. A series of cooperative group studies in both the United States and Europe established intravenous paclitaxel and carboplatin as the most common standard in optimally debulked patients. The recent introduction of intraperitoneal therapy has complicated decision making in terms of which older patients would benefit from this more toxic therapy. In relapsed patients, the issue of platinum sensitivity is critical in deciding whether to reutilize platinum compounds. It is unclear whether single agents or combinations are superior, particularly in older patients. Geriatric assessment is an important component of decision making. Prospective studies are needed to develop strategies to determine the optimal treatment for older patients with ovarian cancer.

The unique characteristics of ovarian carcinogenesis in the adolescent and young adult population

Ovarian cancer in the adolescent and young adult (AYA) population is a disease that is distinctly different with regard to risk factors, genetics, and pathology when compared to ovarian cancers occurring in older women. This article will review the theories behind ovarian carcinogenesis and attempt to elucidate why these tumors exhibit their unique biologic characteristics. Knowledge of these differences will allow us to begin to develop strategies for future research endeavors enabling improved survival in AYA women diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

A population-based 5-year cohort study including all cases of epithelial ovarian cancer in western Sweden: 10-year survival and prognostic factors

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the major gynecologic cancer mortality cause in Sweden. The aim of the present study was to investigate the long-term survival and prognostic factors of a complete population-based 5-year cohort of 682 patients with invasive EOC in western Sweden (population around 1.6 million). Data relating to residual tumor after surgery, FIGO stage, grade, histopathologic subtype, ploidy status, adjuvant chemotherapy (the prepaclitaxel period), and disease state (recurrence and death) were reported to a quality register in a prospectively kept database and were controlled against the Swedish National Cancer Registry for completeness. The median follow-up durations for the prospectively collected data in the Cox analysis and for the survival analysis that was made for all patients were 81 months (range, 52-109 months) and 11.7 years (range, 8.7-14.1 years), respectively. No patient was lost to follow-up. The relative 10-year survival rate was 38.4% (95% confidence interval, 34.5%-42.8%). The median relative survival time was 4.3 years (95% confidence interval, 3.6%-5.2%). In the univariate Cox regression analysis, prognostic significances for age, stage, residual tumor, histopathologic subtype of serous cystadenocarcinoma, grade, CA-125, and ploidy status were seen. In the multivariate analysis, age, stage, residual tumor after surgery, and postoperative CA-125 were of prognostic significance. In conclusion, 4 major prognostic factors were found for EOC in this population-based cohort study that also presents nearly accurate long-term survival owing to the nonselective nature and completeness regarding patients and follow-up of the study.

The treatment and outcomes of early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: have we made any progress?

The objective of this study is to determine the progress and trends in the treatment and survival of women with early-stage (I-II) epithelial ovarian cancer. Data were obtained from the SEER database between 1988 and 2001. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regressions methods were employed for statistical analyses. Of the 8372 patients, the median age was 57 years (range: 12-99 years). A total of 6152 patients (73.4%) presented with stage I and 2220 (26.5%) with stage II disease. Over the periods 1988--1992, 1993--1997, and 1998-- 2001, 3-year disease-specific survivals increased from 86.1 to 87.2 to 88.8% (P=0.076). The number of patients that underwent lymphadenectomy has increased significantly from 26.2 to 38.7 to 54.2% over the study period (P<0.001). Of those patients who underwent staging procedures with lymphadenectomy, there was no improvement in survival over the three study periods (from 93.2 to 93.5 to 93.1%; P=0.978). On multivariate analysis, younger age, nonclear cell histology, earlier stage, lower grade, surgery, and lymphadenectomy were significant independent prognostic factors for improved survival. After adjusting for surgical staging with lymphadenectomy, the year of diagnosis was no longer an important prognostic factor. In conclusion, the use of lymphadenectomy during surgery for early-stage ovarian cancer has doubled over the last 14 years. The marginal improvement in survival demonstrated over time is potentially attributed to the increased use of staging procedures with lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic significance of stathmin expression in correlation with metastasis and clinicopathological characteristics in human ovarian carcinoma

Stathmin, also called oncoprotein 18, is a founding member of the family of microtubule-destabilizing proteins that play a critical role in the regulation of mitosis. Stathmin is non-expressed in normal tissues, but stathmin gene is expressed at high levels in many human malignancies and the relationships between the levels of this gene expression in tumors and prognosis of the patients have been addressed. In this report, we explored the relationships between stathmin mRNA expression in ovarian carcinoma tissues and clinicopathological parameters. We collected and analyzed paraffin wax-embedded ovarian tumor biopsy tissues from 42 ovarian cancer patients in our hospital. We employed RT-PCR method and performed a densitometric analysis to determine the ratio of stathmin relative to beta-actin as an internal marker. Results showed that the stathmin mRNA expression was detected in all the ovarian carcinoma tissue samples and those samples with metastasis had higher levels of stathmin mRNA expression in initial biopsy specimens (P<0.05). Moreover, the levels of stathmin mRNA expression between samples with and without metastasis showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).