1
|
Qin L, Chen D, Li X, Gao Y, Xia W, Dai H, Qiu L, Yang J, Zhang L. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation: a comprehensive evaluation across diseases in randomized controlled trials. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1352145. [PMID: 38813242 PMCID: PMC11135047 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1352145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Current literature extensively covers the use of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation (SPGs) in treating a broad spectrum of medical conditions, such as allergic rhinitis, cluster headaches, and strokes. Nevertheless, a discernible gap in the systematic organization and analysis of these studies is evident. This paper aims to bridge this gap by conducting a comprehensive review and analysis of existing literature on SPGs across various medical conditions. Methods This study meticulously constructed a comprehensive database through systematic computerized searches conducted on PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM up to May 2022. The inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in either Chinese or English, focusing on the therapeutic applications of SPGs for various medical conditions. Both qualitative and quantitative outcome indicators were considered eligible for inclusion. Results This comprehensive study reviewed 36 publications, comprising 10 high-quality, 23 medium-quality, and three low-quality articles. The study investigated various diseases, including allergic rhinitis (AR), ischemic strokes (IS), cluster headache (CH), primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN), pediatric chronic secretory otitis (PCSO), refractory facial paralysis (RFP), chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), as well as the analysis of low-frequency sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation (LF-SPGs) in chronic cluster headache (CCH) and the impact of SPGs on Normal nasal cavity function (NNCF). SPGs demonstrate efficacy in the treatment of AR. Regarding the improvement of rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ) scores, SPGs are considered the optimal intervention according to the SUCRA ranking. Concerning the improvement in Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), Conventional Acupuncture Combined with Tradiational Chinese Medicine (CA-TCM) holds a significant advantage in the SUCRA ranking and is deemed the best intervention. In terms of increasing Effective Rate (ER), SPGs outperformed both conventional acupuncture (CA) and Western Medicine (WM; P < 0.05). In the context of SPGs treatment for IS, the results indicate a significant improvement in the 3-month outcomes, as evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) in the context of Cerebral Cortical Infarction (CCI; P < 0.05). In the treatment of CH with SPGs, the treatment has been shown to have a statistically significant effect on the relief and disappearance of headaches (P < 0.05). The impact of SPGs on NNCF reveals statistically significant improvements (P < 0.05) in nasal airway resistance (NAR), nasal cavity volume (NCV), exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), substance P (SP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY). SPGs treatments for PCSO, RFP, and CTTH, when compared to control groups, yielded statistically significant results (P < 0.05). Conclusion SPGs demonstrate significant effectiveness in the treatment of AR, IS, and CH. Effective management of CCH may require addressing both autonomic dysregulation and deeper neural pathways. However, additional high-quality research is essential to clarify its effects on NNCF, PTN, PCSO, RFP, and CTTH. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021252073, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=312429.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingli Qin
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Dian Chen
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xian Li
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Gao
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wanying Xia
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hanxi Dai
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Linjie Qiu
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jinsheng Yang
- Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Zhang
- Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fabry A, Nedunchelian M, Stacoffe N, Guinebert S, Zipfel J, Krainik A, Maindet C, Kastler B, Grand S, Kastler A. Review of craniofacial pain syndromes involving the greater occipital nerve: relevant anatomy, clinical findings, and interventional management. Neuroradiology 2024; 66:161-178. [PMID: 38159141 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03273-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Craniofacial pain syndromes exhibit a high prevalence in the general population, with a subset of patients developing chronic pain that significantly impacts their quality of life and results in substantial disabilities. Anatomical and functional assessments of the greater occipital nerve (GON) have unveiled its implication in numerous craniofacial pain syndromes, notably through the trigeminal-cervical convergence complex. The pathophysiological involvement of the greater occipital nerve in craniofacial pain syndromes, coupled with its accessibility, designates it as the primary target for various interventional procedures in managing craniofacial pain syndromes. This educational review aims to describe multiple craniofacial pain syndromes, elucidate the role of GON in their pathophysiology, detail the relevant anatomy of the greater occipital nerve (including specific intervention sites), highlight the role of imaging in diagnosing craniofacial pain syndromes, and discuss various interventional procedures such as nerve infiltration, ablation, neuromodulation techniques, and surgeries. Imaging is essential in managing these patients, whether for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. The utilization of image guidance has demonstrated an enhancement in reproducibility, as well as technical and clinical outcomes of interventional procedures. Studies have shown that interventional management of craniofacial pain is effective in treating occipital neuralgia, cervicogenic headaches, cluster headaches, trigeminal neuralgia, and chronic migraines, with a reported efficacy of 60-90% over a duration of 1-9 months. Repeated infiltrations, neuromodulation, or ablation may prove effective in selected cases. Therefore, reassessment of treatment response and efficacy during follow-up is imperative to guide further management and explore alternative treatment options. Optimal utilization of imaging, interventional techniques, and a multidisciplinary team, including radiologists, will ensure maximum benefit for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alienor Fabry
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Kastler
- Radiology Unit, Necker University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Grand
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital, Grenoble, France
| | - Adrian Kastler
- Neuroradiology Unit, University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martens JM, Fiala KJ, Kalia H, Abd-Elsayed A. Radiofrequency ablation and pulsed radiofrequency ablation for the sympathetic nervous system. RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION TECHNIQUES 2024:186-201. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-87063-4.00025-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
4
|
Tybout C, Zhou S, Hussain N, Abd-Elsayed A. Radiofrequency ablation for headache. RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION TECHNIQUES 2024:169-185. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-87063-4.00024-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
|
5
|
May A, Evers S, Goadsby PJ, Leone M, Manzoni GC, Pascual J, Carvalho V, Romoli M, Aleksovska K, Pozo-Rosich P, Jensen RH. European Academy of Neurology guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:2955-2979. [PMID: 37515405 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Cluster headache is a relatively rare, disabling primary headache disorder with a major impact on patients' quality of life. This work presents evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of cluster headache derived from a systematic review of the literature and consensus among a panel of experts. METHODS The databases PubMed (Medline), Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Library were screened for studies on the efficacy of interventions (last access July 2022). The findings in these studies were evaluated according to the recommendations of the European Academy of Neurology, and the level of evidence was established using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). RECOMMENDATIONS For the acute treatment of cluster headache attacks, there is a strong recommendation for oxygen (100%) with a flow of at least 12 L/min over 15 min and 6 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan. Prophylaxis of cluster headache attacks with verapamil at a daily dose of at least 240 mg (maximum dose depends on efficacy and tolerability) is recommended. Corticosteroids are efficacious in cluster headache. To reach an effect, the use of at least 100 mg prednisone (or equivalent corticosteroid) given orally or at up to 500 mg iv per day over 5 days is recommended. Lithium, topiramate, and galcanezumab (only for episodic cluster headache) are recommended as alternative treatments. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation is efficacious in episodic but not chronic cluster headache. Greater occipital nerve block is recommended, but electrical stimulation of the greater occipital nerve is not recommended due to the side effect profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arne May
- Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg- Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Evers
- Department of Neurology, Lindenbrunn Hospital, Coppenbrügge, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR King's CRF, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Massimo Leone
- Neuroalgology Department, Foundation of the Carlo Besta Neurological Institute, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Julio Pascual
- Service of Neurology, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Universidad de Cantabria and IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Vanessa Carvalho
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health (Neurology), Hospital Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
- Centro de Estudos Egas Moniz, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Michele Romoli
- Neurology and Stroke Unit, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Membrilla JA, Roa J, Díaz-de-Terán J. Preventive treatment of refractory chronic cluster headache: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol 2023; 270:689-710. [PMID: 36310189 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11436-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preventive treatment for refractory chronic cluster headache (rCCH) is challenging and many therapies have been tried. OBJECTIVE To study what could be considered the therapy of choice in rCCH through a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42021290983). A systematic search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, clinicaltrials.gov, and the WHO's-International-Clinical-Trials-Registry-Platform. Studies on the preventive treatment for rCCH as defined by the European Headache Federation consensus statement were included. A meta-analysis of the pooled response rate was conducted for the different therapies. RESULTS Of 336 results, 45 were eligible for inclusion. Most articles studied the effect of neuromodulation as a preventive treatment for rCCH. The most studied neuromodulation technique was occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), with a pooled response rate in the meta-analysis of 57.3% (95% CI 0.481-0.665). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was the second most studied treatment with a pooled response rate of 77.0% (95% CI 0.594-0.957). DBS results were more heterogeneous than ONS, which could be related to the different stimulation targets in DBS studies, and reported more serious adverse events than in ONS studies. The remaining therapies (anti-CGRP pathway drugs, warfarin, ketamine-magnesium infusions, serial occipital nerve blocks, clomiphene, onabotulinum toxin A, ketogenic diet, sphenopalatine ganglion radiofrequency or stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, percutaneous bioelectric current stimulation, upper cervical cord stimulation, and vidian neurectomy) present weaker results or have less quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that ONS could be the first therapeutic strategy for patients with rCCH based on the current evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier A Membrilla
- Neurology Department, "La Paz" University Hospital, P.º de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Javier Roa
- Neurology Department, "La Paz" University Hospital, P.º de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Díaz-de-Terán
- Neurology Department, "La Paz" University Hospital, P.º de la Castellana 261, 28046, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smit RD, Mouchtouris N, Kang K, Reyes M, Sathe A, Collopy S, Prashant G, Yuan H, Evans JJ. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks (SUNCT/SUNA): a narrative review of interventional therapies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2023; 94:49-56. [PMID: 35977820 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-329588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with autonomic symptoms (SUNA) are disabling primary headache disorders. The advent of advanced imaging technologies and surgical techniques has translated to a growing arsenal of interventional therapies capable of treating headache disorders. This literature review sheds light on the current evidence available for interventional therapies in medically intractable SUNCT/SUNA. PubMed and EMBASE were searched for publications between 1978 and 2022. Inclusion criteria were SUNCT/SUNA studies reporting outcomes following occipital nerve stimulation (ONS), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), deep brain stimulation (DBS) or microvascular decompression (MVD) of the trigeminal nerve. A greater than 50% reduction in severity or a greater than 50% reduction in the number of attacks was defined as a successful response. The rate of successful responses for the various treatment modalities were as follows: ONS 33/41 (80.5%), PRF of SPG 5/9 (55.6%), DBS of the ventral tegmental area 14/16 (86.7%), SRS to the SPG and/or trigeminal nerve 7/9 (77.8%) and MVD 56/73 (76.7%). Mean follow-up time in months was 42.5 (ONS), 24.8 (PRF), 25.3 (DBS), 20.8 (SRS) and 42.4 (MVD). A significant proportion of SUNCT/SUNA patients remain refractory to medical therapy (45%-55%). This review discusses existing literature on interventional approaches, including neuromodulation, radiofrequency ablation, gamma knife radiosurgery and MVD. The outcomes are promising, yet limited data exist, underscoring the need for further research to develop a robust surgical management algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupert D Smit
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nikolaos Mouchtouris
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - KiChang Kang
- Sidney Kimmel Medical School, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maikerly Reyes
- Sidney Kimmel Medical School, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anish Sathe
- Sidney Kimmel Medical School, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sarah Collopy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Giyarpuram Prashant
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hsiangkuo Yuan
- Jefferson Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Xin B, Xie K, Luo G, Yao M. Long-Term Follow-Up Safety and Effectiveness of CT-Guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of Sphenopalatine Ganglion in Refractory Headache Treatment. Pain Ther 2022; 11:1011-1023. [PMID: 35793048 PMCID: PMC9314503 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00401-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of computed tomography (CT)-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTA) of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for patients with refractory headache. METHODS A total of 14 patients with refractory migraine and 10 patients with cluster headache (CH) who underwent CT-guided SPG RF between May 2019 and August 2021 at the Jiaxing First Hospital, located in Jiaxing City, Zhejiang Province, China, were included and analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. Pain score, sleep quality scores, and treatment effects were observed before operation as well as 1 day and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Also, the incidence of facial numbness at different timepoints after operation was evaluated. RESULTS The frequency and duration of attacks decreased after treatment in patients with migraine, and the shortening of the cluster period and the prolongation of the remission period after treatment in patients with CH indicated that the treatment was effective. The numeric rating scale (NRS) ranged from 0 to 10, where 0 meant no pain and 10 meant the worst imaginable pain. The NRS of patients at 1 day and 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery was significantly lower than before operation (P < 0.05). The treatment of patients with migraine and CH was effective. The overall incidence of numbness in patients with migraine and the total incidence of numbness in patients with CH was recorded. The total incidence of numbness decreased gradually, but no significant difference was detected in the incidence of numbness between the two groups (P > 0.05). No serious adverse reactions, such as orthostatic hypertension, intracranial infection, and visual disturbance, occurred in the patients after operation. CONCLUSION CT-guided RFTA of the SPG significantly relieves headache symptoms in patients with refractory migraine and CH. It has the advantages of rapid onset, long duration, and a safe and reliable treatment process, making it worthy of clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bingyue Xin
- The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, No. 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang China ,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Research Center, The First Hospital of Jiaxing or The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, No. 1882 South Zhonghuan Road, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang China
| | - Keyue Xie
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, No. 548 Binwen Road, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang China ,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Research Center, The First Hospital of Jiaxing or The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, No. 1882 South Zhonghuan Road, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang China
| | - Ge Luo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Research Center, The First Hospital of Jiaxing or The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, No. 1882 South Zhonghuan Road, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang China
| | - Ming Yao
- The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University/The Second School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, No. 109 West Xueyuan Road, Wenzhou City, Zhejiang China ,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Research Center, The First Hospital of Jiaxing or The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, No. 1882 South Zhonghuan Road, Jiaxing City, Zhejiang China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Smith CR, Dickinson KJ, Carrazana G, Beyer A, Spana JC, Teixeira FJP, Zamajtuk K, Maciel CB, Busl KM. Ultrasound-Guided Suprazygomatic Nerve Blocks to the Pterygopalatine Fossa: A Safe Procedure. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2022; 23:1366-1375. [PMID: 35043949 PMCID: PMC9608014 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnac007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Large-scale procedural safety data on pterygopalatine fossa nerve blocks (PPFBs) performed via a suprazygomatic, ultrasound-guided approach are lacking, leading to hesitancy surrounding this technique. The aim of this study was to characterize the safety of PPFB. METHODS This retrospective chart review examined the records of adults who received an ultrasound-guided PPFB between January 1, 2016, and August 30, 2020, at the University of Florida. Indications included surgical procedures and nonsurgical pain. Clinical data describing PPFB were extracted from medical records. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all variables, and quantitative variables were analyzed with the paired t test to detect differences between before and after the procedure. RESULTS A total of 833 distinct PPFBs were performed on 411 subjects (59% female, mean age 48.5 years). Minor oozing from the injection site was the only reported side effect, in a single subject. Although systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were significantly different before and after the procedure (132.3 vs 136.4 mm Hg, P < 0.0001; 78.2 vs 80.8, P = 0.0003; and 97.8% vs 96.3%, P < 0.0001; respectively), mean arterial pressure and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different (96.2 vs 97.1 mm Hg, P = 0.1545, and 78.2 vs 77.4 mm Hg, P = 0.1314, respectively). Similar results were found within subgroups, including subgroups by sex, race, and indication for PPFB. DISCUSSION We have not identified clinically significant adverse effects from PPFB performed with an ultrasound-guided suprazygomatic approach in a large cohort in the hospital setting. PPFBs are a safe and well-tolerated pain management strategy; however, prospective multicenter studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron R Smith
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Katie J Dickinson
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | | | - Jessica C Spana
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Fernanda J P Teixeira
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | | | - Carolina B Maciel
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Katharina M Busl
- Correspondence to: Katharina M. Busl, MD, MS, Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, McKnight Brain Institute, 1149 Newell Drive, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. Tel: 352 273 5500; Fax: 352 273 5575; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Franzini A, Clerici E, Navarria P, Picozzi P. Gamma Knife radiosurgery for the treatment of cluster headache: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45:1923-1931. [PMID: 35112222 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01725-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is a severe trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia that, when refractory to medical treatment, can be treated with Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS). The outcomes of studies investigating GKRS for CH in the literature are inconsistent, and the ideal target and treatment parameters remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the safety and the efficacy, both short and long term, of GKRS for the treatment of drug-resistant CH. A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify all clinical articles discussing GKRS for the treatment of CH. The literature review revealed 5 studies describing outcomes of GKRS for the treatment of CH for a total of 52 patients (48 included in the outcome analysis). The trigeminal nerve, the sphenopalatine ganglion, and a combination of both were treated in 34, 1, and 13 patients. The individual studies demonstrated initial meaningful pain reduction in 60-100% of patients, with an aggregate initial meaningful pain reduction in 37 patients (77%). This effect persisted in 20 patients (42%) at last follow-up. Trigeminal sensory disturbances were observed in 28 patients (58%) and deafferentation pain in 3 patients (6%). Information related to GKRS for CH are limited to few small open-label studies using heterogeneous operative techniques. In this setting, short-term pain reduction rates are high, whereas the long-term results are controversial. GKRS targeted on the trigeminal nerve or sphenopalatine ganglion is associated to a frequent risk of trigeminal disturbances and possibly deafferentation pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Franzini
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Mi, Italy.
| | - Elena Clerici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Mi, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, Rozzano, Mi, Italy
| | - Piero Picozzi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital - IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Mi, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Radiofrequency Ablation for Craniofacial Pain Syndromes. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2021; 32:601-645. [PMID: 34593133 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2021.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Headache disorders and trigeminal neuralgia are common conditions representing the types of craniofacial pain syndrome that can significantly impact quality of life. Many cases are refractory to traditional pharmacologic treatments, whether oral or intravenous. Radiofrequency ablation has been increasingly used as a tool to treat resistant, chronic pain of both of these disorders. Multiple studies have been reported that illustrate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of the numerous headache subtypes and trigeminal neuralgia.
Collapse
|
12
|
Interventional Radiofrequency Treatment for the Sympathetic Nervous System: A Review Article. Pain Ther 2021; 10:115-141. [PMID: 33433856 PMCID: PMC8119558 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00227-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Interventional techniques such as radiofrequency (RF) treatment can be used to interrupt pain signals transmitted through the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). RF treatments including the pulsed (PRF) and continuous (CRF) modalities show enhanced control over lesion size and enhanced ability to confirm accurate positioning compared to other interventional methods. PRF also acts to reduce the area of the lesion. In this article, we characterize the currently available evidence supporting the use and efficacy of RF treatments in sympathetically mediated pain (SMP) conditions. Study Design A comprehensive literature review. Methods A PubMed and Cochrane Library database search was performed for human studies applying RF treatment at sympathetic sites (sphenopalatine ganglion, stellate ganglion, cervical, thoracic, or lumbar sympathetic ganglia, celiac plexus, splanchnic nerves, superior hypogastric plexus, and ganglion impar) between January 1970 to May 2020. Data were extracted, summarized into tables, and qualitatively analyzed. Results PRF and CRF both show promise in relieving SMP conditions, such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), pain in the perineal region, headache and facial pain, and oncologic and non-oncologic abdominal pain, in addition to other types of pain, with minimal complications. Furthermore, in most comparative studies, outcomes using RF treatments exceeded other interventional techniques, such as anesthetic block and chemical neurolysis. Conclusions RF treatments can be effective in carefully selected patients who are refractory to conservative management. However, further randomized controlled studies are needed prior to implementing it into common practice.
Collapse
|
13
|
Narouze S. Topical intranasal lidocaine is not a sphenopalatine ganglion block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2020; 46:276-279. [PMID: 33323391 DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
There is renewed interest in the central role of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) in cerebrovascular autonomic physiology and the pathophysiology of different primary and secondary headache disorders. There are diverse neural structures (parasympathetic, sympathetic and trigeminal sensory) that convene into the SPG which is located within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF). This makes the PPF an attractive target to neuromodulatory interventions of these different neural structures. Some experts advocate for the nasal application of local anesthetics as an effective route for SPG block with the belief that the local anesthetic can freely access the PPF. It is time to challenge this historical concept from the early 1900s. In this daring discourse, I will review anatomical studies, CT and MRI reports to debunk this old myth. Will provide anatomical evidence to explain that all these assumptions are untrue and the local anesthetic has to magically 'travel' a distance of 4-12 mm of adipose and connective tissue to reach the SPG in sufficient concentration and volume to effectively induce SPG blockade. Future research should focus on assessing a clinical biomarker to confirm SPG blockade. It could be regional cerebral blood flow or lacrimal gland secretion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer Narouze
- Center for Pain Medicine, Western Reserve Hospital, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abbate V, Dell'Aversana Orabona G, Troise S, Bonavolontà P, Romano A, Piombino P, Califano L, Iaconetta G. Sphenopalatine ganglion deficit syndrome: An unusual complication after septoplasty. ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CASES 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.omsc.2020.100191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
15
|
Amighi D, Majedi H, Tafakhori A, Orandi A. The Efficacy of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block and Radiofrequency Denervation in the Treatment of Cluster Headache: A Case Series. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e104466. [PMID: 34150572 PMCID: PMC8207843 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.104466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cluster headache is a variant of primary neurovascular headaches. some patients with cluster headache are not responsive to medical treatment and may benefit from interventional modalities, including sphenopalatine ganglion block and denervation. Objectives Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block/denervation in the treatment of cluster headache. Methods In this study, we performed the sphenopalatine ganglion block for patients with cluster headaches, intractable to medical therapy, who were referred to our pain clinic between 2014 and 2018. We registered the following information for all patients: demographic data, pain relief, and pain intensity. First, we conducted a prognostic C-arm-guided sphenopalatine ganglion block. If there was at least 50% pain relief within the first 5 h, then we denervated the ganglion by radiofrequency ablation. The main outcome of the study (dependent variable) was pain relief. We followed the patients for 6 months. Results Among 23 enrolled patients, 19 consented to interventional treatment. Fifteen out of 19 patients (79%) had an acceptable response to the prognostic block. Ultimately, 11 patients underwent ganglion denervation, and 4 patients did not consent for ganglion ablation. Pain relief at intervals of 48 h, and 1, 3, and 6 months after ganglion denervation was 77, 59, 50, and 31 percent, respectively. Conclusions Sphenopalatine ganglion conventional radiofrequency denervation can effectively decrease the pain intensity of the patients with cluster headache for at least several months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorsa Amighi
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hossein Majedi
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Abbas Tafakhori
- Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Orandi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation for the management of refractory cluster headache. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 2020; 16:362-368. [PMID: 34136032 PMCID: PMC8193752 DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2020.100739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has been considered a site of therapeutic potential for cluster headache (CH), the optimal technique of SPG is still to be determined. Low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation (LTPRA) has been proposed as an alternative treatment for several neuropathic pain diseases. Aim To evaluate the effect of LTPRA of SPG in treating chronic and episodic CH. Material and methods The patients with CH, who achieved temporary pain relief following SPG block, treated using LTPRA between January 2015 and October 2017 were reviewed. Seventy-six patients were included: 50 patients suffered from episodic CH and the remaining 26 patients from chronic CH. The primary outcomes were clinical improvement rate, defined as the percentage of partial and complete pain relief results at 1 day, 12 months, and 24 months of follow-up after the operation. Results Clinical improvement rates were 92.3%, 92.3% and 73.1% in chronic CH and 73.1%, 84% and 68% in episodic CH at each follow-up time point, respectively. 3 chronic CH patients and 7 episodic CH patients showed no pain relief after the operation. Drooping eyelids were found in 2 cases, one recovered at the 3-month follow-up but another one did not in the 24-month follow-up. No serious complications occurred intraoperatively or postoperatively. Conclusions LTPRA can be considered an effective and alternative surgical modality in treating patients with chronic and episodic CH, based on SPG block.
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Siakallis L, Connor SEJ. Localization of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion Within the Pterygopalatine Fossa on Computed Tomography Angiography-A Potential Role in the Setting of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Microstimulator Implantation. Neuromodulation 2020; 24:1422-1428. [PMID: 32383279 DOI: 10.1111/ner.13170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A recent approach to treatment of cluster headaches (CH) employs a microstimulator device for on-demand neuromodulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) during an acute CH attack. A precise anatomical localization of the SPG within the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) is optimal in order to position the SPG electrode array. This study aims to investigate a novel approach for SPG localization using computed tomography angiographic studies (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent observers identified the location of the SPG on 54 computed tomography angiographic studies (CTA) and measured its position relative to the vidian canal (VC). The qualitative confidence of identification, morphology, position within the PPF and its relation to vascular structures were also recorded. RESULTS The SPG was detectable in 88% of cases with a variable position. The most frequent positions were superior (56%) and lateral (99%) relative to the VC with a mean (±SD) craniocaudal distance of 0.34 mm (±1.38) and a mean mediolateral distance of 3.04 mm (±1.2). However, in a considerable proportion of cases, the SPG was identified inferiorly to the VC (33%). Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for SPG location were moderate and strong respectively. CONCLUSIONS Since localization of SPG on CTAs is feasible and reproducible, it has future clinical potential to aid placement, optimal positioning and individualized programming of the electrode array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loizos Siakallis
- Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, England, UK
| | - Steve E J Connor
- Department of Neuroradiology, King's College Hospital, London, England, UK.,School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences Clinical Academic Group, King's College London, London, England, UK.,Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lazzari ZT, Palmisani S, Hill B, Al-Kaisy A, Lambru G. A prospective case series of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency therapy for refractory chronic cluster headache. Eur J Neurol 2020; 27:1190-1196. [PMID: 32065436 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The management options for chronic cluster headache (CCH) are limited and a significant proportion of patients become refractory to pharmacological treatments. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) may present an efficacious, minimally invasive treatment modality for patients with refractory CCH. We describe the clinical outcomes of 14 patients with refractory CCH treated with PRF of the SPG. METHODS Patients with medically refractory CCH who underwent percutaneous SPG-PRF treatment between January 2016 and April 2019 were included in this report. Patients obtaining at least 30% reduction in weekly cluster attacks for at least 3 months were defined as responders. Treatment-related side effects were collected. RESULTS A total of 14 patients were included in this report (nine males). At a median follow-up of 6.5 (range 6-13) months post-procedure, eight patients (57.1%) were defined as responders to the treatment. Six patients were non-responders and reported either a reduction in frequency and severity of attacks for <3 months (2/6), no improvement (2/6) or temporary worsening of symptoms (1/6). The majority of patients (63.6%, n = 7/11) treated with >45 V were responders compared with responders treated with 45 V (33.3%, n = 1/3). Five patients (35.7%) experienced post-procedural side effects. CONCLUSION This case series suggests that PRF targeting the SPG might offer a safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment for medically refractory CCH. Given the small number of cases and the short follow-up, larger and more robust studies will be needed to confirm our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z T Lazzari
- University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, USA.,The Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - S Palmisani
- The Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - B Hill
- The Headache Service, Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Al-Kaisy
- The Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - G Lambru
- The Headache Service, Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
D'Amico D, Raggi A, Grazzi L, Lambru G. Disability, Quality of Life, and Socioeconomic Burden of Cluster Headache: A Critical Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Headache 2020; 60:809-818. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico D'Amico
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Center Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
| | - Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Neuroalgology Unit and Headache Center Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta Milan Italy
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust King's College London London UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ornello R, Palmisani S, Murphy M, Sacco S, Al-Kaisy A, Lambru G. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Refractory Chronic SUNCT and SUNA: A Prospective Case Series. Headache 2020; 60:938-945. [PMID: 32202666 DOI: 10.1111/head.13788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (SPG-PRF) for the treatment of patients with refractory chronic short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT) and with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA). BACKGROUND SPG-PRF is a minimally invasive, non-neurodestructive procedure already tested in refractory chronic cluster headache with mixed outcomes. However, no data have been produced in SUNCT/SUNA. METHODS This was a prospective clinical audit of outcomes. Consecutive patients with chronic SUNCT/SUNA refractory to medical treatments and treated with SPG-PRF, were included in the analysis. The SPG-PRF was performed percutaneously via a lateral, infra-zygomatic approach. Responders were defined as patients with a reduction in number and/or severity of headache episodes by ≥30% for ≥3 months. Responders to the first procedure were offered to have the treatment repeated. RESULTS Nine patients (6 female) were analyzed. After a median follow-up of 30 months (range 2-30), 7 patients were considered responders to the treatment (77.8%) for a median of 6 months (range: 4-10), 1 patient obtained 40% improvement for 2 months, and 1 patient did experience any improvement. No procedure-related immediate or delayed side effects were reported. Three patients (33.3%) experienced a worsening of the head pain for 2-4 weeks immediately after the procedure. Four responders had SPG-PRF repeated; a reproducible response was obtained in two of them. CONCLUSIONS In our small series of patients with refractory chronic SUNCT/SUNA, SPG-PRF was a safe and effective treatment modality. The potential reproducible positive effect of subsequent treatments may prevent or delay the use of more invasive and costly interventions for at least a proportion of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Ornello
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Stefano Palmisani
- The Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Madeleine Murphy
- The Headache Service, Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Simona Sacco
- Neuroscience Section, Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Adnan Al-Kaisy
- The Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Giorgio Lambru
- The Headache Service, Pain Management and Neuromodulation Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Huckhagel T, Bohlmann L, Westphal M, Regelsberger J, Eichler IC, Hamel W. Quantitative Sensory Changes Following Gasserian Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation in Patients with Medical Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Prospective Consecutive Case Series. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2020; 81:423-429. [PMID: 31962356 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1698386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Microsurgical vascular nerve decompression and percutaneous ablative interventions aiming at the Gasserian ganglion are promising treatment modalities for patients with medical refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). Apart from clinical reports on a variable manifestation of facial hypoesthesia, the long-term impact of trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) on sensory characteristics has not yet been determined using quantitative methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed standardized quantitative sensory testing according to the established protocol of the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain in a cohort of patients with classical (n = 5) and secondary (n = 11) TN before and after percutaneous Gasserian ganglion RFT (mean follow-up: 6 months). The test battery included thermal detection and thermal pain thresholds as well as mechanical detection and mechanical pain sensitivity measures. Clinical improvement was also assessed by means of renowned pain intensity and impairment questionnaires (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale), pain numeric rating scale, and anti-neuropathic medication reduction at follow-up. RESULTS All clinical parameters developed favorably following percutaneous thermocoagulation. Only mechanical and vibration detection thresholds of the affected side of the face were located below the reference frame of the norm population before and after the procedure. Statistically significant persistent changes in quantitative sensory variables caused by the intervention could not be detected in our patient sample. CONCLUSION Our data suggest that TN patients improving considerably after RFT do not undergo substantial long-term alterations regarding quantitative sensory perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torge Huckhagel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Bohlmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Westphal
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jan Regelsberger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Iris-Carola Eichler
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hamel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goadsby PJ, Sahai-Srivastava S, Kezirian EJ, Calhoun AH, Matthews DC, McAllister PJ, Costantino PD, Friedman DI, Zuniga JR, Mechtler LL, Popat SR, Rezai AR, Dodick DW. Safety and efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for chronic cluster headache: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2019; 18:1081-1090. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30322-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
24
|
Chronic Headache: a Review of Interventional Treatment Strategies in Headache Management. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:68. [PMID: 31359257 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0806-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW To provide an overview of current interventional pain management techniques for primary headaches with a focus on peripheral nerve stimulation and nerve blocks. RECENT FINDINGS Despite a plethora of treatment modalities, some forms of headaches remain intractable to conservative therapies. Interventional pain modalities have found a niche in treating headaches. Individuals resistant to common regimens, intolerant to pharmaceutical agents, or those with co-morbid factors that cause interactions with their therapies are some instances where interventions could be considered in the therapeutic algorithm. In this review, we will discuss these techniques including peripheral nerve stimulation, third occipital nerve block (TON), lesser occipital nerve block (LON), greater occipital nerve block (GON), sphenopalatine block (SPG), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI). Physicians have used several interventional techniques to treat primary headaches. While many can be treated pharmacologically, those who continue to suffer from refractory or severe headaches may see tremendous benefit from a range of more invasive treatments which focus on directly inhibiting the painful nerves. While there is a plethora of evidence suggesting these methods are effective and possibly durable interventions, there is still a need for large, prospective, randomized trials to clearly demonstrate their efficacy.
Collapse
|
25
|
Liu SC, Kao MC, Huang YC, Su WF. Vidian Neurectomy for Management of Chronic Cluster Headache. Neurosurgery 2019; 84:1059-1064. [PMID: 30535031 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of chronic cluster headache (CCH) remains a challenging endeavor, and the optimal surgical approach for medically refractory CCH remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To conduct a preliminary evaluation of the efficacy and safety of vidian neurectomy (VN) in patients with medically refractory CCH. METHODS Between March 2013 and December 2015, 9 CCH patients, all of whom had failed to respond to conservative therapy, underwent VN with a precise nerve cut and maximal preservation of the sphenopalatine ganglion. Data included demographic variables, cluster headache onset and duration, mean attack frequency, mean attack intensity, and pain disability index measures pre- and through 12-mo postsurgery. RESULTS Seven of the 9 cases (77.8%) showed immediate improvement. Improvement was delayed by 1 mo in 1 patient, after which the surgical effects of pain relief were maintained throughout the follow-up period. One patient (11.1%) did not improve after surgery. One year after VN, patients' mean attack frequency, mean attack intensity, and pain disability index decreased by 54.5%, 52.9%, and 56.4%, respectively. No patient experienced treatment-related side effects or complications. CONCLUSION VN is an effective treatment method for CCH patients. Precise Vidian nerve identification and maximal preservation of the sphenopalatine ganglion may achieve good surgical outcomes and dramatically improve quality of life among patients, without significant adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao-Cheng Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Ming-Chang Kao
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.,School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Yun-Chen Huang
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China
| | - Wan-Fu Su
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shapira IL. Neuromuscular dentistry and the role of the autonomic nervous system: Sphenopalatine ganglion blocks and neuromodulation. An International College of Cranio Mandibular Orthopedics (ICCMO) position paper. Cranio 2019; 37:201-206. [PMID: 30973097 DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1592807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG) is known to play an integral role in the pathophysiology of a wide variety of orofacial pains involving the jaws, sinuses, eyes and the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. It supplies direct parasympathetic innervation to the trigeminal and facial nerves. Sympathetic innervation from the superior sympathetic chain passes thru the SPG to the trigeminal and facial nerves.This paper reviews relevant and significant literature on SPG Blocks and Neuromodulation published in peer reviewed medical and dental journals. Neuromuscular Dentistry employs ULF-TENS to relax musculature and simultaneously provide neuromodulation to the ganglion.Conclusion: The effects of ULF-TENS on the autonomic nervous system acts on the Limbic System and Hypothalamus (H-P-A) to address Axis II issues during neuromuscular dental procedures. It also directly affects the autonomic component of the trigeminal nerve involved in almost all headaches and migraines as well as the Myofascial and Joint disorders of TMD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ira L Shapira
- a Regent, Master & Fellow , International College of Cranio Mandibular Orthopedics (ICCMO), Private Practice, Delany Dental Care, Gurnee, IL and Think Better Life , Highland Park , IL , USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Li J, Ren H, Wang B, Wu D, Luo F. Multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, blinded-endpoint study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment for cluster headache: study protocol. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026608. [PMID: 30904875 PMCID: PMC6475260 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Single-centre reports on small groups of patients have shown that pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with refractory cluster headache (CH) can quickly relieve pain without significant side effects. However, a randomised controlled trial is still necessary to evaluate whether pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment is a viable treatment option for patients with CH who are not responding to drug treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This investigation is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, blinded-endpoint study. We will enrol 80 patients with CH who are not responding to medication. The enrolled patients will be randomly divided into two groups: the nerve block (NB) group and the PRF group. All patients will undergo CT-guided pterygopalatine ganglion puncture. A mixture containing steroids and local anaesthetics will be slowly injected into the patients in the NB group. The patients in the PRF group will be treated with PRF at 42°C for 360 s. After treatment, the duration of cluster periods; degree of pain during headache attacks; frequency of headache attacks; duration of each headache attack; dose of auxiliary analgesic drugs; duration of remission; degree of patient satisfaction; effectiveness rates at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure; and intraoperative and postoperative adverse events will be compared between the two groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (approval number: KY 2018-027-02). The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and the findings will be presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03567590; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Li
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hao Ren
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Baoguo Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Sanbo Brian Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dasheng Wu
- Department of Pain Management, Jilin Province People’s Hospital, Changchun, China
| | - Fang Luo
- Department of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cluster headache: crosspoint between otologists and neurologists—treatment of the sphenopalatine ganglion and systematic review. Neurol Sci 2019; 40:137-146. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-03796-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
29
|
Crespi J, Bratbak D, Dodick D, Matharu M, Jamtøy KA, Tronvik E. Prediction of the sphenopalatine ganglion localization in computerized tomography images. CEPHALALGIA REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2515816318824690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) is a target for several headache syndromes. Most of the groups targeting the SPG do not localize it directly, and this might account for some therapeutic failures. As the SPG cannot be seen on computerized tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance image (MRI) must be used to visualize the ganglion. It would be advantageous to be able to predict the location of the SPG on CT scans for those using fluoroscopy or CT-guided injections and for those in whom MRI is not accessible or contraindicated. Methods: We localized the SPG in 21 Caucasian patients (21 right and 17 left ganglia; total 38) in 3 tesla MR images subsequently fused with CT scans. We measured the distance from the SPG to two bony landmarks identified on CT scans. We then applied the average distances to find an estimated position of the SPG. The first landmark was the center of the anterior opening of the vidian canal (VC). The second landmark was a point on the sphenoidal bone, defined in an axial plane at the level of the center of the VC (S-point). The predicted position of the SPG measured from the VC and the sphenoidal bone were referred to as, respectively, vcSPG and sSPG. Finally, the distances between the SPG, as seen on MRI, and predicted vcSPG/sSPG were calculated. Results: The average distance between SPG as seen on the MRI images and the estimated position based on CT images were 1.82 mm (SD 0.83, range 0.22–3.57 mm) for vcSPG and 2.09 mm (SD 0.99, range 0.71–4.79 mm) for sSPG. Conclusions: The localization of the SPG can be predicted on CT images using bony landmarks. Localization of the SPG may be important in achieving successful therapeutic outcomes for treatments that are directed toward the SPG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Crespi
- Department of Neurology, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Daniel Bratbak
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neurosurgery, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - David Dodick
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Manjit Matharu
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Kent Are Jamtøy
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Erling Tronvik
- Department of Neurology, St Olav’s University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tolba R, Weiss AL, Denis DJ. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block and Radiofrequency Ablation: Technical Notes and Efficacy. Ochsner J 2019; 19:32-37. [PMID: 30983899 PMCID: PMC6447206 DOI: 10.31486/toj.18.0163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) blockade or lesioning can offer significant pain relief for cluster headaches (CHs) and a variety of other pain syndromes involving the head and face. Methods: We reviewed the literature on the efficacy of SPG block and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: The infrazygomatic technique can be used to directly access the SPG for injection of local anesthetic or lesioning using RFA. Important technical points to achieve these procedures are described. SPG blockade efficacy is supported by randomized controlled studies but SPG RFA is not. Conclusion: Targeting the SPG is a promising treatment option for refractory CHs. RFA and neuromodulation have the potential to offer long-term significant pain relief, but more randomized studies are needed to demonstrate their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reda Tolba
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Austin L. Weiss
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Daniel J. Denis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
- The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Katsaras DN, Arvaniti CK, Flevari PG, Giannopoulos GV, Batistaki CZ, Stassinos VE, Kostopanagiotou GG, Deftereos SG, Iliodromitis EK, Leftheriotis DI. Sphenopalatine ganglion block: an external gate to modulate cardiac autonomic tone and suppress premature ventricular beats? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:457. [PMID: 30603645 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.11.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Background Autonomic modulation is used for treating various cardiovascular diseases, such as cardiac arrhythmias. Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block is an easy, non-invasive therapy for migraine with a potential cardiovascular impact that remains unclear. In this study, we sought to assess the effect of SPG block on cardiac autonomic tone, as expressed by heart rate variability (HRV), and on ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Methods Forty patients (14 male and 26 female) suffering from migraine were randomized by 1:1 to SPG block or placebo (controls) and HRV parameters were evaluated 1 hour before and hourly after the intervention. Twenty-four additional patients (11 men and 13 women) with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from the right ventricular outflow tract underwent the same randomization and the number of PVCs was assessed during 1 hour before and every hour after treatment. Values were summarized as median (1st-3rd quartile). Results During the first four hours after SPG block, an increase in mean RR [883 (IQR, 869-948) vs. 839 (IQR, 806-887) ms at baseline, P<0.01], SDNN [64 (IQR, 59-69) vs. 51 (IQR, 47-55) ms, P<0.01], SDANN [39 (IQR, 36-43) vs. 27 (IQR, 22-29) ms, P<0.01], ASDNN [51 (IQR, 47-53) vs. 40 (IQR, 37-44) ms, P<0.01], rMSSD [30 (IQR, 27-32) vs. 25 (IQR, 23-27) ms, P<0.01], VLF [26 (IQR, 24-29) vs. 23 (IQR, 22-25) ms2, P<0.01] and HF [14 (IQR, 11-16) vs. 11 (IQR, 9-12) ms2, P<0.01], along with a decrease in LF/HF ratio [1.7 (IQR, 1.4-1.9) vs. 2.0 (IQR, 1.7-2.5), P<0.01] was observed in patients with migraine. In patients with PVCs, the number of ectopic ventricular beats per hour was decreased for the first five hours following SPG block [360 (IQR, 264-850) from 956 (IQR, 545-1,412), P<0.001]. No such differences were observed in controls. Conclusions SPG block is associated with a transient increase in those HRV parameters that mainly express parasympathetic activity. It is also followed by a significant decrease in ventricular arrhythmic burden. These findings imply an effect on cardiac autonomic tone with a potential favorable clinical impact on arrhythmogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios N Katsaras
- Department of Cardiology, "Attikon" University Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Chrysa K Arvaniti
- Department of Neurology, "Attikon" University Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Panayota G Flevari
- Department of Cardiology, "Attikon" University Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | - Spyridon G Deftereos
- Department of Cardiology, "Attikon" University Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Salgado-López L, de Quintana-Schmidt C, Belvis Nieto R, Roig Arnall C, Rodríguez Rodriguez R, Álvarez Holzapfel MJ, Molet-Teixidó J. Efficacy of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Radiofrequency in Refractory Chronic Cluster Headache. World Neurosurg 2018; 122:e262-e269. [PMID: 30315985 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the literature, there are only short series of radiofrequency of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) to treat chronic refractory cluster headache (CCHr) with variable results. Furthermore, there is no consensus on which methodology to use: radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF). METHODS We conducted a prospective analysis of 37 patients with CCHr who underwent RFA or PRF of the SPG in our center between 2004 and 2015. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 40 years (range, 26-59 years). PRF was performed in 24 patients, and RFA was performed in 13 patients. A total of 5 patients (13.5%) experienced complete clinical relief of both pain and parasympathetic symptoms, 21 patients (56.8%) had partial and transient relief, and 11 patients (29.7%) did not improve. There was no evidence of significant superiority of one radiofrequency modality over the other (P = 0.48). There were no complications associated with the technique. The passage of time tended to decrease the efficacy of both techniques (P < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 68.1 months (range, 15-148 months). To our knowledge, this is the series with the largest number of patients and the longest follow-up period published in the literature. CONCLUSIONS Radiofrequency of the SPG is a safe, fast, and partially effective method for the treatment of CCHr. Given its low rate of complications and its low economic cost, we think it should be one of the first invasive treatment options, prior to techniques with greater morbidity and mortality, such as neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Salgado-López
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Robert Belvis Nieto
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carles Roig Arnall
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Joan Molet-Teixidó
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is a debilitating primary headache disorder. Although uncommon, affecting only 0.1% of population, it is one of the most painful conditions known to humankind. Three strategies are employed for effective treatment of CH, namely, abortive therapy, transitional therapy, and preventive therapy. Being an uncommon condition, there is a paucity of large-scale controlled trials and evidence of various therapies are based on smaller studies. This review primarily focuses on therapies with highest quality of evidence and also on the emerging therapies for CH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William S. Kingston
- Centre for Headache, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, USA
| | - David W. Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fontaine D, Santucci S, Lanteri-Minet M. Managing cluster headache with sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation: a review. J Pain Res 2018; 11:375-381. [PMID: 29497328 PMCID: PMC5819579 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s129641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cluster headache (CH) is a primary headache and considered as one of the worst pains known to man. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) plays a pivotal role in cranial autonomic symptoms associated with pain. Lesioning procedures involving the SPG and experimental acute SPG stimulation have shown some degree of efficacy with regard to CH. A neuromodulation device, chronically implanted in the pterygopalatine fossa, has been specifically designed for acute on-demand SPG stimulation. In a pilot placebo-controlled study in 28 patients suffering from refractory chronic CH, alleviation of pain was achieved in 67.1% of full stimulation-treated attacks compared to 7% of sham stimulation-treated attacks (p<0.0001). Long-term results (24 months; 33 patients) confirmed the efficacy of SPG stimulation as an abortive treatment for CH attacks. Moreover, 35% of the patients observed a >50% reduction in attack frequency, suggesting that repeated use of SPG stimulation might act as a CH-preventive treatment. Globally, 61% of the patients were acute responders, frequency responders, or both, and 39% did not respond to SPG stimulation. The safety of SPG microstimulator implantation procedure was evaluated in a cohort of 99 patients; facial sensory disturbances were observed in 67% of the patients (46% of them being transient), transient allodynia in 3%, and infection in 5%. SPG stimulation appears as a promising innovative, efficient, and safe therapeutic solution for patients suffering from severe CH. It has shown its efficacy in aborting CH attacks compared to placebo stimulation, suggesting that it is particularly adapted for CH patients who are not sufficiently improved by abortive treatments such as sumatriptan and oxygen. However, further studies comparing SPG stimulation with standard abortive and/or preventive CH treatments will be necessary to define more precisely its place within the management of severe chronic and/or episodic CH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denys Fontaine
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHU de Nice, Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.,Université Cote d'Azur, FHU INOVPAIN, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Serena Santucci
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHU de Nice, Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France.,Université Cote d'Azur, FHU INOVPAIN, CHU de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Michel Lanteri-Minet
- Université Cote d'Azur, FHU INOVPAIN, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.,INSERM/UdA, Auvergne University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Pain Department, CHU de Nice, Université Cote d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Triantafyllidi H, Arvaniti C, Schoinas A, Benas D, Vlachos S, Palaiodimos L, Pavlidis G, Ikonomidis I, Batistaki C, Voumvourakis C, Lekakis J. Bilateral sphenopalatine ganglion block reduces blood pressure in never treated patients with essential hypertension. A randomized controlled single-blinded study. Int J Cardiol 2018; 250:233-239. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2017] [Revised: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
36
|
Neuromodulation for Headaches—Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805353-9.00063-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
37
|
Ho KWD, Przkora R, Kumar S. Sphenopalatine ganglion: block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation - a systematic review. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:118. [PMID: 29285576 PMCID: PMC5745368 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0826-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Sphenopalatine ganglion is the largest collection of neurons in the calvarium outside of the brain. Over the past century, it has been a target for interventional treatment of head and facial pain due to its ease of access. Block, radiofrequency ablation, and neurostimulation have all been applied to treat a myriad of painful syndromes. Despite the routine use of these interventions, the literature supporting their use has not been systematically summarized. This systematic review aims to collect and summarize the level of evidence supporting the use of sphenopalatine ganglion block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation. Methods Medline, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were reviewed for studies on sphenopalatine ganglion block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation. Studies included in this review were compiled and analyzed for their treated medical conditions, study design, outcomes and procedural details. Studies were graded using Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine for level of evidence. Based on the level of evidence, grades of recommendations are provided for each intervention and its associated medical conditions. Results Eighty-three publications were included in this review, of which 60 were studies on sphenopalatine ganglion block, 15 were on radiofrequency ablation, and 8 were on neurostimulation. Of all the studies, 23 have evidence level above case series. Of the 23 studies, 19 were on sphenopalatine ganglion block, 1 study on radiofrequency ablation, and 3 studies on neurostimulation. The rest of the available literature was case reports and case series. The strongest evidence lies in using sphenopalatine ganglion block, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation for cluster headache. Sphenopalatine ganglion block also has evidence in treating trigeminal neuralgia, migraines, reducing the needs of analgesics after endoscopic sinus surgery and reducing pain associated with nasal packing removal after nasal operations. Conclusions Overall, sphenopalatine ganglion is a promising target for treating cluster headache using blocks, radiofrequency ablation and neurostimulation. Sphenopalatine ganglion block also has some evidence supporting its use in a few other conditions. However, most of the controlled studies were small and without replications. Further controlled studies are warranted to replicate and expand on these previous findings. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s10194-017-0826-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kwo Wei David Ho
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, PO Box 100236,1149 Newell Drive, Room L3-100, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
| | - Rene Przkora
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| | - Sanjeev Kumar
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jacq O, Arnulf I, Similowski T, Attali V. Upper airway stabilization by osteopathic manipulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion versus sham manipulation in OSAS patients: a proof-of-concept, randomized, crossover, double-blind, controlled study. Altern Ther Health Med 2017; 17:546. [PMID: 29262824 PMCID: PMC5738827 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-017-2053-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2017] [Accepted: 12/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Background Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) is used empirically for the treatment of rhinitis and snoring and is thought to increase pharyngeal stability. This trial was designed to study the effects of this treatment on pharyngeal stability evaluated by critical closing pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Methods This single-centre, randomized, crossover, double-blind study compared active manipulation and sham manipulation of the SPG. Randomization was computer-generated. Patients each received one active manipulation and one sham manipulation at an interval of 21 days and were evaluated 30 min and 48 h after each session administered by a qualified osteopath. Neither the patients, nor the investigator performing the evaluations were informed about the order of the two techniques (double-blind). The primary endpoint was the percentage of responding patients presenting increased pharyngeal stability defined by a variation of critical closing pressure (Pcrit) of at least −4 cmH2O at 30 min. Secondary endpoints were the variation of Pcrit in absolute values, sleepiness and snoring. Others endpoints were lacrimation (Schirmer’s test), induced pain, sensations experienced during OMT. Results Ten patients were included and nine (57 [50; 58] years, comprising 7 men, with an apnoea-hypopnoea index of 31.0 [25.5; 33.2]/h; (values are median [quartiles])) were analysed. Seven patients were analysed for the primary endpoint and nine patients were analysed for secondary endpoints. Five patients responded after active manipulation versus no patients after sham manipulation (p = 0.0209). Active manipulation induced more intense pain (p = 0.0089), increased lacrimation (ns) and more tactile, nociceptive and gustatory sensations (13 versus 1) compared to sham manipulation. No significant difference was observed for the other endpoints. Conclusions Osteopathic manipulative treatment of the SPG may improve pharyngeal stability in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. This trial validates the feasibility of the randomized, controlled, double-blind methodology for evaluation of this osteopathic treatment. Studies on a larger sample size must specify the efficacy on the apnoea-hypopnoea index. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in the clinicaltrial.gov registry under reference NCT01193738 on 1st September 2010 (first inclusion May 19, 2010). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi: 10.1186/s12906-017-2053-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
The inputs from sympathetic ganglia have been known to be involved in the pathophysiology of various painful conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome, cancer pain of different origin, and coccygodynia. Sympathetic ganglia blocks are used to relieve patients who suffer from these conditions for over a century. Many numbers of local anesthetics such as bupivacaine or neurolytic agents such as alcohol can be chosen for a successful block. The agent is selected according to its duration of effect and the purpose of the injection. Most commonly used sympathetic blocks are stellate ganglion block, lumbar sympathetic block, celiac plexus block, superior hypogastric block, and ganglion Impar block. In this review, indications, methods, effectiveness, and complications of these blocks are discussed based on the data from the current literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osman Hakan Gunduz
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ozge Kenis-Coskun
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Tassorelli C, Tramontano M, Berlangieri M, Schweiger V, D'Ippolito M, Palmerini V, Bonazza S, Rosa R, Cerbo R, Buzzi MG. Assessing and treating primary headaches and cranio-facial pain in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases. J Headache Pain 2017; 18:99. [PMID: 28963668 PMCID: PMC5622014 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-017-0809-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain is a very common condition in patient undergoing rehabilitation for neurological disease; however the presence of primary headaches and other cranio-facial pains, particularly when they are actually or apparently independent from the disability for which patient is undergoing rehabilitation, is often neglected. Diagnostic and therapeutic international and national guidelines, as well as tools for the subjective measure of head pain are available and should also be applied in the neurorehabilitation setting. This calls for searching the presence of head pain, independently from the rehabilitation needs, since pain, either episodic or chronic, interferes with patient performance by affecting physical and emotional status. Pain may also interfere with sleep and therefore hamper recovery. METHODS In our role of task force of the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCPN), we have elaborated specific recommendations for diagnosing and treating head pains in patients undergoing rehabilitation for neurological diseases. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION In this narrative review, we describe the available literature that has been evaluated in order to define the recommendations and outline the needs of epidemiological studies concerning headache and other cranio-facial pain in neurorehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tassorelli
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino", Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Tramontano
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179, Rome, Italy
| | - Mariangela Berlangieri
- IRCCS National Neurological Institute "C. Mondino", Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioural Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Mariagrazia D'Ippolito
- IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina, 306 00179, Rome, Italy
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Sara Bonazza
- Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosa
- Clinical Medicine - Headache Center, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Rosanna Cerbo
- Pain Therapy Hub, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Sokolov AY, Murzina AA, Osipchuk AV, Lyubashina OA, Amelin AV. Cholinergic mechanisms of headaches. NEUROCHEM J+ 2017. [DOI: 10.1134/s1819712417020131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
42
|
Schytz HW, Hargreaves R, Ashina M. Challenges in developing drugs for primary headaches. Prog Neurobiol 2017; 152:70-88. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Revised: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 12/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
43
|
|
44
|
Tepper SJ, Caparso A. Sphenopalatine Ganglion (SPG): Stimulation Mechanism, Safety, and Efficacy. Headache 2017; 57 Suppl 1:14-28. [PMID: 28387016 DOI: 10.1111/head.13035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2016] [Revised: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the history of and available data on sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) neuromodulation in the treatment of headache up to the present. BACKGROUND The SPG has been a therapeutic target to treat primary headache disorders for over 100 years. Multiple destructive lesions have also been tried with variable rate and duration of success. Neurostimulation of the SPG for cluster headache was first described in 2007. METHODS This is not a systematic review. The authors review the anatomy and pathophysiology of the SPG and cluster headache and the important clinical trials, relating a history of how SPG neuromodulation reached the current state of approval in the European Union (EU) and pivotal registration study for cluster headache in the US. RESULTS The EU approved SPG stimulation for cluster headache with a CE Mark in February of 2012. Since then, several EU countries have elected to reimburse implantation for cluster headache, and over 300 patients have been implanted worldwide. CONCLUSIONS Success rates for implanted SPG neuromodulation in the experimental phase of the European randomized controlled trial, in the open label extension trial, and in the registry of patients implanted outside of the trial remain at about two-thirds of patients implanted being responders, defined as being able to terminate at least 50% of attacks or having at least a 50% decrease in attack frequency or both. A US pivotal registration study is underway to confirm these results and obtain FDA approval for this treatment for cluster headache patients. Further studies in migraine are also underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- Department of Neurology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Puledda F, Goadsby PJ. Current Approaches to Neuromodulation in Primary Headaches: Focus on Vagal Nerve and Sphenopalatine Ganglion Stimulation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2017; 20:47. [PMID: 27278441 PMCID: PMC4899495 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-016-0577-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Neuromodulation is a promising, novel approach for the treatment of primary headache disorders. Neuromodulation offers a new dimension in the treatment that is both easily reversible and tends to be very well tolerated. The autonomic nervous system is a logical target given the neurobiology of common primary headache disorders, such as migraine and the trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs). This article will review new encouraging results of studies from the most recent literature on neuromodulation as acute and preventive treatment in primary headache disorders, and cover some possible underlying mechanisms. We will especially focus on vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) since they have targeted autonomic pathways that are cranial and can modulate relevant pathophysiological mechanisms. The initial data suggests these approaches will find an important role in headache disorder management going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Puledda
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College London, London, UK. .,Wellcome Foundation Building, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sphenopalatine Ganglion: Function and Block. PAIN MEDICINE 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-43133-8_133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
47
|
Láinez MJ, Marti AS. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation in cluster headache and other types of headache. Cephalalgia 2016; 36:1149-1155. [PMID: 27152017 DOI: 10.1177/0333102416644968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The cluster headache is the most excruciatingly painful primary headache. In some patients, neither preventive treatment nor acute treatment is effective or treatment is poorly tolerated. The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has an important role in the pathophysiology of cluster headache and, for this reason, SPG stimulation has been used to treat cluster headache. Methods We have reviewed the published literature on the role of the SPG in cluster headache and the use of different treatments targeting the SPG. Results Multiple procedures have been used over the SPG to treat pain and trigemino-autonomic symptoms in patients with refractory cluster headache. After obtaining good results in a small number of patients, a miniaturized stimulator was developed. Stimulation of the SPG with this device proved to be efficacious in acute and preventive treatment in a clinical trial involving patients with chronic refractory cluster headache. Implantation of the device is minimally invasive and the most frequent side-effects are mild, such as paraesthesia and pain over the maxillary area. In patients who have used the SPG device for longer than one year, the therapeutic effect remains effective and the side-effects decrease. Conclusions The reported studies have demonstrated that SPG stimulation is a safe and effective treatment for chronic cluster headache. Long-term studies have shown that the effect remains over time and this treatment could be a good choice in patients with chronic refractory headache. We need more data about its potential use in other forms of headache, such as other trigemino-autonomic headaches or migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Ja Láinez
- 1 Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Spain.,2 Department of Neurology, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Suller Marti
- 1 Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
An Unusual Location for Sphenopalatine Ganglion in the Pterygopalatine Fossa Which May Facilitate Radiofrequency Neurolysis: A Case Report. ARCHIVES OF NEUROSCIENCE 2016. [DOI: 10.5812/archneurosci.36028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
49
|
Jürgens TP, Barloese M, May A, Láinez JM, Schoenen J, Gaul C, Goodman AM, Caparso A, Jensen RH. Long-term effectiveness of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for cluster headache. Cephalalgia 2016; 37:423-434. [PMID: 27165493 PMCID: PMC5405839 DOI: 10.1177/0333102416649092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objectives The sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) plays a pivotal role in cluster headache (CH) pathophysiology as the major efferent parasympathetic relay. We evaluated the long-term effectiveness of SPG stimulation in medically refractory, chronic CH patients. Methods Thirty-three patients were enrolled in an open-label follow-up study of the original Pathway CH-1 study, and participated through 24 months post-insertion of a microstimulator. Response to therapy was defined as acute effectiveness in ≥ 50% of attacks or a ≥ 50% reduction in attack frequency versus baseline. Results In total, 5956 attacks (180.5 ± 344.8, range 2–1581 per patient) were evaluated. At 24 months, 45% (n = 15) of patients were acute responders. Among acute responders, a total of 4340 attacks had been treated, and in 78% of these, effective therapy was achieved using only SPG stimulation (relief from moderate or greater pain or freedom from mild pain or greater). A frequency response was observed in 33% (n = 11) of patients with a mean reduction of attack frequency of 83% versus baseline. In total, 61% (20/33) of all patients were either acute or frequency responders or both. The majority maintained their therapeutic response through the 24-month evaluation. Conclusions In the population of disabled, medically refractory chronic CH patients treated in this study, SPG stimulation is an effective acute therapy in 45% of patients, offering sustained effectiveness over 24 months of observation. In addition, a maintained, clinically relevant reduction of attack frequency was observed in a third of patients. These long-term data provide support for the use of SPG stimulation for disabled patients and should be considered after medical treatments fail, are not tolerated or are inconvenient for the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim P Jürgens
- 1 Department of Systems Neuroscience, Universitäts-Klinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,2 Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Mads Barloese
- 3 Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and Pet, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Arne May
- 1 Department of Systems Neuroscience, Universitäts-Klinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jose Miguel Láinez
- 4 Department of Neurology, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Universidad Católica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Jean Schoenen
- 5 Headache Research Unit, Department of Neurology - CHR Citadelle, Liège University, Liège, Belgium
| | - Charly Gaul
- 6 Migraine and Headache Clinic Königstein, Königstein, Germany
| | - Amy M Goodman
- 7 Clinical Research, Autonomic Technologies, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Caparso
- 7 Clinical Research, Autonomic Technologies, Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA
| | - Rigmor Højland Jensen
- 8 Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Androulakis XM, Krebs KA, Ashkenazi A. Hemicrania continua may respond to repetitive sphenopalatine ganglion block: A case report. Headache 2016; 56:573-9. [PMID: 26926875 DOI: 10.1111/head.12783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemicrania continua (HC) is a chronic headache disorder characterized by a continuous, strictly unilateral head pain accompanied by cranial autonomic symptoms, which completely responds to indomethacin; however, few alternative treatment options exist for the patients with this disorder who cannot tolerate indomethacin. Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) block has been used for the treatment of various headaches, with the strongest evidence for efficacy in cluster headache. CASE REPORT A 52-year-old woman with a 7-year history of HC was evaluated in our clinic for management of her headaches after she had stopped using indomethacin due to a bleeding gastrointestinal ulcer. After failing multiple pharmacologic therapies, she was treated with repetitive SPG blocks using bupivacaine (0.6 mL at 0.5%) twice a week for 6 weeks and followed by maintenance therapy. This treatment protocol resulted in significant improvement in her headaches, mood, and functional capacity. CONCLUSION SPG block using a local anesthetic may be an effective treatment for patients with HC, specifically for those who cannot tolerate indomethacin, or when this drug is contraindicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Michelle Androulakis
- School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Kaitlin A Krebs
- School of Medicine, Department of Neurology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Avi Ashkenazi
- Department of Medicine (Neurology), Doylestown Hospital, Doylestown, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|