1
|
Mínguez-Olaondo A, Días PA, de Munáin EL, Grozeva V, Laspra-Solís C, Villalba IM, García-Martín V, Vila-Pueyo M, Barandiarán M, Zabalza RJ, Bengoetxea A. Behavioral therapy in migraine: Expanding the therapeutic arsenal. Eur J Neurol 2024:e16414. [PMID: 39034641 DOI: 10.1111/ene.16414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The US Headache Consortium developed evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of migraine and found grade A evidence in support of behavior therapy (BT). Understanding the mechanisms of BT may improve the management of migraine and reduce its burden. METHODS We performed a narrative review to define the current evidence of BT and determine its usefulness in migraine management. RESULTS The information was obtained from 116 publications, with 56 of them retrieved through direct searches in PubMed (2011-2020) and the remainder selected by the authors to complete the content. BT might reduce migraine impact by decreasing the sympathetic nervous system's response to stress and increasing pain tolerance. Acting in headache-related surroundings can be improved, together with headache duration and self-efficacy. Applications such as mobile health and electronic health applications can help to carry out healthier lifestyle patterns. Regarding medication overuse, BT seems to be a good choice, with similar results to pharmacological prophylaxis. Advantages of using BT are the lack of adverse effects and the unrestricted use in children, where BT is postulated to be even more effective than the standardized pharmacopeia. CONCLUSIONS BT is an interesting tool that can be used as an add-on therapy in migraine. Through BT, the autonomy and empowerment of migraine patients is enhanced. BT may not cure migraine, but it could help to reduce pain severity perception, disability, and migraine impact, adding an emotive and cognitive approach to the perceptive role of pharmacopeia. Thus, a better approach in migraine, implementing specific therapeutic management, can improve migraine control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane Mínguez-Olaondo
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Patricia Alves Días
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Laspra-Solís
- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University Clinic of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Valvanuz García-Martín
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
| | - Marta Vila-Pueyo
- Headache and Neurological Pain Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Myriam Barandiarán
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Department of Medicine and Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Deusto, Bilbao and San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Ramon J Zabalza
- Neurology Department, Hospital Universitario Donostia-Osakidetza , Neuroscience Area, Biogipuzkoa Health Institute, Donostia, Spain
| | - Ana Bengoetxea
- Athenea Neuroclinics, Donostia, Spain
- Unité de Recherche en Sciences de l'Ostéopathie, Faculté des Sciences de la Motricité, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mingels S, Granitzer M, Luedtke K, Dankaerts W. Therapeutic Patient Education as Part of the Physiotherapy Management of Adults with Headache: A Scoping Review. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2024; 28:547-564. [PMID: 38613735 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-024-01253-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Physiotherapy interventions for headache mostly include exercise and manual therapy. Yet, the complex nature of headache, sometimes characterized by symptoms of facilitated central pain mechanisms, demands an individualized approach in which therapeutic patient education could be supportive. This scoping review aimed to summarize the position of therapeutic patient education within the physiotherapy management of adults with headache. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched. The search-query comprised terminology relating to "headache", "education", and "physiotherapy". Eligibility criteria were: adults with headache, interventions including education within the domain of physiotherapy, reviews, clinical trials, cohort, case report, case-control studies. RECENT FINDINGS Eleven publications were included from the 281 retrieved publications. These publications were clinical trials (n = 4), reviews (n = 4), case-reports (n = 2), and a guideline (n = 1). Type of headaches studied were migraine (n = 3), post-traumatic headache (n = 2), tension-type headache (n = 2), cervicogenic headache (n = 1), primary headaches (n = 1), chronic daily headache (n = 1), and mixed migraine-cervicogenic headache (n = 1). Education seems an umbrella-term for postural education, lifestyle advice, and pain education. Three themes emerged across the publications: handling headache triggers (migraine, post-traumatic headache), promoting active lifestyle (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, migraine), evaluating posture (post-traumatic headache, chronic daily headache, tension-type headache, cervicogenic headache). All publications recommended education in the management of headache. Only one (of the 11 included) publication described the educational program and determined its efficacy. Based on this scoping review, therapeutic patient education seems supported within physiotherapy management of headache. However, it is unclear how such education is tailored to the specific needs of the individual, the headache subtype, or when it should be added to physiotherapy management of headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Mingels
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven University, Tervuursevest, 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium.
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
| | - Marita Granitzer
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Centre, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Kerstin Luedtke
- Department of Physiotherapy, Pain and Exercise Research, Universität Zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Leuven University, Tervuursevest, 101, 3001, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marier-Deschenes P, Pinard AM, Jalbert L, LeBlanc A. Assessing the Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of a Web-Based Self-Management Program for Chronic Noncancer Pain: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2024; 11:e50747. [PMID: 38701440 PMCID: PMC11102036 DOI: 10.2196/50747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Canada, adults with chronic noncancer pain face a persistent insufficiency of publicly funded resources, with the gold standard multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities unable to meet the high clinical demand. Web-based self-management programs cost-effectively increase access to pain management and can improve several aspects of physical and emotional functioning. Aiming to meet the demand for accessible, fully automated resources for individuals with chronic noncancer pain, we developed a French web- and evidence-based self-management program, Agir pour moi (APM). This program includes pain education and strategies to reduce stress, practice mindfulness, apply pacing, engage in physical activity, identify and manage thinking traps, sleep better, adapt diet, and sustain behavior change. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess the APM self-management program's feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects in adults awaiting specialized services from a center of expertise in chronic pain management. METHODS We conducted a mixed methods study with an explanatory sequential design, including a web-based 1-arm trial and qualitative semistructured interviews. We present the results from both phases through integrative tables called joint displays. RESULTS Response rates were 70% (44/63) at postintervention and 56% (35/63) at 3-month follow-up among the 63 consenting participants who provided self-assessed information at baseline. In total, 46% (29/63) of the participants completed the program. We interviewed 24% (15/63) of the participants. The interview's first theme revolved around the overall acceptance, user-friendliness, and engaging nature of the program. The second theme emphasized the differentiation between microlevel and macrolevel engagements. The third theme delved into the diverse effects observed, potentially influenced by the macrolevel engagements. Participants highlighted the features that impacted their self-efficacy and the adoption of self-management strategies. We observed indications of improvement in self-efficacy, pain intensity, pain interference, depression, and catastrophizing. Interviewees described these and various other effects as potentially influenced by macrolevel engagement through behavioral change. CONCLUSIONS These findings provided preliminary evidence that the APM self-management program and research methods are feasible. However, some participants expressed the need for at least phone reminders and minimal support from a professional available to answer questions over the first few weeks of the program to engage. Recruitment strategies of a future randomized controlled trial should focus on attracting a broader representation of individuals with chronic pain in terms of gender and ethnicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05319652; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05319652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascale Marier-Deschenes
- Laval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada
- CIRRIS, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Anne Marie Pinard
- Laval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada
- CIRRIS, Centre interdisciplinaire de recherche en réadaptation et intégration sociale, Québec, QC, Canada
- CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Laura Jalbert
- VITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Laval University, Medicine Faculty, Québec, QC, Canada
- VITAM, Centre de recherche en santé durable, Québec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rasmussen AV, Jensen RH, Gantenbein A, Sumelahti ML, Braschinsky M, Lagrata S, Tamela K, Trouerbach-Kraan J, Matharu MS, Dalevi V, Smits-Kimman H, Munksgaard SB, Tröndle J, Eriksen MØ, Gravdahl GB, Larsen CN, Tomkins E, Hassinen M, Øie LR, Karlsson LE, Mose LS. Consensus recommendations on the role of nurses in headache care: A European e-Delphi study. Cephalalgia 2024; 44:3331024241252161. [PMID: 38708967 DOI: 10.1177/03331024241252161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nurses work at headache centres throughout Europe, and their care for migraine patients is acknowledged. However, the specific roles and tasks of nursing vary, and a unified understanding is lacking, posing challenges to knowledge sharing and research. OBJECTIVES Using an e-Delphi study method, the objective is to obtain healthcare professional headache experts' opinions on nursing-specific roles and tasks and combine this into consensus statements for nurse recommendations for migraine treatment. METHODS A three-round questionnaire study was conducted with nurses and neurologists from 18 specialised headache centres in 10 countries. In round 1, statements were compiled from a systematic examination of existing literature and expert opinions. In rounds 2 and 3, the experts rated the importance of statements (from round 1) on a 5-point Likert scale. Statements were analysed using a content analysis method, and the consensus of pre-defined statements was evaluated with gradually increased predetermined criteria using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Twenty-one experts, representing all 10 countries, participated. The predetermined consensus of ≥70% agreement was reached for 42 out of the initial 63 statements. These statements formed the final recommendations within two themes: "The nurses' roles and tasks in the clinical setting" and "The nurses' roles and tasks in educating patients and colleagues." The consensus level of statements was strong, with 40% receiving unanimous agreement (100%) and 97% achieving relatively high agreement (>80%). CONCLUSION Nursing plays a vital role with diverse tasks in migraine care. This study offers practical recommendations and a framework for nurses, equipping them with a clinical tool to enhance care and promote a coordinated approach to migraine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rigmor Hoejland Jensen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andres Gantenbein
- Pain & Research Department, Rehabilitation Center ZURZACH Care, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Mark Braschinsky
- Department of Neurology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
- Neurology Clinic, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Susie Lagrata
- Headache and Facial Pain Group, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kristi Tamela
- Department of Neurology, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Manjit S Matharu
- Headache and Facial Pain Group, University College London, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
- The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Veronica Dalevi
- Region Värmland, Neurologi- Och Rehabiliteringsmottagningen, Centralsjukhuset, Karlstad, Sweden
| | | | | | - Johannes Tröndle
- Neurorehabilitation Department, Rehaklinik Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
| | - Maren Østergaard Eriksen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gøril Bruvik Gravdahl
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headaches, St. Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- NorHEAD, Norwegian Headache Research Centre, Norway
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Esther Tomkins
- Neurology Department, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Marja Hassinen
- Neurocenter, Helsinki University Hospital, Neurology Outpatient Clinic & Helsinki Headache Center, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Lise Rystad Øie
- Department of neurology, St Olav University hospital, Norwegian Headache Research Centre (Norhead), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Louise Schlosser Mose
- Research Unit of Neurology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gandy M, Coleman H, Cutler H, Jones MP, Karin E, Kwan P, Nikpour A, Parratt K, Rayner G, Titov N, Todd L, Seil E, Winton‐Brown T, Wu W, Dear BF. Comparative effectiveness of digital mental healthcare models for adults with epilepsy: A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Epilepsia Open 2024; 9:808-818. [PMID: 38345357 PMCID: PMC10984311 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mental health complaints are prevalent among people with epilepsy, yet there are major barriers that prevent access to psychological care, including high out-of-pocket costs and a lack of accessible specialized services. The purpose of the current study is to examine the comparative efficacy, acceptability, cost-effectiveness, and long-term outcomes of a digital psychological intervention when delivered under two models of care (i.e., guided vs. unguided) in supporting the mental health and functioning of adults with epilepsy. METHOD Approximately 375 participants across Australia will be enrolled. Eligible participants will have a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy, experience difficulties with their emotional health, be at least 18 years of age, and live in Australia. Participants will be randomized (2:2:1) to receive the Wellbeing Neuro Course, a 10-week internet-delivered program, with (i.e., guided) or without guidance by a mental health clinician (i.e., unguided), or be allocated to a treatment-as-usual waiting-list control group. Participants will complete online questionnaires at pre-, post-treatment, and 3- and 12-month follow-up and consent to have their data linked to their medical records to capture healthcare system resource use and costs. ANALYSIS Primary outcome measures will be symptoms of depression and anxiety. A cost-utility analysis will be undertaken using the Australian healthcare system perspective and according to current economic evaluation guidelines. Resource use and costs to the healthcare system during the study period will be captured via data linkage to relevant administrative datasets in Australia. SIGNIFICANCE The results of this trial will provide important data concerning the relative outcomes of these different models of care and will inform the integration of digital psychological interventions translation into healthcare services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Human Research Ethics Committee of Macquarie University approved the proposed study (Reference No: 520231325151475). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication(s). ANZCTR TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12623001327673. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This study seeks to find out if a 10-week online psychological treatment can improve the mental health and well-being of Australian adults with epilepsy. Around 375 participants will be randomly assigned to different groups: one will receive treatment with guidance from mental health clinician (guided group), one without guidance (unguided group), and one starting later (waiting control group). All participants will fill out the same outcome measures online. The main goal of this research is to compare these groups and assess how well the treatment works in improving mental health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gandy
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Honor Coleman
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Henry Cutler
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Michael P. Jones
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Eyal Karin
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Patrick Kwan
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Armin Nikpour
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kaitlyn Parratt
- Department of NeurologyRoyal Prince Alfred HospitalCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- The Epilepsy Society of AustraliaSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Genevieve Rayner
- Melbourne School of Psychological SciencesThe University of MelbourneMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Nickolai Titov
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lisa Todd
- Epilepsy Action AustraliaSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Seil
- Australian Institute of Health InnovationMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Centre for the Health EconomySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- Macquarie University Business SchoolSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Toby Winton‐Brown
- Comprehensive Epilepsy ProgramAlfred HospitalMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
| | - Wendy Wu
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Blake F. Dear
- School of Psychological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
- MindSpotMQ Health, Macquarie UniversityNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ulrich S, Gantenbein AR, Zuber V, Von Wyl A, Kowatsch T, Künzli H. Development and Evaluation of a Smartphone-Based Chatbot Coach to Facilitate a Balanced Lifestyle in Individuals With Headaches (BalanceUP App): Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e50132. [PMID: 38265863 PMCID: PMC10851123 DOI: 10.2196/50132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary headaches, including migraine and tension-type headaches, are widespread and have a social, physical, mental, and economic impact. Among the key components of treatment are behavior interventions such as lifestyle modification. Scalable conversational agents (CAs) have the potential to deliver behavior interventions at a low threshold. To our knowledge, there is no evidence of behavioral interventions delivered by CAs for the treatment of headaches. OBJECTIVE This study has 2 aims. The first aim was to develop and test a smartphone-based coaching intervention (BalanceUP) for people experiencing frequent headaches, delivered by a CA and designed to improve mental well-being using various behavior change techniques. The second aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of BalanceUP by comparing the intervention and waitlist control groups and assess the engagement and acceptance of participants using BalanceUP. METHODS In an unblinded randomized controlled trial, adults with frequent headaches were recruited on the web and in collaboration with experts and allocated to either a CA intervention (BalanceUP) or a control condition. The effects of the treatment on changes in the primary outcome of the study, that is, mental well-being (as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety and Depression Scale), and secondary outcomes (eg, psychosomatic symptoms, stress, headache-related self-efficacy, intention to change behavior, presenteeism and absenteeism, and pain coping) were analyzed using linear mixed models and Cohen d. Primary and secondary outcomes were self-assessed before and after the intervention, and acceptance was assessed after the intervention. Engagement was measured during the intervention using self-reports and usage data. RESULTS A total of 198 participants (mean age 38.7, SD 12.14 y; n=172, 86.9% women) participated in the study (intervention group: n=110; waitlist control group: n=88). After the intervention, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed evidence for improved well-being (treatment: β estimate=-3.28, 95% CI -5.07 to -1.48) with moderate between-group effects (Cohen d=-0.66, 95% CI -0.99 to -0.33) in favor of the intervention group. We also found evidence of reduced somatic symptoms, perceived stress, and absenteeism and presenteeism, as well as improved headache management self-efficacy, application of behavior change techniques, and pain coping skills, with effects ranging from medium to large (Cohen d=0.43-1.05). Overall, 64.8% (118/182) of the participants used coaching as intended by engaging throughout the coaching and completing the outro. CONCLUSIONS BalanceUP was well accepted, and the results suggest that coaching delivered by a CA can be effective in reducing the burden of people who experience headaches by improving their well-being. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00017422; https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=DRKS00017422.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Ulrich
- School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas R Gantenbein
- Pain and Research Unit, ZURZACH Care, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Viktor Zuber
- School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Agnes Von Wyl
- School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Kowatsch
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- School of Medicine, University of St.Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Centre for Digital Health Interventions, Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hansjörg Künzli
- School of Applied Psychology, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Johnson E, Corrick S, Isley S, Vandermeer B, Dolgoy N, Bates J, Godfrey E, Soltys C, Muir C, Vohra S, Tandon P. Mind-body internet and mobile-based interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with chronic physical conditions: A systematic review of RCTs. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2024; 3:e0000435. [PMID: 38261600 PMCID: PMC10805319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the effectiveness of scalable mind-body internet and mobile-based interventions (IMIs) on depression and anxiety symptoms in adults living with chronic physical conditions. Six databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL) were searched for randomized controlled trials published from database inception to March 2023. Mind-body IMIs included cognitive behavioral therapy, breathwork, meditation, mindfulness, yoga or Tai-chi. To focus on interventions with a greater potential for scale, the intervention delivery needed to be online with no or limited facilitation by study personnel. The primary outcome was mean change scores for anxiety and depression (Hedges' g). In subgroup analyses, random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates based on personnel support level, intervention techniques, chronic physical condition, and survey type. Meta-regression was conducted on age and intervention length. Fifty-six studies met inclusion criteria (sample size 7691, mean age of participants 43 years, 58% female): 30% (n = 17) neurological conditions, 12% (n = 7) cardiovascular conditions, 11% cancer (n = 6), 43% other chronic physical conditions (n = 24), and 4% (n = 2) multiple chronic conditions. Mind-body IMIs demonstrated statistically significant pooled reductions in depression (SMD = -0.33 [-0.40, -0.26], p<0.001) and anxiety (SMD = -0.26 [-0.36, -0.17], p<0.001). Heterogeneity was moderate. Scalable mind-body IMIs hold promise as interventions for managing anxiety and depression symptoms in adults with chronic physical conditions without differences seen with age or intervention length. While modest, the effect sizes are comparable to those seen with pharmacological therapy. The field would benefit from detailed reporting of participant demographics including those related to technological proficiency, as well as further evaluation of non-CBT interventions. Registration: The study is registered with PROSPERO ID #CRD42022375606.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Johnson
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Shaina Corrick
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Serena Isley
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Ben Vandermeer
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Naomi Dolgoy
- Faculty of Rehabilitation Science, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Jack Bates
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Elana Godfrey
- Faculty of Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Cassidy Soltys
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Conall Muir
- Faculty of Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Sunita Vohra
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| | - Puneeta Tandon
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lipton RB, Buse DC, Nahas SJ, Tietjen GE, Martin VT, Löf E, Brevig T, Cady R, Diener HC. Risk factors for migraine disease progression: a narrative review for a patient-centered approach. J Neurol 2023; 270:5692-5710. [PMID: 37615752 PMCID: PMC10632231 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11880-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In individuals with migraine, attacks may increase in frequency, severity, or both. Preventing migraine progression has emerged as a treatment goal in headache subspecialty practice, but there may be less awareness in general neurology or primary care settings where most people with migraine who seek treatment consult. Herein, we review the definition of and risk factors for migraine progression and consider strategies that could reduce its risk. METHODS A group of headache expert healthcare professionals, clinicians, and researchers reviewed published evidence documenting factors associated with increased or decreased rates of migraine progression and established expert opinions for disease management recommendations. Strength of evidence was rated as good, moderate, or based solely on expert opinion, using modified criteria for causation developed by AB Hill. RESULTS Migraine progression is commonly operationally defined as the transition from ≤ 15 to ≥ 15 monthly headache days among people with migraine; however, this does not necessarily constitute a fundamental change in migraine biology and other definitions should be considered. Established and theoretical key risk factors for migraine progression were categorized into five domains: migraine disease characteristics, treatment-related factors, comorbidities, lifestyle/exogenous factors, and demographic factors. Within these domains, good evidence supports the following risk factors: poorly optimized acute headache treatment, cutaneous allodynia, acute medication overuse, selected psychiatric symptoms, extra-cephalic chronic pain conditions, metabolism-related comorbidities, sleep disturbances, respiratory conditions, former/current high caffeine intake, physical inactivity, financial constraints, tobacco use, and personal triggers as risk factors. Protective actions that may mitigate migraine progression are sparsely investigated in published literature; our discussion of these factors is primarily based on expert opinion. CONCLUSIONS Recognizing risk factors for migraine progression will allow healthcare providers to suggest protective actions against migraine progression (Supplementary Fig. 1). Intervention studies are needed to weight the risk factors and test the clinical benefit of hypothesized mitigation strategies that emerge from epidemiological evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard B Lipton
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Dawn C Buse
- Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
- Vector Psychometric Group, LLC, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie J Nahas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Headache Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Gretchen E Tietjen
- University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Vincent T Martin
- University of Cincinnati Headache and Facial Pain Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Elin Löf
- H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Roger Cady
- Lundbeck LLC, Deerfield, IL, USA
- RK Consults, Ozark, MO, USA
- Missouri State University, Springfield, MO, USA
| | - Hans-Christoph Diener
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weng LC, Huang HL, Tsai YH, Tsai HH, Lee WC, Shieh WY. The effect of a web-based self-care instruction on symptom experience and quality of life in living liver donors: A randomized controlled trial. Heliyon 2023; 9:e17333. [PMID: 37484234 PMCID: PMC10361383 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Living liver donors need help to manage symptom distress and improve their quality of life. This study aims to test the effectiveness of a web-based symptom self-care instruction on symptom experience and health-related quality of life of living liver donors. Methods This study was a randomized controlled trial. Participants were recruited from January 2019 to August 2020. Participants in the experimental group had access to a web-based symptom self-care instruction, which included text and video. The control group received routine care. The primary outcomes were symptom distress and quality of life. Results A total of 90 living liver donors recruited in this study were assigned randomly to the web group (n = 46) and control group (n = 44). The symptom distress was significantly negatively correlated with quality of life at each data collection time. There was an interaction effect with the participants in the web group experiencing more symptom distress at three months after surgery than the control group (B = 3.616, 95% CI: 7.163-3.990, p = 0.046). There was no significant effect on the quality of life. Conclusion Patients in the web-based self-care group had higher symptom distress than those in the control group three months after surgery, but there was no difference in quality of life. Future studies could add some interactive elements to the website and include a larger sample size. Registration This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900020518).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Chueh Weng
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkuo Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Li Huang
- Department of Long-Term Care, College of Health Technology, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Science, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsia Tsai
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkuo Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsin Tsai
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkuo Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of General Surgery, Liver Transplantation, Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Linkuo Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wann-Yun Shieh
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sasseville M, LeBlanc A, Tchuente J, Boucher M, Dugas M, Gisèle M, Barony R, Chouinard MC, Beaulieu M, Beaudet N, Skidmore B, Cholette P, Aspiros C, Larouche A, Chabot G, Gagnon MP. The impact of technology systems and level of support in digital mental health interventions: a secondary meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2023; 12:78. [PMID: 37143171 PMCID: PMC10157597 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02241-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of people with a chronic disease (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, COPD) have more than one concurrent condition and are also at higher risk for developing comorbidities in mental health, including anxiety and depression. There is an urgent need for more relevant and accurate data on digital interventions in this area to prepare for an increase demand for mental health services. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of the digital mental health interventions for people with comorbid physical and mental chronic diseases to compare the effect of technology systems and level of support. METHODS This secondary meta-analysis follows a rapid review of systematic reviews, a virtual workshop with knowledge users to identify research questions and a modified Delphi study to guide research methods: What types of digital health interventions (according to a recognized categorization) are the most effective for the management of concomitant mental health and chronic disease conditions in adults? We conducted a secondary analysis of the primary studies identified in the rapid review. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts and applied inclusion criteria: RCT design using a digital mental health intervention in a population of adults with another chronic condition, published after 2010 in French or English, and including an outcome measurement of anxiety or depression. RESULTS Seven hundred eight primary studies were extracted from the systematic reviews and 84 primary studies met the inclusion criteria Digital mental health interventions were significantly more effective than in-person care for both anxiety and depression outcomes. Online messaging was the most effective technology to improve anxiety and depression scores; however, all technology types were effective. Interventions partially supported by healthcare professionals were more effective than self-administered. CONCLUSIONS While our meta-analysis identifies digital intervention's characteristics are associated with better effectiveness, all technologies and levels of support could be used considering implementation context and population. TRIAL REGISTRATION The protocol for this review is registered in the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Service (ID 75).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Sasseville
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada.
| | - Annie LeBlanc
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Jack Tchuente
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Michèle Dugas
- VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicolas Beaudet
- Université de Sherbrooke, Omnimed, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Becky Skidmore
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Pascale Cholette
- Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Capitale Nationale, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Christine Aspiros
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Alain Larouche
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Guylaine Chabot
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Marie-Pierre Gagnon
- Université Laval-VITAM Research Center on Sustainable Health, Quebec City, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grazzi L, Montisano DA, Rizzoli P, Guastafierro E, Marcassoli A, Fornari A, Raggi A. A Single-Group Study on the Effect of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Chronic Migraine Associated with Medication Overuse Headache: Pain Catastrophizing Plays a Role. Toxins (Basel) 2023; 15:toxins15020086. [PMID: 36828401 PMCID: PMC9967692 DOI: 10.3390/toxins15020086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia are commonly altered in patients with chronic migraine associated with medication overuse headache (CM-MOH) and tend to improve in parallel with clinical improvement. The relation between pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia is poorly understood in patients with CM-MOH receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA therapy. In this single-arm open-label longitudinal observational study, patients with CM-MOH were assigned to structured withdrawal and then administered OnabotulinumtoxinA (5 sessions on a three-month basis, 195 UI per 31 sites). Headache frequency, medication intake, disability, impact, cutaneous allodynia and pain catastrophizing were evaluated with specific questionnaires. In total, 96 patients were enrolled and 79 completed the 12-month follow-up. With the exclusion of cutaneous allodynia and the magnification subscale of the pain catastrophizing questionnaire, all variables showed significant improvement by the sixth month, which was maintained at 12 months. Reduction of pain catastrophizing, and particularly of its helplessness subscale, was a significant predictor of reduction in headache frequency and medication intake. Pain catastrophizing is often implicated in the clinical improvement in patients with CM-MOH receiving behavioral treatments, but, in this study, also showed a role in patients receiving OnabotulinumtoxinA; combining OnabotulinumtoxinA and behavioral treatments specifically addressing pain catastrophizing might further enhance patients' clinical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Licia Grazzi
- Centro Cefalee, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
- Correspondence: (L.G.); (A.R.)
| | | | - Paul Rizzoli
- Brigham & Women’s Faulkner Hospital, John Graham Headacche Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Erika Guastafierro
- UOC Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Alessia Marcassoli
- UOC Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Arianna Fornari
- UOC Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Raggi
- UOC Neurologia Salute Pubblica e Disabilità, Fondazione IRRCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milano, Italy
- Correspondence: (L.G.); (A.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
An investigation of the effects of connective tissue massage in women with migraine: A controlled clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2023; 33:112-119. [PMID: 36775505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To investigate the effects of connective tissue massage (CTM) on pain characteristics, accompanying symptoms, medication usage, disability, sleep quality, psychological status, and quality of life in women with migraine. METHOD The study was designed as a prospective controlled clinical trial. Women were allocated into the CTM (CTM + education (Ed) program, n = 8) and control groups (only Ed program, n = 8). One session of Ed and 12 sessions of CTM were performed for 4 weeks. They filled out a headache diary, including pain characteristics, accompanying symptoms, and medication usage, for the pre-, during-, and after-treatment periods. Disability, sleep quality, psychological status, quality of life, and disability were evaluated with the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Headache Impact Test-6, respectively. RESULTS The CTM group showed a significant change in pain, accompanying symptoms (except vomiting), medication usage, Headache Impact Test-6, and Disability with Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Only the CTM group showed a significant change over time in all parameters of the headache diary except vomiting (p < 0.05). Only Headache Impact Test-6 and Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores improved in the CTM group (p < 0.05). DISCUSSIONS CTM was superior for reducing pain characteristics, accompanying symptoms, medication usage, disability, and improving quality of life. CONCLUSION CTM may be considered as a non-pharmacological and complementary therapy for migraine.
Collapse
|
13
|
Li C, Hou W, Ding D, Yang Y, Gu S, Zhu Y. Evidence Mapping Based on Systematic Reviews of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Neuropathic Pain. Neural Plast 2023; 2023:2680620. [PMID: 36994240 PMCID: PMC10041341 DOI: 10.1155/2023/2680620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective This evidence mapping is aimed at identifying, summarizing, and analyzing the available evidence on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for neuropathic pain (NP). Methods This study was conducted following the methodology of Global Evidence Mapping (GEM). Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to identify systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analysis published before February 15, 2022. The authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the included SRs using AMSTAR-2. The results were presented in the tables and a bubble plot based on the identified population-intervention-comparison-outcome (PICO) questions. Results A total of 34 SRs met the eligibility criteria. According to the AMSTAR-2, 2 SRs were rated "high," 2 SRs were rated "moderate," 6 SRs were rated "low," and 24 SRs were rated "critically low." The most common study design utilized to evaluate the efficacy of CBT for NP was the randomized controlled trial. In total, 24 PICOs were identified. Migraine was the most studied population. CBT for NP usually reaches the "potentially better" result at follow-up. Conclusions Evidence mapping is a useful way to present existing evidence. Currently, the existing evidence on CBT for NP is limited. Overall, the methodological quality of the included SRs was low. Further improvements in the methodological quality of SRs and more research on the most efficient CBT formats for NP are recommended in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conghui Li
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Weiqian Hou
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Dongfang Ding
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
- 2Academy of Medical Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| | - Yujie Yang
- 3University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Qingdao, Shandong 266000, China
| | - Shanshan Gu
- 4Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yi Zhu
- 1The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450000, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Noser A, Gibler R, Ramsey R, Wells R, Seng E, Hommel K. Digital headache self-management interventions for patients with a primary headache disorder: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Headache 2022; 62:1105-1119. [PMID: 36286601 PMCID: PMC10336649 DOI: 10.1111/head.14392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This article systematically reviews the empirical literature examining the efficacy of digital headache management interventions for patients with a primary headache disorder. BACKGROUND Digital headache management interventions provide opportunities to improve access to behavioral headache interventions to underserved groups. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and EBSCO (PsycInfo, Education Research Complete, ERIC, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection) and reference review was conducted. Included studies had to recruit a sample with a primary headache diagnosis, be a randomized controlled trial including a digital component, assess a headache outcome (i.e., frequency, duration, severity, intensity, disability) or quality of life, and be published in English. Two authors independently extracted data for included studies. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS Thirteen studies with unique interventions met inclusion criteria. More than half of the studies were pilots; however, nearly 70% (9/13) demonstrated significant between-group or within-group improvements on one or more headache-related outcomes. All interventions included some form of relaxation training and the majority were delivered via interactive website. While fewer than half the studies report participant race and/or ethnicity, of those that do, 83% (5/6) reported a predominately White/Caucasian sample. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy testing of digital headache interventions is in its infancy with the majority of these studies relying on pilot studies with small samples comprised of homogenous patient populations. Interactive websites were the most common digital medium to deliver digital headache management interventions and have demonstrated promising results. Further testing using large-scale randomized controlled trials and exploration of other digital tools is warranted. Future studies with more diverse samples are needed to inform health equity of digital headache interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Noser
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Robert Gibler
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Rachelle Ramsey
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Behavioral Medicine & Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| | - Rebecca Wells
- Wake Forest School of Medicine – Neurology, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
| | - Elizabeth Seng
- Yeshiva University - Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Bronx, New York, United States
| | - Kevin Hommel
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center - Pediatrics, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reina-Varona Á, Rodríguez de Rivera-Romero B, Cabrera-López CD, Fierro-Marrero J, Sánchez-Ruiz I, La Touche R. Exercise interventions in migraine patients: a YouTube content analysis study based on grades of recommendation. PeerJ 2022; 10:e14150. [PMID: 36199286 PMCID: PMC9528906 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is the second leading cause of disability worldwide, engendering a high economic cost in developed countries. The adverse events related to pharmacological treatment use have increased interest in non-pharmacological interventions such as exercise. YouTube offers a public source of information for migraine patients regarding exercise interventions for migraine improvement. However, this information has not been validated to ensure the quality and validity of its content. Objective This qualitative content analysis study aims to review and evaluate YouTube videos regarding exercise for migraine. Methods A systematic review of the current evidence regarding exercise for migraine was performed to establish evidence classification and grades of recommendation with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network tool. The data sources were PubMed, PEDro, Cochrane, EBSCO, Google Scholar and Web of Science. The quality of YouTube videos on exercise in migraine was reviewed using the Global Quality Scale and DISCERN scale. Finally, the classification in grades of recommendation was used to evaluate the included videos in terms of the various exercise modalities. Results The classification into recommendation grades showed a grade B for aerobic exercise, yoga and changes in lifestyle behavior regarding exercise. A total of 129 videos were included. The healthcare and exercise professional authors produced higher quality videos with a significant statistical difference, although the alternative therapists and patients' videos had a greater impact and a higher viewership based on correlation analysis. The evaluation of the videos based on the recommendation grades could only include 90 videos. 71% of these videos showed a B grade of recommendation, which corresponded to fewer than half of the total included videos. Conclusions YouTube needs higher quality videos on exercise for migraine, and healthcare and exercise professional authors need to improve their scoping strategies to acquire more views. The authors of YouTube videos should have better access to the best current evidence regarding exercise interventions in migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Álvaro Reina-Varona
- Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Aravaca, Madrid, Spain,Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Rodríguez de Rivera-Romero
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Donato Cabrera-López
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Fierro-Marrero
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Irene Sánchez-Ruiz
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain
| | - Roy La Touche
- Motion in Brains Research Group, Institute of Neuroscience and Sciences of the Movement (INCIMOV), Aravaca, Madrid, Spain,Departamento de Fisioterapia, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Aravaca, Madrid, Spain,Instituto de Dolor Craneofacial y Neuromusculoesquelético (INDCRAN), Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Grazzi L. Mindfulness and other behavioral approaches. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:5745-5747. [DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06155-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
17
|
García-Perea E, Pedraz-Marcos A, Martínez-Rodríguez SH, Otones-Reyes P, Palmar-Santos AM. Effectiveness of a Fibromyalgia Online Nursing Consultation in the Quality of Life: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Manag Nurs 2022; 23:478-485. [PMID: 34654636 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2021.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of an online nursing consultation through the Internet platform Red Sinapsis (RS) in improving the perceived quality of life of patients with fibromyalgia (FM). METHOD Eighty patients with FM were randomized to an intervention group (n = 40) or control group (n= 40). The intervention group (IG) was monitored by a nursing specialist through the online platform RS while the control group (CG) received standard follow-up at the clinic. The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) were used at baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. RESULTS The IG showed a 65% improvement in the perception of their general state of health at 12 months into the study, compared with an improvement of 5.6% in the CG (p < .001). The IG also achieved better results for emotional status, with a maintained improvement throughout the study of more than 2 points in the anxiety variable (from 7.64 to 5.36), that remained constant in the CG. The depression variable also showed constant improvement over the 12 months of the study in the IG, rising from an average of 7.72 (standard deviation [SD] = 2.05) to 5.33 (SD = 1.65), while in the CG a slight deterioration was observed. In both cases, the difference in mood evolution was significant (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS Online nursing follow-up for people with fibromyalgia improves patients' perceived quality of life related to their welfare and emotional state. Fibromyalgia (FM) is among the diseases causing the highest rate of occupational disability in Spain. Fibromyalgia (FM) is a complex condition that causes pain, fatigue, non-refreshed sleep, mood disturbance and cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva García-Perea
- Department of Nursing, School of Medicine, University Autonoma of Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Spreadbury JH, Young A, Kipps CM. A Comprehensive Literature Search of Digital Health Technology Use in Neurological Conditions: Review of Digital Tools to Promote Self-management and Support. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e31929. [PMID: 35900822 PMCID: PMC9377435 DOI: 10.2196/31929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of digital health technology to promote and deliver postdiagnostic care in neurological conditions is becoming increasingly common. However, the range of digital tools available across different neurological conditions and how they facilitate self-management are unclear. OBJECTIVE This review aims to identify digital tools that promote self-management in neurological conditions and to investigate their underlying functionality and salient clinical outcomes. METHODS We conducted a search of 6 databases (ie, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Review) using free text and equivalent database-controlled vocabulary terms. RESULTS We identified 27 published articles reporting 17 self-management digital tools. Multiple sclerosis (MS) had the highest number of digital tools followed by epilepsy, stroke, and headache and migraine with a similar number, and then pain. The majority were aimed at patients with a minority for carers. There were 5 broad categories of functionality promoting self-management: (1) knowledge and understanding; (2) behavior modification; (3) self-management support; (4) facilitating communication; and (5) recording condition characteristics. Salient clinical outcomes included improvements in self-management, self-efficacy, coping, depression, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS There now exist numerous digital tools to support user self-management, yet relatively few are described in the literature. More research is needed to investigate their use, effectiveness, and sustainability, as well as how this interacts with increasing disability, and their integration within formal neurological care environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Henry Spreadbury
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.,Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Alex Young
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Myles Kipps
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.,Wessex Neurological Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dudeney J, Sharpe L, McDonald S, Menzies RE, McGuire B. Are psychological interventions efficacious for adults with migraine? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Headache 2022; 62:405-419. [DOI: 10.1111/head.14260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Dudeney
- eCentreClinic, School of Psychological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Louise Sharpe
- School of Psychology The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Sarah McDonald
- Discipline of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health University of Technology Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Rachel E. Menzies
- School of Psychology The University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Brian McGuire
- School of Psychology National University of Ireland Galway Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Implementation of Online Behavior Modification Techniques in the Management of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11071806. [PMID: 35407414 PMCID: PMC8999801 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11071806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis (MA) was to assess the effectiveness of online behavior modification techniques (e-BMT) in the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Methods: We conducted a search of Medline (PubMed), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, APA PsychInfo, and Psychological and Behavioral Collections, from inception to the 30 August 2021. The main outcome measures were pain intensity, pain interference, kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing and self-efficacy. The statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio software. To compare the outcomes reported by the studies, we calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) over time and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the continuous variables. Results: Regarding pain intensity (vs. usual care/waiting list), we found a statistically significant trivial effect size in favor of e-BMT (n = 5337; SMD = −0.17; 95% CI −0.26, −0.09). With regard to pain intensity (vs. in-person BMT) we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of in-person BMT (n = 486; SMD = 0.21; 95%CI 0.15, 0.27). With respect to pain interference (vs. usual care/waiting list) a statistically significant small effect size of e-BMT was found (n = 1642; SMD = −0.24; 95%CI −0.44, −0.05). Finally, the same results were found in kinesiophobia, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy (vs. usual care/waiting list) where we found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of e-BMT. Conclusions: e-BMT seems to be an effective option for the management of patients with musculoskeletal conditions although it does not appear superior to in-person BMT in terms of improving pain intensity.
Collapse
|
21
|
Effectiveness of Telematic Behavioral Techniques to Manage Anxiety, Stress and Depressive Symptoms in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19063231. [PMID: 35328917 PMCID: PMC8951553 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Anxiety, depressive symptoms and stress have a significant influence on chronic musculoskeletal pain. Behavioral modification techniques have proven to be effective to manage these variables; however, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for an alternative to face-to-face treatment. We conducted a search of PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, APA PsychInfo, and Psychological and Behavioural Collections. The aim was to assess the effectiveness of telematic behavioral modification techniques (e-BMT) on psychological variables in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain through a systematic review with meta-analysis. We used a conventional pairwise meta-analysis and a random-effects model. We calculated the standardized mean difference (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Forty-one randomized controlled trials were included, with a total of 5018 participants. We found a statistically significant small effect size in favor of e-BMT in depressive symptoms (n = 3531; SMD = -0.35; 95% CI -0.46, -0.24) and anxiety (n = 2578; SMD = -0.32; 95% CI -0.42, -0.21) with low to moderate strength of evidence. However, there was no statistically significant effect on stress symptoms with moderate strength of evidence. In conclusion, e-BMT is an effective option for the management of anxiety and depressive symptoms in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. However, it does not seem effective to improve stress symptoms.
Collapse
|
22
|
Internet-delivered cognitive and behavioural based interventions for adults with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain 2022; 163:e1041-e1053. [PMID: 35121696 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examined the efficacy of Internet-delivered cognitive and behavioural interventions for adults with chronic pain, and explored the role of clinical and study characteristics as moderators of treatment effects. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and CENTRAL and CINAHL were searched to identify randomised controlled trials published up to October 2021. A meta-analysis of 36 studies (5778 participants) was conducted, which found small effect sizes for interference/disability (Hedges' g = 0.28; 95% CI 0.21, 0.35), depression (g = 0.43; 95% CI 0.33, 0.54), anxiety (g = 0.32; 95% CI 0.24, 0.40), pain intensity (g = 0.27; 95% CI 0.21, 0.33), self-efficacy (g = 0.39; 95% CI 0.27, 0.52) and pain catastrophizing (g = 0.31; 95% CI 0.22, 0.39). Moderator analyses found interventions which involved clinician guidance had significantly greater effect sizes for interference/disability (g = 0.38), anxiety (g = 0.39), and pain intensity (g = 0.33) compared to those without (g = 0.16, g = 0.18; g = 0.20, respectively). Studies using an inactive control had greater effects for depression (g = 0.46) compared to active control trials (g = 0.22). No differences were found between treatments based on traditional Cognitive Behaviour Therapy versus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Sample size, study year, and overall risk of bias (Cochrane rating) did not consistently moderate treatment effects. Overall, the results support the use of internet-delivered cognitive and behavioural interventions as efficacious and suggest guided interventions are associated with greater clinical gains for several key pain management outcomes.Prospectively registered on OSF Registries (citation: osf.io/cvq3j/).
Collapse
|
23
|
Mose LS, Jensen RH, Nygaard NPB, Pedersen SS, Gram B. Use of coping strategies in the management of medication overuse headache. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:390-397. [PMID: 34059361 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Use of Motivational Interviewing (MI) in education may improve medication-overuse headache (MOH) patients' ability to cope with pain. In a randomised controlled trial, we evaluated the effect of education focusing on behavioural change among MOH patients. METHODS Ninety-eight MOH patients were randomized (1:1) to standard treatment and 12-weeks of MI-based education versus standard treatment alone after detoxification. Outcome of interest was changes in coping strategies measured by the Coping Strategy Questionnaire at four- and nine months. RESULTS The educational program improved patients' perceived efficacy in the use of their coping strategies to control pain, both at four-and nine months follow-up (mean±SE): ∆:0.84 ± 0.35, 95% CI:0.16;1.52, p = 0.02 and: ∆: 0.90 ± 0.39, 95% CI:0.14;1.66, p = 0.02, respectively. No between-group differences were detected in the other coping subscales. Within the intervention group, the coping strategy subscales Catastrophizing, and Reinterpretation of pain sensation were significantly improved at nine months follow-up (p = 0.003 vs. p = 0.012, respectively). No changes were found in the control group. CONCLUSION MI-based education focused on behavioural changes improved MOH patients' perceived efficacy in the use of their coping strategies to control pain. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Education based on MI could be valuable for MOH patients with respect to behavioural changes and perceived headache control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Schlosser Mose
- Department of Neurology, University hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Finsensgade 35, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark; Research Unit of Health Sciences, University hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Finsensgade 35, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Rigmor Højland Jensen
- Danish Headache Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niels-Peter Brøchner Nygaard
- Research Unit of Health Sciences, University hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Finsensgade 35, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Susanne Schmidt Pedersen
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Bibi Gram
- Research Unit of Health Sciences, University hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Finsensgade 35, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark; Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Winsløwparken 19, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
White V, Linardon J, Stone JE, Holmes-Truscott E, Olive L, Mikocka-Walus A, Hendrieckx C, Evans S, Speight J. Online psychological interventions to reduce symptoms of depression, anxiety, and general distress in those with chronic health conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychol Med 2022; 52:548-573. [PMID: 32674747 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720002251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the past 15 years, there has been substantial growth in web-based psychological interventions. We summarize evidence regarding the efficacy of web-based self-directed psychological interventions on depressive, anxiety and distress symptoms in people living with a chronic health condition. METHOD We searched Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE databases and Cochrane Database from 1990 to 1 May 2019. English language papers of randomized controlled trials (usual care or waitlist control) of web-based psychological interventions with a primary or secondary aim to reduce anxiety, depression or distress in adults with a chronic health condition were eligible. Results were assessed using narrative synthases and random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS In total 70 eligible studies across 17 health conditions [most commonly: cancer (k = 20), chronic pain (k = 9), arthritis (k = 6) and multiple sclerosis (k = 5), diabetes (k = 4), fibromyalgia (k = 4)] were identified. Interventions were based on CBT principles in 46 (66%) studies and 42 (60%) included a facilitator. When combining all chronic health conditions, web-based interventions were more efficacious than control conditions in reducing symptoms of depression g = 0.30 (95% CI 0.22-0.39), anxiety g = 0.19 (95% CI 0.12-0.27), and distress g = 0.36 (95% CI 0.23-0.49). CONCLUSION Evidence regarding effectiveness for specific chronic health conditions was inconsistent. While self-guided online psychological interventions may help to reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression and distress in people with chronic health conditions in general, it is unclear if these interventions are effective for specific health conditions. More high-quality evidence is needed before definite conclusions can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V White
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
| | - J Linardon
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
| | - J E Stone
- Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria3168, Australia
| | - E Holmes-Truscott
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria3000, Australia
| | - L Olive
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
| | - A Mikocka-Walus
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
| | - C Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria3000, Australia
| | - S Evans
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
| | - J Speight
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University Geelong, Victoria3220, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioural Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gazerani P. Migraine and Mood in Children. Behav Sci (Basel) 2021; 11:bs11040052. [PMID: 33919881 PMCID: PMC8070834 DOI: 10.3390/bs11040052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most prevalent headache disorders in children and negatively influences their quality of life. Physical, social, and school functioning are negatively affected. Mood changes are common in migraineurs and may happen before, during, or after a migraine headache. Children with migraine are not exempt from mood swings. The majority of mood changes occur during the prodromal phase, manifesting as a psychobiological response, e.g., difficulty thinking, trouble concentrating, irritability, higher or lower energy, confusion, and depression. A bi-directional relationship between migraine and mood has been proposed, but mechanisms are not clear. Collectively, a maladaptive stress response has been suggested to explain the inability to balance homoeostatic changes when facing various stressors. Recognizing mood changes and monitoring mood patterns in children with migraine, for example, by various apps and so-called mood monitors, is valuable for better management. A multidisciplinary intervention has been recommended to reduce migraine disability, improve coping strategies, and reduce chronification risks in children with migraine. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies are both available and effective. Biofeedback, relaxation, and cognitive-behavioral therapy yield positive outcomes in pediatric migraine. Developing healthy lifestyle habits (diet, exercise, sleep) also seems to improve migraine in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Gazerani
- Department of Life Sciences and Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, 9229 Aalborg E, Denmark;
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Mukhtar NB, Meeus M, Gursen C, Mohammed J, De Pauw R, Cagnie B. Effectiveness of Hands-Off Therapy in the Management of Primary Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eval Health Prof 2021; 45:183-203. [PMID: 33406891 DOI: 10.1177/0163278720983408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
A number of hands-off therapies have been widely reported and are used in the management of headache. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess evidence supporting these therapies on selected headache outcomes. A systematic literature search for randomized clinical trials reporting on the effects of hands-off therapies for headache was performed in two electronic databases; PubMed and Web of Science (PROSPERO: CRD42018093559). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager v5.4. Thirty-five studies, including 3,403 patients with migraine, tension-type or chronic headaches were included in the review. Methodological quality of the studies ranged from poor to good. Result-synthesis revealed moderate evidence for aerobic exercises, relaxation training and pain education for reducing pain intensity and disability. Other hands-off interventions were either weak or limited in evidence. Meta-analysis of 22 studies indicated that the effect of hands-off therapies significantly differed from one another for pain intensity, disability and quality of life (p < 0.05). Relaxation training, aerobic and active/stretching exercises had significant effect on pain intensity and disability (p < 0.05). To conclude, few hands-off therapies were effective on selected headache outcomes. Evidence to support other hands-off therapies is limited by paucity of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naziru Bashir Mukhtar
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Belgium.,Department of Physiotherapy, 54714Bayero University Kano, Nigeria
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Belgium.,Pain in Motion International Research group, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ceren Gursen
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 37515Hacettepe University, Turkey
| | - Jibril Mohammed
- Department of Physiotherapy, 54714Bayero University Kano, Nigeria
| | - Robby De Pauw
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, 26656Ghent University, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Morse JM, Kent-Marvick J, Barry LA, Harvey J, Okang EN, Rudd EA, Wang CY, Williams MR. Developing the Resilience Framework for Nursing and Healthcare. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2021; 8:23333936211005475. [PMID: 33869667 PMCID: PMC8020405 DOI: 10.1177/23333936211005475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite four decades of resilience research, resilience remains a poor fit for practice as a scientific construct. Using the literature, we explored the concepts attributed to the development of resilience, identifying those that mitigate symptoms of distress caused by adversity and facilitate coping in seven classes of illness: transplants, cancer, mental illness, episodic illness, chronic and painful illness, unexpected events, and illness within a dyadic relationship. We identified protective, compensatory, and challenge-related coping-concept strategies that healthcare workers and patients use during the adversity experience. Healthcare-worker assessment and selection of appropriate coping concepts enable the individual to control their distress, resulting in attainment of equanimity and the state of resilience, permitting the resilient individual to work toward recovery, recalibration, and readjustment. We inductively developed and linked these conceptual components into a dynamic framework, The Resilience Framework for Nursing and Healthcare, making it widely applicable for healthcare across a variety of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice M. Morse
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
- University of Alberta
| | | | - Lisa A. Barry
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
- Intermountain Healthcare, Primary Children’s Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jennifer Harvey
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
- Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, Alaska
| | | | | | | | - Marcia R. Williams
- University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
- Cedarville University, Ohio
- Kettering Health Network, Cedarville, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lau SC, Bhattacharjya S, Fong MW, Nicol GE, Lenze EJ, Baum C, Hardi A, Wong AW. Effectiveness of theory-based digital self-management interventions for improving depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy in people with neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 28:547-558. [PMID: 32954920 DOI: 10.1177/1357633x20955122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to (a) review what theories have been applied to the development of digital self-management interventions for people with neurological disorders; (b) examine their effectiveness to improve depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy; and (c) identify the optimal mode of intervention delivery. METHODS Electronic databases (SCOPUS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched. Two investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Study quality and use of theory were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 944 studies were screened, and 16 randomised controlled trials were included. Theory-based digital self-management interventions were effective in reducing depression (standardised mean difference (SMD) = -0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.04 to -0.49), anxiety (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI -1.54 to -0.21) and fatigue (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.27) and in enhancing self-efficacy (SMD = 1.15, 95% CI 0.11-2.18). Cognitive-behavioural theory (CBT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.22 to -0.39), anxiety (SMD = -1.15, 95% CI -1.85 to -0.44) and fatigue (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI -0.97 to -0.54) and in improving self-efficacy (SMD = 0.84, 95% CI 0.63-1.05), whereas social cognitive theory (SCT)-based interventions were effective in reducing depression (SMD = -0.73, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.28). Partially digital interventions were more effective than fully digital interventions. DISCUSSION Our findings support the use of theory to guide the development of digital self-management interventions to increase intervention effectiveness. In particular, CBT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression, anxiety, fatigue and self-efficacy, whereas SCT-based interventions have a positive impact on depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Cl Lau
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Mandy Wm Fong
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Ginger E Nicol
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Eric J Lenze
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Carolyn Baum
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Angela Hardi
- Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Alex Wk Wong
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.,Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Farris SG, Thomas JG, Kibbey MM, Pavlovic JM, Steffen KJ, Bond DS. Treatment effects on pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia symptoms in women with migraine and overweight/obesity. Health Psychol 2020; 39:927-933. [PMID: 32658497 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia represent two risk factors for greater headache-related disability. Yet, there is limited knowledge of the extent to which these risk factors are modifiable and whether nonpharmacological treatment-related changes are associated with migraine improvements. Using data from the Women's Health and Migraine (WHAM) study, a randomized controlled trial that compared effects of behavioral weight loss (BWL) and migraine education (ME) in women with migraine and overweight/obesity, we tested whether: (a) BWL versus ME produced greater changes in pain catastrophizing and allodynia from baseline across posttreatment and follow-up time points, and (b) whether these improvements were associated with improvements in headache disability. METHOD Women (N = 110) were randomly assigned to 16 weeks of either BWL or ME and assessed at baseline, posttreatment, and follow up (32 weeks). Multilevel mixed effects modeling tested: (a) for between-groups differences in pain catastrophizing and allodynia changes over time, and (b) associations of changes in pain catastrophizing and allodynia with changes in headache disability, adjusting for migraine severity and weight loss. RESULTS Both BWL and ME had significant reductions in pain catastrophizing and allodynia from baseline to posttreatment and follow up, and the improvements were comparable across conditions. Reductions in pain catastrophizing and cutaneous allodynia were associated with significant reductions in headache disability, even when controlling for intervention-related improvements in migraine and weight loss. CONCLUSION Pain catastrophizing and allodynia are not only reduced after nonpharmacologic treatments for migraine, but greater improvements are associated with greater reductions in headache-related disability, independent of migraine severity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
30
|
Mose LS, Pedersen SS, Jensen RH, Gram B. Medication-overuse headache: The effect of a patient educational programme-A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pain 2019; 24:435-447. [PMID: 31661579 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the effects of non-pharmacological interventions among medication-overuse headache (MOH) patients, although non-pharmacological approaches combined with pharmacological treatment are recommended. The objective was to evaluate the effect of an educational programme as an add-on to standard treatment. METHODS Medication-overuse headache patients were randomized (1:1) in a single-centre setting to standard treatment with 12 weeks of education (I-group) versus standard treatment (C-group). The primary outcome was measurement of reduction in headache days/last month at 9 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, acute medication intake, bothersomeness, disability, physical activity and patient satisfaction. The between-group differences were analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measurements with a between group factor (I-group vs. C-group) and a time factor (baseline, 4 and 9 months). RESULTS Ninety-eight patients were randomized (I-group: n = 48, C-group: n = 50), with 40 and 39 patients completing the study, respectively. Intention-to-treat analyses showed that both groups experienced statistically significant reductions in headache days/last month (I-group: -4 ± 6 days (95% CI 2.47; 5.95), p < .001) versus C-group: -4 ± 9 days ([95% CI 1.53; 6.79], p = .003), but there were no significant differences between groups (mean ± SE):Δ: 0.7 days ([95% CI, -2.50; 3.93], p = .66). At follow-up, 85% from the I-group and 86% from C-group, no longer fulfilled the criteria for MOH. CONCLUSION The compliance rate was high, indicating that patients were motivated for receiving education, but we found no additional benefits of adding an educational programme to standard treatment. Future research focusing on the MOH complexity, group heterogeneity, duration and content of educational programmes is warranted. SIGNIFICANCE Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmacological intervention such as patient educational programmes are of great importance, as this approach is common in the clinical practice. Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is a heterogenetic patient group, which must be taken into account when conducting RCTs of non-pharmacological interventions. An educational programme based on Motivational Interviewing is well-tolerated among MOH patients, however, no superior effects were found from adding the educational programme to standard treatment versus standard treatment alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise S Mose
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.,Research Unit of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Susanne S Pedersen
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rigmor H Jensen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Centre, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bibi Gram
- Research Unit of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark.,Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Short AL. Enhancing migraine self-efficacy and reducing disability through a self-management program. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2019; 33:20-28. [PMID: 31738274 DOI: 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic migraine is a primary headache disorder affecting approximately 3-7 million individuals in the United States. This condition is associated with significant individual and societal consequences, causing impaired function and high levels of health care utilization. PURPOSE The aim of this quasi-experimental single cohort study was to determine if an 8-week outpatient self-management program for chronic migraine would decrease migraine disability and enhance self-efficacy. METHODS This was a prospective, single cohort, pre- and postintervention pilot study. Fifteen adults aged 18-65 years who met the criteria for diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled in the study through convenience sampling. Participants participated in an evidence-based self-management program with multimodal formats including verbal, written, video, and online materials. Outcome measures included migraine disability (using Migraine Disability Assessment tool [MIDAS]), headache self-efficacy (using Headache Management Self-Efficacy Scale [HMSE]), acute medication use, and migraine frequency. Participants also completed a postintervention survey to assess satisfaction. RESULTS Findings showed a reduction in MIDAS scores, acute medication use, and frequency of migraine. Outcomes also included an increase in HMSE scores and a trend of improved health behaviors. Acute medication use decreased by more than 50%, and frequency of migraine and headache days reduced by close to 40%. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Despite high rates of disability, patient education and self-management programs for chronic migraine are not readily available. The findings of this study encourage use of a hybrid clinic and web-based self-management model to improve migraine disability and self-efficacy.
Collapse
|
32
|
Smith J, Faux SG, Gardner T, Hobbs MJ, James MA, Joubert AE, Kladnitski N, Newby JM, Schultz R, Shiner CT, Andrews G. Reboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Pain. PAIN MEDICINE 2019; 20:2385-2396. [DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program).
Design & Participants
A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer.
Methods
Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N = 41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N = 39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28).
Results
Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g = 0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N = 25) completing all eight lessons.
Conclusions
Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Smith
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Steven G Faux
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical School
| | - Tania Gardner
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Megan J Hobbs
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mathew A James
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy E Joubert
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Kladnitski
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jill M Newby
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Regina Schultz
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christine T Shiner
- Department of Pain Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St Vincent’s Clinical School
| | - Gavin Andrews
- Clinical Research Unit for Anxiety and Depression (CRUfAD), University of New South Wales at St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Devan H, Perry MA, van Hattem A, Thurlow G, Shepherd S, Muchemwa C, Grainger R. Do pain management websites foster self-management support for people with persistent pain? A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1590-1601. [PMID: 30981410 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2018] [Revised: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 04/05/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate if the contents of pain management websites include the current best practice self-management support strategies for people with persistent pain, are cultural tailored and to determine the website quality. METHODS Websites were searched from three major search engines (Google, Bing, and Yahoo). Websites providing information on self-management strategies and websites that were freely available to the public were included. The website contents were evaluated using a 14-item self-management support (SMS-14) checklist. Website quality was assessed using the Health On the Net code (HONcode) certification. RESULTS Of the twenty-seven websites evaluated, the websites scored a median of nine items (range 1-13) from the SMS-14 checklist. The websites LivePlanBe, ACI Pain Management Network and MyJointPain top-scored (13/14) from the SMS-14 checklist. One website (ACI Pain Management Network) provided culturally tailored information and HONcode certification was present in six websites. CONCLUSIONS The review identified 27 contemporary pain management websites that could be used for self-management skills training. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians could refer people with persistent pain to top ranked websites - LivePlanBe, ACI Pain Management Network, and MyJointPain for enabling self-management skills, with the caveats that most websites lacked cultural tailoring, and have limited or no evidence of clinical efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemakumar Devan
- Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
| | - Meredith A Perry
- Centre for Health, Activity, and Rehabilitation Research (CHARR), School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | | | - Greg Thurlow
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Sam Shepherd
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Carol Muchemwa
- School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Grainger
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Slattery BW, Haugh S, O'Connor L, Francis K, Dwyer CP, O'Higgins S, Egan J, McGuire BE. An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Modalities Used to Deliver Electronic Health Interventions for Chronic Pain: Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e11086. [PMID: 31317869 PMCID: PMC6668295 DOI: 10.2196/11086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electronic health (eHealth) is the use of information and communication technology in the context of health care and health research. Recently, there has been a rise in the number of eHealth modalities and the frequency with which they are used to deliver technology-assisted self-management interventions for people living with chronic pain. However, there has been little or no research directly comparing these eHealth modalities. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review with a network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the effectiveness of eHealth modalities in the context of chronic pain. METHODS Randomized controlled trials (N>20 per arm) that investigated interventions for adults with chronic pain, delivered via an eHealth modality, were included. Included studies were categorized into their primary node of delivery. Data were extracted on the primary outcome, pain interference, and secondary outcomes, pain severity, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life. Pairwise meta-analyses were undertaken where possible, and an NMA was conducted to generate indirect comparisons and rankings of modalities for reducing pain interference. RESULTS The search returned 18,470 studies with 18,349 being excluded (duplicates=2310; title and abstract=16,039). Of the remaining papers, 30 studies with 5394 randomized participants were included in the review. Rankings tentatively indicated that modern eHealth modalities are the most effective, with a 43% chance that mobile apps delivered the most effective interventions, followed by a 34% chance that interventions delivered via virtual reality were the most effective. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review with an NMA generated comparisons between eHealth modalities previously not compared to determine which delivered the most effective interventions for the reduction of pain interference in chronic pain patients. There are limitations with this review, in particular, the underrepresented nature of some eHealth modalities included in the analysis. However, in the event that the review is regularly updated, a clear ranking of eHealth modalities for the reduction of pain interference will emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W Slattery
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.,Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Stephanie Haugh
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Laura O'Connor
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Kady Francis
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Christopher P Dwyer
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Siobhán O'Higgins
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jonathan Egan
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Brian E McGuire
- Centre for Pain Research, School of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sharpe L, Dudeney J, Williams ACDC, Nicholas M, McPhee I, Baillie A, Welgampola M, McGuire B. Psychological therapies for the prevention of migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD012295. [PMID: 31264211 PMCID: PMC6603250 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012295.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a common neurological problem associated with the highest burden amongst neurological conditions in terms of years lived with disability. Medications can be used as prophylaxis or rescue medicines, but are costly and not always effective. A range of psychological interventions have been developed to manage migraine. OBJECTIVES The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and adverse events of psychological therapies for the prevention of migraine in adults. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL from their inception until July 2018, and trials registries in the UK, USA, Australia and New Zealand for randomised controlled trials of any psychological intervention for adults with migraine. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of a psychological therapy for people with chronic or episodic migraine, with or without aura. Interventions could be compared to another active treatment (psychological or medical), an attention-placebo (e.g. supportive counselling) or other placebo, routine care, or waiting-list control. We excluded studies where fewer than 15 participants completed each arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted study characteristics and outcome data at post-treatment and the longest available follow-up. We analysed intervention versus control comparisons for the primary outcome of migraine frequency. We measured migraine frequency using days with migraines or number of migraine attacks measured in the four weeks after treatment. In addition, we analysed the following secondary outcomes: responder rate (the proportion of participants with a 50% reduction in migraine frequency between the four weeks prior to and the four weeks after treatment); migraine intensity; migraine duration; migraine medication usage; mood; quality of life; migraine-related disability; and proportion of participants reporting adverse events during the treatment. We included these variables, where available, at follow-up, the timing of which varied between the studies. We used the GRADE approach to judge the quality of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We found 21 RCTs including 2482 participants with migraine, and we extracted meta-analytic data from 14 of these studies. The majority of studies recruited participants through advertisements, included participants with migraine according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) criteria and those with and without aura. Most intervention arms were a form of behavioural or cognitive-behavioural therapy. The majority of comparator arms were no treatment, routine care or waiting list. Interventions varied from one 20-minute session to 14 hours of intervention. No study had unequivocally low risk of bias; all had at least one domain at high risk of bias, and 20 had two to five domains at high risk. Reporting of randomisation procedures and allocation concealment were at high or unclear risk of bias. We downgraded the quality of evidence for outcomes to very low, due to very serious limitations in study quality and imprecision. Reporting in trials was poor; we found no preregistrations stipulating the outcomes, or demonstrating equivalent expectations between groups. Few studies reported our outcomes of interest, most only reported outcomes post treatment; follow-up data were sparse.Post-treatment effectsWe found no evidence of an effect of psychological interventions for migraine frequency in number of migraines or days with migraine (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.17 to 0.13; 4 studies, 681 participants; very low-quality evidence).The responder rate (proportion of participants with migraine frequency reduction of more than 50%) was greater for those who received a psychological intervention compared to control: 101/186 participants (54%) with psychological therapy; 37/152 participants (24%) with control (risk ratio (RR) 2.21, 95% CI 1.63 to 2.98; 4 studies, 338 participants; very low-quality evidence). We found no effect of psychological therapies on migraine intensity (SMD -0.13, 95% CI -0.28 to 0.02; 4 studies, 685 participants). There were no data for migraine duration (hours of migraine per day). There was no effect on migraine medication usage (SMD -0.06, 95% CI -0.35 to 0.24; 2 studies, 483 participants), mood (mean difference (MD) 0.08, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.49; 4 studies, 432 participants), quality of life (SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.26; 4 studies, 565 participants), or migraine-related disability (SMD -0.67, 95% CI -1.34 to 0.00; 6 studies, 952 participants). The proportion of participants reporting adverse events did not differ between those receiving psychological treatment (9/107; 8%) and control (30/101; 30%) (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.00 to 7.85; 2 studies, 208 participants). Only two studies reported adverse events and so we were unable to draw any conclusions.We rated evidence from all studies as very low quality.Follow-upOnly four studies reported any follow-up data. Follow-ups ranged from four months following intervention to 11 months following intervention. There was no evidence of an effect on any outcomes at follow-up (very low-quality evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review identified 21 studies of psychological interventions for the management of migraine. We did not find evidence that psychological interventions affected migraine frequency, a result based on four studies of primarily brief treatments. Those who received psychological interventions were twice as likely to be classified as responders in the short term, but this was based on very low-quality evidence and there was no evidence of an effect of psychological intervention compared to control at follow-up. There was no evidence of an effect of psychological interventions on medication usage, mood, migraine-related disability or quality of life. There was no evidence of an effect of psychological interventions on migraine frequency in the short-term or long-term. In terms of adverse events, we were unable to draw conclusions as there was insufficient evidence. High and unclear risk of bias in study design and reporting, small numbers of participants, performance and detection bias meant that we rated all evidence as very low quality. Therefore, we conclude that there is an absence of high-quality evidence to determine whether psychological interventions are effective in managing migraine in adults and we are uncertain whether there is any difference between psychological therapies and controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Sharpe
- University of SydneySchool of PsychologySydneyAustralia
| | - Joanne Dudeney
- Seattle Children's Research InstituteCenter for Child Health, Behavior, and Development2001 8th Avenue, Suite 400SeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Amanda C de C Williams
- University College LondonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational & Health PsychologyGower StreetLondonUKWC1E 6BT
| | - Michael Nicholas
- University of Sydney and Royal North Shore HospitalPain Management Research InstituteSydneyNSWAustralia2065
| | - Ingrid McPhee
- University of SydneySchool of PsychologySydneyAustralia
| | - Andrew Baillie
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of SydneyDiscipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in HealthRoom J004, Block J75 East Street.LidcombeNSWAustralia2141
| | | | - Brian McGuire
- National University of IrelandSchool of Psychology and Centre for Pain ResearchRoom 2, Floor 4Woodquay CourtGalwayGalwayIreland
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Befus DR, Hull S, Strand de Oliveira J, Schmidler GS, Weinberger M, Coeytaux RR. Nonpharmacological Self-Management of Migraine Across Social Locations: An Equity-Oriented, Qualitative Analysis. Glob Adv Health Med 2019; 8:2164956119858034. [PMID: 31223518 PMCID: PMC6566474 DOI: 10.1177/2164956119858034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder and the sixth biggest cause of disability worldwide. The World Health Organization has declared migraine a major public health problem due to a paucity of knowledge about cause and effective treatment options. Both in incidence and severity, migraine disproportionately affects people occupying marginalized social locations (SL). Managed pharmacologically, migraine is treated with daily preventive and as-needed abortive medications. Both come with high literal and figurative costs: intolerable side effects, medication interactions, and prohibitive prices. Cost prohibitive, ineffective, and unsustainable pharmacological treatment options have contributed to high levels of interest in complementary approaches by people with migraine, but little is known about their motivations, patterns of use or access, or how these may vary by SL. Method We conducted focus groups with 30 people with migraine to explore their desires and recommendations for migraine clinicians and researchers. We used qualitative content analysis to identify themes. Outcomes: We identified 4 themes: a more holistic, collaborative, long-term treatment approach; medication as a short-term solution; high personal and economic costs of medication; and desire for more information and access to natural approaches. Across SL, participants expressed keen interest in integrative approaches and wanted better access to complementary modalities. Participants in marginalized SL described reliance on traditional/folk remedies, including engagement with family and community healers, who they described as more affordable and culturally accessible. Conclusions Holistic and integrative approaches were preferred over medication as long-term migraine management strategies. However, people in marginalized SL, while disproportionately disabled by migraine, did not feel as comfortable accessing integrative approaches through currently available channels. Engaging with these communities and using a critical lens to explore barriers to access can develop options to make complementary modalities more approachable, while also attending to systemic blind spots that may unintentionally alienate socially marginalized groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna R Befus
- Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University Faculty of Health Sciences, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sharon Hull
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Gillian Sanders Schmidler
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Remy R Coeytaux
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Onur OS, Ertem DH, Karsidag C, Uluduz D, Ozge A, Sıva A, Guru M. An open/pilot trial of cognitive behavioral therapy in Turkish patients with refractory chronic migraine. Cogn Neurodyn 2019; 13:183-189. [PMID: 30956722 PMCID: PMC6426916 DOI: 10.1007/s11571-019-09519-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for pain management is a therapy that aims to modify thoughts and behavior to be more realistic and balanced. There are limited number of studies to assess the efficacy of CBT for patients with pharmacotherapy-resistant chronic migraine in our population. We aimed to invstigate the effects of CBT for patients with refractory chronic migraine on pain attack frequency, disability, severity, anxiety and depression. Fourteen patients with refractory chronic migraine who were referred from the headache clinic to the psychiatry department and regularly attended CBT sessions at least once every 2 weeks for at least 6 months, were included in the study. After 2 sessions of psychiatric evaluation, the subjects had 12 40-min CBT sessions and were given relaxation exercises. The Hamilton depression and anxiety inventories, visual analogue scale for assessing the severity of pain, and the Migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) test were used before and after CBT. The mean Hamilton depression scores before and after CBT were 29.07 ± 7.74 and 14.21 ± 7.7, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean Hamilton anxiety scores before and after CBT were 26.8 ± 11.7 and 11.7 ± 2.6, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean VAS scores before and after CBT were 8.07 ± 0.91 and 3.71 ± 1.32, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean MIDAS scores before and after CBT were 55.5 ± 20.4 and 20.12 ± 16.6, respectively (p < 0.0001). Our results showed that CBT had made a statistically significant difference on pain severity, number of migraine attacks and disability in patients with refractory chronic migraine. CBT should be considered in this patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozge Sahmelikoglu Onur
- Department of Psychiatry, Bakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry Neurology and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Devrimsel Harika Ertem
- Department of Algology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Cagatay Karsidag
- Department of Psychiatry, Bakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry Neurology and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Derya Uluduz
- Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Aynur Ozge
- Department of Neurology, Mersin University School of Medicine, Mersin, Turkey
| | - Aksel Sıva
- Department of Neurology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Meltem Guru
- Department of Psychiatry, Gazi University Health Care Center, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
McLean A, Becker WJ, Vujadinovic Z. Making a new-patient headache education session more patient-centered: what participants want to know. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 42:1462-1473. [PMID: 30689453 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1526337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the new-patient Education Session provided by the Calgary Headache Assessment and Management Program, analyze patient evaluations, and generate potential patient-centered improvements based on themes in patient feedback.Materials and Methods: Between 2008 and 2012, 1873 new patients attended the Education Session, and 913 evaluations were completed. Session objectives ratings were analyzed. Open-ended questions regarding most- and least-helpful components and suggestions for improvement were examined using thematic analysis.Results: Eighty-seven percent of respondents indicated they would recommend the session to others with headache. Median objectives ratings ranged from 9.0-10.0 out of 10 and were stable over time. Most-helpful themes included medication, types of headache, our program's multi-faceted management approach, medication overuse, triggers, and not feeling alone. Most respondents left the least-useful and suggestions sections blank or commented "nothing" or "not applicable". Least-useful themes included migraine overemphasis, insufficient or excessive medication content, participant over-disclosure, and lack of practical trigger management strategies.Conclusion: Most attendees found the Education Session useful. Those who did not provided valuable input that will allow us to modify the content. Our findings may benefit other headache programs seeking to implement or improve patient education programing. Implications for RehabilitationHeadache is a common and debilitating condition.Education is an important part of headache treatment, and has been associated with decreases in headache frequency, intensity, and disability, as well as increases in self-efficacy.A new-patient Education Session is a practical and inexpensive way to provide evidence-based medical and behavioral headache information.Quantitative and qualitative analysis of patient evaluations can help gauge relevance and direct content changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison McLean
- Calgary Headache Assessment and Management Program, Alberta Health Services, Calgary Canada
| | - Werner J Becker
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Zorana Vujadinovic
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Adherence to Behavioral Therapy for Migraine: Knowledge to Date, Mechanisms for Assessing Adherence, and Methods for Improving Adherence. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2019; 23:3. [PMID: 30661135 DOI: 10.1007/s11916-019-0739-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In other disease states, adherence to behavioral therapies has gained attention, with a greater amount of studies discussing, defining, and optimizing adherence. For example, a meta-analysis formally discussed adherence in 25 studies of CBT for 11 different disorders, with only 6 of the 25 omitting addressing or defining adherence. Many studies have discussed the use of text messages, graph-based adherence rates, and email/telephone reminders to improve adherence. This paper examined the available literature regarding adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine as well as adherence to similar therapies in other disease states. The goal of this research is to apply lessons learned from adherence to behavioral therapy for other diseases in better understanding how we can improve adherence to behavioral therapy for migraine. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment for migraine typically includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including progressive muscle relaxation (PMR), cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and biofeedback. Behavioral therapies have been shown to significantly reduce headache frequency and intensity, but high attrition rates and suboptimal adherence can undermine their efficacy. Traditionally, adherence to behavioral therapy has been defined by self-report, including paper headache diaries and assignments. In person attendance has also been employed as a method of defining and monitoring adherence. With the advent of personal electronics, measurements of adherence have shifted to include electronic-based methods such as computer-based programs and mobile-based therapies. Furthermore, some studies have taken advantage of electronic methods such as email reminders, push notifications, and other mobile-based reminders to optimize adherence. The JITA-I, a novel method of engaging individual patient adherence, has also been suggested as a possible method to improve adherence by tailoring engagement with a mobile health app-based on patient input. These novel methods may be utilized in behavioral therapy for migraine for further optimizing adherence. Few intervention studies to date have addressed the optimal ways to impact adherence to migraine behavioral therapy. Further research is required regarding adherence with behavioral therapies, specifically via mobile health interventions to better understand how to define and improve adherence via this novel forum. Once we are able to understand optimal methods of tracking adherence, we will be better equipped to understand the role of adherence in shaping outcomes for behavioral therapy in migraine.
Collapse
|
40
|
Amin FM, Aristeidou S, Baraldi C, Czapinska-Ciepiela EK, Ariadni DD, Di Lenola D, Fenech C, Kampouris K, Karagiorgis G, Braschinsky M, Linde M. The association between migraine and physical exercise. J Headache Pain 2018; 19:83. [PMID: 30203180 PMCID: PMC6134860 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-018-0902-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an unmet need of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options for migraine patients. Exercise can be used in the treatment of several pain conditions, including. However, what exact role exercise plays in migraine prevention is unclear. Here, we review the associations between physical exercise and migraine from an epidemiological, therapeutical and pathophysiological perspective. METHODS The review was based on a primary literature search on the PubMed using the search terms "migraine and exercise". RESULTS Low levels of physical exercise and high frequency of migraine has been reported in several large population-based studies. In experimental studies exercise has been reported as a trigger factor for migraine as well as migraine prophylaxis. Possible mechanisms for how exercise may trigger migraine attacks, include acute release of neuropeptides such as calcitonin gene-related peptide or alternation of hypocretin or lactate metabolism. Mechanisms for migraine prevention by exercise may include increased beta-endorphin, endocannabinoid and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levers in plasma after exercise. CONCLUSION In conclusion, it seems that although exercise can trigger migraine attacks, regular exercise may have prophylactic effect on migraine frequency. This is most likely due to an altered migraine triggering threshold in persons who exercise regularly. However, the frequency and intensity of exercise that is required is still an open question, which should be addressed in future studies to delineate an evidence-based exercise program to prevent migraine in sufferers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Stavroula Aristeidou
- 1st Neurology of Department, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Carlo Baraldi
- Department of Diagnostic, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Daponte D. Ariadni
- 1st Neurology of Department, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Davide Di Lenola
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
| | | | - Konstantinos Kampouris
- 1st Neurology of Department, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Giorgos Karagiorgis
- 1st Neurology of Department, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Mark Braschinsky
- Neurology Clinic’s Headache Clinic, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Mattias Linde
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - European Headache Federation School of Advanced Studies (EHF-SAS)
- Department of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, 2600 Glostrup, Denmark
- 1st Neurology of Department, Eginition Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Department of Diagnostic, Medical Toxicology, Headache and Drug Abuse Research Center, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
- Epilepsy and Migraine Treatment Centre, Kraków, Poland
- Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome Polo Pontino, Latina, Italy
- Headache Centre, Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, London, UK
- Neurology Clinic’s Headache Clinic, Tartu University Clinics, Tartu, Estonia
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
SMOOTH: Self-Management of Open Online Trials in Health analysis found improvements were needed for reporting methods of internet-based trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2018; 105:27-39. [PMID: 30171901 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The growth of trials conducted over the internet has increased, but with little practical guidance for their conduct, and it is sometimes challenging for researchers to adapt the conventions used in face-to-face trials and maintain the validity of the work. The aim of the study is to systematically explore existing self-recruited online randomized trials of self-management interventions and analyze the trials to assess their strengths and weaknesses, the quality of reporting, and the involvement of lay persons as collaborators in the research process. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS The Online Randomized Controlled Trials of Health Information Database was used as the sampling frame to identify a subset of self-recruited online trials of self-management interventions. The authors cataloged what these online trials were assessing, appraised study quality, extracted information on how trials were run, and assessed the potential for bias. We searched out how public and patient participation was integrated into online trial design and how this was reported. We recorded patterns of use for registration, reporting, settings, informed consent, public involvement, supplementary materials, and dissemination planning. RESULTS The sample included 41 online trials published from 2002 to 2015. The barriers to replicability and risk of bias in online trials included inadequate reporting of blinding in 28/41 (68%) studies; high attrition rates with incomplete or unreported data in 30/41 (73%) of trials; and 26/41 (63%) of studies were at high risk for selection bias as trial registrations were unreported. The methods for (23/41, 56%) trials contained insufficient information to replicate the trial, 19/41 did not report piloting the intervention. Only 2/41 studies were cross-platform compatible. Public involvement was most common for advisory roles (n = 9, 22%), and in the design, usability testing, and piloting of user materials (n = 9, 22%). CONCLUSION This study catalogs the state of online trials of self-management in the early 21st century and provides insights for online trials development as early as the protocol planning stage. Reporting of trials was generally poor and, in addition to recommending that authors report their trials in accordance with CONSORT guidelines, we make recommendations for researchers writing protocols, reporting on and evaluating online trials. The research highlights considerable room for improvement in trial registration, reporting of methods, data management plans, and public and patient involvement in self-recruited online trials of self-management interventions.
Collapse
|
42
|
Raggi A, Grignani E, Leonardi M, Andrasik F, Sansone E, Grazzi L, D'Amico D. Behavioral Approaches for Primary Headaches: Recent Advances. Headache 2018; 58:913-925. [DOI: 10.1111/head.13337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Raggi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| | - Eleonora Grignani
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| | - Matilde Leonardi
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| | - Frank Andrasik
- Department of Psychology; University of Memphis; Memphis TN USA
| | - Emanuela Sansone
- Division of Neuroalgology; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| | - Licia Grazzi
- Division of Neuroalgology; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| | - Domenico D'Amico
- Division of Neuroalgology; Neurological Institute C. Besta IRCCS Foundation; Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
How Can We Best Reduce Pain Catastrophizing in Adults With Chronic Noncancer Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:233-256. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 09/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
44
|
Kropp P, Meyer B, Meyer W, Dresler T. An update on behavioral treatments in migraine - current knowledge and future options. Expert Rev Neurother 2017; 17:1059-1068. [PMID: 28877611 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1377611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Besides pharmacological and interventional treatments a variety of non-medical therapeutic options exist for migraine, which has largely been derived from behavioral therapy. Areas covered: For our update we collected available studies via PubMed searches. This review highlights that already consulting of the patient is able to reduce the frequency of migraine attacks. Relaxation techniques, especially progressive muscle relaxation, and various types of biofeedback are effective, as is the implementation of cognitive behavioral therapy. However, recent reviews also point to some existing inconsistencies and methodological limitations. The advent of modern information technology based approaches (e.g. online therapy, smartphone applications) further advanced the arsenal of behavioral treatment regimes. The combination of behavioral treatment options and the combination with pharmacotherapy lead to additive effects. In modern multidisciplinary treatment approaches, behavioral therapy is an indispensable component. Expert commentary: Behavioral treatment in prophylaxis of migraine is as effective as pharmacological treatment with additional effects when pharmacological and behavioral treatment is applied in combination. Novel treatment approaches using online technology and electronic devices offer interesting options that will spread more in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kropp
- a Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology , University Medicine Rostock , Rostock , Germany
| | - Bianca Meyer
- a Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology , University Medicine Rostock , Rostock , Germany
| | - Wolfgang Meyer
- b Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry , Queen Mary University of London , London , United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Dresler
- c Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy , University Hospital Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany.,d LEAD Graduate School & Research Network , University of Tuebingen , Tuebingen , Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Probyn K, Bowers H, Mistry D, Caldwell F, Underwood M, Patel S, Sandhu HK, Matharu M, Pincus T. Non-pharmacological self-management for people living with migraine or tension-type headache: a systematic review including analysis of intervention components. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016670. [PMID: 28801425 PMCID: PMC5629643 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of non-pharmacological self-management interventions against usual care, and to explore different components and delivery methods within those interventions PARTICIPANTS: People living with migraine and/or tension-type headache INTERVENTIONS: Non-pharmacological educational or psychological self-management interventions; excluding biofeedback and physical therapy.We assessed the overall effectiveness against usual care on headache frequency, pain intensity, mood, headache-related disability, quality of life and medication consumption in meta-analysis.We also provide preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of intervention components and delivery methods. RESULTS We found a small overall effect for the superiority of self-management interventions over usual care, with a standardised mean difference (SMD) of -0.36 (-0.45 to -0.26) for pain intensity; -0.32 (-0.42 to -0.22) for headache-related disability, 0.32 (0.20 to 0.45) for quality of life and a moderate effect on mood (SMD=0.53 (-0.66 to -0.40)). We did not find an effect on headache frequency (SMD=-0.07 (-0.22 to 0.08)).Assessment of components and characteristics suggests a larger effect on pain intensity in interventions that included explicit educational components (-0.51 (-0.68 to -0.34) vs -0.28 (-0.40 to -0.16)); mindfulness components (-0.50 (-0.82 to -0.18) vs 0.34 (-0.44 to -0.24)) and in interventions delivered in groups vs one-to-one delivery (0.56 (-0.72 to -0.40) vs -0.39 (-0.52 to -0.27)) and larger effects on mood in interventions including a cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) component with an SMD of -0.72 (-0.93 to -0.51) compared with those without CBT -0.41 (-0.58 to -0.24). CONCLUSION Overall we found that self-management interventions for migraine and tension-type headache are more effective than usual care in reducing pain intensity, mood and headache-related disability, but have no effect on headache frequency. Preliminary findings also suggest that including CBT, mindfulness and educational components in interventions, and delivery in groups may increase effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016041291.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Probyn
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK
| | - Hannah Bowers
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK
| | - Dipesh Mistry
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | - Fiona Caldwell
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | - Shilpa Patel
- Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, Warwick University, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Manjit Matharu
- Headache Group, Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Tamar Pincus
- Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Probyn K, Bowers H, Caldwell F, Mistry D, Underwood M, Matharu M, Pincus T. Prognostic factors for chronic headache: A systematic review. Neurology 2017; 89:291-301. [PMID: 28615422 PMCID: PMC5513814 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify predictors of prognosis and trial outcomes in prospective studies of people with chronic headache. METHODS This was a systematic review of published literature in peer-reviewed journals. We included (1) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions for chronic headache that reported subgroup analyses and (2) prospective cohort studies, published in English, since 1980. Participants included adults with chronic headache (including chronic headache, chronic migraine, and chronic tension-type headache with or without medication overuse headache). We searched key databases using free text and MeSH terms. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the methodologic quality of studies and overall quality of evidence identified using appropriate published checklists. RESULTS We identified 16,556 titles, removed 663 duplicates, and reviewed 199 articles, of which 27 were included in the review-17 prospective cohorts and 10 RCTs with subgroup analyses reported. There was moderate-quality evidence indicating that depression, anxiety, poor sleep and stress, medication overuse, and poor self-efficacy for managing headaches are potential prognostic factors for poor prognosis and unfavorable outcomes from preventive treatment in chronic headache. There was inconclusive evidence about treatment expectations, age, age at onset, body mass index, employment, and several headache features. CONCLUSIONS This review identified several potential predictors of poor prognosis and worse outcome postinterventions in people with chronic headache. The majority of these are modifiable. The findings also highlight the need for more longitudinal high-quality research of prognostic factors in chronic headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Probyn
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK.
| | - Hannah Bowers
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Fiona Caldwell
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Dipesh Mistry
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Martin Underwood
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Manjit Matharu
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | - Tamar Pincus
- From the Department of Psychology (K.P., H.B., F.C., T.P.), Royal Holloway, University of London; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit (D.M., M.U.), Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry; and Headache Group (M.M.), Institute of Neurology and The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lukmanji S, Pham T, Blaikie L, Clark C, Jetté N, Wiebe S, Bulloch A, Holroyd-Leduc J, Macrodimitris S, Mackie A, Patten SB. Online tools for individuals with depression and neurologic conditions: A scoping review. Neurol Clin Pract 2017; 7:344-353. [PMID: 29185556 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients with neurologic conditions commonly have depression. Online tools have the potential to improve outcomes in these patients in an efficient and accessible manner. We aimed to identify evidence-informed online tools for patients with comorbid neurologic conditions and depression. Methods A scoping review of online tools (free, publicly available, and not requiring a facilitator) for patients with depression and epilepsy, Parkinson disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), traumatic brain injury (TBI), or migraine was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 2017 for all 5 neurologic conditions. Gray literature using Google and Google Scholar as well as app stores for both Android and Apple devices were searched. Self-management or self-efficacy online tools were not included unless they were specifically targeted at depression and one of the neurologic conditions and met the other eligibility criteria. Results Only 4 online tools were identified. Of these 4 tools, 2 were web-based self-management programs for patients with migraine or MS and depression. The other 2 were mobile apps for patients with PD or TBI and depression. No online tools were found for epilepsy. Conclusions There are limited depression tools for people with neurologic conditions that are evidence-informed, publicly available, and free. Future research should focus on the development of high-quality, evidence-based online tools targeted at neurologic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Lukmanji
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Tram Pham
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Laura Blaikie
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Callie Clark
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Nathalie Jetté
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Samuel Wiebe
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Andrew Bulloch
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | | | | | - Aaron Mackie
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| | - Scott B Patten
- University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Perry J, VanDenKerkhof EG, Wilson R, Tripp DA. Guided Internet-based Psycho-educational Intervention Using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Self-management for Individuals with Chronic Pain: A Feasibility Study. Pain Manag Nurs 2017; 18:179-189. [PMID: 28433488 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
When considering barriers to chronic pain treatment, there is a need to deliver nonpharmacological therapies in a way that is accessible to all individuals who may benefit. To conduct feasibility testing using a guided, Internet-based intervention for individuals with chronic pain, a novel, Internet-based, chronic pain intervention (ICPI) was developed, using concepts proven effective in face-to-face interventions. This study was designed to assess usability of the ICPI and feasibility of conducting larger-scale research, and to collect preliminary data on effectiveness of the intervention. Data were collected at baseline, after each of the six intervention modules, and 12 weeks after intervention completion. Forty-one participants completed baseline questionnaires, and 15 completed the 12-week postintervention questionnaires. At baseline, all participants reported satisfaction with the structure of the intervention and ease of use. Internet-based platforms such as Facebook aided in accrual of participants, making further large-scale study of the ICPI feasible. There is preliminary evidence suggesting that the ICPI improves emotional function but not physical function, with a small but significant decrease in pain intensity and pain interference. Most participants felt they benefited at least minimally as a result of using the ICPI. The ICPI was well received by participants and demonstrated positive outcomes in this preliminary study. Further research with more participants is feasible and necessary to fully assess the effect of this intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Perry
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; School of Baccalaureate Nursing, St. Lawrence College, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosemary Wilson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Tripp
- Departments of Psychology, Anesthesiology, and Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rogers MA, Lemmen K, Kramer R, Mann J, Chopra V. Internet-Delivered Health Interventions That Work: Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses and Evaluation of Website Availability. J Med Internet Res 2017; 19:e90. [PMID: 28341617 PMCID: PMC5384996 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to easy access and low cost, Internet-delivered therapies offer an attractive alternative to improving health. Although numerous websites contain health-related information, finding evidence-based programs (as demonstrated through randomized controlled trials, RCTs) can be challenging. We sought to bridge the divide between the knowledge gained from RCTs and communication of the results by conducting a global systematic review and analyzing the availability of evidence-based Internet health programs. OBJECTIVES The study aimed to (1) discover the range of health-related topics that are addressed through Internet-delivered interventions, (2) generate a list of current websites used in the trials which demonstrate a health benefit, and (3) identify gaps in the research that may have hindered dissemination. Our focus was on Internet-delivered self-guided health interventions that did not require real-time clinical support. METHODS A systematic review of meta-analyses was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42016041258). MEDLINE via Ovid, PsycINFO, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched. Inclusion criteria included (1) meta-analyses of RCTs, (2) at least one Internet-delivered intervention that measured a health-related outcome, and (3) use of at least one self-guided intervention. We excluded group-based therapies. There were no language restrictions. RESULTS Of the 363 records identified through the search, 71 meta-analyses met inclusion criteria. Within the 71 meta-analyses, there were 1733 studies that contained 268 unique RCTs which tested self-help interventions. On review of the 268 studies, 21.3% (57/268) had functional websites. These included evidence-based Web programs on substance abuse (alcohol, tobacco, cannabis), mental health (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], phobias, panic disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder [OCD]), and on diet and physical activity. There were also evidence-based programs on insomnia, chronic pain, cardiovascular risk, and childhood health problems. These programs tended to be intensive, requiring weeks to months of engagement by the user, often including interaction, personalized and normative feedback, and self-monitoring. English was the most common language, although some were available in Spanish, French, Portuguese, Dutch, German, Norwegian, Finnish, Swedish, and Mandarin. There were several interventions with numbers needed to treat of <5; these included painACTION, Mental Health Online for panic disorders, Deprexis, Triple P Online (TPOL), and U Can POOP Too. Hyperlinks of the sites have been listed. CONCLUSIONS A wide range of evidence-based Internet programs are currently available for health-related behaviors, as well as disease prevention and treatment. However, the majority of Internet-delivered health interventions found to be efficacious in RCTs do not have websites for general use. Increased efforts to provide mechanisms to host "interventions that work" on the Web and to assist the public in locating these sites are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Am Rogers
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Kelsey Lemmen
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Rachel Kramer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Jason Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - Vineet Chopra
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Perry J, VanDenKerkhof EG, Wilson R, Tripp DA. Development of a Guided Internet-based Psycho-education Intervention Using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Self-Management for Individuals with Chronic Pain. Pain Manag Nurs 2017; 18:90-101. [PMID: 28262481 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2016.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2015] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Evidence-based chronic pain treatment includes nonpharmacologic therapies. When addressing barriers to treatment, there is a need to deliver these therapies in a way that is accessible to all individuals who may benefit. To develop a guided Internet-based intervention for individuals with chronic pain, program content and sequence of evidence-based treatments for chronic pain, traditionally delivered via in-person sessions, were identified to be adapted for Internet delivery. With consideration to historical barriers to treatment, and through use of a concept map, therapeutic components and educational material were situated, in an ordered sequence, into six modules. An Internet-based chronic pain intervention was constructed to improve access to evidence-based chronic pain therapies. Research using this intervention, in the form of a pilot study for intervention refinement, was conducted, and a large-scale study to assess effectiveness is necessary prior to implementation. As clients may face barriers to multimodal treatment for chronic pain, nurses could introduce components of education, cognitive behavioral therapy and self-management to clients and prepare them for the "work" of managing chronic pain, through use of this Internet-based intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Perry
- School of Nursing, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof
- School of Nursing, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rosemary Wilson
- School of Nursing, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dean A Tripp
- Departments of Psychology, Anesthesiology, and Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|