Amlodipine

1,4-Dihydropyridine: A Dependable Heterocyclic Ring with the Promising and the Most Anticipable Therapeutic Effects

:

Nowadays, heterocyclic compounds act as a scaffold and are the backbone of medicinal chemistry. Among all of the heterocyclic scaffolds, 1,4-Dihydropyridine (1,4-DHP) is one of the most important heterocyclic rings that possess prominent therapeutic effects in a very versatile manner and plays an important role in synthetic, medicinal, and bioorganic chemistry. The main aim of the study is to review and encompass relevant studies related to 1,4-DHP and excellent therapeutic benefits of its derivatives. An extensive review of Pubmed-Medline, Embase and Lancet’s published articles was done to find all relevant studies on the activity of 1,4-DHP and its derivatives. 1,4-DHP is a potent Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) antagonist derivative which acts as an anti-hypertensive, anti- anginal, anti-tumor, anti-inflammatory, anti-tubercular, anti-cancer, anti-hyperplasia, anti-mutagenic, anti-dyslipidemic, and anti-ulcer agent. From the inferences of the study, it can be concluded that the basic nucleus, 1,4-DHP which is a voltage-gated calcium ion channel blocker, acts as a base for its derivatives that possess different important therapeutic effects. There is a need of further research of this basic nucleus as it is a multifunctional moiety, on which addition of different groups can yield a better drug for its other activities such as anti-convulsant, anti-oxidant, anti-mutagenic, and anti-microbial. This review would be significant for further researches in the development of several kinds of drugs by representing successful matrix for the medicinal agents.

Persistence of antihypertensive efficacy after missed doses: comparison of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system

OBJECTIVE

In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study, the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) was compared following missed doses. Design and methods In a randomized crossover design, 42 patients were randomized to receive amlodipine (5-10 mg) or the GITS formulation of nifedipine (nifedipine GITS) (30-60 mg) once daily for 12 weeks, then vice versa. During weeks 8, 10 and 12 of each treatment period, compliance failures were simulated by patients missing 0, 1 or 2 doses of their medication, and ambulatory systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements were obtained.

RESULTS

Following steady-state treatment (i.e. 'perfect compliance'), there was no difference between amlodipine and nifedipine GITS in SBP (140.1 versus 134.2 mmHg) or DBP (84.0 versus 85.8 mmHg) at 0-24 h post-dose. When compliance was not perfect, i.e. when one or two doses were missed, DBP was maintained at a significantly lower level with amlodipine compared with nifedipine GITS at 24-48 h post-dose (83.1 versus 86.4 mmHg, P = 0.005) and at 48-72 h post-dose (84.2 versus 89.7 mmHg, P < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of amlodipine were better maintained than those of nifedipine GITS. At 72 h post-dose, the plasma concentration of amlodipine was 61% (17.0 +/- 11.2 ng/ml) compared with < 25% (28.3 +/- 49.9 ng/ml) for nifedipine GITS.

CONCLUSION

During short periods of non-compliance, antihypertensive efficacy remains more predictable with amlodipine than with nifedipine GITS.

Calcium channel antagonists enhance retention of passive avoidance and maze learning in mice

Although a number of studies have shown that treatment with calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) can ameliorate impairments in learning and memory in aged animals, evidence for a general nootropic effect of CCAs in neurologically normal young adult animals is ambiguous. This study attempts to resolve some of this ambiguity by comparing the effects of several CCAs on retention of passive avoidance learning and acquisition and retention of appetitively motivated spatial discrimination learning in young adult mice. Animals were trained in a step through passive avoidance apparatus and, immediately after training, injected subcutaneously with different doses of nimodipine, nifedipine, amlodipine, flunarazine, diltiazem, or verapamil. Retention was tested 24 h after training. In the maze-learning task mice were treated with the same doses of the aforementioned CCAs immediately after a brief training session in a linear maze and retention was tested 24 h after training. The most effective dose of each agent in the maze-retention experiment was administered to additional groups of animals 1 h prior to training to determine the effects of CCAs on acquisition processes. The effects of central administration of CCAs were examined by intracerebroventricular injection of different doses of amlodipine immediately after passive avoidance training. Results showed (1) all peripherally administered drugs except verapamil facilitated retention of passive avoidance training in a dose-dependent manner, (2) all drugs dose dependently facilitated retention of linear maze learning, (3) all doses of the drugs (except verapamil) which facilitated maze retention also facilitated maze learning, and (4) central administration of the dihydropyridine amlodipine produced a dose-dependent facilitation of the retention of passive avoidance learning. These data indicate that drugs which block calcium channels can enhance retention of two different types of learning in mice.

Amlodipine therapy in congestive heart failure: hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects at rest and after treadmill exercise

This study examined the acute effects of amlodipine treatment on left ventricular pump function, systemic hemodynamics, neurohormonal status, and regional blood flow distribution in an animal model of congestive heart failure (CHF), both at rest and with treadmill exercise. A total of 14 pigs were studied under control conditions and after the development of pacing-induced CHF (240 beats per minute, 3 weeks, n = 7) or with CHF and acute amlodipine treatment for the last 3 days of pacing (1.5 mg/kg per day, n = 7). Under resting conditions, left ventricular stroke volume (mL) was reduced with CHF compared with the normal state (15+/-2 vs. 31+/-1, p<0.05) and increased with amlodipine treatment (23+/-4, p<0.05). At rest, systemic vascular resistance increased with CHF compared with the normal state (3,078+/-295 vs. 2,131+/-120 dyne x s cm(-5), p<0.05) and was reduced after amlodipine treatment (2,472+/-355 dyne x s cm(-5), p<0.05). With exercise, left ventricular stroke volume remained lower and systemic vascular resistance higher in the CHF group, but was normalized with amlodipine treatment. With exercise, left ventricular myocardial blood flow increased from resting values, but was reduced from the normal state with CHF (normal: 1.69+/-0.12 to 7.62+/-0.74 mL/min per gram vs. CHF: 1.26+/-0.12 to 4.77+/-0.45 mL/min per gram, both p<0.05) and was normalized with acute amlodipine treatment (1.99+/-0.35 to 6.29+/-1.23 mL/min per gram). Resting plasma norepinephrine was increased by >5-fold in the CHF group at rest and was not affected by amlodipine treatment. However, with exercise, amlodipine treatment blunted the increase in plasma norepinephrine by >50% when compared with untreated CHF values. Resting plasma endothelin levels increased with CHF compared with the normal state (10.9+/-0.9 vs. 2.8+/-0.4 fmol/mL, p<0.05) and was reduced with amlodipine treatment (7.5+/-1.5 fmol/mL, p<0.5). In other vascular beds, acute amlodipine treatment with CHF improved pulmonary and renal blood flow both at rest and with exercise; however, there were no effects observed on skeletal muscle blood flow. With the development of CHF, acute amlodipine treatment does not negatively influence left ventricular pump function, but rather may provide favorable hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects.

Efficient inhibition of the development of cardiac remodeling by a long-acting calcium antagonist amlodipine

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of a long-acting calcium antagonist, amlodipine, on the development of cardiac remodeling. Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists have been used widely for many years in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris. It has been reported, however, that a prototype of dihydropyridines, nifedipine, does not reduce mortality of patients with ischemic heart disease, possibly because of reflex stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system. A calcium antagonist, amlodipine, has been reported to have potential benefits by virtue of a gradual onset of action and a long duration of effects. Amlodipine (8 mg/kg per day, once a day) or nifedipine (24 mg/kg per day, three times a day) was administered to spontaneously hypertensive 12-week-old rats for 12 weeks. Left ventricular wall thickness was measured by echocardiography, and relative amounts of myosin heavy chain isoforms were assessed by pyrophosphate gels. Expressions of "fetal type" genes and type 1 collagen gene were examined by Northern blot analysis. Amlodipine and nifedipine both markedly reduced systolic blood pressure. However, the decrease in systolic blood pressure caused by nifedipine continued for no more than 8 hours, whereas the blood pressure-lowering effect of amlodipine continued for more than 16 hours post dose. Amlodipine markedly reduced left ventricular wall thickness, whereas nifedipine only weakly attenuated an increase in the wall thickness. Amlodipine, but not nifedipine, prevented an increase in the relative amount of V3 myosin heavy chain isoform and suppressed an increase in mRNA levels of beta-myosin heavy chain, skeletal alpha-actin, and type 1 collagen. Unlike nifedipine, amlodipine effectively prevented cardiac remodeling secondary to high blood pressure at biochemical levels and morphological levels. These results suggest that a long-acting calcium antagonist is more effective than a short-acting one in preventing organ injury in hypertensive subjects.

Controversies concerning calcium antagonists

The paper discusses the controversial attitude regarding the safety of calcium channel blockers (CCBs), especially of the dihydropyridine nifedipine, induced through several meta-analyses of studies with CCBs by Dr. Furberg et al.; as a result, a detrimental effect of CCBs, especially during acute myocardial infarction, has been claimed. Several independent re-analyses of the 16 studies, all performed in the 1980s and mainly using the short-acting nifedipine capsule, did not confirm Furberg's results and showed an insignificant mortality difference between patients on CCBs versus those on control. Nevertheless, new safety studies applying long-acting CCBs (half-lives of 1 or more days) combined with efficacy assessments are necessary, both in hypertension as well as coronary artery disease, to finally clear up this important question.

Sex- and age-related antihypertensive effects of amlodipine. The Amlodipine Cardiovascular Community Trial Study Group

This community-based study assessed whether there were age, sex, or racial differences in response to amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. This prospective, open-label trial had a 2-week placebo period, a 4-week upward drug titration/efficacy period, and a 12-week drug maintenance period. There were 1,084 evaluable patients (mean age 55.5 years; 65% men and 35% women; 79% white and 21% black; 75% <65 and 25% > or = 65 years old). At the end of the titration/efficacy phase, the mean +/- SD blood pressure (BP) decreased by -16.3 +/- 12.3/-12.5 +/- 5.9 mm Hg, (p < or = 0.0001). Amlodipine produced a goal BP response (sitting diastolic BP < or = 90 mm Hg, or a 10 mm Hg decrease) in 86.0% of patients overall. The BP response was greater in women (91.4%) than in men (83.0%, p < or = 0.001), and greater in those > or = 65 years old (91.5%) than in those < 65 years old (84.1%, p < or = 0.01); however, it was similar between whites and blacks (86.0% vs 85.9%, respectively, p = NS). The sex difference in BP response could not be fully explained by differences in age, weight, dose (mg/kg), race, baseline BP, or compliance, and there were no differences among women based on use of hormone replacement therapy. Amlodipine was well tolerated; mild to moderate edema was the most common adverse effect. Thus, amlodipine was effective and safe as once-a-day monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension in a community-based population. Women had a greater BP response to amlodipine.

Does combined therapy of Ca-channel blocker and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor exceed monotherapy in renal protection against hypertensive injury in rats?

Either calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) is used as an antihypertensive agent, and we are recommended to use them in combination to refractory hypertension with evidence dependent on clinical observations. We examined the renal protective effect of the combined therapy with calcium channel blocker (amlodipine) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (enalapril) against hypertensive renal injury in 5/6 nephrectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) with salt loading, comparing with monotherapy of each drug. Forty males SHRs with 5/6 nephrectomy and salt loading were divided to five groups: group 1 as control (n = 8), group 2 received 0.2 mg/kg/day of amlodipine (n = 8), group 3 received 0.2 mg/kg/day of enalapril (n = 8), group 4 (n = 8) and group 5 (n = 8) that were treated with 0.1 mg/kg/day and 0.2 mg/kg/day of each drug in combination respectively. Either amlodipine or enalapril had remarkable effects on reducing the increases in blood pressure and urinary protein excretion. In histopathological examination, it also suppressed renal injury significantly. Additional significant effect of combined therapy was not observed in blood pressure and urinary protein. There were not remarkable, additional effects of the combination of CCB and ACEi on protecting the remnant kidney in 5/6 nephrectomized SHRs fed a high-salt diet, possibly because sodium retention was not alleviated by the combination.

Slow association of positively charged Ca2+ channel antagonist amlodipine to dihydropyridine receptor sites in rat brain membranes

1. No significant differences were observed in Kd and Bmax values between pH 7.2 (0.16 +/- 0.01 nM and 155.36 +/- 16.07 fmol/mg protein) and pH 10.0 (0.15 +/- 0.01 nM and 158.63 +/- 13.80 fmol/mg protein) in rat brain membranes. 2. The IC50 ratios at 0- and 270-min preincubations of amlodipine and manidipine at pH 7.2 were 23.09 and 10.25, respectively, whereas these ratios for these two drugs at pH 10.0 were 2.63 and 1.34, respectively. 3. In contrast, on treatment with nisoldipine, benidipine, SM-6586 and nifedipine, no significant differences were observed in the IC50 ratios between 0- and 270-min preincubations at pH 7.2 and 10.0.

Effects of the new calcium antagonist mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) on exercise duration in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris: a multicenter, placebo-controlled study. Ro 40-5967 International Study Group

Mibefradil (Ro 40-5967) is a novel calcium antagonist from a new chemical class and is the first that selectively blocks the T-type calcium channel. In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel designed study, its antianginal and antiischemic effects were evaluated in 126 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. Exercise tests were performed after 1 week of placebo (baseline) and 2 weeks after randomization to 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg (once daily) or placebo. Highly significant dose-response relations were present across all treatment groups for exercise duration, time to angina, and time to ST-segment depression. They were associated with a dose-dependent decrease in heart rate and blood pressure and plasma concentrations > 300 ng/ml. Mibefradil was well tolerated. First-degree atrioventricular block (8%) and dizziness (7%) were the most frequently reported adverse events; however, the first-degree atrioventricular block was dose-related, and only one patient discontinued the trial because of dizziness. The excellent efficacy and adequate safety profile of mibefradil may be a consequence of T-type calcium-channel selectivity.

Effects of different antihypertensive drugs on plasma fibrinogen in hypertensive patients

1. In order to evaluate whether treatment with different antihypertensive drugs would affect plasma fibrinogen levels, 118 mild to moderate essential hypertensive subjects, all males, aged 18 to 65 years, were randomly treated with amlodipine 10 mg, atenolol 100 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg or lisinopril 20 mg, all given once daily for 8 weeks. 2. Before and after 8 weeks' treatment, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), fibrinogen, total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), plasma glucose, plasma uric acid, serum creatinine and serum potassium were evaluated. 3. All four medications significantly reduced BP values, although the BP lowering effect of lisinopril, amlodipine and atenolol was significantly greater compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide. 4. Plasma fibrinogen levels were unaffected by atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine, whereas they were significantly decreased by lisinopril (-11.2%, P = 0.002). This fibrinogen lowering effect was more evident in smokers (-17.7%) than in non smokers (-7.4%). 5. Atenolol and amlodipine did not significantly affect plasma lipids, hydrochlorothiazide increased TC, LDL-C and TG and reduced HDL-C; lisinopril increased HDL-C and decreased TC and LDL-C. 6. Hydrochlorothiazide increased plasma glucose and uric acid concentrations, which were unaffected by the other drugs. The diuretic also reduced serum potassium. 7. The results of this study indicate that lisinopril reduces levels of plasma fibrinogen and confirm that different antihypertensive drugs may elicit different metabolic effects, which may variously influence the overall risk profile of the hypertensive patients.

Emerging options in the management of myocardial ischemia

Improved understanding of the pathogenesis of symptomatic and silent myocardial ischemia has led to important advances in the prevention and treatment of these syndromes. For example, recognition of the role of platelets in the atherogenic process and of thrombosis in acute myocardial ischemia has led to extensive use of aspirin and thrombolytic therapy, with resultant decreases in mortality. Both nitrates and beta-adrenergic blockers effectively alleviate myocardial ischemia. However, long-term nitrate use is limited by the occurrence of tolerance. beta blockers have been shown to decrease subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with acute myocardial infarction; however, adverse effects are often associated with their use. Calcium antagonists have been shown to be effective in the treatment of stable and vasospastic angina. In patients with coronary artery disease and symptoms resulting from either fixed obstruction or vasospasm, these agents decrease the frequency of angina episodes. The 3 types of calcium antagonists currently available--phenylalkylamine, benzothiazepine, and dihydropyridine derivatives--while chemically a heterogeneous group, share the common property of decreasing depolarization of smooth muscle, albeit to varying degrees. Nonetheless, other characteristics, including varying electrophysiologic effects, distinguish these groups. The novel calcium antagonist amlodipine is effective and well tolerated as an antianginal agent, and offers the advantage of once-daily dosing. Calcium antagonists appear to be well tolerated in patients with concomitant conditions such as diabetes and are effective in commonly coexistent cardiovascular disorders such as hypertension.

The action of amlodipine on voltage-operated calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle

1. Amlodipine, a dihydropyridine derivative largely ionized at physiological pH, inhibited calcium channel currents in single vascular smooth muscle cells isolated from rabbit ear artery in a concentration-dependent manner. 2. Amlodipine inhibited the current-voltage relationship for calcium channel currents across the range of test potentials used. However, the effect of amlodipine was more marked on more depolarized test potentials. Amlodipine also shifted the steady-state inactivation curve for calcium channel currents in a hyperpolarized direction. 3. The potency of amlodipine as determined from the steady-state inhibition of calcium channel current induced by the drug was dependent on the holding potential of the cells. Use of a more depolarized holding potential increased the potency of amlodipine. 4. Onset of amlodipine-induced inhibition was relatively rapid at both -60 mV and -40 mV holding potential. The use of a more depolarized holding potential increased the rate of association of amlodipine. No recovery from amlodipine-induced inhibition was seen over a 20 min period following washout of the drug. 5. In addition to voltage-dependence, the action of amlodipine showed use-dependence, in that the effect of amlodipine was more marked when calcium channel currents were evoked frequently. Increasing the frequency of activation of calcium channel currents did not alter the apparent onset rate of amlodipine-induced inhibition, but increased the degree of inhibition achieved by the drug. 6. The electrophysiological properties of amlodipine, particularly its voltage-dependence are probably important determinants of its action in vivo.

New synthetic ligands for L-type voltage-gated calcium channels

The pharmacology of the L-type Ca2+ channel has been the subject of considerable basic and clinical investigation over the past two decades primarily because of the clinical activities of nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem. However, it is quite clear that this Ca2+ channel is, in common with other pharmacologic receptors, a multiple drug receptor. There are probably as many as six or more discrete drug binding sites associated with this Ca2+ channel. Continued investigation of these sites may yield both new therapeutic agents, structural clues to ligands active at other classes of Ca2+ channel and structures active at other classes of ion channel.