Discontinuation of phenytoin and carbamazepine in patients receiving felbamate

Organic carbamates in drug design and medicinal chemistry

The carbamate group is a key structural motif in many approved drugs and prodrugs. There is an increasing use of carbamates in medicinal chemistry and many derivatives are specifically designed to make drug-target interactions through their carbamate moiety. In this Perspective, we present properties and stabilities of carbamates, reagents and chemical methodologies for the synthesis of carbamates, and recent applications of carbamates in drug design and medicinal chemistry.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs by use of saliva

Blood (serum/plasma) antiepileptic drug (AED) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has proven to be an invaluable surrogate marker for individualizing and optimizing the drug management of patients with epilepsy. Since 1989, there has been an exponential increase in AEDs with 23 currently licensed for clinical use, and recently, there has been renewed and extensive interest in the use of saliva as an alternative matrix for AED TDM. The advantages of saliva include the fact that for many AEDs it reflects the free (pharmacologically active) concentration in serum; it is readily sampled, can be sampled repetitively, and sampling is noninvasive; does not require the expertise of a phlebotomist; and is preferred by many patients, particularly children and the elderly. For each AED, this review summarizes the key pharmacokinetic characteristics relevant to the practice of TDM, discusses the use of other biological matrices with particular emphasis on saliva and the evidence that saliva concentration reflects those in serum. Also discussed are the indications for salivary AED TDM, the key factors to consider when saliva sampling is to be undertaken, and finally, a practical protocol is described so as to enable AED TDM to be applied optimally and effectively in the clinical setting. Overall, there is compelling evidence that salivary TDM can be usefully applied so as to optimize the treatment of epilepsy with carbamazepine, clobazam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, topiramate, and zonisamide. Salivary TDM of valproic acid is probably not helpful, whereas for clonazepam, eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, pregabalin, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin, the data are sparse or nonexistent.

Antiepileptic drug interactions - principles and clinical implications

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are widely used as long-term adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in epilepsy and other indications and consist of a group of drugs that are highly susceptible to drug interactions. The purpose of the present review is to focus upon clinically relevant interactions where AEDs are involved and especially on pharmacokinetic interactions. The older AEDs are susceptible to cause induction (carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) or inhibition (valproic acid), resulting in a decrease or increase, respectively, in the serum concentration of other AEDs, as well as other drug classes (anticoagulants, oral contraceptives, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs, antineoplastic drugs, and immunosupressants). Conversely, the serum concentrations of AEDs may be increased by enzyme inhibitors among antidepressants and antipsychotics, antimicrobal drugs (as macrolides or isoniazid) and decreased by other mechanisms as induction, reduced absorption or excretion (as oral contraceptives, cimetidine, probenicid and antacides). Pharmacokinetic interactions involving newer AEDs include the enzyme inhibitors felbamate, rufinamide, and stiripentol and the inducers oxcarbazepine and topiramate. Lamotrigine is affected by these drugs, older AEDs and other drug classes as oral contraceptives. Individual AED interactions may be divided into three levels depending on the clinical consequences of alterations in serum concentrations. This approach may point to interactions of specific importance, although it should be implemented with caution, as it is not meant to oversimplify fact matters. Level 1 involves serious clinical consequences, and the combination should be avoided. Level 2 usually implies cautiousness and possible dosage adjustments, as the combination may not be possible to avoid. Level 3 refers to interactions where dosage adjustments are usually not necessary. Updated knowledge regarding drug interactions is important to predict the potential for harmful or lacking effects involving AEDs.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of the Newer Anti-Epilepsy Medications

In the past twenty years, 14 new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for use in the United States and/or Europe. These drugs are eslicarbazepine acetate, felbamate, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. In general, the clinical utility of therapeutic drug monitoring has not been established in clinical trials for these new anticonvulsants, and clear guidelines for drug monitoring have yet to be defined. The antiepileptic drugs with the strongest justifications for drug monitoring are lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, stiripentol, and zonisamide. Stiripentol and tiagabine are strongly protein bound and are candidates for free drug monitoring. Therapeutic drug monitoring has lower utility for gabapentin, pregabalin, and vigabatrin. Measurement of salivary drug concentrations has potential utility for therapeutic drug monitoring of lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and topiramate. Therapeutic drug monitoring of the new antiepileptic drugs will be discussed in managing patients with epilepsy.

Antiepileptic drugs--best practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: a position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies

Although no randomized studies have demonstrated a positive impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on clinical outcome in epilepsy, evidence from nonrandomized studies and everyday clinical experience does indicate that measuring serum concentrations of old and new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can have a valuable role in guiding patient management provided that concentrations are measured with a clear indication and are interpreted critically, taking into account the whole clinical context. Situations in which AED measurements are most likely to be of benefit include (1) when a person has attained the desired clinical outcome, to establish an individual therapeutic concentration which can be used at subsequent times to assess potential causes for a change in drug response; (2) as an aid in the diagnosis of clinical toxicity; (3) to assess compliance, particularly in patients with uncontrolled seizures or breakthrough seizures; (4) to guide dosage adjustment in situations associated with increased pharmacokinetic variability (e.g., children, the elderly, patients with associated diseases, drug formulation changes); (5) when a potentially important pharmacokinetic change is anticipated (e.g., in pregnancy, or when an interacting drug is added or removed); (6) to guide dose adjustments for AEDs with dose-dependent pharmacokinetics, particularly phenytoin.

Clinically relevant drug interactions with antiepileptic drugs

Some patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy benefit from combination therapy with two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Additionally, virtually all epilepsy patients will receive, at some time in their lives, other medications for the management of associated conditions. In these situations, clinically important drug interactions may occur. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital and primidone induce many cytochrome P450 (CYP) and glucuronyl transferase (GT) enzymes, and can reduce drastically the serum concentration of associated drugs which are substrates of the same enzymes. Examples of agents whose serum levels are decreased markedly by enzyme-inducing AEDs, include lamotrigine, tiagabine, several steroidal drugs, cyclosporin A, oral anticoagulants and many cardiovascular, antineoplastic and psychotropic drugs. Valproic acid is not enzyme inducer, but it may cause clinically relevant drug interactions by inhibiting the metabolism of selected substrates, most notably phenobarbital and lamotrigine. Compared with older generation agents, most of the recently developed AEDs are less likely to induce or inhibit the activity of CYP or GT enzymes. However, they may be a target for metabolically mediated drug interactions, and oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, felbamate and, at high dosages, topiramate may stimulate the metabolism of oral contraceptive steroids. Levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin have not been reported to cause or be a target for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions involving AEDs have not been well characterized, but their understanding is important for a more rational approach to combination therapy. In particular, neurotoxic effects appear to be more likely with coprescription of AEDs sharing the same primary mechanism of action.

Pharmacokinetic Variability of Newer Antiepileptic Drugs

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Clinically important drug interactions in epilepsy: general features and interactions between antiepileptic drugs

There are two types of interactions between drugs, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic. For antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), pharmacokinetic interactions are the most notable type, but pharmacodynamic interactions involving reciprocal potentiation of pharmacological effects at the site of action are also important. By far the most important pharmacokinetic interactions are those involving cytochrome P450 isoenzymes in hepatic metabolism. Among old generation AEDs, carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, and primidone induce the activity of several enzymes involved in drug metabolism, leading to decreased plasma concentration and reduced pharmacological effect of drugs, which are substrates of the same enzymes (eg, tiagabine, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and topiramate). In contrast, the new AEDs gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide do not induce the metabolism of other AEDs. Interactions involving enzyme inhibition include the increase in plasma concentrations of lamotrigine and phenobarbital caused by valproic acid. Among AEDs, the least potential interaction is associated with gabapentin and levetiracetam.

In vivo CYP3A4 heteroactivation is a possible mechanism for the drug interaction between felbamate and carbamazepine

Atypical (non-Michaelis-Menten) kinetics are commonly observed with CYP3A4 substrates in vitro. If relevant in vivo, cytochrome P450 heteroactivation could give rise to increased drug clearance. To test the possible in vivo relevance of atypical cytochrome P450 kinetics, we investigated the role of heteroactivation in the therapeutically relevant drug interaction between the anti-epileptics felbamate and carbamazepine. Felbamate heteroactivates CYP3A4-mediated formation of carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (carbamazepine-ep), the major metabolite of carbamazepine, in human liver microsomes and recombinant CYP3A4 at relevant in vivo concentrations of both drugs (maximum activation 98% at 10 microM carbamazepine, 1 mM felbamate). Felbamate (50-500 microM) did not induce CYP3A4, as based on mRNA measurements in human liver slices. The further metabolism of carbamazepine-ep was inhibited (38% by 500 microM felbamate) in human liver slices. We propose a methodology to predict changes in steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of parent drug and metabolite from in vitro heteroactivation and inhibition data, including prediction of the increase in fraction metabolized. A meta-analysis of reported in vivo effects of felbamate on Csscarbamazepine was performed to allow evaluation of this approach. The predicted effect of in vitro heteroactivation on Csscarbamazepine corresponds well to that observed in vivo. Combining the effect of heteroactivation on the fraction metabolized to carbamazepine-ep, and inhibition of its further metabolism, predicts a change in Csscarbamazepine-ep that falls within the range observed in vivo. Our results strongly suggest that in vivo heteroactivation of CYP3A4 is a possible mechanism of the clinically observed drug interaction between felbamate and carbamazepine.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of the newer antiepileptic drugs

The aim of the present review is to discuss the potential value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide. Studies of the relationship between serum concentrations and clinical efficacy of these drugs are reviewed, and the potential value of TDM of the drugs is discussed based on their pharmacokinetic properties and mode of action. Analytical methods for the determination of the serum concentrations of these drugs are also briefly described. There are only some prospective data on the serum concentration-effect relationships, and few studies have been designed primarily to study these relationships. As TDM is not widely practiced for the newer AEDs, there are no generally accepted target ranges for any of these drugs, and for most a wide range in serum concentration is associated with clinical efficacy. Furthermore, a considerable overlap in drug concentrations related to toxicity and nonresponse is reported. Nevertheless, the current tentative target ranges for felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (10-hydroxy-carbazepine metabolite), tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, and zonisamide are 125 to 250 micromol/L, 70 to 120 micromol/L, 10 to 60 micromol/L, 35 to 120 micromol/L, 50 to 140 micomol/L, 50 to 250 nmol/L, 15 to 60 micromol/L, 6 to 278 micromol/L, and 45 to 180 micromol/L, respectively. Further systematic studies designed specifically to evaluate concentration-effect relationships of the new AEDs are urgently needed. Although routine monitoring in general cannot be recommended at present, measurements of some of the drugs is undoubtedly of help with individualization of treatment in selected cases in a particular clinical setting.

Enzyme induction and inhibition by new antiepileptic drugs: a review of human studies

The aim of this paper is to review a number of new antiepileptic agents (i.e. felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide) for their inducing and/or inhibitory properties in humans, mainly considering the interactions where they are involved as the cause rather than the object of such interactions. Two aspects have been particularly taken into account: the changes or absence of changes in plasma/serum concentrations of concomitant drugs and the direct or indirect evidence of induction, inhibition or lack of effect on the six major human hepatic CYP isozymes (CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4), as well as on other CYP isozymes or enzyme systems. Felbamate clearly affects the pharmacokinetics of a number of drugs, generally increasing but also decreasing their concentrations. It induces enzymes such as CYP3A4 and inhibits enzymes such as CYP2C19 and those of the beta-oxidation pathway. Topiramate is not devoid of potential interaction properties: it decreases the plasma concentrations of ethinylestradiol, induces CYP3A4 and inhibits CYP2C19. For oxcarbazepine, no inhibitory, only inductive effects have been observed thus far. Felbamate. topiramate and oxcarbazepine may induce the metabolism of steroidal oral contraceptives. In this respect, tiagabine has been studied at a rather low dose. Pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interaction seems to exist between lamotrigine and carbamazepine. Lamotrigine appears to be a weak inducer of UGTs, whereas induction of CYP3A4 seems improbable as the compound does not change the concentrations of oral contraceptives or the urinary excretion of 6beta-hydroxycortisol. Zonisamide has very peculiar pharmacokinetics and an extensive metabolism. Additional information on its enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties would be necessary, as data so far collected on its effect on the pharmacokinetics of other drugs are conflicting. Gabapentin, vigabatrin and in particular levetiracetam appear to be devoid of significant enzyme inducing or inhibiting properties.

New antiepileptic drugs in children: which ones for which seizures?

Until 1993, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), and valproate (VPA) accounted for the great majority of the prescriptions written for the treatment of epilepsy. Since 1993, five antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been released in the United States, and at least three additional drugs are expected to be released by the end of the year 2000. As a group, these newer drugs differ from the established drugs in terms of their pharmacokinetics, interaction potential, and adverse effects. In addition, any one of the newer drugs may achieve seizure control in situations in which an established drug had not. The newer drugs certainly represent a welcome addition to the existing options for the treatment of epilepsy in children. However, the availability of several new AEDs represents a therapeutic dilemma for the clinician because optimal use of these drugs has not yet been established. This is particularly true in children because (i) newer drugs are often studied less frequently in children, (ii) pharmacokinetics in children differ from those in adults, (iii) children may have different adverse effects, and (iv) children have a broader spectrum of various seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. In the first part of this review, the clinical pharmacology of the currently available newer AEDs is discussed individually, with special emphasis on data in children. In particular, pharmacokinetics, interactions, dosage and titration, efficacy spectrum, and adverse effect profile is discussed for each drug. In the second part, an attempt is made to determine the place for the newer drugs in the treatment of the different pediatric seizures and epilepsy syndromes.

Felbamate

Felbamate (FBM) was the first of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) approved in the United States in 1993 with broad-spectrum efficacy against partial and generalized seizures of various types, and indicated for use as adjunctive and monotherapy. The identification of idiosyncratic aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity, however, drastically curtailed its use. To update information concerning FBM and its idiosyncratic effects, case studies and literature reviews were undertaken. Thirty-four FBM-associated aplastic anemia patients have been reported, with 13 known fatalities. The overall FBM aplastic anemia risk is estimated at between 27 and 209 per million vs. 2 to 2.5 per million in the general population. Prior AED hypersensitivity, cytopenia, and immune disease significantly increase risk. FBM aplastic anemia has not been reported in children below the age of 13 years. Hepatic failure is much less common, occurring with an overall risk similar to that associated with valproate, but children below the age of 5 years have been affected. The recent identification of a reactive metabolite, atropaldehyde, and HLA studies suggest that high-risk patients can be identified. The efficacy profile of FBM should encourage further investigations to allow its better use, but at present FBM is not a first-line AED.

Coadministration of phenytoin and felbamate: evidence of additional phenytoin dose-reduction requirements based on pharmacokinetics and tolerability with increasing doses of felbamate

PURPOSE

This open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of phenytoin (PHT) and felbamate (FBM).

METHODS

Ten subjects with epilepsy receiving PHT monotherapy were administered increasing doses of FBM (1,200, 1,800, 2,400-3,600 mg/day) at 2-week intervals. PHT doses were reduced by 20% on an individual basis when evidence of clinically significant intolerance was present. With intolerance, the PHT dose was reduced before the next incremental FBM dose. Blood samples were analyzed for FBM, PHT, and PHT metabolite 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH).

RESULTS

Total PHT plasma concentrations increased with coadministered FBM. PHT Cmax increased from 15.9 microg/ml at baseline to 20.9 microg/ml after 1,200 mg/day FBM and to 26.8 microg/ml after 1,800 mg/day FBM. Four subjects required a 20% PHT dose reduction after 1,800 mg/day FBM and six after the administration of 2,400 mg/day FBM. All subjects required further 20% PHT reductions before 3,600 mg/day FBM. FBM Cmax and AUCT were reduced, and apparent clearance increased compared with data from FBM monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

With the initiation of FBM therapy in subjects receiving PHT, the PHT dosage should be reduced by 20%. Further PHT dose reductions are likely to be necessary if the FBM dose is increased. The requirements for reductions in dose might be predicted by clinical signs of PHT intolerance.

Determination of felbamate concentration in pediatric samples by high-performance liquid chromatography

A simple and rapid procedure to determine felbamate (2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate) concentrations in human plasma/serum by high-performance liquid chromatography is described. The method employs a high-performance liquid chromatography unit equipped with a C18 reverse-phase cartridge (3-microliters particle diameter, 3.2 x 40 mm), an acetonitrile/water gradient, and detection at 210 nm. The sample is deproteinized with acetonitrile containing internal standard (2-methyl-2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate), and the resulting supernatant, after diluting 1:1 with water, is injected onto the column. The felbamate and internal standard are eluted with a linear gradient of 0% to 22% acetonitrile for 11 minutes at a flow rate of 0.8 ml/minute. Under these conditions, felbamate and the internal standard are eluted at 9.2 +/- 0.03 and 10.8 +/- 0.03 minutes, respectively. The assay is linear from 10 to 400 microgram/ml. It is highly reproducible; at 100 micrograms/ml felbamate, within-day and between-day coefficients of variation are less than 0.5% and 4.3%, respectively. Recovery is > or = 95%. No interferences from other common antiepileptic drugs and analgesics are observed. Advantages of this method include simple and fast sample preparation; use of a gradient to eliminate interferences; and use of a cartridge column, which is economical, provides good resolution, allows rapid equilibration and elution, and operates at low back pressures. The method requires samples of only 100 microliters and is ideal for pediatric samples.

Reappraisal of polytherapy in epilepsy: a critical review of drug load and adverse effects

PURPOSE

We reviewed the literature to determine whether an analysis of published data could clarify the relationship between antiepileptic drug (AED) polytherapy and adverse affects (AE). We highlight the problems encountered.

METHODS

We made a Medline-search for articles published between 1974 and 1994 reporting the number of AE and doses or serum levels of every AED, per patient or treatment group, and used the PDD/DDD ratio to calculate AED load per patient from doses or the OSL/AToxL ratio to do so from serum levels of individual drugs. The PDD/DDD is the sum of ratios of the actual prescribed daily doses divided by the published average therapeutic dose of each drug. The OSL/AToxL is the sum of each observed serum level divided by its average toxic level.

RESULTS

We retrieved 118 trial reports. Most had to be excluded because of incomplete reporting of concomitant medication or AE. The data of the 15 articles selected for further analysis indicate a relationship between drug load and number of AE. We noted no relationship between the number of AEDs administered and AE. In add-on studies, the difference in neurotoxicity between the active and placebo arm may be obscured if the relative increase in drug load is small, as exemplified by the study of McGuire et al..

CONCLUSIONS

Articles reporting add-on trials of new AEDs generally do not provide detailed information about the basic medication to which the new AED is added, which makes calculation of total drug load impossible. Furthermore, often only frequency of AE is reported, not severity or development of tolerance, making it difficult to judge the impact of AE. However, despite the paucity of available information, we present some evidence that toxicity in AED polytherapy may be related to total drug load, rather than to the number of drugs administered. Therefore, the present trend to reject polytherapy for fear of increased toxicity is not warranted, which removes one of the objections to initiating specific research to prove or disprove the value of AED combinations as long as the drug load is appropriate.

Felbamate

The development and release of felbamate is characterized by several relatively unique features. Felbamate was submitted to innovative and unconventional clinical trials. It was the first antiepileptic drug (AED) to be tested in a double-blind fashion in patients withdrawn from AEDs for presurgical video/electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring. In addition, felbamate was the first AED to be tested in double-blind monotherapy trials. Felbamate was also the first drug to be tested in a placebo-controlled trial in children with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. When it was first released in North America in 1993, felbamate was the first new antiepileptic drug in 15 years. Finally, after 1 year of being very successfully marked as a drug devoid of the adverse effects of other AEDs, felbamate came very close to being completely withdrawn from the market, because of several cases of fatal bone marrow aplesia and liver toxicity. At the present time, the main indication for felbamate is in children with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and similar forms of epilepsy, who failed to respond to other AEDs.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of the new antiepileptic drugs

Therapy with traditional antiepileptic drugs is associated with a wide range of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions. In particular, enzyme induction, enzyme inhibition and displacement from protein binding may result in important changes in serum concentrations of antiepileptics. Relevant interactions have also been described for some new antiepileptics. Felbamate increases serum concentrations of phenytoin, phenobarbital and valproic acid (sodium valproate). On the other hand, it reduces concentrations of carbamazepine and increases concentrations of its metabolite carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Concentrations of felbamate itself are reduced by phenytoin and carbamazepine. Concentrations of lamotrigine are considerably increased by valproic acid and decreased by phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital (phenobarbitone). Vigabatrin reduces serum concentrations of phenytoin by approximately 20%. On the other hand, some new antiepileptics have the important advantage of not interfering with the metabolism of other antiepileptics; this is the case for gabapentin, lamotrigine and oxcarbazepine. Furthermore, the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin, oxcarbazepine and vigabatrin are independent of concomitant drugs. These aspects are especially important as, until now, new antiepileptics have been most often utilised as add-on therapy.

Pharmacokinetic profile of topiramate in comparison with other new antiepileptic drugs

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in broad use today have a number of pharmacokinetic liabilities, including a propensity for clinically meaningful drug interactions. Therefore, new AEDs with improved pharmacokinetic characteristics would be welcomed. The pharmacokinetic profiles of six newer AEDs--topiramate (TPM), gabapentin (GBP), vigabatrin (VGB), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), and felbamate--were reviewed. Some of these AEDs offer an improvement in one or more pharmacokinetic parameters compared with traditional AEDs, with TPM, GBP, VGB, and OCBZ demonstrating the most advantageous overall pharmacokinetic profiles.

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of topiramate and carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy during monotherapy and concomitant therapy

PURPOSE

We studied the steady-state pharmacokinetic profile of topiramate (TPM) as a function of dose and the effects of comedication with carbamazepine (CBZ).

METHODS

We enrolled 12 patients with partial epilepsy receiving chronic stable doses of CBZ 300-800 mg every 8 h. In a 6-week period, TPM was added and doses were increased at approximately 2-week intervals from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h and stabilized at the highest tolerated dose to as high as 400 mg every 12 h. CBZ was tapered in the next 4 weeks when possible, and TPM was maintained as monotherapy at the highest stabilized dose for 2 more weeks. Plasma and urine samples were collected before TPM dosing, after each TPM dose increase, and during TPM monotherapy.

RESULTS

Dose-normalized results (n = 10) for TPM area under the curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC(0-12)), Cmin(0), and Cavg indicated that TPM exhibits linear plasma pharmacokinetics over the dose range of 100- to 400-mg every 12 h when administered with CBZ. Mean TPM AUC(0-12), Cmax, Cmin(0), and Cavg values were approximately 40% lower during CBZ treatment as compared with those during TPM monotherapy (n = 3). TPM oral and nonrenal clearance rates were approximately two- to threefold higher, whereas TPM renal clearance was unchanged during concomitant CBZ treatment (n = 3). There were no significant changes in total and unbound CBZ and CBZ-epoxide (CBZ-E) pharmacokinetics during TPM administration (n = 10). TPM pharmacokinetics during concomitant CBZ treatment were significantly different from those during TPM monotherapy, suggesting that metabolic clearance of TPM increases when CBZ is coadministered.

CONCLUSIONS

When CBZ is reduced or discontinued, TPM doses may need to be lowered to maintain equivalent plasma concentrations. Adjusting the CBZ dose for pharmacokinetic reasons when TPM is administered as adjunctive treatment does not appear to be necessary.

Pharmaceutical Care in a State Operated Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Department

Pharmaceutical care in psychiatry is a specialized area of practice within the field of pharmacy and has been selected for Board Certification in the near future. In order to be maximally effective in this clinical setting, mental health pharmacists must combine their knowledge of psychopharmacology, pathophysiology, laboratory data, standardized assessment tools, and federal Health Care Financing Administration requirements, with non-pharmacological treatments to function within a treatment team concept. This treatment team concept aims at maximizing individual clinical outcomes while at the same time minimizing adverse side effects of the treatment regimen.

Felbamate levels in patients with epilepsy

The usefulness of felbamate (FBM) levels in managing epilepsy patients has not been determined. The purpose of the present study was to determine if FBM levels obtained at routine office visits correlated with side effects reported by patients. We determined FBM levels by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) of 46 epilepsy patient plasma specimens (41 patients) and assessed medication toxicity and seizure frequency by a questionnaire. Thirty-six patients were treated with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs); concomitant AED levels not in ranges believed to cause toxicity. FBM levels ranged from 9 to 134 microgram/ml, and were divided into three groups for analysis, resulting in low-range (9-36 microgram/ml), midrange (37-54 microgram/ml), and high-level (44-134 microgram/ml) groups. Anorexia and complaints of severe side effects were reported significantly more often in the high-level group as compared with the low- and midrange groups. Significantly more patients in the high-level group (10/13) reported decreased seizure frequency, as compared with 12 of 30 patients in the low- and midrange groups combined. FBM levels correlated linearly with doses overall, but most closely in FBM monotherapy patients.

The effect of age on the apparent clearance of felbamate: a retrospective analysis using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling

The effects of age on felbamate apparent clearance were examined through a retrospective analysis of plasma concentration data from 700 pediatric and adult epileptic patients (age range, 2-74 years) enrolled in six clinical studies. Patients received felbamate as monotherapy or in combination with either the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA). Data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacostatistical modeling technique (NONMEM). Factors in the model included age, body weight, and concomitant AEDs. Apparent clearance was highest in the very young and decreased during the early teenage years, with minimal changes observed beyond 13 years. Mean apparent clearance values were approximately 40% higher in children (2-12 years) compared with those in adults (13-65 years). This pattern and its magnitude were consistent whether felbamate was administered alone or coadministered with CBZ, PHT, or VPA. The increase in clearance is minimal compared with other AEDs including PHT, CBZ, and phenobarbital. Enzyme-inducing AEDs (CBZ and PHT) increased felbamate apparent clearance by 32-38% relative to monotherapy, whereas coadministration with VPA had a minimal effect on felbamate apparent clearance. Dose/concentration linearity was observed at all ages during mono- or polytherapy. These findings suggest that felbamate dosing should be relatively uncomplicated in children relative to that in adults.

Effect of felbamate on valproic acid disposition in healthy volunteers: inhibition of beta-oxidation

We assessed the effects of felbamate (FBM) on the disposition of valpr oic acid (VPA) in healthy volunteer men. Eighteen subjects received sodium VPA, 400 mg/day for 21 days. Plasma and urine samples were taken on day 7 to document the steady-state disposition of VPA alone. From day 8 to day 21, subjects received placebo or FBM at the following doses (mg/day): 1,200, 2,400, 3,000, or 3,600 (n = 2-4 per group). Many adverse events (AE) occurred from about day 10; 2 subjects dropped out and 1 continued on a reduced FBM dose. Pharmacokinetic studies were repeated on day 21 for the 16 subjects who completed the study. FBM was measured in plasma and urine by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). VPA and its 2-en, 4-en, and 3-oxo metabolites in plasma, and VPA (nonconjugated and total), and its 3-oxo and 4-hydroxy metabolites in urine were measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Mean plasma FBM trough concentrations on day 21 ranged from 26.9 mu g/ml (1,200 mg dose) to 76.8 mu g/ml (3,600-mg dose). Mean plasma VPA C max values were 32-42 mu g/ml in the various subgroups when VPA only was administered. Higher plasma VPA levels were observed when FBM was administered concurrently (55.4-63.8 mu g/ml). The excretion of 3-oxo-VPA in urine was significantly lower on day 21 than on day 7, whereas VPA-glucuronide was significantly increased. The effects of FBM on VPA disposition were dose dependent and were maximal at approximately 2400 mg/day. FBM has caused significant inhibition of the beta-oxidation pathway for VPA metabolic clearance, and this had been largely compensated by increased VPA glucuronidation.

Felbamate monotherapy: implications for antiepileptic drug development

We studied the effect of felbamate (FBM) monotherapy on seizure rate in patients with partial and secondarily generalized seizures undergoing presurgical monitoring at a single site. The study design was a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel monotherapy trial. Forty patients whose seizures had not been controlled by standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized. Seizure type was confirmed by video-EEG monitoring. All baseline AEDs were discontinued, and patients were drug-free for 5.3 +/- 2.4 days before randomization to FBM or placebo. After a 4-day titration, seizures were counted for 14 days. Patients receiving FBM had significantly lower seizure rates, whether all randomized patients, patients who survived titration, or study completers were compared. Eight of 19 placebo patients randomized to placebo, as compared with 13 of 21 receiving FBM, completed the 18-day study. Two FBM patients dropped out due to seizures, and 6 dropped out due to side effects, including anxiety, difficulty sleeping, abdominal discomfort, acute psychosis, and orobuccal dyskinesias. Ten placebo patients met the criteria for premature discontinuation owing to seizures, and 1 hd an episode of panic. There was no evidence of hepatic or hematologic toxicity. FBM reduces seizure frequency in patients with localization-related epilepsy.

New antiepileptic drugs--an explosion of activity

The low therapeutic index of established antiepileptic drugs coupled with a better understanding of the pathophysiology of seizure production has led to the development of a range of new therapeutic agents for the treatment of epilepsy. In this review, the three drugs recently licensed in the UK (vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin) are profiled, together with several of the more promising up-and-coming compounds (oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, stiripentol, remacemide and topiramate). Future avenues for clinical research in the pharmacological management of the epilepsies involve their rational use both singly and in combination.

Neuropharmacology and drug interactions in clinical practice

Absorption, distribution, and clearance are key pharmacokinetic principles. These parameters can be highly variable among patients and among compounds, and are factors that must be considered in the wide variability in response to medications. Current antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) present many challenges in their administration. However, understanding and utilizing pharmacokinetic principles can assist the clinician in the appropriate optimization of AEDs.

Felbamate

After the first year of clinical experience, felbamate (FBM) appears to be a valuable antiepileptic drug (AED) for the treatment of intractable epilepsy. However, many patients experience side effects that may discourage continued usage. These may be decreased by using a slower dose-escalation schedule and/or by being more aggressive in decreasing co-medication. The most common troublesome side effects are nausea and insomnia. With the recent observation of aplastic anemia, FBM should be considered only for persons with intractable epilepsy under the care of a physician familiar with FBM. Nevertheless, many patients have benefited significantly from FBM and have made a decision to continue receiving FBM at the presently known risk profile. A few more years of experience may be needed to more accurately determine the final place of FBM in the treatment of epilepsy.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs

We have reviewed the pharmacokinetics of six antiepileptic drugs that are marketed (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, vigabatrin, and zonisamide) and six drugs that are undergoing evaluation (levetiracetam, ralitoline, remacemide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and topiramate). In addition, we have compared the prodrugs eterobarb and fosphenytoin and the controlled-release formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine with their parent compounds. Finally, we have devised a scoring system to compare the pharmacokinetics of new antiepileptic drugs. Using this system, vigabatrin, levetiracetam, gabapentin, and topiramate appea to have the most favourable pharmacokinetic profiles, whilst ralitoline and stiripentol have the least favourable.

Efficacy of felbamate in therapy for partial epilepsy in children

Thirty children (2 to 17 years of age) with refractory partial seizures received open-label felbamate as an add-on medication to their background antiepileptic drugs. The dose was increased up to a maximum of 45 mg/kg. Compared with baseline seizure activity, there was a 53% decrease in seizure frequency during felbamate therapy; 50% of the patients had more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency. Patients older than 10 years of age were more likely to have a favorable response. Age correlated positively with felbamate concentrations and negatively with apparent felbamate clearance. Transient weight loss occurred in 57% of the patients; the weight loss was maximal after 12 weeks of initiation of felbamate, and subsided after the twentieth week of treatment. Anorexia and insomnia were reported in 20% and 16% of the patients, respectively. Adverse effects were generally tolerable; felbamate therapy was discontinued because of side effects in only one patient, because of a rash. We conclude that felbamate can be a useful and well-tolerated medication in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy in children. However, increased apparent clearance of this drug in younger children should be considered in treatment of this age group.

Newer antiepileptic drugs. Towards an improved risk-benefit ratio

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Even though existing antiepileptic drugs can render 80% of newly diagnosed patients seizure free, a significant number of patients have chronic intractable epilepsy causing disability with considerable socioeconomic implications. There is, therefore, a need for more potent and effective antiepileptic drugs and drugs with fewer adverse effects, particularly CNS effects. Drugs for the treatment of partial seizures are particularly needed. With major advances in our understanding of the basic neuropathology, neuropharmacology and neurophysiology of epilepsy, numerous candidate novel antiepileptic drugs have been developed in recent years. This review comparatively evaluates the pharmacokinetics, efficacy and adverse effects of 12 new antiepileptic drugs namely vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, oxcarbazepine, felbamate, tiagabine, eterobarb, zonisamide, remacemide, stiripentol, topiramate and levetiracetam (ucb-L059). Of the 12 drugs, vigabatrin, lamotrigine and gabapentin have recently been marketed in the UK. Five of these new drugs have known mechanisms of action (vigabatrin, lamotrigine, tiagabine, oxcarbazepine and eterobarb), which may provide for a more rational approach to the treatment of epilepsy. Oxcarbazepine, remacemide and eterobarb are prodrugs. Vigabatrin, gabapentin and topiramate are more promising on the basis of their pharmacokinetic characteristics in that they are excreted mainly unchanged in urine and not susceptible to significant pharmacokinetic interactions. In contrast, lamotrigine, felbamate and stiripentol exhibit significant drug interactions. Essentially, all the drugs are effective in partial or secondarily generalised seizures and are effective to varying degrees in other seizure types. Particularly welcome is the possible effectiveness of zonisamide in myoclonus and felbamate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. In relation to adverse effects, CNS effects are observed with all drugs, however, gabapentin, remacemide and levetiracetam appear to exhibit least. There is also the possibility of rational duotherapy, using drugs with known mechanisms of action, as an additional therapeutic approach. The efficacy of these 12 antiepileptic drug occurs despite the fact that candidate antiepileptic drugs are evaluated under highly unfavourable conditions, namely as add-on therapy in patients refractory to drug management and with high seizure frequency. Thus, whilst candidate drugs which do become licensed are an advance in that they are effective and/or are associated with less adverse effects than currently available antiepileptic drugs in these patients, it is possible that these drugs may exhibit even more improved risk-benefit ratios when used in normal clinical practice.

Potential pharmacokinetic interaction between felbamate and phenobarbital

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of a potential pharmacokinetic interaction between felbamate and phenobarbital in a patient with epilepsy.

CASE SUMMARY

A patient with a history of a mixed seizure disorder and static encephalopathy who was receiving sodium valproate 750 mg/d and phenobarbital 230 mg/d was initiated on felbamate (as part of a compassionate use program). Upon instituting felbamate, valproate dosage was reduced to 500 mg/d and phenobarbital to 200 mg/d. Felbamate dosage was titrated to approximately 50 mg/kg/d over three weeks. In this patient, plasma phenobarbital concentrations increased from 48 micrograms/mL to 68 micrograms/mL, at which point the patient was hospitalized because of clinically significant neurotoxicity. Phenobarbital dosage was subsequently reduced to 150 mg/d; this resulted in phenobarbital trough concentrations of 60 micrograms/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Felbamate has been shown previously to interact with multiple other anticonvulsant medications, including valproate, phenytoin, and carbamazepine. Felbamate appears to decrease the clearance of valproate, phenytoin, and carbamazepine epoxide to a significant extent, an effect that may be the result of inhibition of the metabolism of these compounds. Carbamazepine plasma concentrations have been demonstrated to decrease following administration of felbamate, suggesting metabolic induction. It is reasonable to suggest that based on these findings and the observations in our patient, felbamate comedication may result in clinically significant increases in plasma phenobarbital concentrations. It would seem prudent, therefore, when initiating or adjusting felbamate therapy in patients receiving this drug combination, to monitor phenobarbital plasma concentrations.

Comparative effects of felbamate and other compounds on N-methyl-D-aspartic acid-induced convulsions and lethality in mice

Felbamate and selected compounds were evaluated for their ability to protect against N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-induced convulsions and lethality in mice. Convulsions produced by intracerebroventricular administration of NMDA (0.8 micrograms per mouse) were antagonized by felbamate, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, valproate, diazepam, 2-amino-5-phosphonovalergic acid (APV), dextromethorphan and ketamine. NMDA (350 mg kg-1 intraperitoneally) produced 100% lethality in mice. Felbamate, phenytoin, and phenobarbital were ineffective in preventing NMDA-induced lethalities, whereas diazepam, APV, ketamine and dextromethorphan were the most potent compounds in preventing lethalities. Any relationship between the protective effects of felbamate against NMDA-induced seizures and competitive or non-competitive antagonism of NMDA receptor sites, however, cannot be established until further experimentation is carried out.

Advances in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy

Three new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are likely to be approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration in the near future. In general, all three have good safety profiles, causing only mild, well-tolerated side effects. Felbamate (FBM) is effective in the treatment of partial seizures and Lennox-Gastaut epilepsy. FBM appears to have a broader spectrum of antiepileptic activity than carbamazepine (CBZ) or phenytoin (PHT). Gabapentin (GBP) was designed to be a structured analogue of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). GBP is most effective in the maximal electroshock model of seizures but may have a different mechanism of action than CBZ and PHT. Unique pharmacokinetic properties (no hepatic metabolism and no protein binding) may make GBP especially useful for certain patients, such as those with hepatic disease and elderly patients who are receiving multiple medications. The overall profile of activity of lamotrigine (LTG) is similar to that of PHT and may act on voltage-sensitive sodium channels to stabilize neuronal membranes. LTG is effective in partial seizures, and there is some indication that LTG may be helpful in primary generalized seizures. The long half-life and lack of effect on other AEDs will make LTG easy to dose and add to a patient's existing regimen. These new agents will provide physicians with more effective medications from which to choose in the treatment of the patient with epilepsy.

Prototype antiepileptic drug clinical development plan

Antiepileptic drug (AED) development has been generally difficult owing to many factors: regulatory requirements for demonstration of efficacy and safety, subject availability, traditional trial designs, and physicians' beliefs about epilepsy and its treatment. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations require a new drug to be shown safe and effective for its intended use before it can be marketed. The unambiguous proof required is a formidable hurdle for AED development. We report a recent clinical development plan highlighting innovations in clinical trial design that have addressed these requirements, discuss alternative endpoints, and compare the results of various trial designs at various stages of development. This model clinical development plan includes trials relevant to all three clinically relevant contexts in which an AED might be used: as an adjunct to an existing regimen, as a substitution for much of an existing AED regimen, and as monotherapy.

Felbamate

OBJECTIVE

To provide an up-to-date review of the current literature on felbamate (FBM) and its use as an antiepileptic medication (AEM).

DATA SOURCES

All published literature (manuscripts and abstracts) on FBM was reviewed. The initial bibliography (up to September 1992) was provided by the manufacturer (Carter-Wallace Laboratories); subsequent literature was obtained from American Epilepsy Society presentations in December 1992 and manuscripts published up to January 1993.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION

All pertinent literature was reviewed. Information from the publications was abstracted and organized by the author.

DATA SYNTHESIS

FBM is effective in complex partial seizures either as monotherapy or as an adjunct in patients receiving other AEMs. In addition, it has shown efficacy in some seizures associated with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Adverse effects appear to be mild. When FBM is given as monotherapy, the primary adverse effects are insomnia and weight loss. Patients receiving multiple AEMs may have increased adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

FBM appears to be an effective new AEM. Additional studies as to its role in newly diagnosed and pregnant patients are needed. Pharmacokinetic studies in children, patients with renal failure, and patients on nonepilepsy drugs also are needed.

Advances in pharmacotherapy: recent developments in the treatment of epilepsy

Epilepsy is a disorder of the central nervous system in which the clinical symptoms are recurrent seizures. An increased understanding of the underlying mechanism of seizures and more definitive diagnostic procedures have improved the care of the patient with epilepsy. An improved classification of various seizure types, including specific epilepsy syndromes has helped optimize use of the standard antiepileptic drugs. Research on the mechanism of seizures has led to new antiepileptic drugs. More definitive diagnostic procedures have led to more accurate identification of patients likely to benefit from epilepsy surgery. This review focuses on these areas.

Neuroprotective effect of felbamate after kainic acid-induced status epilepticus

Felbamate (FBM), a newly developed antiepileptic drug (AED), was previously shown to offer some neuroprotective effects against hypoxic injury in both in vivo and in vitro studies. We administered FBM (100 or 300 mg/kg) to 30-day-old rats 1 h after they received a convulsant dosage of kainic acid (KA). Animals were then tested at age 80 days in the water maze, open field, and handling tests. Seizure latency was then tested by flurothyl inhalation. Animals that received 300 mg/kg FBM performed better in all three tests and had longer latencies to flurothyl-induced seizures than did animals that received vehicle. This study suggests that FBM may have some neuroprotective effects after KA-induced status epilepticus (SE).

Efficacy of felbamate in childhood epileptic encephalopathy (Lennox-Gastaut syndrome)

BACKGROUND

The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a childhood disorder characterized by multiple types of seizures, mental retardation, characteristic electroencephalographic abnormalities, and resistance to standard antiepileptic drugs. Felbamate is an investigational antiepileptic drug with a preclinical profile that suggests it would be effective in patients with multiple types of seizures. In controlled clinical trials, felbamate was superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of refractory partial-onset seizures.

METHODS

We studied the efficacy of felbamate in 73 patients ranging in age from 4 to 36 years who had the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. During a 28-day base-line phase, the patients received their usual antiepileptic therapies. At the end of this phase, felbamate or placebo was administered for 70 days in addition to the current antiepileptic medications. The dosage of felbamate was titrated during the first 14 days of the treatment phase to a maximum of 45 mg per kilogram of body weight per day or 3600 mg per day, whichever was less. The primary efficacy variables were the total number of seizures counted during a four-hour period of video recording, parents' or guardians' global evaluations of the patients' quality of life, and the total number of atonic seizures, as reported by parents or guardians.

RESULTS

The patients treated with felbamate had a 34 percent decrease in the frequency of atonic seizures, as compared with a 9 percent decrease in the patients who received placebo (P = 0.01). The felbamate-treated patients had a 19 percent decrease in the total frequency of seizures, as compared with a 4 percent increase in the placebo group (P = 0.002). The global-evaluation scores were significantly higher in the felbamate group than in the placebo group from day 49 to the end of the study. There were no significant differences in the frequency of seizures occurring during video monitoring, but there was a significant reduction (P = 0.017) in the number of tonic-clonic seizures during the maintenance period in the felbamate group. The types and frequency of side effects were similar in the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Felbamate is beneficial in patients with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Felbamate monotherapy: controlled trial in patients with partial onset seizures

Felbamate (FBM) monotherapy was evaluated in 44 patients with uncontrolled partial onset seizures in a unique, single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. During the 56-day baseline period, patients were required to have at least 8 seizures and to be receiving only one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) at a therapeutic level; a second AED was allowed if at a subtherapeutic level. Patients were randomized to valproate (VPA), 15 mg/kg, or to FBM, 3,600 mg/day. In the treatment phase, previous AEDs were discontinued by study day 28 (by one-third decrements on study days 1, 14, and 28). Study end points were completion of 112 study days or the fulfilling of escape criteria. Criteria for escape relative to baseline were: two-fold increase in monthly seizure frequency, two-fold increase in highest 2-day seizure frequency, single generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTC) if none occurred during baseline, or significant prolongation of GTCs. The predetermined primary efficacy variable was the number of patients escaping in each treatment group. Nineteen patients on VPA and 3 on FBM met escape criteria (p less than 0.001, chi-square test). When overall seizure frequency among study completers was compared with baseline, the FBM group had a 50 to 65% reduction in seizure frequency. FBM adverse experiences were all mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of adverse experiences was lower in monotherapy. FBM monotherapy was effective in the treatment of partial onset seizures with or without generalization and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

Blood-brain barrier penetration of felbamate

The brain uptake index (BUI) method of Oldendorf was used to examine blood-brain barrier (BBB) drug transport in mice, rats, and rabbits; felbamate (FBM) extraction (E) in a single transcapillary passage was 5-20%, and drug uptake in rat brain was not concentration-dependent. Like diazepam, FBM was retained in mouse brain. To ensure that radioactivity measurements reflected the disposition of parent drug and not some metabolite, extracts of mouse brain were prepared for further analysis. No FBM metabolites were detected in brain 5 min after administration: In silica gel thin-layer chromatography (TLC), a single [14C]FBM peak was detected--Rf = 0.504 (70:30 acetone:hexane). Confirmatory high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separations [30% methanol, 1.3 ml/min, C18 column, ultraviolet (UV) detection 254 nm] indicated a single peak containing greater than 93% of the radioactivity in the FBM fraction (12-min retention time). In a single transit through the liver (a nonbarrier tissue with fenestrated capillaries), FBM E was 82%. The octanol:buffered saline partition coefficient of FBM was (log PFBM =) 0.54 +/- 0.01. Thus, lipid-mediated BBB penetration of FBM is similar to that of phenytoin (PHT) and phenobarbital (PB). Plasma proteins do not affect FBM entry to the brain: neither human serum, nor bovine or human serum albumin (BSA, HSA), nor human alpha 1 acid glycoprotein (orosomucoid) significantly modified BBB FBM extraction. Erythrocyte-borne FBM may also dissociate and gain access to the brain in a single transcapillary passage. Differences between newborn and adult rabbit BBB FBM extraction and between different anesthetic agents are attributable to cerebral blood flow (CBF) rates. The permeability-surface area products (PS = [CBF].[E]) for FBM in rats, rabbits, and mice were 0.09, 0.16 and 0.30 ml/min/g, respectively. Preliminary autoradiographic analyses of frozen brain sections suggest that [14C]FBM distributes relatively uniformly throughout the brain and that minor variations apparently are a function of differing CBF rates.

Loreclezole monotherapy in patients with partial seizures

Monotherapy is preferable in the treatment of epilepsy; a new antiepileptic drug has to be checked on its efficacy in monotherapy. In this study patients who had successfully been treated with loreclezole in previous studies were gradually withdrawn from their antiepileptic comedication. Nine patients participated in the study. Reduction of comedication was well tolerated in all, no serious side effects occurred. In 6 patients seizure frequency remained unchanged, i.e., within 50% limits. Two patients experienced a clear increase in seizure frequency. In 2 patients reintroduction of a second antiepileptic drug was mandatory. One patient experienced a further reduction in seizure frequency when monotherapy was reached. This observation indicates efficacy of loreclezole, also in monotherapy.

Antiepileptic medications in development

Recently, there has been an increase in the research devoted to the study of investigational antiepileptic medications. This has led to extensive clinical trials of several new compounds. This review focuses on four of these antiepileptic medications in development: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, and vigabatrin. Each has a unique mechanism of action and great potential for the treatment of epilepsy.