The effect of a 473-mL (16-oz) water drink on vasovagal donor reaction rates in high-school students

The efficacy and effectiveness of drinking interventions to reduce vasovagal reactions in blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Blood establishments strive to ensure the safety and comfort of blood donors while minimizing adverse events. This review aims to assess the efficacy and effectiveness of eating and/or drinking interventions before, during and/or after blood donation in reducing vasovagal reactions (VVRs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing eating and/or drinking interventions to no intervention, placebo or usual practice on (pre-)syncopal VVRs and related symptoms. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the risk of bias and overall certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

Pre-donation water ingestion likely results in reduced on-site VVRs, compared to no water (2 fewer per 100 donors, moderate-certainty evidence). A pre-donation isotonic drink likely results in reduced VVRs, compared to usual practice (2 fewer per 100 donors, moderate-certainty evidence). Pre-donation salt-loaded sweetened lemon water may result in fewer off-site VVRs, compared to sweetened lemon water only (1 fewer per 100 donors, low-certainty evidence). Pre-donation water and a gel cap containing sucrose with 250 mg caffeine may result in fewer blood donor reaction ratings, compared to pre-donation water only (low-certainty evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-donation plain water ingestion or isotonic drink probably results in a large reduction in on-site and off-site VVRs. Pre-donation water ingestion with caffeine consumption or salt supplementation may result in a VVR reduction, compared to water ingestion only. Future large trials are required to increase the certainty of the effect of these and other interventions in the prevention of VVRs.

Prevention strategies for vasovagal reaction in whole blood donors: A quadri-armed randomised control trial

INTRODUCTION

Vasovagal reaction (VVR) is a frequently encountered generalised donor adverse reaction, associated with donor deterrence towards future donation. Several mitigation strategies for prevention of VVR were tried but still not standardised. This quadri-armed randomised study evaluated the utility of water ingestion, applied muscle tension (AMT) and combination of both in preventing the VVR among blood donors.

METHODS

A quadri-armed randomised controlled trial was performed on 4320 whole blood donors. Blood donors of 18-65 years of age were randomised into four groups based on the interventions performed i.e., control with no intervention (Group 1, n = 1081), water ingestion (Group 2, n = 1082), AMT (Group 3, n = 1070) and combined intervention (Group 4, n = 1087). VVR during and immediately after blood donation were observed along with assessment of risk factors in blood donors and the effectiveness of interventions were analysed.

RESULTS

The incidence of VVR observed 1.6% in our study, with the highest occurrence in the control group (2.5%) and the lowest in the combined intervention group (0.9%). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the control group donors faced a 1.38-fold greater risk of VVR compared to those receiving interventions (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.10-1.75). Other risk factors included younger age (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.05-2.17), first-time donation (OR: 5.7, 95% CI: 1.66-5.74), prior history of VVR (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 10.4-101.52).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The combined approach of water ingestion and AMT proved significantly more effective in VVR prevention compared to individual interventions.

Pre-donation water and salty snacks to prevent vasovagal reactions among blood donors

BACKGROUND

Minimizing the risk of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) can prevent donor harms and improve donor return. We report the results of a program to reduce VVR rates.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The program was implemented on June 11, 2017 and consisted in drinking water and eating a salty snack before donating blood, plasma, or platelets. All donations made during the "pre-program period" (October 11, 2015-June 10, 2017) and "post-program period" (June 11, 2017-May 11, 2019) were included. Study outcomes comprised VVRs (any severity) and syncopal VVRs, whether employee- or donor-reported. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis proxied causality based on the "pre-program trend," the "immediate trend" (i.e., immediately before versus after the program), and the "post-program trend". The relative risk (RR) of VVR (along with confidence intervals [CIs]) was reported, overall and stratified by subgroups based on age, sex, donor type (i.e., first-time versus repeat), and donation type (i.e., whole blood versus apheresis).

RESULTS

The monthly VVR rate (any severity) dropped from 4.6% in the pre-program period to 4.3% in the post-program period, and never reached its pre-program level. The ITS analysis revealed a statistically significant and increasing pre-program trend (RR [95% CI] = 1.011 [1.002-1.020]), a statistically significant and decreasing immediate trend (RR [95% CI] = 0.848 [0.743-0.969]), and a non-statistically-significant and stable post-program trend (RR [95% CI] = 0.999 [0.993-1.006]). Similar trends were observed for nearly all high- and low-risk subgroups. No statistically significant trend was observed for syncopal VVRs.

DISCUSSION

These results suggest that the herein-described program durably reduced the incidence of VVRs (any severity) by ~15%.

Autonomic, endocrine, and psychological stress responses to different forms of blood draw

Background

Although fingerstick is often favorably compared to venipuncture as a less invasive method of drawing blood for clinical labs, there is little empirical research that compares physical and psychological stress responses to fingerstick vs. venipuncture (blood draw using a needle in the arm) within the same person.

Methods and findings

We assessed changes in cortisol (a stress hormone), heart rate variability (a marker of autonomic stress), and psychological stress in 40 healthy women who completed both venipuncture and fingerstick. Contrary to our predictions, there was a significant decline in cortisol across conditions, with greater decline from pre- to post-draw in response to venipuncture than fingerstick. There were similar patterns of rise and fall in heart rate variability in both types of blood draw, suggestive of mild vasovagal responses. Psychological measures of stress (such as negative emotion and perceived stress) were generally stronger predictors of participant’s reported pain and blood draw preferences than physical stress measures.

Conclusions

These findings challenge the characterization of fingerstick as necessarily “less invasive” than venipuncture, as participant’s stress responses to fingerstick were equivalent to (and for some measures greater than) their response to venipuncture. Heart rate variability response to fingerstick significantly predicted that individual’s vasovagal-like responses to venipuncture, suggesting that measuring heart rate variability during pre-donation hemoglobin testing may identify donors at risk for adverse events during venipuncture.

Incidence and risk predictors analysis of adverse donor reactions in whole blood donation

OBJECTIVE

Adverse donor reactions in normal healthy blood donors is not unusual. However, these unpleasant effects have a negative impact on donor retention. Adverse event due to blood donation is multifactorial in origin. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the frequency and type of adverse donor reactions during or after blood donation. More importantly, this study also aimed at analyzing important risk predictors of adverse donor reaction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted from May 2017 to April 2019 in the department of Transfusion Medicine at a tertiary care center in eastern India. Data were stored in Microsoft excel 2016 by using a standardized format as per ISBT criteria and analyzed with software "R, version 3.5.3" to find out the various independent precipitating factor.

RESULTS

Overall, 107 donors (0.98%) experienced adverse events with 10,814 whole blood donations. The first time, females, younger age donors (18-30 years), and donors with a mean arterial blood pressure of less than 90mm of Hg were the most important independent risk factors predicting the possibility of adverse donor reaction. Donors' weight, hemoglobin, and the type of donation had not affected the frequency of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of adverse donor reactions helps in selecting the blood donors who are at risk of donor reactions. Our study highlights the importance of proper predonation screening especially in terms of assessment of mean blood pressure, along with identification of first time and female blood donors in order to reduce untoward donor reaction.

Donation related fears predict vasovagal reactions and donor attrition among high school donors

BACKGROUND

This longitudinal study of high school whole blood donors examined relationships among donation-related fears assessed prior to donation, vasovagal reactions to donation, and the proportion of donors who attempted another donation over the subsequent 60 weeks.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Data regarding vasovagal reactions and attempted donation were obtained from donor records of 530 female and 342 male high school donors who answered questions about five types of fear (ie, of blood draw, needles, seeing blood, feeling pain, or fainting) prior to their index donation.

RESULTS

Each type of fear was associated with an increased risk of vasovagal reactions (all P < .001) and a smaller percentage of attempted donations was seen among those who reported at least one type of fear (53%) as compared to those who did not report any fear (62.1%); P = .022; β = -0.374, OR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50-0.94. Path analyses of the relationships among fear, vasovagal reaction, and attempted donation revealed significant indirect effects for each type of fear. Specifically, donors who reported fear were at increased odds of experiencing a vasovagal reaction, which, in turn, was associated with decreased odds of attempting a repeat donation.

CONCLUSION

Donation-related fears are associated with reduced donor return rates, and this effect is mediated through an increased risk for vasovagal reactions. For both practical and ethical reasons, blood collectors are encouraged to identify and intervene with fearful donors to reduce the likelihood of negative donation-related symptoms and enhance donor retention.

Beyond Description: The Predictive Role of Affect, Memory, and Context in the Decision to Donate or Not Donate Blood

Background

Research on the recruitment and retention of blood donors has typically drawn on a homogeneous set of descriptive theories, viewing the decision to become and remain a donor as the outcome of affectively cold, planned, and rational decision-making by the individual. While this approach provides insight into how our donors think about blood donation, it is limited and has not translated into a suite of effective interventions. In this review, we set out to explore how a broader consideration of the influences on donor decision-making, in terms of affect, memory, and the context in which donation takes place, may yield benefit in the way we approach donor recruitment and retention.

Summary

Drawing on emerging research, we argue for the importance of considering the implications of both the positive and the negative emotions that donors experience and we argue for the importance of directly targeting affect in interventions to recruit nondonors. Next, we focus on the reconstructed nature of memory and the factors that influence what we remember about an event. We discuss how these processes may impact the retention of donors and the potential to intervene to enhance donors' recollections of their experiences. Finally, we discuss how our focus on the individual has led us to neglect the influence of the context in which donation takes place on donor behavior. We argue that the amassing of comprehensive large data sets detailing both the characteristics of the individuals and the context of their giving will ultimately allow for the more effective deployment of resources to improve recruitment and retention.

Key Messages

In suggesting these directions for future research, our want is to move beyond the ways in which we have traditionally described blood donation behavior with the aim of improving our theorizing about donors while improving the translational value of our research.

A Study on the Effect of Pre-donation Salt Loading on Vasovagal Reactions in Young College Going Whole Blood Donors

INTRODUCTION

The pathophysiology of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) involves both psychological and physiological components. Strategies which could allay physiological changes include interventions like pre-donation water intake and applied muscle tension have been published, however salt loading has not been tested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cross sectional study enrolling 1000 young college going whole blood donors with intervention 250 ml of salted loaded water or plain water as placebo. The immediate VVRs were recorded with respect to age, gender, donation status, blood volume, blood volume drawn and BMI.

RESULTS

VVRs occurred in 25 out of 1000 (2.5%) young college going whole blood donors. Overall there were 18 VVRs in 526 (3.4%) donors in the placebo arm compared to 7 in 474 (1.5%) in salt loaded arm with odds of 2.36 (p = 0.049), however the difference in means of VVRs between the study arms could not achieve statistical significance on binary logistic regression. The independent risk factors including age, gender, blood volume, blood volume withdrawn and BMI or the donation status were not found to be effect modifiers on the occurrence of VVRs.

CONCLUSION

Salt loading before blood donation in young college going whole blood donors does decrease the VVRs in the immediate post donation period; however the decrease was limited to a trend and could not attain statistical significance.

Water ingestion decreases cardiac workload time-dependent in healthy adults with no effect of gender

Ingestion of water entails a variety of cardiovascular responses. However, the precise effect remains elusive. We aimed to determine in healthy adults the effect of water on cardiac workload and to investigate potential gender differences. We pooled data from two controlled studies where blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) were continuously recorded before and after the ingestion of 355 mL of tap water. Additionally, we calculated double product by multiplying systolic BP with HR and evaluated spectral parameters referring to vagal tone. All parameters were investigated for potential differences based on gender. In response to water, HR, systolic BP, and double product decreased significantly during the first 30 min. However, these effects were attenuated for HR and double product and even abolished for systolic BP over the subsequent 30 min. Over the entire post-drink period (60 min), decreases in HR and double product (all P < 0.05) were observed. Spectral markers for vagal tone increased with the on-set of the water drink and remained elevated until the end (P < 0.005). No significant gender difference in cardiac workload parameters was observed. We provide evidence that drinking water decreases, in a time-dependent fashion, cardiac workload and that these responses appear not to be influenced by gender.

Negative experiences and pre-donation blood pressure: the role of attitude and anxiety

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Negative experiences (NEs) have been shown to result in an increased stress response, as indicated by blood pressure, at the subsequent donation. This response might be influenced by how the donor rates the donation in terms of importance and pleasantness [affective attitude (AA)/cognitive attitude (CA)] or by anxiety about donating blood. We investigated the effect of AA/CA/anxiety on the impact of NEs on pre-donation blood pressure (pd-BP) in the subsequent donation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

pd-BP at visit 3 was compared between donors with and without a history of NEs during or after their first two visits (visit 1: medical check, visit 2: first donation). The effect of AA/CA/anxiety (measured 1 month prior to visit 1 on a 7-point scale) on visit 3 pd-BP was explored using linear regression and interaction analyses. Analyses were stratified for gender, age and pd-BP at visit 1, which were taken into account as confounders.

RESULTS

In 1106 first-time blood donors (70% female), 632 donors (57% of total) indicated an NE at their first donation. Mean scores for AA/CA/anxiety were 5·2/6·5/2·2 (men without NE), 4·8/6·3/3·0 (men with NE), 5·2/6·6/2·6 (women without NE) and 4·8/6·6/3·2 (women with NE). No significant associations were found for NE and pd-BP at visit 3 after adjusting for confounding. Of 48 interaction effects, four were significant, but effects were small and inconsistent.

CONCLUSION

In donors who had had negative experiences during their first donation, anxiety and attitude to donation did not influence their pre-donation blood pressure at their subsequent visit.

A randomized trial to evaluate the use of text messaging, letter, and telephone call reminders to improve return of blood donors with reactive serologic tests

BACKGROUND

Low return rates for notification and counseling among donors with reactive serologic screening tests have been reported worldwide. A randomized trial to test the effectiveness of text message, letter, or telephone call reminders to improve return among nonresponding first-time blood donors with reactive serologic tests was conducted.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Donors with serologically reactive screening test results who had a cell phone and resided in the metropolitan telephone area code of São Paulo in the period from August 2013 through July 2014 were eligible. A consecutive sample of first-time donors with reactive screening tests who had not responded to a standard letter requesting the donor return to the blood center were randomly assigned to receive a text, a new letter, or a telephone call requesting return for notification and counseling. Return rates were measured over the subsequent 30 days.

RESULTS

The return rate after a phone call reminder was better than that for a text message (39.8% vs. 28.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.64) but not better than that for a letter (39.8% vs. 34.4%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80-1.99). Older age was a predictor of higher rate of return with each year increase in age associated with a 2% increase in the odds of return (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04).

CONCLUSION

In nonresponding serologic reactive donors, telephone call led to a higher return rate than text message. The results of this study suggest that use of text messages, while attractive for its simplicity, will not lead to increased donor notification success after serologically reactive marker results from blood donation in Brazil.

Sexual dimorphism in the osmopressor response following water ingestion

Compared with men, women exhibit a greater magnitude of increase in resting blood pressure after drinking a single water bolus of 500 ml. Accordingly, our study provides direct evidence of sexual dimorphism in the haemodynamic response to water intake.

There is conflicting evidence as to whether water drinking elicits a pressor response in healthy young adults. The inclusion of a variable number of women may have contributed to the discrepancies found in past research. Thus, we aimed at exploring whether the osmopressor response follows a sexually dimorphic pattern. In a randomized fashion, 31 healthy adults (16 men; 15 women, aged 18–40 years) ingested 50 and 500 ml of water before completing a resting protocol on two separate days. Arterial blood pressure, heart rate and spectral heart rate variability were measured in the seated position at pre- and post-25 min of water ingestion. Women responded to 500 ml of water with a greater proportion of change in diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P<0.05). Conversely, the percent change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate was not different between sexes after 500 ml of water. Overall, women demonstrated lower blood pressure, but higher resting heart rate compared with men (P<0.05). In contrast, heart rate variability was similar between sexes before and after ingesting either volume of water. There was a bradycardic effect of water and, irrespectively of sex; this was accompanied by increased high frequency power (HF) (P<0.05). We conclude that women display a greater magnitude of pressor response than men post-water ingestion. Accordingly, we provide direct evidence of sexual dimorphism in the haemodynamic response to water intake in young healthy adults.

Impact of Elevated Hemoglobin and Serum Protein on Vasovagal Reaction from Blood Donation

We conducted a cross-sectional study to elucidate factors contributing to vasovagal reaction (VVR), the most frequent side effect following whole blood and apheresis donations. Complications recorded at the collection sites after voluntary donations by the Japanese Red Cross Tokyo Blood Center (JRC), in the 2006 and 2007 fiscal years, were analyzed by both univariate analysis and the multivariate conditional logistic regression model. Of 1,119,716 blood donations over the full two years, complications were recorded for 13,320 donations (1.18%), among which 67% were VVR. There were 4,303 VVR cases which had sufficient information and could be used for this study. For each VVR case, two sex- and age-matched controls (n = 8,606) were randomly selected from the donors without complications. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), predonation blood pressure, pulse and blood test results, including total protein, albumin, and hemoglobin, were compared between the VVR group and the control group. In univariate analysis, the VVR group was significantly younger, with a lower BMI, higher blood pressure and higher blood protein and hemoglobin levels than the control group (p<0.001). Furthermore, blood protein and hemoglobin levels showed dose-dependent relationships with VVR incidences by the Cochran-Armitage trend test (p<0.01). For both sexes, after adjusting for confounders with the multivariate conditional logistic regression model, the higher than median groups for total protein (male: OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.76,-2.21; female: OR 2.29; 95%CI 2.05–2.56), albumin (male: 1.75; 1.55–1.96; female: 1.76; 1.57–1.97) and hemoglobin (male: 1.98; 1.76–2.22; female: 1.62; 1.45–1.81) had statistically significant higher risk of VVR compared to the lower than median groups. These elevated serum protein and hemoglobin levels might offer new indicators to help understand VVR occurrence.

How Can We Improve Retention of the First-Time Donor? A Systematic Review of the Current Evidence

Blood products are critical to health systems and donations by voluntary nonremunerated donors are recommended. Worldwide, however, only around 5% of those eligible to donate do so and around half of those never return to donate again. This review focuses on what deters first-time donors, what predicts their retention, and what interventions may promote retention of this group. A comprehensive search of relevant databases identified 9 studies investigating motives and deterrents of first-time donors, 14 studies investigating predictors for first-time donors (13 whole blood [WB] and 2 plasmapheresis), and 15 studies (in 14 published articles) detailing interventions conducted on first-time donors. Drawing on an established blood donation taxonomy, studies were classified by 2 independent raters. Interventions were also classified into traditional, behavioral, or social science interventions. With only 2 eligible studies among first-time plasmapheresis donors, analyses focused on WB donors. First-time WB donors reported benevolent and collectivistic motivations, as well as personal benefits to commence WB donation. Self-reported deterrents have typically not been examined. Intention predicted first-time donor retention with intention determined by attitudes and a sense of (perceived behavioral) control. However, anxiety, adverse events, and deferrals all deterred retention. Traditional interventions, such as reminders and incentives, are widespread yet had only a small effect on return of first-time donors. Although behavioral science interventions such as fluid loading are effective, the strongest effect for the return of first-time donors was found when individual psychological support was provided. The purpose of this analysis was to identify the factors associated with the commencement and continuation of first WB donations. The current review revealed that self-reported motivators are typically not effective, and most successful predictive factors identified have not been translated into interventions. Future work would do well to identify, manage, and meet donors' expectations along with developing more individualized donation experiences. Blood donor research should delineate donor career stages; addressing first-time donor retention will support stable panels for blood collection agencies.

Management of young blood donors

The emphasis on high-school blood drives and acceptance of 16-year-old blood donors led to more research on physiologic and psychological ways to decrease vasovagal reaction rates in young blood donors and to increase donor retention. Research on how to accomplish this has been advantageous for the blood collection industry and blood donors. This review discussed the current situation and what can be done psychologically, physiologically, and via process improvements to decrease vasovagal reaction rates and increase donor retention. The donation process can be significantly improved. Future interventions may include more dietary salt, a shorter muscle tension program to make it more feasible, recommendations for post-donation muscle tension / squatting / laying down for lightheadedness, more donor education by the staff at the collection site, more staff attention to donors with fear or higher risk for a vasovagal reaction (e.g. estimated blood volume near 3.5 l, first-time donor), and a more focused donation process to ensure a pleasant and safer procedure.

Risk factors for complications in donors at first and repeat whole blood donation: a cohort study with assessment of the impact on donor return

BACKGROUND

First-time donation is among recognised risk factors for vasovagal reactions to blood donation and reactions are known to reduce donor return. We assessed associations between potential risk factors and vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in first-time whole blood donation in comparison to repeat donation and analysed the impact of complications on donor return.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a cohort study on whole blood donations in The Netherlands from 1/1/2010 to 31/12/2010 using data extracted from the blood service information system. Donation data up to 31/12/2011 were used to ascertain donor return.

RESULTS

In 2010 28,786 donors made first whole blood donations and there were 522,958 repeat donations. Vasovagal reactions occurred in 3.9% of first donations by males and 3.5% of first donations by females compared to in 0.2% and 0.6%, respectively, of repeat donations. Associations of vasovagal reactions with other factors including age, body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similar in first-time and repeat donors. Needle-related complications occurred in 0.2% of male and 0.5% of female first-time donations and in 0.1% and 0.3%, respectively, of repeat donations. Among first-time donors, the return rate within 1 year was 82% following an uncomplicated first donation, but 55% and 61% following vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications, respectively; the corresponding percentages among repeat donors were 86%, 58% and 82%.

DISCUSSION

Among first-time donors, females suffered less than males from vasovagal reactions. Other risk factors had similar associations among first-time and repeat donors. Vasovagal reactions and needle-related complications in both first-time and repeat donors are followed by reduced donor return.

The Osmopressor Response Is Linked to Upregulation of Aquaporin-1 Tyrosine Phosphorylation on Red Blood Cell Membranes

Studies in patients with an impaired efferent baroreflex led us to discover that ingesting water induces a robust increase in blood pressure and vascular resistance. This response was also present in healthy subjects with intact baroreflexes, described as osmopressor response. This study was to discover the physiology of the osmopressor response by determining functional activation of the aquaporin-1 water channel receptor on red blood cell membranes in young healthy subjects. In a randomized, controlled, crossover fashion, 22 young healthy subjects (age, 19–27 years) ingested either 500 or 50 mL of water. Heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac index, and total peripheral vascular resistance were measured using a Finometer hemodynamic monitor. Blood sampling was performed at 5 minutes before and at 25 and 50 minutes after either the water ingestion or control session. Immunoblotting for aquaporin-1 tyrosine phosphorylation was performed before and after subjects ingested either 500 or 50 mL of water. At 25 minutes after the ingestion of 500 mL of water, total peripheral resistance increased significantly, and plasma osmolality decreased. Functional expression of aquaporin-1 tyrosine phosphorylation on red blood cell membranes increased significantly at 25 and 50 minutes after subjects ingested 500 mL of water compared with that before water ingestion. This study concludes that water ingestion produces upregulation of aquaporin-1 tyrosine phosphorylation on red blood cell, which presents as a novel biological marker that occurs simultaneously with the osmopressor response.

[Blood donor hemovigilance: impact for donor and recipient safety]

Since its creation in 1993, hemovigilance has an important place for blood safety. The part concerning donors, as the name suggests, targeted on improvement of donor's safety covers in fact the two points of the transfusion chain with serious adverse events in donor, epidemiologic survey for recipients and post-donation information on the two sides. Organized management and close collaboration between the actors of the transfusion chain are necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the system.

Donor anxiety, needle pain, and syncopal reactions combine to determine retention: a path analysis of two-year donor return data

BACKGROUND

Efforts to expand the donor pool by recruiting younger donors have resulted in higher numbers of initial donations, but retention of young donors continues to be challenging.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Path analysis was used to examine the simultaneous relationships among syncopal reactions, donation anxiety, needle pain, donor satisfaction, and donation intention in predicting repeat donation. Participants included 421 first- and second-time donors recruited for a study comparing the effects of predonation water loading with and without the use of applied muscle tension during donation (52% female, 60.8% first-time donor, mean age 20.3 years). For this longitudinal follow-up study, donor database records were accessed 2 years after the index donation to assess repeat donation.

RESULTS

Results of a series of path analyses demonstrated the influential role of donor anxiety in shaping donor retention (final model χ(2) = 35.75, root mean square error of approximation 0.03, comparative fit index 0.98, weighted root mean square residual 0.74). First, anxiety exerted a direct negative influence on donation intention, the proximal and sole direct predictor of repeat donation. Second, anxiety increased the likelihood of donor-reported needle pain, adversely affecting donation satisfaction and, subsequently, donation intention. Finally, anxiety was associated with donor ratings of syncopal reactions through its impact on needle pain, which also contributed to decreased donation intention.

CONCLUSION

These results provide novel evidence that donation anxiety plays a central role in shaping future donation behavior. Individual differences in anxiety must be considered when developing and testing strategies to enhance blood donor retention.

Lower body negative pressure-induced vagal reaction: role for the osmopressor response?

BACKGROUND

Water ingestion elicits an osmopressor response in patients with impaired baroreflexes. In young, healthy subjects, water elicits sympathetic vasoconstriction. This study investigated the effect of water on the lower body negative pressure (LBNP)-induced vasovagal reaction and also analyzed its effect on the change of regional cerebral blood flow during LBNP.

METHODS

Twelve young healthy subjects underwent LBNP (40 mm Hg) tolerance testing for 45 minutes or until presyncopal symptoms occurred. Subjects received either LBNP or no LBNP with or without prior water ingestion. The severity of vasovagal reaction was determined by participant self-report rating of orthostatic symptoms during the LBNP test. Changes of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) between LBNP and water ingestion with LBNP groups were assessed using statistical parametrical mapping analyses.

RESULTS

Water ingestion attenuated the severity of symptomatic scores during LBNP (P = 0.004). Water ingestion increased Total peripheral vascular resistance (P < 0.001) and attenuated the blood pressure drop (P < 0.001) at the cessation of study. LBNP decreased rCBF over the left superior prefrontal gyrus, limbic-parahippocampal gyrus, left sublobar-caudate body, and hypothalamus (P < 0.001). Water increased rCBF significantly over the right frontal lobe, including the inferior and medial prefrontal gyrus, subcallosal, and sublobar insula, during LBNP stimulation (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Water ingestion strongly reduces symptomatic burden of the vasovagal reaction induced by LBNP stimulation. The cortical activation of limbic and prefrontal cortex likely indicates the involvement of osmopressor response in central autonomic cardiovascular physiology. The central cortical activation of osmopressor response might provide insight into the mechanisms by which water ingestion reduces the vasovagal reaction.

Water administration and the risk of syncope and presyncope during blood donation: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Blood centers rely heavily on adolescent donors to meet blood demand, but presyncope and syncope are more frequent in younger donors. Studies have suggested administration of water before donation may reduce syncope and/or presyncope in this group.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled trial to establish the effect of preloading with 500 mL of water on the rate of syncope and presyncope in adolescent donors. School collection sites in Eastern Cape Province of South Africa were randomized to receive water or not. Incidence of syncope and presyncope was compared between randomization groups using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 2464 study participants, 1337 received water and 1127 did not; groups differed slightly by sex and race. Syncope or presyncope was seen in 23 (1.7%) of the treatment and 18 (1.6%) of the control arm subjects. After adjusting for race, sex, age, and donation history, there was no difference in outcome between the water versus no water arms (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-1.53). Black donors had sevenfold lower odds of syncope or presyncope than their white counterparts (adjusted OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.47).

CONCLUSION

Preloading adolescent donors with 500 mL of water did not have a major effect in reducing syncope and presyncope in South African adolescent donors. Our adolescent donors had lower overall syncope and presyncope rates than similar populations in the United States, limiting the statistical power of the study. We confirmed much lower rates of syncope and presyncope among young black donors.

Adverse events and safety issues in blood donation--a comprehensive review

Although blood donation is generally safe, a variety of risks and complications exist, the most common being iron deficiency, vasovagal reactions and citrate-related events. In the last decades, extensive efforts have significantly improved recipient and product safety, but there is still great potential to optimise donor care. Many therapies in modern medicine depend on the prompt availability of blood products, therefore it is crucial to maintain a motivated and healthy donor pool in view of a limited number of healthy volunteers willing and able to give blood or blood components. We present a comprehensive review on adverse events addressing all types of blood donation including whole blood, plasma, platelet, peripheral blood stem cell, leucocyte and bone marrow donation. In addition, we outline strategies for the prevention and treatment of these events and give a blueprint for future research in this field.

Adverse reactions and other factors that impact subsequent blood donation visits

BACKGROUND

The importance of adverse reactions in terms of donor safety recently has received significant attention, but their role in subsequent donation behavior has not been thoroughly investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Six REDS-II blood centers provided data for this analysis. Summary minor and major adverse reaction categories were created. The influence of adverse reactions on donation was examined in two ways: Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to determine the cumulative pattern of first return, and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for demographic and other factors positively and negatively associated with return were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Donors who had major reactions had longer times to return than donors with minor or no reactions. The AOR of returning for donors with major reactions was 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.37) and with minor reactions 0.59 (95% CI, 0.56-0.62) when compared to donors who did not have reactions. Conversely, the most important factors positively associated with return were the number of donations in the previous year and increasing age. Subsequent return, whether a major, minor, or no reaction occurred, varied by blood center. Factors that are associated with the risk of having adverse reactions were not substantial influences on the return after adverse reactions.

CONCLUSION

Having an adverse reaction leads to significantly lower odds of subsequent donation irrespective of previous donation history. Factors that have been associated with a greater risk of adverse reactions were not important positive or negative predictors of return after a reaction.

Improved safety for young whole blood donors with new selection criteria for total estimated blood volume

BACKGROUND

Young age, first-time donation status, and estimated blood volume (EBV) are leading determinants of syncopal complications after whole blood donation. We evaluated a multifaceted safety initiative and more restrictive selection criteria for whole blood donation by individuals younger than 19 years.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Measures introduced over 2 years addressed donor education, drive environment and supervision, and new eligibility criteria for EBV of 3.5 L or more based on height, weight, and sex for individuals younger than 19 years. Presyncopal and syncopal reactions after whole blood donation during the school year in the baseline, transitional (2008), and full implementation (2009) periods were evaluated.

RESULTS

Young donors (16- to 18-years-olds) gave 754,402 and 710,922 whole blood donations in the 2008 and 2009 school years accounting for 16% of the total collections in both 9-month study periods. The new selection criteria were associated with a significant reduction in the reaction rates among 16- to 18-year-olds. Sixteen-year-old donors had the greatest decrease in 2009 compared to baseline for presyncopal reactions (10.5% vs. 7.3%; odds ratio [OR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-0.69) and syncope (43.1 vs. 37.1 per 10,000 donations; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). Donor subgroup analysis by sex, age, and donation status demonstrated that age-related differences in reaction rates were eliminated in 2009.

CONCLUSION

The safety initiative with new selection criteria for EBV led to decreased complications among donors 16 to 18 years old, such that the risk for 16-year-olds was no longer different from that observed for 19-year-olds in the analysis stratified by age, sex, and donation status.