True incidence of pacemaker syndrome

New Diseases Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): An Overview

The widespread use of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs) has transformed the management of cardiac arrhythmias, improving survival and quality of life for millions. However, this progress has introduced a range of device-related complications, which can significantly impact patient outcomes. This review examines "new diseases" linked to CIEDs, categorizing them into physical (e.g., infections, venous obstruction, lead failure, and device recalls) and functional complications (e.g., arrhythmias, pacemaker syndrome, and left ventricular dysfunction). Prevention and management strategies are emphasized. Emerging technologies, such as leadless devices, quadripolar leads, and remote monitoring systems, hold promise in reducing risks and enhancing patient care. Future directions include integrating artificial intelligence for real-time monitoring, improving device durability, and exploring novel materials to minimize infections and mechanical failures. Understanding CIED-related complications is essential for healthcare providers to balance the benefits and risks of these life-saving technologies.

Pacemaker generator replacement as a key to the puzzle of dyspnoea in a community dwelling centenarian

A 104-year-old woman presented with dyspnoea. Workup revealed normal troponins, elevated D-dimer at 2285 with subsequent chest CT angiogram negative for pulmonary embolism. NT-pro BNP elevated to 5208 pg/mL. Chest X-ray revealed mild cardiac enlargement with bilateral pleural effusions. ECG revealed accelerated junctional rhythm. The initial plan was to obtain transthoracic echocardiogram and start diuresis for presumed heart failure. Given her specific cardiac history, pacemaker interrogation was ordered which revealed her pacemaker mode changed from DDDR to VVI. She underwent pacemaker battery exchange with complete resolution in her symptoms and ability to return to prior functional status. Overall, dyspnoea in centenarians could be multifactorial. Pacemaker elective replacement mode secondary to end of life battery can present as non-specific cardio respiratory symptoms. As the pacemaker population ages to the survival beyond the battery life, pacemaker aetiology behind heart failure symptoms needs to be highly considered by medical providers.

Postmenopausal Breast Cancer and Physical Function Change: A Difference-in-Differences Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

While breast cancer and associated therapies can influence physical function (PF), findings for breast cancer's effects on PF among postmenopausal women are not consistent. This research evaluates the effect of breast cancer on change in PF.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study analyzed using difference-in-differences (DID) method to compare the changes in PF over time between women with and without breast cancer, by invasive status, stage, and age.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Women's Health Initiative participants, aged 50 to 79 years at baseline, with four completed functional status assessments were eligible for inclusion (mean age = 62.1 ± 6.9 years). Women with breast cancer diagnosed between the 3rd and 11th enrollment year (n = 1636) were compared to women without breast cancer (n = 35 660).

MEASUREMENTS

PF was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 at baseline and years 3, 11, and 12.

RESULTS

Compared with women without breast cancer, women with breast cancer experienced greater PF decline (P < .0001), after adjustment for age, race, education, income, study/trial arm, and body mass index. Overall, functional declines were greatest among women with invasive breast cancer (DID = -4.87; 95% confidence interval = -7.12 to -2.62). In stratified analyses, the breast cancer effect on PF was greater among women in older age groups.

CONCLUSION

Women diagnosed with breast cancer experienced a significant decline in PF beyond what is observed in typical aging in this cohort. To optimally address survivorship issues, disease sequelae need to be distinguished from normal aging in studies incorporating a cancer-free comparison group. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1029-1036, 2020.

Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats

Pacemaker implantation is considered as a standard procedure for treatment of symptomatic bradycardia in both dogs and cats. Advanced second-degree and third-degree atrioventricular blocks, sick sinus syndrome, persistent atrial standstill, and vasovagal syncope are the most common rhythm disturbances that require pacing to either alleviate clinical signs or prolong survival. Most pacemakers are implanted transvenously, using endocardial leads, but rarely epicardial leads may be necessary. To decide whether a patient is a candidate for pacing, as well as which pacing modality should be used, the clinician must have a clear understanding of the etiology, the pathophysiology, and the natural history of the most common bradyarrhythmias, as well as what result can be achieved by pacing patients with different rhythm disturbances. The goal of this review was, therefore, to describe the indications for pacing by evaluating the available evidence in both human and veterinary medicine. We described the etiology of bradyarrhythmias, clinical signs and electrocardiographic abnormalities, and the choice of pacing modality, taking into account how different choices may have different physiological consequences to selected patients. It is expected that this review will assist veterinarians in recognizing arrhythmias that may require permanent pacing and the risk-benefit of each pacing modality and its impact on outcome.

Features of diagnostics and treatment of chronic heart failure in elderly and senile patients. Expert opinion of the Society of Experts in Heart Failure, Russian Association of Gerontologists, and Euroasian Association of Therapists

.

Evaluation of erectile dysfunction in permanent pacemaker implanted patients with cardiac rhythm disorder prediagnosis

Background and aims

To evaluate the anxiety, depression and related psychogenic erectile dysfunction that might be developed before and after pacemaker implantation in patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Material and methods

Thirty permanent pacemaker implanted male patients, were enrolled to study between September 2006 and September 2008. Erectile function domain questions of International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF‐6) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) questionnaires were applied to patients, 6 months before pacemaker implantation (BP6) and on month 1 (AP1) and 6 after application (AP6). Patients were included in a multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation-adaptation program with a duration of 1–2 months. Patients were evaluated in subgroups.

Results

Mean age was 51.5 ± 10.3. Most frequent diagnosis was observed as AV block in etiology. The mean IIEF values were changed 22.8→20.2→24.6 in BP6, AP1 and AP6 time frames consecutively. However, the mean HAD-Anxiety scores were evaluated as 8.1→17.0→7.3 and the mean HAD-Depression as 3.9→7.9→8.9 consecutively in the same time frames.

Conclusion

Cardiac arrhythmia plus permanent pacemaker implantation, increased anxiety and depression of patients and decreased erectile function at AP1; however, the improvement in cardiac symptoms at AP6 with the possible positive effects of rehabilitation program, helps to reduce anxiety and increased IIEF scores, although there was still a slight increase in depression levels.

Where does it lead? Imaging features of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices on chest radiograph and CT

Pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are being increasingly employed in patients suffering from cardiac rhythm disturbances. The principal objective of this article is to familiarize radiologists with pacemakers and ICDs on chest radiographs and CT scans. Therefore, the preferred lead positions according to pacemaker types and anatomic variants are introduced in this study. Additionally, the imaging features of incorrect lead positions and defects, as well as complications subsequent to pacemaker implantation are demonstrated herein.

Pacemaker implantation and quality of life in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST)

BACKGROUND

Dual-chamber pacemakers restore AV synchrony compared with ventricular pacemakers, but the effects on health-related quality of life (QOL) are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of pacemaker implantation, clinical factors, and pacing mode on QOL.

METHODS

The Mode Selection Trial (MOST) randomized 2,010 patients with sinus node dysfunction to rate-modulated right ventricular (VVIR) or dual-chamber (DDDR) pacing. A longitudinal analysis of serial QOL measures (Short Form-36 [SF-36], Specific Activity Scale, and time trade-off utility) was performed. In patients who crossed over from VVIR to DDDR because of severe pacemaker syndrome, the last known QOL prior to crossover was carried forward.

RESULTS

Pacemaker implantation resulted in substantial improvement in almost all QOL measures. Subjects 75 years or older experienced significantly less improvement in functional status and physical component summary scores than did younger subjects. In longitudinal analyses of the effect of pacing mode on QOL, significant improvement in three SF-36 subscales was observed with DDDR pacing compared with VVIR pacing: role physical [62.8 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2, 65.5) vs 56.4 (95% CI 53.7, 59.1)], role emotional [85.0 (95% CI 82.9, 87.0) vs 81.9 (95% CI 79.9, 84.0)], and vitality [51.8 (95% CI 50.3, 53.3) vs 49.3 (95% CI 47.8, 50.7)], but not in other SF-36 subscales, the Specific Activity Scale, or utilities. The gains in QOL were larger than the declines associated with 1 year of aging but smaller than those associated with heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker implantation improved health-related QOL. The mode selected was associated with much smaller, but significant, improvements in several domains, particularly role physical function.

Predictors of health status for heart failure patients

Health status is poorly understood for patients with heart failure. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of relevant sociodemographic, clinical, health perception, and emotional variables in predicting health status. In this study of 87 patients, health status was conceptualized as health-related quality of life, physical activity level, and symptom burden. Hierarchical multiple regression was used to determine sociodemographic, clinical health perception, and emotional variables associated with health status. Worse New York Heart Association class, higher anxiety, and higher depression predicted worse health-related quality of life. Better New York Heart Association class and higher anxiety predicted higher levels of physical activity. Worse New York Heart Association class and higher depression predicted greater symptom burden. Traditional demographic and clinical variables were not associated with health status. Although not routinely assessed, emotional variables had a major impact on health status. Interventions to improve health status should target both physical and emotional well-being.

Pacemaker selection: time for a rethinking of complex pacing systems?The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the Editors of the European Heart Journal or of the European Society of Cardiology

Evidence from randomized trials indicates that the clinical benefits of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing are modest: (i) no significant differences exist between physiological pacing and single-chamber pacing in mortality and stroke; (ii) ventricular desynchronization resulting from chronic right-ventricular pacing in DDD mode, induces a significantly increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure hospitalizations; (iii) AF pacing prevention and therapy algorithms have shown a modest to minimal or absent efficacy; (iv) the widespread use of physiological pacemakers is not an economically attractive strategy. Thus, these data provide a reliable body of evidence on which to make more rationale clinical decisions for individual patients and policy decisions for health costs saving. The cheaper single-chamber AAI(R) or VVI(R) has been shown to satisfy both conditions in most cases of sinus node disease and AV block.

Intra- and interatrial conduction delay: implications for cardiac pacing

Atrial conduction disorders are frequent in elderly subjects and/or those with structural heart diseases, mainly mitral valve disease, hyperthrophic cardiomyopathies, and hypertension. The resultant electrophysiological and electromechanical abnormalities are associated with a higher risk of paroxysmal or persistent atrial tachyarrhythmias, either atrial fibrillation, typical or atypical flutter or other forms of atrial tachycardias. Such an association is not fortuitous because intra- and interatrial conduction abnormalities delays disrupt (spatial and temporal dispersion) electrical activation, thus promoting the initiation and perpetuation of reentrant circuits. Preventive therapeutic interventions induce variable, sometimes paradoxical effects as with the proarrhythmic effect of class I antiarrhythmic drugs. Similarly, atrial pacing may promote proarrhythmias or an antiarrhythmic effect according to the pacing site(s) and mode. Multisite atrial pacing was conceived to correct, as much as possible, abnormal activation induced by spontaneous intra- or interatrial conduction disorders or by single site atrial pacing, which are situations responsible for commonly refractory arrhythmias. Atrial electrical resynchronization can also be used to correct mechanical abnormalities like left heart AV dyssynchrony resulting from intraatrial conduction delays.

High incidence of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST)

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the incidence, predictors, and treatment of pacemaker syndrome in patients with sinus node dysfunction treated with ventricular-based (VVIR) pacing in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).

BACKGROUND

Pacemaker syndrome, or intolerance to VVIR pacing, consists of cardiovascular signs and symptoms induced by VVIR pacing.

METHODS

The definition of pacemaker syndrome required that a patient with single-chamber VVIR pacing develop either congestive signs and symptoms associated with retrograde conduction during VVIR pacing or a >or=20 mm Hg reduction of systolic blood pressure during VVIR pacing, associated with reproducible symptoms of weakness, lightheadedness, or syncope.

RESULTS

Of 996 patients randomized to VVIR pacing, 182 (18.3%) met criteria for pacemaker syndrome in follow-up. Pacemaker syndrome occurred early in most patients (13.8% at 6 months, 16.0% at 1 year, increasing to 19.7% at 4 years). Baseline univariate predictors of pacemaker syndrome included a lower sinus rate and higher programmed pacemaker rate. Previous heart failure, ejection fraction, and drop in systolic blood pressure with VVIR pacing at implantation did not predict the development of pacemaker syndrome. Post-implantation predictors of pacemaker syndrome were a higher percentage of paced beats, higher programmed low rate, and slower underlying spontaneous sinus rate. Quality of life decreased at the time of diagnosis of pacemaker syndrome and improved with reprogramming to atrial-based pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe pacemaker syndrome developed in nearly 20% of VVIR-paced patients and improved with reprogramming to the dual-chamber pacing mode. Because prediction of pacemaker syndrome is difficult, the only way to prevent pacemaker syndrome is to implant atrial-based pacemakers in all patients.

Pacemaker Syndrome in the Young:. Do Children Need Dual Chamber as the Initial Pacing Mode?

The aim of this study was to determine if single chamber rate responsive ventricular pacing (VVIR) predisposes growing children to develop pacemaker syndrome (PS), and if so, what are determining factors and/or clinically useful predictors. PS is a constellation of symptoms that result from the lack of consistent AV sequential filling due to atrial contraction against closed AV valves. PS has not been commonly reported in the young. Data from all patients with pacemakers with congenital complete atrioventricular block (CAVB) with normal anatomy, and those with congenital heart disease (CHD), and surgically acquired CAVB were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were normal ventricular function by cardiac ultrasound and 100% VVIR pacing. Of 89 patients with VVIR pacemaker implants, 33 met these criteria. Of these, 19 developed PS. For statistical analysis, chi-square and independent samples t-test was used with significance defined at P < or = 0.05. No consistent association was found between cardiac anatomy, type of CAVB, or age at implant with development of PS. However, PS did correlate with duration of pacing (P = 0.02). The exercise stress test showed significant differences between 100% VVIR-paced patients with and without PS, in terms of work rate (P = 0.002) and measured oxygen consumption (P = 0.01). This study shows that PS appears to be a time related event in younger children with normal ventricular function who are 100% ventricular paced. Thus, this supports VVIR pacing as an adequate and cost-effective initial therapy for symptomatic bradycardia due to CAVB.

Cardiac resynchronization by pacing: an electrical treatment of heart failure

Various modalities of cardiac pacing have been proposed in the past to improve hemodynamics, either directly or indirectly. Some of these are conventional ways of cardiac stimulation, others such as biventricular or left ventricular pacing, represent dedicated pacing techniques. Left ventricular and biventricular pacing are successfully applied in those patients with congestive heart failure who have conduction disturbances (i.e. left bundle branch block) as they correct the ensuing intra- and interventricular dyssynchrony. This is the reason why these pacing modalities are described as cardiac resynchronization therapy. According to the results of a series of studies, the cardiac resynchronization therapy seems to have a favourable clinical impact in terms of quality of life, morbidity and hospitalization rate. On-going and future studies should assess the impact of resynchronization therapy on overall mortality and its cost-effectiveness profile in specific subgroups of patients. Other open issues regard (i) the convenience of using biventricular pacing as a pacing-alone therapy or in combination with ventricular defibrillation capability, especially for potential candidates to heart transplantation, and (ii) the ways to identify properly the responders to resynchronization therapy.

Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block

BACKGROUND

Dual chamber pacing or single chamber atrial pacing ('physiologic' pacing) is believed to have an advantage over single chamber ventricular pacing in that it resembles cardiac physiology more closely by maintaining atrioventricular (AV) synchrony and dominance of the sinus node, which in turn may reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality thus contributing to patient survival and quality of life. However, a significant proportion of pacemakers currently implanted are single chamber ventricular pacemakers.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the short- and long-term clinical effectiveness of dual chamber pacemakers compared to single chamber ventricular pacemakers in adults with AV block, sick sinus syndrome or both. An additional objective was to assess separately any potential differences in effectiveness between dual chamber pacing and single chamber atrial pacing. The clinical effectiveness of single chamber atrial pacing versus single chamber ventricular pacing was not examined.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1980 to 2002) and the Science Citation Index (1980 to 2002) were searched on 19th August 2002. Citation lists and web sites were checked and researchers in the field contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel group or crossover randomised controlled trials of at least 48 hours duration comparing dual chamber pacing and single chamber ventricular pacing, and investigating cardiovascular morbidity, mortality, patient related quality of life, exercise capacity and complication rates.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted onto pre-piloted data extraction forms. Quality assessment was undertaken using a checklist, with a sub-sample of quality data independently extracted by a second reviewer. Where appropriate data was available, meta-analysis was performed. Where meta-analysis was not possible, the number of studies showing a positive, neutral or negative direction of effect and statistical significance were simply counted.

MAIN RESULTS

Five parallel and 26 crossover randomised controlled trials were identified. The quality of reporting was found to be poor. Pooled data from parallel studies shows a statistically non-significant preference for physiologic pacing (primarily dual chamber pacing) for the prevention of stroke, heart failure and mortality, and a statistically significant beneficial effect regarding the prevention of atrial fibrillation (odds ratio (OR) 0.79, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.93). Both parallel and crossover studies favour dual chamber pacing with regard to pacemaker syndrome (parallel: Peto OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.14; crossover: standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.74, 95% CI - 0.95 to -0.52). Pooled data from crossover studies shows a statistically significant trend towards dual chamber pacing being more favourable in terms of exercise capacity (SMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.45). No individual studies reported a significantly more favourable outcome with single chamber ventricular pacing.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

This review shows a trend towards greater effectiveness with dual chamber pacing compared to single chamber ventricular pacing, which supports the current British Pacing and Electrophysiology Group's Guidelines regarding atrioventricular block. Additional randomised controlled trial evidence from ongoing trials in this area will further inform the debate.

Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Dual-chamber (atrioventricular) and single-chamber (ventricular) pacing are alternative treatment approaches for sinus-node dysfunction that causes clinically significant bradycardia. However, it is unknown which type of pacing results in the better outcome.

METHODS

We randomly assigned a total of 2010 patients with sinus-node dysfunction to dual-chamber pacing (1014 patients) or ventricular pacing (996 patients) and followed them for a median of 33.1 months. The primary end point was death from any cause or nonfatal stroke. Secondary end points included the composite of death, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure; atrial fibrillation; heart-failure score; the pacemaker syndrome; and the quality of life.

RESULTS

The incidence of the primary end point did not differ significantly between the dual-chamber group (21.5 percent) and the ventricular-paced group (23.0 percent, P=0.48). In patients assigned to dual-chamber pacing, the risk of atrial fibrillation was lower (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.66 to 0.94; P=0.008), and heart-failure scores were better (P<0.001). The differences in the rates of hospitalization for heart failure and of death, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure were not significant in unadjusted analyses but became marginally significant in adjusted analyses. Dual-chamber pacing resulted in a small but measurable increase in the quality of life, as compared with ventricular pacing.

CONCLUSIONS

In sinus-node dysfunction, dual-chamber pacing does not improve stroke-free survival, as compared with ventricular pacing. However, dual-chamber pacing reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation, reduces signs and symptoms of heart failure, and slightly improves the quality of life. Overall, dual-chamber pacing offers significant improvement as compared with ventricular pacing.

Cardiac pacing. A review

Pacing is a field of rapid clinical progress and technologic advances. Clinical progress in the 1990s included the refinement of indications for pacing as well as the use of pacemakers for new, nonbradycardiac indications, such as the treatment of cardiomyopathies and CHF and the prevention of atrial fibrillation. Important published data and studies in progress are shedding new light on issues of pacing mode selection, and they may influence future practice significantly. Important technologic advances include development of new rate-adaptive sensors and sensor combinations and the evolution of pacemakers into sophisticated diagnostic devices with the capability to store data and ECGs. Automatic algorithms monitor the patient for appropriate capture, sensing, battery status, and lead impedance, providing better patient safety and pacemaker longevity.

A comparative study on the behavior of three different automatic mode switching dual chamber pacemakers to intracardiac recordings of clinical atrial fibrillation

Automatic mode switching (AMS) allows patients with dual chamber pacemakers who develop paroxysmal AF to have a controlled ventricular rate. The aim of this study was to (1) compare the rate-controlled behavior of three AMS algorithms in response to AF, in terms of speed and stability of response and resynchronization to sinus rhythm, and (2) compare the influence of pacemaker programming on optimal mode switching. We studied 17 patients (12 men, 5 women; mean age 59 +/- 15 years) who developed AF during electrophysiological study. Unfiltered bipolar atrial electrograms during sinus rhythm and AF were recorded onto high fidelity tapes and replayed into the atrial port of three dual chamber pacemakers with different mode switching algorithms (Thera, Marathon, Meta). The Thera pacemaker uses rate smoothing, and mode switches occur when mean sensed atrial rate exceeds the predefined AMS rate (MR). Marathon mode switches after a programmable number of consecutive rapid atrial events (NR). Meta DDDR monitors the atrial rate by a counter for atrial cycles faster than the programmed AMS rate. It increases or decreases the counter if the atrial cycle length is shorter or longer than the programmed AMS interval, respectively. Mode switch occurs when the AF detection criteria are met (CR). A total of 260 rhythms were studied. NR was significantly faster than MR and CR (latency 2.5 +/- 3 s vs 26 +/- 7 s vs 15 +/- 22 s, respectively, P < 0.0001). During sustained AF, MR resulted in the most stable and regular ventricular rhythm compared to NR or CR. In CR, ventricular rate oscillated between AMS and atrial tracking (cycle length variations: 44 +/- 2 s vs 346 +/- 109 s vs 672 +/- 84 s, P < 0.05). At resumption of sinus rhythm, MR resynchronized after 143 +/- 22 s versus 3.4 +/- 0.7 s for NR and 5.9 +/- 1.1 s for CR, resulting in long periods of AV dissociation when a VVI/VVIR mode is used after AMS. Programming of atrial refractory periods did not affect AMS response, although the speed of AMS onset can be adjusted by programming of onset criteria in the Meta DDDR. AMS algorithms differ in their ability to handle recorded clinical atrial arrhythmias. The rapid-responding algorithm exhibits rate instability, whereas slow responding algorithm shows a long delay in response and risk of AV dissociation. Thus different instrumentation of AMS may have clinical implications in patients with dual chamber pacemakers who develop AF.

DDD pacing mode survival in children with a dual-chamber pacemaker

BACKGROUND

The persistence of DDD pacing is well documented in adults, however, in children survival of the DDD pacing mode is less clear.

METHODS

We studied the survival of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing in 36 children aged 1 week to 16 years who underwent implantation of a dual-chamber pacing system between January 1986 and October 1998. The children were divided in the following two groups: 26 had epicardial pacing systems and 10 had endocardial pacing systems.

RESULTS

During long-term follow-up 11 patients lost the DDD pacing mode. The DDD pacing survival rate at 3 months and 1, 2, and 5 years was 80%, 77%, 73%, and 69%, respectively. Age, weight, congenital heart disease, and epicardial pacing leads were not found to be risk factors for loss of DDD pacing mode. However, P-wave values of less than 2.5 mV at implantation of epicardial leads were associated with loss of the DDD pacing mode.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of children remain in the DDD pacing mode during long-term follow-up. A P-wave value of less than 2.5 mV at implantation of epicardial leads is a risk factor for loss of the DDD pacing mode.

[Hemodynamic benefits of left ventricular pacing in two pacemakers syndromes with refractory heart failure]

We describe two cases in which right ventricular pacing produced severe hemodynamic deterioration and in which changing the pacing from the right to the left ventricle sharply corrected these alterations, while simultaneous biventricular pacing did not. Chronic left ventricular pacing can solve hemodynamic alterations in severe pacemaker syndromes, thereby avoiding the need for mitral prosthesis implantation in some cases. The use of this procedure today should be individualized, including acute hemodynamic and echocardiographic studies, because the width of the QRS complex during pacing is not a significant predictor of hemodynamic efficiency.

Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVIR pacing

The incidence and clinical predictors of the development of intolerance to VVIR pacing have not been extensively studied in prospective long-term randomized trials comparing different pacing modes. The frequency and clinical factors predicting intolerance to ventricular pacing are controversial. The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) Trial enrolled 407 patients aged >/=65 years in a 30-month, single-blind, randomized, controlled comparison of quality of life and clinical outcomes with ventricular pacing and dual-chamber pacing in patients undergoing dual-chamber pacemaker implantation for standard clinically accepted indications. We reviewed the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrophysiologic variables at the time of pacemaker implantation in 204 patients enrolled in the PASE trial and randomized to the VVIR mode, some of whom subsequently required crossover (reprogramming) to DDDR pacing. During a median follow-up of 555 days, 53 patients (26%) crossed over from VVIR to DDDR pacing. A decrease in systolic blood pressure during ventricular pacing at the time of pacemaker implantation (p = 0.001), use of beta blockers at the time of randomization (p = 0.01), and nonischemic cardiomyopathy (p = 0.04) were the only variables that predicted crossover in the Cox multivariate regression model. After reprogramming to the dual-chamber mode, patients showed improvement in all aspects of quality of life, with significant improvements in physical and emotional role. The high incidence of crossover from VVIR to DDDR pacing along with significant improvements in quality of life after crossover to DDDR pacing strongly favors dual-chamber pacing compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing in elderly patients requiring permanent pacing.

Inhibition of ventricular stimulation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers and prolonged AV conduction

Episodes of repetitive P wave undersensing have been described in dual chamber pacemakers due to automatic extension of the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). Pacemaker stimulation was completely inhibited despite the presence of adequate P waves. This study sought to determine whether cycles of repetitive P wave undersensing occur even in the absence of PVARP extension. Two-hundred fifty-five patients were investigated after DDD or VDD pacemaker implantation for intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. Forty-six episodes of repetitive atrial undersensing were found during 24-hour Holter ECG in nine patients. Pacemaker syndrome-like symptoms occurred. Episodes were elicited by atrial or ventricular premature contractions when (1) native AV conduction was present but considerably prolonged, (2) intrinsic sinus rate exceeded pacemaker intervention rate, and (3) native AV interval plus PVARP exceeded sinus cycle length. Programming of a particularly short AV interval and PVARP helped to reduce the incidence of repetitive P wave undersensing. Patients with dual chamber devices and prolonged native AV conduction are prone to develop episodes of output inhibition. Standard timing cycles may be inappropriate in these patients.

Permanent cardiac pacemakers: issues relevant to the emergency physician, part II

Many people benefit from the implantation of cardiac pacemakers for management of certain cardiac dysrhythmias. These patients are seen regularly in the Emergency Department with a variety of pacemaker complications and malfunctions. The presence of a pacemaker may also affect management of unrelated medical problems. This, the second of a two-part series, covers the causes, diagnosis, and management of pacemaker malfunction; the pacemaker syndrome; the pacemaker Twiddler's syndrome; and other considerations in the paced patient including diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, ACLS protocols, trauma, and sources of interference.

Complications related to permanent pacemaker therapy

This study evaluates complications related to permanent endocardial pacing in the era of modern pacemaker therapy. There is only limited information available about the complications related to modern cardiac pacing. Most of the existing data are based on the 1970s and are no longer valid for current practice. The recent reports on pacemaker complications are focused on some specific complication or are restricted to early complications. Thus, there are no reports available providing a comprehensive view of complications related to modern cardiac pacing. Four hundred forty-six patients, who received permanent endocardial pacemakers between January 1990 and December 1995 at Kuopio University Hospital, were reviewed retrospectively using patient records. Attention was paid to the occurrence of any complication during the implantation or follow-up. An early complication was detected in 6.7%, and 4.9% of patients were treated invasively due to the early complication. Late complication developed in 7.2% and reoperation was required in 6.3% of the patients. Complications related to the implantation procedure occurred in 3.1%. Inadequate capture or sensing was observed in 7.4% of the patients. Pacemaker infection was detected in 1.8% and erosion in 0.9% of the patients. An AV block developed in 3.6% (1.6%/year) patients who received an AAI(R)-pacemaker due to sick sinus syndrome. There was no mortality attributable to pacemaker therapy. A great majority (68%) of the complications occurred within the first 3 months after the implantation. Complications associated to modern permanent endocardial pacemaker therapy are not infrequent. Eleven percent of patients needed an invasive procedure due to an early or late complication.

Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators

BACKGROUND

Standard clinical practice permits the use of either single-chamber ventricular pacemakers or dual-chamber pacemakers for most patients who require cardiac pacing. Ventricular pacemakers are less expensive, but dual-chamber pacemakers are believed to be more physiologic. However, it is not known whether either type of pacemaker results in superior clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly study was a 30-month, single-blind, randomized, controlled comparison of ventricular pacing and dual-chamber pacing in 407 patients 65 years of age or older in 29 centers. Patients received a dual-chamber pacemaker that had been randomly programmed to either ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing. The primary end point was health-related quality of life as measured by the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey.

RESULT

The average age of the patients was 76 years (range, 65 to 96), and 60 percent were men. Quality of life improved significantly after pacemaker implantation (P<0.001), but there were no differences between the two pacing modes in either the quality of life or prespecified clinical outcomes (including cardiovascular events or death). However, 53 patients assigned to ventricular pacing (26 percent) were crossed over to dual-chamber pacing because of symptoms related to the pacemaker syndrome. Patients with sinus-node dysfunction, but not those with atrioventricular block, had moderately better quality of life and cardiovascular functional status with dual-chamber pacing than with ventricular pacing. Trends of borderline statistical significance in clinical end points favoring dual-chamber pacing were observed in patients with sinus-node dysfunction, but not in those with atrioventricular block.

CONCLUSION

The implantation of a permanent pacemaker improves health-related quality of life. However, the quality-of-life benefits associated with dual-chamber pacing as compared with ventricular pacing are observed principally in the subgroup of patients with sinus-node dysfunction.

Ventricular pacemaker upgrade: experience, complications and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcomes of pacemaker upgrade from single chamber ventricular to dual chamber.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing the procedure.

SETTING

Specialist cardiothoracic unit.

PATIENTS

44 patients (15 female, 29 male), mean (SD) age at upgrade 68.2 (12.9) years.

INTERVENTIONS

Upgrade of single chamber ventricular to dual chamber pacemaker.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Procedure duration and complications.

RESULTS

Principal indications for upgrade were pacemaker syndrome (17), "opportunistic"--that is, at elective generator replacement (8), heart failure (7), non-specific breathlessness/fatigue (7), and neurally mediated syncope (3). Mean (SD) upgrade procedure duration (82.9 (32.6) minutes) significantly exceeded mean VVI implantation duration (42.9 (13.3) minutes) and mean DDD implantation duration (56.6 (22.7) minutes) (both p < 0.01). Complications included pneumothorax (1), ventricular arrhythmia requiring cardioversion (2), protracted procedure (10), atrial lead repositioning within six weeks (8), haematoma evacuation (1), superficial infection (1), and admission to hospital with chest pain (1); 20 patients (45%) suffered one or more complications including four of the eight who underwent opportunistic upgrade.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacemaker upgrade takes longer and has a higher complication rate than either single or dual chamber pacemaker implantation. This suggests that the procedure should be performed by an experienced operator, and should be undertaken only if a firm indication exists. Patients with atrial activity should not be offered single chamber ventricular systems in the belief that the unit can be upgraded later if necessary at minimal risk.

The pacemaker syndrome -- a matter of definition

Pacemaker syndrome is an iatrogenic disease that is often underdiagnosed. We propose that pacemaker syndrome represents the clinical consequences of suboptimal atrioventricular (AV) synchrony or AV dyssynchrony, regardless of the pacing mode. Clinicians implanting and programming pacemakers should attempt to optimize AV synchrony to prevent the occurrence of pacemaker syndrome.

Left atrial function and atrial natriuretic factor/cyclic guanosine monophosphate changes in DDD and VVI pacing modes

Left atrial systolic function and the plasma of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) were investigated as possible markers for the development of pacemaker syndrome during VVI pacing. Patients who developed pacemaker syndrome during VVI pacing had a significant decrease in left atrial emptying fraction and a substantial increase in ANF and cGMP plasma levels.

Effects of right ventricular pacing on ventriculoatrial conduction and systemic venous responses in sick sinus patients

This study was designed to assess the ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction and systemic venous responses to right ventricular pacing at different pacing rates and the feasibility of identifying patients prone to pacemaker syndrome by means of a Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiographic technique. Twenty-two sick sinus patients who received ventricular-demand permanent pacemakers constituted the study group. The proximal inferior vena cava (IVC) diameters were measured by two-dimensional echocardiography. Fourteen patients had VA conduction by preimplant electrophysiologic study or paced electrocardiogram (Group II), while the other 8 patients presented no VA conduction (Group I). Abnormal systolic retrograde flow in the hepatic vein following each paced beat could be demonstrated in those patients with VA conduction in the basal state. In the 8 patients without VA conduction, the IVC diameters were significantly increased during rapid right ventricular pacing in those with left ventricular dysfunction (n = 4) as compared with those with normal left ventricular function (n = 4) (% increment at 120 beats per minute.