Relative efficacy of different tilts with biphasic defibrillation in humans

Average current is better than peak current as therapeutic dosage for biphasic waveforms in a ventricular fibrillation pig model of cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

Defibrillation current has been shown to be a clinically more relevant dosing unit than energy. However, the effects of average and peak current in determining shock outcome are still undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between average current, peak current and defibrillation success when different biphasic waveforms were employed.

METHODS

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) was electrically induced in 22 domestic male pigs. Animals were then randomized to receive defibrillation using one of two different biphasic waveforms. A grouped up-and-down defibrillation threshold-testing protocol was used to maintain the average success rate of 50% in the neighborhood. In 14 animals (Study A), defibrillations were accomplished with either biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) or rectilinear biphasic waveforms. In eight animals (Study B), shocks were delivered using two BTE waveforms that had identical peak current but different waveform durations.

RESULTS

Both average and peak currents were associated with defibrillation success when BTE and rectilinear waveforms were investigated. However, when pathway impedance was less than 90Ω for the BTE waveform, bivariate correlation coefficient was 0.36 (p=0.001) for the average current, but only 0.21 (p=0.06) for the peak current in Study A. In Study B, a high defibrillation success (67.9% vs. 38.8%, p<0.001) was observed when the waveform delivered more average current (14.9±2.1A vs. 13.5±1.7A, p<0.001) while keeping the peak current unchanged.

CONCLUSION

In this porcine model of VF, average current was better than peak current to be an adequate parameter to describe the therapeutic dosage when biphasic defibrillation waveforms were used. The institutional protocol number: P0805.

Slowing of Electrical Activity in Ventricular Fibrillation is Not Associated with Increased Defibrillation Energies in the Isolated Rabbit Heart

Prolonged out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrests are associated with reduced ECG dominant frequency (DF) and diminished defibrillation success. Partial reversal of ischemia increases ECG DF and improves defibrillation outcome. We have investigated the metabolic components of ischemia responsible for the decline in ECG DF and defibrillation success. Isolated Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts were loaded with the voltage-sensitive dye RH237. Using a photodiode array, epicardial membrane potentials were recorded at 252 sites (15 mm × 15 mm) on the anterior surface of the left and right ventricles. Simultaneously, a global ECG was recorded. VF was induced by burst pacing, and after 60s, perfusion was either reduced to 6 ml/min or the perfusate composition changed to impose hypoxia (95% N(2)/5% CO(2)), pH 6.7 (80% O(2)/20% CO(2)), or hyperkalemia (8 mM). Using fast Fourier transform, power spectra were created from the optical signals and the global ECG. The optical power spectra were summated to give a global power spectrum (pseudoECG). At 600 s the minimum defibrillation voltage (MDV) was determined by step-up protocol. During VF, the ECG and pseudoECG DF were reduced by low-flow ischemia (9.0 ± 1.0 Hz, p < 0.01, n = 5) and raised [K(+)](o) (12.2 ± 1.3 Hz, p < 0.05, n = 7) compared to control (19.2 ± 1.5 Hz, n = 20), but were unaffected by acidic pH(o) (16.7 ± 1.1 Hz, n = 11) and hypoxia (14.0 ± 1.2 Hz, n = 10). In contrast, the MDV was raised by acidic pH (156.1 ± 26.4 V, p < 0.001) and hypoxia (154.1 ± 22.1 V, p < 0.01) compared to control (65.6 ± 2.3 V), but comparable changes were not observed in low-flow ischemia (61.0 ± 0.5 V) or raised [K(+)](o) (56 ± 3 V). In summary, different metabolites are responsible for the reduction in DF and the increase in defibrillation energy during ischemic VF.

Implantable intravascular defibrillator: evaluation of defibrillation waveforms with inferior vena cava electrode system

BACKGROUND

A percutaneously placed, totally intravascular defibrillator has been developed that shocks via a right ventricular (RV) single-coil and titanium electrodes in the superior vena cava (SVC) and the inferior vena cava (IVC). This study evaluated the defibrillation threshold (DFT) with this electrode configuration to determine the effect of different biphasic waveform tilts and second-phase durations as well as the contribution of the IVC electrode.

METHODS

Eight Bluetick hounds (wt = 30-40 kg) were anesthetized and the RV coil (first-phase anode) was placed in the RV apex. The intravascular defibrillator (PICD®, Model no. IIDM-G, InnerPulse Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) was positioned such that the titanium electrodes were in the SVC and IVC . Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced and a Bayesian up-down technique was employed to determine DFT with two configurations: RV to SVC + IVC and RV to SVC. Three waveform tilts (65%, 50%, and 42%) and two second-phase durations (equal to the first phase [balanced] and truncated at 3 ms [unbalanced]) were randomly tested. The source capacitance of the defibrillator was 120 μF for all waveforms.

RESULTS

DFT with the IVC electrode was significantly lower than without the IVC electrode for all waveforms tested (527 ± 9.3 V [standard error], 14.5 J vs 591 ± 7.4 V, 18.5 J, P < 0.001). Neither waveform tilt nor second-phase duration significantly changed the DFT.

CONCLUSION

In canines, a totally intravascular implantable defibrillator with electrodes in the RV apex, SVC, and IVC had a DFT similar to that of standard nonthoracotomy lead systems. No significant effect was noted with changes in tilt or with balanced or unbalanced waveforms.

Parameters characterizing implantable defibrillator output: a proposal

AIMS

Recently, a discussion was carried out in Heart Rhythm on the specifications that could characterize implantable defibrillators. It is the intention of this paper to participate in this discussion on defibrillation characteristics and to give recommendations on how this problem could be solved. Theoretical considerations and results There are different defibrillation theories, all finding that the defibrillation's efficacy depends on the time constant RC which is output capacitance C times load resistance R. Efficacy decreases with increasing RC. This means that (i) the knowledge of C is of paramount importance, (ii) the energy is 'devalued' with increasing RC and that those parameter settings such as tilt or pulse duration should be adjusted to the time constant, and (iii) the energy values given without further specification are not meaningful. As there is always a voltage drop across an internal resistance within the ICD, the measured voltage across the output differs from the capacitor voltage and is reduced which determines the efficiency of the device. From the data given by Thammanomai et al., one can determine the parameters maximum voltage, capacitance, internal resistance, and tilt. These parameters are adequate and necessary to describe an ICD device and to derive the effective energy for device comparison. Discussion The 'high output devices' with their high nominal energy are reduced in their effective energies to a degree that they are comparable to the best 'standard output devices'. They do not offer that superiority which is promised by the nominal energy. Moreover, if the tilt is fixed and larger than optimal, the energy requirements are still higher or the effective energy will further drop. The term 'delivered energy' is not used by us because the delivered energy increases with increasing tilt. However, today's tilts are too large as judged by theories, which means that high delivered energies can be worse than lower ones. The delivered energy is, therefore, not a meaningful parameter in judging ICDs.

CONCLUSION

ICD devices should be characterized by: (i) voltage, (ii) capacitance, (iii) tilt or pulse duration (if not programmable), and (iv) internal resistance. All other parameters can be derived from them by simple calculations. Introduction of a 'devaluation factor' characterizes the decreasing efficacy with increasing time constant and renders the output characteristics transparent and comparable.

The Effect of Induction Method on Defibrillation Threshold and Ventricular Fibrillation Cycle Length

INTRODUCTION

Since no clinical data are available on the comparison of the "shock on T-wave" and "high frequency burst" ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction modes during defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing, we aimed to compare these two methods during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

METHODS

The DFT was determined with a step-down protocol using biphasic, anodal polarity (100%, 40%, 20% voltage control) shocks. Patients were randomized: VF was induced by 50 Hz burst in group B (n = 45) and T-wave shock in group T (n = 41). The DFT was defined as the lowest energy level that terminated VF; confirmed DFT (DFTc) was defined as the minimal energy level that consecutively terminated VF twice. Success rate of DFTc was calculated during an intraindividual test for the alternate induction method.

RESULTS

A total of 546 episodes of VF were induced: n = 278 (B) vs n = 268 (T). Incidence of VT during inductions was 9.9% (B) vs 2.7% (T), P < 0.05. Neither the DFT, 8.8 +/- 4.0 J (B) vs 9.7 +/- 4.2 J (T), nor the DFTc, 10.6 +/- 5.1 J (B) vs 10.8 +/- 4.2 J (T), proved to be significantly different. A significant correlation was found between VF cycle length (CL) and the concomitant DFT (r = 0.298, P < 0.05) in group T only. Subgroup analysis of patients under chronic class III antiarrhythmic treatment showed no increase of the DFT in either group and significantly lower incidence of VT induction in group T regardless of antiarrhythmic treatment.

CONCLUSION

The DFT and the VFCL proved to be independent of the VF induction method. The T-wave shock was more unlikely to induce VT during DFT testing. These results suggest that both methods are reliable in DFT determination, though T-wave shock application is a more reliable method for DFT testing.

The Gurvich waveform has lower defibrillation threshold than the rectilinear waveform and the truncated exponential waveform in the rabbit heart

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator studies have established the superiority of biphasic waveforms over monophasic waveforms. However, external defibrillator studies of biphasic waveforms are not as widespread. Our objective was to compare the defibrillation efficacy of clinically used biphasic waveforms, i.e., truncated exponential, rectilinear, and quasi-sinusoidal (Gurvich) waveforms in a fibrillating heart model. Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts (n = 10) were stained with a voltage-sensitive fluorescent dye, Di-4-ANEPPS. Transmembrane action potentials were optically mapped from the anterior epicardium. We found that the Gurvich waveform was significantly superior (p < 0.05) to the rectilinear and truncated exponential waveforms. The defibrillation thresholds (mean +/- SE) were as follows: Gurvich, 0.25 +/- 0.01 J; rectilinear-1, 0.34 +/- 0.01 J; rectilinear-2, 0.33 +/- 0.01 J; and truncated exponential, 0.32 +/- 0.02 J. Using optically recorded transmembrane responses, we determined the shock-response transfer function, which allowed us to predict the cellular response to waveforms at high accuracy. The passive parallel resistor-capacitor model (RC-model) predicted polarization superiority of the Gurvich waveform in the myocardium with a membrane time constant (taum) of less than 2 ms. The finding of a lower defibrillation threshold with the Gurvich waveform in an in vitro model of external defibrillation suggests that the Gurvich waveform may be important for future external defibrillator designs.

Systematic evaluation of the determinants of defibrillation efficacy

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effect of varying shock capacitance, shock impedance, and pulse duration on defibrillation efficacy in a randomized, crossover manner for biphasic shocks.

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the electrical determinants of defibrillation efficacy is incompletely understood.

METHODS

Biphasic shocks were delivered to 12 dogs through epicardial patches (to vary impedance) after 15 seconds of ventricular fibrillation using one of 100- or 155-muF capacitors at each of four pulse durations (2.5, 5, 10, 20 ms), in a balanced random order. There were two impedance groups: six with higher impedance (mean 97 +/- 15 Omega, range 80-120) and six with lower impedance (mean 39 +/- 3 Omega, range 34-44). Voltage requirements were estimated as the average of three defibrillation threshold (DFT) tests.

RESULTS

Shock capacitance, resistance, and pulse duration all had significant effects upon the minimum voltage DFT (P = .0065, P = .0066, and P = .0001, respectively). The tilt associated with the lowest voltage and current requirement for each of the four capacitance/resistance combinations varied widely, between 34 +/- 5% and 63 +/- 3%, depending on capacitance and impedance. The optimal pulse duration associated with minimum DFT lies between 5.11 and 5.34 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

Defibrillation voltage requirements for biphasic shocks are affected by pulse duration, capacitance and impedance, but not "tilt."

How to program pulse duration or tilt in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are available with independently programmable duration and tilt of the shock pulse waveform. Manufacturers do not, however, commonly advise how these parameters can be programmed for optimal clinical benefit. From theoretical considerations, the author recommends programming both parameters based on the measured lead system resistance R into which the shock is delivered. Assuming that the defibrillation pulse decline below the defibrillation threshold rheobase is undesirable because of the possibility of refibrillation. Mathematical relationships expressing optimal pulse duration and tilt as functions of the output time constant can be derived that are valid for monophasic pulses and the first phase of biphasic pulses. Two ICD manufacturers provide for programmable tilt (Medtronic GEM III, atrial channel) or both tilt T and pulse duration PD. (St. Jude Medical newest devices). Considering its output capacitance, it is recommended that the Medtronic Gem III should be programmed for T = 50% when R < 75 omega and 65% when R < 38 omega. The author considers programming tilt to 30% or 40% useless in clinical conditions. By the same reasoning, he recommends that the newer St. Jude Medical ICDs should be programmed to T = 50% if R < 75 omega and 60% if R < 41 omega, and PD = 5.5, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.0 ms for R < 75, 73, 62, 51, 40, and 32 omega, respectively. PD = 6 ms was considered clinically unrealistic. Programmable shock pulse duration and tilt are useful in optimizing defibrillation, but it is suggested that this can best be accomplished by programming these parameters with the guidance of theory as described in this discussion.

Effect of second-phase duration on the strength-duration relation for human transvenous defibrillation

BACKGROUND

The mechanism by which biphasic waveforms improve defibrillation efficacy is unclear. In addition, the optimal shape of the biphasic waveforms remains controversial. Animal experiments suggest that prolonging the duration of the second phase longer than the first worsens defibrillation thresholds (DFT). The purpose of this study was to determine the strength-duration relation for the second phase of a biphasic defibrillation waveform in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective, randomized study of biphasic DFT in 36 patients; a uniform dual-coil transvenous lead system was used. In each patient, 3 DFTs were determined with the pulse duration for the second phase of the defibrillation waveform varying between 1 and 18 ms. The duration of the first phase was fixed at 6 ms and the capacitance was 150 microF. There was a significant increase in the leading edge voltage at DFT only when the second-phase pulse duration was decreased to 1 ms. There was no increase in DFT voltage even when the second-phase pulse duration was increased from 2 to 18 ms. Similar relations were observed for stored energy, leading edge current, or phase 2 energy. The normalized average current delivered during phase 2 decreased monotonically with increasing phase 2 duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In humans, the biphasic DFT voltage or energy is increased only when the second phase of the waveform is <2 ms. The DFT voltage is insensitive to increasing the second phase of the defibrillator waveform to as long as 18 ms, or 3 times the duration of the first phase of the waveform.

Preliminary clinical results of a biphasic waveform and an RV lead system

Biphasic defibrillation waveforms have provided a reduction in defibrillation thresholds in transvenous ICD systems. Although a variety of biphasic waveforms have been tested, the optimal pulse durations and tilts have yet to be identified. A multicenter clinical study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a new ICD biphasic waveform and new RV active fixation steroid eluting lead system. Fifty-three patients were entered into the study. Mean age was 63 years with a mean ejection fraction of 36.8%. Primary indication for implantation was monomorphic ventricular tachycardia alone (54.7%). Forty-eight patients (90.6%) were implanted with an RV shocking lead and active can alone as the anodal contact. The ICD can was the cathode. In four cases (7.5%), an additional SVC or CS lead was used due to a high DFT with the RV lead alone. In an additional case, a chronic SVC lead was used although the RV-Can DFT was acceptable. DFT for all cases at implant was 9.8 +/- 3.7 J. Repeat testing at 3 months for a subset of patients showed a reduction in DFT (7.4 +/- 3.0 J), P value = 0.03. Sensing and pacing characteristics of the RV lead system remained excellent during the study period (acute 0.047 +/- 0.005 ms at 5.4 V and 9.9 +/- 6.2 mV R wave; chronic 0.067 +/- 0.11 ms at 5.4 V and 9.3 +/- 5.4 mV R wave). It is concluded that this lead system provides good acute and chronic sensing and pacing characteristics with good DFT values in combination with this waveform.

Preliminary single center clinical experience of the use of a new implantable cardioverter defibrillator

We report a single center's preliminary clinical experience of the Sentinel (Angeion, Minneapolis, MN) implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), which employs novel technologies that offer the potential for significant reduction in ICD size. Thirty-three patients have received Sentinel ICDs with a mean follow-up of 450 (range 150-1023) days. Device shock therapy has been used to defibrillate/cardiovert 43 spontaneous episodes of malignant ventricular arrhythmia and 510 episodes of hemodynamically well tolerated ventricular arrhythmia have been pace-terminated (pace-termination failed in 6 episodes with subsequent delivery of appropriate shock therapy). There has been no arrhythmic death in this patient population. There have been 9 inappropriate shocks in 6 patients (in 2 patients for atrial fibrillation which had satisfied the algorithm detection criteria for high zone ventricular arrhythmia, in 3 for sinus tachycardia [rate greater than 180 beats per min] and in 1 due to device capacitor malfunction). Device replacement has been required for component malfunction in 3 patients. There have been no other major complications. Follow-up time to date is short and longterm device efficacy and performance remain unproven. However, our early clinical experience suggests that the innovations used to manufacture the Sentinel ICD have facilitated reduction in ICD size without compromising therapeutic efficacy.

Influence of phase duration of biphasic waveforms on defibrillation energy requirements with a 70-microF capacitance

BACKGROUND

Phase duration of biphasic shocks may be an important determinant of defibrillation success. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of changing phase duration of biphasic pulses delivered by 70-microF capacitors on defibrillation energy requirements. This may be clinically relevant for the optimization of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator design and programming.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were determined for 13 waveforms in 13 pigs by application of a 70-microF capacitance and a transvenous/submuscular lead system. In part I, phase-1 duration varied, preserving a phase-1/phase-2 duration ratio of 60%/40%. The phase-1 durations were 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 ms. The DFT was lowest (22.9+/-7 J) for phase 1=3 ms compared with phase 1=1 ms (36.4+/-7.5 J), 2 ms (25+/-6.5 J), 4 ms (25+/-7.6 J), 5 ms (30.7+/-7.3 J), or 6 ms (32.9+/-8.1 J) (P<.001). In part II, phase-1 duration was 3 ms but phase-2 duration varied: 0.7, 1.3, 2, 2.7, 3.3, 4, and 6 ms. Significant DFT minima were found at phase 2=2 ms (22.5+/-4.2 J) and phase 2=4 ms (22.5+/-4.2 J) compared with phase 2=0.7 ms (31.7+/-9.3 J), phase 2=3.3 ms (26.7+/-6.1 J), or phase 2=6 ms (28.3+/-6.8 J) (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The strength-duration curve of biphasic defibrillation shocks demonstrates a single optimum for phase-1 duration. In contrast, two optima with minimal energy requirements were found for phase-2 duration. Optimization of both phases of low-capacitance biphasic shocks may reduce energy requirements for defibrillation.

Effect of the superior vena cava electrode surface area on defibrillation threshold in different lead systems

Little data is available comparing the efficacy of the Transvene, Endotak C 70 series, and the active CAN configuration on defibrillation success. In addition, the impact of the superior vena cava (SVC) electrode surface area and length on the active CAN system is unknown. Therefore, we compared the defibrillation efficacy of the Transvene and Endotak C 70 series lead systems with and without the active CAN in dogs. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was randomly performed in 20 dogs. In protocol I (10 dogs), DFT energy was compared in three RV/SVC lead systems with an SVC electrode defibrillating surface area of 90 mm2 (Transvene-90), 160 mm2 (Transvene-160), 617 mm2 (Endotak), and an RV/CAN configuration. In protocol II (10 dogs), DFT comparison was performed in the Transvene-90/CAN, Transvene-160/CAN, Endotak/CAN, and RV/CAN configurations. In protocol I, increasing the SVC surface area from 90 to 160 mm2 and from 160 to 617 mm2 significantly lowered DFT energy. The Endotak and the RV/CAN systems provided the lowest DFT energy requirements. In protocol II, the Endotak/CAN system significantly lowered DFT energy compared to the other three lead configurations. In both protocols, the impedance decreased as the SVC surface area increased from 90 to 160 mm2. However, no significant reduction in DFT impedance occurred as the SVC surface area increased from the Transvene-160 to the Endotak lead. Increasing the SVC surface area from 90 to 617 mm2 in a two coil lead system lowered DFT energy to similar levels provided by the RV/CAN configuration. The addition of an SVC electrode with a surface area of 90 or 160 mm2 did not reduce DFT energy compared to the RV/CAN configuration. The Endotak/CAN system, however, provided the lowest DFT requirements.

Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation

BACKGROUND

One of the basic characteristics of electrical defibrillation is the strength-duration relationship, or the effect of pulse width on defibrillation efficacy. This relationship is important for understanding the mechanism of defibrillation and for the design of optimal waveforms. However, a detailed evaluation of the strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defibrillation has not been performed previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective study of 29 patients undergoing initial defibrillator implantation with a uniform dual coil, transvenous lead. In each patient defibrillation thresholds were measured for either short (2, 3, 4, 6 ms) or long (6, 12, 18 ms) pulse durations, with the order of testing randomized. The shock waveform was a truncated monophasic pulse from a capacitor of 150 microF. The leading edge voltage at defibrillation threshold was 566+/-100 V for 2-ms pulses. Voltages declined exponentially with increasing pulse width reaching an asymptote by 6 ms (451+/-68 V, P<.05). Defibrillation threshold voltage was insensitive to longer pulse widths. Stored energy at defibrillation threshold showed a similar relationship with pulse width. In contrast, mean current decreased monotonically over the full range of pulse durations evaluated, and there was no evidence of a rheobase.

CONCLUSIONS

The shape of the strength-duration curve and the lack of rheobase current indicate a fundamental difference between cardiac stimulation and defibrillation. The relationship between pulse duration and defibrillation threshold voltage or stored energy is well modeled by a parallel capacitor resistor circuit with a time constant of 5.3 ms.

Effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation thresholds in humans

INTRODUCTION

Despite the common use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator to treat patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, the mechanism of defibrillation and the optimal waveform for implanted devices are poorly understood. All of the currently available pulse generators deliver exponentially declining pulses that are either automatically or manually truncated to achieve tilts of about 50% to 65%. Although this value was chosen based on experimental animal data, several theoretical models have been developed to describe defibrillation, which raise into question this choice of waveform shape. Accordingly, the present study was designed to test the effect of waveform tilt on defibrillation efficacy in humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three patients undergoing cardioverter defibrillator implantation were studied. Monophasic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) were measured using a single reversal protocol at 35%, 50%, 65%, and 80% tilts by altering the pulse width of the shock. Mean defibrillation impedance was 41 +/- 6 omega. The DFT, measured by either leading-edge voltage or stored energy, was insensitive to altering the waveform tilt from 50% to 80%, only increasing when the tilt was reduced to 35%. A tilt of 65% yielded the lowest DFT voltage in only 8 of 23 patients. Significantly lower DFTs (> or = 40 V) were obtained using other tilts in seven patients. When the relationship between average current and pulse width was fit with a Weiss-Lapicque model, the data yielded a mean chronaxie of 4.6 +/- 3.0 msec and a rheobase of 4.2 +/- 1.7 A, but considerable patient variability was observed.

CONCLUSION

On average, DFTs in humans are insensitive to altering monophasic waveform tilts between 50% and 80%. There is, however, considerable patient variability, raising into question the premise that a single defibrillator waveform tilt is best for all patients.

Defibrillation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that specifically shaped biphasic waveforms can lower energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation. We prospectively compared the defibrillation efficacy of three different biphasic wave shapes incorporated in three commercially available implantable defibrillators. The results led to the development of a second protocol in which the importance of negative-phase peak voltage and duration was investigated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing using different biphasic waveforms was performed randomly on 42 patients undergoing implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator for ventricular arrhythmias. In 23 patients (group 1), 3 waveforms were tested: a CPI waveform with 60% positive-phase (P1) tilt and 50% negative-phase (P2) tilt, a Medtronic waveform with 65% fixed tilt in both P1 and P2, and a Ventritex waveform with 60% P1 tilt and a P2 leading edge voltage equal to half of the P1 trailing edge voltage. In 19 patients (group 2), 3 biphasic waveforms with equal P1 tilt at 65% but shorter P2 duration or smaller P2 peak voltage were tested. The Endotak C 60 series lead system (CPI) was used in 11 patients in group 1 and 10 patients in group 2. A Transvene lead system (Medtronics) was used in the remaining patients. Stored energy required for defibrillation was significantly lower with the CPI waveform compared with the Ventritex waveform. In group 2, energy requirements were significantly increased for the waveform with a smaller P2 peak voltage, whereas a short P2 duration did not influence defibrillation success.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that specifically shaped biphasic waveforms delivered from commercially available devices can affect energy requirements for defibrillation. More importantly, the amplitude of the P2 peak voltage may be a more critical determinant than the P2 duration for defibrillation success of biphasic waveforms in humans.

[Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators]

The defibrillation threshold (DFT) is no threshold in the true sense. Between energy levels which defibrillate in all cases and energy levels which never defibrillate, a broad range of energies exists which might or might not defibrillate. Thus, the value of the DFT is dependant on the protocol used for its determination. Usually the DFT presents an energy at which the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) will defibrillate successfully at a rate of approximately 75%. To achieve a 100% success rate the energy has to be programmed 15 J above the DFT or twice the DFT.Using DFT measurements the energy needed for internal defibrillation could be gradually reduced in the last years. Major break throughs have been the introduction of the biphasic defibrillation waveform and the use of pectorally implanted ICD shells as defibrillation electrodes. The shortening of the defibrillation impulse by the use of lower capacitances could not improve DFTs but allowed to construct ICDs of smaller volume. Addition of a superior vena cava electrode or a subcutaneous array electrode at the left lateral chest to the standard bipolar electrode system (right ventricle, pectoral ICD can) allowed for tri- and quadripolar lead configurations which reduced DFTs on average only slightly but reduced the standard deviation of DFTs significantly and thus helped to avoid high DFTs. Besides building smaller ICDs, reduction of DFTs and thus programming of lower defibrillation ICD energies allows for improved battery longevities and reduced capacitor charging times and thus a lower incidence of syncopes.

Comparison of defibrillation efficacy using biphasic waveforms delivered from various capacitances/pulse widths

The efficacy of the biphasic waveform shock for the defibrillation of the ventricular myocardium has been reported by researchers and physicians. Although many authors have suggested that biphasic waveforms delivered from lower capacitances and shorter pulse widths could result in the reduction of the energy required for successful defibrillation, no report has described the smallest capacitance and pulse width yielding the lowest DFT. In this study, we compared efficacies of the biphasic waveform shocks and DFT safety margins among five different capacitances (175 mu f, 125 mu f. 100 mu f. 75 mu f, and 50 mu f) combined with 1-3 pulse widths. These experiments performed in six dogs used an endocardial lead/subcutaneous patch defibrillation electrode system. The average DFTs at E50 for 175 mu f (6.5/3.5 ms), 125 mu f (6.5/3.5 ms), 100 mu f (6.0/3.0 ms), 75 mu f (4.0/2.0) ms, and 50 mu f (3.0/2.0 ms) were 8.5, 10.0, 11.0, 14.0, and 16.5), respectively. These results indicate that a biphasic waveform delivered from a larger capacitance with a proper pulse width could achieve a higher defibrillation efficacy. All DFTs at E50 for all waveforms were compared to their deliverable energies and maximum stored energies. This comparison indicated a narrow DFT safety margin with capacitances below 100 mu f. Therefore, it is concluded that higher energy and higher leading edge voltage are required for a biphasic waveform delivered from a smaller capacitance with a shorter pulse width. Since the current capacitor technology provides a maximum voltage of 750 V using two capacitors in series, with the electrode impedance system used in this study, smaller capacitors appear to have a decreased probability of defibrillation success at a given energy.

Testing different biphasic waveforms and capacitances: effect on atrial defibrillation threshold and pain perception

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to compare the effect of different tilts and capacitances for biphasic shocks on atrial defibrillation efficacy and pain threshold.

BACKGROUND

Although biphasic shocks have been shown to be superior to monophasic shocks, the effect of tilt and capacitance on atrial defibrillation success and pain perception has not been studied in patients.

METHODS

Atrial defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was performed using a right atrial appendage/coronary sinus lead configuration in 38 patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing an invasive electrophysiologic study. Biphasic waveforms with 40%, 50%, 65%, 80%, 30%/50% and 40%/50% were tested randomly in 22 patients (Group 1). In 16 patients (Group 2), a 65% tilt waveform with 50- and 120-microF capacitance was tested. Before sedation, pain sensation was graded by 15 patients in Group 1 after delivery of a 0.5-J shock and by 10 patients in Group 2 after two 1.5-J shocks with 50- and 120-microF capacitance were delivered.

RESULTS

The DFT energy for the 50% tilt waveform was significantly lower than the 65%, 80% and 30%/50% tilt waveforms. The 40%/50% tilt waveform provided slightly lower energy requirements than the 50% tilt waveform. Nine patients (60%) described the 0.5-J shock as very painful, and four (26.6%) complained of slight pain. The 50-microF capacitor lowered energy requirements compared with the 120-microF capacitor. Six patients (60%) perceived the 1.5-J 50-microF capacitor shock as more painful, whereas three (30%) perceived both shocks as equally painful.

CONCLUSIONS

Biphasic waveforms with 50% tilt in both phases and a smaller tilt in the positive phase than that in the negative phase (40%/50%) provided a decrease in energy requirements at atrial DFT. In addition, stored energy was reduced by biphasic shocks with 50-microF capacitance compared with 120-microF capacitance. Despite the reduction in energy requirements, shocks < 1 J continued to be perceived as painful in the majority of patients.